WEBVTT - Monologue: The Agony Of GPT-5

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Also media hell, and welcome to this week's better Offline Monologue.

0:00:07.560 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, led Zeitron, and this has been a

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>tough week. I'm not gonna lie. Monday, we recorded a

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>wonderful episode with Victoria's song and Ashmun Rodriguez, which got

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 1>lost due to a technical four. And then I recorded

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>this in time monolog, which then got lost to a

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>completely different different computer, different room, different place, technical error.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I love making this show for all of you. It's

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>been kind of a pisser, but it's important we get

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>on top of this goddamn subject. So check the episode notes,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>buy a challenge coin, read the newsletter. A's a premium

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>version unrelated to this show. I'd love if you'd subscribe,

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't, I won't feel anything. Don't worry

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>about it, but let's get to it. Last week open

0:00:52.800 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Ai launched GPT five, a new flagship model of some

0:00:55.760 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>sort that's allegedly better at coding and writing, but in

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>reality is much more of the same. Another model is

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>interterminately better at benchmarks built specifically for large language moddles,

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>because they can't do actual work. The Wall Street Journal

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>reported late last year that it took multiple half billion

0:01:11.160 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar training runs to get GPT five off the ground,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and Altman him said said in the podcast with theovon

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of all people at GPT five scared him and made

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>him say, what have we done? And that's a good

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>bloody question, Sammy. According to open Ai, GPT five is

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a unified system with a smart, efficient model that answers

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>most questions, a deeper reasoning model, and a real time

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>router that quickly decides which model to use based on

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>conversation type, complexity, tool needs. And you're explicit in tent.

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I read all of that out because I wanted you

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to hear how convoluted GPT five is and how much

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>effort open Ai has had to put in to create

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.279
<v Speaker 1>something that, based on all reports is fine. To quote

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Simon Willison, it just does stuff. Wowie zowie. In simpler terms,

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Chad GPT's version of GPT five takes the user's prompt

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and decides which modele to use as a result, using

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>one of a few submodels GPT five Regular, Mini or

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>now I know, and then spits out an output. And

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>there are rate limits, by the way, so if you

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>use it too much you get kicked down to many automatically.

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>If you ask it to think about something, it will

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>choose to engage the reasoning part of the model. These

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>things do not think, by the way. They are probabilistic models,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so reasoning is kind of like you get a prompt

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and then it reads the prompt with another model and says, Okay,

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what would the steps be to execute this? It has

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>some returns, but recent papers suggest that it doesn't work

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that well anyway. Using this, you mostly have to trust

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the open ai will choose the best model for the job,

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the cheapest one for open ai to serve,

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>which is what I think they're actually doing. As part

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of the launch, open ai has also killed access to

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>all other models that at least is planning to, and

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 1>truncated user access to two choices GPT five or GPT

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>five thinking with legacy models like four four many and

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>their associated rate limits gone immediately for most, though some

0:02:51.680 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of them are back, and in sixty days of people

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>paying two hundred dollars a month, you'll work out why

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm dithering in a second. This enraged the chat gp subreddit,

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>with users claiming that GPT five was and I quote,

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>wearing the skin of their dead friend, referring to GPT

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>four oh, and another saying that GPT four point five

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.639
<v Speaker 1>genuinely talk to them and as pathetic as it sounds,

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>was their only friend. And it must be clear, we

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>can make fun of these people if we want, but

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>this is actually genuinely sad. There is something going on

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>here where people are so lonely that they want to

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>talk to a chat bot. Mock them if you want,

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and some of you will, and I don't know if

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I even want to. But something is happening here and

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>it isn't brilliant. But after a few days, Clammy Samuel

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and restored access to GPT four overpaid users, and then

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this only matched the stem the type briefly, with one

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>user saying that their baby was back, that they cried

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and that they were crying as they wrote

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the post, ending by saying love you. I assumed to

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>GPT four zero. Here's the problem. Though, users are now

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>doubting that the four O that open Ai is restored

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is actually the same model. One post claims that four

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 1>roh has lost its soul, and another says that fourro

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>is lobotomized all the way down in one three. One

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>user said that four row had gotten markedly worse suddenly,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and another said it's definitely not the same, though others

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in the thread claimed that it was. Another post said

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>legacy GPT four row is GPT five in cosplay, even

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>as others pleaded with them and said it was exactly

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the same and that people were experiencing some strange phantom

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>love for placebo effect. And I think that's actually what's

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>going on, writ large. Chat GPT was never a success

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>based on its actual abilities or outputs or things it

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 1>could do, but a global marketing campaign perpetuated by it

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>taking business media asleep at the wheel, or worse still,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that wanted these companies to win and help them by lying.

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I have done a comprehensive evaluation of the last three

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>years of press around chat, GPT and GPT itself, and

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you will look in the things in twenty twenty three

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and there's shit that's just fucking made up. There's a

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>whole go and look up task Grabbit GPT four. There

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>are so many I'm a link one in the fucking notes.

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.039
<v Speaker 1>There are people that claim that GPT four ordered a

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.039
<v Speaker 1>task grab it to complete a capture. Now, on top

0:04:58.080 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of this not being a thing that task grabbit generally

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.799
<v Speaker 1>it does. This is from the system card of GPT

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:07.240
<v Speaker 1>four and it claims that it hired a taskrab, except

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>when you look at just said it messaged them. It's

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>very clearly made up. But everyone reported it as agents

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.520
<v Speaker 1>existing in twenty twenty three. Aha. Every time I read

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, I feel little goddamn insane. But anyway, because

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>these models do not have obvious replicable ways outside of

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:24.800
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks of testing what they can do, each user is

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.159
<v Speaker 1>effectively in a constant vibe check with the models, and

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the sycophantic qualities of GPT four oh were clearly enough

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to endear them to the platform. People using GPT four Oh,

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't tell you why it's different to GPT five

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>other than it feels less human or doesn't do the

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>same things, even if those things are kind of hard

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>to define. This is what happens when you build a

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>following for a product based on specious hype and vague

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>promises and lines of inference, of course, and then allow

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>users to make up the reasons that they care. You

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 1>begin engaging with the gamer mindset of vibes based fandom

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that's completely unbreakable unless you make one subtle change that

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you could never see coming that breaks the illusion, leading

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>to gamer like distrust and anger. You see, I theorized

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that the vast majority of chat GPT users do not

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>know where they used it in the first place. Three

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>years of immediate pressure to use AI that AI was

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the future, their boss is saying AI is important and

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that you would be left behind if you didn't use AI.

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Mean that people come to chat GPT to work out

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>why they're using it in the first place, which has

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 1>led to all sorts of bizarre emotional attachments, kind of

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>like one's attachments to a live service game and shout

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>out to Catharsis twenty three on Blue Sky, who made

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>this observation. As a result, users were incredibly sensitive to

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>changes like removing or changing a model because their association

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>with chat GPT was based on However, GPT four zero

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>works and sounds by ripping it out and replacing it

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with GPT five, users immediately felt jilted and swindled by

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>open AI, and much like a dying live service game,

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>any changes that have been made as a result were

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>met with paranoia and confusion. Clamiel Altman's attempts to paper

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>over the problem by boosting rate limits on GPT five's

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>thinking and restoring access to GPT four to ZH and

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 1>other models for pay maid users were not enough because,

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in a very real sense, many of those users could

0:07:04.000 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>not tell you what they liked four to oh to

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 1>begin with four oh wasn't good so much as it

0:07:08.520 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was an investment of time. By showing that open ai

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>is willing to cut things arbitrarily, users can no longer

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>trust that this investment of time is worthy, especially as

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>many complain that it launch GPD five deleted a bunch

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of conversations. Now open ai sits in an odd spot

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>where they're supposedly huge Manhattan Project level launch has been

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:30.559
<v Speaker 1>met with either apathy or agony. While they've plicated users

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, it's very clear that the vast

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>majority of users this, like GPT five and power users,

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>don't seem particularly impressed with it either. This was meant

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the big launch that changed things for open

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>ai forever, but it's turned into something of a mass

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>betrayal or just kind of a mass letdown. And because

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>it's based on vibes rather than its actual ability to

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>do something, there's very little one could do to fix

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this problem. It's unclear how all of this affects the

0:07:53.560 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>company long term, but things do not seem good. Sam

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Wortman has already said that open ai is having to

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>reallocate capacity for the couple of months prioritizing paying Chat

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.119
<v Speaker 1>GPT users of an API demand up from the current

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>allocated capacity and commitments that they've made to their customers

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>code for those who do not want to pay priority processing,

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>which is now available for any developer. It's also unclear

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>what happens next. GPT five is not the future. Open

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>ai is running out of capacity, and their product, despite

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the fanfare, has no capabilities or reasons to adopt it

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>that are really new or interesting. Years of allowing the

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>media to spin out ridiculous narratives about what AI can

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or could do using vague pablem that kind of suggests

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>they're more powerful than they are has created a pr

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>campaign for a product that does not exist, and the

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred million weekly active users of chat GPT have

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>clearly arrived there without much guidance. The attachment born of

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>compulsion and societal pressure rather than any real use cases.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>When you allow people to define an indeterminately powerful tool

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 1>by any standard they like, with no interest in correcting them,

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>with no interest in guiding them, with no interest in

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>actually showing them what it was that they were paying

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for others. Then it can generate staff, You'll create an

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>attachment to it that devis any real ability you have

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to control things. Open ai was never forced to productize

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and at scale. It's a very real possibility that people

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>have pressure by the media and society itself force themselves

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to find meaning in LMS somehow, even if it feels

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of stupid. And what I mean by this is

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you get to the product and there really isn't that

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>much guidance. Go on an open AI's website and have

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>a look at the chat GPT page and look at

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what it tells you to do. It's quite vague. You

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>can look at it can analyze data, right, it can

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>generate stuff. It helps you do ideas. Is that good?

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Am I smart for using this? Everything else you look

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>at in the software world will tell you what it

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is you're using it for any consumer driven software at

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the very least. Yeah, chat GPT's never had to because

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the media for three years or two years, I guess

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with chat GPT has kind of just sat there doing

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the work for them, telling them, oh, yeah, you can

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>use it as a powerful person a system assistant. How

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to assist me with what? Nasty? Kevin Russe creepy Kevin

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times a few weeks ago, when

0:10:07.960 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>he did Everyone's Using AI piece with Casey Newton, he

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>said that it's a powerful assistant. It's like, for what

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that? This shit can't control my calendar.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to touch in my emails. I don't

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>think most people do either. So you've just got people

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to use it as a shit, our search engine, an

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>online companion, and a brainstorming thing, which is a natural

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>way to get people kind of addicted, but addicted to

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a product you don't truly control and a product you

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>don't truly understand, one that can be swiped by just

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>about anyone. I actually think we're on the the kind

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of downward spiral for this shit. I am winking like

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a pig and squawking like a bird watching this happen.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Even core Weavers crashing as I record this. They're down

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeen point nine one percent. Still up too much, though,

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.599
<v Speaker 1>And I really do think something has shifted thanks to

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>GPT five, I'm a excited and like Doctor Stones once said,

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>get excited because I think the next few months, like

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>next year, is going to be chuckle heavy's. We're going

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to be whimsy pilled as we go through the remainder

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the AI Boom, and I'll be here to guide

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you through it. Thanks for listening.