WEBVTT - How Hollywood Dealmaker Thomas Dey Views the Streaming Wars

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business Varieties podcast featuring

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:17.079
<v Speaker 1>conversations with industry leaders about the business of media and

0:00:17.200 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>entertain I'm Todd Spangler with Variety Today. Our guest is

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Day, President and CEO of ACF Investment Bank and

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a top deal maker in the media and entertainment business.

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Welcome, Hi Todd. Thank you. So you co founded

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a c F in you've since then broke her numerous

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:42.159
<v Speaker 1>M and A deals across the sector. Um So, just

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe start off by saying, what is the lens through

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 1>which you look at the industry well as as the

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>listeners can tell from our voice. I starked it in

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the UK. UM really the start of the TV production

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>industry if I consider it back in two thousand and

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 1>three when the Communications Act came in transferring the rights

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of TV production creations from the broadcast to the actual

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>the producers and the creators, and that was the real

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>start of the industry because these companies became very valuable.

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>Um So, I think my perspective is really one of

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>spanning sort of two decades, and I've seen the industry

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>morphing and changing from broadcast to cable and now to stream.

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>My first question here is there's been a definitive shift

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 1>in viewing habits during the coronavirus pandemic um and how

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>media companies are reaching consumers. What what are your thoughts

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>here on how permanent this shift in behaviors and what

0:01:54.760 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are the implications for your business. There couldn't be a

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>more fundamental shift target that has occurred really in the

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>last five years, and the reason for that is that

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole business model itself has shifted. If we think

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>back to free to air linear viewing, people turn on

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the TV and what's on the TV they watch, and

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>in between the shows there's adverts that are being shown

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to them, and that is the real generator of cash

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for the broadcast. So the relationships actually between the broadcasters

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>stroke network and the advertiser and the actual consumers as

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a byproduct or actually to product themselves of that exchange

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>because they're watching the adverts. So we've had this very

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>complicated model for fifty seventy years or longer where actually

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 1>the consumers were a secondary consideration and just by their

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>volume of numbers they were considered important. Now this has

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>changed completely to the consumers becoming the subscribers and they're

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>directly engaging with the digital platforms to see the kind

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of content they want to see, and they're controlling what

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>they see and when they steer UM. And this is

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>being distributed now through quite a clever algorithm as opposed

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to um you know, expensive marketing. So the whole model

0:03:26.360 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>has changed fundamentally to what I believe to be a

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>superior product at a lower pricing. Well, it hasn't completely changed.

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>You still have TV networks. They're still large audiences for

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>linear television. There's still players in the game, aren't they.

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and I think free to air and broadcast

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and curated content will always have a place on our schedule.

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think that especially your question earlier about the pandemic,

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:59.440
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about what are they watching on the

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>streaming platforms more than anything else. Right, Yeah, so I

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>can't It's difficult to know where the new sort of

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>cable cutting numbers will will end up, but I think

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>it will be a lot deeper and a lot lower

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>than people think. It's an unstoppable trend, no doubt about it.

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And you're seeing companies like Disney or Media, NBC Universal

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, they're all shifting to point towards

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>this direct model going forward. I mean, they're putting all

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of their chips on that piece of felt. I think, yeah,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very exciting. I mean every week you're seeing a

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>new ark in in in the paper of variety, in

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>magazines talking about the shifts that are occurring. And these

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>shifts are in the institutions that have been around for

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years and now they're all changing their platform

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:59.239
<v Speaker 1>to really focus on content because the content then feeds

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:03.159
<v Speaker 1>into the digital platform. And we're seeing this right acrost

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the studios, right across the broadcasts, and right acrost the networks.

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Talk a little bit, tell us about the deal flow

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and the piece of the deals that you've had in

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the last say nine months during this during this lockdown periods,

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it has it gone up as it stayed the same.

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've seen productions halting has had had an

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>effect on the types of deals you're able to do.

