WEBVTT - Instant Reaction: Nvidia’s Upbeat Sales Forecast Shows AI Boom Remains Strong

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 2>This is a breaking news update from Bloomberg, instant.

0:00:13.360 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Reaction and analysis from our three thousand journalists and analysts

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>around the world.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to actually the outlook first quarter revenue forecast

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 3>beating estimates, the company saying for the first quarter seas

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>revenue of seventy six point forty four billion to seventy

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 3>nine point fifty six billion, that is easily above the

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 3>street estimate of seventy two point seventy eight million. Let's

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 3>go back to the fourth quarter data center revenue that

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 3>coming in better than expected sixty two point three billion

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 3>versus the street estimate of sixty point thirty six billion,

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 3>and Vidia saying computing demand is growing exponentially. Fourth quarter

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 3>adjusted gross margin we expected seventy five percent, We got

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 3>seventy five point two percent. Fourth quarter revenue coming in

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 3>overall sixty eight point one billion, better than the street

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>estimate of sixty five point ninety one billion. Tim we're

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>seeing that stock up now about two point two percent

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 3>in the aftermarket.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, just to remind everybody where we are with these numbers.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>The first the company ce's first quarter revenue coming in

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>six seventy six point four four billion dollars to seventy

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>nine point five six billion dollars. That beat estimates handedly

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.199
<v Speaker 1>handily of seventy two point seven eight billion dollars. As

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Carol mentioned in video, CEO Jensen Wong saying in a statement,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>computing demand is growing exponentially. We are also fourth quarter

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>data center revenue worth repeating a beat there sixty two

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>point three billion dollars the estimers for sixty point three

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>six billion, and that gross margin coming in above estimates

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 1>at seventy five point two percent.

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Our Sarah Friar on our live blog saying that chairs

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 3>are growing up on that data center revenue beat. Hey,

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 3>Ed Ludlow, come on in. I know you're looking at

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>these numbers. What jumps out for you?

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, straight's the outlook. And by the way,

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 4>I would have done the same thing. Go right there.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, revenue in the fiscal first quarter seventy eight

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 4>billion dollars plus le minus two percent, and you know,

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 4>a consensus was really high. But like going into this,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>it's a very simple equation. There were many names from

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 4>across sell side and buyside that said they wanted to

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 4>see in Nvidia beat revenues overall in the current period

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 4>in by the multiple billions of dollars, you know, against consensus,

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 4>and so one thing I would say to confirm something

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 4>is that the fiscal first quarter, which is the the

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 4>April quarter, does not assume any compute revenue from China.

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:34.240
<v Speaker 4>In the outlook does not factor in any compute revenue

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 4>of China. That I guess is something to check off

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 4>the list. It was one of the questions we had.

0:02:38.600 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Jake Goldberg from Seaport Research

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>partnering senior analysts your semiconductors and electronics. He joins us

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>also from San Francisco. Anything in here that confirms your

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>thesis or does it sort of go against the celerating

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that you have on in Vidia?

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean it goes. I mean it's a good quarter.

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 5>It's a good quarter on a good guide. It's above

0:03:00.320 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 5>consensus above My expectations were good for them. Were still

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 5>waiting to see a lot more detail.

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you want to see?

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 5>I want to see, I want to hear more. I

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 5>have to talk about gross margin for next quarter. I

0:03:10.360 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 5>think that's going to be in the CFO commentary.

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Ed jump in, Yeah.

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 4>No, I don't have it yet, but it will be

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 4>in the CFO commentary.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Versus seventy five percent expectations, I mean, can can ed

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Can you use that as sort of a guide for

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>for how the company could see first.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.239
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean on a basis point basis, Yeah, it

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 4>looked like margins are impacted by a number of things.

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 4>It has been a sell side question on prior calls

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 4>the percentage of a server that Nvidia contributes to. And

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 4>again what's changed in the period is in Nvidia starting

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 4>to sell, for example, CPUs as standalone product, and that

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 4>was a part of the meta deal that was included.

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 4>They talked about core Weave being an early user of

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 4>CPU as a standalone product. You know, how does that

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 4>impact the margin profile going forward? But yeah, I mean

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 4>what they do is they own more of the server

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 4>and that has been one of the ways in which

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 4>that they've got margins to where they are. And clearly

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>being zero point two percent above you know, where where

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:17.720
<v Speaker 4>the hopes were is not a bad thing.

