Speaker 1: Look, hiring is tough, right, It's very competitive right now.
Speaker 1: You've got to move fast. You want to get to
Speaker 1: the best people and you don't want to waste a
Speaker 1: lot of time. But a place where growing businesses can
Speaker 1: go to connect with the most qualified candidates is zip recruiter.
Speaker 1: Go to zip recruiter dot com, slash sexton and you'll
Speaker 1: see for yourself. You can use a free trial there.
Speaker 1: It'll connect you to over a hundred of the web's
Speaker 1: leading job boards. They have a powerful matching technology that
Speaker 1: will make sure that the thousands of resumes that you
Speaker 1: get access to will be scanned through so you'll get
Speaker 1: exactly the right people with the right experience for your
Speaker 1: job search. Folks, we used zip recruiter here to hire
Speaker 1: people for The Hill dot com and we've gotten great hires.
Speaker 1: These are now my colleagues and friends, and they came
Speaker 1: courtesy of zip Recruiter. It's no wonder that zip recruiter
Speaker 1: is the highest rated hiring site in America. Try for yourself.
Speaker 1: My listeners can try zip recruiter for free. That's right,
Speaker 1: totally free. Go to zip recruiter dot com, slash sexton.
Speaker 1: That's zip recruiter dot com. Slash Sexton for this exclusive
Speaker 1: offer zip recruiter dot com slash Sexton the smartest way
Speaker 1: to hire. This is the Buck Sexton Show, where the
Speaker 1: mission or mission is to decode what really matters with
Speaker 1: actionable intelligence. Make no mistakes, American, You're a great American.
Speaker 1: Again the Buck Sexton Show begins coming do you live
Speaker 1: from the constitutionally protected free speech bunker in the woods
Speaker 1: of Delaware? Is not Buck Sexton? Tonight the Godfather and
Speaker 1: again for Buck, He'll be back tomorrow. Michael PALKI here,
Speaker 1: I think Bucks in a plane somewhere thirty thousand feet
Speaker 1: over the nation in the flyover state region right now.
Speaker 1: So I'm here. I'm here for the night. I expect
Speaker 1: you to participate. You guys know the rules. You've been
Speaker 1: here when I've been here. If you haven't, if you're
Speaker 1: just tuning in for the first time and picking me up,
Speaker 1: filling in from my buddy Bucks Sexton, we go way back,
Speaker 1: way back to the early days of the Blaze. The
Speaker 1: Blaze dot Com. A matter of fact, today is kind
Speaker 1: of a bit of a Blaze anniversary. If we look
Speaker 1: at two thousand and ten, it was just a couple
Speaker 1: of days before the Blaze launched. The Blaze launched and
Speaker 1: a soft launch on August two thousand and ten, and
Speaker 1: then went full full on in UH September, and that
Speaker 1: was the Blaze dot com. But twenty August was the
Speaker 1: rally on the Mall in Washington, d C. A rally
Speaker 1: that so many people took exception to. But a couple
Speaker 1: hundred thousand people gathered on the mall by the reflection
Speaker 1: pool and the steps underneath the Lincoln Monument and UH
Speaker 1: Glenn Beck led a rally called Restoring Honor, and I
Speaker 1: was part of it. I was there, I covered it.
Speaker 1: I was part of a group called the Project, and
Speaker 1: then shortly thereafter joined the Blaze dot com. It was
Speaker 1: an amazing day because CBS News insisted there were about
Speaker 1: seventy thousand people there, and if you looked at the
Speaker 1: estimates from the parks, the National Park Service, they talked
Speaker 1: about a couple of hundred thousand people, and there were
Speaker 1: folks who said it was a half a million people.
Speaker 1: I will tell you from being there in the middle
Speaker 1: of it that rally, that event, Restoring Honor, probably had
Speaker 1: between two fifty and two people. Just looking at the
Speaker 1: crowd density on both sides, of the monument and being
Speaker 1: a part of an amazing day. When we left them
Speaker 1: all that day, it was cleaner than when we got there.
Speaker 1: I kid you not. The people who showed up were
Speaker 1: told it's not about the tea party, it's not about
Speaker 1: wearing your little tri corner hats. We don't want signs.
Speaker 1: We just want to be there to talk about restoring
Speaker 1: honor to America. And I posted a link back to
Speaker 1: a video that I put up the next day, a
Speaker 1: video with a song my brother wrote, I have a
Speaker 1: brother who's a composer. So if you haven't seen I
Speaker 1: hear America calling. It's out there. But this is also
Speaker 1: the fifty five anniversary of an even more famous and
Speaker 1: more important obviously by many, many multiples over, a more
Speaker 1: important speech delivered in the same location as the Restoring
Speaker 1: Honor event in Nree on August, the Reverend Dr Martin
Speaker 1: Luther King Jr. Gave his I Have a Dream speech
Speaker 1: in Washington, d C. I was a very young boy
Speaker 1: at the time, and we watched it as a family
Speaker 1: growing up in Chicago. It was a very big deal.
Speaker 1: I remember my parents talking about Dr King, and I
Speaker 1: remember that speech being important growing up and it's not
Speaker 1: that long. So I will tell you I encourage you
Speaker 1: as as citizens of this great country. If you've never
Speaker 1: watched the whole thing, go to the YouTube and watch it. Yes,
Speaker 1: I said the YouTube's intentionally, but go to the YouTube's
Speaker 1: and watch it. It is nothing short of inspiring. If
Speaker 1: Dr King's words about America and what we are supposed
Speaker 1: to be do not strike a chord with you, you
Speaker 1: need to get to the doctor immediately. And my my
Speaker 1: favorite moment from it, I think a lot of a
Speaker 1: lot of folks favorite moment. I'll just give you a
Speaker 1: little snippet from right in the middle of it. It's
Speaker 1: it's not even twenty minutes long. Out of your day.
Speaker 1: You owe it to yourself to watch history as it
Speaker 1: was recorded. But here's a little bit of Dr King's
Speaker 1: dream speech from this day, fifty five years ago. Live
Speaker 1: poor little children one day live in a nation where
Speaker 1: they will not be judged by the color of about skin,
Speaker 1: but by the concenterback character. I have a breath. Imagine
Speaker 1: imagine seeing all those faces on the mall in Washington,
Speaker 1: d C. A massive crowd extending past the reflection pond
Speaker 1: all the way back to the Washington Monument and Dr
Speaker 1: King Stanley there giving that iconic address that really wasn't
Speaker 1: just for those people there, it was for the entire nation.
Speaker 1: An amazing moment. I know, I get all all fired
Speaker 1: up about this, but these are the moments in American
Speaker 1: history that tell me just how great of a nation
Speaker 1: we are. It's not the days when we saw the
Speaker 1: fighting on cable TV. It's not the name calling we see,
Speaker 1: it's not what I I lost my mind over ESPN today,
Speaker 1: Tiger Woods was asked if and Tiger Woods was asked
Speaker 1: to make a comment on the president. Tiger Woods a
Speaker 1: guy whose job it is to hit a little white
Speaker 1: ball over grass and then followed the little white ball
Speaker 1: and hit it fewer times than other guys hitting the
Speaker 1: little white ball, and if he does it the fewest,
Speaker 1: he gets a giant check. That's Tiger woods job. He's
Speaker 1: not a schooled political scientist. He's not someone who studied
Speaker 1: at at Harvard or at Princeton or Yale or any
Speaker 1: of the the institutions of great political learning in our country.
Speaker 1: So when Tiger Woods is asked about President Trump, and
Speaker 1: he says, I think we need to respect the office.
Speaker 1: And Stephen A. Smith and Max Kellerman lose their minds
Speaker 1: and basically speak out in complete contradiction to what Dr
Speaker 1: King just talked about. I lose my mind. I lose,
Speaker 1: absolutely lose my mind. And I go back to a
Speaker 1: statement I made on Twitter earlier today. I remember when
Speaker 1: MTV was music television. I remember when A and E
Speaker 1: was arts and entertainment and not the Kardashians. But I
Speaker 1: remember when the History Channel actually taught history. But the
Speaker 1: the ESPN channel has fallen off the beam and is
Speaker 1: no longer really focused on sports. Instead, they appear to
Speaker 1: be focused on politics. So when we we have this
Speaker 1: moment with Max Kellerman and Stephen A. Smith melting down,
Speaker 1: I should give you a little bit of that one too,
Speaker 1: because this happened on ESPN. This is Kellerman and Stephen A. Smith,
Speaker 1: two guys who are paid a whole lot of money
Speaker 1: supposedly on a sports network, are going all political. And
Speaker 1: to me, it's progressive indoctrination. I letta say something abo
Speaker 1: what Tiger Woods say. It really bothers me. I don't
Speaker 1: I am angry at what Tiger Woods said because it
Speaker 1: is it is a thoughtless statement dressed up as a
Speaker 1: thoughtful statement. Tiger Woods chases a white ball over grass.
Speaker 1: Tiger Woods hits a white ball. He does it better
Speaker 1: than of the people on the planet. That's his job.
Speaker 1: His job is not to be a political pundit. But
Speaker 1: you go ahead, Max Kellerman, you accuse him of being thoughtless.
Speaker 1: Either holds in contempt the intelligence of the people who
Speaker 1: hear it, or else. It's just a stupid thing to say.
Speaker 1: Let me tell you what I mean the if to
Speaker 1: say that the office you must have respect for the office,
Speaker 1: Tiger be clear. Are you saying that the office therefore
Speaker 1: confers respect onto its occupant, it's present temporary occupant. No,
Speaker 1: what the what the having respect for the office means, principally,
Speaker 1: in my view, is the office holders should have respect
Speaker 1: for the office. We are all set to a standard,
Speaker 1: were held to a standard of behavior. We had our
Speaker 1: jobs right, people in their in their daily lives. The president,
Speaker 1: if anything, is held to a higher standard of behavior.
Speaker 1: It is not such that we have such great respect
Speaker 1: for the office that, no matter what the behavior of
Speaker 1: its occupant, we must therefore respect it's occupant because of
Speaker 1: the office. No, Tiger Woods is being you said, being
Speaker 1: slick here, he's being slick. We must respect the office. Therefore,
Speaker 1: that confers respect to the occupant. Tiger, is that what
Speaker 1: you're saying. If that's what you're saying, that is a
Speaker 1: stupid comment. So here's a sportscaster who is now suddenly
Speaker 1: a political prognosticator abundant if you will, saying that Tiger Woods,
Speaker 1: a guy who is not in politics at all. I
Speaker 1: don't ever remember him talking politics ever, is stupid because
Speaker 1: he wants us to respect the office of the presidency.
Speaker 1: But if you think that Max Kellerman has lowered the
Speaker 1: bar as far as it can go, Stephen A. Smith
Speaker 1: is about to play the race card and called Tiger Woods, well,
Speaker 1: he's not black. Listen, listen to this. Remember we just
Speaker 1: we just heard Dr King talking about the content of
Speaker 1: someone's character, not the color of their skin. That just happened.
Speaker 1: We just played you a clip from fifty five years ago.
Speaker 1: But all Stephen A. Smith can see is someone's color.
Speaker 1: And if you are a certain color, you are supposed
Speaker 1: to act a certain way. Apparently ESPN is telling us
Speaker 1: don't But I don't even know if he believes that.
Speaker 1: That's what all. We don't know what Tiger Woods believe.
Speaker 1: He's cambl Nation, He's not black when he got arrest.
Speaker 1: He's camblination, he's not black. What in the hell is that?
Speaker 1: Talk about categorizing people just based on their racial makeup. ESPN,
Speaker 1: you should be suspending at least these people for being racist.
Speaker 1: How dare you? He's chamblination, he's not black. This is
Speaker 1: the most embarrassing thing I've ever seen. And it's all
Speaker 1: because the progressive network owned by Disney, Yes, the mouse.
Speaker 1: Let's go right back to ABC and Stephanopolis and ABC
Speaker 1: News and the connections to the Clintons and the butt
Speaker 1: hurt liberals who are now still freaking out almost two
Speaker 1: years after Donald Trump won the election. They're just not
Speaker 1: going to give it up. And they've gotten so far
Speaker 1: as to lose their minds over Tiger Woods saying that
Speaker 1: we should respect the office of the presidency. I I
Speaker 1: just don't know what to say, people, I do not.
Speaker 1: I watched this and my eyes rolled so far back
Speaker 1: up in my head that I saw my own brain.
