WEBVTT - 7/17/25: Saagar Debates Michael Tracey On Epstein Israel Connections

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, Saga and Crystal here.

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and we are so excited about what that means for

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the future of this show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 3>This is the only place where you can find honest

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 3>perspectives from the left and the right that simply does

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 3>not exist anywhere else.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So if that is something that's important to you, please

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 2>go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad free,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and all put together for you every morning in your inbox.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>We need your help to build the future of independent

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 3>news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 3>dot com.

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Joining us now for a little friendly Epstein debate in

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>front of the show. Michael Tracy independent journalist and you

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 2>can check him out over at Mtracy dot Nett. Grace Caesar.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 4>Always a pleasure.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah see you, Michael.

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely so. I said this before, but I'm even though,

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:50.879
<v Speaker 2>like everybody knows, I'm more on soccer side on this,

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>but I'm going to try my best to play the

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 2>role as neutral moderator so we can have a one

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>on one and you're not getting just like you know,

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>teamed up on by both of us on this whole thing.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>But you recently wrote an article that takes apart some

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 2>of what you described as the Epstein mythology. This is

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>for Compact mag We can put this up on the screen.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 2>The headline here is the idiocy of the Epstein mythology.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 2>And you've been very vocal on Twitter now x as

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 2>well in taking part what you see as some of

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the more tenuous theories surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. So before we

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 2>dive in, I just I want to sort of level

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 2>set with you, Michael of like what do you think

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 2>is going on with Trump right now? Like why is

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 2>he acting the way that he is around Jeffrey Epstein?

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 2>And you know, ran on releasing the files and now

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>he's not going to release the files and there are

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 2>no files and now yes there are files, but they

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 2>were written by Obama and screw you. And I don't

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.279
<v Speaker 2>even want you to be a supporter if you believe

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 2>any of this nonsense. What is your assessment of what

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 2>is actually happening here?

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 5>Well, there's no doubt that the Trump administration hasn't roiled

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 5>itself in a pr fiasco of its own making.

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 4>I would argue, you.

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Know, I slightly tongue in say at the end of

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 5>that article. But I do think that there is a

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 5>genuine trafficking conspiracy for people to get upset about. And

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 5>it's that so many people in the Trump orbit trafficked

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 5>and nonsense for the past several years, namely Cash Battel,

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 5>Dan Bongino, et cetera, when they spent their time tantalizing

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 5>their followers with these teases about how there was going

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 5>to be some explosive revelation once the second Trump administration

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 5>got in power and vanquished the deep state, and by

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 5>natural extension of that, of course, the quote unquote Epstein

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 5>files would be released, because it was the satanic, demonic

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 5>Democrats who were for some reason covering up all the damning,

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 5>damning information to protect their donors and friends and allies.

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 5>Becausecrats in this Cash Patel, Dan Bongino, you know, Rumble Universe,

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Imagination are perpetually covering for pedophilic sex trafficking networks. And

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 5>Trump was occasionally asked about this when he would go

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 5>around on these ass kissing podcasts during the twenty twenty

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 5>four campaign, and if you go back and look at

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 5>what he said, he would often be a little bit

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 5>equivocal or non committal. He would say, yeah, sure, maybe

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 5>we'll look into releasing the Epstein files. But it wasn't

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 5>as if Trump went around campaigning on this issue of

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 5>his own volition. It's just that part of the twenty

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 5>twenty four Republican campaign strategy, which I thought was very

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 5>clever and effective, was to tailor a message to audiences

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 5>who consume this kind of media, meaning the Joe Rogan

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 5>Network and kind of related podcast that I would argue

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 5>have conspiracism as a sort of habit of mind or

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 5>kind of soft ideology. Not that they're wrong, but every

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 5>conspiracy theory that they might believe in, but that's just

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 5>sort of how they process information. It's like the epistemology.

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 5>So these Republican campaigners had the tailor a message to

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 5>these people, and Trump just kind of played along with it.

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 5>And it was always I think, going to blow up

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 5>in their faces once the rubber hit the road and

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 5>they were pressed to actually make good on these promises.

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.599
<v Speaker 4>But Trump themself, so let me just really evaded the issue.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Let me just let me just to be really clear

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>where what your position is. I'll get Soger to respond,

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>do you believe there's no they're there with regard to

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 2>young girls being trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein and Glene Maxwell

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 2>to other powerful people, for example, But Clinton, potentially, Donald Trump,

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:53.360
<v Speaker 2>potentially Bill Gates and others. You think there's no there

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>there with regard to those questions. And do you also

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 2>believe there's no there there with regard to potential Intel connections,

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 2>whether it's CIA or Masad.

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So let me try to spell this out pretty carefully.

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 5>I tried to differentiate between what I've been referring to

0:05:11.160 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 5>as Epstein mythology versus the actual factual record when it

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 5>comes to Epstein. In the realm of mythology, there exists

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 5>this belief and correct me if you guys think I'm wrong.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 5>There exists this widespread belief that a pedophilic sex trafficking

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 5>ring has been systematically covered up, and that Jeffrey Eperstein

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 5>orchestrated this pedophilic sex trafficking ring by trafficking minors to

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 5>prominent third party individuals and then conducted a blackmail operation

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 5>to coerce those individuals into silence or complicity or something.

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 5>And the idea was that previously the Biden administration was

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 5>maliciously covering up this information again to protect the likes

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 5>of Bill Clinton or Bill Gates, et cetera.

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 4>But now the idea is shockingly to.

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 5>The MAGA base or the MAGA social media influencers anyway,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 5>which I'm not sure is totally synonymous with the base,

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:16.479
<v Speaker 5>but that's sort of another issue.

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 4>Now, to their.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 5>Absolute shock, Donald Trump is apparently engaging in this very

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 5>same cover up. I would argue that the factual predicate

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 5>for that assumption, which I think you guys will agree,

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 5>is extremely widespread.

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 4>That's why people were so insensive about this issue.

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 5>The factual predicate for that is not well established at all,

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 5>or not nearly as established as you would think, given

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 5>the confidence with which people assert the existence of that

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 5>thing that there're so certain exists.

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, let's go on the intel thing.

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's go and get sobeign and then we'll come back

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 2>and it can dig more specifically to.

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 3>Michael, First of all, I would point out that part

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:57.760
<v Speaker 3>of the reason that the quote unquote factual predicate doesn't

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 3>exist for what you're talking about is actually in existence.

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.559
<v Speaker 3>In my opinion that if you look at the open

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 3>source information for how so many of these prominent individuals

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 3>dealt with Epstein, and then eventually the non prosecution agreement

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 3>that was eventually signed by Alex Acosta and Jeffrey Epstein,

0:07:12.040 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 3>and eventually, of course the Palm Beach County PD only

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 3>bringing a case against him for solicitation of prostitution actually

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>proves that part of the reason why a lot of

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 3>this stuff doesn't exist in the quote unquote factual predicate

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 3>and or DOJ documents is part of the reason why

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 3>so much of this does not exist in a court basis, etc.

