WEBVTT - 2026 U.S. Open Preview with Jaime Diaz

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I miss a green, for example, I'm already upset.

0:00:02.600 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 2>When I find my ball in the bunker, I'm really upset.

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:06.360
<v Speaker 2>And when I find my ball in a.

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Brid egg Frida egg, the dreaded Frida egg Frida, egg,

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Frida egg, Brian egg Frida egg bride egg Lie.

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm about ready to run off the golf course. Welcome

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:41.559
<v Speaker 2>back to another edition of the Friday Golf Podcast. I

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 2>am your host, Andy Johnson, and today I am thrilled

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.639
<v Speaker 2>to be joined by the great him Diaz Uh, one

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 2>of the great golf writers and sports writers of our time.

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Always a pleasure to be joined by Hi May to

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 2>break down a big event like the six US Open

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>at Shinnakok Hills. This will be the fifth time that

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Shinnakok has hosted the US Open in the modern era,

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the sixth time overall in recent US Opens since I've

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 2>been alive, so the last forty years. This is forty

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>years after Ray Floyd in nineteen eighty six to one

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 2>at one under a sensational tournament, so many people in

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the mix. Ninety five you saw Corey Pavin win at

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Shinnikok Hills at even par. Two thousand and four, Ratief

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Goosen won at four under and kind of a thrilling victory. There,

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 2>great tournament and then, of course most recently twenty eighteen,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Brooks Koepka survived a crazy day, a crazy week, shot

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 2>one over par. So this has been a test that

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>has been able to stand up to the monern game.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a huge storyline for the week is

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 2>can I stay up and stand up to the monern game?

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 2>And what type of setup does the USGA deploy as

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:15.519
<v Speaker 2>Shinnecock can get a bit crispy and can be a

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 2>little bit unpredictable. We have really dove into the golf

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 2>course on a lot of channels. Check out our website,

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 2>Thefrida egg dot com. We already have a ton of

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 2>articles up about Shineakak Hills. Also check out our YouTube page.

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 2>We have our Allgrasses Local series on the turf operation.

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>We have the architecture of Shinnacock Hills. We were joined

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 2>by the great Wayne Morrison, a William Flynn historian, as

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 2>well as Bill Corr and Garrett and I break down

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the golf course on the golf on the golf course.

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.720
<v Speaker 2>That's a great video. The architecture of Shinnakok Hills and

0:02:55.280 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 2>also we have Ry McElroy talking about Shinnecock Hills and

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 2>I think what really makes it a tough test for

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:07.120
<v Speaker 2>players like of his ilk. So check out our website,

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 2>check out the YouTube page for a ton of preview content.

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Before we get to high ideas, let's talk about our

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 2>partners here. Max Fly has been a leader in golf

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 2>equipment for over one hundred years. In nineteen eighty six,

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 2>Max Fly was killing it. That might have been the

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 2>HT era of Max fly Ball, known for their innovation

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 2>and excellence. PGA Tour player Ben Griffin and LPGA player

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Lexi Thompson both joined Team Max Fly in twenty twenty

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>four and currently play the Max Fly Tour X, and

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty five, the team expanded further with the addition

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 2>of renowned golf instructor Sean Foley. It was announced earlier

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 2>this year that Ben Griffin and Max Fly extended their

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 2>partnership through twenty twenty eight. Max That's why these balls

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 2>are really good balls. I have enjoyed using them. One

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>of the great things about them is the price point

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 2>you get a tour performance ball. I use the Tour

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 2>X at the cost of thirty nine ninety nine. It's

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 2>kind of like the old days. And if you buy

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 2>two dozen, you get it for seventy dollars. So you

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 2>can purchase these at Dix or Golf Galaxy in store

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 2>or online to purchase the Max Fly Tour series. Big

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>thanks to Max Fly. All right, let's get to high ads,

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>all right. I am joined by the great High Mayds,

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 2>long time writer at SI Golf Channel contributor now writer

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.239
<v Speaker 2>at large at Golf Digest. I May has seen many

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 2>of the ratest golf championships. It's always a pleasure to

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>be joined by him. Hi, May What do you think

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 2>about Shitnacok Kills? Obviously in your illustrious career you've covered

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 2>it many times. What is your favorite tournament that they've

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 2>had at Shinnacock.

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, it might be a little bit romanticism on my part,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>but the first one was eighty six, and I've just

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>come off the first matters i'd been to at eighty six,

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know, arguably that was the best Masters and

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>arguably eighty six was the best Open, at least for me,

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen for many reasons, and one of them

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>was Shinnecock itself. There was a lot of skepticism going

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>into that tournament about the site. It was really sort

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>of this kind of fever dream by Frank Hannigan, who

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>ran the USGA in the eighties and was a great

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>thinker of the game, did a lot for golf architecture

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as far as bringing awareness about the great architects. He

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>did the first really long and you know, very very

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>informative and thought provoking feature on an architect. It was

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.119
<v Speaker 1>on aw tilling Hast, and nobody knew who the tilling

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Hast was. I shouldn't say nobody, I mean a lot

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of historians did, but the general public did not even

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>really put architects first when they thought of the golf courses.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>They just thought of the tournaments that had been held there.

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But it just opened up the world for people learning

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>about Ross and Mackenzie and everybody else. The Golden Age.

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Nobody talked about the Golden Age. Suddenly you're talking about, oh,

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the best golf course in the best land was, And

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you guys at friday E know it better than anyone.

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, how golf exploded because of you know, the

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>great architects building great golf courses back in the twenties

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and even before that, of course Shinnecock. So you know

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>what Flynn did in the thirties was, you know something.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>It turned out to be classic, and I honestly think

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>it's my favorite US Open site. I mean, I won't

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>go on and on, but go ahead, you know, let's

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 1>talk a little more about Shinnecock.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'd love to get some stories from the eighty six.

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 2>So this is your first US Open you covered.

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 1>Then I covered. Yeah, I'd actually become the sixty six

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.000
<v Speaker 1>US Open. That was just because I lived in San Francisco,

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but it was the first one I covered. I went

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to eighty five at Oakland Hills, but I was really just,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, very much a bench player. But it was

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>still a great experience. But the US Open, say that again,

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>t C US Open, TC CHIP, the US Open and

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Andy North grinding it out and sebb that was his

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>best US Open ever, I believe.

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 2>With eighty six. I mean, I guess, like I think

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 2>about the way I cover golf, though as I go out,

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I go out watch. But in that US Open, similar

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 2>to the Masters, I mean, it was anybody's game. You know,

0:07:50.920 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>it's ten ten players at one point within you know,

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>I think ten players held the lead on Sunday.

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I would just eat. You may have this. I always

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>referred back to it Sal Johnson's old print kind of

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a comprehensive statistical summary of all the US opens up

0:08:12.680 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I think through ninety six. But he said at four

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>o'clock in the afternoon on Sunday, nine guys were tied

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for the lead. And I do remember that in sitting

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the in the in the lunch room I was

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>sitting with I mean, I was total, you know, very

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>much deferential just to kind of a rookie with Dan Jenkins,

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Lupica, Dave Anderson, Herbert Warrenwin. I'm just sitting at

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>this table and you know, kind of listening and but

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the leaderboard, going well, I'm gonna go

0:08:43.559 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>out there. Uh. And it was hard to leave that

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:48.320
<v Speaker 1>table just because it was just so much lore being

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>flung around and wise cracks and just really skilled, incredible

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, golf minds, and uh, you know, I left,

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but and I followed Floyd and and and were on

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>the way in.

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 2>What was what was Ray floyd reputation with the media.

0:09:09.520 --> 0:09:13.559
<v Speaker 1>With the media, well, he was one of those guys

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that put out a very gruff exterior and was skeptical

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>of talking to the media and would kind of repel

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>people just with his just with his mood and his

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 1>or at least his the mood that he affected when

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the media came around that I saw. You know, so

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 1>he's a little intimidating. But if you could kind of

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 1>cut through and just keep asking a decent question that

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that showed that you might have an idea of what,

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, what professional golf's about, he would be very

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't say engaging, but he'd be very thoughtful and

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and smart about the game. And you know, I ended

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>up doing a book with with Raymond. The elements of

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>scoring was about the short game mostly, but you know,

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>just in general, his course management and the way he

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 1>thought his way around to go off course and just

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the inside kind of mental part of the game. Of course,

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>he had some you know, some technical stuff he did

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>with his golf swing, but it was very much a

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>homemade golf swing. He was a great athlete. He got

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>drafted by the Cleveland Indians as a pitcher, and so

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>he really knew sports and he really knew golf, and

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>he knew the competitive side of it wonderfully. I mean,

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>like he he mentored Freddie Couples and and and just

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:30.680
<v Speaker 1>took him up a level just in terms of, you know,

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Usier's power intelligently and you know, lecturer, don't, don't make

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>big mistakes and all these things that you know, they're

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>subtle and they're nuanced. But Raymond could coach it and

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>he could talk it. So, you know, not to say

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>he was expansive that week, but on Sunday he was

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>quite eloquent. I thought about, you know, the way he

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the way he not conquered, but the way he handled

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Shinnecock and what Shinnecock demanded of a player. It was

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>really an artistic golf course, and he was an artistic golfer.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, watching the telecast a couple of weeks ago, they

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 2>made o they I can't remember which broadcaster was like

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 2>we I talked to Maria ray Floyd's wife, and you know,

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Floyd hadn't had a lot of success in the US Opens,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 2>and she said that this week was the most conservative

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 2>approach he's ever ever taken to golf course at Shittacock.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 2>And you think about where modern golf strategy has gotten

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 2>and you know, basically the gospel is to play you know,

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to get too far out over, but

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 2>ultra conservative is the way to play. You avoid hazards,

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 2>you avoid bunkers. You and if you you know, aim

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 2>at middles of greens all day, you're going to roll

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of putts and you're going to miss

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a couple close and that's how you get to you know,

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>four under part. But it's interesting to hear, you know,

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 2>he had success when he plays ultra conservative, and I think,

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 2>like it's fascinating, Like there's this lore about so many

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>players in the sport, and you know there's obviously a

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 2>ton of you know, love of Ben Crenshaw, Ray Floyd

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 2>one one leg away from from the Grand Slam. I

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 2>feel like he is one player that is consistently underrated

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 2>or underappreciated of that era.

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and part of it was because he wasn't real

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>expansive and told his story a lot, and you know,

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.719
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't that engaging with the press. He could have

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>he could have controlled the narrative a little bit more,

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>but inside the game he was I would say revered

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>as extremely good mentally, especially down the stretch. You know,

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>we did see him lose the Masters in ninety and

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that was a killer when he lost to Faldo. He

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:55.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't usually make those kind of mistakes. So you know,

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>what he did at Shinnecock was an interesting week because

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the week before he had led the third round at

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:06.319
<v Speaker 1>Westchester and shot seventy seven on Sunday and you may

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>know the story when they were driving from Westchester to

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Shinnecock he and Maria. Maria was very challenging and she

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>was the one who turned Raymond's career around because in

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the sixties he was this really talented, long hitting, powerful

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>player who just kind of screwed around too much, going

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to the racetrack and you know, late nights and bachelor

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, living the life but not getting the

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>most out of his golf. And when he met Maria

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and they got married, it just changed him and he

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>would always talk about that as the turning point of

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.599
<v Speaker 1>his career. And so she said, you know, Raymond, we

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about what happened on Sunday here. You know,

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you just didn't handle it, I mean, what was wrong.

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And Floyd didn't want to talk about it. And you know,

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, leave me alone right now. And

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they're in the car anyway, they end up pulling over

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>on the Long Island Turnpike and having this screaming match.

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>And Maria was a very strong woman and really smart

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and very accompli business woman before she met Raymond, and Raymond,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, was really strong personality. But that's you know,

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 1>he deferred to her in many ways, and she won

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the argument because they did talk about it. And you know,

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess he got his mind right at Shinnacock, whether

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it was conservative play or just you know, just being

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>really focused. And I may screw this up, but you know,

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he used to talk about Raymond having the look, which

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>was this glazed look he would get on Sundays when

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>he would close out tournaments, because he won the PGA,

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I think by you know, he'd led by eight or

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>something coming down the stretch at Southern Hills and just

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>dominated the whole tournament and shot record score. So when

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he got it going, you know, he would just get

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in this wonderful zone. And she said, you know, I've

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>seen him. I've seen him win without the look, or

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I've seen him how did she put it, I've seen

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>him win occasionally without the look, but I've never seen

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>him lose with the look. And he had the look

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>at Shinnacock and it was you know she was she

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was playing with with with Payne Stewart. And later when

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Payne finally won some opens and one of his majors,

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:04.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, I kind of got an education

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.840
<v Speaker 1>from Raymond Floyd. He just had this aura that you know,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I kind of shrunk in its presence because it was

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>really a powerful mental focus that just kind of emanated

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>out of him and the players felt it. So you

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>know that that's what Raymond I think had the And

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>he had all kinds of shots. Incredible wedge player, incredible

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>wet chipper of the ball, and could could move the

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>ball around. He was a good ball striker when he

0:15:32.400 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 1>when he got it going. He was not always a

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>great ball striker. That was his challenge was finding you know,

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the right swing. Thought, let's say on Tuesday afternoon or something.

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it seemed he got it really going. Watching that,

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:48.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, you're describing him his relationship with the press,

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, kind of his his I would say, Aura,

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't want to use Pj's generations terms here.

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Right that was before they don't know that one.

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.400
<v Speaker 2>But he kind of revives, uh be a little bit

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>like the way he's been described in articles I've read

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 2>and you by you here of Brooks Kopka.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I was just gonna say Brooks Brooks could get in

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the zone, especially at majors obviously, and you know, Raymond

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>early in his career could be very distracted, you know. Uh,

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>he hung around with some guys al Bessa Link and

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Doug Sanders and Bob Rosberg and Rossi in particular, loved

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to play the horses, and he was sort of known

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>for like if he was four over on you know,

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Friday morning, after seven holes, he'd walk off and and

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>he'd go to the track and sometimes he take Raymond

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>with him, and and Raymond knew he was you know,

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he didn't really know it. He lived in San Francisco

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>in those days, by the way, you know. And yeah,

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>he owned the club, right, He owned part of a

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>strip club, a topless club in on Broadway there. Uh

0:16:59.560 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>so he was the man. He was the boulevard deer,

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.239
<v Speaker 1>you know. But he did not He was a hell

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>of a gambler, one of those guys who you know,

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.720
<v Speaker 1>very tough to beat on it Tuesday or Wednesday practice round.

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>But he just didn't have the sustained focus, so when

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>he did get it, it would just open up a

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>whole world of how good he could really be. And

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I forgot your original question, and if I'm not answering

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it sent me straight.

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>It was just about Brooks.

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I know Brooks. The only reason I brought

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that up was a good Brooks. You know, he would

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>He's frankly said, you know, it's hard now. Maybe he's

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>different since he's come back from living appreciates maybe with

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the tour really is every every week, but he would

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, week to week, I don't really

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>get up for the tournaments, but when the majors come,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm at my best. And you did see his mean,

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>his demeanor and his facial expression get hardened during those majors,

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and he was really a you know, he won five.

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just incredible you think back, I mean, Brooks is

0:17:55.040 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>not really a force at the moment, but you just

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>can and he's not that old. You can't ignore he's

0:17:59.040 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>won five majors.

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I had We obviously did our five

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.879
<v Speaker 2>things here for this pod, but he has. He's he

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.479
<v Speaker 2>made mine. I think, like whether he contends or not

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>this year, you know, I think the the win at

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Shinnikok Hills is about as good of a US Open,

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, achievement as you can get. And when I

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 2>think about all of Brooks as majors, the Shinnacock Hills

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Open is the one that I think of as quintessential Brooks,

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 2>where you know, he played the golf course smart, he

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:43.199
<v Speaker 2>hit lots of driving irons, he he in where what

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:45.399
<v Speaker 2>I think about the most is like there are a

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 2>lot of excellent approach shots and excellent you know, just

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 2>excellent play out of the back eye to close out

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:56.639
<v Speaker 2>the US Open in twenty eighteen. But I think about

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the up and down for bogey.

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>On eleven eleven yeah, eleven, say yeah.

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>And then the up and down from he was about

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty yards short of fourteen green it was humming down

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 2>wind a front pin, and the up and down there

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 2>as these two just like that's Brooks Kopka in a

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 2>nutshell at a major championship. And obviously you know it

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 2>doesn't you know, distance Shinnacock's I think this is important everywhere.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think distance is like a prerequisite at Shinnacock.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 2>And when I look at like, what's the big difference

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 2>between brooks Kepka today and you know seven years ago

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 2>or eight years ago when when they played at Shanaicagas,

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 2>he's not overwhelmingly powerful anymore because of the way the

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 2>tour has just gotten faster, and he's you know, you

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>lose a superpower. You you aren't going to be you know,

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 2>the you know, the same dominant force that he was.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And I do I think like the way he it

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 2>will always go under the radar. And talked about the

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>way he understood how to attack a golf course and

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 2>understand how to attack a golf course. You know, they talked,

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:11.320
<v Speaker 2>he talked after O Kill about O Kill about this

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.560
<v Speaker 2>at the US Open at la how he he really like,

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:16.920
<v Speaker 2>if you want to understand a golf course, you stand

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.160
<v Speaker 2>on the back of the green and you look back

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 2>and I know which way where I want to be

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 2>approaching the green from from for different pins. And he

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 2>really you know, I think like because of his persona

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 2>and his personality, he will never get the credit for

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the golf brain that he had.

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing, go ahead, scuse me.

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 2>And Shinnakock was that moment you know of of like

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is this is a place that is

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the peak place to win a US Open.

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think one thing that validated him in my mind,

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>besides the wins and the way he played, that was just,

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, very very much a parent just visually was

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>helping Doak at uh at Memorial Park, and Doak you know,

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>he's not always the easiest collaborator by his own you

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 1>know admission. I don't mean personality wise. I mean he

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>just has his his ideas and and they're great ones usually.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>But he said, Brooks really gave him a nice perspective

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>about what tour players, you know, find difficult in green surrounds,

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and that golf course has very few bunkers, and it's

0:21:21.080 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing how well out of golf course as a

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 1>municipal or a public course holds up. And it's because

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of the way that the greens challenge, especially you know,

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:38.719
<v Speaker 1>shots around the green. And so you know, Brooks added

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>that to it. And I think of that shot, the

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>up and down at eleven eleven's probably the most diable,

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:48.919
<v Speaker 1>diabolical part three at Shinnecock and maybe anywhere. I know.

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>He actually chipped it in the bunker from over the

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:52.920
<v Speaker 1>green and then he got up and down. He made

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>about a fifteen foot or so. It wasn't stellar short

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>game play, but it was. It was that toughness and

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>rising to the moment and not make in the big mistake.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>And he he made bogey there and I think DJ

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>three putted and made bogey and that looked like a

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.959
<v Speaker 1>big flip and ended up being nothing and he and

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>he may have won the open on that hole. But anyway,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the big thing about Brooks is he is a very

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>smart course manager and he's pretty well rounded. I'm talking

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>about now, Pete Brooks. He had a good short game,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>he was a good putter, he was a good he

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.639
<v Speaker 1>was a good iron player. I think actually the driver,

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because he hit kind of a cut and

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>his his swing is not optimal as far as the

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>angle of attack for distance. It's kind of steep, and

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he spun it a lot, but he was you know,

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>he got it in the fairway and he was just

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 1>such a brute that he could get it out there

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty far. But it's not a swing for maximized distance.

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you almost never see him turning over with

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a draw, so you know he was giving up distance

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>even then. But he was so powerful and the game's

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>changed obviously, and I think more than anything when I

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>watch him now, it's the putter if he puts well

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and gets that back because I didn't he play well yesterday?

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, who knows back. Yeah, I wouldn't count him out. Uh,

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he's due for something. I think. I gotta believe his

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>mindset is so much different and appreciative and grateful that

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.239
<v Speaker 1>he's back, and you know, probably with a very good

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>attitude at the moment.

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I think I wouldn't be surprised if if

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:20.959
<v Speaker 2>he's back in the mix. I think it would be

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 2>one of the one of the better stories you could have.

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.679
<v Speaker 2>Just I think when like Floyd, when Brooks is in

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the mix, it's it's got he gets that, he gets

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>that look and he gets going and and it's like

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 2>it's a hard player to have in the mix, uh,

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 2>on the leader board just because of the his closing

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 2>ability and and pedigree at majors and at a golf

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 2>course where like you know, Shittacock, I was telling some

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 2>people this the other day, is like I believe and

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 2>I know you want to talk about Shittacock Hills. I

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>believe Shittacock is extremely like what I love about Shitnacock

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 2>is it allows you to go you can make birdie's

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 2>every hole, I think every hole out there. You look

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 2>at it and it's like, if I execute, I can

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 2>make a birdie here. There's no hole that is like

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>overwhelmingly difficult. But what is overwhelmingly difficult about Shittacock is

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 2>stringing together a series of great holes. And I think,

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 2>like what I love about the golf course is that

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 2>you can go out and you could play a great

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 2>round at Shitakock. And we saw that last time the

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 2>US Open was here with rounds from like Tommy Fleetwood,

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Tony f Now played a great round, Daniel Berger played

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 2>a great round. You can go out and you can

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 2>really achieve a great round. But what's tricky about Shittacock

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 2>is doing it multiple days in a row.

0:24:56.240 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, I mean it's unrelenting in that regard. You

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>have to hit it solid and really conceive your iron

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>shots correctly to hold the greens. The targets are so

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>small on the greens themselves. To me, it's a second

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 1>shot golf course. And you know, it's interesting they they've

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed the fairways to be wider this year. John Bodenhemmerh

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>was just talking about that, and you know, I think

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 1>they want they want to see the artistry from the

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 1>fairway with the irons and let that be the determiner

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of who's the best player. And I think that's actually

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the most beautiful kind of golf because then you see,

0:25:32.320 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a physical challenge, great athletic of

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I think act to hit a really solid compressed iron

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>shot that's well shaped and you know, is the right

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>is the right trajectory and all those things that go

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>into a really great iron shot and do a great

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 1>green complex and see that over and over somebody do that.

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what the most memorable rounds are about

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen anyway. And nobody does that right now

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.400
<v Speaker 1>better than Shuffler. Uh. But you know Jack Jack didn't

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>go pin hunting a lot, but man, he hit a

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>million greens and he always hit the right shot. Uh,

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 1>so you know he I remember talking Arnold Palmer wants

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>saying that the best part of Jacks games is middle

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>iron game. He goes, he's just relentless with that doesn't

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>miss greens, hits the right shot, can hold the greens

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.479
<v Speaker 1>when they get really really firm. In majors, and and

0:26:25.520 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>that's what Shennikock's gonna demand. You cannot you can't be

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of slapping iron shots around. And we

0:26:32.000 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>do see that with some players, you know, when the

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>greens are a little softer, they can contend Shehnnacock and

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the opening general is about that. But Shennacock especially, uh

0:26:41.840 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>will separate those guys out. You've got to be a

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:50.199
<v Speaker 1>really you know that that that that flusher that you

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, sound, all that stuff that's really beautiful about

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the game, especially on the practice team when you when

0:26:55.480 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you see guys just you know, just hitting these artistic, beautiful,

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>solid iron shots. That's what Shinnakock asked for.

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>So you've seen a lot of a lot of the

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 2>great Championship golf courses you've attended, so may it covered

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 2>so many of the US Opens. Do you believe Shannakok

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Where do you think it stacks up in the great

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 2>US Open venues?

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Well? To me, it's the best one. And you know

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.120
<v Speaker 1>what I've been hearing that, you know Bodenhammer was talking

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>about yesterday. You know they've been surveying the players the

0:27:29.080 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>last five or six years about you know, what they

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>like to see at the US Open. And and what's

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 1>important about the US Open, And one of the big

0:27:38.200 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>reactions is it matters where you win, and winning at

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Shinnacock they feel defined you as a really good player.

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And so in many ways, for many players, Shinnecock's their

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 1>favorite US Open site. And I'm not saying that because

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the players say that. I love it for its aesthetics,

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.119
<v Speaker 1>for the you know, it's on the best land, probably

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the best golf land America is on Long Island. It's

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.719
<v Speaker 1>the closest to the links, and the wind is blowing

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and in the summer it's not overly humid, and it's

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>just and the colors of the grass are so beautiful,

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and the variations it just the most natural, you know,

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>well designed golf courses too, without being overly elaborate, you know,

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the simplicity of them. It's just a great golf experience.

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>To watch golf out there, and then to watch the

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>players handle it and really go into their bag with

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>everything they got with skill and imagination. You just feel

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 1>like you're watching the very highest level of golf, and

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Shinnecock brings it out.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of courses used to but since

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>this is you know, getting on a harangue. You know,

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>since the ball has started going so far, at least

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>being hit so far, don't want to blame the ball

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>too much. You know, it's just changed the challenge. And

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's to me, it's slightly cheap in the challenge and

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>shinnik because it's not about length as much as just

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>precise contact and beautifully conceived iron shots that that hasn't

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 1>been lost because of the power. You'll be some wedges

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 1>coming in, but you know, they still got to be

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>perfectly hit to get close. And so that's what I

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>love about Shinnacock. And I love the clubhouse, and I

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>love the history of it, and in general, you feel

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like you're at a home of golf. I mean, Pinehers

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is the American home of golf, and and you know

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 1>say it feels like Saint Andrew's. It feels like you're

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>at a historic place, especially that clubhouse and the mood

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that sense at the top of the hill like that,

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the best set clubhouse in America, I think.

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean founding five Club two, which is you know,

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 2>obviously one of the founders of the usgau. There's something

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 2>to that. But I think, you know, an interesting aspect

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 2>is like what can you learn from Shinnacock in terms

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 2>of the spotter technology? I you know, frankly, I think

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 2>the rollbacks kind of a mess right now. Well obviously, yeah,

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:09.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, but the the what can we learn about

0:30:09.080 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>like what makes players uncomfortable because Shittacock's one of the

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 2>places that makes modern the modern golfer uncomfortable, and like, sadly,

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 2>from what I can tell is like the vast majority

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 2>of what Shittacock does to players is it's natural just

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>sheer natural advantages to other golf courses, which is the

0:30:33.520 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 2>ever present wind, the elevation changes, and the firm turf

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 2>that is that is a byproduct of having sandy soil.

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Like those three things together, so wind, elevation, and firm turf.

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, Plus they're repelling edges, you know, the greens

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 2>that repel away the ball if you miss your target

0:30:56.160 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 2>or you miss strike your shot. So you know, the

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the best way to describe this is like when the

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 2>greens are pretty soft, if I catch the ball a

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 2>fraction on the toe and say I hit I'm playing

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>to hit a two yard fade into a green that

0:31:11.760 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I know is going to stop if I hit catching

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>it fraction on the toe and it turns over a

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 2>yard or two. At most golf courses, that's not a

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>big deal. You know, at Shinnacock Hills, that could lead

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 2>to your ball just rolling thirty yards away. Sure, because

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:27.720
<v Speaker 2>of the firmness of the turf, and if you're not

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>hitting the shape. Plus you know, like what the way

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 2>a draw could be accentuated with the wind, or way

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 2>of fade could be accentuated with the wind, all these

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.520
<v Speaker 2>things that the margin for error at Shinnacock Hills is

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 2>shrunk more so than any other American course, and I

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>would say more so than any other course maybe in

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 2>the world.

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Wow, yeah, well you could make I think you made

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>a good argument, and that's very possibly true that it

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is the greatest. I think it's very much in the

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>top three or four of the greatest tests for championship golf. Now,

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 1>if you get it that way for everyday play or

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>even every week play on PGA Tour, it might be

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>a little much. I mean, it's a fine line. You

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>can go over the line. They've gone over the line

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at Shinnacock, at least by their own admission. They're they're

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.640
<v Speaker 1>they're rolling, They're they're they're they're they're sort of backing

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 1>off on going to the edge so much in terms

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of the whole I don't know about the whole positions,

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>but certainly the front for the firmness and the fairway

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>with and the rough they want Shinnacock to be quote

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>unquote Shinnacock. But it's still championship golf, and you've got

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to ratchet it up. I think you're absolutely right. It's

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the natural environment at Shinnecock. That's the greatest challenge. But

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>then when you start tweaking the setup, you know you

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>can make it even better as far as really really

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>testing these guys in a way that brings out inspired

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>championship play. But you can also go over the line

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and and make it, you know, sort of random, and

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to do that either. So I think

0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the setup now at all these majors, it's one of

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the greatest challenges in the game to get it right.

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>For example, I thought it iron i mink. I thought

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>they actually went too far and it wasn't terrible, it

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 1>was interesting, but it got to the point where nobody

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 1>could really hit it close because of the whole positions

0:33:17.400 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and because of the firmness, and yeah, they were hitting

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>wedges a lot of the time because the course wasn't

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that long, but it still ended up with everybody having

0:33:24.360 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty footers for birdies or thirty footers, and you know,

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it was that's why the leaderboard got so bunched and

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>it was so hard to separate. Having said that, Aaron

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Raye he played the best coming in and really was

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a definitive victory. But I'm just saying up to that point,

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it was really like, wow, how do you how do

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you show your superiority in this on this kind of setup?

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the PGA not to pick on them

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>in the past, they've been the ones that were kind

0:33:52.440 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of us open light and might have been considered too

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>acquiescent to the players. I thought they wanted to get

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>away from that around me because it looked like earlily

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the week it was going to be wet, number one

0:34:03.360 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and number two. The golf course wasn't that long. It's like, man,

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we could have a you know, seventeen under deal here.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Who knows. And so, you know, Carrie Hay has always

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 1>been pretty conservative. He went he went kind of aggressively

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I only bring that up because that threat is president

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>every major. Now, if you want to take it to

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the edge, it's harder to take it to the edge

0:34:24.440 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>now because the edge is sharper than it's ever been

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>because of the distance the ball is going. And and

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if it you know, if you allow with but you don't,

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't have enough severity on the green complexes. It's wedges, wedges, wedges,

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and Berti puts, Berty puts, Berty puts. You know that.

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.439
<v Speaker 1>So you then if you tied it up too much,

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and you put too much rough I say too much

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it just becomes so narrow that

0:34:46.400 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 1>everybody's having to hit irons or just getting punished from

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the rough in a way that they can't recover. Then

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:54.919
<v Speaker 1>you have kind of like Marian in twenty thirteen, which

0:34:54.960 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it was terrible, but it was over

0:34:56.719 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>the edge. I thought. So that is a challenge that

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why I favor a rollback that would take that

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>would open up you know, the parameters for the setup, guys.

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I you know, I think they you know, last

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:15.520
<v Speaker 2>year even was a you know, an interesting setup like

0:35:15.560 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 2>the rough at Oakbant, you know, a foot off the

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 2>fairway and and this happened at Ironomic two. I think

0:35:21.360 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 2>this is something that my colleague Joseph Lamannia hits on

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 2>all the time. Is the idea of like where narrow

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:32.600
<v Speaker 2>misses are penalized more than wide miss because you you

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 2>hit it into the gallery, you get into the trample

0:35:34.840 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 2>down rough. And I don't know what the answer to

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 2>that is on on a golf course like ironom inc or.

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>Let me interject, I you know, graduated rough has been

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, villainized.

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't get why.

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's you know, it's it's I think it's

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a very honest, try to be equitable, and uh I

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:58.919
<v Speaker 1>think it works in general. Uh yeah, you know, Marco

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Mirro was a great player. He won two majors, but

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:03.839
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have a great US Open. Raguos. It would

0:36:03.840 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 1>just drive me nuts to because before they had intermediate rough,

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it would just be high rough, right off the edge

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.560
<v Speaker 1>almost and you know I missed if everybody a yard,

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>I might as well miss it by twenty yards. I

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>was dead. So that was part of the challenge of

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the US Opening. Why you had to be so straight.

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It was more of a premium on driving accuracy in

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.399
<v Speaker 1>the past than there is now. Even so it's still

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a distortion I think of the overall test,

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 1>that's all.

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know what, I what I I think that

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:37.799
<v Speaker 2>one of the things that Shinnakak can do is it

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.879
<v Speaker 2>does provide a little bit more of equitable I think

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 2>there's enough space where the crowd, the fans aren't like

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 2>on top of the golf as much. And one of

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 2>the things it has is it has the wider fairways.

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Then there's like a little bit of rough, which sounds

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 2>like it's going to be pretty tough. It's it's unpredictable,

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 2>and obviously the name of the game at Shinnacock, because

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 2>of the greens and the firmness and the repelling nature

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 2>of them and the severity of them. The name of

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 2>the game is having control of your golf ball, and

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 2>that's you have to play from the fairway to do that.

0:37:19.320 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 2>And then they have the fescue, so it's like you

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:24.439
<v Speaker 2>kind of get a natural graduate or rough here.

0:37:24.920 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I think you know, forty eight yards that's

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the average apparently of the fairway with that's a lot.

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 1>So if you do hit in the rough, I think

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 1>fair enough you should be punished, and you got to

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.840
<v Speaker 1>punish the modern player more than used to punish the

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 1>older player, I mean the previous player, because he's hitting

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a shorter club in and the rough has to mean something.

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think as far as equitable, Shinnakock is going

0:37:48.440 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to be an equitable test.

0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you know, like everybody's going to run to the

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 2>forty eight yard number. Those fairways play so much narrower

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 2>than forty eight yards just so fast. Yeah, and they're fast,

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 2>and then they go on diagonals all the time, so

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 2>you're you have to pick I think what the you know,

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 2>it's one of the brilliant aspects of Shinnakok is the diagonal,

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:15.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, And this is one of the things that

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 2>Flynn a lot of Flynn. You know, if you look

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 2>at the third hole, that's that's in the same that

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 2>hole is the same hole as Ceb McDonald laid out

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 2>in the you know, I think it was nineteen sixteen

0:38:28.920 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 2>nineteen seventeen version of Shinnakok. What Flynn did was it

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 2>took he took the t box that was right of

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 2>two green, and it set it straight and moved it

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:43.320
<v Speaker 2>to the left, and he moved it left we'll say

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 2>forty fifty yards. And what that did is it puts

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:50.919
<v Speaker 2>that hole on a diagonal, so you're teeing off like this.

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 2>And what it does is it makes you pick line.

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 2>You have to pick line and distance.

0:38:57.160 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you also got to pick shape, yes, you know,

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.719
<v Speaker 1>and that's I think it's really hard to work the

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>ball with the modern driver and the modern golf ball.

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I just to go back to a

0:39:07.280 --> 0:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>random very quickly. I watched Rory some of the right

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.479
<v Speaker 1>to left sloping fairways. He was still hitting a draw.

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of shocked because he does have a

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>fade in his in his back obviously, and you know,

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>he needed to fade it against the hills so he

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>could keep it in the fairway. So, you know, I

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he's just getting stubborn and going, you know, gosh,

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:26.839
<v Speaker 1>this draw. When I hit it straight, I can hold

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>any fairway because it's so straight, so controlled when he's on,

0:39:30.800 --> 0:39:33.440
<v Speaker 1>But he wasn't quite on the point being you know,

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the percentage is if you can hit shape it so

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it lands into the hills, uh, and not with the hill.

0:39:42.239 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's another you know, especially the back nine at

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Shinnecock has a lot more undulation, and so the driving

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 1>becomes more artistic too. I think you know that's another way. Now,

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you got to pick a golf course that has that.

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Not every golf course has that, of course.

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's take a quick break and talk about

0:40:07.640 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 2>our partner, T Mobile, the official five G network partner

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 2>of the USGA and its national championships, including this week's

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.840
<v Speaker 2>US Open. In addition to bringing advanced network solutions to

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 2>support enhanced video review and communications capabilities for the USGA

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 2>rules officials when it matters, most T mobile members have

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 2>access to exclusive benefits and experiences on site at Shinnecock Hills,

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:36.799
<v Speaker 2>America's best network is now powering the USGA. To learn

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:40.239
<v Speaker 2>more about how T mobile supports the USGA inside the

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 2>ropes and provides exclusive benefits to its members outside, visit

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 2>tashmobile dot com slash USGA. That's tashmobile dot com slash USGA.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to T Mobile. Let's get back to him DS.

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.440
<v Speaker 2>You brought up Rory I we'll get back to the

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:09.879
<v Speaker 2>golf course. I think it'll be probably a through line

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.000
<v Speaker 2>through this whole conversation. One of the things that I'm

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of why watching is obvious as is Rory. I think,

0:41:18.080 --> 0:41:21.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the interesting next things to talk

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 2>about with Rory is like can he win all the

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.440
<v Speaker 2>majors twice? He obviously has two PGAs he has two masters.

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.040
<v Speaker 2>We did a little video with him talking about Shinnakak Hills,

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:36.400
<v Speaker 2>but he talked about the idea of winning a hard

0:41:36.800 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 2>US Open, like a real hard, like one that goes

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 2>down in the story books of like that was. That

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 2>was a tough week, and he's talked about how that's

0:41:46.840 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the thing that gutted him the most about Pinehurst was

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 2>like the idea of like, you know, that was the

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 2>kind of US Open that I want to win. He

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 2>obviously won Congressional. It was soft, It was a long

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.399
<v Speaker 2>time ago. But what I think is is fascinating about

0:42:01.440 --> 0:42:04.719
<v Speaker 2>his career is that if you you know, if we

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 2>had this discussion seven years ago, we would say, or

0:42:09.000 --> 0:42:11.960
<v Speaker 2>even you know, ten years ago, Shinnecock is not a

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 2>Rory golf course. He needs a soft golf course. And

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:20.840
<v Speaker 2>in this this this act of his career, I believe

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 2>that soft golf courses are actually not Rory courses anymore.

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:29.360
<v Speaker 2>I think the firm, you know, fast golf course is

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:33.479
<v Speaker 2>the golf course with that activates his brain and gives him,

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.759
<v Speaker 2>at this point in his career, a big advantage over

0:42:36.800 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the field because of the way he can now think

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 2>his way around a golf course, the work he's done

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 2>with his wedge game, and just his general you know,

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 2>experience level comes comes to the top. And we've seen

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 2>him play. You know, to me, the harder the setup,

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:55.240
<v Speaker 2>the better it is for Rory.

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't know if I go that far, Andy

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>not to say I think he has dramatically improved those

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 1>more subtle and nuanced areas of the game, the wedge play,

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>flighting him lower, spinning him better. He changed his golf ball.

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.799
<v Speaker 1>That helped too. It's a spinner. It's a spinning your ball.

0:43:10.880 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's made him value the control aspect of

0:43:14.280 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the game a little bit more, and he knows it's

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:18.879
<v Speaker 1>cost him in the past. He knows he could look

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at the you know, at the statistics and the analysis

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of that and know that he was an inconsistent wedge player.

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked about Greg Norman a little bit

0:43:26.880 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>earlier off camera, and you know Rory suffered from you know,

0:43:30.800 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>flighting his wedges high and hitting a lot of pulls

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>long and not having the distance control. I mean Tiger

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:38.560
<v Speaker 1>suffered from that for about you know, seven months when

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:40.800
<v Speaker 1>he turned pro and made it a strength, and Rory

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:43.879
<v Speaker 1>has eventually made it I would say a strength now.

0:43:44.320 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 1>So yes, any golf course is not beyond him any longer.

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 1>That was a real thing that he won on wet

0:43:50.360 --> 0:43:52.799
<v Speaker 1>golf courses before he even admitted it. He didn't love

0:43:53.000 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 1>firm and fast. I'm not. I don't think it's necessarily

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>his fort now at the exclusion of I mean, a

0:43:59.640 --> 0:44:03.280
<v Speaker 1>soft golf course with Rory carrying at three twenty is man.

0:44:03.440 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's a that's a golf course that he

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>should dominate. But he also has the other gear, the

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 1>gear that, as you say, sort of brings historical achievements

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and historical performances and and how we really judge is

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.520
<v Speaker 1>this guy a really complete or close to a complete golfer?

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And Shinnecock would do that and he knew it, and

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he knew it at Pinehurst. And but he's gotten better

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 1>in the US Open. I mean, you know seconds so

0:44:27.000 --> 0:44:29.399
<v Speaker 1>many times now, and you know a bunch of top

0:44:29.440 --> 0:44:33.399
<v Speaker 1>tens this this this decade, and you know he's he's

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>better on the harder golf courses than he ever used

0:44:36.360 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>to be. And Augusta too, Augusta Furman fast was something

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't handle that well, and now he does.

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Last two I would say, we're firm and fast assers.

0:44:45.040 --> 0:44:47.919
<v Speaker 1>They Yeah, yeah, he's a better player. He's a better

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>player now he's got some scar tissue. And you know

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that freedom when you watch those those old films of

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:55.920
<v Speaker 1>him at at Congressional or at key Oil. I mean,

0:44:55.960 --> 0:45:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it's so flowing and incredibly free and powerful, and he

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:03.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't even built like he is now. But that was

0:45:03.640 --> 0:45:05.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of the age of innocence in a way, and

0:45:05.640 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 1>as hard as you get older when you know what

0:45:07.160 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>can go wrong. And he's had some tough ones, and

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:12.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that the way he's recovered from those, it's

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 1>really one of the inspiring things in the modern game

0:45:14.520 --> 0:45:17.359
<v Speaker 1>right now is to watch Wrory have this chapter where

0:45:17.360 --> 0:45:20.000
<v Speaker 1>he overcame the pain of what he went through and

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it didn't beat him.

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, I think obviously he's going to be I

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 2>would say probably story B. Story. I think the golf

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 2>course is probably story A. This week, Story b's the

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 2>Scotty Scheffler obviously going for the career Grand Slam, and

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.920
<v Speaker 2>that's going to be the talk of the talk of

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 2>the week. I think it's going to be Scotty Scheffler

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 2>the career Grand Slam. And how is he in a

0:45:48.680 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 2>slump right now?

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, I don't think he's in the slump. You know.

0:45:55.520 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It's funny Tiger used to get occasionally, like in two

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:02.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and three, four oh, Tiger's in a slump. And man,

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>he didn't like hearing that. He really rebelled against that word.

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>But relative to his previous performance, he wasn't a slump.

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>And to some extent or Scott he's in a bit

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.759
<v Speaker 1>of a slump, I think slightly with the irons which

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:18.600
<v Speaker 1>have been so supreme, and I think he's one hundred

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and thirty fifth in proximity this year. You know that's

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a small sample, just to take it for half a year,

0:46:24.680 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>but still it's it's dramatic when you consider he's led

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>proximity I think the last three years. So you know,

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:36.160
<v Speaker 1>he's or at least strokes gained approach, I should say.

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he is the supreme iron player. That's his

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:41.120
<v Speaker 1>greatest of all the strengths that he has, that's his

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 1>greatest strength and he'll need it the most at Shinnecock

0:46:44.920 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm thinking, Okay, let's see if he can

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:48.759
<v Speaker 1>pull like a Nicholas where he goes away for a

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:50.960
<v Speaker 1>week and he figures it out and he comes to

0:46:51.000 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the Major just prepared and you know, and having a

0:46:55.560 --> 0:46:58.720
<v Speaker 1>clear mind about whatever struggle he has had, he's figured

0:46:58.760 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 1>it out, and then it'll be an incredible week for him. Uh,

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 1>but that's a big ask. We don't know if that

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>can happen. At the moment. He could still win even

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:09.960
<v Speaker 1>with his B game, because he's that good throughout the

0:47:10.200 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 1>throughout the bag. Uh, it's gonna be a lot of pressure,

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of expectation. You know. I know how iron

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:20.240
<v Speaker 1>clad he is mentally, but I don't think he loves

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:23.880
<v Speaker 1>all the demands of the public position that he has.

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And he handles it, but it's I won't say it's grudging,

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's sort of in a way that he wants

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to compartmentalize it and put it to the side. He

0:47:32.880 --> 0:47:35.839
<v Speaker 1>knows he doesn't want to really want to live it. Uh,

0:47:36.040 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>golf has got to be separate for him. When that

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 1>comes to that stuff, that's a distraction and it'll be

0:47:40.560 --> 0:47:44.359
<v Speaker 1>harder not to get distracted next week. I think if

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:47.000
<v Speaker 1>he wins, it'll be his greatest win, not just because

0:47:47.000 --> 0:47:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it achieved the Grand Slam, but because of everything that

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:52.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, has been laid upon him, as far as

0:47:52.320 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the burden of sort of carrying the game right now

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and not being at his best by a little bit

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of a margin anyway this year, and to recover right

0:48:00.600 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in time for this moment would be really, I think,

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:04.839
<v Speaker 1>really an exceptional moment for him.

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 2>He hit the nail on the head. Obviously, the iron

0:48:09.120 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 2>play hasn't been where it's at. I do think, you know,

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:16.319
<v Speaker 2>I think we take for granted and maybe this is

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 2>the first time we've really like kind of seen it.

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Just because of the dominance and how long he's been

0:48:21.600 --> 0:48:24.000
<v Speaker 2>put up on the stage of the number one player

0:48:24.000 --> 0:48:27.560
<v Speaker 2>in the world. I mean, it's exhausting. You get you're

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:31.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna get requested to talk every single every single time.

0:48:32.360 --> 0:48:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think what's different about Scotty than You're Rory,

0:48:36.520 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 2>than your Tiger, like other players that have been in

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:44.600
<v Speaker 2>this position, is that the way Scotty ascended to number

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:49.760
<v Speaker 2>one was he was not the young phenom that from

0:48:50.040 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 2>age eighteen, you know, nineteen, Like if he's at a tournament,

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:57.400
<v Speaker 2>people want to talk to him, and it just it

0:48:57.440 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 2>becomes part of his life. He ascended to this stature

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 2>at age twenty five twenty six, where he lived life

0:49:05.719 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 2>out of the limelight and now he then he got

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 2>thrust into like, no, you you need to be you

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:14.839
<v Speaker 2>were you were going to get asked questions. You are

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:18.720
<v Speaker 2>going to be you know, requested every single time after

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 2>he had grown accustomed to a different life, right, which

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I think is hard. It is an adjustment period and

0:49:24.719 --> 0:49:27.799
<v Speaker 2>it's something like you know, like yeah, like it's hard

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 2>that Rory and and Tiger and you could go down

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 2>the list of of you know, Jack and Arnie had

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:36.680
<v Speaker 2>to deal with this all the time, every time they

0:49:36.719 --> 0:49:39.799
<v Speaker 2>showed up anywhere, all the time. But it became that

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 2>for them it was just like part of life. And

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:47.759
<v Speaker 2>for Scotty, he you know, he he played on the

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 2>corn Ferry Tour. None of those guys played on the

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:53.279
<v Speaker 2>corn Fairy Tour where you just play golf and yeah,

0:49:53.719 --> 0:49:56.839
<v Speaker 2>nobody's around, nobody's asking you anything, you know, and then

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 2>he plays on the tour and he you know, he

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:01.279
<v Speaker 2>it's like, oh this he's in the mix a lot.

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 2>But he can't get it done, you know, like that's

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:07.239
<v Speaker 2>not like a life that people you know, where they

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 2>people are dying to write that story all the time,

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:16.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, and now it's he's just always there. I

0:50:16.320 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 2>think what if Scotty, as you said, figures it out,

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 2>this could play out a lot like port Rush. This

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 2>is a golf course that, like when you look at

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 2>it on paper, if Scotty Scheffler is got his a game,

0:50:32.320 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 2>it is going to be exceptionally hard for anybody to

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 2>stay near him because of the demand that the golf

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 2>course presents it. I think port Rush is as good

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:47.080
<v Speaker 2>of a links golf course as we have in the world.

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:50.640
<v Speaker 2>And I said this last year and port Rush is

0:50:50.680 --> 0:50:53.279
<v Speaker 2>as good as it gets. And I think Shittacock and

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:56.160
<v Speaker 2>port Rush are right at the top for me of

0:50:56.760 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 2>just golf course tests for the modern game. And the

0:51:00.280 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 2>way Scotty just dismantled the field in Northern Ireland. If

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:09.400
<v Speaker 2>if if Scotty has the iron play and it's up

0:51:09.440 --> 0:51:12.480
<v Speaker 2>to snuff and he's putting well, I think that's one

0:51:12.480 --> 0:51:14.839
<v Speaker 2>of the things that has been kind of illuminating this year.

0:51:14.880 --> 0:51:17.399
<v Speaker 2>Also is the putter seems to have regressed a little

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 2>bit which is natural. I mean, you know, that's the

0:51:19.719 --> 0:51:23.719
<v Speaker 2>way golf works and statistics work. Like he had a

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 2>great couple of year run and maybe he's regressed a

0:51:26.680 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit with the putter, but if you if he

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:33.640
<v Speaker 2>get if he comes in with his a game, it

0:51:33.680 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 2>could be a blowout.

0:51:35.480 --> 0:51:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Well what's cool is I think the greatest golf courses

0:51:39.000 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>allow the greatest players to separate it by the largest margin.

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh And you know, because they test something that most

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 1>players don't quite have, but the greatest do have, and

0:51:51.080 --> 0:51:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the advantage becomes more pronounced and then suddenly you

0:51:54.520 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>see these you know, these runaways would like Tiger at

0:51:57.280 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>that at Pebble to some extent. I remember when Jack

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in seventy two at Pebble was really windy and he

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and he separated. And you know, Jack wasn't always known

0:52:07.480 --> 0:52:09.000
<v Speaker 1>as a great win player early in his career, but

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 1>he became one. But as far as you know, all

0:52:11.040 --> 0:52:13.719
<v Speaker 1>these things we're talking about with Scotty, I think you

0:52:13.800 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 1>make some great points about his early career not really

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>being one in which he was engulfed by media and

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:22.640
<v Speaker 1>not you know, kind of growing up with it. Now

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a flip side of that which is you become.

0:52:26.760 --> 0:52:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, Rory is an amiable person. I

0:52:30.760 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>think he enjoyed most media growing up. It was mostly favorable.

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:36.719
<v Speaker 1>He was kind of the you know, kind of a

0:52:36.719 --> 0:52:40.640
<v Speaker 1>fair haired, very likable kid. For Tiger, it was a

0:52:40.680 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>burden right from the start, and he got it before

0:52:43.120 --> 0:52:45.359
<v Speaker 1>anybody got it, so he knew how to handle it.

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:49.440
<v Speaker 1>But he handled it in a way that was I

0:52:49.480 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>would say, almost cynical. You know. It's like, man, just

0:52:52.280 --> 0:52:56.399
<v Speaker 1>avoid anything that's gonna, you know, be blown up into

0:52:56.400 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 1>anything else. And he got very good at not saying

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:03.359
<v Speaker 1>very much. I think Scotty is, you know, he's an

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>intelligent guy. Tiger is too. He kind of outsmarted the

0:53:06.239 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>media for a long time. But I think Scotty likes having,

0:53:10.719 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, conversations in normal life. He's engaging, he's pretty funny.

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:21.120
<v Speaker 1>But he also knows from watching and studying number one

0:53:21.160 --> 0:53:24.360
<v Speaker 1>players over these last decades especially, that demand on the

0:53:24.440 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>number one players just getting greater and it's getting to

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.400
<v Speaker 1>be more of a distraction and a harder thing to

0:53:29.440 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>stay up there than ever. And I think he studied

0:53:32.040 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it in a way is going, okay, how do I

0:53:33.600 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>survive up here? How do I do it best, And

0:53:36.760 --> 0:53:39.839
<v Speaker 1>to some extent, he's got to suppress his normal personality

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 1>and not really engage every question and try to, you know,

0:53:42.800 --> 0:53:45.560
<v Speaker 1>get through it with you know, a decent, you know,

0:53:46.000 --> 0:53:49.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of honest answer that's not too in depth. And

0:53:50.120 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 1>so I think he struggles when a question that he

0:53:52.480 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 1>knows is going to lead him into an area that

0:53:54.440 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 1>would open up a lot of interesting kind of writing

0:53:57.200 --> 0:53:59.959
<v Speaker 1>about about it, whether it was the Putter or whatever

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>it happens to be, he puts the brakes on it,

0:54:04.080 --> 0:54:07.799
<v Speaker 1>and so it makes him look like he's not enjoying it,

0:54:08.320 --> 0:54:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not, you know, I kind of said that earlier,

0:54:10.800 --> 0:54:13.319
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't really enjoy I think he doesn't enjoy the

0:54:13.360 --> 0:54:17.400
<v Speaker 1>obligation of it when it can encroach on his concentration

0:54:17.560 --> 0:54:19.440
<v Speaker 1>on the game. And I think one of the things

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that Scotty does best of all is just get into

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a really ironclad mindset for four days. And that's something

0:54:26.000 --> 0:54:28.520
<v Speaker 1>that he's matured into, and he did it at Port Rush,

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and he even talked about that after Port Rush was like, man,

0:54:31.440 --> 0:54:33.960
<v Speaker 1>I was intense on every shot. And I did a

0:54:34.000 --> 0:54:36.080
<v Speaker 1>story on him last month in which he kind of

0:54:36.120 --> 0:54:38.040
<v Speaker 1>learned that from Tiger. He played with Tiger when Tiger

0:54:38.080 --> 0:54:40.680
<v Speaker 1>made ten on the twelfth hole at Augusta and then

0:54:40.719 --> 0:54:44.040
<v Speaker 1>birdied the last five, five on the last six, and

0:54:44.320 --> 0:54:46.200
<v Speaker 1>he'd already gotten the impression. It was the first time

0:54:46.200 --> 0:54:48.400
<v Speaker 1>he played with Tiger, and he said, man, it was

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the other world intensity for every golf shot. And that's

0:54:51.760 --> 0:54:54.799
<v Speaker 1>such a you know, how do you even measure that?

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But he felt it. And maybe it was partly because

0:54:57.320 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 1>of who Tiger was, but also because of but he

0:55:00.320 --> 0:55:02.880
<v Speaker 1>was just seeing in that moment in terms of the

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:05.239
<v Speaker 1>intensity that it took to be that good. And I

0:55:05.239 --> 0:55:09.120
<v Speaker 1>think he's tried to replicate that intensity and and doing

0:55:09.160 --> 0:55:12.279
<v Speaker 1>interviews and stuff. It's fine, it can be interesting if

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you're an off day, but during the tournament, it's going

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to be something that he wants to, you know, as

0:55:19.160 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I say, compartmentalize, put aside and not carry into the round.

0:55:22.520 --> 0:55:24.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, we'll see that. I think

0:55:24.520 --> 0:55:27.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll see that that Scotty next week, a very focused

0:55:27.400 --> 0:55:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Scotty in spite of the New York media asking all

0:55:29.520 --> 0:55:32.200
<v Speaker 1>kinds of stuff about the Grand Slam. I think he'll

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:33.479
<v Speaker 1>keep him at arm's length.

0:55:36.040 --> 0:55:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Your point about the every shot intensity is an underrated

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:45.280
<v Speaker 2>one about you know, golf and the challenge of golf

0:55:45.719 --> 0:55:49.640
<v Speaker 2>is you know, I don't think many people would look

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:55.680
<v Speaker 2>at it, but like the it's so hard to keep

0:55:55.719 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 2>that level of urgency over seven two holes. I feel

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:03.960
<v Speaker 2>like you get it at the start and then there's

0:56:04.000 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 2>a lull in rounds and then there's like you're you're

0:56:07.239 --> 0:56:11.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to close that around and that's that is, you know,

0:56:12.080 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the difference between I think like at any level, even

0:56:15.640 --> 0:56:19.600
<v Speaker 2>like a club level, all the way to separate up

0:56:19.600 --> 0:56:22.879
<v Speaker 2>in the game is the people that can that can

0:56:23.040 --> 0:56:25.560
<v Speaker 2>just and this is you know, you think about Brooks

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:30.680
<v Speaker 2>in his heyday of major championship years was like unrelenting

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:34.640
<v Speaker 2>when to give away a shot, like just does not

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:38.839
<v Speaker 2>give away shots. And that's the thing that Scotty does

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:42.440
<v Speaker 2>so well, especially with that other worldly short game he has,

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:45.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, and when the putter behaves it. You know,

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:48.239
<v Speaker 2>I think there is something about Scotty where he just

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 2>seems to make a ton of fifteen footers in big moments.

0:56:53.560 --> 0:56:56.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, like in a way sometimes I think I

0:56:57.480 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 2>when I watch him, I'm more sure he's going to

0:56:59.640 --> 0:57:02.480
<v Speaker 2>make a fifteen footer then he's going to make a

0:57:02.560 --> 0:57:06.120
<v Speaker 2>six footer, you know, and I think, you know, he

0:57:06.320 --> 0:57:10.839
<v Speaker 2>just he just there obviously that all the talent that

0:57:10.880 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 2>goes into it, you know, it is one thing, but

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:16.080
<v Speaker 2>there is a mindset thing. And the in the in

0:57:16.120 --> 0:57:21.919
<v Speaker 2>the Port Rush major was it, you know where only

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:25.280
<v Speaker 2>two majors removed from it, but it feels so far

0:57:25.360 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 2>by the way the calendar works, but you know, three

0:57:28.680 --> 0:57:31.640
<v Speaker 2>majors go is like, I mean this guy can like,

0:57:31.640 --> 0:57:32.880
<v Speaker 2>how are we ever going to beat him?

0:57:33.360 --> 0:57:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Well, that effort to do that, it's exhausting.

0:57:36.920 --> 0:57:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And and one of the things I thought last year,

0:57:39.000 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Scotty played so well. He didn't get enough rest,

0:57:42.880 --> 0:57:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought, And you know, and I think that that

0:57:46.560 --> 0:57:49.520
<v Speaker 1>intensity shot after shot at or shot so hard to

0:57:49.560 --> 0:57:54.080
<v Speaker 1>summon if you're not fully you know, fully rested physically

0:57:54.120 --> 0:57:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and and your mind has been you know, kind of

0:57:57.160 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>allowed to relax. Uh. And it's as the pressure grows,

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I you're number one, the long longer, it gets harder

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to make that effort over and over because it takes more.

0:58:08.680 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember his Tiger when he won I guess when

0:58:11.600 --> 0:58:16.600
<v Speaker 1>he won the what the last one of the Tiger

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Slam in two thousand and one, he said on eighteen,

0:58:20.240 --> 0:58:22.920
<v Speaker 1>he goes he finally realized, hey, there's no more shots.

0:58:23.400 --> 0:58:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Every shot was the same. In other words, you know,

0:58:25.360 --> 0:58:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for seventy two holes, and then I'm out of shots.

0:58:27.880 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm done, you know, But I gave every one of them.

0:58:30.840 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it was implied I gave everyone the same

0:58:32.640 --> 0:58:35.800
<v Speaker 1>amount of effort and that, as you're saying, I mean,

0:58:36.200 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not really a human things. It's a robotic almost

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, cyborg type thing. Not very few can do it.

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:45.479
<v Speaker 1>And it's a separator at the highest level, no question,

0:58:45.520 --> 0:58:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a separator, I guess said. Even just playing with

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 1>your friends, some guys have better than others. And they

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:53.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have lapses, they don't have lulls. They're able to focus.

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean even in our tab writing. I see guys

0:58:56.800 --> 0:58:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in the press room. They're so good at just sitting

0:58:58.680 --> 0:59:01.480
<v Speaker 1>down and finishing and getting up and walking around like

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:05.040
<v Speaker 1>an idiot, you know, just I'm distractable to procrastinating all

0:59:05.080 --> 0:59:08.520
<v Speaker 1>these things. Yeah, well I'm not proud of it, believe me.

0:59:09.360 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, to have that ability to really just

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:15.800
<v Speaker 1>focus is it's it's an athletic gift and it's a

0:59:15.840 --> 0:59:22.720
<v Speaker 1>life gift. Uh. And anyway, I think you're onto something that.

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you know, I think one of

0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the reasons it's hard to stay on top of the

0:59:29.440 --> 0:59:32.520
<v Speaker 1>game is because it's hard to say, sustain that over years.

0:59:32.800 --> 0:59:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And Scotty's been up there a while, and he looks like,

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:39.000
<v Speaker 1>what's what's really cool is I think he's able. He's

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:42.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to stay long a long time, which

0:59:42.120 --> 0:59:45.400
<v Speaker 1>very few have done, because I think he's got a

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 1>good handle on on the on the burden of it

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and what it takes, and and uh, you know, he

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:56.120
<v Speaker 1>can pull away and say, you know, I got to

0:59:56.160 --> 0:59:58.480
<v Speaker 1>go back and live a regular life so I can

0:59:58.520 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be ready to play again. You Nicholas used to just

1:00:01.520 --> 1:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he disappear after August September and not not really even

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.520
<v Speaker 1>practiced that much until the last couple of weeks of December,

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and be ready and fresh when the season started. And

1:00:12.400 --> 1:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he said that that kept me going. My longevity was

1:00:15.200 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in large part thanks to that. And the way that

1:00:19.320 --> 1:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>season is getting compressed and there's just so many majors quickly.

1:00:22.520 --> 1:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Now I know there's going to be more time off,

1:00:24.480 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like the mental the mental strains getting

1:00:27.760 --> 1:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a little higher again.

1:00:29.800 --> 1:00:32.880
<v Speaker 2>I the the comment about you know he played too

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>much last year. You know, one of the aspects of

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:38.880
<v Speaker 2>Scotty just with how good he is is he's in

1:00:39.400 --> 1:00:43.560
<v Speaker 2>contention every week, and when you're in contention, it takes four.

1:00:43.440 --> 1:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Hours more tiring, there's no doubt.

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, then when you finish T twenty four and you

1:00:48.320 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>know you never really are in it. I think what

1:00:52.160 --> 1:00:58.040
<v Speaker 2>one really big picture story this doesn't pertain to the US.

1:00:58.160 --> 1:01:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Open about that is like, I think that we're going

1:01:02.120 --> 1:01:07.160
<v Speaker 2>to see players, the very best players continue to throttle down.

