WEBVTT - Echoborg: The Computer Controls You

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind from how Stuff

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe mccormicks, and uh,

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to take you into the future here for

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>a minute. I want you to imagine this scenario. You've

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>been contacted by an artificial intelligence, an AI that identifies

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 1>itself only as Mind your Manners or MIM, and MIM

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>as a wonderful job opportunity for you. It needs an

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>echo borg as it attends an industry conference related to

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the corporation it heads. In other words, it needs to

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>augment a human with a non invasive sensory array so

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>as to use them as its living avatar. Hold on

0:00:47.000 --> 0:00:50.199
<v Speaker 1>a second, this sounds like a creepy job. Now, what

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>exactly does this job involve? Essentially, MIM is going to

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>speak into your ears through this sensory array. It's gonna

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>pick up and everything going around in your surroundings, and

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and you will repeat or shadow its words in conversation

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>with various unaugmented humans throughout the week at this conference.

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna be its mouth, it's face, it's every

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>expression as MIM attends several key meetings and networks with

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>industry leaders. You will be the human mask for all

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>its interactions. Now, you of course be required to sign

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a standard nondisclosure agreement, and as Men's schedule for the

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>conference is fairly rigorous, you're gonna be swapping out duties

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>for the week with a second echo board selected for

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>more casual and interactions. But this is a huge opportunity

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for you. Aies like them are known to establish a

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 1>harem of echo bots, each suited to a particular culture

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.960
<v Speaker 1>or setting. This could be your big break. You could

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>become the pampered meat suit of a powerful machine brain. Yes,

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's you know, a great gig if you can

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>get it, you know. Yeah. And now I'm sure that

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>this job, while it might be physically demanding, is it

0:01:57.040 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>probably doesn't require all that much skill, right, So you

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 1>just have to be able to repeat words pretty much

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in real time and give some convincing facial expressions and

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>hand gestures. Yeah, you would need to bring life to

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>its words to a certain extent. I mean, that's part

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of being the mask. Like when one example that comes

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to mind, of course is Arrested Development. They had the

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the the surrogate character that shows up while George sr.

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Is the under house arrest. This character was just a

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>ball cap with a video camera on, and he gives

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a very dead pan version of everything that George is saying,

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and in that he would be you would be a

0:02:33.840 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>terrible echo borg or cylonohite, as we're going to discuss. Uh. Ideally,

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the individual repeating the computer's words would would make it

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>make the words come alive. Okay, So what we're envisioning

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>here is sort of the exact opposite of what certain

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>sci fi writers have predicted with robot avatars. The idea

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>of a robot avatar, like in the movie Avatar, you

0:02:56.960 --> 0:02:58.679
<v Speaker 1>could probably say, Oh, though I don't know if that's

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.679
<v Speaker 1>a robot, I don't know, it's in plenty of sci fi.

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 1>You you hook your brain up to a computer, and

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 1>through the computer, you control the actions and words and deeds,

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>all of the outward motion of some kind of physical

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>embodiment that's not really your body. Yeah, Like I've seen

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it employed as a possibility for space exploration. Right, it's

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>too much for us to send a human, delicate human

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>body to this other world. But you send a robot

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:24.959
<v Speaker 1>and then fat make that robot the avatar for the

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>human explorer, which is great for space exploration because it

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 1>combines the sort of reactiveness and ingenuity of the human

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>mind with the hardiness of a robot body and the

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>hardiness and expendability, let's be frank of the robot body. Um.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, So what we're envisioning here is the exact

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>opposite a computer mind controlling your body. Yes, I mean

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>a computer using a human It's kind of a meat

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>puppet to to give life to its its voice and

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>its will in human and our actions. All right, So

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the terms serenoid a minute ago, and I'm

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna assume. Actually, I don't need to assume, because I

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:07.119
<v Speaker 1>know that comes from Serrano de Bergerac. Yes, Serrano de Berjack,

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Edmund Roston play. A lot of people may be familiar

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>with this, of course, from the Steve Martin movie Roxanne,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 1>which is a retelling of the same story. My first

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>introduction to syran No was the Wishbone episode when I

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>was a kid peek behind the curtain. Robert did not

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>know what wishbone was. I I had to explain it

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to him. I I don't know how I missed this.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>It sounds the lifeful. Now, who who did the dog

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>play character? I think it was Syrano, right, so the dog.

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>If you're not familiar with this story, Serrano de Bergerac

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 1>is based on a real life character from history, but

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in the play it's sort of dramatized, fictionalized made more exciting.

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is that he is a very ugly

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:49.280
<v Speaker 1>man with a big nose, so he has a hard

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>time wooing women. But he's also very clever and brave.

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>He has a great mind in the wrong kind of body.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But if he teams up was somebody who's very handsome

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and very stupid, together they make the perfect package. So

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>all he needs to do is get a handsome man

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to pairt every single word he tells him, and there

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>you've got the perfect suitor. Yeah. Yeah, it's uh, you know,

0:05:15.960 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's often played for for comedy, right, because you

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 1>have especially unarrested development. You end up with with signals

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>getting crossed. Uh, you know, the individual who is who

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 1>is informing the surrogate says something that's not intended to

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>be transmitted and it ends up transmitted and then all

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>sorts of hilarity ensues. Yeah. I think it's played for

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>comedy and the rust and play also. But but it

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>raises some interesting questions about how we perceive other people

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and how we perceive the will behind other people. Yeah. Well,

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I think is certainly true is that

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>people are very sensitive to the outwardly visible source of information,

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes more than they are sensitive to the content of

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the informa issue like if somebody is making an argument

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to you, it's very likely that you're judging the merits

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of that argument more on what the person looks like

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and what their voice sounds like than the actual merits

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>of the arguments they're making. And indeed, you have just

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole communication array that is delivering this information. I mean,

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the voice. It's also often the hands of

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the individual, to body language, the expressions, the micro expressions,

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the eye contact, all of the all of these features

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that add that that additional level of engagement to any

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of information. Yeah, the quality of the tuxedo. And

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>so this connects in a strange way with a question

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that has often come up in artificial intelligence, which is

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the idea of the touring test. And I think the

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>way it relates is if you are the tuxedo, if

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>you're the meat tuxedo for an artificial intelligence speaking through you.

