WEBVTT - UFOs, Spies, and Pizzagate: The Clinton Epstein Deposition 

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Also media welcome to it could happen here show about

0:00:08.640 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>things falling apart. The thing falling apart this week is

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>me after watching nine hours of Clinton testimony the past

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>two days. It can relate. I'm Garrison Davis. I'm joined

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>by Sophie Lechtervid to discuss guys. Hey, Sophie, Hey.

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 2>To discuss the Clinton testimony.

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say, I can relate after you know

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 3>you fortunately missed that Clinton speech at the DNC in

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four.

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Bill Clinton, that was a really really, really really long

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 2>hour of my life.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a long speech for a guy that age too.

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but we were together during Hillary's speech.

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>We did catch that while we're in the pit.

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's when I got COVID. I got the

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Clinton COVID. Hillary got COVID too at the DNC, so

0:00:58.520 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>I think she gave it to me.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 4>There you go.

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 2>That's when we were up close and personal with the

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 2>Clintons last. Now they're back.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>They've never been more back, They've never been more I

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>completely agree. If you don't want to hear the voices,

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I've tried to limit it, but there's gonna be some

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the voices of Hillary and or Bill Clinton. This is

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>your chance if you want to hear me talk about

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Hillary being asked about everything from spies to aliens and quanon.

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>It's again, this is your sign to continue.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So I'm excited. Let's do this.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's get started, because there's probably more more to

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>cover than what we'll be able to so. On February

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixth and twenty seventh, Hillary and Bill Clinton respectively

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>testified and closed door hearings about their relationship with Jeffrey

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Epstein and Galaine Maxwell. The Clinton's referst to penay to

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>testify in this bipartisan House Oversight Committee investigation into the

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>DOJ's handling of the Epstein investigation back in August of

0:01:55.000 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five. For months, they pushed back against having

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to testify, arguing the process was politically motivated, that the

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 1>subpoenas were quote unquote invalid and legally unenforceable, and that

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>any relevant information they had could be delivered via assigned statement.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>In January twenty twenty six, Chairman James Comer advanced two

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>resolutions recommending the Clintons be held in contempt of Congress

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for refusing to comply days before a vote to hold

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>them in contempt. The Clintons finally agreed to testify in February.

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to be fair, they did let other people give

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 2>little shitty statements.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>They so did. That is something that Hillary specifically brought

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>up during her deposition more than once. Yes, So let's

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:40.839
<v Speaker 1>start with Hillary's because that was the first one.

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:02:41.919 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>In her opening statement, she said she had no knowledge

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities, did not ever recall encountering

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein whatsoever, never flown on the plane or visited

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>his Island homes or offices. Gleayne Maxwell dated a family

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>friend around twenty ten he named Ted Waite, who was

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a software developer. Waite brought Glaine to Hillary's Daughters of

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Chelsea's wedding as a plus one guest in twenty ten,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and Hillary says she was unaware of any criminal activity

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>relating to Glene Maxwell, specifically before her crimes republicly revealed

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago. Hillary was asked to recount the

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>origin of the Clintown Foundation, which Hillary only joined the

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>board of in twenty thirteen because she was busy serving

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in office. Hillary was asked about Glene Maxwell leading a

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>breakout session on ocean conservation at a Clinton Global Initiative

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 1>conference in twenty thirteen. Hillary said that she was not

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>involved in the selection process for those sessions, but that

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Glen Maxwell had been an internationally recognized ocean advocate around

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that time. Hillary refused to answer a question about whether

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>her husband is a quote unquote smart guy.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Which was who asked that question?

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I forget, but I had that note written down some

0:03:57.560 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of these things I was watching pretty pretty late.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, what a great question. Hey, Hill babe, is

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 2>your husband a smart guy? Wow? Glad our tax dollars

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>are funding such an important question.

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>She said that her husband had a limited relationship with

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Epstein for a limited time. Yes, used his airplane for

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Clinton Foundation trips, and this connection began and ended before

0:04:24.800 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 1>any of Epstein's crimes were publicly revealed. Representative Pat Fallen

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Republican Majority talked about how Jeffy Epstein visited

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the White House seventeen times under the Clint Did administration.

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>This is mostly for White House Historical Association events and

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>donated money to the White House Historical Association, but said

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that Epstein never visited under Trump or donated money to Trump.

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:54.239
<v Speaker 1>This could in fact, just be simply because the Trump admin.

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, Trump came into office after Trump's relationship with

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Epstein fell through and Epstein was convicted of sex crimes. Correct.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump got into office at twenty sixteen. Clinton was in

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>office in the early nineties. Yeah, that's why Epstein was

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>able to visit the White House for these public events

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:13.719
<v Speaker 1>as a regular citizen, but did not do so when

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump was president.

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, prior to Epstein's first conviction.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, two thousand and eight. Yeah. Pat Fown also tried

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 1>to characterize a twenty thousand dollars donation to a joint

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>campaign fund in the nineties as a donation to Hillary's

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>presidential campaign fund. Many years later, he was called on

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>this being obviously incorrect.

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Come on, man, that's so dumb.

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of stuff like that, So a

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of small errors. Some of them may not have

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>been arrows right, some of them may have been ways

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>to make the transcript read a certain way if Hillary

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>or the lawyers weren't able to catch something. But both

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Hillary and her team, but really mostly Hillary was really

0:05:53.960 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>on it for this entire hearing, like very sharp.

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 2>This was peak Hillary. I feel like a lot of

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.799
<v Speaker 2>people you know, for a lot of the like analysis

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:04.600
<v Speaker 2>online I saw, you know, a take over and over

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 2>again that that was like, why wasn't she like this

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>when she ran for president? She was?

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>This is this is Hillary she was, and it's you know,

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it's impressive, but also a little bit unlikable. For if

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you do that, if you do that like all the time, right.

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 2>If you're like that all the time, it's a little

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 2>bit Oh, okay, I'm going to take a step back.

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot, but you know, yeah, we'll have we'll

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have more on her sort of like intellectual sharpness later.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, she's fiercely intelligent. Yeah, fiercely intelligent.

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 1>And that is that is that is on display for

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the entirety of this deposition.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 2>But I really hated the take where people were like,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 2>if she was like this when she ran for president,

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 2>maybe we wouldn't be dealing with Donald Trump.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>It's like, no, that's not what happened. No, this is

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 2>who Hillary's been her entire adult life. Thank you.

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Hillary said that she never slicted funds for Jeffrey Epstein,

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>ever had funds listed on her behalf, and never invited

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Epstein to any political fundraisers when asked about her own

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>speculation on her husband, previous investigators, or the mind state

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of Jeffrey Epstein and Glen Maxwell. She could not answer,

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because that is speculation on other people's opinions or mind states.

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>About an hour in Nancy Mace asked Hillary Clinton if

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>she believes the Epstein files are quote unquote a vast

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>right wing conspiracy.

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 5>I think if they are fully released, as the Transparency

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 5>Act requires, that would be fulfilling the responsibility of the

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:47.679
<v Speaker 5>Justice Department. But it appears that there have been many

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 5>issues with the full release, so I'm not going to

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 5>characterize it other than to say I think that's a

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 5>well known fact.

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>It is certainly an odd question to ask if the

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>files themselves are a vast right wing conspiracy, and Hillary

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>here just answered by talking about the issues that have

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>come up with the full release of the Epstein files.

0:08:10.240 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>After this, Hillary has asked about whether Jeffrey Epstein was

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the most prolific sex traffickers in the world

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and how the State Department worked to counter international sex trafficking.

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.239
<v Speaker 7>Would you say he's one of the world's most prolific

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 7>sex traffickers.

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 5>I don't know what to compare it. To there are

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 5>terrible sex trafficking rings all over the.

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 7>World, and you were he said. You were Secretary of

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 7>State from two thousand and nine to twenty thirteen, and

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 7>you state your agency prioritized combating sex trafficking internationally.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 5>Correct, that's correct.

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.680
<v Speaker 7>During your time as Secretary of State, did you or

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 7>the State receive any intelligence cables or briefings mentioning Epstein's

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 7>foreign travel, pedophile island, or his network of pedophiles and

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 7>sex traffick not that I am aware of.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 4>No, how did you miss it?

