WEBVTT - Homebuilders Still Favorite Cyclical Sector Pick In 2018: Kudla

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Home

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Builders they were one of his favorite sector in ten

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and he still favors the home builders. Let's find out

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>what David Coudla has in mind when he's the founder

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>and the chief executive officer and chief investment strategist for

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Mainstay Capital Management, helping to manage more than two billion

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars of assets. He can be followed on Twitter at

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>David Underscore Kudla. That's k U d l A. All right,

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>David Underscore. Let what's your thesis on home builders. Well,

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.639
<v Speaker 1>we still believe that there is the long term secular story,

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>there's the cyclical story, and we're running through the event

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 1>driven story that's driven up um some of the sales

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and home building here recently and with some of the

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>suppliers home d polos that are facilitating the you know,

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the rebuild and so forth from the hurricanes. But if

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.919
<v Speaker 1>we look at where we are in the cycle and

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>where we continue to set new records. You know, we

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:37.320
<v Speaker 1>had a tenure high in September on new home sales,

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow in October and November. We've got new

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>housing starts for single family homes at an expansion high,

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>existing home sales at an expansion high, the housing market

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>index as an expansion high. Really, the home builders are

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>firing on all eight cylinders, and we think that continues

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>as we move into because we think we have a

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>continuing a robust build cycle, economy that's doing well, and

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 1>with tax reform economy that could even be doing a

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. All right. Having said that, if you've

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>got an investment that has returned six a year to date,

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you take some of that off the table and

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>just wait in pim. This is you're always asking me

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.079
<v Speaker 1>this one because no one ever tells you went to sell.

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>And I understand that you make your money when you

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>actually buy the investment, just like you make your money

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in a house when you buy the house, although you

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think that way when you do sell. Mm hmm, Well,

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we see that, you know, When we look at where

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.839
<v Speaker 1>we are in the cycle, we're about just about through

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>mid range the home builders, UH from peak to trough

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>or maybe halfway through that expansion. And we're coming off

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a significant low from the Great Recession. So we see

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that there further to go as long as we still

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.239
<v Speaker 1>have a good economy. UH, there's pen up demand for

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:11.920
<v Speaker 1>new homes. We have UM the current supplies only three

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>point four months of inventory, which you know it is

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>still a strong seller's market. So we we want to

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to stay with this sector. Okay, So that if

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>you're invested in the I shares construction, I believe it's

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the home construction E t F I t B. That's

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:33.519
<v Speaker 1>the calculation I was doing increase so far this year

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.120
<v Speaker 1>for for I t B Okay home builders that gets

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a gold start. Tell me about investment opportunities in places

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>like Europe and Japan and emerging markets. Well, when we

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>look at where we are in our cycle here in

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the US, UH, the economy doing what we think we'll

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>do well until next year two and a half to

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>three percent growth. We have very strong earnings, but we're

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>at when we UH look at a a ratio that

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>we use more and more in this industry. To KEPE

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>ratio sickly cyclically adjusted price to earnings ratio UH, we'd

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>about thirty one, which is about a sixteen year high

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>versus when we look at emerging markets and Europe and

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the other areas of the world, we're at

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:24.119
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to twenty, so they're more attractively priced. But even

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, we're seeing UH robust growth in those areas

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>now GDP improving economic data, improving earnings improving UH and

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>unemployment coming down. You know a data point that just

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>came out November, US exports were up ten point three

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the fastest pace in six years. And what that

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>speaks to is what is going on around the rest

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>of the world. We talk about synchronized global growth. That's

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>compared to two years ago when our exports were down

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ten percent. So that's what's happening in emerging markets, in

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>these developed markets, and how well those economies are moving

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 1>along now and what they will translate into in terms

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of opportunities in their stock markets. Is it possible that

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>some of that export strength could be the result of

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.559
<v Speaker 1>an eight percent decline in the value of the US

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>dollar against the g ten partners. Absolutely, absolutely, that's part

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of it. Will that continue? Uh, I think that we

