1
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:05,560
Speaker 1: Now here's a highlight from coast to coast AM on iHeartRadio.

2
00:00:04,840 --> 00:00:09,639
Speaker 2: Begin discussing some of the more let's say common skeptical

3
00:00:09,760 --> 00:00:14,680
Speaker 2: arguments claiming this footage was fabricated. I don't know that

4
00:00:14,760 --> 00:00:17,800
Speaker 2: the orbs may be CGI or something like that. How

5
00:00:17,800 --> 00:00:19,960
Speaker 2: do you counter these arguments? What are they and how

6
00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:21,400
Speaker 2: do you counter them?

7
00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:24,720
Speaker 3: Yeah, that's a great question, and I want to get

8
00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:26,000
Speaker 3: that out of the way because then we can go

9
00:00:26,079 --> 00:00:29,720
Speaker 3: talk about zero point energy and future humanity after that.

10
00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:35,880
Speaker 3: So the first one, Richard, is probably the debris. People say, hey,

11
00:00:35,880 --> 00:00:39,040
Speaker 3: but they found this debris. But as they pointed out

12
00:00:39,159 --> 00:00:42,600
Speaker 3: in our first segment, this debris was found in Africa,

13
00:00:43,240 --> 00:00:45,680
Speaker 3: but we were searching off the coast of Australia. In fact,

14
00:00:45,680 --> 00:00:48,519
Speaker 3: they're searching right now off the coast of Australia. So

15
00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:50,040
Speaker 3: how did that debris get there? Well, I gets it

16
00:00:50,120 --> 00:00:53,080
Speaker 3: drifted in the ocean. Problem is the currents flow to

17
00:00:53,120 --> 00:00:57,240
Speaker 3: the east in the majority of the search area. In fact,

18
00:00:57,240 --> 00:00:59,640
Speaker 3: they kind of flow east and upper around the coast

19
00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:02,440
Speaker 3: of our Australian back to the west. You go look

20
00:01:02,440 --> 00:01:04,560
Speaker 3: at the drift analysis. You guys can go google this

21
00:01:04,720 --> 00:01:08,319
Speaker 3: right now while you're listening, you'll see looking at the

22
00:01:08,319 --> 00:01:11,920
Speaker 3: ocean current model, that the bulk of the debris should

23
00:01:11,959 --> 00:01:15,920
Speaker 3: have washed ashore in Australia. Instead we're finding places like

24
00:01:16,040 --> 00:01:21,080
Speaker 3: South Africa, Tanzania. How's all the ten or so pieces

25
00:01:21,120 --> 00:01:24,399
Speaker 3: of debris that they found washing ashore in Africa? And

26
00:01:24,480 --> 00:01:26,959
Speaker 3: it's not enough to bree to even prove the plane crashed.

27
00:01:27,520 --> 00:01:30,199
Speaker 3: Even the flaperon which people say was this giant piece

28
00:01:30,200 --> 00:01:32,160
Speaker 3: of the plane is only about a seven foot piece

29
00:01:32,200 --> 00:01:35,080
Speaker 3: of one hundred foot wing it that's not even require

30
00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:37,840
Speaker 3: to land the airplane if you look it up. So

31
00:01:39,000 --> 00:01:41,800
Speaker 3: we didn't find enough debris to prove the plane crashed.

32
00:01:41,920 --> 00:01:44,280
Speaker 3: And you have to pick one or the other. This

33
00:01:44,360 --> 00:01:46,560
Speaker 3: is very important for anyone who wants to understand them

34
00:01:46,560 --> 00:01:50,720
Speaker 3: a Street seven zero investigation. Either you believe these satellite

35
00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:53,880
Speaker 3: things that we've been following to search in the South

36
00:01:53,920 --> 00:01:58,160
Speaker 3: Indian Ocean, or you believe the debris. It's one or

37
00:01:58,200 --> 00:02:01,080
Speaker 3: the other. It's a mutually exclusive our arm. Either the

38
00:02:01,120 --> 00:02:04,280
Speaker 3: debris is from MH three seven zero and something happened

39
00:02:04,280 --> 00:02:07,680
Speaker 3: at make three seven zero closer to Africa, or you

40
00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:10,480
Speaker 3: believe the satellite pings and the debris you must be

41
00:02:10,520 --> 00:02:13,399
Speaker 3: fake and then the satellite pings say well, somehow we've

42
00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:15,120
Speaker 3: just not been able to find anything in the South

43
00:02:15,160 --> 00:02:18,280
Speaker 3: Indian Ocean. To me, the answer is obvious. The satellite

44
00:02:18,360 --> 00:02:22,280
Speaker 3: pings were fraudulent, spoofed, misinterpreted, whatever you want to use,

45
00:02:23,520 --> 00:02:27,240
Speaker 3: not real, and the debris is real to in Africa,

46
00:02:27,320 --> 00:02:29,680
Speaker 3: and a much better location for that debris to have

47
00:02:29,720 --> 00:02:32,000
Speaker 3: gone in the water looking at the ocean currents is

48
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:36,320
Speaker 3: not the South Indian Ocean. It's the Maldives and a

49
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:40,040
Speaker 3: secret military base known as Diego Garcia. So that's the

50
00:02:40,080 --> 00:02:45,000
Speaker 3: first one I want people to understand. Also, the amount

51
00:02:45,080 --> 00:02:49,200
Speaker 3: of evidence in general for the videos being real versus

52
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:52,880
Speaker 3: the videos being fake. It's overwhelming on the side of

53
00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:55,880
Speaker 3: them being real. I'll come back to that second, but

54
00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:57,560
Speaker 3: if you will also say, well, the clouds don't seem

55
00:02:57,600 --> 00:03:00,519
Speaker 3: to move in this satellite video you're looking at, and

56
00:03:01,120 --> 00:03:02,880
Speaker 3: if you actually speed it up, you can see the

57
00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:06,200
Speaker 3: clouds don't just move, but they evolve in terms of

58
00:03:06,280 --> 00:03:09,080
Speaker 3: changing shape in our perspective of them. You can see

59
00:03:09,080 --> 00:03:13,399
Speaker 3: parallax changes. So this shows that these are real, three

60
00:03:13,400 --> 00:03:16,080
Speaker 3: dimensional clouds we're looking at, which is important. The next

61
00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:18,960
Speaker 3: thing people say is that these are pictures of clouds

62
00:03:19,000 --> 00:03:21,919
Speaker 3: that some photographer took, and there was this Kim dot

63
00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:25,680
Speaker 3: com saga that happened. Well, what I want to point

64
00:03:25,720 --> 00:03:29,200
Speaker 3: out is that when we reverse image search the images

65
00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:33,160
Speaker 3: in question, they don't even show up before twenty sixteen

66
00:03:33,200 --> 00:03:36,880
Speaker 3: on the archives. So these videos are from twenty fourteen,

67
00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:39,680
Speaker 3: and as I pointed out, there's evidence that shows that

68
00:03:39,720 --> 00:03:42,760
Speaker 3: these require a three D render, including the clouds evolving,

69
00:03:43,320 --> 00:03:46,160
Speaker 3: but also when the zap happens to the plane in

70
00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:50,920
Speaker 3: the satellite video, the light reflects off the distant cloud

71
00:03:51,080 --> 00:03:54,280
Speaker 3: that's not next to it, which shows we're looking at

72
00:03:54,520 --> 00:03:57,840
Speaker 3: real lighting in a three dimensional environment, not a picture

73
00:03:57,880 --> 00:04:00,560
Speaker 3: of clouds. And of course we have two videos from

74
00:04:00,560 --> 00:04:04,240
Speaker 3: two completely different perspectives. They're perfectly in sync with one another,

75
00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:07,160
Speaker 3: which then nescess it takes a three D rendered environment,

76
00:04:07,840 --> 00:04:09,960
Speaker 3: which you can't have two D cloud pictures for that.

77
00:04:11,440 --> 00:04:12,800
Speaker 3: And I also want to point on more about the

78
00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:16,240
Speaker 3: cloud pictures is that they supposedly come from this set

79
00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:19,880
Speaker 3: that a photographer took. There are other images in the set.

80
00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:23,599
Speaker 3: They do go back in the Internet archive before the

81
00:04:23,920 --> 00:04:27,120
Speaker 3: videos in question are sorry that image through seven zero videos,

82
00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:30,600
Speaker 3: but not the supposed images that were used to make

83
00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:34,560
Speaker 3: the videos. Those ones are just missing somehow, and they

84
00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:37,480
Speaker 3: don't even reverse image search back to the website. If

85
00:04:37,480 --> 00:04:41,279
Speaker 3: your virtual image search these images that supposedly were used

86
00:04:41,279 --> 00:04:43,520
Speaker 3: to make the videos, they don't go back to the

87
00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:46,359
Speaker 3: website they're supposedly from. They go back to Reddit, and

88
00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:49,600
Speaker 3: supposedly a six day old Reddit account found them. So

89
00:04:49,640 --> 00:04:52,400
Speaker 3: the story makes no sense at all, And the story

90
00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:55,640
Speaker 3: for the videos being fake makes no sense at all

91
00:04:55,880 --> 00:04:58,240
Speaker 3: either in terms of like who made these because we

92
00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:00,800
Speaker 3: had one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty and real

93
00:05:00,839 --> 00:05:03,960
Speaker 3: bounty for someone to come forward with evidence that they

94
00:05:04,040 --> 00:05:06,360
Speaker 3: were the ones that hoaxed the videos that, how however,

95
00:05:06,400 --> 00:05:08,560
Speaker 3: they made them with like you know, the source work

96
00:05:08,640 --> 00:05:13,120
Speaker 3: that showed, as Kim dot com said, quote unquote, the

97
00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:16,159
Speaker 3: videos without the orgs in them, Like that's something that

98
00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:18,520
Speaker 3: you could prove that you did. Nobody ever came forward,

99
00:05:19,560 --> 00:05:22,680
Speaker 3: no one with any credible evidence whatsoever. One of the

100
00:05:22,720 --> 00:05:24,600
Speaker 3: last things people say as well is that they say

101
00:05:24,640 --> 00:05:28,080
Speaker 3: it's daytime in the videos, it's actually nighttime in both

102
00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:31,719
Speaker 3: of those videos. That whammy footage that I discussed works

103
00:05:31,800 --> 00:05:35,240
Speaker 3: day and night. They can change the lighting effects because

104
00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:38,599
Speaker 3: it's computer generated based on multiple sensors coming in. And

105
00:05:38,640 --> 00:05:41,280
Speaker 3: the reason why you film in thermal again is because

106
00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,680
Speaker 3: partially because you want good evidence and intelligence, but also

107
00:05:44,720 --> 00:05:47,000
Speaker 3: partially because it's nighttime in that video. That's why you

108
00:05:47,040 --> 00:05:49,239
Speaker 3: see all the noise in that video. That's not an effect.

109
00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:53,320
Speaker 3: That's a real thermal video, high grade military thermal video

110
00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,680
Speaker 3: at nighttime. Oh sorry. There is one last one, which

111
00:05:56,720 --> 00:05:58,400
Speaker 3: is they say that there was isn't there something about

112
00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:03,279
Speaker 3: a nineties video game? People remember that that was mentioned

113
00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:06,640
Speaker 3: by the Corridor crew. I think the Lower Lodge and

114
00:06:06,640 --> 00:06:10,280
Speaker 3: Amcwest also all mentioned this. It doesn't even match on

115
00:06:10,320 --> 00:06:13,000
Speaker 3: a single frame. In fact, nobody will even do a

116
00:06:13,000 --> 00:06:16,000
Speaker 3: pixel comparison because they all know that it doesn't match.

117
00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:18,799
Speaker 3: All these people know it doesn't actually match. It doesn't

118
00:06:18,800 --> 00:06:21,160
Speaker 3: have the same number of frames the asset. They claim

119
00:06:21,240 --> 00:06:25,080
Speaker 3: this Pyramania shackleve asset has seven frames in it, and

120
00:06:25,120 --> 00:06:28,080
Speaker 3: it's images of a real fire that somebody took and

121
00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:31,880
Speaker 3: they stacked it because it's an old effect. And the

122
00:06:32,360 --> 00:06:36,599
Speaker 3: zapp is actually only four frames, and they're claiming that

123
00:06:36,640 --> 00:06:38,960
Speaker 3: someone like modified that to get it to match. It

124
00:06:38,960 --> 00:06:42,960
Speaker 3: doesn't even even from just a basic comparison. It doesn't match.

125
00:06:43,440 --> 00:06:47,600
Speaker 2: Did you have the visual effects visual effects people analyzed

126
00:06:47,600 --> 00:06:49,760
Speaker 2: by CGI people and so forth? Did you have them

127
00:06:49,800 --> 00:06:50,760
Speaker 2: analyze this video?

128
00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:55,080
Speaker 3: So let's see who has looked at it. The people

129
00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:57,159
Speaker 3: that I have on my SIDEA there are certain people

130
00:06:57,200 --> 00:07:00,920
Speaker 3: that have supported it to have X expertise, Bob Greenier,

131
00:07:01,600 --> 00:07:05,680
Speaker 3: Professor Simon Holland as well, who's a science filmmaker. I've

132
00:07:05,720 --> 00:07:08,880
Speaker 3: had one of the podcasts I went on early on,

133
00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:13,679
Speaker 3: I think it was Pod Disclosure. He knows Jeffrey Ford,

134
00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:18,440
Speaker 3: who is one of the lead Marvel VFX or editors

135
00:07:19,400 --> 00:07:22,600
Speaker 3: with Marvel, and he had said that for something like this,

136
00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:25,080
Speaker 3: after watching the videos, it would take three to six

137
00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:28,760
Speaker 3: months minimum to like, you know, kind of figure out

138
00:07:28,760 --> 00:07:31,280
Speaker 3: how it should look through the storyboard, all the stuff

139
00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:33,840
Speaker 3: that would be required for something like that. And in

140
00:07:33,880 --> 00:07:36,560
Speaker 3: this case, the window of time is somewhere between four

141
00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:40,560
Speaker 3: days if you believe the description in the video that

142
00:07:40,600 --> 00:07:44,840
Speaker 3: says it was received March twelfth, or seventy two days

143
00:07:44,880 --> 00:07:48,400
Speaker 3: if you believed that the published day, which says May nineteen.

144
00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:51,560
Speaker 3: So I think it's reasonable to say that anybody with

145
00:07:52,120 --> 00:07:55,280
Speaker 3: CGI experience that many people have given their testimonials on

146
00:07:55,320 --> 00:07:57,000
Speaker 3: social media over the last year and a half to

147
00:07:57,120 --> 00:08:00,000
Speaker 3: support that the claim that it would be quite difficult

148
00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:02,520
Speaker 3: for anyone to make this, and if they did make it,

149
00:08:02,600 --> 00:08:05,200
Speaker 3: they would have to be a team most likely, not

150
00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:08,600
Speaker 3: just like an individual that's making this. And the big

151
00:08:08,640 --> 00:08:12,560
Speaker 3: problem is the requirements to make it are primarily not

152
00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:15,400
Speaker 3: just VFX. To make these videos, you have to have

153
00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:19,360
Speaker 3: knowledge of US military surveillance as well, including the case

154
00:08:19,440 --> 00:08:23,160
Speaker 3: is Whami footage. Even when I was exposing and researching

155
00:08:23,200 --> 00:08:25,200
Speaker 3: this just a few months ago, basically no one on

156
00:08:25,280 --> 00:08:27,880
Speaker 3: planet Earth knew that we had this, and some of

157
00:08:27,880 --> 00:08:29,640
Speaker 3: the stuff that I was looking at do go back

158
00:08:29,680 --> 00:08:32,360
Speaker 3: ten years, but very few people I think would have

159
00:08:32,400 --> 00:08:35,040
Speaker 3: been aware back then. And then the physics side of it,

160
00:08:35,679 --> 00:08:38,240
Speaker 3: when we're looking at we're looking at real physics, but

161
00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:41,960
Speaker 3: we're looking at this idea of physics of zero point energy,

162
00:08:41,960 --> 00:08:45,920
Speaker 3: where space is not empty, and that zero isn't really

163
00:08:45,960 --> 00:08:50,000
Speaker 3: necessarily the bottom, and that things like negative energy can

164
00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:53,839
Speaker 3: potentially be real. In fact, I think these videos, as

165
00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:57,480
Speaker 3: we're going to talk about in more segments, proved that

166
00:08:57,520 --> 00:09:00,480
Speaker 3: this idea of zero point energy is real. So you

167
00:09:00,559 --> 00:09:03,760
Speaker 3: have to have a lot of knowledge combine knowledge. So

168
00:09:03,840 --> 00:09:06,520
Speaker 3: unless someone like Eric W. Davis, who is like the

169
00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:11,120
Speaker 3: government's leading physicists on warp drives and wormholes, created these videos.

170
00:09:11,640 --> 00:09:14,480
Speaker 3: I just can't see anyone plane earth having the knowledge

171
00:09:14,520 --> 00:09:17,320
Speaker 3: and foresight. And then to include the whole story of

172
00:09:17,520 --> 00:09:20,680
Speaker 3: Image three seven zero, which the plane is still missing.

173
00:09:20,880 --> 00:09:24,200
Speaker 3: How would the person who hoaxed these videos even know

174
00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:26,120
Speaker 3: that we were never going to find the plane because

175
00:09:26,160 --> 00:09:28,360
Speaker 3: the moment we found the plane, the whole hoax would

176
00:09:28,360 --> 00:09:32,199
Speaker 3: be exposed. Now, I think that the hard true reality

177
00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:35,800
Speaker 3: is that these videos aren't fake, that they are real,

178
00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:38,840
Speaker 3: and they are the plane that we've been searching for

179
00:09:38,840 --> 00:09:42,520
Speaker 3: for almost eleven years now, and that they do answer

180
00:09:43,000 --> 00:09:46,240
Speaker 3: the questions that we've been wanting to know about, Well,

181
00:09:46,240 --> 00:09:48,480
Speaker 3: what are we hiding with ufopn on, what's the big stupit?

182
00:09:48,480 --> 00:09:51,040
Speaker 3: What's so dangerous and scary and dark that we can't

183
00:09:51,040 --> 00:09:53,800
Speaker 3: tell people? Well, when you watch those videos, it's pretty

184
00:09:53,880 --> 00:09:55,960
Speaker 3: damn scary and dark. I don't want those videos to

185
00:09:55,960 --> 00:09:58,120
Speaker 3: be real anymore than anybody else does in terms of

186
00:09:58,520 --> 00:10:01,960
Speaker 3: what that means about our universe, what our government's capable of,

187
00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:05,319
Speaker 3: and what we as humanity are capable of in this universe.

188
00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:06,960
Speaker 2: So imagine they are real.

189
00:10:07,000 --> 00:10:07,520
Speaker 1: For a moment.

190
00:10:07,800 --> 00:10:13,280
Speaker 2: So then what happened to the people on board that plane?

191
00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:17,839
Speaker 2: Where did they go? And how is it that the satellite,

192
00:10:19,440 --> 00:10:22,400
Speaker 2: the satellites and the drones happened to be in the

193
00:10:22,440 --> 00:10:25,240
Speaker 2: right place at the right time to capture that on video.

194
00:10:26,360 --> 00:10:28,320
Speaker 3: Yeah, and that it goes to the thing that people

195
00:10:28,360 --> 00:10:30,520
Speaker 3: say is why is it there and what's recording it?

196
00:10:30,600 --> 00:10:32,640
Speaker 3: And so again, part of the reason why that satellite

197
00:10:32,679 --> 00:10:34,760
Speaker 3: video is not like moving is you're not looking through

198
00:10:34,760 --> 00:10:38,240
Speaker 3: a satellite. They're just sending data to a relay satellite,

199
00:10:38,280 --> 00:10:40,400
Speaker 3: which is probably NROL twenty two, which is what you

200
00:10:40,440 --> 00:10:42,520
Speaker 3: see in the bottom left of the satellite video. It's

201
00:10:42,559 --> 00:10:45,760
Speaker 3: probably the relay satellite beaming all the data down. And

202
00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:48,079
Speaker 3: that's the reason why it doesn't look like that moves.

203
00:10:48,200 --> 00:10:50,400
Speaker 3: The only reason why they would have these assets they're

204
00:10:50,440 --> 00:10:53,240
Speaker 3: filming like this if you talk to anybody in the military,

205
00:10:53,320 --> 00:10:57,760
Speaker 3: is this is an operation. And that's the big dark

206
00:10:57,840 --> 00:11:00,360
Speaker 3: secret of the image three seven zero videos is that

207
00:11:01,200 --> 00:11:04,079
Speaker 3: why are they filming Because it's an operation that they

208
00:11:04,120 --> 00:11:06,880
Speaker 3: are doing on that plane that is human orbs that

209
00:11:06,920 --> 00:11:11,120
Speaker 3: we are seeing US military, US Navy. In fact, I'm

210
00:11:11,160 --> 00:11:14,679
Speaker 3: ready to pin this on the US Navy obviously probably

211
00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,360
Speaker 3: the CIA is involved as well. People like that not

212
00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:21,320
Speaker 3: super familiar with how the intel agencies work. But the

213
00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:23,640
Speaker 3: US Navy is doing this. They're recording with a drone

214
00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:27,200
Speaker 3: and they're recording with their WAMI footage, and this footage

215
00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:29,640
Speaker 3: got leaked on the internet. And then the true story

216
00:11:29,640 --> 00:11:33,520
Speaker 3: of the plane is that they probably concocted in an

217
00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:35,679
Speaker 3: emergency event on the plane in this case of fire,

218
00:11:36,520 --> 00:11:38,400
Speaker 3: so they forced the fire to happen in the plane.

219
00:11:38,480 --> 00:11:41,520
Speaker 3: Plane goes dark, turns around. Whose that's what you're going

220
00:11:41,600 --> 00:11:43,760
Speaker 3: to do in a fire event, which is very dangerous.

221
00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:47,040
Speaker 3: Try to land at the nearest airport, Penang Airport, it's

222
00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:49,880
Speaker 3: where the plane live. It's flying low. Who was seen

223
00:11:49,920 --> 00:11:54,080
Speaker 3: by about twenty different witnesses either on fire or flying low,

224
00:11:54,160 --> 00:11:55,559
Speaker 3: which is what you would do if the plane was

225
00:11:55,600 --> 00:12:01,959
Speaker 3: on fire, doesn't land at today. Probably was, and this

226
00:12:02,000 --> 00:12:05,920
Speaker 3: is completely speculative, but probably got some type of rendezvous

227
00:12:05,960 --> 00:12:09,880
Speaker 3: communication on a secure communication with the plane to say

228
00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:12,360
Speaker 3: come to this rendezvous point and you know, try to

229
00:12:12,440 --> 00:12:14,480
Speaker 3: land the plane here in the water and we'll you know,

230
00:12:14,559 --> 00:12:16,600
Speaker 3: fish out as many people as we can or something

231
00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:19,920
Speaker 3: like that. And it gets to that rendezvous point, which

232
00:12:19,960 --> 00:12:22,800
Speaker 3: is probably where we see the plane in the videos,

233
00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:25,040
Speaker 3: and I don't know if the pilot would in it

234
00:12:25,320 --> 00:12:27,040
Speaker 3: or not. A lot of people lasting because they see

235
00:12:27,040 --> 00:12:29,360
Speaker 3: the orbs. There's a lot of scenarios where the orbs

236
00:12:29,360 --> 00:12:32,959
Speaker 3: can potentially be invisible, so I can't say. But they

237
00:12:33,080 --> 00:12:36,000
Speaker 3: zapped the plane with those orbs, they pulled those orbs out,

238
00:12:36,040 --> 00:12:38,600
Speaker 3: and they were ready for and they were watching, And

239
00:12:38,840 --> 00:12:41,560
Speaker 3: I think what we're seeing in there is teleportation. It

240
00:12:41,600 --> 00:12:44,640
Speaker 3: could also people speculated could be cloaking. Could it be annihilation.

241
00:12:45,160 --> 00:12:47,720
Speaker 3: I don't think it's cloaking because the smoke stops, so

242
00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:50,120
Speaker 3: if it was just playing being cloaked, I think we

243
00:12:50,160 --> 00:12:55,120
Speaker 3: see the smoke, it could be annihilation potentially. But you know,

244
00:12:55,320 --> 00:12:57,320
Speaker 3: if we look at physics, we think that like you

245
00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:00,560
Speaker 3: can't create or destroy energy, like it just has to

246
00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:04,320
Speaker 3: be transferred. So that's a huge amount of mass we're

247
00:13:04,320 --> 00:13:07,080
Speaker 3: seeing in an airplane, So it's in my opinion unlikely

248
00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:09,000
Speaker 3: for it to be annihilation. What we're looking at there,

249
00:13:09,040 --> 00:13:11,839
Speaker 3: I think is a teleportation of a faster than light

250
00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:15,800
Speaker 3: superluminal travel. And it wouldn't surprised me to see that.

251
00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:19,200
Speaker 3: We have videos on the other side either, which is

252
00:13:19,240 --> 00:13:22,000
Speaker 3: spooky and just real quick I want to say as

253
00:13:22,040 --> 00:13:25,880
Speaker 3: well that that UFO hearing that happened, they claimed that

254
00:13:25,960 --> 00:13:28,520
Speaker 3: they have videos, like hundreds of thousands of videos of

255
00:13:28,600 --> 00:13:31,319
Speaker 3: UFO videos that they've just never shown anybody called immaculate

256
00:13:31,480 --> 00:13:34,480
Speaker 3: constellation I think they called it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I

257
00:13:34,480 --> 00:13:37,680
Speaker 3: almost guaranteed these are like the Crown jewels, Like someone

258
00:13:37,800 --> 00:13:42,280
Speaker 3: stole the crown jewels from the dragon's dungeon and ran

259
00:13:42,320 --> 00:13:45,000
Speaker 3: away with them. And that's that makes three some zero videos.

260
00:13:45,320 --> 00:13:48,600
Speaker 3: But there's almost certainly other videos like this. So last

261
00:13:48,600 --> 00:13:52,520
Speaker 3: thing I'll say is why, well, it's counter espionage. If

262
00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:54,680
Speaker 3: you look at the people on board the plane, these

263
00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:58,000
Speaker 3: semiconductor engineers stick out like a sore thumb. There's twenty

264
00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:01,400
Speaker 3: of them. They're Chinese Nationals woroking for the American company

265
00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:05,560
Speaker 3: that is connected US Aerospace and Defense. They were working

266
00:14:05,559 --> 00:14:10,440
Speaker 3: on advanced sem are superconductive microchips. The NSA actually had

267
00:14:10,440 --> 00:14:14,080
Speaker 3: a report that we found showed that so they were

268
00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:16,560
Speaker 3: the motive and they were probably defecting to China bringing

269
00:14:17,040 --> 00:14:19,040
Speaker 3: some of the technology to China, and the United States

270
00:14:19,120 --> 00:14:21,840
Speaker 3: was through with it and was like we're gonna stop

271
00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:24,480
Speaker 3: that from happening. But in a spectacular way that sends

272
00:14:24,520 --> 00:14:28,400
Speaker 3: a message for them to not do it. Now, these

273
00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:33,400
Speaker 3: videos getting out destroys that because now you go from

274
00:14:33,440 --> 00:14:36,600
Speaker 3: a situation where you're laughing at your enemy, where you've

275
00:14:36,840 --> 00:14:40,040
Speaker 3: disappeared this plane and the world has no idea, none

276
00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:42,920
Speaker 3: the wiser. Now these videos are out, and now the

277
00:14:43,000 --> 00:14:45,960
Speaker 3: enemy knows not only did use that the plane, they

278
00:14:46,000 --> 00:14:50,520
Speaker 3: can figure out how you did it and reverse engineer it,

279
00:14:50,680 --> 00:14:53,880
Speaker 3: make their own or make their defenses against it as well.

280
00:14:54,680 --> 00:14:59,160
Speaker 2: Why disappear the plane that way using this incredible technology?

281
00:14:59,160 --> 00:15:01,240
Speaker 2: Why not just shoot it out of the sky?

282
00:15:02,880 --> 00:15:05,400
Speaker 3: Now that's the number one question, And I wonder did

283
00:15:05,400 --> 00:15:08,120
Speaker 3: somebody lose their job over that decision? Ultimately might be

284
00:15:08,160 --> 00:15:10,760
Speaker 3: considered the biggest blunder of all time. In fact, you

285
00:15:10,760 --> 00:15:12,880
Speaker 3: can have a strong argument that you could blame Obama

286
00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:16,960
Speaker 3: for that, like why are we wasting our time using

287
00:15:17,120 --> 00:15:18,960
Speaker 3: orbs on this airplane when you could just shoot a

288
00:15:19,040 --> 00:15:21,680
Speaker 3: rocket add or whatever you want to do. Now, I

289
00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:24,720
Speaker 3: think that people could have survived the actual orbing. If

290
00:15:24,760 --> 00:15:27,560
Speaker 3: this is a wormhole. It turns out human wormholes are

291
00:15:27,640 --> 00:15:31,360
Speaker 3: humanly traversible under the right conditions. And there's been a

292
00:15:31,360 --> 00:15:33,960
Speaker 3: lot of literature over the last four or five years

293
00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:37,480
Speaker 3: that support that notion, so humans could survive that part.

294
00:15:37,480 --> 00:15:39,920
Speaker 3: That's not the part I'm worried about. It's the fire part.

295
00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:42,720
Speaker 3: There was five hundred pounds of lithium ion batteries in

296
00:15:42,720 --> 00:15:45,560
Speaker 3: those planes. One of the side things I do is

297
00:15:45,600 --> 00:15:48,920
Speaker 3: try to expose people to dangers of lithium ion battery fires.

298
00:15:49,440 --> 00:15:53,080
Speaker 3: It's just one inhalation and it's game over. That's how

299
00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:56,880
Speaker 3: dangerous litium ion battery smoke is. That's why some was

300
00:15:57,040 --> 00:15:58,520
Speaker 3: certainly a lithium ion battery.

301
00:15:58,560 --> 00:16:01,080
Speaker 2: Related to this point, Don't it possible it was a

302
00:16:01,080 --> 00:16:03,680
Speaker 2: rescue operation? Is it? Is it possible that we're trying

303
00:16:03,720 --> 00:16:05,280
Speaker 2: to rescue it? Is?

304
00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:08,560
Speaker 3: It is possible? And when I used to push that

305
00:16:08,560 --> 00:16:11,760
Speaker 3: that notion, people would laugh at me. People would say,

306
00:16:11,760 --> 00:16:14,000
Speaker 3: there's no way, the US government, no chance it's a

307
00:16:14,040 --> 00:16:17,240
Speaker 3: rescue operation. But I used to think that until I

308
00:16:17,320 --> 00:16:20,680
Speaker 3: heard something called Diego Garcia Whistleblower, a letter to action

309
00:16:20,880 --> 00:16:23,040
Speaker 3: Forbes and you can find it actually on my YouTube

310
00:16:23,120 --> 00:16:26,560
Speaker 3: channel at just x fashion is all my social media,

311
00:16:26,640 --> 00:16:29,680
Speaker 3: but also my YouTube. Strongly recommend people listen to it,

312
00:16:30,040 --> 00:16:32,120
Speaker 3: because after I listened to that, I went, okay, yeah,

313
00:16:32,120 --> 00:16:36,400
Speaker 3: it wasn't a rescue operation. It's definitely an spionage event

314
00:16:36,480 --> 00:16:40,520
Speaker 3: or a counter espionage event. It's dark to think that,

315
00:16:40,680 --> 00:16:43,640
Speaker 3: but you know that's what It makes sense when you

316
00:16:43,680 --> 00:16:45,600
Speaker 3: think about the power of the technology.

317
00:16:48,160 --> 00:16:51,440
Speaker 1: Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at

318
00:16:51,440 --> 00:16:54,400
Speaker 1: one a m. Eastern and go to Coast to coastam

319
00:16:54,440 --> 00:16:55,520
Speaker 1: dot com for more