WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Big Questions Through 4 Games

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:08.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a break? Yes? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely?

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Ready for a break? Yeah? And so much for that.

0:00:17.079 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>It's time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wall with Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eagleton. It's Tuesday, October third, twenty seventeen, Season thirteen,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>episode number forty nine. Welcome to another edition of The Break,

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 1>live from the s WBC Mortgage Studios. We've got a

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:41.319
<v Speaker 1>lot to talk about on Tuesday. We'll take a big

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>picture look. It's a quarter of the way through the season,

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm going to ask these guys a couple

0:00:46.600 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of questions on a couple actually, a lot of questions

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>about their bigger picture thoughts on this team after four

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>games and what that, if anything, what that means going

0:00:56.800 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>down there entering the second quarter of the season with

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. So how's everybody doing this morning? Man? I'm good,

0:01:03.240 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>You're good. Yep good, Dave good, I am well, Derek awesome.

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And Amber will not be with us. At the beginning

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of the show. She made jo on us at some

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>point the show, but she has some other things going

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>on this morning, so hopefully at some point she joins us.

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>If not, she'll be back tomorrow. All right, So let's

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>jump right in, and before we get into the questions

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that I was telling you I wanted to ask, I

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>want to first start and talk about David Irving. It

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>looks like, I mean, we know he will be returning

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to the team, I presume today today. That being said,

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you guys think as far as who's going

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to have to go? Because somebody's got to go in

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>order for him to make room I mean in order

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>for them to make room for him to come in. Well,

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, before we get into that, I'll let

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Dave talk about who's gonna go. But it was kind

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of funny. Thanks, Well, I don't have to think about

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>have to fire something, think about it. You got about

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>three minutes. Let you do that. I thought it was

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting though, because we were talking to Garrett yesterday after

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the after his press conference, and you know, he's just

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the question was about Irving about you know, what, when

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>do you have to bring a guy back? And or

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>when when Canny come back? And who has to be cut?

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And do you have a roster exemption, and he didn't

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>even seem interested in all those rules. Kind of like

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Dave doesn't seem interested in this story there and it's tired, tired. Tuesday,

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>he was like, Yeah, I don't know all about all that.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna practice and he's gonna play. It's like, well,

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't necessarily have to put him on the you know,

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>on the back of the active roster. You can keep

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.920
<v Speaker 1>him till he's just he's please playing, you know. He

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>was like, Okay, that sounds good. But and all it

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely sounds like that David Irving's practicing this week, I'm

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna play. Don't know what kind of shape he's in,

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>what he looks like, I'm gonna say. Garrett said that

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>yesterday if and unlike Demontrey Moore, they have not seen

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>David Irving and they have not been allowed to be

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in contact with him since the season started. So it's

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>possible he could show up here and just not be

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>ready to play in a game, and maybe they use

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that roster exemption, which they do have. But I also

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>got the impression from talking to Jason Garrett that I

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>expect him to be on them. You know that I'm

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>going to Sunday. Okay, you're right, they haven't seen him.

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>But if there's a team that knows how to get

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>guys like ready to come back, like hey, do this,

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>this and this and come back. I mean, this isn't

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the first time we've had a guy suspended and it

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>needs to come back and be ready for a week,

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>four week, four, week five whatever. I mean, it's happened

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>too many times with Hardy, DeMarcus, Lawrence was, I mean,

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Scandrick was in the same boat. I know I'm missing someone,

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Randy Gregory. Yeah, but he's still suspended. Yeah, that guy.

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Um So, I just think it would surprise me if

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>he's not ready to play. I mean, I think that

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they know what's coming, they know how to get him ready,

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and they probably told him this is what you need

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to do and this is where you need to go.

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You know. I'm sure they have guys out there that

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>can help. Yeah. The thing about it, though, is I

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know that any of those guys you just mentioned

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>came back and really like we're really really like one

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like lit it up. You know. One of them was

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of him, was hard he was, Well, that's true. He

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>had two sacks in his first game. Yeah, that's true here,

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I mean, I guess my point is

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know, Like, yes, you can go and

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>work out and all that, but if you're not playing football,

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know that you're ready to play great

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>football as soon as you come back from not play,

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I need you to be better than Taco. You do that, well,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Taco's probably not going to be active now. Okay, so

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>now get to my other question, who's not going to

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be on this team? Logic Taco definitely, that's definitely not

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 1>the right answer. Coach. Logic points toward Bene bin Wickery. Yeah,

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we've talked about it before that Cowboys

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 1>only have to give up their draft pick if he's

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>on the forty six for X amount of weeks. It's

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>either three or four. He's only been on the forty

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>six for two, so as it stands right now, they

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.559
<v Speaker 1>get that pick back if he's not on the team.