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 3>If you actually look at the information. I mean, I

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 3>think Leslie Wesner is perhaps the best example for proving

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 3>what you were talking about, where we have a actual

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>high prominent individual in the year nineteen ninety one, one

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>of the only billionaires here in the United States of America,

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>the richest man in Ohio, who gives power of attorney

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 3>over jeff too Head aftery Epstein over his entire estate,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 3>transfers hundreds of millions of dollars worth of real estate

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 3>over to him, to which Epstein then uses those properties,

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 3>as you just pointed out in the factual predicate, as

0:07:58.960 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 3>exists and points out in the Elaine Maxwell trial, which yes,

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 3>is only about human trafficking between a young woman and

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Epstein himself as and he is the sole person who

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 3>is victimizing these women that was on Wexner related properties.

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 3>That's a pretty direct example of where nobody, including Wesner himself,

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 3>has ever been able to give an example of how

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 3>exactly you had this extraordinary situation of signing over power

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 3>of attorney and in fact, Vicky Ward, James Stewart, the

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 3>biographers who looked into the story say that many of

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 3>the people around Wexner believe that it was a result

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 3>of a blackmail operation. It's not that difficult to imagine

0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 3>that the founder of Victoria's Secret, which entails selling lingerie

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.880
<v Speaker 3>to teenage girls and surrounding yourselves with beautiful models and

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>all of this, would be involved in some pretty sketchy

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 3>behavior with a known pedophile of Jeffrey Epstein.

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a pretty.

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 3>Clear example tracing all the way back from nineteen ninety one,

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 3>showing the ability to use and coerce behavior, perhaps blackmail

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 3>and others, to enrich himself. And also, I mean, we

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>can get into the intelligence case now in the future,

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 3>but exactly why so many people I think rightfully can

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 3>point in an example like that and say it's very

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 3>clear if you look at that pattern that there is

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 3>smoke there. Now, I agree this has not yet been proven,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.559
<v Speaker 3>but I would actually argue that the reason that has

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>not been proven is specifically to cover up the very

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:19.679
<v Speaker 3>type of behavior.

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 5>Well that some people around wester may have believed, as

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 5>you put it, that there was some potential explanation for

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 5>Epstein's inheritance of this wealth that had to do with blackmail.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 5>Is not a proven factual predicate for anything.

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, nobody's saying that, but by that point we're not

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 3>supposed to take any reporting. You know, at the end

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 3>of the day, you have a multi billionaire who signs

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 3>over power of attorney for his entire estate and hundreds

0:09:50.320 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 3>of millions of dollars in real estate, and it's because

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 3>he thought he was a money genius that shore.

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 4>I acknowledge.

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.960
<v Speaker 5>I acknowledge that there are aspects to this story that

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 5>are non mythological in the sense that they really do

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 5>raise questions about the mystery surrounding how he garnered his wealth.

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 4>And so forth.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.320
<v Speaker 5>But let me give one example that I don't think

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 5>has adequately penetrated the popular consciousness nor has it been

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 5>adequately covered on alternative media, maybe including this very show.

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:23.840
<v Speaker 5>Virginia Gouffrey, who I think you'll agree if you've studied

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 5>this case, which I assume that you have, is the

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 5>central figure who spawned the widespread belief that there had

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 5>to have been this pedophilic sex trafficking network, because in

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 5>late twenty fourteen, she issued a court filing in which

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 5>she alleged that she had been sex trafficked to a

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 5>myriad of prominent third party individuals like Prince Andrew, like

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 5>the former majority leader of the United States Senate George Mitchell,

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 5>like the former governor of New Mexico, Bill Richardson, and

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 5>other people. And then she also made a categorical claim

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 5>that she had been trafficked to like unnamed prime ministers

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 5>and other people of prominence around the world.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 4>That's what really spawned it.

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 5>And I just don't think it's disputable that Virginia Gouffrey

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 5>was a serial fabulist.

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 4>I know people don't want to hear that.

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 5>I know whenever I've commented on this subject anywhere on

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:27.880
<v Speaker 5>the Internet, ninety five percent of the comment sections are

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 5>against me, and they think that I'm covering up for

0:11:30.240 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 5>pedophiles or something, as though I love pedophilia and that's

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 5>why I'm making this argument.

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 4>That's not the case.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 5>Virginia Goufrey, per the factual record, was a serial fabuloust.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure you know, Sagar, that she accused Alan Dershowitz, Yes,

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.680
<v Speaker 5>I do, having been one of the third party individuals

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 5>to whom she was traffick. She made this accusation adamantly

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 5>under the cover of the litigation privilege for nearly a decade.

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 5>Then by twenty twenty two, because Dershowitz actually had the

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:07.839
<v Speaker 5>resources and the motivation to pursue this charge against him,

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 5>or to dispute it to the point of a settlement,

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 5>she then had to retract and recant this signature claim

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 5>that she had been making for ten years. Almost that

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 5>very much animated the media coverage around this issue. She

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 5>withdrew it, she totally obliterated her own credibility, and then,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 5>sure enough, in the g Islaine Maxwell trial of twenty

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 5>twenty one, she was not even called as a witness

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 5>by the prosecution because she would have been a nightmare

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 5>under cross examination because so many of the things, the

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 5>most salacious claims that she made around this story just

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 5>do not stand up to basic scrutiny. You could even

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 5>find examples of her signing on to like literal hoaxes

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 5>in terms of these creeps who came out the woodwork

0:12:56.080 --> 0:13:02.079
<v Speaker 5>claiming that they had the video footage of illicit sexual

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 5>activity in Epstein's properties. And then Goufrey's own attorneys, David Boyce,

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 5>who by the way, made a killing on this whole issue.

0:13:11.160 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 4>That's another thing we could get into.

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 5>How you know, basically the Epstein matter had has subsidized, uh,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 5>the South Florida bar and all these feeding frenzy lawyers

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 5>who have made a killing.

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 3>But the other way, Michael, But yeah, yeah, it goes

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 3>both ways.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 5>But the defense attorneys concocted a whole strategy whereby they

0:13:33.400 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 5>would extract enormous payouts for themselves.

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 4>Gives the toxicity of the.

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Victim.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 5>Last point, last point, Virginia Goufrey made millions of dollars.

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 5>She was she had a life of luxury as a

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 5>result of her deciding to become this professional victim that

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 5>was her full time job.

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 4>She launched a scam. Ng O, I thought the right

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:56.840
<v Speaker 4>was supposed.

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>To be doing right now, mind, do you know how

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it ended up?

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 3>That she ceased because her life and because she was

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 3>a very troubled individual. It's not deniable she's pictured there

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.079
<v Speaker 3>with Prince Andrew, but to paint it only as a

0:14:13.520 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Virginia Goufrey is one of the only people that is

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 3>saying this is just not accurate.

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Part of the reason.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 3>Why he was absolutely integral to the coverage, and largely

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 3>it is because of the photo, which you're not going

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 3>to deny, I hope, of her picture with Prince Andrew,

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 3>which is literally.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>What got him removed from his.

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Public duties, as from his public duties as a member

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 3>of the British Royal family. Clearly they believe, at least

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>in some part, that Prince Andrew was involved in some

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 3>pretty sketchy behavior. There was his relationship with Epstein. But

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 3>even let's step back.

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 5>Further, the Royal family was coerced through the tsunami of

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 5>horrible pr that they were subject to.

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 3>Hanging out with the convicted sex offender and in this

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 3>case with a seventeen year old girl with his arm

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 3>around here. That's not acceptable behavior, not just.

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>For a British role family.

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 5>He wasn't a convicted sex defender at the time that

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 5>photo was taken.

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 3>You're right, he's just his routine to be hanging out

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 3>with seventeen year old women and to take photos of that.

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 5>Was he a convicted sex offender at the time, that the.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Photoportunity to check the date on what it is.

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 4>But he wasn't.

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 5>He was taken reportedly in two thousand again he was

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 5>not a convicted sex.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Fer, saying that in that case that Prince Andrew, the

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 3>member of the British role family, was did not have

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 3>access to the global elite in which people like Donald

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Trump could say on the record in two thousand and

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 3>two before Jeffrey Epstein is convicted as a sex offender,

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 3>in which he can say, Jeffrey, he likes him young,

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 3>and which is an open secret literally among the jet

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 3>set class that this type of behavior is acceptable to

0:15:41.000 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 3>Harvey Weinstein and to everybody else. This is this is

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 3>open out from vanity fair reporting from from a quote

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 3>from Donald Trump himself, that's our current president.

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>But beyond that it is an o'.

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump said that Jeffrey Epstein, Jeffrey Epson is a

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 5>great guy, and he tends to.

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Like the company of women.

0:15:57.640 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>He likes.

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 5>It does not prove that Donald Trump is a sex offender.

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>No, I didn't say that, it's he proves prove.

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 3>What I'm saying is that it's open knowledge that Epstein

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 3>routinely is seen and is pictured with young women at

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 3>that time. By the way, and let's continue this, and

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 3>this is why so was Donald Trump pegging this entirely

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 3>on Virginia Grufrey again is not accurate, and I think

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 3>it what.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Is largely I mean, she's the one who is.

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Not because again, the photo of her with any of these.

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 4>Netlix documentaries.

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 5>Center they because she was, they never ever qualify any

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 5>of their coverage by noting that she has a proven,

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 5>demonstrable record of serial fabulousm.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, did you can see that she's a serial fabulous?

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>I would concede that she was a troubled individual who

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 3>clearly as serial fabulous from the way that her attorneys

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 3>and others have acknowledged that she did make up some facts.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And I do think I'm not relying all of this

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>on Virginia Gufray. That's my point.

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I have a much broader I have a much broader

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 3>amount of evidence to point and this is all where

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 3>I think it kind of you.

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.440
<v Speaker 5>Don't think conceding that the most high profile accuser who

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 5>was integral in the claim of a sex trafficking ring

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 5>insofar as her claim was that she was sex trafficked

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 5>to prominent third party individuals. I'm not contesting that Epstein

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:20.119
<v Speaker 5>himself was a sexual predator. I mean, he's on the

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 5>record saying that he rejects that there should be any

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 5>kind of taboo against you know, post pubescans women of

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 5>any age or girls of any age being accessible to

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.640
<v Speaker 5>men for impregnation. I mean, he had bizarre and creepy

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 5>and depraved beliefs around sexual relations with minors.

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 4>I'm not contesting that. I'm contesting this third party sex trafficking.

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 5>Ring that forms the basiness of why people are so

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.639
<v Speaker 5>outraged now about something purportedly being covered up and all

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 5>these elites getting away with things.

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask you a question about this, Michael, how

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 2>do you explain the deal he was able to cut

0:18:01.640 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>down in Florida with Alexicostu goes on to be Trump's

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 2>labor secretary, who was US attorney at the time, which

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 2>led to him serving I believe thirteen minutes in a

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 2>county jail with the jail cell was open where he

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 2>was able to go to his office for twelve hours

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a day. Afterwards he's released. There's significant reporting that indicates

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 2>after he was supposed to be on home confinement, he's

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 2>flying around, He's doing what he wants to do. That

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 2>deal was so sort of outlandish that actually a judge

0:18:28.680 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 2>came in and said, you violated the rights of victims.

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.440
<v Speaker 2>This deal was actually technically illegal, And not only did

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 2>it provide for very cushy deal and very low level

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 2>charge ultimately for Jeffrey Epstein, it also indicated that none

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 2>of his potential co conspirators could be charged whatsoever. So

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 2>how do you explain this person getting such an incredibly

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 2>cushy deal at that point, and a deal again that

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 2>allows any even theoretical co conspirators off the hook, which

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 2>is it's so extraordinary the even glean Maxwell now is

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 2>appealing to the Supreme Court saying, hey, I should have

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 2>been part of that deal. What am I in prison

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 2>four since you the government said no co conspirators could

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 2>have ever been in you know, in diet or found

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 2>guilty of anything.

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 5>I'm just not sure why people think it's such a

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 5>profound mystery that a wealthy individual, whatever the source of

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 5>his wealth, and I agree that if possible, a more

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:26.399
<v Speaker 5>forensic audit should be done of how he acquired his wealth,

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:29.920
<v Speaker 5>But obviously he had the means to hire a dream

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.880
<v Speaker 5>team of lawyers to come and negotiate with the government

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 5>on his behalf. He brought in Alan Dershowitz, who had

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 5>just participated in securing an acquittal for O. J.

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 4>Simpson.

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 5>He brought in Ken Starr to make a federalism argument

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 5>to federal prosecutors, arguing that the offenses for which Epstein

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 5>was accused were fundamentally state level crimes and did not

0:19:56.359 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 5>enter the purview of federal prosecutors on that ground because

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 5>as the federal prosecutors couldn't establish that there was trafficking

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:07.720
<v Speaker 5>across state lines or some other element that would place

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 5>the crime in their purview. Were these technical arguments, sure,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 5>But you know, if you want to make this a

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 5>scandal about wealthy people having access to powerful lawyers who

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 5>can maybe get them a more lenient non prosecution agreement

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 5>than the average person would have access to, I'd be

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 5>all on board with that. But it seems that people

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 5>just immediately launch into the explanation that he must have

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.919
<v Speaker 5>been some kind of intelligence asset or agent, and just

0:20:33.920 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 5>to touch on that for a moment, you know, Sager,

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm not trying.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't. I'm not trying to personally attack you. I

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 4>happened to see. I happened.

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 5>I saw a clip going around last week of you

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 5>on Tucker's Show in which you asserted that, Okay, maybe.

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 4>You corrected it, but I'm just right. But a lot

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 4>of people have repeated this quote.

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 5>That derives from a twenty nineteen Vicky Ward article in

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 5>which she's quoting or she's attributing, this quote from alex

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 5>Acosta from several years before twenty nineteen, when he's in

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:10.879
<v Speaker 5>a meeting with Trump transition officials and according to Vicky Ward,

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 5>a former Trump senior Trump administration official, which sounds a

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 5>lot like Steve Bannon's blowing smoke. We don't know that

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 5>with one hundred percent certainty. By the way, why is

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 5>Steve Bannon sitting on sixteen hours of rawut okay okay?

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 5>And why was he strategizing with Epstein about how he

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 5>could present himself for a media interview with sixty minutes.

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 4>But anyway, that will leave that aside for the moment.

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 5>But that quote, with a sense, it's like the definition

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:45.479
<v Speaker 5>of hearsay, and yet it got characterized as an on

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 5>record like declaratory statement from Acosta of him just asserting

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.160
<v Speaker 5>that he had been warned that Epstein belonged to intelligence

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 5>pursue it to the two thousand and seven non prosecution

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:58.440
<v Speaker 5>agreement and therefore he should back off.

0:21:58.440 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 4>That's not what that quote signified.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:05.080
<v Speaker 5>And actually, several years later, post twenty eighteen, when the

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 5>Miami Herald series brief new life into the story harnessing

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 5>the power of me Too, which by the way, I

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 5>thought the right was mostly skeptical of. Instead on this

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 5>issue and in like select circumstances, we hear the rights

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 5>saying believe women, we have to honor all survivors. We

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 5>can't use any critical scrutiny of their claims. But after

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 5>the me Too energy bolstered this story, the DOJ, the

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 5>DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility conducted a review of the

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 5>two thousand and seven two thousand and eight non prosecution

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 5>agreement and alis Acosta did directly address this claim that

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 5>he had once potentially asserted that Epstein belonged to intelligence

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 5>and that's why a supposedly more lenient deal was given

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 5>and Alex Acosta did deny it on the record. Now

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.800
<v Speaker 5>in terms of the leniency of that deal, listen to

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 5>what Dershowitz has to say. I'm not saying I agree

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 5>with Alan Dershowitz on everything. In fact, I strongly disagree

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 5>with him on the issue of Israel.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 4>It's odd to me that every critic of.

0:23:01.200 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 5>Israel now has to feel that they have to be

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:07.960
<v Speaker 5>wedded to this particular issue because their criticism of Israel

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 5>is bolstered by the idea that the reason that Israel

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 5>is so widely supported among power structures is because there's

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 5>a pervasive sexual blackmail network. I think that kind of

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 5>makes critics of Israel look rather stupid. But Dershowitz says

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.480
<v Speaker 5>that Epstein fired him and refused to pay his legal

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 5>fees because Epstein felt that he did not get a

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 5>lenient deal. He felt that the prostitution charges, state level

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 5>prostitutions and charges in Florida that he was required to

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 5>plead guilty to were actually overly onerous and he should not.

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Have had to be subject to any kind of.

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Over whether they were actually let me act, Michael.

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 3>The idea that this was because of me too is

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.600
<v Speaker 3>complete bullshit. The reason why the energy of the US

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 3>district court judge ruled that the non prosecution agreement violated

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 3>the rights of the victims who were not informed of

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 3>the non prosecution agreement, which you're portraying as standard operating

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 3>procedure for some sort of rich person.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>That is just absolutely not.

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Jammy Harold's series came out.

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 3>I agree it came out to REGATROM eighteen, but it

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 3>was a twelve year period in which the victims himself

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 3>were not informed of the situation sued under their rights

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.120
<v Speaker 3>under the I believe it's like the crime the crime.

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't exactly Brown.

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 4>Tina Brown, who have covered this issue very much.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm saying is that the district court judge is the

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 3>person who who overturned the NPA, which is the reason

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:39.160
<v Speaker 3>why now perhaps some of the motivations of perhaps coming

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 3>back for your rights.

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>It is indisputable that the.

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Rights of the victims were violated under that non prosecution

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 3>agreement number one. As you just pointed out in that

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 3>OPR review, they said that a cost to himself exercised

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 3>what poor judgment whenever he came to that.

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Now, let's addressgen Yeah, but.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's address that intelligent. First of all, the transcript of

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 3>that has never been made public. And the way that

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>it was phrased specifically around OPR and when they asked

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 3>him about intelligence was he said absolutely not. I did

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 3>not have information that he was an intelligence asset. The

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>way that that question, as you and I know, asked,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>is pretty damn specific.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Now let's talk about Israel as we know. And no, no, no, no,

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it was much more.

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 4>It was much more. It was much more.

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Did you look at that out? Yes? I did.

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:19.479
<v Speaker 3>I looked at both the footnote where he said I

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 3>was allowed to address it in a classified saturd he

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 3>said absolutely not. When asked specifically whether he belonged to intelligence.

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 5>He says, Now he was asked whether he had knowledge

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 5>of Epstein being a quote, intelligence asset. Yes, Bossa stated

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 5>the OPR that quote. The answer is no. I'm not

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 5>sure how much the more direct he could have been.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 3>The answer is Look, I mean, I'm trying to be

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.479
<v Speaker 3>very specific here. I believe that the way that that

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 3>question is asked in the transcript and the circumstance are very.

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 4>Important front of me.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 3>But but that's my point though, is that even if

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 3>you're quote he belonged to intelligence and I was told

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 3>to leave it alone.

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Is not direct knowledge.

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 3>These are classic non denial denials, and in his twenty

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 3>nineteen press conference he did not actually address it whenever

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 3>he was asked on the record publicly. It's only in

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 3>this OPR review that he later on comes back to it.

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you're going to deny in twenty nineteen

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 3>that he did not leave the door open to the

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 3>fact that that report could have had some accuracy. He

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 3>said something along the lines of I wouldn't believe everything

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 3>you read, but it was a non denial denial. But

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 3>at that time of that non prosecution agreement that you're

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 3>talking about, Jeffrey Epstein, by verified report, is in Israel

0:26:19.240 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 3>basically brought all of his assets over there, returns from

0:26:22.440 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Israel to Palm Beach in April of two thousand and eight.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.960
<v Speaker 3>So that's the first, in my opinion, sketchy connection for

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 3>why he is exactly granted this special status in Israel

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 3>whenever he's fighting a pedophile prosecution in the United States

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:36.719
<v Speaker 3>of America.

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's just continue down that fact.

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 3>And this is the part that I just don't understand

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 3>for somebody who generally looks for links, why do you

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 3>have the former Israeli Prime Minister ade Barack, flying on

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 3>his plane multiple times, staying at his house for months

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 3>on end, pictured when there were dirt women there holding

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 3>a scarf in front of his face to Kaida his

0:26:53.960 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 3>identity from the tabloids.

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Why is it that? What is it?

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:01.399
<v Speaker 3>JP Morgan in twenty eleven to rely on Epstein to

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 3>broker meeting with Prime Minister net and Yahoo? Why is

0:27:04.880 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 3>it that aud Olmayer and Simon Perez are both linked

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 3>to Jeffrey Epstein. Aud Brock was asked, how did you

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 3>meet Jeffrey Epstein? I did it via Shimon Perez. Aud

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Olmaher is named specifically by the US Virgin Islands as

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 3>an Epstein associate. I mean, if we take that and

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 3>then combine it here with Leslie Wexner, the fact that

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 3>Jeffrey Epstein is on board of the Wexner Foundation and

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 3>then pays aud Brock two point three million dollars to

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 3>complete two reports, one of which he never finished, I

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.240
<v Speaker 3>can continue back further here we have Jeffrey Epstein involved

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 3>in multiple sketchy arms transactions from the nineteen eighties. I mean,

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 3>this is where I genuinely wonder, like if you're just

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 3>trying to be a contrarian.

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you accept it as.

