WEBVTT - Elon Musk Talks Tesla Sales Slump, US Politics and Putin Relationship

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news, Elon Musk Welcome to

0:00:08.160 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>cut their Economic Forum. How are you?

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:12.559
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for having me? I'm mine, How are you?

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Very well? Thank you and very pleased to have you

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>with us. You know among those here in the audience

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>in Doha are some you will know people who have

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>backed to you financially. Over the years since you last

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>spoke here in twenty twenty two, a lot has changed

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>in your life. You're not only running multiple companies. You

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>were doing that then, but now you also have a

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>role in government. So, first of all, I hope you

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>won't mind it. From time to time I have to

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>move you from one topic to another because we have

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot to cover in the time we have. That

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>will be all right, Okay, Well, let's start then with

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly the fact that you now have this combination of

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>being a CEO and having a role as a government advisor.

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about your week. How does it work? What's

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the split of your time?

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, I travel a lot. So I was in Silicon

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Valley yesterday morning. I was in LA yesterday evening. I

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>mean Austin right now, I'll be in DC tomorrow. I'll

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.320
<v Speaker 3>be there having dinner with President tomorrow night, I believe,

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 3>and then a lout of cabinet secrety meetings and then

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>back to Slotton Valley on Thursday night.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, the balance of your time is it Well,

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly it's a lot. But is it still the case

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>as you said a while ago, that it's about one

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:32.479
<v Speaker 1>to two days a week on your government work.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's correct.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>And what does that mean for your corporate life? Because

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>if we start with Tesla, the company has suffered in

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>recent months what you've called blowback. So what is your

0:01:48.520 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>plan for turning that around? The declining sales picture? And

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>by what stage do you think you're going to be

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>able to turn it around.

0:01:57.640 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh, it's already to turn around.

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Give me some evidence for that. I've just been looking

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>at the sales figures for Europe in April, would show

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>very significant declines in the big markets.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>Europe is our weakest market. We're stronger everywhere else. So

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>our sales are doing doing well at this point. We

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 3>don't anticipate any any meaningful sales shortfall and.

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 2>The you know the.

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 3>Obviously the stock market recognizes that since we're now back

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 3>over a trillion dollars in marketcap. So really the market

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 3>is aware of the situation, so it's it's already turned around, but.

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Sales still down compared to this time last year.

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 2>In Europe.

0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>In Europe, okay, and.

0:02:46.040 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but that's that's true of all manufacturers. There's no exceptions.

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean that you're not going to be able?

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean you're quite weak?

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay? But you would acknowledge, wouldn't you that what you

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are facing. Okay, let's just take it as your what

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 1>you are facing is a significant problem. This Tesla was

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly aspirational brand. People identified with it. It saw it,

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>they saw it it being at the forefront of the

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>climate crisis. And now people are driving around with stickers

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in their cars saying I bought this before we knew

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Elon was crazy.

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 3>And there are also people who are by buying it

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>because Elon's crazy, or however they may view it. So, yes,

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 3>we've lost some sales perths on the left, but we've

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 3>gained them on the right. The sales numbers at this

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 3>point are strong and we've seen no problem with them

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 3>had So what I.

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Mean, you can just look at the stock price if

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>you want the best inside.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Information the stock market analysts have that, and our stock

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be trading near all time eyes if it was not,

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 3>if things weren't in good Jay, They're fine, don't worry

0:03:59.000 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I was citing sales figures rather than share price.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Well tell me then, how committed you are to Tesla?

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you see yourself and are you committed to still

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>being the chief executive of Tesla in five years time? Yes,

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>no doubt about that at all.

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I might die, Okay, sure to that. Let

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 2>me see you if I'm dead. So does that.

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Mean that the value of your pay doesn't have any

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>bearing on your decision?

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:44.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's not really serject discussion in this forum. The

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I think, obviously there should be a conversation for if

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 3>there's something incredible is done, that compensation should match.

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 2>That something incredible was done.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 3>But I'm confident that so whatever the whatever some activist

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 3>posing as a judge in Delaware happens to do will

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 3>not affect the future compensation.

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>This is the judge who twice struck down the fifty

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.479
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollar pay package that was awarded to you.

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I think the value on the basis on the current

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>value of stock options.

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not a judge, not a judge the activist who

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 3>is cars playing a judge in a Halloween costume.

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, that's your characterization. I think the value on the

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 1>current value of stock options.

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 2>I think the actual justice according to the law, on the.

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Current value of stock options. I think the value of

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that pay package stands at about one hundred billion dollars.

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you saying you are relaxed about the value of

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 1>your future pay package? Your decision to be committed to

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Tesla for the next five years as long as you

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>are still with us on this planet, is completely independent

0:05:55.880 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of pay. No, it's not independent. So pay is a

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>relevant factor then to your commitment to Tesla.

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 3>A sufficient voting control such that I cannot be ousted

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 3>by activists investors is what matters to me. And I've

0:06:14.120 --> 0:06:17.159
<v Speaker 3>said this publicly many times, but let's not have this

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 3>whole thing be a discussion of my list pay. It's

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 3>not a money thing. It's a reasonable control thing over

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the future of the company, especially for building millions, potentially

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 3>billions of humanoid robots.

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 2>I can't be sitting.

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 3>There and weren't going to get tossed out by for

0:06:34.279 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 3>political reasons by activists. That would be unacceptable. That's all

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.200
<v Speaker 3>that matters. Now let's move on.

0:06:39.440 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Well just one question, well one question before we

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>move on to other companies, which is that I wonder

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>if some of what you've has happened to Tesla in

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the last few months, did you take it personally?

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes?

0:06:57.400 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And did it make you regret any of you all

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think twice about your political endeavors, because it is I

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>did what needed.

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 3>To be done, Uh, the violent antibody reaction, and I'm

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 3>not someone who's ever committed violence, and yet massive violence

0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 3>was committed against my company's massive violence was threatened against me.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 2>Who are these people? Why would they do that? How

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 2>wrong can they be?

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 3>They're on the wrong, on the wrong side of history,

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 3>and that's an evil thing to do, to go and

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>damage some pointocent person's car, to threaten to kill me.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 3>What's wrong with these people? I have not harmed anyone,

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 3>So something needs to be done about them. And a

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 3>number of them are going to prison and they deserve it.

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You're well, you're referring to the attacks on Tesla showrooms.

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 3>But I think, well, it's into showrooms and burning down

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 3>cars unacceptable. Those people will go to prison, and the

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.120
<v Speaker 3>people that funded them and organized them will also go

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 3>to prison.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry, wouldn't you coming you wouldn't you, hm, wouldn't.

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Wouldn't you acknowledge that some of the people who turned

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>against Tesla in Europe were were upset at your politics,

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and very few of them would have been violent in

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>any way. They just objected to what they saw you

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>say or do politically.

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's certainly fine to object to political things, but

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 3>it's not it's not fine to resort to violence and

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 3>hanging someone in effigy and death threats. That's obviously not okay. Uh,

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 3>you know that's sir.

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 2>That is in no way justifiable at all.

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 3>In any way, shape or form, And some of the

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>legacy media and nonethless have sort of justified, which is unconscionable.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Shame on them.

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about your other companies then, in other business area, SpaceX.

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw that you said in a speech at the

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>West Point Military Academy recently that the future of warfare

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is AI and drones, and obviously defense is an increasingly

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>booming sector with the state of the world at the moment,

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>do you see SpaceX moving into weaponized drones?

0:09:45.080 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 3>You certainly ask interesting questions that are impossible to answer.

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 3>So SpaceX is is the space launch leader.

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 2>So SpaceX doesn't do drones.

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX world's rockets, satellites, and Internet terminals. So SpaceX has

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 3>a a very dominant position in space launch. So of

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.079
<v Speaker 3>the mass launch to orbit this year, SpaceX will probably

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 3>do nine.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 2>China will do the.

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 3>Remain half of the remaining amounts of five percent, and

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the rest of the world, including the rest of the US,

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:28.840
<v Speaker 3>will do about five percent. So SpaceX will do about

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 3>ten times as much as the rest of world combined,

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 3>or twenty times as much as China, which is in

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 3>China is doing actually a very impressive job. The reason

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 3>for this is that we're putting it into orbit the

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 3>largest satellite constellation the world has ever seen by far,

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 3>so I think at this point about maybe approaching eighty

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 3>percent of all active satellites in orbit are SpaceX and

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 3>they're providing GLOGH high votwordth global connectivity throughout the world.

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 3>In fact, this connection is on a SpaceX connection, so

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 3>very good thing because it means that we can provide

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.680
<v Speaker 3>low cost my bandwidth Internet to parts of the world

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 3>that don't have it or it's very expensive. And I

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 3>think the single biggest thing you can do to lift

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 3>people out of poverty and help them is giving them

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 3>an Internet connection, because once you have the Internet connection,

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 3>you can learn anything for free on the Internet, and

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 3>you can also sell your goods and services to the

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 3>global market. And once you have knowledge by the Internet

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 3>and the ability to engage in commerce, that this is

0:11:35.559 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 3>going to greatly improve quality of life for people throughout

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 3>the world. And it has. And I'd just like to

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 3>think anyone in the audience who may have been helpful

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 3>in you know, with starlink and getting it to approved

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 3>in their country, and I think it's doing a lot

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 3>of good in the countries that have approved it, which

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 3>is I think this point one hundred and thirty countries.

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Are very happy with it.

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't currently in space likely getting into the weapons business,

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 3>that's certainly it's not an aspiration. We're freaquing. We're frequently

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 3>asked to do to do weapons programs, but we have

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 3>done by a client.

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you envisage SpaceX or Indeed, starlink is a separate

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>entity publicly listing in the near future or at all.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 3>It's possible that starlink may go public at some point

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:26.839
<v Speaker 3>in the future.

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>And what would be the what would be the time frame,

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>what kind of time frame you consider it?

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean no rush, no, I mean no rush to

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 3>your public. The public is I guess a way to

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, potentially make more money, but at the expense

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 3>of a lot of public company overhead and inevitably.

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 2>A whole much of lawsuits, which are very annoying.

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 3>So there's really something needs to be done about the

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 3>share shareholder shareholder derovative lawsuits in the US because it

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 3>allows plaintiffs law firms who don't represent the shareholders to

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 3>pretend that they represent the shareholders by getting a puppet

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 3>plainter for a few shares to initiate a massive lawsuit

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 3>against the company, and the irony being that extreme irony

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 3>that even if the class they purport to represent were

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 3>to vote that they don't want the lawsuit, the lawsuit

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:23.679
<v Speaker 3>will still continue.

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 2>So how can it be a.

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Class action representing a class if the class worked against it.

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 3>And that's the bizarre situation we've got in the US

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 3>that needs a diary to reform. As anyone's running public company,

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 3>you've experienced this, it's an absurd situation that needs to change.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, do you think Donald Trump might change it. You've

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly got his ear. I imagine that you've put this to him.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Is this something you're trying to change before any starlink IPO.

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, we need a law to be passed. The trouble

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 3>being that you need extent Senate votes and the Democrats

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 3>will vote against it. The plaintiff's bar is I believe,

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 3>the second largest contributor to the Democratic Party.

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>That's that's the issue.

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 3>At the state level, this can be solved, and I

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 3>should say Texas recently passed a law which at least

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 3>the state level made it is much more reasonable because

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>you have to get at least one in thirty three

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 3>shareholders to agree that they are part of a class

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 3>of shareholders three percent.

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 2>This will be really helped with frivolous lawsuits.

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about AI, which is in so many of

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>your businesses and in all our worlds in different ways.

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 1>It's one of the big changes the development of generative AI.

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Since you last spoke to this forum three years ago,

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you're in this space of course with GROP which almost

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>everyone will know. You co founded open ai and then left,

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and you've obviously got a legal battle with open ai

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and Sam Altman. I wonder if you could say something

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>about the status of that, because you were together in

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia with the president last week with Sam Oldman

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in the same place at the same time in the neighborhood.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>So does that mean you are pushing ahead with the

0:15:28.360 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit against open AI.

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes. So I came up with the name open AI

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 3>as an open source and as a nonprofit, and I

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 3>founded AI opening I for the first roughly fifty million dollars,

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 3>and it was intended to be a nonprofit open source company,

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 3>and now is they're trying to change that for their

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 3>own financial benefit into a for profit company that is

0:15:59.040 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 3>closed source.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 2>So this would be like, let's.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 3>Say you you find it a nonprofit to help preserve

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 3>the Amazon rainforest, but instead of doing that, they became

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 3>a lumber company, chopped down the forest and sold the word.

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 3>You'd be like, wait a second, that's not what I

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 3>found it. That's opening Eye.

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 1>They've made some changes to their corporate instructure, though, haven't

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they since in recognition of of what you've.

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Said, and now that's just what they told the media.

0:16:28.120 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, part they have part they have partly walked back

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>their plan to restructure the business. I guess that's made

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>no difference to how you feel about it. So you

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>determined to see them in court.

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Of course.

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well that's certainly going to be one to watch.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I also wanted to ask you about AI and regulation

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>because when you were here last talking to John Mickelfwait,

0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you had some pretty strong words about the risk that

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>AI poses, and you said that you really felt what

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.199
<v Speaker 1>the US was missing was a federal AI regulator, that

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, something along lines of the Food and Drug

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Administration or the Federal Aviation Administration. Now you're clearly now

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.719
<v Speaker 1>in a zone where you're more you're more on the

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.439
<v Speaker 1>cutting regulation side than wanting new regulators. So has your

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>view changed on the need for an AI regulator?

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, so that I don't think there should be regulators.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 3>You can think of regulators like referees on the on

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 3>the field in sports, there should be some number of referees,

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 3>but that you shouldn't have so many referees that you

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 3>can't kick the ball.

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Without hitting one. So in many in most.

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Fields in the US, the regulatory burden has grown over

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 3>time to the point where it's like having more referees

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:53.399
<v Speaker 3>than players on the field. So, and this is a

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 3>natural consequence of an extended period of prosperity.

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.920
<v Speaker 2>It's very important to appropriate I appreciate this.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 3>This has happened throughout his When you have an extended

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 3>period of prosperity with no existential war, there's no cleansing

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 3>function for the for unnecessary laws and regulations. So what

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 3>happens is that every year more laws and more regulations

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 3>are pasted, because you know, legislators are going to legislate,

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 3>regulators are going to regulate, and you will get the

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 3>steady pile of more and more laws and regulations of

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.959
<v Speaker 3>a time until everything is illegal. And let me give

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 3>you an example of a truly absurd situation. Under the

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Biden administration, SpaceX was sued for not hiring asylum seekers

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 3>in the US. Now, the problem is, it's actually illegal

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 3>for SpaceX under itar in National Traffic and Arms regulations

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 3>to hire anyone who is not a permanent resident of

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 3>the United States, because the premise being that they will

0:18:57.560 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 3>take advanced rocket technology and return to their country if

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 3>they're not a permanent resident.

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 2>So we're simultaneously.

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 3>In a situation where it's illegal to hire slams US

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 3>and is also illegal to hire asylum seekers and the

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 3>violence Partner of Justice chose to prosecute us despite both

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 3>paths being illegal.

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Down if you do, down if you don't.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>But my question was specifically about a regulator for AI,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>which you said three years ago was needed, and you

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 1>said we need to be proactive on the regulation of

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>AI rather than reactive. Have you changed your mind on that?

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 3>No, of course not.

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.240
<v Speaker 2>What no, of course not.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 3>What I'm saying is that there should be some referees

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 3>on the field, a few referees, but you shouldn't have

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 3>a field jam packed with referees such that you could

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 3>not kick a ball in any direction without hitting one.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 3>So the fields that have been around for a long time,

0:19:53.440 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 3>such as automotive, so aerospace, you know, the sort of

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 3>food and drug industries are overregulated, but the new fields

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 3>like artificial intelligence are underregulated.

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 2>In fact, there is no regulator at.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>All, so they should be.

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Do you still think that, Yes, I'm simply saying, which

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 3>I think is just basic common sense, that you that

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 3>you want to have at least you want to have

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 3>a few referees in the field. You don't want to

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:26.120
<v Speaker 3>have an army of referees, but you want to have

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 3>a few referees on any given field, in any given sport,

0:20:29.520 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 3>or even any given arena industrial arena.

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 2>To ensure help that public safety is taken care of.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.880
<v Speaker 3>But you don't have so there's a there's a there's

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 3>a proper number of referees. Like I said, it's actually

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 3>very easy to visualize this when compared to sports. If

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 3>the whole field is packed with referees, that would look absurd.

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 3>But if there were no referees at all, your game

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:55.080
<v Speaker 3>is not going to be as good.

0:20:56.119 --> 0:21:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So let's then talk about your new world to

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>your role advising government. You are in this unique and

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>unprecedented position of having billions of dollars worth of contracts

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>with the federal government yourself, mostly through SpaceX, and also

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>now an insiders knowledge of it because of dose. Can

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you see that there is a conflict of interest or

0:21:21.000 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a potential conflict of interest in broad terms just through

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>that very fact?

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so.

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Actually, there have been many advisors throughout history and the

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 3>US government and others who have had economic interests, And

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely an advisor.

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 2>I don't have a formal power, and.

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:46.399
<v Speaker 3>That's a president can choose to accept my advice or not,

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 3>and that's how it goes. If there's a single contract

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 3>that of my companies that have received that people think

0:21:54.040 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 3>is somehow not was awarded improperly, it would immediately be

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 3>front page news, to say the least. And if I

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 3>hadn't mentioned it, certainly my competitors would. So if you're

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 3>not seeing that, then the clear is not a conflict

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 3>to interest the Yeah.

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>There's another way though to look at it.

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 3>That.

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, you have many competitors, whether it's companies like

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Boeing or companies you would like to do more of

0:22:22.240 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of work you do for NASA Blue Origin

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Rocket Lab. And because DOGE is in every federal government department,

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you or people who work for DOGE and you are

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the driving force behind it, have an insight into those companies'

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>affairs and those companies' relationships with the federal government.

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Now, all we do is we review the organization to

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 3>see if the organization has departments that are no longer

0:22:56.080 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 3>relevant and other contracts that are being awarded good value

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 3>for money. In fact, frankly, the bar is not particularly high.

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.679
<v Speaker 3>Is there any value of money in a contract and

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.719
<v Speaker 3>if there's if there isn't, then we make recommendations to

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 3>the secretary. The Secretary can then choose to take those

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:16.959
<v Speaker 3>actions or not take those actions, and that's it.

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 2>And then any action that that is as.

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.760
<v Speaker 3>A function of DOGE is posted to the DOGE website

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>and to the DOGE dog Govt at DOGE handle on

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 3>the x platform. So it's it's complete transparency. And I've

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>not seen any case where the best min has even

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 3>been an accusation of conflict because it is completely and

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 3>utterly transparent.

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:43.160
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And what about the international dimension. Now, let's think about Starlin.

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Starlink is obviously a very very good internet service. It's

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>sought after all over the world. It's critical to the

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>frontline in Ukraine. It has also had more contracts coming

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>its way, and there is some evidence that companies are

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing access to it because they want to be close

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Trump administration and send the right signal. So

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg broke news today that the South African government is

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:13.359
<v Speaker 1>working around the rules on black ownership in order to

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>allow starlinkin and that is being done on the eve

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of the visit the President Ramaposa is going to make

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to the White House. Do you recognize that as a

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>conflict of interest?

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, of course not.

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 3>First of all, you should be questioning why is there

0:24:28.000 --> 0:24:30.719
<v Speaker 3>why the racist laws in South Africa. That's the first problem.

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 3>That's what you should be attacking. It's improper for they

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 3>be racist laws in South Africa. The whole idea with

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 3>what Nelson Mandela, who is a great man, proposed, was

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 3>that or racs should be on an equal footing in

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 3>South Africa. That's the right thing to do, not to

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 3>replace one set of racist laws with another set of

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 3>racist laws, which is utterly wrong and improper.

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 2>So that's the deal, that all races.

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 3>Should be treated equally and there should be no preference

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 3>given to one or the other, whereas there are.

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Now one hundred and forty laws in South Africa that give.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 3>That basically give strong preface to you if you're black

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 3>South African and not otherwise. And so now I'm in

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 3>the subsurd situation where I was born in South Africa

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 3>but cannot get a license to outgrates in starlink because

0:25:18.800 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm not black.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, it looks like that's about it looks looks like

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that looks like that's about to change.

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.159
<v Speaker 3>I just asked you a question, please answer, Does that

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 3>seem right to you.

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, those rules were designed to bring Those rules were

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>designed to bring about an era of more economic equality

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>in South Africa, and it looks like the government has

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>found a way around those rules for you.

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 2>Ask your question?

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Is this is your interview. Everyone wants to hear from you.

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 2>Your question yes or no?

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Not for me to answer. I have got a question

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for you about about your government works and the amount

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of savings.

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 2>Why do you like racist laws?

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.239
<v Speaker 1>This is not for me to answer. Come on now,

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't be trying to dodge a question.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Do you have to answer this question? Question? Answer? No,

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>you answer mine.

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I say, I think if you I'm sure you can

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>have that conversation directly with the South African government if

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to. I want to ask you.

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:18.880
<v Speaker 2>About the total believe it, that's not good.

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about the total allown risks.

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.479
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about the total amount that

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you're planning to save through Doge's work. Before the election,

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you said it was going to be at least two trillion.

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>The number currently on doze dog gov is one hundred

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:39.119
<v Speaker 1>and seventy billion dollars. That's a big change. What happened

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>to the two trillion.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Or do you expect it to happen immediately?

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, is it going to happen because dose is supposed

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>to run till next July.

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your question is absurd in this fundamental premise.

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 3>Are you assuming that that on day you know, within

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 3>a few months this instant two trillion saved?

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:58.679
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not all I'm just asking you, is that

0:26:58.760 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>still your aim?

0:26:59.480 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Thought willing to get the amount of time? Have we

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 3>not made good progress given the amount of time?

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly what I'm asking. So, is it's still your

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>aim to go from one hundred and seventy billion to

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>two trillion?

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 2>The ability of those to operate is this.

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 3>Function of whether the government and this includes the Congress,

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 3>is willing to take our advice. We're not the dictators

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 3>of the government.

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:29.159
<v Speaker 2>We are the.

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 3>Advisors, and so we can advise. And the progress who've

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 3>made thus far I think is incredible. Those team has

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 3>done incredible work. But the magnitude of the savings is

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>proportionate to the support we get from Congress and from

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 3>the executive branch of the government in general.

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 2>So we're not the dictators. We are the advisors.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 3>But thus far, for advisors, we two team to their

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>credit has made incredible progress.

0:28:06.480 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>You've talked about four billion dollars a day being saved,

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:14.439
<v Speaker 1>but that that won't get which is an I think

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>everyone can agree that combating waste and inefficiency in government

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>is a very good thing. But if you add that up,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to get to two trillion over the

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>lifetime of DOUGH. I'm sorry, the four billion, the four

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>billion a day, if dose is going to run till

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 1>next July, is not going to get you to two

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. But you still say it's your aim, so

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll take that as read.

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 2>There's there's, there's there's what dog I mean, I fail.

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 2>You're somewhat trapped.

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 3>In the NPC dialogue.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Tree of a traditional work journalist.

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 3>So it's difficult when when I'm conversing with someone who's

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 3>trapped the dialog tree of a conventional journalist, because it's like.

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Talking to a computer.

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 3>So doges an advisory group, we are doing the best

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 3>we can as an advisory group. The progress made thus

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 3>far as an advisory group is excellent. I don't think

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 3>any advisory group has done better in the history of

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 3>advisory groups of the government. Now, we do not make

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 3>the laws nor do we control the judiciary, nor do

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 3>we control the executive branch. We are simply advisors. In

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:34.240
<v Speaker 3>that context, we are doing very well. Beyond that, we

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 3>cannot we cannot take action beyond that because we are

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 3>not some sort of imperial dictator of the government. There

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 3>are three branches of the government that.

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 2>That art some degree opposed to that level of cost savings.

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:55.920
<v Speaker 3>Nonetheless, let's let's not criticize whether there's four trillion and

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.959
<v Speaker 3>instead look at the fact that our sixty billion has

0:29:59.000 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 3>been saved and more we so too.

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And as I said, I think everyone can agree that

0:30:04.320 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>cutting waste and indeed fraud in any government and being

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>responsible with taxpayer money is a very good thing. So yes,

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I can see, I can see that you're proud of

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that work. I do want to ask you about USAID

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and the comments that Bill Gates made the other day,

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>which and I know that you called him. I know

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you've said that already.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 4>I wanted and I'm just who does Bill Gates think

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 4>he is to make comments about the welfare of children,

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 4>given that he is before quented Jeffrey Epstein.

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, well, he's he's he said he regrets those and

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 1>he's spent he spent. He spent a lot. He spent

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his own money on on philanthropy around

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the world over the years. My question to you is,

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have you looked at the data to check if he

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>might be right that the cuts to U S a

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I D might cost millions of lives.

0:31:06.520 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I'd like him to show us any any evidence

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 3>whatsoever that that is true. It's false. There were found

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 3>with USA D cuts and by the way, they haven't

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 3>open cut the parts of the U S A D

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 3>that we found to be even slightly useful. We're transferred

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 3>to the stage department, so they've not been deleted. They've

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 3>cerverly been transferred to the stage department. But many many

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 3>times over with US A D and other organizations, when

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 3>we've when they said, oh, well this is going to

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 3>help you know, children, or it's.

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Going to help some.

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Uh disease eradication or something like that, and then when

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 3>we ask for any evidence whatsoever, I say, well, please

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 3>connect us with this group of children so we can

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 3>talk to them and understand more about their issue.

0:31:50.360 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>We get nothing.

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 3>We don't they don't even try to prevent show. We

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 3>should come up with a with it with a show

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.960
<v Speaker 3>orphan meaning like this sort of I'm like, well, can

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 3>we at least see a few kids, like where are they?

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 3>If they're in trouble, we'd like to talk to them

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 3>and talk to their caregivers.

0:32:08.520 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 2>And then we get that thing.

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 3>As a response because it's what we find is an

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:16.600
<v Speaker 3>enormous amount of fraud and graft.

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me put this example.

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 3>Very little of it actually yets so the kids if

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 3>anything at all.

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let me put this example to you because you

0:32:24.960 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>grew up in South Africa, so you will know the

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:29.240
<v Speaker 1>impact of HIV AIDS well. And this is why I

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>asked about the data the US led on international efforts

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to combat HIV AIDS treatment prevention, and there's an initiative

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.560
<v Speaker 1>called PEP file which is credited with saving twenty six

0:32:40.600 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>million lives in the last twenty years. It was part

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Foreign aid freeze. Then there was a limited

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>waiver its services are disrupted and unaid says if permanly discontinued,

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>there will be another four million AIDS related deaths by

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty nine. So if you look at that exam,

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.680
<v Speaker 1>which is backed up by data in twenty twenty three,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and thirty thousand people died of AIDS related illnesses,

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>then perhaps Bill Gates's figures are not wrong. Millions of

0:33:10.440 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 1>lives could be lost.

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 3>First of all, the program, the AIDS medication program, is continuing,

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 3>so your fun model premise is wrong. It is continuing. Now,

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 3>do you have another example, not.

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>In its entirety, not in its entirety the program there's

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a limited waiver and UNAIDS have said that not all

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.680
<v Speaker 1>of the services that were previously funded by USA IDEA continuing.

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's why I put that example to you.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, which ones aren't being funded?

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll fix it right now for okay, Well, actually they're

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>all on the un unaid's website, so you'll be able

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>to see them. But mostly they are to deal with.

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Mostly they are to do with, and for example, the

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>rollout of a drug called glenna kappavir, which was hailed

0:34:05.200 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>as one of the biggest breakthroughs against AIDS for many years,

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>which came out last year. So if you are perhaps

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure UNAIDS would be delighted if you were able

0:34:14.560 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to look at that again.

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but well, if in fact this is true, which

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 3>I doubt it is, then we'll affix it.

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, fine, So finally, political your political influence. I wondered

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>whether you have decided yet how much you're going to

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.919
<v Speaker 1>spend on the upcoming midterms.

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Is it?

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>You spent a lot more money on the last US

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>election than you envisaged when you were speaking here three

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Are you going to continue to spend at

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that kind of level on future elections?

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 3>In terms of political spending, I'm going to do a

0:34:57.920 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 3>lot less in the future.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>And why is that?

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I've done enough?

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it? Is it because of blowback?

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, if I see a reason to do political spending

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:17.319
<v Speaker 3>in the future, I will do it currently see reason?

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Ok what about political influence beyond the US? How often

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:23.880
<v Speaker 1>do you speak to President Putin?

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't speak to President Putin.

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>You've never spoken to President Putin.

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 3>I was on a video caller with him once about

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 3>five years ago.

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the only that's the only.

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Speaks President Putin. Oh you must I get it speak.

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Actually, I've heard you. I've heard you speak about it.

0:35:44.200 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>For example, in your West Point speech, you said, oh,

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>I challenged President Putin to uh to was it an

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:52.880
<v Speaker 1>arm wrestle? And I know the wall Street Journalist reported

0:35:52.960 --> 0:35:56.479
<v Speaker 1>your reported conversations. If you're if you're saying they haven't

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 1>happened other than once, I'll take that as red.

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 3>Is there worst publication on the face of the earth

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 3>than the Wall Street Journal, I wouldn't use that tolign

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 3>up my cage for paragraphics that that newspaper is the

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 3>worst newspaper in the world. And there's and you know,

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 3>if there's one newspaper that should be pro capitalist, it's

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the one with Wall Street in the name. But it isn't.

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 2>So I have the very lowest opinion of the Wall

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Street Journal.

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely answers, and you clearly have believed the tripe that

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 3>you've written that you've written in those papers I read.

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I read very widely, and I'm putting these questions to

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:35.919
<v Speaker 1>you so that you have an opportunity to respond to them,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>which you are and for which we're all grateful to hear.

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Your response is, okay, we are. We are out of time.

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned you mentioned challenging. I did so on

0:36:45.920 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 3>on the X platform. I challenged Vladimir Putin to single

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 3>combat over the I didn't talk to him. That was

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:55.640
<v Speaker 3>a post on the X platform.

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>That's why, that's why I asked you, and you've and

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you've clarified and explain. Thank you. That's that's why I

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>was asking whether you have had reported conversations and and

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:06.959
<v Speaker 1>you've said you have a video.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, legacy media lize.

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Okay, listen. I actually thought I might give Grock the

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>last word, because when I asked Rock what your hardest

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>challenge is, it said the strain of managing multiple high

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>stake ventures made financial, regulatory and public relations crises. And

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I wondered whether you recognize that characterization and whether you

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>do think that this is a pivotal year in your life.

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, ever, he has been somewhat pivotal, and this one's

0:37:42.080 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 2>no different.

0:37:44.760 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 3>So I mean, in terms of interesting things that probably

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:57.360
<v Speaker 3>our complish this year, the getting Starship two be fully reusable,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 3>so that the that we catch them, both the booster

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:02.960
<v Speaker 3>and the ship, which will be the first fully re

0:38:03.040 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 3>usable orbital rocket ever in history, which is would be

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 3>a profound breakthrough, as the essential breakthrough necessarily to make.

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Life multiplanetary and ultimately become.

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 3>A space faring civilization. We've got neuralink, which is now

0:38:17.280 --> 0:38:24.680
<v Speaker 3>helped five patients restore capability using the Telefty implant where

0:38:24.719 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 3>they're able to control the computer simply by thinking, we'll

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 3>be doing our first patient to restore blank just rest

0:38:35.280 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 3>restore site with our blind site implant, which is the

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 3>end of this year early next.

0:38:40.880 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 2>In fact, that that first patient might be in U

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 2>a E.

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:45.839
<v Speaker 3>Since we have a relationship with you AE and the

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:52.239
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland clinic clinic there the I think what's running on

0:38:52.280 --> 0:38:55.439
<v Speaker 3>the AI front, we are close to what you might

0:38:55.480 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 3>call a GI or digital superintelligent, and I think we'll

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 3>see we are seeing an explosion of digital super intelligence here.

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.800
<v Speaker 2>And then we've got to at Tesla the what we'll.

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Be launching unsupervised autonomy basically self driving cars with no one.

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 2>In them in Austin next month. So it's it's a

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 2>big year for sure. Many other things on the in

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 2>the in the works too. I'm a technologist first and

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:25.840
<v Speaker 2>foremost