WEBVTT - The History of Social Networks: Here Come the Micro-Blogs!

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>job in Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Radio and how the tech are you. We are continuing

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>our series of episodes about the history of social networks.

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>This one will be the fourth one in that series.

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So in our first episode, we covered some of the

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>really early examples of social networks like six degrees, dot

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>com and high five. In episode two, we talked about

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>how my Space became the dominant player in social networks

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>until Facebook swept up from behind and overtook it. And

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.160
<v Speaker 1>then in the third episode we talked about Google's early

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>attempt at a social network, a Orchid, and we also

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about Bibo, and I covered some networks that are

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>related to social networks but maybe not a full social

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>network on their own, like YouTube and Reddit, and just

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>as a reminder, I am tackling these kind of one

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>network at a time. So while the episodes are organized

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>chronologically in regards to when these networks were founded, I'm

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.480
<v Speaker 1>not going like year by year. This isn't like and

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 1>now we're covering two thousand ten to two thousand fourteen,

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>because you would have to jump back and forth across

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>so many different stories would be impossible to keep them

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>all sorted. It would be Madness or Sparta, or you know,

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those two. Anyway, we're up to two thousand six,

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and that year would see the birth of a microblogging

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 1>service that would be founded early on uh and then

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>launch publicly in the summer. And this microblogging service would

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>end up taking advantage of the technology of things like

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>short messaging system that kind of thing. And I am,

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of course talking about jaiqu got you didn't I maybe anyway,

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it might have sounded like I was talking about Twitter,

0:02:08.440 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, being founded in two thousand six and launching

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>publicly in that summer. But technically a couple of engineers

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in Finland founded Jaiku one month before Twitter would emerge.

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:22.799
<v Speaker 1>As to who was working on what first, I don't know,

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't aware of each other at the time.

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.239
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't have been, because Twitter was not a publicly

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>known entity yet at the finished team built their tool

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>with a specific phone operating system in mind, the Symbian

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>operating system specifically on the Nakia S sixty platform. Now

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.360
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind two thousand six is still a year

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>before the iPhone would launch, and while smartphones would take

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 1>time to get some traction here in the US, over

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>in Finland, Nokia and the simian Os already had a

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>leg up. Jaiku's creators figured that young people were starting

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>to do this crazy thing called texting, and they had

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>also taken up the practice of journaling online using blogs,

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.239
<v Speaker 1>So why not combine the two and build an application

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that would allow for really concise blog posts microblogging in

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>other words, and it would work on mobile devices so

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>that you could post your thoughts right when you had

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>them and maybe have no filter. Many of the same

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 1>concepts that Twitter would embrace were also present in Jaiku.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Now there was also a web based components, so you

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 1>could go to the Jaiku web page and access your

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>account there rather than using the phone interface if you preferred.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And I suspect that because the service launched overseas, it

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't really get as much attention here in the United

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>States as Twitter would. Also, the engineers would later say

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that the s sixty platform was quote impossible to develop

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>for end quote. It did still an attention, however, and

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the folks who heard about Jaiku got into it pretty

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>quickly and used it a lot. And while the team

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>had been hoping for this kind of success, the rapid

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>adoption created some new challenges for the small group of

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>engineers because now they had to figure out how to

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>scale the service to meet demand, and they were having

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of performance issues as a result, because it's expensive.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>It's something that's really hard for a small team to do,

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and it soon became clear that they were going to

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be completely overwhelmed. And that's what when something that appeared

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a lifeline showed up. In the long run,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't a lifeline, but at the time it seemed

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that way. So in late two thousand seven, Google bought Jaiku,

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.919
<v Speaker 1>perhaps sensing that maybe the company Google could push Jaiku

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to greater heights and challenge the now trendy Twitter, which

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we will talk about in a second, because by two

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:02.839
<v Speaker 1>thousand seven, Twitter was quite the phenomenon now. Unfortunately, the

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>same thing happened with Jaiku that we've seen happen in

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:11.679
<v Speaker 1>countless other examples of Google acquired companies and services. Google

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't really know how to promote Jaiku or to develop Jaiku,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and it failed to gain any real traction. While Twitter

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.680
<v Speaker 1>continued to grow in popularity. In two thousand nine, Google

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>decided to stop actively developing Jaiku as a company, but

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>turned it into an open source project. But even that

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>move only kept Jaiku around for a couple more years.

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand eleven, Google announced it was going to

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>kill off Jaiku at the start of the following year,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and in January, Jaiku guessed its last breadths and then

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>was heard no more, as was predicted by the Mayan

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Long Count calendar. Yes, that's what the two twelve stuff was. No,

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>not really, I'm being asias obviously, but yeah, it was gone.

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Jaiku did not stand the test of time. But let's

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>get back to two thousand six, because that is also

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the year that Twitter would launch. As I said a

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit earlier, it launched a month after Jaiku did

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>well after Jaiku was founded. Technically, Jaiku didn't launch publicly

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>until July, which was after Twitter had its public launch.

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So I've talked a lot about Twitter's history over the years,

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>especially this year. So we're gonna keep this really bare

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>bones and relatively fast. I mean, you know me, nothing

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is fast but as fast as I go. Anyway, So,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time there was a company called Odio,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and this company developed directories for stuff like podcasts. The

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>idea was, how can we make podcasts easier to discover

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and to subscribe to because early, early, early on in

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.239
<v Speaker 1>the days of podcasts, you kind of had to hunt

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>down our ss feed and subscribe to it. There was

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>not like a whole lot of easy options for you know,

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>doing this without hunting and pecking. Of course, this isn't

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>the very very early days of podcasts now. The brief

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>story of Odio is a pretty interesting one. It's complete

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>with drama around who started the company versus who got

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, the credit for being a founder, and lots

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of things like that. But that's for another time. But

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>by two thousand and six, Odeo was struggling to be relevant.

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>The main problem was that shortly after Odio became a thing,

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Apple began to support podcasts and incorporate podcast subscriptions into iTunes,

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we even call them podcasts because of

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the Apple iPod. That kind of gives you an idea

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>of how dominant Apple was in the space and still

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is to a great extent. So Odio quickly found itself

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>looking for ways to keep investors on board because the

0:07:57.720 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>company was really struggling with its main product. Now a

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>side project in Odeo was also developing. This project was

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to create a messaging service that would let one person

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>post a short message via SMS or short messaging service

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to their own timeline of posts, and it would also

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>send it out to their contacts or followers, and it

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>became a form of microblogging, journaling in very short character messages.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>That character limit was because the limitations of SMS itself.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 1>The project leaders, among them Noah Glass, decided to call

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the service Twitter, but there were no vowels. It was

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>t W T t R. Now, of course this would

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>become Twitter t w I T t e R, and

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it launched in March two thousand six. Jack Dorrisey created

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the first profile on the platform and sent out the

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>first tweet, which read, just set up my Twitter, and

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>he spelled it the the no vowels way. So worlds

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>are turned on such tweets. So that's Marched two thousand six, right,

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But Twitter would launch to the public a few months

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>later in July. Actually, July is the same month that

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Jaiku would launch to the public too, so both services

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>hit the public at the same time. But to keep

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>in mind. Jaiku is launching in Finland and didn't get

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>nearly the same amount of coverage as Twitter did here

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.839
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Ev Williams, biz Stone and Jack

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:31.479
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey decided to purchase up most of odio in October

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand six. They bought it back from the

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>various stakeholders and investors, and we're consolidating ownership and pivoting

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the business away from podcasting where clearly Apple was going

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to dominate, and instead they were going to focus on

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>this new kind of social network and messaging service. The

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 1>service grew over the course of two thousand six, but

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it really began to take off the following March in

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seven, So essentially a year after Dorsey sent

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>out that first tweet, Twitter itself would become famous. It

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>was the year that Twitter had gone to south By

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Southwest in Austin, Texas. It's a big festival. It's got

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of different components to it, like there's a film

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>component and a music component, but there's also a tech

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>or interactive component in south By and south By is

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>how some people refer to it. I always feel weird

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>calling it south By. I don't think I'm cool enough.

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>That's the problem is that really cool people can call

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it south By and sound like, you know, they're not

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>total dweebs. But if I try and say cool things,

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>my dweet bishness comes to the surface and it's undeniable.

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>And I'm cool with that. By the way, I'm not.

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not upset. I just know who I am. Anyway, Uh,

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it was seen as sort of the cool conference in

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the tech space. You know, it's where the young startups

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>would show off what they could do while rubbing elbows

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>with you know, the mon e and Uh. South By

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>was leaning more towards trendy and fashionable, much more than

0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:10.839
<v Speaker 1>larger tech industry conferences like ce S, which were still important,

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>but they weren't seen as being like, again, you're gonna

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think I'm terrible because I'm gonna use terrible, antiquated language.

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they didn't seem hip anyway. The Twitter

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>teams set up displays around south By Southwest that showed

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the latest tweets that were sent across the microblogging service.

