WEBVTT - Reusable Rockets

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says the stars

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>look very different today. I'm Jonathan Strickland, Laura, and I'm

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick Melancholy again. It's a two First. I told

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you in the last episode that was a bitter sweet.

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>That was tribute, right, tribute. Yeah. Actually, now I feel

0:00:32.720 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like I need to like find some good Alan Rickman quotes,

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it's been a rough week. Wizards and Goblins. Man, Wizards

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>and Goblins, got my slitherin sweater here though, So everything's

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>doing okay. Yeah. So while we are mourning, we're grieving,

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we're also celebrating because one, we're celebrating great art that

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>was left behind as artists themselves have passed away. But

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>we're also celebrating because we're in an era of amazing

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 1>technological and science development and we're witnessing it right now.

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Like we are in a time that is phenomenal for

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>multiple reasons, and just one of those is that recently

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a couple of really cool demonstrations of a

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>technology that we've been waiting for for a while. Uh,

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea of reusable rockets, rockets that can launch up,

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>go into space, returned to Earth and land safely so

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that they could be used again after being refurbished. And

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a big deal and we'll talk about why

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in this episode. Yea. So, so the two examples that

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen are are Blue Origin, which was the company company. Yeah,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Blue Origins the company, and that was that's backed by

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Bezos of Amazon. Uh, and their rocket New Shepherd,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>which was the first one in late I think it

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was November, launched up, went to the edge of space.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that in a little bit, and then

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>returned to Earth and landed safely using thrusters to maneuver

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at self and land upright. And then uh, SpaceX would

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>be the other one, and they launched a Falcon nine

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>which actually delivered a payload into lower Earth ormit because

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX does that. Yeah. Yeah, it was a payload that

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>had some satellites in it. So now I should mention

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that the Falcon nine, it was the first stage that

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>returned to The Falcon nine is a two stage rocket.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about that a little bit later too.

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But in both cases, this is really impressive display of

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>technological and engineering expertise. Now, if you're sitting there thinking,

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.160
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, what's so great about that? I thought

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.520
<v Speaker 1>all the spacecraft we sent to space typically returned. Isn't

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>that sort of the point? If they if they're especially

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>for crude space missions, don't they come back? Here you

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>need to understand the distinction between the spacecraft or the capsule,

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>for true, and the rocket. That's true. I'm being very

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>loose with the terminology, but yes, the rocket, the vehicle

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that delivers the spacecraft up into space, is what we're

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>really talking about here. And the situation with rockets today,

0:03:05.800 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it seems kind of wasteful. It's like

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>if you decided, hey, I'm gonna cook dinner, and in

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the process of doing so, you destroyed every piece of

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>equipment in your kitchen that you used to make dinner with,

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>like the whole kitchen. Basically, like you just at the

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>end of when by the time it's done, your stove

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is gone, your fridges, pots and pans in the trash,

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Your you know, knife, you're going in the trash. You're ruined.

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.119
<v Speaker 1>The example I gave is imagine that you are going

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>to go on a family road trip and you buy

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>a brand new car, and then you go out to

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Wally World, and then you just leave the car there

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and you uber it back home, and your car you

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>never get to touch that car again. That car is gone.

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>So every time you take a road trip you have

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to buy a new car. That sounds expensive. You can

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>get up there. I mean, you know, it depends on

0:03:50.480 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>your taste of vehicle. I being a luxurious type. It's

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it starts to rack up after eight or nine trips. Sure,

0:03:57.200 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>And as you can imagine, launching things into space is

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 1>even as cheap as going to Wally World. No, it's

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>actually a tad more expensive. Uh yeah, So we wanted

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>to talk today about the concept of reusable rockets. Why

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is that a big deal? And to really understand that.

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought it'd be kind of interesting because that's the

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>way I think, to have a rundown on the basic

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>physics of rocketry, so we can understand what is going

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>on when we're sending a rocket up into space. This

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.840
<v Speaker 1>is particularly important because New Shepherd and Falcon nine are

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>two very different approaches right. One thing you should keep

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in mind, of course, is where those two names come from.

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>New Shepherd named after Alan Shepherd, the first American to

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:41.239
<v Speaker 1>make it into space. Falcon nine named after Star Wars

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the Millennium Fall. So, uh, those two are are quite different.

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's also a really good look into the minds

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of Elon Musk and Jeff Basis. Yeah, I would, I

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>would agree with that, but this this is uh, you know,

0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk a little bit about how those two are

0:04:56.960 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>very different as we move along. So rockets work because

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of fundamental law of our universe actually collection of laws

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of our universe that we understand it. Yeah, if they

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>weren't true, we wouldn't be sending stuff into space, right,

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>And uh, those laws were first explained in a book

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>called the Philosophia Naturalists Principia Mathematica by Isaac Newton, Sir,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 1>pardon me, sir Isaac Newton. And in that work Newton

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>framed his observations of physics and frame them in the

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>form of basic laws of motion. And there are three

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>basic laws that we have to really look at. And

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.239
<v Speaker 1>the first is that objects at rest remain at rest

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and objects in motion remain in motion, moving in a

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 1>straight line at a steady speed unless acted upon by

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>an unbalanced force. Meaning an outside force of some sort. Right,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>So a ball only stops rolling along the ground because

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.919
<v Speaker 1>of friction. It doesn't stop rolling because things naturally slow

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>down over time, Right, it would just continue for infinity

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if in fact that friction wasn't present, or or if

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it ran into something else in the change direction, obviously

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that would be difference, or maybe went through a gravitational

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:14.160
<v Speaker 1>field that caused some attraction. Yeah, but again, so when

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it encounters an unbalanced force, given no unbalanced forces, given

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:21.239
<v Speaker 1>only balanced forces. Yes. Also, we we wanted to note

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a thing about the terms rest and motion. Yeah, they're

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>relative terms, so it all depends upon your point of reference. Right,

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So some of it can be a little counterintuitive. If I'm,

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for example, sitting on a train and the train is moving,

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.719
<v Speaker 1>Am I at rest or my in motion? Well, we

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>would describe me as being at rest because compared to

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>my surroundings, I eat the train, the physical train that's

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>around me, I'm not moving. I'm sitting down, I'm sitting

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in a seat. Now, if I were to get up

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and walk in that train, then I would be in

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>motion because according to my surroundings the train I am

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 1>moving around compared to that the train itself is in

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>motion because it's moving relative to the surroundings the countryside

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>or tunnel or whatever the heck, the train happens to

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>be going around, so it's all relative. Yeah, so that's

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>important to remember. Unbalanced force is referencing the sum, total

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 1>or net force exerted on an object. So I used

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 1>a sandwich on a table because I wrote this note

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>shortly before lunch and I was dreaming of sandwiches. Hungry

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>notes are sandwich notes, Yes, So a sandwich on a

0:07:28.160 --> 0:07:31.119
<v Speaker 1>table is an example of an object under balanced force

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>because gravity is pulling down on that sandwich, but the

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>table is giving equal force upward, keeping the sandwich on

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the table. It's not pushing too hard because we're pushing

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 1>harder than the sandwich would jump off the table. Right.

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>This is a really great analygy to be an amazing

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>table would be an amazing table, but it's not happening.

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's exactly a balanced force. Now, if you

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>can buy this table from you, this is a metaphorical table,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So the answer is yes, I will sell it. Uh,

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you were the table, I am interested in

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>your sandwich table, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>If you were to pick up the sandwich, you would

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>introduce unbalanced force because you would be actually counteracting gravity. Further,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>you would have to use enough force to counteract the

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>poll of gravity to lift the sandwich higher than its

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>current height on the table. So what we're really talking

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>about here is is two different scenarios in which forces

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>can be balanced. Yes. Yeah, So if an object does

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>at rest, the forces on it are balanced, and that's

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that's without question, right, If an objects at rest, by definition,

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the forces are balanced. If an object is moving, then

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it could still have balanced forces. If it's moving in

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a straight line and it's moving at a constant speed.

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>If it's speed changes or its direction changes, that's a

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>change and acceleration that is indicative of an unbalanced force

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>being applied to this object. So that's covering just the

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>first law of motion. The other two are pretty easy

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to remember. Second law of motion states that force is

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>equal to mass times acceleration. Keeping mind, acceleration is not

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just speed like I said, it's it's a change in

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>speed or direction because it's a vector quantity. And then

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the third law, which is for every action

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>there is an equal and opposite reaction, And that's really

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the rocket law right there. Yeah, all three of these

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are are applicable. But yeah, but but the rocket would

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>not go anywhere if it weren't for the fact of

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that third. That's the key to the propellant idea of

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>rocket tree. So when we look at rockets, a rocket

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>at rest is going to require a certain amount of

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:41.839
<v Speaker 1>unbalanced force for it to lift off of a launchpad.

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got this big, massive, heavy thing sitting

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>on a un a really big sandwich. Yeah, an enormous

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>sandwich sitting on a really big tape. Because the moon

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.080
<v Speaker 1>looks very hungry, yes, and shouldn't we treat it once

0:09:57.120 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in a while. So this unbalanced force has to be

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>greater than the forces pulling it downwards. So it has

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to be greater than gravity. And uh so with rockets

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we call that unbalanced for something specific, we call it thrust.

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>So a rocket has to have enough thrust to lift

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 1>off of the launch pad. If it doesn't, then it's

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>not going to go anywhere. Even if you're shooting flames

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>out the back of this rocket. If it's not enough thrust,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it will just be a flamethrower firing at the launchpad.

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And gravity isn't the only thing that's that's in play

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 1>here exactly. There are a couple of other things to

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind. So there's a drag, which actually is

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of air resistance. Really yeah, yeah, because

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>as we have said many times before, the air around

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>us is not open and clear. It's soup particle soup. Yeah.

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 1>If it were otherwise, we'd be in a vacuum and

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that would suck for us. We wouldn't exactly like a hoover.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>It would suck for us. I wish you could see

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the little laugh that Laura. What was great was Laura

0:10:55.480 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>half laughter that almost came out. There was the moment

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>where where she wasn't sure where I was going, and

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>then there was the moment where she's like, on, man,

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I probably make around to you a lot.

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It's you're not the only person I inspire that. But

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, so as long as a rocket is

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.600
<v Speaker 1>within Earth's atmosphere, it has to deal with the drag, right,

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna deal with this air resistance, which is part

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of something that like, when we think of air resistance,

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you're probably thinking, well, that's got to be minor compared

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to gravity. I'm not saying it's more powerful than gravity,

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's something that as a rocket scientist you have

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to take into account. Otherwise you might not be developing

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a rocket engine that provides enough thrust to escape Earth's gravity. Actually,

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to escape ears gravity entirely, I mean not just going

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>into orbit, but to actually leave Earth's gravity, you need

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to be going at a speed greater than eleven point

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>one eight six kilometers per second or six point nine

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>five miles per second. Wait, that's really fast, super fast

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>for seventy kilometers per hour or thousand twenty three miles

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>per hour. I know that's true, but you don't think

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>about that when you watch a rocket take off because

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't look like it's going that fact, well,

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>at the point where it's leaving the ground, it's not

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>going that fast exactly constantly accelerating. And then, of course,

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>once you get outside the air atmosphere, you're no longer

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the drag. And also the further out you go,

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the less you have to worry about gravity. And the

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>mass of the rocket itself is changing, right, because you've

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 1>got the mass of all the fuel inside the rocket.

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:37.439
<v Speaker 1>As you burn that fuel, that mass starts to decrease,

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you need less force to accelerate it, right, because forces

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>mass times acceleration um. As the mass goes down, it

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>actually is easier to accelerate, right. And that's why multi

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>stage rockets are so interesting, because you can jettison part

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the rocket you had used to get up to

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:57.720
<v Speaker 1>where you are at that point of that altitude. Right.

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>That's what we talked about earlier, like throwing your pots

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and pants in the trash as you're done with them, right,

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the second stage you light up, and the

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>second stage can then accelerate the smaller mass of the

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>rocket plus spacecraft, uh, much easier than it would if

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the first stage were still attached, because then you would

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>have more mass to deal with. So that's that's interesting too.

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>So the way that this thrust is generated is through

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>propellant through burning fuel. Essentially, you're creating very hot, very

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>rapidly expanding gas and you're directing it through a nozzle. Yeah,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one thing we should specifies that it's kind

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.959
<v Speaker 1>of different than when we usually think about burning fuel.

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>We we're thinking about like internal combustion engines or something

0:13:43.800 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like this. A rocket literally works by throwing mass out

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the back. Yeah, it's and that mass is in the

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>form of gas, and you would think, oh, gas doesn't

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>have a whole lot of mass to it. Well, it's true,

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's coming out at an incredible rate. Yes, So

0:13:59.559 --> 0:14:02.760
<v Speaker 1>remember forces mass times acceleration. If that gas is coming

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>out at an incredible acceleration, then the fact that it's

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>small as far as mask goes doesn't matter so much,

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>right though, I also think the total escaping mass that

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>comes out the back of a rocket is pretty significant,

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:19.560
<v Speaker 1>even though it's gas over the over the length of

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a launch, definitely, But at any given instant, the amount

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of gas that's escaping that mass is tiny compared to

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the rocket plus spacecraft, right, But the acceleration is so

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>great that it's enough to counteract gravity. So, in other words,

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>when you watch a launch and you see that kind

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of slow lift off, that's because you've got this huge

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>mass undergoing a relatively small amount of acceleration compared to

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the tiny mass of the gas particles undergoing massive acceleration. Now,

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I have another physics question. Has anybody ever done the

0:14:55.960 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>math to figure out how much it changes the position

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>shin of the orbit of the Earth every time you

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have a rocket to pitch against the Earth to leave.

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Orbit pushes back, Earth pushes back, So you know, you

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>shove Earth, Earth shoves you. Then it goes to your family.

0:15:16.800 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Another reason to go treat the moon. The moon never

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>did nothing to anybody, well werewolves, but other than them.

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So obviously, when you are making your plans to launch

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 1>your rocket, it's not just the mass of the rocket

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and spacecraft you have to take into account. You also

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 1>have to take into account the mass of the fuel

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're including, right, So this gets a little more

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>complicated because then you think, all right, well I need

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to add enough fuel to get to this particular altitude,

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>more fuel to pay for the fuel exactly right. So

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>then you know, it's interesting, Joe, because before we went

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>into the studio, in fact, a couple of hours ago,

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you had mentioned it's really cool that we live on

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Earth because Earth has properties that allow rocketry to even

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>work here. Yeah, we actually got a really good piece

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of listener mail about this one time on Stuff to

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Blow Your Mind, the other podcast that I do with

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and Christian Seger, and this listener wrote in

0:16:12.760 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk to us about about how we're in a

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>nice position on Earth that you know, we can build

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>rockets that can escape Earth's gravity. But if we lived

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>on a planet that had a more difficult to escape gravity, well,

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what would we do. Yeah, Because if you

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>can't find fuel that has the energy density that you

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>need and is able to release that gas at an

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>acceleration that's going to counteract the effect of gravity on

0:16:37.480 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>your mass. In this case of rocket, you're stuck. Yeah,

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>technological civilization that just can't get off the surface of

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the planet, which is entirely possible depending upon the gravity,

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>right or not just the gravity, but also which elements

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are commonly available to turn into fuel, although for ygen

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>not uncommon. I mean, once you figure out like fusion,

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>then probably have a pretty good chance. Fusion is great.

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Fusion is great. Once you get into space to actually

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>create lift with thrust, it would be interesting. I'm sure

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a way to do it. I'm just I guess

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you could probably even do it with steam if you

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to, like if you wanted to write a

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>boiler into space plan Yeah, But fusion I think of

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>as more of a way of releasing a controlled amount

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of energy over a long period of time, as opposed

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>to that burst that you need in order to escape

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the bonds of Earth or whatever hypothetical plant. Yeah, maybe

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>you could do one of those nuclear explosion reactions you do,

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the use nuclear bombs to propel yourself. You just yeah,

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like I've actually read about this, using like three

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or four nuclear explosions to propel an object into space.

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, once you're real done with the planet, then

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>why not. I've been stuck here for thousands of years.

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sick of it for them, For them, nuclear real

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>asian might be a tasty treat. So at any rate,

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 1>getting back to some of the other things that affect

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>rockets taking off, there's also air pressure, so this is

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting too. You know, you have to counteract air pressure

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in order to have gas escape from the rocket in

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the first place. Right, If the air pressure were too strong,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it would be like a cork, so no gas would

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>ever escape your rocket. So your rocket has to produce

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>more internal pressure than there is air pressure here on Earth.

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Not such a big deal, right, If air pressure were

0:18:33.160 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that great where a rocket could not generate enough internal

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>pressure to escape, we wouldn't be breathing right now. But

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>it is a factor that you have to take into

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>account when again you're a rocket scientist, it's not completely

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>trivial where you can ignore it. Also, rockets have to

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously be strong enough to contain that internal pressure. If

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>they didn't, they would not be rockets. They would be

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>bombs because it would explode. Uh, that would be what

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you would call something that is unable to contain the

0:19:01.200 --> 0:19:04.680
<v Speaker 1>pressure that generates inside of it. Um And until recently

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they were one use affairs. It's kind of like with

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.040
<v Speaker 1>your kitchen example, my car example. The idea that you

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>use this thing one time. Other couple of exceptions that

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the one that Lauren will pick up in a second.

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.879
<v Speaker 1>But in general, you'd use it to launch something up

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>into space. It would fall back to Earth, usually in

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.440
<v Speaker 1>an ocean. That's what where that's where we wanted to go. Also,

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the oceans cover more of the surface of the plant

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.600
<v Speaker 1>than than land mask does. And you might go out

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and retrieve it, but you probably weren't going to use

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>it again, which meant that you had to build a

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>whole new one the next time you wanted to put

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>something on the space. Yeah, or you would have to

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>put a whole lot of work into making that thing reusable. Yeah.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>For For example, for the Space Shuttle, NASA designed components

0:19:47.800 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>that could be retooled and reused the there two solid

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>rocket boosters were the parts that got the shuttle off

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the ground and end up some like twenty eight miles

0:19:56.680 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>or KOs And at that point they'd separate and and

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>those solid rocket boosters would parachute into the Atlantic. The

0:20:04.200 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Navy would go out and pick them up, and then

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they could be taken back into the into the lab

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and refurbished for future launches. But it was such an

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>intense process because of the solid part of those solid

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>rocket boosters that they used solid fuel instead of liquid,

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>so huge parts of the rockets had to be completely

0:20:20.680 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>replaced each time. But I mean that was the whole

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>idea behind the space shell, right, was that they were

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to make as much of it reusable as possible.

0:20:29.320 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Like that was the whole concept behind that particular era

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of NASA's space exploration was we want, we want, We're

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>limited the low Earth orbit, but we can keep using

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this equipment repeatedly. And it had some stages that couldn't

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>be reused. Right. The external tank, which was the shuttle's

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>main fuel tank, would burn up upon re entry after

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:50.880
<v Speaker 1>launching the shuttle the rest of the way into low

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Earth orbits. And and that's a good point to make

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because there actually if you want to use a reusable

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>rocket to get you not just to the edge of space,

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>spit up into orbit around the Earth and then back safely,

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>there are a couple things you've got to take into consideration.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>One of them would be making it so that it

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>survives re entry into the atmosphere from space. We've got

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it up in orbit. Uh, it's got to be able

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to get back into our gassy soup I talked so

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>wonderfully about with that drag. Thing becomes pretty intense without

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 1>burning and breaking apart. And then it's also got to

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>survive contact with the surface of the Earth. And so furthermore,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know about any of you guys,

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but every time I dunk my expensive electronics and an ocean,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.959
<v Speaker 1>they don't work anymore after. So so that's that's another thing,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Like if you have an ocean splashed down, then you're

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:43.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get this thing ready to fly into space.

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's why all all those rockets have that one

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>sticker that goes from white to black. If it's had

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>contact with an ocean um in case you didn't notice

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it as you were fishing it out of the Pacific

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 1>or Atlantic. Yeah, so the reusable rocket idea is very

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>attractive and that it can lower costs that you can

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>keep you equipment instead of having to rebuild it every

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>single time in the case of something like the Falcon nine.

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it only applies to the first stage of the rocket.

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.479
<v Speaker 1>The second stage, which would push payloads further into space,

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that is not retrievable in that sense. So I think

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>I've read that typically the first stage is like the

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>most expensive part of the deal. It's definitely the largest

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and has the most fuel on it, so I would

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.160
<v Speaker 1>imagine it would have to be the most expensive. Honestly,

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the hard things to do is to put

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 1>a price on a rocket, as it turns out, because

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>lots of companies work on them. And I'm not going

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to say that the government is squirrelly about releasing those

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>numbers in in specific breakdowns, but they're really hamsterry about it.

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Or well, everybody nobody wants to tell you exactly how

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>much money they actually spent to do something. Well, and

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to be again, it's it's complicated because if you look

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 1>at we'll talk about the Saturn five rocket in a second.

0:22:57.520 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>That was what we used to get the Apollo missions

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>into days. If you look at the Saturn five rocket,

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>three different companies worked on the three different stages of that, rightet.

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>That was a three stage rocket, so you had your

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>initial stage that would get to launch, and then two

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 1>more stages to actually push the Apollo spacecraft out to

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 1>where it was supposed to go. And a different company

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.159
<v Speaker 1>designed each of those stages. When you talk about that,

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>and then you look at it and and ask somebody

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>how much does the Saturn five rocket costs? It's understandable

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>that the answer is that it's complicated, right, It's not

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>just like you don't you go out to the lot

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, how much for the Saturn five? Doesn't

0:23:34.480 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>work that way. But at any rate, um it is

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>still pretty cool that we've seen a couple of demos

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of this reusable rocket approach. They they actually retain enough

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>fuel so that they can use thrusters on the return

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a light, relatively light touchdown on a on

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a on a pad landing pad and on a launchpad.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So both the Falcon nine and UH New Shepherd have

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated this ability, although they've done it in very different ways.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like orders of magnitude difference in a way.

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>But they neither of them were using a parachute, right.

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.119
<v Speaker 1>They were actually using thrusters to counteract gravity's pull and

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 1>slow down the descent so that they can have a

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>smooth touchdown, just just so we can make it feel

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a little cooler. Can we call them retro rockets? Sure,

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 1>they fired the retro rockets, firing retro rockets and slowed

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the descent so that they could land. Now, one other

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>thing I want to point out before I get into

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the differences between all this is also that at the

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>time we're recording this, which is on January fourteenth, two

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen, very soon we're gonna have another demonstration

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of SpaceX trying to land one of these rockets on

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the barges that are floating out in the ocean.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Like y, I think it's I think it's the seventeenth.

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>So by the time this episode goes live, it we

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>will know whether or not it worked. But but we

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>don't now. Yeah, we don't know now because we can't see.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>So you guys have one up on us. But it

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>hasn't worked yet for for the ocean landing. It has

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>worked for a landing pad that was on the ground.

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>The fingers crossed. Yeah, and okay, so just in case

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you guys are thinking, like, man, this doesn't sound that hard,

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>let me lay out another few reasons that I don't

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 1>think that we've covered on why this is really difficult

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to do this whole reasonable rocket thing. Okay, first off,

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and you know, not to bring the party down too much,

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, like it needs to be brought up.

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>The failure of the original version of the Space Shuttle

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.760
<v Speaker 1>solid rocket boosters was what caused the destruction of the

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Challenger back and okay that the problems with that original

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>design have been really well documented. Concerns about them were

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>raised with the NASSA during development, So of course that

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>tragedy is taken into consideration by today's engineers when they're

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>building reasonable rockets. Just you know, I'm just trying to

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>say that whenever you're trying to save a piece of

0:25:56.760 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>equipment for future use, you've got to be so careful

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that you're not doing so by potentially endangering the crew

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and the passengers. Um, it's it's a it's a really

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>huge thing to think about. Also, from an engineering perspective,

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>when you reuse a rocket, you're basically stopping development of

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>that rocket, so you're looking at getting stuck with a

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially imperfect model. And this was pointed out by a

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:25.479
<v Speaker 1>representative of the French Space Agency c n e S

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>by the name of Christoph Banal, and he sat back

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 1>in I just thought it was such a pithy little quote.

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>If you reuse, you stopped producing, depending on the level

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of reusability, so you end up with a permanent prototype. Um,

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so that's something to think about. And then he he

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>also pointed out that the equipment and fuel that you

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>need to add to a rocket to get it to

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>land safely is a non trivial weight and size issue.

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>He estimated that you'd be needing to use at least

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like more fuel at launch than you would with non

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>reasonable rockets. So in other words, you'd have to make

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sure that however much more fuel you need doesn't completely

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>over than than rebuilding a rocket from scratch. I would argue,

0:27:08.440 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I see totally where he's coming from, and I agree

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that those concerns are warranted. But if you're talking about

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to an era where the space industry

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:22.600
<v Speaker 1>makes financial sense. Clearly, at some point we have to

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:26.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the ability of using reusable rockets, because otherwise

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:30.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna be this ridiculously expensive proposition that never

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:35.679
<v Speaker 1>goes beyond a very very narrow use case. It seems

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like common sense that the reasonable would be the eventual

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>way to go. Right. But but yeah, so let's look

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>at the two different ways that these two companies are

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to get past these problems. Right So, Blue Origin, uh,

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.399
<v Speaker 1>with the New Shepherd rocket it's it's approach was arguably

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.400
<v Speaker 1>not even arguably it was simpler than the Falcon nine

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:59.840
<v Speaker 1>approach or less ambitious. If you're Ellen, Muski might mention

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:06.880
<v Speaker 1>something along those lines. Uh must actually tweeted about SATs. Yeah,

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if I spat might be a

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>little too friendly, Yeah, that would I think ribbing is

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is a good way of putting it. But uh So,

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the test vehicle of New Shepherd it was had a

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>target altitude of three hundred seven thousand feet, which is

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about ninety three point six kilometers. Now, the goal for

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>commercial flights, which is the whole concept behind Blue Origin,

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is uh an altitude that would be just over one kilometers.

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>And the reason for that is that internationally, we define

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the boundary of space at one kilometers. When I say we,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean pretty much everyone besides the United States now

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>on a scale of one to ten. How arbitrary is that?

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Like a fourteen? Yeah, I mean it's uh, there's a

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>specific term for it. But at any rate, the international

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>community says one kilometers. United States will say that anyone

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>who has flown at an altitude higher than eighty kilometers

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>as an astronaut, but does not actually have a specific

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.959
<v Speaker 1>definition for what the edge of space is. So, uh,

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 1>there's this twenty kilometer gap between what the international community

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>agrees as an astronaut and what the United States does.

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh so what's twenty kilometers between friends? Right? But

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>at any rate, Um, that one hundred kilometers, while impressive,

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is not the same as delivering something to low Earth orbit.

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Low Earth orbit begins at about a hundred sixty kilometers.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>So this vehicle goes just beyond half the distance it

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>would need to get to a little bit more than

0:29:34.200 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>half the distance it would need to get to low

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Earth orbit. Um, it's actually meant to be kind of

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a passenger vehicle. Like, if you have a decent amount

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of cash to burn, you could get a seat aboard

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>a space capsule on top of one of these rockets.

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you do you get a discount if you're a

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>member of Amazon Prime. That's an excellent question. I've been.

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been Amazon Prime members since they first launched it,

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so just week so I think I think I should

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>get This should include free space travel, or at least

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>at least a significant discount space travel. They'll just be

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 1>like we just dropped the shipping fee Black Friday special.

0:30:11.760 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So the way it works is that you know, you

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>would get aboard this capsule. H. The rocket would launch. Um,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>there would be a separation phase. What I'm sorry, still

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>my space travel never arrived? Can you send me another one? Uh?

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 1>So it would launch, the space capsule would separate from

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the rocket at the proper altitude. Space capsule would continue

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to go up a little bit just from momentum from inertia. Uh,

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the rocket would start to descend and would it's almost

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's going straight up and straight down there. It's

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>not quite like that there is an arc to it,

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Like it's almost like a really narrow parabola that you

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:54.240
<v Speaker 1>would see but the rockets orientation pretty much remains vertical

0:30:54.320 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>with respect to the ground, so it doesn't tilt. Meanwhile,

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>you aboard the capsule would be able to experience free fall,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>which would feel like weightlessness for several minutes, and then

0:31:06.040 --> 0:31:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you would get a little alerting buzz that says, hey,

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>you need to put on your seatbelt now and experience

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>around five g s of accelerative forces as you descend

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 1>towards the Earth and land safely through a combination of

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>thrusters and parachutes. The New Shepherd rocket uses just those

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>retro rockets for landing and it doesn't use a parachute.

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So that's Blue Origins New Shepherd, which I don't want

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to downplay. It is a very impressive achievement. They demonstrated

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it before SpaceX was able to have a successful landing

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of their Falcon nine. And if in fact they want

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to create a vacation experience where people with the right

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of money you can actually go up into space,

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a really cool way of doing it. But

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 1>if you were elon Musk, what might you tweet at that?

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Would it be something like congratulations? But people need to

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>understand the difference between space and orbit. That's pretty much

0:31:59.800 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>why he said. Right, So the Falcon nine, unlike New Shepherd,

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>can deliver payloads into lower th orbit. It is a

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.479
<v Speaker 1>two stage rockets, so the first stage gets them, the

0:32:11.520 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>second stage and the the whatever the payload is up

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to the right altitude for separation, and then the second

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>stage takes it from there. But the first stage already

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>goes significantly higher, like into the lower th orbit range

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>than the New Shepherd rocket can. And this is way

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>harder to do, right. This is not just like you

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have this attitude that well, once you're in space,

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in space, right, It's not like that at all.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.479
<v Speaker 1>Earth's gravity is still a major factor to contend with,

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>and you have to have a much higher velocity to escape, right,

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And you also have to your the orientation of your

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:48.080
<v Speaker 1>rocket changes because you're you're actually trying to when you're

0:32:48.120 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>going into orbit, you're essentially constantly in free fall around

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the Earth. Right, You're traveling forward at a speed that

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is great enough so that as you fall towards the Earth,

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the Earth curves away at a similar rates, so you're

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>never going to actually hit the ground, at least assuming

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't slow down enough. So that your orbit deteriorates

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.239
<v Speaker 1>and you fall. Also, if you're if you're SpaceX, then

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you're probably trying to do stuff while you're up there. Yeah,

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you're probably actually delivering payloads like like, and those are

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>two space barges, sandwiches on the Moon to probably not

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the Moon, probably stuff aboard the International Space Station, as

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 1>well as satellites. You're delivering all that shrimp cocktail they

0:33:28.520 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>love so much. Yes, yes, we've talked about the shrimp

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>cocktail at length in previous Forward Thinking episodes. Uh So,

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>when that first stage separates from the second stage and

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever the payload is UM, it then starts to descend.

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>They use the thrusters so that they can orient the

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>rocket properly so it's not just twirling and falling, you know,

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>willy nilly as it descends into the Earth's atmosphere. And

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>then they have to make sure that they use the

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>right amount of force so that it can actually land

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:02.720
<v Speaker 1>safely on a landing pad. So it is already more

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 1>difficult than the Blue origin approach, which was already really

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>hard to do UM. And then add to that the

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 1>fact that they want to do this regularly using autonomous barges.

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Floating on the ocean, which obviously that's gonna be a

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>moving platform. That makes it even harder. Drone boat sounds cooler.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:28.560
<v Speaker 1>That's not a rowboat. That's something totally different. Okay, Well,

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I have a question about this whole enterprise. Yeah, so

0:34:32.120 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the question is exactly how much money would a reusable

0:34:36.840 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>rocket save in the long run. Now, I know Elon

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Musk himself has given a prediction, though you know, we

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:44.439
<v Speaker 1>might want to take it with a grain of salt

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.319
<v Speaker 1>because he himself has a stake in that somewhat yet. Yeah,

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but his prediction, he's he's famously said that rockets that

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are as reusable as modern airplanes will reduce the cost

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 1>of access to space by a factor of about a

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred time. Yeah. Do you think that number is close

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:06.839
<v Speaker 1>to right if it were as reusable as an airplane? Probably,

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's if you take into consideration the fact that

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>airplanes can be serviced and ready to go back up

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>in the air within within half an hour. I don't

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:17.919
<v Speaker 1>think we're ever going to get to a point where

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>rockets are going to be that reusable. Of course, that

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>may not have been what he was trying to get across.

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>He might have just been saying like, well that he's

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>used that comparison several times. I think is is saying like,

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, look at what airplanes can do. Uh, you know,

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine if you throw your airplane in the garbage every

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>time it landed right, And it's an interesting comparison. Again,

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think with any rocket launch, you're going to have

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a significant just for the sake of safety. You obviously

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 1>have to have a significant amount of time to test

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and refurbish and everything to make sure that the rocket

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>is ready to go for another another launch, which adds

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>to the cost. Right, It's not just the amount of

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>fuel you have to dump into the thing, it's the

0:35:58.160 --> 0:35:59.759
<v Speaker 1>amount of work you have to do to make sure

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be safe and not danger to

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the payload or to anyone else in the launch area.

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying, you think all this, all this testing

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>is very important. We're not just like glad awesome, we're

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>addicted to testing. I would say that in the case

0:36:14.160 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>of rocket science, testing is of some importance. And so

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>whether or not that testing would be enough to reduce

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>this one hundred times cheaper prediction to you know, fifty times,

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, But still fifty times would be significant.

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, even if this is a ridiculously high estimate,

0:36:35.000 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>like I would take thirty times, y'all, I would take

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen times, it would be Any improvement would be really impressive,

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:45.759
<v Speaker 1>especially a magnitude of more than like two. So, but

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to actually answer your question of how much money,

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>how much physical dollars it would save, as we said before,

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to put a price in rocket. Why

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>do they have to be physical dollars? Oh, I don't know.

0:36:57.719 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Talking about space exploration is going to be some kind

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of cat show only enterprise and we can change. Bitcoin

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is the new thing, guys. This is how you use

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:12.759
<v Speaker 1>up your old pennies, Joe. So, you know, trying to

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>answer the question like how much money would be saved,

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's super tricky because obviously, unless you have the actual

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 1>price tag of a rocket and you can see how

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>much it costs from building it from scratch all the

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>way to the point of launching it, and then compare

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that to a refurbished rocket that has already been fired

0:37:31.080 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 1>once and is now going to go again, you can't

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.319
<v Speaker 1>easily answer that question obviously. But if we want to

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.280
<v Speaker 1>look historically and again, this is kind of comparing apples

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to oranges. We can look at the center in five rocket,

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like I mentioned before, that's what NASA used to get

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the Apollo missions up into space, and those costs at

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the time around four million dollars per launch. That's in

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the late sixties, early seventies. If you adjust for inflation,

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 1>that's more than three billion dollars per launch. Now that's

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:03.800
<v Speaker 1>not just for the cost of the rocket and the fuel,

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that's all the costs associated with launching. But still three

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. So I thought, well, let me check and

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 1>see what SpaceX how much that would cost? Uh? And

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I looked on SpaceX's website, which actually has the amount

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of money it costs to launch a Falcon nine rocket

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>according to two thousand sixteen numbers, and according to that

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's sixty one point two million dollars. So three billion

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 1>to sixty one point two million. Already we've seen a

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.200
<v Speaker 1>dramatic drop in the in the in the cost. Right,

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>That's that's pretty good. That's not bad. Now. Arguably, we

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>could also add the fact that we've got decades of

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:45.680
<v Speaker 1>research and development between the sixties and today. We have

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>things like computers. Yes, we're not using slide rules to

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 1>make the calculations. So yeah, just the decreasing cost of

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:56.120
<v Speaker 1>computing power is gonna be a huge part of enormous stuff.

0:38:56.120 --> 0:38:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh and I love the fact that that SpaceX calls

0:38:58.080 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it their standard payment plan for the sixty million dollars

0:39:02.560 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>per launch. So if they're able to actually make a reliable,

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>reusable rocket, that cost the sixty one point two million

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>might actually go down significantly, at which point you might

0:39:13.880 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 1>have other companies that would be interested in launching scientific

0:39:17.719 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>research equipment or commercial equipment out into space. It might

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.839
<v Speaker 1>fall within the realm of possibility now, because for some

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>companies they might say, well, we have this great idea,

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's no no point in even developing it because

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>we have no way of actually executing this. But this

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>could open a lot of doors as well as usher

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 1>in a new era of space exploration, manned missions or

0:39:39.880 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>peopled missions. I guess I should say, I mean, you know,

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>we we we like it when people are able to

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 1>do science. Yeah, it's it's pretty pretty psyched about it.

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:53.200
<v Speaker 1>It's also nice to see something that could reverse the

0:39:53.280 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>trend of space missions getting so expensive that governments are

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>loath to fund them, right especially if there's not some

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>other outside force that is acting upon our interests. For example,

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I say that because the Space Race was largely funded

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>because it was part of the Cold War between the

0:40:16.560 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>United States and the then Soviet Union. Arm wrestling, military

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>related kind of kind of thing, and we benefited from

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:30.879
<v Speaker 1>all of that scientific exploration and discovery, But ultimately what

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>was funding it was something akin to fear and aggression,

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>which I would rather we not have to have. But

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but sometimes when you're talking to the person who signs

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the checks, you've got to have that other really compelling reason.

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>But are you saying now that the the analogy to

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War could be like billionaire ego feuds could

0:40:52.600 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>be that, or it could also just be it also

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>could just be that, well, now the price has fallen

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to a point where it's easier for the people who

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>fund things to see that there could be a return

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on that investment. You know. The thing that we talked

0:41:05.080 --> 0:41:07.240
<v Speaker 1>about and forward thinking all the time is that pure

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>research is of value all by itself because you never

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 1>know what else you're going to learn or or benefit

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.880
<v Speaker 1>from down the line as a part of that pure research.

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's a hard sell for the people who actually

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.600
<v Speaker 1>signed the checks, if they're not a scientist, if they

0:41:24.600 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have that appreciation. Uh. And by lowering the cost,

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>it may make it easier to convince the powers that

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>be to actually fund the various missions that could lead

0:41:36.200 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 1>to phenomenal discoveries down the road, things that we can't

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:43.920
<v Speaker 1>even anticipate right now. Um. So I'm excited by this era.

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I really hope that it continues to develop over time.

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:51.879
<v Speaker 1>I really hope that the SpaceX demonstration was successful, which

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:53.879
<v Speaker 1>we will know by the time this episode goes live.

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I hope that we see even more competition

0:41:57.600 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 1>in the space because that drives innovation. If you can't

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 1>get competition through you know, various nations warring with one another,

0:42:04.560 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>companies trying to one up each other, I'll take that, sure.

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:10.600
<v Speaker 1>And I guess that kind of comes akin to your

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.200
<v Speaker 1>billionaires all getting into a fight with one another and

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.239
<v Speaker 1>just through space exploration. All right, that's fine. I don't

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>mind if we benefit from it, sure better than I

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 1>bought a bigger boat. I don't think that's nearly as

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 1>beneficial to humanity. So just wait till we introduce James

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Cameron into this feud. Yeah, well, I mean, we'll have

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to get them out of the ocean first, right. Once

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we get them out of the ocean, then maybe we

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>can point them towards space. But at any rate, this

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>was fun to talk about. We're so excited to be back.

0:42:39.320 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And guys, if you have any suggestions for future topics

0:42:42.080 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for forward thinking, or you got any comments or questions,

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you should send those into us our email addresses FW

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking at how Stuff Works dot com, or you can

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 1>drop us a line on Facebook or Twitter or Google Plus.

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and Google Plus we are FW thinking. You can

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>search FW thinking on Facebook. We'll pop right up. You

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.719
<v Speaker 1>can leave us a message there. Thank you guys so

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.400
<v Speaker 1>much for your support. Thank you for all the questions

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:06.279
<v Speaker 1>about Hey, when are you guys coming back, because it

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>means a lot to us. We're so pleased that we

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>could be back now and strap in because it's gonna

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:13.200
<v Speaker 1>be a crazy year. I have a feeling. I mean,

0:43:13.760 --> 0:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>there's some weird stuff coming down the pipe as far

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:19.239
<v Speaker 1>as science and technology goes, and we're gonna try and

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:22.680
<v Speaker 1>cover all of that. That's my it's my ambition. So

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see, all right, and until then, we'll talk to

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon for more on this topic. In

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the future of technology, visit forward thinking dot Com, brought

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to you by Toyota Let's Go Places,