1 00:00:21,244 --> 00:00:24,604 Speaker 1: Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all you 2 00:00:24,645 --> 00:00:27,565 Speaker 1: can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in 3 00:00:27,685 --> 00:00:31,365 Speaker 1: just two visits. See any standard two D movie anytime 4 00:00:31,725 --> 00:00:34,805 Speaker 1: with no blackoutdates or restrictions. Sign up now on the 5 00:00:34,885 --> 00:00:37,284 Speaker 1: Regal app or at the link in our description and 6 00:00:37,405 --> 00:00:41,685 Speaker 1: use code film spot twenty six to receive fifteen percent off. 7 00:00:47,965 --> 00:00:50,445 Speaker 1: What kind of a show you guys putting on here today? 8 00:00:50,565 --> 00:00:52,965 Speaker 1: You're not interested in armed now? No, Look, we're going 9 00:00:53,004 --> 00:00:53,484 Speaker 1: to do this thing. 10 00:00:53,525 --> 00:00:58,365 Speaker 2: We're going to have a conversation from Chicago. This is 11 00:00:58,365 --> 00:01:01,965 Speaker 2: film Spotting. I'm Adam Kempinar and I'm Josh Larsa. The 12 00:01:02,005 --> 00:01:06,645 Speaker 2: sun is dying. You're the only scientists who might know 13 00:01:06,685 --> 00:01:10,285 Speaker 2: what this is. I'm just a teacher at Grover Cleveland 14 00:01:10,285 --> 00:01:14,005 Speaker 2: Middle We have a doctorate in molecular biology. I need 15 00:01:14,005 --> 00:01:14,765 Speaker 2: you to come with us. 16 00:01:15,925 --> 00:01:18,765 Speaker 1: Ryan Gosling will save us Adam, and he might save 17 00:01:18,804 --> 00:01:19,445 Speaker 1: the movies too. 18 00:01:19,725 --> 00:01:22,925 Speaker 2: Gosling stars in Project tail Mary, which opened last weekend 19 00:01:22,965 --> 00:01:25,285 Speaker 2: to big box office over one hundred and fifty million 20 00:01:25,324 --> 00:01:28,604 Speaker 2: dollars worldwide. Big laughs and maybe a few tears. 21 00:01:28,884 --> 00:01:34,285 Speaker 1: Our review plus Hitchcock Versus Kurrasawa Bambi versus Jimmy Stewart. 22 00:01:34,604 --> 00:01:38,645 Speaker 1: It's Round two of nineteen forty's Madness. That more on 23 00:01:38,804 --> 00:01:39,485 Speaker 1: Film Spotting. 24 00:01:46,765 --> 00:01:50,245 Speaker 2: Welcome to Film Spotting Round two of forties Madness. Josh 25 00:01:50,485 --> 00:01:55,125 Speaker 2: no less mad than Round one. Bamby somehow outlasted Jimmy 26 00:01:55,205 --> 00:01:59,204 Speaker 2: Cagney in White Heat and whatever was in that suitcase. 27 00:01:59,525 --> 00:02:02,445 Speaker 2: But how will it fare against another Jimmy Jimmy Stewart 28 00:02:02,485 --> 00:02:04,925 Speaker 2: in the holiday classic It's a Wonderful Life. I think 29 00:02:04,965 --> 00:02:06,525 Speaker 2: Jimmy Stewart will play a little. 30 00:02:06,245 --> 00:02:10,845 Speaker 1: More fair I would expect. So who's cuddlier Bambi for 31 00:02:11,005 --> 00:02:12,285 Speaker 1: Jimmy Stewart. I don't know. 32 00:02:12,565 --> 00:02:15,605 Speaker 2: Question, it's a toss up, it is. The Round two 33 00:02:15,645 --> 00:02:19,765 Speaker 2: matchups are live. You can vote now at filmspotting dot Net. 34 00:02:19,965 --> 00:02:23,005 Speaker 2: We'll talk through Round one results and some of Round 35 00:02:23,005 --> 00:02:26,644 Speaker 2: two's toughest matchups later in the show. I've got four 36 00:02:26,925 --> 00:02:30,685 Speaker 2: that I really had to pause on Josh, not in 37 00:02:30,725 --> 00:02:33,485 Speaker 2: this episode, but already in the Film Spotting feed wherever 38 00:02:33,525 --> 00:02:37,285 Speaker 2: you get your podcasts. What I thought was a really lively, 39 00:02:37,605 --> 00:02:42,605 Speaker 2: really in depth, fun conversation about Kelly Reikert's Meek's cut Off. 40 00:02:42,605 --> 00:02:45,805 Speaker 2: That film was one of nine movies that's been nominated 41 00:02:45,805 --> 00:02:50,244 Speaker 2: for induction in the film Spotting Pantheon. I don't want to, 42 00:02:50,325 --> 00:02:52,445 Speaker 2: you know, spoil anything or put this out there, but 43 00:02:52,525 --> 00:02:55,804 Speaker 2: Meek's cutoff has to be in real contention for your vote, 44 00:02:55,805 --> 00:02:57,565 Speaker 2: doesn't it, Josh? One of your votes for the film 45 00:02:57,605 --> 00:02:58,125 Speaker 2: Spotting Panthers. 46 00:02:58,204 --> 00:02:59,885 Speaker 1: Yeah? Absolutely. I mean this is going to be tough 47 00:02:59,885 --> 00:03:01,445 Speaker 1: when we get to it, but yeah, who would have 48 00:03:01,445 --> 00:03:03,645 Speaker 1: thought we could have gotten a rich conversation out of 49 00:03:04,365 --> 00:03:07,125 Speaker 1: what you said? It's a shared top twenty five film 50 00:03:07,125 --> 00:03:10,204 Speaker 1: of the century between us, right, Yes, so there was 51 00:03:10,245 --> 00:03:12,804 Speaker 1: a lot to dig into for this film. The first 52 00:03:12,805 --> 00:03:14,605 Speaker 1: time we were able to do that together. It was fun, 53 00:03:14,805 --> 00:03:15,605 Speaker 1: that's right. Yeah. 54 00:03:15,644 --> 00:03:18,245 Speaker 2: We reviewed it here on Film Spotting in twenty eleven, 55 00:03:18,805 --> 00:03:21,965 Speaker 2: just before you joined the show. We did have to 56 00:03:22,005 --> 00:03:24,965 Speaker 2: give it an official Adam and Josh review for it 57 00:03:24,965 --> 00:03:27,405 Speaker 2: to be Pantheon eligible. I don't know how long I 58 00:03:27,405 --> 00:03:30,325 Speaker 2: should have looked this up. How long the original conversation was. 59 00:03:30,805 --> 00:03:33,845 Speaker 2: I know it wasn't as long as this conversation was now. 60 00:03:33,885 --> 00:03:37,565 Speaker 2: In fairness, any second conversation is almost certainly going to 61 00:03:37,605 --> 00:03:40,285 Speaker 2: be longer. But we do have atenially how it works 62 00:03:40,525 --> 00:03:43,365 Speaker 2: to talk more these days? Here on film Spotting again. 63 00:03:43,445 --> 00:03:45,365 Speaker 2: To hear that review, go to film spotting dot net 64 00:03:45,485 --> 00:03:47,805 Speaker 2: or find it wherever you get your podcasts. And you 65 00:03:47,845 --> 00:03:51,205 Speaker 2: can find more about our little film Spotting Pantheon project 66 00:03:51,245 --> 00:03:55,365 Speaker 2: at filmspotting dot net slash pantheon. A quick reminder, film 67 00:03:55,405 --> 00:03:58,845 Speaker 2: Spotting is available as a video podcast. You can watch 68 00:03:58,885 --> 00:04:01,405 Speaker 2: the show at film spotting dot net or i should 69 00:04:01,405 --> 00:04:05,844 Speaker 2: say YouTube dot com slash film spotting, and at film 70 00:04:05,885 --> 00:04:08,645 Speaker 2: spotting dot net you can find all of our episodes, 71 00:04:08,645 --> 00:04:14,965 Speaker 2: including links to those shows on YouTube. First up, Josh Project, 72 00:04:14,965 --> 00:04:18,565 Speaker 2: Hail mayor I'm Grace, I'm gonna call you Rocky. 73 00:04:18,645 --> 00:04:20,125 Speaker 1: We're here for the same reason. 74 00:04:20,405 --> 00:04:23,125 Speaker 2: His son is eyeing too. We're going to say to 75 00:04:23,165 --> 00:04:25,125 Speaker 2: our planets, we have to learn how to communicate. 76 00:04:25,805 --> 00:04:31,685 Speaker 1: Check this out. We've with about two hundred and fifty words. 77 00:04:31,845 --> 00:04:36,685 Speaker 1: Let's find you a voice. Why in the space? Nope? 78 00:04:36,765 --> 00:04:39,525 Speaker 2: Why is a scorchyo in space? Tu? This? 79 00:04:40,725 --> 00:04:46,925 Speaker 1: I am Rocky. I like imagine that you're lost in space, 80 00:04:46,964 --> 00:04:51,565 Speaker 1: adam a drift desperate for home. You can choose one 81 00:04:52,005 --> 00:04:55,724 Speaker 1: cinematic space castaway to be stuck with. Here are your options. 82 00:04:56,284 --> 00:05:01,325 Speaker 1: Matt Damon's no nonsense NASA astronaut in The Martian, Brad 83 00:05:01,325 --> 00:05:06,685 Speaker 1: Pitt's Estranged Neptune Bound Sun in ad Astra, Ryan Goslin's 84 00:05:06,685 --> 00:05:10,564 Speaker 1: middle school science teacher in Project hail Mary, who wakes 85 00:05:10,685 --> 00:05:13,005 Speaker 1: up from a coma on a spaceship in a distant 86 00:05:13,045 --> 00:05:17,165 Speaker 1: star system with two dead crewmates and little memory of 87 00:05:17,365 --> 00:05:20,845 Speaker 1: how he got there. While you mull those options, Adam, 88 00:05:21,205 --> 00:05:24,365 Speaker 1: give a bit more background about the newest of those movies, 89 00:05:24,404 --> 00:05:29,165 Speaker 1: Project hail Mary. There's a clear connection with the Martian here. 90 00:05:29,205 --> 00:05:33,724 Speaker 1: Both films are adapted from Andy Weir novels by screenwriter 91 00:05:33,805 --> 00:05:37,245 Speaker 1: Drew Goddard. While The Martian had Ridley Scott as director. 92 00:05:37,325 --> 00:05:39,964 Speaker 1: Project hail Mary has been guided by the team behind 93 00:05:39,964 --> 00:05:44,565 Speaker 1: the Lego movie, Phil Lord and Christopher Miller. Along with Gosling, 94 00:05:44,964 --> 00:05:48,325 Speaker 1: Hail Mary also stars Sandra Huler as the head of 95 00:05:48,325 --> 00:05:53,445 Speaker 1: the international agency that sent Gosling's Ryland Grace across the 96 00:05:53,445 --> 00:05:56,005 Speaker 1: stars on a research mission to find a way to 97 00:05:56,045 --> 00:05:59,365 Speaker 1: save our dying son. So who do you want to 98 00:05:59,365 --> 00:06:02,645 Speaker 1: be stuck with, Adam picked your fellow cinematic space castaway, 99 00:06:02,685 --> 00:06:06,164 Speaker 1: the practical damon the Mopi Pit, or the genial Gosling. 100 00:06:06,565 --> 00:06:10,125 Speaker 1: I really do want answer, but Honestly, this is just 101 00:06:10,165 --> 00:06:13,085 Speaker 1: a roundabout way of asking what you think of Gosling's 102 00:06:13,565 --> 00:06:17,085 Speaker 1: performance here, how does he handle what I guess is 103 00:06:17,205 --> 00:06:21,325 Speaker 1: now a write of actorly passage the space Bound solo flight. 104 00:06:21,885 --> 00:06:25,525 Speaker 2: Okay, well let's unpack this. But first I do want 105 00:06:25,565 --> 00:06:28,685 Speaker 2: to say we put that Meeks cut Off conversation in 106 00:06:28,765 --> 00:06:32,124 Speaker 2: the feed separately. But I do love it when there's 107 00:06:32,325 --> 00:06:34,765 Speaker 2: just a little bit of coincidence spotting, because of course 108 00:06:34,805 --> 00:06:37,885 Speaker 2: we can never plan these things. We could have never 109 00:06:37,925 --> 00:06:40,525 Speaker 2: known that we'd talk about Meeks Cutoff on the same 110 00:06:40,565 --> 00:06:42,604 Speaker 2: show or in the same week as Project Hail Mary. 111 00:06:42,605 --> 00:06:46,125 Speaker 2: And I'm watching Meeks cut Off after Project Hail Mary, 112 00:06:46,125 --> 00:06:48,765 Speaker 2: and we get to the scene where we've got these 113 00:06:49,005 --> 00:06:51,604 Speaker 2: these settlers trying to communicate with a member of the 114 00:06:51,645 --> 00:06:54,485 Speaker 2: Cayuse tribe, and of course they can't understand a word 115 00:06:54,565 --> 00:06:57,205 Speaker 2: this Native American is saying. And I thought, well, well 116 00:06:57,605 --> 00:07:01,565 Speaker 2: they if they only had Ryan Gosling's Ryland Grace here, 117 00:07:01,565 --> 00:07:04,605 Speaker 2: they'd figure out some way to communicate, just like he does. 118 00:07:04,765 --> 00:07:08,364 Speaker 2: True the alien in Project Hail Mary. No, they're not 119 00:07:08,404 --> 00:07:12,325 Speaker 2: that sophisticated, and it doesn't go as well, but I'm 120 00:07:12,525 --> 00:07:15,405 Speaker 2: I'm going to try to unpack your your little hypothetical 121 00:07:15,405 --> 00:07:18,565 Speaker 2: here because because I love it, and and it makes 122 00:07:18,605 --> 00:07:22,405 Speaker 2: sense too, because there's so many movies that you have 123 00:07:22,485 --> 00:07:25,565 Speaker 2: to think about when you watch this movie. You're not 124 00:07:25,605 --> 00:07:29,485 Speaker 2: only thinking about the Martian, which makes total sense for 125 00:07:29,525 --> 00:07:32,845 Speaker 2: the reasons you mentioned, but because of the language component, 126 00:07:33,285 --> 00:07:36,005 Speaker 2: I'm thinking about a rival. But then you're also thinking 127 00:07:36,045 --> 00:07:39,765 Speaker 2: about how he's communicating essentially with a rock, like Tom 128 00:07:39,805 --> 00:07:44,804 Speaker 2: Hanks is communicating with a volleyball in in Castaway. And 129 00:07:45,125 --> 00:07:47,805 Speaker 2: I don't know, I'm sure I have others listed in 130 00:07:47,885 --> 00:07:50,085 Speaker 2: my notes, So there's a lot of other movies that 131 00:07:50,165 --> 00:07:52,205 Speaker 2: you do have in mind as you watch this one. 132 00:07:52,285 --> 00:07:56,364 Speaker 2: The character that you mentioned that I'm the most like, 133 00:07:57,085 --> 00:08:02,925 Speaker 2: and let's be clear in temperament or damage psychology only, 134 00:08:03,605 --> 00:08:07,005 Speaker 2: would be be Brad Pitt's character in ad Astra, which 135 00:08:07,045 --> 00:08:11,285 Speaker 2: is precisely why I could not choose to be stuck 136 00:08:11,325 --> 00:08:13,405 Speaker 2: with him in Space. I was gonna say, you're gonna 137 00:08:13,645 --> 00:08:17,845 Speaker 2: weight with yourself? No, the weight of all that sad sollipsism. 138 00:08:17,965 --> 00:08:19,845 Speaker 2: It would be like a Bergmann movie. Yeah, And that's 139 00:08:19,925 --> 00:08:21,845 Speaker 2: just that's too heavy. I can't I can't do that. 140 00:08:22,605 --> 00:08:28,085 Speaker 2: Between the two Andy, we're characters Gosling's Grace and Damon's 141 00:08:28,485 --> 00:08:29,205 Speaker 2: Mark Wattney. 142 00:08:29,325 --> 00:08:31,085 Speaker 1: I think that's his name. 143 00:08:31,805 --> 00:08:36,245 Speaker 2: I'm nothing like either. They're they're scientifically minded, they're resilient, 144 00:08:36,325 --> 00:08:40,365 Speaker 2: they're resourceful, they're they're good with their hands. Remember Josh, 145 00:08:40,405 --> 00:08:43,005 Speaker 2: I'm I'm the guy who doesn't want to go camping 146 00:08:43,365 --> 00:08:47,165 Speaker 2: even if you spotted me the tent so so true. 147 00:08:47,205 --> 00:08:51,885 Speaker 2: There there's no overlap there. But I think if if 148 00:08:52,045 --> 00:08:54,285 Speaker 2: your question is who would I who would I rather 149 00:08:54,325 --> 00:08:57,285 Speaker 2: be stuck with? If I had to choose, it would 150 00:08:57,365 --> 00:09:02,205 Speaker 2: be Matt Damon's Wotney, Okay, and it's it's because of 151 00:09:02,245 --> 00:09:07,565 Speaker 2: that kind of more serious, straightforward, no nonsense approach, at 152 00:09:07,605 --> 00:09:09,685 Speaker 2: least compared to Grace. But I do want to say, 153 00:09:09,725 --> 00:09:12,365 Speaker 2: let's not forget the hilarious fact that The Martian won 154 00:09:12,405 --> 00:09:16,205 Speaker 2: the Golden Globe for Best Picture Musical or Comedy. And 155 00:09:16,285 --> 00:09:20,925 Speaker 2: it wasn't because of the dance numbers. Watney. It did 156 00:09:21,205 --> 00:09:25,365 Speaker 2: job that, it really did. Wotney is funny too, that's 157 00:09:25,485 --> 00:09:28,685 Speaker 2: part of the movie's charm, at least a small movies charm. 158 00:09:28,804 --> 00:09:32,765 Speaker 2: But but he is decidedly more more deadpanned, and I 159 00:09:32,965 --> 00:09:38,005 Speaker 2: just need someone to balance out my my high strung neuroses, 160 00:09:38,085 --> 00:09:41,005 Speaker 2: and I think I think Watney's more likely to do 161 00:09:41,045 --> 00:09:45,525 Speaker 2: that than the also high strung and neurotic Rylan Grace. 162 00:09:45,684 --> 00:09:48,125 Speaker 2: But here's what I'll say about Grace as we we 163 00:09:48,245 --> 00:09:51,165 Speaker 2: actually get into talking about this movie, and and one 164 00:09:51,205 --> 00:09:53,804 Speaker 2: of the main reasons why I like it is that 165 00:09:53,925 --> 00:09:57,325 Speaker 2: with Grace, if you're stuck with him for two and 166 00:09:57,325 --> 00:10:01,724 Speaker 2: a half hours in the movie Theater is You, you 167 00:10:01,845 --> 00:10:04,445 Speaker 2: kind of get three and one. He's kind of a 168 00:10:04,485 --> 00:10:09,444 Speaker 2: combination of Pitt's character and Damon's character, but he also 169 00:10:09,485 --> 00:10:12,605 Speaker 2: gives you something that that they don't. As I said, 170 00:10:12,605 --> 00:10:16,245 Speaker 2: he gives you all of all of Wotney's resourcefulness and 171 00:10:16,725 --> 00:10:21,525 Speaker 2: scientific brilliance, but there is also just enough of a 172 00:10:21,564 --> 00:10:25,844 Speaker 2: melancholy about him because of the circumstances that brought him 173 00:10:25,845 --> 00:10:29,325 Speaker 2: to the ship, which he pieces together as his memory 174 00:10:29,325 --> 00:10:34,765 Speaker 2: comes back, because of this semi disgraced scientific career that 175 00:10:34,804 --> 00:10:37,725 Speaker 2: has him teaching middle school. Now he may genuinely like 176 00:10:37,804 --> 00:10:40,885 Speaker 2: teaching middle school, that doesn't change the fact that he'd 177 00:10:40,925 --> 00:10:43,965 Speaker 2: probably rather be doing what he's doing more of with 178 00:10:44,045 --> 00:10:47,645 Speaker 2: this project because of the absence of someone back at 179 00:10:47,645 --> 00:10:51,525 Speaker 2: home to be brave for. As the movie frames it, 180 00:10:52,005 --> 00:10:55,965 Speaker 2: also just the circumstances of this mission, right, the dreadful 181 00:10:55,965 --> 00:10:58,805 Speaker 2: circumstances on which it's needed. But also the fact that 182 00:10:59,445 --> 00:11:01,724 Speaker 2: I don't think this is a spoiler. It's a one 183 00:11:01,765 --> 00:11:03,844 Speaker 2: way trip. It's supposed to be a one way trip. 184 00:11:03,885 --> 00:11:06,965 Speaker 2: That's the whole conceit of this right. So with that 185 00:11:07,045 --> 00:11:09,485 Speaker 2: all in mind, you can imagine, or you can understand 186 00:11:09,525 --> 00:11:13,405 Speaker 2: why he might be a little melancholy or more similar 187 00:11:13,564 --> 00:11:17,324 Speaker 2: to Pitt's character in that regard. And I think Gosling 188 00:11:17,804 --> 00:11:21,805 Speaker 2: is a serious enough and strong enough drum actor in 189 00:11:21,845 --> 00:11:25,725 Speaker 2: addition to obviously strong enough comedic talent that he infuses 190 00:11:25,804 --> 00:11:30,725 Speaker 2: Grace with just enough, you know, just enough McRoy McBride 191 00:11:30,965 --> 00:11:36,125 Speaker 2: the ad Astra character like tormentedness. That that suggests that 192 00:11:36,845 --> 00:11:38,765 Speaker 2: the thing that makes him really distinct here from the 193 00:11:38,765 --> 00:11:42,885 Speaker 2: other two is is that constant verbal banter and even 194 00:11:42,925 --> 00:11:45,765 Speaker 2: his physical humor, that that that isn't a matter of 195 00:11:45,885 --> 00:11:50,565 Speaker 2: him just being a really good, impulsive comedian, which there's 196 00:11:50,564 --> 00:11:52,845 Speaker 2: some of that, of course, but it also seems like 197 00:11:52,925 --> 00:11:56,165 Speaker 2: it's a defense mechanism. And I think then that there 198 00:11:56,684 --> 00:12:00,045 Speaker 2: there are enough hinted at, or there are enough on 199 00:12:00,165 --> 00:12:04,205 Speaker 2: the surface layers to Grace that Gosling and Goddard and 200 00:12:04,245 --> 00:12:07,564 Speaker 2: Lord and Miller provide that that give a little bit 201 00:12:07,605 --> 00:12:10,085 Speaker 2: of weight to this character. And I think there's there's 202 00:12:10,125 --> 00:12:12,045 Speaker 2: a good rule of thumb. I was thinking about this 203 00:12:12,405 --> 00:12:14,925 Speaker 2: walking out of the movie. Maybe a good rule of 204 00:12:14,925 --> 00:12:17,365 Speaker 2: thumb that you can apply to almost any movie to 205 00:12:17,485 --> 00:12:22,525 Speaker 2: know that the marriage of material and lead performers has 206 00:12:22,684 --> 00:12:24,964 Speaker 2: enough magic to it. And that's when you walk out 207 00:12:25,045 --> 00:12:27,325 Speaker 2: and you try to consider whether or not any other 208 00:12:27,445 --> 00:12:31,005 Speaker 2: actor or actress of their generation, of their type, let's say, 209 00:12:31,445 --> 00:12:34,325 Speaker 2: could play that part, no matter how talented or how 210 00:12:34,405 --> 00:12:38,765 Speaker 2: much you've enjoyed them in other roles, and you fail 211 00:12:39,325 --> 00:12:43,565 Speaker 2: or you can't really imagine anyone but Ryan Gosling nailing 212 00:12:43,684 --> 00:12:47,565 Speaker 2: this part the way Gosling does, And I can't. I 213 00:12:47,605 --> 00:12:52,885 Speaker 2: can't imagine anyone without Gosling's particular set of skills nailing 214 00:12:52,965 --> 00:12:56,445 Speaker 2: Ryland Grace. Now, if someone else played it, the reality 215 00:12:56,525 --> 00:12:59,365 Speaker 2: is I'd probably walk out and think I can't imagine 216 00:12:59,405 --> 00:13:02,445 Speaker 2: anyone but them doing it. But that's my point, though, 217 00:13:02,525 --> 00:13:05,204 Speaker 2: is that when it works, you walk out thinking how 218 00:13:05,245 --> 00:13:08,005 Speaker 2: could anyone but Ryan Gosling play this character? And that 219 00:13:08,205 --> 00:13:10,204 Speaker 2: is how I felt leaving the theater. 220 00:13:11,165 --> 00:13:12,885 Speaker 1: Yeah, I get your point. I think that's fair, and 221 00:13:12,925 --> 00:13:15,804 Speaker 1: I think it's right. I think I'm with you on 222 00:13:16,125 --> 00:13:18,365 Speaker 1: you know how you saw this character and how you 223 00:13:18,445 --> 00:13:20,765 Speaker 1: enjoyed the movie. This is This is a good film. 224 00:13:21,165 --> 00:13:23,645 Speaker 1: I'm glad I saw it. I didn't really have particular 225 00:13:23,725 --> 00:13:28,165 Speaker 1: expectations for it, except for knowing some of the talent involved, 226 00:13:28,245 --> 00:13:31,845 Speaker 1: and I think it succeeds along, yeah, along the lines 227 00:13:31,885 --> 00:13:36,125 Speaker 1: that I probably would have hoped for from this group. 228 00:13:36,245 --> 00:13:38,525 Speaker 1: I think it's a good test case a role like this. 229 00:13:38,645 --> 00:13:41,485 Speaker 1: It's more than just star, a marriage of star and material. 230 00:13:41,605 --> 00:13:44,285 Speaker 1: It's like the star really has to carry the material, 231 00:13:44,765 --> 00:13:47,285 Speaker 1: you know. I mean, we'll get into the co star here, 232 00:13:47,365 --> 00:13:51,565 Speaker 1: who eventually Ryland spends a lot of time with, but 233 00:13:51,965 --> 00:13:57,045 Speaker 1: this is his story and he's alone on the screen 234 00:13:57,165 --> 00:13:59,925 Speaker 1: for a lot of it. Real quickly to get the 235 00:13:59,925 --> 00:14:01,805 Speaker 1: silliness out of the way, I think you convinced me 236 00:14:01,925 --> 00:14:04,204 Speaker 1: that Matt Damon and the Martian is the way to go. 237 00:14:04,365 --> 00:14:07,684 Speaker 1: My instinct would have been, you know, gossling. 238 00:14:07,285 --> 00:14:09,645 Speaker 2: Here because he is more entertaining. 239 00:14:09,485 --> 00:14:12,525 Speaker 1: More entertaining. But then you know, by year three, you'd 240 00:14:12,525 --> 00:14:13,685 Speaker 1: probably want to kill the guy. 241 00:14:13,725 --> 00:14:17,325 Speaker 2: As to kill the guy, I knew for sure, Damon, 242 00:14:17,445 --> 00:14:19,605 Speaker 2: was your answer, I know you better than you know you. 243 00:14:19,885 --> 00:14:22,805 Speaker 1: Okay, come on, Maybe I mean, yeah, that is the 244 00:14:22,885 --> 00:14:24,685 Speaker 1: right answer now that I think about it. But maybe 245 00:14:24,685 --> 00:14:27,045 Speaker 1: it speaks to how much I enjoyed gossling in this room. 246 00:14:27,165 --> 00:14:29,725 Speaker 1: I just think, and you tapped into, I think the 247 00:14:29,805 --> 00:14:33,365 Speaker 1: key part. You know, we could have predicted he'd be charismatic, 248 00:14:33,805 --> 00:14:36,725 Speaker 1: we could have predicted to be charming, predicted to be funny, 249 00:14:38,125 --> 00:14:41,525 Speaker 1: but there is that other level of melancholy that isn't 250 00:14:41,565 --> 00:14:44,285 Speaker 1: pushed too hard. But there's a crucial scene fairly early 251 00:14:44,325 --> 00:14:47,645 Speaker 1: on where I was like, it's a touching scene, but also, 252 00:14:47,885 --> 00:14:50,725 Speaker 1: you know, the analytical of my mind was, oh, I'm 253 00:14:50,725 --> 00:14:53,245 Speaker 1: glad we got that. So this isn't going to be 254 00:14:53,645 --> 00:14:57,605 Speaker 1: a late night show routine the whole time, which I 255 00:14:57,645 --> 00:14:59,565 Speaker 1: regret using that phrase already. I don't think any of 256 00:14:59,565 --> 00:15:01,965 Speaker 1: this movie is that, but it could have been that, right, 257 00:15:02,485 --> 00:15:05,925 Speaker 1: But there's the scene where his two crewmates who have 258 00:15:05,965 --> 00:15:09,045 Speaker 1: passed away, he's moving their bodies to another part of 259 00:15:09,085 --> 00:15:13,205 Speaker 1: the ship. He's collected their gat he's essentially recreating a 260 00:15:13,245 --> 00:15:16,925 Speaker 1: form of funeral for them, and he gives these eulogies 261 00:15:17,205 --> 00:15:20,365 Speaker 1: and he again his memory has not come back yet. 262 00:15:20,445 --> 00:15:23,285 Speaker 1: He doesn't know anything about them, so he's basing everything 263 00:15:23,405 --> 00:15:27,445 Speaker 1: on their polaroids. And there's a hint of humor to 264 00:15:27,485 --> 00:15:32,765 Speaker 1: what he says, but really there's a genuine effort to 265 00:15:32,965 --> 00:15:39,245 Speaker 1: offer something personable and meaning personal and meaningful about these people. 266 00:15:39,445 --> 00:15:39,925 Speaker 2: Yes, and I. 267 00:15:39,965 --> 00:15:44,005 Speaker 1: Found that incredibly poignant. It gave a needed layer to 268 00:15:44,085 --> 00:15:47,965 Speaker 1: this movie that also pops up in other instances and 269 00:15:48,085 --> 00:15:51,725 Speaker 1: also in the performance. So I think, you know, I 270 00:15:51,765 --> 00:15:54,205 Speaker 1: think it's really strong. And the thing you mentioned about 271 00:15:54,245 --> 00:15:56,605 Speaker 1: him being a middle school teacher, there is that qualifier 272 00:15:56,685 --> 00:15:59,965 Speaker 1: that he had set out to be, you know, a 273 00:16:00,005 --> 00:16:03,605 Speaker 1: research scientist in some form and proposed a theory that 274 00:16:03,685 --> 00:16:05,845 Speaker 1: was laughed away and now he's teaching. But I think 275 00:16:05,965 --> 00:16:08,605 Speaker 1: key to this is that. And we see him in 276 00:16:08,645 --> 00:16:12,085 Speaker 1: the classroom early on. He really likes it. He loves 277 00:16:12,085 --> 00:16:15,205 Speaker 1: interacting with these kids. He's really good at it. He 278 00:16:15,285 --> 00:16:20,765 Speaker 1: brings genuine enthusiasm, he likes the kids. And here Adam 279 00:16:20,805 --> 00:16:24,085 Speaker 1: the he is why this works. When we do move 280 00:16:24,165 --> 00:16:28,325 Speaker 1: to this relationship with Rocky. This we're going to spoil this. 281 00:16:29,165 --> 00:16:31,165 Speaker 1: If you don't know anything, this is your point to 282 00:16:31,205 --> 00:16:34,765 Speaker 1: fast forward. It comes in maybe a third into the 283 00:16:34,765 --> 00:16:37,685 Speaker 1: third of the way into the movie, maybe halfway at 284 00:16:37,725 --> 00:16:42,525 Speaker 1: any rate. Once Ryland has made to this destination where 285 00:16:42,525 --> 00:16:44,125 Speaker 1: he's going trying to figure out what's happening to this 286 00:16:44,165 --> 00:16:50,085 Speaker 1: other son, he encounters this other spaceship, there's a creature Rocky, 287 00:16:50,445 --> 00:16:53,165 Speaker 1: that reaches out to him that is essentially mostly what 288 00:16:53,205 --> 00:16:57,125 Speaker 1: I understand puppetry. Looks like a rock spider to me, 289 00:16:57,405 --> 00:17:01,605 Speaker 1: multiple legs. Some CGI is involved, but mostly puppetry. I 290 00:17:01,645 --> 00:17:04,405 Speaker 1: want to talk about James Ortiz giving the vocal and 291 00:17:04,445 --> 00:17:08,645 Speaker 1: the puppeteer performance here, but going back to Gosling's performance, 292 00:17:09,405 --> 00:17:14,525 Speaker 1: he relates to Rocky not condescendingly, but the way Ryland 293 00:17:14,645 --> 00:17:21,205 Speaker 1: related to his students again enthusiastically, affirmingly, as he's trying 294 00:17:21,245 --> 00:17:24,485 Speaker 1: to learn from him. He's trying to teach Rocky things. Yes, 295 00:17:24,565 --> 00:17:28,285 Speaker 1: And I think it's a key character trait that this 296 00:17:28,325 --> 00:17:30,845 Speaker 1: guy's a really good mood middle school teacher, which is 297 00:17:31,005 --> 00:17:35,365 Speaker 1: like a treasure right too. I mean that's like someone 298 00:17:35,405 --> 00:17:38,285 Speaker 1: who has that talent is a real gift, and Goslyn 299 00:17:38,325 --> 00:17:40,125 Speaker 1: has it. It made me think, you know, the puppetry 300 00:17:40,125 --> 00:17:42,445 Speaker 1: part too. He must have been on the Muppets at 301 00:17:42,445 --> 00:17:45,725 Speaker 1: some point, right, because he just has that facility for 302 00:17:45,845 --> 00:17:49,645 Speaker 1: interacting with with and it suns out. It turns out 303 00:17:49,685 --> 00:17:52,484 Speaker 1: he hasn't. I guess he did like a promo social 304 00:17:52,525 --> 00:17:56,165 Speaker 1: media thing with Almo for this movie. But unless unless 305 00:17:56,165 --> 00:17:58,965 Speaker 1: my quick research missed it, he hasn't, and he would 306 00:17:59,005 --> 00:18:01,445 Speaker 1: just he would nail something like that right, being able 307 00:18:01,485 --> 00:18:06,205 Speaker 1: to be. I'm charismatic with these imaginary, imaginary creatures. So 308 00:18:06,405 --> 00:18:09,525 Speaker 1: I think Goslin. Goslyn really pulled this off. Hi Grace, 309 00:18:11,005 --> 00:18:14,205 Speaker 1: you're in a ball so Rocky no di in great atmosphere. 310 00:18:14,405 --> 00:18:15,645 Speaker 1: I come up, Oh, you're coming up. 311 00:18:16,925 --> 00:18:20,445 Speaker 2: Detect him Graven Rocky big sign how to kill after it? 312 00:18:21,045 --> 00:18:23,484 Speaker 2: I really love that connection you're making because obviously you 313 00:18:23,485 --> 00:18:26,485 Speaker 2: can see him in the role. There's that clear connection 314 00:18:26,965 --> 00:18:29,765 Speaker 2: of him acting like a teacher and him, you know, 315 00:18:29,885 --> 00:18:32,125 Speaker 2: writing like he's sort of writing on a chalkboard, and 316 00:18:32,165 --> 00:18:35,485 Speaker 2: there's that element of teaching and learning, the reciprocal nature 317 00:18:35,525 --> 00:18:40,085 Speaker 2: of that. But Rocky is even obviously he has a 318 00:18:40,085 --> 00:18:43,125 Speaker 2: lot of wisdom that his middle school kids don't have, 319 00:18:43,565 --> 00:18:45,725 Speaker 2: and he and he learns from them, probably more than 320 00:18:45,885 --> 00:18:47,765 Speaker 2: he learns from Rocky, probably a little bit more than 321 00:18:47,765 --> 00:18:50,645 Speaker 2: he learns from his students. But nevertheless, just like middle 322 00:18:50,645 --> 00:18:54,525 Speaker 2: school or or middle school students nevertheless can teach you 323 00:18:54,565 --> 00:18:56,925 Speaker 2: something if you listen to them, if you're willing to. 324 00:18:57,285 --> 00:19:01,125 Speaker 2: And just like those middle school students, Rocky is a 325 00:19:01,165 --> 00:19:05,205 Speaker 2: little bit too energetic and over excitable. It's right, and 326 00:19:05,325 --> 00:19:08,045 Speaker 2: he has to learn how to. He has to kind 327 00:19:08,045 --> 00:19:11,965 Speaker 2: of keep him tethered down a little bit right and 328 00:19:12,245 --> 00:19:15,005 Speaker 2: try to just you know, keep him focused. So there 329 00:19:15,445 --> 00:19:18,125 Speaker 2: is there is something to that, absolutely, and and it's 330 00:19:18,165 --> 00:19:20,885 Speaker 2: actually a perfect transition. I'm really glad that you sing 331 00:19:21,165 --> 00:19:24,965 Speaker 2: out that scene and and and why that works, and 332 00:19:25,005 --> 00:19:29,085 Speaker 2: why it gives the movie just enough poignancy, and how 333 00:19:29,125 --> 00:19:31,445 Speaker 2: it speaks to where the movie doesn't go too far 334 00:19:31,605 --> 00:19:36,045 Speaker 2: I think pushing the sentimentality or pushing the poignancy, but 335 00:19:36,245 --> 00:19:41,485 Speaker 2: also gives us just enough comedy. The eulogy scene. Eulogies 336 00:19:41,765 --> 00:19:46,965 Speaker 2: often are sometimes different people. I was at one, actually, 337 00:19:47,005 --> 00:19:49,805 Speaker 2: I was at a service this Saturday where it was 338 00:19:49,925 --> 00:19:53,005 Speaker 2: very poignant, but the person giving it was an actor, 339 00:19:53,885 --> 00:19:56,525 Speaker 2: and so of course they leaned into the humor. They 340 00:19:56,645 --> 00:19:58,885 Speaker 2: leaned into the performance, and you know what, it it 341 00:19:58,965 --> 00:20:02,125 Speaker 2: worked like Gangbusters. They pulled it off, they nailed it. 342 00:20:02,245 --> 00:20:05,685 Speaker 2: So there was a lot more humor there but eulogies 343 00:20:05,725 --> 00:20:08,885 Speaker 2: tend to have some jokes in them. They need they 344 00:20:09,005 --> 00:20:12,285 Speaker 2: need similarvity to cut that right. So there's a little 345 00:20:12,325 --> 00:20:14,525 Speaker 2: bit of that there, But you're absolutely right. For the 346 00:20:14,525 --> 00:20:18,285 Speaker 2: most part, it's about honoring those two people. It's meaningful, 347 00:20:18,605 --> 00:20:22,205 Speaker 2: and there's a real sensitivity and emotion and that Grace 348 00:20:22,845 --> 00:20:24,484 Speaker 2: as the movie tends to refer to him, so I'll 349 00:20:24,525 --> 00:20:27,405 Speaker 2: call him Grace. That grace shows in that scene. So 350 00:20:27,525 --> 00:20:29,165 Speaker 2: this is the next thing I wanted to say about 351 00:20:29,165 --> 00:20:30,965 Speaker 2: why I think the movie works and why I think 352 00:20:31,005 --> 00:20:33,885 Speaker 2: Gosling works in the role is and it's not just 353 00:20:33,965 --> 00:20:37,484 Speaker 2: praise for him. It speaks to this marriage of the 354 00:20:37,525 --> 00:20:44,085 Speaker 2: collaborators and their shared sensibility. Is Gosling's unabashed sensitivity, and 355 00:20:44,485 --> 00:20:47,005 Speaker 2: I think all speak to I won't spoil it, but 356 00:20:47,045 --> 00:20:49,805 Speaker 2: there's a scene where there is, let's say, a particularly 357 00:20:50,005 --> 00:20:53,925 Speaker 2: major revelation and once we get that and we know 358 00:20:54,085 --> 00:20:57,085 Speaker 2: he's going to feel all sorts of ways about it, 359 00:20:58,045 --> 00:21:01,565 Speaker 2: and it cuts to a close up of him and Gosling. 