WEBVTT - Rodents and Red Wine with Maria Konnikova

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:24.316
<v Speaker 1>Bushkin love that you're wearing a T shirt that says Canada,

0:00:24.476 --> 0:00:28.556
<v Speaker 1>just so that we have no ambiguity whatsoever.

0:00:27.676 --> 0:00:31.156
<v Speaker 2>Where are you right now? You in Las Vegas?

0:00:32.236 --> 0:00:34.716
<v Speaker 1>I'm in Vegas right now. Yeah, I just got back

0:00:34.756 --> 0:00:36.956
<v Speaker 1>here two days ago.

0:00:37.276 --> 0:00:40.076
<v Speaker 2>Nice, very nice? Did I tell you? You know that?

0:00:40.156 --> 0:00:43.076
<v Speaker 2>I was in Las Vegas and I had an afternoon

0:00:43.116 --> 0:00:47.356
<v Speaker 2>and I sat in this coffee shop and there were

0:00:47.396 --> 0:00:50.356
<v Speaker 2>three people next to me having the most interesting conversation.

0:00:50.916 --> 0:00:53.956
<v Speaker 2>And one of the guys started talking and I realized

0:00:53.996 --> 0:00:57.396
<v Speaker 2>he was talking about you.

0:00:57.476 --> 0:00:57.796
<v Speaker 1>Really.

0:00:58.036 --> 0:01:01.956
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he was a lawyer of some kind who like,

0:01:02.316 --> 0:01:04.916
<v Speaker 2>was a writer, lawyer or something. I don't know. I

0:01:04.916 --> 0:01:07.396
<v Speaker 2>couldn't figure it out. And I was eavesdropping in a

0:01:07.436 --> 0:01:11.476
<v Speaker 2>conversation for like, and it was like the most interesting conversation.

0:01:13.916 --> 0:01:16.396
<v Speaker 1>I love that story. Now you did not tell me,

0:01:17.076 --> 0:01:19.636
<v Speaker 1>and I have no idea who you're talking about.

0:01:20.916 --> 0:01:24.156
<v Speaker 2>Allow me to introduce a new voice to this podcast,

0:01:24.516 --> 0:01:29.636
<v Speaker 2>Maria Kanakhova. In basketball, they call people like Maria Swiss

0:01:29.716 --> 0:01:34.076
<v Speaker 2>army knives, people who do everything. Maria got a PhD

0:01:34.196 --> 0:01:36.636
<v Speaker 2>with the famous Walter Michelle, the guy who invented the

0:01:36.636 --> 0:01:39.836
<v Speaker 2>marshmallow test. She's written a bunch of brilliant New York

0:01:39.836 --> 0:01:43.476
<v Speaker 2>Times bestsellers. She decided at one point that she was

0:01:43.476 --> 0:01:47.636
<v Speaker 2>interested in poker, taught herself poker, became a poker champion,

0:01:48.076 --> 0:01:51.116
<v Speaker 2>made some enormous sum of money. She's the kind of

0:01:51.116 --> 0:01:55.316
<v Speaker 2>person that random strangers talk about in coffee shops, which

0:01:55.356 --> 0:02:04.076
<v Speaker 2>is to say, my kind of person. I'm Malcolm Gladwell.

0:02:04.236 --> 0:02:08.076
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Revisionist History, my podcast about things overlooked

0:02:08.396 --> 0:02:11.676
<v Speaker 2>and misunderstand, and I have the pleasure in this episode

0:02:11.716 --> 0:02:15.556
<v Speaker 2>to bring you the fabulous Maria Konikova, who has agreed

0:02:15.556 --> 0:02:20.436
<v Speaker 2>to become the first ever Revisionist History amistman, or rather

0:02:20.676 --> 0:02:23.716
<v Speaker 2>honest person. She is joining the show to be the

0:02:23.756 --> 0:02:27.236
<v Speaker 2>advocate for you, dear listener, to call me on my nonsense,

0:02:27.596 --> 0:02:30.276
<v Speaker 2>to be a voice of reason, to participate in the

0:02:30.396 --> 0:02:34.836
<v Speaker 2>kind of whimsical, meandering flights of intellectual fancy that is

0:02:34.916 --> 0:02:41.796
<v Speaker 2>our trademark here at Pushkin Headquarters. So Maria, welcome to

0:02:42.196 --> 0:02:45.116
<v Speaker 2>Vision's History. I could think of no one better equipped

0:02:45.436 --> 0:02:49.516
<v Speaker 2>to speak truth to the power that is Revision's History.

0:02:49.916 --> 0:02:52.916
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for having me on the show, Malcolm.

0:02:53.076 --> 0:02:55.316
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited about this. You know, maybe you'll change

0:02:55.356 --> 0:02:58.156
<v Speaker 1>my mind maybe I'll change yours, but I think that

0:02:58.236 --> 0:03:02.036
<v Speaker 1>the conversation is going to be very entertaining no matter what.

0:03:02.356 --> 0:03:05.756
<v Speaker 2>Wonderful let's have at it. I am putting in your hands.

0:03:05.836 --> 0:03:06.436
<v Speaker 2>Is that correct?

0:03:08.756 --> 0:03:12.756
<v Speaker 1>Nice putty that's responsive and that talks back?

0:03:13.556 --> 0:03:16.756
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you're driving this train, all right?

0:03:16.836 --> 0:03:22.356
<v Speaker 1>Perfect. So one of the fascinating episodes of this season

0:03:22.356 --> 0:03:27.716
<v Speaker 1>of Revisionist History was about the lack of iodine in

0:03:27.756 --> 0:03:30.436
<v Speaker 1>people's diets and how this was discovered and how it

0:03:30.516 --> 0:03:34.916
<v Speaker 1>was actually then addressed and had I actually did not

0:03:35.076 --> 0:03:39.036
<v Speaker 1>know the story at all. It's such a fascinating question.

0:03:39.476 --> 0:03:42.236
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do we think about these things in

0:03:42.276 --> 0:03:44.556
<v Speaker 1>the present day? Would we be able to do something

0:03:44.676 --> 0:03:47.676
<v Speaker 1>like this today, you know, especially like after COVID, after

0:03:47.756 --> 0:03:50.636
<v Speaker 1>all of these things like add iodine to their salt

0:03:50.796 --> 0:03:52.596
<v Speaker 1>or their water and see what happens. What do you

0:03:52.596 --> 0:03:54.276
<v Speaker 1>think the response to something like that would be.

0:03:54.636 --> 0:03:58.716
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, it's interesting that there is a line,

0:03:59.116 --> 0:04:06.316
<v Speaker 2>there's a common line of either complaint or congratulation among

0:04:06.756 --> 0:04:10.556
<v Speaker 2>sciences where they say that experiment could never be done today.

0:04:11.116 --> 0:04:14.996
<v Speaker 2>The Stanford's Prison experiment could never be done today. Then

0:04:15.316 --> 0:04:17.756
<v Speaker 2>the Tuskegee siftless experiment could never be done. You know,

0:04:17.756 --> 0:04:20.076
<v Speaker 2>there's a whole long list of things. They look at that,

0:04:20.156 --> 0:04:22.996
<v Speaker 2>and they say, and that's because we are much more

0:04:23.036 --> 0:04:29.556
<v Speaker 2>mindful of people's autonomy, much better about obtaining consent. You

0:04:29.636 --> 0:04:31.956
<v Speaker 2>totally today could not go to Akron and dose up

0:04:31.996 --> 0:04:36.636
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of schoolgirls with a ton of eyeein. However,

0:04:37.636 --> 0:04:40.476
<v Speaker 2>my reaction to that argument is always the same, which is, yeah,

0:04:40.516 --> 0:04:46.996
<v Speaker 2>but we simultaneously conduct consentless experiments on human beings in

0:04:46.996 --> 0:04:50.676
<v Speaker 2>the present day that are probably way more consequential, and

0:04:50.716 --> 0:04:53.036
<v Speaker 2>we don't think twice about it. You know, think about

0:04:53.076 --> 0:04:56.516
<v Speaker 2>the way we have disrupted the lives of I don't

0:04:56.556 --> 0:04:59.476
<v Speaker 2>know children over the last twenty five years, with all

0:04:59.556 --> 0:05:03.956
<v Speaker 2>of these new technologies. How's that not a massive experiment

0:05:04.036 --> 0:05:06.476
<v Speaker 2>done without the consent of those who were experimented on.

0:05:06.876 --> 0:05:10.636
<v Speaker 2>How is the Facebook algorithm, which you know shows you

0:05:10.716 --> 0:05:14.156
<v Speaker 2>only the things that are likely to evoke a deeply

0:05:14.196 --> 0:05:18.076
<v Speaker 2>emotional response in you. How's it not an experiment? I mean,

0:05:18.356 --> 0:05:19.916
<v Speaker 2>there's a part of me that just wants to throw

0:05:19.956 --> 0:05:26.316
<v Speaker 2>out my hands and say, you know, efort, well, it's

0:05:25.716 --> 0:05:29.756
<v Speaker 2>not even let's not even let's not even bother making

0:05:29.796 --> 0:05:34.196
<v Speaker 2>these distinctions. Once we've conceded that all these experiments can

0:05:34.236 --> 0:05:36.716
<v Speaker 2>go on. Let's just declare them experiments and let people

0:05:36.796 --> 0:05:38.316
<v Speaker 2>pick and choose the one they want to be a

0:05:38.316 --> 0:05:38.636
<v Speaker 2>part of.

0:05:38.996 --> 0:05:42.236
<v Speaker 1>I think there's something to that, especially because you know,

0:05:42.516 --> 0:05:45.516
<v Speaker 1>at least with the iodine, right, it was there was

0:05:45.956 --> 0:05:49.436
<v Speaker 1>scientific evidence for the test, right, There was a reason

0:05:49.516 --> 0:05:51.796
<v Speaker 1>why they did it. There was a huge body of

0:05:51.836 --> 0:05:56.916
<v Speaker 1>evidence behind this, and the study was run as a study,

0:05:57.036 --> 0:05:59.516
<v Speaker 1>and so there were scientific controls in place. You know,

0:05:59.556 --> 0:06:03.356
<v Speaker 1>they actually could gather data, whereas with a lot of

0:06:03.356 --> 0:06:06.356
<v Speaker 1>these other things, you know, it becomes a natural experiment,

0:06:06.876 --> 0:06:10.836
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously MESSI has a lot of unintended consequences,

0:06:11.036 --> 0:06:13.636
<v Speaker 1>and I mean there are a lot of different questions there.

0:06:13.916 --> 0:06:16.156
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually curious about flipping it around where you have

0:06:16.276 --> 0:06:19.636
<v Speaker 1>something like fluoride, right, which is another additive that's put

0:06:19.676 --> 0:06:24.556
<v Speaker 1>in our water. And last year, I don't know if

0:06:24.596 --> 0:06:27.396
<v Speaker 1>you were following this, but in a town in Vermont,

0:06:27.876 --> 0:06:30.676
<v Speaker 1>it turned out that a town official for over a

0:06:30.796 --> 0:06:37.116
<v Speaker 1>decade had been lowering fluoride levels below the accepted minimums

0:06:37.156 --> 0:06:40.316
<v Speaker 1>because he thought that it was a government conspiracy. You know,

0:06:40.716 --> 0:06:44.236
<v Speaker 1>fluoride in your water bad. And he resigned and it

0:06:44.316 --> 0:06:47.036
<v Speaker 1>was a big outrage, and everyone was outraged that their

0:06:47.076 --> 0:06:53.196
<v Speaker 1>water wasn't being properly fluoridated, that they actually weren't getting

0:06:53.396 --> 0:06:56.596
<v Speaker 1>the numbers that they needed for dental health, cavities, et cetera.

0:06:56.996 --> 0:06:58.956
<v Speaker 1>I just did think that it was such an interesting

0:06:59.156 --> 0:07:02.356
<v Speaker 1>counterpoint because normally it's, oh, don't add anything, right, I

0:07:02.356 --> 0:07:04.476
<v Speaker 1>don't want anything at it that I don't know about.

0:07:04.756 --> 0:07:08.556
<v Speaker 1>I want natural salt, I want natural water. I don't

0:07:08.596 --> 0:07:11.636
<v Speaker 1>want you adding anything, you know, big pharma, big government,

0:07:11.876 --> 0:07:15.356
<v Speaker 1>big big, et cetera. And here the town was actually horrified,

0:07:16.356 --> 0:07:18.196
<v Speaker 1>which I think they should have been.

0:07:18.676 --> 0:07:22.036
<v Speaker 3>You know, I'm biased, you know, I think there's good

0:07:22.036 --> 0:07:24.636
<v Speaker 3>evidence that adding Florida to water is a good thing,

0:07:24.676 --> 0:07:26.836
<v Speaker 3>that adding I had dined to salt is a good thing,

0:07:27.356 --> 0:07:29.636
<v Speaker 3>and that when things are good.

0:07:29.436 --> 0:07:31.876
<v Speaker 1>For our health and we're not going to get them

0:07:31.956 --> 0:07:33.836
<v Speaker 1>in any other way, that this is a great way

0:07:33.876 --> 0:07:35.876
<v Speaker 1>of doing it. But a lot of people disagree.

0:07:35.996 --> 0:07:39.396
<v Speaker 2>Well, I wonder, you know, if that are they responding

0:07:39.436 --> 0:07:42.836
<v Speaker 2>to the Florida They responding to what they see as

0:07:42.956 --> 0:07:46.916
<v Speaker 2>as the official abusing his position, right, you can you

0:07:46.956 --> 0:07:49.196
<v Speaker 2>know it's it's it's maybe it's a bit of both,

0:07:49.396 --> 0:07:52.516
<v Speaker 2>or you know, you could see people who might ordinarily

0:07:53.516 --> 0:07:57.796
<v Speaker 2>be indifferent to fluoride just getting pissed off over this issue.

0:07:57.996 --> 0:07:59.916
<v Speaker 2>This guy's like, you're not allowed to do that, sir.

0:08:02.476 --> 0:08:05.196
<v Speaker 2>Hold on, hold on, it's time for a short break.

0:08:05.476 --> 0:08:07.996
<v Speaker 2>When we come back, we'll talk more about how salt

0:08:08.036 --> 0:08:12.476
<v Speaker 2>and revision is history are changing lives, and also the

0:08:12.516 --> 0:08:24.436
<v Speaker 2>infamous Minnesota starvation study.

0:08:25.196 --> 0:08:28.516
<v Speaker 1>So let's read a letter about someone from someone who

0:08:28.596 --> 0:08:30.596
<v Speaker 1>I actually I love this letter. I just saw it

0:08:30.676 --> 0:08:36.036
<v Speaker 1>today and it is a very positive take on additions

0:08:36.076 --> 0:08:38.436
<v Speaker 1>to food and someone who says that, you know, the

0:08:38.436 --> 0:08:41.756
<v Speaker 1>Salt episode actually really changed their life. So this is

0:08:42.156 --> 0:08:45.796
<v Speaker 1>from Mary P. And she writes that it was a crazy,

0:08:45.836 --> 0:08:49.156
<v Speaker 1>awesome coincidence that I was listening to this episode around

0:08:49.196 --> 0:08:52.276
<v Speaker 1>the same time my doctor felt a nodule on my thyroid.

0:08:52.716 --> 0:08:54.956
<v Speaker 1>He told me to go get an ultrasound, and my

0:08:55.076 --> 0:08:58.556
<v Speaker 1>thyroid and nodule both were large enough and suspicious enough

0:08:58.556 --> 0:09:01.716
<v Speaker 1>that it was recommended automatically that I get a biopsy.

0:09:02.436 --> 0:09:05.596
<v Speaker 1>So she went for her first biopsy and the results

0:09:05.596 --> 0:09:10.116
<v Speaker 1>came back in conclusive. And I'm going to continue reading

0:09:10.116 --> 0:09:13.836
<v Speaker 1>her letter. They sent another side for genetic texting. Meanwhile,

0:09:13.876 --> 0:09:16.956
<v Speaker 1>I bought some iodized salt and started cooking with it.

0:09:17.356 --> 0:09:20.236
<v Speaker 1>I had switched to kosher salt and other fancy salts

0:09:20.236 --> 0:09:22.676
<v Speaker 1>over the past few years, and I'm an avid at

0:09:22.676 --> 0:09:26.196
<v Speaker 1>home cook. We also live in the Midwest. I used

0:09:26.236 --> 0:09:29.676
<v Speaker 1>iodized salt in moderation, of course, and thought nothing more

0:09:29.716 --> 0:09:32.676
<v Speaker 1>of it. Well, I went back for my biopsy and

0:09:32.716 --> 0:09:36.196
<v Speaker 1>they took new ultrasound images of my thyroid. This was

0:09:36.236 --> 0:09:39.596
<v Speaker 1>about two to three months after my original ultrasounds. In biopsies,

0:09:40.116 --> 0:09:44.036
<v Speaker 1>the ultrasound tech was asking me many questions and seemed confused,

0:09:44.076 --> 0:09:47.116
<v Speaker 1>but kept to himself. The doctor came in and told

0:09:47.116 --> 0:09:51.316
<v Speaker 1>me to sit up. My nodules and thyroids had all shrunk.

0:09:52.076 --> 0:09:56.556
<v Speaker 1>My once once sentime to nodule was now around five millimeters.

0:09:57.036 --> 0:09:59.756
<v Speaker 1>He had no reason to biopsy because there was nothing

0:09:59.836 --> 0:10:04.436
<v Speaker 1>of concern. In fact, he would not biopsy it, no surgery,

0:10:04.876 --> 0:10:08.356
<v Speaker 1>just a follow up scan in a year Hallalujah. I

0:10:08.436 --> 0:10:10.916
<v Speaker 1>told him my theory about the iodine and he said

0:10:10.916 --> 0:10:14.316
<v Speaker 1>that very well could have been what shrunk everything. I

0:10:14.356 --> 0:10:16.556
<v Speaker 1>asked if the cancer could be in there, just smaller.

0:10:16.916 --> 0:10:18.796
<v Speaker 1>He scoffed at me and said no.

0:10:19.876 --> 0:10:22.476
<v Speaker 2>What a great letter, right, Wow, for all of those

0:10:22.556 --> 0:10:26.476
<v Speaker 2>who doubt the healing power of Revision's history. I present

0:10:26.596 --> 0:10:30.116
<v Speaker 2>you this letter. We don't we don't just we don't

0:10:30.196 --> 0:10:33.076
<v Speaker 2>just rile up our listeners. We save lives. This is

0:10:34.316 --> 0:10:37.996
<v Speaker 2>a resounding endorsement of years of Revision's history.

0:10:38.076 --> 0:10:41.076
<v Speaker 1>And those types of coincidences are great. Right, that you

0:10:41.196 --> 0:10:44.996
<v Speaker 1>hear something and it actually has such an impact that

0:10:45.076 --> 0:10:47.316
<v Speaker 1>would have been a life changing thing for her to

0:10:47.436 --> 0:10:50.316
<v Speaker 1>have no thyroid function, half her thyroid function for the

0:10:50.356 --> 0:10:51.676
<v Speaker 1>rest of our life, that's a huge thing.

0:10:51.876 --> 0:10:54.956
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, it's a reminder. This is one of

0:10:55.036 --> 0:10:59.756
<v Speaker 2>these weird things, like one hundred years ago, what she's

0:10:59.796 --> 0:11:03.516
<v Speaker 2>describing was commonplace. In fact, this is a little little

0:11:03.516 --> 0:11:05.396
<v Speaker 2>fact in that episode that I can never get over

0:11:05.436 --> 0:11:07.756
<v Speaker 2>my head is if you went to parts of the

0:11:07.796 --> 0:11:10.796
<v Speaker 2>world that were iodine to fish and some extraordinarily high

0:11:10.836 --> 0:11:15.236
<v Speaker 2>percentage of the population had these massive goiters on their neck,

0:11:15.436 --> 0:11:18.156
<v Speaker 2>and like that was just part of the part of

0:11:18.196 --> 0:11:20.356
<v Speaker 2>the experience of going to the Swiss Alps, or part

0:11:20.356 --> 0:11:23.516
<v Speaker 2>of the experience of going to somewhere around the Great

0:11:23.596 --> 0:11:26.596
<v Speaker 2>Lakes was you'd walk into a small town and you

0:11:26.636 --> 0:11:30.956
<v Speaker 2>know whatever, quote of the people had big grapefruit sized

0:11:32.276 --> 0:11:35.076
<v Speaker 2>masses on their necks. It's just so strange.

0:11:35.876 --> 0:11:39.956
<v Speaker 1>It's crazy how little we still know about nutrition. Right.

0:11:40.076 --> 0:11:42.516
<v Speaker 1>Nutrition is complicated, and I think that's one of the

0:11:42.516 --> 0:11:45.836
<v Speaker 1>reasons why people still have, you know, so many questions,

0:11:45.876 --> 0:11:48.396
<v Speaker 1>so many issues, why we go back and forth with

0:11:48.476 --> 0:11:51.596
<v Speaker 1>nutritional advice, because the body is a complex thing, right,

0:11:51.596 --> 0:11:55.796
<v Speaker 1>It's a complex machine, and it's so it's very difficult

0:11:55.916 --> 0:11:58.636
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes to know like this is the recommendation and it

0:11:58.636 --> 0:12:00.676
<v Speaker 1>will always be the recommendation.

0:12:00.316 --> 0:12:02.196
<v Speaker 2>And also, you know, it's hard. This is sort of

0:12:02.196 --> 0:12:06.076
<v Speaker 2>what brings us to the miss starvation experiment, which I'm

0:12:06.076 --> 0:12:07.916
<v Speaker 2>sure we're going to talk about. But one of the

0:12:07.956 --> 0:12:11.836
<v Speaker 2>big impetuses for that is that one of the reasons

0:12:11.876 --> 0:12:14.796
<v Speaker 2>we know so little about nutrition is that it's impossible

0:12:14.836 --> 0:12:18.516
<v Speaker 2>to test hypotheses about nutrition, because how do you do

0:12:18.676 --> 0:12:21.756
<v Speaker 2>it right, Like, if you think about something as simple

0:12:21.796 --> 0:12:30.556
<v Speaker 2>as does drinking alcohol harm or help your health? Right,

0:12:31.716 --> 0:12:33.916
<v Speaker 2>that's a question that's been irrelevant for as long as

0:12:33.996 --> 0:12:36.876
<v Speaker 2>human beings have drunk alcohol, So thousands and thousands and

0:12:36.916 --> 0:12:40.116
<v Speaker 2>thousands of years, we're still arguing about that. And the

0:12:40.116 --> 0:12:42.756
<v Speaker 2>reason we're still arguing about it is it's virtually impossible

0:12:42.796 --> 0:12:46.836
<v Speaker 2>to design a study which would satisfactorily answer that question.

0:12:47.196 --> 0:12:49.916
<v Speaker 2>So there happens that which say people who drink wine

0:12:49.916 --> 0:12:55.036
<v Speaker 2>and moderation seem to live long, healthy lives. But you know,

0:12:55.316 --> 0:12:58.196
<v Speaker 2>the problem is that people who drink wine in moderation

0:12:58.316 --> 0:13:04.036
<v Speaker 2>are people who otherwise live moderate, healthy lives. Right, They're like,

0:13:04.676 --> 0:13:08.636
<v Speaker 2>you know, they're villagers in the south of Italy who

0:13:08.636 --> 0:13:11.676
<v Speaker 2>are getting in enormous amount of exercise and living in

0:13:11.716 --> 0:13:14.716
<v Speaker 2>bucolics surroundings. So you just don't know is it is.

0:13:14.836 --> 0:13:17.676
<v Speaker 2>Are are they living long, happy lives in spite of

0:13:17.716 --> 0:13:21.836
<v Speaker 2>their one consumption or because of it? Right simontanoing you

0:13:21.836 --> 0:13:24.676
<v Speaker 2>know you see these so you can read. It's just

0:13:24.716 --> 0:13:26.796
<v Speaker 2>incredibly I just read read the other day, like there's

0:13:26.836 --> 0:13:29.916
<v Speaker 2>a new line of thinking which says, you know, all

0:13:29.996 --> 0:13:32.556
<v Speaker 2>alcohol is basically like really bad for you and should

0:13:32.596 --> 0:13:33.076
<v Speaker 2>be avoided.

0:13:33.356 --> 0:13:34.236
<v Speaker 1>I saw that.

0:13:34.556 --> 0:13:36.156
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea what to make of that, Like,

0:13:36.316 --> 0:13:38.196
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know how do they manage that conclusion.

0:13:38.436 --> 0:13:40.756
<v Speaker 2>It's just that that idea that we could be in

0:13:40.876 --> 0:13:44.516
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty three and still being capable of answering these

0:13:44.636 --> 0:13:47.076
<v Speaker 2>questions with any degree of accuracy is fascinating to me.

0:13:47.316 --> 0:13:50.076
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's totally crazy. It's so funny that you mentioned

0:13:50.076 --> 0:13:52.636
<v Speaker 1>red wine, which is you know, or alcohol in general.

0:13:53.036 --> 0:13:56.476
<v Speaker 1>The first one of the first studies I ever worked

0:13:56.476 --> 0:13:59.476
<v Speaker 1>on as a journalist who who kind of is interested

0:13:59.716 --> 0:14:02.956
<v Speaker 1>in these questions forever ago, was on resveratrol when it

0:14:02.996 --> 0:14:05.596
<v Speaker 1>first came out, like the data that, oh my god,

0:14:05.636 --> 0:14:08.836
<v Speaker 1>res vitrol makes you live longer, and everyone was saying, great,

0:14:09.396 --> 0:14:12.156
<v Speaker 1>red wine, it's amazing. Then a few years later we

0:14:12.196 --> 0:14:15.516
<v Speaker 1>find out that the quantity of versviatrol you need is

0:14:15.676 --> 0:14:17.876
<v Speaker 1>just so much higher than you would ever get. And

0:14:17.916 --> 0:14:20.356
<v Speaker 1>it goes back and forth, and I've seen that one

0:14:20.476 --> 0:14:25.356
<v Speaker 1>question just go in circles for you know, almost twenty

0:14:25.396 --> 0:14:29.036
<v Speaker 1>years now, and we we just have no idea.

0:14:29.076 --> 0:14:31.276
<v Speaker 2>Do you remember was it were they Were they getting

0:14:31.716 --> 0:14:33.076
<v Speaker 2>rats large doses of.

0:14:33.316 --> 0:14:36.396
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Oh, that's the thing, exactly, That was exactly it.

0:14:36.396 --> 0:14:38.996
<v Speaker 1>It was rodents, rodence, and red wine.

0:14:39.276 --> 0:14:40.676
<v Speaker 2>So the only the only thing we can say for

0:14:40.756 --> 0:14:44.276
<v Speaker 2>certain is that within the rat population, those who enjoy

0:14:44.796 --> 0:14:46.916
<v Speaker 2>a good bottle of wine every night are going to

0:14:46.956 --> 0:14:47.836
<v Speaker 2>live a little longer.

0:14:48.556 --> 0:14:50.396
<v Speaker 1>So I think that this is a good a good

0:14:50.396 --> 0:14:53.596
<v Speaker 1>segue point. You know, people who were not drinking any

0:14:53.636 --> 0:14:56.796
<v Speaker 1>wine were taking part in the starvation study, that was

0:14:56.836 --> 0:15:00.636
<v Speaker 1>part of this season of revisionist history. So I mean,

0:15:00.756 --> 0:15:04.916
<v Speaker 1>first of all that study, let's just kind of recap

0:15:04.956 --> 0:15:09.956
<v Speaker 1>it very quickly. I mean we're talking actual starvation, like

0:15:10.116 --> 0:15:13.756
<v Speaker 1>the number of calories that these men. So it was

0:15:13.796 --> 0:15:20.316
<v Speaker 1>all men. It was all young, relatively healthy men who were,

0:15:20.876 --> 0:15:23.436
<v Speaker 1>for one reason or another, not in the military, not

0:15:23.596 --> 0:15:27.796
<v Speaker 1>serving abroad during World War two, and they were all

0:15:28.556 --> 0:15:32.716
<v Speaker 1>brought to this place to try to control because as

0:15:32.756 --> 0:15:35.836
<v Speaker 1>we've just talked about, it's really difficult to control food intake,

0:15:36.196 --> 0:15:38.356
<v Speaker 1>to try to control it as much as possible, to

0:15:38.436 --> 0:15:40.876
<v Speaker 1>try to do their part for the war effort to

0:15:40.916 --> 0:15:44.636
<v Speaker 1>see how starvation affects the body. Is that a fair summar.

0:15:44.396 --> 0:15:49.116
<v Speaker 2>Race, Yes, exactly, because you don't already had The impetus

0:15:49.236 --> 0:15:52.076
<v Speaker 2>was this was in the middle of the war, and

0:15:52.076 --> 0:15:54.516
<v Speaker 2>the feeling was that by the end of the war

0:15:54.796 --> 0:15:56.956
<v Speaker 2>one of the biggest problems the world was going to

0:15:56.996 --> 0:16:01.036
<v Speaker 2>face was that millions of people around the world had

0:16:01.076 --> 0:16:05.996
<v Speaker 2>suffered prolonged malnutrition throughout the conflict, and we didn't know

0:16:06.036 --> 0:16:08.796
<v Speaker 2>how to help them. We honestly had no idea if

0:16:08.836 --> 0:16:13.116
<v Speaker 2>someone has been malnourished for a year and a half,

0:16:13.476 --> 0:16:15.476
<v Speaker 2>what is the best way to nurse them back to

0:16:15.516 --> 0:16:19.636
<v Speaker 2>health and literally we hit people. At the time didn't

0:16:19.636 --> 0:16:21.796
<v Speaker 2>have the size clue, right, So they were trying to

0:16:21.796 --> 0:16:26.476
<v Speaker 2>answer that question with some at least get some information

0:16:26.556 --> 0:16:29.276
<v Speaker 2>about that. So there was the stakes here were huge.

0:16:29.756 --> 0:16:32.516
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's what gives the study, it's kind of

0:16:34.156 --> 0:16:34.876
<v Speaker 2>moral force.

0:16:35.276 --> 0:16:38.556
<v Speaker 1>So that's an interesting question, right, does the study have

0:16:38.676 --> 0:16:41.596
<v Speaker 1>the necessary moral force to do something like this, because

0:16:41.636 --> 0:16:44.036
<v Speaker 1>when back in the day, right back when this study

0:16:44.076 --> 0:16:47.356
<v Speaker 1>was done World War Two, we didn't have the sort

0:16:47.436 --> 0:16:50.236
<v Speaker 1>of reviews on studies that we have today. So these

0:16:50.316 --> 0:16:52.716
<v Speaker 1>days you need to go through an i RB, which

0:16:52.796 --> 0:16:56.196
<v Speaker 1>is an institutional review board when you're doing any sort

0:16:56.236 --> 0:17:00.196
<v Speaker 1>of human research, and you need to have every single

0:17:00.236 --> 0:17:05.796
<v Speaker 1>subject give informed consent. And this is crucial. The benefits

0:17:05.836 --> 0:17:10.276
<v Speaker 1>of this specific study have to outweigh and potential harm

0:17:10.716 --> 0:17:15.556
<v Speaker 1>to the participants in the study. And so to me,

0:17:16.236 --> 0:17:19.996
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I listened to kind of the details

0:17:19.996 --> 0:17:23.116
<v Speaker 1>of the starvation experiment, I knew that it existed, but

0:17:23.156 --> 0:17:26.196
<v Speaker 1>I actually didn't I'd never actually kind of gone deep

0:17:26.196 --> 0:17:29.396
<v Speaker 1>into it. This was the most I'd learned about it

0:17:29.436 --> 0:17:32.396
<v Speaker 1>was from you. And as I was listening, I was

0:17:32.436 --> 0:17:37.516
<v Speaker 1>trying to think, you know, first of all, benefits versus harm.

0:17:37.916 --> 0:17:40.676
<v Speaker 1>You know, how do we think about that? And I

0:17:40.676 --> 0:17:43.276
<v Speaker 1>think that's actually changed over the years. But the second

0:17:43.316 --> 0:17:46.156
<v Speaker 1>part of it is how do you actually give informed

0:17:46.196 --> 0:17:49.836
<v Speaker 1>consent of all the potential downsides to something like this

0:17:50.436 --> 0:17:54.796
<v Speaker 1>when you're researching something where you don't actually know what

0:17:54.876 --> 0:17:56.316
<v Speaker 1>the potential downsides are.

0:17:57.476 --> 0:18:03.116
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's like spaceflight. You're sending an astronaut to the moon.

0:18:04.116 --> 0:18:07.476
<v Speaker 2>Presumably you pull the astronaut aside beforehand and you say

0:18:08.476 --> 0:18:12.036
<v Speaker 2>the benefit year is mankind will be able to say

0:18:12.036 --> 0:18:15.116
<v Speaker 2>we went to the moon. But you know, in that situation,

0:18:15.996 --> 0:18:19.156
<v Speaker 2>the first astronaut in space, we don't know what it's

0:18:19.236 --> 0:18:22.636
<v Speaker 2>like to be out for a couple weeks in zero gravity.

0:18:22.916 --> 0:18:25.316
<v Speaker 2>So I don't know how do they do consent. I

0:18:25.316 --> 0:18:29.796
<v Speaker 2>guess they said, you're taking a risk of unknown quantity,

0:18:30.476 --> 0:18:32.836
<v Speaker 2>you might be damaged by what you're doing. Are you

0:18:32.876 --> 0:18:35.116
<v Speaker 2>fine with that? And I think the answer they were

0:18:35.156 --> 0:18:37.236
<v Speaker 2>fine with it is that many of those astronauts came

0:18:37.236 --> 0:18:39.996
<v Speaker 2>out of the military, and so they were used to

0:18:41.156 --> 0:18:46.556
<v Speaker 2>the idea that they were called to do something on

0:18:46.636 --> 0:18:50.676
<v Speaker 2>behalf of their country, which carried with it a significant

0:18:50.796 --> 0:18:52.756
<v Speaker 2>risk of illness and death.

0:18:53.116 --> 0:18:55.716
<v Speaker 1>I think That's an interesting example, but it's not a

0:18:55.996 --> 0:18:59.116
<v Speaker 1>complete analogy, because this was their profession, right, this was

0:18:59.116 --> 0:19:01.716
<v Speaker 1>their career, this is what they had signed up for.

0:19:01.836 --> 0:19:05.236
<v Speaker 1>They became astronauts with the knowledge that they would hopefully

0:19:05.276 --> 0:19:07.956
<v Speaker 1>be able to go into space one day. Whereas these

0:19:07.956 --> 0:19:11.596
<v Speaker 1>study participants were just ordinary men who were called upon

0:19:11.796 --> 0:19:14.956
<v Speaker 1>by their patriotic feelings and said, you know, do you

0:19:14.996 --> 0:19:17.396
<v Speaker 1>want to do your patriotic duty. That's a lot of pressure,

0:19:17.396 --> 0:19:19.796
<v Speaker 1>and that's not your life. This is not something that's

0:19:19.836 --> 0:19:23.276
<v Speaker 1>your career. You're being asked to do something that's just

0:19:23.396 --> 0:19:24.716
<v Speaker 1>totally out of the ordinary.

0:19:24.836 --> 0:19:29.716
<v Speaker 2>Wait, you are you? Are you a Minnesota's starvation experiment skeptic?

0:19:29.876 --> 0:19:32.276
<v Speaker 2>Do you not think it should have been done? No?

0:19:32.596 --> 0:19:35.236
<v Speaker 1>I'm someone who wants to push back though, and to

0:19:35.916 --> 0:19:41.156
<v Speaker 1>question how it was done and whether they could potentially

0:19:41.356 --> 0:19:43.756
<v Speaker 1>have ever given and formed consent to something like this,

0:19:44.236 --> 0:19:47.556
<v Speaker 1>especially given what we know now about the long, longitudinal,

0:19:47.596 --> 0:19:51.956
<v Speaker 1>long term effects about starvation. Back then, the term epigenetic

0:19:51.956 --> 0:19:54.956
<v Speaker 1>I don't think even existed. People did not know kind

0:19:54.956 --> 0:19:59.076
<v Speaker 1>of what the interaction of genes and environment is. Today,

0:19:59.276 --> 0:20:05.596
<v Speaker 1>we actually know that starvation has lifelong consequences. They actually

0:20:05.916 --> 0:20:10.396
<v Speaker 1>change the methylation patterns of your of your genes, of

0:20:10.436 --> 0:20:13.676
<v Speaker 1>your genome, and that there's actually a lot of damage

0:20:13.676 --> 0:20:16.036
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be done for your entire life.

0:20:16.116 --> 0:20:18.196
<v Speaker 1>And the funny thing is a lot of the data,

0:20:18.276 --> 0:20:20.596
<v Speaker 1>the best data that we have on this didn't come

0:20:20.636 --> 0:20:24.316
<v Speaker 1>from the starvation experiment, but actually happened from a natural

0:20:24.356 --> 0:20:27.196
<v Speaker 1>experiment that came at the exact same time, more or

0:20:27.316 --> 0:20:35.036
<v Speaker 1>less contemporaneous, which was basically the Dutch hunger winter. It

0:20:35.236 --> 0:20:38.396
<v Speaker 1>was also during World War Two there was a huge

0:20:38.556 --> 0:20:43.076
<v Speaker 1>famine in the Netherlands because there was a blockade by

0:20:43.076 --> 0:20:47.196
<v Speaker 1>the Nazis and thousands of people died. I think something

0:20:47.276 --> 0:20:51.196
<v Speaker 1>like twenty thousand people ended up dying. But at the

0:20:51.236 --> 0:20:52.916
<v Speaker 1>same time, there were a bunch of women who were

0:20:52.916 --> 0:20:57.356
<v Speaker 1>pregnant and doctors were taking all of the measurements that

0:20:57.396 --> 0:21:01.156
<v Speaker 1>you would normally take during pregnancy, but these women happened

0:21:01.196 --> 0:21:04.636
<v Speaker 1>to be starving, and then they ended up following the

0:21:04.676 --> 0:21:09.796
<v Speaker 1>women and the babies for their lives and actually got

0:21:10.076 --> 0:21:12.916
<v Speaker 1>an amazing amount of data on what starvation does to

0:21:12.956 --> 0:21:13.356
<v Speaker 1>the body.

0:21:14.076 --> 0:21:14.796
<v Speaker 2>What does it do?

0:21:15.476 --> 0:21:18.756
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, we're still finding out. There are lots of

0:21:18.836 --> 0:21:21.316
<v Speaker 1>things that end up happening later in life. You're more

0:21:21.356 --> 0:21:23.956
<v Speaker 1>prone to gain weight because your body is prepared for

0:21:24.036 --> 0:21:29.236
<v Speaker 1>starvation and has been prepared for from in utero. It

0:21:29.476 --> 0:21:33.756
<v Speaker 1>also ends up, you know, affecting your the way that

0:21:34.476 --> 0:21:36.876
<v Speaker 1>your kids are going to develop. So if you were,

0:21:37.116 --> 0:21:42.116
<v Speaker 1>I guess, a fetus during during this time, then by

0:21:42.156 --> 0:21:45.596
<v Speaker 1>the time that you're you're an adult, when you have

0:21:45.676 --> 0:21:47.676
<v Speaker 1>your own kids, you're actually going to pass a lot

0:21:47.676 --> 0:21:53.196
<v Speaker 1>of these epigenetic changes further on to them. They are

0:21:53.236 --> 0:21:59.356
<v Speaker 1>also going to be effects on how you're going to

0:21:59.556 --> 0:22:02.956
<v Speaker 1>just think and do in life. It turns out that

0:22:03.716 --> 0:22:07.916
<v Speaker 1>there are labor market effects, hospitalization effects, so you know,

0:22:08.276 --> 0:22:11.716
<v Speaker 1>it actually puts you down a notch. But this is

0:22:11.756 --> 0:22:14.356
<v Speaker 1>once again we're talking about the people who were who

0:22:14.356 --> 0:22:16.516
<v Speaker 1>were fetuses during this time, which is very different from

0:22:16.516 --> 0:22:19.356
<v Speaker 1>the starvation study, but it ends up having a lot

0:22:19.396 --> 0:22:22.556
<v Speaker 1>of downstream effects, and those studies are still being done.

0:22:22.796 --> 0:22:25.396
<v Speaker 1>So there are you know, there's a new paper at

0:22:25.476 --> 0:22:31.356
<v Speaker 1>least once every few years using this cohort which shows

0:22:31.396 --> 0:22:34.156
<v Speaker 1>that you know, you didn't there are lots of things

0:22:34.196 --> 0:22:36.196
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't know you were signing up for. If

0:22:36.236 --> 0:22:38.116
<v Speaker 1>you thought that this was just going to be an

0:22:38.396 --> 0:22:41.036
<v Speaker 1>easy you know, I starve myself completely and then I'm

0:22:41.076 --> 0:22:45.356
<v Speaker 1>all better and this will never actually follow me throughout life.

0:22:45.556 --> 0:22:47.836
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting to me that I think some of

0:22:47.876 --> 0:22:50.476
<v Speaker 1>our best data comes from a natural experiment, as opposed

0:22:50.516 --> 0:22:55.356
<v Speaker 1>to something where a bunch of men said, okay, starve

0:22:55.396 --> 0:22:56.516
<v Speaker 1>me and let's see what happens.

0:22:56.996 --> 0:22:59.356
<v Speaker 2>So imagine that we were doing a version of the

0:22:59.396 --> 0:23:06.076
<v Speaker 2>Dutch starvation thing involving pregnant women. But it was an experiment, right.

0:23:07.476 --> 0:23:10.356
<v Speaker 1>All right, magic wandftly measure.

0:23:10.956 --> 0:23:13.876
<v Speaker 2>And what we learned from that is that actually starving

0:23:13.876 --> 0:23:19.876
<v Speaker 2>people when they're pregnant has incredible as unanticipated long term

0:23:19.916 --> 0:23:22.156
<v Speaker 2>consequences not just for the mother but for the child

0:23:22.676 --> 0:23:27.356
<v Speaker 2>and even maybe for the child's children child.

0:23:27.956 --> 0:23:29.316
<v Speaker 1>So absolutely so.

0:23:29.356 --> 0:23:32.076
<v Speaker 2>In other words, and we had no idea of this before.

0:23:32.156 --> 0:23:34.996
<v Speaker 2>So this is a kind of like, this is a

0:23:35.276 --> 0:23:40.556
<v Speaker 2>this is a earth shattering, huge bit of understanding about

0:23:41.196 --> 0:23:47.236
<v Speaker 2>human beings. Why wouldn't this be an argument. Why wouldn't

0:23:47.236 --> 0:23:50.156
<v Speaker 2>the magnitude of what we learned from that such an

0:23:50.156 --> 0:23:52.756
<v Speaker 2>experiment be an argument for doing the experiment?

0:23:53.076 --> 0:23:53.156
<v Speaker 1>Not?

0:23:53.636 --> 0:23:59.636
<v Speaker 2>Right, It's so important that hundreds thousands, millions more people

0:23:59.676 --> 0:24:02.436
<v Speaker 2>could be helped from the knowledge gleaned from that experiment

0:24:02.516 --> 0:24:05.476
<v Speaker 2>than those who were who were harmed by it, And

0:24:05.556 --> 0:24:10.276
<v Speaker 2>if the people who signed up for that experien had

0:24:10.356 --> 0:24:14.676
<v Speaker 2>a at least a kind of reasonable suspicion that what

0:24:14.836 --> 0:24:18.236
<v Speaker 2>was learned from the from them putting themselves at risk

0:24:18.596 --> 0:24:22.796
<v Speaker 2>might help many, many, many, many many more people, then

0:24:23.116 --> 0:24:26.676
<v Speaker 2>to my mind, that settles it. It's fine. I mean,

0:24:26.916 --> 0:24:28.276
<v Speaker 2>this is what I was trying to get to in

0:24:28.316 --> 0:24:31.396
<v Speaker 2>the podcast, is that we're so indifferent to people who

0:24:31.436 --> 0:24:36.156
<v Speaker 2>have altruistic motives. That isn't where is the altruistic motive

0:24:36.516 --> 0:24:40.676
<v Speaker 2>data point in the consent algorithm? Like you should be

0:24:40.756 --> 0:24:42.596
<v Speaker 2>able to say, I know it's going to harm me,

0:24:43.076 --> 0:24:45.076
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's going to help a lot more people,

0:24:45.196 --> 0:24:46.516
<v Speaker 2>and I'm fine with that.

0:24:47.116 --> 0:24:49.076
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So, like I said, when you asked me, am

0:24:49.076 --> 0:24:51.436
<v Speaker 1>I a skeptic of this? I said, I'm not necessarily

0:24:51.476 --> 0:24:54.116
<v Speaker 1>someone who said this shouldn't have happened. I just think that,

0:24:54.476 --> 0:24:57.196
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are lots of issues to consider. So, yeah,

0:24:57.276 --> 0:25:00.716
<v Speaker 1>there is this. There's definitely an argument to be made that,

0:25:00.756 --> 0:25:04.356
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we learned from Dutch famine shows that

0:25:04.396 --> 0:25:08.876
<v Speaker 1>studies like this are incredibly important. But in this particular case, right,

0:25:09.636 --> 0:25:12.756
<v Speaker 1>I think in the pregnancy case, you're also giving consent

0:25:12.876 --> 0:25:16.236
<v Speaker 1>for your fetus. Right, So it's one of these things

0:25:16.276 --> 0:25:22.356
<v Speaker 1>where that's even if you're an altruist, I think that

0:25:22.356 --> 0:25:25.116
<v Speaker 1>that would be a very strange definition of altruism, because

0:25:25.436 --> 0:25:28.876
<v Speaker 1>you're being altruistic for the world, but not for this

0:25:29.276 --> 0:25:31.956
<v Speaker 1>one specific human who has no say in this whatsoever.

0:25:32.236 --> 0:25:36.436
<v Speaker 2>But I would say this like so, for much of

0:25:36.516 --> 0:25:40.556
<v Speaker 2>human history, continue to the present day, a large percentage

0:25:40.556 --> 0:25:46.236
<v Speaker 2>of the world's population suffers from prolonged malnutritionolutely, So one

0:25:46.996 --> 0:25:50.836
<v Speaker 2>really important historical question is what can we do to

0:25:50.956 --> 0:25:54.996
<v Speaker 2>convince the wealthier parts of the world that this is

0:25:55.036 --> 0:26:00.396
<v Speaker 2>such an urgent problem that it needs to be addressed immediately. Right,

0:26:01.156 --> 0:26:04.596
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't it make sense to try an extreme experiment of

0:26:04.596 --> 0:26:07.396
<v Speaker 2>this sort to try and bring the world around?

0:26:09.156 --> 0:26:11.156
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think I think that's a very valid point.

0:26:11.196 --> 0:26:14.236
<v Speaker 1>And you actually had a letter from a listener, Robert A,

0:26:14.756 --> 0:26:17.316
<v Speaker 1>who asked a question that kind of circles around what

0:26:17.356 --> 0:26:20.796
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about. He asks, who is responsible for

0:26:20.836 --> 0:26:25.356
<v Speaker 1>a system which both restricts voluntary breakthrough research like that

0:26:25.436 --> 0:26:29.556
<v Speaker 1>conducted by Ansel Keys and the conscientious Objectors, and that

0:26:29.636 --> 0:26:32.956
<v Speaker 1>which fails to take accountability when mistakes are made? So

0:26:33.236 --> 0:26:36.356
<v Speaker 1>there's a that's I think an interesting question because you

0:26:36.396 --> 0:26:38.716
<v Speaker 1>do have those two sides of it. So we do

0:26:38.796 --> 0:26:41.076
<v Speaker 1>have a system that now does restrict that kind of

0:26:41.116 --> 0:26:43.916
<v Speaker 1>breakthrough research quite often. I mean, when I was in

0:26:43.996 --> 0:26:48.436
<v Speaker 1>grad school for psychology and I needed to do an

0:26:48.436 --> 0:26:53.676
<v Speaker 1>experiment that had deception, I just I couldn't get it approved.

0:26:53.716 --> 0:26:57.396
<v Speaker 1>I had to jump through so many hoops, and eventually,

0:26:57.796 --> 0:27:00.356
<v Speaker 1>you know, with the support of all the senior faculty

0:27:00.916 --> 0:27:04.956
<v Speaker 1>in the psychology department, it was just this silly thing.

0:27:05.036 --> 0:27:07.916
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't even a major deception study, but we needed

0:27:08.156 --> 0:27:10.956
<v Speaker 1>We couldn't tell them that we were studying self control, right,

0:27:10.996 --> 0:27:14.916
<v Speaker 1>because that would actually have defeated the purpose of the

0:27:15.076 --> 0:27:19.076
<v Speaker 1>entire study. And how many studies are not done because

0:27:19.116 --> 0:27:20.956
<v Speaker 1>of that. So that's kind of the one side of it.

0:27:21.196 --> 0:27:23.316
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, there's a reason for all

0:27:23.316 --> 0:27:25.676
<v Speaker 1>of these safeguards because you have things like the Stanford

0:27:25.716 --> 0:27:29.796
<v Speaker 1>person experiment, right, you have things like Tuskegee. You have

0:27:29.956 --> 0:27:34.276
<v Speaker 1>things that really crossed the line without informed consent, with deception,

0:27:35.036 --> 0:27:38.236
<v Speaker 1>with a lack of understanding of what was going to happen.

0:27:38.276 --> 0:27:42.476
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one nutrition study that was done, I don't

0:27:42.476 --> 0:27:44.996
<v Speaker 1>know if you remember this one, but it was done

0:27:45.076 --> 0:27:50.076
<v Speaker 1>in Washington on some young men who were working, you know,

0:27:50.316 --> 0:27:53.316
<v Speaker 1>around DC at the time, and they were basically they

0:27:53.356 --> 0:27:56.516
<v Speaker 1>agreed to be poisoned. They went to the Congressional cafeteria

0:27:56.556 --> 0:28:00.316
<v Speaker 1>in their diet was very strictly controlled and they were

0:28:00.316 --> 0:28:02.636
<v Speaker 1>just trying to figure out how different food additives work.

0:28:02.956 --> 0:28:05.676
<v Speaker 1>And some of them got incredibly sick because it turns

0:28:05.716 --> 0:28:08.676
<v Speaker 1>out that they were eating very toxic amounts of things

0:28:08.716 --> 0:28:12.276
<v Speaker 1>they should not have been eating. So that was that

0:28:12.396 --> 0:28:14.396
<v Speaker 1>was a study gone a bit off the off the

0:28:14.436 --> 0:28:16.956
<v Speaker 1>rails when it comes to nutrition. But so you have

0:28:17.036 --> 0:28:20.196
<v Speaker 1>those two extremes and how do you how do you

0:28:20.276 --> 0:28:23.156
<v Speaker 1>weigh that, how do you balance that? How do you

0:28:23.836 --> 0:28:26.236
<v Speaker 1>not in retrospect where we can say, Okay, you know

0:28:26.316 --> 0:28:28.276
<v Speaker 1>this is what we learned from this study and it

0:28:28.316 --> 0:28:31.636
<v Speaker 1>was really good, but before it happens, how do we

0:28:31.916 --> 0:28:34.196
<v Speaker 1>how do we think about that? How do we kind

0:28:34.196 --> 0:28:36.116
<v Speaker 1>of how do we walk that line?

0:28:36.236 --> 0:28:41.556
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say that there is there is one

0:28:41.596 --> 0:28:46.556
<v Speaker 2>area on this where I am I'm the you know,

0:28:46.596 --> 0:28:50.196
<v Speaker 2>I've been talking so far about how I would I

0:28:50.516 --> 0:28:53.476
<v Speaker 2>tend to be pretty laissez faire about giving researchers the

0:28:53.516 --> 0:28:56.316
<v Speaker 2>freedom to do things that are a little bit risky.

0:28:56.436 --> 0:29:01.996
<v Speaker 2>Or there's another area though, where I'm on the exact

0:29:01.996 --> 0:29:08.716
<v Speaker 2>opposite side of the fence, And what am I referring to, patience, grasshopper?

0:29:09.316 --> 0:29:30.356
<v Speaker 2>When we come back more from my conversation with Maria Konakova,

0:29:31.076 --> 0:29:33.556
<v Speaker 2>we're back, and I was telling Maria that I'm pretty

0:29:33.636 --> 0:29:37.796
<v Speaker 2>laissez fair about letting experiments go forward, except in the

0:29:37.796 --> 0:29:41.316
<v Speaker 2>case of what might be the most awful natural experiment

0:29:41.636 --> 0:29:47.036
<v Speaker 2>we're living through right now. I am incredulous at the

0:29:47.076 --> 0:29:51.276
<v Speaker 2>idea that thousands of pages of text and hours of

0:29:51.396 --> 0:29:55.356
<v Speaker 2>argumentation is spent on the ethics of one medical experiment

0:29:55.436 --> 0:29:59.276
<v Speaker 2>or another. And at the same time we are, you know,

0:30:00.196 --> 0:30:05.356
<v Speaker 2>completely indifferent or cavalier about the levels of violence that

0:30:05.396 --> 0:30:08.236
<v Speaker 2>are present in media every day. Now, there had been

0:30:08.236 --> 0:30:11.196
<v Speaker 2>moments every now and again, periodically there are moments where

0:30:11.556 --> 0:30:16.556
<v Speaker 2>various interest groups get upset about depictions of violence on television.

0:30:16.636 --> 0:30:18.716
<v Speaker 2>Was a big deal I think in the seventies, for example,

0:30:18.716 --> 0:30:20.396
<v Speaker 2>and then it sort of went away, and then the

0:30:20.436 --> 0:30:24.316
<v Speaker 2>people who were complained about this got painted as kind

0:30:24.356 --> 0:30:28.076
<v Speaker 2>of buffoons or as naive sewer in the middle of nowhere.

0:30:28.076 --> 0:30:30.836
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I don't want to give it away,

0:30:30.836 --> 0:30:34.476
<v Speaker 2>but I had in the course of an episode of

0:30:35.436 --> 0:30:38.516
<v Speaker 2>I'm Doing in this upcoming season where I have these

0:30:38.516 --> 0:30:42.916
<v Speaker 2>long conversations with trauma surgeons who deal with gunshot wounds,

0:30:42.956 --> 0:30:45.996
<v Speaker 2>and what they have to say on this very specific

0:30:46.556 --> 0:30:53.196
<v Speaker 2>matter is incredibly interesting and disturbing. They're They're not like

0:30:53.276 --> 0:30:55.436
<v Speaker 2>hiding their head in the sand about this. They are

0:30:55.476 --> 0:30:58.636
<v Speaker 2>fully aware of it. The people who are who have

0:30:58.756 --> 0:31:01.996
<v Speaker 2>a I believe a morally objectionable position, or the people

0:31:01.996 --> 0:31:06.036
<v Speaker 2>in Hollywood, many of whom are self described liberals, who

0:31:06.076 --> 0:31:08.476
<v Speaker 2>will go on and on and on about the you know,

0:31:08.516 --> 0:31:12.116
<v Speaker 2>the terror need for gun control in America and how

0:31:12.116 --> 0:31:15.076
<v Speaker 2>outrageous all the Second Amendment people is. And meanwhile they're

0:31:15.116 --> 0:31:18.476
<v Speaker 2>making movies well like twenty people are slaughtered in the

0:31:18.516 --> 0:31:21.356
<v Speaker 2>first fifteen minutes. Like, I'm sorry, this is just like

0:31:21.836 --> 0:31:25.956
<v Speaker 2>completely incomprehensible behavior, right. This drives me nuts.

0:31:27.556 --> 0:31:29.796
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know that there's a lot to be said

0:31:29.796 --> 0:31:33.156
<v Speaker 1>for that. It's like we've never outlived the instinct for

0:31:33.236 --> 0:31:36.916
<v Speaker 1>public executions right where everyone would come to the town square.

0:31:37.556 --> 0:31:40.676
<v Speaker 1>Instinct is still alive and well, it's an important tangent

0:31:40.756 --> 0:31:43.956
<v Speaker 1>to go on, and it is related to everything we've

0:31:43.956 --> 0:31:46.276
<v Speaker 1>been talking about about how do you study this? You know,

0:31:46.276 --> 0:31:48.476
<v Speaker 1>what are the benefits, what are the harms? And there's

0:31:48.796 --> 0:31:52.196
<v Speaker 1>you so kind of coming full circle back to the

0:31:52.236 --> 0:31:55.916
<v Speaker 1>starvation experiment, there is one thing that we haven't talked about,

0:31:55.996 --> 0:31:59.156
<v Speaker 1>which was an important point that one of the listeners

0:31:59.276 --> 0:32:01.516
<v Speaker 1>brought up. And this is an important point about a

0:32:01.596 --> 0:32:04.956
<v Speaker 1>lot of the research not from that day, but that

0:32:04.996 --> 0:32:08.676
<v Speaker 1>continues to be done to this day, which is how

0:32:09.196 --> 0:32:12.236
<v Speaker 1>realizable are the results to the segments of the population

0:32:12.316 --> 0:32:16.476
<v Speaker 1>that might actually benefit most from it. So Maura, this

0:32:16.636 --> 0:32:20.556
<v Speaker 1>listener wrote, how can we treat eating disorder patients primarily

0:32:20.636 --> 0:32:24.676
<v Speaker 1>young women using data collected exclusively on white men. How

0:32:24.716 --> 0:32:26.876
<v Speaker 1>can we use this to study the impact of dieting

0:32:26.956 --> 0:32:29.716
<v Speaker 1>and weight loss when dining is more prevalent and pressured

0:32:29.796 --> 0:32:32.876
<v Speaker 1>upon among women. How can we use this to study

0:32:32.916 --> 0:32:36.636
<v Speaker 1>obesity when non Hispanic black adults and Hispanic adults have

0:32:36.676 --> 0:32:41.036
<v Speaker 1>the highest prevalence of obesity in the United States. That's

0:32:41.076 --> 0:32:42.476
<v Speaker 1>the end of her letter, But I would just go

0:32:42.556 --> 0:32:44.836
<v Speaker 1>on and on. When we're talking about malnourishment and we

0:32:44.876 --> 0:32:47.836
<v Speaker 1>realize that most of the malnourished population of the world

0:32:47.876 --> 0:32:50.996
<v Speaker 1>is not white men, So that is kind of an

0:32:51.076 --> 0:32:53.876
<v Speaker 1>interesting side note, and this is actually still a huge problem.

0:32:53.916 --> 0:32:56.316
<v Speaker 1>That's not something that we left behind in the forties.

0:32:56.516 --> 0:33:01.596
<v Speaker 1>To this day, most medical data comes from men, not women,

0:33:02.236 --> 0:33:05.516
<v Speaker 1>and it's a very kind of that's an interesting way

0:33:05.516 --> 0:33:09.116
<v Speaker 1>of looking at you what are the actual benefits from

0:33:09.276 --> 0:33:11.556
<v Speaker 1>us to the people who need them, and how general

0:33:11.596 --> 0:33:12.476
<v Speaker 1>of isable is.

0:33:12.796 --> 0:33:18.116
<v Speaker 2>If you're trying to develop actionable policies and guidelines and

0:33:18.156 --> 0:33:23.636
<v Speaker 2>approaches to affective populations, it absolutely does matter. And you know,

0:33:23.996 --> 0:33:26.916
<v Speaker 2>we went through this with I think with our understanding

0:33:26.956 --> 0:33:32.956
<v Speaker 2>of heart attacks right where we started off testing a

0:33:32.996 --> 0:33:36.916
<v Speaker 2>lot of these hypotheses in men, white men, and that's

0:33:36.956 --> 0:33:39.076
<v Speaker 2>how we got our baseline knowledge. But then we tried

0:33:39.076 --> 0:33:44.156
<v Speaker 2>to use that information to kind of understand how to

0:33:44.156 --> 0:33:48.516
<v Speaker 2>deal with women without realizing that the biology of a

0:33:48.556 --> 0:33:50.356
<v Speaker 2>lot of these problems, physiology of a lot of these

0:33:50.356 --> 0:33:53.556
<v Speaker 2>problems in women's very different. So I think it depends

0:33:53.596 --> 0:33:56.556
<v Speaker 2>where you are in the kind of stage that you're at.

0:33:56.756 --> 0:34:00.116
<v Speaker 2>And the mistake we make, I think is we don't

0:34:00.156 --> 0:34:06.596
<v Speaker 2>honor this distinction between kind of basic understanding and actionable research.

0:34:07.876 --> 0:34:11.116
<v Speaker 2>If you talk to somebody body who is works for

0:34:11.796 --> 0:34:15.556
<v Speaker 2>a pharmaceutical company and is involved in drug trials. You know,

0:34:15.916 --> 0:34:18.196
<v Speaker 2>they will talk your ear off on this, and what

0:34:18.236 --> 0:34:20.796
<v Speaker 2>they will say is, do you know how hard it

0:34:20.836 --> 0:34:24.596
<v Speaker 2>is to put together a study population. It's insanely difficult

0:34:24.676 --> 0:34:27.396
<v Speaker 2>to find someone. I actually thought of I was going

0:34:27.436 --> 0:34:32.076
<v Speaker 2>to volunteer for a trial about lime disease vaccine. And

0:34:32.116 --> 0:34:34.596
<v Speaker 2>then I add that the first thing to do is

0:34:34.636 --> 0:34:36.996
<v Speaker 2>you have half an hour conversation with someone. And they

0:34:37.036 --> 0:34:39.756
<v Speaker 2>detail that I would have to go to drive to

0:34:39.796 --> 0:34:43.956
<v Speaker 2>Albany an hour away, seven times and have to set

0:34:43.956 --> 0:34:46.836
<v Speaker 2>aside half a day on each of those occasions. And

0:34:46.876 --> 0:34:48.876
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't clear whether I'd be part of the treatment

0:34:48.876 --> 0:34:51.796
<v Speaker 2>group or the pacibo group, right, So I listened to that.

0:34:51.836 --> 0:34:54.196
<v Speaker 2>I was like, I can't do that. I'm not taking

0:34:54.876 --> 0:34:57.876
<v Speaker 2>you know, somewhat selfishly, I decided I don't have that

0:34:57.956 --> 0:34:59.756
<v Speaker 2>much time to devote to this, so I'll let someone

0:34:59.796 --> 0:35:02.236
<v Speaker 2>else carry the burden. So it's like, it's really hard

0:35:02.716 --> 0:35:05.156
<v Speaker 2>to do these studies. So when you if we say

0:35:05.196 --> 0:35:08.636
<v Speaker 2>these studies have to be perfectly representative, you're just making

0:35:08.676 --> 0:35:10.356
<v Speaker 2>it less likely that the study gets done in the

0:35:10.396 --> 0:35:11.996
<v Speaker 2>first place at a certain point. Right, So that's the

0:35:12.036 --> 0:35:13.996
<v Speaker 2>trade off. It's an impossible trade off.

0:35:14.316 --> 0:35:16.436
<v Speaker 1>Sure, No, I think, I think there's a lot of

0:35:16.436 --> 0:35:19.356
<v Speaker 1>truth to that. That said, I do think that even

0:35:19.436 --> 0:35:22.556
<v Speaker 1>baseline knowledge studies these days should at least include women

0:35:22.636 --> 0:35:24.756
<v Speaker 1>because you know, if you're omitting more than half the

0:35:24.756 --> 0:35:28.196
<v Speaker 1>population and the basic biology is different, then but.

0:35:28.356 --> 0:35:31.916
<v Speaker 2>You couldn't have done the starvation experiment with women.

0:35:32.276 --> 0:35:34.996
<v Speaker 1>So that's the other thing, right, what are we proposing

0:35:35.076 --> 0:35:38.076
<v Speaker 1>in the starvation case? Do we want women there? And

0:35:38.796 --> 0:35:42.676
<v Speaker 1>Hispanic and black where it's much more difficult to actually

0:35:42.756 --> 0:35:46.876
<v Speaker 1>obtain consent because especially back then, but even to this day,

0:35:46.916 --> 0:35:51.436
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are populations that have had a lot

0:35:51.476 --> 0:35:56.836
<v Speaker 1>of negative research done without consent, and it's actually much

0:35:56.876 --> 0:35:59.236
<v Speaker 1>more difficult, I would say, and the burden of proof

0:35:59.316 --> 0:36:03.236
<v Speaker 1>is much higher to ask for consent from vulnerable population.

0:36:03.636 --> 0:36:07.796
<v Speaker 2>You can't do a starvation experiment like that in Minnesota

0:36:07.836 --> 0:36:10.836
<v Speaker 2>on young women because if it has consequences for their

0:36:11.196 --> 0:36:13.636
<v Speaker 2>fertility than you have So what are you going to see?

0:36:13.956 --> 0:36:16.396
<v Speaker 2>Does so are we going to use are we going

0:36:16.436 --> 0:36:19.876
<v Speaker 2>to use postmen apausal women only? But that brings up

0:36:19.876 --> 0:36:22.076
<v Speaker 2>a whole different set of issues because now you have

0:36:22.116 --> 0:36:25.756
<v Speaker 2>an older population that's going to be less susceptible to

0:36:25.756 --> 0:36:29.676
<v Speaker 2>whatever risks you're exposing them to it's tricky. This reminds

0:36:29.716 --> 0:36:34.676
<v Speaker 2>me we talk in the season about magic wands experiments

0:36:34.676 --> 0:36:36.156
<v Speaker 2>we could do if we could wave a magic wand

0:36:36.196 --> 0:36:38.356
<v Speaker 2>this one doesn't actually you require a magic wand, although

0:36:38.356 --> 0:36:40.116
<v Speaker 2>it would be very hard to do in the real world.

0:36:40.436 --> 0:36:47.796
<v Speaker 2>But you mentioned that natural experiment in Holland which gave

0:36:47.876 --> 0:36:51.196
<v Speaker 2>us information that would have been almost impossible to get

0:36:51.356 --> 0:36:53.716
<v Speaker 2>otherwise in a formal experiment. And it goes to the

0:36:53.796 --> 0:36:56.796
<v Speaker 2>larger point that this is the great thing about natural

0:36:56.836 --> 0:36:59.116
<v Speaker 2>experiments is that when you can find a good one,

0:36:59.756 --> 0:37:03.596
<v Speaker 2>they almost invariably tell you stuff that you could never

0:37:03.596 --> 0:37:06.636
<v Speaker 2>find out other way. They're incredibly productive kind of experiment.

0:37:07.036 --> 0:37:10.996
<v Speaker 2>So why can't we engineer actual experiments? So imagine this.

0:37:11.116 --> 0:37:15.476
<v Speaker 2>Imagine if someone came to you and me and a

0:37:15.516 --> 0:37:19.076
<v Speaker 2>million other people and said, we're at the stage now

0:37:19.676 --> 0:37:23.716
<v Speaker 2>in our in technology where we can put little sensors

0:37:23.716 --> 0:37:27.796
<v Speaker 2>on you which can continuously monitor every one of your

0:37:28.516 --> 0:37:32.556
<v Speaker 2>physiological signs and vital signs in real time. Would you

0:37:32.596 --> 0:37:38.636
<v Speaker 2>agree to be basically monitored for the next whatever ten

0:37:38.716 --> 0:37:42.836
<v Speaker 2>years and you and two million or ten million other

0:37:42.876 --> 0:37:45.876
<v Speaker 2>people agree to be part of this, and we will

0:37:46.756 --> 0:37:48.996
<v Speaker 2>we will simply wait and see what happens to you

0:37:49.836 --> 0:37:56.596
<v Speaker 2>and use that massive data set to kind of improve

0:37:56.596 --> 0:37:59.236
<v Speaker 2>our understanding of the kinds of things that lead to

0:37:59.276 --> 0:38:01.316
<v Speaker 2>various sorts of diseases. I mean, if you had ten

0:38:01.316 --> 0:38:03.716
<v Speaker 2>million people and they were giving you ten years of

0:38:03.716 --> 0:38:08.676
<v Speaker 2>their life and every conceivable indicator and vital sign was

0:38:08.716 --> 0:38:12.636
<v Speaker 2>being monitored on a moment to moment basis, you would

0:38:12.636 --> 0:38:16.036
<v Speaker 2>be able to understand stuff that right now we have

0:38:16.076 --> 0:38:18.676
<v Speaker 2>no clue about, right and all it takes is for

0:38:19.636 --> 0:38:22.076
<v Speaker 2>people just they don't even take in a risk, They're

0:38:22.156 --> 0:38:25.716
<v Speaker 2>just being willing to be monitored and donate their data.

0:38:25.836 --> 0:38:28.876
<v Speaker 2>That's essentially engineering a natural experiment. I don't understand why

0:38:28.916 --> 0:38:33.036
<v Speaker 2>that hasn't been done. Privacy, no one who cares this

0:38:33.076 --> 0:38:35.596
<v Speaker 2>is don't even me started on privacy. Privacy drives me

0:38:36.116 --> 0:38:40.476
<v Speaker 2>just nuts. It's like, what an absurd thing in this

0:38:40.556 --> 0:38:44.476
<v Speaker 2>day and age to be concerned about. Like, basically, as

0:38:44.516 --> 0:38:46.876
<v Speaker 2>far as I can tell, every single fact about Malcolm

0:38:46.876 --> 0:38:50.396
<v Speaker 2>Glovel is known by like some combination of Facebook, Apple,

0:38:50.556 --> 0:38:52.036
<v Speaker 2>Google and someone else.

0:38:52.196 --> 0:38:54.756
<v Speaker 1>And so I meant to ask, Malcolm, what is your

0:38:55.036 --> 0:38:58.436
<v Speaker 1>mother's maiden name? I just have a few more questions.

0:38:58.556 --> 0:38:59.756
<v Speaker 1>Before we were at I.

0:38:59.956 --> 0:39:03.156
<v Speaker 2>Know it's like a ludicrous and so it's fine for

0:39:03.236 --> 0:39:06.636
<v Speaker 2>those guys to scour, you know, the Internet and put

0:39:06.636 --> 0:39:10.316
<v Speaker 2>together massive dossiers of everything, every fact about me. But somehow,

0:39:10.316 --> 0:39:13.476
<v Speaker 2>if I want to allow someone to peek into my

0:39:14.876 --> 0:39:17.756
<v Speaker 2>is it physiological, you know, for the benefit of mankind?

0:39:18.316 --> 0:39:20.636
<v Speaker 2>That's a problem. Just drives me crazy.

0:39:21.116 --> 0:39:23.196
<v Speaker 1>It is a problem, And I didn't know that I

0:39:23.436 --> 0:39:25.796
<v Speaker 1>hit a nerve with that one word privacy. But here

0:39:25.836 --> 0:39:29.596
<v Speaker 1>we are, so that I think is a nice place

0:39:29.996 --> 0:39:34.076
<v Speaker 1>to wrap up our starvation study, except for one final question.

0:39:34.676 --> 0:39:39.276
<v Speaker 1>One listener was really fascinated by the cinnamon role of

0:39:39.356 --> 0:39:43.116
<v Speaker 1>recipe from the episode of the Starvation Study Tara A.

0:39:43.396 --> 0:39:46.076
<v Speaker 1>She said, thank you for these episodes, Malcolm. So, Malcolm,

0:39:46.076 --> 0:39:48.876
<v Speaker 1>thank you for these episodes. Any chance you know how

0:39:48.916 --> 0:39:51.916
<v Speaker 1>we could track down that cinnamon roll recipe. I was

0:39:51.956 --> 0:39:54.356
<v Speaker 1>thinking would be nice to make some and share in

0:39:54.356 --> 0:39:58.516
<v Speaker 1>my community and for a refresher for listeners who don't

0:39:58.516 --> 0:40:00.396
<v Speaker 1>love cinnamon roles as much as I do. So did

0:40:00.476 --> 0:40:03.156
<v Speaker 1>it immediately light up at this detail. So there was

0:40:03.196 --> 0:40:07.036
<v Speaker 1>a character in the episode, Lester Glick, who was part

0:40:07.036 --> 0:40:10.276
<v Speaker 1>of this study and one of the things that mentally

0:40:10.516 --> 0:40:12.916
<v Speaker 1>fortified him. Although I think for me it would have

0:40:12.956 --> 0:40:16.276
<v Speaker 1>probably had the opposite effect. As he carried around a

0:40:16.316 --> 0:40:19.796
<v Speaker 1>picture of a cinnamon roll and he had it with

0:40:19.876 --> 0:40:22.436
<v Speaker 1>him always, and it was something that kept him going.

0:40:22.796 --> 0:40:25.396
<v Speaker 2>And then later he would for the rest of his

0:40:25.436 --> 0:40:28.516
<v Speaker 2>life he would make them obsessively for family and friends,

0:40:28.836 --> 0:40:32.316
<v Speaker 2>by the dozens. It was the defining one of the

0:40:32.316 --> 0:40:34.476
<v Speaker 2>defining acts of the rest of his life.

0:40:34.596 --> 0:40:37.796
<v Speaker 1>Now, I love cinnamon rolls, so I also wanted to

0:40:37.836 --> 0:40:39.076
<v Speaker 1>track down that recipe.

0:40:39.236 --> 0:40:41.636
<v Speaker 2>We will post it online in all those brave souls

0:40:41.676 --> 0:40:45.556
<v Speaker 2>who want to recreate the famous cinnamon rolls can do that.

0:40:45.556 --> 0:40:48.196
<v Speaker 2>That was fun. Thank you, Maria. That's really fun, of course.

0:40:48.276 --> 0:40:58.876
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Bye bye, Maria, Maria, Maria, thank you so

0:40:58.956 --> 0:41:01.676
<v Speaker 2>much for agreeing to take on the role of revisionist

0:41:01.716 --> 0:41:05.876
<v Speaker 2>histories inaugural homless person. Just so all of you know,

0:41:06.316 --> 0:41:08.556
<v Speaker 2>we hope to make Maria a regular on the show

0:41:08.556 --> 0:41:11.076
<v Speaker 2>in the future. You may have thought she went easy

0:41:11.116 --> 0:41:13.236
<v Speaker 2>on me this time. Let me just say I have

0:41:13.356 --> 0:41:17.356
<v Speaker 2>no expectation that will ever happen again. Oh, if you're

0:41:17.396 --> 0:41:19.916
<v Speaker 2>wondering why I said it takes bravery to make the

0:41:19.916 --> 0:41:23.516
<v Speaker 2>cinnamon rolls, let's just say the recipe involves among other

0:41:23.556 --> 0:41:28.516
<v Speaker 2>things mash potatoes. Go to our website and see for yourself,

0:41:28.996 --> 0:41:31.636
<v Speaker 2>and thank you to the Glick family for sharing that

0:41:31.716 --> 0:41:35.436
<v Speaker 2>with us. Maria will be back soon, So send your questions,

0:41:35.836 --> 0:41:39.516
<v Speaker 2>your challenges, your gripes, and your stories to all of

0:41:39.596 --> 0:41:43.956
<v Speaker 2>us at revisionististory dot com. Revision's History is produced by

0:41:44.036 --> 0:41:47.916
<v Speaker 2>Leaming Gestou, Amy gains Kiara Powell, and Jacob Smith. Our

0:41:47.956 --> 0:41:52.316
<v Speaker 2>showrunner is Peter Clowney. Original scoring by Luis Gara, mastering

0:41:52.436 --> 0:41:56.396
<v Speaker 2>by Sarah Braguaire and engineering by Nina Lawrence. Fact checking

0:41:56.556 --> 0:42:02.036
<v Speaker 2>by Mishelle Williams. Special thanks to Julia Barton. Subscribe to

0:42:02.076 --> 0:42:05.476
<v Speaker 2>pushkin plus to hear all our episodes of Revisionist History

0:42:05.716 --> 0:42:09.076
<v Speaker 2>add free, and as of this year, get our shows

0:42:09.196 --> 0:42:15.076
<v Speaker 2>two weeks earlier than the rest of the world. I'm

0:42:15.076 --> 0:42:15.756
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm Pampa.