0:04:18.040 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm looking at that CFO commentary. As we know,

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.559
<v Speaker 3>revenue expected to be seventy eight billion plus or minus

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 3>two percent, and as you correctly pointed, out not assuming

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 3>any data center compute revenue from China. In their outlook,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 3>gap and non gap gross margins expected to be seventy

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.359
<v Speaker 3>four point nine percent and seventy five percent, respectively, plus

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 3>or minus fifty bases point inclusive of a one tenth

0:04:41.800 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 3>of one percent impact from stock based compensation expense. Just

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 3>looking at what else we have here, Operating expensive gap

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 3>and non gap operating expenses to be approximately seven point

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 3>seven billion seven and a half billion, respectively, including that's

0:04:56.440 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 3>inclusive of one point nine billion of stock based compensation expense.

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>A headline getting my attention is in Vidia says that

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>hyper scalers were just over fifty percent of four Q

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:09.359
<v Speaker 1>data center revenue. Jake Goldberg, I want to repeat that

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.839
<v Speaker 1>headline for you, hyper scalers, We're just over fifty percent

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>of fourth quarter data center revenue. Is that a sign

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>that in Vidia is diversifying revenue? Who who made up

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the other half of data center revenue? Is it automakers?

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Like who's buying well?

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 5>I think that's one of the most interesting things that's

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 5>taking place with in videos is they're not just reshaping

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 5>the semiconductor industry, They're trying to reshape the cloud computing

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 5>industry as well. And that's why you see we see

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 5>all these neoclouds getting investment from or support from in video.

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 5>In Vidia would much rather have one hundred neocloud customers.

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Than three HYPERD scale customers, of.

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 5>Course, and they're doing a really good job of creating that,

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 5>willing that into existence.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So those other customers had come on in here. Those

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>other customers are like the core weaves and the other neoclouds.

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, what is still important in his fact

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.719
<v Speaker 4>is that obviously the vast majority has been the hyperscalers

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 4>plus meta, right, and so they've wanted to kind of

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 4>switch between a story what they used to call an

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 4>AI factory. At first, an AI factory was an on

0:06:14.839 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 4>prem data center that enterprises and maybe some of the

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 4>neoclouds would operate themselves. Now an AI factory is what

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 4>they you define any data center that's running AI workloads

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 4>in so they have chopped and change between that story,

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:31.679
<v Speaker 4>but its origin was that they wanted to go beyond

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 4>the hyperscalers to have people own their own infrastructure for

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 4>AI workloads if they were say a software company or

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 4>an enterprise of a slightly different size.

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 2>You know, it's interesting.

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking for supply constraints and they seem to say

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 3>in the CFO commentary, I'm seeing it in terms of gaming.

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 3>They say, we expect supply constraints to be a headwind

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 3>to gaming in the first quarter fiscal twenty twenty seven

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 3>and beyond, but not so important, right ed. I mean,

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 3>we want to really just see if that's a problem

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 3>in the data center area.

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 4>Sadly, you know my history within video, you know, before

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 4>coming Silicon Valley and covering the data center thing was

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 4>gaming and you know it's now such a small piece

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 4>of revenue. It's I mean, Jay, you can jump in,

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 4>but really it's not where anyone's looking right now. There

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 4>is some discussion later on as it relates to the

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 4>balance sheet and cash flow on things to do with supply,

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 4>but you're right that what they're basically saying is that

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 4>that was the gaming was the segment that was impacted,

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 4>and I don't know that that is having any effects really.

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 4>And how we see the stock trading in after hours, well.

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And Video shares up three point four percent right now,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and in fact we're seeing Broadcom TSMC and Micron shares

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>follow in video higher. Jake Goldberg come on in here

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 1>and talk a little bit about the broader repercussions of

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a print like this outside of in video. What's the

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>signal that it sends not just to hardware makers but

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to the entire market.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 5>I think there are always concerns about how long the

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 5>spend is going to keep going, and we had certainly

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 5>had some positive data points about that. Two weeks ago

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 5>when the hyperscale is reported, Facebook reported they have very

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 5>strong CAPEX numbers. This just continues that trend. And I

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 5>don't want to say it's a rising tide that lifts

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 5>all boats, but it's it is six seven hundred billion

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 5>dollars in CAPEX this year, and that's going to spread

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 5>across the entire ecosystem.

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>No, and I want to go back to it, and

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 3>I totally get like gaming non important, but I was

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 3>like looking to see if there's any supply constraints in

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 3>the rest of their universe, and I just thought it

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>was kind of interesting that I haven't seen anything along

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>those lines.

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 2>It was just in regards to gaming.

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 3>So is that a good sign that we haven't seen

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 3>anything that the company has said so far in terms

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 3>of supply constraints.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for the rest of the business, or I don't know,

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 2>is it not that important?

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:47.840
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know, I leave it to the analyst to

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 4>model money left on the table if there were any,

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 4>so to speak. But given the outlook in terms of

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:59.239
<v Speaker 4>sales and where it came in relative to consensus, you know, Nvidia,

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 4>it's an enviable position to be in right where demand

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.200
<v Speaker 4>exceeds your ability to supply anyway. But going back to

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 4>that five year handbag analogy of a few moments ago,

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, the other argument that Jensen Wong and Video

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 4>have made quite consistently is that if you tell your

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 4>suppliers what you plan to do five years in advance,

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 4>then the rest of the supply chain can help prepare

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 4>with you and keep up. And you know recently that

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 4>that's been most difficult in memory. But memory shows up

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 4>in pricing, you know. And if you're Jensen Wong, I'm

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 4>sure you can make a phone call and make sure

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 4>that the corresponding high bandwidth memory that you need is

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:36.880
<v Speaker 4>there or thereabouts.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 3>Quick check on now ZAK one hundred many futures here

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.480
<v Speaker 3>in the aftermarket, and they're up about one point eight percent.

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 3>So we're certainly seeing a lift to the overall market.

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Jay Gilbert, come on back in what's top of mind

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 3>when we get to this conference call in terms of

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 3>what you want to hear. I know we talked a

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 3>lot about margins earlier, but what is it?

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I think this margin stuff is important

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.400
<v Speaker 5>because what I'm sort of reading between the lines is

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 5>they had to negotiate pricing with the memory memory makers,

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 5>and the memory makers have the most leverage they've had

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 5>in a decade, and we don't see any impact on

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.920
<v Speaker 5>in videous numbers. Compare that to pretty much any other

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 5>electronics company out there today which is warning about memory.

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure they're in video is feelings some of that,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 5>but the fact that their gross margins are guiding to

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.600
<v Speaker 5>at least in line tells me that they're just going

0:10:26.640 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 5>to price on those memory increases to their customers, which

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 5>is a testament to their pricing power, to their power

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 5>their market position.

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Jake Goldberg, Jay, we're gonna have to leave it there.

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>We're going to give you time to get ready to

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>jump on that call. Jake Goldberger, Senior Analyst, Semiconductors and

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Allow Electronics for Seaport Research Partners. Once again, Jay, the

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>only analyst tracked by the Bloomberg terminal who has a

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>celerating on in video and want to give you the

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 1>last word. You've spoken to Jensen Wong many many times.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>What's a question that you would have for him on

0:10:59.080 --> 0:10:59.959
<v Speaker 1>the earnings call tonight?

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Like, ultimately, it just always comes down to a

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 4>projection of confidence that all of the stories we've been

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 4>over in more than the last year is still intact.

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 4>You know that the great buildout of AI infrastructure is early,

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 4>that they have long horizon visibility into what's going on.

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 4>All in video can control, I suppose, is the roadmap

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 4>to go from one generation of compute to the next.

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 4>And so they talk about in the CFO document margins

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 4>being supported by the ramp up in blackwell and mix

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 4>of new products. Well, when does that mixed change? When

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 4>does Vera Rubin really kick in and then go beyond that?

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:39.960
<v Speaker 4>That's kind of how the street would look at it.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I think, all right, we're going to live with there.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 6>Ed.

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 3>We know you're busy as well. Ed Lovelo, thank you

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 3>so much as we awaited those numbers then helping us

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 3>break them down. Co host of Bloomberg Tech of course

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Television, Catch It at eleven am Wall Street

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 3>time Monday through Friday. In the meantime, we've got chairs

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 3>of Nvidia up about three point two percent. We're seeing

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 3>broad come up about three quarters of one percentage point.

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 3>Here in the aftermarket, TSM, Taiwan Semi up about one

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 3>in a third percent, and you're seeing Micron also hire

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 3>off its best levels.

0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 2>In the aftermarket. It's still up Tim about eight tenths

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 2>of a percentage point.

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're keeping an eye on this. We know

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Pellett is keeping an eye on all this and more.

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He's standing by in the Bloomberg Interactive brokers to studios

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>with a business flash.

0:12:20.520 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 7>Hey Charlie, all right, I thank you very much. Tim

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 7>and Carol keeping an eye as we recap and reset

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 7>on in video. The stock hire after ours up by

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 7>three percent right now. It did give another bullish quarterly

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 7>revenue forecast, signaling that the massive buildout of AI computing

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 7>does remain on track. Chip maker said fiscal first quarter

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 7>sale is going to be around seventy eight billion. That

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 7>compares with an estimate of seventy two point eight billion

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 7>in Nvidia is the world's most valuable company. Closely watched

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 7>shares up now by three percent, salesforce heading in the

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 7>other direction after ours, stock down roughly five percent, out

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 7>with a lukewarm outlook for sales growth in the new

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 7>fiscal year, fueling while Street's worries that the software giant

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 7>will lose out to new competitors in the age of AI.

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 7>Other companies reporting earnings, Zoom Communications forecast adjusted EPs for

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 7>two twenty twenty seven that guidance missing the average analyst estimate,

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 7>shares down one point seven percent. Also reporting snowflake after Ours,

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 7>the stock down two and a half percent. It gave

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 7>an outlook for quarterly sales that was in line with estimates.

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 7>The Dow, the SMP, and Neztak all advanced today, s

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 7>and P up fifty six, wrapping up the Wednesday session

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.760
<v Speaker 7>at sixty nine forty six, a gain of eight tents

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 7>of one percent. Dow Industrial is up three oh seven

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 7>ups six tens, Nez Stack today up by one point

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.559
<v Speaker 7>three percent, the Nestak one hundred index up today by

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 7>one point four percent, the Vics just falling below eighteen

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 7>with a ten year four point zero five percent spot

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 7>Gold up twenty six dollars, the ounce up by five

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 7>tens of one percent, fifty one seventy major move in

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 7>bitcoin today surging eight point one percent sixty nine thousand,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 7>two hundred and forty five on bitcoin and finally beyond

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 7>Wall Street, Cuban forces killed four people today who opened

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 7>fire from a speedboat with Florida tags, an incident with

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 7>the potential to escalate an already ten standoff with the US.

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 7>Carolyn tim that is a Bloomberg business flash.

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, folks, we're watching in Vidia, Charlie, thank you

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>so much for that breakdown on all of that. In

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Vidia shares continuing to trade higher. A couple of headlines

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>also crossing that we want to bring to you, and

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Vidia says it's secured supply to.

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Meet demand for several quarters.

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 3>So we talk about supply constraints often when we're talking

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 3>about Nvidia and the AI demand. Also in Vida saying,

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the United States granted a license to ship H two

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 3>hundred chips to China based clients, so they've granted a

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 3>license for specific China based customers. The US licenses to

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 3>ship small amounts of the H two hundred to China,

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 3>So we were looking for some clarification on its business

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 3>in China. Something that they've certainly been looking for.

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>We've got a great Bloomberg Intelligence roundtable, Mandeep's saying. His

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>global head of Technology Research for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>us here in the Bloomberg Interactive broker's studio. He covers

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in Vidia, he covers Snowflake and more. Also, anurag Rana

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>is senior technology analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>from Chicago, and he covers a salesforce. So we're going

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to talk software, We're going to talk hardware. Man, Deep,

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with your reaction to in Video.

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>It was a beat it, I mean, a very good quarter.

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Your reaction to margin and what is actually holding up

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>margins here because seventy five point two percent.

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, no mention of any impact related to memory costs,

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 6>which is surprising.

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>And why is that surprising? I know memory costs have

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>gone up, but in Video is such a big company.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't they have pricing power? They do, but purchasing power.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 6>They clearly did a great job in terms of securing

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 6>that supply, and they don't have the premium. They don't

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 6>have to pay the premium that everyone else has to

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 6>pay on the hardware. Signe.

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>They said, secured supply to meet the man for several quarters.

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>What's several well, I mean in this case at least

0:15:58.520 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>like the FED. This is like the FED.

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>But they're saying that they've got it. That's a good thing.

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 6>They have got it, and they're guiding to you know,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 6>mid seventy percent rose margin for next quarter as well.

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 6>So clearly memory not you know, an impact at all

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 6>in terms of the margins. The thing that is clear

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 6>is they are selling you know, to existing customers, not

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 6>just GPUs, but systems. And that's the big difference between

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 6>and in Vidia and AMD. AMD wants Meta to use

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 6>their chips and integrate it right. Nvidia is actually selling

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 6>their custom to their customers entire systems that have higher asps.