360 00:21:02,045 --> 00:21:06,125 Speaker 2: His character is immediately in tears, and Josh, I think 361 00:21:06,165 --> 00:21:10,045 Speaker 2: a lot of other actors playing this character, even playing 362 00:21:10,165 --> 00:21:13,605 Speaker 2: him ostensibly as nerdy as Gosling plays him a lot 363 00:21:13,685 --> 00:21:15,885 Speaker 2: of other actors. Honestly, I think would still be trying 364 00:21:15,925 --> 00:21:19,565 Speaker 2: to play that in a more conventionally masculine way. I 365 00:21:19,565 --> 00:21:21,885 Speaker 2: think they would be trying to fight back the tears. 366 00:21:22,085 --> 00:21:24,045 Speaker 2: They'd be trying to play it a little more tougher, 367 00:21:24,605 --> 00:21:27,165 Speaker 2: a little tougher they'd be. They'd be playing up the arc. 368 00:21:27,445 --> 00:21:30,565 Speaker 2: And there's this element I referenced this earlier. They'd be 369 00:21:30,605 --> 00:21:33,205 Speaker 2: playing the arc more of of whether or not he's 370 00:21:33,325 --> 00:21:36,405 Speaker 2: he's finally being brave or not. And I think they'd 371 00:21:36,405 --> 00:21:41,005 Speaker 2: be trying to show that bravery gozzling Lord Miller, Goddard. 372 00:21:41,085 --> 00:21:43,965 Speaker 2: They have no problems just going right to tears in 373 00:21:44,045 --> 00:21:46,285 Speaker 2: that scene. And and I think, and and I think 374 00:21:46,325 --> 00:21:52,005 Speaker 2: that that character's lack of bravery, lack of conventional masculine bravery, 375 00:21:52,125 --> 00:21:54,405 Speaker 2: is a key underpinning of the story. And I think 376 00:21:54,445 --> 00:21:57,765 Speaker 2: that that sensitivity and that willingness to show it is 377 00:21:58,245 --> 00:22:01,045 Speaker 2: something that really makes this film work. And it's tapping 378 00:22:01,085 --> 00:22:05,165 Speaker 2: into something that is not unique to Gosling, but but 379 00:22:05,245 --> 00:22:09,005 Speaker 2: it is something that that he certainly has available to him. 380 00:22:09,045 --> 00:22:11,365 Speaker 2: It's a it's a faculty he has as an actor. 381 00:22:11,445 --> 00:22:13,885 Speaker 2: But here's the other thing he has, maybe even more 382 00:22:13,925 --> 00:22:15,845 Speaker 2: than that that they tap into Josh, And I wonder 383 00:22:15,845 --> 00:22:18,485 Speaker 2: if you you noticed this too, or if I'm making 384 00:22:18,525 --> 00:22:20,925 Speaker 2: too much out of it, because I know this is 385 00:22:21,045 --> 00:22:25,845 Speaker 2: something that you are often really struck by and tend 386 00:22:25,845 --> 00:22:28,325 Speaker 2: to be more judgmental about, at least when it's it's 387 00:22:28,325 --> 00:22:32,885 Speaker 2: something that's a more blatant element of movies. That joke 388 00:22:32,965 --> 00:22:36,205 Speaker 2: before about The Martian winning the Globe for Best Picture 389 00:22:36,365 --> 00:22:39,685 Speaker 2: Musical or Comedy, even though it actually did. Project Hail 390 00:22:39,685 --> 00:22:43,445 Speaker 2: Mary probably will too, and it would actually deserve it, 391 00:22:43,485 --> 00:22:46,005 Speaker 2: because it's not only more of a comedy, but there 392 00:22:46,045 --> 00:22:51,525 Speaker 2: are scenes where Gosling really gets to move. And I 393 00:22:51,525 --> 00:22:53,965 Speaker 2: don't just mean those kind of silly scenes with Rocky 394 00:22:54,365 --> 00:22:59,405 Speaker 2: where he actually dances yea and Rocky, you know, mirrors him, 395 00:22:59,405 --> 00:23:02,965 Speaker 2: which which are fine, But I mean how often Lord 396 00:23:03,005 --> 00:23:09,565 Speaker 2: and Miller take advantage of Gosling's body in motion. And 397 00:23:09,605 --> 00:23:12,685 Speaker 2: I think this is another way too that the movie. 398 00:23:13,485 --> 00:23:15,525 Speaker 2: There is and and and it's not just the physical 399 00:23:15,525 --> 00:23:17,685 Speaker 2: comedy jokes though, which is a huge part of it. 400 00:23:17,725 --> 00:23:19,965 Speaker 2: But I think this is another way the movie distinguishes 401 00:23:20,005 --> 00:23:22,925 Speaker 2: itself from The Martian, at least in my memory, where 402 00:23:23,005 --> 00:23:26,805 Speaker 2: Damon is either often sitting still, or he's just more 403 00:23:26,845 --> 00:23:30,965 Speaker 2: of a straight line kind of physical performer. But because 404 00:23:31,005 --> 00:23:35,685 Speaker 2: of Gosling's dexterity as a dancer, not only do these 405 00:23:35,765 --> 00:23:40,805 Speaker 2: ships twirl and whirl in space, but frequently so does Grace. 406 00:23:41,245 --> 00:23:45,805 Speaker 2: Sometimes it's not even in space. So I remember early on. 407 00:23:45,845 --> 00:23:48,005 Speaker 2: I didn't jot it down. I remember early on, even 408 00:23:48,005 --> 00:23:51,885 Speaker 2: in the classroom, the way he moves is a bit 409 00:23:52,085 --> 00:23:56,165 Speaker 2: like a dancer. Scenes with Carl he's just so he's 410 00:23:56,205 --> 00:24:01,005 Speaker 2: so physically aggressive, and he's so graceful when he's moving. 411 00:24:01,485 --> 00:24:04,805 Speaker 2: It was it seemed to me a very intentional effort 412 00:24:05,085 --> 00:24:08,845 Speaker 2: on the part of the filmmakers to take advantage of 413 00:24:08,925 --> 00:24:12,285 Speaker 2: Gosling's ability to move. And I mean even as a dancer. 414 00:24:12,525 --> 00:24:15,365 Speaker 2: And I'm referencing with the twirling and whirling. You know, 415 00:24:15,405 --> 00:24:17,725 Speaker 2: there's a scene where it's almost a musical number. The 416 00:24:18,165 --> 00:24:21,805 Speaker 2: violin start, the music starts, the ships start twirling with 417 00:24:21,845 --> 00:24:25,845 Speaker 2: each other in a centrifugal way. But along with that 418 00:24:26,165 --> 00:24:29,605 Speaker 2: is the way the way Grace moves, the way he 419 00:24:29,925 --> 00:24:32,805 Speaker 2: the way he leaps in certain scenes, and I just 420 00:24:32,845 --> 00:24:35,845 Speaker 2: think that it's it's fun to watch Gosling move like that. 421 00:24:36,245 --> 00:24:39,325 Speaker 1: Yeah, No, I appreciated that as as well. I mean, 422 00:24:39,365 --> 00:24:42,085 Speaker 1: they do some of them do verge on musical numbers. 423 00:24:42,165 --> 00:24:45,245 Speaker 1: I think they get a lot of humor out of it, honestly, 424 00:24:45,405 --> 00:24:49,365 Speaker 1: that that I enjoyed early on. There's the entire montage 425 00:24:49,445 --> 00:24:54,605 Speaker 1: when he wakes up from this coma completely confused and 426 00:24:55,125 --> 00:24:59,165 Speaker 1: is exploring the space station, and how do they how 427 00:24:59,165 --> 00:25:02,965 Speaker 1: do they handle that montage comically? Right'll his head will 428 00:25:03,045 --> 00:25:05,365 Speaker 1: like suddenly you'll have a shot of a long tunnel 429 00:25:05,405 --> 00:25:07,925 Speaker 1: of the spaceship and then you have Gosling's head just 430 00:25:07,965 --> 00:25:10,925 Speaker 1: pop up like a mirrkat, you know, And there's a 431 00:25:11,045 --> 00:25:14,405 Speaker 1: there's a couple of shots like that. And you mentioned 432 00:25:14,565 --> 00:25:16,805 Speaker 1: there's a lot of visual humor in the filmmaking here, 433 00:25:16,885 --> 00:25:19,125 Speaker 1: which I suppose we should expect from Lord and Miller. 434 00:25:19,165 --> 00:25:23,085 Speaker 1: But I like the marriage of that with this two 435 00:25:23,125 --> 00:25:27,125 Speaker 1: thousand and one setting of grandeur, and which we get 436 00:25:27,165 --> 00:25:29,605 Speaker 1: some very especially use of color, Like there is some 437 00:25:29,725 --> 00:25:33,845 Speaker 1: visual beauty here, but there's also a comic sensibility approach. 438 00:25:33,885 --> 00:25:37,525 Speaker 1: So here the famous two thousand and one Oh gosh, 439 00:25:37,605 --> 00:25:40,125 Speaker 1: what the Blue Danube is? That? Is that the music 440 00:25:40,485 --> 00:25:43,405 Speaker 1: that's played in the sequence of the space you're going 441 00:25:43,445 --> 00:25:43,805 Speaker 1: to make. 442 00:25:43,685 --> 00:25:46,405 Speaker 2: Both of us look better. It's sad being able to. 443 00:25:46,765 --> 00:25:50,285 Speaker 1: I'll guarantee you it sure entirely incorrect. I'm mispronouncing it, 444 00:25:50,325 --> 00:25:52,285 Speaker 1: so either way I lost. But you know what I'm 445 00:25:52,285 --> 00:25:55,645 Speaker 1: talking about. The version here, the Blue Danube, You were right, 446 00:25:56,125 --> 00:25:59,244 Speaker 1: Blue Danube. Okay, thank you. The version here is a 447 00:25:59,285 --> 00:26:04,325 Speaker 1: comic one where this is after Gosling has recognized Rocky ship. 448 00:26:04,405 --> 00:26:07,325 Speaker 1: They haven't contacted yet, but the ship has appeared and 449 00:26:07,365 --> 00:26:10,325 Speaker 1: his instinct is to panic and fly away from it, 450 00:26:10,685 --> 00:26:14,205 Speaker 1: and then Rocky ship follows him. Right. Well, this could 451 00:26:14,285 --> 00:26:17,725 Speaker 1: be a tense dramatic chase sequence, but no, Lord and 452 00:26:17,725 --> 00:26:20,885 Speaker 1: Miller play it for comedy, where you have you have 453 00:26:21,485 --> 00:26:24,845 Speaker 1: Grace's ship just jut forward across the cosmos like a 454 00:26:24,885 --> 00:26:28,085 Speaker 1: little bit, and then Rockies follow it a little bit more. 455 00:26:28,405 --> 00:26:31,685 Speaker 1: And that doesn't sound funny, of course, but visually it 456 00:26:31,765 --> 00:26:33,765 Speaker 1: is something you'd see more, let's just say, in a 457 00:26:33,765 --> 00:26:36,765 Speaker 1: Looney Tunes cartoon than in a Kubrick space picture. And 458 00:26:36,845 --> 00:26:40,605 Speaker 1: it works. And I do like that they brought a 459 00:26:40,605 --> 00:26:45,205 Speaker 1: little bit different of a sensibility to this space grandeur 460 00:26:45,405 --> 00:26:48,245 Speaker 1: that we would normally get with a story like this 461 00:26:48,645 --> 00:26:53,045 Speaker 1: without lampooning it or making it silly, right, They still 462 00:26:53,085 --> 00:26:56,525 Speaker 1: recognize the grandeurs there, but they're having some with some 463 00:26:56,605 --> 00:27:00,205 Speaker 1: fun with the comic visual possibilities as well. 464 00:27:00,285 --> 00:27:03,845 Speaker 2: You alluded to this earlier or mentioned it earlier as well, 465 00:27:03,885 --> 00:27:05,245 Speaker 2: and I want to single it out as a real 466 00:27:05,285 --> 00:27:08,285 Speaker 2: strength of this movie. I didn't learn until after I 467 00:27:08,285 --> 00:27:11,485 Speaker 2: saw it that there was apparently no green screen used 468 00:27:11,525 --> 00:27:14,605 Speaker 2: on the movie. But you know, obviously with a movie 469 00:27:14,605 --> 00:27:16,525 Speaker 2: like this, there are going to be some digital effects, 470 00:27:16,525 --> 00:27:21,565 Speaker 2: there's going to be cgi but watching it, you get 471 00:27:21,605 --> 00:27:26,165 Speaker 2: the feeling that it is predominantly practical. You can tell, 472 00:27:26,325 --> 00:27:29,125 Speaker 2: and this movie needs to be because it is about 473 00:27:29,205 --> 00:27:32,805 Speaker 2: these resourceful, resilient characters. That is that is built into 474 00:27:32,845 --> 00:27:38,325 Speaker 2: the DNA of apparently these Andy Weir novels. At least 475 00:27:38,725 --> 00:27:42,085 Speaker 2: it's about duct tape. The movie has to feel that way. 476 00:27:42,525 --> 00:27:46,165 Speaker 2: It has to emanate off the screen or the film 477 00:27:46,285 --> 00:27:50,565 Speaker 2: doesn't work. And you understand in every moment of the 478 00:27:50,565 --> 00:27:53,885 Speaker 2: movie that it is an actual set and that Rocky 479 00:27:54,245 --> 00:27:57,765 Speaker 2: feels like a physical entity. And so there's a physicality 480 00:27:57,765 --> 00:28:00,605 Speaker 2: to Gosling that works. But there's a physicality to Rocky 481 00:28:00,885 --> 00:28:04,805 Speaker 2: and also to the actual spaces that they inhabit. It's 482 00:28:04,845 --> 00:28:09,605 Speaker 2: crucial to the movie's success. And it absolutely works here. 483 00:28:09,885 --> 00:28:12,645 Speaker 2: And I'll say a couple of times, and this is 484 00:28:12,725 --> 00:28:15,365 Speaker 2: just on me. It's it's I'm going to use it 485 00:28:15,365 --> 00:28:17,725 Speaker 2: as praise for the movie, not an example of me 486 00:28:17,965 --> 00:28:20,885 Speaker 2: being pulled out. It's on me for doing it. But 487 00:28:21,445 --> 00:28:24,845 Speaker 2: you know that it's working. The the sort of miracle 488 00:28:24,925 --> 00:28:26,845 Speaker 2: of it or the magic of the movie, because there 489 00:28:26,845 --> 00:28:28,484 Speaker 2: were a couple of times Josh for I had to 490 00:28:28,605 --> 00:28:30,205 Speaker 2: I had to just kind of sit back and go, 491 00:28:31,805 --> 00:28:35,925 Speaker 2: this is Ryan Gosling sitting on a set talking to 492 00:28:36,005 --> 00:28:38,445 Speaker 2: a rock, talking to a you know what I mean, 493 00:28:38,605 --> 00:28:41,805 Speaker 2: Like these these kinds this isn't happening. Of course, it's 494 00:28:41,805 --> 00:28:44,645 Speaker 2: you know, it's like it's like, you know, Tom Hanks 495 00:28:44,645 --> 00:28:47,885 Speaker 2: talking to a volleyball, you know, and yet and yet 496 00:28:48,005 --> 00:28:52,085 Speaker 2: watching it the magic of movies, you truly do feel 497 00:28:52,285 --> 00:28:56,645 Speaker 2: as if it is they are they are two buddies, 498 00:28:56,885 --> 00:28:59,365 Speaker 2: they are they are friends. You feel like they are 499 00:28:59,485 --> 00:29:03,045 Speaker 2: linked for life, and you you feel as strongly about 500 00:29:03,125 --> 00:29:07,205 Speaker 2: Rocky as a as a character as you do about 501 00:29:07,245 --> 00:29:09,765 Speaker 2: Grace and and the fact that that move the movie 502 00:29:09,805 --> 00:29:13,645 Speaker 2: can pull it off because of the writing, but also 503 00:29:13,725 --> 00:29:16,085 Speaker 2: because of the practical effects. I think is a key 504 00:29:16,125 --> 00:29:19,885 Speaker 2: part of it. That that here again is why it's 505 00:29:19,885 --> 00:29:20,805 Speaker 2: how you know the movie is. 506 00:29:20,805 --> 00:29:25,485 Speaker 1: Work absolutely And yeah, just to call out James Ortiz again, 507 00:29:25,565 --> 00:29:28,445 Speaker 1: who I was looking up, you know, was the puppeteer 508 00:29:28,445 --> 00:29:31,405 Speaker 1: for Rocky originally hired for that had done i think 509 00:29:31,445 --> 00:29:35,765 Speaker 1: some Broadway work that was similar in terms of being 510 00:29:35,805 --> 00:29:40,325 Speaker 1: a puppeteer and gave the voice performance and they heavily 511 00:29:40,365 --> 00:29:43,005 Speaker 1: filtered it and ended up using that for the final 512 00:29:43,085 --> 00:29:45,765 Speaker 1: voice of Rocky as well. And you get this combo. 513 00:29:45,885 --> 00:29:49,885 Speaker 1: It's like a tech garble. It actually reminded me of 514 00:29:50,005 --> 00:29:52,365 Speaker 1: a film we both liked a lot at recent film 515 00:29:52,365 --> 00:29:55,525 Speaker 1: Tuesday with Julia Louis Dreyfuss, and featured this giant talking 516 00:29:55,605 --> 00:30:00,005 Speaker 1: macaw and that was, you know, performed on set by 517 00:30:00,205 --> 00:30:03,725 Speaker 1: Rinzay Kenney who also provided the voice, and then effects 518 00:30:03,725 --> 00:30:06,045 Speaker 1: were layered on top of that. But just this sense 519 00:30:06,045 --> 00:30:09,565 Speaker 1: of having something on set for an actor to respond to, 520 00:30:10,805 --> 00:30:14,725 Speaker 1: in both cases providing acting as well non traditional acting. 521 00:30:15,405 --> 00:30:17,245 Speaker 1: But that's a key part of it, you know. That's 522 00:30:17,245 --> 00:30:19,085 Speaker 1: why I like that you mentioned this is a collaboration. 523 00:30:19,165 --> 00:30:21,605 Speaker 1: You have to have an actor like Gostling who's capable 524 00:30:21,645 --> 00:30:25,525 Speaker 1: of something like this or teas with these very particular talents, 525 00:30:25,525 --> 00:30:27,925 Speaker 1: and then Lord Miller, who are able to you know, 526 00:30:28,045 --> 00:30:32,205 Speaker 1: manage all of these sensibilities together. So yeah, it really, 527 00:30:32,325 --> 00:30:34,565 Speaker 1: it really does work. There's a lot of things about 528 00:30:34,605 --> 00:30:37,925 Speaker 1: Project tel Mary that could have not only not worked, 529 00:30:38,005 --> 00:30:41,565 Speaker 1: but not worked in a really bad way, and I 530 00:30:41,645 --> 00:30:47,165 Speaker 1: think instead they managed to make this a really entertaining, 531 00:30:47,245 --> 00:30:48,605 Speaker 1: thought provoking experience. 532 00:30:49,365 --> 00:30:51,485 Speaker 2: One other quick note about Ortiz. I don't know if 533 00:30:51,525 --> 00:30:53,525 Speaker 2: you saw this. I think it it popped up in 534 00:30:53,565 --> 00:30:55,845 Speaker 2: my Instagram reels, but it kind of reminds me of 535 00:30:55,885 --> 00:30:59,525 Speaker 2: the story about David Lynch. Apparently, you know, one of 536 00:30:59,565 --> 00:31:03,925 Speaker 2: the most infamous characters in TV history, Bob from Twin Peaks, 537 00:31:04,285 --> 00:31:07,125 Speaker 2: and the guy who plays Bob is just you know, 538 00:31:07,205 --> 00:31:09,245 Speaker 2: some guy on the set who had some other role 539 00:31:09,485 --> 00:31:11,005 Speaker 2: and they just kind of put him in. Not that 540 00:31:11,045 --> 00:31:14,045 Speaker 2: it's apples to apples, but James Ortiz, apparently, you know, 541 00:31:14,325 --> 00:31:20,005 Speaker 2: was just hired to be the puppeteer. Yeah, and what 542 00:31:20,085 --> 00:31:22,445 Speaker 2: they found he was not going to do the voice work. 543 00:31:22,885 --> 00:31:26,725 Speaker 2: But what they found was, of course because he was 544 00:31:26,805 --> 00:31:31,405 Speaker 2: doing all the physical work. He was such a good collaborator. 545 00:31:31,685 --> 00:31:36,285 Speaker 2: He knew he understood Rocky so well, and he was 546 00:31:36,485 --> 00:31:40,085 Speaker 2: he was playing off of Goslings so well he understood 547 00:31:40,085 --> 00:31:43,245 Speaker 2: how Rocky thought, and he not only moved, but thought 548 00:31:43,565 --> 00:31:46,325 Speaker 2: basically that they realized that it's like, what are we doing? 549 00:31:46,365 --> 00:31:49,525 Speaker 2: He needs to be Rocky and that's how it ended 550 00:31:49,605 --> 00:31:51,565 Speaker 2: up happening. And it's funny because he talked about how 551 00:31:51,565 --> 00:31:53,965 Speaker 2: he's actually now you won't be able to unhear it 552 00:31:54,005 --> 00:31:56,885 Speaker 2: a little bit. He's channeling Catherine Hepburn a little bit 553 00:31:57,285 --> 00:31:59,885 Speaker 2: with his rocky voice. So it is, I think, a 554 00:31:59,925 --> 00:32:02,285 Speaker 2: really great performance and I do want at least mention 555 00:32:02,365 --> 00:32:05,965 Speaker 2: before we go. I mean, not surprising because we've loved 556 00:32:05,965 --> 00:32:09,605 Speaker 2: her in other films, but Sondra Huler I think brings 557 00:32:09,925 --> 00:32:12,525 Speaker 2: exactly I mean the right tone to this as well, 558 00:32:12,565 --> 00:32:17,165 Speaker 2: because she has a role that could be thankless and 559 00:32:17,205 --> 00:32:19,885 Speaker 2: actually could derail this movie a little bit. She has 560 00:32:19,925 --> 00:32:23,685 Speaker 2: to be the international ice queen, you know, talk about 561 00:32:23,725 --> 00:32:25,845 Speaker 2: no nonsense, you know. She she has to be the 562 00:32:25,925 --> 00:32:30,205 Speaker 2: just completely serious boss who's completely ruthless, who's just about 563 00:32:30,285 --> 00:32:32,245 Speaker 2: you know. Yes, she wants to save the planet, so 564 00:32:32,285 --> 00:32:35,285 Speaker 2: of course she has compassion, but she will do whatever 565 00:32:35,285 --> 00:32:39,045 Speaker 2: it takes and that's that's who she is. And she 566 00:32:39,165 --> 00:32:44,085 Speaker 2: barely if ever cracks a smile, and and she could 567 00:32:44,125 --> 00:32:47,125 Speaker 2: then veer. It'd be very easy for a performer, I think, 568 00:32:47,165 --> 00:32:51,205 Speaker 2: to veer too far into that and and almost actually 569 00:32:51,285 --> 00:32:57,605 Speaker 2: lean into comic territory because they're overplaying that sternness. And 570 00:32:57,605 --> 00:33:00,565 Speaker 2: and here, like I was saying, with Gosling, who plays 571 00:33:00,605 --> 00:33:04,245 Speaker 2: the comedy and shows just enough of the dramatic or 572 00:33:04,285 --> 00:33:09,205 Speaker 2: the poignancy, I think she she shows just enough. She 573 00:33:09,205 --> 00:33:12,005 Speaker 2: she cracks just enough of a smile without ever showing 574 00:33:12,005 --> 00:33:14,205 Speaker 2: her teeth. Yeah, you under you right that you know there, 575 00:33:14,245 --> 00:33:16,165 Speaker 2: You know there's a person in there. You see the 576 00:33:16,205 --> 00:33:19,805 Speaker 2: person beneath the boss all of the time. And I 577 00:33:19,845 --> 00:33:24,165 Speaker 2: don't know about you, but that that moment where we 578 00:33:24,285 --> 00:33:27,765 Speaker 2: get a musical performance has to be a contender for 579 00:33:27,965 --> 00:33:30,405 Speaker 2: music moment or it's gonna go on the list. And 580 00:33:30,565 --> 00:33:32,245 Speaker 2: I think the reason why is because not only is 581 00:33:32,285 --> 00:33:36,245 Speaker 2: she a great she's a pretty good at least musical performer. 582 00:33:36,405 --> 00:33:39,925 Speaker 2: And we knew that because she has won a music 583 00:33:40,005 --> 00:33:44,605 Speaker 2: moment previously the show's history. But but that moment actually 584 00:33:45,645 --> 00:33:49,965 Speaker 2: serves a dramatic function. It serves a practical function in 585 00:33:50,005 --> 00:33:52,325 Speaker 2: the construct of the story as well. And with her 586 00:33:52,405 --> 00:33:53,725 Speaker 2: character in Grace's character. 587 00:33:54,205 --> 00:33:56,405 Speaker 1: Yeah, I was. When that moment came, I was like, oh, 588 00:33:56,525 --> 00:33:58,765 Speaker 1: is this why she's in this movie? Like that they 589 00:33:58,805 --> 00:34:00,045 Speaker 1: saw Tony Erdman. 590 00:34:00,165 --> 00:34:02,605 Speaker 2: And are like, oh, or is apparently it wasn't originally 591 00:34:02,605 --> 00:34:03,245 Speaker 2: in the script? 592 00:34:03,685 --> 00:34:06,485 Speaker 1: Well or did she demand it? She's like, I'll be 593 00:34:06,525 --> 00:34:08,685 Speaker 1: in her movie, but I gotta get to sing. But 594 00:34:08,725 --> 00:34:11,125 Speaker 1: I agree with you. She's I'm still not quite sure 595 00:34:11,125 --> 00:34:14,045 Speaker 1: why she's in the movie, but she's about as good 596 00:34:14,085 --> 00:34:16,685 Speaker 1: as you could be in this part. And she's good. 597 00:34:16,364 --> 00:34:20,165 Speaker 1: She's she's dryly funny, which to your point, the part 598 00:34:20,285 --> 00:34:23,725 Speaker 1: needs to have to be just like twenty percent more interesting, 599 00:34:23,844 --> 00:34:24,605 Speaker 1: and it is so. 600 00:34:25,765 --> 00:34:29,125 Speaker 2: Projectail Mary currently playing in wide release. If you've seen it, 601 00:34:29,205 --> 00:34:32,325 Speaker 2: and we're guessing you have because a lot of the 602 00:34:32,325 --> 00:34:35,404 Speaker 2: world has, and if you agree or disagree with our thoughts, 603 00:34:35,445 --> 00:34:39,125 Speaker 2: we would love to hear from feedback at filmspotting dot net. 604 00:34:41,645 --> 00:34:43,285 Speaker 1: Adam, we had a lot of good things to say 605 00:34:43,365 --> 00:34:46,844 Speaker 1: about projectail Mary, and we touched on this, but could 606 00:34:46,845 --> 00:34:51,085 Speaker 1: have spent more time on the visual splendor of this 607 00:34:51,165 --> 00:34:54,485 Speaker 1: space movie, which I think is one of its qualities 608 00:34:54,525 --> 00:34:57,485 Speaker 1: along with all the other things we discussed in detail. 609 00:34:57,605 --> 00:35:01,445 Speaker 1: And I'm so glad that I had a chance to 610 00:35:01,525 --> 00:35:03,445 Speaker 1: see it not just in a theater, but a theater 611 00:35:04,005 --> 00:35:06,844 Speaker 1: with a big screen, the sort of screens you're going 612 00:35:06,885 --> 00:35:12,285 Speaker 1: to find at Regal Cinemas, and a movie like Projectail Mary. 613 00:35:12,325 --> 00:35:15,285 Speaker 1: If you had Regal Unlimited, you would have a chance 614 00:35:15,805 --> 00:35:19,925 Speaker 1: to see it for free through this program. Regal Unlimited 615 00:35:20,085 --> 00:35:23,205 Speaker 1: is the all you can want watch movie subscription pass 616 00:35:23,285 --> 00:35:26,205 Speaker 1: that pays for itself in just two visits. Right now, 617 00:35:26,645 --> 00:35:30,365 Speaker 1: Regal is offering film spotting listeners endless movies for less. 618 00:35:30,645 --> 00:35:33,525 Speaker 1: If you sign up for Regal Unlimited using code film 619 00:35:33,605 --> 00:35:38,165 Speaker 1: Spot twenty six, you'll get fifteen percent off. Regal Unlimited 620 00:35:38,285 --> 00:35:41,925 Speaker 1: is the only truly limitless movie subscription pass. You can 621 00:35:41,965 --> 00:35:45,325 Speaker 1: see any standard two D movie anytime with no blackout 622 00:35:45,445 --> 00:35:49,805 Speaker 1: dates or restrictions. Also with Regal Unlimited, you won't just 623 00:35:49,885 --> 00:35:53,525 Speaker 1: save money on tickets, you'll also save on snacks. Members 624 00:35:53,565 --> 00:35:57,765 Speaker 1: get ten percent off all non alcoholic concessions. Sign up 625 00:35:57,805 --> 00:35:59,965 Speaker 1: now in the Regal app or at the link in 626 00:36:00,045 --> 00:36:03,805 Speaker 1: our description and use code film Spot twenty six to 627 00:36:03,885 --> 00:36:11,844 Speaker 1: receive your discount. Adam, let's thank a couple of our 628 00:36:11,885 --> 00:36:16,765 Speaker 1: film spotting family members. But first let's tell folks who 629 00:36:16,805 --> 00:36:19,085 Speaker 1: have enjoined the family. Why they should. Here's what you 630 00:36:19,165 --> 00:36:22,364 Speaker 1: get for only four ninety nine a month. You get 631 00:36:22,405 --> 00:36:26,765 Speaker 1: bonus shows every month, ad free listening every episode. You 632 00:36:26,805 --> 00:36:30,605 Speaker 1: can join the Family discord whenever you want. Sam writes 633 00:36:30,685 --> 00:36:34,245 Speaker 1: a weekly film spotting Family newsletter, and then we offer 634 00:36:34,285 --> 00:36:38,205 Speaker 1: pre sales and discounts for our special events. That's all 635 00:36:38,245 --> 00:36:40,725 Speaker 1: four ninety nine a month. Of course, if you want 636 00:36:40,725 --> 00:36:44,005 Speaker 1: to pay annually, it's going to be even cheaper for you. 637 00:36:44,405 --> 00:36:46,765 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm going to say pro rated. I'm not good 638 00:36:46,845 --> 00:36:49,205 Speaker 2: with business. I don't know if I'm using that term correctly, 639 00:36:49,245 --> 00:36:51,565 Speaker 2: but if you pro rated it out to just five 640 00:36:51,685 --> 00:36:55,285 Speaker 2: seventy five per month, you also get complete archive access 641 00:36:55,325 --> 00:36:58,045 Speaker 2: in addition to all of the things you mentioned. Going 642 00:36:58,085 --> 00:37:00,285 Speaker 2: back the archive to two thousand and five, it's like 643 00:37:00,325 --> 00:37:04,364 Speaker 2: twelve hundred plus episodes total. That is just seventy six 644 00:37:04,445 --> 00:37:08,525 Speaker 2: cents more per month with that annual Family plus plan. 645 00:37:09,125 --> 00:37:13,285 Speaker 2: Producer Sam has decided to spell it out even further. 646 00:37:13,645 --> 00:37:16,565 Speaker 2: You want math, it's less than seven hundreds of a 647 00:37:16,605 --> 00:37:22,325 Speaker 2: penny per archive episode. Okay, so we've done a lot 648 00:37:22,365 --> 00:37:26,245 Speaker 2: of talking over the years, and that seems like, you know, 649 00:37:26,925 --> 00:37:28,485 Speaker 2: a very small sum to. 650 00:37:28,445 --> 00:37:34,364 Speaker 1: Pay seven hundredths of a penny per archive episode. Yeah, 651 00:37:34,485 --> 00:37:37,445 Speaker 1: let's let's get that all over social media, print the 652 00:37:37,445 --> 00:37:42,965 Speaker 1: T shirts. Yeah that's great, But I think let's also 653 00:37:43,045 --> 00:37:46,765 Speaker 1: thank family plus members Eric Jensen, who's in Union, New Jersey, 654 00:37:46,805 --> 00:37:50,285 Speaker 1: and Brady in southern California. Eric wrote in although I 655 00:37:50,325 --> 00:37:53,364 Speaker 1: can't recall how I started listening to Film Spotting, I 656 00:37:53,405 --> 00:37:55,445 Speaker 1: can tell you from going back and listening to old 657 00:37:55,485 --> 00:37:58,725 Speaker 1: episodes why I've been listening weekly for a decade. The 658 00:37:58,725 --> 00:38:01,805 Speaker 1: show has always felt natural, nothing feels forced, feels like 659 00:38:01,845 --> 00:38:04,325 Speaker 1: we've been invited to hang with two friends who genuinely 660 00:38:04,365 --> 00:38:06,525 Speaker 1: love movies and want to share their love with us. 661 00:38:06,805 --> 00:38:09,685 Speaker 1: I can safely say that Film Spotting has been, if 662 00:38:09,685 --> 00:38:11,805 Speaker 1: not the reason I became a centophile, one of the 663 00:38:11,805 --> 00:38:12,685 Speaker 1: main reasons. 664 00:38:13,045 --> 00:38:16,525 Speaker 2: That's nice to hear. Brady says. A couple of years ago, 665 00:38:16,605 --> 00:38:19,165 Speaker 2: I watched Paris, Texas for the first time and was 666 00:38:19,205 --> 00:38:22,125 Speaker 2: floored this. This has one of my favorite lines in 667 00:38:22,525 --> 00:38:25,245 Speaker 2: a recent listener email. In it, Josh, I thought, why 668 00:38:25,285 --> 00:38:27,725 Speaker 2: aren't more people talking about this movie? I should be 669 00:38:27,765 --> 00:38:30,925 Speaker 2: having water cooler conversations about this movie at work. They 670 00:38:30,965 --> 00:38:33,325 Speaker 2: should be talking about this movie on the news. 671 00:38:34,805 --> 00:38:35,085 Speaker 1: Wow. 672 00:38:36,885 --> 00:38:39,645 Speaker 2: I mean what a world where it was almost my 673 00:38:39,765 --> 00:38:42,924 Speaker 2: reaction to Paris Texas. We loved it. I went looking 674 00:38:42,965 --> 00:38:45,885 Speaker 2: for podcasts to hear what more articulate cinephiles had to 675 00:38:45,885 --> 00:38:48,445 Speaker 2: say about it. I found the Paris Texas episode, was 676 00:38:48,445 --> 00:38:51,605 Speaker 2: hooked by the dialogue and have been keeping up ever since. 677 00:38:51,605 --> 00:38:54,765 Speaker 2: And you know, I should dig into this a little 678 00:38:54,805 --> 00:38:59,445 Speaker 2: further with Brady because Paris Texas was originally a bonus 679 00:38:59,485 --> 00:39:04,125 Speaker 2: conversation just for family members, if I recall correctly, I 680 00:39:04,205 --> 00:39:07,285 Speaker 2: think at some point we did there was a reason 681 00:39:07,325 --> 00:39:09,725 Speaker 2: why we dropped it in the main feed, which we 682 00:39:09,765 --> 00:39:12,925 Speaker 2: don't usually do exclusive contents exclusive content, but I think 683 00:39:12,965 --> 00:39:15,405 Speaker 2: there was a reason why we did. So maybe Brady 684 00:39:15,925 --> 00:39:18,685 Speaker 2: found it, he heard it in the in the in 685 00:39:18,765 --> 00:39:21,725 Speaker 2: the main feed, and then became a family member because 686 00:39:21,725 --> 00:39:24,525 Speaker 2: of it, or maybe he saw that it was exclusive 687 00:39:24,525 --> 00:39:27,085 Speaker 2: content and became a family member to hear it. I'll 688 00:39:27,085 --> 00:39:29,165 Speaker 2: have to check that out with Brady. But yeah, that 689 00:39:29,205 --> 00:39:31,445 Speaker 2: was a that was a really good, good review, at 690 00:39:31,565 --> 00:39:34,045 Speaker 2: least I remember fondly good fun. 691 00:39:34,885 --> 00:39:37,965 Speaker 1: I hope Brady isn't like splicing into the cable cord 692 00:39:38,045 --> 00:39:41,085 Speaker 1: and stealing bonus episodes, and that how he that's how 693 00:39:41,085 --> 00:39:41,485 Speaker 1: he got. 694 00:39:41,525 --> 00:39:43,485 Speaker 2: I'm sure, I'm sure not. And you know, you know, 695 00:39:43,525 --> 00:39:46,045 Speaker 2: Sam's gonna include this comment from Eric that his favorite 696 00:39:46,045 --> 00:39:49,645 Speaker 2: show segment is Massacre Theater. It's almost always, he says, 697 00:39:49,765 --> 00:39:52,325 Speaker 2: a lock for a good laugh. So that means sometimes 698 00:39:52,565 --> 00:39:55,444 Speaker 2: it's not good for a laugh. See, I'm gonna draw 699 00:39:55,525 --> 00:39:59,005 Speaker 2: on that, but he says, Eric says, long live Massacre Theater. 700 00:39:59,765 --> 00:40:02,525 Speaker 1: There you go, Eric, appreciate the support, all right. The 701 00:40:02,525 --> 00:40:05,205 Speaker 1: film that Brady credits with becoming a cinophile, this is 702 00:40:05,245 --> 00:40:08,765 Speaker 1: this is kind of wild, The blurir Witch Project. When 703 00:40:08,765 --> 00:40:11,245 Speaker 1: I was seven, I snuck into the back of the 704 00:40:11,245 --> 00:40:14,245 Speaker 1: living room after bedtime. I knew my parents were planning 705 00:40:14,285 --> 00:40:16,765 Speaker 1: to watch a rented VHS tape of this new movie 706 00:40:17,005 --> 00:40:19,525 Speaker 1: that had taken the country by storm. I made it 707 00:40:19,605 --> 00:40:23,045 Speaker 1: deep into the runtime before I was finally caught. I 708 00:40:23,165 --> 00:40:26,005 Speaker 1: begged to finish the movie, and by some miracle, convinced 709 00:40:26,005 --> 00:40:29,685 Speaker 1: my parents that I could separate fiction from reality. I 710 00:40:29,725 --> 00:40:32,685 Speaker 1: was allowed to stay on the condition that I don't 711 00:40:32,725 --> 00:40:36,485 Speaker 1: tell my classmates or teacher. In the post movie debrief, 712 00:40:37,045 --> 00:40:39,805 Speaker 1: my parents emphasized how amazing it was that we had 713 00:40:39,845 --> 00:40:41,845 Speaker 1: all been terrified by something that looked like one of 714 00:40:41,845 --> 00:40:45,765 Speaker 1: our home videos. It was an eye opening experience realizing 715 00:40:45,805 --> 00:40:48,405 Speaker 1: what some kids with the camera had pulled off. I 716 00:40:48,445 --> 00:40:50,765 Speaker 1: really do credit blair Witch with showing me that movies 717 00:40:50,845 --> 00:40:54,725 Speaker 1: can create thought provoking emotional experiences. Also, my mom says 718 00:40:54,725 --> 00:40:57,285 Speaker 1: I made it about a week before I let slip 719 00:40:57,325 --> 00:41:00,725 Speaker 1: that I recognized the birch trees in my science textbook 720 00:41:00,805 --> 00:41:07,685 Speaker 1: from somewhere else. Uh oh Man, school counselor appointment immediately? 721 00:41:07,885 --> 00:41:08,885 Speaker 1: Is that what happened? 722 00:41:09,365 --> 00:41:12,365 Speaker 2: How about that though age seven and in the impulse 723 00:41:12,725 --> 00:41:16,685 Speaker 2: was to keep watching, not to run away terrified, like 724 00:41:16,765 --> 00:41:17,844 Speaker 2: my response would have been. 725 00:41:18,485 --> 00:41:21,765 Speaker 1: I mean, I think it was about seven when I 726 00:41:21,925 --> 00:41:26,725 Speaker 1: was inappropriately confronted with Friday the thirteenth. I've shared this 727 00:41:26,765 --> 00:41:28,245 Speaker 1: story on the show before, so I'm not going to 728 00:41:28,285 --> 00:41:31,285 Speaker 1: go into it in detail. And I think I would 729 00:41:31,285 --> 00:41:33,525 Speaker 1: wish that on a kid at seven over the blair 730 00:41:33,565 --> 00:41:38,645 Speaker 1: Witch Project, honestly. I mean, that's some pretty rough going there, Brady. 731 00:41:39,165 --> 00:41:40,725 Speaker 2: I don't know. I was always one of those kids 732 00:41:40,765 --> 00:41:43,165 Speaker 2: who was drawn to those movies and then as soon 733 00:41:43,165 --> 00:41:45,165 Speaker 2: as it got scary, ran out of the room and 734 00:41:45,405 --> 00:41:47,965 Speaker 2: had nightmares about it and never never came back. So 735 00:41:48,365 --> 00:41:48,725 Speaker 2: I don't know. 736 00:41:49,285 --> 00:41:49,525 Speaker 1: Eric. 737 00:41:49,925 --> 00:41:53,325 Speaker 2: Eric says his first theater experience was seeing Speed at 738 00:41:53,325 --> 00:41:56,325 Speaker 2: a far too young age. He credits it with his 739 00:41:56,445 --> 00:42:00,125 Speaker 2: love of movies and the theater. Yon Debant, I love it. 740 00:42:00,205 --> 00:42:01,845 Speaker 2: Well done, Well done, Eric, I understand. 741 00:42:01,885 --> 00:42:02,685 Speaker 1: We think understand. 742 00:42:02,725 --> 00:42:05,485 Speaker 2: Yeah, we think Eric and Brady for being family plus 743 00:42:05,485 --> 00:42:08,045 Speaker 2: members and for all of those years of listening. If 744 00:42:08,085 --> 00:42:10,325 Speaker 2: you would like to follow them, and they're they're very 745 00:42:10,365 --> 00:42:15,525 Speaker 2: discerning taste on letterboxed. Brady is bird man. That's b 746 00:42:15,725 --> 00:42:20,404 Speaker 2: U r R ed. I'm going birdman, Josh. And Eric 747 00:42:20,565 --> 00:42:24,285 Speaker 2: is sand is overrated, and that is that is exactly 748 00:42:24,285 --> 00:42:28,965 Speaker 2: what I said, all one word, sand is overrated. We 749 00:42:29,005 --> 00:42:32,325 Speaker 2: remind you there, Eric, Yeah, we remind you that your 750 00:42:32,325 --> 00:42:35,485 Speaker 2: membership does come with all of those perks, and your 751 00:42:35,525 --> 00:42:38,125 Speaker 2: April bonus will be and ask us anything we love, 752 00:42:38,205 --> 00:42:41,325 Speaker 2: ask us anything you throw out questions. We talk about 753 00:42:41,325 --> 00:42:44,645 Speaker 2: things we don't normally talk about on the show. If 754 00:42:44,685 --> 00:42:46,445 Speaker 2: you'd like to be part of that, you can be 755 00:42:46,445 --> 00:42:48,445 Speaker 2: part of the Film Spotting Family and you can do 756 00:42:48,485 --> 00:42:51,925 Speaker 2: that by visiting Film Spotting Family dot com. You can 757 00:42:51,965 --> 00:42:55,965 Speaker 2: also rate or review us on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. 758 00:42:56,085 --> 00:43:00,045 Speaker 2: We thank you for any or all of that. All right, 759 00:43:00,125 --> 00:43:02,325 Speaker 2: So before we got married, we did this thing or 760 00:43:02,365 --> 00:43:03,605 Speaker 2: we said the worst thing we've ever done. 761 00:43:04,285 --> 00:43:05,725 Speaker 1: I'll tell mine if we all do it. 762 00:43:05,805 --> 00:43:10,925 Speaker 2: Promise, what did you do this doll, beer bottles and 763 00:43:11,045 --> 00:43:16,405 Speaker 2: porn left? Yeah? 764 00:43:16,565 --> 00:43:21,965 Speaker 1: Okay, I are you serious? 765 00:43:22,365 --> 00:43:26,605 Speaker 2: Opening next weekend, Zendeia and Robert Pattinson are a soon 766 00:43:26,605 --> 00:43:29,925 Speaker 2: to be married couple in the drama. We will have 767 00:43:29,965 --> 00:43:32,965 Speaker 2: a review of that the following week. Next week is 768 00:43:33,005 --> 00:43:35,765 Speaker 2: a sort of week off for the show. Hey, we 769 00:43:35,845 --> 00:43:37,565 Speaker 2: deserve a little bit of a spring break, but we 770 00:43:37,605 --> 00:43:40,605 Speaker 2: will have content. We're always going to deliver some content 771 00:43:40,965 --> 00:43:45,165 Speaker 2: into your feed. Part of that content will be Forty's 772 00:43:45,245 --> 00:43:49,165 Speaker 2: Madness Round two results. That means we will be telling 773 00:43:49,205 --> 00:43:54,125 Speaker 2: you which movies are advancing to the Suite sixteen, and 774 00:43:54,485 --> 00:43:57,685 Speaker 2: we'll have another archive drop for you, a really good 775 00:43:57,685 --> 00:44:00,365 Speaker 2: one tying in with the drama. Our top five movies 776 00:44:00,405 --> 00:44:04,924 Speaker 2: about marriage from twenty nineteen. I wonder if I wonder 777 00:44:04,965 --> 00:44:07,165 Speaker 2: if we got personal or not with that one. Josh, 778 00:44:07,245 --> 00:44:09,725 Speaker 2: do you have any recollection? Did we talk about our marriages? 779 00:44:09,925 --> 00:44:12,045 Speaker 2: My wife would murder me if I did. I don't 780 00:44:12,085 --> 00:44:15,845 Speaker 2: know about yours. I think we played it very careful, 781 00:44:16,085 --> 00:44:18,285 Speaker 2: is mine? We probably did. Yeah, you can find the 782 00:44:18,285 --> 00:44:22,005 Speaker 2: film Spotting schedule at Filmspotting dot Net episodes. 783 00:44:22,365 --> 00:44:25,125 Speaker 1: Quick note about our sister podcast, The Next Picture Show, 784 00:44:25,165 --> 00:44:28,605 Speaker 1: looking at cinema's present via its past. They're on to 785 00:44:28,685 --> 00:44:31,404 Speaker 1: part two of their Couples get Away Pairing. That means 786 00:44:31,405 --> 00:44:35,685 Speaker 1: they're talking about the Bride and in the context of 787 00:44:35,725 --> 00:44:38,125 Speaker 1: the film they discussed in part one, which was nineteen 788 00:44:38,165 --> 00:44:41,085 Speaker 1: sixty seven's Bonnie and Clyde, one of the many, many, 789 00:44:41,525 --> 00:44:45,045 Speaker 1: many many many influences on the Bride, which you know 790 00:44:45,325 --> 00:44:48,165 Speaker 1: I liked, so can't wait to hear them dig into 791 00:44:48,725 --> 00:44:51,444 Speaker 1: that conversation. New episodes of The Next Picture Show drop 792 00:44:51,445 --> 00:44:54,165 Speaker 1: every Tuesday wherever you get your podcasts. 793 00:44:54,445 --> 00:44:57,725 Speaker 2: We do have another save the date reminder for you 794 00:45:00,085 --> 00:45:03,285 Speaker 2: two Fest two film spotting. That's what we're going with 795 00:45:03,325 --> 00:45:06,685 Speaker 2: this time, yep. That is, in fact, that needs to 796 00:45:06,725 --> 00:45:09,325 Speaker 2: be the title. I think I am a follow right 797 00:45:09,325 --> 00:45:12,365 Speaker 2: after this with our graphic designer, and I think that 798 00:45:12,365 --> 00:45:16,925 Speaker 2: that has to be the graphic. June twenty seventh and 799 00:45:17,005 --> 00:45:22,005 Speaker 2: twenty eighth in Chicago, Three movies on Saturday at one venue, 800 00:45:22,365 --> 00:45:25,645 Speaker 2: one on Sunday at another. Who will be there? Josh 801 00:45:25,685 --> 00:45:29,525 Speaker 2: will be there. Yes, he will return from Scotland if 802 00:45:29,525 --> 00:45:33,805 Speaker 2: they let him back in the country and Golden Joe 803 00:45:33,845 --> 00:45:39,404 Speaker 2: to so all be there. Producer Sam, Michael Phillips, and 804 00:45:39,645 --> 00:45:44,364 Speaker 2: other guests and family members Film Spotting family members. You'll 805 00:45:44,365 --> 00:45:47,365 Speaker 2: get access to tickets before everyone else. You'll get a 806 00:45:47,365 --> 00:45:51,045 Speaker 2: discount on those festival passes. You'll also get a special 807 00:45:51,285 --> 00:45:54,885 Speaker 2: meet and greet opportunity. So you want to be part of. 808 00:45:54,885 --> 00:45:57,925 Speaker 1: It, Adam, do you remember where you ranked too Fast, 809 00:45:57,965 --> 00:46:00,845 Speaker 1: too Furious on your Fast and Furious ranking? 810 00:46:01,685 --> 00:46:05,485 Speaker 2: I am going to say it. Did you look this up? 811 00:46:06,125 --> 00:46:09,125 Speaker 1: No? No, no, I show Okay, I'm just guessing. Think 812 00:46:09,125 --> 00:46:10,205 Speaker 1: you do that much work? 813 00:46:10,685 --> 00:46:12,965 Speaker 2: I I think I probably put it last. 814 00:46:13,765 --> 00:46:16,085 Speaker 1: Yeah for me. If it's not last, I think it's 815 00:46:16,085 --> 00:46:19,765 Speaker 1: second to last. So nevertheless, we will stick with two 816 00:46:19,805 --> 00:46:24,965 Speaker 1: fest to fear to best spotty film. Yeah, that's really goodurse. 817 00:46:25,085 --> 00:46:27,765 Speaker 1: I wish I came up with that, but you can. 818 00:46:27,885 --> 00:46:32,445 Speaker 1: You can safely assume that if it's really funny. Producer 819 00:46:32,485 --> 00:46:35,685 Speaker 1: Sam probably put it in my notes. I only about 820 00:46:35,805 --> 00:46:37,685 Speaker 1: two out of one hundred times did I come up 821 00:46:37,685 --> 00:46:40,725 Speaker 1: with it, So all right, DM Sam van Holgren, I 822 00:46:40,765 --> 00:46:44,125 Speaker 1: love it. Also in the future, also possibly put on 823 00:46:44,165 --> 00:46:47,605 Speaker 1: your calendars though it's coming pretty quickly here. Sorry for 824 00:46:47,685 --> 00:46:51,285 Speaker 1: the late notice, but Berlin meet up anyone love it? 825 00:46:51,365 --> 00:46:55,125 Speaker 1: Let me know April ten, a Friday. I'm going to 826 00:46:55,165 --> 00:46:57,605 Speaker 1: be in Berlin and would love to hang out if 827 00:46:57,925 --> 00:47:01,525 Speaker 1: any listeners are in the vicinity, so just let us know. 828 00:47:01,725 --> 00:47:04,645 Speaker 1: You could email feedback at film spotting dot net or 829 00:47:04,725 --> 00:47:09,525 Speaker 1: find me on social Facebook, Instagram, blue Sky. Probably the 830 00:47:09,525 --> 00:47:11,844 Speaker 1: best place is Larsen on film l A R S 831 00:47:11,965 --> 00:47:14,205 Speaker 1: E N. And yeah, let's try to get together in 832 00:47:14,245 --> 00:47:16,005 Speaker 1: Berlin on April ten. 833 00:47:16,405 --> 00:47:19,965 Speaker 2: You had so much success with Copenhagen, why not why 834 00:47:20,005 --> 00:47:21,405 Speaker 2: not advance? I mean Germany. 835 00:47:21,885 --> 00:47:26,364 Speaker 1: The Copenhagen accords are strong, but yeah, we want it 836 00:47:26,365 --> 00:47:28,844 Speaker 1: from Berlin. We want to build on more. 837 00:47:29,525 --> 00:47:33,085 Speaker 2: I love it. Nobody else has ever danced the Red 838 00:47:33,125 --> 00:47:36,685 Speaker 2: Shoes since you left. Nobody else ever shall. 839 00:47:36,645 --> 00:47:38,565 Speaker 1: Like I probably should have told you this before, but 840 00:47:38,685 --> 00:47:42,605 Speaker 1: you see, well in sanity runs in my family. 841 00:47:43,045 --> 00:47:45,805 Speaker 2: If I could only get inside that brain of yours 842 00:47:45,845 --> 00:47:49,925 Speaker 2: and understand what makes you do these crazy twisted things, 843 00:47:50,245 --> 00:47:52,085 Speaker 2: put on the red shoes, Ikey. 844 00:47:53,325 --> 00:47:54,765 Speaker 1: And dance for us again. 845 00:47:55,485 --> 00:48:01,285 Speaker 2: That smart Sam doing some handy work with the intro. 846 00:48:01,885 --> 00:48:05,365 Speaker 2: He's he's expanding it. We're getting some forties films in 847 00:48:05,405 --> 00:48:07,364 Speaker 2: the intro. But you know, we still have to end 848 00:48:07,445 --> 00:48:12,125 Speaker 2: strong with the standby rule one is you can't take 849 00:48:12,165 --> 00:48:15,965 Speaker 2: Sparta out of the Madness intro. But we remind you 850 00:48:16,085 --> 00:48:18,885 Speaker 2: Round two of forties Madness is live. Vote now at 851 00:48:18,925 --> 00:48:22,445 Speaker 2: film spotting dot net. Polls closed as they always will 852 00:48:22,685 --> 00:48:26,605 Speaker 2: Mondays eleven to fifty nine pm Central time. The new round, 853 00:48:26,605 --> 00:48:30,405 Speaker 2: the Sweet sixteen, will then open on Tuesday at noon, 854 00:48:31,245 --> 00:48:33,285 Speaker 2: and you can find everything you need to know on 855 00:48:33,325 --> 00:48:36,405 Speaker 2: our website filmspotting dot net. But the direct route, the 856 00:48:36,485 --> 00:48:38,965 Speaker 2: most direct route, because yes, I bought the domain name 857 00:48:39,165 --> 00:48:44,405 Speaker 2: several years ago, is film spotting Madness dot com. Josh, 858 00:48:44,885 --> 00:48:49,645 Speaker 2: let's highlight a few notable Round one results. No, we're 859 00:48:49,685 --> 00:48:52,125 Speaker 2: not going to go through all thirty two or anywhere 860 00:48:52,165 --> 00:48:56,805 Speaker 2: close to all thirty two matchups, but some of the 861 00:48:56,845 --> 00:49:00,765 Speaker 2: more interesting or at least some of the closer battles. 862 00:49:00,845 --> 00:49:03,205 Speaker 2: And here's what we have to say. I think I 863 00:49:03,205 --> 00:49:04,645 Speaker 2: don't know if this is the first time this has 864 00:49:04,645 --> 00:49:09,884 Speaker 2: ever happened or not, but praise, I suppose is due 865 00:49:09,885 --> 00:49:14,165 Speaker 2: for the selection committee because there was not a single 866 00:49:15,085 --> 00:49:19,765 Speaker 2: upset every movie. I mean, that's boring, so maybe there 867 00:49:19,765 --> 00:49:22,165 Speaker 2: shouldn't be praise for the selectction committee. But that does 868 00:49:22,325 --> 00:49:26,405 Speaker 2: mean that every every title that Sam and myself thought 869 00:49:26,725 --> 00:49:30,485 Speaker 2: quote unquote should win slash would win, did win. 870 00:49:31,285 --> 00:49:33,565 Speaker 1: Got it? You had a rank more highly than we 871 00:49:33,605 --> 00:49:36,645 Speaker 1: had a rank and it and it took took it. 872 00:49:36,725 --> 00:49:39,085 Speaker 2: Okay, Yeah, that's that's how it played out. 873 00:49:39,325 --> 00:49:42,605 Speaker 1: Yeah, maybe we'll get some upsets as we move forward here, 874 00:49:43,325 --> 00:49:46,125 Speaker 1: but for now, what are we looking at. It looks 875 00:49:46,165 --> 00:49:50,325 Speaker 1: like Bambi did move on as we suggested I think earlier, 876 00:49:50,445 --> 00:49:53,885 Speaker 1: taking out James Cagney in White Heat. And yeah, fifty 877 00:49:53,925 --> 00:49:57,924 Speaker 1: five percent to forty five percent, So you know, kind 878 00:49:57,925 --> 00:50:02,325 Speaker 1: of close there that we love getting. That's the closest okay. 879 00:50:03,205 --> 00:50:05,484 Speaker 2: One we yeah, we I'll just say real quick, Josh, 880 00:50:05,485 --> 00:50:07,485 Speaker 2: to set it up, we only had four matchups decided 881 00:50:07,525 --> 00:50:11,005 Speaker 2: by ten percent or less. There just were no real nailbiders. 