Speaker 1: It's just unbelievable. Am I wrong that I missed the
Speaker 1: boat on this one? Him? Is it okay? No, it's
Speaker 1: not okay. MTV has now become a progressive outlet preaching
Speaker 1: and they they're gonna do a big push for mid
Speaker 1: terms for the vote you watch. I know MTV gave
Speaker 1: us rock the vote back in the eighties. I was
Speaker 1: in the music video business. I know that I didn't
Speaker 1: mind it when it was just telling people get out
Speaker 1: to vote. When when you tell people how to vote
Speaker 1: and you're delivering messages on every program And now ESPN
Speaker 1: is is shaming Tiger Woods because he doesn't march in
Speaker 1: lock step with them, because gee, his color means he
Speaker 1: should be thinking this way, but he's not, so we
Speaker 1: have to call him out and say he's stupid. It's
Speaker 1: just unbelievable. Michael Pelka in for Buck Sexton tonight. You
Speaker 1: want to join the conversation. We have a lot to
Speaker 1: talk about. We're gonna get intoto the Catholic church story.
Speaker 1: Our buddy Emily's Anadi from the Daily Wire is going
Speaker 1: to talk to us. Uh, just in about forty five
Speaker 1: minutes or so. She's a big time Catholic. I'm a Catholic.
Speaker 1: I'm very upset about what's going on in my church obviously,
Speaker 1: and uh, something else happened on CNN. CNN another award
Speaker 1: of fake news, maybe two big awards of fake news.
Speaker 1: I'm talking about the Landy Davis story. And uh, if
Speaker 1: you missed Alison Camerata interviewing former Bush White House Chief
Speaker 1: of Staff Johnson UNW, former governor of New Hampshire, one
Speaker 1: of the elder statesmen in the GOP. Johnson UNW delivered
Speaker 1: a master class on how to deal with angry media.
Speaker 1: It's just brilliant. We'll get into that, but you can
Speaker 1: join the conversation. Eight four four Buck eight four four
Speaker 1: nine b U c K. Michael Pelka in for Buck
Speaker 1: on the Buck Sexton Show. It is the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Michael Pelca filling in for Buck. He'll be back tomorrow
Speaker 1: somewhere over the Great United States Continental State Group, you know,
Speaker 1: the Contiguous States. Buck is probably in the air, winging
Speaker 1: at home from Calafornia. So I'll be here tonight and
Speaker 1: enjoying your company. I hope you're enjoying mine. I encourage
Speaker 1: you to participate in the conversation. You want to rant,
Speaker 1: you want to rave. I'll be doing a lot of
Speaker 1: ranting and raving and sharing thoughts thoughts for the day.
Speaker 1: I noticed Times Square had an evacuation today, and whenever
Speaker 1: I get a little alert on my phone, especially about
Speaker 1: Times Square. I lived in New York City, in Midtown
Speaker 1: Manhattan for twenty four years. I think it was right
Speaker 1: over by the U N so not far from Times Square.
Speaker 1: So when a news report pop saying Time Squares being evacuated,
Speaker 1: I'm like, what what could go on? You guys know
Speaker 1: Bucks history with helping to catch the Time Time Square
Speaker 1: bomber in his um his work with the New York
Speaker 1: City Task Force, the Terror Task Force, so I'm acutely
Speaker 1: attuned to that. And then I read it was a
Speaker 1: swarm of bees that took over a section around a
Speaker 1: hot dog stand in Times Square. And no, it's not
Speaker 1: the boobies that are there in Times Square, because we
Speaker 1: have that too. Since its summer. There are a bunch
Speaker 1: of young ladies who wear nothing but paint and panties
Speaker 1: and walk around Times Square asking for money from people,
Speaker 1: and people give it to them too. They also give
Speaker 1: him a lot of creepy looks. But bees, bees forced
Speaker 1: an evacuation in Times Square. Today, bees will swarm even
Speaker 1: in the concrete jungle of Midtown Manhattan, the crossroads of
Speaker 1: the world. If you will. I said I was gonna
Speaker 1: get after CNN, and I will. I need Time and
Speaker 1: a lot of time to get into the Alison Camerada
Speaker 1: Johnson new news story. So maybe we can just follow
Speaker 1: up on the Landi Davis story. Landi Davis a Clinton operative,
Speaker 1: a guy who has so so much tight links to
Speaker 1: the Clintons. There is no daylight between them. When we
Speaker 1: were kids in Catholic school, the nuns used to come
Speaker 1: up to guys and girls who were too close together
Speaker 1: and say, leave some room for the Holy Spirit. Well,
Speaker 1: between Landi Davis and the Clintons, there is no room
Speaker 1: for the Holy Spirit. I can guarantee you that. So
Speaker 1: when Landy Davis ends up as Michael Cohen's attorney, former
Speaker 1: Donald Trump attorney now plea copying guy. When Landy Davis
Speaker 1: ends up as Michael Cohen's attorney and I realize he's
Speaker 1: so close to the Clintons, every antenna on my body
Speaker 1: is going this is problems. Landi Davis puts a go
Speaker 1: fund Me campaign up to try and raise money so
Speaker 1: Avanadi's legal bills won't be too big. Kind of weasely
Speaker 1: thing to do, right, Yeah, I think so. And then
Speaker 1: he goes on after the Plea announcement, he goes down
Speaker 1: a media march and says and tells Axios and others
Speaker 1: that in fact, his client has more to say. His
Speaker 1: client has more to say, and there will be much more.
Speaker 1: So Lannie Davis really, um, I can't tell you what
Speaker 1: a weasel this guy is. He he told CNN one
Speaker 1: thing that in a bombshell report that Michael Cohen was
Speaker 1: prepared to tell Robert Moadonald Trump knew in advance of
Speaker 1: the Trump Tower meeting. Uh now he's saying that was wrong,
Speaker 1: and he and CNN we're saying anonymous so horses told
Speaker 1: him that anonymous sources sources being plural. It turns out
Speaker 1: that Landy Davis was the only source on this. Landy
Speaker 1: Davis is the guy behind it. Landy Davis has now
Speaker 1: lied to the mainstream media and now he's kind of
Speaker 1: walking it back, but CNN will not walk it back.
Speaker 1: CNN is still telling the world that they believe there
Speaker 1: are anonymous sources. Landi Davis is a big time liar,
Speaker 1: and CNN you know what you get on this one.
Speaker 1: You get a big fake news slap. We'll we'll get
Speaker 1: to more CNN fake news and what they did with
Speaker 1: Alison Camarada and Johnson Knew next on The buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show with Michael Pelca. Michael Pelca here for buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: Buckleby back tomorrow, America, The Godfather in the House. I
Speaker 1: was I talking over the intro. I guess a little bit.
Speaker 1: I'm told Brandon, that's okay, a little bit. We have
Speaker 1: a lot to do tonight. I'm just itching to get
Speaker 1: to all the topics. I have to get to the
Speaker 1: question about the pot and the breast milk. I have
Speaker 1: to talk about that. We got to get to the
Speaker 1: Catholic thing. I'm ticked off at Peter uh omar Rossa,
Speaker 1: who we banned last week. She's trying to make herself
Speaker 1: relevant again. She says there's going to be a race war,
Speaker 1: that Trump wants a race war. Come on, go away,
Speaker 1: go back into your omar Rossa hole wherever you go.
Speaker 1: Isn't she supposed to be on a reality show somewhere,
Speaker 1: locked up for six or eight weeks, just hoping. I
Speaker 1: guess we'll get into that. Uh. There's some primaries happening tonight.
Speaker 1: I don't know full here out of Arizona while the
Speaker 1: show's on, but that's an interesting primary to watch. There's
Speaker 1: news out of the New York primary race for governor
Speaker 1: and the Texas race for Ted Cruises seat that we
Speaker 1: have to get into. Some funny stuff happening in there,
Speaker 1: the the the sex and the city lady who's running
Speaker 1: against Cuomo. And I think it's part of an Overton
Speaker 1: window move to shift that political window in New York
Speaker 1: just a little bit farther left. Cynthy Nixon had no
Speaker 1: chance in hell of ever getting elected in New York State,
Speaker 1: but her candidacy allows the Liberal Party to push the
Speaker 1: Overton window a little bit farther to the left, and
Speaker 1: it makes Cuomo look more palatable. I know that sounds machiavellian,
Speaker 1: doesn't And I know it sounds like it just a
Speaker 1: little too calculated, But I believe this Democratic Party is calculating.
Speaker 1: I believe Octavio Cortez, so that that's her name, Acasio Cortez.
Speaker 1: Why do I call her Octavio. I have a friend
Speaker 1: named Octavio. That's why I believe she's part of the plan.
Speaker 1: That they package it in an attractive vehicle so that
Speaker 1: people will go, well, you know, she says some things
Speaker 1: we could at behind, but she's so crazy. But I
Speaker 1: do think that in the case of the debate, so
Speaker 1: I know I got a d D momented there. In
Speaker 1: the case of these debates, the this woman Cynthy Nixon
Speaker 1: has now demanded that the temperature for the debate between
Speaker 1: herself and Governor Cuomo be seventy six degrees because it's
Speaker 1: sexist if the room is any cooler, I kid you not.
Speaker 1: I kid you not. That's what is going on. Synthing
Speaker 1: Nixon has now demanded that her debate against Governor Cuomo
Speaker 1: be in a room that's seventies six degrees because she's
Speaker 1: always so cold. Well, maybe if you would eat a
Speaker 1: sandwich and you wouldn't be just bones and skin, you
Speaker 1: wouldn't be cold all the time. I'm just saying, I
Speaker 1: don't believe she ever had a snowballs chance in hell.
Speaker 1: I think her campaign is being underwritten by the party
Speaker 1: to push the party farther left without making Cuomo come
Speaker 1: out and make those direct moves to the left. I'm
Speaker 1: just saying. And in the case of Ted Cruz against
Speaker 1: this guy Beato, whose name is not Beato, it's a
Speaker 1: made up name to make him sound more palatable to
Speaker 1: the Latino voters in Texas. The way that the New
Speaker 1: York Mayor Warren Wilhelm. Oh no, that's not the mayor.
Speaker 1: His real name is Warren Wilhelm. Build the Blasio changed
Speaker 1: his name to be more voter friendly. Same thing with Beato.
Speaker 1: Oh Rourke, he wanted to be one of the cool kids.
Speaker 1: But he was supposed to debate Ted Cruz this Friday.
Speaker 1: They were supposed to have the first of a series
Speaker 1: of debates in there their fight for the Senate in
Speaker 1: that seat in Texas. Now, the last time Ted Cruise
Speaker 1: was elected to the Senate in Texas, he won and
Speaker 1: it appeared to be a big margin of victory. But
Speaker 1: the Democrats identified eight counties in Texas, and eight counties
Speaker 1: is not a lot where Ted Cruz barely won. And
Speaker 1: they have driven voter registration specifically to Hispanic communities. And
Speaker 1: now you have a candidate named Beato who sounds like
Speaker 1: he might be a Hispanic man, doesn't he. They have
Speaker 1: targeted those eight counties in an effort to turn Texas blue.
Speaker 1: It was six years ago I was part of something
Speaker 1: called the test Studo project that was a Republican effort
Speaker 1: to fight the Democratic effort to turn Texas blue the
Speaker 1: way they turned Colorado purple. So this is going on
Speaker 1: the Democrats have been deeply engaged in trying to get
Speaker 1: rid of Ted Cruise for quite some time, and they
Speaker 1: had a plan the day he was elected. And now
Speaker 1: that plan is is coming into shape. The races within
Speaker 1: single digits, and there's a really good chance that Ted
Speaker 1: Cruz may not win that seat. So I'm telling you
Speaker 1: if you were engaged in the mid term elections, which
Speaker 1: were now less than seventy days away from if you're
Speaker 1: engaged and you're playing on voting, it is incumbent upon
Speaker 1: you if you want to retain the progress that we
Speaker 1: have made as a nation in both economic strength, military strength,
Speaker 1: the consumer confidence, the direction we are going. If you
Speaker 1: want to maintain it, it's up to you to take
Speaker 1: somebody to the polls with you. You need to drag
Speaker 1: somebody's but to vote on election day. All right, I'm
Speaker 1: done with my little ramped I didn't even get to
Speaker 1: the the CNN story, but I will get to that.
Speaker 1: I I know there's so much going on today, So
Speaker 1: I have another d n C story that we we
Speaker 1: have to jump into as well. The d n C.
Speaker 1: They are just making it too easy to make fun
Speaker 1: of themselves. And I hope, I hope I hope. I
Speaker 1: hope we can get we can keep the GOP on
Speaker 1: track to get through the midterms. I I still think
Speaker 1: there's a fairly decent chance we'll lose the House. And
Speaker 1: if we lose the House, you know what happens. Maxine
Speaker 1: Waters gets freed from Nancy Pelosi's basement where she's been
Speaker 1: for the last two months, and she starts up with
Speaker 1: her campaign again. Right I'm gonna say and peach forty
Speaker 1: five every day and page forty five every day, and
Speaker 1: page forty five every day. That's what's gonna happen if
Speaker 1: we don't make sure the blue wave is nothing but
Speaker 1: a trickle right now, I think it could go on
Speaker 1: one of two either way. It's a going flip right now.
Speaker 1: And if you believe the posters, it's a faith to complete,
Speaker 1: which means game over for the Trump train going full speed. Okay, now,
Speaker 1: what happened on CNN? What happened on CNN? Alison Camearrata
Speaker 1: had Johnson New Knew on the show on her show,
Speaker 1: and she invited Johnson now on the show to talk
Speaker 1: about John McCain. The life and legacy of John McCain.
Speaker 1: That was the title of the segment. So they talked
Speaker 1: about John McCain for a couple of minutes, and then
Speaker 1: Alison Camerata flip the script and we learned what she
Speaker 1: was really about. We learned what she was really going
Speaker 1: after check this out. So, Governor, what do you think
Speaker 1: about President Trump rejecting the practice of putting out an
Speaker 1: official White House statement about John McCain's service and sacrifice.
Speaker 1: So that that's the question, what do you think? So
Speaker 1: what do you think Johnson know about the President reject
Speaker 1: gang couldn't have same with any more animosity, rejecting the
Speaker 1: White House statement honoring John McCain's service and sacrifice. Well,
Speaker 1: this this story comes from a Washington Post story. The
Speaker 1: Washington Post claims Donald Trump rejected the White House statement
Speaker 1: praising John McCain, and CNN carried that water for the
Speaker 1: Washington Post. But Johnson now new delivers a masterclass in
Speaker 1: reflecting and deflecting and squashing cameraradius bias. Look that that
Speaker 1: that was printed in the Washington Post, And I have
Speaker 1: to be honest with you, I don't give much credence
Speaker 1: to what we also have that reporting. Yeah, well the
Speaker 1: same thing applies, Alice. He laughs as she says we
Speaker 1: also have that reporting. He chuckles and says, yeah, uh,
Speaker 1: the same thing applies, Allison. How do you not love
Speaker 1: this guy? But it didn't stop there, because now Alison
Speaker 1: Camerada delivered what she thought was going to be a
Speaker 1: gut punch to Johnson. Una, what do you think about this,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump rejecting a statement honoring John McCain? What are
Speaker 1: you thinking? He goes, well, Washington Post don't give too
Speaker 1: much credibility. Well, we reported that too, sir, and he
Speaker 1: laughs and says same to you. So now he just
Speaker 1: counterpunched and delivered a body blow verbal. Of course, I'm
Speaker 1: not advocating for violence at all, not against Allison Camerada
Speaker 1: or anyone at CNN. I could understand it, but I
Speaker 1: will not ever support it. But so here's Camerata. Now
Speaker 1: she's upset. You come on CNN, and we appreciate you
Speaker 1: coming on CNN, and we appreciate shape your take on it,
Speaker 1: but I don't appreciate you denigrating our reporting. I think
Speaker 1: that you know we have excellent reporters here. But are
Speaker 1: you saying that you don't want to believe that you
Speaker 1: don't want to believe that President Trump would do that
Speaker 1: about saying that I don't want to comment on a
Speaker 1: report that I haven't satisfied myself as correct. So Johnson
Speaker 1: Una came back with a gracious response to rather ungracious claim.
Speaker 1: She's dressing him down, Governor, and then she pauses for
Speaker 1: a couple of secons, you came in our house? How
Speaker 1: dare you? Sir? And he goes, look, all I'm saying
Speaker 1: is I don't know if the report to real. I
Speaker 1: don't know if I trusted, I don't know if I
Speaker 1: believe it. She still can't accept it, and she presses
Speaker 1: on if that report were true, I'm not going to
Speaker 1: answer the hypothetical. It's not hypothetical. This is our reporting.
Speaker 1: We have rock solid sources in the White House. There
Speaker 1: was a statement about you McCain. I'm here to talk
Speaker 1: about John McCain, as I remember him, I'm not here
Speaker 1: to talk about the press. Is handling of of a
Speaker 1: difference between the White House UH and the press corps
Speaker 1: at this time. So brilliant response again from Sunu, a
Speaker 1: statesman like response to say, are you invited me here
Speaker 1: to talk about John McCain. I'm not here to opine
Speaker 1: on a difference of opinion between the White House and
Speaker 1: the Press Corps, and she goes it's a difference of opinion.
Speaker 1: She still can't give it up. Talk about an ungracious host.
Speaker 1: But it gets a little worse. The press is handling
Speaker 1: it's President Trump's handling of John McCain's death. Look, John
Speaker 1: McCain was a great American who deserves to be recognized
Speaker 1: as a great American. Um he is being recognized by
Speaker 1: his colleagues, and the friends are his friends around Milandia.
Speaker 1: Trump has certainly put out an exceptionally strong statement outlining
Speaker 1: the appreciation for his service. The White House has recognized
Speaker 1: the sorrow of the family, and and I think Americans
Speaker 1: ought to be looking at the positive side, not trying
Speaker 1: to create a division amongst people who are in joint
Speaker 1: uh sorrow warning a great American. So another great statement,
Speaker 1: Johnson un basically laying it out. The White House put
Speaker 1: out Milania Trump's statement, the colleagues of John McCain or
Speaker 1: mourning him. If he saw today they were standing up
Speaker 1: and crying in the Senate. And fine, that's great, all
Speaker 1: well and good. You knew the guy, you loved him,
Speaker 1: you miss him. Alison Camearad of CNN cannot give it up.
Speaker 1: She continues, are you satisfied the President Trump's statement goes
Speaker 1: far enough? I suspect there'll be additional statements over time.
Speaker 1: And I think, Uh, this effort to try and create
Speaker 1: a cleavage there really does disturb me. So he said,
Speaker 1: this effort by you, the media, to try and create
Speaker 1: a cleavage there disturbs me. The word cleavage seemed to
Speaker 1: confuse Alison Camerata, and I I admit I've never used
Speaker 1: the word cleavage in that frame, in that reference. But
Speaker 1: John Sunu just delivered that. Camerata can't seem to quite
Speaker 1: get it, and she has to ask him to repeat it.
Speaker 1: That cleavage between the White House and and the and
Speaker 1: those that are morning John McCain. It is this effort
Speaker 1: by the press to accentuate the negative that I think
Speaker 1: has created the climate that prevents UH in the long term,
Speaker 1: the bipartisanship that John McCain supported. So Snu with another
Speaker 1: great statement, it's the press who is creating the spread
Speaker 1: between the two sides of the aisle. There's more to this,
Speaker 1: and there's more great I know, I know what's going on,
Speaker 1: but this you never get a moment like this with
Speaker 1: the CNN anchor acting this ridiculous more of Alison Camerata
Speaker 1: and her ridiculous meltdown, her attempts to shame Johnson UNU
Speaker 1: into attacking the President, which he did not sun a masterclass.
Speaker 1: Michael Pelca filling in for Buck Sexton on the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. We'll be right back, Michael Pelca in for
Speaker 1: my buddy Buck Sexton tonight, and we're trying to get
Speaker 1: to everything. But I got really wrapped up in this
Speaker 1: Alison Camerata embarrassing, embarrassing attack on Johnson unw She brought
Speaker 1: him in to talk about John McCain, Remember the life
Speaker 1: of John McCain, and then tried to make it an
Speaker 1: attack on Donald Trump. And when we last left the clip,
Speaker 1: this was still going on with Camerata going after she's
Speaker 1: already dressed him down once going Governor, we invited you here,
Speaker 1: and uh, you're just not you're not being good. But
Speaker 1: let's see what what's happening now. I don't want to
Speaker 1: be a part of rubbing whatever salt is in whatever
Speaker 1: wound there may be, because I think that just adds
Speaker 1: to the division. I'm here because I lost a good friend.
Speaker 1: I wanted to express my concern about that. I wanted
Speaker 1: to applaud what he contributed to the country. I wanted
Speaker 1: to underscore the relationship he had with the state of
Speaker 1: New Hampshire. And I'm not here to play the political
Speaker 1: games that some of the press want to play at
Speaker 1: this moment of of what I think is great sorrow
Speaker 1: for the country. So great statement. Right, you should say
Speaker 1: thank you and goodbye. We had you here. Camerata can't
Speaker 1: let go. Just to be clear, we don't see it
Speaker 1: as a game. Just to be clear, we don't see
Speaker 1: it as a game. Soon news only reaction is to laugh.
Speaker 1: And to be clear, the press didn't create whatever division
Speaker 1: exists that President Trump feels that allowed him to spike
Speaker 1: the statement that General John Kelly wanted him to put
Speaker 1: out about John McCain's sacrifice. The press, everybody, everybody, everybody
Speaker 1: reflects their concerns in ways that are consistent with whatever
Speaker 1: they feel. I've expressed my concern, uh the loss of
Speaker 1: John McCain, who I think was a great American, a
Speaker 1: great American hero in the military, a great American hero
Speaker 1: in the political process, and frankly, a great American hero
Speaker 1: on a personal level. Two people that knew him well,
Speaker 1: and it is on those three levels that I sensed
Speaker 1: the loss, and I have expressed my my feelings of
Speaker 1: of sorrow for him having passed, and my expression of
Speaker 1: feelings of sorrow for for his personal family who lost him,
Speaker 1: for a country who lost the great American hero. She
Speaker 1: can't let go. She just cannot let go. Alison Camerata,
Speaker 1: I hope you watch this and learn something about graciousness
Speaker 1: and about the truth. The truth has no agenda. Apparently
Speaker 1: CNN does Michael Pelca in for Buck Sexton next hour,
Speaker 1: Emily Zanati, come on back me on calls home. Title
Speaker 1: theft buck Sexton mission. Decoding the news and disseminating information
Speaker 1: is actionable intelligence. Make no mistake, American. Let great, You're
Speaker 1: a great American again. This is the Buck Sexton shown. No, well,
Speaker 1: it's not really Buck Sexton, but I've got your six Buck.
Speaker 1: It's Michael Pelca, the Godfather, sitting in from my friend,
Speaker 1: former colleague Buck Sexton here and the Buck Sexton show.
Speaker 1: Buck is somewhere twenty five thousand feet over the heartland
Speaker 1: of America, winging his way back from Calaifornia to get
Speaker 1: to uh the studio for tomorrow night. So I'm here
Speaker 1: and uh we want to talk about some really hot
Speaker 1: topics tonight. We just took a part the Alison Camerado
Speaker 1: Johnson UNW interview, and boy, oh boy, was that delicious
Speaker 1: right on the heels of the LANDI Davis fake news
Speaker 1: that CNN has duggets heels and Alison Camerata just amazing
Speaker 1: and Johnson UNU delivering a master class in how to
Speaker 1: be diplomatic as well as political at the same time.
Speaker 1: Really well done stuff. But this hour I want to
Speaker 1: hear from you about the question of the day. In
Speaker 1: my mind, I was raised Roman Catholic, grew up in
Speaker 1: the South Side of Chicago, went to Catholic schools for kindergarten,
Speaker 1: grammar school, high school, and uh. Raised in a house
Speaker 1: with nine kids, very Catholic. We had a red phone.
Speaker 1: I always believed a hotline to Rome where the Pope
Speaker 1: would call and say we need more more kids. And
Speaker 1: so my parents were dutiful Catholics, and we went to
Speaker 1: our Lady of Perpetual Help Church and then St. Philip
Speaker 1: the Apostle all that stuff, and my faith has always
Speaker 1: been part of my life, and now it's shaken by
Speaker 1: the scandals and the gigantic nature of the scandals that
Speaker 1: we're hearing about, and my heart is breaking for my
Speaker 1: faith and the good people in my faith, and I
Speaker 1: wonder if it's time for the pope to step down.
Speaker 1: So I want to hear from you guys to eight
Speaker 1: four buck eight four four D to A to five
Speaker 1: the phone number here. And I needed to bring in
Speaker 1: some help on this. And there is a young lady
Speaker 1: I respect greatly for her work as a journalist, but
Speaker 1: also her faith work. I learned more about obscure saints
Speaker 1: that I never knew about when I read or talk
Speaker 1: to Emily Zanati from the Daily Wire. So Emily agreed
Speaker 1: to carve out a little bit of time from her
Speaker 1: life tonight and join us. Welcome, my friend, how are you.
Speaker 1: I'm good? Thanks for having me anytime. I encourage you
Speaker 1: everybody to follow I m Zanati on the Twitter and
Speaker 1: just go to the Daily Wire and read Emily stuff. Uh.
Speaker 1: Some of it's quirky, some of it's kind of freaky,
Speaker 1: but your faith stuff, I think is is always spot
Speaker 1: on a solid Are you feeling Are you feeling some
Speaker 1: of the pain and gut punching that I'm feeling as
Speaker 1: a Catholic with all the news of late Oh yeah, absolutely.
Speaker 1: I don't think it's possible not to feel like you've
Speaker 1: been punched on the gut. And I feel like it
Speaker 1: happens every day, like it does goods, This gets a
Speaker 1: little bit worse every day. I think it hasn't stopped
Speaker 1: since I believe it was two weeks ago August eighteen,
Speaker 1: so we had the first news of Pennsylvania and the
Speaker 1: Philadelphi or Pittsburgh diocese overrun with about three complaints of
Speaker 1: essentially pedophile and pedder asked priests. And now I feel
Speaker 1: like we've just kept moving up the line. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: it's frightening how how pervasive it seems to have gone.
Speaker 1: And I get mad. I get mad at the numbers
Speaker 1: that I see when they start touring on the numbers
Speaker 1: not just of the victims, but the dollars. Because the
Speaker 1: church basically asks every week, like every faith group does, says, hey,
Speaker 1: we need a little help to roof fund is getting thin,
Speaker 1: we got the heater needs to be replaced. Can you
Speaker 1: help us out? And then I read about stories claiming,
Speaker 1: well this this priest was retired and they bought it
Speaker 1: two point six million dollar mansion for him to live
Speaker 1: out his life in. And I just feel like, what
Speaker 1: are we doing here? When is this going to stop?
Speaker 1: And what happened today with with is it coupe or
Speaker 1: coupe out of Chicago? Cardinal stupid? What happened there? So
Speaker 1: this goes back to something that happened over the weekend.
Speaker 1: On Saturday night, we had this eleven page letter drop
Speaker 1: from Archbishop Vigaro, who I think I'm pronouncing that right,
Speaker 1: who basically said that Theodore mccaric are former Cardinal Theodore
Speaker 1: mccaricic who was basically stripped for having had years of
Speaker 1: relations with seminarians and just ran Russia over at least
Speaker 1: three dioceses, did whatever he pleased, had relationships with whomever
Speaker 1: he pleased. The allegations and this letter and Saturday were
Speaker 1: that Pope Benedict had taken some measures against mccaic and
Speaker 1: had designated him as he had to stay where he
Speaker 1: was and he had to live a prayerful and penitential life.
Speaker 1: He could not go out in public, he was not
Speaker 1: supposed to travel, he was not to represent the church. Supposedly,
Speaker 1: Pope Benedict levied this very harsh punishment it took a
Speaker 1: while to get back to mccaricic he didn't really follow
Speaker 1: it during Pope Benedict's rain, but once it turned over
Speaker 1: to Pope Francis, it appears according to this letter, the
Speaker 1: allegations are that Francis basically reinstated him, that said, you know,
Speaker 1: ignore all the allegations against you. You're going to be fine,
Speaker 1: You're going to be able to travel, You're going to
Speaker 1: be a close counselor to the Vatican. And in this
Speaker 1: letter they also named several other people who were collaborators
Speaker 1: of sorts with mccaic, including Chicago's Cardinal Blaze Stupit, who
Speaker 1: a day went on television and now, of course we
Speaker 1: know that this letter contains very serious allegations if they
Speaker 1: are true. In fact, the Pope has done some very
Speaker 1: bad things or has looked the other way while some
Speaker 1: very bad things have been done. But today arts are sorry.
Speaker 1: Cardinal Stupitch went on TV and basically said, you know what,
Speaker 1: the Pope has more important things to do. You guys
Speaker 1: don't need to be bugging him with these allegations of
Speaker 1: a of a global child sex network that he covered
Speaker 1: up for. He has to focus on climate change and
Speaker 1: the migrant crisis. And also, you guys are a little
Speaker 1: bit racist because he's Latino. Actually the Pope is Italian
Speaker 1: by ethnic ethnic background. But it was a very strange
Speaker 1: day for Chicago's cardinal. I lost, as to speak in
Speaker 1: the parlance of you millennials, I lost my ability to
Speaker 1: even when when the cardinals says, the Pope's too busy
Speaker 1: dealing with climate change and the migrant immigrant crisis to
Speaker 1: deal with children, to deal with this, what could be
Speaker 1: a Vatican If it is true, if this eleven page
Speaker 1: letter is true, and so far evidence points to at
Speaker 1: least a little bit of it being true. We don't
Speaker 1: have everything just yet. But if this is true, then
Speaker 1: this is a major scandal that goes all the way
Speaker 1: to the top levels of the church. And this is
Speaker 1: the agenda. In fact, I think most Catholics would agree
Speaker 1: with me when we say this is the thing you
Speaker 1: should be focusing on. I no longer want any priest
Speaker 1: in any diocese in the United States or anywhere in
Speaker 1: the world being able to prey on children, being able
Speaker 1: to pray on seminarians. If they exist in these dioceses,
Speaker 1: they need to be punished with the full force of
Speaker 1: the law, and I think that that's a fair and
Speaker 1: full x dictation of a religion. And certainly this isn't
Speaker 1: going to be nice. It's going to hurt a lot,
Speaker 1: but once it's over, we're going to have a very
Speaker 1: different church. So but these guys are saying, you know what,
Speaker 1: maybe we'll get to ad after climate change. All I
Speaker 1: I throw my hands in the air. I look at
Speaker 1: the statements from the Attorney General in Pennsylvania and the
Speaker 1: guy who said that one of the things holding back
Speaker 1: any real progress is the statute of limitations on child abuse,
Speaker 1: and many states have eliminated that, so that would probably
Speaker 1: help out and at least going more aggressively after these criminals,
Speaker 1: these animals, these beasts. But here's the question I would
Speaker 1: ask you, Emily's an addie of the Daily Wire. Do
Speaker 1: you think the answer not just solving the problem rooting
Speaker 1: out the bad people. Do you think the answer is
Speaker 1: allowing priests to marry. See, I don't think so. I
Speaker 1: think this goes beyond that. If priests wanted to marry,
Speaker 1: they would be having illicit families. We would be seeing
Speaker 1: a very different um, a very different sort of concern
Speaker 1: in the church. This is a case where some people
Speaker 1: who wanted to do some bad things got in maybe
Speaker 1: several decades ago, and paved the way for a lot
Speaker 1: of terrible things to happen from the top down. We've
Speaker 1: not had married priests for two thousand years, and we
Speaker 1: only seem to have had these problems in the last
Speaker 1: forty years. So this is a this is a time now.
Speaker 1: I have had some friends of mine who are also
Speaker 1: traditional Catholics like mine, suggests that perhaps we do need
Speaker 1: some wives in the church because they might be better
Speaker 1: off it controlling the men. But I, I don't know,
Speaker 1: I don't think my well, my point was I I
Speaker 1: always thought that the elimination of marriage for priests happened
Speaker 1: somewhere in or twelfth century, and it was because the
Speaker 1: Catholic Church was tired of giving some of the land
Speaker 1: assets when there were divorces, and so that's when that
Speaker 1: came about. That was one of the tales I was
Speaker 1: told as a young man, because I I asked the
Speaker 1: priests that taught me at Loyola, how come priests can't marry?
Speaker 1: Don't you don't you see the beauty in women that
Speaker 1: the rest of us see? And he said knows the
Speaker 1: vows celibacy was part of the higher calling. And yet
Speaker 1: now we hear that many of them, not all of them,
Speaker 1: but many of them didn't have that vow. I just
Speaker 1: think if we were to root out the problem and
Speaker 1: get rid of those bad actors and maybe allow it, maybe,
Speaker 1: like you said, there's some wives in the rectory, might
Speaker 1: make two for a lot better situation. And a lot
Speaker 1: of friends who are entering the seminary now, or they're
Speaker 1: priests in the seminary, or they're very new priests, and
Speaker 1: these are really good guys, and it's important to remember
Speaker 1: that these guys have been hurt too. The worst that
Speaker 1: you think of priests and worst that you think of
Speaker 1: the Catholic Church, and the worst that you think of
Speaker 1: these terrible people who have now soured everything. They really ruined.
Speaker 1: This for men who do receive the calling, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a this is a very very prestigious calling.
Speaker 1: If you're called to be a priest in the Catholic Church,
Speaker 1: it means a lot. And that vow is you take
Speaker 1: Christ as your wife, you take the body of Christ,
Speaker 1: which is the entire church, and you're responsible. In fact um,
Speaker 1: I'll never forget when one of my friends was um ordained.
Speaker 1: The priest who is ordaining him said, you know, we're
Speaker 1: all buried and and and our funerals face Heaven. Our
Speaker 1: funerals face East. Priest funerals face the other direction, because
Speaker 1: they have to face the people whose lives and souls
Speaker 1: they were responsible for. So it's it's a very it's
Speaker 1: a very high calling. And these guys have committed some
Speaker 1: very terrible acts, and every last Catholic is a victim
Speaker 1: of them. It's definitely of a different magnitude than the
Speaker 1: sexual abuse victim. But be kind to priests because they
Speaker 1: a lot of them, a lot of them did not
Speaker 1: do anything wrong here. Well, you're you're really right to
Speaker 1: bring up the point that this hurts not just the
Speaker 1: victims of the sex abuse, but the members of the church,
Speaker 1: but more importantly, the members of the clergy who are
Speaker 1: good members. There are so many priests from my education
Speaker 1: growing up as an altar boy, as a Catholic in
Speaker 1: high school, as a person married in the Catholic Church. Uh,
Speaker 1: so many great priests in my life, in my history
Speaker 1: that it bothers me that a relatively small percentage has
Speaker 1: done such a monumentally bad thing. But it could bring
Speaker 1: down the church at least could bring down this papacy.
Speaker 1: If you were a betting woman, would you bet that
Speaker 1: Francis is going to have to step down. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I think it'll come down to what we see and
Speaker 1: find in the next several weeks. It would be a
Speaker 1: big deal to have France to step down. That's really
Speaker 1: not happened before except for Benedict, who willingly resigned the papacy,
Speaker 1: So we would have three living popes at that point.
Speaker 1: Um certainly a trial would have to be held for
Speaker 1: him and he could be lay sized. But these are
Speaker 1: all things that are so far down the road right now.
Speaker 1: I think what everyone needs to focus on is getting
Speaker 1: the church to agree to having these investigations. To understand
Speaker 1: this matters to people of faith, and not just Catholics,
Speaker 1: but it matters to people who have children in Catholic schools.
Speaker 1: It matters to people whose friends are Catholic to go
Speaker 1: to Catholic weddings. This is all very this is this
Speaker 1: is very devastating for a large body of people. Yeah,
Speaker 1: a billion people plus around the world. It's a topic
Speaker 1: that will not be going away quickly. I wonder in
Speaker 1: the back of my head I start playing what's first?
Speaker 1: You know, if the Democrats who in the house? Is
Speaker 1: there an article of impeach before the pope is being squeezed,
Speaker 1: and and that situation, so that all these plates are
Speaker 1: spinning in my head. Emily Sinnati, I don't know, I
Speaker 1: don't quite know where to go. What give me one
Speaker 1: story of yours on the Daily Wire? Then they need
Speaker 1: to track to get me out of this horrific story.
Speaker 1: UM let me see, Well, yesterday we did a story
Speaker 1: about the introduction of lingerie for men. That's a totally different. Well, yeah,
Speaker 1: I think it's actually totally different. We did that. Um.
Speaker 1: We also have stories up there about John McCain's legacy,
Speaker 1: and of course the renaming of the potential renaming of
Speaker 1: the Russell Senate Office building for John McCain. That's something
Speaker 1: that we covered today. So I think you'll find things
Speaker 1: on the Daily Wire that will certainly take your mind
Speaker 1: off of the Church but may not make you happy
Speaker 1: for society. I can't say that at that. On top
Speaker 1: of that, today's Pumpkin spice latte return day, it's I know,
Speaker 1: I can't, I can't do it. I'm I'm not a
Speaker 1: coffee drinker. I'm not a pumpkin spice person, but I
Speaker 1: guess it means it's fall soon to be here. Emily's
Speaker 1: a note from the Daily Wire. Thank you for talking
Speaker 1: about a real heavy topic. We usually get pretty silly,
Speaker 1: but I appreciate you being able to go deep on
Speaker 1: this one. Thank you. And there she goes a really
Speaker 1: smart young lady, somebody I I read every single day,
Speaker 1: and I hope you do too. Michael pelca in for
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton, what do you think you think impeachment will
Speaker 1: happen before the pope leaves? Do you have a thought
Speaker 1: on all of this? You know the number? Uh eight
Speaker 1: four d Buck? You know it better than I do.
