WEBVTT - Supply Chain, Interest Rates, And Trading Sentiment (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Matt and I have

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.280
<v Speaker 1>really been focusing on during this whole pandemic, the global

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issue, because that affects so many companies in

0:00:29.000 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>so many industries on a global scale, and weekend we

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>still don't. We heard about it again today from Targets,

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>so huge issue. The New York Federal Reserve Bank is

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>weighing in now and they've got what I'm what they're

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>calling today the New York Federal New York Fed Global

0:00:42.720 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Supply Chain Pressure Index. That's what we need. I need

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.520
<v Speaker 1>a picture, I need some numbers, and Dr John grown

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us here. He is Economic Research Advisor for the

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Dr Groan, thanks so

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us here. Supply cham I'm looking at

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>your graph. Tell me what your index is. What it

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>tries to measure and what it's telling you, sure, good morning,

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and thank you for having me on. So what we're

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>launching you to this this morning is what we've denoted

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>as the Global Supply Chain Pressure Index or g s

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>c p I, and it's a it's a single measure

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>of global supply chain pressures, uh, and it's it's can

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>be used to gauge the importance of the disruptions to

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:27.800
<v Speaker 1>global supply chains and how they infect economic conditions and

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>how they these constrains uh evolve over time. Basically, all right,

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>so I'm looking for the folks on radio. I'm looking

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>at a graph here and it just kind of shows

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>the standard deviations from the average supply chain time goes

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>back to it's usually plus one minus one. We're up

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like plus three, four or five. I mean, give us

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a sense of kind of the the magnitude of the

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>supply chain shock we're experiencing right now. Yeah, So basically

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen since to e twenties, essentially precious has

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:06.639
<v Speaker 1>been like at the peak, it was like five times

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 1>as high as the average level of the whole sample. Right,

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so starting from to twenty two, uh so before twenty

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>really we haven't seen anything even closer that. I mean,

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>what what what has been closes was what happened during

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven, you know, when we had the Fukushima earthquake

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that hit a lot of the Japanese supply chains, and

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>then later that year the flow floodings in Thailands, which

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>which had hit a lot of like companies that you

0:02:38.200 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>know were supplying electric components to you know, electronic electronic

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>producers and auto producers. So this is like completely unprecedented. Uh,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, that's it's it's a new unique phase in

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the global economy. So what is it taking into account? Exactly?

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Is these transportation cost is this raw input coast um?

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>What are we looking at in terms of the contributors

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to this index? Right, So basically the index summarizes developments

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in twenty seven series and basically there are two main

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>categories of global transportation costs and then regional surveys about

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the state of manufacturing in in in seven inter linked economy.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>So in terms of the transportation cost you know, they're

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>looking we're looking at you know, the b d I

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, which is a measure of just war war

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>raw good shipping transportation, and we're also looking at the

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 1>container shipping rates. And then in terms of you know,

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturing data, we we we really heavily rely on

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>p m I surveys and especially data about you know,

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>supply supply delivery times, backlogs and inventories of manufacturing firms

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in UH in the US, in China and Taiwan, South Korea, Japan,

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the Ara area, and in the UK. So DR going

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investors, you know, I think as they

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>think about inflation, they want to get a sense of

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>has it peaked to what extent and what you know,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of rate will it decline? What is has your

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>data indicated to you that perhaps the supply chain bottlenecks

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>have peaked, well, so what the what the index really

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>shows that the peak up to now was kind of

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>reach in December, So then we reased you know a

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>level of like five times higher disruptions than than the average.

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And between December and basically April, we've seen a steady

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>decline I mean at the motor pace, but quite steady,

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but still well made that historically historically high level. So

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it still was about you know, less than three three

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>times the average level. What we've seen having in April

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a little bit of a resurgence in disruptions.

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>So pastures went up again on the back of you know,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the geopolitical tensions in Europe due to the Ukraine Russia

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>conflict as well as the COVID lockdowns in China. So

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>it went back up to just over three times the

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>average levels. So yes, we speak, but it seems to

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.119
<v Speaker 1>do at the moment, seems to botton out and maybe

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>become a little bit worse again. I mean going forward.

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>This measure is not a forecasting measure for future supply

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>chain pressures. I mean it's more like where we are

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 1>now at the moment. But it would be interesting to see,

0:05:41.760 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know how how it involved going forward. Alright, good stuff,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.039
<v Speaker 1>very interesting that to young grown economic research advisor for

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the New York

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Fed releasing today a brand new index that tries to

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>measure the supply chain is called the New York Fed

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Global Supply Chain Pressure Index. Fascinating stuff because again it

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>is an issue that really has come to the fore

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and made all of us, i think, kind of experts

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>at logistics and supply chain and all that type of stuff.

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Because Curtty we hear about it from all different types

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of companies. Yeah, we really do. I mean we're talking

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>about retailers heavily in focus right now. But wasn't this

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the story for Tactics a couple of weeks earlier. I mean,

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these chip shortages that we've been talking about

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for going on two years now, they are still there.

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>That chip shortage is still there. You hear it in

0:06:26.400 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>automakers even trying to get their hands on metals. So

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>this isn't a a right now story. But I think

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>he made a very apt point in the nine o'clock

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is we've been talking about this for ages, why is

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the market still not pricing it in? Yeah, it's interesting,

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, part of it is China and

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>getting those factories open on a consistent basis. And we're

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>starting to hear some news that parts of China are

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>starting to reopen, and most notably in the Shanghai region,

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that will help things. And we had the

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>head of the l A Ports on yesterday he sees

0:06:54.200 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the backlog of ships off the port coming down. You've

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>got gasoline prices at the pump uh at or near

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a record high. I think about Matt having to flow

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 1>up that twenty three gallon. I don't know what is it,

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Chevy Silverado pickup truck, gas tank that's gonna be You're

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna take out a mortgage to do that? All right,

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's check in on the consumer here. We've had a

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of retail sales numbers, We've had a lot of

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>retailers report quarterly earnings. Uh, A mixed back here, but

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>inflation is the number one story we had earlier President

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago FED, President Charles Evanson with Michael McKee talking

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about the offensibility to impact and lower inflation. Let's check

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in with Jennifer Leasing, your economist and managing director for

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>BMO Capital Markets. Uh. Jennifer, again, the Federal Reserve seems

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to be laser focused on inflation. In reality, how much

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>can they impact inflation when some of the inflation we're

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing is just kind of commodity driven, whether it's gasoline

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 1>or food prices. How do you think about its ability

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to impact and good morning? UM. I think they have

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good way of a pretty as strong UM handle.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I think on on what they or their tools of

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 1>what they can do to UM to to curb inflation

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>or to rein up back to the two percent a target.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's going to be painful as that share Powell

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>has has said, and you know, it's just going to

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>be using higher rates and they're going to keep going higher.

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's like you just said that they're almost very

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>much laser focused now it was. It's kind of funny.

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like last year it was almost like they were

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:34.959
<v Speaker 1>looking for a reason to tighten, and now it's almost

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like they're looking for a reason to stop. You know,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>they're going to keep going faster and higher, and they're

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>just going to go beyond neutral before they stop and

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>take a break. Jennifer, there's a difference between an outright recession,

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a contraction of the economy and to slow down. And

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>it feels like, if you are listening to the market commentary,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we've gone very quickly from a deceleration and growth to

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>an outright recession. Is that justify? So this is where

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it gets a little dicey, Okay. So in in you know,

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 1>your textbook term of recession is two consecutive quarters of decline,

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and we've already had one quarter on the headline drop

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in GP at one point four percent annualized. Again in

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Q one and um, you know Q two's I don't

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be a decline, but I mean it

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly does feel like a recession. But again I'm just

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna focus now on the first quarter, Like what dropped,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>what caused GDP to slow down? It was all imports,

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>like a huge surgeon imports, which speaks to very strong

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>domestic demand and less or slower inventory accumulation. Businesses are

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>still trying to you know, stock the shelves, but they're

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>doing it at a slower pace because they can't get

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 1>enough stuff to stuff to to stock their shelves with.

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>So you know, again the headline figure is because suggest

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that there is recession, but again I don't think it's

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the true true definition. Um. And I'm going to point to,

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the fact that we still had a really

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>solid retail sales figure for April, which do you guys

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>are all talking about yesterday? Um, And even though it's

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>a nominal terms, you know, in real terms, it was

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of flat from ugal levels. But the still fact

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that consumers are still well, they're buying, I think speaks volumes.

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>In the fact that there's still a very strong labor

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>market for now, and that guarantees that you know if

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:15.719
<v Speaker 1>you have ever wage, if you sort off, you have

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 1>a job, then that means you're going to get a

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>study paycheck, which I think is um the key factor

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to all of this. You mentioned inventories. That's a really

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>key piece. I wanted to kind of harp on and on.

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>In Target earnings today, you heard that one of the

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>costs from or when the margin pressures was coming not

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>from headcount of compensation in their stores, but in their

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>distribution centers. And I've actually chart this. You can do

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this folks on the terminal and chart the inventory to

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>sales spread of a lot of these major retailers. It's

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>essentially spiking to a twenty year high, which I believe

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is as far as the data goes. Jennifer, I have

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to ask you if you see this inventory build up

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't create more reasons for the economy to slow down.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>The idea being that if you see demand slow down,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>even demand increase for that matter, and you have this

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>inventory build up, there's less incentive to produce more things

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>or even import more things. Does that add to the slowdown? Well,

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's um. The fact that you're adding to

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>their inventories you know, um, you know, from on a

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>trend basis, I guess that is actually adding um to

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.839
<v Speaker 1>growth and that's not potentially slowing it down. But you know,

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>of course you've got it's like you just pointed out,

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you just have to look at the the demand side,

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and so far there is still and I'm going to say,

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>there's still a lot of strong demand. There's still a

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, a lot of businesses waiting for items

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 1>to come through. Um. You know, I I love to

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the I s M surveys not for the headlines,

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but for the comments, and for these are the people

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that are directly working you know, Um, they're they're they're

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>are you know, in the factories, and they're the ones

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>who are counting all the widgets that are coming in.

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>And all the comments still point to the fact that

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they are running low on materials and that which is

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>driving costs higher. Um. And still you know, there's still

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of demand. But the interesting thing to all

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of this is that businesses are actually turning down orders

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:02.760
<v Speaker 1>still because you know, it's like it's almost like your

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>money is don't go here, right you um, uh, your

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>orders are coming in, but sorry, we can't fulfill it

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>out of reasonable time, so you know, we we can't

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>take your order right now, which is a very weird

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>place to be at right now. But I still think

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that there is demand out there. As long as there

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is demand, the inventory levels, you know, they're just trying

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>to build it up in order to meet that, all right.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Lee, thank you so much for joining us giving

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts here on these markets, on this federal reserve,

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 1>and on inflation that is rife in this economy. Jennifer Lee,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Senior economist and Managing director for BMO Capita Markets. Looking

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 1>at the markets here, rolling over yet again, we're down

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 1>about two percent here on the SMP five, a little

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>more than two percent on nastack. Looking at the tenure treasury, Uh,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit out there for the tenure treasure. Yields

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.959
<v Speaker 1>are coming back. We have the tenure yielding two point

0:12:50.040 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>nine three percent. We were about three percent uh this morning,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so yields really coming in. Oil. Crew to oil was

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit earlier, but the off just slegged

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:00.960
<v Speaker 1>off about a half percent for w t I crude

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>oil that's called twelve dollars a barrel, still way elevated.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Do we have a bottom in this market. I don't

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:13.679
<v Speaker 1>think so, and not by today's trading hill off another

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>one point eight percent on the smp UH five hundred.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>But let's talk to somebody who does this for a

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>living and talks to traders for a living. Barry metzger

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>managing director and head of Trading and Education at Charles Schwab,

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>joins us here in our Bloomberg in our actor Broker

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>studio Live. He's in town in the Bloomberg headquarters for

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a Bloomberg Intelligence Investor conference today. Barry, thanks so much

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. You know, I think the question

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that I started hearing more and more in the last

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>week or two is are we at the bottom? How

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>do I identify a bottom? When you talk to your traders,

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>when you do your surveys, our traders thinking about calling

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 1>a bottom anytime soon? Well, first of all, Paul, it's

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>great to be here live, so thanks for having me.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, our traders are very vocal, and you know,

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to calling a bottom, that's always tough.

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>But certainly what we seen in this recent survey as

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>clients are very bearish. They are definitely bearish given the UH,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>given the events inflation is absolutely on their mind. I

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>would say issues one, two, and three are inflation, inflation, inflation.

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So when you take that into account, and we listened

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to the survey from our clients, you know that inflation

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>issues the biggest one. And I would say from the data,

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a third of our clients stint inflation is going to

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>stick around for a little bit. But um, excuse me,

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a third of them think it's gonna last until so

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>based on that sunament, that's that could be quite well too.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Thirds thinks it's a little bit more of a shorter term.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>But um, certainly our clients are looking at what we're

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>calling a Russian Bear Russian Bear meeting. All the three

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>major industries are down in Bear territory by the end

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of two a Russian Bear, a Russian Bear tie to Ukraine.

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course. Um, you know it's interesting. I camera christ

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>our Macroman strategist. Always he was when my teachers used

0:14:57.360 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to tell me find the historical precedents that I've been

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>obset with the nineteen sixty two President Cuban missile crisis,

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the market just slid for nine months straight and didn't

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>recover until the Cuban missile crisis was over. So I

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>have to ask, we're painting a lot of the sell

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>off on inflation, We're painting it on supply chain issues,

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>even COVID. The minute the war in Ukraine ends, whenever

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that might be, is that when we see a complete turnaround. Yeah,

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly our clients are very much looking at the geopolitical

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>roosts in Ukraine. So, as I mentioned, inflation is number one,

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine is absolutely number two. So could you see a

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>bump based on what our clients are saying once that ends,

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and what does that look like? It depends, But I

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>would certainly think there would be positive news based on

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing, But a lot more goes into it

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>as well. You know, it is inflation, it is Ukraine,

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 1>but it is you know, obviously the prices that they're seeing.

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, the question I get after often a lot is, Okay,

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>if if I were to hand you ten thousand dollars,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>what would you do with that? You know, that decision

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:55.120
<v Speaker 1>was pretty easy a couple of years ago. You could

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>put in your megacap socks and be happy. Now all

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, you gotta pause, you have to think

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>about it. And our clients are actually looking more towards

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>real estate, um oil, gold, and even crypto as potential

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>other investments besides the typical ones that we've seen. Yeah,

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. I mean the we had the Chicago FED

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>President Charles Evans on Bloomberg Radio television earlier this morning,

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, he was saying, as you were saying,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that the Fed is absolutely laser focused on inflation. Um.

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That kind of goes to the point they're going to

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>be aggressive here and they've already shown to be aggressive.

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of begs a question, what risk assets

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>can perform well in that type of environment. Yeah, great question.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, when we looked at the survey, clients

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>did address this. And you know, when the survey was taken,

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think most of our clients were thinking twenty five

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>basis point increase was kind of the norm. If we

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>had that survey taken today, they would probably be more

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>a half or even you know, three quarters, So maybe

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>even a different pump um. You know, it's it's hard

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to say. I think this speaks to having a diversified portfolio.

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this gets back to some of the basics

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of having a financial plan, understand your goals. Look, I

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>leave the trading business. But I'm still a believer in

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.760
<v Speaker 1>your wealth management principles of having a plan tied your

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>goals and objectives, having an asset allocated portfolio. And there's

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>times when you need to ignore the noise um. And

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we've heard that many, many times, and so this, you know,

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>for many investors, I think it is playing a little

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>bit of the long game versus trying to get you know,

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>swept up in some of these short term markets, which

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I think is really really important. I'm glad you mentioned

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a short term markets because you also said the conversation

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>on where you spend your ten thousand dollars is really

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>easy two years ago, but not so easy now. So

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>let's put this to you. You have ten thousand dollars,

0:17:37.840 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>You've got a three month time horizon. Where do you

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 1>put it? So I'm not going to leave it in

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>bank in the bank, I'm not going to leave it

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in cash. Listen. I still go to the the the

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.119
<v Speaker 1>philosophy of you know, if you walk past the store

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>and you see an item that you wanted me to

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>buy that was thirty or off, you're gonna buy it

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>right away, like wow, such a deal. But when it's

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the market um for some reason, people are hesitant to

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>take advantage that. So I would still look for opportunities

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>that are tied to my objectives. Do a little dollar

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>cost averaging, maybe not all once, but look at different

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>sectors that I believe in more for the long term

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>and start buying them on a discount. So that could

0:18:13.320 --> 0:18:15.840
<v Speaker 1>be you know, your typical large cap sectors as well.

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And but I think there are opportunities for alternative investments,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like I said earlier, and I do think there's some

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.719
<v Speaker 1>other opportunities specifically in rates, just like our clients are

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that do look opportunistic, you know, we're you know.

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>There's one of the stock stories of the day today.

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Barry was a target reported some numbers with some disappointing guidance,

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>citing the cost inflation impacting their business and their consumers.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Started the day a hundred billion dollar market cap. It's

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>off twenty five percent. It is rare in my experience

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>to see such a large company very liquidly traded. Thirty

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>one analysts follow the stock, widely held by some of

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the smartest institutional investors. What does it tell you about

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>when when you see the price action in a big

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 1>cap stock like that today. Yeah, I mean we're we're

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:01.919
<v Speaker 1>seeing the in lots of different places. I think this again,

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.239
<v Speaker 1>ghost e fact, you certainly don't want to have all

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>your eggs in one basket, um, because you never know

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 1>what could happen with that basket. I mean, the markets

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>can be unpredictable. I think the important thing in all

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>sincerity is not to panic and not to make grass decisions. Uh,

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's to stick to your fundamental plans and recognize that

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>markets move, and markets can move quickly, and it always

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.440
<v Speaker 1>seems like, man, they fall so much quicker than they rise. Um.

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And so maybe a good day for those of you

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>invest in that To turn off the screens, that's okay,

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.719
<v Speaker 1>but take a long view approach versus getting whipsawed by

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the news on a day to day basis. Are you

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 1>still seeing I mean your schwab, you've got the you know,

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you get the greatest view on individual traders and retail

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 1>What are the retail folks doing these days? Yah? So

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>retail folks are certainly still engaged in what we see

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of our more active traders is um.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Even though there's more volatility, more unpredictability in the markets,

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.679
<v Speaker 1>and maybe certain sectors that they had to invest in.

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 1>They're still using this time time to stay educated. I

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's really important. In my role, it's trading and education,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and education, in my opinion, has never been more important.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>So let's say the example you said about ten dollars,

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't investor right away. Maybe I spend more

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>time researching, spend more time understanding different strategies that I

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.440
<v Speaker 1>could be utilizing, maybe looking at more risk, defying strategies,

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>utilizing options, and other areas that potentially can help my

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>portfolio or had some risk. So I would say, by

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and by and large, our clients are actively staying engage,

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>utilizing more education, and trying to get more knowledgeable about

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets. All right, verty great stuff. Really appreciate you

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 1>coming into the Bloomberg studio. Barry Metzger, He's managing director

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and head of Trading an Education at Charles Schwab. All right,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at d X Y index here, the dollar

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.880
<v Speaker 1>index on a trailing twelve month basis. We started about

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a year ago down around ninety. The index today's one

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 1>h three spots six. Just a steady, steady move higher

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for the green back. Is there a bear case out there?

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 1>For the dollar. Brent Don, president of Spectr Markets, joins us. Brent,

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean the the US dollar has just been marching

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 1>higher and higher and higher. Is there a bear case

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>for the dollar? Hey, good morning, Paul. Yeah, that's a

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.840
<v Speaker 1>really interesting thing that's happened. Is the death of the

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.720
<v Speaker 1>dollar is a popular theme, right It always is a

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>popular theme. Ever since I was a kid. It's been

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>a popular theme. And yet it's just a theme that

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:31.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work very well. Um. Currently with two engines of growth,

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>China and Europe are both sputtering and you really see

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that especially in new orders UM and expectations in Europe. UM.

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.359
<v Speaker 1>The dollar is kind of the cleanest dirty shirt right now.

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:46.479
<v Speaker 1>People thought that with the swift band on Russia that

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that would be some kind of warning signed to other

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:54.199
<v Speaker 1>central banks to stay away from from US assets. The

0:21:54.240 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>weaponization of the dollar potentially could have been negative for

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, but it hasn't had any impact at all,

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, it hasn't even had an impact on gold.

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Where people thought that was the obvious trade was if

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>central banks are going to move away from US assets,

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and they certainly don't want European assets because they bend

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they made the band as well. Then gold seemed like

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>an obvious beneficiary, and yet there's been no evidence of

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>central banks buying gold either. So what it comes back

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to is the US is the most liquid capital market

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and when people are nervous, even if

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>US equities are underperforming, which they are, when people are nervous,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they come and buy the dollar. Brent Donnelly, I was like,

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this name sounds so familiar in the pole, I realized

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I have his book on my bookshelf, really the Art

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>of Currency Trading. Well, he's been all currencies, yeah, HSBC,

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Lehman Brothers, Nomura, I mean, totally an expert on the dollar.

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, it's very cool to speak to an author

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I know for my bookshelf. But Brent, I have to

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 1>ask you about stagflation. That seems to be a ward

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that comes up over and over and over agun Is

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that a inevitability for the United States or for Europe.

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say it's inevitable. Um, you know, forecasting is

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>hard and that's something I say in my book, but

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say that so stagflation, stagflation obviously is stagnation

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>and inflation. I don't think I need to talk about

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 1>the inflation side, um, But the concern now is that Okay,

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>first of all, you have Europe and China are both problematic.

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, new orders, especially which tends to be

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.679
<v Speaker 1>the most forward looking, is really ugly, especially in Europe.

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is now in the US people focus

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>on on lagging data like the unemployment rate, But if

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you listen to the conference calls and you look at

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the more recent anecdotal stuff, those anecdotes add up to

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of concern, even on the labor market.

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't say that it's recessionary type of concern.

0:23:54.320 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>But if you look at Amazon, Netflix, Facebook, Twitter, cameo Carvon,

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean I could actually make a longer list than that.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:05.359
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of either hiring restraint announcements or

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>outright layoffs, and that kind of stuff doesn't show up

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.399
<v Speaker 1>in the data for a while. So I think people

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that are relying on a strong US jobs market to

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:18.240
<v Speaker 1>make the case that everything's fine are probably a slightly

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>misguided because that the unemployment rate specifically is a very

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lagging indicator. And to me, the the drop in unemployment

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>or the freezes and or the freezes and employment are

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>very reminiscent of two thousand, two thousand one. If you

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>remember that era, stocks dropped about before you saw anything

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.720
<v Speaker 1>in in the unemployment or initial claims data. UM. So

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>now you have the disruption and work from home stocks

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:50.919
<v Speaker 1>all down around and then the exact same pattern plays

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:55.119
<v Speaker 1>out where hiring slows because these tech companies know that

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the financing is drying up right. It's Powell Is is

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>tightening financial conditions and VC and everyone is feeling that.

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>So anyone that overbuilt, like Carbona being an extreme example,

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but even Amazon being another example, really have to pull

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 1>back the reins now, UM, and specifically the tech companies

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that lose a lot of money are not going to

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.240
<v Speaker 1>have easy access to free money anymore. So I think

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that's leading to a drop in confidence, and you see

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that in the consumer confidence data. Now much of that's

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>driven by inflation, but now you're starting to see a

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit of concern about employment too. So I think

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we're on the front edge of the stagnation part um,

0:25:38.400 --> 0:25:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and we really have to monitor the data and actually,

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:44.119
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, I think monitor the conference calls of of

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>the big names because you look at Target and Walmart.

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>UM also kind of concerning right, you're moving out of

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the tech area and now into the consumer and that's

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit worrisome too. So I would say people

0:25:57.400 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>should be worrying about stagflation, all right, Brent, good stuff.

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate you taking the time talking to us about

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>this economy, talking to us about the currency markets here,

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>focusing on again not just the government information, but UH

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>info and forward forecast, forward looks from a lot of

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>these companies. Brent Downley, president of Spectr Markets. He spent

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>uh many many years trading currencies across Wall streeted number

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of firms, so he's got a good feel for here,

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>what moves this U S Dollar relative to other currencies,

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>UM and economic winds that push these currencies, uh, you know,

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>from up and down on a global scale. So I

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>always love talking to f X people just kind of

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>market rolling over here, uh cretty. So a lot of

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>folks not liking what they're seeing, not feeling like we've

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>seen a bottom in this market. Got some more room

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to go. We have this fedtle reserve of course raising rates. Uh.

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>And again a little bit of concern coming out of

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>these retailers over the last three or four days as

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>it relates to kind of the inflation impact on not

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>only their business but on the consumers. Thanks for listening

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller three.

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>On Fall Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Radio