1
00:00:01,280 --> 00:00:15,880
Speaker 1: The Volume. All right, welcome to Hoops and Night. Here

2
00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:18,720
Speaker 1: at the Volume. Happy Tuesday, everybody. Round two coverage of

3
00:00:18,760 --> 00:00:20,520
Speaker 1: the NBA Playoffs Here at Hoops Tonight is brought to

4
00:00:20,560 --> 00:00:23,520
Speaker 1: you by Chase Freedom Unlimited. How do you Cash Back?

5
00:00:23,560 --> 00:00:25,400
Speaker 1: So I wake up this morning and walking over to

6
00:00:25,440 --> 00:00:28,760
Speaker 1: my coffee machine to sit down and watch some film,

7
00:00:28,800 --> 00:00:31,440
Speaker 1: and it dogs on me. I'm like I said at

8
00:00:31,440 --> 00:00:33,159
Speaker 1: the beginning of last night's show, I was going to

9
00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:35,479
Speaker 1: talk about Nick's Heat and then I totally forgot to.

10
00:00:35,800 --> 00:00:39,080
Speaker 1: So I sincerely apologize to the Knicks fans and Heat

11
00:00:39,159 --> 00:00:42,440
Speaker 1: fans or anybody who was interested in hearing a breakdown

12
00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:44,239
Speaker 1: about that game. We are going to get to it

13
00:00:44,560 --> 00:00:47,040
Speaker 1: this morning, just gonna go for like eight to ten minutes,

14
00:00:47,159 --> 00:00:49,600
Speaker 1: given my thoughts on that series. You guys know the

15
00:00:49,680 --> 00:00:51,560
Speaker 1: drill before we get started. To subscribe to the Volumes

16
00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:53,360
Speaker 1: YouTube channels. You don't miss any more of our videos.

17
00:00:53,360 --> 00:00:55,800
Speaker 1: Follow me on Twitter at underscore json lt so you

18
00:00:55,800 --> 00:00:58,200
Speaker 1: guys don't miss any show announcements. And if for whatever reason,

19
00:00:58,240 --> 00:00:59,640
Speaker 1: you guys miss one of these videos and you can't

20
00:00:59,720 --> 00:01:02,600
Speaker 1: back to YouTube to finish, don't forget. You can find

21
00:01:02,640 --> 00:01:05,760
Speaker 1: them wherever you get your podcasts Under Hoops tonight, All right,

22
00:01:05,840 --> 00:01:09,160
Speaker 1: let's talk some basketball. I have never in my time

23
00:01:09,200 --> 00:01:12,680
Speaker 1: covering the league ben as wrong about a team as

24
00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:15,200
Speaker 1: I've been about this Miami Heat team. Now, in my defense,

25
00:01:16,120 --> 00:01:17,920
Speaker 1: you guys know, kind of the way we do this show,

26
00:01:18,120 --> 00:01:20,720
Speaker 1: I'm going to pay attention to what I'm seeing on

27
00:01:20,840 --> 00:01:23,360
Speaker 1: film and pay attention to the trends and what we

28
00:01:23,440 --> 00:01:25,600
Speaker 1: learn about these teams from the regular season and try

29
00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:30,280
Speaker 1: to use that to project forward. And the Heat, desperately

30
00:01:30,319 --> 00:01:33,720
Speaker 1: fighting for playing position, went twelve to thirteen over their

31
00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:36,560
Speaker 1: last twenty five games, got their asses kicked by the

32
00:01:36,560 --> 00:01:39,200
Speaker 1: Atlanta Hawks at home in the first playing game, and

33
00:01:39,240 --> 00:01:41,399
Speaker 1: then we're trailing by three late in the fourth quarter

34
00:01:41,760 --> 00:01:44,679
Speaker 1: in the second playing game against the Chicago Bulls. So

35
00:01:46,280 --> 00:01:49,240
Speaker 1: that was the information I was using to project forward.

36
00:01:50,160 --> 00:01:52,200
Speaker 1: That said, I think where I went wrong is I

37
00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:55,040
Speaker 1: did not properly account for the fact that this is

38
00:01:55,080 --> 00:01:58,400
Speaker 1: a team that won, is extremely well coached, and will

39
00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:00,960
Speaker 1: inevitably play above their pay great in the playoffs. This

40
00:02:01,000 --> 00:02:03,000
Speaker 1: is benefit of the doubt that I've given to the

41
00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:05,400
Speaker 1: Warriors over the years that I should have applied to

42
00:02:05,400 --> 00:02:08,440
Speaker 1: the Heat. That was my mistake. Jimmy Butler, same type

43
00:02:08,440 --> 00:02:11,080
Speaker 1: of thing, a player whose impact goes so much higher

44
00:02:11,120 --> 00:02:14,080
Speaker 1: into the playoffs. And I did factor these things in,

45
00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:16,160
Speaker 1: but just not enough. I should have weighed them even

46
00:02:16,200 --> 00:02:20,120
Speaker 1: more heavily than I did. Even as I looked at

47
00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:22,799
Speaker 1: that Milwaukee Bucks series, and I look at Giannis missing

48
00:02:22,840 --> 00:02:26,120
Speaker 1: three games, and just some of the crazy factors like

49
00:02:26,280 --> 00:02:30,160
Speaker 1: Milwaukee having significant double digit leads in the fourth quarter

50
00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:32,919
Speaker 1: in each of the last two Miami Heat wins, it

51
00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:36,120
Speaker 1: just clouded my judgment a little bit, and I was

52
00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:38,639
Speaker 1: very wrong. I said they didn't have enough shot creation.

53
00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:41,720
Speaker 1: Jimmy Butler, bam Adebayo and the guards have all been fantastic.

54
00:02:41,760 --> 00:02:45,400
Speaker 1: Kyle Lowry again last night, just manufacturing offense for them

55
00:02:45,440 --> 00:02:47,600
Speaker 1: when they need it. I said they weren't big enough.

56
00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:51,160
Speaker 1: They've soundly out rebounded the Knicks, who were one of

57
00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:54,320
Speaker 1: the league's best rebounding teams is here, including just smashing

58
00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:57,680
Speaker 1: them on the gas in the last two games. And

59
00:02:57,720 --> 00:02:59,760
Speaker 1: now they're up three to one, and this series looks

60
00:02:59,760 --> 00:03:02,600
Speaker 1: like I believe the Heat will win at this point,

61
00:03:02,639 --> 00:03:07,160
Speaker 1: probably in five, maybe six. There are three dynamics, in

62
00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:09,720
Speaker 1: my opinion, that I've swung this series away from where

63
00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:12,000
Speaker 1: I projected it, and I think I picked nix and

64
00:03:12,040 --> 00:03:15,359
Speaker 1: six originally that's obviously dead on arrival. There are three

65
00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:17,639
Speaker 1: things I want to hit really quick. One gap in

66
00:03:17,720 --> 00:03:22,200
Speaker 1: spot up conversion. The spot up situations are are much

67
00:03:22,200 --> 00:03:24,079
Speaker 1: more convoluted than just three point shooting. A lot of

68
00:03:24,120 --> 00:03:26,640
Speaker 1: people focus on three point shooting. I prefer spot up

69
00:03:27,040 --> 00:03:29,440
Speaker 1: point per possession because one of the things you can

70
00:03:29,480 --> 00:03:31,440
Speaker 1: do to beat a team in a spot up situation

71
00:03:32,120 --> 00:03:37,000
Speaker 1: is attack close out right. It's a much more fluid situation.

72
00:03:37,080 --> 00:03:39,839
Speaker 1: Basketball is more complicated than just how what's your three

73
00:03:39,840 --> 00:03:42,280
Speaker 1: point percentage? Right? Even when you look at three point percentages,

74
00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,040
Speaker 1: there are different factors. How many isolation threes are you taking,

75
00:03:45,080 --> 00:03:47,360
Speaker 1: how many bailout and of shot clock threes are you taking,

76
00:03:47,640 --> 00:03:49,200
Speaker 1: or are you only taking catch and shoot threes? Are

77
00:03:49,200 --> 00:03:51,720
Speaker 1: you being left open by the opposing defense, or are they

78
00:03:51,720 --> 00:03:54,080
Speaker 1: panic chasing you off the line. All of that stuff

79
00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:57,280
Speaker 1: factors in to what your three point percentage is. So

80
00:03:57,320 --> 00:03:59,480
Speaker 1: that's why I prefer to look at spot up points

81
00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:01,800
Speaker 1: per possession. Well, the Knicks were a middle of the

82
00:04:01,840 --> 00:04:04,560
Speaker 1: pack spot up shooting team during the regular season. They

83
00:04:04,560 --> 00:04:07,160
Speaker 1: were not as bad as the narrative surrounding them coming

84
00:04:07,160 --> 00:04:08,840
Speaker 1: into this series. That was a big part of why

85
00:04:08,880 --> 00:04:10,960
Speaker 1: I picked them over the Calves. The Knicks were a

86
00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:14,080
Speaker 1: much much better spot up shooting team in the regular

87
00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:16,440
Speaker 1: season than the Calves were, and I thought that Manu

88
00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:20,320
Speaker 1: manifested throughout the series well one point zero three points

89
00:04:20,360 --> 00:04:22,479
Speaker 1: per possession or in the regular season. In the Game

90
00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:26,279
Speaker 1: one loss, the Knicks converted spoted possessions at zero point

91
00:04:26,480 --> 00:04:30,200
Speaker 1: four points per possession, so less than half the efficiency

92
00:04:30,240 --> 00:04:33,360
Speaker 1: they had in the regular season. In the Game three loss,

93
00:04:34,040 --> 00:04:38,600
Speaker 1: zero points seven to six points per possession, so about

94
00:04:38,920 --> 00:04:42,200
Speaker 1: two thirds to three fourths the efficiency that they had

95
00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:44,440
Speaker 1: during the regular season. And then in Game three they

96
00:04:44,480 --> 00:04:47,440
Speaker 1: were slightly better one point per possession, but still below

97
00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:50,560
Speaker 1: their regular season average. So after and guess what, they

98
00:04:50,560 --> 00:04:52,920
Speaker 1: were up over one point two points per possession on

99
00:04:52,960 --> 00:04:55,760
Speaker 1: spot up situations in the Game two win at home.

100
00:04:55,839 --> 00:04:59,720
Speaker 1: So again, like Miami, Eric Spolser has been given the

101
00:04:59,839 --> 00:05:03,760
Speaker 1: lead because of the complete collapse of the Knicks spot

102
00:05:03,800 --> 00:05:06,920
Speaker 1: up players to load up on these Jalen Brunson pick

103
00:05:06,920 --> 00:05:09,159
Speaker 1: and rolls in these ISOs, and to load up on

104
00:05:09,240 --> 00:05:13,560
Speaker 1: these Julius Randall bullyball possessions, and that's allowed them to

105
00:05:13,640 --> 00:05:17,560
Speaker 1: force turnovers, force missus get out and transition find easier

106
00:05:17,560 --> 00:05:20,520
Speaker 1: opportunities in the open floor. That to me, has completely

107
00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:23,320
Speaker 1: flipped the dynamic of the Knicks on offense. They're spot

108
00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:26,520
Speaker 1: up shooting and spot up close out attacking, which was

109
00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:30,839
Speaker 1: reliable for them all season, not great, but reliable, totally

110
00:05:30,920 --> 00:05:34,119
Speaker 1: let them down in this series and that completely messed

111
00:05:34,200 --> 00:05:37,440
Speaker 1: up the offensive end for them. Secondly, gap in star

112
00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:40,799
Speaker 1: performance every single time we did Nicks videos this year's

113
00:05:41,640 --> 00:05:44,000
Speaker 1: this year, I told you guys that the Knicks will

114
00:05:44,000 --> 00:05:46,400
Speaker 1: go as far as Jalen Brunson and Julius Randall take them.

115
00:05:47,200 --> 00:05:50,520
Speaker 1: They need star production and Jalen Brunson has been great

116
00:05:50,600 --> 00:05:54,000
Speaker 1: throughout this postseason run, but Julius Randall just has not. Now,

117
00:05:54,000 --> 00:05:56,080
Speaker 1: in his defense, I do think the ankle has played

118
00:05:56,080 --> 00:05:58,320
Speaker 1: a role. He was in such a great jump shooting

119
00:05:58,400 --> 00:06:01,479
Speaker 1: rhythm throughout the regular season and that got disrupted by

120
00:06:01,520 --> 00:06:04,800
Speaker 1: him being away from the game to rest and ankle injury.

121
00:06:05,080 --> 00:06:07,520
Speaker 1: So I mean, I'd love it might have something to

122
00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:09,200
Speaker 1: do with the postseason, might have something to do the

123
00:06:09,200 --> 00:06:10,920
Speaker 1: way he's guarded, but I do think the injury has

124
00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:13,039
Speaker 1: played a role. But the reality is is in this

125
00:06:13,120 --> 00:06:16,240
Speaker 1: series They've combined to average just forty five points per

126
00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:19,120
Speaker 1: game on only okay efficiency, and both have been ice

127
00:06:19,200 --> 00:06:21,479
Speaker 1: cold from three. That's the one thing with Jalen Brunson

128
00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:23,960
Speaker 1: that hasn't been working is he's calling for these ball

129
00:06:23,960 --> 00:06:27,360
Speaker 1: screens and he's getting pretty good looks going to his right,

130
00:06:27,400 --> 00:06:30,680
Speaker 1: which is where left handed shooters like good balance, good lift,

131
00:06:30,720 --> 00:06:33,000
Speaker 1: and Jalen Brunston just can't stick these pull up threes

132
00:06:33,040 --> 00:06:35,320
Speaker 1: right now. It's been a big problem. Julius Randall has

133
00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:39,000
Speaker 1: thirteen turnovers so far in three games. I think Jimmy

134
00:06:39,040 --> 00:06:43,120
Speaker 1: Butler and bam Adebayo have soundly outplayed them. They're also

135
00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:45,760
Speaker 1: averaging forty five points per game, but on much higher efficiency,

136
00:06:45,839 --> 00:06:49,000
Speaker 1: much better playmaking, and both of them are monumentally better

137
00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:52,919
Speaker 1: as defensive players. So after out playing Mitchell and Garland

138
00:06:52,960 --> 00:06:56,359
Speaker 1: in Round one to swing that series, the Brunson Randall

139
00:06:56,440 --> 00:06:59,400
Speaker 1: duo just has not been good enough in this second

140
00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:02,560
Speaker 1: round series against the Miami Heat. And last but not

141
00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:05,880
Speaker 1: at least, the rebounding. The Knicks were the second best

142
00:07:05,920 --> 00:07:08,159
Speaker 1: rebounding team in the league this year. They grabbed thirty

143
00:07:08,160 --> 00:07:10,120
Speaker 1: two percent of their own misses. That's how dominant they

144
00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:13,200
Speaker 1: were on the offensive glass. Guess what, The Miami Heat

145
00:07:13,320 --> 00:07:17,560
Speaker 1: grabbed fifty five point five percent of all available rebounds

146
00:07:17,960 --> 00:07:20,560
Speaker 1: in the two wins in Miami to go up three

147
00:07:20,600 --> 00:07:23,800
Speaker 1: to one. So even though the Knicks are the bigger,

148
00:07:23,880 --> 00:07:28,160
Speaker 1: more physical, more athletic team, the Heat have played more physical,

149
00:07:28,240 --> 00:07:31,239
Speaker 1: have played bigger, and have looked like the more well coached,

150
00:07:31,280 --> 00:07:35,360
Speaker 1: more desperate team throughout this series, and it's allowed them

151
00:07:35,400 --> 00:07:37,080
Speaker 1: to beat a Knicks team that I think has more

152
00:07:37,120 --> 00:07:40,400
Speaker 1: talent up and down the roster. Albeit I think you

153
00:07:40,440 --> 00:07:44,200
Speaker 1: can say definitively that Butler and baman Obayo are a

154
00:07:44,280 --> 00:07:47,120
Speaker 1: much better playoff duo in terms of their star performance.

155
00:07:47,200 --> 00:07:50,160
Speaker 1: But you know, on the Knicks front, it's it's just

156
00:07:50,200 --> 00:07:51,920
Speaker 1: something that they're gonna have to come to terms with.

157
00:07:52,040 --> 00:07:56,720
Speaker 1: That Julius Randall piece. Is Is it the injury? I

158
00:07:56,760 --> 00:07:59,800
Speaker 1: don't know, but that's gonna be the weak piece I think.

159
00:08:00,080 --> 00:08:03,440
Speaker 1: I think Jalen Brunson has definitively proved himself as a

160
00:08:03,480 --> 00:08:05,280
Speaker 1: playoff player and a guy that you can have in

161
00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:07,880
Speaker 1: this role, but I think they might need to upgrade

162
00:08:07,920 --> 00:08:11,440
Speaker 1: that wing forward star position to have a real chance

163
00:08:11,480 --> 00:08:13,840
Speaker 1: to contend looking into the future. Last note of the

164
00:08:13,840 --> 00:08:18,480
Speaker 1: Miami Heat. This is guys. They're one win away from

165
00:08:18,520 --> 00:08:21,800
Speaker 1: being in the conference finals three times in the last

166
00:08:21,800 --> 00:08:25,640
Speaker 1: four years in a conference that has a really good

167
00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:29,120
Speaker 1: Boston Celtics team, a really good Philadelphia seventy six Ers team,

168
00:08:29,320 --> 00:08:33,800
Speaker 1: and outstanding Milwaukee Bucks team. The fact that they've been

169
00:08:33,880 --> 00:08:36,200
Speaker 1: one of the final two standing in three of the

170
00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:40,800
Speaker 1: last four years is incredibly impressive. It's a testament to

171
00:08:40,920 --> 00:08:43,880
Speaker 1: Eric Spolster, who I believe is the best coach in basketball,

172
00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:49,000
Speaker 1: the best at making opposing teams and schemes uncomfortable and

173
00:08:49,040 --> 00:08:52,840
Speaker 1: making teams go to areas of their game that they're

174
00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:55,600
Speaker 1: not great at. It's a testament to Jimmy Butler and

175
00:08:55,640 --> 00:08:58,800
Speaker 1: his success as a playoff player. This guy has soundly

176
00:08:58,840 --> 00:09:02,160
Speaker 1: outplayed Tatum and Brown in the twenty twenty Bubble to

177
00:09:02,200 --> 00:09:07,560
Speaker 1: go to the NBA Finals, soundly outplayed Giannis and Tanan

178
00:09:07,600 --> 00:09:11,640
Speaker 1: Kombo this year right to and now. Giannis was hurt,

179
00:09:11,679 --> 00:09:13,800
Speaker 1: but in the two games down the stretch in Game four,

180
00:09:13,800 --> 00:09:15,800
Speaker 1: in Game five of that series, Jimmy was just a

181
00:09:15,840 --> 00:09:19,640
Speaker 1: better player, particularly at the end of games. I thought

182
00:09:19,640 --> 00:09:22,640
Speaker 1: he soundly outplayed Jason Tatum in the conference finals last year,

183
00:09:22,840 --> 00:09:25,960
Speaker 1: just obviously didn't quite have the talent at his disposal,

184
00:09:26,000 --> 00:09:28,840
Speaker 1: but he still was one shot away from stealing that

185
00:09:28,960 --> 00:09:33,120
Speaker 1: series despite being at a like a massive talent disadvantage.

186
00:09:33,120 --> 00:09:35,319
Speaker 1: And here he is right now out playing Jalen Brunson

187
00:09:35,840 --> 00:09:39,640
Speaker 1: and Julius Randall. So I mean, I've learned my lesson

188
00:09:40,000 --> 00:09:41,920
Speaker 1: and this team is going to be just like the

189
00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:45,560
Speaker 1: Golden State Warriors for me moving forward, where I just

190
00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:47,800
Speaker 1: have to give them a huge amount of the benefit

191
00:09:47,800 --> 00:09:50,400
Speaker 1: of the doubt. And if we're sitting in early April

192
00:09:50,440 --> 00:09:53,360
Speaker 1: next year and the Miami Heat are, you know, thirty

193
00:09:53,440 --> 00:09:57,080
Speaker 1: nine and thirty eight, and we're like, man, they're mediocre.

194
00:09:57,200 --> 00:09:59,600
Speaker 1: This roster isn't very good. Blah blah blah blah blah.

195
00:10:00,120 --> 00:10:02,480
Speaker 1: It comes time to start picking in the playoffs. I'm

196
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:05,800
Speaker 1: gonna be tempted to pick Miami in every single series

197
00:10:05,960 --> 00:10:09,560
Speaker 1: because they just find they just find a way. It's

198
00:10:09,640 --> 00:10:12,520
Speaker 1: it's it's truly impressive. It's a testament to just everything

199
00:10:12,520 --> 00:10:15,400
Speaker 1: I love about the game of basketball. Talent's important, but

200
00:10:15,400 --> 00:10:17,440
Speaker 1: it's not what wins the day. It's a combination of

201
00:10:17,480 --> 00:10:21,079
Speaker 1: your talent with your schematic approach, your basketball IQ. You're

202
00:10:21,120 --> 00:10:25,560
Speaker 1: coaching the superstars and their ability to overcome uh less

203
00:10:25,559 --> 00:10:28,880
Speaker 1: than ideal situations. Shout out to the mind heat many.

204
00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:30,920
Speaker 1: They're doing it again. They're doing it again, right in

205
00:10:30,920 --> 00:10:32,960
Speaker 1: front of our eyes. All right, guys, I will be back.

206
00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:35,040
Speaker 1: We're doing a double video tonight, so we'll be going

207
00:10:35,200 --> 00:10:37,840
Speaker 1: live on AMP, I believe, right after Celtic sixers, and

208
00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:40,200
Speaker 1: then we'll be going uh just on YouTube later in

209
00:10:40,200 --> 00:10:42,160
Speaker 1: the evening after Nuggets suns. I appreciate you, guys, and

210
00:10:42,200 --> 00:11:02,280
Speaker 1: I'll see you later tonight. The volume