Speaker 1: Eight four four nine to A to five Michael Pelica
Speaker 1: and for Buck Sexton, come on back, Michael pelk and
Speaker 1: for Buck Sexton on the Buck Sex and Show. Buck
Speaker 1: will be back tomorrow. But we have a hot topic tonight.
Speaker 1: Is especially for Catholics like me with the scandal in
Speaker 1: the church. Should the Pope resign? A lot of you
Speaker 1: are weighing in not only on this question, but on
Speaker 1: your thoughts on this. Greg and Allentown, Pennsylvania, welcome to
Speaker 1: the show. Where where are you on all this? Greg
Speaker 1: Well not being a Catholic though. The question that I
Speaker 1: first have about this is is the percentage of pedophile
Speaker 1: priests any greater than the percentage of pedophiles in society.
Speaker 1: It's a good question. I don't have hard answers on that.
Speaker 1: It certainly seems to be um a higher concentration, but
Speaker 1: I'm only going to speculate, so my information is flawed,
Speaker 1: you know, more more publicity, perhaps maybe not a higher concentration.
Speaker 1: And another thing too with with these priests and nuns,
Speaker 1: I think are extraordinary people because they have to say
Speaker 1: to do things that human beings are not designed to do,
Speaker 1: and that is remain single. Yeah. I have uh friends
Speaker 1: who were priests and became priests and then didn't stay
Speaker 1: priests that I have stayed in touch with. And I
Speaker 1: have I have friends who are nuns that taught me
Speaker 1: in grammar school, and they are, as you have described,
Speaker 1: remarkable people. So we need to remember there is a
Speaker 1: great number of them out there who continued to do
Speaker 1: God's work and are strong warriors of faith. So yeah,
Speaker 1: great point, Greg, appreciate this time. Can't think to stop
Speaker 1: praying for these people? Do that will make an ultimate difference.
Speaker 1: I think in their lives. Wow, what a great thought.
Speaker 1: Pray for the people who saw off and pray for us.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Greg, I appreciate that, very simple and powerful thought.
Speaker 1: Michael Pelkins for Buck Sexton, will continue talking, David p
Speaker 1: A hang on, I want to get to your call,
Speaker 1: but I have to take a short break. Should the
Speaker 1: Pope resign? Where are you on the Catholic crisis? Michael
Speaker 1: Pelican for Buck Sexton on the Buck Sexton Show. He's
Speaker 1: back with you now because when it comes to the
Speaker 1: fight for truth, the fuck never stops. Michael pelca in
Speaker 1: for Buck Sexton tonight. Buck will be back tomorrow evening. Yes,
Speaker 1: it's the Godfather once again. Happen to be here. This
Speaker 1: audience always engages and inspires me, so I'm glad you're here.
Speaker 1: We talked earlier tonight with emily's Anati from the Daily Wire,
Speaker 1: a very talented writer, also a Catholic, somebody I I
Speaker 1: follow religiously. Yeah, see what I did there, And we
Speaker 1: talked about the situation with the Catholic Church and the
Speaker 1: Vatican and the allegations now that the scandal involving the
Speaker 1: abuse of young children, predominantly male children by male priests.
Speaker 1: Has uh has been known inside the Vatican at the
Speaker 1: highest levels for a long time, And I asked the question,
Speaker 1: if it's true, if the Pope knew and didn't didn't
Speaker 1: address it properly, is it time to remove him or
Speaker 1: should he remove himself? And a lot of you were
Speaker 1: calling eight four four buck eight four four to eight
Speaker 1: to five to express your opinion. Dave, and Pennsylvania's on
Speaker 1: the phone. Dave, it's your state that let the fire.
Speaker 1: Where are you on this? Oh? Well, in regard to
Speaker 1: this situation, I just want to say that I'm I'm
Speaker 1: not a Catholic, but I consider myself to be a
Speaker 1: born again Bible believing Christian. And I say, no matter
Speaker 1: what the nomination you're from, Protestant, Catholic, Lutheran, Baptist, whatever,
Speaker 1: anyone who's trusted in Jesus as his savior is can
Speaker 1: consider themselves to be a Christian. So I think ultimately
Speaker 1: the moral of the soul story is that the only
Speaker 1: person we can really look to for an example here
Speaker 1: is Jesus himself, because all the rest of us are
Speaker 1: flawed in some way. And uh, maybe this had to
Speaker 1: happen in the Catholic Church to some extent, because the
Speaker 1: Catholic Church at times portrays its priests and every its
Speaker 1: cardinals and the Pope to almost be in a higher
Speaker 1: spiritual realm than the rest of us were immortals. And
Speaker 1: maybe he just just just had to happen to remind
Speaker 1: us all that we're all flawed individuals and the only
Speaker 1: perfect one. That's a fair point. That's a fair point.
Speaker 1: I don't know if Dave's line cut off, but the
Speaker 1: only perfect okay, good, the only perfect one, as an example,
Speaker 1: was Jesus. And I will tell you, um, well, have
Speaker 1: you been to Rome and to the Vatican. Oh? No, okay,
Speaker 1: it's it's quite stunning. And I've been inside the Vatican.
Speaker 1: I attended midnight Mass on Christmas Eve in nine. It
Speaker 1: was a powerful moment in my life. I attended something
Speaker 1: known as a consistory, which is the installation of new
Speaker 1: cardinals in and it as well is a powerful spiritual moment.
Speaker 1: And there are reminders of of man's humanity everywhere. Uh.
Speaker 1: You climb the Scala Sancta to a tiny prayer chapel
Speaker 1: outside of the Vatican near City Hall in Rome, and
Speaker 1: it's the Pope's private prayer channel at chapel. It's tiny,
Speaker 1: you can't even imagine. But the Scala Sancta lead you
Speaker 1: up to that prayer chapel and above the little altar inside,
Speaker 1: and it's protected by bulletproof glass. You can't go in there.
Speaker 1: It's where the Pope praise him self above the altar.
Speaker 1: In in Latin is written this is the holiest place
Speaker 1: on earth, and you feel it when you're there. So
Speaker 1: there is uh an understanding of our minuscule nature in
Speaker 1: terms of eternity and this feeling. And I think sometimes
Speaker 1: we elevated some of the people in the hierarchy of
Speaker 1: the church beyond the humanity that they really should be
Speaker 1: in touch with. The Pope is the only one who's
Speaker 1: infallible and Jesus the only one perfect if you're a Christian.
Speaker 1: But I just wonder, if these humans are truly flawed,
Speaker 1: and they they are exposed for being flawed, shouldn't we
Speaker 1: expect them to remove themselves or be removed by the mechanism.
Speaker 1: Isn't that a fair assumption? Yeah, I'd agree with that, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think. And now currently I posted a poll on Twitter.
Speaker 1: If you guys want to vote, if you don't want
Speaker 1: to chime in, on the phones. If you want to vote,
Speaker 1: you compare your computer and go to at stunt brain
Speaker 1: on Twitter. It's a vital question. At the top of
Speaker 1: my Twitter account, I asked, considering the latest news in
Speaker 1: the Catholic sex abuse crisis plaguing the Vatican, if the
Speaker 1: Pope knew, should he resign or be removed? Sixty percent
Speaker 1: of people in early, very early voting or saying yes,
Speaker 1: zero percent say no, that's interesting, nine percent say depends
Speaker 1: on what he knew. And of my Twitter followers don't care,
Speaker 1: which is interesting. A fifth of people just don't care.
Speaker 1: I will follow up on this throughout the evening online,
Speaker 1: so you're welcome to jump in. Dave, your state is
Speaker 1: the one leading the charge on this. Do you think
Speaker 1: it goes wider across the country or do you think
Speaker 1: it's isolated. I think it's wider across the country. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I feel like you are uh and not to minimize it.
Speaker 1: You are the canary in the coal mine unless you're
Speaker 1: you're very very early. Even though we've heard out of
Speaker 1: Boston for years, in New York and now Chicago as well,
Speaker 1: but I think this is the biggest one. It really
Speaker 1: is chilling, and Emily brought up a really good point.
Speaker 1: There are many great people of faith who are going
Speaker 1: to be hurt by this as well as the kids,
Speaker 1: but we must remember them in our prayers. Thank you, Dave.
Speaker 1: I appreciate your chiming in on that. Michael pelcam my name,
Speaker 1: As I said, I'm here for Buck Sexton. You're welcome
Speaker 1: to join the conversation anytime on any topic. We're covering
Speaker 1: a broad range of things. Earlier tonight, I mentioned, uh,
Speaker 1: some of the ridiculousness in local races around the country.
Speaker 1: For example, in New York City, there really isn't a
Speaker 1: snowball's chance, and how that a Republican will get elected
Speaker 1: to the governorship. It would be nice, but the Democrats
Speaker 1: are really organized. If you live in New York City
Speaker 1: and the lower portion of the state, Democrats outnumber Republicans
Speaker 1: eight to one, think about that, uh, and think about
Speaker 1: what it took to get Rudy Giuliani elected. You had
Speaker 1: to have a really incompetent mayor in New York City
Speaker 1: in order to get a Republican like Rudy Giuliani elected.
Speaker 1: And trust me, New York had a major league incompetent
Speaker 1: mayor that Juliana came in and beat in David Dinkins,
Speaker 1: and so now New York City after Dinkins and then
Speaker 1: Giuliani and then Bloomberg, now they have Bill de Blasio,
Speaker 1: the communist a k a. Warren Wilhelm his real name.
Speaker 1: But in the governorship it's kind of the same deal.
Speaker 1: It's doubtful you get a member of the GOP to
Speaker 1: to earn the governorship. And in in New York State
Speaker 1: you now have Cuomo the governor running against in a primary.
Speaker 1: An actress from sex in the city sent the next
Speaker 1: in and she has set out a condition for the
Speaker 1: debate that she wants the room temperature to be seventy
Speaker 1: six degrees because if it's any colder, it's sexist. And
Speaker 1: I didn't realize that temperature had sexism tied to it,
Speaker 1: but now we know. And I also mentioned in Texas,
Speaker 1: Ted Cruise is up against this guy Beto O'Rourke, and
Speaker 1: that's a nickname, Beto, and it's politically calculated to make
Speaker 1: him sound like somebody who would appeal to members of
Speaker 1: members of the Hispanic voting public. But a Rourke was
Speaker 1: supposed to debate Ted Cruz. By the way, Ted Cruz
Speaker 1: has a Debate award named for him at Princeton. So
Speaker 1: O'Rourke would probably be mincemeat under Ted Cruz's debating skills.
Speaker 1: A Roor canceled their Friday appearance, and we're trying to
Speaker 1: figure out what it was there. We're trying to figure
Speaker 1: out what it was that uh has gotten his attention.
Speaker 1: And now we understand Beto O'Rourke is scheduled to appear
Speaker 1: on Ellen on the Ellen television program, and maybe that's
Speaker 1: why he canceled the debate with Ted Cruise. And my
Speaker 1: only question for Ellen is, oh, really, so you put
Speaker 1: him on, will you also be inviting Ted Cruz? Because
Speaker 1: that would be the fair thing to do, I would think.
Speaker 1: Let's see, I got a call on the buck Sexton hotline.
Speaker 1: Here eight Bucks Steve from Mississippi checking in. Steve, welcome
Speaker 1: to the buck Sexton program. How are you? I can't
Speaker 1: really hear Steve. You with me. You're on delay, Steve,
Speaker 1: so you're you're hearing like forty seconds earlier. But that happens.
Speaker 1: I don't mean to keep you on holding. I thought
Speaker 1: I got to stave pretty quickly. So maybe he'll join
Speaker 1: us here in a second. He has something to say,
Speaker 1: Stephen Mississippi. Uh, Steve, are you're with us? Check in again, Steve,
Speaker 1: come in, Steve Mississippi. Oh he's not responding. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: glad he's actually paying attention to his driving. That's a
Speaker 1: good thing. So I just want to point out those
Speaker 1: two inconsistencies in uh, those two major races Beato or
Speaker 1: Rourke canceling a debate so he can be on the
Speaker 1: Ellen Degenerous show. And uh, I imagine that's his audience.
Speaker 1: I imagine the Ellen audience is more of a left
Speaker 1: leaning audience. Okay, so we got Stephen Mississippi on the phone. Steve,
Speaker 1: welcome to the program, sir, Well, thank you, thank you.
Speaker 1: I'd like to wait in on the pope. Okay, please
Speaker 1: do are you? Do you happen to be Catholic? I
Speaker 1: do not. I'm not, okay, I do. I am a
Speaker 1: literalist and the okay literalist Okay, yes, hundred okay. And
Speaker 1: if if if Peter the Rock acquires his his authority
Speaker 1: from Jesus upon this Rock, I will be my church. Yes, sir,
Speaker 1: I'm with you so far. That's right. So if if
Speaker 1: the unction from God is to Peter, and it is
Speaker 1: to be passed down through men. How can you resign
Speaker 1: because it's supposed to be an unction? And if it's not,
Speaker 1: then the whole connection between Peter and Jesus, the Perfect,
Speaker 1: the Triune God, the the God in flesh. If that's broken,
Speaker 1: then what I thought he is there? Well, I go
Speaker 1: back to one of the previous callers, Dave from Pennsylvania,
Speaker 1: who talked about the only perfect one among us would
Speaker 1: have been no, no, no, no, no way. Man. I'm
Speaker 1: biab believing. I think he is God. It's not perfect.
Speaker 1: God is perfect, so he is God, So he would
Speaker 1: be perfect, wouldn't he Jesus, Yes, Jesus, Yeah, I'm with you.
Speaker 1: I'm with you on this one. He is perfect, Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm with you on this one. And if he, if
Speaker 1: he adnointed Teeter and the Catholic Church says that everyone
Speaker 1: that succeeds him stands in his stead? How can you
Speaker 1: resign on unction? And if I understand it? But but
Speaker 1: I'm gonna Steve, I understand the case. Well, you're you're
Speaker 1: a literalist, and there are those that would interpret things
Speaker 1: different than you. And there are almost as many interpretations
Speaker 1: as there are uh groups around this country. Sex if
Speaker 1: you will, of different groups within the church. So there
Speaker 1: are literalists and there are people who are interpreting, and
Speaker 1: they will have different interpretations. And I will tell you,
Speaker 1: I think that the failings of man have invaded parts
Speaker 1: of my faith, and that's how I see this. And
Speaker 1: I would think that if the Pope looked the other
Speaker 1: way and did not recognize those failings of those humans
Speaker 1: and allowed that to happen to the youngest and most
Speaker 1: unguarded among us, the children, then I would believe that
Speaker 1: it is time for the church to remove, or the
Speaker 1: Pope himself to remove. And I don't know all the mechanisms.
Speaker 1: I have to do my homework on this one. I'll
Speaker 1: research it with my buddy Emily's Anati and uh, we'll
Speaker 1: continue on this. I know I've got more calls coming
Speaker 1: in Michael Pelka and for Buck Sexton on the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show. Come on back, Michael Pelca in for Buck
Speaker 1: Sexton tonight. I guess I opened a can of worms.
Speaker 1: Are trying to get to a lot of topics tonight,
Speaker 1: but I opened up this Vatican topic and it is, uh,
Speaker 1: it's a hot topic because I'm a Catholic. We talked
Speaker 1: to another very Catholic young lady. And Emily's a Nati
Speaker 1: who writes a lot about faith but other things in
Speaker 1: the Daily Wire. And I post the question is it time?
Speaker 1: Is it Is it appropriate if this pope new and
Speaker 1: look the other way in regards to the child sex
Speaker 1: abuse cases in the Vatican and in parishes around the country,
Speaker 1: is it appropriate he should resign or be removed? And
Speaker 1: currently six of you say yes, two percent say no,
Speaker 1: ten percent say depends on how much you knew and
Speaker 1: don't care. But James is calling from Mississippi the way
Speaker 1: and on this James, welcome to the buck Sexton program. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Mike. Uh just as a former Catholic myself,
Speaker 1: I was at one time. Now I'm not. But it
Speaker 1: seems to be that people think that the pope is
Speaker 1: infallible when all people are infallible. I mean they're they're
Speaker 1: they're all fallible. Excuse me. They all have failures and
Speaker 1: if you take a look at one one pope said
Speaker 1: to another, there's still some differences. So how can one
Speaker 1: be infallible if he's contradicting what another says. That's a
Speaker 1: good point. Our humanity is what makes us vulnerable in
Speaker 1: all situations, and UH, it's something we need to be
Speaker 1: mindful of. But thank you. In regards to your question
Speaker 1: whether the pope should UH resign or not? Um, I
Speaker 1: think the more important question would be if he knew
Speaker 1: about this, could he be charges as an accessory after
Speaker 1: the fact. It depends on the jurisdiction. I guess you know.
Speaker 1: I'll reach out to our lawyer friend, Wendy Patrick and
Speaker 1: see if she can get us an answer. Maybe she'll
Speaker 1: send me a text on it. Thank you, James, I
Speaker 1: appreciate you. I love my friends in Mississippi. Let's check
Speaker 1: in quickly with Ike. I don't know where you're calling from, Mike,
Speaker 1: but welcome to the Buck Sexton Show, Florida. Okay, hey, Ike,
Speaker 1: are you talking to me? Did we lose him? Can
Speaker 1: you hear me barely? You got about just under a minute.
Speaker 1: What's your question? Real quickly? My name is Mike and
Speaker 1: not Mike hesitant. Um anyway, um uh I was you
Speaker 1: were you made mention of UH priests should get married.
Speaker 1: I believe and I think that's long overdue that priests
Speaker 1: are would be getting married and they had this pin
Speaker 1: up energy and it would it would change the status
Speaker 1: of who's going for priesthood and everything like that. And Uh,
Speaker 1: I had some other interesting thoughts, uh that we're hanging
Speaker 1: on a second, Mike. I'll try and get back to you.
Speaker 1: Michael Pelca, wrapping up another hour on the Buck Sexton Show.
Speaker 1: Come on back. We'll get after it. Buck Sexton mission,
Speaker 1: decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make
Speaker 1: no mistake, American, rank You're a great American Again. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show. A former CIA analysts, remember Sexton.
Speaker 1: Michael Pelka is sitting in for Buck Sexton tonight. Buck
Speaker 1: returns tomorrow evening. He's winging at home from the left coast,
Speaker 1: literally the left coast. Uh. We have been hammering on
Speaker 1: a solid topic for almost the last hour here talking
Speaker 1: about the Vatican the scandal. I do need to get
Speaker 1: to a couple other stories before the night is over.
Speaker 1: We have to get to the d n C and
Speaker 1: their committee ruling that they just changed because they realized
Speaker 1: it was contradictory to all their craziness and some great
Speaker 1: moments in Trump history. We will get to that and
Speaker 1: what the President said that some people on the left
Speaker 1: are freaking out about. When it comes to social media.
Speaker 1: He talked about Google and one of the things he said,
Speaker 1: as a bunch of my friends. Yes, I have friends
Speaker 1: who are liberals freaking out, but I gotta get quickly
Speaker 1: to the phones because they are smoking. Of course. Eight
Speaker 1: four buck eight four four nine to eight to five.
Speaker 1: We were asking the question should the pope step down
Speaker 1: if he's caught or there is proofing knew about the
Speaker 1: scandals with the children and covered it up, and Mike
Speaker 1: was on the phone from Florida and we were running
Speaker 1: out of the hour, So Mike, I give you the
Speaker 1: floor to once again address your statement. Thanks. Um, can
Speaker 1: you hear me? Okay? You're perfect rock and roll man,
Speaker 1: toll you okay. Um. I was just, uh, you know,
Speaker 1: I think you may have mentioned that it would be
Speaker 1: a good idea if priests could get married, and I've
Speaker 1: been thinking that quite some time. My wife was raised
Speaker 1: as a Catholic um and um, I don't know it's
Speaker 1: too much about Catholicism myself, but anyway, it just seemed
Speaker 1: like I could be a good idea if they could
Speaker 1: get married. And I think in my draw a different
Speaker 1: different people into the priesthood for one thing, but also
Speaker 1: there's if there if there's been up energy, it could
Speaker 1: create negative energy. If if that makes any sense, I
Speaker 1: understand where you're going there, Mike. I got it. So
Speaker 1: I think it's something I wish my faith would consider that.
Speaker 1: But that's an argument for bigger brains than mine. But
Speaker 1: I know they makes it off of what Paul had
Speaker 1: said something. But it should have been just a wish
Speaker 1: of his instead of making an a mandate like that.
Speaker 1: You know, that's what That's what kind of bothers me.
Speaker 1: You know, if somebody, if a priest chooses to be
Speaker 1: completely selivant and everything else, you know, then that's I
Speaker 1: think that's a great thing. But I was if I
Speaker 1: could share an example when I lived in Atlanta, but
Speaker 1: I think it was the early nineties when a great
Speaker 1: priest was there. I might have been named Martino, maybe
Speaker 1: Father Martino or something like that, and he got into
Speaker 1: an affair with a young lady and he was bringing
Speaker 1: all the preachers before this happened, he was bringing all
Speaker 1: the preachers are different um you know um Protestantry, which
Speaker 1: would say we're all meet on a certain morning and
Speaker 1: pray together. I was bringing the whole church, all the
Speaker 1: church segments together. It was a great thing, and then
Speaker 1: he got busted for having a girlfriend and everything like that,
Speaker 1: and I don't know whatever happened, and he got de
Speaker 1: frocked right away, and uh, anyway, yeah, he got he
Speaker 1: got thrown out for being human, which you know, my
Speaker 1: my faith may not like me saying that, but it's
Speaker 1: one of those things. Thanks Mike, I got a rock
Speaker 1: and roll. Let's go to Texas and Fort Worth, one
Speaker 1: of my favorite towns in the whole wide world. Larry
Speaker 1: and Fort Worth. Welcome to the buck Sexton Show. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you, Michael. Yeah, the whole uh the buckle with
Speaker 1: the is going on now hurt so many people and
Speaker 1: being Catholic myself, Um, it's just said. But then you
Speaker 1: think about back in two thousand two when I guess
Speaker 1: the us um presuduced issue came about, what did they
Speaker 1: do well, they had that I think it was called
Speaker 1: the John James Commission that they involl. The bishops met
Speaker 1: in Dallas and decided what they were going to deal
Speaker 1: with the scandal, and basically they just refocused it, putting
Speaker 1: the blame on the parishoners. We're not Everyone who's involved
Speaker 1: in any kind of ministry at the church has to
Speaker 1: go through this program calling called the Keeping Children and
Speaker 1: Vulnerable Adults STAS. But it was like the priest say
Speaker 1: that they go through it too. But well, I think
Speaker 1: we need drastic action. Obviously, what we did in two
Speaker 1: thousand and two and anything between then and now it's
Speaker 1: not appropriate it and we need drastic action. And those
Speaker 1: of us who want to save the church for the
Speaker 1: good Catholic priests and nuns are are crying out for
Speaker 1: the leadership to do something. So I hope that works out.
Speaker 1: Take careful worth for me, Larry, It's one of my
Speaker 1: favorite talents. I got to check in real quickly with
Speaker 1: josh in Ohio. Joshua, welcome to the Buck Sexton program. Hi, hey,
Speaker 1: thanks for taking my call. Of course, sir, where where
Speaker 1: are you on this topic? Are you changing topics on me? No? Uh.
Speaker 1: You know a lot of people are suggesting that if
Speaker 1: they would allow the priest to marry that things would change,
Speaker 1: But the real question is I think it points to
Speaker 1: the need for reformation in the Catholic Church. You see,
Speaker 1: these priests they accumulate money through the years, and they
Speaker 1: have properties and things like this, and when they die,
Speaker 1: they don't have kids to leave them to. And uh,
Speaker 1: for centuries. They've left all their earthly materials to the
Speaker 1: Catholic Church. And it seems to me that if you
Speaker 1: follow the money, I think there's an answer there. Uh
Speaker 1: and uh, I mean the Bible clearly says Peter was
Speaker 1: the first pope, but he had Jesus, he was mother
Speaker 1: in law, so he was a married man. Uh. A
Speaker 1: matter of fact, the Bible says they'll come a time
Speaker 1: when people will come forbidding to marry. So it's not
Speaker 1: a doctrinal issue. It seems to me that it's a
Speaker 1: it's a matter of money. And Uh. Sometimes when you
Speaker 1: follow the buck, I think you get the answer there. Yeah,
Speaker 1: money does have an effect on all of us, doesn't it,
Speaker 1: And some it affects more than others. A really good point, Josh,
Speaker 1: thank you for bringing that up. If you want to vote,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna keep this pull up for twenty three more
Speaker 1: hours on Twitter at stunt brain all one word s
Speaker 1: t U N T B R A I N and
Speaker 1: will obviously post the results there right now. Overwhelming majority
Speaker 1: says the pope should be removed or resign, especially if
Speaker 1: he knew, and there's still people saying depends on how
Speaker 1: much he new if one child was abused in the
Speaker 1: pope new and covered it up. I'm sorry that that
Speaker 1: violates my my my rules. I got to get into
Speaker 1: something the President has been getting some heat about. The
Speaker 1: President was going after Google today and then the last
Speaker 1: few days we have heard President Trump make comments about
Speaker 1: social media banning or quieting or stifling conservative speech. And
Speaker 1: I am a gigantic fan of free speech, especially speech
Speaker 1: I don't agree with. I will defend your right to
Speaker 1: be as offensive as you want, of course, as long
Speaker 1: as you realize there are consequences if you are an
Speaker 1: offensive prig p R. I g uh, if you are
Speaker 1: an offensive prig, and I defend your right to free speech,
Speaker 1: but that means you're not going to get jobs. If
Speaker 1: you wanted to be a kindergarten teacher, that's the penalty
Speaker 1: you pay. But in social media their private companies. Obviously
Speaker 1: the First Amendment doesn't apply to them. And I think
Speaker 1: that we as free citizens vote with a wallets or
Speaker 1: our presence online. Look at how Facebook has been affected
Speaker 1: when so many of us said, wait a minute, Facebook,
Speaker 1: you're shutting down our free speech. You're sitting on conservatives,
Speaker 1: you're limiting who's gonna see my Facebook posts and then Twitter,
Speaker 1: I was shadow band. I don't know if you understand it,
Speaker 1: but there are some of us who will post things
Speaker 1: on Twitter and no one will see them, and we
Speaker 1: won't be told that they're being squelched. We won't be
Speaker 1: told that Twitter is kind of putting that tweet over
Speaker 1: in the corner where nobody can see it. Well, it
Speaker 1: happens when you use certain words. If I go through
Speaker 1: some of my tweets from the day and I tend
Speaker 1: to report on things that interest me or retweet things
Speaker 1: that trust me, I can see let some of them
Speaker 1: get more attention than others, and I know Twitter is
Speaker 1: gonna say no, it's because they're just not interesting. But
Speaker 1: I have taken the same tweet about Second Amendment rights
Speaker 1: and remove the word gun and reposted the exact same
Speaker 1: tweet without the word gun, and it's seen by instantly
Speaker 1: almost a thousand people. So Twitter is shadow banning people.
