WEBVTT - Episode 16: Making Money When Everyone Else is Losing Theirs

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to the latest edition of the Odd

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Lots Podcast. I'm Joe Wisenthal, Managing editor at Bloomberg Market.

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>My co host Tracy Alloway is away again this week,

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>but fortunately she is going to be back next week.

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 1>But since she's out, we're doing another special episode or

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>unusual episode. I wanted to talk to one of my

0:00:28.440 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>colleagues here at Bloomberg who wrote a fantastic news story

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that I absolutely love entitled the Big Long making a

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:41.600
<v Speaker 1>killing in the market everyone left for dead. It's about

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>the people who made a fortune by going long risky

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 1>assets down at the worst part during the worst period

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of the financial crisis. So essentially the opposite of the

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>big short. So um, without further ado, I want to

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>get right into it. I'm here with Alastair Marsh who

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>wrote this story. Alistair, thank you very much for joining us.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks having me on. Let's give the quick round up.

0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:10.520
<v Speaker 1>What's your story about? Who were these investors who were

0:01:10.640 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>bold enough to go along very risky assets right at

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of January two thousand nine. Who were they

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and what was their bad sure were They were trading

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>asset back securities for a UK bank called h Boss

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>H BOSS has a very interesting history in the UK.

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact that one of the most controversial ones, you

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>might say, UM, ultimately collapsed back into the end of

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight. It had a government bail out,

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>it had a secret cash infusion from the Central Bank,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately was taken over by Lloyd's Bank. So while

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>all this UM was happening in the in the background,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>you had these two traders at h BOSS called Melam

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Patel and Richard Paddle, who had spent the last ten

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>years or so trading A B S every day. And

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>when the crisis hit, A B S the asset back

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>security is and these were the securities that were tied

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to mortgages mostly that everybody has come to know and understand.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>We're sort of a key variable in the financial crisis exactly. Yeah,

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>these were typically backed by so these were bonds backed

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>by mortgages in the UK, typically UM, and they were

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>trading these for ten years or so. For most of

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.959
<v Speaker 1>that time, these were considered a relatively vanilla product. Most

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of them were rated triple A, and it all seemed

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>like a good and safest houses, so to speak, kind

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of bet. The title of your story is called The

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Big Long obviously a reference to the Big Short, So

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>explain what they did in this trade and how it

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>was sort of the mirror opposite of the Big Short trade. Sure,

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.079
<v Speaker 1>there as many kind of paradles to the Big Shot. Effectively,

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>the Big Short was saying that, um, the housing market

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to collapse, and these subprime mortgage bonds are

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>priced at crazy levels that don't imply that collapse. Well,

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they had the opposite view that in the UK the

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>housing market was not going to collapse, and that the

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>mortgage bonds in the UK implied that the mortgage market

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>had collapsed or was about too, and they believed it wasn't.

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And they believed that the same kind of massful closures

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>that we saw in the US, or the same spike

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in mortgage you is, was it wasn't going to happen

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. And obviously they they ultimately turned out

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to be correct. So anyone who's seen the movie or

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>read the book The Big Short knows that it wasn't

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>just enough to have a negative view on housing or

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>asset values, but that these trades were not trivial to exercise.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>They were complicated to structure. In the case of the

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>story you reported, on, there were difficulties and complications in

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>executing the opposite trade. What did they have to do

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to express their view on these assets? Sure? What the

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest difference between the two, leaving aside one was short

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and one was long, was that the short bet. These

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>were mainly institutional investors, hedge funds and others trying to

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>do this, but the big long These guys whilst they

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>were traders by profession, they worked for a bank. Actually

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>they used there, they put up their own money. This

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>was a kind of Ultimately they were retail investors and

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>so they had to go They had to first get

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>compliance from the bank and they managed to get this.

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>It's what's quite interesting and I've I've had feedback from

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>a number of people in their ASBAC securities market here

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>in the UK who are quite indignant that these guys

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>were able to do this because they whilst working at

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>various other banks, wish that they had had the opportunity

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they were permitted to do so as well. But anyway,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>they they they had to ask compliance that that they

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>managed to get that, and then they had to go

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to the retail broker and say I want to buy

0:04:48.880 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a BS please, and the retail broke would say, you

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>want to buy what typically there are? These are retail

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>brokers that are typically used to selling vanilla bond and stocks. Right,

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not acid back securities or the sort of more

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>complicated stuff that institutional traders trade, right exactly. Yeah, that

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they be the kind of thing like I want to

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>buy BP shares or I want to sell bark these

0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>shares please. So asking for triple B granite bonds, for example,

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>which is what their best trade was, was virtually unheard of,

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and they had to explain to these to the basically

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>called a call center in Glasgow. For some reason, in

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the UK, most of our call center operators are based

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>in Scotland because there's something to do with the Scottish

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>accent that's kind of soothing or something like that. Is

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that is that really a thing? That's really a thing

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>called most most banks, which boards, etcetera. It's always in

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Scotland anyway. So they call them, they call Glasgow, they're

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>they're on the phone for two hours and they have

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to explain not only what they want, um, what it is,

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.479
<v Speaker 1>how it works, but also kind of where they can

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 1>get it and in some cases who to call to

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 1>get it. So for the A B s, they because

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting at the Bloomberg, they have all context in

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the market. They know that, for example, Morgan Stanley has

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>got these bonds, so they know that Credit Swiss has

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>got those bonds. So they'd say, cool this guy, Morgan Stanley,

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:10.320
<v Speaker 1>please and get me these bonds. So basically they are

0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>doing the job before the retailer. I love this because

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.919
<v Speaker 1>there because their institutional traders, they know everything there is

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to know about what they're trading. But because they, for

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>this weird quirk, were forced to go through a retail

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>brokerage to make these purchases. They had to sit there

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>on the phone and walk the broker through the trade

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly so Melan Melan Patel said that he would while

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting at his desk, he'd be on hold or be

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Beethoven Symphony and then in the background

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>whilst the cool center person tried to work out what

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it was and how to how to get hold of it.

0:06:46.800 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But but ultimately these retail brokers were able to do

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the mechanics of buying these assets and getting them into

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>their accounts. Ultimately, yes, but it was very painful. That

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>was It was it, but it was very painful. Now,

0:07:02.000 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>do the stories of these two traders, Patel and Paddle,

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>do they sort of undermine a common argument? I mean,

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the view is, I think in popular culture and probably

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.679
<v Speaker 1>expressed by the books and movies, that the people trading

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>these assets had no idea what they were trading. They

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>had no idea what was in them. Everyone on Wall

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Street was kind of stupid and there were only a

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>few smart people. But does their experience show that actually

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the traders really did understand them and

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>were at least more aware of what was in these

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>assets than popular culture is depicted. Well, they certainly knew them,

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's no basically they The way they explained it

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is that they were trading for ten years. They knew

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the names of the bonds, that knew how they were structed,

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>They knew were to buy them, who to sell them to,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>So they knew the market at the back of their hand.

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of stands to reason that the same

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>thing would be true of other traders and other institutions.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not to say that they weren't kind of

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>egregious things done in very very various times of various places,

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but it stands to reason that people who trade these

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>products every day, and these are not simple products, are

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>very complicated. That's why it took them so long to

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>get it through the their brokers. Um, you know, they

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>should know the risk, they should know what's backing them.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>They should know what the mortgages are like, they should

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>know the chances of um you know that the arrears history.