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 6>They are helping them reduce the token costs and that's

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 6>where the customers don't mind paying that extra you know,

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 6>premium that in Vidia is charging because overall the total

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 6>cost of ownership is lower than if you were to

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 6>standardize on any other chips. And that's what's reflected in

0:16:56.760 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 6>their print is look, their customers see.

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 2>The so well done in video right by doing the whole.

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 6>Thing and the Blackwell architecture that's really taken off. I mean,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 6>all the concerns around the migration from Harper to Blackwell.

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they just prove that Blackwell will be probably

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 6>a bigger, you know product in terms of their chip architectures.

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Does this in your mind?

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean I always feel like you're like the calmvoice

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 3>of saying, the airspend is still happening, like everybody relaxed.

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 6>It's accelerating that.

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>But it's accelerate. That's what you're getting from this.

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 6>I mean, look at Nvidia's growth in the last fiscal quarter.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 6>It was around mid sixty percent. They're pointing to seventy

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 6>seven percent growth in their fiscal one Q So that

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 6>goes to show and the proof point you can see

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 6>in the hyperscalar capex. The hyperscalar capex seems to be

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 6>going up as well. So it's underpinned by healthy fundamentals.

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 6>We know why. And Vidius top line is accelerating, right

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 6>because the kapex seems to be accelerating, and all these

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.960
<v Speaker 6>points towards more inferencing, more for AI compute, and we

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 6>are hitting that phase where it's not just you know

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 6>about training or whether it will happen or not. It's happening.

0:18:09.200 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 2>So the ROI the usage right, We're seeing it.

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 6>The usage is happening, and companies are consuming the compute.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 6>It's going to get reflected in the cloud revenue next quarter.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 6>It's going to get reflected in all the possible forms

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 6>of where inferencing will show up.

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>We're gon we're going to bring on aurag In in a

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>second and talk Salesforce because I think that's a good

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>transition to talk about what companies are doing with AI

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and the message at least that Salesforce trying to make

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.919
<v Speaker 1>with agentic AI. But before we get there, maybe if

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I do want you to weigh in on what Carol

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier about the China business. H two hundred shipped

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>under a new program subject to a twenty five percent tariff.

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Nvidia discloses US government in a ten K filing, granted

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>license by the US and February of twenty twenty six,

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the US licenseship small amounts of H two hundred to

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>China for specific China based customers. What what is our

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>investing ADI? You need to understand about what it can

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>sell to China and the impact on that financially.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 6>I mean it used to be China used to be

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 6>mid single digit percentage of in Vidio's overall data center revenue,

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.919
<v Speaker 6>and Jensen has said China is about a fifty billion

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 6>dollars addressable market when it comes to you know, chips,

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 6>and so the fact that they're allowed to sell something

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 6>now to China doesn't mean it's going to grow at

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 6>the same rate as their overall top line, which is

0:19:26.760 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 6>you know, seventy seven percent, and that excludes the China number.

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 6>But it's all incremental revenue. And this print shows there

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 6>is just insatiable demand for Invidia's chips and whoever can

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 6>get it well buy it. So it's just a question

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 6>of whether in Vidio is willing to sell it to

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 6>them or not.

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, so let's go to salesforce.

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 3>We do want to bring in our anarag Rana, senior

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 3>technology analyst a Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 2>He's in Chicago.

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Shares of Salesforce anaragar Dad about four and a half

0:19:56.000 --> 0:20:00.199
<v Speaker 3>percent in the aftermarket. Some of the red headline that

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 3>we crossed on the Bloomberg Company in terms of the

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 3>outlook sees first quote a revenue.

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Of eleven point zero three to eleven point zero eight billion.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 3>That's above the street estimate of ten point ninety nine billion,

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 3>also increasing its share buyback authorization. Did fifty billion dollars

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>walk us through? Because this company has certainly been under

0:20:18.280 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pressure. It's down about fifty percent since

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 3>late twenty twenty four.

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 8>So there are two things that are happening right now.

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 8>The first is, given so much spend going into AI,

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 8>the NONAI spending is the one that's under pressure, and

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:36.119
<v Speaker 8>that is hurting companies like Salesforce, workday accenture, and so forth,

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 8>because companies have or the clients don't have that much

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 8>money to spend in terms of how they're allocating AI

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 8>spending versus NONAI. The second big piece right now is

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 8>the market's extremely worried about software companies getting disrupted by

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 8>all the model providers and all the AI native companies.