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 3>A fact that Stephen Hoffenberg, Douglas Lease, and ad Non

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Koshogi Robert Maxwell, who by the way, is a known

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 3>MOSAT agent, did not have connections with Jeffrey Epstein in

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 3>which it looks like with a source of his wealth

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 3>was used as cutouts for use by the US intelligence

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 3>or the US and Israel intelligence community. The four individuals

0:28:02.400 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 3>who I just named are known and linked to multiple

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 3>sketchy arms deals from the nineteen eighties Kaushogi, Robert Maxwell,

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Douglas Lease, Stephen Hoffenberg. They've given on the record statements

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 3>about their relationship with Epstein. At one point, Epstein is

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 3>flying on a private jet with Douglas Lease in the

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 3>nineteen eighties when he's just twenty eight years old. I mean,

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.159
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how you can't look at that, specifically

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 3>hear about the money, even ignore the sex trafficking, and

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.159
<v Speaker 3>not saying that he did not have connections here to

0:28:29.359 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 3>intelligence or at the very least for cutouts and use

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 3>as an intelligence asset in the past. I genuinely do

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 3>not know how you cannot look at that and specifically

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 3>where the source of his wealth is complete bullshit. He

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 3>starts a firm in nineteen eighty eight Jay Epstein in Associates,

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 3>where he says, I only take on people with a

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars. There are only one hundred and forty one

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty people in the country or in the

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 3>world at that time who have a billion dollars under management.

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 3>He's never been a registered money manager, he has no

0:28:57.360 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 3>proven tax record. He called himself a coot high level

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 3>bounty hunter when he forms an international assets group. In

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 3>what way does this not look suspicious for everything that

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 3>I have just laid out there in the highest level.

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 5>I totally get I don't know what we're doing around

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 5>this issue.

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 4>But if you come out and.

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Say, fact, yeah he was Mosad, That's not how it works, Michael.

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 3>The CIA doesn't come out and say, yeah, we killed Kennedy.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 3>We connect all of the dots. I mean, do you

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 3>believe then the official Warren What you're saying is that

0:29:25.760 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 3>because the Warren Commission said that the magic bullet theory

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 3>is true.

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 5>So now we're going to go with you a detour

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:34.880
<v Speaker 5>into the Warren Commission. But what I mean you're saying, well,

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 5>that's discuss this issue. But that's a fact like one

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 5>coherent training, that's a factual.

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 4>The War Commission that.

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 5>The primary Epstein accuser is a serial fabri.

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 3>By the way, by the way, there are two other

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 3>individuals who had named her name, Prince Andrew Johanna Schobert,

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 3>and I need to find her name who's.

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 2>Been named here a Let me ahead and get that

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 2>is the case in particular? You know it, sober lay

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.680
<v Speaker 2>down the connections with what four different Israeli or is

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 2>really prime prime ministers? You know, how do you how

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 2>do you assimilate that information?

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>What's your response to that?

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 4>Sure?

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 5>First of all, I have to just address the idea

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 5>that I'm just being arbitrarily contrarian. I can't tell you

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 5>how many issues I've received that accusation on over the years.

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 5>Whether it was the Trump Russia story which contained conspiratorial

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 5>elements where I was accused of being a contrarian, whether

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 5>it was the twenty twenty George Floyd riots, which I

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 5>went around and critically covered the poor media coverage of

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 5>I was widely denounced for being a contrarian.

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 4>I'll give you all the evidence. Whether it was the war.

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 5>In Ukraine, This just happens to be an issue where people,

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 5>I guess more on the right now think I'm being

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 5>a contrarian, and so they're particularly in range.

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't, I should not have impened your motives.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 5>But god, okay, yeah, well so, I just don't believe

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 5>it's not contrarianism to critically cover how media narratives can

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 5>ngeal in the absence of what I think to be

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 5>a reliable factual basis, and.

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 2>People believe me linked up with all these I mean,

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 2>you had Dave.

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 5>Smith, who I think you guys have had on to

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 5>discuss this, or you had on a regular guest who

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 5>was at the Talking Points conference and accused Donald Trump

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:11.520
<v Speaker 5>of covering up a child sex trafficking or child rapering.

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, soccer, do you think that that was a

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 5>credible statement. I simply don't.

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so again, I would not.

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 5>So, but let me let me address the Israelisraeli officials, okay,

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 5>so yes, It's not disputed that hud Barack, for instance,

0:31:26.080 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 5>was a long time associate of Epstein.

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 4>They engaged in some business deals together.

0:31:32.240 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 5>They even edhud Barack, amazingly enough, was actually present when

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 5>Epstein was on a media strategizing session with Steve Bannon

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 5>where they were planning how he could rehabilitate his image

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 5>in the wake of the twenty eighteen Miami Herald series,

0:31:48.120 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 5>and Bannon was having to educate Epstein about how me

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 5>too had changed cultural attitudes around this stuff. So you

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 5>couldn't just be as obstinate as maybe you were able

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 5>to be before in the past in rejecting some of

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 5>these charges.

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:02.240
<v Speaker 4>So Steve Bannon was.

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Actually announce smear the women basically, yeah, yeah.

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 4>You had to be more sensitive.

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 5>So Steve Bannon conducted this fit in the sixteen hours

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 5>of preparatory interviews with Epstein to kind of tell him

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 5>how he would be questioned in the context of the

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 5>sixty minutes interview or something on the Israel connection. Yes,

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 5>edhud Barack was a longtime associate of Epstein. Epstein had

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 5>longtime associations with an astonishing array of people. I'm not

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 5>doubting that he was a consummate bullshitter. He had alliances with,

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 5>as we know, everybody from Bill Gates to Donald Trump

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 5>to Bill Clinton over the years. So it does as

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 5>it surprise me that some of those people included the

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 5>Israeli government, no or the Saudy arms deal stuff that

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 5>he was involved in in the nineteen eighties.

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 4>No, I'm not surprised about any of that.

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 5>And I'm also allowing for the possibility, as I wrote

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 5>in that Compact article, that over the course of his

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 5>bizarre international jet setting, perhaps he did come into contact

0:33:03.200 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 5>with somebody who was associated with the Israeli security services

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 5>and who Barack himself would have been the head of

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 5>MASAD when he was Prime minister.

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 4>So is it.

0:33:12.160 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Inconceivable ahead of military intelligence?

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 4>So is it sure?

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 5>So is it inconceivable that over the course of their

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 5>meetings who Barack obtained some piece of information that maybe

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 5>he passed along to somebody.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 4>No, that's not inconceivable at all. I just don't see.

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 5>It as dispositive or as like all encompassingly explanatory of

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 5>Epstein supposedly getting away with this child sex trafficking ring,

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 5>whose existence I don't regard as having been anywhere near established.

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:48.120
<v Speaker 5>You know, in the Gislaine Maxwell trial, interestingly, Maureen Coley

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 5>was the prosecutor who was just fired yesterday, and she

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 5>then tried to prosecute you know, p Diddy, Combs, et cetera,

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 5>under like similar auspices of like you know, asserting a

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 5>sex track a ring, but like weirdly narrowing the claimed

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 5>contours of the sex trafficking to two people or one person.

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 5>So people hear trafficking and they think they must be

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:14.720
<v Speaker 5>the sprawling, multi layered ring, when in reality, the grounds

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:19.000
<v Speaker 5>on which Maxwell was convicted was a sex trafficking que

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 5>unquote conspiracy that literally consisted of two people according to

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 5>the government and according to what the four purported victims

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 5>in that trial even claimed. Oh and by the way,

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 5>those victims in that trial just received multi million dollar

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 5>payouts from the Epstein estate and from JP Morgan. And

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 5>there was a similar Deutsche back settlement that came out

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 5>where by they could confidentially and non adversarily have their

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.360
<v Speaker 5>claims adjudicated by a mediator. So if you had any

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 5>tangential connection to Epstein, or if I had any tangential

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 5>connection to Epstein, of course I would work with my lawyers,

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 5>who are going to get cut to come up with

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 5>a story.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I become.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 4>Purchase focused on.

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 3>I literally just told you there is another I had

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 3>to I have her name here in my notes.

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I've got it right.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:17.960
<v Speaker 4>The latest.

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Prince Andrew of inappropriate sexual contact while posing for a

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 3>photo at the Epstein mansion, suggesting that she was traffick there.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.919
<v Speaker 3>That's in a sworn affidavit in the very defamation case

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.960
<v Speaker 3>they're talking about Caroline be another anonymous individual.

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 1>But listen, I mean, this is my thing. I did

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you read the door?

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Did you read the Deutsche Bank settlement with the New

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 3>York Yes?

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:40.520
<v Speaker 1>And what does it say in there?

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Epstein had Epstein had multiple financial transactions which broke bank rules,

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 3>in which he's transferring money to Eastern European women for

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 3>apparent sex trafficking purposes.

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 1>It's in the fucking.

0:35:51.080 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Report there, Michael from the New York Financial Services in

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 3>which they find the bank for breaking its own policies

0:35:56.920 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 3>for sending men wiring money all over the world our

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:00.840
<v Speaker 3>apparent purposes.

0:36:00.880 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>After he's a convicted sex defender.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean, do you think he's wiring all of these

0:36:04.920 --> 0:36:07.359
<v Speaker 3>money for hulkers just for himself? Because that's not even

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 3>what they say in the New York Financial Services document

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 3>regarding the Deutsche banks elpment.

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:14.719
<v Speaker 4>Money at Rich.

0:36:14.800 --> 0:36:17.719
<v Speaker 5>If he's trafficking, mind, if he's participating in a trafficking

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 5>conspiracy to supply miners to others, how is it that,

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.799
<v Speaker 5>over the course of over a decade of incredibly intensive

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 5>and lucrative litigation, not a single credible allegation of a

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 5>third party individual having miners trafficking them to has been established.

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 5>How come after every media outlet, at least post twenty

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 5>eighteen became hugely invested in this story. So you have

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 5>Netflix documentaries, HBO documentaries, newspaper and magazine articles, podcasts out

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:57.160
<v Speaker 5>the wazoo. How come none of them have ever established

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:02.240
<v Speaker 5>any third party individual to whom a minor was traffic

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 5>Or is it because everybody is just so afraid of

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 5>offending Bill Clinton?

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Really?

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, no, but that's not accurate because.

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 5>That couldn't extract a lucrative settlement for Bill Clinton. The

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 5>virgin I be accused of having a minor trafficy in the.

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:16.160
<v Speaker 1>US Virgin Islands.

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 3>Who has the most evidence around this because so many

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 3>of the heinous accusations, I won't say crime were committed

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 3>on their soil. Had an Attorney General who actually was

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 3>going forward with a lot of this prosecution. What happened

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 3>to that Attorney General, Michael They were fired and the

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 3>current Attorney General who.

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:32.919
<v Speaker 1>Is in charge of the case.

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 3>What you were still work for the Epstein estate, So

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 3>that seems like a little bit of a cover up

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 3>and a problem there no, especially whenever that's something that

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 3>happened to have been intersected in the past week, exactly

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 3>the lucrative dispersion of much of the Epstein estate.

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>They have Attorney general after this, let.

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Me ask you this that Soger, Yeah, go ahead.

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:53.239
<v Speaker 5>Would you concede that there is a perverse incentive or

0:37:53.560 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 5>or an incentive for purported self.

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 4>Identified victims because by the.

0:37:57.840 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 5>Terms of these settlements, all the court victims have to

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 5>do is self identify as a victim. They can do

0:38:03.480 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 5>so confidentially, meaning they don't have to be cross examined,

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 5>they don't have to have their claims adversarially scrutinized, and

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 5>then there's no downside reputational risk for them in the

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 5>fact that they're not adjudicated to.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 4>The modified victims.

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>And you know, why would you agree that there's a.

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Perverse incentive in terms of dramatizing claims to maximize one's

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 5>chances to receive the biggest possible payout. And were you

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 5>aware that the four people that the that Maureen Komi

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 5>and her fellow prosecutors had to settle on to bring

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 5>forward in the Maxwell trial in twenty twenty one, receiving

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 5>multimillion dollar payoffs because they were counseled by their attorneys

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 5>that in order to obtain the biggest possible settlement, they

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 5>should prosecution.

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 4>Does that create a perverse incentive structure?

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 3>I agree that, or contrarians, I agree that it could

0:38:54.719 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 3>create a perverse and censor structure. At the same time,

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:01.040
<v Speaker 3>many of these are legally justifiable because of their proven

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 3>claim in a court where she was convicted by a

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:04.760
<v Speaker 3>jury of her peers.

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 5>In which he was Did you know that full flesh adults,

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 5>so not minors adults were eligible for these payouts and

0:39:10.560 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 5>actually one adult testified at the Maxwell trial.

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 4>Meaning she was above legal.

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Able to sue somebody or have legal you know, have

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 3>legal justification whenever they are a victim of sec like

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 3>in the case of.

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 5>The fact that people who were adults could receive payouts.

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Because many years after the fact they could.

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.279
<v Speaker 3>Adults never be able to sue anybody else and be

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:37.560
<v Speaker 3>able to get any money for it for damages.

0:39:37.600 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's like, what are you saying.

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 3>That their entire legal civil court system is false and

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 3>stuff by that standard. The ability to claim damages in

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 3>itself is a perverse incentive. Now, I agree it can

0:39:48.239 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 3>be weaponized, but I mean, in the Maxwell case, the

0:39:50.800 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 3>basically yeah, okay, but then I don't.

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Know what to say, Michael, what's a financial game?

0:39:56.520 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 3>And the shuld support Republicans who want tort reform or whatever?

0:39:59.360 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The fuck?

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.000
<v Speaker 5>You know that all that is, they do not support

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:04.319
<v Speaker 5>to a reform around this particular issue because it's been

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:05.759
<v Speaker 5>so insanely.

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Let me ask, let me ask, We'll try to close

0:40:08.960 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 2>this up, Soccer. A question for you is one of

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the things that I've seen from people who say, look there,

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:16.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, we believe Trump and there's no there there

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 2>as they say, well, look, if the Democrats had access

0:40:19.239 --> 0:40:21.920
<v Speaker 2>to this material and Trump is potentially implicated, don't you

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 2>think they would have released that. What is your response

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:27.320
<v Speaker 2>to that claim?

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Me?

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Mind?

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you Soccer, Okay, yeah for me, I mean, look,

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I originally thought that it was actually a decent argument,

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 3>but considering Trump's behavior now so far, and this is

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 3>actually where I wonder if Michael would disagree with me. Michael,

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:43.840
<v Speaker 3>why don't we just release all of the evidence within

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 3>the FBI and within whatever the case that has from

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 3>the Department of Justice, the secret indictment from two thousand

0:40:50.760 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 3>and seven, which has never yet been made public, that

0:40:53.000 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 3>was prior to that non prosecution agreement. Release everything that's

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:59.080
<v Speaker 3>in the case file and just show it to the

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:01.320
<v Speaker 3>American public and we can all make up our minds.

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's where maybe you'll be vindicated, Michael. Maybe

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 3>you won't show any of.

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 4>The release everything.

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't everything.

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:08.080
<v Speaker 4>I agree with Dershowitz.

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:11.839
<v Speaker 5>Okay, Dershowitz said for said for for the past ten years. Look,

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 5>release everything. I waive any right to privacy. I've been

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 5>falsely accused. I'm going to be vindicated, so I want

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 5>maximum disclosure.

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 4>I'm in favor of that.

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 5>But there are there are two judges in New York

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 5>who are keeping materials under seal, you know why, to

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 5>protect the purported victims, mainly maybe to protect others who

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:32.719
<v Speaker 5>could be defamed by those victims. So if people want

0:41:32.760 --> 0:41:35.000
<v Speaker 5>to go lobby, I mean, Breaking Points should go lobby

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 5>in the Southern District of New York for disclosure the

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 5>files that remain under seal. But I think the fact

0:41:40.640 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 5>that Dan Bongino, I mean, talker, would you agree with

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 5>me that Dan Bongino and Cash Betel and all these

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 5>people obviously dangle these tantalizing little tidbits in front of

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 5>the right wing social media audience on the idea that

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 5>Trump was going to storm into office with his most loyal,

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 5>tenacious soldiers and expose the deep state, demonic sex trafficking Democrats,

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 5>and that whole narrative was obviously politically expedient, you know,

0:42:08.680 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 5>bullshit that they very cleverly used to gin up excitement

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 5>to vote Republican in twenty twenty four, and it wouldn't

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 5>necessarily translate to any concrete revelations. Once these thought there

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 5>was a consolidated Epstein list that the DOJ hasn't some

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.440
<v Speaker 5>vault somewhere that they could just release. Was always kind

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 5>of like, I agree population to get people all exercise.

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:34.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm on the record here at Michael, I completely agree

0:42:34.360 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 3>with you for the political expedience purposes, but I don't

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 3>agree that it's bullshit when I have also said it's

0:42:38.520 --> 0:42:40.719
<v Speaker 3>a canard to say that there's some Epstein client lists

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:43.440
<v Speaker 3>where it's like, hey, fuck the kid now supports Israel.

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 3>That's not the way. Look, I'm not here to defend Cashpitel.

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I agree with you completely that the way that they

0:42:50.080 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 3>frame Look, there's two options. They either ginned it up

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 3>and exploited perhaps what they claim is the rape of

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 3>thousands of children or hundreds of victims or whatever for

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 3>politically expeding purposes, or they did that, which is disgusting,

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 3>or they are covering upset thing, which is equally disgusting,

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 3>perhaps more so actually on the line, I would love

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 3>for them.

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 4>I totally agree.

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 5>I would love for the maximum amount of material to

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:15.320
<v Speaker 5>come out, because you know what, Virginia, who you happily

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 5>conceded was a serial fabulous.

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 3>No, I didn't say that. She's a old woman who, yes,

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 3>has been proven to it.

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Now you don't agree, I didn't know.

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:24.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to use your level of framing, which

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 3>I actually do frankly think is disgusting because it points

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 3>her as the central character, which you've self appointed. It

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:33.680
<v Speaker 3>ignores the other individuals.

0:43:33.719 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 5>I want to introduce the whole sex trafficking theory fourteen

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 5>with the photo.

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 1>The photo exists, Virginia photo exists.

0:43:42.280 --> 0:43:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Finish your point, Okay, So I mean I agree that

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 5>the maximum disclosure should.

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Be made and that these.

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:56.239
<v Speaker 5>Concealments that are still in place to protect the supposed accusers,

0:43:56.480 --> 0:44:00.680
<v Speaker 5>many of whom are serial fabulous, but yet received enormous

0:44:00.680 --> 0:44:02.279
<v Speaker 5>payouts from these settlement funds that.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Claims because when when when when that stremely was applied

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 4>to Virginia Gouffrey.

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 5>As more and more information had to be revealed, she

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.760
<v Speaker 5>had to concede that she just made an enormous amount

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 5>of stuff. So I think that that would that would

0:44:16.880 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 5>probably with Extreedian luxury. Uh, you know, it's just whatever.

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 4>She didn't She did not live a life of luxury.

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 5>She didn't have an ocean front mansion in Australia and

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:30.400
<v Speaker 5>a ranch, and she didn't make it.

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 4>She didn't make.

0:44:31.000 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 3>Fifteen suicide bro, Like, yeah, this is what I'm saying, Like,

0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 3>let me. It was so it was so great for

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.760
<v Speaker 3>her that she decided to Let mean, I don't yeah, because.

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:42.640
<v Speaker 5>She hadstic because she got accorded to her a strange husband.

0:44:42.880 --> 0:44:46.200
<v Speaker 5>She became increasingly violent and attacked him the local Australian.

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:49.520
<v Speaker 5>That's a husband, and then she lost custody of her

0:44:49.600 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 5>children and became distraught. I mean, could that maybe reflect

0:44:52.360 --> 0:44:54.960
<v Speaker 5>on her credibility that way to what.

0:44:55.040 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 4>She was not called as a witness in the Maxwell trial.

0:44:57.160 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Reflects to me somebody a pattern of behavior of somebody

0:45:00.040 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 3>who was obviously, in my opinion, abused whenever she was

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.759
<v Speaker 3>young and as a child, and that's its credibility.

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So Michael, let me let me wrap.

0:45:08.160 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 4>Up with you. Obviously, did I know it's like it's

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:12.279
<v Speaker 4>difficult to admit because.

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Hearing smirts somebody who killed herself and who obviously was

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 3>a troubled.

0:45:22.200 --> 0:45:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Prominent individual for a decade.

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, your feelings at there so are mine? All right?

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, Michael.

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:31.480
<v Speaker 2>The final question here for you, Uh, how do you

0:45:31.600 --> 0:45:36.880
<v Speaker 2>explain the fact that you had the Trump administration go

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 2>from the big influencer Phase one Epstein files coming out.

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 2>We're reviewing Pam Bondi's I'm reviewing thousands of hours of

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 2>footage to two page memo. Nothing to see here. We're

0:45:48.480 --> 0:45:52.279
<v Speaker 2>moving on case closed to Trump now saying well, there

0:45:52.320 --> 0:45:55.480
<v Speaker 2>are files they were creating a creator by Obama and

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Hillary and Comy and Brennan and it's all a hoax

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know that everyone needs to move on and

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:05.280
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing to see here. So how do you explain

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:12.040
<v Speaker 2>his specifically changing narrative of what's going on here? And

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:15.600
<v Speaker 2>you know the fact that Obviously, it seems bizarre the

0:46:15.640 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 2>way he's handling this in the worst possible way just

0:46:17.920 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 2>for him politically, let alone anything else.

0:46:21.160 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, I mean, I think people in the right wing

0:46:22.600 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 5>media universe are Charlatans, and they exploit their charlatanism to

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 5>politically expediently cater to this long standing.

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Belief that Trump specifically no I know.

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 5>I got it, but it leads into Trump meaning there's

0:46:38.120 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 5>like a pervasive, ever present belief within right wing media

0:46:42.160 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 5>circles whom Trump harnesses for political power, that there's a

0:46:48.120 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 5>pedophilic sex trafficking ring that's perpetually waiting to be uncovered.

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 5>That's why they were so into Q andons and that

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 5>kind of transferred over to Epstein. Well, but it explains

0:46:59.120 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 5>it in that, like why did Pam Bondi in that

0:47:02.120 --> 0:47:06.040
<v Speaker 5>now notorious February twenty twenty five interview with Fox News

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:08.760
<v Speaker 5>say she had the Epstein files waiting on her decks

0:47:08.800 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 5>desks because there was an incentive within this mill you

0:47:14.080 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 5>to dangle the most appetizing little snippets in front of

0:47:19.360 --> 0:47:22.320
<v Speaker 5>the audience. Like the beating heart of right wing social

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 5>media and like comments sections always believes that there's a

0:47:25.760 --> 0:47:28.800
<v Speaker 5>that the you know, the triumphant anti deep state warriors

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 5>in the Trump administration are finally going to unveil the

0:47:31.160 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 5>true heart of evil at the core of elite networks

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 5>and expose the pedophiles. Pat cashpertellus to put on her

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 5>big point pants and tell us who the pedophiles are,

0:47:42.080 --> 0:47:46.600
<v Speaker 5>and so Bondi was kind of playing into that assumption,

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 5>and she used, like, in precise language, is she are

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 5>these people?

0:47:50.480 --> 0:47:53.000
<v Speaker 4>Charlatan's You're not getting an argument for me. I was

0:47:53.040 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 4>trying to.

0:47:53.360 --> 0:47:57.600
<v Speaker 5>Make this argument like last year when they were pumping

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 5>out this stuff for their own elector or advantage. Now,

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 5>I will say, is there a possibility that there are

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 5>some additional materials somewhere that could be embarrassing to Trump?

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 5>Of course, we know that he was a friend of

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 5>Jeffrey Epstein's for like fifteen years. Jeffrey Epstein is on

0:48:16.200 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 5>tape that was released by Michael Wolfe saying I'm Donald

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 5>Trump's closest friend or I was his closest friend. Now

0:48:22.480 --> 0:48:26.160
<v Speaker 5>could that be puffery by Epstein who loved to exaggerate.

0:48:26.040 --> 0:48:27.919
<v Speaker 1>People also him for fifteen years?

0:48:28.160 --> 0:48:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, So.

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:32.120
<v Speaker 5>I mean, so there could be something that is embarrassing

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 5>on Trump somewhere in the archives here that wouldn't be

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:40.360
<v Speaker 5>surprising at all. Michael Wolfe claims that Epstein displayed to

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 5>him like pictures or polaroid photos of Trump like sitting

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 5>around with like topless young women or something. That there

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 5>was no claim that those women in the photos were miners,

0:48:54.160 --> 0:48:56.880
<v Speaker 5>but like Trump was also in these modeling circles.

0:48:56.880 --> 0:49:00.759
<v Speaker 4>That's how you've met Milania, right, and Epstein And also.

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Michael, I just got to point out, man, this is

0:49:02.880 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 3>the same hearsay that you're indicting the intelligence quote. You're like, oh,

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Michael Wolfe, But by the way, Michael wolf is a

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 3>fucking serial fabulous Are we're gonna sit here and not

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 3>say that he literally made ship up in his book

0:49:13.480 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 3>in fury?

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Uh?

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Like, why is it that the second hand account here

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 3>from Michael.

0:49:18.080 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Wolf I'm not saying it's worse, No, what it is.

0:49:20.360 --> 0:49:25.239
<v Speaker 5>You're always that's not it's not it's not here. By

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:27.279
<v Speaker 5>the way, it's not hearsay for Michael wolf to say

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:29.600
<v Speaker 5>I was shown this photo like he could testify in

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 5>court to that.

0:49:30.520 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 4>He couldn't testify in court.

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:36.439
<v Speaker 5>That he was told by somebody that somebody else told him,

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 5>Michael Wolf.

0:49:37.160 --> 0:49:40.319
<v Speaker 4>They spoke to Alex Acosta two years prior to that.

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 5>So it's a different level if you're saying, I'm not

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 5>saying it's dispositive reporting.

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Fine, Wolf has.

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:48.720
<v Speaker 5>Shown that he has recordings of Epstein, He has hours

0:49:48.760 --> 0:49:51.800
<v Speaker 5>of tape. Vicky Ward as Quo quotes on that record.

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:55.239
<v Speaker 5>Why why is she a worst report? By the way,

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 5>Vicky Ward And I'm not claiming.

0:49:57.160 --> 0:49:58.840
<v Speaker 4>That that Trump is a sexual predator.

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 5>I'm trying to I'm arguing against that assumption now that

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:07.799
<v Speaker 5>has overtaken these these popular assumptions, right, So I mean,

0:50:07.800 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm not I'm not trying to argue that Trump is

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:10.240
<v Speaker 5>a sexual predator.

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree with him reporting from other people.

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:17.680
<v Speaker 4>Here's the Okama's razor that I tend to use with Trump.

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 5>Obviously, he'll just launder whatever bullshit he can to get

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 5>through a current controversy. And the way that he's handled

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:28.400
<v Speaker 5>this issue is really amazing. I mean, now he's like

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:30.839
<v Speaker 5>voluntarily bringing it up when he calls into these right

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:33.760
<v Speaker 5>wing like Real America's Voice shows and saying Epstein oaks.

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:36.239
<v Speaker 4>He's disowning his supporters over it.

0:50:36.680 --> 0:50:39.400
<v Speaker 5>So obviously I don't know, like does he have the

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 5>presence of mind to know how to negotiate this story

0:50:43.080 --> 0:50:45.720
<v Speaker 5>in a way that is befitting him.

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:46.239
<v Speaker 4>Maybe not.

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean he's seventy seventy eight years old now, so

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:52.319
<v Speaker 5>that could be an explanation. It is interesting to me

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 5>that never once do you hear Trump express sympathy for

0:50:56.560 --> 0:51:00.200
<v Speaker 5>the quote unquote victims, like a traditional politician would say,

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 5>we sympathize with the victims. They've been through trauma. We're

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 5>not going to re traumatize them. This uh, this horrible

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 5>person Epstein was a pedophile, sprays some whatever like Trump

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:15.440
<v Speaker 5>doesn't even make any perfunctory gestures along those lines. He

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:18.080
<v Speaker 5>just like goes nuclear now on his own supporters. So

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 5>is he handling this artfully?

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 1>You know?

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:22.760
<v Speaker 4>But like I think there are.

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:25.760
<v Speaker 5>Some you know, more simple explanations than oh that means

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:30.279
<v Speaker 5>he's covering up the child rape ring that people accused

0:51:30.480 --> 0:51:33.800
<v Speaker 5>Democrats of covering up, and now Trump is following suits.

0:51:33.800 --> 0:51:35.480
<v Speaker 4>I just don't find that to be that plausible.

0:51:35.560 --> 0:51:37.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, Michael, thank you appreciate your time.

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 5>Okay, and one more thing, like, Okay, I know this

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 5>guy a little heated, and it's genuinely nothing personal against Sager.

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:45.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I'm well.

0:51:44.920 --> 0:51:48.800
<v Speaker 5>I'm waiting for the avalanche of comments denouncing me, and

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:49.640
<v Speaker 5>that's fine to.

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 2>Quote whoever was Dan BUNGEI and know I think we

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:56.480
<v Speaker 2>all have our big boy pants on here. So good

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:57.279
<v Speaker 2>to see you, Thank you.

0:51:57.480 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for watching guys.

0:51:58.640 --> 0:52:00.600
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate it. We will see you all tomorrow for

0:52:00.640 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 3>the Friday show.