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>They but it should know that stuff. But it does

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>seem like the way people talk about this period always

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>is very black or white. There's a few people that

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>were warning and then all of the other people were

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>cheap and not, you know, not paying attention to the

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>risks at all. And it sounds like it's not quite

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that simple. Yeah, that's true. And actually I think in

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the pages of The Big Short, actually it

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>implies that some of the guys in the investment banks

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't know what they were doing. They were just hoping

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that the a merry go round to go on for

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer than it did, so he knew

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 1>what was in there. Of course, one of the things

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>that makes The Big Short such a compelling story it

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:12.839
<v Speaker 1>just the jaw dropping returns that those traders got in

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money they made talk to me about

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>how well these two traders did. Well. They didn't do

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>anything um on the scale of the big shot. They

0:09:24.280 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't become billionaires and they didn't become billionaires no, um,

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think well that they were. They didn't give they

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't disclose fully the numbers. We had to do some

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>calculations here, but we we estimated that Buttel made about

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>one point too million pounds, which is not bad return

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that the best they put he put forward, we reckoned

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about four fifty thou pounds um. Their best return was

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 1>on bonds called Granite. These were sort of controversial and

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>central to the whole thing. Tell us about the Granite bonds. Well,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Grantite we're backed by mortgages from UK Bank called Northern Rock,

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 1>and Northern Rock is probably the closest thing we had

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in the UK to sub prime and the bank basically

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>massively over leveraged um Well. It had a huge residential

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>mortgage backed securities program and which was called Granite and

0:10:18.520 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>allowed it to fund fifty billion pounds worth of mortgage lending.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately it succumbed to the first bank run in the

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>UK in a hundred and forty years. So the I

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>remember the scenes of watching people queuing outside of Northern

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Rock branches on the high streets of various towns across

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the UK. That that that sort of that is almost

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>as iconic as the images of the Lehman Brothers bankers

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>leaving the building with the you know, their crates and

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>so on and so so. Northern Rock is a very

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of controversial and um institution, and it was bailed

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>out by the UK government. Um. But granite bonds because

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they were sold, I mean without going to all the

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>technicalities of securitization. They were sold by a separate vehicle

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that continue to exist once Northern Rock didn't. In the

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>story you quote Paddle is saying, quote there was a

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>concern in the market that the UK government would rip

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it up. What did that mean that they would theoretically

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>pay nothing in the end? Yeah, well they they bought

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>these bonds. So they were initially sold at a hundred

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.760
<v Speaker 1>pence on the pound. They brought them eightpence, So now

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this was discount. Yeah. Um, Now that that was for

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the riskiest bonds, the ones that were first in line

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to take losses. Um. But even so, that's that's kind

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of huge decline and the view was simply that basically

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it was down to political risk that the UK government

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>having taken over the institution. I don't think we've had

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a nationalization like that in well in anyone's memory. Um,

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen? This is unprecedented. Are they just

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:56.079
<v Speaker 1>going to say, do you know what, we're not paying

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.319
<v Speaker 1>those bonds back. This bank doesn't have enough money, We're

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to pay. Why did they feel confident that

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>the government would not rebub those bonds? Well they didn't actually,

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>but what there basically their view was that m mathematically

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>it worked out that they should get at least get

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>their money back. So they bought eight pence on the pound.

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think the way they described by the way

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they described it to me was that it would take

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>about two years for the granite structure to be unwound,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>as in it's quite a complicated structure and lots of

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>mortgages behind it, and soon it would take about two

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>years in their calculations to unwind. And in that period

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they should have two years of five coupons, so ten,

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>so they should get ten back having put eight in.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>So that was their very kind of basic bet. Obviously,

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 1>they then had a huge huge price rally, so that

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that's where the huge returns came from. But at that

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>point they were just thinking. Yeah. So in you have

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this chart that obviously the list a nurse to the

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>podcast can't see, but I'm looking at it right now,

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and it shows that they bought in around eight and

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>then they sold around sixty. But actually the bonds continued

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to rally. Uh what well, uh, you know, there's a

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit of volatility, but they actually rallied much more

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>even after they sold them. Yeah, that's right, um, and

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I did, Austin, why didn't you try to hold on?

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Because actually they were redeemed in January and December so

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>that they don't exist anymore and they were paid back

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>at pass so at one. That's just let's just pause

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>right there. How unbelievable that is that you know that

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>we all remember these bonds, these first in line losses

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand eight and two thousand nine. I don't

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>even think that got much attention that in ten they

0:13:45.840 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>had essentially recovered a hundred percent of their value. Not

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 1>that they recovered some, but virtually the entire thing. I

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think that part is almost entirely unknown to people. Yeah,

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty unbelievable really, Um, but they said or Patel

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically said that his start of investing is not to

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>try to time the top and not to try to

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>hold on for the last or so. But having gone

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>from eight to seventy or sixty, he thought, you know what,

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good return. I'll take that. And actually,

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>at the time they sold out, which was about eleven,

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't clear at all that the UK government was

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>going to sell them. That's that's why they were deemed

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 1>because the government sold them, but it wasn't clear at

0:14:29.320 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>all that was going to happen at that point. So yeah,

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>so no reason to get greedy. Eight to sixty is

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a pretty a pretty nice return, isn't it. Yeah. Um,

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's look big picture for a second. Um. You

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>know one thing I want I'm always curious about is

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>um the sort of psychology of trading, making a making

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a bed, or making a trade that's the exact opposite

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>of how the market sees like, basically, having the guts

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to make a call that's different from what everyone around

0:14:58.680 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you is um calling for. And it seems to me

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that bears, they're always bears, are always people who think

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the world is coming to an end. There are always

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>people who are predicting doom, and that sort of accepted.

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>People just accept that there's going to be negative people

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>out there. But in a way, optimism in the face

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of panic actually strikes me as much more brave, because

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.160
<v Speaker 1>no one likes to hear someone called a perma ball,

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or people mock the balls. People have an intellectual respect

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 1>for negative people. How does that? What's your view on that?

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that like that this view that they

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>expressed was particularly brave and gutsy given the prevailing negative

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>sentiment at the time. I think it was, and especially

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the very place where they were

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>sitting that when they put these trades on, or when

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>they first asked permission to do that. That was in

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>January two thousand and nine, and it was that month

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that the takeover of h Boss actually happened. So they've

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>had in in a few months earlier Lehman had gone down,

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>then HBOS itself had had a twenty billion pound bail

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>out from the government, it had a Central Bank additional

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>top up from the Central Bank, and so with all

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that background for them to be sort of bullish for

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>lack of a better way, but it is um. It's

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 1>quite remarkable. But what's also interesting about these guys is

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that that they're not particularly um. They're not how you

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>might think or a caricature of a bond trader. They're

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>not kind of gregarious types or brash. That they're both

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>quite um, quiet and quite thoughtful. And actually Milan in

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>particularly very interesting because he's he had he started um

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>investing in bank bonds, not a B S, even though

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>he traded a B S for living. He first started

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>investing in bank bonds and he told me, having not

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>known this market that well, he spent his evenings for

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>about a month or so reading through bond prospectuses. So

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>this is just like Michael burry So was like someone

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>who's actually willing to dive into all the paperwork to

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>really figure out what's in there and how did you

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>find the story. Just as a reporter, it was quite

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>fun finding them. Actually, I spent quite a bit of

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>time in reporting on the sale of Granite the UK

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>government announced it was going to sell. At the time,

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it was thirteen billion pounds and it was the biggest

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>ever sale of assets from the UK government. And because

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 1>granted was such a well known um series of bonds.

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to investigate and actually managed to break some

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>news on who was bidding for them, who wanted to

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>buy them. In the end, it was Cerberus who won.

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.960
<v Speaker 1>And but as part of that I kept hearing about

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 1>these mystical traders or the mythical I should say, traders

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>who bought granted at the bottom, and I guess there

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>had to be someone, right, Yeah, Well, one one whimsical

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund manager told me that it was Harold Tynesite

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>who bought the bonds at the bottom. But I wanted

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to find out who did, particularly when in December the

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>first bond started to be redeemed and they were paid

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>back at part at one hundred, which to me thought,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>if he bought at the bottom and got a hundred back,

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that's amazing UM. And so I kind of made it

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a mission to find out who brought them,

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:20.119
<v Speaker 1>and through asking various contacts in the market, came across

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Richard Paddell and he was kind enough to to speak

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:26.480
<v Speaker 1>to me in turn with the tale and was fascinating.

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>And then Milan also, so yeah, it was a really

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting investigative process and looking back at the crisis in

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the will the UK's experience of the crisis really interesting.

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Other other others that you think probably you haven't found, Well,

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>there's others I know of, but I haven't necessarily included

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in the piece. Um, there were some others who did

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it with them at h BOSS. I mean, Milan and

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Richard were effectively the brains of the trade, but there

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>were other traders that got in on various various purchases

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with them. Um. We also know of a few other

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds and one particularly large US investment bank UM

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that shall remain unnamed. I guess that that, yeah, that

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>also got in on the trade. But they were doing

0:19:13.359 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it not for them, not for themselves or their own

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>personal money, but for for the either the prop desk

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>or for the hedge funds. So looking ahead to today,

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.040
<v Speaker 1>are they're always these types of stories in the market,

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>people finding assets with extreme dislocations or is this really

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the type of thing that when there's a huge crisis

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>or a huge bubble, Yes, you find them, but most

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of the time people can't really be expected to find

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>these extraordinary dislocations. I think you could probably argue that

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>both ways. Actually, I mean, Richard Paddles said something very

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:54.639
<v Speaker 1>interesting that he reckons that every ten years this or

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>approximately every ten years, there's some big market event that happens,

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>whether it be the dot com the do calm bubble bursting,

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>whether it be the Asian financial crisis, whether the e

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.399
<v Speaker 1>M debt in Russia for example, And this time around

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.639
<v Speaker 1>he said, well this in so in the two thousand

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine, it was in the A B

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>S market, aspect securities market, and since he was trading

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that market, he was in the perfect position to profit

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>from it. Now, following his logic, then you know, in

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a few years time, we should see something else, something similar,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps some people might say, oh, that's bank bonds,

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>or maybe that's high yield, or some people might even

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>say that's et F s um. So I'm sure that

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there are going to be more of these type of scenarios.

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess you just need to be in the right

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>place at the right time. I really know that market well, Alistair,

0:20:46.000 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much for joining us. I'm looking forward

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to in a few years you reporting on who made

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the big money in and sixteen. I'm sure you'll find

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>them and I really appreciate you coming on the other podcast.

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Thank you, and thank you very

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us on the Odd Lodge podcast. I'm

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter at the

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.199
<v Speaker 1>Stalwart and you should follow Alistair too because he'll be

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>turning up the next great uh, the next grade scoop.

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>He's on Twitter at at Alistair j Marsh and we'll

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>be back here next week. We at Bloomberg are proud

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of our new and growing slate of original content podcasts.

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 1>They include Benchmark, a jargon free dive into the stories

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that drive the global economy. It's hosted by Tory Stillwell,

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Ako and Dan Moss. Odd Thoughts, hosted by Joe Wisenhal

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and Tracy Alloway, takes you on a not so random

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>walk through hot topics and markets, finance and economics. And

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>each week Bloomberg m and a reporter Alex Sherman discusses

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>market moving news about mergers in Deal of the Week

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>from Washington and points in between. Meantime, we showcase the

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>intersection of politics and pop culture with Culture Caucus, hosted

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>by John Hilman and Will Leach from Bloomberg Politics. And

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>then there's Masters in Politics, hosted by veteran TV producers

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Tammy Hadad, and Betsy Fisher Martin. This bi weekly podcast

0:22:15.600 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>features extended conversations with candidates, campaign strategists, and journalists. You

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>can find all these podcasts on the Bloomber terminal, bloomber

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>dot com, iTunes, SoundCloud, and any one of your very

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite podcast platforms.