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 7>If he's I believe, one of the most prolific sex

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 7>traffickers in the world, you were Secretary of State, how

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:02.280
<v Speaker 7>did you miss it?

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, that would have been a matter of the Justice Department,

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 5>not the State Department.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 7>But in your opening statement and your statements earlier, in

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 7>your opening statement, you stated that Secretary of Rubio should

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 7>be called to testify. You said that he has and

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 7>the administration has quote abandoned survivors using the same logic.

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 7>You were Secretary of State during a time period after

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 7>Jeffrey Epstein was convicted of being a pedophile and soliciting

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 7>children for sex. Why then, did you quote using your

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 7>own logic abandoned survivors.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 4>Uh, what is the question?

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 8>Please?

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 5>I followed her comment. First of all, we focused on

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:44.439
<v Speaker 5>whether there were laws that made sex trafficking, sexual slavery,

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:49.679
<v Speaker 5>domestic violence, other abuses of women on the books in countries.

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 5>And then we tried to evaluate were those laws being

0:09:53.440 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 5>implemented and were judges appropriately trained and briefed about how

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 5>to implement those laws, were governments taking them seriously? We

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 5>looked at the broad institutional approach to these very serious abuses.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 1>This is an interesting exchange to me. Yeah, so Mace

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>here doesn't really understand the role of the Justice Department

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 1>versus the State Department. Yes, for the Justice Department investigates

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>crimes committed in the United States, versus the State Department

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>is this entity that pressures other countries to create or

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, improve sex trafficking laws and doesn't really understand

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this difference right, and refers to a part in Hillary's

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>opening statement about how Rubio's shrunk specific office to combat

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>international sex trafficking, and she isn't quite able to like

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand how Hillary is critiquing that, while also saying

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Justice Department mishandled the Epstein investigation while she

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.560
<v Speaker 1>was Secretary of State. It's this interesting just break and

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.319
<v Speaker 1>not really understanding how the government works. And this clip

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>also shows like how sharp Hillary is being able to

0:11:05.520 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>follow this line of questioning better than her own lawyers

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:10.439
<v Speaker 1>in some instances be able to actually like respond to

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>what Mace is really asking.

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:13.680
<v Speaker 2>Notice that as well.

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Mace then continues to ask about how the US government

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>handled Jeffrey Epstein's first criminal case, and this is how

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Clinton responded.

0:11:23.360 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 7>Would you say the US government at that time, during

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 7>this time period was appropriate with the way that it

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 7>handled Epstein.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't think that you could say that was true

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 5>about any of the government's prosecutorial efforts, starting with the

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 5>Southern District of Florida and alex Acosta and all those

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 5>who basically gave him a sweetheart deal. And then I

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 5>think going up the chain there was very little attention

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 5>paid that should have been paid. But what we had

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 5>laws on the books, they were not being implemented. But

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 5>that was not within my purview because what we were

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 5>looking at is what's the institutional structure and can we

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 5>do more to make sure countries take it seriously. Our

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 5>country had laws on the books, So this man was

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 5>not held to account you, It was not in your

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 5>purview when you were Secretary of State. Then why is

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 5>it today in Secretary of Rubios? Because what's happened is

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 5>that the office that was actually following what was going

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 5>on around the world has been decimated. Seventy percent of

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 5>the staff is gone. It's impossible to carry out the

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 5>functions of that office if you don't have a critical

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 5>number of people. So my question would be to Secretary Rubio,

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 5>is there more that can be done out of time here?

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Wow? Yeah, Nancy Mace, you suck, You suck.

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Pretty clear articulation there from Secretary Clinton.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I fear that like that, Nancy Mace spent most

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 2>of this time trying to set Hillary up, and I

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 2>don't think she I don't think she succeeded.

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>No. Hillary was then asked if she was quote unquote

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>concerned when she saw photos of her husband getting a

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>back massage or in a pot tub and what went

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>through her mind. Hillary refused to speculate on events in

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>which she has no context for and was not there.

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go on a quick ad break now

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and then return to continue the discussion on the Clinton testimony.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back. I want to get a little

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>bit into the background of this hearing some more so.

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>When the Clintons finally agreed to testify in February, one

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of the things they pushed for was that the testimony

0:13:49.000 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>take the form of public hearings broadcast live. Hillary addressed

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>German comra online saying, quote, you love to talk about transparency.

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing more transparent than a public hearing camera onquote.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>There was a brief back and forth negotiation on what

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the depositions would be open to the public. Ultimately they

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>were not, but they were recorded on camera and transcribed

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:16.079
<v Speaker 1>for later release. Part of the terms for this private

0:14:16.160 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>hearing this deposition was that press and photographers were not

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed inside the room, and that deposition materials would only

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be released in full through official channels after sensitive information

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>like staffer names, president of the deposition and off the

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>record exchanges between lawyers were properly removed or redacted. At

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>about an hour and twenty minutes into Hillary's deposition, the

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Clinton staff learned that one of the Republican committee members

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>leaked a photo of Hillary to right wing influencer Benny

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Johnson Crazy, who posted the picture and wrote quote breaking

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the first image of Hillary Clinton testifying under oath but

0:14:56.400 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein to the Republican Oversight Committee. This is the

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>first time Hillary has had to answer real questions about Epstein.

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Clinton does not look happy. Photo provided by Representative Lauren Bobert.

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, there's actually nobody more unprofessional than Lauren Bobert.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Will get into her unprofessional conduct later in this hearing

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. Great, but here's a clip of the Clinton

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>team realizing that a photo has been leaked.

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 9>I have another photos that are being released of the

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 9>secretary as she is testifying from inside this room. Can

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 9>you please advise me as to whether or not that's

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 9>permissible and consistent with the rules, particularly given that we

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 9>have asked for public hearing. If there are photos that

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 9>are being released of the secretary she is testifying, can

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 9>you please explain how.

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 5>Much I've done with this. If you guys are doing that,

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 5>I am done. You can hold me a contempt from

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 5>now till the cows come home. This is just typical behavior.

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 5>Oh for heaven, I would like.

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 9>To understand how that's permissible hearing.

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't matter.

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>We all are abiding by the rules.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, I would like to take a break at

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 5>this movie I'd like to have done for now.

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Fair threw up the record. Pretty shocking stuff.

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>There's no defense for that. That's that's wild, and uh

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 2>I would walk out as well.

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>When they went back on the record, Chairman Comer discussed

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>how he advised all members that no photos of the

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>deposition were to be released and that an instant like

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:30.040
<v Speaker 1>this would not happen again. Lauren Barber later told reporters

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that she took the picture before a testimony actually began

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and that she checked with committee staff about using the photo.

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 1>No follow up on that.

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that chance, it's embarrassing.

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>After returning from off the record, the minority, the Democrats

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>asked about the Justice Department illegally withholding certain files related

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to the investigation from public disclosure. Hillary says that this

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.480
<v Speaker 1>behavior by the Justice Department deserves the most thoroughn destigation

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>that Congress could carry out. This will be a longer clap,

0:17:04.920 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 1>about two minutes, but there's some good information inside.

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.399
<v Speaker 5>I think from the very beginning, the behavior of the

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 5>Attorney General and her staff has demonstrated either a gross incompetence,

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 5>which is bothersome because they are the keepers of information

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 5>that should be evaluated for law enforcement purposes or a

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 5>clear cover up because they are protecting the president and others.

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Either one of those should be the focus of this

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 5>committee to try to get to the bottom. If they

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 5>are incompetent and they are incapable of complying with the

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 5>law that the Congress passed, we need to know that

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.040
<v Speaker 5>because they are falling down on the job. They have

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 5>an FBI director is more interested in drinking beer in

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 5>a hockey dressing room after our team won the Olympics

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 5>rather than being responsive and complying with the law as

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 5>it has been promulgated. So I don't think it's unfair

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:27.360
<v Speaker 5>to say that given the sequencing of the event, starting

0:18:27.400 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 5>with the way that President Trump made the release of

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 5>the files a key element of his twenty twenty four campaign,

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 5>the promise that he and then his Attorney General made

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 5>that the files would be released, then a walking back

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 5>of that as they began to look at the files,

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 5>an ignoring of what they had promised, including that they

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 5>had a client list on the desk of the Attorney General.

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 5>Reasonable people would have to assume they are engaged in

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:10.200
<v Speaker 5>a massive cover up, which is infuriating as an American

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 5>as a citizen, all of us should be, regardless of party,

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 5>wondering what are they hiding?

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:20.239
<v Speaker 2>The thing says I watched sports more than calling it

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 2>a hockey dressing room dressing room, I was like Hillary

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 2>up with the times.

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 10>Uh.

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Hillary goes on to mention how the prosecutor the original

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Epstein case, alex Acosta, was not asked any questions by

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Republicans during his Epstein deposition. About half an hour later,

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Hillary and the Majority go into about a three minute

0:19:45.440 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>exchange thing. This is between Hillary and Nancy Mace about

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Howard Lutnick, Trump's Commerce secretary, who's frequently named in the files,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 1>whom Hillary knew from being a New York senator during

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the nine to eleven attacks, where Lutnik lost the highest

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of employees out of anyone that day, like over six hundred.

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 1>So Hillary was asked how she knows Lutnik. Hillary tries

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to respond by saying how they met, which was the

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of nine to eleven. Mace claims that this is

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>like a distraction from answering the question and that Hillary's

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to garner sympathy. Things get very heated over over

0:20:19.960 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the course of these like three minutes, as they like

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>argue about, you know, if she's actually answering the question.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Mace talks about being a survivor herself, and now she's

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to, you know, get the truth out of these hearings.

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Hillary responds by talking about how she's been very sympathetic

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to Mace's situation and respects the work that she's doing

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Epstein hearings, but is trying to answer the

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>question specifically about Lutnik. It's a pretty loud and contentious

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>three minutes. About two minutes after that, Republicans made Hillary

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>read emails from the Epstein files.

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for a fun night. Your littlest girl was

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 5>a little naughty.

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>How does that make you feel?

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Makes me sick?

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 11>If you can also read the EFTA zers zero eight

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 11>seven eight four two one. This is also another email.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 12>Can you just please provide the context.

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:16.720
<v Speaker 11>It's an email to Jeffrey Epstein, if you could just

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 11>read the context of what it is.

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 5>Of course, the O H Jesus, ohio Jesus, I'm coming trick.

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 12>And just the main body of the context of the email.

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 5>Said that she felt God's presence next her when she

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 5>was in bed. She knows that Jesus watches over her

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 5>and he helped save her life.

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 8>Whoops.

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>How does that make you feel?

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 5>It's bizarre. I don't know what it means.

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 13>The reason I asked you to read both of these

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 13>is because these emails are both sent by co conspirators

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 13>that were then given the plea deals and now have

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 13>been given victim status.

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 4>Both of these.

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 11>Women were also named an FBI document, and they're on

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 11>a number of other emails.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 2>What does that have to do with Hillary?

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that's the exact thing that I wrote down. This

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 1>has no relevance to Clinton at all. This, this doesn't

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>relate to her.

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 2>They wanted soundbites of her reading weird things.

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a humiliation ritual, right, It's yeah, there's no reason

0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>for them to do this that the majority just go

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>on to ask Hillary if the DOJ should reevaluate the

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>plea deals of these two people, something that Hillary has

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>no expertise for. Like, that's what she's here to testify

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>on her own knowledge relating to Epstein and Maxwell. This

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is this is a complete non sequitor. This doesn't relate

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>to her in any way. It's just grosse. You're just

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just getting a woman to read the Epstein files

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>for your own entertainment. Yes, it's disgusting. Yes, I have

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a few clips here. This is what three clips about

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>her intellectual kind of ruthlessness and the ways that the

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.879
<v Speaker 1>question in this committee, we're trying to get certain asses

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.959
<v Speaker 1>out of her, and she was able to either correct

0:23:05.000 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>them or navigate in an interesting way. I'll start with

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>this first one at three and a half hours in gosh,

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>you watched a lot.

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 6>In twenty fourteen, Epstein met with William Burns, who was

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 6>then a senior State Department official and later a CIA director.

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 9>Excuse me, could you say what year that was?

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Again?

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 6>In twenty fourteen.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 9>In twenty fourteen he met with William Burns.

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 6>Epstein met with William Burns as as a Secretary of

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 6>State at that time.

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 4>Were you aware of that meeting?

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:40.880
<v Speaker 5>I wasn't secretary of State in twenty fourteen.

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 6>Okay, were you aware of them?

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 4>I was Master Burns.

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, embarrassing stuff. Yeah, she was not secretary of state

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fourteen. She served from twenty nine to two

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 1>US and thirteen. Asking a question about if she was

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.639
<v Speaker 1>informed of something, well, secretary of State in twenty fourteen,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>she simply was not there. She was not secretary of State.

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>The people in this committee should know this. They should

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>know when she actually served as Secretary of State. It's

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing they continued to get like dates wrong throughout this

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hearing that this guy who's asking this question is his representative,

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Eric Berlinson. He also mischaracterized Chelsea's wedding as Hillary's wedding,

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that Glen Maxwell attended Hillary's wedding and that Glene

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Maxwell vacationed with Chelsea after the wedding. This event that

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>he's referencing, this vacation was actually a year before the wedding,

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>and who has a nine Hillary and her lawyers had

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to correct all of that stuff. Specifically, Eric Berlinson did

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 1>not seem to know what he was talking about at

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>all in this hearing. Just constantly got little dates and

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 1>facts wrong.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 2>That gives me pause for a number of reasons. But

0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 2>it just makes me think about, you know, if they

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 2>were actually talking to somebody that they needed to deeply press, yeah,

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 2>that they would not get the results needed. It gives

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:58.240
<v Speaker 2>me a major pause that they have lack of confidence

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 2>in this committee to do their job. But it's it's

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 2>just frankly embarrassing that these are elected officials and they

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 2>can't even get their dates right.

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is an extremely serious matter, and these are

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the people doing oversight.

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>This is not a laughing matter.

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they are totally incompetent.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Barber then asked a very leading question about when

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Hillary learned her husband was spending time with a registered

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 1>sex offender.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 14>Miss Clinton, when did you first learn that your husband

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 14>was spending time extensively with a registered sex offender?

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 5>He did not after he was convicted, years after Bill stopped.

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 14>Having any Were there any activities that raised any red

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 14>flags to think that he could be charged of sex

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 14>crimes during the time, are you asking?

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 5>Clinton has awareness yes, of Jeffrey Epstein.

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 14>Of any red flags being brought to your awareness, to

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 14>your family's awareness while your husband was spending time with

0:25:58.640 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 14>Jeffrey Epstein.

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.679
<v Speaker 5>I have no recollection of anyone bringing any red flags

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 5>to me.

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 1>They continued to ask about her husband, and she just

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 1>had to She just had to keep reiterating it, like

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>the committee will have a chance to question her husband tomorrow,

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>like they could ask him about his relationship with it

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Epstein tomorrow. There's no use in her speculating about her

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 1>husband's relationship. They can just ask him, literally in less

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>than twenty four hours. But they just kept they just

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>kept going.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:26.160
<v Speaker 2>Classic.

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>One of the more bizarre moments they quoted Epstein referring

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 1>to Hillary being prettier in person. And this exchange is

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>interesting because of the way it suggests the committee's interpretation

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of certain statements made by Epstein when I think they

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>probably infer something to the opposite.

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 2>It's bizarre, just like weird misogyny going on.

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 14>So regarding the Epstein files, there are many files where

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 14>Jeffrey Epstein seems to speak as though he does know

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 14>you personally. In one file ft A zero zero six

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 14>five seven one one five, mister Epstein is commenting and

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 14>he quotes, Hey, Hillary Clinton is much prettier in person.

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 14>This was Tuesday, September twentieth, twenty eleven. And then another.

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 5>Congresson I'm not going to object to that keeps me.

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 4>Commiss can we see the documents because we don't think

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 4>that we would get that present.

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 7>They don't think the documents not that you're not pretty.

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 14>Jeffrey Epstein is also commented that meetings with Hillary are

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 14>not easily discreet. Has he ever connected someone to meet

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 14>with you, not that I'm aware of.

0:27:52.560 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 11>Okay, this is my first time seeing that clip.

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 2>That's so funny. First of all, very funny. Second of all,

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 2>this is not what this is supposed to be. Why

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:13.000
<v Speaker 2>are you bringing that up? What does that have to

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 2>do with anything?

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean they're trying to establish some sort of

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 1>relationship between Hillary and Epstein.

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 2>Purely, but it doesn't exist.

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>And to me, these exchanges just inferred that, you know,

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein had seen Hillary in person before, likely at

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>these White House Historical Association events where she sees you know,

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of people who like walk by, right. But then

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Epstein himself like expressed that it's actually difficult to get

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>a private meeting with her. So this, this doesn't prove

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>that they had any actual, like personal knowledge of each other,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like mutually. Obviously Epstein knew who she was. She was

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the first Lady of the United States.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. It's ridiculous.

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>About ten minutes later, and this is getting to the

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>end of this hearing about, like, you know, four hours in,

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Hillary just kind of goes off a little bit after

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>just being asked the same question again and again and again,

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and then also demonstrates like how much she actually knows

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 1>about this committee's investigation.

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 4>You have said that you have never been to mister

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 4>Epstein's island. Is that correct?

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 5>You know what, I am so tired of answering that question.

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 5>If you have one sentilla of evidence to the contrary,

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 5>put it forward. I have never been on his island period.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 5>I've never been in his homes, his offices, his anything.

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 5>So I don't know how many times you have to

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 5>say the same thing over and over and over again.

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 5>And I just am struggling with the relevance of all

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 5>of this. But no, I never have been.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 4>And based off that response, I would include, you've never

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 4>been to mister Epstein's Manhattan town home. I have not

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 4>his New Mexico ranch.

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 13>No.

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 4>I have not his Palm Beach residence.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 10>No.

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 4>I have not his Paris apartment.

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 5>Didn't know he had one.

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 4>I haven't been there.

0:29:58.680 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 10>You know.

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 5>I also find it very interesting because I went back

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 5>and looked at the transcripts of all of your other depositions,

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 5>and none of the Republicans asked a single question to

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 5>any witness about Jeffrey Epstein, or any question that would

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:22.200
<v Speaker 5>help provide answers for his victims.

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Hillary goes on to say that Republican Chairman Comer did

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>ask Attorney General bar not about Epstein, but if he

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>was aware of clinton involvement in the twenty sixteen Russia

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>collusion investigation. Again in a deposition about the DOJ's handling

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Epstein files. Completely relevant, completely relevant to the

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>matter at hand. And if these people want to pretend

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that they actually take, you know, what happened to these

0:30:54.600 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>victims seriously, then they would have a focused effort on

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the actual subject. All these wild partisan threads. And I'm

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>now gonna discuss before before we before we go and

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>break again about how this hearing kind of threwout it.

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>But I've condensed this down into one section, turned towards

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the weird multiple times in ways that are sometimes you know, relevant,

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 1>but oftentimes not. Earlier in this hearing, Hillary stated that

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>she had never been briefed on whether Jeffrey Epstein had

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>foreign intelligence ties while serving in office, but that speculation

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that Jeffrey Epstein could have been a foreign intel asset

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is a quote unquote fruitful area of investigation. Although she

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was not made aware of any connection of this sort

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>wild Secretary of State, she was also asked about a

0:31:40.800 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>passport belonging to Epstein which bore a different name.

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 11>This is actually a passport that was given. The individual's

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 11>name is Marcus Robert Fortinelli. Do you think that this

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 11>is a sign or a telltale sign of intelligence operations

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 11>and pseudonymes.

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 5>I can't speculate, I don't, okay.

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 11>Victims have stated to this committee, both Democrats and Republicans,

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 11>that during Epstein's time, during his daycamp DALs what I'll

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 11>call it, that he was also an active communication with

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 11>Bush's CIA director. They also had stated that he had

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:21.479
<v Speaker 11>active ties to Russia, Israel, and I Ron. Given your

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 11>status not just as the first Lady, but also in

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 11>your secretary position, have you ever been targeted by any

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 11>of these countries as a means of a foreign intelligence

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 11>gathering operation? I you were potential vulnerabilities.

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.000
<v Speaker 5>And yeah, I was targeted by Russia in the twenty

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 5>sixteen campaign.

0:32:38.320 --> 0:32:39.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean I think that's pretty well known.

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 9>What about Israel Aribran?

0:32:42.280 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 5>I don't know about either Israel or Iran?

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:48.840
<v Speaker 12>Do you believe that Epstein was running potentially a honeypop

0:32:48.880 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 12>operation with intelligence gathering operations to collect information on how

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 12>high profile individuals, both Democrat Republican the United States in

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 12>an effort to sway.

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 5>Are foreign policy.

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 9>Is it possible.

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 5>I have no direct knowledge, but I think it's one

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 5>of the areas your committee should investigate. Do you think

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 5>it's possible, Well, it is certainly possible. It's a tried

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.959
<v Speaker 5>and true technique of certain intelligence agencies.

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 12>Do you believe that he was using Honeypott's an effort to.

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 5>I can't sarraculate.

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what this is such a weird use

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 2>of their time.

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Later, she said that she had no reason to believe

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that personally she was the subject of an intel gathering

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>operation relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Glene Maxwell. And then

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>right after she was asked if she was ever denied

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>access to information about youaps that's an unidentified aerial phenomenon.

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Hilary said that she was never denied access because she

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.239
<v Speaker 1>never asked for access. When questions, she said that she

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 1>believes the American public deserves access to such topics subject

0:33:51.800 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to national security implications. This bizarre off topic line of

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>questioning continued nearly an hour later into the hearing.

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 6>Going to begin with some lighthearted different questions and You're

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 6>welcome to ignore them or if you want to. But

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:09.840
<v Speaker 6>while I have you here, I just have to ask. So,

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 6>when your husband was president, it is Lawrence Rockefeller had

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 6>an effort to try to disclose UFOs UAPs. When you

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 6>were running for president, John Podesta publicly stated that you

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 6>would disclose these files with if given the chance, if

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 6>you had been president. Are you pleased to see that

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 6>these files may be disclosed?

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Finally, I am pleased.

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 5>As I say, I think they have to be carefully

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 5>scrutinized so that no national security information is disclosed. But

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 5>this is an issue of real importance to so many people,

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:52.360
<v Speaker 5>and I think whatever can be disclosed should be disclosed.

0:34:53.840 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 6>Was there a program that specifically that that was referencing

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 6>that you were aware of. It's not.

0:35:00.600 --> 0:35:03.839
<v Speaker 5>As you mentioned. John Podesta, who was one of my advisors,

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 5>was deeply interested in the issue, and if I had

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 5>been elected, I certainly would have listened to his advice.

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 6>Oh, thank you for indulgent on.

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>That very odd, completely off topic, no relevance to the

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:23.080
<v Speaker 1>actual subject of inquiry. A few minutes later, Hillary asked

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>a clarifying question about why UFOs were brought up.

0:35:26.760 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 4>This is sort of like off subject.

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:33.959
<v Speaker 5>But didn't you all require in the latest Defense authorization

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 5>that the UFO information asked about what?

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 9>They ripped it out?

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.680
<v Speaker 4>They killed it. Oh I thought that it gone through.

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 6>That was my amendment and it ripped out.

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 5>Oh okay, well you've just I didn't know that, So

0:35:45.719 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 5>thank you for enlightening me.

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 9>Okay, Yeah, they've been killing that.

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.799
<v Speaker 1>So if alien disclosure questions weren't bad enough and you know,

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:58.759
<v Speaker 1>disrespectful to victims of epstein it' sex trafficking, it did

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:02.840
<v Speaker 1>get worse. Yeah, did, And we will get into the

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 1>worse after this at break. All right, we're back at

0:36:17.920 --> 0:36:22.840
<v Speaker 1>nearly the four hour mark into Hillary Clinton's deposition, Lauren

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Bobert started asking about conspiracy theories.

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 14>In past public statements, as in twenty seventeen speeches and interviews,

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 14>you described pizza gait as a baseless conspiracy theory alleging

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.399
<v Speaker 14>you and others ran a child sex trafficking ring from

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 14>a Washington pizzeri based pizzeria basement. Have you reviewed any

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 14>twenty twenty five twenty twenty six EPSTEIN files that were

0:36:49.840 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 14>released that you believe reference or relate to those specific

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 14>twenty sixteen claims regarding the Podesta emails comic ping Pong

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.240
<v Speaker 14>pizza used as code.

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 10>Possibly. I'm sorry about whether she's reviewed emails that files

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 10>related to the wacky Pizzagate excuse.

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 14>You could characterize it however you want. I just would

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.520
<v Speaker 14>like to know if she's familiar with any of them.

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:18.439
<v Speaker 9>So your question is about whether or not she has

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:24.960
<v Speaker 9>reviewed any emails in the Epstein release files about Pizzagate. Correct,

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.439
<v Speaker 9>Pizzagate was totally made up.

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 5>It was an outrageous allegation that ended up hurting a

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 5>number of people, that caused a deranged young man to

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 5>show up with his assault rifle and shoot up a

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 5>local Pizzeriha. I can't believe you're even referencing it. You

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 5>should be there.

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 14>There are connections to the language.

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 5>Believe there are, so I don't know what believe at.

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It completely unhitched.

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.239
<v Speaker 2>But why are we doing this? I have complete lack

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 2>of faith in this committee. This is offensive to survivors

0:38:04.760 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 2>of Epstein, and this is getting us no relevant information

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:12.239
<v Speaker 2>to the Epstein probe as they call it. This is ridiculous,

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 2>this is infammatory. I mean, I expect nothing less from

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Loan and Bobart, but you know, it's just it's insane

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 2>and embarrassing.

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 1>It's insane, and like there has been a resurgence of

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, Pizzagate related conspiracy theories, people talking about Pizzagate

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>since the files had been released. Since people can create

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:33.920
<v Speaker 1>their own patterns, right by selectively honing in on words

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 1>or symbols which allow them to overlook what's right in

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>front of their nose. Right, all of the very clear

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>connections laid out in the Epstein files, those can be ignored, yes,

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and instead you focused on these like coded messages hidden everywhere,

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>hidden in the backgrounds of videos, people carrying pizza boxes

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>into the Clinton deposition, all this kind of stuff. It's

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it allows them to miss the very the very clear

0:38:57.200 --> 0:38:59.640
<v Speaker 1>things that are actually outlined into files. It is, you know,

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the negative side effects of you know, of

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>files like this being released is that it allows a

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of points of interest to be honed in on

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>by people charting wildly conspiratorial matrices.

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 2>I just don't even know how somebody like Lauren Barbert

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 2>on a committee like this, or an elected official or

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, employed Frankly.

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Hilary went on to say, I expected a lot of

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting questions today, but Pizzagate was not on the list.

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Lauren Bobart replied, that's okay. We're asking all sorts of

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>things here, okay. A few minutes later, Bobert returned with

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>even more Pizzagate questions, and things escalated to the point

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>where they had to go off the record.

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:47.360
<v Speaker 14>That's lord, are you aware of any files that were

0:39:47.400 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 14>on Anthony Wiener's laptop and a folder that was titled

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 14>Insurance Life Insurance with a ZIP file titled.

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 10>Chairman.

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 9>Is this within the scope? Mister chairman?

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 14>Chairman rules that it's not with mister.

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 9>Based on what you said in the public hearing, is

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 9>this within the scope?

0:40:11.280 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 4>For a moment, mister chairman?

0:40:12.640 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 9>Is this within the scope?

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:15.000
<v Speaker 8>Record?

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>So you couldn't quite make out what Bobart was referencing there.

0:40:19.680 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>She was talking about the Frazzle Drip conspiracy theory that

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 1>alleged Anthony Wiener possessed a video of Hillary Clinton conducting

0:40:27.920 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>a satanic ritual murder of a child, cutting off this

0:40:31.880 --> 0:40:35.000
<v Speaker 1>child's face to wears a mask to fill the child's

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:39.360
<v Speaker 1>blood with adrenochrome to be harvested. This is like a

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen conspiracy theory, one of one of the more

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:48.040
<v Speaker 1>like like graphic and gross aspects of QAnon, And here

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Bobert is just openly asking Hillary Clinton about Frazle drip

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>by name, completely inappropriate, has no bearing on the investigation.

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:01.280
<v Speaker 1>It's an insult to actual victim of child sex trafficking.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>So this whole conspiratorial angle of the Hillary Clinton deposition

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.960
<v Speaker 1>made up a significant chunk. Another chunk that made up

0:41:11.000 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a significant portion of time is just Clinton kind of

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 1>advising and the committee members both on the Republican and

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>Democrat side, like asking for her advice on how to

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>conduct their own investigation. She advised that they should follow

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Senator Widens compiled Treasury data on Epstein's financial transactions, and

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that data should be subpoened from the Treasury Department. She

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was asked about how they could determine if Jeffrey Epstein

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 1>was a spy. Hillary advised them to send document requests

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to subpoena the CIA, the Department of National Intelligence counterintelligence

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>departments in the DOJ, saying to quote unquote cast a

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>wide net. She suggested cooperating with UK investigations and to

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>former Prince Andrew and trying to see if Israel will

0:41:56.160 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>cooperate in sharing information regarding the investigation. Finally, Hillary suggested

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 1>to Chairman James Coohmer that he should advise on how

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>laws could be changed to prevent future abuse based on

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the committee's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's manipulation techniques and mode

0:42:13.600 --> 0:42:17.120
<v Speaker 1>of operation. But there was like significant chunk of at

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>least like, you know, thirty minutes where she was essentially

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 1>being asked or advising the committee on how to do

0:42:22.880 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>their own job, just due to the sheering competence that

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.479
<v Speaker 1>has been displayed in the clips that I've selected here.

0:42:29.040 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't really have anything else to say besides

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:33.440
<v Speaker 2>that it's just like.

0:42:33.800 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Pathotic, yeah, I mean, and most of the interesting stuff

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:38.440
<v Speaker 1>is in the Hillary Hillary Clinton won.

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 10>Yeah.

0:42:38.840 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill was deposed the next day. But for some of

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the like logistics regarding this hearing, a source told The

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>New York Post, so take that as you will. Sure

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Clinton team demanded specific quote unquote beauty lighting

0:42:51.600 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and camera positions relatable life hear to get the most

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>flattering angle of Hillary's face, and brought white tablecloths to

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 1>bounce the overhead lighting onto the bottom of her face

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to mind of my shadows.

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Pictures of the whole room also showed that the Clinton

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:08.480
<v Speaker 1>team was the only ones with these like nice orange

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>upholstered chairs. The rest of the chairs were just like

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>regular black folding chairs. The New York Post contains this

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 1>little tidbit that the customized blue paneled backdrop was developed

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>by a local specialized vendor within about seven hours after

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's team concluded it did not like the vibe of

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 1>the original black curtains in the background unquote. So they

0:43:34.360 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like went in saw this, you know, white table with

0:43:38.120 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>black curtains. They thought it looked too much like a

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 1>criminal interrogation or or like a quote unquote hostage situation

0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.719
<v Speaker 1>is what's quoted in the Post article, as opposed to

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like an official congressional deposition, you know, like an official

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 1>government venue. So they got like a local carpenter to

0:43:54.840 --> 0:43:58.360
<v Speaker 1>make this blue paneled backdrop in like a few hours

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to put behind Hillary. And that's just an interesting insight

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>into like the thought process of the Clinton team regarding

0:44:05.560 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the optics of this hearing shop local. So let's briefly

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>go through some of the sections on bill. Bill started

0:44:13.200 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>by saying that they should not have questioned Hillary, quote,

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but I do think you should be talking to me.

0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 1>You should have called me, I did take those plain

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>trips with him. You have a right to ask those questions. Unquote,

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:27.359
<v Speaker 1>He said that quote, I'll be honest with you, I'll

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:29.440
<v Speaker 1>be eighty eight years old if I lived my next birthday.

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:31.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember everything that happened twenty four years ago,

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but I do remember some things, and I'll tell you

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 1>what I remember the best that I can. On quote.

0:44:36.320 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>When asked when he first met Jeffrey Epstein, Bill referred

0:44:39.400 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to a photo of him shaking Epstein's hand in nineteen

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety three at a White House Historical Association event. But

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Bill said that he doesn't remember that, but this photo

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 1>does exist. He shook a lot of people's hands. Does

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:54.680
<v Speaker 1>not remember everyone he meets. He first remembers meeting Jeffrey

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Epstein for a Clinton Foundation plane trip in two thousand

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and two. He said he was connected with Epstein through

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:05.360
<v Speaker 1>someone named Larry Summers, who told Bill that Jeffrey Epstein

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:08.280
<v Speaker 1>made a large donation about ten million dollars to brain

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>research and was a quote unquote, information hungry person. Summers

0:45:13.200 --> 0:45:15.440
<v Speaker 1>said that Epstein wanted to talk with Bill about economics

0:45:15.440 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and politics and offered to take Bill his staff and

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>his secret service detail on Clinton Foundation trips for global

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:25.360
<v Speaker 1>humanitarian aid, so Bill saw this as a way to

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:28.800
<v Speaker 1>drive the price down for these trips. He took the

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:30.399
<v Speaker 1>last one of these flights in two thousand and three.

0:45:31.680 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 1>When asked why this relationship ended, Bill said that the

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 1>AIDS program, it was a humanitarian aid program to help

0:45:37.520 --> 0:45:39.919
<v Speaker 1>with AIDS, but that this AIDS program, you know, took

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:43.760
<v Speaker 1>off and more people that Bill knew better offered to help,

0:45:44.120 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and Jeffrey did not seem as interested in the AIDS program,

0:45:47.360 --> 0:45:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so they kind of just naturally drifted apart. Bill characterized

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.359
<v Speaker 1>the relationship as friendly, but didn't know him well enough

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:55.879
<v Speaker 1>to be considered a friend, and so that he never

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:58.719
<v Speaker 1>talked about witness or participated in anything sexual. Relating to

0:45:58.760 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein and young women and girls, Bill said he

0:46:02.560 --> 0:46:05.640
<v Speaker 1>learned of Epstein's crimes in two thousand and eight. Bill

0:46:05.680 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 1>said he had no indication Epstein was trafficking women. Quote

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:10.520
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing that I saw when I was around him

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that made me realize he was trafficking women. Quote. Bill

0:46:13.600 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>was asked about if he communicated with a long list

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of people regarding Epstein. This was kind of a weirdly

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>framed question. It was have you communicated with any of

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:27.239
<v Speaker 1>these people about Jeffrey Epstein. Bill had a hard time

0:46:27.320 --> 0:46:29.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of understanding the nature of this question. It is

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of oddly phrased. Hillary was asked the same one.

0:46:32.680 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>They just read a list of names. Bill recounted if

0:46:35.520 --> 0:46:39.640
<v Speaker 1>he knew the person or not, and lawyers had to specify, like, oh, no,

0:46:39.680 --> 0:46:42.800
<v Speaker 1>they're asking if you communicated with them about Epstein, not

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:45.319
<v Speaker 1>if you knew them. So it kind of got some

0:46:45.360 --> 0:46:51.360
<v Speaker 1>confusing responses. Interestingly, both Hillary and Bill laughed at the

0:46:51.480 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 1>mention of Noam Chomsky. Bill said that he never communicated

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>with Chomsky and that Chomsky quote wasn't a big fan

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of mine. He thought I was too conservative.

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Fuck off, nome, fuck off, no crazy.

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Bill did testify that he thought that someone relating to

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:12.759
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement would ask him about Epstein in two thousand

0:47:12.760 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and eight when the news about Epstein's crimes came out,

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 1>considering that Epstein let Bill use the plane, but no

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>one ever did m He said he never suspected Intel

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:28.800
<v Speaker 1>agency connections with Epstein and was at the time unaware

0:47:28.840 --> 0:47:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of Epstein's visits to the White House while Bill was president,

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and it has only since been informed of this in

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>preparation for this testimony, Okay, Bill was asked about a

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:44.480
<v Speaker 1>New York Times article claiming to expound on Bill and

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's relationship in the nineties, characterized as chummy, which Bill denies.

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>He said that he didn't even know Epstein really during

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 1>this time, even though they may have been at the

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:00.880
<v Speaker 1>same events. He was asked about but being asked to

0:48:00.920 --> 0:48:04.839
<v Speaker 1>write a personal note to Jeffrey Epstein's mother. Bill said

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:07.279
<v Speaker 1>that he never met Jeffrey Epstein's mother and that he

0:48:07.360 --> 0:48:08.959
<v Speaker 1>wrote a lot of notes to a lot of people

0:48:08.960 --> 0:48:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that he did not know. He was unsure of who

0:48:11.400 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>asked him to write this note. He was also asked

0:48:14.000 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 1>about this passport appearing to belong to Epstein bearing a

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:22.920
<v Speaker 1>different name, with the questioner asserting that they believe Jeffrey

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Epstein was an intelligence operative running a honeypot against the president.

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>When later asked if he believes that he was targeted,

0:48:32.480 --> 0:48:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Bill says that it's possible. The lawyers objected this based

0:48:35.440 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on speculation, but Bill says he doesn't know if he

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:41.160
<v Speaker 1>was targeted but would be surprised. Refers to Jeffrey Epstein

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>as a quote unquote vacuum cleaner of information but was

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:49.959
<v Speaker 1>not overtly manipulative. Early on, saying that Epstein mostly asked

0:48:49.960 --> 0:48:54.759
<v Speaker 1>about derivatives trading and stock market regulation. Bill was asked

0:48:54.760 --> 0:48:57.239
<v Speaker 1>if he ever had contact with someone named Shante Davies,

0:48:57.880 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>who was a quote unquote flight attendant on Epstein's plane.

0:49:01.840 --> 0:49:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Bill confirms that he did, and confirmed that a neck

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:10.880
<v Speaker 1>rub took place once with Chante Davies, but denied he

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ever went to the island.

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 2>I don't know something about neck rub and Bill Clinton

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:18.120
<v Speaker 2>just makes me stomach hurt.

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:19.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:49:19.080 --> 0:49:21.360
<v Speaker 1>He later says that he was unaware of the abuse

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>happening to Chante Davies and says that he quote wish

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Schante had told me I liked her, but said that

0:49:28.680 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 1>he did not think there was anything unusual. He said

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>that massages on rich people's planes and boats weren't uncommon.

0:49:35.680 --> 0:49:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Was never aware of anyone under the age of eighteen

0:49:37.400 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all these flights, and if there were, that would have

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 1>made him uncomfortable. He specified that Secret Service was with

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>him for every single trip. He quote never signed off

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Secret Service protection. He talked about specifically this neck rub incident,

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:52.759
<v Speaker 1>saying that he had a sore neck during one of

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the legs of these Clinton Foundation Aid trips and received

0:49:57.320 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a massage this one time. That's what he claimed. He

0:50:01.440 --> 0:50:06.440
<v Speaker 1>was asked about the note in Jeffrey Epstein's fiftieth birthday book,

0:50:07.080 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 1>Bill said that his own staff asked him to write

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a letter for the book, specifying that he sends out

0:50:12.520 --> 0:50:15.720
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of birthday letters every year to friends or people

0:50:15.719 --> 0:50:19.840
<v Speaker 1>he's only met a few times. A regular occurrence, he's

0:50:20.160 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 1>asked to read a section of the letter that people

0:50:22.680 --> 0:50:26.880
<v Speaker 1>had a hard time transcribing exactly, which makes a reference

0:50:26.920 --> 0:50:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to Epstein having made errors in his life, and he

0:50:30.960 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>was asked whether this errors referred to sex crimes. Bill said, no,

0:50:36.480 --> 0:50:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in the life of someone fifty years old, they're going

0:50:38.640 --> 0:50:42.560
<v Speaker 1>to make mistakes. It was a throwaway line in one

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>section of this very short letter. I don't think it's

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>super relevant. Now. Around this time when they're reading from

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:53.560
<v Speaker 1>this letter is where there's this viral clip of Bill

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 1>pulling back a copy of a photo from his lawyers

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:59.359
<v Speaker 1>like while smiling. This is circulated a lot. It looks

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:03.279
<v Speaker 1>like he's no recounting like good memories or something. The

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>piece paper he's pulling back is actually just a copy

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of a new York Times article. It's not a picture

0:51:09.520 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 1>of him and Epstein. It's not a picture of memories.

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>There may be a small photo framed in the picture

0:51:16.360 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>included in this New York Times article. It's being passed around,

0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like he's like flipping through like a

0:51:21.480 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 1>year book of like a good moments with friends and like,

0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, happily recounting. I think this, this little clip's

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>been decontextualized.

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 2>I agree.

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not not trying to defend Bill Clinton here.

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 2>No, but I'm adding context for what's.

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Actually happening in this hearing. And his lawyers are passing

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:41.880
<v Speaker 1>around a copy of a New York Times article which

0:51:41.920 --> 0:51:44.680
<v Speaker 1>he's being questioned about, and that's the context for that clip.

0:51:45.320 --> 0:51:49.080
<v Speaker 2>And like, this clip went pretty viral, and so I

0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 2>was talking about it actually with my mom My. Mom

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:55.160
<v Speaker 2>My mom's first reaction held some weight with me. She

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:56.920
<v Speaker 2>was like, that's just Bill Clinton's face.

0:51:57.080 --> 0:51:59.080
<v Speaker 1>He's kind of this happy, goofy guy.

0:51:59.040 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Like he's generally like a smiley guy. And you know,

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 2>I think that makes sense contextually. Here again, not defending

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:12.359
<v Speaker 2>Bill Clinton, but yeah.

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I do want to play one clip about Trump. Bill

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>was asked if the committee should talk to Donald Trump

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:20.919
<v Speaker 1>since his name appears more frequently in the thousand almost

0:52:20.960 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>any other person. Bill says, that's up to the committee

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and mentions an instance where he talked with Trump about

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Epstein on a golf course for a charity tournament around

0:52:30.840 --> 0:52:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to US in two to TWISM three, and they talked

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:35.280
<v Speaker 1>about Epstein because Trump somehow knew that Bill had flown

0:52:35.360 --> 0:52:38.799
<v Speaker 1>on the plane. But besides this incident, he had no

0:52:38.840 --> 0:52:42.799
<v Speaker 1>other conversations with Trump about Epstein or Maxwell.

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 8>The day I was there, he would typically.

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 10>Donald Trump would come out and play a few holes

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:56.799
<v Speaker 10>with us, and he somehow knew I had flown in

0:52:57.120 --> 0:52:59.480
<v Speaker 10>Jeffrey Epstein's aircraft. And he said, you know, we have

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:04.000
<v Speaker 10>some great times together over the years, but we fell

0:53:04.040 --> 0:53:07.640
<v Speaker 10>out all because of a real estate deal.

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.720
<v Speaker 8>And he said, I'm sorry it that's all.

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:15.800
<v Speaker 15>Do you recall whether President Trump was the first one

0:53:15.840 --> 0:53:19.120
<v Speaker 15>to affirmatively bring up the subject of Jeffrey Epstein.

0:53:21.120 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 8>No, but I'd be shocked if I did. I just

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:25.439
<v Speaker 8>don't do that, you know.

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 15>Do you recall whether President Trump elaborated at all on

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 15>the great times that he had with Jeffrey Epstein.

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 10>No, And I took at the time I took. No,

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 10>I didn't put any you know, sexual stint on it.

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 15>And as far as you recall, President Trump characterized the

0:53:46.520 --> 0:53:50.240
<v Speaker 15>nature of the ending of their friendship as being solely

0:53:50.320 --> 0:53:52.839
<v Speaker 15>due to the real estate he said.

0:53:54.239 --> 0:53:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly, here Bill recounts that Trump's reason for breaking with

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Epstein was due to a real estate deal, not the

0:54:01.920 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 1>poaching of employees at mar A Lago, as alternatively reported.

0:54:07.040 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Right the minority, the Democrats referred to statements from three

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Epstein victims in statements, including Bill, in some way.

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Starting with someone named Maria Farmer, an Epstein employee who

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:21.720
<v Speaker 1>first reported abuse to the NYPDNFBI in nineteen ninety six,

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:27.359
<v Speaker 1>She claimed that she acknowledge that Bill visited Epstein's house

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:31.760
<v Speaker 1>multiple times. Bill denies this. Someone named Virginia Roberts Druffey

0:54:32.040 --> 0:54:37.240
<v Speaker 1>remarked that she had knowledge that Bill was at Epstein's island.

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Bill responded by saying that ultimately his person quote unquote

0:54:41.480 --> 0:54:45.319
<v Speaker 1>reached a different conclusion and denied declaimed that he flew

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in a helicopter with Glenn Maxwell to the island. The

0:54:48.360 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>committee member reference a diary entry as the piece of

0:54:52.520 --> 0:54:58.480
<v Speaker 1>information asserting that Bill was on the island. Bill's lawyers

0:54:58.560 --> 0:55:01.680
<v Speaker 1>asked about the dates for this entry so that they

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:05.480
<v Speaker 1>could determine whether Bill was in a different part of

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:08.160
<v Speaker 1>the world around this time. But this gets moved on

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:11.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty quick. They briefly bring up this picture of Bill

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 1>in a hot tub in Brunei. He says that he

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:16.399
<v Speaker 1>was staying at a hotel during one of these AIDS

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:18.960
<v Speaker 1>trips and briefly went to a hot tub. Other people

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:22.719
<v Speaker 1>were present from this trip secret Service. That's about a

0:55:22.760 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>bizarre painting of Bill Clinton wearing Monica Lewinsky's blue dress

0:55:27.480 --> 0:55:30.600
<v Speaker 1>found in Jeffrey Epstein's apartment. Bill said he'd never seen

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 1>it before. Was asked to speculate why this painting was made.

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Lawyers said that the committee can ask the artist. Lauren

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Barber goes on a very poor line of questioning regarding

0:55:40.640 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a conversation transcript between two people, and this line of

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 1>questioning requires deposition to go off the record to figure

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:48.280
<v Speaker 1>out what exactly she's talking about.

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:48.920
<v Speaker 10>Bill.

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Event she responds to a question stating that he never

0:55:52.160 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>felt that he owed Jeffrey Epstein any favors and never

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:59.000
<v Speaker 1>participated in any quote unquote to island orgies since he

0:55:59.040 --> 0:56:01.720
<v Speaker 1>never traveled to the US Virgin Islands with Jeffrey Epstein

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about two hours in. Bill Clinton has asked if he

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:10.480
<v Speaker 1>thinks Jeffrey Epstein killed himself, something they never asked. Hillary.

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:12.200
<v Speaker 8>I would just like to ask.

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:15.120
<v Speaker 14>You, personally and directly, do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein

0:56:15.200 --> 0:56:15.920
<v Speaker 14>killed himself?

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:18.439
<v Speaker 9>Are you asking him to speculate on how mister Epstein died?

0:56:18.880 --> 0:56:22.160
<v Speaker 14>I am asking what Miss the President thinks when you're

0:56:22.200 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 14>asking his opinion, Mister President, was your was your friend Jeffrey.

0:56:26.320 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 9>Epstein's cessifying him as a friend who he has testified.

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:31.280
<v Speaker 14>That he's a friend in a letter.

0:56:31.080 --> 0:56:33.360
<v Speaker 9>He said he was friendly, but not you've asked for

0:56:33.400 --> 0:56:34.280
<v Speaker 9>his test President.

0:56:34.320 --> 0:56:36.160
<v Speaker 14>Do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein was suicidal?

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:38.960
<v Speaker 10>Do you know?

0:56:39.320 --> 0:56:40.719
<v Speaker 14>Was he ever suicidal?

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:41.920
<v Speaker 8>I don't know.

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:46.239
<v Speaker 10>I don't know what the medical founding was. I think

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:50.560
<v Speaker 10>maybe he finally got caught.

0:56:51.239 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 8>I don't know. I've accepted it my own mom. I

0:56:55.000 --> 0:56:56.760
<v Speaker 8>don't know what happened, Miss President.

0:56:56.800 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 14>What did you accept that he killed himself or.

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:01.600
<v Speaker 8>That he did not that he did? But I don't know.

0:57:02.120 --> 0:57:06.440
<v Speaker 14>Yes, sir, and none of us know, Miss President has

0:57:06.480 --> 0:57:06.959
<v Speaker 14>been an honor.

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:08.319
<v Speaker 5>Thank you, Thank you.

0:57:09.880 --> 0:57:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Why would you ask him that that makes no sense?

0:57:13.360 --> 0:57:15.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, this is Lauren Bobber, the same person

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:18.360
<v Speaker 1>asking about pizza Gate. He's she's trying to donkey in

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:20.959
<v Speaker 1>as many of these conspiracy theory questions as she can,

0:57:21.080 --> 0:57:23.520
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's like who she is, right, she has

0:57:23.520 --> 0:57:26.880
<v Speaker 1>she is a conspiracy theorist herself. She may not characterist

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it that way, but she's trying to, you know, go

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:32.400
<v Speaker 1>go off a checklist of like epic owns against the

0:57:32.480 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Evil Child eating Clinton's a few other few other small

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 1>notes that I think are interesting. Bill was asked about

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>emails being sent to Glene Maxwell by one of his assistants,

0:57:44.400 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and Bill says that he never sent these emails and

0:57:46.280 --> 0:57:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he's only ever sent two emails in his life, which

0:57:49.560 --> 0:57:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I do believe I can too.

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:56.760
<v Speaker 3>It's so crazy, Oh, Bill Well.

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Bill's asked about a statement that Epstein made saying that

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Bill quote unquote likes them young. Bill Lawyer's asked, you know,

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:08.360
<v Speaker 1>if Bill's be asked to speculate on Jeffrey Epstein's mind.

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Bill says that this isn't true, that he quote unquote

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:14.880
<v Speaker 1>likes them young and never went to the island again.

0:58:15.640 --> 0:58:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Mace later asks if it's unusual for a quote unquote

0:58:18.480 --> 0:58:22.760
<v Speaker 1>sitting president to receive a massage. Bill Sawyers had to

0:58:22.840 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 1>argue back and forth because Bill was not a sitting

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 1>president during the time where this neck massage incident occurred.

0:58:30.000 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Bill's once again asked if he was the target of

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:34.920
<v Speaker 1>an intel operation, he says, I doubt it. There was

0:58:34.960 --> 0:58:38.320
<v Speaker 1>then an extended argument between Mace and Lawyer's reference to

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Daily Beast reporting on a statement Bill made after Jeffrey

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Epstein's to his a nineteen arrest, mischaracterizing two instances where

0:58:45.400 --> 0:58:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Jeffy Epstein visited the Clinton office and Bill once visited

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Jeffy Epstein's New York compartment, which he later remarked Jeffrey

0:58:52.280 --> 0:58:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Epstein was not even present for, and Nancy Mays kept

0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:58.440
<v Speaker 1>asking if Bill lied about only meeting Jeffrey Epstein at

0:58:58.440 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>these two times based on the phrasing of the Daily

0:59:01.640 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Beast article, but the full statement that the Daily Beast

0:59:05.360 --> 0:59:09.600
<v Speaker 1>was quoting from also lists the four plane trips, which

0:59:09.640 --> 0:59:13.640
<v Speaker 1>contained a total of seventeen stops. The Beast article just

0:59:13.640 --> 0:59:16.640
<v Speaker 1>mischaracterized this as only being two incidents, and Mace was

0:59:16.680 --> 0:59:19.200
<v Speaker 1>referring to the article, not the actual original statement. This

0:59:19.520 --> 0:59:22.760
<v Speaker 1>resulted in a pretty extensive argument. This leads us to

0:59:22.800 --> 0:59:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the final clip that I'll play, which I think is

0:59:26.000 --> 0:59:31.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of the only interesting question across the nine hours

0:59:31.600 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of testimony, the only question I think is actually kind

0:59:34.080 --> 0:59:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of interesting and worthwhile, and it's not actually followed up

0:59:37.720 --> 0:59:41.440
<v Speaker 1>on in any substantial way. Nancy Maaska asks why the

0:59:41.480 --> 0:59:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Clintons still associated with Glade Maxwell after Jeffrey Epstein's first conviction,

0:59:47.720 --> 0:59:51.160
<v Speaker 1>knowing that Maxwell was one of Epstein's closest associates.

0:59:52.240 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 10>First of all, when the wedding occurred, she was with

1:00:06.200 --> 1:00:11.280
<v Speaker 10>Ted White, and she was for several more years. We

1:00:11.480 --> 1:00:18.160
<v Speaker 10>did not know when Sane was arrested that she was

1:00:18.200 --> 1:00:21.400
<v Speaker 10>still involved with him.

1:00:21.560 --> 1:00:23.240
<v Speaker 8>I think that clears a lot of this up.

1:00:23.320 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 10>We didn't know, and I don't want all of me

1:00:27.800 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 10>to get We're all getting an allowed.

1:00:29.280 --> 1:00:37.760
<v Speaker 8>There's a logical extromation. We didn't know, and I'm sorry

1:00:38.000 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 8>for what she did and what she allowed her life

1:00:41.200 --> 1:00:43.400
<v Speaker 8>to become and now she's living with it.

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>They do not follow up on this at all. The

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that the Clinton's, knowing that Maxwell was like Epstein's

1:00:50.360 --> 1:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>number two guys, spent a decent amount of time with

1:00:52.720 --> 1:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>on these four plane trips and to US and two

1:00:54.840 --> 1:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to two US and three on these humanitarian aid Clinton

1:00:58.280 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Foundation trips. You know, a lot of time I'm with

1:01:00.840 --> 1:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Glaine and Epstein. The committee did not follow up on

1:01:04.640 --> 1:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>why they continued to associate even loosely, like very loosely

1:01:08.240 --> 1:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with Glaine after the Twestaate conviction. Yeah, that's a pretty

1:01:12.040 --> 1:01:14.919
<v Speaker 1>reasonable question to have, and it just doesn't even get

1:01:15.080 --> 1:01:17.960
<v Speaker 1>focused on very much. Instead, they started talking about this

1:01:18.000 --> 1:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>report from an Epstein victim about Bill Clinton allegedly walking

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>into the offices of Vanity Fair and threatening them to

1:01:25.320 --> 1:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>not write sex trafficking articles about Jeffrey Epstein, something that

1:01:28.560 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Bill obviously denies, and there would be other witnesses for

1:01:31.600 --> 1:01:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this event. But like this, this question about the Clinton's

1:01:35.840 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>extended relationship with Glaine Maxwell after the first conviction is

1:01:39.760 --> 1:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the very last questions asked. It takes them

1:01:42.520 --> 1:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>nine hours to get there. Yeah, they don't even follow

1:01:44.920 --> 1:01:48.479
<v Speaker 1>up on it, and it just kind of ends very

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>very flaccid.

1:01:50.080 --> 1:01:53.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry to the survivors, Like, you're not getting any

1:01:54.000 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>kind of justice. This committee is incompetent, embarrassing, and pugnant.

1:02:01.280 --> 1:02:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and that kind of sums up the hearing, all

1:02:03.960 --> 1:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of the hearings they were inconfident, embarrassing and repugnant, really

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>spending more time on weird conspiracy theories than asking like new.

1:02:12.560 --> 1:02:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Questions on Pizzagate.

1:02:15.200 --> 1:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because like they asked Hillary and Bill basically the

1:02:17.160 --> 1:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>same two questions over and over again, the same answers,

1:02:20.080 --> 1:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>wasting hours and hours of time. The only new questions

1:02:22.880 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>they asked are these insane conspiracy ones. It's it's embarrassing,

1:02:26.760 --> 1:02:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it does not hold any relevance to the investigation, and

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's nine hours of my life I'll never get back.

1:02:31.400 --> 1:02:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:35.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, that does it for us here at it could

1:02:35.960 --> 1:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>happen Here. We'll keep following some of these some of

1:02:38.320 --> 1:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>these hearings and depositions as this continues. I know there

1:02:41.880 --> 1:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>was new FBI documents about witness statements regarding President Trump

1:02:47.840 --> 1:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>released as I was writing this, like last night, and

1:02:51.120 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll probably be talking about those in executive disorder and

1:02:53.880 --> 1:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>later on throughout our coverage.

1:02:56.520 --> 1:03:03.120
<v Speaker 16>Bye, Hi, it could happen Here is a production of

1:03:03.200 --> 1:03:06.320
<v Speaker 16>cool Zone Media. For more podcasts from cool Zone Media,

1:03:06.440 --> 1:03:09.720
<v Speaker 16>visit our website coolzonmedia dot com, or check us out

1:03:09.760 --> 1:03:13.160
<v Speaker 16>on the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen

1:03:13.200 --> 1:03:15.840
<v Speaker 16>to podcasts, you can now find sources for it could

1:03:15.840 --> 1:03:18.120
<v Speaker 16>happen here, listed directly in episode descriptions.

1:03:18.440 --> 1:03:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening.