WEBVTT - The 2022 Ig Nobel Prizes, Part 2

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of

0:00:05.320 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>My Heart Radio. Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Land, and I'm Seth

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Johnson. That's right, Joe is still out on parentally. Uh.

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>He and his wife are somewhere in the zombie land

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of of of early parenthood. Uh, they're because they're completely

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in the dark. I haven't heard from him in a

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>few days, so I think everything. I think he's in

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the upside down basically right now where where up is

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>up is down, down is up. Uh. Sleep takes place

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>whenever it can be obtained. Uh. Now how long does

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 1>this period last? Do you know? Rob like like like

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the like baby won't sleep through the night phase. I

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. Um, I'm not certain either. I

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>think to some extent it varies from child to child.

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I'm more knowledgeable what's sort of like general

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>trends in in child sleep habits. And I know that

0:01:04.959 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>that that, of course is going to vary a lot

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>from kid to kid. Uh. My wife and I are

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>fortunate that our our child has always been a very

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>very committed sleeper. But but I know that's that's not

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 1>always the case, well, well, best of luck to Joe

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>right now in his uh, you know, parental duties right now,

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure he is spending his free time listening

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to this podcast. So hello Joe. All right, So if

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you joined us on Tuesday, then you know that we

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>began discussing some of this year's winners of the ig

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Nobel Prizes. Uh. This is a series of awards that

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>are given out each year by the scientific humor journal,

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Annals of Improbable Research, that has been edited for

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>many years now by Mark Abrams and their stated purposes

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to quote honor achievements that make people laugh and then

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>make them think, and so every year on stuff to

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>bow your mind. Since I don't know how long I

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know how long I've been doing this, we generally

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>look at at least some of the winners from from

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that given year and discuss them, talking about, you know,

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>why they're funny, what's important about the studies, what's interesting

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>about the studies. And it's generally a great exercise because

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of times the stuff that wins it gets

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>into an area that we might not otherwise explore, or

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:28.519
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't devote an entire episode to certainly, and uh yeah,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I always learned something new. So this is the second episode.

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 1>But this is one of those situations where if you

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>missed Tuesday and you're already listening to today's episode Thursday's episode,

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you're still probably good to go, because we're just looking

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:46.399
<v Speaker 1>at individual winners that revolve around generally one study. Maybe

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>you're a handful of studies, but each one is kind

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of a self contained topic. So go ahead, feel free

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:53.639
<v Speaker 1>to listen to this one and then go back and

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>listen to Tuesday's You'll be just fine. So last time,

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I think we talked about three different studies, and once

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>again we're gonna talk about three more today. Uh seth,

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>why don't you start us off with your first selection?

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>This one is the winner of the Safety Engineering Prize.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>This was a paper written by Magnus Gens and it

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>was for developing a moose crash test dummy. And uh

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that this was out of Sweden. This was published by

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, and it's

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just fun to picture crash test dummies in general.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember in like the gosh, late eighties, early nineties,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a crash test dummy trend for some reason. Yeah,

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I I definitely remember this because I remember being a

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>bit into it. There were commercials right and had crash

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>test dummies, but they also at least made action figures

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and in little crash sets, and I think I might

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>have even had one of the action figures. I had

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of myself. I had a car and two

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the action figures of the dummies, because I believe

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they made an anime series based on it as well.

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>My memory is kind of fuzzy about this, but I

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely remember the toys, and I definitely remember the live

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>action commercials, and yeah, that the toys were interesting because

0:04:09.960 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they often had some sort of action where if you

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>like pressed a button on their chest, you know, their

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>arms would fly off or or like the doors would

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>come off the cars or something. And yeah, hey, trends

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>for children are very strange, but there was definitely a

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>crash test dummy trend for children, uh, late eighties, early nineties.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But but anyway, Oh no, no, I have to keep

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>going on this because it raises the question now that

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I think I haven't really thought about this in a

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>long time, but do you think that this was a

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>situation where our desire as children to have action figures

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>of dummies that were used in crash tests like industrial

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>crash test. Was this entirely manufactured this desire and marketed

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 1>to us, or did they anticipate the fact that children

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 1>would see these ads and say, hey, I want one

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of those. This looks fun. I'm in I think this

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>was a Geico Caveman situation where a company probably paid

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 1>just for some standard like you know, public service announcement

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>ads made some very colorful, friendly looking live action p

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>s as, and when they aired on television, for some reason,

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:16.279
<v Speaker 1>children really glommed onto it. Maybe they were aired during

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Saturday morning cartoon breaks or something, and for some reason,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe the bright colors, maybe the action, the goofy like,

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, almost like live action Looney Tunes esqueness of

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>like the explosions and whatnot. Maybe that just appealed to

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>children so hard that some enterprising, you know, business person went,

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I know, let's sell this to those kids, you know.

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So I I think it was a television commercial they

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>got too popular for its own good, and then they

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>took advantage of it. That that's my guess. Imagine if

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>they had known, they could have introduced a moose trash

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>test down me as well, a talking moose that would

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have been amazing, like a funny sidekick Bowwinkle style. Everyone.

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I love that. So, so that is what we're discussing today.

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Just picture a moose crash test dummy and why they

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>would need it. And here's a little chunk from the

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:14.240
<v Speaker 1>abstract from this paper quote. In certain areas of our

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>planet there are big wild animals. One big species is

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the moose called elk in certain regions. Scandinavia has a

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>very large moose population and car moose collision is a

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>huge problem with many fatal outcomes. In order to reduce

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the number of injuries caused by passenger cars colliding with moose,

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a valid and repeatable method to arrange staged accidents is needed.

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>A moose dummy was constructed after thorough research work. Yeah,

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>so a couple of things, Like, first of all, like

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the moose is very large. The moose is much larger

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>than a deer, and and hitting a deer with an

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>automobile is already a serious concern. But on top of that,

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.599
<v Speaker 1>you also have behavioral differences with the moose, like a

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>moose uh has a different or can have a different

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:05.400
<v Speaker 1>um attitude toward vehicles and in encounters. I've certainly heard

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>tales of vehicles being charged by a moose before. Oh yeah,

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and and they're huge, which we we will get to.

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into some very specific stats very soon. So, so,

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the two primary goals of this research were accuracy, and

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>they wanted the cars that collided with the dummy moose

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a comparable damage to real cars that collided

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>with real moose. So you know, I think most crash

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>test folks have that goal in mind. And the second

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was repeatability. They wanted this moose dummy to be able

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>to endure many crash tests before it had to be replaced. Again,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. These are very expensive to construct. You know,

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to get your money's worth out of them.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So first and foremost, animal collisions with cars are very common.

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>They're dangerous, and they're also very unpredictable. Animals simply don't

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to follow the rules of the road. Uh, no

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>matter how many signs we put up for them. You know,

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>cross here, your dumb dear, this is your cross swak.

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But but they just don't pay attention to that. Yeah,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>add into that, having a disrupted environment which there are

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>fewer predators to actually keep the numbers of say, dear down. Yeah,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it becomes becomes a huge issue. No, No, this is

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.320
<v Speaker 1>their faults. We gave them a side cross here, this

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>is your crosswalk, and they just don't they don't do it.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So not. Now. Moose collisions are particularly dangerous because they

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>are very top heavy, very tall, and have relatively spindly

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>legs for a creature of their size. So the average

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>moose is about six ft tall at the shoulder, and

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it can get obviously much bigger than that, and they

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>can weigh as much as fourteen hundred pounds, and like

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I said, most of that weight is you know, pretty

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>high up in the air. And if anyone out there

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>has ever like seen a moose in real life, it's

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it's actually kind of kind of like, I don't know,

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's awesome. It feels shocking to see a

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>creature that large in person. Yeah, I have. I have

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>very vague memories of my childhood and Canada of seeing

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>these seeing a moose and it was quite I mean,

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say it was terrifying, but yeah, it was

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of on inspiring. They're just so huge, Yeah, for sure.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So this study took place in Sweden, where annually thirty

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand car accidents involving cloven footed animals occur. That means

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety accidents daily, and thirteen of those ninety involved a moose.

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Unrelated to this study, the row deer is actually the

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>cause of the majority of these collisions, but they are

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>much smaller and lighter, so they cause far less damage.

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Those thirteen out of the ninety daily accidents are the

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>ones that are I'm not gonna say almost always fatal,

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>but are often fatal because, like I said, fourteen hundred pounds,

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>six ft tall, and it's it's they're they're like a

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.319
<v Speaker 1>very heavy anvil on top of a very small spindle

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>legged table. Like there, it's it's just not it's not smart,

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know. So our researcher then has pages and pages

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>of research to determine like the physiology of the moose

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to be replicated by the dummy UH formulas to determine

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the velocity during collisions typical car sifty practices that might

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 1>be found in the average vehicle models, etcetera, ETCeteras. Now

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to start to build up this dummy

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>moose one version, they take a bunch of water filled hoses,

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, to try and get that weight and that

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like oh um that that animal pu push

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>but also solidity didn't quite work. They tried another version

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>with wires and would but but once again it was

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a bit too fragile that couldn't get the weight quite

0:10:43.679 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>right with it, but ultimately ended up working. Were these

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>big thick slabs of rubber kind of cross cut um. Specifically,

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they were thirty six rubber plates assembled vertically and assembled

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>together through through through locking wires. The the way I

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can describe this is um. I remember as a child

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>there were these like model kits where where they were um, hundreds,

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>if not thousands, of these little flat you know, shapes

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>that you would then stack on top of one another,

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and it would build like a three D model of something,

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>usually a bust or something like that. You know I'm

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>talking about rob Yeah, I had one of these of

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>jar Jar Binks before the film came out. I didn't

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know who this character was. After the film,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.079
<v Speaker 1>I perhaps would not have cared to build a model

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of this character. Uh So you can see these pretty

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>easily online too, if you just search um crash test moose.

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you'll be able to find them. You can

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>also find actually some pretty good footage on television shows

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or things like that of people using them, and it's

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's pretty beautiful. You'll know we're talking about the

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>same one if you see this. There's basically like it

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>looks kind of like a swing set hanging above the moose,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and then there's a releasing mechanism with electrical magnets that

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>will hold the moose like the correct height pre collision,

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but then ensuring that the mechanism won't contribute to the

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>results of the damage. It will be completely free and

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>clear when the collision actually occurs. Because once again, these

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>animals are a mystery. So the dummy cannot stand on

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>these little spindle legs on its own. It needs a

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>little support structure to hold it at the correct height

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>before the car actually gets there. Yeah, the sense I

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of get from the image here. It's like if

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you if you three D printed the torso of a moose,

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>like from from romp to next dump, and then you

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you hung it from like a swing set structure of

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>some sorry. Yeah, and and to represent the legs they

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:47.559
<v Speaker 1>got these uh, big wires hanging down, and they covered

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it with more rubber disks to represent the weight and

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the size of each leg. And there there are subtle

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>variations between front legs and back legs. But but but

0:12:56.160 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, the body was the big concern of this, know, uh,

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>more or less it's um it's that big weight. It's

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that big high center of gravity weights that just falls

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on the car. Because I mean, if you think about it,

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>um here here's more or less what happens to think

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about a typical car's height in relation to a moose

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and its anatomy, especially when you think about like where

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a bumper is on a typical sedan. So so the

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>bumper is gonna come in real low, it's just a

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of feet from the ground, hits the moose in

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>its tall, thin legs, and as a result, the animal

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>will then rotate over the engine hood and crashed through

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the windshield pounds, which then releases all that weight directly

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>onto the driver and the passenger. That's why it's often

0:13:42.800 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>so deadly. It's it's not because it's heavy. It's not

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because they stand in the road and sometimes charge at you.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It's because they're heavy and they're tall, so that our

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>cars are almost like engineered to get hurt the most

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 1>from this creature. It's it's it's a it's a difficult thing.

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately this stummy was successful. They were able to

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, repeat their crashes multiple times with this giant

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>rubber body. And also it was able to accurately duplicate

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the real life damage from these creatures. So. Um, currently,

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>if if you see the images of this, I haven't

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.600
<v Speaker 1>seen any with a head yet. They say that eventually

0:14:25.640 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 1>they do plan to build one with a head and

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>antlers because apparently there's a pendulum like effect when the

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>body is hit, then the head follows afterwards, etcetera, etcetera. Um,

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but that's secondary damage. Like I said, they're focusing on

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>that big, hulking pound body. And this study came out

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand one, so maybe they have done the

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>head since then. Yes, yes, perhaps so. Uh So, So

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>why is this funny? Um, it's a it's a most stummy.

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's it's very specific, it's very silly, and ultimately moose

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>are just kind of like an interesting, odd creature. Um. Also,

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I can say that as as a lifelong fan of

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the TV show MythBusters. I have to mention that this

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>subject was also tackled in season six, episode one of

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>that show. This was in their Alaska special UH. Specifically,

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what they did is they tested the myth that it's

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>better to hit a moose going quickly rather than slowing down.

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>So so, like I, I I believe in this show they

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>may have used the exact same crash test dummy from

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>this UM from this UH, from this paper. However, I

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>couldn't find the exact footage, so I can't confirm that

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going based on memory that myth was busted

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 1>going really fast. The The myth was that if you're

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>going really fast when you hit the moose, that like

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>like the aerodynamic kind of curve of a car will

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>just fling the moose directly over your car and you'll

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>be perfectly safe. That is not the case. Like I said,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it's four pounds, Nah, it's it's it's crushing that front

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of your car. Unfortunately, you can, like I said, you

0:15:55.320 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>can see footage. You can look this up on YouTube.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>It's wild to see. UM. So yes was busted. Don't

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>think that going extra fast will make you safer when

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>when running into a moose and which brings me to

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>why this is important. This can genuinely lead to saving lives,

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>particularly in areas like Scandinavia or the Pacific Northwest regions

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of of the of North America, basically anywhere that a

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>moose can be found easily. This data can you know,

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>be duplicated and given to car manufacturers, so they can

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>know which parts of their cars, especially cars that are

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>sold often in these regions where they need extra you

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>know enforcement, you know, Uh, can they make a moose

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>proof windshield? Is that even possible? Will will cars have

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like not not not a cow catcher, but a moose

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>catcher in the in the near future who knows, who knows?

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>But but now they can test it over and over

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>again and hopefully make safer cars for these regions that uh,

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, are I want to say moose proof, but

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that's probably a bit too ambitious. Well, I mean, the

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>moose test is definitely a thing. Um. Just doing a

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.360
<v Speaker 1>little searching around, I found this is a website called

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>hot cars dot com and they have an article five

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>cars that have passed Sweden's moose test and five that failed.

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, these are all different vehicles and they just

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>look like normal automobiles are just about normal automobiles with

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>enough like safety protocol and um like structural integrity I suppose,

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases larger looking vehicles but sometimes not

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>so large um that that have done well. So I

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 1>guess in a way, I'm not disappointed that there are

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:39.359
<v Speaker 1>no crazy Swedish moose proof vehicles that look like the

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>front of a train, but it is great that they've

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 1>been able to take this data and then use it

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to ensure safety in various vehicles. This is a complete tangent.

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But have you ever seen Land of the Dead, the

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>George A. Romero film? Is that the one with the

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>tower and John Lacosama. Yes, yes, exactly, I have, but

0:17:58.440 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it since it came out, so I'm

0:17:59.880 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>a little foggy. There's a vehicle there's a vehicle in

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in that film called Dead Reckoning, which is like their

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>major like vehicle for like going out into the world,

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's basically zombie proof. And in the end of

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>that movie they all hop in Dead Reckoning and they

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>drive to Canada and that's like they're like, hey, where

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>we're okay? And I think you know what, I think

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Dead Reckoning is moose proof. So that would be that'd

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be a real kicker, that'd be a real down or

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>ending where they escape in this vehicle, then they hit

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>their first moose and they're just done for. They could

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>survive the zombie hordes, but they can't survive a zombie moose.

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>All Right, For the next one, I'm gonna be talking

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about the Art History Prize. So I suppose the other

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>side of covering Ignobile Award winning studies is that sometimes

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it forces us to cover topics that we might not

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:58.840
<v Speaker 1>otherwise cover um at least these days, and that's certainly

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the case with the r History winner. For two honored

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 1>are this page is This paper from was published in

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the Journal of ethno Pharmacology by Peter de Smett and

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Nicholas Hellmuth, titled a Multidisciplinary Approach to Ritual Enema Scenes

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>on Ancient Maya Pottery. So, just to kick things off,

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>why is it funny? Well, I guess it's supposed to

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be funny because it features enemas, but I also kind

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of have to I mean, just in general, yes, I

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>buy that logic. I didn't particularly find this one to

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be a humorous inclusion, but I mean everyone's sense of

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>humor is going to vary on this sort of thing,

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and I suppose it's it's the juxtaposition to that, if

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you are to see depictions of enemas, you don't expect

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it to be on your your pottery, on on your

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>on your fine china. Yeah. Yeah, I suppose so like that,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's art history and that and and that's the thing

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>because because the next question why is it important? Well,

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of a double whammy here, because first of all,

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the discipline of ethno pharmacology is highly fascinating. It can

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>also be illuminate. It can also be rather illuminating and

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>potentially illuminating about the use of various substances that Western

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>medicine has not quite come around to yet. And then

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>also we're talking about Mayan history here, my in history

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>and culture, so I feel like it is the sort

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of thing that shouldn't be ignored. So I'm not going

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to lean as much into the humor on this one,

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>but it was all very fascinating and I want to

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>explain it all a bit, maybe demystify it. So to

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>kick things off, though, I feel like what we should

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>have a little refresher on Mayan civilization that kind of

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>refresher is very much in order. So we're talking about

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the Mesoamerican civilization that occupied southern Mexico, Guatemala, and northern Belize.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>The Mayan pre Classic period is measured back to two

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand b C, with the Classic period running to fifty

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>c Eed and nine and the post Classic period running

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>up until fifteen thirty nine. This was an advanced civilization

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>with agriculture, a sophisticated right system, mathematics, calendar and astronomical systems,

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and a highly developed architectural and artistic style, as we've

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>discussed on the show before. Of course, the arrival of

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Europeans to to this region constituted a kind of outside

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>context event that designated the civilizations and cultures of the Americas.

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>But many aspects of Mind culture survived and are cherished.

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe something like thirty Mind languages are still spoken today.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And there has been a pan Maya movement that's an

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>ethno political movement in Mexico and Guatemala by often marginalized

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Maya people there. And of course, on top of this,

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>there have been many efforts to better understand and celebrate

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the culture and history of the Mayans. Despite all the

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Spanish initially destroyed. Okay, so that's your refresher on the Mayans.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Now let's get into a refresh on enemies. So strictly speaking, uh,

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>an enema is an injection of liquid into the lower

0:21:57.119 --> 0:22:00.719
<v Speaker 1>bowel through the rectum, and the most often reason for

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 1>this procedure is to relieve constipation or to prepare for

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>medical procedures. It's it's simply stool evacuation. It's liquid aided

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>stool evacuation. Now, the mere act of waste leaving the

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.199
<v Speaker 1>body already kind of has a myriad of real and

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine benefits, because obviously waste leaving the body is a

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>good thing. We've kind of talked about this in the

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>last episode. What happens when a scorpion loses its anus

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and it cannot relieve itself, Well, its stuff builds up

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 1>and uh and it's it's not necessarily great for the scorpion.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So excess materials do need to leave the body after

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>our bodies have extracted as much from the matter as

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>can be extracted. But then on top of that, again

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>we have this, we have this deep history of humanity's

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>attempt to to understand our bodies and also conflating and

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>confusing hygiene with purity at times. I'm reminded particularly of

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>a book I had to pick this one off the

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>shelf for this one A little Bit UH by Virginia

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Smith titled Clean, A History of Personal Hygiene Impurity, which

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is a great read if anyone's interested in like the

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>history of things like like just bathing rituals and so forth.

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Sona rituals and how you have these sort of dual

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>columns of the ways that these things are actually good

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>for us, the way they actually cleanse us. And then

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on the other side are complicated understanding of purity, spiritual purity,

0:23:25.480 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and also getting into various um, you know, pre medical

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>theories of how the body works. So, for instance, Smith

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>points out that according to Greek humoral theory UH, a

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>strong bowel movement was an indicator of of a healthy

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>body ridding itself of dangerous waste. And if this didn't

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 1>seem to be the case with them in a an

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.119
<v Speaker 1>an individual, if you didn't seem to to to be

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>having good strong bowel movements, well, then a whole host

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of quote herbal or mineral purges and emetics might ensue.

0:23:57.440 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Now coming back to those to the detail that the

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:04.679
<v Speaker 1>entire gut is all about processing organic material and absorbing

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.640
<v Speaker 1>water and nutrients from it, and then displacing whatever can't

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>be digested at all or can't be digested in a

0:24:10.480 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>timely matter. UH. It shouldn't come as a surprise that

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>even at the very final leg of the journey, the

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 1>system is still capable of absorbing water and due to

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the rectum's blood supply, the rectum can also absorb various

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>substances and drugs such as alcohol, tobacco, and UH, and

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>also various like hallucinogenic materials as well. Now at this point,

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I know some of you might be thinking of various

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 1>like shocking headlines and scare headlines that have appeared in

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the media over the years, and I do want to

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>just drive home. Do that you should not try this

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>at home. UH. Do not try to absorb things on

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>your own recreationally through your rectum. UH. Two major issues

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind here is that, first of all,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:02.679
<v Speaker 1>there's usually a lower threshold for the side effects of

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a given substance if it's taken rectally. And also if

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you take it rectly, it bypasses your body's natural defense

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:14.959
<v Speaker 1>of vomiting. UH. So the the level entering your system

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>might be too high and you can't just vomit as

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>a means of your body trying to rid yourself of

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that substance. This makes me wonder if there has ever

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>been a headline where someone, let's say, did get alcohol

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>poisoning through a ingesting alcohol the wrong way and basically

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>the headline just said rectum damn never killed him. Maybe

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>so and some of you more scandalous newspapers and the

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of newspaper you find in a barber shop that

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>kind or if you get your news from like a

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>mad magazine that sort of thing, you know, or the

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>crip keeper, I guess. But but at any rate, this

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is the same issue though. This is why it is

0:25:56.960 --> 0:26:01.959
<v Speaker 1>sometimes an advantageous route for medication and by medical professionals,

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's a way of bypassing nausea and vomiting. So

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if some sort of condition is keeping the individual from

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, being able to really keep anything down, well,

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 1>then the the rectal application of the medication might be

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the best way to go via suppository. So this is

0:26:17.720 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>nothing that the humans figured all of this out quite

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago. I was reading about this a

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit the ancient Egyptian uh Ebber's Papyrus from fifteen

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty b c. E makes mention of of medical enemas,

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and other evidence indicates that it was an important tool

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.879
<v Speaker 1>of ancient Egyptian medical practice, and it was said to

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>have been invented by the god thought, the divine physician,

0:26:44.680 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and the God of secret knowledge. Now I'm not going

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to go through the entire global history of enema usage,

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 1>but I think if one had the appetite for it,

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>one could probably do an entire episode of stuff to

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>blow your mind on it. There's a lot of stuff

0:26:56.600 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>out there. They are numerous notable examples from historic writings

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>from Greece, from Babylon, from China, and of course Western

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>European cultures across the centuries. And the reasons for these

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 1>practices breakdown into basic traditions of of either cleansing or

0:27:16.080 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>drug and alcohol absorption, or in some cases mere sensation.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not gonna I'm not gonna listen through all these,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>but I did have two that I wanted to bring

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>up because I was cross checking some stuff in a

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>book titled The Mystery of the Exploding Teeth and Other

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Curiosities from the History of Medicine by Thomas Morris. This

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is a really fun book and it contains multiple mentions

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of enemas. Uh some Sometimes you'll you'll have a even

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>a very serious history book and you go to the

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>index and they don't have anything about enemas. Uh clean.

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>The book I referenced earlier really only has one mention

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>of enemas in it, and it's not listed in the index.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>But Morris has your back on enema mentions multiple mentions

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in this in this tone, and want to I want

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to highlight a couple of them. First of all, this

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is a headline from an eighteen fifty eight study published

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in the British Medical Journal eight quote port wine in

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>amata as a substitute for transfusion of blood in cases

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of postpartum hemorrhage. Needless to say this, uh this, This

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>may have seemed like a possible sensible alternative at the time,

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:32.480
<v Speaker 1>but it turns out this would this would not be

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the best practice. Yikes. I mean, I'm not going to

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 1>jump into conclusions. But what they like, their their their

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>their structure of thought was back then, But was the

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>idea like, oh it's red wine, so you know, it

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>looks like blood. What I didn't get into this one's

0:28:48.320 --> 0:28:50.720
<v Speaker 1>super deep. But it does seem a little late for

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 1>for that kind of logic, but uh, it was. It

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was presented as a possibility. Morris also discusses a seventeen

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine version of the Swiss physician Samuel Tissot's medical writings,

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>but and and so this was like a Swiss physicians

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>writings that then were then also published. And to some

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>extent it was a little foggy on what exactly has

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>meant here. But essentially this comes out again. It's from

0:29:19.640 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>years earlier, but then it comes out again in seventeen

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>sixty nine, with amateur physician and founder of Methodism John

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Wesley also credited on it. I think basically Wesley was

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a fan of Samuel Tissett's writings, and one of the

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>recommendations in the book is to revive near drowned individuals

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>by not only blowing tobacco smoke into their lungs through

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>their mouths, but also pumping it into quote the fundament.

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Tissa advised using pipe and bladder system to do this,

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>which was not a new method, as European doctors were

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>already using this treatment as an attempt to revive the sick.

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Elsewhere in Europe, I think it was like there there

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>was a Dutch method in particular that used this technology.

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>So this was not new. This was not an invention

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>of Samuel Tessed, but he was very much advocating, Yes,

0:30:11.400 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have somebody that may have been underwater too long,

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>then you might want to pump smoke into any orifice

0:30:17.960 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>available to you. Wow, and we all have a new

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>uh euphemism, the fundament, The fundament. Yes, I've never heard

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that one before. Yeah. This, Uh, that's another thing. Some

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of these writings will you'll find. I mean it varies,

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess from source to source. But some don't really

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 1>want to get into this particular part of the human

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>anatomy or into various animate treatments. But I mean, I

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>guess one of the things is, first of all, clearly

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 1>humans have been using this technology for a very long time.

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>And I guess if you're getting into situations of life

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and death, yeah, I mean, people were like, well, what

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>can we try? What have we not tried? Have we

0:30:56.080 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>tried pumping tobacco smoke uh into their body by any

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>means necessary? Yeah? Wild? I mean, hey, trial and error,

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the years, it has benefited us that

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>someone tried putting tobacco smoke in someone's fundaments. Again, listening

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.080
<v Speaker 1>at home, do not attempt any of this at home. Meanwhile,

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Americas, however, where of course we're ultimately going

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with all of this, there's evidence that the oldmes used

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>inema technology to administer psychoactive substances and smoke inemas were

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>definitely used by various North American tribes, and this is

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>also mentioned in Morris's book. But finally coming back around

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Mayans. So the Mayans certainly engaged in ritual intoxication.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>For example, they drank this substance called bal cha, which

0:31:43.760 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was made from the bark of the evergreen tree Luncho

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Carpus violachias. It was soaked in water and honey and

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>then it was fermented. So they had this this drink,

0:31:55.560 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 1>this balcha. Also, the honey apparently would have been from

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>ease who fed on a high ergine morning glory. This,

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>according to F. J. Kared artall in hallucinogenic drugs in

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 1>pre Columbian Mesoamerican cultures from So this is where it

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>gets interesting with the ball cha though, And this is

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the way Kara Artel explains it. So ball

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>cha is alcoholic at the end of this process, but

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of low in its alcohol level, so

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you have to drink a lot of it to reach

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the desired level of intoxication to the point. It sounds

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like that you'd become sick well before you reach that point.

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of images in the Mayan

0:32:38.040 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>art of individuals vomiting from the drink. And it also

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you would actually wear some manner of of

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>bag around your neck, like essentially you'd have a barf

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>bag on hand um to use while consuming it. Now,

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, this this wouldn't be the only right of

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>using some sort of a substance that involved vomiting. I

0:32:57.320 --> 0:33:00.239
<v Speaker 1>mean this is also common to things like you hear

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>about this in ayahuasca uh ceremonies and so forth. So

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.160
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, very hard to reach this desired level

0:33:07.240 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of intoxication with this stuff, you're gonna be vomiting. Also,

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 1>other substances were also taken, including tobacco laced with datura

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and in addition to ball chay, psycho stimulants and hallucinogens

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>were also consumed and ritual animals were also taken, and

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we see that on various surviving examples of Mayan pottery,

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>including I included a picture of this for you. Seth Uh.

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>There is a ritual jar from the met collection and

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:37.680
<v Speaker 1>it's from the eighth to ninth century, and it seems

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to display wise women aiding or instructing men in the

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>use of the enemas with the liquid for the enemies

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>originating from a large jar like the artifact itself here

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>with some sort of foaming liquid in it. And this

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>is I think widely thought to be a fermented drink,

0:33:55.480 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 1>likely ball chay. It's quite beautiful to this piece of pottery. Um,

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 1>if you were just walking through a museum and you

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>glanced at it, you wouldn't think twice about it. But

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>then you you take that second look, and uh, yeah,

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's even more interesting. Yeah. I don't remember this

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>from any visit I've I've had to the mat. It

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>may not be something that is of course on regularly

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>on display, uh, but it does seem like the kind

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>of thing that one could easily walk by and you

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>not realize that this is the subject of it, and

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 1>this was perhaps the purpose for the artifact. I think

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>this is an important lesson to all of us that

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we need to pay more attention when we're in the museums. Yes,

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean especially in the matt there's so much to see.

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, this would all make sense given

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that again balja had a lower alcohol content

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>to it, and if you were to take it via enema,

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>this would enhance absorption of set alcohol and also it

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>would bypass the whole barfing thing. Now what where it

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gets also interesting here is that you might hear all

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this and it sounds um hedonic, you know, it sounds

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>like some sort of you know, crazy rich will um.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But according to smit at All, this is the This

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is the the the authors of the ignoble winning paper,

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the Mayans were largely understood to have been a contemplative people.

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 1>So on one hand, this seems to have sort of

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 1>presented a conundrum to some people studying the Mayans, because

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it seemed maybe out of character that they would that

0:35:19.719 --> 0:35:21.919
<v Speaker 1>they would, you know, do all these other serious minded things,

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but then engage in this sort of ritual. Well uh,

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.240
<v Speaker 1>And I should also add that smit at All also

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>suggests that while the substance used may well have been alcohol.

0:35:32.719 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Some scenes also might suggest the use of tobacco and

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 1>quote water lily or some other flowering plant as key ingredients.

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 1>At any rate, the argument, sort of the counter argument,

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess made by a caret artal is that this

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:50.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a hedonic practice. This was a spiritual practice, and

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>it was typically conducted in caves uh and these would

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>have been considered places that were closer to the spirit realm.

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>And that the consumption of the these various substances I

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>mean basically like a whole cocktail of mind and body

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>alternating substances that would have included apparently psychoactive mushrooms as

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>well potentially, and these were widely used among Mesoamerican cultures.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That all of this the location the ritual, like the

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>non psychoactive aspects of the ritual, just the performative aspects

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of it, and then of course the psychoactive aspects of it.

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>That this would all serve to bring you closer in

0:36:26.840 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>line with the spirit world. And again this would have

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:31.879
<v Speaker 1>been a spiritual ritual that everyone was engaging in here.

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Needless to say, the Spanish disapproved of all of this,

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 1>even the production of ball Chay itself, So I find

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I found all this rather interesting. Um again, not a

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>topic I would think I would I would have I

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>would have normally researched on my own. But once you

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>start getting into it and uh and taking it apart.

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, very fascinating. Yeah yeah, the the the twists

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 1>and turns of this, it goes deeper than I would

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 1>have would have thought. It's it's not not just the

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>punch line, right, but if that punchline forces people to

0:37:02.560 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>look a little closer at it than than Yes, the

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Ignal Bells have done their purpose here sneaker at the

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>study or the or the paper, but then look closer

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:14.399
<v Speaker 1>and and learn a few things. So I applaud them

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for this selection. Thank you, thank you. All Right, We've

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>got one last study today from the Igno Bell Award winners.

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 1>This was the Applied Cardiology Prize, so this had multiple contributors.

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>We had pro Jakova, Saksi, Baron's, Lynde, and Kretz. And

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>this was for seeking and finding evidence that when new

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>romantic partners meet for the first time and feel attracted

0:37:48.640 --> 0:37:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to each other, their heart rates synchronize. It's a bold

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>claim and I was fascinated by this just from the beginning,

0:37:57.040 --> 0:37:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and I will say that's that's a bit of a

0:37:58.880 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 1>sensationalist headline, and I think it's actually a bit deeper

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>than that, but but still it's it's it's pretty accurate, yeah,

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because if you're just taking it faith value, it sounds

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:10.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a scientific attempt to understand something you

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:13.440
<v Speaker 1>saw on a Looney Tunes cartoon. It's like when a

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>wolf sees of a pretty lady, does do his eyeballs

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>really stick out like that and his heart fall on

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the table and crawl around and his tongue grows twelve

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>sizes and and unrolls like a carpets. Yeah. Yeah, these

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:30.719
<v Speaker 1>are all facts. So to determine what drives attraction, the

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>researchers measured the physiological dynamics between real people on real dates.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 1>And this was outside of the lab environments. It was

0:38:37.880 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 1>still controlled environments, but it was not happening inside a lab.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 1>They gathered the data in multiple ways. Um they had

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>eye tracking glasses with embedded cameras. They had a heart

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>rate monitors and skin conductivity sensors all happening at the

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 1>same time while they did their multiple prodding and testing,

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>which I'll get into. So so there were multiple findings.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Three specifically, one, women were typically more expressive than males. Two,

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:08.879
<v Speaker 1>men stared at women more than women stared at men.

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And most importantly the point of this paper from from

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the ignoble point of view, three visible signals that can

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be controlled, such as facial expression or gaze did not

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 1>predict attraction. Instead, attraction was predicted by synchrony and heart

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>rate and skin conductance between partners, which is involuntary, unconscious,

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>and very difficult to regulate. So with a modern dating

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>culture the way it is right now, you know, you'll

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>just go into your mind of either things you experience

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 1>or your friends experience. Uh, you know, we're all utilizing

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>dating apps and dating websites, which has become far more

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:51.359
<v Speaker 1>common than it ever has been before. The three big

0:39:51.480 --> 0:39:54.000
<v Speaker 1>consequences that this paper pointed out from that are that

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.600
<v Speaker 1>people are dating strangers far more often. It's not just

0:39:57.719 --> 0:39:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like your friend's friend or a co worker or whatever,

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just someone you met online. Um, so ergo, less

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>time is spent with a potential partner before you decide

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 1>on having subsequent dates, and that like the potential dating

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.720
<v Speaker 1>pool and the candidates for dating is much much larger.

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.719
<v Speaker 1>But also kind of much more anonymous. So, you know,

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>with all these potential limiting factors with relationships that's happening

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>in today's world, people still, you know, get attracted to

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 1>each other, People still date, people still get married. So

0:40:29.320 --> 0:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>they really wanted to research what was the root predictor

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>for attraction and that was the goal of this research.

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>So they set up a series of tests and they

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:43.880
<v Speaker 1>were fascinating and really wild. But um, I'm going to

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>try and describe it, but they they had actual graphs

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>in the paper, So look up the paper if you

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>want to see some artists renderings of how this all looked.

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But basically, they set up a blind date for the participants.

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 1>They set them up in this nice little cabin where

0:40:57.280 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 1>they set them down at a table and then there's

0:40:59.360 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>a partition and in between them, okay, and it can

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>raise and lower on a timer or as the researchers needed.

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:10.720
<v Speaker 1>So with the the there was a wide variety of circumstances.

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, the partition is up, the partition is closed.

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Now I want you to talk freely for two minutes.

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I want you to look at each other for two

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 1>minutes but not talk, etcetera, etcetera. Etcetera. All kinds of

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>different tests and variables and controls. They they all were

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>there and they were all pointed out in this paper.

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>After gathering their data from this you know, blind date

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 1>into cabin with robots, uh, the researchers would then ask

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the participants a series of questions about their date. Number one,

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:43.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think your partner would want to date you again?

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Number two? How attractive do you think your partner is?

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And number three how attractive do you think your partner

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:55.400
<v Speaker 1>finds you? So here here are the findings with the

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>question do you think your partner would want to date

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you again? Only about fifty were correct. Females were slightly

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:06.840
<v Speaker 1>more accurate than males. Females got correct while males got fifty,

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>but all pretty close to overall pretty much just you know,

0:42:11.200 --> 0:42:14.720
<v Speaker 1>flip of a coin. With the questions involved in attractiveness,

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>their findings were pretty fascinating. The more attractive the subject

0:42:19.560 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>found their partner, the more likely they were to think

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that their partner was attracted to them. I'm gonna say

0:42:28.600 --> 0:42:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that again, just kind of be as clear as possible.

0:42:32.120 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>The more attractive the subject found their partner, the more

0:42:35.400 --> 0:42:39.080
<v Speaker 1>likely they were to think that their partner was attracted

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to them. Okay, So so to sort of translate, like,

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the more out of your league you find the other person, statistically,

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the more likely you think that that person is actually

0:42:50.560 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 1>attracted Yes, yes, which which is fascinating I I I

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>would think that that that the opposite was true. But

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 1>but here we are now. May maybe it's got something

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with like flood Like maybe it's like part

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:06.799
<v Speaker 1>of our evolution of like flooding our body with endorphins

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>when you are attracted to someone just to give you

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the confidence to ask them out on a date or whatever.

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>So huh but uh, there was no correlation found in

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that at all, and it was actually found to be counterintuitive. Uh.

0:43:22.200 --> 0:43:25.080
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the graphs, it's not exactly a

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>wrong to right, but it's close to it. The graphs

0:43:28.680 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are moving in opposite directions, so so that is a

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>wrong estimation. And in general, it was just proven that

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>people are not very accurate when reading a partner's romantic

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>intentions full stop. Like that's just one of the biggest

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>things they found. Um, so, ultimately, our biology is a

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:50.160
<v Speaker 1>much better judge of what's happening than our than our

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.240
<v Speaker 1>thoughts that are than our brains. More or less, here's

0:43:53.239 --> 0:43:55.759
<v Speaker 1>a chunk that's going to kind of explain that this

0:43:55.800 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is directly from the paper quote. Intriguingly, people are often

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 1>una were of being influenced by others effective displays. This

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:07.799
<v Speaker 1>is evident from studies showing that friends and lovers implicitly

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>mimic each other's nonverbal behavior, such as gaze and facial expressions. Remarkably,

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a series of recent studies demonstrated that committed romantic partners

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.360
<v Speaker 1>synchronize their heart rate and skin conductance, and that the

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>level of synchrony was positively associated with the quality of

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 1>relationship emotional ties, such as the amount of time spent

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>together and the ability to identify the emotions of one's partner.

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Contemporary theories proposed that behavioral and psychological synchrony results from

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the biologically mediated tendency to adapt to incoming social information. Specifically,

0:44:45.320 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 1>during an interaction, individuals continuously exchange information via verbal and

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>non verbal routes like a date, for example. Continuing during

0:44:56.239 --> 0:45:00.759
<v Speaker 1>this process, the sensory receptors convert vibrational energy from the

0:45:00.880 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 1>partner's face and body to electrical impulses that the brain

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:08.840
<v Speaker 1>then uses to acquire social and emotional information. A recent

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>fmr I study showed that the human brain possesses a

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>neural mechanism which attracts individuals to partners who effective nonverbal behavior.

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>They can easily understand. From this point of view, emotional

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:28.000
<v Speaker 1>expressions that people display do not only communicate emotions, they

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 1>embody human feelings, build social bonds, and promote attraction. It's

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big thing to find. I mean that that

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.759
<v Speaker 1>that really does I. I know you and I are

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:44.160
<v Speaker 1>both both married men, but it makes me think that

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I would approach dating differently knowing that, you know, like

0:45:48.600 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>like just just kind of thinking about like how I

0:45:51.000 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>feel and and just kind of like duplicating the intentions

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and the subtle signals of of my potential dating partner.

0:45:58.160 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Like it's just I don't I think, thankfully I haven't

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>had had to date someone in like twenty years, but

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it's still it's a fascinating idea. Yeah, I mean, especially

0:46:06.960 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the things that prepare one to

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>enter the dating world are it's it's stuff you're you're hearing,

0:46:13.320 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>maybe parentally, just to varying degrees depending on what the

0:46:16.280 --> 0:46:19.719
<v Speaker 1>parental presence is, like also socially, Also things that are

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 1>presented to you in media, but and in music, you know,

0:46:22.520 --> 0:46:26.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously in movies and so forth. But uh, but there's

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>there's never I don't think there's ever like a time

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>when someone says, all right, here's the science of what

0:46:30.920 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you're about to go out and do. I mean, certainly

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:36.840
<v Speaker 1>when you get down to uh, physical sexuality, yes, hopefully

0:46:36.880 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>there is going to be that in place, but in

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>terms of like, this is actually what's going on when

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you're just even anticipating how another person feels about you. Yeah,

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 1>this is so going back to the data, this is

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:51.480
<v Speaker 1>what they found to be true, Um, when these attractions

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:55.240
<v Speaker 1>were genuine, not based on what people thoughts, but actually

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:57.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, is this person attractive yes? Is this

0:46:58.040 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>person attractive yes? Completely separates isolated answers. They found that

0:47:02.560 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>analyzing the heart rates during the dates, it was far

0:47:06.400 --> 0:47:09.800
<v Speaker 1>more accurate, I mean, like absurdly more accurate than just

0:47:10.040 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>asking you know, do you think they liked you? Like

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>it was it's just off the charts different. This also

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>went with uh, skin conductivity, but the heart rate was

0:47:20.640 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the part that they really focused on on this paper. Um, so,

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean they even did some things. Once again, you

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>should read the paper, it's fascinating where they just just

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to test their theory, they started matching the heart rates

0:47:34.200 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 1>from randomly selected other dates to see if perhaps this

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 1>was just something that happened to anyone on a date

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>with anyone. But no, no, they didn't match up at all,

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Like like, it wasn't something that happened. That there is

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a subtle, unconscious, non verbal pairing that's happening, and and

0:47:53.160 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the closer that pairing occurs biologically, the more you are

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:02.320
<v Speaker 1>attracted to each other. And it's fascinating that that this

0:48:02.560 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>might have much deeper implications that are provided just here

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in this paper. But it's it's it's a really interesting,

0:48:09.520 --> 0:48:12.759
<v Speaker 1>uh piece of information. Uh So, So basically keep in

0:48:12.840 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>mind that facial cues, movements, and words would sometimes attempt

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 1>a similar mimicry in these dates, but the heart was

0:48:20.040 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the best indicator for sure. So why is this funny?

0:48:24.360 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's kind of proving like an old adage, you know,

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you should listen to your heart, you know, if you're

0:48:28.560 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>out on a date with someone, you know. It's it's

0:48:31.360 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>funny because in so many um instances of like you know,

0:48:36.000 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>romantic love, the heart really is like the center point.

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:42.759
<v Speaker 1>It's saying like this is you know where love comes from?

0:48:42.920 --> 0:48:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Valentine's etcetera, etcetera. Hearts, hearts, hearts, and then like you know,

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe being a bit cynical, we go, oh, it's actually

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>from the brain, it's from personality, etcetera, etcetera. No, No, no, actually,

0:48:53.880 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know Valentine's are kind of right that that your

0:48:56.960 --> 0:49:00.800
<v Speaker 1>heart really does factor in in a pretty substantial at

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:05.279
<v Speaker 1>least in terms of accurately predicting attraction. And why this

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:08.000
<v Speaker 1>is important is that self awareness and self analysis is

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 1>always a good thing. It's it's important first of all

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to know that perhaps your um perception of whether or

0:49:15.400 --> 0:49:17.520
<v Speaker 1>not someone is attracted to you, you could be way

0:49:17.680 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 1>off on that, substantially way off. And perhaps if you

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>use heart monitors on yourself and your date, then you'll

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>have a more accurate representation. Uh. If this is actually

0:49:28.480 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>going somewhere, so that rock Set was right, listen to

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 1>your heart. There's nothing else to Rocks that were right.

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Rock Set was a duo now I'm remembering, Yes, the

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Rocks that was not was not an individual but to

0:49:42.640 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Swedish pop stars, I believe, and I think that wraps

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>up our Ignobles for two. I believe it does now.

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>There there were some other winning studies from this year

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:54.360
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to cover here. If you want the

0:49:54.440 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>full list, you're gonna have to go to Improbable dot

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:01.399
<v Speaker 1>com slash i g. That's their website and just look

0:50:01.680 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>look up Improbable Research on any search engine and it

0:50:05.360 --> 0:50:07.120
<v Speaker 1>will be one of the first two things that come

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>up for you. They always do a great job of

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:12.160
<v Speaker 1>just on one page you can see all the winner

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>since they have links to the various studies. Now, sometimes

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>those studies are gonna be hidden behind pay walls or

0:50:20.120 --> 0:50:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in one case, for one of the award winners this

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>year entirely in Japanese. There's one about like how do

0:50:26.200 --> 0:50:29.320
<v Speaker 1>people turn a door knob? That I wanted to know

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:32.640
<v Speaker 1>more about, but I could not find an English translation

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of the study, so I'm just had to be like,

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:35.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, I just I'm gonna have to leave this

0:50:35.880 --> 0:50:39.839
<v Speaker 1>whe it phays value. So anyway, check that out. There

0:50:39.960 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>always a lot of fun, and of course we have

0:50:41.880 --> 0:50:44.239
<v Speaker 1>past episodes of stuff to blow your mind that have

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:47.279
<v Speaker 1>looked at winners from years past. So that's gonna be

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 1>it for this episode. But let's see just to run

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>through a few things here. Um. First of all, yes,

0:50:53.239 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 1>core episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind come to

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:57.239
<v Speaker 1>you on two days and Thursdays. And the Stuff to

0:50:57.280 --> 0:50:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind podcast feed, where you can find wherever

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you get your pot gusts. On Monday's we do listener mail,

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday's we do a short form monster fact or

0:51:04.920 --> 0:51:07.600
<v Speaker 1>artifact episode, and on Fridays we do Weird How Cinema.

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:10.160
<v Speaker 1>That's their time to set aside most serious concerns and

0:51:10.360 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 1>just talk about a weird film. Thanks as always to

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Set for producing the show and of course on this

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:20.399
<v Speaker 1>episode co hosting while Joe was out on for rental leave.

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:21.920
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to get in touch with us

0:51:21.960 --> 0:51:24.960
<v Speaker 1>about anything we discussed here about other ig Nobel Prize

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 1>winning studies, about past episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind,

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:30.800
<v Speaker 1>present episodes and Stuff to Blow Your Mind or future episodes,

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>just drop us a line at contact at Stuff to

0:51:33.719 --> 0:51:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:46.440
<v Speaker 1>is production of iHeart Radio. For more podcasts for My

0:51:46.480 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or

0:51:49.560 --> 0:52:03.439
<v Speaker 1>wherever you're listening to your favorite shows. Times to three

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:03.719
<v Speaker 1>po