WEBVTT - What To Know Ahead Of India's Election

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of The Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Time show wasn't And I'm Tracy Allaway. Tracy, Remember, I

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>think it was just last week's episode, and I was saying,

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>for however much we talk about it, I really feel

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>like I have no understanding of what's going on in

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese economy. Um, yes, it was just last week's episode.

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're not alone in that sentiment. I

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people who are actually actively involved

0:00:39.360 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in that market are probably just as confused as you are.

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>And I remained confused, although I did learn a bit

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>after last week's episode. Well, you know, there's another gigantic economy,

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and after thinking about it this morning, it's also really huge,

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and I probably even know less about this economy than China's. Wait,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>uh an economy almost as big. You said, Yeah, well

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not China, and it's obviously not the US. What's

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>another Really, it has to be India. Yeah, so right,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>here's another country of the billion people, huge emerging market.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>And when I think about it, I realized, wow, I

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>even know less about how the Indian economy functions. In

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the state of the Indian economy right now, uh than

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.360
<v Speaker 1>China's yeah, and obviously India is, Um. Well, it's a

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>big economy. It's also a fast growing economy relative to

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of others out there in the world. But

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>it's also kind of unique in many ways. And whenever

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think about India, one of the things that always

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>springs to mind is the uniqueness of its market, Like

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it's still a very closed off market in many many ways.

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Do you mean do you mean financial markets specifically financial markets? Yes,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I should be clear, right, So I think not a

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of people talk about it, and not a lot

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>of people discuss it. Certainly it doesn't get as much

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>attention in China, and perhaps for good reason, but I

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>think it's an important time to be talking about it more.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, uh, it's growing rapidly. There's also an

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>election coming up this year, so I think it's uh,

0:02:13.800 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>it's time that we had a an India episode. I'm excited.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually really really interested in the upcoming India elections. Um,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they haven't the dates haven't actually been announced yet, but

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they could be announced basically any day after we published

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>this episode, because we are recording the day before. India

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is also due to release its latest government budget and

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:42.839
<v Speaker 1>this is like the big set piece from the current administration,

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.959
<v Speaker 1>the Modi government, um the Nationalist government, and it's gonna

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>be really interesting to see what they do and whether

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they pull out all the stops to try to win

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>support ahead of the election. So in light of all

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of this news that's about to happen, I think we

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>should get started today. We have two guests, two very

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.679
<v Speaker 1>smart commenters on all things macro and they know a

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 1>lot about India, my own sex Saria of Macro Risk

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Advisors and Serenavas tra Vedanta of the Jerome Levy Forecasting Center,

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>both of them joining us here in studio to talk

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>about the election and the economy and the markets. And

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you both for coming in. Thank you, thank you

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy thanks guys. So, uh, let's get started first. Let's

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about the election it's coming up with. As Tracy mentioned,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the exact dates, but uh, both of

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>you and Snavas, you could start first. What are you

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be watching for in this election? Well, you know,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean it all comes down to the economy. As

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>James Scottville famously said, it's the economy stupid. And you know, curiously,

0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>all the discussion in India is not much about the economy.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It's all about you know, combinations, cast politics and all

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. You know, it's it rarely is about the economy.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>But I actually look back in to the history of

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the last eleven elections and I looked at you've just

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>simple prediction using a simple model of how GDP has

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>done during the term of the incumbent government compared to

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the previous five years, and that has predicted nine over

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the eleven directions. It is the economy stupid, and I

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>think Indian electorate is not given enough credit. They They

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>are actually pretty savvy in that regard. I think that's

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. The participation rate and in the for elections

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is in the sixties, much higher than say most drop markets,

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>and that is trended higher over time. And the sort

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:43.840
<v Speaker 1>of incumbency anti incumbency that Samas mentioned has become more

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>correlated with economic outcomes than social or religious related outcomes

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>than it used to be in the past. So in

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>many ways, I sort of see this as a maturation

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of the Indian electorate. It's very easy to forget sometimes

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that the country is not even seventy years old. Basically

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>starting seven so it's a very very young country, and

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I sometimes think about it as a parallel to the

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>US maybe a hundred years ago, where you have a

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>sort of state laboratory style model, where you can have

0:05:19.960 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>massive variation between what's happening in one state. Was another

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.359
<v Speaker 1>myke on that point. Could we maybe back up for

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a second and could you perhaps walk us through how

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>we got to the current point because Moody, you know,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Moody won his current position. He sort of ran on

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:42.239
<v Speaker 1>a big, big economic platform. Walk us through what he's

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>been promising the Indian electorate and how the governmental system

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>actually works, because as Joe alluded to, like it's quite

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>different to what we see in other places like the US.

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.719
<v Speaker 1>So at the very high level, the political system or

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the government system in India is a parliamentary system. It's

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of a variant of the British system. The voters

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>don't vote for a person like in the US, to

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>become the head of the state. They vote for local

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>elections sort of like essentially, if you imagined, uh, you

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>voted for everybody in Congress, and then Congress came together

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and picked based on whoever had the votes in a

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>party sense, who's going to lead the government. The other

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>differences that it's not a two party system like in

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the US, it's some multi party system similar to say, uh,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:33.039
<v Speaker 1>closer to something which people might be more aware of,

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like Germany where you have a number of parties come

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>together and then they formed the government and then they

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>picked someone based on electoral math to to be the leader.

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>More specifically to the current government. So since nine seven

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and Streams might have a more specific answer on this,

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say more than eight percenter. Time the government

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>has been run by one party, which is the Congress

0:06:56.000 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Party UM and only since the late nineties has the

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>b JP become a national level party of any comport um.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>And they had power from thousand and four previously, and

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and fourteen was when Moody won. And obviously

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different things that people will promise,

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but really I think it boils down to two things.

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>One thing between us already mentioned it was a very

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>poor five year run for the economy from two thousand

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and nine to fourteen, And on top of it, there's

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>a there's extremely negative sentiment environment for the current government

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of the time, centered on corruption. So Moody came in

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and sort of made himself the centerpiece of this idea

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to give you good governance which is

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 1>essentially anti corruption and economic outcomes that are better. And

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>has Moody delivered on that, both the anti corruption and

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the good governance, you know, I mean, I'm not prevy

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to all the corruption things. This is always hard to improve.

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>But from what I have heard, the high level corruption

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is down for sure. And one of the signs that

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>corruption is down is also that if you look at

0:08:11.160 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>real estate deals, um, they are down, and real estate

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 1>prices are down because you can't use mostly real estate

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>deals are none heavily on cash and there's not enough

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>cash in circulation. So in that sense, corruption is down. Yes,

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned and just on this sort of delivery

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of economic growth, you talked about the strong relationship between

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>electoral results and growth. Has the growth been strong enough

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years that Moody is likely the favorite. No,

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it is touch and go. I would say it's a

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>toss up. The growth has not real growth has been occaish,

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.400
<v Speaker 1>but not strong enough to make it a slam dunk.

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So it's a touch and go. And part of the

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>reason why it has not been is the government actually

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>has been on an austerity osterity bench much opposed to

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>my advice which I've been consistently writic about. Um, they

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>see coming into two thousand four, when when this government

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was taking the office, Uh, the India was facing a

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:09.520
<v Speaker 1>corporate sector deal everaging those huge amount of corps sets

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to debt and banks were struggling with non performing loans,

0:09:12.840 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of nonperforming loans. So basically credit system was shot.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So in that environment, the government has has to do

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the lifting. If you're going to listen to advice that

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>the government has to consolidate its physical house, which the

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>moding government started doing. On top of that, they took

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>two major very disruptive reforms. One was demonetization and the

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>other was GST, the Generalized Sales Tax. So it's a

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>national national VAT kind of thing, replacing a huge mess

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of a labyrinthine taxes around the country. So you're doing

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>those kind of reforms at the same time you're tightening belt. Uh,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not good for growth. I mean, obviously it's

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 1>remarkable that growth has still been reasonably good given this

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of policy. So I im mentioned in the intro

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that we have the budget UM coming up. It's supposed

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to be released on a Friday, February second, and it does.

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It does feel like both sides UM are are basically

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of ramping up or trying to ramp up their spending. Now,

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I think the opposition party recently was pledging a

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>minimum income guarantee for farmers. So how how serious are

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 1>people about I guess you'd call it sort of competitive

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 1>populist economic policies. Are they actually going to start spending

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in significant amounts now? Well, you know, I think the

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.840
<v Speaker 1>populist tide in Indian economy has turned. It was no

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>longer as populist, even though they make these statements, and

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>surely the opposition is far more populist. And I don't

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think Moody is as competitive populist. You know. One of

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>his things is he just doesn't give into this kind

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of a populist blackmail. That's been his gig all the time.

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's why all that people have been talking

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>about him, uh stimulating the economy for two or three

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>years now, he has not been doing it because that's

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>not what he believes and he doesn't believe in giving

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>people buying people's vote through Phoebe's He says, look, you

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>trust my my policies and it's going to work. And um,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so maybe he will do something in tomorrow's budget, but

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be very much against his instinct. If you

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>go back to him when he was chief minister in

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>gudarrad Um, he one of the things that he did

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>was he took away free power. You know, one of

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the things that all governments give is free power to

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the to farmers. But effectively, what good is free power

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>if you don't actually get the power? Right, So he said, look,

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>I won't give you free power, but I will ensure

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that you will get power at a reasonable rate, but

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it will be reliable and will be supplied all the time.

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>And he'll eventually won on that platform. So you know,

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I don't think he will compete

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on populacy. Well, so on these sort of I guess

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you could call him supply cide reforms or structure reforms

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>to the economy, whether it's the nationwide tax system to

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>unit by the patchwork, whether it's on just making sure

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the power systems run. Has he, in your view, been

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>successful on those things? Does he get the structure reforms

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>done that he claims he can do. He has done

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, but there's still a lot to be

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>done if you look at it from a purely macro

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 1>point of view, you know, with labor and everything. But

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think his major plank is delivering the stuff that

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>most most of us take for granted and developed countries,

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff like you know, toilets and electricity. You know, India's

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>not even even now fully electrified. You cannot believe this,

0:12:35.800 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>but it's still not fully electrified. So delivering electricity, delivering toilets,

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>clean water, you know, those kind of things. Um immunization helped,

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, those kind of things, very basic, grass tech stuff.

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what his his plank is going to be,

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is that. Look, I have given you guys this and

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that's his populous message. So a few points here. One

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:03.079
<v Speaker 1>I think where I disagree with Novas because I want

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that this podcast is not everybody agreeing

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>on everything. Is that coming into uh there wasn't in

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>my view, much of a choice in terms of what

0:13:13.280 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the government had to do. If you remember at that time,

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 1>uh Morgan Stanley had coined this popular phrase fragile five

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and India is one of them, and nobody talks about

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>it that way anymore. And a large part of that

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>has to do with what the Central Bank did with

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Rajan at the head at that time and in the

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>central government in adjusting one the oil subsidy policy, and

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially they disentangle the negative feedback loop from higher oil

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>prices to both a bigger deficits of the government and

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the external sector and generally sort of changing the trajectory

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of the fiscal of the fiscal side. Now it is

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>fair to maybe say that, Okay, at what point do

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you turn that around and you stopped doing that and

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>add sort of government resources that are going to be

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.079
<v Speaker 1>sort of deaf expansionary, but maybe you can handle it now.

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>That is a fair point of debate. But I don't

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think that the overall action was entirely unjustified given what

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the situation on the ground. But this is a difference

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>between an e M and a t M not being

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>able to do countersecut policy when you want to. If

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>if if India could do counter cecultical policy when they

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to, they would be the US, but they aren't.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>The other point would be in terms of what are

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>they likely to do? I do think that they will

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 1>engage in competitive populism. Maybe there will definitely be a

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>gap between what the opposition is promising and what the

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the current party is going to promise. But I am

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>while I understand the point that that is not as instinct.

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>The instincts get over ridden when the election is three

0:14:54.120 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>months away. I'd be curious to get both your thoughts

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on the structural reforms that have already been mentioned. The

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>demonetization move was, I guess is now widely considered a

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty unpopular one within India, but typically foreign investors love

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this kind of thing, right, Like everyone talks about em

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and the need for structural reform in India is actually

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>doing some of it with some degree of success or

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>at least conviction. So how is that playing out both

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>domestically and on the international scene. So here's what's happening

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>with It happened with demonetization. Whatever the original logic for

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>it was. I don't know whether that has ranned out,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>But here's what. What are three good things that have

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>come out of it. First of all, the the decline

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>in growth that came from demonetization was pretty temporary. Um

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, World Bank has a paper on this based

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>on using satellite imagery of electricity electricity intensity. Um So,

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a sharp decline but quickly reversed. The benefits

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>are one, tax buoyancy and tax collections in the tax

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>base has increased. Even FD had an articles tax buoyancy.

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw you use that Termainent tweet the other day.

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Tax boyancy is how fast your revenues grow relative to GDP.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So GDP goes okay, so, um so that has improved

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>number one. Number two, the tax collection and the tax

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>base have improved. Followed up with g ST. The tax

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>base is widened by okay, so that's one. That's a

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>major thing. Um so in future. As Mink just pointed out,

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>India is not the US, and one of the reasons

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>India is not the U S or any e M

0:16:45.920 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is not a developed market is because it doesn't have

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the physical capacity or the tax base to be able

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to sustain large programs. Well before we uh go further

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>down this line, what do you say to my exclaim that, look,

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>even if it wasn't the time for austerity due to

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the external situation, India just didn't have the capacity from

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>too now to do much more on the fiscal front. No, no,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I I do. I disagree with that. I think there

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>was more capacity than It doesn't mean that they should

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>have they should be doing five six pers in like

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>China does you know nothing, nothing of the stock, but

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>significantly more than what they did. So I think it's

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>one of degree. I think I think he probably would

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. Yeah, I think maybe two years ago

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they could have turned things around once it became clear

0:17:33.720 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that the currency was sort of generally stabilized, because I

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think foreign investors honestly are looking at, oh my god,

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the GDP, that the GDP is like thirty business points hire,

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not going to take all their money out.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>The other thing related to that is to trace these

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>questions around how are foreign investors, you know, sort of

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>generally involved in this market. I think initially she made

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the point that it's sort of a you know, low

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>connect tipt market foreigners. I don't think actually that's right.

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>On the equity side, it's a forty plus percide ownership

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.960
<v Speaker 1>by foreigners, so but on the that side it's in

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the single digits. So the so the difference is compared

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to most other em it's the equity ownership that tends

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>to be the capital counter risk as opposed to the

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>dead ownership, and it has very little compared to most

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>countries dollar debt, So it's it's a very low dollarization

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 1>economy and therefore it can sort of sustain a lot

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>of these other problems. Uh that that happened in this

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>place like Indonesia or Mexico where foreigners on a lot

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of bonds, they on a lot of dollar debt. Well,

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna ask, I mean this, uh, summer

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen, we saw various countries get in trouble, Turkey, Argentina,

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>coinciding with a pretty sharp jump in um oil prices,

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and so that really exacerbated some of their external tensions.

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think in both of those cases

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty levels of dollarrization in the economy. India also had

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't produce any oil, has a lot of oil import bills,

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>but that but they didn't struggles much. Well, the rupee

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 1>did come under pressure, but they didn't struggle as much

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 1>because the results were high and you know, the situation

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>was much better as compared to two. But on the

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>point on equity ownership, you know what has happened is

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>here the one of the consequences of demonetization is what

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you've done is you push people out of the cash economy, right,

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people who had black money, what

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>they would typically do is either keep it in gold

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>or by real estate, right, so those were the two

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>favored destinations. By pushing people away to more formal sector,

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you are actually financializing the economy. So the financial participation

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 1>in equity markets has increased leaps and bounds since two

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>thou sixteen, when after demonetization there's a big break in

0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>mutual fund influence, steady influence steadily increasing. So domestic PARTI

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.120
<v Speaker 1>patient has actually been a buffer against foreign this year

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:07.880
<v Speaker 1>foreign last year. Foreign institutional investors have been actually taking

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.920
<v Speaker 1>money out of Indian equity, but it was buffered by

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 1>by the domestic investors bringing in money. So that's been

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the impact of you know, eventually stabilization of

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy and more formalization of the economy. One thing

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that's helped on that front, also from the policy side,

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>is that the government pushed for significant increase in simply

0:20:30.240 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>linking people to bank accounts. So then thea say five

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>years ago, it was probably in the teens in terms

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of percentage of people who even had a bank account,

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>let alone people who had credit um and that has

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>jumped massively. So now you have people who are linked

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>into some sort of system and as are maybe shouldn't

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>ask talk about a little bit more is a sort

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of social security number type system that was Also, this

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is not a current government thing. This has been existing

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and been pushed for the last ten plus years, but

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it has sort of gone exponential in terms of coverage.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:07.639
<v Speaker 1>So you have a lot of simply formalization of the

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>economy that is taking place, which is not very sexy.

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not a creative to GDP in the moment, it

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>might not even be a creative to GDP in five

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>years time. But what it is doing it's it's building

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>institutional or state capacity to use a sort of more

0:21:22.200 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>formal term, that is that sort of board well for

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>putting a floor on growth over time. The on on

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>oil to the earlier point, I make two comments. One, actually,

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>oddly enough, India has become a pretty significant exporter of

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>oil from a product site because there's a big oil

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>industry and actually the biggest company in India's is Reliance,

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>which is an oil producer. So oil is a bit complicated.

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>But also and this, you know, going back to the

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>fiscal sort of contraction point. The one of the ways

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>that the fiscal is to expand when oil prices went

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>up was because the government essentially would step in and

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>protect the consumer completely, so the consumer would not see

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 1>any price increases, so you would have garn account increase

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>into more deficit and the fiscal increase dollar for dollar.

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 1>They essentially broke that linkage, and that's part of the

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 1>reason why when you had this big problem in Turkey,

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you did not have that in India because that the

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>fiscal reform had taken place. And you know, this is

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the small disagreement the Trense and are having here.

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that was the right thing to do, because

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>would it have been better if that spend a little

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>bit more money versus so the currency getting smashed ten

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:33.160
<v Speaker 1>percent further, it's not obvious to me that the tradeoff

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. But this was my point about structural reforms

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and attracting foreign investors versus how the domestic population might

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>feel about these reforms. At what point does you know,

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>strengthening institutions in various ways, introducing these supply side reforms,

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 1>at what point does that actually feed into the economy

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 1>and make everyone feel much better about their own place

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in the world, because I imagine at some point people

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>start to run out of patients and that's when you

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>come to sort of a crunch point for the government.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And at that point, that's when they might start introducing

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>these sort of competitive populist fiscal policies like we were

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier. These things, you know, they are they

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>are complicated because they what they are doing is they're

0:23:19.400 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>setting the scene. Doesn't mean that I think growth is

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 1>going to take off, right, uh. And if you look

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>through India's history, a lot of things have happened by serendipity,

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>but because the structure was in place, they were able

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of it. Fall into the software boom, right,

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the the investments in software boom, whether it was in

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the technical education infrastructure, or whether it was in the

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>domestic software industry which had been developing since the nineties, sixties, seventies,

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>all those things, they were like nobody even cared about

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>those things. And certainly when there was a software boom, oh,

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly all those things became a strength. Right. So it

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't but that's a long time. We don't know when

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 1>these things are going to benefit and how long it

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>will take. And your point is absolutely right. In the meantime, people,

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the electorate gets angry and and frustrated and and clearly

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>there are huge aspirations in a young country like India,

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>where the youth population is huge. They just don't want

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>simple things like free vs. You know, they want jobs,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>They want better prospects and that comes from growth. And yeah, sure,

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that those those pressures are there

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>in democracy, and um, they will spill over. Yes, This

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>is where I would go back to a point that

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I made earlier about sort of uh, sort of a

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>state laboratory type set up a perfect example of the

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>question that Tracy had already happened. So, Rajasthan is a

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>state on the west course of India, and there you

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>had a sort of state government which is also a

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>b JP one, but a much more aggressive one in

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>terms of the reforms that they were trying to pursue,

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>including on the labor side, which is one of the

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of biggest problems in India. And they pushed them through,

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but it came with a cost in terms of for

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a while depressing growth relative to the rest of the country.

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And they were thrown out of power, So you are

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>always sort of dealing with the situation where if you

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>push things too far at the cost of growth in

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the moment, are you then taking yourself out of doing

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>better forms in the future. So it's it's really an

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>optimization problem that I don't think there's any right answer.

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's interesting talking about that sequence because it

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>now strikes me listening to this is kind of the

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>opposite of China, which we were talking about last week,

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>which has just been sort of pedal to the floor

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>growth all around the country for a long time and

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.240
<v Speaker 1>now is sort of having to deal with these things.

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, what if that model isn't working,

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>we actually have to deal with restructuring and restructure where

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the demand came from. It sounds like India is kind

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of doing the opposite, uh, not going pedal to the

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 1>metal with growth, but actually trying to address some of

0:25:56.920 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>these things preemptively too hopefully have a brighter, brighter point

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Right. But India also faces, as opposed

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to China, more balance of payments um constraints compared to China, Right.

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing is India goes through these faces

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>all the time right. I mean it has these pedal

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to the mental growth phase which it had from two

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, but then it became unsustainable. It showed up

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in inflation and then eventually balance of payment problems, and

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>then the government got voted out because people don't like

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 1>inflation either. That's one of the beauties of democracy. You

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>get instant feedback, right and so um so then you

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.199
<v Speaker 1>get through this period of consolidation. But most of the

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>time what happens is the government that consolidates does not

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>reap the benefits of the consolidation. The same thing happened

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>from the government got vooted up and the next government

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed the benefits of the boom that came. You know.

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>That's that's sadly part of democracy. The other sort of

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the comparison to China is really interesting and I you know,

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>people make that all the time, a sort of clarification

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>thing that or something that really puts the under stock contrast.

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Think about where India is in the credit cyclip versus China.

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Real credit growth over the last seven years has been

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>near zero in India, so it and there's been a

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of dead consolidation. Even three years ago post TFC

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.679
<v Speaker 1>in dollar terms, the more npls that recognize in India

0:27:17.760 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>than China, and you think about these two countries are

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>not actually similar in terms of what their sizes and

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in terms of definitely not similar in terms of what

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the credit in the system is. So uh, a lot

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of this is not by design. I must say that

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this is not as if there's some set of people

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>are trying to say, Okay, this is how you want

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to do it. A lot of things happened in India.

0:27:36.480 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I like Tuniversa's word surrendipity. It just sort of happens.

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's because of the democratic structure. Maybe it's because

0:27:42.800 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>of the sort of you know, EU style. They're like

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>fift you know, I don't know how many states even anymore.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:51.320
<v Speaker 1>They keep changing all the time. Uh, it's very very varied.

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>And it what it does is it reduces the chances

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of I think, making bad mistakes. It doesn't have the

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>ramp like China US, but it does also it sort

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>of puts the floor in some ways in terms of

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>how badly things can get screwed up. All Right, So

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we started this podcast by saying it's the economy stupid.

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>So if the upcoming elections are all about the economy,

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and then I have to ask who do you think

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.880
<v Speaker 1>is gonna win? As it's a toss up. I think

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 1>at this point it's it's a toss up. It's going

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to be really close, and it's going to come to

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the managing the local coalitions. It's no party is going

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to get enough to form a government on its own, like,

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>so you are going to be I think back to

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what in India people called coalition politics, which is you

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of cobbled together seemingly people with not lined up

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>ideologies and trying to run a government for five years. Uh,

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that is the period where when things don't tend to

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>happen quickly enough and people get very frustrated. And I think, uh,

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the risk of that is higher now then it has

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>been in in the earlier part of the decade. Well,

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>will you both come on for a after the election

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>rap and then we sort of analyze what happened and

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>then talk about what's next. Sounds good, so we'll plan

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a follow up screen of oz tour of a Dante

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and my aunt Sex. Sorry, thank you very much for

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>joining us. I feel like my knowledge is still just

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>like scratching the service. But that's more than it was

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>this morning. Thanks guys, Thank you Tracy. Well, like I

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>said there, I still feel like I probably know nothing,

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but maybe a little bit more than I did before.

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But I did think, I mean, I did learn quite

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit and thinking about all these different structural reforms.

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, so often you hear that term structural reform

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of just some nonsense term that gets

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thrown around by someone trying to sound smart, or it's

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 1>just code word for cutting spending or cutting pensions. But

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it actually seems like the story in India is sort

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of far more nuanced and complicated than a lot of

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>discussions about so called structural reform. Yeah, I totally agree,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and I feel I feel a little well, I feel

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>like you. I feel like I should know more about India,

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>but sadly, I think most of my knowledge comes from

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Bollywood movies, which sadly don't have enough of political content

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to satisfy a discussion like this. Although I did know

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that many villages in India do not yet have electricity

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because I watched that Shower Khan movie where he goes

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>back to his home village and works on electrifying it. Anyway, Sorry,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go off on a Bollywood tangent um. It

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting. The last bit of the discussion where

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about the possibility of a coalition government

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>posts the elections. That'll be an interesting one because if

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>we think that people aren't satisfied right now under you know,

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a Modi government that has actually been able to get

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>quite a few things done, it's going to be really

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see how they react to a coalition

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 1>government where there's a lot of uncertainty and maybe the

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>possibility that the agenda sort of gets fought over and

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>not much gets accomplished. Yeah, it'll be interesting to watch.

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And I really liked a Serinavaz's point about how, for

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>better or worse in a democracy, Uh, the government that

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe does the difficult stuff of the structural reforms that

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't short term growth often doesn't get to reap the reward.

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's probably you could certainly point

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to several examples in the US where the president, uh,

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>just who gets credit for the booming economy just happens

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to be the one who came in after the last

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>one got booted out for a recession that maybe was

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>caused by something their predecessor did. So Yeah, that's just

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.960
<v Speaker 1>how it goes. But I'm now feel a little bit

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>prepared at least to watch the election, and I have

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 1>some knowledge of what people are voting on. It's gonna

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>be great and all. So I know we're recording this

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>before the budget announcement, but to the earlier conversation about

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Moody is going to go full on

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>populist economic policy Friday, February second will have revealed a

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of clues by the time we actually release this podcast. Okay,

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>so when you're listening, go read the articles about what

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:21.960
<v Speaker 1>happened a couple of days before. And on that note,

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart and I'm Tracy Alloway. I'm on Twitter at

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. And you should follow both of our guests

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 1>because there are also two of my favorite people to

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>follow on Twitter for all things India and macro and

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 1>politics and just a bunch of other stuff. Uh Serena

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>vostra Vedanta he's at T three on Twitter, and my

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 1>own Sex Saria He's at my own Sex Saria, so

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely you should follow them, and you should definitely follow

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>our producer Topur Foreheads. He's at for his tea on

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>her as well as the Bloomberg head of podcast Francesco

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Leave at Francesca Today. Thanks for listening.