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>continue with some dollar weakness. We don't see the dollar

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>strengthening significantly against the dollar index against the Euro. We

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>think we continue with dollar weakness. Okay, dollar weakness. I

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>want to ask about one particular investment idea, the Colombia

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.279
<v Speaker 1>India small cap e t F. What is it that

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>draws you to it? Uh? It is that we like

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets and that we like the opportunity of small

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>cap companies in emerging markets. UH, the in India being

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>one of those. And there's any specific reason. I mean,

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you know you like it. I understand that other as

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't buy it, But I mean, is there some

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>fundamental reason why this particular one or why you like

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>small caps in India? That it's the transformation the economy

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.279
<v Speaker 1>what uh Prime Minister Modi has been doing there and

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>transforming the economy. They're going through literally transformational change, and

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>we've seen that translate into opportunity deregulation. Opportunity specifically in

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>small companies is evidenced by the rise we've had in

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that e t F during our holding period. In certain

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>over the past year, the arc web x point O

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>e t F. It is uh, well a conglomeration of

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of tech companies. You've got Tesla, Netflix as well as

0:06:44.920 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Bitcoin Investment Trust. Still like this. We do,

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.799
<v Speaker 1>in fact that when we look at the technology space,

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 1>because you often hear people say they like technology across

0:06:59.920 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the board. But we've seen a peak in in chip sales,

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 1>We've seen uh, some areas that aren't doing as well

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in technology. But when we look at e commerce in

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, that is an area where there's a second

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:19.240
<v Speaker 1>or growth story that continues, uh, not only domestically but abroad.

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>And we think that's the real opportunity in the reason

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that we like specifically that E t F A r

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 1>k W. Well, the shares of A r k W

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they're up nearly eighty eight percent uh this year. All right, David,

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>here's your chance to fall on your sword. Was the

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>one mistake you regret in investing over the last twelve months? Oh,

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that's easy. I wish I would have loaded up on

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin twelve months ago, really, or or ethereum or light

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>coin or Ripple or the list goes on and and

0:07:54.920 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's an easy one in hindsight, but certainly there

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, in terms of an outsize gain,

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>tremendous opportunity there. But um, if we bring it back

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to just the markets in general, uh, probably that we

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't uh significantly overweight large cap growth even more in

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 1>terms of our portfolios from a tactical standpoint, because large

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>cap growth dominated in We've got to leave it there.

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much and happy New Year to David Kudla,

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 1>Chief executive chief investment strategists at Mainstay Capital. A new

0:08:47.280 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 1>question is what did you watch on Facebook last night?

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:55.319
<v Speaker 1>Shira Oviday is our Bloomberg Gadfly columnists. She covers technology

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and can be followed on Twitter at Shira Oviday s

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>H I R A O V I D E S. Yeah.

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I tried to get through all the details because it's

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of tough, you know when you just say it.

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>But maybe Facebook is going to take care of that

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>because everyone can be the star of their own TV

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>show with Facebook can't take yes and no. So Mark

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Mark Zuckerberg, sorry, the Facebook CEO, has said for a

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>few years now that he believes web video is the

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>future of Facebook and the Internet in general. And you

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>can see that right if you look in your Facebook feed. Now,

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 1>odds are there'll be a lot of web videos and there,

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>whether you like it or not. And so a few

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>months ago Facebook um basically change strategy a little bit,

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.319
<v Speaker 1>or added a strategy to its web video initiative. It

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>started this new tab that's called Watch that is basically

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to be more of a TV like destination where

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it has longer form videos, things that are more like

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the kinds of shows you see on cable television. And

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Facebook hopes you go there, you hang out, you chat

0:09:57.520 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>with your friends about Hey, it wasn't this a really

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>cool video about some surfing program. And they're trying to

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>build both community and grab more of our time. All right,

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to grab more of your time. They've got

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.599
<v Speaker 1>someone who's trying to well coller you, right, is a

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Fiji Simo. Who is Fiji Semo and maybe just describe

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what her challenges, right, So Fiji Simos profiled in our

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of gadfly Year in Review pieces. She is the

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>vice president of product at Facebook. She's been there about

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 1>eight years and she's responsible for some of the most

0:10:33.080 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>high profile and issues at the company. She was hired

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>at first to sort of help them expand their ads

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>on smartphones, which is basically the most important innovation at

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Facebook in the last decade. And now she's responsible basically

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for all video in Facebook, including this new watch tab.

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And look, it's a big bet for Facebook that they're

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to become a little bit more like TV, get

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>more of our attention, get more of advertisers money, And

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be an easy thing to do.

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And she's kind of at the center of all this.

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But Facebook has tried this previously, right, with a different strategy. Right. So,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>if you listened to people like Mark Zuckerberg last year,

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the only thing they talked about was live video that

0:11:17.600 --> 0:11:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they wanted people like you and me, pim uh, celebrities

0:11:21.600 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>like the chef Gordon Ramsey, news organizations like CNN. They

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>wanted everybody to broadcast videos live on Facebook. The famous

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>example being there was a you know this mom, but

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Chewbacca mom she was called, who put on this kind

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of toy Facebook sorry toy Chewbacca Star Wars mask and

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>basically posted a video of herself live, cackling hysterically as

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>she wore this ridiculous mask, and it was this viral hit.

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And those were the kinds of things that Facebook couldn't

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>shut up about last year, and this year nobody talks

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>about live really. I mean I'm exaggerating slightly, but it

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>does seem like, I don't know it can control it. Well.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that is part of the issue. So in

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to things like Chewbacca Mom making the headlines last

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>year for Facebook live video, the other things were people

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>broadcasting live videos of violent acts, including this guy in

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland who murdered people and basically broadcast live his confession

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook. And these were the kinds of things that

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>alarmed people, certainly outside of Facebook, that you've created this

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>live video platform that gives people an incentive to broadcast

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the worst of humanity and get attention for it. Um

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And maybe they found that they couldn't control something like

0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>live video. Based on your reporting and speaking with your sources,

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>do you believe that Facebook understands the responsibility that they

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>would take on if indeed they could be held libel

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>for these kinds of things being broadcast on their net

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>are I think there has been a slow awakening inside

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook the last year or so, just understanding how

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>powerful their platform is to shape what people think, what

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>people read or don't read, the views that get sent

0:13:19.640 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>out into the world. Um, I think Facebook initially didn't

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 1>understand the ramifications of what they were doing and maybe

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't think about the potential downsides of things like Facebook

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Live in advance. And I think that's starting to change

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>slowly and reluctantly. But there's also no easy solution for Facebook.

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>What does it do? Does it ban certain kinds of posts?

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that we want Facebook being a sensor either,

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>So they're really in a tough spot. But yes, they

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>are recognizing that they have responsibility for this powerful platform

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that they created. Yeah, you're not allowed to shout fire

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>in a crowded theater, right, I mean, there's got to

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>be some kind of incentive or some kind of punishment

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.599
<v Speaker 1>if you do those kinds. And look right now, Facebook,

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.199
<v Speaker 1>and and this goes for Google and others too. They're

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>mostly self policing. They're creating the rules of the road

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>on their own Internet services. And the question is and

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>changing them and when they want changing them at whim,

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>when it feels like it needs when they feel like

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they need to absolutely, And the question is, will regulators

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>in the US or Brussels or other countries around the

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>world start to demand um start to basically impose more

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>order from the top on these companies, and they certainly

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>don't want that to happen. I would say, also, never

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>mind governments, what about advertisers, because isn't that really the

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>only way that Facebook makes money is selling ads. Y

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook's revenue sorry, comes from advertisements. So it is

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely true that advertisers collectively are a powerful voice on Facebook.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And you've seen them both on Facebook and places YouTube

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>basically revolt when it's become clear that those platforms have

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>made bad decisions that you know, put their commercials next

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>to terrorist videos and things like that. Um And and

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that does spur change at these companies because it affects

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>them in their wallet. Yeah, well that would that would

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>certainly get their attention. And Facebook has also run up

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>against these kinds of issues when it comes to politicians

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>political campaigns. They even send out people to teach those

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>political operatives how to best use this platform to their

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>own game. Yeah. And I think our colleagues at Bloomberg

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>News have written some great stories in the last few

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>months about Facebook's role in helping political campaigns, including in

0:15:43.280 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>places like the Philippines, UM where maybe we don't want

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the government of the Philippines being smart about how to

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>use Facebook to manipulate the electorate or to harass critics

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of the administration. Right, So, look, all these tech company

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is Twitter, Google, Facebook, They do help political campaigns and

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>political leaders, um, understand how best to use their platforms,

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and that goes for journalists to write. Facebook has a

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>large organization that helps journalists figure out how to disseminate

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>their stories on Facebook and other places. Um. But yeah,

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a big difference between helping journalists circulates stories and

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>helping candidates figure out how to tailor their messages and

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>helping dictators in places like the Philippines. Indeed, thanks very much,

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Shira over Day, Thank you very much our Bloomberg Gadfly

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>calumnist all things Technology. You can follow Shira on Twitter

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>at Shira over Day and Happy New Year too. Always

0:16:42.680 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure. Small business is in the United States. They

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:08.000
<v Speaker 1>make up nearly ninety nine percent of US employer firms

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of net new private sector jobs nearly fifty percent of

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>private sector employment. However you look at it, small business

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is important and crucial to the health of the U

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>S economy. Karen Mills is a Senior Fellow at the

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Harvard Business School and former Small Business Administrator Small Business

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 1>Administration for the SBA for under President Barack Obama from

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nine to two thousand thirteen. Karen Mills, thank

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you very much joining us from Boston. You can be

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>followed on Twitter at Karen G. Mills. I am happy

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>New year to you too. Let's talk about a small

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>business and the tax overhaul plan. I wonder if maybe

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>just start with one aspect of it that is related

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to the A C A Affordable Care Act, and this

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is the individual UH mandate. Is there anything in the

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>bill that would change the way small businesses have to

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>UM offer or provide for the health insurance of their employees. Well,

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you started with the tax bill, but overall,

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so now that I'm a faculty member, I did end

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of year grading on the Trump administration and UM. The

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 1>total report card is three season a D. But one

0:18:25.080 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>of the seasons for taxes UM, the health care pieces,

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, was sort of tagged on there for political reasons.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's really too bad because it turns out that

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>about four million people in the Obama Care UM markets

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are small business owners who are buying individual coverage, and

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what's going to happen, UM, because we

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand the impact of the mandate taking away

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the mandate on pricing. But in the last two years

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a JP Morgan study that came out this

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:07.239
<v Speaker 1>year that said it has gone up very little for

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>small business owners who are buying on the individual marketplace,

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So it is possible that that will go away. Very

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>few small businesses, I think, will um choose not to

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>buy coverage when they had before because their their employees

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to ask for it. And we're in tight

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 1>labor markets now, and if employees aren't getting health care coverage,

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>they're going to switch to a place that gives it

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to them. So I'm not sure that uh, this was

0:19:40.840 --> 0:19:44.360
<v Speaker 1>worth doing and what it accomplished, Okay, And I don't

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>want to get into too much about the mandate for

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>individual health care, but a lot of it I know

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>had to do with the cost, the premium cost and

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.639
<v Speaker 1>then the high deductible. So they had some cases in

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>which people looked at how much it was going to

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>cost them to get health and show earns and they said,

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:03.639
<v Speaker 1>you know what, if my deductible is going to be

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:07.400
<v Speaker 1>five thousand. Why am I going to buy health insurance

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>for something that I don't believe that I'm necessarily going

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to use. I really just want a catastrophic care. Is that?

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's at least the other side of the

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>argument correct. Well, as long as you know, it's up

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to an individual what they're gonna buy. But if they

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't buy any health insurance, that puts them and their

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>employer at risk. Because an employer a small business like

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a family, and if one of your employees get sick.

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 1>I had small business owners tell me they went out

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of pocket themselves to help them. So employers want to

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>provide health insurance because if somebody gets sick and they're

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>not covered, it's everybody else that pays. So I think

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>what has happened is that people actually have gotten used

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to Obamacare. You saw in a very short enrollment period

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we had nine million people sign up, more than anybody expected.

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think what's going to happen is that we've

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>got a solution. I think people are still going to

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>use it. All right, let's focus now on another aspect

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:10.439
<v Speaker 1>of the tax over how you mentioned family businesses, and

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if the increase in the ceiling for estate

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>taxes will have a positive effect for for those kinds

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of uh financial you know, organizations. I mean, if you're

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>running a small business or have a business that has

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a high level of assets that are going to be

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:31.959
<v Speaker 1>valued upon death. Will won't this be beneficial? You know?

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it actually will be beneficial. I'm all for

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>family businesses. I think that this is an important part

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of you know, the American heritage, and that people UM

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have said that they want to be able to pay

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the tax once not twice. And the state tax is

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>UM is pretty tough tax. So I think this is

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>going to um be helpful to small businesses. Another piece,

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's helped fill is the accelerated depreciation UM.

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's an unusual sort of technical bit, but we did

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it twice during the Obama administration, and we found that

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>actually did encourage people to buy a truck, you know,

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.679
<v Speaker 1>to buy some equipment, and that creates more jobs. Right,

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>do you get to write it off much more, much

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:23.919
<v Speaker 1>more quickly? Just a quick question to you, if you

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>could redo any of the grades that you gave you

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>said the three season a d anything you could do

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>to increase the great average gives well D is for dealmaker.

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump has not proved to be a good deal maker.

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>And there's so many deals on the table here in

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>regulation reform, UH, in infrastructure, in giving tax breaks for

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>training or having employers pay for college. He really missed

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a big opportunity, UM to do bipartisan deals and bring

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this big business to the table, to do things that

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally helped our economy. One of the season is for

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>UM the economy as a whole. Nothing here structurally changed.

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.360
<v Speaker 1>What's going to happen going forward? So when you predict

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>for how are we going to have an economy that

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>really grows without some structural change, well maybe the grade

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>will improve. In from Karen Mills, Senior Fellow, Harvard Business School,

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks for being with us. We know that millions of

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:40.719
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be gathering in a Times Square

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>in New York City for the ball drop to US

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Shore in the new year, and also are all around

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. People will be gathering in groups to share

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the festivities. One thing that they will have in common

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>in addition to looking to is security, and by some estimates,

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the physical security industry globally could end up being a

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 1>two hundred billion dollar market. Here to tell us a

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about the security and the industry itself

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>is Lou Palumbo. He is the director of Elite Intelligence

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and Protection. Lou, Happy New Year to you. You're going

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>to be in Times Square. I understand, yes, this is

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about my consecutive year I've I've had the pleasure of

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>supporting various clients in Time Square for the News Eve celebration. Okay,

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 1>So over the course of your career, I'm sure you've

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>seen some big changes to security. What are some of

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the ones that you can highlight for us? Well, clearly

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 1>after nine eleven and on the heels of these UM,

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>I would say, rather commonplace incidents throughout the world and

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>now our country, we've seen seen an increased presence of

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement, especially in the form of practical units. Post

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:01.120
<v Speaker 1>nine eleven, they began to implement what we call high

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:05.479
<v Speaker 1>pointment and observers, which are snipers. I'm not divulging anything

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 1>that the Police Commissioner O'Neill hasn't already spoken to UM.

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the perimeters pushed out, choke points hardened, UM,

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:19.439
<v Speaker 1>increase of overall deployment for this for this event, UH

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>taking control of the subways, shutting down garages, and proximity

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of times square welding the caps for the streaked guests

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>is to escape from corn ed. We've done everything, removal

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of garbage pails, post office boxes, everything you could possibly

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine that could represent some form of a delivery system

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>for a device or even an individual. So we've seen

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>consistently post nine eleven, a continuous hardening of target. Now,

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>this hardening of targets, it comes with a cost, right absolutely,

0:25:56.320 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I know people ask me all the

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>time about that. You know, what's the budge it like?

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 1>And my response to them is the budget is rather

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>fluid because based on an event or or an episode

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the week before or even the evening of could change

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the entire approach of a law enforcement agency, not just

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 1>locally but through our federal agencies and the intelligence community.

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And what I say to people is, how do you

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>monitorize the value of someone's life? You can't. And the

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>thing I do want to say, which I think people

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>should be mindful of, whatever the amounts of money that

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>are being allocated in budget to secure these events, whether

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it's Sat Patty's, they parade, the Halloween festivity on October

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty one in Lower Manhattan uh St Patrick's Thanksgiving Time Square.

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>The police department seems to have a formula that they've

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>been able to put into place that we have not

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>had an incident. So I know that there's a lot

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of money involved, as we know just listening to when

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>President Trump comes into Trump Tower, they estimated a million

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars a day. It's hard to give a definitive number,

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>but whatever of that number is, it seems to be

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the right number because they seem to have the deployment down.

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 1>They seem to have the perimeter properly constructed, and I

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>don't mean just from north to south and east to west,

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>even vertically. They have this down pretty much pat and

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no other police department in the world that has

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the ability to do something like in New Year's Eve

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>deployment because of the thirty seven thousand sworn officers they

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>have in the city lou We understand and and UH

0:27:29.040 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of course are grateful for all of their efforts, and

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>not only in New York, but around the country and

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>around the world. You have law enforcement officials working and

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>during these times to secure the environments. Is what do

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you say though, if someone comes back and says, look,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>these threats that you are guarding against, they are they

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>may be threats against specific areas. In other words, as

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>horrible as a potential attack might be, it is not

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:04.160
<v Speaker 1>going to cause the country to come to a complete stop.

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Even we found that even with nine eleven that the

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>country rebuilt itself and went on. Is there a point

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>at which you would say, gee, we want the news media,

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>let's say, to offer less publicity to the people that

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>perpetrate these things, because it's not a physical attack that's

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>going to cripple the economy, but it it becomes a

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>psychological attack. Yes, that's correct. And one of the mechanisms

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that prevents the psychological attack from overcoming the citizens of

0:28:36.960 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>this concert country or the residents of the state and

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>city of New York is the reassurance that law enforcement

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to provide a safe and as safe in

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>an environment as they possibly can. So I go back

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and say this again. You know, you know, I I

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>live by this philosophy error on the side of caution,

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's a lot of what law enforcement does as well.

0:28:56.640 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And I repeat to you again, whatever they have implemented

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>as far as planning and methodology, it's working. So I

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if there's a criticism, if that's what I'm

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>sensing that can be made, or a question. No, no,

0:29:11.320 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it was. It wasn't a criticism of of their efforts.

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>It was what can the non law enforcement officials or

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>even just regular people give you that tensecon What can

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 1>regular people do in order to support all of your efforts. Basically,

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the first thing is if you see things that are

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>out of the ordinary, report at number one. Number two.

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Try to develop this concept what we call situational awareness.

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.080
<v Speaker 1>If you see individuals that are acting out of sync

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in your environment, or packages are left or begs, please

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>report them immediately to a local law enforcement agency. In addition,

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I would recommend that everybody abandoned the practice of sticking

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>earbuds in their ears, which is kind of commonly done.

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>It's how we unestize ourselves to a lot of points.

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Good point, Lou Palumbo, thank you very much, and happy

0:29:57.480 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>New Year two, Director of Elite Intelligence and Protection about

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Security on coming up New Year's Eve celebrations. Thanks for

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. You can

0:30:12.480 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud or whatever.

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.240
<v Speaker 1>at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa abramoits one

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide on

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio