Speaker 1: All of you for being with us. Right down are
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number if you want to be a
Speaker 1: part of the program. It's eight hundred and ninety four
Speaker 1: one sean if you want to join us. There are
Speaker 1: certain moments in time when you look at the United
Speaker 1: States Military and it just you well up with a
Speaker 1: sense of gratitude and you are in just awe of
Speaker 1: how amazing these men and women in an all volunteer
Speaker 1: you know, armed forces are at any given moment, and
Speaker 1: you think of the history of the US and dealing
Speaker 1: with the Iranians, and it has not been a good
Speaker 1: one for the last forty seven years, you know, with
Speaker 1: the Ayatola Komane coming into power nineteen seventy nine and
Speaker 1: Americans held hostage for four hundred and forty four days,
Speaker 1: and how stupid so many past presidents have been in
Speaker 1: trying to deal with this radical eye Islamo fascist regime
Speaker 1: that controls this place, and what they have done to
Speaker 1: once great people, the Persian people, and how they have
Speaker 1: so oppressed this country and driven them into poverty, and
Speaker 1: how much terror they have been fomenting around the world
Speaker 1: and their terror proxies that they have been funding. And
Speaker 1: then you think of the utter stupidity of people like
Speaker 1: Barack Hussein Obama. You know, oh, look, let's just fly
Speaker 1: in cargo planes of cash and other currency and billions
Speaker 1: of dollars so that the Iranians can build out their
Speaker 1: nuclear capability, ballistic missile capability, and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: And the result has been devastating for the region, and
Speaker 1: it has been becoming an existential threat to the entire world.
Speaker 1: We'll get into the need for this entire operation in
Speaker 1: a second, although we've addressed it many times, But there
Speaker 1: are so many people that could not be any more
Speaker 1: wrong about the urgents of the President's actions here. And
Speaker 1: it's all I could tell you, had the President not
Speaker 1: acted expeditiously, that the odds of a nuclear armed Iran
Speaker 1: would have been that much greater. We once again, the
Speaker 1: world underestimated the Iranians capability in terms of the range
Speaker 1: of their ballistic missiles. We now know they have ballistic
Speaker 1: missiles capable of being launched and that could hit countries
Speaker 1: like Great Britain and France and cities like Paris and London.
Speaker 1: We did not know that before. As per usual, international
Speaker 1: globalist organizations underestimated what they had and so we have
Speaker 1: been engaged in this military effort because we learned from
Speaker 1: our Mid eastn voice, Steve Whitkoff, who was negotiating with
Speaker 1: the uraniums confirmation of that which we kind of already knew,
Speaker 1: which they had enough sixty percent enriched uranium that could
Speaker 1: be enriched to way eapens grade uranium with it in
Speaker 1: no less and no more than twelve days, which would
Speaker 1: have given them enough uranium for eleven bombs. You couple
Speaker 1: that with their ballistic missile capability, and now you're looking
Speaker 1: at a nuclear armed Iran, you know, with a live
Speaker 1: with a converter di mentality and the number one state
Speaker 1: sponsor of terror. The fact that we have to convince
Speaker 1: some people that this was the right decision is a
Speaker 1: little bit difficult for me to comprehend because we do
Speaker 1: have a lot of stupid people. It's like a lot
Speaker 1: of stupid people. I was watching melt down over the
Speaker 1: weekend because the President put out a controversial truth posting,
Speaker 1: and I'll get to that in a minute. But the
Speaker 1: moment that all of you heard, many of you heard
Speaker 1: Sunday morning, Easter morning, many of you heard Saturday night.
Speaker 1: We got him. My fellow Americans. Over the past several hours,
Speaker 1: the United States Military pulled off one of the most
Speaker 1: daring search and rescue missions in US history for one
Speaker 1: of our incredible crew member officers, who also happens to
Speaker 1: be a highly respected colonel, who I am thrilled to
Speaker 1: let you now to know is now safe and sound.
Speaker 1: His brave warrior was behind enemy lines in the treacherous
Speaker 1: mountains of Iran, being hunted down by our enemies who
Speaker 1: were getting closer and closer by the hour, but was
Speaker 1: never truly alone because his Commander in Chief, Secretary of War,
Speaker 1: Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and fellow war fighters were
Speaker 1: monitoring his location twenty four hours a day, diligently planning
Speaker 1: for his rescue. At my direction, the US military sent
Speaker 1: dozens of aircraft armed with the most lethal weapons in
Speaker 1: the world to retrieve him. He did sustain injuries, but
Speaker 1: he will be fined. The miraculous search and rescue operation
Speaker 1: comes in addition to a successful rescue of another brave
Speaker 1: pilot yesterday, which we did not confirm because we did
Speaker 1: not want to jeopardize our second rescue operation. This is
Speaker 1: the first time in military memory that two US pilots
Speaker 1: have been rescued separately deep within enemy territory. We will
Speaker 1: never leave an American war fighter behind. The fact that
Speaker 1: we were able to pull off both of these operations
Speaker 1: without a single American killed or even wounded, just proves
Speaker 1: once again that we have achieved overwhelming air dominance and
Speaker 1: superiority over the Iranian skies. This is a moment for
Speaker 1: all Americans, Republican, Democrat, everyone else that they should be
Speaker 1: proud of all of the United States and all our
Speaker 1: brave fighters. We truly have the best, most professional, lethal
Speaker 1: military in the history of the world. God bless America,
Speaker 1: God bless our troops. Happy Easter to all. I don't
Speaker 1: know why people doubt our military might. I'm not really sure.
Speaker 1: We are at a very critical, crucial point in how
Speaker 1: this is going to go down. A lot of people
Speaker 1: don't know. When a US aircraft goes down in a
Speaker 1: war zone, the response is anything but completely anticipated, choreographed tightly,
Speaker 1: and and it is something that they practice from day one.
Speaker 1: And what is the highest, you know, the most sensitive technology.
Speaker 1: You know, we want to keep that out of enemy hands,
Speaker 1: deny our adversaries, intelligence propaganda wins. The military has a
Speaker 1: clear playbook. But when these situations arise there it is
Speaker 1: it is factored into any military mission. Because we're dealing
Speaker 1: with mechanical equipment. Things can go wrong. Our people are
Speaker 1: important and anyway, so if a pilot, like in this case,
Speaker 1: two pilots ejecting and they survive, they are trained to
Speaker 1: evade capture using survival techniques that are drilled into them
Speaker 1: before they are ever deployed. Concealment, communication with friendly forces,
Speaker 1: movement to avoid detection. Military commanders prepare, they plan, they
Speaker 1: execute recovery operations long in advance of them ever engaging
Speaker 1: in any military activity, and ensure that these individuals are
Speaker 1: trained to contend with any event unforeseeable event and capable
Speaker 1: of recovering personnel and staff to react quickly to whatever
Speaker 1: situation just happens to arise. You know, elite units like
Speaker 1: you know Air Force, you know power rescue, Navy seals,
Speaker 1: Army special ops teams are are they know they're going
Speaker 1: to be dispatched. They're often escorted by helicopters, fighter jets,
Speaker 1: et cetera. In some cases, drone satellite surveillance aircraft are
Speaker 1: used and they monitor and track the pilot's position and
Speaker 1: they were able to do this with perfection. It is
Speaker 1: something that is practiced over and over and over again.
Speaker 1: And the goal is to prevent a sensitive equipment radar
Speaker 1: weapons technolo from falling in enemy hands. But more importantly,
Speaker 1: it is to make sure that we don't leave Americans
Speaker 1: behind and when a crash site, the military may destroy
Speaker 1: the records from the air. They ended up doing that
Speaker 1: and this this effort for a number of different reasons
Speaker 1: that came on board at the time. Now, when you
Speaker 1: look at the details of this, it is spectacular, and
Speaker 1: the President went into great detail today and we'll play
Speaker 1: some of it as the as the show on folds
Speaker 1: throughout the day to day, and all of it is incredible.
Speaker 1: All of it is. You know, we had over one
Speaker 1: hundred men, you know, the US rescued this this f
Speaker 1: fifteen airmen. It was deep inside enemy territory. They had
Speaker 1: Sealed Team six, one of the they had. John Ratcliffe,
Speaker 1: the CIA director, described the CIA ruse to divert their attention.
Speaker 1: They constructed a forward air strip in hostile territory. They
Speaker 1: had patrols, they create a perimeter. They were using you know,
Speaker 1: drones all over the region. As it means they knew
Speaker 1: exactly the location of this fighter pilot. I'll get to
Speaker 1: that in a second. But the officer shot down on
Speaker 1: Good Friday, this was southwestern Iran. Hid in the mountains.
Speaker 1: He managed to climb a seven thousand foot ridge. My
Speaker 1: understanding is get inside a little crevice inside of a mountain,
Speaker 1: knowing that the Iranians had every belief that he was
Speaker 1: alive because they found the ejection seat and they found
Speaker 1: a pilot there. But he was able to climb this
Speaker 1: seven thousand foot ridge, And in an effort to confuse
Speaker 1: the Iranians, they put a sixty thousand dollars bounty, which
Speaker 1: is more times more than ten times the average household
Speaker 1: income in Iran, So that was a great incentive for
Speaker 1: people on the officer's head. The CIA pulled off a
Speaker 1: diversion Saturday, planting fake intel that he had already been
Speaker 1: rescued and was being driven out of Iran, according to
Speaker 1: The Times, to push them off at their attention in
Speaker 1: another area. The operation involves landing multiple transport aircraft inside
Speaker 1: of Iranian territory. Deep inside that territory, the US Air
Speaker 1: Force landing strip was set up close to the city,
Speaker 1: and they started out with and this is another amazing
Speaker 1: part of it, because they have contingency plans. And I
Speaker 1: talked to people familiar with the mission. It's been now
Speaker 1: widely reported. I'm not reporting anything that's not now in
Speaker 1: the in the out in the public. They had these
Speaker 1: two massive C one thirties that ended up, you know,
Speaker 1: coming in. They ended up actually sort of like having
Speaker 1: problems when that was on the ground, But immediately they
Speaker 1: dispatched not one, not two, but three backup transport planes
Speaker 1: that were in place ready to take off in case
Speaker 1: as a contingency, in case they had a problem. They
Speaker 1: didn't have to you know, last minute, you know, scramble
Speaker 1: these planes as a backup in case something happened. I mean,
Speaker 1: pretty amazing stuff. And I mean this is like, I
Speaker 1: don't know, Jason Bourne, mission impossible, you name it, James
Speaker 1: bond All loaded up in one. They had a total
Speaker 1: of four helicopters night stalkers. According to a report in
Speaker 1: the war zone, it's believed the Iranians were fired upon
Speaker 1: from the air in other words, as they created a
Speaker 1: perimeter and anyway, they were able to send in these
Speaker 1: backup aircraft to go in and get the rescue teams
Speaker 1: and get this pilot that had been injured during the ejection,
Speaker 1: and the US Air Force used multiple bombs, blowing up
Speaker 1: all the aircraft that they ended up abandoning, you know,
Speaker 1: just to get the hell out of there, which is
Speaker 1: standard operating procedure, and the US suffered no casualties. And
Speaker 1: US Special Ops commandos also engaged in skirmishes apparently as well,
Speaker 1: and then the President was able to say, we got them.
Speaker 1: It is a lesson and it is a moment for
Speaker 1: this country to just, you know, take a moment and
Speaker 1: be proud, be proud of the fact that we have
Speaker 1: brave men and women that are willing to risk their
Speaker 1: lives to protect one another and to protect us. There
Speaker 1: is still a grave misunderstanding out there, and I think
Speaker 1: it's purposeful and the part of people that have agendas.
Speaker 1: The saddest part in all of this is you don't
Speaker 1: hear from the left. You don't hear from the crazy Democrats,
Speaker 1: you don't hear from the radical left, you don't hear
Speaker 1: from the isolationist wing all over the place that you know,
Speaker 1: if they had their way, Iran would have nuclear weapons
Speaker 1: and would hold the world and our children and grandchildren hostage.
Speaker 1: Now you can be convinced of. And that is the
Speaker 1: whole reason that the President made this very quick decision
Speaker 1: for Operation Epic Fury. To begin with, it's the sixty
Speaker 1: percent enriched uranium. Now, according to the President, they are
Speaker 1: in the middle of negotiations with a deadline of tomorrow,
Speaker 1: with the promise that the President's going to blow up
Speaker 1: their bridges and blow up their infrastructure and their power
Speaker 1: plans and blow them into the Stone Age if they
Speaker 1: do not go along with this deal. And I'll get
Speaker 1: to the actual verbiage of it in a second. And
Speaker 1: the reason that the President is pushing this point and
Speaker 1: this is a very simple choice for the Iranians. Now,
Speaker 1: they had an opportunity for peace before midnight Hammered. They
Speaker 1: did not take that opportunity. The same thing with Epic Fury.
Speaker 1: They were given time, and the President would have preferred,
Speaker 1: he said it repeatedly, he would prefer to have peace.
Speaker 1: But when you're dealing with Islamo fascists that believe in
Speaker 1: convert or die, the number one state sponsor of terror,
Speaker 1: it's very hard to negotiate with radicalized people like this,
Speaker 1: indoctrinated people like this. Now, the one benefit that we
Speaker 1: have the president believes this next tier of leadership, the
Speaker 1: fourth or fifthier, is being more reasonable. But if they
Speaker 1: don't agree to open the straight of horror moves, if
Speaker 1: they don't agree how to turn over the uranium, not
Speaker 1: if they will turn over the enriched uranium, then the
Speaker 1: president will follow through on his promise. And you would
Speaker 1: think that they might have learned something about Donald Trump
Speaker 1: and his promises at this point. Do you think they
Speaker 1: might have learned that they've been They've been decimated. They're army,
Speaker 1: their navy pretty much, their ballistic missile systems, they're nuclear systems.
Speaker 1: Fourteen bunker buster bombs. How many more lessons you know,
Speaker 1: do you have to teach one regime before they come
Speaker 1: to some level of understanding of what they're dealing with. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I hope that they choose the peaceful option. Be better
Speaker 1: for the world, better for our country, better for everything.
Speaker 1: But you know what, they just can't be permitted to
Speaker 1: have a nuclear weapon. We went over why this was
Speaker 1: needed at this time, this conflict with Iran. We're now
Speaker 1: neutralizing the number one state sponsor of terror. We are
Speaker 1: preventing them from ever getting a nuclear weapon. While we
Speaker 1: had an opportunity. And I've explained in detail how this
Speaker 1: president learned the lessons of Reagan peace through strength, the
Speaker 1: lessons of history the last century, one hundred million dead
Speaker 1: souls in the name of some Isam that could have
Speaker 1: been taken out earlier that was not. And he also
Speaker 1: learned the lessons of Iraq and Afghanistan. And you know,
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm listening to people out there that are
Speaker 1: now trying to claim that this war is illegal. As
Speaker 1: Martin Goury put in the New York Post, wars are
Speaker 1: not subject to laws or court hearings. Institutions that to
Speaker 1: pretend to be otherwise, like these globalist institutions like the
Speaker 1: UN and the International Court of Justice, which we don't
Speaker 1: recognize have existed, they have historically been anti Semitic and
Speaker 1: anti American. A war is either just or unjust, he
Speaker 1: makes a great point, and this is determined by the
Speaker 1: circumstances of the conflict and the moral valiance of combatants.
Speaker 1: The circumstances of this present conflict are straightforward death to America,
Speaker 1: number one state sponsor of terror. And you know, I
Speaker 1: just I don't even know why this is even a
Speaker 1: question for some people, but it is what it is.
Speaker 1: And I think that history will be very kind to
Speaker 1: the President's foresight wisdom to neutralize what was a growing,
Speaker 1: clear present danger to the world and to the United
Speaker 1: States before it became more powerful and before it became
Speaker 1: a nuclear armed A couple you marry nuclear, you know,
Speaker 1: capability with radical Islamism, and you've got yourself a formula
Speaker 1: for a potential modern day holocaust. It's that simple, not complicated.
Speaker 1: You know, if you watch Donald Trump sixty seconds. I
Speaker 1: don't know why this is hard, you know for people
Speaker 1: to really understand ow the straits of horn moves and
Speaker 1: the sixty percent enriched uranium. They remain the final pieces
Speaker 1: of this puzzle, and we're going to find out in
Speaker 1: fairly short order. You know, we might know by the
Speaker 1: time we get on this program tomorrow. We might know
Speaker 1: by the end of this program today. I don't know.
Speaker 1: And that is whether or not the President is able
Speaker 1: to successfully negotiate terms with this remaining tier of quote leadership.
Speaker 1: By the way, well nobody was paying attention, you know,
Speaker 1: while Field Team six and all these other heroes were
Speaker 1: rescuing this wounded airmen in the US warplanes were dropping
Speaker 1: a bunker buster bomb on the Ranium Revolutionary Guard headquarters,
Speaker 1: taking out more of their top leadership. We just don't stop.
Speaker 1: We're pounding them and to the point where they are
Speaker 1: now not capable of fighting any war. I mean, even
Speaker 1: Prime Minister nat Yaho said that this existential threat that
Speaker 1: was Iran is not currently an existential threat even to Israel,
Speaker 1: which is in the air, which is in the region.
Speaker 1: By the way, the President did acknowledge today that they
Speaker 1: are trying to funnel weapons to the Iranian protesters. I
Speaker 1: hope that is successful, because you can't win revolutions without slingshots.
Speaker 1: But the President was also clear regime change was not
Speaker 1: our main goal. Our main goal was to make sure
Speaker 1: we don't have a nuclear armed Iran, and the President
Speaker 1: is proving successful in that effort. The President says that
Speaker 1: they're getting close. The President also said today that he
Speaker 1: vowed to prosecute the leaker who blabbed the news that
Speaker 1: a second airman was missing in Iraq in Iran rather apparently,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure which news organization. Linda's telling me she
Speaker 1: believes it was CBS through and also the BBC, and
Speaker 1: they have a relationship. But I want to see what
Speaker 1: happened because you know, news organizations often pick up on
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff that they can't in good consciences.
Speaker 1: They love their country and care about men and women
Speaker 1: in harm's way, you just don't do it. Let me
Speaker 1: get to this issue of President Trump and his tweet.
Speaker 1: The tweet because people woke up on Easter Sunday morning
Speaker 1: and they were shocked, Linda, they were just shocked. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump has been saying controversial things ever since he announced
Speaker 1: he's running for president, and he came down that escalator
Speaker 1: at Trump Tower. I don't know why at this point
Speaker 1: in time people act shocked. I think it's fanned. I
Speaker 1: think it's bony. I think it is that they don't
Speaker 1: want to understand Donald Trump. He said Tuesday, meaning tomorrow
Speaker 1: will be power plant Day and bridge Day, all wrapped
Speaker 1: up in Won. They will be nothing like it. Open
Speaker 1: the blanking straits. You crazy. I can say, bastards, or
Speaker 1: you'll be living in hell. Just watch Praise be to Allah.
Speaker 1: That's what he said. Now, he says this as Steve Whitcoff,
Speaker 1: Jared Kushner, and Marco Rubio reportedly or all negotiating with
Speaker 1: whatever Iranian regime exists. In other words, went out with
Speaker 1: the fourth or fifthier of leadership. Now, why did the
Speaker 1: president do this? Why? I know it's not conventional. Is
Speaker 1: there anything about Donald Trump that's conventional? Really? Is there
Speaker 1: anything that really surprises you? How many presidents are like
Speaker 1: Donald Trump? We'll never see another one like him, I
Speaker 1: don't think in our lifetime. And the fact that people
Speaker 1: don't understand him at this late after having all these years,
Speaker 1: if they had any sense of objectivity and any desire
Speaker 1: to understand him, you would understand him. Now, what is
Speaker 1: he doing? It's what I say he always does. He's
Speaker 1: in a perpetual state of new negotiation. He wants an answer,
Speaker 1: and the answer is is this new Iranian leadership? Are
Speaker 1: they really more reasonable or not? And he is putting
Speaker 1: them to the test. Now I can tell you what
Speaker 1: he wants is the outcome. He would want the Iranians
Speaker 1: to end this war peacefully. This is about pushing for peace,
Speaker 1: not for more war. We've proven we can destroy them,
Speaker 1: We've proven that we can obliterate them, and he wants
Speaker 1: the Iranians to choose peace. But he also knows the
Speaker 1: mindset of these Iranians, especially in some level of leadership.
Speaker 1: Convert or die Number one state sponsor of terror. Wipe
Speaker 1: Israel off the map, Wipe America off the map. He
Speaker 1: knows exactly what he's doing. He's being purposely provocative. He
Speaker 1: wants them to know. Number one, he will do it.
Speaker 1: Number Two, he's crazy. If your enemy thinks that you're
Speaker 1: willing to do it, that these are not idle words
Speaker 1: that are being spoken by somebody like Obama and Biden.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of power behind that. If there is
Speaker 1: any chance of any deal. This is the President drawing
Speaker 1: his line in the sand, and he's speaking the only
Speaker 1: language that lunatics like this will understand. People. You know,
Speaker 1: the reports that they're actually arming children in case America
Speaker 1: ever hits the ground in Iran, they want young children
Speaker 1: to go fight their wars rather than the quote leadership,
Speaker 1: you know, putting weapons on themselves and going to fight wars.
Speaker 1: You ever notice the leadership never strap bombs on themselves
Speaker 1: with the promise of seventy two virgins to go kill
Speaker 1: innocent men, women and children. They would get indoctrinated, you know,
Speaker 1: rich people to do that, but they themselves never do that.
Speaker 1: And he's speaking the only language they understand. I'm telling
Speaker 1: you right now, just like he didn't want to drop
Speaker 1: fourteen bunker buster bombs before Midnight Hammer. He would have
Speaker 1: preferred a peace steal, just like he didn't want He
Speaker 1: would have preferred peace before Operation Epic Fury gave them
Speaker 1: every opportunity for peace. He is doing it now once again,
Speaker 1: except the first tier of leadership, the second tier of leadership,
Speaker 1: the third tier of leadership is now dead and gone,
Speaker 1: and he's hoping that maybe this next tier of leadership
Speaker 1: might take him seriously. The ball is going to be
Speaker 1: in their court. It really, to use a very simple analogy,
Speaker 1: it's no different than a professional athlete, except the stakes
Speaker 1: are much higher. Obviously, you know, talking Adam Schiff to
Speaker 1: get a star player on the other team off their game,
Speaker 1: and he's playing chess, and the media and other countries
Speaker 1: are playing checker, and everybody else lives in fear. After
Speaker 1: eleven years of him being front and center on the
Speaker 1: world stage, you would think that they understand. And what
Speaker 1: is this negotiation coming down to. If the Iranians want
Speaker 1: a deal, and we should know sometime tomorrow if there's
Speaker 1: going to be a deal, all the President wants is
Speaker 1: they must open the straight or horse moves immediately. The
Speaker 1: second thing that they're gonna have to agree to, not
Speaker 1: if they will hand over the sixty percent enriched uranium,
Speaker 1: how they will hand over the sixty percent enriched uranium. Now,
Speaker 1: if they agree to this oldtimatum, then hell will not
Speaker 1: rain down on Iran. It will not be bridge day,
Speaker 1: it will not be infrastructure day. It will be Okay, Now,
Speaker 1: let's finish these negotiations and your country can survive day.
Speaker 1: That's what it's going to be. And I hope and
Speaker 1: I meet this. Maybe some people think I like whop No.
Speaker 1: I want to get our brave men and women out
Speaker 1: of arms way as quickly as possible while removing a
Speaker 1: potential threat down the road that we have a nuclear
Speaker 1: armed Iran Prime Minister nat Yakshu, who actually has declared
Speaker 1: Iran no longer poses that existential threat to Israel. But
Speaker 1: he's also factoring in that the sixty percent of enrich uranium.
Speaker 1: It's either gonna come out. It's we could do it
Speaker 1: the easy way or we can do it the hard way.
Speaker 1: And that's that's where we now are. Now I'm gonna
Speaker 1: tell you something else. There's two other things that have
Speaker 1: pissed me off in all of this Number one, I
Speaker 1: have had it with Europe. Absolutely. They have chosen to
Speaker 1: disintegrates as individual countries and as a continent. They have
Speaker 1: abandoned their commitment to national security and national defense. They
Speaker 1: have embraced radical social and climate alarmism, which is why
Speaker 1: they are so dependent on outside sources. They've they've bought
Speaker 1: into solar panels and climate change and all of this.
Speaker 1: It's cost them billions and billions and hundreds of billions
Speaker 1: of dollars. They've not committed themselves to securing their continent
Speaker 1: or their individual countries. And when America just asked for
Speaker 1: a little bit of help and the President said it
Speaker 1: was a test to see if NATO would step up,
Speaker 1: they did not. So I would imagine when this is
Speaker 1: all said and done and resolved, and it will be
Speaker 1: resolved in a way that there won't be a nuclear
Speaker 1: armed Oran or a nuclear threat of Iran. And that
Speaker 1: actually helps out oh cities like Paris in London because
Speaker 1: they have the ballistic missile range that we didn't think
Speaker 1: they had, and they can get to Paris and London
Speaker 1: with nuclear material if they had it, and they just
Speaker 1: they were a bunch of cowards. Neville Chamberlain juniors. They
Speaker 1: learned nothing. We rebuilt Europe after World War Two and
Speaker 1: they have allowed unfettered illegal immigration and did not demand assimilation,
Speaker 1: which has resulted in nearly one hundred Sharia courts in
Speaker 1: Great Britain and no go zones and other parts of Europe,
Speaker 1: including France. And why they You know, it is fascinating
Speaker 1: as the world is getting away from radical Islam. Now,
Speaker 1: how interesting is it, Linda, that the daughter of the
Speaker 1: top Iranian official Ali Larijani. Remember we talked about him
Speaker 1: when they took this guy out anyway, forced out of
Speaker 1: Emory University in Atlanta, set to be booted from the
Speaker 1: United States. And anyway, her late father was a top
Speaker 1: official in Tehran. Very evil guy. She worked as an
Speaker 1: assistant professor at Emory. Anyway, Now it sparked backlash. Now
Speaker 1: did you see that the niece and grand niece of
Speaker 1: General Solomani arrested in Los Angeles after the Secretary of
Speaker 1: State Mark or Rubio terminated their permanent residence status and
Speaker 1: then ICE agents scooped them up. Apparently, I guess in
Speaker 1: Los Angeles routinely boasting on Instagram about attacks against the US,
Speaker 1: bashing US as the Great Satan Why would we be
Speaker 1: that stupid of a country to allow them into this country?
Speaker 1: Did you see the pictures that the New York Post
Speaker 1: had of this young niece, this grand niece of Solomony?
Speaker 1: What for all to talk about? You know, love of
Speaker 1: Allah and you know the ayah tola? This I told
Speaker 1: a lot of these leaders, kids, grandkids, nieces, nephews. Boy,
Speaker 1: they all made their way to the US. What does
Speaker 1: that say about the US? It says we're a stupid
Speaker 1: country for allowing them