WEBVTT - Buen Vivir with Andrew

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to it could happen here once again

0:00:07.640 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>hosted by myself and Drew. As you know, we talked

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>about whatever. We've entered a new year, so you know,

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>happy new year. By the way, James, I don't think

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I told you. Oh yeah, happy new year. Yeah. The

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:22.759
<v Speaker 1>what I've in question this time is carrying over from

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>some of the discussions we had in the previous year,

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>because you know, time moves forward. Uh, and with time

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, how puts in? It becomes increasingly necessary, very

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.440
<v Speaker 1>very necessary to interrogate into uproot a lot of the

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>classical capitalist ideas embedded in our world. An ideology, for example,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:50.279
<v Speaker 1>it just won't die, that idea of development, despite as

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>many critics over the past few decades, despite the colonizing

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and post clear nations, people of those nations, you know,

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>rallying against such projects development due to the harms they've

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>caused socially, environments and otherwise, this ideology, this idea of development,

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:15.679
<v Speaker 1>just won't die. Um. But here we are, and I

0:01:15.680 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>think at least here in this podcast, among the audience

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of this podcast, we can agree that the time has

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>come for some kind of alternate. Maybe some kind of

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 1>alternative can happen here, you know, a different view, a

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>new path you all recurrently have and stage right when Vivie,

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>are you familiar with the concept, I'm not, Actually no

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>fun to learn about it, all right? Well fantastic, So

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you could ask anything any questions you have about it

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>as I go along. So a lot of the early

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>concepts related to this idea of gen Vivie arose in

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>reaction to the classical economic development strategies that have ripped

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>through communities in their environments. I'm talking, of course about

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>acts of inclosure, prioritization, new life, new liberalization, economic imperialisms

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. Capitalism and its element basically government projects

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that lying the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats, development banks,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>quote and quote that really never seem to fund the

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>people directly. When Revered draws from this heritage, a heritage

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of indigenous communities, uh, particularly in South America. In some cultures,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>they have no concepts analogous to the modern western capitalist

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.640
<v Speaker 1>concept of development. Of course, moderness and courts. There's no

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>concept of a linear life, a linear time, even with

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:44.080
<v Speaker 1>a form and subsequent state. And so the idea of

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>underdevelopment and development of primitive and advance just does not

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>mesh with that ontology. And all these these concepts of

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.960
<v Speaker 1>wealth and poverty, no are they are necessarily concepts of

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>wealth and poverty as we understand them based on the

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>accumulation lack of material good. I've said when Revere probably

0:03:03.960 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a dozen times by now. The question is what is

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>when revere? In Latin America, the concept of ween vivere

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>or good life or good living provides new alternatives to development. Um.

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's very honest to you. I feel like I

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's something that we should have been working

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>on for a really long time. UM. You know, like

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I don't know what you James, but I

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>really care about GDP growth or increase in return on investment.

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I care about living a good life. I

0:03:35.080 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 1>care about gen vivere. And so I think the name

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of the philosophy, it's from the name of the concept

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>itself automatically gets you to ask the question what is

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a good life? And the answer, the beauty of the

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>answer is that you decide that I decide, that we

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>decide that our communities decide that collaboratively. The good life

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>is not some sort of policy for poosal or government

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>project or development initiative for imposition. The good life is

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a pluralistic concept. Is when nos confervas. It's a different

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>ways of living well together. It's not a single homogeneous

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>or unrealizable good life. It's not like this single homogeneous

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.919
<v Speaker 1>pursuit of profit that our entire system is built around.

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Now now, the good life breen Vere, it's more about

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>people living well together in a community, in different communities,

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>living well together at individuals and communities, living well with nature.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And that these concepts sound familiar, it's because you know,

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.839
<v Speaker 1>you must have heard it from other places. It's a

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a trend we're starting to see around the world

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in this twenty one century and even prior to then. Uh,

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 1>these ideas are sully game one or esteem as time

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>goes on. Um, you know, the ideas present in social ecology,

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea is present in various animals to ontologies, and

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>they're really being or to the forefront in this time

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>because we need them now more than ever. Despite efforts

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of Western forces primarily to erase and to redact and

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to confine these ideas and these concepts of the realm

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of irrelevance or backwardsness or superstition they endure in sometimes

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>new forms, as with gen Vivere. What view is about

0:05:26.400 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>quality of life but also also the idea that quality

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of life will well being as individuals. It's only possible

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>within a community. The community which as I mentioned includes

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the floor and floor that surround us and in many

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>ways that can be interpreted, which is the real beauty

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of it. So as a concept, you can look at

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.279
<v Speaker 1>gen Vivie. It's a two word phrase and it's also

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a double barrel of a concept, the two for one

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>package of both criticism of the classical western capitalist notion

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of development and an alternative to that. You're a centric

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>tradition put onto indigenous traditions plural, and so that two

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>for one package within that, and you can really unpack

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that package and see that you know, you see the

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>idea of the same sort of basis that the growth

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>is getting its critique from the same sort of ideas

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>being shared. And in terms of alternatives, when you look

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>into Interviewer, you sort of see the anarchic bent that

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>has become ever more present in new political imaginations over

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the past few years. At least it feels that way

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>to me. That's um that sort of community oriented, autonomy oriented,

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>liberatory deculding oriented mindset is becoming more and more prevalent.

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I could be you know, my own Internet

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 1>biases and algorithms present to me what I want to see.

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>But I would like to think that more and more

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:03.159
<v Speaker 1>people exploring these ideas. Yeah, it is hard to say

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>his n because I feel the same way, Like, am

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.279
<v Speaker 1>I am I seeing whatever? It's like, Oh, there's these

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>new institutes and initiatives and programs and movements. It's so

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>amazing all these things are developing. And then like you

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:19.119
<v Speaker 1>talk to somebody who is not like in this fair

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>and they haven't heard of any of it. Yeah, you know,

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like they don't think anarchism means, like, I don't know,

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>throwing a breakthrough a window like that is the whole ideology.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, I don't know. We can hope, we can hope,

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we can hope. I would like to think it's getting

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>more prominance, but we can only hope. And so like

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>so like anarkis are too keen on you know, necessarily

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>submitting to earn as some sense that's like Google vote

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>sens or some kind um. But I would like to

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>think that anarchic ideas. Um. I mean, and all the

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>exploration that I've done of um various parts of the world. However,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, shallow my expliration has been so far. Um,

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I just I see it could be my anarchist tinted

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>glasses seeing anarchic principles and everything. But I see it

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in certain practices, in sign ideologies and sign ideas and

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, ways of living. And I think gen vere

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>is a sort of a recognition of that in one sense,

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>as there is no single gen vivere right, there is

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>no single good life you know, I might want. For example,

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>my beIN view might look like sailing the Caribbean Sea, um,

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, touching down in various isylins and exploring the

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ecology therein. Or my good life it look like a

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>more settled sort of homestead existence. Um. What sort of

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a fusion of urban and rural living. Uh, sort of

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a good ending for the suburbs, way able to live

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in a walkable sort of environment and community that is

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>both not too far from you know, the goings on

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of human social interaction, but also very much rooted and

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>connected with, um, what's happening in the natural world. But

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what might yr good life your bend Revere

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>look like James. Yeah, that's interesting, isn't it. I think, Uh,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I grew up in a countryside, so it's

0:09:30.240 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>light the idea of living in a rural area and

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>still having community and having like that, being lives to nature,

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and still also being close to people who I care

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>about and being able to look after each other. I

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's interesting how often, like at least the sort

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of set like colonial concept of rural life or the

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:53.959
<v Speaker 1>construct of rural life I guess in America is like, oh,

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 1>rugged individualist, m being on your own one In fact,

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like living in the countryside, people have look after one another. Yeah, exactly, exactly.

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.199
<v Speaker 1>We maintain this kind of this this false idea that

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>it's you against see against the elements and crushing nature

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and subjecting it to your will and all this stuff. Yeah,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's there's something interesting about. At least

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>people have spoken to um in various circles and stuff.

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask them, you know, what is your

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.439
<v Speaker 1>ideal life? What is your good life? I don't necessarily

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>say when Revie, I just asked them, you know, what

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>do you want? Um? And you dig into it, you

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>asked him a couple of problem questions and people. Despite

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>ben Revere being a pluralistic concept, people tend to generally

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>want similar things, and so it sort of begs the question, like,

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>why we in this situation? Please please, you know, because

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>like everyone says, well, you know, I want like an

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>involved community, and I want like I want to be

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>able to like grow my plans, and I also want

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do my arts and uh, you know,

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:00.559
<v Speaker 1>enjoy my time of people and do a bit of

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>travel and not work my whole life and that kind

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of thing. People of course phrase it and frame it

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in certain ways, and so that's why I asked the

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>proving questions. Because I might initially say, oh, well, like

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to retire early. I want to really dig

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>into that means it's like I don't want to spend

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>my whole life working, you know. Or they might say

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>something like, um, you know, I want to I want

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to travel a lot. So I want to like start

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a business. When you ask them what kind of business

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to start, why they want to start a business,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it really comes down to I want autonomy. I want

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 1>flexibility in my label. I want control of my own

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>labor kind of thing, like, yes, of course they are

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>people who have they couldn't qute entrepreneurial spirit who want

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to just be at the top of the food chain.

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>But then I think mostly entrepreneurs, they couldn't qut entrepreneurs

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 1>that I've met up in people who just like, oh, well,

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I started selling candles because I really like

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>making candles and I wanted to share them with people,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and ALUs need to make a living and I'm just

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>passionate about it or whatever that kind of thing is.

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Under necessarily wanted to cruw it or whatever. They just

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to sustain themselves doing something that

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.080
<v Speaker 1>they enjoy. Yeah, it's interesting because we're always sold like

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>every new advancing technology and in production that comes along,

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like these concepts you're talking about, like like working less,

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>having community, all these things always sold as what that's

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do, right, But instead we end up working

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>more or the same amount and instead just generating more

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>income for a certain group of people, like we don't

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>get any other good things. But yeah, there's there's always

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a carrot in whatever this kind of neoliberal capitalism that

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we have is, but we never get there exactly. That's

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the tragedy of it. Another aspect of you know, the

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>idea of the good life is that it's not a

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>static concept, right, It's not like we come up with

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 1>this good life that's when we here where we want

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>for ourselves. Now we etch it into stone tablets and

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>piously here to them forever like the Ten Commandments, like nah,

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the good life is supposed to be flexible

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>when reviewers wo responding to your conditions, the conditions of

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the community or ecology, etcetera, and really redefine and what

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>it means to to live a good life continuously, you know,

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in response to change in circumstances, because you know, changes life. Um.

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>Of course, not is this idea to gut life quote

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>unquote backward concept so problematic frame in and of itself,

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but um, sometimes you have to use problematic shortcuts to

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>community yates um effectively. But the idea of when reviewer

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>is not like an invitation to return to some idea

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like past or ide like non past, you know, like

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>non existent world that people are sort of mentally constructed,

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.959
<v Speaker 1>as in the case of a lot of the romanticization

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you see on social media UM and video. Is not

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>like some kind of religion with its own rules and functions.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's and it's not Also it's not imposing that

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>you must become a home insteader or a forager, you

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>must live in a rural community to live a good life.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>There's more possibilities yet unrealized. UM. And it should be

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>something that is, it should be considered something that is

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>undergoing a constant construction and reproduction process. And that's I

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>think way of the global potential that when videalize UM.

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's why I think there's viral potential for it.

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course, when you look at a lot

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of things that end up dominating the social media news cycle,

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of negativity UM dominating current discourse right now,

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I think is the topic of masculinity and UM, particularly

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the prevalence of ah Andrew teats and you know, UM,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you also have the constantly bubbling under the surface existence

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>of in cells UM and so and then you go

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok. I don't know if you go on TikTok, James,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's the point I was good for

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It's just like anymore, Yeah, I should have made that decision,

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>But I mean I kind of like TikTok because Um,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how other people are curiates in their

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>their fo you pages, but by four you pages UM

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a place I enjoy being out a bit too much,

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>which is why I have like limits on my phone

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to prevent me from staying on TikTok for too long.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's a place that I enjoy. And you

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of trends come and go on TikTok

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. The big thing is like Niche stock and

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>core core um, which I know is is probably Greek

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to you, yes, um, but in that general ve and

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>if you were to see what those trends who, I

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>think you get a sense when I'm talking about Niche

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Shock and Coco and then as well, so it seems

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to be an attempt to um rebrand the idea of

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Sigma um and the Sigma meal. It started off as

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a very you know, patriarchical thing. And then I've seen

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of different creators who who didn't a sort

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of an ironic or a post ironic sense um as

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a meme because it became a meme

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to make fun of people who take it seriously. Um.

0:16:36.520 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>And then from that that sort of mumification of it,

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>people said, reclaimed the tomb um. And then it became

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a sort of you see, um, you see like a

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>video where a guy um does something polite or something,

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, shiver us something kind and then the comments

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>are like, um, typical sigma to you, true sigma, this

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is what true signal looks. Kind of Um. So I

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's just a national aspect. They fluid it to

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>you the internet, the fickleness of the Internet, because I'm

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sure they're still they have mi misogynistic Sigma people, they

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>still exist. But then there's also people who memes themselves

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>into a brand of Sigma. That's a kind of a

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>way pseudo positive masculinity. It's kind of interesting. Um. I'll

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>continue to do my TikTok anthropological research and and you know,

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 1>discuss my findings as this situation develops. But in that

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>same vein of in that vein of communification, and those

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>are developments, I think there is a potential of wen

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Vivere to become a global phenomenon, to have that Google potential,

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a global reach because and then there's something

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in it for the people. The there's also an anti

0:17:52.560 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 1>work current present in a lot of TikTok trends, so

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's something too and I can again

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I see there's an anti current in the TikTok trends,

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>but those are the TikTok trends. I ain't being presented

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with the post ironic rebrandification or whatever. Sigma is something

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 1>my for you p has given me. It's not necessarily

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>reflective of the entirety of reality. And that's the scary

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 1>part of the Internet, right, Like you're not seeing the

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>full reality, you're seeing algorithmically produced version and skewed version

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.399
<v Speaker 1>of reality. Yeah. Yeah, it's interesting to me how like

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like most people I encounter on a daily basis will

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.720
<v Speaker 1>not know what will where me and marras and like

0:18:34.080 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>if I look at my Twitter page right now, it's

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.159
<v Speaker 1>just all like half of it. It's in Burmese, you know,

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and there's lots of people I follow and that that's

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>like my reality. But yeah, sort of then I get

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 1>really frustrated when when people don't have a clue what's

0:18:48.920 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>going on there exactly exactly, it's it's it's it's kind

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of tricky. It's kind of tricky because you really in

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>terms that need really get a sense of how you know,

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in moments like those where you confront that in real life,

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like okay, so like my my possession of reality

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is like slightly skewed by the Internet, you know, yeah,

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in ways that I am aware and not aware of,

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>in ways that other people are aware not aware of.

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's interesting. But back to when review, right when

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we here, I think is also like a path for decolonization,

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of a way to let go of

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the Western norms and impositions and speech

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and dress and labor and lifestyle and knowledge and social

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>norms and relationships and ceteral and adopting ways of life

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that account for our cultures and conditions free of those

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>mental by I think that it's the power of when review.

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So I guess another question arises, who or where or

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>when did when review come from? And so the radical

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.640
<v Speaker 1>questioning that birthed when Revere was made possible within several

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>indigenous traditions in South America, which, as I said, culturally

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 1>lacked can can steps of developmental progress. And so the

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>contribution of indigenous knowledge brend Revere continues to be the

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of critical threat associated values and experiences and practices

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 1>and worldviews of interview already existed in some form before

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the arrival of Um European conquistadors, but they were of

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>the process of qualization, silenced and marginalized, and even openly opposed.

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Rendverea is part of a long legacy, long quest along

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>pursuits of alternative lifestyles forged from the passionate battles of

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>indigenous peoples and nations seeking new ways of life, seeking

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>freedom from the Latin America and the quintessential Latin American

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 1>oli called nation state. Brutish is of course rooted and

0:20:51.440 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>clunealism and neo liberalism. And so we are seeing through

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>bend Revere within Renverea side of and review. Adjacent to

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>review um utopias in the making, the imagination, the imagining

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of utopias of the Andes and of the Amazon that

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 1>are shaping discourse, are shaping political projects that are shaping

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 1>social and cultural and economic practice. The good life in

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.959
<v Speaker 1>review is not something that is unique to Latin America.

0:21:22.000 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Of course, it has been practiced many different epochs and

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>regions of this Earth. It's been known by many different names.

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>The concept has been known by many different names in Ecuador,

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>it's known as suma um, which is a Quechua wording

0:21:37.880 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>for a fullness of life and community together with the

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>persons in nature and believia the Aymara concept for it

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>is called suma kamana in the Mapuche in Chile, and

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.919
<v Speaker 1>the Guarani in Paraguay, and the Coda and Panama, the

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Shua Naqua and Ecuadorian Amazon, the Maya and Guatemala and

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Chiapas Mexico, and of course the African too Ubuntu and

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Indian concept of sage. There are all these sorts

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of threads of what a good life for life and community,

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 1>radical ecological democracy and community. All of these sort of

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 1>concepts sort of threaded within developing dif front in different

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 1>forms in different contexts. However, UM the concept has also

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>been adopted in some sense by certain states, most notably

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Bolivia and Ecuador. Recently, Bolivia, you know, rewrote its constitution

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>um establishing itself as a blury national state, and they've

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>taken it to what they quality vivid bien um. They're

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to basically propose economic model that accommodates various diverse

0:22:56.640 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 1>cultural origins. In Ecuador, UM the conceptual freework is a

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 1>be different. They take when vere and they use it

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of described as a set of rights,

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>rights to shelter, to health, to education, to foods, the environment.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's less of an ethical principle, more of a

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>complex set of rights that are also found in Western

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>traditions but also include, uh you know, the the right

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to freedom, participation, communities, to protection, and to nature. Part

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>of that recognition of the right to nature and the

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>fundamental rights of water has led to the banning of

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>any form of privatization of water um, and also the

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>promotion of leaving crude oil in Ecuadorian Amazon blew the

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 1>ground um. However, I feel like I need to point

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>out that I don't believe the state is compatible with

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the essence of when vie, with the practice of when

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>year um. And so the use of those concepts and

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>state propaganda uh in state rebranding efforts unnecessarily encouraging to me,

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily make such dates the power gon. So they

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>would paint themselves to be because to me, when video

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>can only really be grassroots concepts. So I think we

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>must be careful of fall into that trap of accepting

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, state propaganda on the good life um,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, compromising the concept and allowing it to be

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 1>co opted or watered down. As I previously noted, I

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think there's a major overlap between concept of de growth

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in the idea of when Revere I both agree that

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the fundmental problems is, you know, this idea,

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>this constant commercialization of societal fabric kind of nature of

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>criticism of capitalism, this criticism of the way that progress

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>felt an economic growth understood and implemented um. And so

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>they almost they sort of complement each other, right because

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I think of criticism people have of the growth, is

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>it as this destructive thing, as it's negative thing, as

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>negative freemen. And so in a sense, when Vere and

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the growth can sort of be coupled, the growth as

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the couldn't quote missile wood destructive. Well, when Vivie is

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:37.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, presenting a constructive alternative, as you know, we

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>attempt to progress, to move away from capitalism, transitions and

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>new systems. There's a lot to learn with have a

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>lot we can learn from various non capitalist practices around

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the world. And I think gen vivere Um is a

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>concept that really tries to look at the way is

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a way of harmoniously co existed as humans in our

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>environment UM, and the way is that you know, a

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>good life can be combined with the growth efforts. There's

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>also a measure of fluidity present in green vivere Um

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that seeks balance socially, ecologically, politically, economically. UM encompasses and

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>encompasses within that balance people, plants, and animals. There's not

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>separate nature from society as found in classical Western dualism.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>And that sort of perspective is necessary if we were

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to move beyond the exploitation of nature for the properts

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of acumulating capitell that has really placed us in this

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>mess and even in that and recognized and that we

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.640
<v Speaker 1>need to move beyond exploitation of nature. Baked into that

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>because we are part of nature is a recognition that

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we need to take stuff exploiting humans. They need to

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>direct and nice human beings as part of a community,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that we are not just as my individuals, that we

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>are in communities, that we must be part of community used,

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that our community is the people within them and the

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>lands we are part of must cooperate in harmony. I

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>think there's a challenge to one review of course what

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>verea is not restricted to the countryside, but it did,

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it did originate there. Um. I think the challenge one

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>review is to confront today's urban spaces very much of

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:37.359
<v Speaker 1>humanity's population lives UM, to find ways to deal with

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the environment respectfully and solidarity in an urban setting, to

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>find to conceptualize a good life for and in cities.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>We can't exactly expect everybody to move to the countryside,

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>nor should everybody, UM, and so we need to find

0:27:53.960 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 1>ways that city life, urbanized life UM can be reconstrued structed.

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>And so one potential sort of way that that has

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>manifested is through the transition towns movement, which you can

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>look more into have something that interests you, where people

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are basically attempting to taking truth of their communities and

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 1>not to survive the challenge that is climate change and

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to create uh, you know, sustainable economies and ecologies. Wherefore

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>they find themselves movements. It can be found in many

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 1>different countries. You know, you might even find it in

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 1>your area and your country. Look it up, um, and

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>it has a lot in common with the concept of

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Wenevere Like I said, like I feel that there are

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>selling different movements and ideas and philosophies, you know, sort

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of with the same ideas that seemed to be feel

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like they're on the rise. Ultimately, I believe wend Revere

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>is highly ah subversive. I believe it looks not to

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>return to the past or to uh, you know, get

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>caught up in any kind of strict rules or positions.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It seeks a good life. It seeks to oppose cleanism

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and its consequences, to encourage new, more sustainable ways of

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>living drawn from old examples and models, and to really

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>create horizontal society, a cooperative society, so develop self management

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>instead of new forms of top down governance. UM the

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:31.479
<v Speaker 1>one that rejects both the market and the state as

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>solutions to our issues and looks to ourselves. One that

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>looks one that rejects the markets and the state has

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>potential solutions and looks to ourselves. The idea of development

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:49.400
<v Speaker 1>is an almost a zombie category, as some writers have

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>described it. It's supposed to be dead and yet it lives.

0:29:55.720 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>And so gwen Vivere provides an opportunity to move away

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from developments and look towards When it recognizes that all

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>may never create a perfect life, we can create a

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>good life. That's it. Thanks here and that's really interesting.

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I like that. You can find me on YouTube at

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>andrewids m on to dot com slash and his co

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Seeing Drew, and if you're so inclined, you can support

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>me on picture dot com slash Seeing Drew. This has

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>been Andrew at It could Happen Here, with James signing off.

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>It could Happen here as a production of cool Zone Media.

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>cool zone media dot com, or check us out on

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:53.000
<v Speaker 1>listen to podcasts. You can find sources for It could

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Happen Here, updated monthly at cool zone Media dot com

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:57.959
<v Speaker 1>slash sources. Thanks for listening.