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure you know this. Folks really like it

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>when they see themselves or their words up on screens.

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Gives them a real kick. So for more proof of that,

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>just go to any big sporting event in the United

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>States and watches the jumbo tron shows video of fans

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in the stands. They go bonkers for that kind of thing.

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>So Twitter was declared the best startup at south By

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Southwest and thousands of people signed on. Moreover, the people

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>who attend south By south West tend to fall into

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the category of influencer, so these folks had their own

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>fan bases, which also began to join the platform. Twitter

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>proved to be really popular as it seemed to give

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>folks a more personal insight into the lives of folks

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that they liked, whether those folks were close friends or

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, like a celebrity crush. Twitter spun off to

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>become its own company in two thousand seven, and Jack

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey was the first CEO. Dorsey would serve as CEO

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>another time later on in Twitter's history actually, but in

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the summer of two thousand seven, Twitter began to see

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>some emergent behavior that would become foundational for the service.

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm talking about the hashtag. So that's the pound sign,

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that little cross hatch sign. The hashtag when used in

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>front of a name or a keyword would make it

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>easier to search Twitter for that specific topic to see

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>what folks were saying about it. Because Twitter wasn't really

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>designed to make large conversations a possibility, right, Like, it's

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to participate in a conversation on Twitter beyond back

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and forth with just two people. So some users came

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>up with this idea of using a hashtag in front

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of a keyword, like what the conversation is actually about,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.359
<v Speaker 1>so that people could do a search for that hashtag

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>word and pull up the actual relevant tweets. Tweets that

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 1>did not have the hashtag in front of the word,

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 1>those wouldn't get tagged, right, Those wouldn't get pulled up

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 1>in search results. So this made it easier to look

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for specific kinds of content. And again, this was just

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>something that emerged through user behavior, but over time Twitter

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>would adopt that and some other user behaviors and incorporate

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>those as features. In two thousand eight, Jack Dorsey stepped

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>down as Twitter's CEO and co founder Evan Williams would

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>take a turn. But don't worry, we'll be back with

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorsey in a little it. Before we can do that, though,

0:14:02.800 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break, Okay, we're back. In two

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, Twitter got the first account to hit one

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>million followers. That actually was a kind of a race.

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The account belonged to Ashton Kutcher, the celebrity who campaigned

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to be the first to hit one million, because

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>CNN was closed again on a million followers right around

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time. These days, you can find lots of

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>accounts that have many millions of followers. But keep in mind,

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, this event where we hit the first one

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>million followed account was in two thousand nine. It was

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>just a few years after launch, and really folks outside

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the text space hadn't really found out much about

0:14:54.840 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at all, Like they didn't know that it was

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a thing. It was really the tech space that was

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>aware of it, and in a few folks on the

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>periphery of tech. This would change when Oprah set up

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>her own Twitter account on an episode of her daytime

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>talk show, which led to thousands more people signing up.

0:15:12.520 --> 0:15:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I should also add Twitter in the United States is

0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>seen as a pretty big deal, but it's not as

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>big in other regions. There are other social networks that

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>actually are used more frequently than Twitter. In those cases,

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I say this because even as someone who is on Twitter,

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I often forget that it's not as widely used as

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you might think. And while you might feel that that

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>certain sentiments that are really popular on Twitter, uh have

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>widespread appeal, you're really looking at a kind of slice

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of the overall population. I say this because it means

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that if you spend a lot of time on Twitter,

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>your perspective could be skewed so that you think that

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>more people think a specific way, and that's not necessarily

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the case. I know I've been guilty of falling into

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that trap myself, so I just thought I would mention

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>that here now. It's also good to remember that Twitter's

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>early years coincided with the growth of the consumer smartphone.

0:16:14.600 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, smartphones have been kind of a thing

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in certain parts of the world, but here in the

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>United States, they just were not the domain of the

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>general consumer. It was pretty much your executive on the

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>go who had a smartphone, and that was it until

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple debuted the iPhone and made smartphones sexy, and then

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they had a really disruptive effect on the web. In general,

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>services like Twitter could be repackaged as an app, and

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this really helped boost user numbers as well. Now, in

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>these early years, Twitter didn't really have a means to

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>generate revenue. Uh, it was dependent upon influxes of cash

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>from investors. But in two the company introduced promoted tweets,

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>so then an account could pay a to have a

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.560
<v Speaker 1>message promoted so that it would show up on the

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>feeds of hundreds of thousands of Twitter users. Even if

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>those users didn't follow that specific account, they would see

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the tweet. We started seeing more brands engage with Twitter

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>as a way to promote themselves and their products as

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>well as to interact with customers. And we also saw

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of folks using Twitter as a way to

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 1>fast track issues to get them resolved with customer service

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>of various companies. I saw so many tweets directed at airlines.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh and those early years would also be when we

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>would see the famous fail whale a lot. So This

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>image created by artist Kooney a k a k a

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Dash ninety two has the official title of Lifting a

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Dreamer and it shows a flock of little birds holding

0:17:47.800 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 1>onto strings that serve as a kind of harness for

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a happy whale. This was the image that greeted users

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>when Twitter services were put which happened frequently enough that

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>if you were using Twitter back in those days, you

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.719
<v Speaker 1>undoubtedly saw the fail whale at some point or another.

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Twitter users would sometimes push Twitter beyond capacity, particularly during

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>really popular live events where everyone was trying to give

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>their hot take on what was going on at the

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>same time. In Evan Williams stepped down as CEO in

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 1>order to focus more on product development. He would leave

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the company no several years later. He actually completely divorced

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:32.439
<v Speaker 1>himself from Twitter by like twenty seventeen, so in his place,

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Dick Costolo became the new CEO. In two thousands thirteen,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter would transition from being a private company to a

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded one, and so it held its I p

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>O or initial public offering on November. Uh, well, in

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>November of two thousand thirteen, I don't have the specific

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>date in front of me, but not everything was going

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 1>super smoothly for Twitter even as it was making this transition.

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, the platform was starting to get a

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>reputation for abusive users. People were complaining that Twitter failed

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to handle abuse properly. Like it it wasn't responding quickly enough.

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, a little bit later it was it got

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>so bad that the CEO copped to it. In an

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>internal memo. Costolo said that Twitter had failed to handle

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>trolls and abuse and as a result, had lost users

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>in the process. Now, this was around the time of

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>gamer Gate, which was really a harassment campaign conducted mainly

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>online but also in other ways. And while Twitter would

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>see quite a bit of action during gamer Gate, the

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>real battles were being fought elsewhere online in the real world.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>But lots of folks in the gaming industry, particularly women

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:52.200
<v Speaker 1>who dared to be so bold as to work professionally

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>in the field, found themselves the targets of abuse. In

0:19:56.280 --> 0:20:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the summer of Dick Costolo stepped down as CEO, and hey,

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Jack Dorsey came back as CEO, you know, the first

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Twitter, one of the code founders, and Dorsey

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>remained in charge of Twitter until the fall of when

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he would resign and the former c t O, Parague

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Agraval would take over and Agrival would lead the company

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.959
<v Speaker 1>until a certain tech billionaire would really shake things up.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>That tech billionaire was, of course, Elon Musk. He made

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 1>waves in the spring of So it feels like it

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>was an eternity ago at this point by announcing his

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>intention to acquire Twitter. First, he purchased a significant percentage

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>of shares in the company. Then he declined an invitation

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>to join the company's board of directors because he learned

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that if he did that it would prevent him from

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>being able to acquire even more stake in the company.

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Then he said he wanted to buy the company, and

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.400
<v Speaker 1>he started going about to secure the funding for it.

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Then reconsidered and decided he wanted out of the deal,

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.160
<v Speaker 1>but at that point he had already committed to it.

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>There was no easy way to back out. Twitter went

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to court to force Musk to go through with the

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>acquisition bias gosh darn it, you're legally bound to And finally,

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in the fall of Musk actually did purchase Twitter. Then

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Musk fired like all the leadership at Twitter and half

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of the employees. Then another quarter of the employees left

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the company. And that's kind of where Twitter is today.

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Musk is aiming to transform Twitter into what he calls

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter two point oh. And obviously that's a super fast,

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>super high level treatment of Twitter. We could talk about

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>so much more, but honestly, we kind of have, particularly

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>throughout this year, so I thought I would leave this

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 1>here for now, but if people want me to do

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:58.479
<v Speaker 1>like an honest to goodness deep dive on the history,

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the evolution, the influence of Twitter, let me know, um

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and I guess I can do that. But that'll that's

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>almost a mini series on its own because it's just Twitter.

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>While again, while it's reach is not as big as

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the way a lot of people think has been incredibly important,

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>particularly here in the United States, but also in other

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world, like in in Egypt. But we'll

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>save that for some other time. If y'all want me

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk more about it, some of you are probably

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>sick of hearing about Twitter, so hey, why don't we

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about something else. So that same year that that

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter in Jaiku launched in two thousand and six, saw

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the launch of yet another social networking slash microblogging site,

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 1>but this one was called Tumbler. I mean it launched

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 1>in private beta towards the end of two thousand six.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>It would become a publicly accessible social network the following

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>year in two thousand seven. David carp who turned twenty

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand six, dude, anyway, he was behind Tumbler.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>He had already established himself as a web developer and

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>tech enthusiasts by then, Like when I looked into his background,

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>because I really didn't know much about David carp. I

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:17.000
<v Speaker 1>know much about Tumbler apart from being somewhat familiar with

0:23:17.000 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>it as a platform, but I looked into his background,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I was just so astonished and humbled, because holy cow,

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>this guy, by the time he was twinning, had accomplished

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>so much. So he creates this site along with Marco Armett.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean to diminish Marco's contributions. And the whole

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>idea was to give a place where users could create

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>profiles and write what we're called tumble logs. So these

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 1>are short, warm blogs, sometimes longer than tweets, but shorter

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>than what you would typically find in a regular blog.

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And Tumbler gave tools to users to let them incorporate

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of multimedia stuff like photos and audio clips

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and videos and even things like chat logs. You could

0:24:06.080 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 1>just post those directly into a Tumbler feed, right from

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the user interface. So it was really streamlining that process

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>so that you could create a really engaging and interesting

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.440
<v Speaker 1>tumble log about whatever it is that you wanted to

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>write about. You know, maybe it's a journal about your

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>own experiences, maybe it's about something you really are passionate about,

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case may be. So users had a few

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>options when it came to designing the look of their feed.

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>They had a lot of default options, or they could

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 1>actually shell out some real world money to purchase a

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>pre made theme from Tumbler, kind of like a you know,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a premier theme. And like Twitter, Tumbler let users follow

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>accounts that they found interesting, so that each user had

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a curated experience based upon their own preferences. Now, one

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>thing was very different with Tumbler, and that was that

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler posts didn't feature a comment section, so you could

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>not comment on someone else's post. Carpet had seen how

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>comments could become a breeding ground for abuse and he

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to avoid that, so users were not given

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the option to comment on posts. Alternatively, however, they could

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 1>choose to reblog someone else's post, and in the reblog

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they could include their own commentary. So while you might

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>not be able to leave a comment on one of

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>my posts and write you're a jerk face, you could

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>reblog one of my posts and write, this guy is

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>a jerk face as your commentary that would work words

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:52.640
<v Speaker 1>can hurt. Tumbler's emphasis on multimedia really kind of set

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>it apart from other platforms at the time, and it

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>became a place where fandoms would coalesce around various pieces

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of pop culture, very active communities around fan fiction and

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>fan theory and things that are in that realm. Like really,

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>when you use the word fan you know, it's short

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>for fanatic. Fanaticism really was playing out on Tumbler. You

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>would see like entire communities grow up around specific theories

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>and wish fulfillment for certain characters in pop culture to

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>get together. That kind of thing. The whole browny culture,

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>which was a male identifying people who are fans of

0:26:32.359 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>My Little Pony Friendship is Magic. That all started on Tumbler.

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>So you had these kind of micro communities that were

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>really passionate about their specific area of focus. Humbler was

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty popular when in Yahoo came a callin and we've

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about Yahoo already in this series because that's the

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.400
<v Speaker 1>same company that came around and acquired Flicker a few

0:26:57.480 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>years earlier. Yahoo shelled out a cool billion dollars for Tumbler.

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>That's billion with a B. David carp stayed on as

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 1>CEO for the time being. But unfortunately for Yahoo and

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>for Tumbler, that popularity didn't really translate into profitability, and

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and sixteen, Yaho actually did a write

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 1>down of that acquisition of more than seven hundred million dollars. Yeah,

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially Yahoo's saying, yeah, we paid way too much

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>for this asset. When Verizon bought Yahoo in tween, Because

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>as quigon Jin reminds us, there's always a bigger fish, Tumbler,

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>like Flicker, was shuffled underneath a parent company called Oath

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>O A t H. In two thousand eighteen, Tumbler made

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a change that had a dramatic effect. See I talked

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 1>about fandoms and stuff, but one thing I did not

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 1>mention is that Tumbler was also a really popular site

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 1>for posting material of a more adult nature, whether it

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>was fan fiction, illustrations, photographs, videos. Some users relied on

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler to share material that was a bit too hot

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for Oath. So Tumbler would make a change that would

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>have an enormous impact on the site and its followers.

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 1>But before we get into that, let's take another quick break. Okay,

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so I'm sure all of you could at least guess

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>where this was going if you didn't know already. Tumbler

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>when faced with this issue of adult content proliferating across

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the site, which by the way, made it very hard

0:28:51.000 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to work with advertisers, right because advertisers don't want their

0:28:54.560 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>ants showing up next to illustrations that depict a raw

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>adic liaisons between Captain Kirk and Darth Vader or whatever.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So Tumbler passed a new policy banning adult content on

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the site, and usage plummeted by about thirty percent. That's

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot. When you say, hey, no more porn and

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you lose a third of your traffic, that definitely tells

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you something about how your users were using your platform.

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Now that brings us up to two thousand nineteen. So

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:39.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point Tumbler is wallowing under Oath, which, now

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that I actually think about it, that that came out

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>away that was different from what I intended. Not wallowing

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>under Oath, but wallowing under the company called Oath. And

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it continued to struggle, and at this point David carp

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 1>had already left the company. He actually did that in

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>two thousand seventeen, and Oath ended up selling Tumbler off

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to another company called Automatic, which in turn is kind

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of connected to WordPress, the publishing platform. And the price

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.160
<v Speaker 1>tag of Tumbler when it was sold in two thousand

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen was three million dollars. Y'all, if you've been following

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>this series, you know, like there have been some notable

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>cases where companies were bought for massive amounts and sold

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>for a tiny percentage afterwards, Like my Space was something

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like five million dollars, that Newscore bought it four and

0:30:33.280 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>then sold it for like thirty five million, And you know,

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we've had other examples where something was bought for like

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.959
<v Speaker 1>nine million and then sold for ten million. But this

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>was bought for a billion dollars and then sold off

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>for three million. Yikes, huge drop in value. But importantly,

0:30:55.200 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler did not die. It also didn't change that much.

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Leadership decided to really focus on how Tumbler allows users

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to choose how they post and how they consume content,

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and users began to return to the platform, though there's

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>still a ban on adult content there, so not all

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of them did. Something else that sets Tumbler apart from

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>its competitors is that The site follows a chronological ordering

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>system for posts, with the most recent posts being at

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the top. You do not get an algorithm shuffling everything

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>around so that you see what the algorithm thinks will

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>keep you there longer. That is different from Twitter. It's

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>different from Facebook, and you might notice, if you've ever

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been on Facebook or Twitter that the posts you're looking

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>at are all out of order chronologically. Tumbler passed on

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>that particular approach, which I certainly appreciate. I think a

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of users much prefer having a reverse chronological ordering

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of content and you just keep on scrolling down until

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you reach the point where you're like, oh, I've seen

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:03.400
<v Speaker 1>this before, now I'm all caught up. Tumbler is also

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>not as dominated by brands and influencers as a Facebook

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram and Twitter are. It has more of a

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:16.160
<v Speaker 1>community feel to it than other platforms. Now, I'm not

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>saying Tumbler is perfect. In fact, I haven't really used

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler very much myself at all, but I do think

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it is a breath of fresh air if you felt

0:32:25.600 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>lost in a sea of influencers, algorithms, brands promoting themselves

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of thing. But if you're tired of drama,

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Tumbler might not be a solution to that. Funny little

0:32:38.880 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>side note, I actually decided to log into Tumbler for

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the first time in years while writing this, and one

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the top things to populate in the trending tab,

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 1>which is where it dumped me. I didn't realize that

0:32:49.680 --> 0:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>at first. I'm looking at like, I don't recognize any

0:32:52.320 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of these accounts. Did I follow all of these back

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was actually on Tumbler years and years ago?

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things I saw was a post

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about safety tips for new witches, which I thought was funny.

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Several of my friends consider themselves to be witches. That

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.239
<v Speaker 1>actually really tickled me to see this. I was like,

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>does Tumbler know who my friends aren't? But then I realized,

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>oh no, I'm in the trending tab. Once I popped

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>over to the four you tabu, the posts were fewer

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and further between, and they were all very techy, so

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, okay, no, this is this is

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>where I left off, all right. Next up, we got

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 1>a company created by some ex Googlers. So Brett Taylor

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and Jim Norris had worked on Google Maps before they

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>struck out on their own to work on their own

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>idea at a Finchure capital firm called Benchmark Capital, which

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>had its own kind of incubator program. So their idea

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>was to bring together in one place all the different

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>social network activity of a single user, so that you

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>could catch up on a person's activities no matter where

0:33:55.880 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>they were posting. Two other ex Googlers, Sanjeev Singh and

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul bou Kite, whose name I'm sure I have completely mispronounced,

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:08.279
<v Speaker 1>so I apologized for that. They helped build Gmail back

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in the day. Well, they ended up joining on this

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>project as well, and the tool became friend Feed. It

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>could aggregate social network activity across more than twenty different

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 1>platforms when it launched, and even more as time went on.

0:34:22.640 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So that included stuff like Facebook and Twitter, but it

0:34:25.600 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>also included stuff like Netflix and YouTube and last Fm

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>and read It and things like that nature. So on

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>friend Feed users could like posts and they could leave comments,

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>much as you would on Facebook later on, but you

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.719
<v Speaker 1>could also see activity across all these different things. If

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>if a user activated all these platforms on their their feed,

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>anytime they would post at any of those sites, friend

0:34:54.760 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 1>feed would aggregate it and pull it into that feed

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.479
<v Speaker 1>as well, so you'd have like this consolidated feed, which

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>made it interesting for folks like me where I would

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>post variations of the same thing on different platforms, and

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>so on friend feed, you would get like multiple versions

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of essentially the same message, but it would be tailored

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to whatever platform I was going to. So, for example,

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I might make a longer post on Facebook to promote say,

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast episode, but on Twitter it would be a much

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>shorter message. Meanwhile, friend feed you'd be like, Jonathan, just

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>can't shut up about this podcast episode you did. But

0:35:29.400 --> 0:35:31.319
<v Speaker 1>let's say you've got a friend who's really active on

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>numerous social networks. So instead of having to go place

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to place to keep up with this friend, you know,

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>all right, well have they posted new YouTube videos? Have

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 1>they been active on Reddit? You would just subscribe to

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>friend feed and you would get kind of a fire

0:35:45.960 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>hose of all the content they were posting at different places,

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:52.760
<v Speaker 1>assuming that they enabled those platforms when they were joining

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.840
<v Speaker 1>friend Feed. So the number of supported services grew and

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it became a really impressive from that kind of perspective,

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>But the problem was it didn't really fit in anywhere.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>The UI felt kind of like a hybrid between Twitter

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook, it never quite took off. Plus, in two

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand nine, Facebook itself decided to acquire friend Feed. Facebook

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>would continue to operate friend Feed for several more years,

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>but in two thousand and fifteen it officially pulled the

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>plug and the aggregator went dark. All right, let's go

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>back to our timeline. In two thousand and eight, we

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:30.879
<v Speaker 1>got Plerk. So at this point, Twitter and Jaiku had

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.720
<v Speaker 1>both been out for a couple of years, and Plurk

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:38.839
<v Speaker 1>was another one character limit microblogging service that later would

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>expand up to two characters. But clerks Ui was different.

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, Twitter and a lot of other social networks

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:51.600
<v Speaker 1>would arrange their messages vertically in roughly reverse chronological order,

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>although as we've said, algorithms would change the order quite

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a bit depending upon what was being used at the time.

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>But on the plerk website, messages are organized horizontally along

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 1>a timeline, and the leftmost plurics represent the most recent messages,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and as you go to the right you get to

0:37:10.800 --> 0:37:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the older and older messages. This company was founded in

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Toronto with co founders Danny Lynn and Alvin Woon. Now

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the name Plurk has a few different meanings. One is

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a combination of the words people and lurk plerk. Another

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is the combination of play and work, and yet another

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 1>is an acronym which is peace, love, unity, respect and karma.

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Plurk like other services I'm pluric. You can follow other

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>people and you can read their timelines. You can upload photos,

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you can share links, you can import YouTube videos, that

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. For a while, Plurk had something called Qualifiers,

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 1>which was sort of like a menu of words that

0:37:55.840 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>would let you quickly use them those words to make

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a message. So you could use a word like loves

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 1>or hates or likes or wishes, and you could do

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:10.560
<v Speaker 1>this to craft a message. And those words had highlight

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to them, so like the word loves obviously was associated

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>with the color red, hates was associated with the color black.

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>So you would very quickly be able to just glance

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>at a message and you would see one of these

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 1>highlighted words and you think, oh, I get the just

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan's mad about something again, I'm not even gonna bother

0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:30.280
<v Speaker 1>reading this, which I think was a very useful tool

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>for people who followed me. Not that different from how

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook would incorporate moods like you would see that on

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Facebook posts for a while. I don't know if people

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:41.720
<v Speaker 1>still use it. I haven't been on Facebook and ages,

0:38:41.760 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know if people still use moods or not,

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.840
<v Speaker 1>or if it even is still a thing. Anyway, users

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>could also respond to Clark messages. They could leave comments

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on a post, and it was way easier to follow

0:38:53.560 --> 0:38:56.879
<v Speaker 1>a conversation on Plerk than it was at Twitter at

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the time. Anyway, Twitter had really yet to introduce threaded messages,

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was not easy to follow along and read

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:09.400
<v Speaker 1>responses to tweets, so it would be really tough to

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of figure out where a conversation was going on

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Twitter if you were not a direct part of it.

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:17.239
<v Speaker 1>But I'm plerk, it was way easier. You would just

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>click on the relevant comment and then or or plerk

0:39:20.719 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and you would see all the comments below, so you

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.800
<v Speaker 1>could just follow the conversation and take part of it. Uh.

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>That way, it was really easy. Clerk also introduced karma,

0:39:30.880 --> 0:39:34.399
<v Speaker 1>so folks could award karma they saw stuff they liked doing.

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Certain actions would get you karma, like if you added

0:39:36.640 --> 0:39:40.479
<v Speaker 1>a photo to your profile that got you karma and

0:39:41.040 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>receiving karma meant that you would be able to do,

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, to access certain features like special emoticons that

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>otherwise we're not available, you know, or being able to

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:54.799
<v Speaker 1>assign a title to your timeline if you had enough

0:39:54.880 --> 0:40:00.320
<v Speaker 1>karma around. Alvin Woon relocated to Taiwan. He took Pork

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with him. The service never got a ton of love

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>here in the West. Like you know, there are people

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>who used it, but it really wasn't popular. But it

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 1>did have a steady user base over in Asia and

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>particularly in Taiwan. So the company got a round of

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Series A funding in as well, and it is still

0:40:21.520 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>around today. You can actually go to pluric dot com

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and make yourself an account if you like, actually have one.

0:40:27.239 --> 0:40:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I've posted maybe like a dozen times since I first

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.720
<v Speaker 1>made the account way back in I don't know ten

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. I don't know when I made

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:38.439
<v Speaker 1>my Plark account, but I haven't posted to it very much.

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>It didn't stick with me the way Twitter did for

0:40:41.080 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a very long time. Okay, that's enough for it today.

0:40:45.480 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go super long with this episode.

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got a few more we're going to cover before

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 1>we conclude the history of social networks, We've got some

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 1>ones that we need to chat about, like Google Plus.

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an important one to talk about because

0:40:59.080 --> 0:41:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it really kind of illustrate some mistakes that Google made

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in the process of trying to create another social network.

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>And there are a few other examples that we can

0:41:08.400 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about. But obviously, like we've hit most of the

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>really big ones, at least the big ones in the West,

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>there are some that are really big in other parts

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of the world, like in China and in Russia. And

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I have listeners in places where they're thinking, hey,

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not really covering the ones that are popular here,

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and to that I apologize, Um, but you know, I

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 1>just I just drew the line to the ones that

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>were really big or known at least here in the West,

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and not you know, the ones that that people had

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 1>less contact with over here. Maybe in the future I'll

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do an episode where I focus on some of these

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.440
<v Speaker 1>other social networks that are almost unknown here in the

0:41:54.520 --> 0:41:59.280
<v Speaker 1>United States. But I have already four episodes into this series,

0:41:59.680 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and if I kept on doing it, it it would probably

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>be like eight episodes long. And uh, I still have

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to do my end of the year wrap up, folks.

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, to that end, if you have suggestions for

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>topics I should cover on tech Stuff, including any big

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>news tech news items from two that you think should

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.120
<v Speaker 1>be included in my end of the year wrap up,

0:42:19.680 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>please get in touch with me. You've got a couple

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>of ways of doing that. One as you can download

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Radio app. It's free to download, it's

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>free to use. Navigate over to tech Stuff. You just

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>put tech Stuff in the little search field pop up

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>over to the podcast. Over on the podcast page, you'll

0:42:34.200 --> 0:42:36.839
<v Speaker 1>see there's a little microphone icon. If you click on that,

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you can leave a voice message up to thirty seconds

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>in length, and if you even like, you can let

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 1>me know and I can play it in a future episode.

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>But I won't do it unless you tell me too,

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:49.760
<v Speaker 1>or if you prefer, you can use Twitter. The handle

0:42:49.800 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 1>for the show is tech Stuff H s W and

0:42:53.360 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:05.880
<v Speaker 1>an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.