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I think two things. I think one one

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is that the types of companies that were reliant on

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>large production crews going to far away places. These were

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the sort of traditional shows that were creating the profits

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that sold the companies that we are acting for and

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>when COVID hit that, we had about ten deals in

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>progress and eight of them were instantly on hold because

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the buyers had considerable issues in their own businesses where

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they were fighting fires and trying to work out what

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to do. And meanwhile our clients, the sellers were no

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>longer confident of their pipeline or their production. So it

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>was it was a complete seizing up of the industry UM,

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and I expected things to completely hold UM And what

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>actually happened is those types of deals did hold. So

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I was right in that regard. I think where I

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>was surprised, they were pleasantly surprised. A bunch of other

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.240
<v Speaker 1>deals didn't move forward, and people shifted their focus, and

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>we shifted our focus to try and find companies that

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't have that lines, so companies that had other ways

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of growing or other ways of being. Now, let's talk

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>about some of the recent deals that you've been UM

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>advising on. You were you were instrumental as as an

0:06:54.880 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>advisor for Charlie Brooker and Annabel Jones, creators of Black Mirror. UM.

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>They did a more deal with Netflix for their new

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in the production company Broken Bones. This was reported to

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>be a deal worth over a hundred million dollars. I

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know you can comment on that, but what what

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>were the dynamics in that particular that you that you

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>helped them secure. Of course, to the terms of the

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>deals are confidential, but what I can told about is

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that that type of deal was exactly the kind of

0:07:31.120 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>deal I'm talking about. Charlie Brooker and a Bell Jines

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>are the creators of Black Mirror. They did so at

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>their previous company that was an in them all um,

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and Netflix was looking for a relationship with them and

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>looking for a way to create compelling content. So this

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was a deal that was not reliant on huge teams

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of people and the historic performance. Who was very much

0:07:56.720 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a deal looking forward and working with two of the

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>most count of people in the industry and a ready

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>marrying them up with one of the most exciting digital platforms.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is all about growing a business, going forward

0:08:11.120 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and creating more content, you know, like the black enfranchises. Now,

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>once you seem kind of water finding and it's its

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>own level, let's say, and you've got whatever it is,

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>h five or seven or ten global streaming services, I mean,

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are we going to see a pullback on you know,

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>these kinds of pretty large overall deals with creators or

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is the competition just going to get fiercer for this

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of talent. I mean, I think that Netflix is

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the earlier initiatives of these types of deals,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and they've been the most active in the sort of

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>earliest time period, and some people would say they have overpaid.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, with all of these things,

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I think people are often accused, including the networks and

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>broadcasters that we've sold over a hundred companies too. They

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>always talk about are they overpaying? And I think the

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the question is are there companies that aren't doing enough

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to meet the new challenges that are And if you

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>don't do enough, what is the price of that? Because

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, capturing the top talent in the

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>market is always going to be um, you know, a

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>sure way of guaranteeing your future, whereas being you know,

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe more conservative with your investment means you might not

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be here. And I think, you know, so we've got

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to look at these shows and recognize that with a

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper and a pen, these writers can create

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:50.800
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar franchises. So it's really hard how to to

0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>assess how much to pay up front to gain that

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of watching. We were speaking a little bit earlier,

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know bridging your mouth, but you were

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:07.920
<v Speaker 1>saying that it's, um, it's become uh the case that

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>where you have a more agile type of production, one

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't require a lot of infrastructure, that those deals

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have been um been more fruitful in getting that you mentioned.

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the Bear Grills UH deal with with Bana

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>J tell us a little bit about what that was,

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:33.439
<v Speaker 1>what that involved, and why that happened at this particular time. Sure,

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think the deal with Bear and Bandage

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>closed slightly prior to COVID impact, but I think it's

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a very good example. Certainly, I know you still working

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>with them and content that they've been doing very well

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:56.679
<v Speaker 1>going forward because there's a very small production team that

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is being dropped by helicopter into the Amazon with some

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>fortunate or unfortunate leader of the country who then survives

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>with them for ex period of time. So this is

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>very much a sort of small group of people that

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>can create some quite exciting content without having huge crews

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily interacting with each other. So I think that the

0:11:20.440 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Natural Studios, which is what the opportunity was called was

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>about creating global content and really encouraging outdoor activity and

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>entertainment across the world. And man j has got a

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>very huge network production companies in each territory. So it

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>was a good marriage and it was a good idea.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I should note before I forget that you've been recognized

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in Varieties Dealmakers Impact Report for the last seven years

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and I just wanted to mention that. But on the

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>topic of UM, you know, industry consolidation. Obviously we've seen

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 1>in Disney buying the bulk of century backs. UM you're seeing,

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, those those types of UM massive deals. Does

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that does that put the brakes on M and A

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>in the industry or does it accelerate, you know, the

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>scrambled for positioning by other players. I think if you

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the last kind of ten fifteen years UM,

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.959
<v Speaker 1>there was there was a steady growth of channels, there

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 1>was a steady growth of cable, there was a high

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 1>viewing interaction. But content became dispersed across many channels and

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>as a result, the the broadcasts and the networks became

0:12:47.559 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>very risk adverse, spending huge amounts of money on expensive

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>script and shows that after episode two could be canned,

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>So really that was the birth of the reality TV

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of local lost higher volume viewing UM.

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And as the advertising revenues kind of went down as

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the viewers went down, this pressure but more and more

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the broadcast network and there was a downward

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>spiral where their budgets went down and their viewing figures

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>went down. So sixteen, seventeen and eighteen were not good

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 1>years for anyone in the industry. Um, you bring into

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>eight twenty in the streaming platforms which have been preparing

0:13:29.760 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for their debutant outing suddenly come into the market and

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>start spreading the kind of money we haven't seen for

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a decade. UM. It's completely changing the industry to brought

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>back scripted, high end content from people like Left Bank

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:51.079
<v Speaker 1>who produced The Crown, right across the board UM. And

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the industry has actually allowed more

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and more of that money to pour into the hands

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>of the creator is the onscreen town and the writers.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.559
<v Speaker 1>So I to see a very vibrant next five to

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ten years as people via for those people's um sort

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of attension and relationships, and I don't see any shortage

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of cash coming space. I do think that if you're

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>going to compete in this territory, you have to have

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>access to huge budgets or really niche content, So you've

0:14:26.040 --> 0:14:30.200
<v Speaker 1>become a specialist in an ultra sort of niche aspect

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of the content, otherwise that people in the middle will

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>just be sucked up. We've been talking about new productions mainly,

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 1>but let me ask you just a bit about the

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>value of library content. Um are you seeing that increase

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>or these sort of libraries of bankable you know, popular

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>titles or maybe even long tail titles. Is that the

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing that has increased in value given the

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.920
<v Speaker 1>race to director conterior streaming, Yes, exactly. I mean I

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>think if you look at the music industry, it seems

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to be about ten years ahead of the content industry.

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>And when the music industry went online, initially there was

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a complete tale of the record sales and everybody bemoaned

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the loss of the whole industry, and actually they said

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that was happening was live events. And

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>then the streamers came on board, you know, with with

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Spotify and Amazon Music and all these companies, and they

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>took the pricing point of music down to a point

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>where everyone went, you know what, I don't mind this.

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to pay eight dollars a month ten dollars

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a month to listen to anything I want to listen

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to at any point. And what that did was create

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>nostalgic listening. So you and I initially listened to all

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the funky news stuff, and very quickly we started going

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>back to the seventies, eighties and nineties and listening to

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>things that we haven't even thought of listening to. So

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>all these music library is weren't from value less to

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>generating income, and a lot of people must have got

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>shocks where they suddenly started getting these big royalty checks.

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the same thing happened with libraries that for

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a while they were mismanaged and left in small businesses

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that couldn't distribute them very effectively, so they were often

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>assets sitting in the wrong hands, in the wrong country

0:16:22.600 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and people couldn't actually access. And I think now, through

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the ease of the digital platforms, these films are now

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>becoming absolutely valuable. So we're seeing them and shoot up

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in value, and we're seeing a lot of people let

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>go of them and allow them to be arriving at

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the home. In the commodities now pulling back just a

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>little bit here in the seismic shifts in the industry

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that we've been talking about, who are the winners, Who

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>are the losers? That's a big question, um. I mean,

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I think with I think it's the players in the middle.

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that, um, I think that people whose supply

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of okay services to a small group of people

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>who will get washed away. And I think there's going

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to be very dominant, very big players that will have

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>largely global networks that can be more efficient to reach

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>more corners. And then I think there will be ultra

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>niche providers of content to specialize in narrow areas that

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>are hard to get, and I think everyone in between

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>will be sucked up to go out of business, will

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be sucked up in some bigger entities. So those are

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>potential acquisition targets. You had mentioned before that that your

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>belief is that even with this uh you know, stampede

0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>towards streaming, there's still going to be a need to

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>monetize these entertainment properties off platform. What do you mean

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>for that, and what are the implications, um, you know,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>for theatrical exhibition, given that we're still all in large

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world under lockdowns and theaters are not

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:09.400
<v Speaker 1>an open mind. Yeah, I mean, I think what's happening

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>is as the streaming platforms are launching and competing with

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>each other, there is an acceptance that they have to

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>consider off platform monetization and what that means is it's

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>not just feeding it to the subscribers, but it's actually

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>looking for other ways to monetize that intellectual property. And

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen across the board, interntional property can be turned,

0:18:36.520 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as you said, into the article, that can be turned

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>into live performances, that can be turned into immersive theater.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.719
<v Speaker 1>It can be books that can be merchandizing. There can

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>be so many sort of extensions from intellectual property. But

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just a fact that like the big studios before them,

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 1>they will slowly increase their their efforts to monetize. And

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the as we talk about is whether they're

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going to actually end up having a distributional because a

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of the digital platforms affected in the countries that

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>have the infrastructure. There's lots of countries that don't have

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.399
<v Speaker 1>the infrastructure. So they're actually talking about will they go

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of downstream and start having a distribution on or

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>even at broadcast style that will see the broadcast to

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 1>those terrace ms. One other question on industry trends. Do

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you see, you know, this coupling of UM telecommunications and media,

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>is that a model that's going to survive? You know,

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 1>podcast with NBCU and now Sky and a T and

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 1>T with direct TV and Warner Media. Are those vertical

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 1>integrations advantageous to those companies through to those some have

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>become a liability. Well, I'm completely biased with my answer,

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>but I do believe it's got a small amount of

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>actual grounding. UM. I think that the technology platforms are

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 1>becoming a homogeneous and a little bit like you lay

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the cabling, and you know, once you've laid the cabling,

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you put down it? I think that's the

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>issue that both technology and telecomspects, which is, you know,

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you can come up with a smarter piece of technology

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that slightly improves the quality of telecoms, but what do

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you Why are people coming to you? What is the

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>originality between the different providers? As the service becomes more

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and more homogeneous between the groups, the one thing that

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>distinguishes them is access to what comes down those pipes,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>what gets them to you? And I think content is

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>something that everybody identifies with. It's quite funny when you

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to someone you know about a bioscience business or

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>about even automotive, unless they're really enthusiasts, you can lose

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>them with in three months. But if you talk to

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>some about coming own and switching on the TV and

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>watching a stream or watching a broadcaster. Everyone has a

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>personal view as long as a business view. Um. And

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that in this world, content is just critical.

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>People talk about it. It's the new politics. It's acceptable

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.719
<v Speaker 1>to talk about your favorite show of the dinner policy.

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Try talking about politics now well. UM. And in this

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>new world, data obviously has become a big piece. You know,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.919
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of a crown jewel. And you know

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that's why you're seeing companies wanting to own that first

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>party data. Um does this this? Doesn't that put more

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>leverage on the side of the content buyer as opposed

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>to the content seller. That's interesting. I was planning on

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>going on holiday and they said you have to have

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a COVID test and in the small print it said

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>they own your DNA information. And I was quite alarmed

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>by that, as that could be a According to you,

0:22:05.920 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>our horari that that would be the next bit of

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>data we're giving away with content. I think your question

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is probably aimed at the US, where the buyers or

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the commissioners of the content usually end up owning the

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property. In other countries in the world, it can

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:27.199
<v Speaker 1>be the creators that end up owning intellectual property. And

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:32.080
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in a very competitive environment is that

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>as you the creator can negotiate with more than one party,

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you can start having quasi ownership rights and that could

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>be having points on the back end, that could be

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>having a lifetime right to produce it, and it can

0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>even be a share of income from the content. So

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I think that in this country

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:59.240
<v Speaker 1>there is definitely a vault of content that is created

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>by the by has. But I still think that new

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>content pips the day in terms of attractive audiences. It's

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>about that renewal, is yeah. Right. Um, so a c

0:23:11.480 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>F does have a global per view. You're you're relatively

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>small investment bank, but you're you've got transatlantic operations here. Um,

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 1>are we seeing deals more global in nature now that

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you have h companies that do span global global operations?

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And does that does that change the nature of um

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of how those deals are done. Okay, that's a good question.

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean we we kind of operate in space of

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>about fifty million dollar deals going up to that two

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.719
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar deals, and most of the investment banks who

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>operating in space do not have the transatlantic footprint. You

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have a global from footprint. But I've actually found

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that a significant number of ideals involved parties selling from

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>UK Europe into the US and people from the US

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>selling into Europe UK. It just seems to be a

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of transatlantic interest, both in terms of the style

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of content and the wish to access the sort of

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>consumer or the subscribers. So I think we are unique

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.440
<v Speaker 1>in that regard that we maintain that global presence that

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.360
<v Speaker 1>can service deals of that songs. Why do you think

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>there is that interest in getting foreign product, if you will,

0:24:36.640 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 1>to a domestic audience. Well, I definitely know that in

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the UK and in Europe. The idea is that the

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:47.959
<v Speaker 1>budgets in the US are just significantly high. Um So

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of golden eyed sort of envy

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to If you want to make a

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, you have to come to the US

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and be able to access those budgets at the same

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>time is extreme only hard to do that from the UK,

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you have to set up a team,

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to access to the market. The US market,

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 1>they certainly welcome Europeans into their content world, which you

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>need to have a base here and you need to

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>be accessible. And then I think for the US, because

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.959
<v Speaker 1>they have such a strong dominance in the content space,

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>they like the uniqueness and the sort of idea generation

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that comes out of the UK or Europe. I mean,

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>God Mora is a good example of a show that

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>was in Italian and had subtitles. It totally increased the

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>interest in the Italian based content. And and just to

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>tell our listeners, that deal involved to Go More sold

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to Sorry Go Mora was produced by Catalet who sold

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to my TV, and it has done very well. I think,

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it has and we've recently a deal with

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>the Spanish speaking great called the Immigrant, who we helped

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>launch their product I think last year. Yeah, it's interesting,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think you you had pointed out that

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that foreign language content it's really been this second tier

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 1>creature for the last couple of decades, and now you're

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot more interest in that um from across

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the landscape. Correct, and what I'll say, I'll slit you

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>just bet. I don't want it to be viewed as

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>second tier content. What I'll say is that the English

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>speaking broadcasters put it into a chair or two interest

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>um because they found that it was too hard to

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 1>do and they were worried about consumers being able to

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:42.480
<v Speaker 1>enjoy it. And what happened in the last thirty six

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>months is again, I think it's the idea of this

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>spressions that you see that you see the content put

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>together in a different way, with a different vibe and

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a different energy, and people are firing. That refreshing because

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one of the by products of

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>streaming and whatch and binge watching. So previously, with network

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and broadcams, we had to wait once a week to

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>watch our favorite show, and the formula in the show

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>was not necessarily visible. Bad guy comes in and going

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to do something bad, scared, everyone fails, but then manages

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but then the good guy stops him

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>at the end. That's what we watched once a week,

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and we found the formula refreshing because we could watch

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it time and time again. It was familiar. When you

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>watch seven of them back to back over three hours,

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the formula becomes very appound and we start going, Okay,

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>when's the good guy going to get the upper hand again?

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And then he's going to lose it again and needs it. So, actually,

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I think consumers have become much more aware of that

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>formula much. It's much more visible. So when you get

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a foreign speaking content with a different formula, it's just

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>enough to throw people and keep them much more interesting. Yeah,

0:27:55.000 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting point. Um, back to this this question. Uh,

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know there's so much money being spent on original

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>content and to some ce library content to feed the

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>streaming services as everyone's trying to get an edge and

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 1>capture their their customers, and people have been complaining about

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the blood of content that's out there. There's just thousands

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and thousands of hours. Um. Do you see that as

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 1>potentially depressing new productions going forward? Or is or is

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 1>this appetite for original content going to continue innovated? Well,

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd suggest after COVID that we've all searched high and

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>loads through each streaming service and heap of content, and

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>then because productions have haven't been aver to really happen.

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd say right now, they're streaming out for even more content. Content.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's always nostalgic watching, but I

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>think the people are viewing their annual subscription going out

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the door. If they're not getting a good dollop of

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of new content that's exciting and any of it,

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they will challenge them. You know, we've been

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>debating in the industry how many services the average family

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>will have, and you know, we're kind of thinking that

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it will be three, maybe four. And if you agree

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>that Netflix and Amazon and Disney, you know, kind of

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>three of the main ones, there's kind of a space

0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for like plus one. So there's going to be a

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>fierce competition to fill that slot. And if you don't

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>feel the slot, you know it's it's it's enough that

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel it once customers have to come back and

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>watch it again and again and again and not turn

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>it off because that that you know, they're not giving

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you two year kind of contracts. Back to the question

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of doing deals in a distributive remote situation like we're

0:29:56.400 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 1>in today, how has that changed the as yea, And

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think we'll ever go back to these in

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>person negotiations as the primary meeting for MAT. It's interesting

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>because if you speak to people who are fortunate not

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to have lost anyone to Covid or suffered any serious

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>business home from Covida business being shut down. I think

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people have found this period, this last

0:30:25.200 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>eight months ten months to have a lot of advantages

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and not just disadvantages. And we've set and seen the

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>ability to you know, face to face zooms and meet

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.400
<v Speaker 1>people around the world without having to fly there to

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:45.479
<v Speaker 1>be immensely efficient. And all data is digital nowadays, so

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>there's no need to sit in the room, there's no

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>need to share a physical contract when you can do

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>it all over emails. So I think we almost were

0:30:55.560 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>being nostalgic up until two thousand and nine team and

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a considered a courtesy that you would meet

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>people face, play shake hands and somehow the firmness of

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the hand shape would tell you whether they were truthful

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>or not. I think that's all been blown away now,

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so I think the efficiency of this has already been

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>proson and is factor that lots of business is finding

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 1>more efficient. I think the flip side is when I

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:27.040
<v Speaker 1>heard today that there is a potential vaccine and it's

0:31:27.200 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent effective. You know, you immediately as a human

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>being in a joyous feeling of freedom and adventure. And

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that will come back much quicker than people expect.

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>When your competitor actually flies over and meets them and

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't, I think that would be the point where

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you get back on the plane say it's time to

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>do it again. But I'd like to think that we

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 1>can at least cut down the extrabits. And you know,

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>this is this incessant traveling around the world to end

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:59.719
<v Speaker 1>of this market, you know, incessence of traveling backwards and forwards,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>east coast, west coast. I'm hoping that can all reduce.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But I think there'll always be a place for face

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>to face and human content now times you mentioned that

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a couple of the pending deals that you've been working

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>on and then have been tabled. Um, what are what's

0:32:17.600 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>getting the most attention at this moment, and then looking

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead to one, what do you see happening as hopefully

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>restrictions start to ease up. I think at the moment,

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that scripted continent has led away for the

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, certainly double digit and higher multiples

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>are being paid for scripted companies. They can create compelling

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>shows that you know, keep the whole TV department relevant.

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's been a consistency of the last

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>three four years. What I've seen in the last twelve months,

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe eighteen months, is a move into premium unscripted UM

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think that there has been a great interest

0:33:01.480 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in having high quality unscripted programs. We did a deal

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>with plincel I Share and it is attracted interest from

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.640
<v Speaker 1>all over the globe and you know, they do very

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>high end unscripted content UM and I think that that

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>to me indicated that the key word here is premium.

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you think what premium means, it means content

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with the brand, content with identity. And I think that

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world of global streaming, when you're being given

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a whole bucket of content, the thing that stands out

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is things that have identity with you. And the things

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that stand out are things that people have either told

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you about, you've heard about before, or you know some

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of the people attached and that's how you choose your content.

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>I doubt many of us take on the storyline and say, oh,

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:55.800
<v Speaker 1>it's about a little boy growing up in South Africa

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and he grows a business and becomes maybe I'll watch that.

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>We commediately to see what is it grand that's on

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the screen that we can easily identify it. So what

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see going forward is that high end, branded,

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>recognized content, maybe a recognized director in the film, a

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>recognized actual the screen, or a recognized series that we've

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed before. What do you think the impetus behind unscripted

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been I think it's this Bins watching. I think

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>after you've and I think it's the formulas that people

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:33.320
<v Speaker 1>are using when scripted that after you've watched your tenth

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones series, you start seeing the high end,

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>glossy scripted content and you just don't want that formula

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>for a while. You want to try something different, and

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I certainly as a viewer, have done that and you

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>start looking at documentaries, you start looking at biographies. You

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of move away from that kind of drama and

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.239
<v Speaker 1>action when you start looking for something else. So I

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's a consumer driven push. I mean, it must

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be said. It's more cost effective on per hour of production,

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. I mean it depends, actually, I mean if

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you get into some of the natural history programs that

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.000
<v Speaker 1>take five years of a guyline on top of an

0:35:15.040 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>iceberg with a camera to get can get expensive. But yeah,

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think there's a I think there is

0:35:22.520 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a lower pricing point, but the quality of the unscripted

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>now is so high that it's not that much. Okay, Thomas,

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>any last thoughts on what we can expect to see

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in the in the coming year in terms of M

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>and A and the media and entertainment sector. Yes, certainly.

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think for me, the thing that's interesting

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is when you look at this industry like we have

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>over a twenty year time period. You know, we've seen

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>genres come in and out of vogue, and if you remember,

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and if we push our minds back, you know, for

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a while it was the soap opera. Then we went

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>into the shiny floor game shows. Then we went into

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.680
<v Speaker 1>scripted and everyone said it was too spensive, so that

0:36:00.719 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>we came out. And then we went into unscripted cute

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:08.160
<v Speaker 1>reality shows. And now we've gone heavily into scripted and

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>our premium unscripted. My sort of guest is that the

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>next area is going to be in comedy and game

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>show again. I think it's going to be the rise

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of you know, these kind of game shows that we

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 1>used to see ten plus years ago. Um So, I

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>think the other thing is the non English and content

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:29.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to be of an interest. Well,

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, timas Day of SCF and dost Think,

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Thank you, thanks for listening. Be

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>sure to leave us a review at Apple Podcasts. We

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from listeners, and be sure to tune

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>in next week for another episode of Strictly Business