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 2>They're the amount of events they play because the way

1:01:10.840 --> 1:01:13.680
<v Speaker 2>the schedules set up with the majors, and we're starting

1:01:13.680 --> 1:01:18.840
<v Speaker 2>to see it where we see, you know, between these majors,

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:22.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a month between all these majors, and we're lucky

1:01:22.560 --> 1:01:26.040
<v Speaker 2>to see a player once, you know, if it's a Rory,

1:01:26.240 --> 1:01:28.760
<v Speaker 2>a Scottie, and obviously with liv you know you have

1:01:28.920 --> 1:01:31.919
<v Speaker 2>rom somewhere else. But you know, we haven't seen Cam

1:01:32.000 --> 1:01:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Young play. You know, Cam Young played Memorial. It's like

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:38.439
<v Speaker 2>that you see these players and they they they are

1:01:39.000 --> 1:01:44.720
<v Speaker 2>they're shrinking their schedule down in major season and I

1:01:44.720 --> 1:01:47.000
<v Speaker 2>don't you know, like I think that's only going to

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>continue it's like it feels like it's like the precipice

1:01:50.320 --> 1:01:54.439
<v Speaker 2>of the practice round thing, where like some guys start

1:01:54.480 --> 1:01:57.920
<v Speaker 2>to limit their play before a tournament to get the rest,

1:01:58.200 --> 1:02:00.840
<v Speaker 2>to say my body's fresh, and then all of a sudden,

1:02:00.960 --> 1:02:01.800
<v Speaker 2>everybody did it.

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I think there's a moment people are trying

1:02:06.240 --> 1:02:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to optimize everything now, you know, whether it's you know,

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>clubhead speed or spin raiates, and you can optimize your

1:02:13.440 --> 1:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>readiness to play. And you know, in the older days,

1:02:17.920 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, everybody had to play. They had to make money,

1:02:19.520 --> 1:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and they played a lot of times with their ce

1:02:21.400 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>game and got through it and kept going and played

1:02:23.360 --> 1:02:26.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty tournaments a year, and that was part of being

1:02:26.400 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a pro. And now there's so much money that you

1:02:29.000 --> 1:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have to play every week. Number one, I think

1:02:31.840 --> 1:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>live creating all that disruption and for a moment that

1:02:34.920 --> 1:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the tour being in chaos elevated the majors, and I

1:02:38.840 --> 1:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>think that that has endured as a lasting kind of

1:02:42.520 --> 1:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>value on the majors, that it's actually increased and as

1:02:46.280 --> 1:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a result, the tour has to be careful now that

1:02:49.280 --> 1:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't become too subordinate to the majors, and that's

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a challenge, because really, if you're talking about being a

1:02:58.160 --> 1:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>tour player, now, who's going to be demanding the most commanding,

1:03:02.880 --> 1:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the most endorsements and the most recognition and branding and

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. You win majors and more so than ever.

1:03:10.800 --> 1:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And as a result, you know, the the the week

1:03:17.440 --> 1:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to week has been to some extent diminished, and that's

1:03:23.240 --> 1:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous trend. I don't want that to happen. I

1:03:25.760 --> 1:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>want the tour to be premier, you know, spectacle every week,

1:03:32.000 --> 1:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>just like the NFL is. You know, that's one of

1:03:34.320 --> 1:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the great strengths of the NFL is those Sundays all

1:03:37.680 --> 1:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>matter and you wait a week for him, and but

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that that caravan the tour has. You don't want to

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:47.000
<v Speaker 1>start looking monotonous in any way, not important, and the

1:03:47.040 --> 1:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>majors can do that. Jack gets blamed for that, like

1:03:49.920 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you made the Major so important, but the tour was

1:03:52.520 --> 1:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>still players had to play, they had to play to

1:03:54.960 --> 1:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>make money, and the tour was still a week to

1:03:57.160 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>week really important deal. And that is right now to

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>some extent. I'm not saying it's going away. I'm just

1:04:03.160 --> 1:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>saying there's a shift. And to your point, you know,

1:04:07.640 --> 1:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>now with the major's being so compressed. People really want

1:04:10.560 --> 1:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to be ready for those four and in the tournaments

1:04:12.880 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>around it are are getting to be you know, kind

1:04:16.040 --> 1:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of a sense of man, you're waning. Do you really

1:04:20.280 --> 1:04:22.360
<v Speaker 1>do you really want to play and get tired and

1:04:22.360 --> 1:04:25.640
<v Speaker 1>not be optimal for that major. I don't know if

1:04:25.640 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an exact science and they really know what's optimal

1:04:27.880 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>or not. Golf so random. Sometimes the tire player comes

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>in and shoots the lights out and somebody thinks they

1:04:33.000 --> 1:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>got it right loses it on Thursday morning. You just

1:04:35.560 --> 1:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know in golf that'll always be there. But there

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is a pattern now where guys are going, No, this

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:42.959
<v Speaker 1>is how you get ready, and it's not always playing

1:04:43.000 --> 1:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot.

1:04:46.040 --> 1:04:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Another player that was at the top of the game

1:04:48.400 --> 1:04:50.439
<v Speaker 2>that I wanted to talk about who hasn't been playing

1:04:50.480 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 2>a lot is John Rahm. We saw, you know, we

1:04:55.880 --> 1:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>saw him. I think like in a way, this live

1:05:00.360 --> 1:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>the Lift thing's been rough for him in a way

1:05:03.480 --> 1:05:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he anticipated obviously. I think it was

1:05:06.400 --> 1:05:11.560
<v Speaker 2>really clear that he thought when he went that everything

1:05:11.640 --> 1:05:14.000
<v Speaker 2>was going to come together and he was gonna like

1:05:14.080 --> 1:05:20.000
<v Speaker 2>effectively get a payday and then bring everything together and

1:05:20.120 --> 1:05:23.920
<v Speaker 2>in it's I think it's gone. It's been a nightmare

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:28.080
<v Speaker 2>for him the last couple of years. I think the

1:05:28.080 --> 1:05:32.080
<v Speaker 2>the added burden of coming to majors and and having

1:05:32.080 --> 1:05:34.480
<v Speaker 2>to deal with the are you going to be the

1:05:34.520 --> 1:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>player you were before you left or Live has been

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:41.640
<v Speaker 2>bad in a way. I think this uh this year

1:05:41.840 --> 1:05:45.680
<v Speaker 2>with the you know, the piff pulling the plug on

1:05:45.800 --> 1:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Live in terms of funding, I think he's actually in

1:05:50.680 --> 1:05:54.040
<v Speaker 2>a great situation now in the sense of like he

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 2>has some closure, this is this is going to be

1:05:56.880 --> 1:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>over soon for me, And I think it sets him up,

1:06:02.200 --> 1:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'm I think it sets him up to

1:06:06.760 --> 1:06:10.440
<v Speaker 2>be a obviously with his talent, a real threat. But

1:06:10.560 --> 1:06:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I think it's going to lead to a comeback of

1:06:14.320 --> 1:06:20.120
<v Speaker 2>sorts of John Rahm as the you know, elite major. Okay,

1:06:20.280 --> 1:06:23.160
<v Speaker 2>if it's not, if it's not Rory or Scottie, John

1:06:23.240 --> 1:06:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Rahm is, like, you know, is right there with him

1:06:26.320 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 2>as a major player, and we haven't had that for

1:06:29.440 --> 1:06:31.680
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years in terms of where he's been.

1:06:31.760 --> 1:06:33.880
<v Speaker 2>But I think we've seen some signs of it this year.

1:06:34.560 --> 1:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>He played great at the PGA. I thought he and

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that was impressive. Man, he was driving it so aggressively

1:06:40.640 --> 1:06:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and so consistently. I mean it was really that was

1:06:45.080 --> 1:06:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a weapon, man, and you start realizing this guy, this

1:06:48.480 --> 1:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>guy's got a lot of a lot of firepower, a

1:06:51.280 --> 1:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of tools, and he's a great player. However, you know,

1:06:56.440 --> 1:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>he made a decision that had real consequences, and you know,

1:07:01.640 --> 1:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I hope he overcomes, you know, the toll that took.

1:07:06.320 --> 1:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But part of me feels like, man, you made a

1:07:10.560 --> 1:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>big mistake and you should have seen that coming. I

1:07:14.240 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's almost like, you know, it sounds so

1:07:16.240 --> 1:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>crazy going into a ran. You know, it's like, didn't

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you see that coming? They're gonna close the straight to

1:07:20.680 --> 1:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>core moves. Then you see that coming, You're not gonna

1:07:22.880 --> 1:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to play with the best players and you're

1:07:25.120 --> 1:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose your edge. And also you did something that

1:07:27.960 --> 1:07:32.600
<v Speaker 1>was really dangerously harmful to the tour. A tour survived,

1:07:32.680 --> 1:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but man, it was touch and go there because the

1:07:35.600 --> 1:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>other guys could have followed at that moment and that

1:07:38.120 --> 1:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>could have been a breaking point. And you know, that's

1:07:41.000 --> 1:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a hard thing to forget. And you know, look, I

1:07:46.160 --> 1:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>root for his talent, I root for him having a

1:07:47.840 --> 1:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>good career, but I also say, what's happened to him

1:07:52.800 --> 1:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>was predictable. He should have seen it coming and shouldn't

1:07:55.840 --> 1:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have done it as a result. Now I'm sounding judgmental there,

1:07:58.880 --> 1:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but and that's not hindsight. I mean I felt it

1:08:02.440 --> 1:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time. I felt like, this is a mistake. Man,

1:08:04.840 --> 1:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>You're too good a player. You talk about playing for history.

1:08:07.440 --> 1:08:09.840
<v Speaker 1>How is this playing for history? Now he's back to

1:08:09.880 --> 1:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>plane for history. He had a cessation there that he'll

1:08:12.800 --> 1:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>never get back. That's a gap in his life, a

1:08:15.200 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>gap in his career.

1:08:16.520 --> 1:08:17.559
<v Speaker 2>And he comes out.

1:08:17.600 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>If he comes out with the right attitude, he can

1:08:19.439 --> 1:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>regain what he had. But those are lost years.

1:08:23.560 --> 1:08:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think, you know, when when we look back

1:08:26.160 --> 1:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>and we'll see where where he gets to in terms

1:08:28.920 --> 1:08:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of majors, Like you know, he's somebody that you know,

1:08:32.840 --> 1:08:35.960
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't be surprised to see four or five majors

1:08:36.040 --> 1:08:38.160
<v Speaker 2>next to his name when he's all of a sudden done,

1:08:38.360 --> 1:08:42.719
<v Speaker 2>of course, but a piece of his legacy will always

1:08:42.720 --> 1:08:47.559
<v Speaker 2>be him in that Letterman that lived Letterman jacket and

1:08:47.600 --> 1:08:47.960
<v Speaker 2>that was a.

1:08:47.880 --> 1:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Bad campaign, bad campaign and there, yeah.

1:08:51.080 --> 1:08:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's always going to follow him everywhere. But

1:08:54.040 --> 1:08:57.280
<v Speaker 2>I do think we're probably on the I would say

1:08:57.280 --> 1:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the backside of the.

1:09:00.560 --> 1:09:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I'll just interjact really quickly. I think he's handled it

1:09:03.680 --> 1:09:07.479
<v Speaker 1>very well. Recently he wasn't handling it too well, but

1:09:07.560 --> 1:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>he's handled it very well as far as like, hey,

1:09:11.560 --> 1:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was there's a certain humilities, just a

1:09:15.320 --> 1:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>nice kind of restraint to the way that he answered

1:09:18.200 --> 1:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>questions at the PGA, an evenness, an equanimity, you know,

1:09:24.280 --> 1:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>just kind of a wisdom to like, Okay, I went

1:09:26.360 --> 1:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>through this, I made a mistake. I want to pick

1:09:28.760 --> 1:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>up my life in my career and without being angry

1:09:32.120 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>about it or arrogant about it or defiant about it.

1:09:35.800 --> 1:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that was not just good to hear. I

1:09:38.720 --> 1:09:40.799
<v Speaker 1>think it was good for him.

1:09:41.640 --> 1:09:44.400
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, obviously we saw ron burst on the scene.

1:09:44.479 --> 1:09:48.320
<v Speaker 2>He was one of the great college players. Something that

1:09:48.479 --> 1:09:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm very excited about this this week is two young

1:09:54.040 --> 1:09:59.840
<v Speaker 2>players just announced Jackson Coyven's turning pro after the US Open.

1:10:00.280 --> 1:10:04.439
<v Speaker 2>Seeing Jackson Coven and Miles Russell, who who qualified out

1:10:04.439 --> 1:10:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of out of Florida, who's still in high school, I

1:10:08.200 --> 1:10:10.280
<v Speaker 2>think these are two the you know, I think we've

1:10:10.280 --> 1:10:13.400
<v Speaker 2>been void of we have been void of a great

1:10:13.520 --> 1:10:17.519
<v Speaker 2>young American star in a while. Uh, and these two

1:10:17.880 --> 1:10:22.000
<v Speaker 2>are our people that I think have the you know,

1:10:22.160 --> 1:10:28.040
<v Speaker 2>the the personalities, the games to potentially fill that. Obviously,

1:10:28.120 --> 1:10:33.160
<v Speaker 2>Coyven's been a absolute dominant force in college. He's won

1:10:33.240 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 2>the SEC Championship three years in a row. Number one

1:10:36.280 --> 1:10:40.240
<v Speaker 2>ranked amateur. He basically earned his card through the PGA

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:44.519
<v Speaker 2>Tour You Points system a year ago. He is, he is,

1:10:44.880 --> 1:10:47.960
<v Speaker 2>He's done basically everything at the amateur level. He has

1:10:47.960 --> 1:10:50.680
<v Speaker 2>won the USAM he has won Nancy A Championship, but

1:10:51.200 --> 1:10:54.479
<v Speaker 2>he has been a a absolute force on the amateur

1:10:54.520 --> 1:10:59.040
<v Speaker 2>circuit and I'm I'm fascinated to see him begin to

1:10:59.439 --> 1:11:02.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of take the next step to the highest threshold

1:11:02.439 --> 1:11:07.720
<v Speaker 2>of pro golf. And I'm fascinated to watch. I think

1:11:07.760 --> 1:11:10.280
<v Speaker 2>that is a kind of a fun thing to follow

1:11:10.920 --> 1:11:13.439
<v Speaker 2>early next week and we'll see where he gets to.

1:11:14.280 --> 1:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I think two things have happened and are

1:11:17.000 --> 1:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>true right now. These young players are getting better, faster,

1:11:21.640 --> 1:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and getting at a higher level than they've ever gotten.

1:11:25.120 --> 1:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But there's so many of them that it's harder to separate. Yeah,

1:11:29.200 --> 1:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and we don't know who's going to emerge out of this.

1:11:31.120 --> 1:11:34.639
<v Speaker 1>Miles Russell looks like he's just a prodigy, incredible talent,

1:11:35.280 --> 1:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>just you know, looks like he's Togan hitting the ball.

1:11:38.400 --> 1:11:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Every swing looks the same. I don't know, I'm amazed

1:11:42.560 --> 1:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>at how proficient these guys are young. But the irony

1:11:45.920 --> 1:11:50.439
<v Speaker 1>isn't It doesn't predict stardom necessarily because there's so many

1:11:50.439 --> 1:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>guys to beat and there's so many other elements to

1:11:52.320 --> 1:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>be in a good touring professional. I mean, do you

1:11:54.960 --> 1:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like the life? Can you handle the disappointment? You know,

1:11:59.120 --> 1:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>all the all the things between the ears that happened

1:12:03.000 --> 1:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>that we can't see, the invisible things. But as far

1:12:05.640 --> 1:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>as the visible things, wow, they're just also good.

1:12:11.400 --> 1:12:11.560
<v Speaker 2>You know.

1:12:11.680 --> 1:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Brings me back to equipment and things. Not the blame

1:12:13.800 --> 1:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>equipment for how good they are, but it's like you

1:12:16.240 --> 1:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>see these kids who have been hitting the ball and

1:12:18.360 --> 1:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>on a track man since they were nine years old,

1:12:20.160 --> 1:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and they perfected it almost and it's like, man, the

1:12:22.880 --> 1:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>game is almost too easy for these guys, and golf

1:12:26.200 --> 1:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>will never be too easy, but they just give that

1:12:28.080 --> 1:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>illusion of it. But then all the other intangibles come

1:12:32.160 --> 1:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>in and you don't know who's going to emerge. I mean, Tiger,

1:12:34.920 --> 1:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I watched Charlie Woods swing and I and

1:12:36.920 --> 1:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I and I thought, God, he's actually his swing. Not

1:12:40.400 --> 1:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>that I came the best judged necessarily at all, but

1:12:44.080 --> 1:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of better than Tiger's was looking, at least

1:12:47.000 --> 1:12:50.519
<v Speaker 1>when he was fourteen. But Tiger had something else and

1:12:50.600 --> 1:12:52.519
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know how you even define it to

1:12:52.560 --> 1:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>this day, but it was an intensity and it was

1:12:55.120 --> 1:12:59.519
<v Speaker 1>a focus that was on other you know, off the charts.

1:12:59.560 --> 1:13:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So who's going to have that and whether it's you know, Covid,

1:13:04.240 --> 1:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I haven't watched him play. You're a good student of

1:13:06.320 --> 1:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>these young guys, and I should watch more college golf

1:13:08.680 --> 1:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>because really you're you're watching an incredible level. But again,

1:13:13.240 --> 1:13:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's sort I sort of feel like, let's wait and

1:13:14.920 --> 1:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>see because it's just too early. But yeah, maybe somebody

1:13:18.439 --> 1:13:21.599
<v Speaker 1>emerges and listen. I honestly think one of these young

1:13:21.640 --> 1:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>guys could like win a tournament, like we've seen that before,

1:13:25.439 --> 1:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>amateurs winning tournaments. Fill One one when I think he

1:13:28.200 --> 1:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>was twenty, and Scott Ford Plank and others have won.

1:13:32.280 --> 1:13:34.639
<v Speaker 1>But there's it seems like there's four or five who

1:13:34.680 --> 1:13:36.920
<v Speaker 1>could actually get into the arena and not be odd

1:13:36.960 --> 1:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>by it because they've been playing competitive golf so long

1:13:39.120 --> 1:13:41.639
<v Speaker 1>and such a high level and probably play at home

1:13:41.960 --> 1:13:44.519
<v Speaker 1>at some of these clubs that have a million tour

1:13:44.560 --> 1:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>pros around. I mean, I think one of Scotty's great, you know,

1:13:47.600 --> 1:13:51.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of developmental advantages was he was around a bunch

1:13:51.720 --> 1:13:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of pros when he was like seven years old at

1:13:53.400 --> 1:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Royal Oaks and just picking up stuff that you wouldn't

1:13:56.320 --> 1:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>normally pick up until you got on the tour in

1:13:58.400 --> 1:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the old days. And and they're so precocious, but again,

1:14:03.920 --> 1:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. There's still a mystery to what it

1:14:06.360 --> 1:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>really takes to be great, and things have to break

1:14:09.040 --> 1:14:12.639
<v Speaker 1>right sometimes and the prodigies sometimes come through and sometimes

1:14:12.720 --> 1:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>they disappear completely. So but I think the odds are

1:14:16.760 --> 1:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see younger and younger winners going forward here

1:14:19.920 --> 1:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>because they're just better at a younger age.

1:14:22.560 --> 1:14:25.519
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's I feel like we've had a run of

1:14:26.160 --> 1:14:28.800
<v Speaker 2>players where it's like, oh, like they play, they come

1:14:28.880 --> 1:14:31.240
<v Speaker 2>up and they play really well, but then they they

1:14:31.280 --> 1:14:33.639
<v Speaker 2>actually make the leap to the full time tour pro

1:14:34.160 --> 1:14:36.559
<v Speaker 2>and they regressed in a way like we saw this

1:14:36.600 --> 1:14:40.280
<v Speaker 2>with Luke Clanton. You obviously have like everybody's kind of

1:14:40.280 --> 1:14:43.599
<v Speaker 2>waiting for Michael Thorpe Jornsen to have to kind of

1:14:44.040 --> 1:14:47.360
<v Speaker 2>get out and win everybody after the year Johnny Keefer

1:14:47.400 --> 1:14:49.840
<v Speaker 2>had on the Court Ferry tour was Johnny, you got

1:14:49.840 --> 1:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>to watch out for this guy, Johnny Keefer. And the

1:14:52.880 --> 1:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>reality is are is it's it's hard. There are so

1:14:55.960 --> 1:14:59.719
<v Speaker 2>many good players. It is hard to separate. And that's why,

1:14:59.800 --> 1:15:02.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, like, what's one of the things that's been

1:15:03.000 --> 1:15:07.439
<v Speaker 2>a I think like a revelatory And you know, you

1:15:07.520 --> 1:15:10.439
<v Speaker 2>go back to the twenty twenty one you Ryder Cup

1:15:10.439 --> 1:15:12.320
<v Speaker 2>at Whistling straight. Do you think the US is going

1:15:12.360 --> 1:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>to dominate forever? Look at all this young talent in

1:15:15.200 --> 1:15:18.080
<v Speaker 2>a way that Europeans have more young talent.

1:15:18.600 --> 1:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, maybe their developmental period, their their developmental

1:15:23.120 --> 1:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>programs is is more healthy and better in some ways,

1:15:26.960 --> 1:15:29.599
<v Speaker 1>it's not quite as intensive. They're not on the AJJ

1:15:29.840 --> 1:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>tour as much in the same way, but they eventually

1:15:33.040 --> 1:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>all come to America and that's the place where you

1:15:36.120 --> 1:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>really prove it. So, you know, I was going to

1:15:40.439 --> 1:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>say something about some of the young guys. Oh, you know,

1:15:44.360 --> 1:15:48.559
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if the unorthodox guy, I mean Michael, I'm

1:15:48.600 --> 1:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>going to pronounce his name wrong, or Thorpe Jordtson. I mean, man,

1:15:54.760 --> 1:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>he's impressive looking. And then I look at Scott gotter Up,

1:15:58.080 --> 1:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris Gottrup, Excuse me, I mean, I mean he you know,

1:16:01.800 --> 1:16:04.559
<v Speaker 1>he's an athlete number one. But that is an unorthodox swing.

1:16:04.960 --> 1:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a really personal golf swing with a lot of

1:16:07.400 --> 1:16:10.479
<v Speaker 1>actually different kind of shots that he hits too. He

1:16:10.840 --> 1:16:12.519
<v Speaker 1>can do all kinds of things with the golf ball,

1:16:12.720 --> 1:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and part of it is because he's not really programmed

1:16:15.360 --> 1:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>technically in this perfect way. And so sometimes you wonder, man,

1:16:20.520 --> 1:16:25.519
<v Speaker 1>maybe something's lost when everybody looks so uniform, and in

1:16:25.560 --> 1:16:28.479
<v Speaker 1>Europe you see a little bit more variation. I think.

1:16:29.320 --> 1:16:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Although they're in golf camps just like Americans are and

1:16:33.760 --> 1:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the national teams and everything, they're teaching a lot of

1:16:35.920 --> 1:16:39.439
<v Speaker 1>uniform things, but individuality is something that sometimes is the

1:16:39.479 --> 1:16:42.519
<v Speaker 1>thing that ends up being the separator. Are you true

1:16:42.520 --> 1:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to yourself? Are you not trying to be something else

1:16:45.880 --> 1:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>but just what you are and only know yourself so

1:16:48.840 --> 1:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>well that you know yourself better than the guys who

1:16:51.800 --> 1:16:54.639
<v Speaker 1>have actually tried to fit into a mold, so to speak.

1:16:54.880 --> 1:16:58.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's a very general statement. I think Abubba Watson,

1:16:58.840 --> 1:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like the most talented player I ever saw in some

1:17:00.840 --> 1:17:05.599
<v Speaker 1>ways didn't have it. Uh, in the intangibles didn't have it.

1:17:06.400 --> 1:17:09.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean you think about like the mental makeup of

1:17:09.520 --> 1:17:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Bubba would not be what.

1:17:11.240 --> 1:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>You never and it never would be. It never would

1:17:14.439 --> 1:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what you said.

1:17:15.280 --> 1:17:18.800
<v Speaker 2>The physical attributes. I mean it's still you know, this

1:17:18.920 --> 1:17:21.920
<v Speaker 2>is is he's I think he's forty eight now.

1:17:22.320 --> 1:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>He could still do it if he wanted, if he

1:17:24.240 --> 1:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>had it the head for it, he could still do it.

1:17:26.360 --> 1:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>He's that talented. But you know, it's there's it just

1:17:28.960 --> 1:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>teaches us. There's a lot more than that. There's a

1:17:30.840 --> 1:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>lot more than not just talent, but just physical you know,

1:17:33.800 --> 1:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>creativity and all those things that we talk about. You

1:17:36.479 --> 1:17:38.680
<v Speaker 1>still got to have it between the ears when you're

1:17:38.680 --> 1:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>walking from one shot to the next shot, and god,

1:17:41.320 --> 1:17:43.880
<v Speaker 1>that is no one's figured it out completely. You know,

1:17:43.920 --> 1:17:48.479
<v Speaker 1>you got you know, uh, sports psychologists are taking more

1:17:48.479 --> 1:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>of a prominent role again with Gosha here. Now, I've

1:17:55.479 --> 1:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>been talking too long in my minds.

1:17:57.800 --> 1:18:01.559
<v Speaker 2>U Julie, Julia, and.

1:18:01.080 --> 1:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to think of the players. She's you know,

1:18:02.800 --> 1:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we know Wyndham Clark. Wyndam Clark's amazing physical talent, amazing

1:18:07.040 --> 1:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>physical so strong, so graceful, athletic as hell, and yet

1:18:11.360 --> 1:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you know he's had to battle his his internal life,

1:18:14.160 --> 1:18:18.599
<v Speaker 1>his internal game. And as that improves, I still feel

1:18:18.600 --> 1:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like that's the next frontier, that's where everybody will really

1:18:22.080 --> 1:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>start to optimize, because that's still there's more unknowns about

1:18:26.080 --> 1:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that than anything else.

1:18:27.920 --> 1:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. I wrote down a bunch of names here. Obviously

1:18:33.080 --> 1:18:37.840
<v Speaker 2>this is always a major discourse item best players without

1:18:37.840 --> 1:18:40.360
<v Speaker 2>a major, and I feel like we've we've stacked up

1:18:40.560 --> 1:18:43.920
<v Speaker 2>that nobody I don't think on this list stands out

1:18:43.960 --> 1:18:47.840
<v Speaker 2>as like wow, like look at this. You know, there's

1:18:47.880 --> 1:18:51.479
<v Speaker 2>no Lee Westward, there's no Phil Mickelson at you know,

1:18:51.560 --> 1:18:54.400
<v Speaker 2>age thirty two on this list, but it's you know,

1:18:54.400 --> 1:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>you got Russell, Henley, cam Young, Tommy Fleetwood, Chris got

1:18:57.880 --> 1:19:01.000
<v Speaker 2>her up, Ludwig are the names kind of wrote down

1:19:01.360 --> 1:19:04.719
<v Speaker 2>as like right now, the best players without without a major?

1:19:05.960 --> 1:19:10.599
<v Speaker 2>Who of those would you be most most interested in

1:19:10.800 --> 1:19:13.280
<v Speaker 2>this week? Potentially breaking through this week?

1:19:13.640 --> 1:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, Victor Hoblin's another name.

1:19:15.720 --> 1:19:18.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I had I had him on PJ. PJ was

1:19:18.360 --> 1:19:20.559
<v Speaker 2>shaming me with Victor Holin, which well, you.

1:19:20.560 --> 1:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Know Victor, Victor, he's an explorer, you know, and he's

1:19:23.720 --> 1:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>taken a couple of wrong turns, but I still have

1:19:26.880 --> 1:19:31.559
<v Speaker 1>faith he he'll no, no, no, I I didn't mean.

1:19:31.640 --> 1:19:34.280
<v Speaker 1>I just thought of him because you know, his his

1:19:34.360 --> 1:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>great golf has been tremendous. You know, Oberg is kind

1:19:37.720 --> 1:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the most intriguing because it just looks so natural

1:19:40.960 --> 1:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and easy for him, and he's so gifted physically, his size,

1:19:45.280 --> 1:19:48.719
<v Speaker 1>his effortlessness. You know, it looks like he's good at everything.

1:19:48.720 --> 1:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>It turns out statistically he's not the greatest around and

1:19:51.320 --> 1:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on the greens, but those things can be improved. Uh,

1:19:55.960 --> 1:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think he'll have a breakout. I think

1:19:57.920 --> 1:20:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Players was a scarring moment and that you know,

1:20:01.640 --> 1:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>it may be lingering, who knows, but in the end

1:20:03.520 --> 1:20:06.599
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a good lesson that he'll I think,

1:20:07.040 --> 1:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>grow from. But you know, you hate to see the

1:20:09.080 --> 1:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>delay from it, but that's golf. Nobody gets out unscarred.

1:20:14.000 --> 1:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I think size and power is still the advantage we

1:20:18.280 --> 1:20:20.759
<v Speaker 1>used to talk about. You know, hey, the optimal size

1:20:20.760 --> 1:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>for a golfer should be like five ten, you know,

1:20:23.240 --> 1:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>one sixty one seventy because once you get really long limbs,

1:20:26.479 --> 1:20:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you got all these angles and all these variables and

1:20:28.640 --> 1:20:32.559
<v Speaker 1>it's harder to repeat, you know. I think that that's

1:20:32.640 --> 1:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>been debunks probably. And also we're seeing really tall guys

1:20:38.120 --> 1:20:40.759
<v Speaker 1>be great putters, and that was true all through history.

1:20:40.800 --> 1:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Actually a few guys, who knows why, So I think.

1:20:45.000 --> 1:20:47.960
<v Speaker 2>It's about how they see the line maybe, yeah, or just.

1:20:47.920 --> 1:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>The pendulum action of standing that tall who knows, I

1:20:50.920 --> 1:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know. George Archer was maybe the greatest, and a

1:20:54.479 --> 1:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>few other guys who were that. Tom Siekman was a

1:20:57.240 --> 1:20:59.519
<v Speaker 1>great putter and the best part of his game. He's

1:20:59.560 --> 1:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>a big guy, six five sixty six. Anyway, Uh, I

1:21:04.479 --> 1:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>just think that now, I see I lost my train again. Sorry.

1:21:10.200 --> 1:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Well with Ludwig, yeah, yeah, no, I think is to

1:21:15.320 --> 1:21:19.360
<v Speaker 1>me he's shown the most the most potential and h

1:21:19.400 --> 1:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he's been through a couple of wars now, so maybe

1:21:21.200 --> 1:21:23.400
<v Speaker 1>next time he gets in one he'll be more ready

1:21:23.400 --> 1:21:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for it. So I guess I pick him.

1:21:25.360 --> 1:21:27.840
<v Speaker 2>That's I. You know, I think there's a you know,

1:21:27.880 --> 1:21:32.040
<v Speaker 2>an online discourses, as we learn with the with the

1:21:32.200 --> 1:21:37.879
<v Speaker 2>NBA Playoffs is just a treacherous place where where players

1:21:37.880 --> 1:21:40.640
<v Speaker 2>could go from the love to to hate it in

1:21:40.840 --> 1:21:43.400
<v Speaker 2>three days. With the with the New York fans going

1:21:43.439 --> 1:21:49.080
<v Speaker 2>at him. But the but the I would say, the

1:21:49.080 --> 1:21:52.960
<v Speaker 2>the thing about Ludwig, which I am. You know, people

1:21:53.640 --> 1:21:57.240
<v Speaker 2>are now like, oh, he can't get it done, you know,

1:21:57.439 --> 1:22:01.400
<v Speaker 2>and it's you know, what the game is to get

1:22:01.439 --> 1:22:05.080
<v Speaker 2>yourself in the mix so you can get it done

1:22:05.240 --> 1:22:09.240
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday. And I think like, of this list, why

1:22:09.560 --> 1:22:14.240
<v Speaker 2>you buy Ludwig, I would say cam Young, I would put.

1:22:15.160 --> 1:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Absolute, he showed so much. Yeah, you know that Sunday thing.

1:22:19.560 --> 1:22:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It's still the greatest challenge in the game, you know,

1:22:22.439 --> 1:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it is to close it out. That's such a hard

1:22:25.160 --> 1:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>thing now.

1:22:25.920 --> 1:22:28.640
<v Speaker 2>I used to think it was you can't close it

1:22:28.640 --> 1:22:29.559
<v Speaker 2>out if you're not there.

1:22:29.760 --> 1:22:31.519
<v Speaker 1>Well, no, true, but a lot of guys get there

1:22:31.560 --> 1:22:35.439
<v Speaker 1>in fade, you know, kind of repeatedly and makes you

1:22:35.479 --> 1:22:38.519
<v Speaker 1>think sometimes it's innate, and maybe to some extent it is.

1:22:38.800 --> 1:22:40.519
<v Speaker 1>But I also think it can be a learned behavior

1:22:40.560 --> 1:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to handle it. And you know, Watson was a guy

1:22:44.000 --> 1:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>who you know, threw a couple away pretty pretty traumatically,

1:22:47.920 --> 1:22:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Tom Watson and then became an incredible closer. Even Jack

1:22:52.040 --> 1:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>threw a couple away early, you know, So can you

1:22:55.800 --> 1:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>learn from it? I guess that's that's the separator. Can

1:22:59.200 --> 1:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I think you have to.

1:23:00.960 --> 1:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>It gets easier every time, even if you go through

1:23:03.800 --> 1:23:04.200
<v Speaker 2>the pain.

1:23:04.720 --> 1:23:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, it can get harder too, if you do it

1:23:06.680 --> 1:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>too much. You know, it's a delicate balance. It's a

1:23:10.400 --> 1:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>tight rope. There's a lot at stake when a guy

1:23:13.040 --> 1:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>gets into contention. I think that's one reason unconsciously he's

1:23:15.840 --> 1:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>talking sports psychologists about this. Some guys don't want to

1:23:19.000 --> 1:23:23.360
<v Speaker 1>be number one. It's too much to always have your

1:23:23.439 --> 1:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>game being judged and on the brink of a really

1:23:27.080 --> 1:23:30.519
<v Speaker 1>disappointing result. It hurts more when you're on top, and

1:23:30.560 --> 1:23:32.559
<v Speaker 1>it hurts when you're in the middle of the pack

1:23:33.040 --> 1:23:36.559
<v Speaker 1>living a decent, you know, kind of consistent life as

1:23:36.640 --> 1:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>long as you're not losing your card in that sort

1:23:38.240 --> 1:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of thing. And some guys settle into that. I don't

1:23:40.760 --> 1:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>know if that's going to happen more, and if that

1:23:42.160 --> 1:23:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a real thing, But it was theorizable a

1:23:44.360 --> 1:23:48.240
<v Speaker 1>lot it used to be. And I think it's easier

1:23:48.280 --> 1:23:50.759
<v Speaker 1>now to make a great living without being a big winner.

1:23:51.479 --> 1:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you might see guys pulling back from that

1:23:54.600 --> 1:23:57.839
<v Speaker 1>cauldron because it is a painful one. I mean, Rory've

1:23:57.880 --> 1:24:00.400
<v Speaker 1>been through hell, and I think that's why he pulled

1:24:00.400 --> 1:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>for him so hard to get out of it because

1:24:02.680 --> 1:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you knew, man, he's overcoming a lot now, and it

1:24:06.160 --> 1:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>was really pretty heroic to win that first Masters. Really was.

1:24:10.040 --> 1:24:12.559
<v Speaker 1>He had every reason to be you know, kind of

1:24:12.960 --> 1:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>permanently disabled, and he wasn't.

1:24:16.000 --> 1:24:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, it's I mean, the burden. It's one of

1:24:20.160 --> 1:24:22.960
<v Speaker 2>the best parts about a major. You know, you have

1:24:23.080 --> 1:24:27.000
<v Speaker 2>this week, you have weeks of speculation and talking like

1:24:27.080 --> 1:24:29.920
<v Speaker 2>this podcast about who might get it done. Then you

1:24:29.960 --> 1:24:33.040
<v Speaker 2>have the days setting up, and then it gets to Sunday,

1:24:33.240 --> 1:24:36.200
<v Speaker 2>and it gets to that point on Sunday where players

1:24:36.280 --> 1:24:38.439
<v Speaker 2>go or they fade. I think it's one of the

1:24:38.439 --> 1:24:41.679
<v Speaker 2>things that resonated with me the most about Aaron Rye

1:24:42.080 --> 1:24:44.000
<v Speaker 2>was you had this, he did not a lot of

1:24:45.360 --> 1:24:49.360
<v Speaker 2>spectacular players on the leader board, and Aaron Raie goes

1:24:49.400 --> 1:24:52.840
<v Speaker 2>and he just beats the crap out of everybody.

1:24:52.400 --> 1:24:54.519
<v Speaker 1>And takes it. You know, he just shot coming in

1:24:54.600 --> 1:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>did not.

1:24:54.960 --> 1:24:57.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he just took the major. He just took it

1:24:57.760 --> 1:25:00.479
<v Speaker 2>in like no matter what, like people are going to

1:25:00.560 --> 1:25:02.639
<v Speaker 2>go back in time and like, I don't expect this

1:25:02.680 --> 1:25:05.559
<v Speaker 2>to be a flurry of Aaron Rye wins in there,

1:25:05.600 --> 1:25:07.719
<v Speaker 2>and you know, twenty years from now, with the context

1:25:07.840 --> 1:25:10.400
<v Speaker 2>ripped away, people will be like Aaron Rye one won

1:25:10.479 --> 1:25:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the PGA. Aaron Raie took that championship away from the

1:25:15.439 --> 1:25:16.759
<v Speaker 2>best players in the world.

1:25:16.920 --> 1:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>He did the thing that everybody dreams of doing at

1:25:19.920 --> 1:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>the biggest moment. He played his best golf. I mean

1:25:22.720 --> 1:25:27.559
<v Speaker 1>literally his best golf. That is so rare for anybody.

1:25:27.720 --> 1:25:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's going to have that forever, and you know,

1:25:31.600 --> 1:25:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he might get studied. He's maybe a model because I

1:25:34.200 --> 1:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>know how meticulous he is, and you know, and also

1:25:37.320 --> 1:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the humility he carries himself with. All those things are

1:25:40.080 --> 1:25:41.759
<v Speaker 1>things that are going to go. Hey, there's a lesson

1:25:41.800 --> 1:25:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with that guy. That was not an accident. He did

1:25:44.080 --> 1:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it and he's paid his dues and when the moment came,

1:25:47.040 --> 1:25:49.559
<v Speaker 1>he was ready. Why let's find out why.

1:25:52.160 --> 1:25:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean I think that you make a lot

1:25:54.840 --> 1:25:58.400
<v Speaker 2>of money if you can figure out why. I think

1:25:58.400 --> 1:26:01.400
<v Speaker 2>you can make a lot of money across Yeah, recreation,

1:26:01.960 --> 1:26:04.200
<v Speaker 2>you're thinking about making you're thinking about making money.

1:26:04.280 --> 1:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>You're not going about it the right way. That's the thing.

1:26:06.800 --> 1:26:08.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, you got to have your mind in the

1:26:08.080 --> 1:26:10.559
<v Speaker 1>right Are you playing for the right reasons? You know,

1:26:10.720 --> 1:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that's that's another sports psychologist question, what are the why

1:26:14.479 --> 1:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>do you? Why do you play? And if it's for

1:26:16.800 --> 1:26:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the money, you're probably not going to be as great

1:26:18.800 --> 1:26:19.439
<v Speaker 1>as you could have been.

1:26:20.479 --> 1:26:23.479
<v Speaker 2>We're going to close this out with a with with

1:26:23.600 --> 1:26:28.720
<v Speaker 2>a topic that could be this whole old podcast. You know,

1:26:28.960 --> 1:26:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I think there the USGA obviously is pushing the roll back,

1:26:34.720 --> 1:26:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the RNA obviously very behind it, the idea of you know,

1:26:39.080 --> 1:26:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't call it a rollback, We're just honestly trying

1:26:41.920 --> 1:26:46.000
<v Speaker 2>to set stand still, stand still. I think there was

1:26:46.040 --> 1:26:50.479
<v Speaker 2>a terrible snag that was hit recently when it came

1:26:50.520 --> 1:26:52.760
<v Speaker 2>out that Cameron Young, who hit a three hundred and

1:26:52.760 --> 1:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>eighty yard you know, t shot on the eighteenth hole

1:26:57.360 --> 1:27:01.040
<v Speaker 2>at the Players this year, it came out that Cameron

1:27:01.080 --> 1:27:04.320
<v Speaker 2>Young's ball is conforming under the rollback, and I think

1:27:04.320 --> 1:27:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it hit a little bit of a snag and I'm

1:27:07.280 --> 1:27:09.800
<v Speaker 2>very you know, I think this is something that you

1:27:10.520 --> 1:27:13.880
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk about as well. It could be just

1:27:14.000 --> 1:27:19.559
<v Speaker 2>a fascinating week in terms of like what is the

1:27:19.640 --> 1:27:21.519
<v Speaker 2>USGA going to say about rollback?

1:27:22.960 --> 1:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think unfortunately the process has been corrupted, not

1:27:28.880 --> 1:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in an unlawful way, but for what was intended, which was,

1:27:33.600 --> 1:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>let's bring everybody in, let's have a consensus about what

1:27:36.040 --> 1:27:39.480
<v Speaker 1>we should do. Let's make sure every quote unquote stakeholder

1:27:39.520 --> 1:27:41.919
<v Speaker 1>gets a voice, and so then when there's a decision,

1:27:42.200 --> 1:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>there will be consensus, there will be an agreement that

1:27:45.560 --> 1:27:47.760
<v Speaker 1>we all got a fair shot and this was the

1:27:47.760 --> 1:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>best decision. And instead what you have is more more fragmentation.

1:27:53.240 --> 1:27:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And to me, the key moment was when the USGA

1:27:57.920 --> 1:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>got off their original proposal of bifer king of two

1:28:01.439 --> 1:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>sets of rules basically and uh, you know, the model

1:28:05.400 --> 1:28:09.719
<v Speaker 1>local rule being enforced at the elite events, and gave

1:28:09.800 --> 1:28:12.479
<v Speaker 1>in to the idea that we can never get off,

1:28:12.880 --> 1:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, the unified rule and everybody playing by the

1:28:15.800 --> 1:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>same equipment rules and everything the same. And that allowed

1:28:21.040 --> 1:28:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the opponents of a rollback to basically mitigate what the

1:28:25.920 --> 1:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>USGA couldn't could ask because you once you start taking

1:28:30.240 --> 1:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>distance away from the recreational player, you're you're you know,

1:28:33.680 --> 1:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>you're stepping on the third rail. That's poison. You can't

1:28:36.720 --> 1:28:39.920
<v Speaker 1>do that, and they're doing it now in very small increments,

1:28:39.960 --> 1:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's still all these pushback because everybody wants to

1:28:42.760 --> 1:28:45.800
<v Speaker 1>get longer. But I would just say the threshold has

1:28:45.800 --> 1:28:48.799
<v Speaker 1>been met at the elite level. Getting longer is becoming

1:28:48.840 --> 1:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>now counterproductive. And you can judge any way you want.

1:28:53.000 --> 1:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>The game will survive. This is a matter of taste.

1:28:55.160 --> 1:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>What kind of game do you want to see? I

1:28:56.840 --> 1:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>want to see the skill game. I want to see

1:28:58.760 --> 1:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the game where everybody hits all kind of shots with

1:29:00.680 --> 1:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>different clubs.

1:29:02.040 --> 1:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

1:29:02.320 --> 1:29:05.559
<v Speaker 1>That game is leaving us because the shots coming into

1:29:05.560 --> 1:29:08.479
<v Speaker 1>the greens are so short now in general, and the

1:29:08.479 --> 1:29:11.599
<v Speaker 1>clubs being hit are lofted. And that doesn't mean it's

1:29:11.640 --> 1:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a bad game. It just means that there's a part

1:29:13.880 --> 1:29:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of the game that we're not seeing that actually was

1:29:15.720 --> 1:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the most challenging part of the game. And I'm not

1:29:18.240 --> 1:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>on a soapbox now, so I don't mean to be.

1:29:19.840 --> 1:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say that, you know, I would

1:29:23.320 --> 1:29:25.320
<v Speaker 1>say that if the USGA could, and I don't know

1:29:25.360 --> 1:29:27.360
<v Speaker 1>if they can, because what we don't know at this

1:29:27.479 --> 1:29:30.559
<v Speaker 1>moment who's going to follow it anyway. The tour has

1:29:30.600 --> 1:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>not bought in yet, the pH of America has not

1:29:32.240 --> 1:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>bought in yet. The manufacturer certainly have not bought in yet.

1:29:36.360 --> 1:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we got we got a major gridlock here,

1:29:39.080 --> 1:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and there is the reality that there is nothing legally

1:29:43.200 --> 1:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>compelling anyone from following what the USGA and the RNA decide.

1:29:46.760 --> 1:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>That's always been, you know, this just kind of gentlemen's

1:29:50.120 --> 1:29:53.639
<v Speaker 1>agreement that, you know, we should follow those guys because

1:29:54.000 --> 1:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>they know best. And now people are saying, no, they

1:29:56.400 --> 1:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know best, and we're not. We think it's unfair

1:29:59.240 --> 1:30:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and we don't want to Well, they're threatening to say

1:30:01.400 --> 1:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we are not going to follow it. If that happens,

1:30:03.320 --> 1:30:05.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens to the game. As far as you know,

1:30:05.720 --> 1:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>there's anarchy, there's there's chaos. So I think there's a

1:30:08.720 --> 1:30:11.599
<v Speaker 1>lot riding on all this, and I think cooler heads

1:30:11.640 --> 1:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>will prevail, wiser heads will prevail eventually. But it's been

1:30:14.800 --> 1:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>a very long and unnecessary detour. I just wish if

1:30:20.000 --> 1:30:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the USJA could be a little autocratic and go, we

1:30:22.320 --> 1:30:24.439
<v Speaker 1>decree this, this is what it's going to be. Like

1:30:24.479 --> 1:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the NFL would do, like the NBA would do, like

1:30:26.360 --> 1:30:29.599
<v Speaker 1>the MLB would do, Like every major sport does they

1:30:29.600 --> 1:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>set their own rules and the players follow them. Golf,

1:30:33.479 --> 1:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>because of all kinds of variables, does not do that.

1:30:36.160 --> 1:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's been to the detriment. We've reached

1:30:38.160 --> 1:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a point where it's now become to a head and

1:30:41.240 --> 1:30:43.479
<v Speaker 1>we you know, are at a crossroads. And I hope,

1:30:43.960 --> 1:30:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope something at this open gets clarified a little bit,

1:30:48.640 --> 1:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>because I think right now it's very murky what's going forward.

1:30:52.640 --> 1:30:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, it's I you know, I think it's obviously

1:30:56.880 --> 1:31:00.120
<v Speaker 2>so easy to go play you know, Monday more and

1:31:00.160 --> 1:31:04.120
<v Speaker 2>in quarterback. But if you look at the decision making,

1:31:04.840 --> 1:31:08.800
<v Speaker 2>and this was always you know, by not putting a

1:31:08.880 --> 1:31:12.599
<v Speaker 2>firm line and an aggressive line in the sand, you

1:31:12.680 --> 1:31:16.320
<v Speaker 2>remove all your negotiation power which was bound to happen.

1:31:17.200 --> 1:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And is any really quick. It turns out that behind

1:31:20.120 --> 1:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the scenes they understand now the USJA and the r

1:31:23.120 --> 1:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>any kind of understand we don't have as much leverage

1:31:26.360 --> 1:31:27.439
<v Speaker 1>as people thought we had.

1:31:28.320 --> 1:31:31.519
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think there is leverage, though the masters

1:31:31.520 --> 1:31:32.840
<v Speaker 2>are behind them. It used to.

1:31:32.840 --> 1:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Be basically I hate the USA, but I gotta do

1:31:35.280 --> 1:31:37.519
<v Speaker 1>what they say. You know, even guys who were opponents

1:31:37.520 --> 1:31:39.679
<v Speaker 1>of it, now it's like, hey, I don't like the USA,

1:31:39.800 --> 1:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do it. Wow, you know that's

1:31:42.880 --> 1:31:43.439
<v Speaker 1>a big lead.

1:31:44.479 --> 1:31:48.600
<v Speaker 2>It's uh so, you know, this is this is anecdotal,

1:31:48.640 --> 1:31:51.320
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, it's wild, it's you know, I played.

1:31:51.439 --> 1:31:55.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm on a recreational golf journey here where I'm I'm

1:31:55.400 --> 1:31:57.720
<v Speaker 2>at banded dudes playing thirty six sols a day with

1:31:57.800 --> 1:32:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Hickory Clubs. Oh cool, Now abandon from the regular teas.

1:32:03.920 --> 1:32:09.080
<v Speaker 2>I can overwhelm bandon with abandoned dude's courses with power where.

1:32:09.000 --> 1:32:11.719
<v Speaker 1>You can overwhelm them. Wow, I'll.

1:32:13.920 --> 1:32:16.719
<v Speaker 2>I'll hit regis in all day long from the regular piece.

1:32:16.800 --> 1:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's the modern game. You're just playing the modern game.

1:32:19.320 --> 1:32:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, I'm playing Hickory Clubs coming down the stretch. And

1:32:23.720 --> 1:32:26.519
<v Speaker 2>I was playing a match yesterday afternoon, coming down the stretch.

1:32:27.080 --> 1:32:31.880
<v Speaker 2>I had a par five. I hit a five iron

1:32:32.000 --> 1:32:34.320
<v Speaker 2>into the green for my third shot. It was into

1:32:34.320 --> 1:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>the wind. I was abandoned traills on the seventeenth, Oh,

1:32:37.880 --> 1:32:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I had a three iron. On eighteen, I hit a

1:32:39.960 --> 1:32:45.040
<v Speaker 2>three iron into the green. Like that is different. It's

1:32:45.160 --> 1:32:51.080
<v Speaker 2>just insane to me that people. The best thing in

1:32:51.120 --> 1:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>sports is a wide range of outcomes, like anything could happen.

1:32:56.360 --> 1:33:01.439
<v Speaker 2>That is what is exciting about sports is the range

1:33:01.439 --> 1:33:07.320
<v Speaker 2>of outcomes. The shorter the club in, the less outcomes

1:33:07.560 --> 1:33:09.160
<v Speaker 2>are are feasible.

1:33:09.479 --> 1:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess, or at least the process. The process is

1:33:12.800 --> 1:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>less variable, there's no question you can still have incredibly incredible,

1:33:16.600 --> 1:33:19.719
<v Speaker 1>incredible finishing. Let me just say real quick, the best

1:33:20.080 --> 1:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>advertisement to me for a rollback was Matt Fitzpatrick's four

1:33:25.040 --> 1:33:28.439
<v Speaker 1>iron into eighteen at Hilton Head into the wind and

1:33:28.520 --> 1:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a big hard into a crosswind with a four iron

1:33:32.560 --> 1:33:35.519
<v Speaker 1>that he flushed with a draw against that wind. It

1:33:35.600 --> 1:33:39.519
<v Speaker 1>was a classic golf shot. You don't see that shot

1:33:39.600 --> 1:33:42.519
<v Speaker 1>anymore except on par fives. To see it on a

1:33:42.560 --> 1:33:45.519
<v Speaker 1>par four, to me, brought that tournament alive. It just

1:33:45.720 --> 1:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>raised not just the drama, it raised the admiration for

1:33:49.080 --> 1:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>how good they are, and some of that is being lost.

1:33:52.200 --> 1:33:52.439
<v Speaker 2>I mean.

1:33:52.439 --> 1:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I would say if I if I

1:33:54.439 --> 1:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>was running a campaign for a rollback, I'd run a

1:33:57.880 --> 1:34:00.639
<v Speaker 1>video of that shot and try to, you know, put

1:34:00.640 --> 1:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>people in that moment and what it meant. And you know,

1:34:04.080 --> 1:34:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to lose that in golf. In my opinion.

1:34:06.720 --> 1:34:10.479
<v Speaker 2>You see it with the with this week. You're gonna

1:34:10.479 --> 1:34:14.000
<v Speaker 2>see the paving shot over and over and over again,

1:34:14.200 --> 1:34:19.280
<v Speaker 2>his forward on eighteen and that just does not happen.

1:34:19.720 --> 1:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>But you know, neither one is those who's gonna happen.

1:34:22.400 --> 1:34:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, if there is a rollback. Even if there's

1:34:25.120 --> 1:34:28.439
<v Speaker 1>one that's the best case scenario, we're gonna be talking

1:34:28.439 --> 1:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>about six and seven irons, not four irons and four woods. Yeah,

1:34:33.680 --> 1:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>but that's okay. That that still to me will improve

1:34:38.000 --> 1:34:42.280
<v Speaker 1>the game at the highest level. Only everybody else play

1:34:42.320 --> 1:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>with everything you got kidded, as far as you can

1:34:46.240 --> 1:34:50.559
<v Speaker 1>play not conforming equipment, I'm okay with it. You know, honestly,

1:34:50.600 --> 1:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the game is hard. But when you're that good and

1:34:53.200 --> 1:34:55.519
<v Speaker 1>you want to see the best separate themselves from the

1:34:55.560 --> 1:34:58.639
<v Speaker 1>rest of the best, I think the game needs an adjustment.

1:35:00.040 --> 1:35:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I completely agree. I think I don't think you know,

1:35:04.720 --> 1:35:08.000
<v Speaker 2>the best are still going to be the best. And

1:35:08.000 --> 1:35:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and I think there's like I get, I completely understand

1:35:11.960 --> 1:35:15.559
<v Speaker 2>if I'm a tour player. Why like tour players can't

1:35:15.600 --> 1:35:18.479
<v Speaker 2>you can't go to them. You're you're literally threatening their

1:35:18.600 --> 1:35:22.759
<v Speaker 2>their jobs here, they're alway to change the game. Different

1:35:22.880 --> 1:35:26.840
<v Speaker 2>players might rise. I think the best are always going

1:35:26.880 --> 1:35:27.599
<v Speaker 2>to be the best.

1:35:27.760 --> 1:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Like, look at all these changes that are been andy

1:35:30.120 --> 1:35:33.720
<v Speaker 1>all through, I mean from Hickory to steal from you know,

1:35:33.760 --> 1:35:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the little ball to the big ball, you know, the

1:35:36.920 --> 1:35:39.920
<v Speaker 1>British ball of the one point one point six I

1:35:39.920 --> 1:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>mean that was a huge change, and everybody made it.

1:35:43.080 --> 1:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, Nicholas just talking about going over to play

1:35:45.920 --> 1:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the Open and on Tuesday start playing a little

1:35:50.280 --> 1:35:53.479
<v Speaker 1>ball and you know, after about eight holes he was Okay,

1:35:53.840 --> 1:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I got it. I mean, it's not that big a change.

1:35:57.600 --> 1:36:00.879
<v Speaker 1>These guys act like it's such science. It's never been scienced.

1:36:01.160 --> 1:36:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I know, there's all kinds of you know, everything is

1:36:04.240 --> 1:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for analytics, everything track man, there's all kinds of actual

1:36:08.960 --> 1:36:11.519
<v Speaker 1>science being applied to the game. But hitting a golf

1:36:11.560 --> 1:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ball perfectly every time is not attainable. So there's variables

1:36:16.600 --> 1:36:20.679
<v Speaker 1>and everything. And if the equipment changes, players will adapt.

1:36:20.800 --> 1:36:25.599
<v Speaker 1>They'll adapt imperfectly, like they would adapt, not just adapt,

1:36:25.640 --> 1:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>but as they would continue on imperfectly with what they have.

1:36:28.439 --> 1:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just an imperfect game. So equipment changes should not

1:36:32.040 --> 1:36:35.439
<v Speaker 1>be looked at as you know, apocalyptic, like I just

1:36:35.479 --> 1:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's propaganda.

1:36:38.000 --> 1:36:42.360
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of propaganda out there. But it'll be

1:36:42.840 --> 1:36:46.040
<v Speaker 2>that'll be a Wednesday, I believe, maybe. I think it's

1:36:46.160 --> 1:36:50.880
<v Speaker 2>usually Wednesday when the USGA talks. Hi may last question here,

1:36:51.640 --> 1:36:53.960
<v Speaker 2>who's your winner this week? I know you're having to

1:36:53.960 --> 1:36:57.320
<v Speaker 2>pick early. Who would you be your pick? On Friday,

1:36:57.640 --> 1:36:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the week before the US I'm.

1:36:59.040 --> 1:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Always biased wards, you know, history and the great and

1:37:02.400 --> 1:37:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the great player, and I want to see Scotty win

1:37:04.560 --> 1:37:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the Grand Slam. So I'm gonna I'm gonna pick Scotty

1:37:06.920 --> 1:37:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on the basis of thinking he's right now this moment,

1:37:09.760 --> 1:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>he's getting it together. And I'm not saying he's that

1:37:11.760 --> 1:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>far off. It's a small he's gonna tweak it positively,

1:37:15.400 --> 1:37:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's gonna bring that ultra intensity and and he's

1:37:19.680 --> 1:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>always up there and he's and he's gonna get it

1:37:22.160 --> 1:37:24.559
<v Speaker 1>done on Sunday like he did at the Olympics, like

1:37:24.560 --> 1:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>he did at Port Rush. He's gonna be in that

1:37:26.240 --> 1:37:29.599
<v Speaker 1>zone again. So that's my that's my wish, but it's

1:37:29.640 --> 1:37:30.439
<v Speaker 1>also my prediction.

1:37:31.360 --> 1:37:33.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm uh, I'm gonna go. I'd be remiss to not

1:37:34.000 --> 1:37:36.080
<v Speaker 2>get him. You know, it could be me just trying

1:37:36.080 --> 1:37:39.679
<v Speaker 2>to crowbarrow this name into the podcast, but I'm gonna

1:37:39.720 --> 1:37:43.680
<v Speaker 2>go with uh. You know, maybe I you know, we

1:37:43.800 --> 1:37:48.640
<v Speaker 2>keep he's becoming an ageless wonder, but we keep. You know,

1:37:50.200 --> 1:37:53.640
<v Speaker 2>this could be the last year of really great chances

1:37:53.760 --> 1:37:57.280
<v Speaker 2>of succeeding. I think this sets up very well for him,

1:37:57.439 --> 1:38:00.840
<v Speaker 2>this type of type of golf. Uh, I'm I'm gonna

1:38:00.880 --> 1:38:01.920
<v Speaker 2>go with Justin Rose.

1:38:02.479 --> 1:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well, he is a very complete player. He's yeah,

1:38:06.600 --> 1:38:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, Sunday is the problem. I'm not saying he's

1:38:08.840 --> 1:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>not capable, but Sunday afternoon. Yeah, as you get older,

1:38:12.000 --> 1:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just harder to summon your very best at the

1:38:15.080 --> 1:38:15.519
<v Speaker 1>very end.

1:38:16.360 --> 1:38:21.720
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting to be this year. This year's Masters had

1:38:21.760 --> 1:38:22.679
<v Speaker 2>to hurt a lot.

1:38:22.720 --> 1:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Yes, he played great though again with just the

1:38:25.920 --> 1:38:26.799
<v Speaker 1>last six holes.

1:38:27.160 --> 1:38:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:38:28.000 --> 1:38:31.479
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that's permanent. I mean, look at Phil,

1:38:31.640 --> 1:38:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Phil did it at Kia. Incredible. It can be done. Uh,

1:38:35.840 --> 1:38:37.559
<v Speaker 1>So that's not a bad pick. I mean I'm gonna

1:38:37.560 --> 1:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>say it be a very popular win.

1:38:39.479 --> 1:38:42.439
<v Speaker 2>It would be it would be you know, it's this

1:38:42.600 --> 1:38:46.639
<v Speaker 2>in Brokedale and uh, you know, another another trip around

1:38:46.680 --> 1:38:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the sun, and and it's like you don't know, you

1:38:49.680 --> 1:38:51.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know when it's when it's going to really go.

1:38:52.160 --> 1:38:54.799
<v Speaker 2>But it feels like this is this is a great

1:38:54.800 --> 1:38:57.559
<v Speaker 2>opportunity for him given the elements. I think there is

1:38:57.640 --> 1:39:01.760
<v Speaker 2>like an aspect of Shinnakok that rewards words really high

1:39:01.840 --> 1:39:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Q high IQ golf, and I think Justin Rose has

1:39:07.880 --> 1:39:11.560
<v Speaker 2>played so much golf through the years, you think about

1:39:11.680 --> 1:39:14.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's you know, I think like one thing

1:39:14.320 --> 1:39:18.640
<v Speaker 2>that Gil told me candidly is you know, is like

1:39:18.680 --> 1:39:22.040
<v Speaker 2>when the Olympics came around, Justin Rose was all over

1:39:22.160 --> 1:39:25.759
<v Speaker 2>him about getting information about how to play the Olympic

1:39:25.880 --> 1:39:29.320
<v Speaker 2>golf course at Rio. Like he is a someone who prepares,

1:39:29.520 --> 1:39:31.800
<v Speaker 2>He's someone who understands the game of the highest level,

1:39:31.880 --> 1:39:35.679
<v Speaker 2>understands himself maybe better than any player in the field.

1:39:36.320 --> 1:39:39.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think this is a golf course that those

1:39:39.439 --> 1:39:41.840
<v Speaker 2>types of traits rise to the top.

1:39:42.200 --> 1:39:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So you want to Marion similar, similar, Testy.

1:39:47.360 --> 1:39:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Hi may look forward to seeing you next week, look

1:39:50.400 --> 1:39:55.120
<v Speaker 2>forward to reading your work at Golf Digest, and always

1:39:55.280 --> 1:39:57.280
<v Speaker 2>a great pleasure to have you on this podcast.

1:39:57.320 --> 1:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>A pleasure to be with you. Andy, Thanks for having me.

1:40:10.240 --> 1:40:13.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, Big thanks for listening to another edition of

1:40:14.000 --> 1:40:17.360
<v Speaker 2>the Friday Golf Podcast. Big thanks to him for joining

1:40:17.560 --> 1:40:22.880
<v Speaker 2>m PJ for managing to produce this episode while while

1:40:22.880 --> 1:40:28.160
<v Speaker 2>the city is in absolute Knicks frenzy. Maybe maybe Nick,

1:40:28.560 --> 1:40:30.280
<v Speaker 2>by the time you're listening to this, they are the

1:40:30.400 --> 1:40:35.519
<v Speaker 2>NBA champions. We'll see what happens here in game five.

1:40:36.280 --> 1:40:40.799
<v Speaker 2>We'll be back after the US Open to break everything

1:40:40.880 --> 1:40:44.559
<v Speaker 2>down with Trevor Immulman. All right, we'll talk to you soon.