WEBVTT - The Cycle: Pitching Streamers and Two-Start Pitcher Competition (Ep. 1000)

0:00:02.000 --> 0:00:04.560
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Honda. When you

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>test dr off the All the Electric Prologue SUV, there's

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot that can impress you about it. There's the

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>generous passenger space, the clean, thoughtful design, and the intuitive technology.

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But out of everything, what you really love most is

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that it's a Honda. Visit Honda dot com slash ev

0:00:20.160 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>to see authors.

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Hello, everybody, Welcome back in to the third segment of

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 2>the cycle. This week, I am once again Mike mahyor

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 2>still Mike Maher and I am joined once again by

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Kelly Kirby and Kelly, how are you doing and are

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 2>you ready to close out this week's series of the cycle.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I'm doing better and better than More Awake.

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm way better than worm but uh yeah, No, I'm

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>doing well and I'm excited to close it out because

0:00:56.120 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 3>I love talking pitching, so this should be great.

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 2>I do too in a bunch of leagues where I

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>stream pitching by a choice or necessity, or I just

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 2>do it to torture myself. But I like kind of

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 2>targeting matchups that I like. Sometimes I'll do like a

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>week or two in advance, see if I can kind

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 2>of sneak pitchers in that way, Like we talked in

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>a previous video, I kind of snuck Tony Gonsolin in

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>before people were thinking about him. That went very well

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 2>twayas Myers not going so well for me. But yeah,

0:01:23.280 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>let's get right into it. We often use when we

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 2>when we talk pitching streamers, we kind of go day

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 2>by day because some people like to We've heard, you know,

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 2>some requests. Some people like to have pitching streamers for

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 2>every day because they're in daily, daily leagues and they

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 2>can just kind of like rotate through or pick which

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>ones they want, whether they have like daily transactions or

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 2>just daily lineups. They like to have daily options, and

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>so we break it down. We start with Monday, go

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 2>all the way through through Sunday, and we use the

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Pro's Pitching Streamer tool, which is a really cool

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 2>tool that we have on the site where you can

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 2>just put it, you know, open it up, you sink

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 2>your leagues, and it shows you who's available in your

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>league and their matchup and whether or not it's a

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 2>good or bad matchup, and you know some recent will

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.559
<v Speaker 2>but numbers and so yeah, it's very useful for someone

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 2>like me. Streams pretty consistently, and so let's get right

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 2>into it. Kelly, you are the person who put the

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 2>names in the sheet, so I will toss it over

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 2>to you and we can start going through starting with Monday.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>Who who do you like to stream this week?

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I thought it was really interesting. The top VBR

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 3>pitcher on Monday is Matthew Boyd for the Cubs up

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 3>against San Francisco. But it's at home, so I wanted

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 3>to pick that one. But being at home makes me

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 3>a little bit nervous about that game if the wind

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 3>is blowing out, which it seems to have been a

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 3>lot this year. So I actually jumped down, and you know,

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 3>this will be the only white sock that I probably

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>ever recommend. But I'm curious about streaming Shane Smith against

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City. I think that he matches up okay with them,

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 3>and you know, he's got twenty six strikeouts and thirty

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 3>two innings easy areas two point two three, whip is

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 3>one o eight. So I've just I thought that he

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 3>would be a good option just to see if Kansas

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 3>City is continuing to struggle to get on base that

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 3>he could provide some value.

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I like Shane Smith a lot. I edited him

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>in a few Dynasty leagues, either earlier the season or

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 2>right before the season started. I watched him pitch earlier

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:16.679
<v Speaker 2>in the year and I was just really impressed. I

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 2>think the wheels kind of came off late in that game,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 2>but he may have just been in there a little

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>bit too long. But I remember watching it and I

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:23.359
<v Speaker 2>was like, this guy's pretty good. You know, I kind

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of like them. What I'm see here, he's got some

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 2>juice and yeah, I'm seeing here in the phantash prost

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 2>Pitcher streaming tool that the Kansas City Royals are highlighted

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 2>in green, and green means good. As we know, it

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 2>does look like he's wind up going against called Reagan's.

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 2>But if Reagan's is going to make that start though,

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 2>we're not sure, so yeah, would probably wouldn't want to

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 2>line up against him. But also we don't know if

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Reagan's throwing a bullpen today, possibly right now

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>while we're talking called Reagan's throwing a bullpen session to

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 2>see that sort growing fields, which I feel like he

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 2>probably should have just gone on the IL. But you know,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a magor league manager. I don't always Usually

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 2>it's the opposite. I'm targeting, targeting the white Socks offense,

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 2>and I'm pitching streaming pitchers. But you know, i'd like

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 2>a Shane Smith. I can get down with that. Some

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>other name is potentially available in your leagues for Monday.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Are Matthew Boyd. Maybe he's doing all right, not too bad.

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.799
<v Speaker 2>He's he's available in some leagues, maybe not some others.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.239
<v Speaker 2>It took like twenty six percent consensus roster. It's probably

0:04:20.279 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 2>dragged down by ESPN a little bit. I don't want

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 2>to do a landing route against the Cubs. Tobias Myers

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 2>one more time, Tobias Myers against the Astros struggling off

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Astros offense. I will be streaming Tobias Myers. I don't

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 2>even know if you can consider it streaming if I

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>stream the guy every week because he's just on my

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 2>teams right now.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I also like an HJA Smith Shaver, who's been picturing

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.920
<v Speaker 2>really well. He's got the Reds, but not in Cincinnati,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 2>so that's good at Cincinnati, bad against Cincinnati somewhere else good.

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:57.559
<v Speaker 2>But that's enough about Monday. Let's go over to Tuesday.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>Who do you got for Tuesday?

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 3>On Tuesday? In our last segment, we called Stephen Matt's

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 3>a pitcher who exists, and on Tuesday he is facing

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh at home. So I and he he is not

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>rostered very many places. So I feel like that that's

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 3>a decent streamer, just again Pittsburgh versus lefties. He could

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 3>function as a major league pitcher, maybe get you a win.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 3>So that's who I'm going with.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I was surprised to see he already has twenty four

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.039
<v Speaker 2>innings pitched. I feel like he just came back. But

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 2>I guess he had been in the bullpen and now

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 2>he's just now starting because I thought he was like

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 2>hurt and I came back, but I was like, how

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:36.680
<v Speaker 2>does this guy have twenty four innings pitch? But he

0:05:36.720 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 2>was in the bullpen and now he's starting. He's made

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>two starts. But yeah, so far, so good. If you

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 2>want to talk yourself out of it, you know, we

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:45.479
<v Speaker 2>talked to the previous segment about looking at like fip

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>X PIP Sierra. The pick the one you want right

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 2>now is ERA is one point five and if you're

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 2>pro Stephen Mattz, his FIP is one point eight nine.

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 2>If you're anti Steven Matts, his X fips three point

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 2>four nine. So it depends on you know which narrative

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to spin, but I do like it. I'd

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 2>like the matchup. You know, the Pirates are a bottom

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>five offense according to our pictures streaming tool, so again,

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 2>not the not the worst options. How about Wednesday?

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 3>On Wednesday, I have Michael Waka if he's available. I

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 3>think his roster percentage is slightly higher, so he might

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 3>not be, but in some leagues he might be sitting

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 3>out there and he gets the White Sox at home.

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 3>So I will take that all day long.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's the classic strategy of going against the White

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 2>Sox offense when you can, as opposed to targeting their pictures. Yeah.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm not the biggest Michael Waka fan. I don't know

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:44.919
<v Speaker 2>that there are a ton of really big Michael Waker

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.479
<v Speaker 2>fans out there. But you know, again, he's a guy

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 2>he's been like. He's like a high floor, low ceiling

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of guy who he probably won't get you killed,

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 2>but he's not gonna He doesn't strike out a ton

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 2>of batters. So though twenty six and thirty two innings,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 2>it's that's fine. You know, it's not bad it might

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 2>might may be able to get more out of the

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox. I do want to mention I forgot

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 2>to mention when I was talking before about Stephen Matt again,

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 2>that ideal does look like he's lined up to go

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 2>against Paul Skins, and that doesn't that doesn't always matter

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>with the Pirates because a lot of times they just

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 2>do don't give him any run support. So maybe that's

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 2>actually a good thing. Maybe you know, you'll have to

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 2>deal with like five or six shot out anings form

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Paul Skins, But then you know, as long as you

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 2>don't give up a ton of unds, maybe you still

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 2>get a win. Other names for Windsday. Let's see, I'm

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 2>not seeing a lot of other intriguing options. Quinn Priester

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>against the Astros. I've I've not enjoyed the Quinn Priester

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 2>experience so far, so I'm probably not gonna dive back

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 2>into that. He's someone I've streamed recently, Probably not gonna,

0:07:44.360 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>probably not gonna go with that one. Probably I'd rather

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>go with a Michael Waka Tanner Hawk against the Rangers.

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm not ready to get hurt by Tanner Halck yet Again,

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 2>He's looked. He looked better in his most recent start,

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not ready to get hurt again. We talk

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 2>about low Lawyer, there's a low floor there. We saw

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 2>it well. Yeah, I like the option of Waka against

0:08:05.840 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox. You rarely go wrong targeting the White

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>Sox because the bad start against White Sox is not

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>like a bad start against the Doctors. They are different,

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>different realms. Thursday we have blank. It seems like we

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 2>don't like Thursday.

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 3>We don't like Thursday. First, there's just a lot of

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of players who are just highly rostered going.

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 3>So that's where it gets a little bit trickier. And

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 3>you know, the only one that I was kind of

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 3>interested in was Joisey Soriano against Toronto at home. But

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 3>that's not not enough that I would want to pick

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 3>him up and stream.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Him Thursday small slate day. So that's that's kind of

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 2>where we're run into trouble there. I do want to

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 2>double check one thing though, Sugano going up against the Twins,

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 2>but it looks like that may have changed. I think

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>it changed, so it looks like we had Sugano on Saturday,

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>but they have changed their rotation. So it looks like

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Sugano is going to are He's no longer starting Saturday

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>against the Angels. He's now starting Thursday against the Twins.

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 2>So not to spoil our Saturday pick, but it was

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>tell me, Yuki Sigano, do you still like him as

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 2>a Thursday streamer against the Twins or are you out

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>now that it's not the Angels?

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean I yeah, because I saw him on here

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 3>and I thought that seemed interesting that I hadn't looked

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 3>at him. But in Minnesota right now, with this like

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 3>it's been pretty cold, it's been pretty like crappy weather overall,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>so I don't hate it. They've been struggling a little

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 3>bit too, so so the I I could stream him

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 3>for that one.

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, Thursday, smallest light day, not a whole lot

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 2>out there. There's a few bigger names pitching, so that

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 2>also decreases the available streamers. Other names Brian Bayo. He

0:09:50.559 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 2>pitched pretty well in his first start, but still kind

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:55.200
<v Speaker 2>of like, kind of tough to trust, even though it

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.719
<v Speaker 2>is against the Rangers. But of Courseiger will be back

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 2>by then, so it will be a rain offense with

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Corey Seeger and without Jake Berger. You don't get that

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 2>free out anymore.

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Other than that, like Jack Lider, I'm not I'm not

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 2>getting down with Jack Lider against the Red Sox in Boston.

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Not that the Red Sox offense has been great, but

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 2>anything can happen in Fenway Park. So I'm not trying

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to take that risk with the Jack Lder stream. And

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 2>everyone else is either going to be not available or

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not interested. So let's jump over to Friday. Where

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 2>do you got for Friday?

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 3>On Friday, I have Jose Kintana. I laugh because I

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 3>laugh because Kantana and Matt's are like the same picture

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 3>in my brain, just that lefty that you're like, oh yeah,

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.320
<v Speaker 3>so apparently he is still here. He's I don't love

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 3>the matchup against He's in Tampa against Tampa, but he's

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 3>also just he's in kind of one of those modes

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 3>he gets in where he's just firing and and and

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 3>getting people out, and so I feel like that's a

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 3>winnable game for the Brewers and and I don't mind. Yeah,

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 3>I would be fine streaming him, I guess, you know,

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 3>since I know it's hard when Patrick Corman is also

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 3>on the list, but I would stick with Kintana on

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 3>that one.

