WEBVTT - Daniel Whiteson on Space Itself

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Scoot to Blow Your Mind production of My

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>today we have got a special treat for you. Returning

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>champion previous guests to the show, Daniel Whiteson of Daniel

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge Explain the Universe. We are so privileged to

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>have Daniel join us again today. Daniel, say hi and

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>introduce yourself. For anybody who wasn't around last time, Hi guys,

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for having me on. Great to be back. Um.

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Daniel Whitson. I'm a professor of particle physics at

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>u c Irvine down here in southern California, and I'm

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.879
<v Speaker 1>also the co host of the podcast Daniel and Jorge

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Explain the Universe, a podcast with my good friend and

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>collaborator Jorge cham in which we talk all about the

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>craziness of the universe. We try to answer questions, We

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>try to share the wonder and the mystery of the

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>uni verse in a way that makes it accessible and

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>hopefully a little bit fun. Well, we really appreciate you

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us today, Daniel. So I wanted to invite you

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>onto stuff to blow your mind today to talk about space.

0:01:11.959 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>This is actually a subject I've I've wanted to tackle

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on the show for a while with uh, the unifying

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>question of what is space? Why is there such a

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>thing as the distance between the Earth and the Sun,

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>or between an atomic nucleus and the electron that orbits it.

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Because I think a lot of the time when we

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>think about physical reality, we just immediately look past space

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to the things that occupy it. We we assume space

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:42.480
<v Speaker 1>as a kind of given, a de facto canvas on

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>which physics can be realized. But I wanted to think

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>about space itself. What is it? How does it exist?

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Do we know anything about where it comes from and

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>where it's going? So maybe the easiest way to start

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>off today would be to to get as simple as

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we can so in simplest terms in a sentence, if

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you could do it, how would a physicist define space?

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 1>While all of space in one sentence? That is a

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty tall order, you know, I have to say, to

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 1>be honest, I'd have to say, we really have no

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>idea what space is. I mean, I think it's wonderful

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>that you're asking this question. It's the kind of question

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that it takes like a sort of maturity of science

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and philosophy to even understand why the question is interesting

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and important. You know. It's like it's like we're have

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>been fish scientists for a thousand years swimming through this fluid,

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and then only recently have realized that it's it's something fascinating,

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>something to study, something that has property, something can do

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>weird things. And so it's a it's a deep and

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>important question, you know. And and just to digress a

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>tiny bit more like it makes me wonder how many

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>other crazy basic questions we aren't even asking because we

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>don't realize how rich the topic is, you know. So

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel sort of privilege that we're at this moment

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in science when we can ask this question what is

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>space and understand that it is an important question? Alright,

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:11.959
<v Speaker 1>So I totally dodged your question there, But I could

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>try to give a one sentence answer if if you'd like, sure,

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll start simple and then and then we'll get more

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>into the nuances here. All right, Well, a simple answer

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to what is space? Is that? Oh man? I mean

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I could try to maybe impossible, um, I'd say the

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>simplest description I could give for what space is is

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>something which has various properties. We've discovered it can contain

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>quantum fields, it can expand, and it has relationships to

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>other parts of space. And so that's more a description

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of like what we've what we've observed about space. It's

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not really an inherent understanding of what it is because

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't have that understanding. Well, maybe this brings me

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to a question I wanted to ask later on. But

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>if there is no good answer to this, it can

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>help ground us as we go forward. So I wanted

0:04:04.280 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask, is there such a thing as even a

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical physics without space? Does all physics assume space? And

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can we imagine, say a possible world that exists but

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>does not contain space, or is that just inconceivable? Now?

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that all physics that we do assume space,

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Like all of our modern theories, the standard model and

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>quantum field theory, they all operate in some space. And

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>there are different kinds of theories that we have, and

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those make different assumptions for what that space is.

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Like quantum field theory, you write down with the spaces

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.919
<v Speaker 1>in advance. You say I'm gonna assume space. You know

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is three dimensions and extents in all in all these directions,

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm going to talk about the fields that

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>are in that space. Other theories like general relativity. Space

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 1>is a part of what you're sort of trying to

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>get at. It's not like the backdrop. It's the thing

0:04:57.000 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you solve for. You say, if I have this configuration,

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>then what does the space look like? But they all

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>assume space. I mean space gives you a relationship between stuff, right,

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 1>tells you this is here and this is not here.

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And in the end, all of our theories are trying

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to understand the world we live in, and everything we

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>live in has space. So it's pretty hard to grapple

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>with a non spatial theories or non spatial physics. So yeah,

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say that we need space, okay, But so

0:05:25.600 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>if we could come at it from the exact opposite

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>angle you think, you you couldn't really have a physics

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>without space. Could you have a universe full of space

0:05:34.760 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with no matter of energy in it? Could space exist

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>without any contents? Could space exists without any contents in it? Yeah?

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That is an awesome question, and it's fascinating because we

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>have two theories of physics right now, quantum mechanics and

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>general relativity, and they're both awesome achievements, staggering insights into

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the way the universe works, and they give different answers

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to this question. Right, So general activity um is Einstein's theory.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 1>And he has a bunch of equations. Let's say, what

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe look like depending what you put in it,

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 1>and he has and one of the and it's really

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>hard to solve, like, there's very few ways you can

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>actually solve these equations. One of the very few ways

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you actually can get an answer out is what they

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 1>call the vacuum solution, like to say, assume there's nothing,

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>then what does the universe look like? If there's nothing

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in it? All? Right? Einstein can solve that problem quantum

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>field theory. Though, quantum field theory says, hold on a second,

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>um space is filled with all these quantum fields and

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>particles and matter and all the stuff that you make

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>me and you are just like excited states of these fields.

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at an electron, it's not a particle,

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not a wave. It's a little ripple in some

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.760
<v Speaker 1>field which is not in space. It's part of space.

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>So if all these fields. You have the electron field,

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the electromagnetic field, all the fields associated with each of

0:06:53.800 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the forces. As lots of them. We can talk about

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>them later if you'd like. But some of them never

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>relax completely. Some of them are always have some energy

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in them, for example, the Higgs field. The Higgs field

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>is in every part of space, and it's always got

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>some built intention to it, and that means that there's

0:07:12.840 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>energy in every part of space. So quantum field theory says, no,

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you can't have space without some energy in it. There's

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>some inherent energy to space, where the general relativity says,

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I could totally imagine it. And we don't know which

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>theory is the fundamental, true theory of the universe. If

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>either one, we can't seem to make them play together

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>very well. And so this question really goes to the

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>heart of the nature of reality itself. It's fascinating. It's

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the kind of thing that in five years physicists will

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to and look back at us and

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, man, those people didn't understand anything about

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the universe they were living in, right,

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>What a bunch of cave men and cave women like

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>they were subjignary misses. So I love that idea about

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>quantum field theory. And if I understand this right, you're

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>saying that under the assumptions of quantum field theory, you

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>could have a big block of space, and even if

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you were able to clear everything out of it, clear

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>out all the hydrogen particles, clear out all the dust,

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so there's no matter left in it, you'd still you

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>still really wouldn't have an empty void. Is that correct?

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Every unit of space comes with energy built

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in it comes from the factory with energy already in it,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>and um and and lots of those fields cannot cannot relax.

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>The Higgs field is one example, but many of these

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>fields cannot relax all the way down to zero. And

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's impossible, according to these quantum theories, to have

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>space with no energy density in it at all. And

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that means and that's stuff, right, All stuff is is

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>some kind of energy, like the matter that makes it

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>me and you. That's just a form of energy. So

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to say that this space has energy in it really

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>means it's not empty. So what you're describing space as

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>really goes against a lot of our intuitions, where you know,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.719
<v Speaker 1>I think the standard understanding of empty space what's out

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>there beyond Earth, you know, even if you could clear

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>all the hydrogen and dust and everything out of it,

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is that it's just this empty relationship between two points.

0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But you mentioned, of course, the the idea that there,

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, quantum fields that can be excited and can

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>give birth to particles and stuff. Well, I might be

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>putting words in your mouth. There is that correct though. Yeah, okay,

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>but earlier you mentioned also that it has other properties,

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>So it sounds like you're saying space really is a thing.

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.199
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like a substance of a kind. Yes, space

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is a goo. Right. We first imagine space sort of

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as a place to hold our ideas, right where like

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe when you think space and you think a deep space,

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you imagine some like glowing x y z axes that

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>used to like the backdrop on which maybe your calculations

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 1>take place or your spaceship flies through or whatever sort of.

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>But they're like mental metrics we use to understand where

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:54.720
<v Speaker 1>things are. That sort of the initial idea of space.

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But then it turns out the space can do things

0:09:57.360 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that are inconsistent with that, right, Like space can ripple

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen gravitational waves. When black holes orbit each other

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and eventually collide or other things happen, they create these

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>ripples in space itself. These ripples, they're space getting stretched

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and space getting contracted, right, squeezing and shrinking and then

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>expanding again, and very very very small, which is why

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 1>they were hard to discover. But yes, we've discovered that

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>space can do things. So it can ripple, it can expand, right,

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about the expansion of the universe, the universe

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>expanding its first moments, and it's continuing to expand. In addition,

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>space can bend. Maybe the most familiar example is understanding

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>gravity as distortions in space by having mass nearby and

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and so space can do all these things that nothingness

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>cannot do, that a backdrop cannot do. You can't just

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>think of spaces like the theater of the universe. It's

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a weird dynamical thing in itself. Yeah, I think in

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>general our listeners are going to be more familiar with

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the idea that space can can bend in accordance with

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>general relativity. There's a big object, you know, and that

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>creates curvature, and in spacetime it's a little bit harder

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>to picture exactly what's happening with the first thing you

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>mentioned with the ripples through spacetime. So that's something that

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 1>would be like, that's like how we detected gravitational waves, right,

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is that correct? Um? So what what exactly is happening

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>when a ripple goes through space? Like? How do how

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>do you measure that? What? What is that in the moment? Right? Well,

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, a ripple through space is information propagating through

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the gravitational field. Something that's very important that came out

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of general relativity that we didn't have with Newton's gravity

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>is the concept that information takes time to move gravitationally.