882 00:50:11,085 --> 00:50:12,165 Speaker 2: So that's that's where we're at. 883 00:50:12,605 --> 00:50:15,645 Speaker 1: Okay, Well, here's a comment, and please do share your 884 00:50:15,685 --> 00:50:17,925 Speaker 1: comments as you vote so that we can share them 885 00:50:18,005 --> 00:50:21,844 Speaker 1: on the show. Uh. For this matchup, w Day Lichty said, 886 00:50:21,885 --> 00:50:25,045 Speaker 1: Bambi is cinematic art. I think that gets lost since 887 00:50:25,125 --> 00:50:27,805 Speaker 1: it's now part of the Disney genre. But I would 888 00:50:27,845 --> 00:50:32,445 Speaker 1: even put it above Fantasia for Artistry, and yeah, Bamby 889 00:50:32,485 --> 00:50:37,085 Speaker 1: took out Fantasia pre tournament and is moving on here 890 00:50:37,165 --> 00:50:38,965 Speaker 1: as well by taking out White Heat. 891 00:50:39,605 --> 00:50:43,605 Speaker 2: I have to correct you. Fantasia in round one, Josh, 892 00:50:43,805 --> 00:50:47,765 Speaker 2: but but maybe not advancing. Yeah, yeah, it was Bamby. 893 00:50:48,005 --> 00:50:53,245 Speaker 2: Bamby was up against Dumbo, I think right right? Oh, yes, yes, 894 00:50:53,365 --> 00:50:58,005 Speaker 2: but Fantasia was part of round one. It unfortunately is 895 00:50:58,045 --> 00:51:01,405 Speaker 2: not advancing to round two. So Bambi is representing Disney 896 00:51:01,885 --> 00:51:04,525 Speaker 2: after taking out Jimmy Cagney. Now I said last week, 897 00:51:04,565 --> 00:51:06,725 Speaker 2: I thought this one was a tough one to predict, 898 00:51:07,205 --> 00:51:11,125 Speaker 2: and considering it was only a nine percent difference, I 899 00:51:11,165 --> 00:51:14,525 Speaker 2: guess I am vindicated. Vincent Maneli's Meet Me in Saint 900 00:51:14,525 --> 00:51:18,685 Speaker 2: Louis up against Billy Wilder's The Lost Weekend, and Meet 901 00:51:18,725 --> 00:51:22,045 Speaker 2: Me in Saint Louis did take it, but fifty four 902 00:51:22,085 --> 00:51:26,005 Speaker 2: percent to forty six percent. Joseph Carr says, I kind 903 00:51:26,005 --> 00:51:28,325 Speaker 2: of detested the schmaltz of Meet Me in Saint Louis, 904 00:51:28,565 --> 00:51:31,245 Speaker 2: but boy has it stuck around in my head. Judy 905 00:51:31,285 --> 00:51:33,045 Speaker 2: Garland will do that to you, so it gets the 906 00:51:33,125 --> 00:51:36,365 Speaker 2: vote for me. Peter Ketder says, perhaps someone will do 907 00:51:36,405 --> 00:51:40,924 Speaker 2: a musical version of the Lost Weekend. Hmmm, I'm I'm 908 00:51:40,965 --> 00:51:43,685 Speaker 2: not sure about that. Now. One last one, we're gonna 909 00:51:43,685 --> 00:51:46,645 Speaker 2: mention to you the closest matchup that was only six percent, 910 00:51:46,685 --> 00:51:49,485 Speaker 2: and Josh, it works out perfectly. I think that we're 911 00:51:49,485 --> 00:51:52,285 Speaker 2: alternating here and you get to highlight this one because 912 00:51:52,325 --> 00:51:55,445 Speaker 2: if I saw correctly, did you see one of these 913 00:51:55,485 --> 00:51:58,085 Speaker 2: two movies for the first time and also rate it 914 00:51:58,125 --> 00:51:59,485 Speaker 2: four out of four stars. 915 00:52:00,125 --> 00:52:04,245 Speaker 1: Part of my homework? Yeah? Yes. Jacques Tournaire directed noir 916 00:52:04,445 --> 00:52:09,325 Speaker 1: Out of the Past. I watched specifically for madness, and 917 00:52:09,525 --> 00:52:12,245 Speaker 1: I think it might have jumped into maybe one of 918 00:52:12,245 --> 00:52:15,405 Speaker 1: my top five noirs at it's so good. It is 919 00:52:16,285 --> 00:52:19,765 Speaker 1: so good, the riches, the level of riches you have 920 00:52:20,485 --> 00:52:23,845 Speaker 1: in Out of the Past. You've got Tornaire, who you know, 921 00:52:23,965 --> 00:52:26,685 Speaker 1: also directed Cat People. I Walked with a Zombie just 922 00:52:27,085 --> 00:52:30,045 Speaker 1: at the top of his game. Here Robert Mitcham. I 923 00:52:30,325 --> 00:52:36,205 Speaker 1: don't know if anyone's so casually held the screen in 924 00:52:36,285 --> 00:52:39,725 Speaker 1: such a tight grip as Robert Mitcham does here. Two 925 00:52:39,805 --> 00:52:42,565 Speaker 1: Femmes fatale, you get Jane Greer and Ronda Fleming and 926 00:52:42,645 --> 00:52:45,525 Speaker 1: Kurt Kirk Douglas. I didn't know. I mean, this just 927 00:52:45,525 --> 00:52:47,685 Speaker 1: shows how naive I was. I didn't know going in. 928 00:52:47,805 --> 00:52:49,285 Speaker 1: I knew it was mitcham, I knew some of this 929 00:52:49,325 --> 00:52:52,765 Speaker 1: other stuff. Kirk Douglas pops up in like the third 930 00:52:53,285 --> 00:52:57,005 Speaker 1: role as sort of the crime boss, pulling the strings, 931 00:52:57,085 --> 00:52:58,965 Speaker 1: and I think it's I think it might have been 932 00:52:59,045 --> 00:53:04,245 Speaker 1: his third or fourth screen performance, and he's incredible. So yeah, 933 00:53:04,365 --> 00:53:07,685 Speaker 1: out of the Past, man, this is what madness is about, 934 00:53:07,725 --> 00:53:11,285 Speaker 1: like a quote unquote discovery for me. Now we do 935 00:53:11,365 --> 00:53:15,205 Speaker 1: have someone who disagrees with me, though, Jordan Jersik wrote 936 00:53:15,245 --> 00:53:18,565 Speaker 1: in and said this about this matchup. Out of the 937 00:53:18,605 --> 00:53:21,445 Speaker 1: Past is a really effective noir that I quite enjoyed. 938 00:53:21,445 --> 00:53:23,725 Speaker 1: But to Be or Not to Be is on a 939 00:53:23,725 --> 00:53:28,285 Speaker 1: completely different level, hilarious, political, expertly crafted, making fun of 940 00:53:28,365 --> 00:53:30,565 Speaker 1: Nazis before it was cool. If you haven't had the 941 00:53:30,605 --> 00:53:33,205 Speaker 1: pleasure make time for this one. 942 00:53:33,125 --> 00:53:35,325 Speaker 2: I'm with you. I voted for out of the Past. 943 00:53:35,765 --> 00:53:40,085 Speaker 2: I'm against Jordan on that one. But as we transition 944 00:53:40,245 --> 00:53:44,525 Speaker 2: into highlighting some round two matchups, out of the Past 945 00:53:44,605 --> 00:53:47,965 Speaker 2: is going to come up again for me, Josh, because 946 00:53:48,925 --> 00:53:52,605 Speaker 2: it's definitely part of a matchup that is very, very 947 00:53:52,805 --> 00:53:55,645 Speaker 2: tough to pick. Why don't you start us off though, 948 00:53:55,685 --> 00:53:59,085 Speaker 2: with one or two, or however many you'd like to highlight. 949 00:53:59,285 --> 00:54:00,965 Speaker 2: Did you look at round two? Have you had a 950 00:54:01,045 --> 00:54:06,045 Speaker 2: chance yet and did any strike you as as particularly troubling? 951 00:54:07,245 --> 00:54:10,805 Speaker 1: Yeah, I did so. With the timing here actually and 952 00:54:11,245 --> 00:54:14,565 Speaker 1: having a course right after these matchups go live, I 953 00:54:14,765 --> 00:54:16,685 Speaker 1: only had a chance take a quick glance. But I 954 00:54:16,765 --> 00:54:19,085 Speaker 1: do have a few that stood out, and I'll start 955 00:54:19,085 --> 00:54:22,405 Speaker 1: with the toughest to pick me me. There's a handful 956 00:54:22,445 --> 00:54:24,165 Speaker 1: of them that looked tough, but the one that really 957 00:54:24,245 --> 00:54:29,245 Speaker 1: jumped out was personally Best Years of our Lives versus 958 00:54:29,245 --> 00:54:33,964 Speaker 1: Mildred Pierce. And yeah, I think at this point Best 959 00:54:34,085 --> 00:54:37,685 Speaker 1: Years has become I'm fair to say, a film spotting 960 00:54:37,725 --> 00:54:41,205 Speaker 1: title after our Thiah Weiler Marathon. I mean, we shared 961 00:54:41,245 --> 00:54:45,365 Speaker 1: it as our favorite picture of the marathon, and I 962 00:54:45,405 --> 00:54:48,285 Speaker 1: know I've had it on top five lists. I just 963 00:54:48,525 --> 00:54:52,485 Speaker 1: really respect that film. At the same time, Mildred Piers 964 00:54:52,605 --> 00:54:57,005 Speaker 1: might be my favorite Joan Crawford melodrama, and that's after 965 00:54:57,125 --> 00:54:59,845 Speaker 1: doing what came up on the show recently, you know, 966 00:55:00,005 --> 00:55:03,364 Speaker 1: during COVID the Family Joan Crawford Marathon. So I've seen 967 00:55:03,365 --> 00:55:07,165 Speaker 1: a fair amount of her stuff, and man, Mildred pierces 968 00:55:08,285 --> 00:55:10,405 Speaker 1: it's a tough one in all the good ways as 969 00:55:10,445 --> 00:55:13,445 Speaker 1: a Joan Crawford melodrama should be. So I'm gonna have 970 00:55:13,485 --> 00:55:15,205 Speaker 1: to sit and wrestle with this one for a while. 971 00:55:15,605 --> 00:55:18,045 Speaker 2: Okay, I didn't have it on my tough list, but 972 00:55:18,445 --> 00:55:22,165 Speaker 2: you're not wrong. I mean I hesitated because maybe it's 973 00:55:22,245 --> 00:55:25,605 Speaker 2: recency bias. I love both films. I think they're both. 974 00:55:25,965 --> 00:55:30,085 Speaker 2: I think they're both excellent, and because of the recent 975 00:55:30,645 --> 00:55:35,485 Speaker 2: Wiler marathon and how giddy I suppose I was for 976 00:55:35,525 --> 00:55:37,885 Speaker 2: best years of our lives, I have it. I have 977 00:55:37,965 --> 00:55:40,085 Speaker 2: it just higher. But you're right. Mildred Pierce is a 978 00:55:40,085 --> 00:55:43,245 Speaker 2: movie I've written about. It's a movie I've seen multiple 979 00:55:43,285 --> 00:55:48,085 Speaker 2: times and love love as a noir. So it should 980 00:55:48,125 --> 00:55:50,605 Speaker 2: be a tough choice because they're both really excellent films. 981 00:55:50,725 --> 00:55:52,005 Speaker 2: So I'm with you. 982 00:55:52,005 --> 00:55:53,725 Speaker 1: What were your toughest on this round? Then? 983 00:55:53,885 --> 00:55:56,565 Speaker 2: Well, I'll I had I had four I voted. I 984 00:55:56,605 --> 00:55:58,364 Speaker 2: had four that I had to stop at and just 985 00:55:58,365 --> 00:56:00,565 Speaker 2: be like, I don't I don't know what to do 986 00:56:00,645 --> 00:56:05,165 Speaker 2: with these. And one of the four I still haven't 987 00:56:05,205 --> 00:56:07,205 Speaker 2: voted in, and I'm not sure I can bring myself 988 00:56:07,245 --> 00:56:11,285 Speaker 2: to vote in. But I'll count down from easiest to 989 00:56:11,325 --> 00:56:13,844 Speaker 2: so easiest of the hard to the to the one 990 00:56:13,885 --> 00:56:17,765 Speaker 2: that I'm still mad about. The first two Josh are 991 00:56:17,845 --> 00:56:25,965 Speaker 2: Hitchcock related. Rebecca advanced past Red River, Rebecca beat out 992 00:56:26,005 --> 00:56:30,605 Speaker 2: Howard Hawks, but now is up against Kerrosawa and a 993 00:56:30,645 --> 00:56:34,565 Speaker 2: movie we talked about fairly recently in Stray Dog. And 994 00:56:35,005 --> 00:56:38,205 Speaker 2: you know, we're talking about two masters in Kurrosawa and Hitchcock. 995 00:56:39,125 --> 00:56:42,245 Speaker 2: I think that there are much better Hitchcock films than 996 00:56:42,965 --> 00:56:46,525 Speaker 2: the Hitchcock films that are in this tournament. Of all 997 00:56:46,565 --> 00:56:49,605 Speaker 2: the Hitchcock films that are in the bracket, and we've 998 00:56:49,605 --> 00:56:54,165 Speaker 2: got Notorious Rebecca, we've got Rope, and we have Shadow 999 00:56:54,205 --> 00:56:58,045 Speaker 2: of a Doubt, which did advance by beating by beating Pinocchio. 1000 00:56:58,205 --> 00:57:00,925 Speaker 2: Shadow of a Doubt is my favorite, and Shadow of 1001 00:57:01,005 --> 00:57:03,925 Speaker 2: Doubt is going to go down, I think unfortunately. Pretty hard. 1002 00:57:04,325 --> 00:57:07,245 Speaker 2: I say unfortunately because it's my favorite of the ones 1003 00:57:07,285 --> 00:57:11,565 Speaker 2: I just highlighted, But it's gonna run into a buzzsaw, 1004 00:57:11,645 --> 00:57:14,725 Speaker 2: I think in round two, and that movie is the 1005 00:57:14,805 --> 00:57:18,045 Speaker 2: number six seed, the Red Shoes. I do think the 1006 00:57:18,045 --> 00:57:20,565 Speaker 2: Red Shoes will take it down from the Sweet sixteen. 1007 00:57:20,725 --> 00:57:23,285 Speaker 2: But there's a lot of love for Hitchcock out there 1008 00:57:23,845 --> 00:57:28,485 Speaker 2: amongst film spotting listeners. I do like Rebecca quite a bit, 1009 00:57:28,605 --> 00:57:33,445 Speaker 2: maybe here again recency, and maybe even appreciating Kurosawa a 1010 00:57:33,485 --> 00:57:36,325 Speaker 2: little bit more. I just can't get that excited about Rebecca, 1011 00:57:36,925 --> 00:57:39,325 Speaker 2: and I'm gonna even though I had to pause, I'm 1012 00:57:39,365 --> 00:57:42,125 Speaker 2: going with the upset. I think stray Dog. I'd hope 1013 00:57:42,125 --> 00:57:44,805 Speaker 2: stray Dog would win. I don't think it will. The 1014 00:57:44,845 --> 00:57:49,365 Speaker 2: next one is Notorious versus Sullivan's Travels. Now, I like 1015 00:57:49,445 --> 00:57:53,645 Speaker 2: Notorious more. I like Notorious more than Rebecca. This is harder. 1016 00:57:54,085 --> 00:57:57,325 Speaker 2: But I also I also kind of think Sullivan's Travels 1017 00:57:57,405 --> 00:58:04,605 Speaker 2: is a masterpiece, like a legitimate Hollywood masterpiece, And for 1018 00:58:04,645 --> 00:58:09,845 Speaker 2: that reason, I'm nudging Hitchcock out again, and I would 1019 00:58:09,845 --> 00:58:12,885 Speaker 2: go with the upset. I finally voted, and I picked 1020 00:58:13,045 --> 00:58:16,285 Speaker 2: Sullivan's Travels over Notorious. 1021 00:58:16,805 --> 00:58:19,205 Speaker 1: The Past do you I've got that one real quick 1022 00:58:19,405 --> 00:58:21,685 Speaker 1: In my hardest to predict, that was the one that 1023 00:58:21,765 --> 00:58:23,965 Speaker 1: jumped out at me, because I do think you have 1024 00:58:25,525 --> 00:58:28,365 Speaker 1: this might be hitchcockick the Hitchcock at the top of 1025 00:58:28,405 --> 00:58:33,485 Speaker 1: his spy game, possibly with Notorious and then but Sulivan's Travels. 1026 00:58:33,525 --> 00:58:35,125 Speaker 1: I think you might have sturg just at the top 1027 00:58:35,165 --> 00:58:38,525 Speaker 1: of his game. Altogether. So I don't know how, you know, 1028 00:58:38,685 --> 00:58:41,205 Speaker 1: anyone gets their mind around that. It's going to be difficult. 1029 00:58:41,245 --> 00:58:43,405 Speaker 1: For me, not the most difficult, but I think for 1030 00:58:43,485 --> 00:58:46,685 Speaker 1: most viewers it will be a tough one. So for me, 1031 00:58:46,725 --> 00:58:48,045 Speaker 1: it's hardest to predict. 1032 00:58:48,325 --> 00:58:52,485 Speaker 2: Okay, my number two toughest to pick. The film you 1033 00:58:52,565 --> 00:58:55,045 Speaker 2: just talked about, Out of the Past, one of my 1034 00:58:55,165 --> 00:59:00,445 Speaker 2: favorite noirs. It's going up against a very, very highly 1035 00:59:00,485 --> 00:59:03,805 Speaker 2: seated and rightfully so, the Third Man. I think the 1036 00:59:03,845 --> 00:59:06,565 Speaker 2: Third Man is going to kill it, and I think 1037 00:59:06,565 --> 00:59:09,005 Speaker 2: that's because it's a beloved film. I think Out of 1038 00:59:09,005 --> 00:59:12,805 Speaker 2: the Past is still probably a little under seen compared 1039 00:59:12,845 --> 00:59:17,205 Speaker 2: to the Third Man. It it isn't It isn't going 1040 00:59:17,245 --> 00:59:18,565 Speaker 2: to win. And I was just going to look up 1041 00:59:18,605 --> 00:59:21,365 Speaker 2: real quick while we're talking, what the seeding is. The 1042 00:59:21,365 --> 00:59:23,365 Speaker 2: Third Man is the five seed. Out of the Past 1043 00:59:23,445 --> 00:59:27,965 Speaker 2: is fairly highly seeded. Realistically, selection committee, we probably put 1044 00:59:27,965 --> 00:59:29,965 Speaker 2: it a little too high, not that it doesn't deserve 1045 00:59:30,005 --> 00:59:32,085 Speaker 2: to be this high, but just in terms of how 1046 00:59:32,125 --> 00:59:34,685 Speaker 2: I think it would go, twenty eight is probably a 1047 00:59:34,685 --> 00:59:36,765 Speaker 2: little too high for it. But there's a reason why 1048 00:59:36,845 --> 00:59:40,725 Speaker 2: the Third Man is the number five seed, and I 1049 00:59:40,725 --> 00:59:43,445 Speaker 2: don't think it's going to win. But Josh, here again 1050 00:59:43,725 --> 00:59:45,325 Speaker 2: it Well, I was gonna say it might be a 1051 00:59:45,365 --> 00:59:48,365 Speaker 2: case of recency bias, but I haven't seen either of 1052 00:59:48,405 --> 00:59:50,365 Speaker 2: these movies in a long time. I can trace Out 1053 00:59:50,405 --> 00:59:53,605 Speaker 2: of the Past back to it's noir marathon here on 1054 00:59:53,645 --> 00:59:56,645 Speaker 2: film Spotting, so maybe two thousand and six. I hadn't 1055 00:59:56,645 --> 01:00:00,045 Speaker 2: seen it before that. The Third Man, I don't remember 1056 01:00:00,085 --> 01:00:01,765 Speaker 2: when I saw it, but I've only seen it once. 1057 01:00:01,805 --> 01:00:04,885 Speaker 2: And while I do, while I do really like that movie, 1058 01:00:05,685 --> 01:00:09,125 Speaker 2: for me, it's not it's not one of those all timers, 1059 01:00:09,405 --> 01:00:11,285 Speaker 2: you know. It's not one of my top ten or twenty, 1060 01:00:11,405 --> 01:00:14,005 Speaker 2: or or even top fifty movies like I think it 1061 01:00:14,045 --> 01:00:16,965 Speaker 2: is for a lot of people. If I had to choose, 1062 01:00:16,965 --> 01:00:18,645 Speaker 2: if I could only watch one of the two films, 1063 01:00:18,685 --> 01:00:20,685 Speaker 2: now I do need to rewatch The Third Man, But 1064 01:00:20,725 --> 01:00:23,045 Speaker 2: if I I could only rewatch one of these two 1065 01:00:23,085 --> 01:00:26,645 Speaker 2: films for the rest of my life, I'd go with 1066 01:00:26,765 --> 01:00:28,845 Speaker 2: Out of the Past for all the reasons that some 1067 01:00:28,885 --> 01:00:31,245 Speaker 2: of the reasons anyway, that you've already talked about. 1068 01:00:31,365 --> 01:00:33,405 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's tough for me too, and I can't even 1069 01:00:33,485 --> 01:00:37,485 Speaker 1: fairly The recency thing is just you know, for me, 1070 01:00:37,565 --> 01:00:40,205 Speaker 1: it's not even fair to compare a movie you watched 1071 01:00:40,245 --> 01:00:42,445 Speaker 1: a week ago to one it's spent like at least 1072 01:00:42,445 --> 01:00:44,725 Speaker 1: ten years. So yeah, that's a tough one. 1073 01:00:44,805 --> 01:00:46,685 Speaker 2: And for me, it's been longer The Third Man. I mean, 1074 01:00:46,885 --> 01:00:48,845 Speaker 2: I'll just say it, it's probably been at least twenty 1075 01:00:48,885 --> 01:00:52,645 Speaker 2: five years since I've seen The Third Man. So I'll 1076 01:00:52,685 --> 01:00:56,005 Speaker 2: set that aside, and that brings me to number one. 1077 01:00:56,085 --> 01:00:59,365 Speaker 2: I know this isn't tough for you, but you can 1078 01:00:59,405 --> 01:01:03,765 Speaker 2: surely understand why it's tough for me. And Sam and 1079 01:01:03,805 --> 01:01:07,645 Speaker 2: I both saw this coming as a very likely Sweet 1080 01:01:07,685 --> 01:01:13,725 Speaker 2: sixteen matchup. We saw the poetry, the awful poetry I 1081 01:01:13,765 --> 01:01:21,205 Speaker 2: suppose in this, this British matchup, this great Britain, and 1082 01:01:21,285 --> 01:01:24,285 Speaker 2: matchup of one of the if not the all time 1083 01:01:24,365 --> 01:01:29,125 Speaker 2: friendship movie and one of the all time tragic, if 1084 01:01:29,125 --> 01:01:33,325 Speaker 2: not the all time tragic love stories. Don't get me wrong, 1085 01:01:33,485 --> 01:01:37,045 Speaker 2: I think Brief Encounter is going to beat the Life 1086 01:01:37,045 --> 01:01:39,085 Speaker 2: and Death of Colonel Blump. I don't think it's going 1087 01:01:39,125 --> 01:01:41,605 Speaker 2: to be even that close. The Life and Death of 1088 01:01:41,645 --> 01:01:45,845 Speaker 2: Colonel Blump from the Archers is number twenty four seed. 1089 01:01:46,405 --> 01:01:50,445 Speaker 2: It's not as highly regarded by everyone as The Red Shoes. 1090 01:01:50,525 --> 01:01:52,565 Speaker 2: I even am pretty sure I have the Red Shoes 1091 01:01:52,845 --> 01:01:58,245 Speaker 2: higher on my Archer's ranked list, but it's up against 1092 01:01:58,325 --> 01:02:02,245 Speaker 2: you know, Brief Encounter, which I also love, and it's 1093 01:02:02,245 --> 01:02:06,685 Speaker 2: the nine seed. I think both movies are masterpieces. Both 1094 01:02:06,725 --> 01:02:11,045 Speaker 2: movies are films that I had not seen until I 1095 01:02:11,125 --> 01:02:14,245 Speaker 2: discussed them here on Film Spotting. I consider them both 1096 01:02:14,685 --> 01:02:19,005 Speaker 2: quote unquote film spotting movies. I think they're both essential. 1097 01:02:19,285 --> 01:02:20,965 Speaker 2: That's that's the only other way I can refer to it. 1098 01:02:21,165 --> 01:02:23,485 Speaker 2: That's that's how strongly I do feel about the life 1099 01:02:23,485 --> 01:02:26,885 Speaker 2: and death of Colonel Blimp. I think most people understand 1100 01:02:27,205 --> 01:02:29,685 Speaker 2: why we might feel that way about Brief Encounter, but 1101 01:02:30,165 --> 01:02:33,805 Speaker 2: that's how I feel about Colonel Blimp as well. And 1102 01:02:35,805 --> 01:02:38,485 Speaker 2: it makes me really mad. It makes me really mad 1103 01:02:38,565 --> 01:02:41,405 Speaker 2: to have to vote one way or another. Josh. That's 1104 01:02:41,445 --> 01:02:44,925 Speaker 2: all I can say this is this is madness. I'm angry. 1105 01:02:45,285 --> 01:02:49,205 Speaker 2: I have no one to blame but myself and Sam. 1106 01:02:49,245 --> 01:02:53,885 Speaker 2: I'm I'm actually, I really am actually leaning Colonel Blimp. 1107 01:02:54,205 --> 01:02:57,525 Speaker 2: There there there are just there are things about Colonel Blimp, 1108 01:02:58,045 --> 01:03:01,805 Speaker 2: the riches of that movie, the richness of that movie, 1109 01:03:02,125 --> 01:03:07,045 Speaker 2: the layers to that movie. There there are depths to 1110 01:03:07,085 --> 01:03:10,045 Speaker 2: it that that have me wanting to go back to 1111 01:03:10,085 --> 01:03:14,165 Speaker 2: it again and again that that maybe have me putting 1112 01:03:14,205 --> 01:03:17,245 Speaker 2: it just slightly higher than Brief Encounter, even though, like 1113 01:03:17,285 --> 01:03:19,685 Speaker 2: I said, I think Brief Encounter is an essential film. 1114 01:03:19,725 --> 01:03:22,405 Speaker 2: So if I if I forced myself right now, I've 1115 01:03:22,445 --> 01:03:26,805 Speaker 2: got four incredibly tough to pick matchups, but in all 1116 01:03:26,885 --> 01:03:31,605 Speaker 2: four I think I would pick the underdog to win, 1117 01:03:32,085 --> 01:03:35,925 Speaker 2: even though to be clear, I don't think the underdog 1118 01:03:35,965 --> 01:03:38,245 Speaker 2: will win in any of these four matchups, and actually, 1119 01:03:38,565 --> 01:03:41,405 Speaker 2: maybe again kind of boring, I think we're going to 1120 01:03:41,485 --> 01:03:44,325 Speaker 2: have another round where all of the favorites are going 1121 01:03:44,325 --> 01:03:46,725 Speaker 2: to advance, just like in round one. 1122 01:03:47,085 --> 01:03:51,085 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think you're not entirely alone with your Blimp favoritism, 1123 01:03:51,245 --> 01:03:55,365 Speaker 1: though I wonder even if I mean, there are Archers 1124 01:03:55,405 --> 01:03:58,045 Speaker 1: fanatics who will definitely vote for it over a Brief Encounter, 1125 01:03:58,125 --> 01:04:01,965 Speaker 1: And I do wonder if Brief Encounter might still be 1126 01:04:02,125 --> 01:04:04,685 Speaker 1: to your point about out of the past, a bit underseen. 1127 01:04:05,125 --> 01:04:07,245 Speaker 1: It seems to me like the people who I was 1128 01:04:07,325 --> 01:04:09,845 Speaker 1: late to catching up with it. You know, it's not 1129 01:04:09,885 --> 01:04:13,045 Speaker 1: necessarily where you start with lean right, you kind of 1130 01:04:13,085 --> 01:04:17,845 Speaker 1: get there eventually and just astounded by what I discovered there. 1131 01:04:18,405 --> 01:04:20,845 Speaker 1: But I wonder if there are a fair amount of 1132 01:04:21,045 --> 01:04:26,605 Speaker 1: people who have that similar trajectory, and maybe they'll be 1133 01:04:26,805 --> 01:04:30,085 Speaker 1: counteracted by the Archers fanatics who just love Blimp. We'll 1134 01:04:30,125 --> 01:04:30,685 Speaker 1: have to see. 1135 01:04:30,965 --> 01:04:34,005 Speaker 2: Yeah, maybe, So while while you're talking, you know, sometimes 1136 01:04:34,205 --> 01:04:37,565 Speaker 2: I reference this when I'm trying to make choices and 1137 01:04:37,605 --> 01:04:42,845 Speaker 2: it gives you. It doesn't always tell you what direction 1138 01:04:42,965 --> 01:04:46,685 Speaker 2: you should go, because it's not always indicative of our audience. 1139 01:04:46,925 --> 01:04:50,645 Speaker 2: It is indicative, obviously of the Letterboxed audience. The Life 1140 01:04:50,645 --> 01:04:53,885 Speaker 2: and Death of Colonel Blimp has been seen by thirty 1141 01:04:54,005 --> 01:04:59,365 Speaker 2: nine thousand people logged on Letterboxed, and it has thirteen thousand, 1142 01:04:59,805 --> 01:05:03,805 Speaker 2: so a third exactly a third like it, and it 1143 01:05:03,805 --> 01:05:06,125 Speaker 2: actually shows up. It has the crown next to it, 1144 01:05:06,165 --> 01:05:09,005 Speaker 2: which means it's number two fifty five in the letterbox 1145 01:05:09,085 --> 01:05:13,005 Speaker 2: top five hundred. So it's highly regarded to be two 1146 01:05:13,045 --> 01:05:15,005 Speaker 2: fifty five in the top five hundred, even though it's 1147 01:05:15,045 --> 01:05:19,005 Speaker 2: only been seen by thirty nine thousand people's that's relatively 1148 01:05:19,085 --> 01:05:21,765 Speaker 2: low when we're talking about the top five hundred movies 1149 01:05:21,885 --> 01:05:24,285 Speaker 2: compared to some of the other titles, and the number 1150 01:05:24,325 --> 01:05:28,405 Speaker 2: of views I know that they have brief encounter by comparison, 1151 01:05:29,365 --> 01:05:32,685 Speaker 2: has one hundred and forty five thousand views, oh and 1152 01:05:32,885 --> 01:05:37,205 Speaker 2: fifty fifty six thousand likes, And so that's like four 1153 01:05:37,405 --> 01:05:41,565 Speaker 2: four times at least, right the likes and four times 1154 01:05:41,605 --> 01:05:44,485 Speaker 2: the views, and it's it's number one thirty six on 1155 01:05:44,525 --> 01:05:47,365 Speaker 2: that top five hundred. So that that does make me 1156 01:05:47,405 --> 01:05:50,525 Speaker 2: think Encounter. See, Yeah, I think it's going to triumph. Now. 1157 01:05:50,645 --> 01:05:53,525 Speaker 2: One forty five is still much lower than a lot 1158 01:05:53,525 --> 01:05:56,125 Speaker 2: of the other films we're talking about. Yeah, in this bracket, 1159 01:05:56,685 --> 01:06:00,525 Speaker 2: but it's it's more than Colonel Blimp. And I do 1160 01:06:00,645 --> 01:06:05,605 Speaker 2: think I do think Colonel Blimp is heading for a defeat. Now. 1161 01:06:06,045 --> 01:06:10,845 Speaker 2: Toughest to predict, Like I said, I think it's going 1162 01:06:10,925 --> 01:06:13,765 Speaker 2: to be chalk as they say, I think the favorites 1163 01:06:14,085 --> 01:06:17,605 Speaker 2: are going to advance once again. But I do have 1164 01:06:17,645 --> 01:06:20,805 Speaker 2: one where I think it could be close, and maybe 1165 01:06:20,805 --> 01:06:23,605 Speaker 2: not surprisingly. It's the one matchup where the seeds are 1166 01:06:23,605 --> 01:06:26,125 Speaker 2: the closest. But you mentioned this earlier. Do you do 1167 01:06:26,165 --> 01:06:27,805 Speaker 2: you have a couple or just one that you think 1168 01:06:27,885 --> 01:06:28,645 Speaker 2: is tough to predict. 1169 01:06:29,685 --> 01:06:33,285 Speaker 1: The toughest one you already mentioned for me is Notorious 1170 01:06:33,365 --> 01:06:35,605 Speaker 1: versus Sullivan's Travels. I don't know if that's what you 1171 01:06:35,605 --> 01:06:37,005 Speaker 1: were thinking of, or if you were going to. 1172 01:06:36,965 --> 01:06:39,125 Speaker 2: Know, I have one different one. Yeah, I have one 1173 01:06:39,165 --> 01:06:42,405 Speaker 2: other one that I'm not sure what to make of it, 1174 01:06:42,845 --> 01:06:46,485 Speaker 2: and it's the number fifteen. Here it involves the Archers again. 1175 01:06:46,805 --> 01:06:49,805 Speaker 2: You know, I guess they're really confounding me. It's a 1176 01:06:49,805 --> 01:06:53,405 Speaker 2: matter of life and death, which I love. I love 1177 01:06:53,405 --> 01:06:55,365 Speaker 2: all these films by the Archers. It's a matter of 1178 01:06:55,405 --> 01:07:00,365 Speaker 2: life and death against the Philadelphia Story, which is considered 1179 01:07:00,485 --> 01:07:06,165 Speaker 2: maybe the all time best romantic comedy. And here here 1180 01:07:06,205 --> 01:07:08,085 Speaker 2: is a case again where you look at the numbers. 1181 01:07:08,645 --> 01:07:11,365 Speaker 2: A Matter of Life and Death seventy six thousand views, 1182 01:07:11,405 --> 01:07:14,365 Speaker 2: twenty nine thousand likes, but it is number two oh 1183 01:07:14,485 --> 01:07:18,125 Speaker 2: nine in that top five hundred, So seventy six and 1184 01:07:18,445 --> 01:07:21,925 Speaker 2: twenty nine Philadelphia Story, by contrast one hundred and forty 1185 01:07:22,005 --> 01:07:26,285 Speaker 2: nine and forty seven, so very clearly it's double. It's 1186 01:07:26,285 --> 01:07:30,285 Speaker 2: double the likes and double the views. But the Philadelphia 1187 01:07:30,285 --> 01:07:32,525 Speaker 2: Story is not in the top five hundred, and A 1188 01:07:32,565 --> 01:07:35,045 Speaker 2: Matter of Life and Death is two nine. So there 1189 01:07:35,125 --> 01:07:37,845 Speaker 2: is that prestige factory a matter of life and death 1190 01:07:37,925 --> 01:07:41,485 Speaker 2: that comes with the Archers. That is why I'm pretty 1191 01:07:41,485 --> 01:07:45,605 Speaker 2: sure that that in the aggregate there are more people 1192 01:07:45,645 --> 01:07:49,605 Speaker 2: listening who have probably seen the Philadelphia story, but the 1193 01:07:49,725 --> 01:07:52,085 Speaker 2: people listening who have seen a matter of life and 1194 01:07:52,125 --> 01:07:54,565 Speaker 2: death probably feel stronger about it. 1195 01:07:54,645 --> 01:07:54,845 Speaker 1: Love. 1196 01:07:54,965 --> 01:07:57,605 Speaker 2: Yeah, and that right, and that that may get out 1197 01:07:57,645 --> 01:07:59,925 Speaker 2: the vote if you will. And I could see the 1198 01:08:00,005 --> 01:08:03,365 Speaker 2: number eighteen seed potentially winning or at least giving the 1199 01:08:03,365 --> 01:08:07,045 Speaker 2: Philadelphia story a really close close contest. 1200 01:08:07,165 --> 01:08:09,365 Speaker 1: Yeah, and there was one year for our prediction brackets. 1201 01:08:09,405 --> 01:08:12,925 Speaker 1: I just, you know, played the letterbox game entirely, and 1202 01:08:12,965 --> 01:08:16,644 Speaker 1: it's doesn't as I think you suggested earlier, it doesn't 1203 01:08:16,845 --> 01:08:21,165 Speaker 1: entirely match up necessarily with film spotting listenerships. So so 1204 01:08:21,205 --> 01:08:23,485 Speaker 1: it's a good guide. I think it's more helpful than 1205 01:08:23,525 --> 01:08:28,125 Speaker 1: not in making your predictions. But it's not necessarily a 1206 01:08:28,165 --> 01:08:31,205 Speaker 1: lock by gathering those stats. 1207 01:08:31,445 --> 01:08:34,884 Speaker 2: No, it's not. Now we do have to highlight before 1208 01:08:34,965 --> 01:08:40,445 Speaker 2: we move on the bracket prediction contest. And I know 1209 01:08:40,525 --> 01:08:44,525 Speaker 2: that the burning question on everybody's mind, or I assume 1210 01:08:44,525 --> 01:08:46,965 Speaker 2: it is, because it certainly was the burning question on 1211 01:08:47,005 --> 01:08:50,085 Speaker 2: my mind. The first thing I looked at this morning, Josh, 1212 01:08:50,165 --> 01:08:53,245 Speaker 2: after where do I rank? The first thing I looked 1213 01:08:53,245 --> 01:08:55,485 Speaker 2: at is where does Ricky Kendall rank? 1214 01:08:55,645 --> 01:08:55,885 Speaker 1: Right? 1215 01:08:56,045 --> 01:09:00,885 Speaker 2: Yeah, because Ricky Kendall one one year, I think he 1216 01:09:01,005 --> 01:09:05,085 Speaker 2: actually predicted every matchup correctly and one year only got 1217 01:09:05,125 --> 01:09:08,005 Speaker 2: one wrong. And how you could get a perfect bracket 1218 01:09:08,125 --> 01:09:12,165 Speaker 2: or even one wrong, just you know, I don't know 1219 01:09:12,205 --> 01:09:15,325 Speaker 2: how that's possible. So I wanted to magic Ricky. 1220 01:09:15,685 --> 01:09:17,205 Speaker 1: Yeah, dark magic. 1221 01:09:17,005 --> 01:09:20,445 Speaker 2: Where Ricky stood. Now, obviously, after round one there's only 1222 01:09:20,645 --> 01:09:23,165 Speaker 2: the high score you can get his thirty two. Each 1223 01:09:23,205 --> 01:09:26,325 Speaker 2: win each matchup gets you one point, So there's gonna 1224 01:09:26,325 --> 01:09:29,885 Speaker 2: be a lot of ties. And right now I will 1225 01:09:29,925 --> 01:09:32,885 Speaker 2: tell the world, sorry, sorry, Ricky, that I'm calling you 1226 01:09:32,965 --> 01:09:36,485 Speaker 2: out for being in one hundred and ninetieth place. But 1227 01:09:36,485 --> 01:09:39,165 Speaker 2: but Ricky, Ricky so far. Not that Ricky's dead by 1228 01:09:39,165 --> 01:09:46,085 Speaker 2: any means, but Ricky is tied for one hundred and ninetieth. No, actually, 1229 01:09:46,165 --> 01:09:49,285 Speaker 2: you know what, Oh gosh, you know what, Josh, I'm wrong. 1230 01:09:50,205 --> 01:09:52,405 Speaker 2: I'm wrong. I should mean I should I should we 1231 01:09:52,405 --> 01:09:56,605 Speaker 2: should have Sam edit that out. I besch he's not 1232 01:09:56,845 --> 01:10:00,005 Speaker 2: he's not winning, but he's in much better standing than 1233 01:10:00,045 --> 01:10:04,125 Speaker 2: I suggested. He's in. He's tied for twenty third. Okay, okay, 1234 01:10:05,485 --> 01:10:07,805 Speaker 2: he's in the running. He has one hundred and ninety 1235 01:10:07,845 --> 01:10:10,805 Speaker 2: points that he could earn. He he got thirty right, 1236 01:10:10,845 --> 01:10:13,485 Speaker 2: he only missed on two Okay, so he got thirty right, 1237 01:10:13,805 --> 01:10:16,205 Speaker 2: but already he's missed more than he missed the last 1238 01:10:16,245 --> 01:10:17,724 Speaker 2: two badnesses combined. 1239 01:10:17,765 --> 01:10:19,005 Speaker 1: He's he's on a slide. 1240 01:10:19,405 --> 01:10:21,724 Speaker 2: He's on a slide, but he is tied for twenty third, 1241 01:10:22,005 --> 01:10:25,845 Speaker 2: so he's doing okay. All right, let's highlight. We do 1242 01:10:26,005 --> 01:10:29,445 Speaker 2: like to highlight who the leaders are, and we do 1243 01:10:29,645 --> 01:10:34,485 Speaker 2: have five people who are tied for first perfect brackets 1244 01:10:35,045 --> 01:10:40,045 Speaker 2: after round one, and I think I can call them out, Sam, Sam, 1245 01:10:40,125 --> 01:10:44,005 Speaker 2: Mike Marrigan the film Spide Matters, Godfather. I think I 1246 01:10:44,045 --> 01:10:46,365 Speaker 2: can call them out by name because their names are 1247 01:10:46,365 --> 01:10:48,445 Speaker 2: in their email, and I hope they won't mind. We 1248 01:10:48,525 --> 01:10:52,045 Speaker 2: have Matthew Emery, we have Owen Bloom, we have Anthony Reich, 1249 01:10:52,405 --> 01:10:55,925 Speaker 2: we have Patrick McCoy, and we have one other that 1250 01:10:56,045 --> 01:10:58,604 Speaker 2: I don't have the full name, but Shadrick is in 1251 01:10:58,645 --> 01:11:02,805 Speaker 2: the email. Those five have perfect so far, thirty two 1252 01:11:02,845 --> 01:11:05,804 Speaker 2: out of thirty two. And we'll we'll start keep tabs 1253 01:11:05,845 --> 01:11:08,564 Speaker 2: and as this develops, we'll give them a chance to 1254 01:11:08,645 --> 01:11:12,205 Speaker 2: share their their wisdom and their tricks with our eyes. 1255 01:11:13,405 --> 01:11:15,965 Speaker 1: Yeah, so you know, enjoy it now, is what I 1256 01:11:16,005 --> 01:11:20,005 Speaker 1: would say, and we'll see how you do in the future. 1257 01:11:20,485 --> 01:11:24,325 Speaker 2: Yes, now speaking of that that bracket competition that we 1258 01:11:24,365 --> 01:11:27,445 Speaker 2: have every year with you and me and Sam and 1259 01:11:27,485 --> 01:11:31,285 Speaker 2: Mike Marrigan are our listener who is the founding father, 1260 01:11:31,525 --> 01:11:34,805 Speaker 2: the godfather of film spoting madness. We do compete, and 1261 01:11:34,885 --> 01:11:37,325 Speaker 2: really what we compete for is not supremacy, but just 1262 01:11:37,405 --> 01:11:38,724 Speaker 2: to to not lose. 1263 01:11:39,405 --> 01:11:39,564 Speaker 1: Yes. 1264 01:11:40,005 --> 01:11:44,005 Speaker 2: In this case, there there's good news and bad news 1265 01:11:44,005 --> 01:11:48,125 Speaker 2: for me. I am in the lead at the moment, 1266 01:11:48,605 --> 01:11:51,525 Speaker 2: even though I am I'm tied for one hundred and 1267 01:11:51,525 --> 01:11:56,805 Speaker 2: first because I got three wrong. Okay, Mike Marrigan is 1268 01:11:56,805 --> 01:11:59,725 Speaker 2: one hundred and twentieth. We're not doing well, Josh. Mike 1269 01:11:59,765 --> 01:12:02,885 Speaker 2: Merrigan is one hundred and twentieth. He got four wrong, 1270 01:12:03,365 --> 01:12:07,085 Speaker 2: all right, Sam, one hundred and eighty first, he missed five. 1271 01:12:07,765 --> 01:12:10,684 Speaker 2: You also missed five, but you're two hundred and seconds, 1272 01:12:10,765 --> 01:12:14,125 Speaker 2: so one of the ones you missed must must affect 1273 01:12:14,805 --> 01:12:16,725 Speaker 2: future matchups. 1274 01:12:16,805 --> 01:12:20,165 Speaker 1: I'm guessing you love trust you, this is already. You 1275 01:12:20,165 --> 01:12:23,485 Speaker 1: don't want me to call it out, No, I believe you. 1276 01:12:23,805 --> 01:12:26,245 Speaker 1: I don't need I don't need to see the work 1277 01:12:26,485 --> 01:12:27,485 Speaker 1: future embarrassment. 1278 01:12:27,605 --> 01:12:31,365 Speaker 2: Okay, So here's where here's where it's good news for 1279 01:12:31,445 --> 01:12:35,445 Speaker 2: you though, and Mike and Sam in bad news for me. True, 1280 01:12:35,605 --> 01:12:38,045 Speaker 2: I only miss three and I'm higher ranked, but I 1281 01:12:38,805 --> 01:12:44,285 Speaker 2: did hint at this. Last week. I got a little aggressive, 1282 01:12:44,485 --> 01:12:48,564 Speaker 2: thinking that there'd be some Disney magic that might propel 1283 01:12:49,045 --> 01:12:56,245 Speaker 2: Fantasia as our Cinderella, and I thought Fantasia would actually 1284 01:12:56,445 --> 01:13:01,205 Speaker 2: not only when it's round one matchup, I thought Fantasia 1285 01:13:01,325 --> 01:13:03,564 Speaker 2: might win. No, I thought it would win it's round 1286 01:13:03,645 --> 01:13:11,045 Speaker 2: two matchup and take down the Philadelphia story. But it 1287 01:13:11,205 --> 01:13:13,325 Speaker 2: didn't beat a matter of life and death, that's not 1288 01:13:13,325 --> 01:13:16,325 Speaker 2: gonna happen. The Philadelphia story happened. So I already have 1289 01:13:16,445 --> 01:13:21,485 Speaker 2: one of my Sweet sixteen out, which doesn't ode well 1290 01:13:22,325 --> 01:13:22,605 Speaker 2: for me. 1291 01:13:23,485 --> 01:13:28,725 Speaker 1: All Right, I will confess I was under a bit 1292 01:13:28,765 --> 01:13:36,005 Speaker 1: of duress submitting my bracket this year and mostly made 1293 01:13:36,245 --> 01:13:39,604 Speaker 1: my picks based on instinct, and then a final pick 1294 01:13:39,645 --> 01:13:43,325 Speaker 1: for winner based on an excuse to name my team. 1295 01:13:43,845 --> 01:13:48,325 Speaker 2: So I like your name, by the way, share it please? Well? 1296 01:13:48,605 --> 01:13:50,125 Speaker 1: Should I? Or I don't want to. 1297 01:13:50,205 --> 01:13:52,525 Speaker 2: I don't know if I want to give you that. Okay, 1298 01:13:52,645 --> 01:13:53,125 Speaker 2: I don't know. 1299 01:13:53,365 --> 01:13:53,765 Speaker 1: I don't know. 1300 01:13:53,885 --> 01:13:56,325 Speaker 2: Yeah, No, that's fine, that's fine. I think I think 1301 01:13:56,365 --> 01:14:00,765 Speaker 2: only myself and Sam as the administrators can see the 1302 01:14:00,965 --> 01:14:04,885 Speaker 2: emails attached the names attached to the brackets, but you 1303 01:14:04,885 --> 01:14:09,205 Speaker 2: you missed Gaslight lost to the Archers. It's not just 1304 01:14:09,245 --> 01:14:11,205 Speaker 2: an all Archers bracket, by the way, but it could 1305 01:14:11,205 --> 01:14:15,725 Speaker 2: be Arcissus one Rome, Open City did not beat the 1306 01:14:15,765 --> 01:14:19,925 Speaker 2: Grapes of Wrath, and the Lost Weekend did not beat 1307 01:14:19,925 --> 01:14:22,365 Speaker 2: Me Me in Saint Louis, spell Bound did not take 1308 01:14:22,405 --> 01:14:27,525 Speaker 2: down Ozoo's Late Spring, and The Great Dictator in fact, 1309 01:14:27,845 --> 01:14:30,805 Speaker 2: did beat John Ford's My Darling Clementine. Those were the 1310 01:14:30,845 --> 01:14:35,885 Speaker 2: five that you lost on Josh. So all right, well, yeah. 1311 01:14:35,685 --> 01:14:39,285 Speaker 1: We'll see there's zero live, many many rounds to go. 1312 01:14:40,165 --> 01:14:45,125 Speaker 2: Indeed, but the round two poles, as we've mentioned, are live, 1313 01:14:46,045 --> 01:14:49,285 Speaker 2: and the Bracket Challenge, well you can't enter it anymore, 1314 01:14:50,005 --> 01:14:53,925 Speaker 2: but we're going to be keeping tabs on those results 1315 01:14:53,965 --> 01:14:57,724 Speaker 2: and sharing them with you every week. Remember that we'll 1316 01:14:57,805 --> 01:15:02,285 Speaker 2: announce the Sweet sixteen here next week on film Spotting, 1317 01:15:02,365 --> 01:15:06,724 Speaker 2: and those poles will open on Tuesday. That's Tuesday, March thirty, 1318 01:15:06,805 --> 01:15:10,965 Speaker 2: first noon Central time. You can find all the madness 1319 01:15:11,165 --> 01:15:15,005 Speaker 2: at film Spotting, madness dot com and Josh That's our show. 1320 01:15:16,045 --> 01:15:18,205 Speaker 1: If you'd like to connect with us on social media, 1321 01:15:18,245 --> 01:15:22,884 Speaker 1: you can find Adam and the show on Instagram, Facebook, letterboxed, YouTube, 1322 01:15:22,925 --> 01:15:26,365 Speaker 1: at film Spotting, I'm at those places as Larson on film. 1323 01:15:26,765 --> 01:15:30,285 Speaker 1: We are independently produced, and listeners supported support and the show. 1324 01:15:30,325 --> 01:15:34,165 Speaker 1: By joining the film Spotting Family. At film spottingfamily dot com, 1325 01:15:34,205 --> 01:15:37,445 Speaker 1: you can listen early and ad free, plus get monthly 1326 01:15:37,525 --> 01:15:40,925 Speaker 1: bonus episodes, a weekly newsletter, and access to the entire 1327 01:15:41,005 --> 01:15:44,245 Speaker 1: show archive. For show t shirts and other merch go 1328 01:15:44,325 --> 01:15:46,844 Speaker 1: to film spotting dot net slash shop. 1329 01:15:47,285 --> 01:15:50,045 Speaker 2: In the film Spotting archive, there's other Lord and Miller 1330 01:15:50,085 --> 01:15:52,085 Speaker 2: and I know there's more than this, but you can 1331 01:15:52,125 --> 01:15:55,365 Speaker 2: definitely find the Lego movie episode four seventy eight, your 1332 01:15:55,445 --> 01:15:58,564 Speaker 2: number one film of twenty fourteen. Dit it was yeah 1333 01:15:58,605 --> 01:16:02,684 Speaker 2: true twenty one Jump Street reviewed on episode three ninety four. 1334 01:16:03,365 --> 01:16:05,485 Speaker 2: I don't know that we got a review of Claudi 1335 01:16:05,565 --> 01:16:09,285 Speaker 2: with the Chance of Meatballs in but good maybe it 1336 01:16:09,365 --> 01:16:11,085 Speaker 2: is a good movie. I'll have to search the archive 1337 01:16:11,485 --> 01:16:14,965 Speaker 2: for that. Streaming and vod out now. Mike and Nick 1338 01:16:15,165 --> 01:16:18,564 Speaker 2: and Nick and Alice. Okay, a time travel gangster comedy 1339 01:16:18,965 --> 01:16:23,085 Speaker 2: with two Vince Vaughn's plus James Mark and Iza Gonzales 1340 01:16:23,445 --> 01:16:27,325 Speaker 2: in limited release. Yes, Josh, Julia Duke Cornell, I saw, 1341 01:16:27,365 --> 01:16:30,085 Speaker 2: I just saw the trailer for this over the weekend 1342 01:16:30,125 --> 01:16:33,365 Speaker 2: before Project Hail Mary Alpha is finally getting its US 1343 01:16:33,485 --> 01:16:37,564 Speaker 2: release after premiering at the twenty twenty five can Film Festival. 1344 01:16:37,605 --> 01:16:39,924 Speaker 2: It is her follow up to twenty twenty one's Titan, 1345 01:16:40,285 --> 01:16:45,205 Speaker 2: and it looks crazy, I'm sure. 1346 01:16:45,205 --> 01:16:47,485 Speaker 1: And I hate when this happens. It's you know, I 1347 01:16:47,525 --> 01:16:52,045 Speaker 1: was so high on Raw her debut Titan was, you know, 1348 01:16:52,365 --> 01:16:55,605 Speaker 1: a wild ride. I'm still processing, I think, but the 1349 01:16:55,685 --> 01:16:59,045 Speaker 1: fact that this got caught in limbo a little bit 1350 01:16:59,205 --> 01:17:01,604 Speaker 1: means I mean, I'll have to catch up with it. 1351 01:17:02,325 --> 01:17:04,685 Speaker 1: Who cares about release dates and all that. I am 1352 01:17:04,725 --> 01:17:07,045 Speaker 1: excited that we're finally getting a chance to see the 1353 01:17:07,165 --> 01:17:09,965 Speaker 1: new Julia Duke Cornell, even though yeah, I better buckle up. 1354 01:17:09,965 --> 01:17:10,445 Speaker 1: I'm sure. 1355 01:17:11,365 --> 01:17:15,604 Speaker 2: A Magnificent Life is out from French animator Sylvan Chome, 1356 01:17:16,045 --> 01:17:18,925 Speaker 2: who did the Triplets of Belleville and Sophia Coppola has 1357 01:17:18,925 --> 01:17:21,764 Speaker 2: a new documentary out. It's a documentary port of designer 1358 01:17:21,805 --> 01:17:25,725 Speaker 2: Mark Jacobs called Mark by Sophia in wide release. A 1359 01:17:25,845 --> 01:17:29,405 Speaker 2: witchy film fem Cult is the setting of Forbidden Fruits. 1360 01:17:29,685 --> 01:17:32,565 Speaker 2: Our friend Robert Daniels caught it at south By Southwest 1361 01:17:32,685 --> 01:17:36,525 Speaker 2: and calls it a reverentally silly teen girl slasher Okay, 1362 01:17:37,045 --> 01:17:40,405 Speaker 2: they Will Kill You also debuted at south By Southwest, 1363 01:17:40,445 --> 01:17:43,604 Speaker 2: and that is about a young woman who finds herself 1364 01:17:43,645 --> 01:17:48,205 Speaker 2: working as a housekeeper for a satanic cult. Okay, so horror, Josh, 1365 01:17:48,245 --> 01:17:51,884 Speaker 2: just horror upon horror. There's also a Speaking of Horror. 1366 01:17:51,925 --> 01:17:56,405 Speaker 2: An AI doc or How I Became an Apocalyoptimist. I 1367 01:17:56,445 --> 01:18:00,045 Speaker 2: think I said that right is from director Daniel Rhorr, 1368 01:18:00,085 --> 01:18:03,965 Speaker 2: who gave us Navalny and Once We're Brothers, Once Werer Brothers. 1369 01:18:04,285 --> 01:18:06,724 Speaker 2: It takes a personal journey into the world of AI. 1370 01:18:07,045 --> 01:18:10,725 Speaker 2: And finally, two thousand and ones, The Mummy Returns is 1371 01:18:10,725 --> 01:18:13,685 Speaker 2: getting a re release. Where's the Sacred Cow on The 1372 01:18:13,765 --> 01:18:17,205 Speaker 2: Mummy Returns? It? Would you know what, though, I'm gonna 1373 01:18:17,205 --> 01:18:19,445 Speaker 2: have to say this, I think I've admitted this. It 1374 01:18:19,485 --> 01:18:22,365 Speaker 2: would have to be part Blackpotting. It'd be a blind cow. 1375 01:18:22,445 --> 01:18:23,165 Speaker 2: I've never seen it. 1376 01:18:23,405 --> 01:18:25,804 Speaker 1: Wait, you've never seen The Mummy or The Mummy Returns? 1377 01:18:26,125 --> 01:18:28,804 Speaker 2: Well neither, I've never seen any Mummy movie. 1378 01:18:29,245 --> 01:18:30,245 Speaker 1: What are we doing here? 1379 01:18:30,605 --> 01:18:33,564 Speaker 2: Wait it says we revisited it in twenty twenty. Did 1380 01:18:33,565 --> 01:18:36,485 Speaker 2: we watch the Mummy? I have no recollection of talking 1381 01:18:36,485 --> 01:18:38,925 Speaker 2: about the Mummy. Did we talk about the Mummy? 1382 01:18:39,045 --> 01:18:39,205 Speaker 1: Oh? 1383 01:18:39,245 --> 01:18:42,205 Speaker 2: We did talk about what about sad is? If we did, 1384 01:18:43,005 --> 01:18:44,405 Speaker 2: Rachel Weiss, we did. 1385 01:18:44,525 --> 01:18:46,965 Speaker 1: It's one thing to say that, Adam about a review 1386 01:18:47,045 --> 01:18:52,205 Speaker 1: that's like ten years ten years or more. But apparently 1387 01:18:52,245 --> 01:18:53,725 Speaker 1: we did this in twenty twenty four. 1388 01:18:54,005 --> 01:18:55,564 Speaker 2: It was like a year and a half ago. 1389 01:18:56,085 --> 01:19:00,165 Speaker 1: Okay, so fair enough. I don't think you were wild 1390 01:19:00,165 --> 01:19:04,125 Speaker 1: about it time. It's a really fun movie. My Mummy returns, 1391 01:19:04,485 --> 01:19:07,445 Speaker 1: The Mummy returns. I don't you know, unless we want 1392 01:19:07,485 --> 01:19:10,165 Speaker 1: to get into what the Rock meant for cinema and 1393 01:19:10,285 --> 01:19:12,725 Speaker 1: start at the beginning. Yeah, I don't know if we 1394 01:19:12,885 --> 01:19:13,365 Speaker 1: I don't know. 1395 01:19:13,285 --> 01:19:15,245 Speaker 2: If we really We'll have that show coming up and 1396 01:19:15,645 --> 01:19:20,285 Speaker 2: I'll promptly forget about it Episode nine sixty four, almost 1397 01:19:20,325 --> 01:19:24,285 Speaker 2: exactly two years ago. The Mummy at twenty five, along 1398 01:19:24,325 --> 01:19:27,884 Speaker 2: with our fifth movie and our and our William Wyler marathon. 1399 01:19:27,925 --> 01:19:30,085 Speaker 2: How did I forget that I've seen the Mummy? 1400 01:19:30,125 --> 01:19:32,564 Speaker 1: Okay, how did we ever convince you to even do that? 1401 01:19:32,725 --> 01:19:33,245 Speaker 1: Is the question. 1402 01:19:33,245 --> 01:19:36,165 Speaker 2: I know. I think it was my idea. Now that 1403 01:19:36,205 --> 01:19:39,485 Speaker 2: it's flooding back to me, Wow, next week we will 1404 01:19:39,525 --> 01:19:42,925 Speaker 2: have some forties madness sweet sixteen talk for you. We'll 1405 01:19:42,925 --> 01:19:44,005 Speaker 2: see what else we get up to. 1406 01:19:44,445 --> 01:19:46,645 Speaker 1: Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe to So and 1407 01:19:46,685 --> 01:19:49,604 Speaker 1: Sam van Holgren. Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show 1408 01:19:49,645 --> 01:19:53,885 Speaker 1: wouldn't go. Our production assistant is Sophie Kempinar. Special thanks 1409 01:19:53,885 --> 01:19:57,005 Speaker 1: to everyone at wb e Z Chicago. More information is 1410 01:19:57,045 --> 01:20:01,885 Speaker 1: available at wbeazy dot org for Film Spotting, I'm Josh Larson. 1411 01:20:01,685 --> 01:20:05,165 Speaker 2: And I Madam Kempinar. Thanks for listening. This conversation can 1412 01:20:05,245 --> 01:20:06,885 Speaker 2: serve no purpose anymore. 1413 01:20:07,765 --> 01:20:08,205 Speaker 1: The Barn