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Like at some point the wheels are going to

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 2>come off for Jose Cantana. You just have to hope

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 2>you're not. You know, it's like hot potato. You're not

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the one holding You're not the one holding the Jose

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Antana when he when he goes off. He's an interesting one.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I like I've mentioned, I feel if it was last

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 2>week three before, Like I'm streaming him everywhere. He was

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 2>like a two star pitcher. I need a pitching I

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 2>need a volume. I'm just streaming him and so far

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 2>it's going great. But I know this is not a

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.719
<v Speaker 2>long term fix. And he's a fun one. If you

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk about ERA and expected numbers ERA one

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>point one four, Sierra four point sixty five x CIRA

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>four point four two, x FIT four point three one,

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.439
<v Speaker 2>and then FIP three point three six a little bit lower.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 2>The big thing for him is keeping the ball in

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>the ballpark. His home run to fly ball rate is

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:53.439
<v Speaker 2>just four percent, which also but he's like a he

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 2>keeps the ball on the ground like almost he's all.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>He's like a forty five percent plus groundball rate guy,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 2>which is good. And if you're going to pitch in

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that ten time a ballpark in Tampa, you're gonna need

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 2>to keep the ball on the ground. So yeah, I

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 2>don't love the matchup being in Tampa, but the Rays

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 2>offense is not the most terrifying right now, not a

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 2>ton of power to really scare you, all right. So

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Jose Katana someone that I have been streaming for a while.

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 2>I haven't been a bunch of leagues kind of out

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 2>of necessity, and so far, so good, and we like

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 2>him for this week. We like him for the matchup

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 2>that he gets the Tampa offense, which is not scary,

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 2>but he's in Tampa, which is scary. But he keeps

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 2>the ball on the ground, which is good. Home runs bad,

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 2>ball on the ground good. So Jose Katana probably can

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 2>get a ton of strikeouts, but hopefully this is not

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 2>the week that he turns back into a pumpkin. So

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 2>we originally had Tomoyuki Sagano on Saturday, but we had

0:12:47.800 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 2>to remove him because he got moved to Thursday. So

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to put you on the spot here. Let's

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 2>do it in real time. Is there anyone else that

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 2>we like for Saturday? And in previous weeks we've actually

0:12:57.679 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 2>avoided Friday for two weeks in a row because we're

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 2>a good point a few weeks ago of you know,

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 2>we like to stream, we can stream it. You know,

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 2>we're going to look at streaming options for every day.

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 2>But sometimes the best option is just to stream nobody.

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes streaming no one is better than streaming a bad picture.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 2>But that being said, on short notice, is there anyone

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 2>on Saturday that sticks out now that we had to

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 2>move to Ghana?

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 3>How afraid of Edward Cabrera are we? Because he pitches

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 3>against the White Sox.

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:30.199
<v Speaker 2>White Sox. That's always uh, that's always you know, a

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 2>decent approach. If you just stream against the White Sox.

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 2>There are worse strategies.

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Assuming Rangers war is back. It says he's listed to

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 3>go up against Cleveland, But I don't know if we

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 3>want to play that card yet, So yeah, on the spot,

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, unless you need it, I don't carera against

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 3>the White Sox is the only one that I would consider,

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and even then I think I would probably pass on it.

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 2>I would mention this so well Monday, you mentioned Shane Smith.

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 2>If you're in a weekly league and you have to

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 2>lock Shane Smith in two star pitcher and a second

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 2>starting against the Marlins. I don't hate that. I don't

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 2>hate that at all. I always like streaming two start

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 2>star pictures because then you're streaming for volume, so I

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 2>don't hate that. And then also, uh, I think this

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 2>is gonna change. I think we had Ben Casparius as

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 2>a two star picture, but I think that has changed. Yeah,

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 2>it's unlikely to be a two star picture now. But

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 2>like we said before, originally it was against it was

0:14:25.560 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 2>at Miami, and then against the Diamondbacks. I'm okay missing

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 2>that Diamondbacks start, so no problems there. And then what

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>about for Sunday.

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 3>I went with Lucas Giolito again, going back against Kansas

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 3>City on the road. We talked in a previous segment

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 3>that I'm not a I'm not a big Delaitle fan,

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 3>but I do think that that matchup is al right,

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 3>so I would do that. I kind of like land

0:14:55.560 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 3>and Rope Rope against the Twins, but either one those

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 3>are those will be my two streamers that I see

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 3>on the page.

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Lucas Giolido, like like we talked about in

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 2>our first segment of the week, our first video of

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the week, he looked good in that first you know,

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 2>especially for the first start back if you're missing him

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 2>basically two years. He was locating well until the very end.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 2>It was like, you know, he was one strike away

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 2>from six shot out innings and like having a phenomenal

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>first start, and then like ended up walking. I think

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 2>George Springer he had Donn varshow O two and then

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 2>he just like he tried to bury a change up

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 2>and he just left it right over the middle of

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 2>the play to run home run. And then Alejandro Kirk

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 2>also hit home run, and he ended up you know,

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 2>he still escaped with the quality start, but he was

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 2>like one strike away from a really good start, and

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I think there was even a point there where he

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 2>got squeezed on a potential strike three that like really

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 2>could have gone the other way. Yeah, I don't, I don't.

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm not like super in on Giolito, but I do

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 2>think he was intriguing enough in that first start that

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>you can't target him here against the Royals, Kyle Gibson

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>at the Angels without Mike Drout, no Mike Trout, but

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 2>it is Kyle Gibson. You have any interests of Cayle Gibson, I.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Have no interest in Kyle Gibson.

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, come on, Tyler Anderson on the other side, Tyler

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Anderson against the Orioles.

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm probably more on his side, but even again,

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't really want anything to do with either one

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 3>of them. If I can.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Completely cromulent Tyler Anderson worm Worm likes when I make

0:16:21.280 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Simpsons references because he's actually never seen The Simpsons. So

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 2>I like to squeeze the Simpsons reference in whenever I can.

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 2>My default is just to call someone cromulant, because that's

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 2>at least the reference that he knows. Now, I'm trying

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 2>to find a good time to squeeze in the like

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the Mark McGuire reference. I don't know if you've watched

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 2>The Simpsons, but have.

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 3>You ever seen Mark mcgu I know, I don't think there's.

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 2>A whole Baseball episode from like way back when where

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 2>they're saying, they say, like Mark, major League Baseball is

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>like spying on people, And eventually at the end they

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 2>send like Mark McGuire in like on a helicopter and

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 2>they're like they're asking Mark McGuire why major League Baseball

0:16:58.280 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 2>is spying on them, and he's like, do you want

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 2>I know the harrifying truth or do you want to

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:04.360
<v Speaker 2>see me hit a few dingers and they're like dingers

0:17:04.480 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 2>and so he just like takes the evidence on the

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 2>berries in his hat and he starts like hitting home runs.

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, great reference. Okay, so those are our pitching

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 2>streamers for the week. And we got our Simpsons reference

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 2>out of the way as well. So two really good

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 2>segments to knock out there. And now we have our

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 2>two star pitcher competition that Worm and I do head

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 2>to head every week. I didn't update the previous week.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm going we'll wait until Worm is back to tally it.

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 2>He likes to look at the league settings, and last

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>year we do it by like the points from like

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>a league that Worm is in for, like the points category,

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 2>like to track all the points for that I am

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:41.360
<v Speaker 2>now in that league, so I can see the points.

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 2>I think there are some wacky settings, but overall, you know,

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 2>it's fine. There's some like outfield assists points that I

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 2>don't care for, but that doesn't really a point, you know,

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 2>impact the pitching thing. But you know, I won't complain

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 2>about it. But for this week, you'll be filling in

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and we'll wait till Worm's back to tally the results.

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 2>But who are you going with for your two Stars

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 2>picture of the week? And I will say it was

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 2>almost someone that Worm had as a backup a couple

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 2>of weeks ago, because I looked at Country Brown that

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 2>might not make two starts, but he didn't, so Brce Miller,

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 2>who I almost said the name. I did say the name.

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:15.479
<v Speaker 2>So tell me why you are targeting pitching on one

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 2>of those ballparks that is very pro offense right now?

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just looked over. I kind of went with

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 3>two things. One, I was trying to figure out who

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't mind me taking off the board for him? But

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 3>then too, yeah, he's he's at He's at the Athletics,

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 3>which is a not a great ballpark to go in,

0:18:36.640 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 3>but I liked it paired with facing Toronto at home,

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 3>which was super green on our two Star Pitchers tool,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 3>So that was that was the option. I looked at

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 3>yours and and almost picked it, but I just went

0:18:53.600 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 3>the other way. So that's really all I've got on it.

0:18:56.280 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I just didn't know who. I didn't know who Worm

0:18:58.880 --> 0:19:02.919
<v Speaker 3>would mind me stealing, and considering that I don't want

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 3>him blaming me for anything.

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you if you if you don't want Worm

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 2>to mind, we can change your pick.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 3>To I mean, Sandial Contra is facing the Dodgers.

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Accordion to Carmen Maladazinski, he wouldn't mind if you took him.

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 2>He's a stitcher for the Pirates, going at the Cardinals

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and versus the Braves. You know, I don't think Worm

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 2>will mind him not being on the board.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I'll take Shane Smith. Are you Kansas

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.560
<v Speaker 3>City and Miami? I'm changing. I'm gonna go Shane Smith.

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to rewrite. Okay, cool, all right?

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>You want to spoil mine since I said your back soon.

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was gonna say I looked at Zach Wheeler,

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 3>but I thought that he might be angry if I

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 3>took him off, So.

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am going Zach Wheeler again. He's at Tampa Bay,

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 2>so not an ideal ballpark to target for a streaming pitcher.

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 2>And then at Cleveland, better team, worse offensive ballpark, but

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 2>still one of the best pictures in baseball. And uh

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 2>in pre these weeks, it's been kind of like really

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 2>light on two star pictures. This week is really good

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 2>for two star pictures at least in terms of like

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 2>top names like Orton Burns, that Allen Chrissale, Exhane Smith,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 2>your boy, Cole Reagan's as protected. Sandiale Contra gets the

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers again. Oh man, poor guy, he's going right back there,

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the Dodgers, Oh boy, Michael King, Bryce Miller, Yeah, just

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 2>some decent names. In previous weeks, we were really scraping

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the barrel. Yeah. The current standings are tied one to one,

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and just you know, your pick will count for Worm's record,

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 2>just like it will you know when he disappears in

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:42.359
<v Speaker 2>two weeks to go do football. But yeah, and uh,

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you were you here. I don't

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 2>think you were here when I tallied last year's two

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 2>start picture competition. You know, we tied. Worm refuses to

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>believe that we tied, even though he didn't you know,

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 2>check any of the results himself. But I double and

0:20:55.440 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 2>triple checked it and I tied, And he he accused

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 2>me of just like giving myself a win the final week,

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, no, I actually lost the final week.

0:21:04.000 --> 0:21:06.119
<v Speaker 2>It turns out I was like up, you know, I

0:21:06.200 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 2>match up, and then we tied. So yeah, this this

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 2>this year, whoever wins, we'll have to determine what a

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 2>fair punishment is. We should just punish Worm regardless for

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 2>leaving us early. Whereas you know, you and I close

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 2>out the season and are here every every week for sure,

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and now we're not closing out the season. But let's

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.880
<v Speaker 2>close out the episode with weekend excitement. Worm always likes

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 2>to finish on a warm and fuzzy note to think

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 2>for what we like to what we're looking forward to

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 2>this weekend. So I'll let you go first as our

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:37.919
<v Speaker 2>guests for the week. What's your weekend excitement? What are

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 2>you looking forward to this weekend?

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 3>My Cubs are playing the Brewers. I call it Wrigley

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 3>North mostly so if fits ever watches this, he can

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 3>get just a little irritated. But my big one is

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 3>the NHL Playoffs are continuing. My oilers made it onto

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.239
<v Speaker 3>Round two, which is going to start this weekend, and

0:21:57.240 --> 0:21:59.719
<v Speaker 3>this is where I plug that. Tyler and I have

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 3>a live stream on Twitch on Tuesdays and Fridays at

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 3>three pm Eastern where we cover what bets we're doing,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 3>and so far we're hitting at a pretty solid rate.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 3>So if you want to tune into that, that's my

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 3>other focus, So what do you got going on this weekend?

0:22:14.840 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Nice? Also, that live stream is a Twitch dot tv

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 2>slash Fantasy Pros I believe is the ORL and we're

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>doing a ton of stuff on Twitch now. We just

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 2>started this year. We're having a lot of fun with

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 2>it and it's going very well and I think it's

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 2>probably here to stay. So as opposed to like YouTube

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 2>and other places where we kind of have different channels

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 2>for everything, we're just putting everything on like one Twitch

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>channel for right now and just you know, seeing how

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 2>it goes. We've had a really positive response to it.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 2>People really enjoy it, and we're having a lot of

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>fun with it. And so yeah, give us a follow

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>on Twitch, Twitch dot tv slash Fantasy Pros and join

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:49.879
<v Speaker 2>us over there because we're going to do but you're

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 2>doing a lot a bunch of like stuff that's live

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 2>on Twitch and then we upload it as on to

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 2>YouTube as a video maybe audio in the podcast feed.

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 2>But if you want to join us live for stuff,

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 2>join us over there on twins. It's a lot of fun.

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 2>For me. We can excite in Kentucky Derby. I'm not

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the biggest horse racing fan, but you know it takes

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 2>like one minute. I'll watch it. You know, it's like

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 2>six thirty on Saturday. You know, I have to do

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 2>enough work for it here at betting Pros that you know,

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I might as well watch it and see who wins.

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>This year, there's a horse name Journalism, so really hoping

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 2>that Journalism wins. I think there's also a horse named

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 2>is it publisher or publishing Journals? I assume it's the

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.679
<v Speaker 2>same owner. If I had to guess journalism publisher, I

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 2>imagine that's the same same owner. But if not, I

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 2>hope they both win. I hope one comes first once

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>comes in second, as someone who you know has a

0:23:34.840 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 2>journalism background, very fun for me. And then there are

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>some pretty good baseball series this weekend. We have Diamondbacks Phillies.

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm a Red Sox fan, but I have a you know,

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 2>I always watching the Phillies as well, someone who loves

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 2>all things Philly, the return of the Best Picture, and

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:49.959
<v Speaker 2>Baseball Rangers for us. I obviously have to watch that

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Dodgers Braves again. I forget if I mentioned in a

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 2>previous video or not, but it feels like the Braves

0:23:57.680 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 2>got off to such a poor start, and it feels

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 2>like every time I turn around facing the Dodgers again,

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 2>and I'm like, are they just play the Dodgers every weekend?

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 2>These poor guys are trying to like turn things around.

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Ex Striders down, the Cooney Is down, and they're just like, oh,

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 2>here's here's Italian the Dodgers again like just kicking us

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 2>all over down. And then Dylan ce'es versus the Pirates.

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 2>And I would really like Dylan Sees to be good

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 2>deal in Dylan Sea's and not bad dealing Dylan Sea's

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 2>because I have him in a few leagues as well,

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 2>and I want that like mid threes ra and two

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.879
<v Speaker 2>inno strikeouts. I don't want a six era and tour

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 2>on of strikeouts. And it's a pretty good matchup for him,

0:24:30.640 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and I would like him to be good Dylan CEA's

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and not bad Dylan Seas. And that's all I got

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 2>anything else from you, any parting words of wisdom.

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 3>Party words of wisdom, No, I really don't won't have

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 3>any at this point. Just stay, stay, just be very

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.439
<v Speaker 3>careful with Dalton Varshall. That's pretty much what I have

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 3>to offer. So otherwise, it's been fun sitting in all right.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.359
<v Speaker 2>For Kelly Kirby. I'm Mike Marre. This has been the

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 2>cycle and thank you for stopping by.

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast.

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 4>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 4>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 4>or Spotify. Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 4>Fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 4>dot com slash Fantasy Pros MLB