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 8>So Salesforce are getting hit by two different ways. But

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 8>the results, frankly, I mean I wouldn't say they were disappointing.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 8>I would say they were stayble to inline in terms

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 8>of what they were saying they're going to do. So

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 8>from our side, you know, it is just going to

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 8>take some time to sort out.

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>So ANNI rog.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 7>The question.

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people have excuse me about

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a company like Salesforce, and you know, we could go

0:21:19.280 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>through any other software company, not any other, but many

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>other software companies and ask you the same question is

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>about the threat from artificial intelligence. And Mark Benioff was

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was very clear in the press release to say that

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this is a company that has like relaunched, I don't

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have the exact wording in front of me, but relaunched

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:40.719
<v Speaker 1>as an AI and agentic AI company. Is is it

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>really under threat? And specifically like what is the threat

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>from Claude, from anthropic or from open AI that investors

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>are so worried about and is it warranted?

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 8>So the question is the answer to the if is

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 8>it warranted? I mean, I think we're going to take

0:21:57.600 --> 0:21:59.959
<v Speaker 8>some time to play out because if the models get

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 8>really smart, then why do you need a manufactured software

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 8>like this. That software can do a lot of what

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 8>you need to do in terms of managing your salesforce

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 8>or customer service. Now, the question is in our view,

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 8>when a company like Salesforce is there there are a

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 8>handful of their products that they have they have that

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 8>they sell into the enterprise, whether it's customer service, cloud

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 8>or sales automation cloud. Those are the ones I think

0:22:23.920 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 8>they have a little bit better position of not being disrupted.

0:22:27.600 --> 0:22:31.400
<v Speaker 8>But they have other visualization tools or some other smaller

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 8>products that you know, may not be the ones where

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 8>anybody would pay for it. So I think there is

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 8>a lot that needs to be done from Salesforce in

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 8>terms of adding more AI capabilities to its core product

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 8>and not be you know, change the narrative around it.

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 3>You know, the narratives have been so interesting on AI

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.600
<v Speaker 3>as you really well know, looking at names like Snowflake

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 3>down about one point three percent here in the aftermarket,

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.400
<v Speaker 3>we're talking about Salesforce and that stock just a real

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 3>quick rehash here on the Bloomberg seeing that stock still

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>down about four and a half percent here in the aftermarket,

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:05.640
<v Speaker 3>and then of course you've got Nvidia up about two

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 3>point three percent.

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 2>You put out some great research.

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 3>This week, Anaog, you and the team about the haves

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 3>and have nots and AI disruption. What do we need

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 3>to know at this point, especially when everyone says, folks,

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>we're still early in on this.

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 2>We don't really know how it all plays out.

0:23:23.080 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 8>I think that's the most important thing is we are

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 8>very early in the inning. But at the same time,

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, when people are worded daily entirely sell the

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 8>entire sector. We have seen that numerous times. So when

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 8>we looked at this thing, I mean the entire team

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:37.120
<v Speaker 8>worked on creating a framework of you know, when we

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 8>see a company, does it have high market share? Does

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 8>it sell to very large companies versus smaller companies? Is

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:46.800
<v Speaker 8>it a platform, is it a system of record? All

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 8>those things takes into account, you know, kind of the

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 8>history of a company. So let's say a company like

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 8>I SAIP that's been around for fifty years, you you know,

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 8>use it for your code, accounting, reason, supply chain. I

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 8>think something like that is better entrenched than a very

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 8>small company that's probably doing one particular function or selling

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 8>only to the small and medium customers.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 3>Hey, final question here on Salesforce. Just going back as

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.320
<v Speaker 3>we watch this stock down four point six percent, top

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 3>of mine. I know I always ask you guys this,

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.639
<v Speaker 3>but when the call starts with the company and the

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 3>C suite and analyst and investors, what must be asked?

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 8>I think the biggest thing is going to be like,

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 8>how what are you doing to change the narrative around

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 8>them being disrupted by AI? And how are they adding

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 8>more AI capabilities across the entire suite?

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, love it, Anirog, thank you so much, Anirog.

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 3>Grana his research certainly on the AI world and also

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 3>on salesforce.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>We'll be looking for that later on today.

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Anirag Grana, senior technology analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence out there

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 3>in Chicago,