Speaker 1: Facebook is selectively choosing who can have access to its platform.
Speaker 1: YouTube has done so with a guy I don't respect
Speaker 1: at all. YouTube has sat on Alex Jones. So I'm
Speaker 1: I'm not a fan of Alex Jones, but I think
Speaker 1: the public should vote on whether or not his content
Speaker 1: is worthwhile seeing. So when the President gets up this
Speaker 1: morning and after saying some things about social media and
Speaker 1: Twitter and Facebook and Instagram, and now he makes a
Speaker 1: comment about Google, because we know Google is left leaning,
Speaker 1: and Google has just turned down an invitation to appear
Speaker 1: before a Senate Select Intelligence Committee. And there they said, no, thanks,
Speaker 1: we don't we don't need to be there. Well, I
Speaker 1: do think you need to be there. If you are
Speaker 1: so big that you control a gigantic portion of the Internet,
Speaker 1: then the government has the right to find out what
Speaker 1: the heck you're up to if you are indoctrinating or
Speaker 1: controlling so much information as to obscuring access to certain
Speaker 1: things that might let people have the whole story. I
Speaker 1: think it's important. So I was reading this afternoon on
Speaker 1: MRC on NewsBusters dot org. I don't know if you
Speaker 1: ever go over there and not everything a NewsBusters hits me,
Speaker 1: but this one did. It's a story from Ashley Ray
Speaker 1: Goldenberg and Dan Gainer of NewsBusters. It's a titled Censored
Speaker 1: how online media companies are suppressing conservative speech. And we
Speaker 1: know about Twitter and Facebook and and YouTube shutting down conservatives,
Speaker 1: and look, I was one of the people who went
Speaker 1: with Glenn back to Facebook a couple of years ago
Speaker 1: when Mark Zuckerberg and Cheryl Sandberg brought in conservatives to
Speaker 1: say we need you, we respect you, and then they
Speaker 1: did whatever the hell they wanted. So I was there.
Speaker 1: I witnessed all that, and we met with some of
Speaker 1: the people from Twitter. I think Jack Dorsey was at
Speaker 1: the lunch we're at, and they freely admitted of the
Speaker 1: people who work in these organizations are liberals. You can't
Speaker 1: swing a cat and hit a conservative. I'm not advocating
Speaker 1: for cat swinging, but in this story, there are suggestions
Speaker 1: from the folks in MRC on what tech companies can do.
Speaker 1: People are Google and Facebook and Twitter, and I think
Speaker 1: the suggestions are actually pretty good. Starting with people our policy,
Speaker 1: they they write Goldenberg and Gainer right, Tech companies like
Speaker 1: Google and Facebook are making a nominal effort to hire conservatives,
Speaker 1: but it doesn't address the core problem within the organizations.
Speaker 1: The company need to eliminate policies and biases that discriminate
Speaker 1: against conservatives so we know they exist. Let's just be open.
Speaker 1: And the next suggestion is transparency. We need transparency and
Speaker 1: tech companies the organizations either have stuff restricted or deleted.
Speaker 1: Need to know if you're gonna do it, tell and
Speaker 1: tell us why. And at this pace, technology is always
Speaker 1: ahead of legislation. Technology always leads, and then the government
Speaker 1: catches up. I'm I'm the last guy who wants more
Speaker 1: government regulation. But I think we need rules from these companies.
Speaker 1: If they're going to purport to be supporters of free speech,
Speaker 1: we need to know what are your rules. And they
Speaker 1: also say they should avoid partnering with bad actors. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and bad actors include people who are agenda driven, like
Speaker 1: the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Southern Poverty Law Center
Speaker 1: is not a a fair group. As a matter of fact,
Speaker 1: they got in trouble for slapping terrorists labels and calling
Speaker 1: people bad actors. Had to pay I think it was
Speaker 1: six million dollars in fines. So if social media, all
Speaker 1: these platforms, Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, Google, would avoid partnering with
Speaker 1: agenda driven people, people who are funded by George Somers,
Speaker 1: I think we'd have a much better situation. And uh,
Speaker 1: neutral fact checkers yeah, I don't know if neutral fact
Speaker 1: checkers exist because as long as algorithms are involved, neutral
Speaker 1: fact checkers aren't real. If you want to see a
Speaker 1: copy of this story. I think it's worth reading, and
Speaker 1: I think the President's going to get a lot of
Speaker 1: heat for calling out Google. And I I have a
Speaker 1: friend who's pretty big in the media who said, Hey,
Speaker 1: just because you don't like what Google's doing doesn't mean
Speaker 1: you can go after them. They are one of the
Speaker 1: biggest companies in the world. Well, your size doesn't give
Speaker 1: you the right to trample on people. If that were
Speaker 1: the case, we'd all be in big trouble. So yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm nervous about what Google and Facebook and Twitter and
Speaker 1: YouTube are doing to conservative speech. And as someone who
Speaker 1: reported on the i r S shutting down conservatives, the
Speaker 1: first national breaking story on the i r S going
Speaker 1: after conservative groups, this really makes my skin crawl. You
Speaker 1: can see the article in NewsBusters. Like I said, I
Speaker 1: will tweet out a link to it. Michael pelka in
Speaker 1: for Buck Sexton when we get back, the d n
Speaker 1: C has a gender problem. Oh it's a big one
Speaker 1: and we're going to have some fun with it. Plus
Speaker 1: the Din and Dash jerk who is facing thirteen years
Speaker 1: in jail. Yeah, it's real. Michael pelca in for Buck Sexton,
Speaker 1: Come on back. Michael pelke in for Bucks Sexton tonight.
Speaker 1: Buck is back tomorrow hanging out with the audience. I
Speaker 1: so appreciate you, and uh, we we've got politics happening tonight.
Speaker 1: As these primaries are going on. Of course, Arizona is
Speaker 1: picking the candidate to replace Jeff Flake, Senator Flake leaving retiring,
Speaker 1: and it's going to be interesting who's going to win
Speaker 1: that establishment favorite. Martha McSally, a veteran, could be there.
Speaker 1: You also could have Kelly Ward. And let's not forget
Speaker 1: Joe R. Pio. Sure if our Pio is in there.
Speaker 1: And at the same time, the governor, Governor Doug Doocey
Speaker 1: of Arizona has the task of replacing John McCain. Now
Speaker 1: he has to pick a Republican. Those are the rules
Speaker 1: in Arizona. You have to select someone of the same
Speaker 1: party of the guy you're replacing. So if if God forbid,
Speaker 1: Arizona had a Democratic governor and a Republican senator resigned
Speaker 1: in that state, the Democratic governor would be forced to
Speaker 1: replace the now deceased John McCain with another Republican. And
Speaker 1: I wonder maybe we should do a quick, uh, a
Speaker 1: quick poll for the rest of the show who should
Speaker 1: replace John McCain. Who do you think. There's talk of
Speaker 1: Sydney McCain, there's talk of Megan McCain and and there's
Speaker 1: six other McCain kids. There's talk of insiders, former associates
Speaker 1: of of Senator McCain stepping in. So who do you
Speaker 1: think should replace John McCain. We're going to have either
Speaker 1: mc sally or uh Kelly Ward or or Sheriff or
Speaker 1: Pyo as the the GOP nominee to face the Democrat
Speaker 1: for Jeff Flake seat. And that's not a lock, but
Speaker 1: we could put anyone, pretty much anyone in that seat
Speaker 1: to replace John McCain now that he's no longer with us,
Speaker 1: So that's a hot topic. We'll also get to the
Speaker 1: story of the d n C and their problem with
Speaker 1: their committees. They got a big gender problem with their committees,
Speaker 1: and most of that has to do with the fact
Speaker 1: that they got a big gender problem, So we'll dive
Speaker 1: into that. Michael Pelkin and for Buck sex and the
Speaker 1: number to suggest every place for for John McCain eight hundred,
Speaker 1: buck eight four four, nine hundred to a to five.
Speaker 1: Let's go. He's back with you now. Because when it
Speaker 1: comes to the fight for truth, the fuck never stops.
Speaker 1: Michael Pelka in for Bucks Sexton tonight. Buck returns tomorrow,
Speaker 1: happy to be here. We've got a half hour left here,
Speaker 1: a little bit less. If you want to weigh in,
Speaker 1: tell me who should governor doucy a point to John
Speaker 1: McCain's seat. I'm totally against a McCain family member, just
Speaker 1: completely against it. We don't have political families dynasties in
Speaker 1: this country. At least uh we did for a while.
Speaker 1: But I didn't like the Bush dynasty theory. I didn't
Speaker 1: like the Clinton dynasty theory. They're still thinking Chelsea has
Speaker 1: a shot. No, didn't like the Kennedy dynasty theory. So
Speaker 1: I'm against a McCain. So governor, you gotta pick somebody
Speaker 1: who will hold that seat till next time of that
Speaker 1: seat up for election, choose wisely, people, if you want
Speaker 1: to weigh in, eight four four Buck eight duck. Big
Speaker 1: news out of Florida in their primaries. Rhonda Santas a
Speaker 1: guy the the President endorsed is Um up for the
Speaker 1: gubernatorial race. So he's got a good shot, and maybe
Speaker 1: a Senate seat could flip with a Democratic senator flipping
Speaker 1: for Republican senator in that state as we'll be watching
Speaker 1: that in UH sixty nine and a half days are
Speaker 1: the Florida Governor Rick Scott is going to face off
Speaker 1: with Democratic Senator Bill Nelson in that race coming up
Speaker 1: just around the corner. So get people out and vote.
Speaker 1: And speaking of the Democrats, they've had an interesting couple
Speaker 1: of weeks as they're trying to figure out how they
Speaker 1: are going to go after the president. I know they're
Speaker 1: working state by state, district by district on mid terms.
Speaker 1: I know that's happening, so we already understand that. But
Speaker 1: the big question is going forward and they're starting to
Speaker 1: put the structure underneath them. We saw yesterday the news
Speaker 1: that the Democrats had basically stripped the super delegates from
Speaker 1: their selection of a candidate process, and the superdelegates were
Speaker 1: what Hillary Clint used to guarantee she would beat Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders had that that nomination stolen from him. I
Speaker 1: covered that campaign, both the GOP and the Democratic one.
Speaker 1: I attended rallies, I was at the conventions. Sanders had
Speaker 1: the energy, the crowds, the people. He did not have
Speaker 1: the machine behind him. They stole it from him. Debbie
Speaker 1: what's her name? Schultz should have been run out of
Speaker 1: that party. She's not. She was given cover and Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders I didn't think. It's a little consolation to him now.
Speaker 1: But by removing the power of the super delegates, it
Speaker 1: won't happen again. Is Bernie strong enough to live through
Speaker 1: another one of these campaigns. He's pretty solid. He I
Speaker 1: think he's in better shape than Hillary, and he's a
Speaker 1: lot older than she is. But now the d n
Speaker 1: C has a problem, a gender problem, you know, because
Speaker 1: the way these progressives are, everything has to be fair,
Speaker 1: it has to be fairness. We have that fairness. So
Speaker 1: the d n c's charter modified recently to say that
Speaker 1: all committees in the Democratic National Committee, all the subcommittees
Speaker 1: would be evenly divided between men and women. And they
Speaker 1: were out there saying, you see, all of our committees
Speaker 1: are going to have gender equality. We're going to have
Speaker 1: gender equality between the men and the women. That's it's
Speaker 1: the way our party looks. We are a diverse party
Speaker 1: with a commitment to inclusion and opportunity. And then somebody,
Speaker 1: excuse me, Mr Chairman, Tom Perez danc chairman, excuse me,
Speaker 1: Mr chairman, what about the people that agenda fluid. What
Speaker 1: about the people who you know, sometimes they feel like
Speaker 1: and not sometimes they don't. What about those people? And
Speaker 1: they went, oh, way better of meeting. We're gonna have
Speaker 1: a meeting on this. We need to figure out what
Speaker 1: we're gonna do. Because there are people who identifies the
Speaker 1: different gender than the gender they are. Because you know,
Speaker 1: we've now said that there there are non binary gender
Speaker 1: non binary members, that people who use a different preferred
Speaker 1: gender pronoun because they wake up today and they say,
Speaker 1: I want to be this. So the Democratic National Committee
Speaker 1: voted on Saturday to modify its charter to define gender
Speaker 1: as being determined by the self identification in order to
Speaker 1: include a classification for gender non binary members, which, so
Speaker 1: what does that do? What does that even mean? In order,
Speaker 1: you were out there saying we are the greatest party ever,
Speaker 1: we are the party that has equal representation for men
Speaker 1: and women, and then now you have to say, and
Speaker 1: we are going to have to have equal representation for
Speaker 1: the l g B, t q R, S, t u
Speaker 1: V community. How do you even make this happen? Are
Speaker 1: you going to have to now say we're going to
Speaker 1: have a a member on every committee. I know I
Speaker 1: intentionally use the word member, thank you. Are we going
Speaker 1: to have a straight mail and then a gay mail
Speaker 1: and then a fluid mail? Are are we even allowed
Speaker 1: to say that? Do we say g? Are we going
Speaker 1: to have preferred gender pronoun requirements for all of meetings?
Speaker 1: Do you understand the madness that is inside that has
Speaker 1: infiltrated the Democratic Party. I don't think they even understand
Speaker 1: it themselves, And yet they're trying to say that this
Speaker 1: is a really good thing. We adopted language that expand
Speaker 1: ends our definition of gender and make sure we can
Speaker 1: have gender non binary, non binary individuals participating in our
Speaker 1: full process. Look, we want everyone to feel like they
Speaker 1: have a voice in this country. But when you and
Speaker 1: I'm looking at you Democratic people, when you tell me
Speaker 1: that I'm a science denier because I don't believe your
Speaker 1: gender up climate stuff that is really just a scheme
Speaker 1: to snatch money and redistribute wealth when it's really not
Speaker 1: going to do anything to change the air quality or
Speaker 1: the water quality. When you call me a science denier,
Speaker 1: but then you deny the science behind gender, you have
Speaker 1: no stance. You have absolutely no stance. So I love
Speaker 1: seeing the fact that the d n C, which has
Speaker 1: every opportunity let's let's be clear. The Republicans are not
Speaker 1: exactly acting efficiently in order to keep control of the process.
Speaker 1: We shoot ourselves in the foot a lot. And if
Speaker 1: the d n C had half of its act together,
Speaker 1: they would be stomping. Their blue wave would be a reality.
Speaker 1: But no, we've got them now running scared. Now they're
Speaker 1: being chased by their own party internally with their gender parity.
Speaker 1: You gotta have gender parity now on your committees, or
Speaker 1: somebody inside is gonna yell, you know, we don't have
Speaker 1: enough one legged lesbians on this and they need to
Speaker 1: have a Native American background too, otherwise we can't be
Speaker 1: the party of the people. Talk about losing your way,
Speaker 1: and I mean no insult, no disrespect to the one
Speaker 1: legged lesbians of Native American descent, But you should be
Speaker 1: guaranteed a member on a d n C committee if
Speaker 1: that's the reality in your life. I'm saying, so watch
Speaker 1: this space. There's a great story in the National Review
Speaker 1: from Jack Crow about it, talking about how the Democrats
Speaker 1: changed the rules to say, yay, our committees are equal
Speaker 1: men and women, and then somebody went, excuse me, and
Speaker 1: now they had to basically rewrite everything, so killing the
Speaker 1: super delegates and now making sure that your committees have
Speaker 1: equal representation from all over. And by the way, while
Speaker 1: we're talking about the d n c UM, what happened
Speaker 1: to Keith Ellison? What happened to Representative Keith Ellison, the
Speaker 1: guy who wants to be the attorney general in the
Speaker 1: state of Minnesota and was charged with some pretty serious
Speaker 1: sexual aggressive behavior by an X. What happened to that story?
Speaker 1: Why isn't that story getting any attention? Oh? Oh, that's right.
Speaker 1: He's a Democrat, so you won't see it any where.
Speaker 1: It's just astounding to me. I'm not excusing crimes committed
Speaker 1: by anybody on the right if they got caught misusing
Speaker 1: campaign funds, you know who I'm talking about. But remember
Speaker 1: the me too moment was everything. Al Franken has got
Speaker 1: to be asking, wait a minute, Ellison gets to stay
Speaker 1: and I had to go. Yeah, Ellison apparently gets to
Speaker 1: stay and Al Franken, who I bet you, is thinking
Speaker 1: about a run again. Al Franken is gone. So there
Speaker 1: is a duplicitous nature to all the politics here, but
Speaker 1: it just seems to be taken to the highest level
Speaker 1: when you put the word democrat in front of it.
Speaker 1: Michael Pelka in for Buck Sexon, I have to get
Speaker 1: some crazy stories today. There there's a crazy story out
Speaker 1: there about pot and breast milk. Now, I'm a big
Speaker 1: fan of medical marijuana, and I'm somebody who, admittedly, in
Speaker 1: my unsupervised years in college, probably smoked my weight in marijuana.
Speaker 1: But I stopped smoking pot when I became an adult
Speaker 1: and got a job, a big, full time job in
Speaker 1: radio a long, long time ago. And I know everybody's
Speaker 1: gonna wait, you worked on the Wacky Morning Zoo, and
Speaker 1: you know I didn't. I didn't smoke pot when I
Speaker 1: was working on the Wacky Morning Zoo. I thought that
Speaker 1: was for my youthful days. So I'm not a fan
Speaker 1: of recreational marijuana. I don't think it's we know enough
Speaker 1: about it. I don't think we have a handle on
Speaker 1: what it does to people who are driving cars, et cetera,
Speaker 1: operating heavy machinery. I don't think it's a good thing.
Speaker 1: Medical marijuana A completely different story. I happened to have
Speaker 1: a niece for whom a law was written in the
Speaker 1: state of Illinois, who now can go to school with
Speaker 1: normal kids because she no longer has seizures. Thank you
Speaker 1: to medical marijuana. I have a friend who suffers from
Speaker 1: MS and but for the medical marijuana he uses, he
Speaker 1: would not be able to function in society. You know him.
Speaker 1: His name is Monte Williams. So I'm pro medical marijuana.
Speaker 1: I'm against recreational marijuana, and now i have extra evidence
Speaker 1: to be against it. Uh. The waste from from recreational
Speaker 1: marijuana is destroying the water systems in Oregon and the
Speaker 1: Portland area. So those people who live in that real
Speaker 1: green area of Oregon, the Portland area, yeah, they're recreational
Speaker 1: pot use is killing the water, both the trash and
Speaker 1: the use of water to grow the stuff. And now
Speaker 1: we hear that nursing my there's who smoke pot. Think
Speaker 1: about this. Nursing mothers who smoke pot, they probably stopped
Speaker 1: drinking when they got pregnant and said I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: through my whole pregnancy and not have a drink. That's
Speaker 1: good for you. Good for you if you did that.
Speaker 1: I know my mother drank through every pregnancy. We had
Speaker 1: nine kids in our family. She wasn't hammered, but she
Speaker 1: had a glass of wine at night. But it's your choice.
Speaker 1: But now in this case, in this case, nursing mothers
Speaker 1: are now showing up with marijuana in the breast milk
Speaker 1: and it stays in the system for up to six days.
Speaker 1: We're hearing another reason why I'm against recreational use. And
Speaker 1: where is the outcry for the kids on this one? Simple?
Speaker 1: I know a lot of you are gonna say, Mike,
Speaker 1: you don't get it. Yeah, I do get it. We
Speaker 1: don't know enough yet. We need to be a little
Speaker 1: bit smarter. That's all I'm saying. I got a couple
Speaker 1: more weird stories have to share with you, and these
Speaker 1: are the crazy stories of the day. The guy who's
Speaker 1: facing thirteen years in jail, thirteen years in a state
Speaker 1: prison for dine and Dash. We'll get to that. And
Speaker 1: a bride Zilla you won't believe. Michael pel and for
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton on the Buck Sexton Show, Michael PLC and
Speaker 1: for Buck Sexton. Tonight, guess this night went buying a blink.
Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for helping out tonight, and
Speaker 1: I guess it's time for a great treat. Treat moments
Speaker 1: of President and Donald Pnald Trump Trump Trump. Yes, you
Speaker 1: could name many great moments. I'm predicting. I'm making a
Speaker 1: prediction tonight that Donald Trump's deal, his Napha deal, will
Speaker 1: be remembered as one of the greater deals, not just
Speaker 1: for what it did with trade between the US and Mexico,
Speaker 1: not of what it does to help Mexico's economy ultimately
Speaker 1: our economy, but how it shives China. And that's the
Speaker 1: art of the deal. So watch that space. Just keep
Speaker 1: an eye on that. And uh I I have to
Speaker 1: also do a shout out to a weird Al Yankovic
Speaker 1: who got a star in the Hollywood Walk of Fame
Speaker 1: and said the following, Please please don't pick ax my star. Okay, guys,
Speaker 1: I mean, I know it's all the rage these days,
Speaker 1: but that's not cool. Just you know, that's that's really
Speaker 1: just Please don't do that, unless unless, at some point
Speaker 1: in the future I do something unfathomably monstrous and evil,
Speaker 1: in which case serifying okay, go ahead makes sense. But
Speaker 1: but but anything short of that, please limit yourself to
Speaker 1: spitting and urinating. Okay, I have some class people had
Speaker 1: some class pape. Well, just spitting in urinating on weird
Speaker 1: el star. I'm a weird Al fan. The thirteen year
Speaker 1: old boy and me will always be excited for weird.
Speaker 1: Al uh, did you ever dine in Dash? There's a
Speaker 1: guy who's facing ten felony counts for allegedly skipping out
Speaker 1: on dates. He would set up dates all around l A,
Speaker 1: southern California, and he would meet the women, have dinner
Speaker 1: and then excuse himself just before the bill showed up
Speaker 1: and he'd leave. Eight of the women ended up paying
Speaker 1: the bill themselves, one thinking the guy would actually pay
Speaker 1: her back. The other two instances the women got a
Speaker 1: break from the restaurant. Well, cops caught up with the guy.
Speaker 1: He's now facing thirteen years in a state prison for
Speaker 1: felony felony dined in Dash? Who knew it was a
Speaker 1: felony for dining and dashing? And his meals in prison
Speaker 1: will be paid for by us the rest of us.
Speaker 1: And then the bride Zilla story from Hell. This one
Speaker 1: I love as well. I saw this on the Fox
Speaker 1: dot com. A bride canceled a wedding, broke up with
Speaker 1: the fiance four days before the wedding because her friends
Speaker 1: and family wouldn't cough up sixty grands so she could
Speaker 1: have her dream wedding. Um, millennials, I'm looking at you.
Speaker 1: These are a lot of the entitled listas who think
Speaker 1: that the rest of us should pay for them. No,
Speaker 1: I think this guy dodged a bullet. Sixty grands. She
Speaker 1: wanted her dream wedding. She wanted to be like a Kardashian. No, no, Madam,
Speaker 1: wonderful stories. I know it's a crazy stories. Wrapping up
Speaker 1: the night again. Buck will be here tomorrow. Uh he
Speaker 1: just asked the Godfather jump in. That's me, Michael Pelca.
Speaker 1: Follow me on Twitter at stunt Brain and hopefully next
Speaker 1: time he's out, I'll be back again. Until such time.
Speaker 1: As always, test studo, my friends. Test studo a tie
Speaker 1: on here in studio with Mark Buckman, the CEO of
Speaker 1: Global Verification