WEBVTT - NFL Week 2 Picks: Nick Wright PREDICTS Eagles-Chiefs, Jaguars-Bengals, Falcons-Vikings & more!

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, demanse Week two gambling show. After a pretty successful, solid,

0:00:09.360 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>steady start to the year, let's look at how week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>one went again Friday night. That you know, my first

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>two picks on there were basically doa the Chiefs minus

0:00:24.520 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>three now when they had it tied. Uh well, actually

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess they never had it tie. They yeah, they

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>were town one and the down one really made it

0:00:34.080 --> 0:00:37.879
<v Speaker 1>to where like you're in trouble on that. Uh So

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>that was in bad shape. And Miami obviously was one

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of the worst picks of the weekend. The other three, though,

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 1>two of them were true never a doubters, and one

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>we just did a great job waiting to get optimal

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:54.960
<v Speaker 1>line value. Cleveland plus five against Cincinnati they should have

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>won outright. Raiders plus two and a half against New

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>England they did win outright, And we talked about this Tuesday.

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about it again. If you bet Buffalo against

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore early in the week, you lost because it was

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo minus one and a half and that wouldn't have been,

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, one of my picks. But as soon

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>as Buffalo, a great team was getting points at home,

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that is an auto of barring a catastrophic injury. That

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is an auto bet that might actually come up this

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>week as well. Buffalo plus one was the other winner.

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So we are three and two. We will take three

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>and two every single week of the year. Now that's

0:01:35.959 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a sixty percent clip. We'd be happy with it.

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's see how we do this week. Demanse tell America

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>my first pick.

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 2>We're coming in at New England plus one at Miami.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh so this is demans me still leaning a bit

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on what I thought about teams before the year and

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>try not to overreact to week one. So now you

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>might say you can over you know you are overreacting

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to week one by betting against Miami. This is not

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not my point. My point is this. I think

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 1>New England right now, going into the year, I thought

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>New England would be solid. They obviously didn't look at

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in Week one. But I also thought the Raiders were

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a good team. I don't think America, and

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the books think the Raiders necessarily are

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>a good team, and so they look at that Patriot

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.200
<v Speaker 1>loss as a total indictment. I don't necessarily look at

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>it that way. I do look at Miami as a

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>team that going into the year was teetering, and we said,

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, needed to get off to a good start,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and instead they played as poorly, basically as poorly as

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>any team in the league this first weekend. And so

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>because of that, I'm getting a point. I think Vrabel

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>is the better coach. I think Drake may should be

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the better quarterback. We'll see if he is. I think

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that they will try to run at Miami, and I

0:03:12.240 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>think New England will be able to confuse and disrupt Tua,

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and so I I like New England getting the one

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>point in Miami. Again, it's not supposed to be crazy

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>hot down there this week, and that's something that happens

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>sometimes September games in Miami. They get that home you

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>know heat edge. Now I understand that Tua and McDaniel

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are four and zero, you know, undefeated against the spread

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and straight up against the Patriots. That's not great, but

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it all could fall apart in Miami. I

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think this is an absolute, true must win for New

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>England if they have any playoff hopes. You can't started

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the year off losing to the Raiders at home and

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>then losing to the Dolphins after they got boat raced,

0:04:06.720 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I will take there. It's done, it's over

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>for them, and so I and I will take New

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>England plus a point. Your feelings on that.

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 2>I'm fair. I'm actually going with the Dolphins in my

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 2>in my herd picks. I think I've got the minus

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 2>one and a half or some minus one. I don't

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>know what the mine is, but uh, okay, yeah my

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.280
<v Speaker 2>one probably well because I think it might be Yeah,

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, so I'm fainting you there, but yeah, hopefully

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 2>that's a want and over you.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, Well I don't love that. I'll tell

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you to be honest, but that's okay, all right. Pick two.

0:04:43.680 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Next, you've got Jacksonville plus three at Cincinnati.

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I gotta tell you, I'm wishing we were doing

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>this show later in the week because my guess is,

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this thing kicks off at three and a half and

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 1>that's a very very very value half point. But still,

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Jacksonville's better than Cincinnati. I think the Jacksonville

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>best part of their defense is their pass rush, and

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Cincinnati is going to struggle with it. I

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>think that Cincinnati is not going to be able to

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>cover Brian Thomas Junior, who needs to, you know, should

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>have a bigger game than he had in Week one,

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and Travis Hunter, you know, was open for a seventy

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>yard touchdown and Trevor just missed him. I think that

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>we have seen Cincinnati's early season woes are not just

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a Week one thing. They're one and eleven in weeks

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>one and two, you know, or two and eleven now

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Zach Taylor era. I think Jacksonville wins this

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>game outright. If Cincinnati does win, I think it's similar

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to this past week where it is, you know, a

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>very very tight game that Cincinnati escapes with Joe Burrow

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in his career is three to eight against the spread

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in weeks one or two. Meanwhile, Trevor Lawrence has covered

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in five straight games, which as long as that streak

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Because Vegas still underestimates the Jacksonville Jaguars,

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 1>we did not bet them in Week one because I

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.640
<v Speaker 1>don't love laying points with Jacksonville, but getting points, I

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>will do it. I think Jacksonville wins this game twenty seven,

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. I will take the Jags getting three points.

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you there, You're with me, all right, I

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like that reminder about our friends, our new presenting sponsor,

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet. Everybody knows and loves the hard Rock

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>hotels and casinos, and now you can use the top

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>rated hard Rock Bet sportsbook to place your bets all

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>NFL season and beyond. Hard Rock Bet is the only

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.280
<v Speaker 1>legal sportsbook in the state of Florida, the only one

0:06:56.279 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in Florida, and it's also available in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois,

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 1>and Colorado, with more states launching all the time. You

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>can also play on hard Rock Bets online casino if

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you are in New Jersey. Throughout the football season, We'll

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>be using hard Rock Bet lines to make our predictions

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>for the biggest games as we gear up for the

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>NFL season. Sign up for hard Rock Bet, make a

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>five dollar bet and you'll get one hundred and fifty

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets if you win. Head over to

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:33.239
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet and sign up to make your first

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>deposit today payable in bonus bets, not a cash offer

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>offered by the Seminal Tribe of Florida In Florida, offered

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>by Seminal hard Rock Digital LLC and all other states.

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Must be twenty one plus and physically present in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana,

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia to play. Terms and

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>conditions apply. Concern about gambling in Florida, call one eight

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>eight eight admit it. In Indiana, if you were someone

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you know as a gambling problem wants help, call one

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and nine with it. Gambling problem called one

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred gambler in Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee,

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or Virginia. We only bet demands one favorite. Last week

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it was the Chiefs at lost. We are only betting

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 1>one favorite this week. Tell America what it is.

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 2>He's got Arizona minus six and a half of versus Carolina.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think Carolina might be truly truly awful and

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:43.360
<v Speaker 1>until proven otherwise. If I have a team that I

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>think could you know, be frisky adjacent, and it's there

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>at home and laying less than a touchdown against Carolina,

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll take them. I think that that Jonathan gannon defense,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>now that he finally has some personnel, could really give

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray trouble. I also think that Kyler himself could

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 1>make some could have some success against that Carolina defense.

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I also think that Carolina in Week one was a

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hot a top candidate for the team that looked the

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.959
<v Speaker 1>most out of sorts and the most like what were

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you guys doing all off season? And so because of that,

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think people didn't watch that game, in

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:45.199
<v Speaker 1>part because it was Jaggs Panthers, I understand, but also

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in part because there was that hour plus rain delay

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:53.839
<v Speaker 1>or weather delay that screwed things up. But this game,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Carolina's finished with ten points and seven of them were

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>total garbage time. Just get to the locker room an

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>end of game, you know, nonsense. Jacksonville scored twenty points

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 1>on its first four possessions and then basically just kicked

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 1>it into you know, second gear and coasted home. Travis

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Etienne ran all over Carolina, And I just think Carolina

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is really, really bad. And I'm not having to lay

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>more than a touchdown. I will lay the six and

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a half with Arizona.

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, That's why I'm with you there. Six and

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 2>a half's a lot Arizona. But yeah, Carolina sucks.

0:10:38.559 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean yeah, I mean it's a lot of points

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>to lay. But if yeah, I guess here's my point.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that they as long as they can get

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen, they'll cover. Like I think Carolina is gonna

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>struggle to break ten points and if they get to

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>if Arizona gets to twenty one, I'm certain they'll cover.

0:10:59.040 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I just I think Bryce is going to

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>struggle against that ganon defense. Allay the six and a half.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Next you've got Kansas City plus one versus Philly.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I'm just telling you guys right now, every time

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes is healthy and he's a home dog, he's

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 1>an auto bet. And it's only happened a couple times

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>in his career. And by the way, one of them

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>was I think against Buffalo in the regular season and

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>they lost. I don't care. It is a must bet.

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 1>It is wildly insulting for the Chiefs to be home

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>dogs this early in the season against a team at

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>any point, really, but against a team that didn't look

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that good in Week one. We spent a lot of

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>time discussing this game at the top of the show.

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>We don't have to spend more time on it here.

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you the Chiefs getting points in arrowhead

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in a game they want I don't know if we

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>want to say need, but need adjacent is a must fire.

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And so the Chiefs plus one in a game, I

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>expect them to win, outright, I'm just betting that every

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>single time.

0:12:09.520 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 2>I don't, I wouldn't take it, but I.

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Know you wouldn't. That's fine. Listen, And to your point

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>as far as my kind of blind, unwavering faith, it

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>was a whole two games ago that everyone thought they

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:26.319
<v Speaker 1>were about to win their third straight Super Bowl. I mean,

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this team, I mean, this team is just totally It's

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>been a long two games that has led from everyone

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>believing this team is about to pull off the unprecedented,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>impossible three peats two? Are they actually even gonna make

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs? May Listen, maybe my faith is unwavering, or

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe everyone else is just out of their mind.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>All right, say it's two games as if it's been

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:52.719
<v Speaker 2>like two days, and it's also been like.

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, what's that got to do with anything? It's

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>just people being bored, all right. Ever, sign up for

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a phone play thinking wow, amazing price, and a few

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.439
<v Speaker 1>months later, surprise your bills higher Boost Mobile, You've Bay

0:13:05.480 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars a month forever unlimited talk, text and data

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>starting at just twenty dollars a month, no price hikes,

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>no contract forever plus. Boost Mobile is now a legit

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>nationwide five G network. They've invested billions building five G

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>towers across the country. Visit boostmobile dot com or head

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>to your local Boost store today and get unlimited talk,

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>text and data for twenty five dollars a month forever.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Five G speed's not available in all areas after thirty gigs,

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>customers may experience lower speeds. Customers will pay twenty dollars

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a month as long as they remain active on the

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Boost Unlimited plan.

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, next, so you've got Atlanta plus four and

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 2>a half at Minnesota. Oh you just got it. You

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 2>got an extra half point.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I like this at Atlanta plus four. But it's

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but a hard rock bet as of this morning, and

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>again we're doing this Wednesday mornings four and a half.

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 1>So here's the deal. I thought it was a great

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>win by the Vikings Monday night, but they didn't look

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like awesome. Atlanta played a team that I think is

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>really good in Tampa and played them right down to

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the wire. Had a young way coup kick to force

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:21.760
<v Speaker 1>overtime that he just pushed right and I'm getting points.

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a Pinnix JJ McCarthy National Championship Game rematch, Minnesota's

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>on a short week. It would not shock me at

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all if Atlanta wins this game. Minnesota is not to

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>me in a position where they're gonna be blowing anybody out,

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>as JJ McCarthy is a kind of you know, work

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in progress. So I was, I was shocked by this line.

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was gonna be Minnesota minus two and

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a half. Minnesota minus four and a half is just

0:14:55.360 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>too attractive. And again Pinnix has shown you a not

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot, but enough in his limited sample of like, Okay,

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I see what we're working with here. Again,

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I could see this being twenty to seventeen Atlanta much less,

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, and twenty to seventeen Minnesota. I still win.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I like Atlanta in this spot indoors, short week, Minnesota,

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta coming off a tough loss, Minnesota coming off you

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean, a kind of great win. Those

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 1>factors kind of play against each other following week. So

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Demonse my five picks this week. Once again, we're going

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>with four dogs. We have New England plus one at Miami,

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Jacksonville plus three at Cincy, Arizona minus eight and a

0:15:45.600 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>half at home against Carolina, kans City plus one at

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>home against Philly and Atlanta plus four and a half

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>at Minnesota. Now to your teaser, my friend, one to oh.

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Last week, to remind America what a great teaser it was,

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you had a three team eight point teaser at even money.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You had Dallas getting sixteen. They could have won out right.

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You had Cleveland getting thirteen, they could have won out right.

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>You had Buffalo getting nine. They did win outright. This

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a hard one to top. Let

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>me hear what you got.

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you're probably not. You're not gonna dig

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 2>this one. But we got a three team eight point

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 2>team teaser. It's at plus one hundred, just like last week's.

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>We're teasing Tampa Bay up to ten and a half,

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>and we're teasing the Jags up to eleven, and then

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna tease Philly up to seven. I hate going

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>against the grain like this. I love you, Pops, but

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I gotta take that Phil And I know it's just

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 2>across the zero, but it's only one point.

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>It's like Philly and you're getting key numbers there. I

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't hate it, Demands, because I don't

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>think that Chiefs are gonna have like without Xavier and Rashi,

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>what are the Chiefs paths to winning by double digits?

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Which is you know what I mean, like Barry slim.

0:17:10.359 --> 0:17:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Philly disaster if like I think that's disastrous, if that is.

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if you if you get blown out by the

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs when they don't have their top two receiver Shore, Yeah,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And so like my game pick for Casey Philly is

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven to twenty four Kansas City, and I love

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the other legs of it. So you're getting Tampa the

0:17:29.600 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>we talked about this game earlier. It's Tampa is playing

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>the Texans. You're getting Tampa and you're getting ten and

0:17:35.240 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a half points. Yeah, but you're and you're getting ten

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half points on Monday night and Jacksonville against

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati and you're getting eleven points. I like this one

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot, Demanda. You get through all the key numbers.

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Your again, like you said, teas through the zero is

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not ideal, but.

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 2>This one it's one. I feel like it's one.

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a little different. Yes, agreed. Uh, I'm gonna give

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this like. I like this teaser a lot. I think

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>this is I think that's a sharp bet. And I

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 1>also think that like Jacksonville and Tampa also have massive

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>even if the game really gets away from him against

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>for Jacksonville, against that defense in Cincinnati and Tampa with

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>just Baker's kind of disposition, the chance for a back

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>door late touchdown down fourteen points or even down seventeen

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>points to cover. I love it, so I listen. I

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's really good, all right. The offer last week missed.

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:45.440
<v Speaker 1>It was in theory one pass away from hitting because Trevor.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>We needed two Trevor touchdowns he finished with one. You

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 1>would have needed under one Trevor interception. He finished one

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and the Jags win. But it he had Travis Hunter

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>for what could have been a seventy yard touchdown and

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>j C. Horn just snagged it out of the air.

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But I smartly stayed away from it. What is this

0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>week's teaser up? I'm sorry, offer option.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 2>The offer We're gonna follow up with what we saw

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>on Monday Night Football with Caleb and the Bears. So

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 2>they had a good game script and they were ahead

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>of everything early, but then they blew it. So the

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>offer this week is Chicago first half plus three and

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 2>a half mixed with Detroit UT minus five minus five

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 2>and a half at plus five hundred.

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's Chicago to cover in the first half, Detroit

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to cover in the game. I get five and a half.

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>And I say this with respecting kindly, this is maybe

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the worst offer we've had yet. I hate this one

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>so much. I understand that that is what happened last week.

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:57.639
<v Speaker 1>I am not interested in betting Chicago plus three and

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>a half and trying to just bear win that. So

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>then I'm on pace to win Detroit minus five and

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a half. That is, I would need ten to one odds,

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>not five to one. I am going to kindly reject

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the offer for the second straight week. I do, however,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have before we wrap the show something that I think

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:23.439
<v Speaker 1>the producers are going to really be interested in Demons. So,

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know my friends at Splash Sports doing these survivor

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:31.719
<v Speaker 1>pools with them. They season started, so you know, what

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna do? They presented me with an idea

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>of what if starting I think not this week but

0:20:39.280 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>next week, so it'd start in week three and they

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>said for this one they might put a guarantee on it.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I think one hundred thousand dollars guarantee and fifty bucks.

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It would be fifty bucks to enter, so you would

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>need what two thousand people to hit the guarantee, but whatever,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that's their money, not mine. It is in any Time

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Touchdown Survivor Pool, so every week you have to pick

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 1>one person to score a touchdown. You then can't use

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>that person again obviously all year, and it's that you know,

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you miss one and you're out. I think that's a

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty fun one. I've never I've never thought of an

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Anytime Touchdown Survivor pool, but the producers love themselves in

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Anytime Touchdown bet. They just love it. So I think

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>we might get that going with Splash Sports for starting

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in week three, So that would be super fun. So

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I think we're gonna do that