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Like if the Sun disappeared, would we feel the Sun's

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>gravity instantly disappear or would it take a moment? Turns

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>out Newton says it would go away instantly. Einstein says, no,

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't even notice for eight minutes because the gravity

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>from the Sun would take The information about the Sun

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>being gone would take eight minutes to get here gravitationally,

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.839
<v Speaker 1>And so that's propagation of information. And so gravitational wave

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is a special form of that. Say you're familiar with

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the concept of like putting a mass and that deforms space.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll imagine you put a mass in space, and then

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you take it away, and you put it in space,

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and you take it away, and you put in space

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and you take it away. What's going to happen, Well,

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you know it's not gonna be very pleasant for the

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>occupants of your space. They're gonna get jerked around, right,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>It's back and forth and back and forth. And that's

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>sort of a more dramatic version of what happens when

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 1>two black holes orbit each other. Is they're creating ripples

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>in this gravitational field, and you feel those as stretching

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and squeezing of space itself. And we measured that here

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on Earth by having really long rods essentially and watching

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>them shrink and expand shrink and expand. With those north

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>there would be like lasers that you would use to

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>measure that. Yeah, the practical way you measure a very

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>small change in the length of a long rod is

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>that you don't actually of the physical rods. That was

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the first thing they tried, actually did that here, you see,

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>I Jo Webber did that, and it's because he had

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>no idea like maybe this is easy to spot right,

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>let's just build a big block of metal and see

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>if its shrinks and expands. I was gonna say, what

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>was it made out of? Yeah, it's just a big

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>cylinder of metal. Um. But nowadays they're miles long and

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.199
<v Speaker 1>their laser and they use lasers to measure the length

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>between two isolated mirrors. And I think that the biggest

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>misconception people have about space being bent by mass is

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that they're used to this rubber sheet analogy where you

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 1>have like a big rubber sheet and you put a

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.439
<v Speaker 1>bowling ball in it and it bends space. And the

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>bowling ball is supposed to represent the sun and the

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>rubber sheet is supposed to represent space. And that's helpful

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>up to a point because it gets you to think

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>about space being bent instead of flat. But it's also

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think confusing. And the way it's confusing is that

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's bending in some sort of third dimension, right, and

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that analogy space the universe is two D and you

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 1>put some object in it and it bends in some

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>third dimension. But our space it's three D. First of all,

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>when you put a mass in it, it doesn't bend

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>in some fourth dimension. It's not like our space is

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>embedded in some higher dimensional space and then it gets

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>bent in fourth dimension. It's an intrinsic bending, not an

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>extrinsic It's not like there's somebody out there with a

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>true set of rulers in four D space and they're

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>noticing our space being bent. It's an intrinsic bending, which

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>means it just changes the relationship between points in space.

0:14:31.240 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Right it says, Okay, now that space, that bit of

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>space is closer and this bit of a space is

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>further away. Wow. So I've never thought of it that way. So,

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>so you're saying that the gravitational influence of a large

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 1>object like a star is in some literal sense shortening

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the distance between points of space as you get closer

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to it. Absolutely. You know, massless particles like photons travel

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not in straight lines. They travel along geodesics, which means

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the shortest path through curved space. Now out in the

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>middle of nowhere, there's no mass anywhere that happens to

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be a straight line. That's why it seems like photons

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>travel straight. But photons can also be bent by the sun.

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>How does that happen? Photons have no mass, right, Well,

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the the Sun is changing the shape of space, so

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that the shortest path from A to B is no

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>longer what we would consider a straight line. It's a geodesic.

0:15:22.040 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>It's the shortest path. And so general relativity and mass

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>changes the relationship between space between here and there, and um,

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what we maybe you hear people talk about like

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the spacetime metric that relates like how bits of space

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are connected. So this is sort of the biggest conceptual

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>leap to make from the rubber sheet analogy to our

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>actual three D space, which is that it's an intrinsic bending.

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a relationship between points in space, and that's what

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a gravitational wave is doing. Also, it's a ripple in

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>this metric as it passes through space, and it's saying, oh,

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>these things are now closer together, now the further apart.

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Like you can change the distance, but weeen two things

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>without those things moving relative to each other, right, because

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you change the relative distances. Well, it almost makes me

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>think in terms of how this is communicated to non experts,

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that would maybe be better to not use terms like

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>bending of space and maybe more like compressing or squeezing

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of space. Yeah, but space can also be expanded, right,

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>like what we're seeing in the universe right now is

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that space is expanding, which is crazy. It's like something

0:16:27.200 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>out there is manufacturing new units of space all the time.

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It's filling the universe with new space. Like that's that's

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the hardest thing for me to get my mind around.

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like where this new space is coming from, what

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it means to make new space? And are you making

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>units of new space? There's space continuous and smooth and like, man,

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>there's so many questions. Oh well, I want to talk

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>about that. Maybe we should take a quick break and

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 1>then when we come back we can explore the expansion

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of space. Sounds good than all? Right, we're back. We're

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>talking with Daniel Whitson about space, the nature of space.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So before we went to the break, Daniel,

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>you just introduced the idea of the expansion of space.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>As we've we've been talking about the properties of space

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>as a as a thing and not just an emptiness. Uh.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And so of course we know one of the things

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>that space is doing is that it's expanding. Uh. I

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>think we all know now that the universe as a

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>whole is expanding and maybe expanding at an accelerating rate.

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>If I've got that writing, comment on that in a second.

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>What exactly does it mean for space to expand? Because

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I think from an intuitive level, people might think, well,

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't notice space expanding, Like I don't notice it

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like the space in between the molecules in

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>my body is expanding. So so is space in general

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>expanding or is it just say, the distance between galaxies

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is expanding. What form does that expansion take? Yeah, it's

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a great question. I love the intuition there. You know.

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>The idea is like this thing is supposed to be

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>happening everywhere in the universe. Kind of sort of reconcile

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that with my experience. Can I see that happening around me?

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, like a few hundred years ago, that

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>was a big conceptual leap to say like the rules

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of the universe should also being applied here. Um. So

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. And and the short answer is

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 1>that space is expanding everywhere, Like every unit of space

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is the same. It's homogeneous as far as we understand.

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>There's no difference to this chunk of space and a

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>chunk of space out there in the deepest voids between galaxies.

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>They're all the same from the point of view of

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe, and they're all expanding, which means they're all

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>creating new space. But that's not the only thing happening, right.

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You are made of a mesh of atoms that are

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.879
<v Speaker 1>held together with pretty strong bonds, and this expansion of

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.959
<v Speaker 1>space is dramatic, but per unit of space, it's pretty small.

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Like there's not a whole lot of space being made

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:52.280
<v Speaker 1>between me and this microphone, for example. It adds up

0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:54.800
<v Speaker 1>when you get to like cosmic scales between me and

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the galaxy, because there's a lot of space between us,

0:18:57.800 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>but here on the small scale, it's not very powerful,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>so the bonds in my body are strong enough to

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>hold me together. The same thing said for you know

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the reason why you're staying on Earth. You know, Earth

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is holding you down because if it's gravity, that's enough

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to overcome this expansion of space, and Earth is bound

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>gravitationally to the Sun for the same reason. The space

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>between us and the Sun is expanding, but the gravity

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the Sun holds us there. It's like if you were

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>sliding away from somebody on an ice sheet, but they

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>had a rope around you, and so they were keeping

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you at a fixed distance. Okay, so there are forces

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>within our bodies, holding our bodies together that are counteracting

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that expansive force. But I'm trying to imagine what exact

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:42.480
<v Speaker 1>form does that take. So does that mean that the say,

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the bonds between the molecules and our body holding them

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>together actually prevent the space from expanding there so it

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't expand, or does the space somehow kind of roll

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>out beyond us without affecting our you know, our bodies

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>as it does. So you can't stop the expansion of space,

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 1>but you can't and keep your constant distance. If those

0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:04.800
<v Speaker 1>bonds were deleted, then all the items would sort of

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>drift further and further apart, but instead you have these

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>bonds holding them together. And so it's more of that

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>the answers the latter, that space sort of rolls out

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.960
<v Speaker 1>past you. So space is emanating from us at all times. Yeah,

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like we're in a pool of space

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that's expanding larger and larger, and we're a smaller and

0:20:22.240 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>smaller dot inside of it. So as a result, you know,

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the universe is getting getting more and more dilute, like

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the matter energy density of the universe decreases with time

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's no more stuff being created, but there is

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>more space being created all the time. And so that's

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>really like the way to think about the whole expansion

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of the universe since the Big Bangs, that the universe

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't start out small. It started out dense. It was

0:20:46.560 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like compressed and hot and nasty and wet, and then

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the Big Bang is just this rapid dilution of space

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:56.440
<v Speaker 1>into something much more sparse, and then that's just continued.

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:58.919
<v Speaker 1>The universe has just gotten more and more cold and

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>dilute and spread out as new spaces being created and

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 1>these little chunks of matter desperately clinging to each other

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to avoid being totally isolated. And I think there's another

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>part of your question which I think is fascinating, is

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like at what scale does that take over? Like you

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>hold yourself together, Yeah, the Earth holds onto you, the

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Sun holds onto the Earth, the galaxy holds onto the

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Sun and all the stars, and dark energy is probably

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:26.239
<v Speaker 1>not going to rip apart our galaxy, and even the

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 1>neighboring galaxies like Andromeda is going to collide into us,

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>and the direct gravity these two galaxies are going to

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>smash them together, and the group of galaxies is mostly

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:40.960
<v Speaker 1>gravitationally bound, and that's the biggest sort of gravitationally bound thing.

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Beyond that, things are not tightly connected enough by gravity

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.159
<v Speaker 1>to resist dark energy. And that's so it's these groups

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of galaxies that are getting pushed apart and getting further

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and further away because there's nothing really to resist the

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>dark energy push. Okay, So the reason then that you

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>would normally see the expansion of the universe expressed in

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.159
<v Speaker 1>terms of like the separation of what galaxy clusters or

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>what it would be that that's where gravity is no

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>longer strong enough to hold back against it. And it's

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>not just the amount of distance, you know, causes the

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>uh causes all the expansion to add up there, That's right,

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:20.239
<v Speaker 1>It's it's both things. I mean, the the amount of

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>distance makes it more dramatic, and the distance makes gravity weaker.

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And so what you think which happens if you sort

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of project the universe forward billions or trillions of years,

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>is that these gravitationally bound clusters continue to contract and

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>hold themselves together, but they get more and more distant

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>from everything else. So the future is is islands of

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff separated by even more vast distances of space. It's interesting.

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So all of this talk about space as a substance

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and having all these properties that we can measure and

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not just as a you know, uh, the void or

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the distance between things is uh somehow on on one level,

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes a lot of these like sci fi

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>plots where you manipulate space itself with technology seem more plausible. Robert,

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you had some questions about this, maybe right, yeah, yeah,

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>this this got me thinking, you know about the expansion

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>explosive expansion. H Daniel, what do you make of the

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>notion that faster than light travel could essentially be achieved

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 1>by some manner of of work bubble manipulation moving the

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>space containing the ship rather than the ship through space alone. Oh,

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm ready to invest in your work drive company for sure. UM.

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>I read a lot of science fiction, and um, I

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>love these ideas. And there's a lot of bolognay and

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 1>science fiction where they just like slap quantum mechanics on

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a plot hole because they don't really know how to

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 1>think about it. But I give people a lot of

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>flexibility when it comes to space because we really don't

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:50.399
<v Speaker 1>know what he can do. And there's a lot of

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>opportunities there for new ideas. And the one that you

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>mentioned I think is is a great um idea and

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not just science fiction. I think it really could

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 1>be that we could develop a warp drive that that

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>gets us two distant stars. You know, there's one very

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 1>hard and fast rule about the universe, which is you

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>cannot move through space faster than the speed of light.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>But you've gotta be a bit of a lawyer about it, right,

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna be like, what on a second, you said

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>move through space? Right? That's fine, so you can't travel

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 1>through a light year of space in less than a year.

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But what if you didn't want to move through space? Right?

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>What if you squeeze space itself? Right? Or if you

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>stretch space? And that's the basis of these warp drive

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 1>ideas is to get around it by saying I don't

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>want to go all the way to Alpha Centauri. I

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>want to squeeze the distance between here and Alpha Centauri.

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Or I want to create this warp bubble which continuously

0:24:43.200 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>is like squeezing the space in front of me, so

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I can move really really fall What what what would

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>have been otherwise really far in a short amount of time,

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and and that way you can get somewhere which would

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>have taken light a long time to get there, but

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>it only takes you a few moments because you've effectively

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>shortened that distance. So I think that's totally plausible. Um,

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it's far, far beyond our abilities. You know,

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like this moment when physicists pass things

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>off to engineers, you know, like we're interested in is

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>it totally possible or totally impossible. Once we decide it's

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>probably possible, then it's a practical question of like how

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>do you focus that much energy in order to accomplish that?

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 1>How do you actually build something which does this? And

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole separate question. And you know, there are

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>even other crazier ideas for how to get far through

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>space which take advantage of this this new sort of

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.479
<v Speaker 1>modern conception of space, and that's like, don't even go

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 1>through any space at all. General relativity tells us that

0:25:44.400 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you can be creative about assigning the distances between bits

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of space. Right, it doesn't have to be you lay

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>out a grid and everything that's next to each other

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>has equal distances. Right, mass can change the relationship of

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>points in space. And it's more than just like taking

0:25:59.520 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a she and stretching it and squeezing it to make

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>gentle differences. You can have crazy rear arrangements. You can

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>connect bits of space which are not adjacent to each other.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we call a wormhole, is a connection

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:15.959
<v Speaker 1>between bits of space which you know, have no reason

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>otherwise to be next to each other. But it's like,

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm here in Orange County, you're in Atlanta. What if

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we just somehow said Orange County is next to Atlanta,

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we just rearrange the connections. That's what

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:34.399
<v Speaker 1>a wormhole does. And shockingly, crazily, mind bogglingly that's not

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>against the rules. Yeah, this makes me think of the

0:26:37.359 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>examples we saw in the Hyperion novels where you had, uh,

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, essentially warp gates that were allowing a river

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in one world to flow into a river in the

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 1>other world, which, you know, if it feels completely fantastic,

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but what what you're saying, if you lawyer up appropriately,

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not completely out of the realm of possibility. Yeah,

0:26:57.880 --> 0:26:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not out of the realm of possibility at all.

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's the kind of thing which might never be practical.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>They might be that we're never able to build something

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>which allows you to have a house where your bathroom

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>is in one planet, in your living room is another.

0:27:11.160 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I love that book, Um, But also might be totally possible,

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and it might be seem impossible, and then somebody has

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a breakthrough, like, oh, it turns out it's a lot

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>easier than we thought. And it used to cost um

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the entire energy output of the human race for a

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>year just to transmit a particle through a wormhole. Now

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>we can do it for or five cents, you know,

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and then the next year that's an app for it, right,

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and sort of the progression of technology, And you know,

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the way a wormhole would work is conceptually quite tricky. Still.

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>You need to create a black hole, you need to

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 1>open this wormhole up, you need to keep it open.

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It might require the creation of exotic matter and all

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff, but it's tactically not impossible. And that's

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>that's excite to me, um, mostly because I'd love to

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>visit these other star systems and walk on another planet,

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>or at least have humans walk on other planets and

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>tell us about it, you know, um, it feels frustrated

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to be stuck in this tiny little island of our

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 1>universe and not able to explore the neighborhood. And so

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:14.880
<v Speaker 1>if warp drives and wormholes could be built, then I'm

0:28:14.920 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 1>all for it. So yeah, I'd love to invest in

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 1>your company. So to come back to another question about

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.879
<v Speaker 1>the properties of space, I was thinking about, um, So

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:29.679
<v Speaker 1>we think of space as a kind of undifferentiated, uncountable

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>mass of potentially occupied territory, kind of the way you

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>use the analogy of water earlier, the way we think

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>about water. But of course in the modern world we

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:42.239
<v Speaker 1>know that water is not actually continuous and uncountable. It's

0:28:42.240 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a made up of h two molecules. In theory, you

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 1>could separate them out and count them. Is there any

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence that space works like that? Are their smallest indivisible

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>units of space that could be counted? And does anybody

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have any ideas for how to look into this question? Yeah,

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a wonderful question. The short answer is that we

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>think space should be pixelated, and we think that there

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:08.760
<v Speaker 1>should be a smallest meaningful unit of space. But the

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>arguments are kind of fuzzy, and it goes something like this,

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we look around in the universe and we

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>see that everything at the smallest scale is quantized. Like

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you can have one electron, you can have two electrons.

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>You can't have one point six one electrons. Electrons in

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>bound states have energy levels. You can be an energy

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>level one or two. You can't be at one point

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to one. Right, the universe seems to be quantized everything,

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:38.520
<v Speaker 1>excitations of quantum fields. Everything comes down to numbers, integers,

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not real numbers, but integers. And so we imagine that

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:45.960
<v Speaker 1>as we zoom in on space smaller and smaller and smaller,

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that we should similarly see the smallest bit of space.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>It would sort of be counter a lot of what

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we imagine to be foundational to quantum mechanics if it

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>wasn't right, if you could always zoom into a smaller space.

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And so there's this idea that space could be made

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>out of these basic units, these pixels. And you can

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>think of it either it's like space being pixels or

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>space being sort of made out of this foam um.

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that's not a very strong argument, but

0:30:17.000 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's consistent. You know, you find these general principles

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>who say, hey, the universe seems to work this way,

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and so it should work this way in all categories.

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It should every part of it should follow these rules.

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Are there any ideas for types of experiments that could

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 1>test for this right now? Where is? That's just totally

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>beyond our even guests of how to how to look

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for right now? Well, it's hard to know because we

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know how big these pixels should be. Right we

0:30:42.120 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>let's think about scales for example, like we can look

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at really small things using particle colliders. For example, with

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>a large hadron collider at certain we can zoom in

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and see things that are about ten to the minus

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty meters. That's pretty small, um. But if we had

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to make a guess for how small these space pixels

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>would be, we don't really have a lot of good

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>reasons to guess. And what we do is we just

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of take all the numbers we have and we

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>rearrange them until they give us something that have units

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of a meter. We're like, okay, take the speed of light.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:18.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's meters per second multiplied by planks constant. Alright,

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that has energy units. So keep throwing in fundamental constant

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to the universe until you get something that has units

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of meters, and you can do it, and you get

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a number, and that number is about ten to the

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>minus thirty five meters, and it's called the plank length.

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>And it sounds like a really deep insight. I mean,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it's really nothing more clever than dimensional analysis. It's just saying,

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>how can I get a unit of meter? Doesn't mean

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that that's the fundamental scale of the universe, doesn't mean

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that space pixels are that size, but it's the only

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>thing we can do. And often in science we start

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>with like, let's start with the dumbest idea because that's

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>all we can do, and then let's get more sophisticated.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So if that's the case, and if space pixels are

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.800
<v Speaker 1>ten to the minus thirty five meters, that's really far

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>from what we can see today, right, that's fifteen orders

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude from what we can see. That's like, if

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you can see whole solar systems, then one over one,

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>one over ten of the fifteen would be like seeing

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a meter stick. So it's like saying I can barely

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>detect solar systems and other galaxies. Okay, well, can you

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 1>see a meter stick on the surface of a planet?

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>In another galaxy. No, I mean we're not even close.

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So we're trillions of scale factors away from being able

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to see these things in particle collisions. Um. But there's

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a whole area of research that's built up the other directions.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's start from the bottom instead of starting from the

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>top and like breaking up protons and electrons into smaller

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bits all the way down to the plank scale, Let's

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>start from the bottom. Imagine that it's true. Can we

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of build up and come up with the theory

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of physics and then make a prediction? Right? And that's

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>this this group of of theories called loop quantum gravity,

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's really fascinating stuff, and it's you know, they've

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:05.959
<v Speaker 1>instead of trying to bring general relativity together with quantum

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>field theory by saying, oh, let's turn gravity into a

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>quantum field theory, they go the other direction. They say,

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:16.520
<v Speaker 1>let's take space and make it into quantized units. Let's

0:33:16.600 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>chop it up in the little bits and imagine that

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the quantized. So then as space is expanding, you're like

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>popping off new little bits of space, which is sort

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of conceptually hard to imagine. But your question really was like,

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.360
<v Speaker 1>have we figured that out, could we possibly see it?

0:33:31.880 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And so far that the whole field is sort of

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>in its infancy. You know, it's decades old. They only

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>realized if you know, fifty years ago, was even possible,

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and how to do basic calculations and how to just

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>get simple stuff right. Um, But the short answer is,

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and we could answer all these questions, we could resolve

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>all these mysteries if we could see inside a black hole.

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't happen to have a black hole, dude, Uh,

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of impossable, right, Like you're not you're not

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>getting information out of a black hole? Is that correct?

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. And that's the frustrating thing is that

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like gravity is very very weak, it's a very weak force.

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>It takes a lot for gravity to do anything very powerful.

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But inside a black hole you have in tremendous gravity,

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>so much gravity that it could reveal things like you know,

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the creation of new bits of space or the distortion

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of space, or it could show us like what's, um,

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:28.479
<v Speaker 1>what's the matter distribution like inside a black hole? Because

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>general relativity says that there's a singularity, that there's all

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this mass concentrated in a single dot zero volume but

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.680
<v Speaker 1>if space is pixelated, if loop quantum gravity is right,

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>then you can't have a tiny infinitesimal dot. You have

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.399
<v Speaker 1>need to have a basic unit of space. So if

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.399
<v Speaker 1>we could see what was going on inside a black hole,

0:34:47.440 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we could see what happens when gravity tries to compress

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>things down to these tiny units of space. But you're right,

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>all the secret to the universe exists inside black holes,

0:34:56.880 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 1>but they are unobservable. Will never get that information and out,

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>which is so frustrating. It's like if you know, the

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>oracle says, here are all the answers, and I'm gonna

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>put them in a box, which if you try to

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>open it destroys all the answers. It's like some cruel

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Greek fable or something. You know. Also a really safe

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.560
<v Speaker 1>place to hide the secrets of the universe, right, that's right,

0:35:15.600 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and all your passwords. I keep all my passwords in

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a black hole. Just think. So the short answer is

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not anywhere close to discovering the basic pixels of space.

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you pulled physicists in them would

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>say that space is probably pixelated. So I'm sorry if

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I if you already alluded to this and I missed it,

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But um, so would you say looking for pixelated space

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the smallest units of space is something that could potentially

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be done by experimental methods available to us if we had,

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the ultimate particle collider or energy levels you

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>know you couldn't that are nowhere near what we have today?

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Or is it just like not within reach of any

0:35:55.920 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>reasonable experimental paradigm that we know about. That's a great question, um.

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And one of the amazing things about particle colliders is

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that there really is no limit to what they can do.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It's really just a money question. Like the more money

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you give us, the bigger the particle collider we can build,

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the faster we can shoot those particles around. And speed

0:36:17.480 --> 0:36:20.239
<v Speaker 1>is sort of inverse two distance, right, The faster your

0:36:20.280 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>particles are going, the smaller the distance they can probe.

0:36:24.040 --> 0:36:26.719
<v Speaker 1>And so there's really no limit. If we built a

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Milky Way size particle collider, then yes, we could answer

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>these questions, and uh, you know, we could find space

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>pixels and we could you know, see quantum effects at

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this level. Um, but you know that would cost us.

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if there's a number for the

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>amount of money. If so, be bigger than this recent

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>stimulus by a lot. So you're saying it would not

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be like, you know, something five to ten times bigger

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>than the large had round collider. It would need to

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 1>be like galaxy sized or something. Yeah, it have to

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:59.160
<v Speaker 1>be like ten to the fifteen times larger than the

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.839
<v Speaker 1>larger run colider. And that would be like I don't

0:37:01.880 --> 0:37:03.439
<v Speaker 1>even know what the acronym would be like, you can't

0:37:03.480 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>just call it a large hage junk collider. You need

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like a very very very very very large hit junk

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>lider V to the fifteen LHC or something. Nobody's even

0:37:12.600 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>asking for that money. But yeah, there's no limit to

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to sort of how small we can peer down if

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we have really powerful colliders and we know the technology right, like, um,

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:26.240
<v Speaker 1>we just add more little boosters to make the particles

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.120
<v Speaker 1>go faster. Um. But you know, we also are working

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on other kinds of technologies to make these colliders more

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>powerful without having to make them ridiculously big and expensive,

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>because currently we're limited by sort of how fast we

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>can make these particles move because it takes this these

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:45.720
<v Speaker 1>little units to give them a kick and then magnets

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to bend them. But if we can make those accelerators,

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>the little units of accelerators, better and faster and more

0:37:51.800 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>compact than we could build like tabletop accelerators. There are

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>people here you see Irvine, working on these plasma wakefield

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>devices to try to get particles accelerated to really high

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>energies and very short distances um and then it might

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be possible to you know, peel back a layer of

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>reality and see what's going on underneath the without spending

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>ten of the fifteen trillion dollars. So we've been looking

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot at the very smallest properties of space. I say,

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.279
<v Speaker 1>we zoom out to the biggest possible, uh way of

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at space and talk about the shape of the

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>universe we live in as a whole. Um. So, yeah,

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 1>so you've I was reading an article that you and

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Jorge wrote about this. Uh could you talk a little

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:36.239
<v Speaker 1>bit about the shape of the universe. Yeah, the shape

0:38:36.280 --> 0:38:38.879
<v Speaker 1>of the universe is a wonderful question. It's it's sort

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of hard to imagine because I think people again think

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>about the shape of the universe, they think about like

0:38:43.400 --> 0:38:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a big blob, and then when like, what is the

0:38:45.520 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 1>shape of that blob? Is it, you know, look like

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a pile of dog poop or like a bagel, or

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>like a doughnut or whatever. But when we talk about

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the shape of the universe again, we're talking about something intrinsic, right,

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about how do the pieces of the universe

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.640
<v Speaker 1>relate to each other? Because we don't imagine that the

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.480
<v Speaker 1>universe is like sitting in some larger space. We're not

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.720
<v Speaker 1>asking like, if you were outside the universe and looking

0:39:07.760 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 1>at it, which shape would it have. We're really talking

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about how does the universe curve? You know, like when

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you put mass in a solar system, it bends space

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:21.080
<v Speaker 1>so that planets move in according to these geodesics, which

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>happen to be orbits. So we're really talking about the

0:39:23.480 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>large scale like bending of the universe. And you know,

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>as you put stuff in the universe, planets, stars, whatever,

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the universe bends in such a way so that it

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>would tend to collapse, right, tend things We tend to

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of roll towards each other, moved towards each other,

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:44.319
<v Speaker 1>so that gets space one curvature. But what we've done

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 1>is we've we've gone out, we've measured the curvature of space.

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:50.800
<v Speaker 1>We've we've asked like how much stuff is there in space?

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>And how do these things balance each other? Because it

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 1>turns out there's a there's one way to bend the universe,

0:39:57.280 --> 0:39:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's by having mass, and there are other ways

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.239
<v Speaker 1>to bend the universe the other direction. These things called

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>dark energy, which are contributing to the expansion of space,

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>actually has the opposite effect on this curvature. Some mass

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>bends it one way, dark energy bends it the other way,

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and together the two things give you perfectly flat space.

0:40:15.840 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>So these two titanic forces which are balancing each other

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and giving you space which is completely flat, meaning that

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>on average there is no curvature to the universe. That

0:40:26.560 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know that things should move in straight lines.

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>So I've read the curvature of the universe described alternately

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>as flat and as almost flat. Could you help me

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 1>sort sort out the difference? There is one of those

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>just wrong or or what's going on? Well, it's a measurement, right,

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're measuring the curvature of the universe. And roughly

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>how we do is we add up all these pieces

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and we ask, you know, what do they come out to?

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>But they all have uncertainties, you know, we don't know

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>precisely how much stuff there is in the universe. We

0:40:55.960 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly how strong dark energy is. And we

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>get better and better measurements every year, and those measurements

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are consistent with totally flat, right with adding up to

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:10.560
<v Speaker 1>being exactly flat. But there's uncertainty there, and some measurements

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:14.120
<v Speaker 1>suggest a tiny deviation from flat, and some measurements are

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>consistent with flat and other things, and so there's some

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>wiggle room there. And and we're trying to measure in

0:41:19.760 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>lots of different ways because we don't just trust one

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>experiment or one experiment or and so we try to

0:41:25.440 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>probe these things from different directions and sometimes they slightly disagree,

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:32.359
<v Speaker 1>so there can be some sort of momentary controversy there.

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think the larger question is like,

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:37.800
<v Speaker 1>why are we flat at all? You know, it seems

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:41.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of weird once you discover the space can be curved,

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>to discover that our universe just sort of happens to

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>be flat. So you say just sort of happens to

0:41:46.760 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>be flat. That indicate that you think the flatness of

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the universe, in your expert opinion, is basically a coincidence,

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>or do you think that that it's not a coincidence

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's a downstream effect of some thing we don't

0:42:00.719 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 1>understand or some other variable. It depends right like um,

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>before we had this theory for how the universe began,

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it seemed really weird to have a flat universe. Seemed

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>really strange for space to be so smooth and to

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:17.720
<v Speaker 1>not have curvature, because as you put stuff in the universe,

0:42:17.840 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>it should sort of gather together, right, that's gravity, and

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>it should make it more and more curt and so

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's weird to start with the universe that's pretty

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 1>flat and then end up with the universe it's pretty flat,

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Like it doesn't seem stable. It seems like if you

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>have any deviation from flatness, that deviation would build on

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 1>itself and build on itself and build on itself, and

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>eventually you'd be pretty far from flat. So then our

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>universe is pretty old. It's fourteen billion years old. This

0:42:43.160 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>has been going on for a long time. Why are

0:42:45.760 --> 0:42:48.319
<v Speaker 1>we still flat? And so for a long time that

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 1>was that seemed like a coincidence, like either we were

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 1>so closed to flat in the first few seconds that

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we've hardly deviated it all, Like we're like balanced on

0:42:58.160 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the knife's edge and we're still balanced fourteen billion years later,

0:43:01.840 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which seems unlikely, or there's some reason for it. And

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the explanation that we've come up with recently is this

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:13.760
<v Speaker 1>idea of inflation, that the universe was stretched super quickly

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:16.799
<v Speaker 1>in the first few moments of the universe that made

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it essentially hyper hyper flat. It's like if you're standing

0:43:20.400 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>on a tennis ball. You look around, and you can

0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 1>tell that the universe is a little bit curve, right,

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>because the tennis ball is a lot of curvature to it.

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But if the tennis ball suddenly gets inflated to the

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:31.959
<v Speaker 1>size of a planet where you look around, you can't

0:43:31.960 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>tell that the Earth is not flat, right, it seems

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to be flat. And so that's what happened, we think

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in the first few moments of the universe. That explains

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>how the universe got so flat in the beginning. So

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.600
<v Speaker 1>if if this is what it is like in a

0:43:46.680 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>flat universe, I mean, is there any way to to

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>even discuss like what it would be like within a

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>round universe or a square universe or anything other than

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a flat or almost flat universe. Yeah, Well, it has

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:03.880
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating applications for like the possible sizes of the universe. Right,

0:44:03.920 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 1>if the universe is flat, then it can go on forever. Right,

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you can just keep going forever because it can be

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:12.960
<v Speaker 1>flat like an infinite sheet. Right, But in three dimensions,

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>if the universe is curved, like if the universe is

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the surface of a sphere right in some higher dimensional space,

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 1>then it it might not be infinite. Right. It might

0:44:23.400 --> 0:44:26.120
<v Speaker 1>be that you move and you keep curving and eventually

0:44:26.120 --> 0:44:28.239
<v Speaker 1>you come back to where you were, and so it

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.719
<v Speaker 1>could be infinite, but not necessarily have any edges, right

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>because like on the surface of the sphere or on

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the surface of the Earth, you walk for long enough,

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you come back to where you started. You don't like

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 1>run into the edge of the Earth. So the shape,

0:44:40.920 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 1>this curvature of the universe has a lot of consequences

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>for the potential size of the universe, And so if

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it was curved, it wouldn't necessarily be infinite. Um, if

0:44:50.600 --> 0:44:53.759
<v Speaker 1>it's flat, that suggests it could be infinite, but it

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:58.280
<v Speaker 1>also might not be. Right, there's ways to connect the universe.

0:44:58.440 --> 0:45:01.000
<v Speaker 1>It can be flat but also still be like weirdly

0:45:01.080 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>connected like an asteroids game, so that you come off

0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:06.480
<v Speaker 1>one side and you end up on the other side.

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Because remember space can have these complicated, non trivial connections

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>between parts of it. The whole edge of the universe

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>could be basically a set of wormholes that bring you

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 1>back to the other side. All Right, we're gonna take

0:45:17.400 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 1>one more break, but we'll be right back. All right,

0:45:22.840 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>we're back. So I've got a question about the Big Bang. Then,

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the the expansion of the universe, we

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>often hear, of course, the Big Bang was that the

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>universe was once in this hot, dense state, and then

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.399
<v Speaker 1>there's this expansion. You you think, when you go through

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.799
<v Speaker 1>this period of inflation, that seems to be the consensus

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>now and then we we keep expanding and cooling. But

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>what form does that expansion take with respect to space?

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that the universe or the contents of

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the universe expanded into pre existing space, or that space

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:58.799
<v Speaker 1>itself expanded, space itself expanded. The way I think about

0:45:58.800 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not like a small blob of stuff that then

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 1>blew up and moved through space, but instead an infinite

0:46:05.560 --> 0:46:09.279
<v Speaker 1>universe created with infinite stuff in it. And then the

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Big Bang happened simultaneously everywhere, all at once, meaning that

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:17.360
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff just got diluted, like new space was

0:46:17.440 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>being created everywhere. Space was expanding, and it's not like

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it was stretching stuff into what was previously empty space.

0:46:25.000 --> 0:46:28.320
<v Speaker 1>It was just creating new space everywhere between all the bits.

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>So what used to be hot and dense and intense

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is now more dilute. And so I think one of

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest misconceptions that the Big Bang started off like

0:46:38.200 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe the size of an atom, and then

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just a big explosion where stuff moves through space.

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:46.279
<v Speaker 1>But instead, I think it's much more natural to think

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:50.720
<v Speaker 1>about the universe be created um infinite amount of stuff

0:46:50.719 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>created all at once, and then diluted and then expanded.

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's like requires you to imagine an infinite creation

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of stuff and then an infinite big bang on top

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of it, which is sort of mind blowing and also

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:06.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of more natural. I really like that explanation because

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>I feel like it places uh sit places that the

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the individual thinker within the model, instead of placing us

0:47:14.000 --> 0:47:17.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to place us with outside of the model, which

0:47:17.520 --> 0:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>which excuse this UH, this attempt to understand like what

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:24.360
<v Speaker 1>space is, you know, and then you don't have to

0:47:24.400 --> 0:47:26.640
<v Speaker 1>ask questions like, well, where was the Big Bang? Was

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it over there and over there? And we're close to

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the center, and when we look around us, we see

0:47:31.040 --> 0:47:34.319
<v Speaker 1>everything is moving away from us, and there's no directionality

0:47:34.360 --> 0:47:36.239
<v Speaker 1>to it, like things over here moving away from us,

0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:38.600
<v Speaker 1>things over there moving away from us. And that's true

0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:42.080
<v Speaker 1>everywhere in the universe, which means that there is no center.

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no place from which this explosion happened. It happened

0:47:45.880 --> 0:47:49.399
<v Speaker 1>everywhere all at once, and that's what differentiates sort of

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:52.720
<v Speaker 1>things moving through space from the expansion of space itself.

0:47:53.800 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 1>This makes me wonder if, kind of like the idea

0:47:56.120 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 1>of bending in general relativity, if we're suffering from the

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>connotation ends of the word we happen to use. The

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:07.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of expanding usually indicates like the pushing of boundaries

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>into areas that were previously out of bounds, Like if

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you expand a map, you know you're pushing the edges out,

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't really make sense in this case. We're

0:48:16.080 --> 0:48:18.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about the expansion of space, So it would almost

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>make more sense to think about the Big Bang maybe

0:48:20.239 --> 0:48:24.799
<v Speaker 1>as a um a population of or I don't know,

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a population of space expanding and infilling of space. Yeah.

0:48:29.239 --> 0:48:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I think of it like a take an infinite ruler,

0:48:31.960 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>right and mark off two dots, and then somebody stretches it. Right. Well,

0:48:35.719 --> 0:48:39.319
<v Speaker 1>it was infinite before, it's infinite now. But there's more

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:42.920
<v Speaker 1>of it, right, And so space is really this like

0:48:43.200 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's more of a stretching, you know, than

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 1>an expansion. It's not an explosion. It's more of like

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.759
<v Speaker 1>a Yeah, it's like a stretching. There has to be

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.439
<v Speaker 1>a social distancing metaphor, and all of us I keep,

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I keep kind of grasping for it. Well, I'm certainly

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:01.839
<v Speaker 1>expanding inside my pants on a notice that they're all there.

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 1>They're all denser these days, and then before this quarantine.

0:49:06.280 --> 0:49:08.359
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's something that's hard to grapple with,

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is this creation of an infinite universe or an infinite

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of space. And people write us questions in our

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast all the time, and one of the most common

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>questions is what is the universe expanding into? Right? And

0:49:21.680 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that comes from this conception of the Big

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Bang as a small dot which is then exploding, right,

0:49:28.800 --> 0:49:31.400
<v Speaker 1>or even if you imagine space as a chunk of

0:49:31.440 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff and you understand the space itself is expanding, you

0:49:35.120 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>wonder what is it expanding into? And I think that's

0:49:38.200 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 1>this desperation to sort of place the universe in a

0:49:41.920 --> 0:49:45.840
<v Speaker 1>context is to say, alright, we started off by drawing

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:48.600
<v Speaker 1>access lines and describing all the stuff happening in universe

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in this sort of construct we imagine called space, which

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:54.440
<v Speaker 1>was maybe philosophical or just a thought idea, and then

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:56.760
<v Speaker 1>it turns out it's real. Well, we'd like to place

0:49:56.800 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>then that space in some sort of super space or

0:50:00.280 --> 0:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>meta space. So sort of grapple with it. It's difficult

0:50:03.760 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>even for me or for cosmologists, I think, to still,

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, grapple with this concept of space not being

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>in anything else, not necessarily sitting in a superspace or

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a meta space on which you can define these axes.

0:50:15.840 --> 0:50:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It just sort of is inherent. So I'm sure you've

0:50:18.880 --> 0:50:21.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten this question before, but I think it always helps

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to to try as best we can to imagine it

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on our own level. So imagine you have a space ship,

0:50:27.080 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that can go faster than the light, as

0:50:29.200 --> 0:50:31.360
<v Speaker 1>fast as you possibly wanted to go, there's no limit

0:50:31.400 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to it, and you just travel in the same direction

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 1>forever but what do you imagine happens then, Well, I

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>think you would really never get anywhere. I mean, you

0:50:40.800 --> 0:50:43.880
<v Speaker 1>leave the galaxy, and then you leave the local group

0:50:43.880 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of galaxies, and then you're flying off towards another group

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of galaxies. But that group of galaxies is moving away

0:50:50.080 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>from us faster than the speed of light. Right now.

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:56.320
<v Speaker 1>It's not again physics lawyer talk, it's not moving through

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.480
<v Speaker 1>space fasten the speed of light. New space is being

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>created between us and those galaxies faster than we could

0:51:03.080 --> 0:51:05.480
<v Speaker 1>move to it, faster than even a photon could fly

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>through it. So those galaxies, if you just sat here

0:51:08.160 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>on Earth, those galaxies are disappearing from our view. Eventually,

0:51:12.800 --> 0:51:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the photons being created by them will no longer get

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:19.239
<v Speaker 1>to us. It's like if Lussin Bolt was running at you,

0:51:19.520 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>but somebody was laying track in front of him faster

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>than he was running. It doesn't matter how fast he is,

0:51:24.120 --> 0:51:26.520
<v Speaker 1>right if they're laying track faster, he's never going to

0:51:26.640 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 1>beat them. So, in that same way, those photons will

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>never get to us, and we will never get to

0:51:31.640 --> 0:51:36.000
<v Speaker 1>those galaxies, which means that the night sky is getting

0:51:36.080 --> 0:51:39.279
<v Speaker 1>darker and darker. Right things are literally falling off the

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:44.040
<v Speaker 1>edge of the observable universe, and things are disappearing from

0:51:44.040 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>our view. You know, in fifty billion years or a

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion years, it may be that there are no

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:56.319
<v Speaker 1>galaxies visible in the sky. Imagine human civilization survives that long,

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:58.880
<v Speaker 1>or maybe we have some apocalypse when we rebuild and

0:51:58.920 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>we start building human edge again, then there is no

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:04.399
<v Speaker 1>Edwin Hubble moment when you look out in the sky

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and discover distant galaxies and realize, oh, we're not alone

0:52:07.520 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>in the universe is expanding. They would never know that.

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:12.200
<v Speaker 1>There would be no way for them to learn that,

0:52:12.719 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and that to me is so tantalizing and frustrating to

0:52:16.080 --> 0:52:18.800
<v Speaker 1>know that that knowledge could be hidden, because I project

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the other way. I'm like, all right, well, we're fourteen

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>billion years into the universe. What has already disappeared from

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the night sky which we will never recover? What clues,

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:32.600
<v Speaker 1>what incredible context are we missing about the night sky

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:35.879
<v Speaker 1>that you know, astronomers thirteen billion years ago would laugh

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:38.400
<v Speaker 1>at us for not understanding. We don't know, and we

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:42.960
<v Speaker 1>probably never will, and that drives me crazy. So this

0:52:43.000 --> 0:52:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is our shot. We don't have time to re evolve

0:52:45.040 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 1>from bacteria and do it again. That's right, that's right.

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>If we haven't missed our shot already, we should scrape

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the barrel and understand what's going on

0:52:53.080 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 1>out there in the universe. You know, we wrote a

0:52:55.719 --> 0:52:57.879
<v Speaker 1>whole book about it's called We Have No Idea, And

0:52:58.280 --> 0:53:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the point of that book is that we don't even

0:53:00.440 --> 0:53:03.480
<v Speaker 1>really know what the denominator is on our ignorance, Like

0:53:03.600 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 1>what fraction of the universe do we have understood? You know,

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:09.200
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that we only in the last thirty

0:53:09.280 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 1>years figured out that space is a thing and it's

0:53:12.160 --> 0:53:15.279
<v Speaker 1>expanding and could do all these weird stuff, and the

0:53:15.400 --> 0:53:18.000
<v Speaker 1>universe is growing and growing, that so many of our

0:53:18.040 --> 0:53:21.160
<v Speaker 1>basic questions about the universe have different answers than we imagined,

0:53:21.280 --> 0:53:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And we're discovering new basic questions like what is space?

0:53:24.480 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 1>What is time? How many dimensions are there to space,

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:29.360
<v Speaker 1>which we didn't even get into. Um. It tells me

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lot of stuff that we don't even

0:53:31.000 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>know to ask yet. And I would just hope we

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:35.239
<v Speaker 1>figure out where the questions are before we run out

0:53:35.239 --> 0:53:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of time to answer them. So I've got a question

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:39.959
<v Speaker 1>going in another direction. This might not make any sense,

0:53:40.040 --> 0:53:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Feel free to decline it if it doesn't. But I

0:53:42.560 --> 0:53:45.719
<v Speaker 1>was wondering, does it make sense to think that the

0:53:45.760 --> 0:53:51.279
<v Speaker 1>fundamental properties of physics are actually properties of space, you know,

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:54.359
<v Speaker 1>or of local space as we know it. I'm thinking about,

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, you know, I don't know relative strength of

0:53:56.520 --> 0:53:59.320
<v Speaker 1>fundamental forces or the mass of the proton or something.

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Does the nature of space have anything to do with

0:54:02.560 --> 0:54:05.719
<v Speaker 1>these constants or the laws of physics? And are they

0:54:05.719 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 1>in some way contingent upon what kind of space we

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:11.840
<v Speaker 1>live in? Oh? My god. Absolutely, that's not a crazy idea.

0:54:11.920 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is a crazy idea, but it's also real,

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Like the universe is a crazy idea. So um, A

0:54:18.239 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of the things that we consider to be fundamental

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:24.480
<v Speaker 1>about the universe are actually just properties of space and

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that space around here at least seems to behave.

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 1>For example, we know that particles. The reason particles have mass,

0:54:32.719 --> 0:54:36.160
<v Speaker 1>tiny little particles like electrons have mass, it's not because

0:54:36.160 --> 0:54:38.319
<v Speaker 1>they have a little stuff to them. It's because they

0:54:38.360 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>interact with this new field we discovered, the Higgs field,

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's in interacting with those fields that they get inertia.

0:54:44.239 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>The reason a little electron when you push it it

0:54:47.280 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>um takes some force to get it to move, is

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:51.800
<v Speaker 1>because it has some inertition. The inertia comes from the

0:54:51.880 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Higgs field. But where does the Higgs field come from? Well,

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the Higgs fields we talked about before is one of

0:54:58.120 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>these quantum fields. It's part of space, and it's got

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:04.440
<v Speaker 1>some tension built into it. Like when the universe cooled

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 1>in the very first few moments, there's a lot of

0:55:06.800 --> 0:55:09.399
<v Speaker 1>energy in the universe sort of cooled down, cooled down,

0:55:09.520 --> 0:55:11.719
<v Speaker 1>But the Higgs field got stuck. It didn't go all

0:55:11.760 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the way down to zero, got like stuck on a

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 1>little shelf, and it's very happy there for now. But

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:20.439
<v Speaker 1>if the Higgs field got kicked off that shelf and

0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>relaxed down to a lower level, then the electron would

0:55:23.800 --> 0:55:27.120
<v Speaker 1>have less mass or zero mass, the proton, the corks

0:55:27.160 --> 0:55:29.840
<v Speaker 1>would have less mass or zero mass. All the fundamental

0:55:29.880 --> 0:55:33.240
<v Speaker 1>particles could have different masses, and that includes the force

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:36.239
<v Speaker 1>carrying particles like the W and the z boson, which

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:39.160
<v Speaker 1>affect the strength of the forces. So like the reason

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the weak force is so weak is because the W

0:55:42.239 --> 0:55:45.080
<v Speaker 1>N Z boson that carry it are so heavy. Because

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the Higgs field is stuck where it is, so everything

0:55:48.600 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 1>is hanging on the Higgs field, being stuck on this shelf,

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and if it gets down to a different shelf or

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 1>falls off completely, space is totally different. I mean, it

0:55:57.200 --> 0:56:00.080
<v Speaker 1>still follows laws of physics, but the laws of is

0:56:00.120 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 1>if we've discovered a sort of emergent properties of all

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:07.000
<v Speaker 1>these assumptions, and if both changed, everything would be different

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and space would be almost unrecognizable. So yeah, crazy, but

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 1>also true, and it's possible that that could happen. You know,

0:56:13.840 --> 0:56:16.800
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what it takes to trigger the Higgs

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 1>field to sort of collapse to what we call its

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>true vacuum. Some people worry that, for example, collisions of

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:25.799
<v Speaker 1>particles that high energies lack are being done by some

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:30.840
<v Speaker 1>people in Switzerland, you know, not now actually during this pandemic.

0:56:31.080 --> 0:56:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But those kind of situations could create um vacuum bubbles

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Higgs field, and those vacuum bubbles would expand

0:56:38.600 --> 0:56:41.120
<v Speaker 1>at the speed of light and pass through all space,

0:56:41.600 --> 0:56:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and so we could end up collapsing the Higgs vacuum

0:56:44.200 --> 0:56:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and changing the way space works, and you would still

0:56:47.160 --> 0:56:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have physics. You would just have very very different physics

0:56:50.239 --> 0:56:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that we would you know, we wouldn't be around to

0:56:52.800 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 1>explore it. But somebody would have a lot of fun

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>figuring out what the rules of that space are. I

0:56:58.280 --> 0:57:00.719
<v Speaker 1>think there's there's another fascinating as it's of space, which

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is sort of hard to grapple with. Which is so

0:57:03.160 --> 0:57:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between space and stuff, Like we think about

0:57:07.120 --> 0:57:10.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff as in space. It's like moving through space. Spaces

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:12.879
<v Speaker 1>like there for you to be in, like the way

0:57:12.880 --> 0:57:15.759
<v Speaker 1>a car is on a road. Right, But if you

0:57:16.040 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 1>are serious about space having quantum fields in it, and

0:57:19.840 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 1>all particles are just excitations of those quantum fields, then

0:57:24.040 --> 0:57:27.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff is really just a property of space, right, Like

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>if space is just like a big quantum field, then

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you imagine your road is like a bigger

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:35.960
<v Speaker 1>rubber band, and a car on the road is like, okay,

0:57:36.040 --> 0:57:38.960
<v Speaker 1>this part of the rubber band is bouncing, has it's excited,

0:57:39.600 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and then as the car moves down the road, it's

0:57:41.800 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>not like you move that car. Instead, that energy gets

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:48.400
<v Speaker 1>transported to a new part of space, which then has

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the bounces. So it's like every time you move from

0:57:51.520 --> 0:57:54.360
<v Speaker 1>one piece of space to another, it's like star Trek teleporter.

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not actually the same particles, right, It's like the

0:57:58.240 --> 0:58:02.360
<v Speaker 1>information is being transmitted, so you can excite that new

0:58:02.360 --> 0:58:04.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of space in the same way. But is it

0:58:04.920 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 1>at least still you you know, it's all ship of

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:11.080
<v Speaker 1>theses stuff. And so when I slide from over here

0:58:11.120 --> 0:58:14.160
<v Speaker 1>over here with the space isn't changing. It's just like

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 1>different parts of space are getting excited and so, and

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the way. We are all sort of part of space.

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>We're not in it, we are part of it. This

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:26.920
<v Speaker 1>almost seems like a sort of deeper reformulation of the

0:58:26.960 --> 0:58:29.240
<v Speaker 1>ether idea, right, like that they used to think that

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 1>there needed to be a uh, substance in space that

0:58:33.520 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic radiation would propagate through, and then that was considered obsolete.

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:41.680
<v Speaker 1>But maybe is space itself in a way that substance

0:58:41.720 --> 0:58:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that everything propagates through. Yeah, yeah, I mean that we're

0:58:45.120 --> 0:58:47.320
<v Speaker 1>discovering all sorts of new forms of ether, like dark

0:58:47.440 --> 0:58:50.360
<v Speaker 1>energy and a cosmological constant in the Higgs field, and

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like there are these things that that fill the universe

0:58:54.360 --> 0:58:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with stuff with with something with some physical dynamical object

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and so, right, it used to be ridiculous to imagine

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that space was filled with something, and now it turns

0:59:04.560 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>out space is everything, right cool, um, it is it

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:14.760
<v Speaker 1>is very cool. Alright. So we talked about several other

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:18.200
<v Speaker 1>properties of space, but one that we're wondering about now

0:59:18.320 --> 0:59:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is how many ways does it go? You know, so

0:59:21.040 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you gotta got up and down, left, right, back and forth.

0:59:24.480 --> 0:59:27.200
<v Speaker 1>And we know that. Uh. Now, we generally think of

0:59:27.280 --> 0:59:30.720
<v Speaker 1>time as another dimension of space. Space time that they're

0:59:30.760 --> 0:59:33.479
<v Speaker 1>they're sort of combined there. But does it stop there

0:59:33.680 --> 0:59:37.040
<v Speaker 1>or is it reasonable to think about additional directions that

0:59:37.120 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you could go in that are not even conceivable to

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:43.600
<v Speaker 1>us in our you know, macroscopic movements. I think what

0:59:43.720 --> 0:59:45.760
<v Speaker 1>physics has taught us over the last time of years

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is that every crazy idea is reasonable to think about

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:51.439
<v Speaker 1>for a few moments, and some of them will turn

0:59:51.440 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>out to be true. And this is one of my

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:57.440
<v Speaker 1>favorite questions, is like how many dimensions are there to space?

0:59:57.560 --> 0:59:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think you can start from just like, well,

0:59:59.640 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>why would there be three? You know, like three is

1:00:02.320 --> 1:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a weird number. You know, it's uh, whenever you find

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:08.560
<v Speaker 1>something about the universe and has a number, and you've

1:00:08.560 --> 1:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>got to ask, like why that number? If you ask,

1:00:11.240 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 1>like mathematicians, what like deep numbers do you expect to

1:00:14.280 --> 1:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>see in a description of the universe? You know, they'll

1:00:16.280 --> 1:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>say one or pie or e, but nobody says three,

1:00:20.280 --> 1:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>right unless they're Catholic and think that the trinity has

1:00:22.760 --> 1:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>really insight into the fundamental nature of reality. And hey,

1:00:25.520 --> 1:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe they're right. But that's like clue number one.

1:00:28.120 --> 1:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like, is there something three ish about the universe?

1:00:31.440 --> 1:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Like that's kind of weird, but maybe it is. But

1:00:34.600 --> 1:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that there's no reason to think that

1:00:36.520 --> 1:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe couldn't have more dimensions. And you know what

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>that would mean is like another way to move, Like

1:00:42.520 --> 1:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>you write your position in spaces, you know x y Z, right,

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>you would just have another coordinate system. And the first

1:00:49.560 --> 1:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>thought you might have is like, well where would it go? Right,

1:00:52.200 --> 1:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Like where do you put it? You can't, like X

1:00:55.240 --> 1:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>y Z seems to describe everything. Where would it be?

1:00:58.400 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And you have to it's really hard to think it

1:01:00.520 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>higher dimensions. So you have to do this trick where

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you think in two D and extrapolate the three D

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>because your mind can handle both of them, and then

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>try to use that three D that extrapolation to go

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>from three to four. Right, So when you think about

1:01:12.920 --> 1:01:14.439
<v Speaker 1>two D, you like on the surface of a piece

1:01:14.480 --> 1:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of paper, three D you're like a cube. So imagine

1:01:17.880 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>moving that piece of paper through three dimensional space and

1:01:20.840 --> 1:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking about what that would be like as you like

1:01:23.040 --> 1:01:26.400
<v Speaker 1>interact with the three D objects. A sphere passing through

1:01:26.560 --> 1:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>a piece of paper would look like a dot that

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>grows to a circle and then shrinks again to a

1:01:30.960 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>dot and disappears. So in that same way, you can

1:01:33.560 --> 1:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>imagine four D objects in three D space. And so

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you use that sort of mental exercise to imagine like

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>what these other dimensions could be like. And but it

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>turns out that that the current theories of physics don't

1:01:44.600 --> 1:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine these other dimensions being like these first three that

1:01:48.120 --> 1:01:50.959
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be infinite dimensions that you could go like there's

1:01:50.960 --> 1:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>no limit to how far you can go and X

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>or y or z. But these other dimensions, if they

1:01:55.600 --> 1:01:58.560
<v Speaker 1>were infinite, we probably would have noticed them already. So

1:01:58.680 --> 1:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>if they exist, they would be compactified. They would be

1:02:02.080 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>like rolled up like instead of being infinite, there would

1:02:04.800 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>be curved like we talked about before, and they might

1:02:06.920 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just be like a centimeter wide, and you know what

1:02:10.240 --> 1:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that means. It's like, Okay, you have x, y, z,

1:02:12.280 --> 1:02:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and then you have another number which varies between you know,

1:02:15.240 --> 1:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>zero and one centimeter, And it's actually quite a natural idea.

1:02:20.360 --> 1:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>If it's true, it would explain a lot of mysteries

1:02:23.200 --> 1:02:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. Like in the in the nineties, I

1:02:25.760 --> 1:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>remember when this happened, people came up with this idea

1:02:27.800 --> 1:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that we might have um extra dimensions of space of

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>time to explain why gravity is so weak. Like you

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>know that we have these basic forces of the universe,

1:02:38.200 --> 1:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the electromagnetic force, the weak force, the strong force. They're

1:02:41.400 --> 1:02:44.400
<v Speaker 1>all pretty powerful compared to gravity. Gravity is like ten

1:02:44.480 --> 1:02:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to the thirty times weaker in comparison. And that's weird.

1:02:47.880 --> 1:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Why can't we jump at all? And and that's weird right,

1:02:53.200 --> 1:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Like if you hold a little magnet above the Earth,

1:02:56.320 --> 1:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you have the entire gravitational force of the Earth, right

1:02:59.560 --> 1:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is being outpowered by a tiny little fridge magnet. Right,

1:03:02.800 --> 1:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty impressive. Um, so we wonder like why is

1:03:05.880 --> 1:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>gravity is so weak? And then we thought, well, maybe

1:03:08.320 --> 1:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>gravity isn't actually so weak. It's just that most of

1:03:11.920 --> 1:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>gravity sort of leaking out into these other dimensions because

1:03:16.280 --> 1:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the strength of gravity depends on how many dimensions there are.

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, as space grows, as you get further

1:03:22.600 --> 1:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>away from something the sort of same amount of gravitational

1:03:25.520 --> 1:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>power spreads out through that dimensional space. So space was

1:03:29.160 --> 1:03:32.280
<v Speaker 1>four or five or six dimensional, gravity would be weaker, right,

1:03:32.760 --> 1:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And so they imagine that maybe space does have more

1:03:36.560 --> 1:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>dimensions and that gravity is actually really strong, and these

1:03:39.600 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>dimensions are really really short and anywhere past like a

1:03:42.560 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>centimeter distant, what you're feeling is gravity being weakened because

1:03:45.840 --> 1:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it's spread out in these other dimensions. So that was

1:03:48.920 --> 1:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea. It's sort of cool insight. I love when

1:03:51.800 --> 1:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you have like an idea that requires you to revolutionize

1:03:55.600 --> 1:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the way you think about the universe and solves an

1:03:58.160 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>existing puzzle. Um that was the idea, and it was

1:04:01.200 --> 1:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>especially tantalizing because they realized nobody had checked, like what

1:04:05.160 --> 1:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is the gravitational force between two things that are just

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a centimeter apart? And they realized, oh my gosh, nobody's

1:04:10.600 --> 1:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>actually done that experiment. We didn't even know. And the

1:04:13.720 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>reason is that it's hard, like what's the gravitational force

1:04:16.800 --> 1:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>between two marbles? Almost nothing, So it takes like real

1:04:20.880 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>experimental bravado to set up the test to test gravity

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>really really short distances. And so they did that, and

1:04:29.200 --> 1:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they've done a bunch of these cool experiments in the

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>University of Washington testing really really isolated situations, and they

1:04:35.360 --> 1:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>found that gravity doesn't seem to get any stronger as

1:04:38.040 --> 1:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>you bring things really really close together. And then we

1:04:41.120 --> 1:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>tried to discover these extra dimensions at the particle colliders,

1:04:44.560 --> 1:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, because we use particle colliders for everything, you know,

1:04:47.440 --> 1:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>test the fundamental theories of the universe and new new

1:04:49.880 --> 1:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>new dimensions and you know, clean your laundry and all

1:04:52.040 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>sorts of stuff. And the idea is that if gravity

1:04:56.520 --> 1:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>gets really strong when things get closed up, then maybe

1:04:59.080 --> 1:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>when proton get smashed together, you could create little mini

1:05:02.800 --> 1:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>black holes. Because if gravity is really powerful as short distances,

1:05:07.040 --> 1:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>then even the really low mass stuff like protons might

1:05:10.000 --> 1:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have enough energy to create black holes. And that's what

1:05:13.240 --> 1:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a whole hull baloo about whether or

1:05:15.440 --> 1:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not the particle collider was going to destroy the world. Um,

1:05:19.400 --> 1:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's one reason why people thought maybe it could happen,

1:05:22.600 --> 1:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is that we might create these black holes, which would

1:05:25.600 --> 1:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>prove that there are extra dimensions and explain why gravity

1:05:29.000 --> 1:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>is so weak, and then also you know, eat the

1:05:31.840 --> 1:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>Earth and end the human race. But it turns out

1:05:34.920 --> 1:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't seen any of those black holes. And

1:05:37.840 --> 1:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>also we're pretty confident that that we're not going to

1:05:40.520 --> 1:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>be creating a dangerous black holes. That's certain because there

1:05:42.960 --> 1:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>are other collisions that happen all the time, very high

1:05:45.560 --> 1:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>energy collisions from space that create the same configurations and

1:05:49.560 --> 1:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet created a black hole to eat the Earth.

1:05:51.920 --> 1:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So we thought that was safe. But we didn't see

1:05:54.000 --> 1:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>these black holes, which would have proven to us that

1:05:56.480 --> 1:05:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there were extra dimensions, and so currently we don't know

1:06:00.120 --> 1:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>if there are other dimensions to space like we think

1:06:02.240 --> 1:06:04.600
<v Speaker 1>there might be. It still could be possible. They would

1:06:04.600 --> 1:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>just have to be smaller than about a millimeter, but

1:06:07.360 --> 1:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen them and we don't have any evidence

1:06:09.360 --> 1:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that they exist. But there are some theories that like them,

1:06:12.000 --> 1:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>like Strength theory would love if there were eleven or

1:06:14.680 --> 1:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty six dimensions, but at this point we sort of

1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen them until we build that you know, trillion

1:06:20.400 --> 1:06:23.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar galaxy sized particle collider. Well, it looks like we're

1:06:23.800 --> 1:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>running out of time here, Daniel. You're you and Jore

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are still actively putting out episodes of the podcast. Can

1:06:31.120 --> 1:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you give us just a brief idea of like what

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>is out right now and what's coming out in the

1:06:34.880 --> 1:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>immediate future. Yeah, we're putting out episodes of Daniel and

1:06:38.000 --> 1:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Jorge Explain the Universe twice a week. Recent topics include

1:06:41.480 --> 1:06:44.160
<v Speaker 1>like could dark matter be made out of quarks? Or

1:06:44.320 --> 1:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>what's the cosmological constant? Or We've been doing a really

1:06:47.360 --> 1:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fun series on analyzing the science of science fiction universes

1:06:51.440 --> 1:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>where we interview famous science fiction authors and ask them

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>nitpicky physics questions about their wormholes and their warp drives.

1:06:58.600 --> 1:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're having a lot of fun and we answer

1:07:00.920 --> 1:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of listener emails. We had a whole episode

1:07:02.960 --> 1:07:05.760
<v Speaker 1>recently where we just went through listener questions and answered

1:07:05.960 --> 1:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>all of their questions from seven year olds to seventy

1:07:08.520 --> 1:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>seven year olds. Sorry, I just had a glance at

1:07:11.280 --> 1:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the I was glanced into the episode list to see

1:07:12.760 --> 1:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>if I was particularly familiar with any of the authors.

1:07:15.200 --> 1:07:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So that you've you've talked to thus far y'all doing? Uh,

1:07:18.080 --> 1:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Kim Stanley Robinson by by chance? No, we have it yet,

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>but we've talked to Bray Crouch. Should we talk to

1:07:23.880 --> 1:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Award winning authors like Ann Lecky and Mary Robin

1:07:27.480 --> 1:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and Cole and Becky Chambers um, it's been really fascinating

1:07:31.880 --> 1:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>to see, like, how do you build the science fiction universe?

1:07:34.320 --> 1:07:36.360
<v Speaker 1>At what point do you stop worrying about getting the

1:07:36.360 --> 1:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>science right and just think about the story. And then also,

1:07:39.560 --> 1:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>for me, since I'm such a science fiction buff, I

1:07:41.720 --> 1:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>just get a fanboy a little bit and talk to

1:07:43.360 --> 1:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>all these famous people. This might be too loaded of

1:07:46.120 --> 1:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a question, but if you could interview a now deceased

1:07:51.280 --> 1:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>science fiction author and asked them some of these same questions,

1:07:54.360 --> 1:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>which one would you choose? You know, until I learned

1:07:59.040 --> 1:08:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that he was also a jerk, I would have loved

1:08:01.000 --> 1:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>to interview Isaac Asimov because he created not just you know,

1:08:05.480 --> 1:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>new technology fiction, but like his Foundation series where he

1:08:09.160 --> 1:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>creates like actually a new field of science in his

1:08:12.840 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>prediction of the future. Um, I thought that was really fascinating.

1:08:16.080 --> 1:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I would love to just understand the kind of development

1:08:18.920 --> 1:08:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of that idea and how he built a story around it.

1:08:21.760 --> 1:08:24.639
<v Speaker 1>But then it turns out, like many greats from the past,

1:08:24.720 --> 1:08:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he was also a jerk to lots of people he

1:08:26.760 --> 1:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>worked with. All right, well, well, thanks again for for

1:08:29.479 --> 1:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>coming on the show and chatting with us, And yeah,

1:08:31.280 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we encourage our listeners to check out those episodes and

1:08:34.080 --> 1:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, and and hang with us. Thanks for

1:08:36.720 --> 1:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>calling in from your closet to talk with us. As

1:08:39.160 --> 1:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we call in from our closets, don't expand out of

1:08:42.000 --> 1:08:44.559
<v Speaker 1>reach before the next time we get to have you on.

1:08:44.960 --> 1:08:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope I'll still fit in my pants by the

1:08:46.640 --> 1:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>next time I talk to you, guys. Thanks very much

1:08:48.760 --> 1:08:51.519
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. All right, thank you, Thanks Daniel.

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:53.760
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, if you want to check out other

1:08:53.760 --> 1:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>episodes of Stuff to Boil your Mind, head over to

1:08:56.840 --> 1:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>stuff to Boil your Mind dot com. That'll shoot you

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>over to the I Heart listing for this show. But

1:09:00.760 --> 1:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you can find our podcast wherever you get your

1:09:04.200 --> 1:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>podcasts and wherever that happens to be. Just make sure

1:09:07.200 --> 1:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>you rate, review, and subscribe huge thanks as always to

1:09:11.120 --> 1:09:14.439
<v Speaker 1>our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would

1:09:14.479 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with us with feedback on

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>this episode or any other, to suggest a topic for

1:09:18.400 --> 1:09:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the future, or just to say hi, you can email

1:09:20.840 --> 1:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:09:31.800 --> 1:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

1:09:34.640 --> 1:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my Heart Radio, this the iHeart

1:09:37.040 --> 1:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Radio app Apple Podcasts or wherever you're listening to your

1:09:39.800 --> 1:09:49.120
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows,