WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: The Six Simple Machines

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Jovian Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech. It is time for

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a tech Stuff classic episode. This episode originally published February

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, two thousand and fifteen. It is titled The

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Six Simple Machines Enjoy. Have you all ever done a

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast on the six classical simple Machines? If not, that

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>might make for an interesting topic. Oh I remember these

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>from school? I do too, is except I don't remember them.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>What were they? There was the toaster, There was the

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>what the electric camera? Yeah? I think I'm pretty sure

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the A T M was on their nail gun, right,

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's way up there? Yeah, and uh I think, uh,

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I think perpetual motion. That was one was really simple.

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>It just kept going. The machine simple and it also

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>know as the clock. Yes, yeah, yeah, no, of course

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the six Simple Machines are far simpler than that, but

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>they are really important. They form the basis of a

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of the machines that we use today, and ultimately,

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, they make work easier. Work is hard work

0:01:27.240 --> 0:01:30.319
<v Speaker 1>is hard, work is hard to explain unless you're a

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>physics teacher and you do it all the time. But

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it has been many, many years since I took a

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>course in physics, and while I still understand and appreciate

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>simple machines and the concepts of work and force and

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this sort of thing, it behooved me to do a

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>quick refresher course before doing this podcast. We'll share your

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>knowledge with this, Jonathan. All right, So work is force

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>acting on an object in the direction of motion. Uh.

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you could think of it in the equation

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of force times distance equals work. All right. Uh. So

0:02:04.400 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>this is why we we express work in units of

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>force and time, such as a Newton meter and a newton.

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Since this raises the next question, a newton is the

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of force required to accelerate one m of mass

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>at one per second squared. So these are the basic

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>units we're talking about, although we'll also be talking about

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>uh pound foot as a means of a unit of measurement.

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Because we're in America and we use antiquated systems of

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>units in our measurements. Then we can't understand how to

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>use this funky you know, metric system approach or or

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the standard unit approach. Okay, but wait a second, how

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>is work different from force? So force is an agent

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that results in accelerating or deforming an object. So if

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you want to get an object to start moving, you

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>have to apply force to it. If you want to

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>punch a hole in a wall, you have to apply

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>force to it. But work is the force acting on

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 1>that object in the direction of motion. So it's it's

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's it encompasses more than just the force. Okay.

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.519
<v Speaker 1>So if I pushed a wheelbarrow twenty feet over a

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>certain period of time, that would be work, right, But

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>your actual pushing against the wheelbarrow itself is force, So

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's kind of a perspective thing in

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a way. But it's very important when you start talking

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>about how much how much work and actual task is

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>versus the amount of force that you have to do

0:03:40.920 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to accomplish that task. Okay, And so machines in the

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>simplest way, are something that helps us do work easier, right, Yeah,

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>so that we either have to do the work with

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>less force or uh. Really, machines can change the dynamics

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of force and distance an interesting way, and sometimes it's

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>ways that might seem counterintuitive to you will definitely talk

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>about something that seems counterintuitive, at least the fort when

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I first thought of it, it was counterintuitive when we

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>get to h levers, which spoiler alert are actually one

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of the six. But at any rate, yeah, it means

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have to exert as much energy when

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>we are trying to accomplish this task, the specific type

0:04:25.480 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of work, whatever that might be. And that was really important.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously in early the early days of humanity,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we spent most of our effort just trying

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we weren't dying, and anything that would

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>save us that kind of effort meant that we could

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we could reserve more energy for very important things like

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>running away. It's a big one, yeah, But at any rate,

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so there are four main ways that machines make work easier,

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and the first is that he can increase the magnitude

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>of a force. So they essentially amplify the amount of

0:05:04.720 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>force being applied to an object or system. So you

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>are are exerting a certain force upon a machine, the

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>machine amplifies that force applied to whatever the load is.

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>That's usually what we call the the thing that you're

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 1>having the machine act upon and it amplifies that force

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>so that the load is is experiencing more force being

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>exerted upon it than you are putting into the machine. Okay,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so in early humanity terms, you might think of this

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>as something like an AX, right, yeah, that would be one,

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, any or a ramp, just a simple ramp,

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.919
<v Speaker 1>because you would you would be exerting less force to

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>move the object as if you wanted. Let's say you

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to move an object, huh to a allege that's

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>ten ft above ground level, and if you were to

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>actually just lift that object physically, it would require a

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>certain amount of force on your side. But if you

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>used a ramp, it would decrease, especially a very long,

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>gradually sloped ramp, It would decrease the amount of force

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 1>you needed to get the thing moving. It would just

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>increase the amount of distance you would have to travel

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to get it to where it needs to go. We'll

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>talk more about that in a bit. Oh yeah, well,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess an AX would actually involve more than one

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of simple machine because it has an inclined plane

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>or a wedge on it. Yeah, I thought so, maybe

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>what I should have said would be a club, Yeah,

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a club that would magnify force, right, yeah. Yeah. There's

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>also the the idea of transferring a force from one

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>place to another, which machines that allow us to apply

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a force in one place the forces transferred to another place.

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So uh, this can be uh we'll get into some

0:06:37.000 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>examples a little bit later. There's also changing the direction

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the force, where you may have to apply a

0:06:43.000 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>force in one direction and it's being exerted in Another

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>classic example of this would be a lever or a

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>pulley where you know the classic lever where I might

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>like it. With a classic leaver, I pushed down on

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.239
<v Speaker 1>one side, the other side goes up, so I'm actually

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>pushing the opposite direction of where the force is being applied. Okay,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 1>so like a seesaw. Yeah. Then there's also the increasing

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the distance or speed of a force, which is a

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty simple concept. Uh. And this is the one that

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>to me was the most counterintuitive when we get to levers,

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but I want to save that for when we get there.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And of course, a combination of machines can create a

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 1>wide array of effects, and we'll talk about some compound

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>machines which are uh, you know it's obviously two or

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>more simple machines put together to make something more complex. Okay,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>well one of these simple machines has got to be

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the wheel, right, well, wheel and axle to be to

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>be specific. But yes, yeah, I guess without an axle,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>wheel isn't not as useful, no it you know, they're

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially POGs. Yeah, you could push it a little bit

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and then you'd have to keep putting it back under

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 1>the thing. Yeah. In fact, that's exactly how early humans

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 1>were moving large weights. They would have a collection of

0:07:57.040 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>logs and they would lay those out on the ground,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>place a heavy weight on top of the logs. They

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>pushed the heavy weight. The heavy weight would roll across

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the tops of those logs. But that would mean that

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>you get closer to the edge, right, you're the the

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>end of the object. We get closer to the last

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>remaining log in the front. You would have to pick

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>up the logs in the back, run around, put them

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>down in front of everything. Was not the most efficient

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>means of getting a heavy weight from point A to

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>point B. I bet that was a fun job. Yeah,

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, now, granted, when all you're trying to do

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is build a megalithic structure to sacrifice humans on. Well,

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and here's the thing, the people who were building said

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>megalithic structures often time was not something they were really

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that concerned about. Yeah, but at any rate, Um, if

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the wheel and axel, we believe that

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:49.600
<v Speaker 1>was invented sometime around thirty five hundred b c E. Yeah,

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the earliest evidence actually comes from thirty two hundred from

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Sumerian artifacts. And also it appears to have been independently

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>invented in China around Okay, so not shared from the Sumerians,

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 1>but different people came up with the same idea. Yes,

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that that seems to be the case. There are some

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>people who suggest that no, there was one common ancestor

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for all wheel and axles, and that that then proliferated

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>across the rest of the world. But the research I

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>read suggested that in fact it did appear independently, which

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is kind of cool. Yeah, So this allows for obviously

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>much easier travel and transportation. Right, it reduces the friction

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that you would experience when you're pushing something against the ground.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>That makes a lot of sense because I can imagine

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the most common work problems in the ancient

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>world was just getting stuff from one place to another,

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and it probably wasn't always megalithic structure, materials, you know,

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>moving a giant stone, just moving your supplies. You've got

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>foods you've collected or foraged, You've got you know, tools

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>or building materials you want to take with you. How

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:02.439
<v Speaker 1>do you get them from one place to another? I mean,

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 1>if all you've got is you can carry them on

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 1>your back, right, you might build a sledge or something

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>so that now you have some sort of animal that's

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>pulling it, but that's not very efficient. It's very slow going,

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course if you hit any terrain that's not

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>conducive to such you know, vehicles, then you're really stuck

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>literally in some cases. So yeah, the wheel reduces friction, right,

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the big thing it does in this in this use.

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 1>There's another use for the wheel and axle that we'll

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about in a second, But when you attach it

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to something like a cart and you have an axle

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and wheel set up there, then the wheels turning reduces

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the friction that you experience when you're pushing this against

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the ground, and it reduces the amount of force you

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>need to use to get this thing moving. Um. It's

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty simple concept. And there are two different,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>really you know types of wheel and axles. There's the

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>type of wheel and axle where the wheel can move

0:10:55.240 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>freely around the axles, the axle remains stationary in act

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to the wheel. The wheel just rotates around the axle.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the fixed that that one would be

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>fixed to the frame of the cart, so the axle

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is fixed and the wheel moved right. And then they're

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>also the type where the axle turns along with the wheel. Uh,

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and it has to be in some sort of bearing

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that will hold on and allow it this turning motion.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think what would be the advantages and

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>disadvantages of each. So if you have free moving wheels,

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>each wheel can move independently. Um. But if you have

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 1>wheels attached directly to the axles, then the wheels on

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>each end of one axle will have to move together,

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.680
<v Speaker 1>which you know, you look at cars, Yeah, you know,

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>if if all of our cars had each wheel moving independently,

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and some actually do have some four wheel independent drive, uh,

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 1>then that's different than if they're all working together in concert.

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>If you will and so yeah, I mean they're they're

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>different use cases, and there are different advantages and disadvantages. Uh.

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>The important thing to remember is that this simple machine

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is one of the things that helped revolutionize humanity and

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>keep humanity alive and allowing it to thrive. Um. Obviously,

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>otherwise we just went and get our stuff to where

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it needs to be. It would be tough. Uh. So

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>another thing you can do with the wheel and axle besides,

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, attach it to a vehicle and have it

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>moved through. Uh. The the wheel and axel has a

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>multiplying force aspect to it, so the force around the axle.

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Think of the axle. It's kind of like a small

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>cylinder in the center of a larger cylinder, the larger

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 1>one being the wheel and the small one being the axle.

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>The rotational force around that small cylinder is greater than

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the rotational force on the outer cylinder, but the distance

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>traveled on the outer cylinder is greater than the distance

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>traveled in the inner cylinder. Yeah. Okay, Now what that

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>means for us is that you can use a wheel

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>as a means of like a crank or uh, you know,

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a valve, something along those lines, and you can apply

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a small amount of force to the outside of that wheel,

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the force being experienced on the axle part is much greater.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you have something that normally would be fairly

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 1>tough to turn, if you have a large enough wheel,

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it starts to become easier and easier to turn it,

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>which is why you start seeing things like those giant

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>wheel like um uh handles for things like the heavy

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>doors and submarines things like that. So, yeah, that it

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>allows you to move much heavier machinery or gears or

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever using a small amount, relatively small amount of rotational

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>force on a larger surface, and the multiplication of that

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>force is what gives you the ability to do a

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of work. Yeah, I can see that. In like, say,

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the at the helm of an old ship, you would

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>have a very large wheel, and I'm sure it took

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of force to move the rudder of the ships.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Having a larger wheel probably made it easier. I'm glad

0:14:09.400 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>you brought that up. I'm glad you brought up the

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:16.839
<v Speaker 1>wheel because or the helm obviously, because that that will

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>allow us to talk about some interesting different types of machines,

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>not just the wheel, but our next machine, the lever,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>because before the helm, before the wheel of a ship,

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>which really didn't come about until the really the late

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century. Yeah, yeah, you see those wheels on ships.

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Those are all modern inventions. In the long run, the

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 1>classic way of controlling a ship was with a tiller,

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.040
<v Speaker 1>which was more like a lever. So a tiller is

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially it's a it's a lever that comes out, you

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>hold onto the end. You make small adjustments on one side,

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>but because the way the lever is adjusted, it makes

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>larger changes with the rudder of the ship. The helm

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of a ship involves a lot of other parts. It's

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>really a compound um machine ultimately, because you've got the wheel,

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got some pulley systems that connect the wheel to

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the rudder. It's pretty cool. So I'm glad you brought

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it up. Well, you know, if you look at a

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 1>wheel like that as uh, something that allows you to

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>apply force over a greater distance to create more force

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on a shorter distance in the middle, it's kind of

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like some types of levers, like, for example, a torque wringe. Right,

0:15:30.800 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>So if you if you have a wrench and you

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>have a bolt that you know it's really it's really

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>or sorry, it would be a nut. I guess a nut.

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And it is really hard to loosen. It takes a

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of force to do it. You can do it

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>by having a longer handle on your wrench. The longer

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the handle, the easier it is to get that thing loosened. Right,

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And you have to travel a greater distance, uh in

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a circle a circle right for you to get that

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>that nut to go one complete rotation. But it's far

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>easier as far as the amount of force applied. I

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>like that you pronounce it lever and I pronounce it lever.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna get really interesting when we're talking about leverage.

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So the data data, Yeah, this is the device that

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>gives us a leverage, and which is really how I

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>would say it. I don't know why I say lever

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>but then I say leverage. I just don't. I guess

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's just because that song you know,

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty ways to love your lever. Okay, never mind, you

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>love them and then you love them. So remember that.

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Like we were saying, work equals force times distance, and

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>like Joe was just pointing out, if you increase the distance,

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that means you you can decrease the amount of force

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to do the same amount of work, right, or you

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>could increase the amount of force and decrease the amount

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of distance and get the same amount of work. It's

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>those two factors that determine the amount of work that's done.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>So using a lever, we can change that amount of

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>force applied. Uh. And the law of the lever proposed

0:16:57.400 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>by Archimedes you may have heard of him, is that

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>quote magnitudes are an equilibrium at distances reciprocally proportional to

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:10.199
<v Speaker 1>their weights. End quote. That clears everything up, but it's

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.719
<v Speaker 1>essentially what we're talking about. So what are the basic

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>parts of a lever. You've got, uh, your the lever

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>itself is the side that you apply the force to. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got something that it typically has to

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 1>rest against at some point along the beam. You think

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of the beam as the full length of whatever the

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>liver is. The fulcrum is the pivot point that it

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>rests against that you you use to help uh apply

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>force to whatever the output side is typically speaking. And uh,

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the way this works is depending on what side is longer,

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that's going to travel more distance and and apply less force.

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>So if you have a weight, and you put the

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 1>short side of a beam under that weight, and then

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you got a fulcrum there, and then the long side

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>of the beam is the one that you pushed down on.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>You have to push further to make the weight go

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>up the distance you wanted to go, but you're using

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>less force than you would if you were to just

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>lift the weight up bodily, straight up. So we thought

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>this would be easier to understand with an example. So

0:18:20.560 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you've got a fifty pound weight. I'm just

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna do a little bit of metrics here just at

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, and then I apologize. You're just gonna have

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to use conversions to convert everything over because I didn't

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 1>do it for everything. But if you're talking about fifty pounds,

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that's about twenty two point seven trams and you want

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to lift it up two feet, which is about point

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 1>six meters. To do this, you have to do a

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:45.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred pound feet of work or one thirty five point

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>six newt meters of work, because again it's force times distance.

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So you'd have the uh fifty pounds of weight times

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the two feet, and that gets the hundred pound foot work. Now,

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>if you used a lever that was twenty ft long

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on one side and then ten feet on the other side.

0:18:59.840 --> 0:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So so the side that you're going to apply force too,

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's twice as long. And you've got a fulcrum that's

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>just uh that's one ft tall. It would be half

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the amount of force you would need to lift that

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>load than before um, so it you know, it's it's

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>much easier. And of course if you were to extend

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the lever longer, it would be less and less force,

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>but you have to travel greater distances to get it

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>up the two feet that you want. This is why

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>you have the famous possibly apocryphal quote, uh that our

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>committees said that he said if he had a lever

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>long enough, he could move the world. I guess that's

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>probably true. Yeah, I guess, well, no, I don't probably

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>using it would depend It would depend on what the

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the lever or lever was made of, wouldn't it. Because

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point, when you're trying to move things

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of great enough mass are taking enough force to move,

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd reach the breaking point of your lever, wouldn't you. Well, yeah,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you had something that was that long,

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>unless it had incredible strength, it would uh, it would

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.120
<v Speaker 1>break under its own weight. We'll be back with more

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of the six simple machines after these brief messages. So

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>leavers change the direction or they can change the direction

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of an applied force, but depends upon the input and

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 1>output output forces relative to the fulcrum. And there are

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.560
<v Speaker 1>three classes of levers. So the one we just talked

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>about that example, the you got the it's it's like

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>the seesaw looking type of lever. That's a the first

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>class style of lever. Okay, So one side of the

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>seesaw is longer than the other side. You can use

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the longer side to lift heavier loads. And it also

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>changes the direction of the applied force. That's one of

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the one of the elements of it. The second class

0:20:55.480 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is more like a wheelbarrow, which involves too simple machines.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You have the wheel and axle, but you also have levers.

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>The handles act as levers. Now in that case, the

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fulcrumb is on one end of the entire beam. Think

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of the handles as a beam. So the fulcrumb in

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this case the wheel is weigh on one end. Then

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>you have the load, which is the actually little load

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>that's inside the wheelbarrow. Then you have the handles the

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>input that you create. So it's different from the seesaw right,

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 1>where you would have the fulcrum in the center. Now

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you have the fulcrum on the end, then the load

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you lifting it this one. Instead of reversing

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the force, it's the same direction right

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>because you're lifting up on a wheelbarrow, handles and it

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and it lifts the load up as well. So it's

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>different from uh, the first class of leavers. The third

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 1>class is the one that seems the most counterintuitive if

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you first think about it. So would the flat end

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of a crowbar be a second class lever because they're

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing is you don't have the full crumb

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>in the middle. You're you're pressing the end against the

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>inside of the door frame, say, and then a little

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>bit further towards the end you're holding is what's mashing

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>against the door and you're using it to pry like

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a prying action. Seems like second class levers. It is,

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>And of course, if you were to turn the crowbar

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>around to use the curved end be a first class

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just like a Claude hammer would be as well. Here's

0:22:26.760 --> 0:22:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a Claude hammer to remove nails. Uh, so that's a

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>great example. Third class levers are the ones to me

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that are the most counterintuitive. Um they have the fulcrum

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>at one end, then you have the input force, then

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the output force. So you know when the

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>wheelbarrow example, we've got input force on one end, then

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>output in the middle, then the fulcrum in this case

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>fulcrum input output. And you might think, wait a minute,

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what the how does that even work? It doesn't sound

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>like and why would you want to use that? Because

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.160
<v Speaker 1>if you use if you use the sort of lever,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it has what we call an ideal mechanical advantage of

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>less than one ideal mechanical advantage. This is what's telling

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you how how how much it's helping you in the

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>sense of how much force you have to apply versus

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the force that you're getting out of this too for

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the issue of making work right, So here you're you're

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>actually at a loss. Yeah, and you might wonder, well,

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>why would you want to do that? And the reason

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is that you are that output force has actually applied

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>over a greater distance. So it's kind of the reverse

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of what we were talking about. Earlier about how with

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the wheel, when you have the greater distance, you have

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 1>to apply less force, but you get more distance. In

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>this case, you have to apply more forced down at

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the input, but you're getting greater distance at the output,

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 1>which is really useful if you're up to bat. A

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>baseball bat is a third class leaver. So this would

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>be like my club example earlier exactly, that's essentially a

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>third class lever or a first class bunk in the head.

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh So anyway, yeah, very interesting. Some of the some

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of this to me is counterintuitive. I'm sure to some

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>people that are like, this all makes perfect sense. I

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you're talking about with counterintuitive, but I

0:24:14.320 --> 0:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>remember the first time I read about they were using

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a hockey stick as a an example of a third

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>class lever from one of the sources. I was looking

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 1>over and I thought, I'm from Georgia. That example means

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing to me. And then they said baseball band, Like, Okay,

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>now I understand what you're saying. We're gonna wrap up

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the six simple machines in just a moment, but before

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we do that, let's take another quick break. Next, we

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have another simple machine, the inclined plane, and it is

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:55.440
<v Speaker 1>so inclined. It's the simplest of all simple machines. Perhaps

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's definitely, I mean it's it's essentially a ramp,

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's really what is So when you want

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to move, when you want to move a load from

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>one elevation to a different elevation and it's too heavy

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to just lift, a ramp can often help out. It

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>decreases the amount of force you need to get the

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>load to that height, but it increases the distance you

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>must travel in order to do so. So when we

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 1>were talking earlier about the wheels and the logs and

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, this this concept of how much time is

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it going to take to do this? Uh, the pyramids

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>were built by moving these enormous blocks of stone up

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>very long ramps to get to their their various elevations

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>because the blocks of stone are far too heavy to

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.640
<v Speaker 1>just lift and put them in place. Wow. I think

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>for a long time we didn't know how they were built, right, Yeah, No,

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of speculation about how it actually happened.

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>But as it turns out, the ramp method is the

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>one that was used to You know, if you build

0:25:57.000 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the ramp out long enough, then you decrease that force

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to make it more manageable, but you do have to

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>make the ramp longer and longer to increase that mechanical advantage. Right,

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That does mean you have to travel further and further,

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and makes sense because you know, you just intuitively understand

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that a short ramp is going to be much more steep,

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and that steepness is going to make make it so

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>that you have to apply more force to get whatever

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the load is up that ramp. That you're familiar with.

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>This in simple walking terms, I mean you take fewer

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>steps going up a short steep incline to the same

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 1>altitude versus a very long, slow, gradual slope to an

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>equal altitude, but you but it's still you know, easier

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>taking the long, slow way. You're still doing the same

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>amount of work overall, because again it's four times distance,

0:26:50.280 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but you're doing less force per unit of walking, so

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel like it's as exhausting unless the ramp

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is so long as to make the journey intolerably long,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>which could be a possibility if you have enough space.

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>But infinite ramp that's a good band name. Yeah, Yeah,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling that just just be a jam band,

0:27:14.000 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 1>play those like incredibly long jam sessions that don't ever

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>go anywhere. But yeah, if you were to take that

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>same weight we were talking about that fifty pound weight

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we were mentioning earlier, we have a ramp that's two

0:27:25.760 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ft tall and four ft long. It'll take half the

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>amount of force needed to get it moving over twice

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the distance of just lifting it up those two feet,

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>So again saves you the force needed to move this thing. Uh.

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Then making that ramp longer would decrease the steepness and

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the force needed to move the weight even further, but

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it would increase the distance at the same time. And

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>now we start getting into some of the the advanced

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>simple machines. The ones we've named so far are really

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, most people argue this is the the furthest

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>can break down a simple machine. The other ones have

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>some elements to them that are similar to the previous ones,

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like the pulley, which is kind of similar to levers

0:28:10.560 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and also to wheel and axle. I feel like, maybe,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of all the simple machines, I encounter a pulley the

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 1>least often in my life, at least at least visibly, right,

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So pully maybe if I were a sailor. Yeah, we

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>we You probably know what a pulley looks like. Um,

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, you've got like a grooved wheel that's suspended

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:35.320
<v Speaker 1>within a frame, can spin freely within that frame. You

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>feed a rope through it, or line through it if

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you're a sailor. Uh. And this allows you to change

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 1>the direction of force, but it doesn't change the amount

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of force you need to move a weight all by itself.

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So so, changing the direction of force, even if you're

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not adding force, can be very useful because, as everyone knows,

0:28:54.680 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>it's much easier to pull down on something using your

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>body weight and gravity tare advantage than it is to

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>push up with the same force. Right. So, and I

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>should clarify when I say this, I'm really talking about

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 1>a suspended pulley from like a beam or some other

0:29:10.880 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>stationary object. And the weight you want doesn't have a

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 1>pulley attached to it, because you could attach a pully

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to the weight and then tie one end off to

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>something like a beam and you could hold the other end,

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in which case it doesn't reverse the direction of the force.

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Right you are pulling up, but it reduces the amount

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of force you need to lift the weight. So if

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you if you do it that way, where the beam

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is holding one end of the rope and you're holding

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the rope, you're reducing the amount

0:29:38.760 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of force, but you're not changing the direction. If, on

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, the beam is holding the pulley and

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the rope is just attached to a weight, you're reversing

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the direction, but you're not reducing the amount of force. Um,

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>but I bet there is a way to reduce the

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of force. Yeah, you just gotta add more police.

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's say we put how many how many you got?

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard of block and tackle? All right? First,

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>let's let's go with the simplest approach, where we have

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>two pulleys. Let's say you have one pulley attached to

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a stationary thing like a beam hanging from the roof, right,

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and then you have a second pulley that's attached to

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the weight that you plan on moving. You tie one

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>end of your line off onto the beam or even

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>onto that that first pulley that we're talking about. Feed

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the line down through the pulley that's attached to the weight.

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Feed that line up through the pulley that's attached to

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the beam, and then you finally hold the other end.

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>You pull down, and now the weight has been reduced

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the amount of force you need, or at least the

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 1>perceivable weight you feel. The amount of force you need

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to move that weight has been reduced a half. But

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to move twice as you have to pull

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.479
<v Speaker 1>twice as far, twice as much rope to move it

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the distance that you wanted to go. So, in other words,

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>if you want the symmetry of physics is beautiful. Yeah,

0:30:58.080 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>so if you want to have lifted that two feet,

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to pull four feet of rope, all right,

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>But you could add more pulleys and this would decrease

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the amount of force further while increasing the amount of

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>distance more. You would actually have to have longer rope obviously,

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>if you started to add lots and lots of of

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>pulleys and you had a full block and tackle system.

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>But this would allow you to move incredible weights using

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a relatively small amount of force. You would just have

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 1>to be willing to pull lots of rope in order

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to do it. Or line all, all of the sailors

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:32.719
<v Speaker 1>who listen are just singing, there's such a Rube saying rope.

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe they don't like the word rope. It's

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:40.400
<v Speaker 1>it's line. It's not rope, it's line on a ship. Yeah,

0:31:40.680 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I spent a little, tiny, tiny amount of time on

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a ship and I got I got corrected so many times. Well,

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we should have a face off between geometris and geometrs,

0:31:54.360 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>geometricians and geometris, geomet geometrists or I think, Yeah, I

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>think of geometry as trickery, so I I my vote

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 1>goes to the geometric stars, geometry teachers, and sailors, and

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they can argue about lines. I knew some geometry teachers

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>who could definitely take on some sailors in their time. Okay,

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>let's let's do another one. All right, sure, what what

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>do you want to do? The screw? The simple machine? Right, Yes,

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I am so, if I'm not mistaken. The screw is

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 1>basically just an inclined plane in a particular configuration. Yeah,

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an inclined plane that is wrapped around the core

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of something like a like a shaft. So you take

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a shaft, you put an inclined plane, and you spiral

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it around the shaft and you get a screw and uh, screws.

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Can it's a tiny circular ramp. Yeah, And that circular

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 1>part is what's really important, because it means that if

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you apply a rotational force to the screw, it provides

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>a linear force along the length of the shaft that

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is greater than the force you used to turn the

0:33:00.440 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>screw in the first place. Uh. This, of course is

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>dependent upon the pitch. The pitch. The pitch the pitch

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and screws is The description is that it's the distance

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>between the treads. So the the sections of the ramp,

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the closer together they are, the greater the ideal mechanical advantage.

0:33:20.720 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is the mechanical advantages dependent upon the

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>length of the inclined plane the ramp to the length

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of the shaft. So if the treads are closer together,

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that means if you were to untwirl this, the ramp

0:33:36.400 --> 0:33:38.960
<v Speaker 1>would be much much, much longer because the cram more

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of it along the length of the screw. Yeah, that

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So yeah, that's like having that longer, slower

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>gradient of ramp up to the summit, right exactly. Yeah,

0:33:48.160 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting to think of it that way. But yeah,

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the treads are closer together, it's going to exert a

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>greater force when you turn this this. These of course,

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have been really useful in lots of different uh applications,

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>every thing from you know, just securing something to the wall,

0:34:03.160 --> 0:34:06.479
<v Speaker 1>for example, because it has a great holding force that

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 1>way to lifting things. Our comedies, screw was a way

0:34:10.520 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>of drawing water out, which was kind of cool. Um.

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's an interesting simple machine, and it's

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>something that if you were to look at, like you

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 1>go to a hardware store and you look at a

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 1>bunch of screws, you wouldn't necessarily think this is a machine, right.

0:34:25.560 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 1>You think of it as a tool or or you know,

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>just something that you need. But it actually is one

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of the simple machines. And only is it one of

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the simple machines, but like we're pointing out, it's a

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.800
<v Speaker 1>simple machine that's made up of an even simpler machine,

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:42.239
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of cool. Um. Yeah, it's an interesting,

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>uh piece of machinery, if you if you will. And

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the earliest evidence of screws come from Greece, uh so

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they were actually one of the later simple machines to

0:34:52.239 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 1>arrive on the scene. And the grand scheme of things

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:58.200
<v Speaker 1>had had a screwed. Yeah. Yeah, that was the one

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>that drew water up. Yeah, the water the water screwe. Yep,

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>it's really cool. If you've never seen any illustrations of that,

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:06.879
<v Speaker 1>you should look it up. Our commedie screw is pretty cool.

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we talked about it, and we did a

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff podcast ages ago about our comedes, and I'm

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure we talked about our commedity screw. We we

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of that time. That was a Cris

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Pallette episode, and we've been a lot of that time

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about some of the crazy inventions attributed to our commedes,

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>perhaps apocryphal e Like the claw that reaches out of

0:35:27.760 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the city walls and grab ships. That was one of them. Yeah. Alright,

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about the last of the simple machines.

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Yet another application of the ramp, right, Yeah, this is

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the wedge. So a wedge is essentially two inclined ramps

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.799
<v Speaker 1>that are against each other to create this wedge shape.

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>And uh, they can be used to do a couple

0:35:50.239 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of different things. They can be driven beneath a weight

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to lift it up. So this would be you know

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a wedge that you would you would put the end

0:35:58.560 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of it under the weight, and you would apply force

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to the the flat end of the wedge, the back end,

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the butt end of it, and that would end up

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:11.480
<v Speaker 1>pushing the weight upward because of the the design of

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the wedge, or you could use it to be destructive.

0:36:14.560 --> 0:36:17.439
<v Speaker 1>So Jonathan, I have a question for you. Ask away, Joe,

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>have you ever split wood with a mall? I want

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.759
<v Speaker 1>split wood with Darth mall? No, I'm serious now, no

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>lightsaber jokes. Have you ever split wood with a mall?

0:36:28.560 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I have not. I've only split wood with axes, which

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>are not necessarily easy tools to use for that purpose. Well,

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a splitting mall is. It's hard work, but man, it

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>is a really satisfying feeling. So imagine it's sort of

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.640
<v Speaker 1>like an ax. Uh. It is a sort of a

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:50.719
<v Speaker 1>combination of an ax and a sledge hammer. If you

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>can imagine that it's a long handle and then at

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the handle you have this bulky heavy

0:36:56.800 --> 0:37:00.120
<v Speaker 1>head that is basically a wedge on one end and

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>then a sledge hammer on the other. Just I think

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:06.879
<v Speaker 1>to increase the weight basically, and the wedge doesn't even

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>necessarily have to be that sharp. I think it usually

0:37:09.520 --> 0:37:13.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't the one I used wasn't very sharp, but because

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>of the weight, it was a one hit splitter. So

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you'd put a log segment out and you'd hit it

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 1>once and it would just cleave apart, which is pretty impressive. Yeah.

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, it it felt good to do, but it

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>got tiring after a while. Yeah. And see you can

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>see that there's some like within the mall. There are

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>two machines here at work. Right, You've got the lever

0:37:32.640 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>as far as the handle, that's what's allowing you to

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>apply leverage when you're doing your swing, and then you

0:37:38.200 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>have the wedge, which is doing the actual splitting. So

0:37:41.480 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the wedge, what it's doing is it's applying that downward

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>force and changing the direction of that forced to outward. Yeah,

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:51.400
<v Speaker 1>so that's why you when you hit the log, that

0:37:51.520 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>outward force splits the log apart. And it's really cool.

0:37:55.480 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I tried doing the same thing with access, which you

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>can do, but it takes more effort, yeah, because the

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>axe head probably just doesn't heavy enough that. Yeah, it's

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're using, so you have to take up

0:38:07.280 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the force that normally would have been taken

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>care of by the the tool itself. It's pretty cool.

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:19.759
<v Speaker 1>I've never done that now. Uh, it's yeah, give it

0:38:19.800 --> 0:38:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a shot sometimes. All right, next time I'm out in

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the woods and I'm just thinking, you know what I

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>need to do, It's just split get your hands on

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the mall. You know, my family actually called it a maddic.

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I had to look it up and figure out that

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong about what a mattock was. A matic

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 1>is a thing with a differently oriented head. It's kind

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of like a pick axe got you. But that was

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>just how your family referred to it. It was a mall.

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.919
<v Speaker 1>I have determined now. So yeah, these are um, that's

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the that's the last of the six simple ones. But

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>then there are also other machines that we can talk about,

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>compound machines. I mentioned those earlier. These are the machines

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that combined two or more simple ones. Ship's Home is

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the examples we already talked about. Wheelbarrow was

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:03.520
<v Speaker 1>another one we talked about. Scissors would be a great

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>example because with scissors, you've got a pair of wedges. Uh,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.000
<v Speaker 1>those would be the blades of the scissors, and you

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>have a lever. The handle that you hold would be

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a lever. The fulcrum would be the center that that

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>binds them together. Uh, and so that's what allows you

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to use scissors. Compound machines have more moving parts than

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>simple machines, but that's not necessarily a good thing overall,

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:29.640
<v Speaker 1>because the more parts you have, the more you have

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 1>to overcome friction. If you add lots and lots of

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:36.840
<v Speaker 1>different parts, that friction could be very difficult to overcome

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and it could end up generating a lot of heat,

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>which is why very complex machines like a car engine

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>require coolens and lubricants in order for them to continue

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to work properly. Um. That means there's also a loss

0:39:49.520 --> 0:39:54.879
<v Speaker 1>and efficiency. However, the compound machines have greater mechanical advantage.

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>You actually multiply the problem. You multiply the mechanical advantage

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of each of the individ dual um simple machines within

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the compound machine to determine what its mechanical advantages. So

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>as long as every single simple machine in your compound

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>machine has that ideal mechanical advantage of greater than one,

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the more you add, the greater mechanical advantage the compound

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:27.880
<v Speaker 1>machine has. And thus we get to the room Goldberg device. Yeah,

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>what what's it? Has like a goldfish that operates a

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>magnifying glass that burns a rope and yeah, exactly, and

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>then you get an okay go video out of it.

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Not all those would be simple machines, I don't think

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the magnifying glass, but even some of those would be

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 1>compound machines. That would be a collection of simple machines.

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>But there you go. That's the collection of simple machines

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and what they do and why they're important. Um, it's

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>it was fun to look back at this, even though,

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like again, this is something that any of our listeners

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>who are still in school, they may be rolling their

0:40:56.760 --> 0:40:58.760
<v Speaker 1>eyes for the whole thing because they're thinking they've already

0:40:58.800 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>learned all this stuff and that is repetitive. But for

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>those of us who graduated a long time ago, and

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>perhaps I have not kept up with physics the way

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we might have, you know, wanted to. I loved physics

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>when I was a kid. It was one of my

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite favorite subjects in school. I wish I had appreciated

0:41:16.000 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>science more when I was in school. I didn't. I

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't really come to love science until after I was

0:41:21.000 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>out of school, and then I wished I could go

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:26.320
<v Speaker 1>back and and treat it with the respect it deserves.

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Out of all the sciences, uh, classical physics was the

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>one that appealed to me most because it was the

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>one that made sense to me, because it was it

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 1>was the physics of the world that I could observe

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>around me, and I loved it. I just I understood

0:41:39.520 --> 0:41:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it and I took to it. Not so much with

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the biology and chemistry as it turns out. I mean,

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I did well, but they were harder. They were harder

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to learn for me. That wraps up the classic episode

0:41:50.480 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 1>on the six Simple machines. I've seen so many cartoons

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that explained those and I love them so much. Uh,

0:41:57.560 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating stuff to me, like to think back on

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:06.359
<v Speaker 1>how these underlies so many machines today. I mean, at

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:08.960
<v Speaker 1>least the mechanical ones. Once you start getting into digital,

0:42:09.160 --> 0:42:11.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a whole different ball game. But I hope you

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:14.960
<v Speaker 1>found that interesting. If you have suggestions for topics I

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>should cover for future episodes of tech Stuff, please reach

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>out to me. The best way to do that is

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. To handle for the show is text stuff

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>H s W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I heart radio production. For more

0:42:34.719 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.