1 00:00:15,410 --> 00:00:24,090 Speaker 1: Pushkin, Florence, Alabama, nineteen eighty eight. A preacher has an affair, 2 00:00:24,890 --> 00:00:28,970 Speaker 1: a woman is murdered. It sounds like the beginning of 3 00:00:29,010 --> 00:00:32,690 Speaker 1: one of the many true crime series that saturate the 4 00:00:32,730 --> 00:00:35,850 Speaker 1: podcast world. But when I tell you that I'm teeing 5 00:00:35,930 --> 00:00:40,250 Speaker 1: up the latest series of revisionist history, you know it's 6 00:00:40,250 --> 00:00:46,090 Speaker 1: going to be different. Malcolm Gladwell doesn't do podcast by numbers. Instead, 7 00:00:46,570 --> 00:00:49,810 Speaker 1: he's taking this terrible crime as a jumping off point 8 00:00:50,050 --> 00:00:52,530 Speaker 1: to explore the death penalty in the US. 9 00:00:56,970 --> 00:00:57,970 Speaker 2: The bad news. 10 00:00:58,930 --> 00:01:03,770 Speaker 3: That's how a Wlizabeth said, graded for justice to. 11 00:01:03,770 --> 00:01:08,930 Speaker 4: Occur is still damaging all others. It's still hurts us 12 00:01:08,930 --> 00:01:09,650 Speaker 4: to think about. 13 00:01:10,450 --> 00:01:14,530 Speaker 2: There was this joke that said that it was easier 14 00:01:14,570 --> 00:01:18,370 Speaker 2: to get forgiveness in the Church of Christ for murdering 15 00:01:18,410 --> 00:01:21,050 Speaker 2: somebody than it was to be divorced. 16 00:01:22,170 --> 00:01:24,650 Speaker 5: I don't know which one of them, kid, I really don't, 17 00:01:25,930 --> 00:01:29,850 Speaker 5: but I think both of them got what they probably deserved. 18 00:01:31,210 --> 00:01:33,250 Speaker 1: He would say to himself, turned to the right, to 19 00:01:33,290 --> 00:01:35,010 Speaker 1: the victim's family and apologize. 20 00:01:35,130 --> 00:01:37,250 Speaker 3: Turn to the left, tell my family, I love him. 21 00:01:37,650 --> 00:01:41,450 Speaker 2: He was taken out of the cell thinking that his 22 00:01:41,730 --> 00:01:43,410 Speaker 2: execution was imminent. 23 00:01:43,610 --> 00:01:48,730 Speaker 6: Because a cold blooded convicted killer complains about the prodding 24 00:01:48,930 --> 00:02:02,650 Speaker 6: and poking of a small ivy line. Really, we recently 25 00:02:02,850 --> 00:02:06,610 Speaker 6: explored capital punishment in the UK with our episode of 26 00:02:06,650 --> 00:02:09,810 Speaker 6: Cautionary Tales Derek Bentley die. 27 00:02:10,490 --> 00:02:12,770 Speaker 1: So I was keen to find out more about revisionist 28 00:02:12,810 --> 00:02:16,570 Speaker 1: history the Alabama murders, and I am delighted to say 29 00:02:16,570 --> 00:02:19,410 Speaker 1: that Malcolm god Will joins me now. Malcolm, welcome back 30 00:02:19,450 --> 00:02:20,370 Speaker 1: to Cause Me Tales. 31 00:02:20,810 --> 00:02:22,490 Speaker 4: Thank you, Tim, delighted to be here. 32 00:02:22,930 --> 00:02:24,970 Speaker 1: So what drew you to this story, Malcolm? 33 00:02:25,370 --> 00:02:28,170 Speaker 7: I met a woman a friend of a friend, who 34 00:02:28,250 --> 00:02:32,210 Speaker 7: was a trauma specialist, and I thought she was really interesting, 35 00:02:32,890 --> 00:02:35,210 Speaker 7: and so I just started meeting with her once a 36 00:02:35,210 --> 00:02:37,330 Speaker 7: month or so for two two and a half hours, 37 00:02:38,170 --> 00:02:40,250 Speaker 7: and she just told me about her life and her work, 38 00:02:40,290 --> 00:02:45,290 Speaker 7: and she treats torture victims, and then she started doing 39 00:02:45,410 --> 00:02:48,250 Speaker 7: people with suffering from PTSD, and she spent time at 40 00:02:48,290 --> 00:02:51,810 Speaker 7: Guantanamo Bay, and then she started working with people on 41 00:02:51,850 --> 00:02:54,930 Speaker 7: death row because they were often people who had been 42 00:02:55,090 --> 00:02:59,250 Speaker 7: greatly traumatized as children. She'd done something like thirty five 43 00:02:59,730 --> 00:03:01,650 Speaker 7: death row cases that was the course of her career, 44 00:03:01,770 --> 00:03:04,610 Speaker 7: but this was the one that stayed with her and 45 00:03:05,370 --> 00:03:08,690 Speaker 7: immediately when she started to talk about this case, I realized, Oh, 46 00:03:08,810 --> 00:03:10,850 Speaker 7: that's that's why we're doing this. 47 00:03:10,970 --> 00:03:11,170 Speaker 4: You know. 48 00:03:11,810 --> 00:03:15,250 Speaker 7: I always like discovering the purpose for an interview in 49 00:03:15,290 --> 00:03:18,610 Speaker 7: the interview as opposed to before, and this was a 50 00:03:18,650 --> 00:03:21,970 Speaker 7: perfect example of that. When she started to talk about it, 51 00:03:22,010 --> 00:03:24,570 Speaker 7: what she was saying was so powerful and emotional that 52 00:03:25,050 --> 00:03:26,810 Speaker 7: I realized, that's the story I wanted to tell. 53 00:03:27,410 --> 00:03:30,050 Speaker 1: In your conversation with her really really stayed with me 54 00:03:30,090 --> 00:03:32,690 Speaker 1: as well as a listener. There's a real sense of 55 00:03:33,450 --> 00:03:37,090 Speaker 1: place in the season. You take us right into the 56 00:03:37,130 --> 00:03:40,170 Speaker 1: heart of the Bible Belt and this very devout area. 57 00:03:41,210 --> 00:03:46,690 Speaker 1: But the Church of Christ features very heavily at the 58 00:03:46,730 --> 00:03:50,170 Speaker 1: beginning of this story, and even by Bible Belt standards, 59 00:03:50,210 --> 00:03:53,330 Speaker 1: the Church of Christ has these very strict rules. And 60 00:03:53,370 --> 00:03:56,530 Speaker 1: you start by introducing us to a minister of the church. 61 00:03:56,650 --> 00:03:58,210 Speaker 1: So tell me about Charles Senate. 62 00:03:59,090 --> 00:04:03,650 Speaker 7: Charles Senate is a Church of Christ minister. You know, 63 00:04:03,690 --> 00:04:08,290 Speaker 7: there are many flavors of American fundamentalist religiosity. This is 64 00:04:08,370 --> 00:04:15,250 Speaker 7: the kind of setic, intellectual, unflinching version. They don't believe 65 00:04:15,250 --> 00:04:19,650 Speaker 7: in any kind of instrumentation. They are people of the book. 66 00:04:19,810 --> 00:04:22,850 Speaker 7: They take everyone in that world take the Bible literally, 67 00:04:22,890 --> 00:04:25,370 Speaker 7: but these guys take it super literally, and they have 68 00:04:25,410 --> 00:04:28,170 Speaker 7: a belief that they are the true Christian Church and 69 00:04:28,170 --> 00:04:31,530 Speaker 7: that everyone else is either soft or a backslider, or 70 00:04:31,650 --> 00:04:37,130 Speaker 7: is misinterpreting the text. There's also no church structure whatsoever, 71 00:04:37,250 --> 00:04:41,330 Speaker 7: no hierarchy. The preacher is incomplete control of his church. 72 00:04:41,330 --> 00:04:42,970 Speaker 7: And I say his because there are no women in 73 00:04:43,010 --> 00:04:45,810 Speaker 7: positions of authority in the Church of Christ. My best friend, 74 00:04:46,210 --> 00:04:48,610 Speaker 7: his father was a Church of Christ minister, so I 75 00:04:48,690 --> 00:04:52,530 Speaker 7: knew all about this denomination quite well. It's centered in 76 00:04:52,610 --> 00:04:58,010 Speaker 7: Texas and Alabama, and I'm Oklahoma, so by southern. So 77 00:04:58,050 --> 00:05:01,410 Speaker 7: our lead character is a Church of Christ minister who 78 00:05:01,450 --> 00:05:06,730 Speaker 7: is doing something that in their world is absolutely unforgivable, 79 00:05:07,010 --> 00:05:11,170 Speaker 7: which is he's having an affair. If you get a divorce, 80 00:05:11,250 --> 00:05:12,810 Speaker 7: you have to leave the church. Like this is. 81 00:05:13,330 --> 00:05:14,330 Speaker 4: These guys are serious. 82 00:05:14,890 --> 00:05:18,410 Speaker 7: They have a kind of grim grim is too strong 83 00:05:18,410 --> 00:05:22,610 Speaker 7: a word, but an incredibly strict moral code. So like 84 00:05:22,690 --> 00:05:26,610 Speaker 7: this is the world. In small On, Alabama, we have 85 00:05:26,690 --> 00:05:29,530 Speaker 7: a preacher who has done the unthinkable. He has had 86 00:05:29,570 --> 00:05:32,250 Speaker 7: an affair with a compregant. And that's where we begin. 87 00:05:32,690 --> 00:05:37,050 Speaker 1: Yeah, and you introduce us quite early on to the 88 00:05:37,090 --> 00:05:41,450 Speaker 1: idea of a failure cascade, one thing leading to another 89 00:05:41,690 --> 00:05:45,490 Speaker 1: and another, And we're not going to discuss the entire 90 00:05:45,530 --> 00:05:49,450 Speaker 1: cascade in this conversation. But the failure cascade begins with 91 00:05:49,970 --> 00:05:53,690 Speaker 1: the affair and then it quickly escalates to a murder. 92 00:05:54,210 --> 00:05:57,530 Speaker 1: Tell us about the murder and how that came about. 93 00:05:57,770 --> 00:06:00,130 Speaker 7: Well, first of all, let me say that there is 94 00:06:00,170 --> 00:06:03,370 Speaker 7: no concept in his entire series more Tim Harford friendly 95 00:06:03,930 --> 00:06:05,250 Speaker 7: than the failure cascade. 96 00:06:05,570 --> 00:06:08,250 Speaker 1: Yeah, I felt seen when I heard you describe this. 97 00:06:10,570 --> 00:06:14,250 Speaker 7: It is straight out of your own playbook. But it's 98 00:06:13,930 --> 00:06:21,370 Speaker 7: this fascinating concept, an engineering thing to describe how an initial, 99 00:06:22,010 --> 00:06:27,090 Speaker 7: very small mistake or misstep or malfunction can balloon into 100 00:06:27,130 --> 00:06:30,490 Speaker 7: something bigger. This whole series is about a failure cascade, 101 00:06:30,610 --> 00:06:34,810 Speaker 7: but begins with this affair that Charles Sennatt is having 102 00:06:35,330 --> 00:06:38,650 Speaker 7: with one of his congregants. And then the next stage 103 00:06:38,690 --> 00:06:43,490 Speaker 7: is that Charles Senen's wife is murdered her home. Is 104 00:06:43,610 --> 00:06:50,250 Speaker 7: she's alone at home and someone breaks in and robs 105 00:06:50,290 --> 00:06:54,370 Speaker 7: the house and stabs her to death. That happens in 106 00:06:54,850 --> 00:06:56,810 Speaker 7: the spring of nineteen eighty eight, and it is the 107 00:06:56,890 --> 00:06:59,850 Speaker 7: first serious step in the cascade. 108 00:07:00,330 --> 00:07:02,170 Speaker 1: And who do the police initially suspect. 109 00:07:02,370 --> 00:07:05,850 Speaker 7: Well, they find they get a tip that two kind 110 00:07:05,890 --> 00:07:09,970 Speaker 7: of wayward kids, John Parker and Kenny Smith, from this 111 00:07:10,090 --> 00:07:14,570 Speaker 7: town of Florence in northwestern Alabama. The VCR stolen from 112 00:07:14,650 --> 00:07:17,290 Speaker 7: the house turns up in one of the kids' homes. 113 00:07:17,850 --> 00:07:21,290 Speaker 7: Somebody turns them in. But then suspicion very quickly falls 114 00:07:21,330 --> 00:07:25,610 Speaker 7: on Charles Senner himself because there's too many inconsistencies in 115 00:07:25,650 --> 00:07:29,090 Speaker 7: his story. Mike, colleague Ben and I spent an evening 116 00:07:29,170 --> 00:07:32,530 Speaker 7: talking to a former law enforcement person who had been 117 00:07:32,570 --> 00:07:36,050 Speaker 7: investigating the case back in nineteen eighty eight named Ricky Miller, 118 00:07:36,610 --> 00:07:39,330 Speaker 7: and he very memorably told us about how quickly law 119 00:07:39,410 --> 00:07:41,970 Speaker 7: enforcement developed suspicions about Charles Sennett. 120 00:07:42,210 --> 00:07:45,450 Speaker 5: The first thing that called our at tension, the best 121 00:07:45,490 --> 00:07:49,690 Speaker 5: I can remember, was he made too many alibis, but 122 00:07:49,850 --> 00:07:52,970 Speaker 5: it was overkilled. You know, he stopped to see people 123 00:07:53,010 --> 00:07:56,330 Speaker 5: they had never seen, and that just threw up a 124 00:07:56,370 --> 00:07:57,530 Speaker 5: red flag to us. 125 00:07:57,890 --> 00:07:58,410 Speaker 4: Why is he. 126 00:07:58,410 --> 00:08:01,450 Speaker 5: Seeing all these people for the first time? That happen 127 00:08:01,450 --> 00:08:04,810 Speaker 5: to me at the time his wife's being murder. You know, 128 00:08:06,290 --> 00:08:09,250 Speaker 5: they could tell you every time everything, every day, What 129 00:08:09,530 --> 00:08:12,890 Speaker 5: had my wife just been murdered in my home? I 130 00:08:12,970 --> 00:08:17,770 Speaker 5: couldn't tell you, my mind's gone, but he knew everything 131 00:08:17,850 --> 00:08:18,450 Speaker 5: in detail. 132 00:08:18,690 --> 00:08:20,610 Speaker 4: That's a red flag. 133 00:08:21,250 --> 00:08:25,090 Speaker 7: He started talking about how she'd been attacked by two men, 134 00:08:25,170 --> 00:08:28,130 Speaker 7: when he would have no reason to know that it 135 00:08:28,170 --> 00:08:30,130 Speaker 7: was more than one person. I mean, it was kind 136 00:08:30,130 --> 00:08:34,490 Speaker 7: of like he's not a high percentile criminal. She hadn't 137 00:08:34,490 --> 00:08:36,930 Speaker 7: thought through anything or didn't figure out how to tell 138 00:08:36,930 --> 00:08:39,610 Speaker 7: his story properly. They quickly established that the two men 139 00:08:40,610 --> 00:08:42,810 Speaker 7: they had been told were involved in this crime had 140 00:08:42,850 --> 00:08:46,890 Speaker 7: a connection, a previous connection to Charles Sennett. And there's 141 00:08:47,290 --> 00:08:49,970 Speaker 7: a moment when the police officer says to him, do 142 00:08:50,050 --> 00:08:51,930 Speaker 7: you know and mentions the name of one of the 143 00:08:51,970 --> 00:08:55,090 Speaker 7: sky Kenney Smith, and he turns bright red, and it 144 00:08:55,130 --> 00:08:55,770 Speaker 7: turns out. 145 00:08:55,650 --> 00:08:59,410 Speaker 1: That he he, in the end, hired these kids. 146 00:08:59,690 --> 00:09:02,770 Speaker 7: Yeah, he is the one who approached these two kids 147 00:09:02,890 --> 00:09:05,730 Speaker 7: and gave them a couple thousand dollars and told them 148 00:09:05,730 --> 00:09:07,650 Speaker 7: to deal with his wife, which they do in a 149 00:09:07,730 --> 00:09:11,810 Speaker 7: kind of spectacularly. In what's interesting about the case is 150 00:09:11,970 --> 00:09:15,810 Speaker 7: there's a version of this case that it ends with 151 00:09:15,890 --> 00:09:19,530 Speaker 7: the apprehension of Charles Sennett and of these two kids, 152 00:09:19,570 --> 00:09:21,770 Speaker 7: and that's it. People go to jail and we walk away. 153 00:09:22,210 --> 00:09:25,290 Speaker 7: But that's not what happens. It just gets it just 154 00:09:25,410 --> 00:09:28,850 Speaker 7: keeps going and going and going, and ultimately, you know, 155 00:09:28,970 --> 00:09:33,650 Speaker 7: the the last and most sort of grotesque act in 156 00:09:33,690 --> 00:09:37,650 Speaker 7: this case does not take place until last year, So 157 00:09:37,770 --> 00:09:43,250 Speaker 7: some thirty five years after the murder thing goes on, 158 00:09:43,650 --> 00:09:45,170 Speaker 7: we're talking about something it goes on forever. 159 00:09:45,810 --> 00:09:48,930 Speaker 1: We've recently heard about the case of Derek Bentley on 160 00:09:49,050 --> 00:09:53,210 Speaker 1: Cautionary Tales. One of the men in the frame for 161 00:09:53,250 --> 00:09:58,250 Speaker 1: Elizabeth Sennett's murder reminded me of Derek Bentley. He was 162 00:09:58,290 --> 00:10:03,690 Speaker 1: on the scene when a police constable, Sydney Miles, was killed. 163 00:10:04,370 --> 00:10:08,610 Speaker 1: He didn't pull the trigger. It seems unlikely he intended 164 00:10:08,610 --> 00:10:14,850 Speaker 1: any harm. Derek had learning difficulties. He was very easily led, 165 00:10:14,930 --> 00:10:17,970 Speaker 1: and I think there's a hint of that with John Parker. 166 00:10:18,730 --> 00:10:22,650 Speaker 7: Yeah, I mean I would say it more broadly, any 167 00:10:22,690 --> 00:10:27,610 Speaker 7: systematic discussion of people who are involved in murders like this, 168 00:10:28,490 --> 00:10:32,210 Speaker 7: there's always some history of trauma. I mean, that's who 169 00:10:32,210 --> 00:10:35,010 Speaker 7: commit murders. Both John Parker and Kenny Smith, the two 170 00:10:35,050 --> 00:10:39,210 Speaker 7: people who were ultimately convicted of this crime, they're both 171 00:10:40,010 --> 00:10:44,410 Speaker 7: come from the most the bleakest childhoods. Parker had suffered 172 00:10:44,410 --> 00:10:47,890 Speaker 7: as serious concussion as a toddler, had major learning disabilities, 173 00:10:48,010 --> 00:10:51,250 Speaker 7: was using drugs since he was in his late adolescence. 174 00:10:51,730 --> 00:10:55,330 Speaker 7: These are not healthy, well adjusted, advantaged people. These are 175 00:10:55,370 --> 00:11:00,770 Speaker 7: people struggling with a whole series of deficits. And that 176 00:11:00,930 --> 00:11:03,170 Speaker 7: is the rule, as opposed to the exception when it 177 00:11:03,210 --> 00:11:07,450 Speaker 7: comes to homicide, that we're dealing with people who are 178 00:11:07,490 --> 00:11:11,330 Speaker 7: not whole the way they see and deal with the world. 179 00:11:11,530 --> 00:11:14,930 Speaker 1: So eventually, these two young men, John Parker and Kenny 180 00:11:14,970 --> 00:11:20,490 Speaker 1: Smith are tried for murder. So what happens when their 181 00:11:20,530 --> 00:11:22,250 Speaker 1: case reaches court. 182 00:11:22,970 --> 00:11:26,850 Speaker 7: In the keske that we're describing in this story, where 183 00:11:27,610 --> 00:11:31,290 Speaker 7: there is one misstep after another. This is one of 184 00:11:31,290 --> 00:11:34,330 Speaker 7: the crucial stages in the cascade that at the crucial 185 00:11:34,370 --> 00:11:38,090 Speaker 7: moment where the criminal justice system is supposed to deliver justice, 186 00:11:38,530 --> 00:11:43,610 Speaker 7: it fails. And it's really really unclear whether John Parker 187 00:11:43,690 --> 00:11:47,050 Speaker 7: and Kenny Smith, two men convicted in this case, actually 188 00:11:47,850 --> 00:11:51,650 Speaker 7: murdered Elizabeth Senate. In both cases, the jury overwhelmingly says 189 00:11:52,090 --> 00:11:55,130 Speaker 7: we don't have enough certainty hear to recommend the death penalty, 190 00:11:55,170 --> 00:11:57,250 Speaker 7: and in both cases the judge said it and says, 191 00:11:57,250 --> 00:12:00,850 Speaker 7: I don't care. These guys should be executed for their crimes. 192 00:12:01,330 --> 00:12:03,810 Speaker 1: So I was curious about the motivation of the judge 193 00:12:03,970 --> 00:12:08,050 Speaker 1: because in the case of Derek Bentley, the judge in 194 00:12:08,090 --> 00:12:11,570 Speaker 1: that case was was notorious. He was nicknamed the Tiger 195 00:12:11,730 --> 00:12:17,090 Speaker 1: Judge Goddard, and it seems pretty clear that he took 196 00:12:17,570 --> 00:12:21,010 Speaker 1: a perverse pleasure in handing out the death sentence. What 197 00:12:21,210 --> 00:12:24,330 Speaker 1: was going on in the Alabama cases, but the judges 198 00:12:24,410 --> 00:12:27,290 Speaker 1: enjoying the idea of dishing out life and death. 199 00:12:27,850 --> 00:12:33,090 Speaker 7: In the state of Alabama, they have partisan elections for judges, 200 00:12:33,610 --> 00:12:36,290 Speaker 7: So a judge is essentially is a political figure in 201 00:12:36,330 --> 00:12:39,450 Speaker 7: the same way that a congress person is or a 202 00:12:39,490 --> 00:12:43,890 Speaker 7: state senator. If you're in a conservative district running for 203 00:12:44,410 --> 00:12:49,010 Speaker 7: office on the Republican ticket, you're powerfully motivated to be 204 00:12:49,090 --> 00:12:52,330 Speaker 7: seen as tough on crime as you possibly can be. 205 00:12:53,170 --> 00:12:55,650 Speaker 7: And there's no sure way to say that you are 206 00:12:56,170 --> 00:13:00,170 Speaker 7: unflinching in your opposition to crime in the state of Alabama. 207 00:13:00,290 --> 00:13:02,770 Speaker 7: Then to say the jury's wrong, We've got a crack 208 00:13:02,810 --> 00:13:03,730 Speaker 7: down on this murderer. 209 00:13:04,370 --> 00:13:07,730 Speaker 1: That opens up this whole question as to if you 210 00:13:07,850 --> 00:13:11,770 Speaker 1: as a state wish to kill somebody as a punishment, 211 00:13:12,410 --> 00:13:14,930 Speaker 1: how are you going to do it? And this is 212 00:13:14,970 --> 00:13:20,250 Speaker 1: where the details that you were exploring I think astonished me. 213 00:13:20,330 --> 00:13:23,250 Speaker 1: I just assumed, well, I guess you're going to kill someone. 214 00:13:23,250 --> 00:13:24,970 Speaker 1: You're going to kill someone. How hard can it be? 215 00:13:25,570 --> 00:13:26,130 Speaker 1: Not so easy? 216 00:13:26,170 --> 00:13:28,090 Speaker 7: It turns out, well, first of all, it's hard to 217 00:13:28,170 --> 00:13:31,850 Speaker 7: kill people, period. But then if you have to do 218 00:13:31,930 --> 00:13:33,930 Speaker 7: so in a way that sort of meets a certain 219 00:13:34,090 --> 00:13:37,850 Speaker 7: humane standard, then if your job gets even tougher, and 220 00:13:37,890 --> 00:13:39,450 Speaker 7: then you have to do it, if you have to 221 00:13:39,490 --> 00:13:42,370 Speaker 7: do it without the assistance of medical personnel, because of 222 00:13:42,410 --> 00:13:46,130 Speaker 7: course no doctor is going to help you kill someone, right, 223 00:13:46,250 --> 00:13:47,010 Speaker 7: no real doctor. 224 00:13:47,570 --> 00:13:49,370 Speaker 1: That's the difficult bit, right, I mean you said it's 225 00:13:49,370 --> 00:13:52,290 Speaker 1: hard to kill someone. It's probably not physically, Probably isn't 226 00:13:52,330 --> 00:13:56,450 Speaker 1: that hard to kill somebody, But it's this bizarre, almost 227 00:13:56,450 --> 00:13:59,690 Speaker 1: grotesque constraint where you said, well, you know, you've got 228 00:13:59,690 --> 00:14:00,770 Speaker 1: to kill them, but you've got to do it the 229 00:14:00,810 --> 00:14:03,690 Speaker 1: right way. And then that raises the question of well, 230 00:14:03,690 --> 00:14:07,050 Speaker 1: what is the right way? What is the way that 231 00:14:07,210 --> 00:14:09,650 Speaker 1: that is not cruel and unusual? What is the appropriate 232 00:14:09,650 --> 00:14:12,610 Speaker 1: way in which the state can kill somebody? And yeah, 233 00:14:12,690 --> 00:14:16,570 Speaker 1: as you say, there's no doctors, they've sworn the hippocratic oath. Yeah, 234 00:14:16,610 --> 00:14:17,690 Speaker 1: they can't do it. 235 00:14:17,170 --> 00:14:22,330 Speaker 7: It's useful to remember that the guillotine is invented as 236 00:14:22,370 --> 00:14:26,850 Speaker 7: a humane alternative to previous methods of capital punishment. The 237 00:14:26,890 --> 00:14:29,650 Speaker 7: point of the guillotine is like, oh, finally we can 238 00:14:29,810 --> 00:14:34,050 Speaker 7: kill someone cleanly and without undue suffering, you know, in 239 00:14:34,090 --> 00:14:38,610 Speaker 7: a way that's consistent with our beliefs about civil society. 240 00:14:39,090 --> 00:14:41,810 Speaker 7: Like the struggle to come up with a good way 241 00:14:42,570 --> 00:14:44,730 Speaker 7: for the state to kill someone has been going on 242 00:14:44,810 --> 00:14:45,850 Speaker 7: for hundreds of years. 243 00:14:46,210 --> 00:14:48,130 Speaker 1: I'm not a historian of the death penalty, but I 244 00:14:48,170 --> 00:14:51,490 Speaker 1: feel that hanging was was also regarded as relatively clean. 245 00:14:51,530 --> 00:14:54,370 Speaker 1: And then the electric chair presumably that was that was 246 00:14:54,410 --> 00:14:57,250 Speaker 1: that kind of a modern technological method. They didn't introduce 247 00:14:58,050 --> 00:15:00,810 Speaker 1: the electric chair because they thought it would hurt more 248 00:15:01,250 --> 00:15:03,690 Speaker 1: that that was not the aim, and it may have 249 00:15:03,690 --> 00:15:05,250 Speaker 1: been what happened, but it wasn't the goal. 250 00:15:05,890 --> 00:15:06,370 Speaker 4: Yeah. 251 00:15:06,730 --> 00:15:09,730 Speaker 7: When I was doing this my report, I had a 252 00:15:09,770 --> 00:15:13,850 Speaker 7: conversation with a death penalty expert who is personally opposed 253 00:15:13,850 --> 00:15:16,730 Speaker 7: to the death penalty, but she was making the argument 254 00:15:16,770 --> 00:15:19,210 Speaker 7: that it was time to bring back the firing squad. 255 00:15:20,250 --> 00:15:23,650 Speaker 7: Her point was, in this kind of ongoing search for 256 00:15:23,690 --> 00:15:26,250 Speaker 7: the most humane method, we should have stopped with the 257 00:15:26,290 --> 00:15:29,890 Speaker 7: firing squad. It's the best, yeah, because you really do 258 00:15:30,450 --> 00:15:33,410 Speaker 7: diet pretty quickly and consistently under the firing squad. 259 00:15:33,850 --> 00:15:36,810 Speaker 1: Where did the idea of lethal injection itself come from. 260 00:15:37,210 --> 00:15:39,570 Speaker 7: One of the earliest proponents was Ronald Reagan when he 261 00:15:39,690 --> 00:15:43,090 Speaker 7: was governor of California, and he made the observation at 262 00:15:43,090 --> 00:15:47,330 Speaker 7: a time when people were increasingly aware that were concerned 263 00:15:48,010 --> 00:15:50,530 Speaker 7: that the electric chair was a kind of grizzly and 264 00:15:50,570 --> 00:15:55,810 Speaker 7: inappropriate way to execute someone. Reagan famously says, why don't 265 00:15:55,850 --> 00:15:58,490 Speaker 7: we just put murderers down the same way we put 266 00:15:58,530 --> 00:16:03,090 Speaker 7: down horses. That insight, such as it was, catalyzes all 267 00:16:03,170 --> 00:16:06,850 Speaker 7: kinds of people to look for ways of killing people 268 00:16:06,930 --> 00:16:09,650 Speaker 7: through injecting them with lethal drugs, which. 269 00:16:09,450 --> 00:16:13,850 Speaker 1: I think sounds intuitive, But you describe it, it's not 270 00:16:13,970 --> 00:16:16,850 Speaker 1: quite as painless as you might think. No. 271 00:16:17,610 --> 00:16:21,890 Speaker 7: I talked at length to this really extraordinary man named 272 00:16:21,930 --> 00:16:26,690 Speaker 7: Joel Zivett, who's a Canadian intensive care specialist who has 273 00:16:26,850 --> 00:16:30,770 Speaker 7: developed a kind of subspecialty in the death penalty, and 274 00:16:31,810 --> 00:16:34,090 Speaker 7: he was the first person ever to ask the question, 275 00:16:34,370 --> 00:16:36,970 Speaker 7: when you try and execute someone through lethal injection, what 276 00:16:37,170 --> 00:16:41,450 Speaker 7: exactly happens to the person being executed? That is to say, 277 00:16:42,130 --> 00:16:44,330 Speaker 7: how do they die? You're giving them a cocktail of 278 00:16:44,890 --> 00:16:48,690 Speaker 7: lethal drugs, and we had a kind of assumption about 279 00:16:49,290 --> 00:16:52,090 Speaker 7: what drug did what and at what point in this 280 00:16:52,850 --> 00:16:56,130 Speaker 7: protocol these three drugs you're being injected with, what point 281 00:16:56,170 --> 00:16:59,570 Speaker 7: do you die? And he pointed out that our prevailing 282 00:16:59,610 --> 00:17:03,450 Speaker 7: assumption about it was entirely wrong. And what's interesting about 283 00:17:03,850 --> 00:17:06,730 Speaker 7: his discovery, apart from how kind of grotesque it is, 284 00:17:07,610 --> 00:17:10,850 Speaker 7: was that we've been used into lethal injection in the 285 00:17:10,970 --> 00:17:14,210 Speaker 7: United States as a method of killing people for whatever 286 00:17:14,370 --> 00:17:17,690 Speaker 7: thirty forty years. No one had ever bothered to ask 287 00:17:17,730 --> 00:17:21,050 Speaker 7: the question how it worked. So there's a level of 288 00:17:21,170 --> 00:17:26,730 Speaker 7: kind of indifference and callousness, and you think it's some 289 00:17:26,810 --> 00:17:30,770 Speaker 7: kind of scientific, thought out process, and it's not. It's 290 00:17:30,810 --> 00:17:34,330 Speaker 7: a bunch of random people who come up with something 291 00:17:34,370 --> 00:17:37,010 Speaker 7: on the back of an envelope and use it to 292 00:17:37,050 --> 00:17:42,490 Speaker 7: execute people. This is if describing what he found out 293 00:17:42,690 --> 00:17:45,170 Speaker 7: about what really happens when you're try and kill someone 294 00:17:45,210 --> 00:17:46,090 Speaker 7: through lethal injection. 295 00:17:47,090 --> 00:17:50,690 Speaker 3: It travels rapidly to the heart, where the heart comps, 296 00:17:50,770 --> 00:17:55,130 Speaker 3: it immediately into the lungs and it tears the lungs apart. Basically, 297 00:17:55,490 --> 00:17:59,570 Speaker 3: they get burned from the inside and then the separation 298 00:17:59,730 --> 00:18:03,930 Speaker 3: of air and blood. There's a very fine layer of 299 00:18:03,970 --> 00:18:07,210 Speaker 3: tissue there that gets destroyed and the blood. 300 00:18:07,090 --> 00:18:08,450 Speaker 4: Just pours into the lungs. 301 00:18:09,730 --> 00:18:13,930 Speaker 3: And I'm sorry as I'm saying this, it's awful, and 302 00:18:14,450 --> 00:18:18,330 Speaker 3: this is what this is how lethal injection actually kills you. 303 00:18:18,730 --> 00:18:22,850 Speaker 3: It kills you by burning your lungs up, and you're 304 00:18:22,890 --> 00:18:27,490 Speaker 3: also paralyzed, so you can't complain that this is happening. 305 00:18:28,370 --> 00:18:30,290 Speaker 3: And then to finish you off, of course, you know 306 00:18:30,370 --> 00:18:34,050 Speaker 3: you're probably begging for the potassium at that point, because 307 00:18:34,050 --> 00:18:39,090 Speaker 3: that finally stops your heart and stops this process. But 308 00:18:39,130 --> 00:18:41,930 Speaker 3: in the meantime, you know this has been gone on 309 00:18:42,090 --> 00:18:46,330 Speaker 3: for a few minutes, so the last thing that you know, 310 00:18:46,410 --> 00:18:49,290 Speaker 3: you may know, is that you're on fire from the 311 00:18:49,330 --> 00:18:53,010 Speaker 3: inside and the blood is filling up your lungs as 312 00:18:53,050 --> 00:18:53,450 Speaker 3: you die. 313 00:18:55,410 --> 00:18:58,610 Speaker 7: I mean, one of the Zibet's points is that because 314 00:18:58,770 --> 00:19:02,690 Speaker 7: you're restrained and you've been given a paralytic you are 315 00:19:02,730 --> 00:19:04,890 Speaker 7: in agony as you are dying of lethal injection, but 316 00:19:04,970 --> 00:19:08,530 Speaker 7: you can't no one's aware of it. You look calm, 317 00:19:09,130 --> 00:19:12,090 Speaker 7: and you can't move and you can't speak. You've been 318 00:19:12,130 --> 00:19:15,930 Speaker 7: given this very powerful drug that renders you mute. It's 319 00:19:15,970 --> 00:19:19,770 Speaker 7: the worst. It's just sort of an unimaginable kind of 320 00:19:19,850 --> 00:19:20,530 Speaker 7: horror story. 321 00:19:20,930 --> 00:19:24,370 Speaker 1: And to loop back to what originally drew you into 322 00:19:24,370 --> 00:19:27,730 Speaker 1: this story, you were talking to Kate Portfield and she 323 00:19:27,850 --> 00:19:31,690 Speaker 1: works with people who have been tortured, and the discovery 324 00:19:32,410 --> 00:19:37,690 Speaker 1: the realization really that to be on death row facing 325 00:19:38,090 --> 00:19:41,770 Speaker 1: execution is a kind of torture, and at least some 326 00:19:41,810 --> 00:19:44,850 Speaker 1: of these methods of execution are themselves a form of torture. 327 00:19:44,930 --> 00:19:47,170 Speaker 1: But we've just not really thought about it that way. 328 00:19:47,810 --> 00:19:49,050 Speaker 4: Yeah. 329 00:19:49,130 --> 00:19:51,450 Speaker 7: The only way that the death penalty I think can 330 00:19:51,530 --> 00:19:55,090 Speaker 7: sustain itself in the modern world is through an act 331 00:19:55,130 --> 00:19:59,090 Speaker 7: of kind of willful indifference on the part of a society. 332 00:19:59,130 --> 00:20:02,690 Speaker 7: You just have to kind of close off any kind 333 00:20:02,730 --> 00:20:05,450 Speaker 7: of empathy or moral awareness of what you're doing. We 334 00:20:05,530 --> 00:20:07,770 Speaker 7: see that all over the place. But I think this 335 00:20:07,850 --> 00:20:10,370 Speaker 7: is something Americans are have proven to be very good 336 00:20:10,370 --> 00:20:12,810 Speaker 7: at when it comes to the use of the death penalty. 337 00:20:13,370 --> 00:20:15,530 Speaker 1: Yeah, I wanted to ask about that now. Who In 338 00:20:15,570 --> 00:20:18,650 Speaker 1: the UK, we haven't had the death penalty for sixty years, 339 00:20:18,650 --> 00:20:20,970 Speaker 1: and in fact, it was the case of Derek Bentley 340 00:20:22,090 --> 00:20:24,050 Speaker 1: that I think was an important turning point in the 341 00:20:24,090 --> 00:20:27,810 Speaker 1: campaign to abolish the death penalty, and in fact, Derek 342 00:20:27,930 --> 00:20:31,610 Speaker 1: was posthumously pardoned in nineteen eighty eight. So that's the 343 00:20:31,690 --> 00:20:33,810 Speaker 1: UK story. But do you think we're ever going to 344 00:20:33,810 --> 00:20:36,050 Speaker 1: see an end of the death penalty in the US 345 00:20:36,370 --> 00:20:37,170 Speaker 1: or anytime soon. 346 00:20:37,970 --> 00:20:40,610 Speaker 7: Well, you know, it's very hard to be optimistic about 347 00:20:41,090 --> 00:20:46,090 Speaker 7: moral progress, you know states right now. But the death 348 00:20:46,130 --> 00:20:49,730 Speaker 7: penalty is slowly going away. But there's two things that 349 00:20:49,770 --> 00:20:52,690 Speaker 7: are hindering out. One is the unresolved conflict between the 350 00:20:52,730 --> 00:20:57,290 Speaker 7: two arguments that are used against the death penalty. One 351 00:20:57,410 --> 00:21:01,450 Speaker 7: is that we execute people who don't deserve to die, 352 00:21:01,450 --> 00:21:07,970 Speaker 7: who either innocent or moderately guilty, as you describe Derek Bentley, 353 00:21:08,050 --> 00:21:10,450 Speaker 7: or are impaired in some way and not fully responsible 354 00:21:10,490 --> 00:21:11,050 Speaker 7: for their actions. 355 00:21:11,210 --> 00:21:13,050 Speaker 1: Yeah, there was the sense with Bentley that he had 356 00:21:13,050 --> 00:21:16,130 Speaker 1: done something wrong, but he didn't deserve death. He hadn't 357 00:21:16,330 --> 00:21:19,330 Speaker 1: he hadn't committed this grotesque crime of murdering a police officer. 358 00:21:19,810 --> 00:21:24,130 Speaker 7: Yeah, that's argument one, and that's the easier one. The 359 00:21:24,210 --> 00:21:27,930 Speaker 7: harder one is should you execute people who, in a 360 00:21:28,010 --> 00:21:33,330 Speaker 7: kind of colloquial sense, deserve to die, right, the cold blooded, 361 00:21:33,850 --> 00:21:37,570 Speaker 7: vicious murderer. And what happens if if all you make 362 00:21:37,650 --> 00:21:41,090 Speaker 7: is argument one. Then you leave the proponent of the 363 00:21:41,090 --> 00:21:43,970 Speaker 7: death penalty with the opening to say, well, let's just 364 00:21:43,970 --> 00:21:47,290 Speaker 7: do a better job of implementing it, and you're not 365 00:21:47,370 --> 00:21:49,730 Speaker 7: confronting the fact that ultimately you have to say say 366 00:21:49,730 --> 00:21:53,610 Speaker 7: that there are people who are evil and in every 367 00:21:53,730 --> 00:21:57,490 Speaker 7: conceivable sense and unmistakably guilty, and who have violated every 368 00:21:57,810 --> 00:22:03,250 Speaker 7: social compact. But we have to affirmatively decide as a 369 00:22:03,690 --> 00:22:06,490 Speaker 7: society whether we want to stoop to their level or not. 370 00:22:08,210 --> 00:22:14,250 Speaker 7: And that is that's second part that America struggles with, right, yeah, 371 00:22:14,530 --> 00:22:17,330 Speaker 7: argument what is not sufficient to end the death bentley 372 00:22:17,370 --> 00:22:18,650 Speaker 7: in the United States? 373 00:22:19,570 --> 00:22:22,490 Speaker 1: Is that why you called the series the Alabama Murders 374 00:22:22,930 --> 00:22:26,730 Speaker 1: because yes, legally speaking, there was only one murder, Elizabeth Sennett. 375 00:22:27,370 --> 00:22:33,130 Speaker 7: Yeah, we felt that the subsequent executions of the two 376 00:22:33,650 --> 00:22:37,530 Speaker 7: men found guilty in Elizabeth Senna's murder qualify as murders. 377 00:22:38,130 --> 00:22:40,210 Speaker 4: There are state murders, but they're murders. 378 00:22:40,410 --> 00:22:44,370 Speaker 1: And though the States should not be lowering itself to 379 00:22:44,490 --> 00:22:46,850 Speaker 1: the level of the common murderer, we should be better 380 00:22:46,890 --> 00:22:47,170 Speaker 1: than that. 381 00:22:48,250 --> 00:22:48,650 Speaker 4: Yeah. 382 00:22:49,170 --> 00:22:51,610 Speaker 7: Yeah, But like I say, it's hard to make arguments 383 00:22:51,610 --> 00:22:53,250 Speaker 7: about what we're better than. 384 00:22:54,130 --> 00:22:57,530 Speaker 4: Yeah, right now, in the United States. 385 00:22:57,890 --> 00:23:02,010 Speaker 1: We ended our episode Derek Bentley Must Die with a 386 00:23:02,090 --> 00:23:06,410 Speaker 1: quote from England's chief hangman Pierpoint. 387 00:23:06,770 --> 00:23:07,970 Speaker 4: I have his book. 388 00:23:08,530 --> 00:23:13,050 Speaker 1: Yeah, interesting fellow. What he said was, I do not 389 00:23:13,290 --> 00:23:16,930 Speaker 1: now believe that any one of the hundreds of executions 390 00:23:16,970 --> 00:23:20,290 Speaker 1: I carried out has in any way acted as a 391 00:23:20,370 --> 00:23:25,770 Speaker 1: deterrent against future murder. Capital punishment, in my view, achieved 392 00:23:25,810 --> 00:23:29,850 Speaker 1: nothing except revenge. 393 00:23:30,010 --> 00:23:30,770 Speaker 6: Do you agree? 394 00:23:31,410 --> 00:23:32,170 Speaker 4: I do agree. 395 00:23:32,290 --> 00:23:39,450 Speaker 7: It's funny he's such a compromised authority does a death penalty. Yeah, 396 00:23:39,490 --> 00:23:44,730 Speaker 7: And I'm still hung up on how that's the lesson 397 00:23:45,010 --> 00:23:48,490 Speaker 7: He chose to draw from his lifetime of work of 398 00:23:48,610 --> 00:23:53,450 Speaker 7: executing people to wonder about his deterrent effect, as opposed 399 00:23:53,490 --> 00:23:57,370 Speaker 7: to reflect on what it's said about his society, about 400 00:23:57,970 --> 00:24:02,370 Speaker 7: what it felt like to be responsible for so many deaths. 401 00:24:03,330 --> 00:24:05,930 Speaker 1: As making the series made you think differently about the 402 00:24:05,930 --> 00:24:07,170 Speaker 1: death penalty, margam. 403 00:24:07,610 --> 00:24:11,050 Speaker 7: Well, I was never a fan. It has lowered my 404 00:24:12,770 --> 00:24:17,490 Speaker 7: estimation of state authority. We keep in Revision's history returning 405 00:24:17,530 --> 00:24:20,490 Speaker 7: to Alabama because it's just such a bizarre place. It 406 00:24:20,570 --> 00:24:23,970 Speaker 7: is the place where sort of every contradiction of American 407 00:24:24,610 --> 00:24:30,210 Speaker 7: history and society is concentrated, and it's amateur hour at 408 00:24:30,370 --> 00:24:32,810 Speaker 7: one turn after another as we tell the story, you're 409 00:24:32,810 --> 00:24:35,410 Speaker 7: destruck by the fact that they don't know what they're 410 00:24:35,450 --> 00:24:39,250 Speaker 7: doing and they don't care. Yeah, not even trying to 411 00:24:39,330 --> 00:24:42,410 Speaker 7: keep up appearances. You know, to be a Canadianist to 412 00:24:42,450 --> 00:24:47,330 Speaker 7: believe that government is at least moderately competent and well meaning, 413 00:24:48,210 --> 00:24:50,450 Speaker 7: that most high minded and brightest of the people I 414 00:24:50,490 --> 00:24:53,810 Speaker 7: went to college with went into government, and like you 415 00:24:53,810 --> 00:24:57,730 Speaker 7: look at Alabama, you're like most high minded and competent 416 00:24:57,770 --> 00:24:59,050 Speaker 7: people did not go into government. 417 00:24:59,130 --> 00:25:01,690 Speaker 1: One thing that really struck me listening to a statement 418 00:25:01,770 --> 00:25:07,450 Speaker 1: by one of the officials after a particularly controversial episode 419 00:25:07,530 --> 00:25:12,250 Speaker 1: in Alabama's history of actal punishment, and the point he 420 00:25:12,330 --> 00:25:16,370 Speaker 1: made was or there are people out there who are 421 00:25:16,410 --> 00:25:20,530 Speaker 1: trying to prevent us doing these executions, and they sympathize 422 00:25:21,290 --> 00:25:25,770 Speaker 1: with the criminals. Some of them are international. I just thought, 423 00:25:25,810 --> 00:25:29,970 Speaker 1: oh wow, it's an unusually clear example of using some 424 00:25:30,090 --> 00:25:33,930 Speaker 1: kind of tribalism as an alternative to thinking through the issues, 425 00:25:34,410 --> 00:25:37,970 Speaker 1: rather than justifying what we've done or possibly acknowledging that 426 00:25:38,130 --> 00:25:41,050 Speaker 1: something has gone wrong. Instead, there are people out there, 427 00:25:41,450 --> 00:25:45,970 Speaker 1: many of them abroad, who love criminals and they're trying 428 00:25:46,010 --> 00:25:50,050 Speaker 1: to take away your death penalty. Gosh as a really 429 00:25:50,090 --> 00:25:52,370 Speaker 1: striking stance for him to take. 430 00:25:52,930 --> 00:25:56,770 Speaker 7: Their willingness to jump to that kind of language and 431 00:25:57,250 --> 00:26:01,290 Speaker 7: attitude is Beth taking as opposed to examining what they're doing. 432 00:26:02,250 --> 00:26:04,850 Speaker 4: Alabama's a weird place. I will say, I love the state. 433 00:26:04,890 --> 00:26:05,570 Speaker 4: I love going there. 434 00:26:05,690 --> 00:26:08,370 Speaker 1: No, you made that quite clear. Actually you thought it 435 00:26:08,450 --> 00:26:11,210 Speaker 1: was straighten. You thought that the government was behaving in 436 00:26:11,210 --> 00:26:13,290 Speaker 1: a shameful way. But there was a real affection for 437 00:26:13,850 --> 00:26:14,810 Speaker 1: the place and the people. 438 00:26:15,530 --> 00:26:15,730 Speaker 4: Yeah. 439 00:26:18,290 --> 00:26:22,210 Speaker 1: I loved listening to the whole season of The Alabama 440 00:26:22,290 --> 00:26:25,090 Speaker 1: Murders malcom I. When I started listening, I was thinking, Oh, 441 00:26:25,090 --> 00:26:28,090 Speaker 1: this is really cool. They've done a really good job. 442 00:26:28,130 --> 00:26:29,930 Speaker 1: I love the music, I love it, I love the 443 00:26:29,930 --> 00:26:31,850 Speaker 1: way they've done this. And by the end, I wasn't 444 00:26:31,890 --> 00:26:35,010 Speaker 1: thinking at all about the way anybody had done anything. 445 00:26:35,050 --> 00:26:39,210 Speaker 1: I was completely in the moment. It really changed the 446 00:26:39,250 --> 00:26:43,010 Speaker 1: way I saw the death penalty, and I thank you. 447 00:26:43,130 --> 00:26:47,130 Speaker 1: It's an amazing piece of journalism. So just tell people 448 00:26:47,130 --> 00:26:48,690 Speaker 1: where can they find it. 449 00:26:48,690 --> 00:26:53,090 Speaker 7: It's in the Revisionist History feed. It's out now wherever 450 00:26:53,090 --> 00:26:56,010 Speaker 7: you get your podcasts. It's called The Alabama Murders seven 451 00:26:56,050 --> 00:26:59,890 Speaker 7: part series. You can subscribe to pushkin plus and binge 452 00:26:59,890 --> 00:27:02,210 Speaker 7: it all at once, or you can listen to it piecemeal. 453 00:27:02,250 --> 00:27:03,930 Speaker 4: Over the course of the next two weeks. 454 00:27:04,250 --> 00:27:07,050 Speaker 1: I have been talking to Malcolm Gladwell, Malcolm, thank you 455 00:27:07,130 --> 00:27:08,370 Speaker 1: very much, thank you. 456 00:27:08,410 --> 00:27:12,330 Speaker 4: Tim D