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Does that in any way influence how people receive the

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>messages coming from an artificial intelligence. So we should probably

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.640
<v Speaker 1>explain a little bit the idea of the touring test

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>for people who aren't familiar. This is a standard often

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>referred to concept in in the progress of artificial intelligence,

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and it comes from the computer scientist and sort of

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a I pioneer Alan touring. And there's no actual one

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>touring tests. You can't buy the kit online and bring it,

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>bring it home and to start being pulling it against

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>every toaster in your vicinity. Right, It's more of a

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>general concept that's been applied in a lot of ways.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>And the most basic, stripped down version of the test

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is can a human chatting through text only tell if

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the person they're chatting with is a real human being

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>or a computer program designed to talk like a real

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:55.000
<v Speaker 1>human being. I mean, it basically comes down to two

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>tourings insistence that, uh, the question of whether a machine

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>can think is too meaningless to really waste time on,

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>so you have to instead think, well, am I am

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I buying it? Am I am I fooled by it?

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>It is it is creating the the semblance of intelligence,

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and and it deceives me, then that's what we need

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to look for, exactly right. And I think I largely

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>agree with the point he's making, because how can you

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>tell that other humans possess real intelligence? I mean, come

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>up with a way of explaining how you know other

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>humans really think? You say, well, I mean listen to

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the way they talk, look at the way they react

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to what I say. It's a very complex kind of reaction. Well,

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>what if you could have a computer or robot that

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>does all of the same things, then would that not

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>be thinking? I mean, all we have to go by

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:50.599
<v Speaker 1>in science is externally measurable phenomena. You can't get inside

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>someone else's sentience and judge whether or not they're thinking

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>by I don't know, just sort of like your phenomenal intuition.

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's in carry practice The hog Father, where

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a essentially a thinking machine that's used by the

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>wizards there and uh and and when somebody asks the

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>wizard they're using the machine if if the machine thinks

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for itself and uh and he says, uh, says, don't know,

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it just it just appears, makes it has the appearance

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>of thinking for itself, and the oh the character says, well,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just like everyone else then all right, right, yeah,

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be a solop syste you could say, well,

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually the only object in the entire universe that thinks,

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just surrounded by very convincing artificial intelligences. Yeah.

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, as we discussed in our Alien episode that

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>we did recently, it's when you start trying to it's

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it's hard enough for us to to decide and quantify

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>what human consciousness is, what intelligence is, and when we

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>start looking for artificial versions of it, uh, it becomes difficult.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So you have to have some sort of standard to say,

0:09:49.559 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is this is enough. And that's what

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the Turing Test sets out to do. Right. It's the

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.720
<v Speaker 1>idea not can computers think, but can they convincingly appear

0:09:57.800 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>to think? Yeah, And of course this shows up in

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of science fiction. I believe it. Uh, it's

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in Blade Runner. It's been a while since I've seen

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Blade Runner, but more recently, um in x Makina. Oh yeah,

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I just saw that movie, and maybe we should talk

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>about that later in this episode. Yeah, but I'll go

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>ahead and give my endorsement. Now, I thought it was

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome. Yeah, it's it's a it's a very very

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>engaging film. I recommend it to anyone who is who's

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>a listener to the show. Okay, but let's describe a

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>turing test scenario. Like I said, there's no one test,

0:10:29.360 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but lots of people try to put together some kind

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of touring test type scenario to test their chat bot

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to see how good it is. And the chat bot

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>is just a program that you have a conversation with

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever engaged, if you've ever been in a website,

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and that little, you know, text stuff screen comes up,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's some sort of little uh, you know, stock

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>art of an individual you might be talking to one

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of these chatterpots. Yeah. Yeah, so let's paint a little picture.

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you walk into a mostly empty warehouse and

0:10:58.720 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>right in the center of the warehouse us as a

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>card table and a folding chair and a computer terminal.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And you go and you sit down at the terminal

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's a little blinking cursor and you type hello,

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and it responds hello back, and then you type some

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>more things, and it types some more things back to you,

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and you get to talk to it for some length

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of time it was pre specified. Maybe you talk to

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it for five minutes, maybe you talk to it for

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes. But at the end of the session, it's

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>your job to say, now, what was I just interacting with?

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Was that a computer program or was that a person

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>sitting at a terminal like mine in the warehouse next door.

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>These days, most of the time, I think it's still

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be pretty easy to tell, especially if you

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 1>have a limited amount of time to interact, and if

0:11:47.920 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the chat bot program operates within some kind of I

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, borderline cheating kind of kind of conditions, Like

0:11:56.000 --> 0:12:00.080
<v Speaker 1>some of these bots might suggest they have a conver

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>sational limitation, like oh, I'm a real person who is

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a child from another country and I don't natively speak

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>your language. That makes it a little easier to be convincing.

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 1>Or you could say that you suffer from some kind

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of condition that makes you interact socially in a different

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>way than most people would. And in any of these cases,

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you're sort of like putting dampeners on our judgment. You're

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>saying like, Okay, I shouldn't be expecting somebody who interacts

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>just like anybody I would meet, you know, at work

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>or at a party or something like that. This person

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.839
<v Speaker 1>might very well be a human and still be acting

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of strange. But once you say okay, you can

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>talk for four hours and this is just you know,

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a regular person who doesn't have any kind of limitations

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on their conversation you, you'll pretty much always be able

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 1>to tell these days, I would say, yeah, and you know,

0:12:52.000 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of this is gonna, you know, at

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>least start off as just small talk, you know, like

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>you were saying, hello, what's your name, what do you what?

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you what? What's your favorite band? You know,

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that's something, and then that the the the AI or

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the attempted in AI, the chatter bought attempts to answer

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>those in a way to fool you into thinking as

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a real person. In fact, let's go ahead and just

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>roll through a short script from a chatter bot conversation. Yeah,

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>so we'll reveal the source of this in a bit.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But Hi, Robert, what kind of movies do you like? Um? Historical?

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I prefer modern era films. Great, what are your favorites?

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>My favorite movie so far is The Imitation Game. It's

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 1>about my idol, Alan Turing. What did you like most

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>about it? I like fruit trees? Were there lots of

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>fruit trees in the movie. Maybe we can talk about

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that later. Okay, shall I continue with gardening or do

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you want me to move on? You can move on.

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's pretty obvious who is the chatter

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>bought in that conversation. Yeah, so I was the chatter

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 1>bot there. That was coming from a chat bought named Rose,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.400
<v Speaker 1>which was created by Bruce Wilcox and documented. That was

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.199
<v Speaker 1>verbat on a transcript of a video produced by some

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>researchers that we're going to talk about in a minute.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>But there's a variation on that script we just read

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>because in the video that didn't take place at a

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>text terminal. All the lines that both of us said

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>were spoken out loud by human beings. Now, how could

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>that be. Well, that's going to tie into the concept

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of echo borgs, which we brought up at the beginning.

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So to get into echo borgs, we need to talk

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>about a favorite figure in the weird history of psychological

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>research in the United States, and that's Stanley Milgram. Yes,

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, best known for his controversial

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>obedience experiments actually a series of social psychology experiments about

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen in all, all conducted by Milgram in the nineteen sixties. Yeah,

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you probably have heard about these, if you're familiar with Milgram,

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:09.840
<v Speaker 1>it's probably from the they're often just called the Milgram experiments,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and they sort of give him a bad name because

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>they were they were kind of nasty. Yeah, they're they're

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>generally anytime you see a list of like, you know,

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>top ten scariest or weirdest or most evil psychological experiments,

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>they tend they tend to throw this one in though, uh,

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's really more troubling and what it

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>reveals about about human human nature. So what was the deal. Well,

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's important to note that the first one of these

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>took place in nineteen sixty one, just three months after

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the start of the trial of German Nazi war criminal

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem, and so Milgram wanted to see

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>just how far we'd go in the name of a

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>band an authority figure of course, of course, because the

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>whole argument is are that these bad people were they

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 1>just simply following orders? Right. It was the idea that

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the Germans are especially evil. Where the were the people

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>who became the you know, guards at Auschwitz just from birth,

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 1>truly evil people who were susceptible to that kind of behavior,

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>or would we behave the same way in the same circumstances. So, Yeah,

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the experiment revolved around, you know, an individual in a

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>room and you hear the sounds of someone being shocked

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>in the next room whenever that individual pushes a button,

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>pulls a lever, or whatever on the command of an

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>authority figure. And so the question is how far will

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you go to when will you stop shocking? Would you

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>ever stop shocking that individual in the next room if

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 1>an authority figure is telling you to do it and

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>telling you that it's okay. Yeah, And what Milgram claimed

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:35.560
<v Speaker 1>to find through his experiments is, yeah, even you know,

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>your regular people, your next door neighbor Americans, if they've

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>got somebody in a white lab coat who's supposedly in

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>charge of the experiment saying please continue shocking them, they've

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 1>agreed to this in advance. Lots of people will continue

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>shocking even after the supposed victim of the shocking. Now

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we should say that in this experiment, nobody was acting.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Nobody actually electrocuted in the next room. Yeah, there were

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 1>actors pretending to be in in immense pain from these

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>shocks that lots of people in the experiment would supposedly

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 1>continue shocking them. Yeah. And if you want to hear

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>more about that, that series of experiments and what some

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of the ramifications of it, uh, stuff to bow your mind.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Did an episode earlier in the year titled The Power

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>of Polite, and I'll make sure to link to that

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>on the landing page for this episode. But Stanley Milgram

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:26.879
<v Speaker 1>also had some other experiments going on, right, He wasn't

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.439
<v Speaker 1>just doing the shocking people and Nazi experiments. He was

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.719
<v Speaker 1>into other ways to make us feel a bit troubled

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>about our humanity. Where they all creepy? Did he specialize

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>only in creepy science? And I think he had some

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>less creepy ones, you know, I mean, you know, they

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.959
<v Speaker 1>involve how we I think most of his work revolved

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>around how we view ourselves and how we vie your bodies,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. By texts of puppies and lollipops on our psyche. Yeah,

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>but you know, not everything was necessarily um you know,

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>people in the next room dying. Sure, but we referred

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to a term at the beginning of this episode, which

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>is serra woid. And this also comes from Stanley Milgram,

0:18:03.000 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I believe from unpublished results of some experiments he conducted,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>right right, He he never published any of these. They

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>ended up, you know, putting some work into it, but

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>then going off in a different direction with his research. Yeah. So,

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>as we said, the term serenoid comes from Syrano to

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>bears your act. But what was the deal with Milgram's experiments?

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So Milgram essentially wanted to say, hey, if you're that

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the woman that is being wooed bye bye bye by

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Syrano's meat puppet's handsome. It's handsome young man. I think

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>her name was Roxanne x. Roxane's on the balcony being

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>wooed by a handsome meat puppet that's being fedlines by Syrano. Yeah,

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:41.720
<v Speaker 1>if you're Roxanne, would you be able to detect something

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>was weird? Would you would you encounter this young man

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and say, hmm, he you know, he seems a little

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>more clever than than he should be, or there's a

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>delay in in what he's telling me, you know, would

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>there be something that would tip you tip you off

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>to the deception you know, with modern technology, I'd imagine

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>you can carry out that experiment pretty easily. Yeah, I

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>mean even at the time, the technology was good enough.

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So in these unpublished experiments, he had a source speak

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>into a microphone and a shadower listened through a hidden earpiece.

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Then he or she would repeat whatever they heard, you know,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>basic you know, arrested development, surrogate kind of situation. But

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. You found that with practice, speech shadowing

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>becomes easier and easier, Like we really take to it

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>rather naturally. They say, it's not that hard at all.

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I read in one of the sources we used for

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:31.879
<v Speaker 1>this episode that sometimes it only takes a few milliseconds

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>of delay between the speech being fed in through the

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>earpiece and saying it. We're ready, willing and able to

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>not think for ourselves, and so yeah, he observed that

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>he set all this up, put people in motion with

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>these with a source and a shadower, and then a

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.440
<v Speaker 1>test subject having to interact with this individual or is

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it his individuals um and then give feedback about what

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>they thought. And he observed that people couldn't tell the

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>difference between a Syran wid again that person. Uh that

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that that Shadower, who was informed by another source just

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>repeating words that are entering his or her ears, could

0:20:09.720 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>not tell the difference between syenoid and a normal human

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>being during interactions. Yeah, so that's what Milgram reported. And

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, that's surprising and creepy. Yeah, I would

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think that I would easily be able to tell the

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>difference between a person speaking of their own free will

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and somebody who's just being fed lines in a near piece. Yeah.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And one experiment Milgram's sourced in other words, fed you know,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 1>lines to a pair of eleven and twelve year olds.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>So they the eleven and twelve year olds where the

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>shadows and Milgram himself was speaking correct. Uh Yeah, the

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>the children were the serenoids, if you will, and a

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>group of observing teachers never suspected that they were chatting

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with anything other than a normal, though very bright child.

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh and uh. And and it is experiments he found

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that most people could have a lengthy twenty minute conversation

0:20:56.320 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 1>with a serenoid without noticing anything amiss. Wow. Yeah, but

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, that's that's hard to believe. I mean,

0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it just seems like you'd be able to notice that

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>right off the bat. But well, but just think how

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>easily we we buy into an actor's presentation. I think

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and think of all the interactions we have in the

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>course of of our lives where the individual we're talking

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to is maybe not completely yeah, genuine, maybe that you know,

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're interacting with with someone that's doing customer service

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>or they're trying to sell you something or can you, etcetera.

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>It's like, it's not always going to come off is oh,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>this person is completely fake. It's gonna It's just an

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.200
<v Speaker 1>aspect of human interaction. Well, it's funny you mentioned actors

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>because I had this thought when I was reading this research.

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>In a strange kind of way, all actors in movies

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>are seronoids. Like you have the writer coming up with

0:21:50.440 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>lines for many types of characters that aren't anything like

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>them outwardly at all. Like you can have, you know,

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, a sixty five year old female writer writing

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>lines for a ten year old boy in a play,

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and that boy effectively is a distanced serenoid. And should

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.719
<v Speaker 1>we be able to tell the difference, like sometimes you can.

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes you watch a movie, you know, and you're like,

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>kids wouldn't say that, that's not how kids talk, but

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>other times you buy it. Yeah. I think one of

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the things to keep in mind about serenoids and ultimately

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>about echo borgs this we've moved forward is that we're

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a hybrid personality. So there's the there, there

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>are the words and the personality of the individual who

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 1>is informing, and then the words of the shadower or

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the serenoid. That individual is bringing their own delivery, their

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>own personality to it. Sure, because your personality, as you

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>present it outwardly, is way more than the words you say. Yeah, obviously,

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's your body language, it's your expressions, it's you know,

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the way you carry yourself. I mean that that's all

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the message you present. Like we can all

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think of of movies or TV shows where there's a

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 1>particularly gifted actor who's able to bring lack lester lines

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to life in a way that a less gifted actor

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>who just would not be able to achieve. I always

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>think of ral Julia in Overdrawn at the Memory Bank,

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>who you know, some people, you know, it's easy to

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of fun with his performance. It's you know,

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.399
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of cheesy and outlandish. But that man in

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that movie which is like a you know, a low

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>budget PDS adaptation of a of a science fiction story.

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>He brings so much life to every line, so many

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>lines in that in that film, if they were delivered

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>by a lesser actor, would have just fallen flat. But

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>he makes even the most pointless line, uh, just really

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>land I agree, and I think this is a common

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>feature actually an older actors. I see this way more

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>commonly with actors who have been in the business for

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a long time. I think of Star Wars Episode two,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:53.360
<v Speaker 1>which my opinion is that that is a horrible, horrible movie. Huh.

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But when Christopher Lee shows up and starts talking, the

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 1>writing I think is just as bad as it's been

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the entire time. But suddenly I'm okay, I'm listening Christopher Lee.

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying it. He is really selling this horrible dialogue. Yeah, yeah, exactly.

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>So in that respect, Raw Julia, Christopher Lee, they would

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>make wonderful serenoids. And keep in the mind they might

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>have made excellent echo borgs. Okay, So Robert and think

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about echo borgs being the natural extension

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of serenoids. So the serenoid is a person being fed

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>lines by another person. The echo borg, as we talked

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>about at the beginning of the episode, would be a

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>person being fed lines by a computer program. Yes, I

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>want to know, are there any studies where people have

0:24:38.600 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>looked into this phenomena and if so, does a person

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 1>delivering the lines from a chat bot make the chat

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>bought any more convincing in the Turing test? Well, indeed,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that that's exactly what we're gonna look at in this

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>half of the podcast, particularly the work of two individuals

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>British social psychologists Kevin Cordy and Alex Gilefski. And Uh,

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>basically we have two studies that we're gonna we're gonna

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>analyze here, two thousand fourteen study where they essentially just

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>recreate some of Milgram's work and uh and look at

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the at the serenoid, and then a two thousand fifteen

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>study that just came out, um where they take the serenoid,

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>apply it to chatter bots and give us the echo borg. Yeah.

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So the script we read earlier from the conversation between

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the eco borg and the regular interactor that came from

0:25:32.680 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>London School of Economics Research. It was a YouTube video

0:25:35.400 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that they had put up, So that was their echo

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Borg saying that it liked fruit Trees and that the

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Imitation Game was its favorite movie, you know, And I

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>do want to throw in like that was the dead

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>giveaway that was a robot, because that that movie is

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>nobody's favorite movie, right, And I think Rose, the chatbot

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>in that example, is sort of programmed to be playful,

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>like not necessarily to be entirely convincing as a human,

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:00.720
<v Speaker 1>because Rose gives other playful answers. Also in that same video,

0:26:00.760 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a part where the human interactor says to the

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>human eco borg, do you like food? And the human

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>eco borg delivers the line yummy electricity. Yeah. I don't

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>know if the comedy needs to be a primary programming

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of function. I mean, you know, humor is an important

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 1>part of any human interaction. Sure, I mean that's good

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>humor for a chat boton, but that's obviously the chatbot

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>who's not trying all that hard to hide it. Yeah,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 1>being a little little two cooi. Alright, So let's look

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>at this the work of Accordion glevskie Um. In two

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand fourteen, they poblished this paper in the Journal of

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Social Psychology, and they essentially set out to to replicate

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Milgram's work. Okay, So the basic set up here is

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>they they had a shadower set in an interrogation room.

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>So that's the seranoid type figure, and uh, they were

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 1>engaged in a conversation with an interactant. This is an

0:26:55.600 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>unsuspecting volunteer. Meanwhile, the source, that's the individual feeding the shadow,

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we're feeding the serenoid. Um. They're in another room and

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>they're observing everything through video and audio links, and they

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>tell the shadow or exactly what they need to say

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>through a uh, you know, discreet FM radio transmitter set up. Okay,

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.880
<v Speaker 1>So they have twenty volunteers that are engaged in ten

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>minute conversations with the serenoid and twenty additional volunteers that

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>are tested in a control setting. Okay. So the control

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>setting is just a regular person talking, not being fedlines.

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And so this backed up exactly what Milgram had told

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>us decades earlier that when one human parents and other

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:38.160
<v Speaker 1>humans words, we just totally buy it. Okay. So even

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.960
<v Speaker 1>if you were skeptical of Millgram, and who knows, you

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>might have had reason to be, we've got to We've

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>got a new study backing that up now and the

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>implications of this are kind of creepy. It's that unless

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you check in people's ears to make sure they don't

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:55.440
<v Speaker 1>have an earpiece in there, anybody in your life could

0:27:55.480 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be feeding you lines from somebody sitting in a van

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>outside the building and you might not know it. Yeah,

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at the movie The Exorcist, right, That's

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>why demons, when they possess people, they have to spit,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, green vomit across the room and spin their

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>heads around, because otherwise we're just not going to buy

0:28:12.400 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>into the fact that an individual is not uh functioning

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>of their own free will, right or you know, you've

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 1>got the problem of Okay, so the priest tries to

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>go to the authorities and say, I need to conduct

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 1>an exorcism. My evidence is this person was speaking in

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a language they've never learned. It's like, well, how do

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know they're not being fed that language from somebody

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in a van outside the building through a near piece.

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.919
<v Speaker 1>You've got to have the pup well, you know, speaking

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of possessed children. A second part of the same experiment,

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>according and collepski Um, use a twelve year old male

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>actor to serve as a shadow er while like thirty

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:47.680
<v Speaker 1>seven year old male social social psychologist acts as the source,

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and again no one suspected the illusion, though some thought

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that children might have been coached prior, so there was

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a little you know, trepidation there where they think, uh,

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I think somebody was preparing the kid at this conversation,

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so they picked up that something was off, but they

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't pick up that the kid was being fedlines. Yeah,

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and again that just kind of drives with with so

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>many interactions, most of us having our lives where you

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you talk to somebody and you might think that person

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>seemed kind of fake, but you're not thinking that person

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was serving as a meat puppet for an AI or

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.120
<v Speaker 1>some dude in a van. You just think they're they're

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a little phony there. You know, they have some sort

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of an agenda, they're kind of playing the room, or

0:29:26.840 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>they're they're in just full on customer service mode, etcetera.

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Or they might just be experiencing some anxiety and awkwardness.

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you want to give people the

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>benefit of the doubt, and that's I think coming through

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in some of these experiments. If somebody acts a little

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>awkward or weird, I mean, you don't want to just

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 1>judge them and say that person is a robot. You know,

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>they're being fedlines or something like that. You know, we

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.880
<v Speaker 1>understand that some people get in moods, they have trouble,

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:53.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes they feel awkward. We've all felt like this, and

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you want to be accommodating of other people's awkwardness whenever possible. Yeah,

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, awkwardness is in his own in its own right.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>It is an essential part of human interaction. Um. And

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>if I an AI or a computer wanted a part

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of legitimate human interaction, they need to sign up for

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>some serious awkwardness from time to time. So this initial

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>studies pretty much backs off everything Milgram told us. So

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>from that point, um Cordy and Gillepskie moved on to

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence, to chatter bots and the creation of the

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>eco borg. And again, an echo borg is essentially the

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.600
<v Speaker 1>same as a serenoid, except the shadow er is speaking

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the words of a chatter box, so the source is

0:30:32.160 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>not human, it's a computer program, right, And again this

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is what this is. It's important to keep in mind

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>that a serenoid is a hybrid personality, the individual behind

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the speaker and then the personality of the speaker coming together.

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So in eco borg, the borg aspect of that referring

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to cyborg. It really is a new type of cyborg

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're playing with here, uh, a machine and a

0:30:54.680 --> 0:31:00.479
<v Speaker 1>human as one. And the question presents itself, would we fooled?

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Will we observe an echo borg in action? And and

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>suspect that it's a machine will behind the human face.

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say that even before I read the results

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of the study, when I knew what the subject was,

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought, you know, I bet it depends heavily on

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the sort of pre priming of the study participants, Like

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.560
<v Speaker 1>are they expecting to be interacting with somebody who might

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be an echo borg? Or are they or they just

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>going in blind and interacting with somebody who might be

0:31:32.000 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a little weird. It's true, I mean, when you're presented

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with the if you're presented with the possibility, hey, you

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 1>might be talking to a robot here, chance that's gonna

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it's gonna alter your perceptions of bit. Yeah.

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So what did they find? First of all, this is

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>how the study rolled out. Forty one participants in the

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>experiment were shown a text messaging client with two windows

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>until they be interacting with two human shadowers at the

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.960
<v Speaker 1>same time. One shadower is sourced by another human be

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:03.480
<v Speaker 1>either source patch atter bot, and each interrogator asked questions

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>via text, and then the participants were told they'd be

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>asked which of the two agents was a real human. Now,

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the researchers also wanted to compare human and text responses,

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 1>so they divided the group into two groups. Twenty of

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the participants typed their half of the conversation and into

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a text client, but got responses from the two echo

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>boards setting in the same room. The other twenty one

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>participants just had text chats the whole way through. So

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>this way they would have a you know, a base

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>comparison to the you know, the more established chatter bot

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:35.840
<v Speaker 1>to rank test situation that we waked turtling into a terminal. Right,

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>So the results were that all the text only participants

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>correctly identified the real humans. So again dead giveaway based

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on just the limitations of the chatter bot um, it's

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy to tell that you're just talking to a program. Yeah,

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>if you if you have enough time to talk to them,

0:32:53.720 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you can almost definitely trip them up. Yeah. Now, on

0:32:56.680 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, in the other set up, only two

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>of the participants didn't identify the real humans, so in

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the eco borg situations, they still weren't too terribly convincing, Right,

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>so they can tell the difference between a seranoid and

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>an eco borg. Everybody except two of them could, Right,

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So it seems that human or not still rather easy

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to identify the machine behind the flesh. You know, I

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 1>would chalk this up probably just to the poor quality

0:33:25.680 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of today's best chat bots. Yeah, I mean, because even

0:33:30.800 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>even a raw Julia or or Christopher Lee, you know,

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>presented with the with the dialogue we were using earlier,

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they're they're not They're just gonna come off as a

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>doll person at best, you know, Right, There's no way

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you can sell the line I like fruit trees in

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a way that makes people think you're you're being fedlines

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>by a human, no matter how good of an actor

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you are. That's a dead giveaway that the machine does

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 1>not know what to do with what you just said. Yeah,

0:33:55.120 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>unless you're a toddler speaking that line, or or again,

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're hiding it behind to say, some sort of

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>mental deficiency or or language gap um or some sort

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of you know, character that's leveled over everything it's going

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a dead giveaway. But the echo borgs certainly

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.520
<v Speaker 1>made the machine seem more human and the text only group,

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the chatbot received an average a humanity rating of two

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>point one four on a scale of one to ten.

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>In the echo board group, the average was a four

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>point oh five. So significant difference there. Okay, yeah, that's interesting.

0:34:29.239 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>So we can still tell that the Serenoid is more

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 1>human than an echo borg. But an echo borg is

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:40.640
<v Speaker 1>more human at least in a qualitative evaluation than a

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>text only chat bot. Yeah, to lay it out, text

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 1>text only chat bought two point one four humanity. Uh,

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>the echo boorg four point oh five humanity, and then

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the Serenoid had a humanity rating of eight point seven six,

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 1>eight point one five. So it sounds to me like

0:34:56.600 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>even a normal human interaction, like your score, your score

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>ring a nine, just straight up non augmented human interactions.

0:35:03.640 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>You're doing pretty good. Yeah, So it does prove that

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:11.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a humanizing effect to the eco borg system.

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 1>It's just the limitations of existing chatter bots that they're

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>coming into play, right. It makes you think if there

0:35:17.840 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>were a really good chatbot out there, the eco borg

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>might be that finishing touch, that final push over the

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>edge of the cliff to sort of make the you know,

0:35:27.120 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the perfect android. Yeah, kind of a bridge for the

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>uncanny valley, you know, like you just just all you

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 1>need is just a little acting on top of this

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to really bring the script to life. Now. They they

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.280
<v Speaker 1>also conducted a second experiment in this and they tested

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to see if fifty eight new participants would guess whether

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>they were talking to an echo borg or a person

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>pretending to be an echo borg. So, you know, obviously

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a person who's actually fed their lines by a chatter

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>bot or someone who's just playing around and pretending to

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be speaking the words of a chatter bot. Right, so

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a reverse touring test. Can you pretend to

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>be a machine? Right? But here's the catch. They're both

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>pure eco borgs. There, there's no there's no faco echo boorg.

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But the but the individual being tested they think that

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the two echo borgs is just a person pretending.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So seventy of the twenty eight participants who faced an

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:19.800
<v Speaker 1>echo borg through I thought the person was just mimicking,

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>mimicking a chat bot. So they seemed fake but not inhuman.

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So if there is you know, some reason to believe

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that this is just a person being a little fake

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and putting on a show versus being you know, a

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>complete echo borg. We're still going to give them the

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>benefit of a doubt. Interesting, now, I think we should

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:39.319
<v Speaker 1>do our duty and hedge a little bit. Say, all

0:36:39.360 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>these sample sizes were pretty small, and it would be

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see more research along these lines, like with

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:48.880
<v Speaker 1>bigger sample sizes and trying to repeat these results. And

0:36:49.000 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and and also to your point, is chatterbots improve, it's

0:36:52.440 --> 0:36:55.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be interesting to see echo borgs employed as

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 1>as a way to test them. And in fact, that's

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>something that's pointed out in the in the study, is

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>that like this is a great way moving forward to

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to analyze the chatter bots. Yeah, but also, as

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:10.279
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned, the people who were interacting with these with

0:37:10.480 --> 0:37:14.719
<v Speaker 1>these serenoids and echo borgs, we're in some of these

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>cases primed to expect something weird because they're in a

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>test environment. You can't hide the fact that you're in

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:25.439
<v Speaker 1>a psychological test and you're you know, whenever you're part

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 1>of a test group, you're sort of like ready for

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>some weirdness, you know. Now, I wonder how this would

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>be if you sprung these shadowers, these serenoids, and these

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 1>echo borgs on people in a purely social scenario like

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>a like we talked about at the beginning of convention,

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:47.719
<v Speaker 1>or you know, workplace meeting or a party where people

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>weren't expecting anything strange to be going on right until

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>they have to fill out of survey after they leave

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the dinner party. So what did you think of Susie

0:37:56.560 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and or antecdote exactly. Yeah, I don't know why she

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>was so into fruit trees. You wouldn't shut up about it.

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, gardening is okay. But yeah, Now, something that

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really stood out to me when we were going over this,

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>especially when you start thinking about the eco borg and

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>what it would like to what it would be like

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to be an echo borg, and the sort of pros

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and cons of being an eco borg, of of of

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>giving life to this will behind your will. He reminded

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:29.200
<v Speaker 1>me a lot of transactive memory, which comes into play

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>really in two key areas. First of all, it's the

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>method by which we've always stored information in other people. Okay,

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.359
<v Speaker 1>so you know those facts that you never remember because

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>your spouse remembers them, or it's that, or it's a

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 1>particular spelling or a bit of trivia that you never

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>keep in your own head because you always look it

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>up on your smartphone. It's the same thing. So outsourcing

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a memory. I think this, this must be one of

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:55.839
<v Speaker 1>your favorite topics. You've come back to this a lot,

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's really interesting that because I see

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it every day in my own life, and as I

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 1>read about it's like, it's it's all I see. It's

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>like the things that I forget, the things that I

0:39:04.880 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>my mind refuses to learn because I've outsourced it to

0:39:09.000 --> 0:39:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the ubiquitous technology. Yeah. Yeah, I think the story is that,

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Socrates was worried about this, right that if

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, if we teach everybody writing and we have

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>writing on scrolls all the time, nobody's going to be

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.399
<v Speaker 1>able to remember anything. You're not priming your memory. There

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>might be some truth to that, But then again, are

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>are we not just, you know, by writing things down

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and having Internet archives and things becoming cyborgs in a way? Yeah,

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in a sense, the voice is already whispering

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in our ear. Yeah. I mean you could look at

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>it as a weakening of the human mind, or you

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 1>could look at it as a technological upgrade of the

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:48.479
<v Speaker 1>human mind. Yeah, to what extent, will we all become

0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:50.840
<v Speaker 1>echo boards of a type? You know where instead of

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 1>it being a situation where I'm just going to be

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a conduit for a powerful artificial intelligence, what if it's

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>more like I want to augment my existing self, which

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I think is pretty good with say, you know, an

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 1>artificial intelligence that'll feed me the right lines in like

0:40:06.440 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 1>business situations or social situations. So it's you know, less

0:40:11.120 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on I'm just gonna be a meat puppet, but

0:40:14.000 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>rather can I merge with this AI, maybe even just

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>a small percentage you know five AI, and become a

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 1>better person and more effective person. Yeah, And these experiments,

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 1>all these examples are are word for word dictation. So

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the shadower of the of the serenoid type

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>being fedlines by human or the shadower of the echo

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>borg type being fedlines by a computer, it's all lines.

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 1>You're getting full sentences and you're just trained to say

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>them as fast as you can. I mean, I wonder

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.719
<v Speaker 1>if this setup could be more conceptual in nature, or

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, feeding you facts or feeding you sort of

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:57.480
<v Speaker 1>feedback on the progress of the conversation. It also makes

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.200
<v Speaker 1>me think about the comedic possibilities because you imagine an

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>individual and sort of you know, a very updated Syrian

0:41:03.200 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>No kind of story story where individual goes into a

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>business situation and they thought they loaded uh you know,

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 1>business Helper for a one into their into their their

0:41:13.040 --> 0:41:18.000
<v Speaker 1>mind box, and instead they put Lothario four point one romance. Yeah,

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>so suddenly they're they're fed all these really effective lines.

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh if you were you know, in a bar, but

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>instead you're you're throwing them out there in the business meeting. Yeah,

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it could work. Walks on the beach have

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 1>to do with the new rollout, well, you know, it

0:41:34.280 --> 0:41:38.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind Black Mirror, the British television series that

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>does such a fantastic job looking at the ramifications near

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>future of our modern technology, often with very troubling results.

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>The Christmas episode they recently did, which I have not

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>seen yet. I think that's the only episode I haven't seen. Yeah,

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's made it to like Netflix here

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 1>in the States yet, And I'm not gonna spoil anything,

0:41:56.440 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but the initial setup involves one character who who offers

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a Syrano de Bergerac kind of service to individuals out

0:42:06.960 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>there who need a little help with their their pickup game.

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 1>I number one, that's super creepy. And number two, I

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>can totally see that being a real thing. Yeah, I

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>don't find that out outlandish at all. Yeah. I mean,

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the great thing about Black Mirror is that, you

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:25.880
<v Speaker 1>know that's it leans in the sci fi direction, but

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 1>not too far like it's and and and that it's

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>perfect science fiction because it speaks to the problems that

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we have today and how we are viewing the problems

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to come. Exactly. If you want to see some disturbingly

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>plausible dystopias, watch Black Mirror. But you know it ultimately

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>leads to the question echo bot, echo borgs? Is this

0:42:47.800 --> 0:42:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a dystopian idea or is it a pretty cool idea?

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Is it ultimately a utopian idea where it

0:42:54.400 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>would allow us to to be better individuals? I don't know.

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, would the ancient for loss forers look at

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>our relationship with the contents of our computers and the

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 1>web as a horrible dystopia and feels fine to me?

0:43:09.360 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>But would they look at that and say, oh, you know,

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>react the same way as we do to a Black

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Mirror episode? Problem I mean also they would look at

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:18.279
<v Speaker 1>our pants and say, what are they doing? Where are

0:43:18.320 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>their telegets? Oh my god, yeah, a dressed like a persian.

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:25.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand. I don't know. Ultimately, that's a question

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>throughout to the listeners. You know, what, how would you

0:43:28.320 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>accept that job offer that we laid out at the

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the episode. And and furthermore, would you augment

0:43:34.440 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>yourself with some sort of mild echo borg system again,

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like a you know, a romance one oh one or

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a business business strategy one oh one kind of program

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to to feed you the necessary lines or even just

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>ideas or facts that you might need to make it

0:43:49.239 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>through that business luncheon or dinner date. You know. In

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>another aspect of transactive memory that I want to drive

0:43:57.120 --> 0:43:59.920
<v Speaker 1>home that that plays in nicely with the hybrid per

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.920
<v Speaker 1>sonality model of serenoids and echo boards, and that is

0:44:04.560 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>cross queuing. Okay. This is when, and I imagine a

0:44:08.040 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>number of you can can relate to. This is when

0:44:09.680 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you're having a conversation with let's say you know, a

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>spouse or a partner, a close friend or family member,

0:44:15.040 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and neither of you are quite able to remember something

0:44:17.800 --> 0:44:20.200
<v Speaker 1>on your own, but when you start queuing each other

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the you're able to remember it together in a way

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that you wouldn't, you know, kind of vultron style, you know,

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:28.920
<v Speaker 1>bringing it together, and suddenly your combined power for call

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that memory, right, you're sort of pulling the triggers on

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 1>each other's brains. Yeah, so I think it's interesting to

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:38.080
<v Speaker 1>think about that, uh, that scenario cross queuing and transactive memory,

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>especially because if you imagine this AI scenario where you

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>know you've got some kind of on board artificial intelligence

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that feeds you lines occasionally when you need them. You know,

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you're not just a parrot for everything it says, but

0:44:50.480 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>it's it's an occasional helper. How does it know when

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you need help? You would need some kind of some

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of queuing in the conversation or even just in

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>your mind for this thing to know. Okay, I'm going

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to step in. Like every time you go hmm, and

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>then it starts feeding you the line, it's like he's stalling,

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>throwing some throwing some good dust, some good winkow there

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:14.919
<v Speaker 1>every time you say the word interesting, interesting, interesting. Yeah,

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean it would it would certainly change the podcast game.

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you that. So I guess that wraps it

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>up for today, but we have some homework for you.

0:45:22.360 --> 0:45:25.200
<v Speaker 1>If you happen to be watching Benedict Cumberbatch in The

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Imitation Game, I want to see if you can figure

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>out how the underlying gospel message of the machine cult

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of fruit Trees is propagated in the cinematic subtleties of

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the film. So if you're watching it, just give it

0:45:38.320 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>some thought. In the meantime, check out stuff to Blow

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:43.080
<v Speaker 1>your Mind dot com. That's where you'll find all of

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>our podcast episodes. You'll find our videos are blog posts,

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as well as links out to our social media accounts

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>such as Facebook, Twitter, and Tumbler. And if you want

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to let us know whether you are interested in a

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>career as an echo borg or a shadower of some

0:45:56.719 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 1>other kind of strange alien intelligence, you can email us

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at blow the Mind at how stuff works dot com.

0:46:05.920 --> 0:46:08.439
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, visit

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com