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>It's also a reasonable guest that should have been a

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>Woozier and Nolan Carroll are able to play this week.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You've got Jordan Lewis is seemingly he completely recovered from

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>his injury, so secondary looks about as good as it

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>has since the season started. Would you possibly want to

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.239
<v Speaker 1>consider even if he's ready to come back, maybe, would

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you possibly want to consider still keeping Cheeto out because

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially get really like three weeks, because he wouldn't play

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a game again until you got this week. You've got

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>next week for the blind, and you've got another week

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>where you play. Not only that, but also somebody probably

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to be inactive, just even one of those healthy

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean that they've been going the

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.719
<v Speaker 1>last few weeks with four cornerbacks, so now you're probably

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>now you've got five. Let's just say that they do

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>release been Wickery and if Nolan, if Nolan can come

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>back from his concussion this week, then you could still

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>sit Cheeto and cut Ben Wickery and you'd still be

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>okay the four corners. Maybe you do want five corners

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for this game? You know, maybe you might? Yeah, I mean,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna be interesting. I mean, I I woke

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>up this morning thinking about the inactives, like what if

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Hitchens and Lee are ready to go? Like are you

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>in the shower or just just kind of laying there?

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably should have got up a little bit before that.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Before thinking about all the least linebackers. Is it like cool?

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Like good, bad, sad that that's what we do, because

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>like I do the same stuff, Like that's what I

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>start thinking, go to bit thinking about it, wake up

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it. I wake up like, now, if if

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Hitchens can do this on Wednesday, what does that mean?

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>And then I stopped and I'm like, you can wait,

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Like you can wait till you get to work, at

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>least brush my teeth first, right, Yeah, I had a

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>dream last night that I left this job and accepted

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a job covering the MAVs. And when I woke I

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>woke up, I woke up in a cold sweat, like,

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I made whatever mistake? Why why would

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to cover the MAVs? Basketball is terrible and

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the MAVs are awful? Why would I want to do that? No?

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I was just like, I gotta call Derek right now

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and beg for my job back. And then I realized

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I had been dreaming. I was just taken more from

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the standpoint the number of games you gotta cover. Everything

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that is a ton different than everything about covering basketball

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>sounds terrible, interviews, zero fund, all of it all right, too?

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's jump in. Let's talk a little bit about these

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>questions that I have for you guys. There's a I

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>got a whole list of questions and they'll be on

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 1>all different topics around this team. So some of them

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>true false, some of them are just I'll give you

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>answers and we'll just see how it goes, all right,

0:07:27.320 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>First question, based on expectations, who's been the biggest Which

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>unit has been the biggest disappointment through four games? The

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:38.679
<v Speaker 1>offensive line or the wide receivers. I'll say the wide

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>receivers because I somebody pointed this out to me on

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter yesterday. I had the foresight to be worried about

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line and training camps. So no, you weren't backup,

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>back up, backup back. He was back up. You were

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>worried about the offensive line as of the Denver game.

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>That's when you were worried about the offensive Remember that,

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna sit here and say I thought they

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>were gonna suck, but they still don't suck. You can

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>go back and find the tape where I was like,

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think it's not smart to assume that

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna pick off and pick up and it's

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be business as usual like last year regards. Yeah,

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you can go find it. It's there. The wide receivers,

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I really thought. And they haven't been bad. No, nobody's

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>been like atrocious. Like it's not like their own fills

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>are off this thing yet. Yeah. But you know, you

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about getting all of your receivers back, you know,

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>all five of your guys are back from last year.

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I just thought there'd be more continuity. I thought there'd

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.559
<v Speaker 1>be fewer drop passes and fewer bad throws, and you

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>just it wouldn't. I keep using the term herky jerky,

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's what it looks like. Yeah, that's a good

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>word for it. It really is. Um, So I'll go

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 1>I'll go with them, all right, Nick. Yeah, I mean

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the offensive line is actually the No. I

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>think the wide receivers are the reason why the offensive

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>line is in question right now. Really yeah. I think

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>when you when you really break it down, I think

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>when teams are looking at this team and defenses look

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>at it, how to stop him, and they say, you

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 1>know what, like, let's just keep putting that eighth guy

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>down there. Let's just make these guys we're not gonna

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>get run over by them. We're not worried about these receivers.

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.959
<v Speaker 1>We're not worried about them, none of them. We are

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>really worried about um that's gonna beat us deep, and

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna just take our chances. And I think it's

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>a product of the fact that the wide receivers. Now

0:09:25.160 --> 0:09:28.079
<v Speaker 1>which one is surprising us the most, maybe offensive line

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>because we didn't expect a ton from the receivers anyways.

0:09:31.480 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think it all stems from the passing game,

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Dak and the receivers. I just think teams

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are saying, I'm gonna take my chances. You know. It's

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of like it's kind of like in baseball when

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you got a guy on third and and and he's

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>tagging up, and you're like, Okay, I'm gonna take my

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>chances that he's gonna make this clean through, you know, catch, throw,

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the guy's gonna get it tagged. All these things have

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:56.719
<v Speaker 1>to happen. My guy just has run from here to here.

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they think of like that with the defense,

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>just say all right, I'm gonna take my chances that

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Dak's not gonna get the ball to him, and our

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 1>guy's not gonna get beat, and you know, I just

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's what's happening. How's that different from last year? Well,

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I just think I think teams are figuring it out

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>because I think the difference is is that it's from

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>two years ago, you know, when when you or whenever,

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>when you had Tony there. I think Tony is would

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get the ball to them a little bit more down

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the field in different routes better than than Dak does.

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to sit here and say this is

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Dak versus Tony, because Tony's gone, But I'm just saying

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that I think that teams are figuring out that from

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the passing game, if he's gonna sit in the pocket,

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll take our chances with them getting beat like that. Well,

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, and you know, I always I don't I

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>always I don't want to oversimplify these things because they're

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely not simple. But you go back, and you know

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the great thing about as the season goes along, like

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>the gifts start to come out. You know you can

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>find it on Twitter. People break these plays down and

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you can get game pass and go watch the All

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:03.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty two yourself. I think defenses, and you know it's

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>honestly a little surprising to me. It just doesn't sound logical.

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But they're doubling Cole Beasley and in situation, yeah, they're

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.319
<v Speaker 1>doubling the easy throws and that's where Dak feasted last year.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>They're taking they're like, we think, if you have to

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:21.599
<v Speaker 1>make more difficult throws, this will be again do it,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you won't be able to do it successfully, at least

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not on a consistent basis. To this point, that's proven

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to be pretty true. Do you think part of the

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>reason that that is is because that means you're going

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to be throwing the ball more to Dez Bryant, And

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>as we know, a lot of times he's running these

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty fifty routes and just by the nature of them,

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.520
<v Speaker 1>they are not He's not a guy that separates a lot.

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So just by the nature of that kind of route,

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of passed a kind of throw, you're only

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>going to complete half of them at best, Like you're

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>not going to regularly complete that pass, So you're you're

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>your completion percentage is automatically going to go down when

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you're throwing that ball versus passes to Cole or passes

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>to Jason and it's not just it's not just Dez.

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean Terrence too. But if you're throwing the ball

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>ten to twenty yards downfield as opposed to four to six,

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:08.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just that's just statistics. It's gonna be

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>harder to complete and I just like I said, it's

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not that easy. But I think that is part

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of what you're seeing play out. Can you fix that

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>with different kinds of routes for Dez? I know during

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>training camp, one route that I saw them run will

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of seeming like a lot of success was

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that dig route and I haven't really seen a lot

0:12:26.840 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of that in the first four games. But using routes

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>that that are not that maybe a little bit of

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>an easier throw for Dak and at the same time,

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe a higher higher completion percentage type route and throw

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>for Dak and Dez. You think there's a way to

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 1>do that that maybe improves their ability to throw when

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>they're taking away some of those easier throws. Well, yeah,

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm sure that they're gonna they're gonna tweak

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:54.320
<v Speaker 1>all of that stuff. Yes, that there's ways to get

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the ball to DEAs that aren't as that are with

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a higher percentage, and I think that that's one of them.

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:02.439
<v Speaker 1>But I also think you can sit here and make

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the case. Now go back and make call the offensive line.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the problem because you know, if the Cowboys were

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>running the ball better on first and second down, especially

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>on first down, then it sets up more third and three,

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 1>third and fourth, third and five, where Beasley and Witton

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>can kind of get more involved, where those passes make

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 1>more sense. When it's third nine, third and ten, you

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>don't expect those guys to really get the first downs

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>as much. So it all goes hand in hand. You know,

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the running game's not great, but it might be a

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>product of them not worried about the passing game. Passing

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>game hadn't been great because the running game is not

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of backing them off. So play better. You guys

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about first downs a lot. I actually

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>did some research last night and I went back to

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.720
<v Speaker 1>look at what the Cowboys did on first downs running

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the ball last year versus this year. Last year, on

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>first downs when they ran the ball, they average five

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 1>point nine three yards per attempt five point nine three.

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.960
<v Speaker 1>It's almost six yards per tempt this year year four

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>point one, almost two yard difference between last year and

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>this year. When they're running the ball and first downs,

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it is a huge difference. End. By the way, don't

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>forget this in the game against the Rams that that

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>percentage went up significantly because they ended the game with

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a six point three average. But that was also because

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that seventy yard run came on first down. I know,

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't like to take runs out, but if just

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to look at kind of what they did the rest

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of the game, if you take the seventy yard or out,

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>their average, actually it was two point three yards per

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.000
<v Speaker 1>attempt on first down when they ran the ball, So

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>all things being considered, they that's your biggest problem is

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on first down. They're running the ball on first down

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, and when they do, they're not getting

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of yards and that's setting up bad situations

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>for them down the road and they're not being able

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to sustain drives like they did last year. Another issue

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I think is the tight ends is either they're not

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>getting the ball to them as much, because when you're

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna play that kind of personnel twelve thirteen personnel, those

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>guys are on the field a lie, you know, showing

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that they could run the ball. Hey, two tight ends,

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>three tight ends. Obviously they're gonna run, but they've got

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to utilize that that type of package

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>on defense and say all right, now we're gonna play. Actually,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna spread out. We saw Hannah get open. We

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>need to see Witton and Swam Swam. I don't think

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it's caught a ball all year, has he? No? So

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean the utilize that part and say all right,

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna jumbo and match this. We'll watch this. I'm

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna put Swam out and put Hannah out, and we're

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw the ball a little bit more. So we

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>need to see more wrinkles from the passing game too.

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>They did do that on one play last week. They

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>had thirteen personnel out there and they passed out of it,

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>which I was kind of surprised because you're right, they

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>hadn't done that much this season. But they are gonna

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have to start doing those kinds of things. And also

0:15:38.160 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>I think and Dak. We saw the touchdown and against Arizona,

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but Dak has to keep that ball more on that

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 1>read option or whatever that they're calling it. They need

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>he needs to keep that ball more because you don't

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>want to see him get hurt or you know, and

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of shots. He needs to learn how

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to slide a little bit better than what we saw

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>last week. But still I think that will spread things out.

0:15:59.880 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of different things that I think the

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys can do. That's from someone that's never called any plays,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So I would like, you know, I think other than

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm Madden, of course, right, not really, you know, I don't.

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't play Madden. Used to. I've played

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit, used to play Tech. I was horrible. Yeah, yeah,

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I say, good Genesis Mad. Let's take our first break.

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we're going to continue with our questions.

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>The next question I'm gonna have up for you guys,

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>for you think about is which has been more concerning

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the left guard with Jazz Green and Jonathan Cooper or

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the safety position with Jeff Heath and Byron Jones. We'll

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 1>ask that question when we come right back. This is

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Radio. We the entertainment loving people

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>demand the best unlimited wireless plan ever from ATNT. What

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>else do you want? Are you unicorn? Maybe only a

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>T and T offers you unlimited data with HBO included

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and never pay over. Just get ATNT unlimited plus our

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>best wireless deal and unlimited data plus save twenty five

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars per month on Direct TV. It's entertainment, You're right

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>after twenty two dedvites of data us A and TAM

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Slow Speech plan includes stream saving videos, will streaming standard

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>definition unless you turn it off. Twenty five dollars direct

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>savings across AT and T unlided plus credits Stark Thing

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>three build service prices, suject to change over usage, speed, fees,

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>charges and restricts supplies the eight T dotcom slash unlimited

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>for details. Hey Cowboys fans, did you know that over

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the next few years, more than a million service members

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>will transition from military to civilian life. Veterans face unique

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 1>challenges when they get out of the military, and Bank

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of America and the Dallas Cowboys are teaming up to

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>help with financial education, career opportunities, and support of military

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:30.679
<v Speaker 1>nonprofits and organizations locally in North Texas and across the country.

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>We're proud to support our troops and are deeply grateful

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>for the dedication and sacrifice of our service members and veterans.

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Official Bank of the Dallas Cowboys invites

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 1>you to join us and our efforts to get involved

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>by tagging game day photos on social media using hashtag

0:17:47.080 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>troop thanks. That's hashtag troop thanks, and by learning more

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>about our commitment to veterans at Bank of America dot

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>com slash Military Support. Together, we can thank our troops

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>in ways that make a re difference. Copyrank, twenty sixteen,

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Bank of America Corporation. It's bowling night with brands and

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you're hanging down together. He bit us better, but you're

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>craving something better. But they supposed defenside you don't know

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>what to do. Craving pepper the second year, you have

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:27.119
<v Speaker 1>to believe the don the pepper and pepper. When you

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>crave a doctor Pepper, nothing else will do. Pick up

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>an nice cold twenty ounce bottle today, doctor Pepper, want

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>you crave. I hear all this talk about what it

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>takes to be a cowboy. Everyone's got their ideas, but

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.399
<v Speaker 1>I just say to myself, it's what's up top that matters. Sure,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you need men with the muscle and heart to get

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 1>her done. But if your scouts and coaches are listening

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>out there a word of advice. Pick the man with

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the most well worn stetson, that's the one most cut

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>out to be a cowboy. Stetson hats are handmade right

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>here in Texas and have been on Cowboys heads for

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.959
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred fifty years. The rest of you can

0:19:01.080 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>visit stetson dot com slash cowboy to find a retailer

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>nearest you. Back to the Break, Welcome back. It's the

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.919
<v Speaker 1>second segment of The Break, live from the SWBC Mortgage

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>studios at the Star. We're asking some questions about this

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>team after the quarter of the season is done. We've

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>got four games in the books, We've got another twelve

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>left to go. Let's go to question number two, which

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>has been more concerning the left guard position with Chaz

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Green and Jonathan Cooper or the safety position with Jeff

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Heath and Byron Jones Day. We'll start with you safety.

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Why because they haven't done anything I mean at least

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, it speaks to how good the

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>running game was last year that we're complaining about it.

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But they have gone over one hundred yards in every

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.160
<v Speaker 1>game of this season. Have they not as a team

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>as a team as a team, yes, you're right. I'm

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>sorry they have forty. I forgot the worst one. Yeah,

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they had forty against Denver. I miss something. They had

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the worst rushing day. Everybody calmed the hell down. I

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>forgot about Denver. Forgot that that happened. But they went

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for one twenty nine against New York, one hundred against Arizona,

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and one eighty nine against the Rams. They're they're doing

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>all right. I mean, you know, and it's not great.

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not last year, but they're doing it, and it's

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a quarterway through the season. I don't have a

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>ton of problems with the way the left guards have played,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>specifically Chaz Green and honestly, Jonathan Cooper was going against

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>two of the best defensive tackles in football. The safeties

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>by Byron Jones has had some moments in coverage, good

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>or bad moments both. But I mean, like, but I'm

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>he's had some good moments. He he broke up a

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>third down play in the red zone against the Rams

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the other day. He's he's had some past defenses. Um,

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I know, I was super impressed by the read that

0:20:50.359 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Heath made on that no play in Arizona where

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he went up and almost picked that ball off. But

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>it just it, it hasn't been there for him, you know,

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Todd Todd Gurley's fifty three yard touchdown. I mean you

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>have to consider that a busted play, and like, it

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been terrible, but it just hasn't been there, and

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>especially you basically you let Bury Church walk in free agency,

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and the talking point all offseason is well, we have

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confidence in the guys that we have,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and it hasn't It hasn't been there as of yet.

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been really encouraged by Xavier Woods. But again, you know,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Jeff Heath before he got the starting role,

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is would he look that good if he was out

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>there seventy plays and you know, teams were scheming to

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>beat his deficiencies. I don't know. Um, So it's not awful,

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>but it certainly hasn't been great. It hasn't been what

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the team tried to sell it as what they thought

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>it could be. Okay, Nick, I think it is ironic

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>or it's probably actually probably not a coincidence that the

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>two positions that that you know, left and free agency

0:21:57.000 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that we were kind of worried about were Bury Bury

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Church and Ron Leary, And you're sitting here talking about

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>these two guys now in these two positions that they've

0:22:05.800 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they've left a void. I would say the answer would

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>be probably safety. You know, I agree with with Dave.

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that because you know, safety is gonna gonna

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>cause more problems, you know, because you're supposed to be

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the last line of defense. So when Jeff Heath misses

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Todd Gurley in the open field, it's a touchdown. And

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, if they if they get the wrong

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>read and they let a guy go over the top

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like Arizona or whatever, it's a touchdown. So yeah, I

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>think that even though they're playing okay, okay, we'll still

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>give up touchdowns and this team can't do that, and

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>they can't. They for the most part, they do. But Ben,

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>but you cannot break. And I will see in some breaks,

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I will say this, I mean, it looks similar to

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>last year with Ben but not break. But last year's defense,

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of Odell Beckham's touchdown in the second

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants game, they did not give up thirty forty or

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>more yard plays, especially ones that ended in touchdowns. You

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>saw it happened with Todd Gurley on Sunday. You saw

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fitzgerald do it two or three times in that

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals game. Those have been things that they did not

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>allow last year that you have seen happen in I

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>would say three out of the four games this year,

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>you've seen those types of backbreaking games, and that's indicative

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of your safety play. All right, next question, what's been

0:23:29.359 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>tough for the first quarter of the season where you

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>played New York at Denver, at Arizona and versus the Rams,

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>or the second quarter of the season where you will

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 1>face Green Bay at San Francisco at Washington in Kansas City.

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I was posting about that last night, right before I

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.399
<v Speaker 1>went to bed. I broke down the next four for

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>everybody in the NFC East, the Cowboys have the toughest

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.479
<v Speaker 1>draw out of everybody. Maybe Washington's got a pretty tough

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>draw to but this and it looks tough. I mean

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. I don't need to say anything about them.

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. I know, I know that they're seen as

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>a bottom feeder, but they've been playing teams tough though

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>they've been, they've been in most of the games they've played.

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>It seems like this year Um and then Kansas City

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>is the only undefeated team in the league, and Washington

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>has looked pretty darn good. They gave why, they gave

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Casey all they wanted. Last gave Casey all they wanted.

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Beat the crap out of an Oakland team that a

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are high on, and beat this Rams

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>team that just beat the Cowboys on the road on

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the West Coast. And if you bet on games, how

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>about that? Why did I why did I think of

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you at the end of the day game. I don't

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 1>bet on games. I know you don't. I know you

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 1>follow those lines. I do enjoy that far Sports Center

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>with a bad beats, like that's like the all timer.

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>That is the number one bad beat of all times.

0:24:52.720 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I didn't stay up late enough to see Van Peltz second,

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>but it's I mean, that's unbelievable. Like you, if you

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>bet on that game, you got to be feeling pretty

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>good about yourself. With four seconds left, you may have

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>turned off the TV, may have gone to bid right

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>because it was like a touchdown. I think I think

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Redskins were getting a touchdown. So when they even

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>when they were driving to kick it to go to

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 1>overtime with like a minute to go, you're thinking, all right,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>even if this game goes overtime and the chief score,

0:25:22.480 --> 0:25:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I've got this. Yeah. The only way would be if

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>if the Chiefs go down real quick, it's kick a

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>field goal and then I have enough time and I

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>try to do cal Stanford laterals. But by nobody, yeah,

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>say by nobody, and nobody thought that picks up and

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>toward touchdown, and that leads that leads to my favorite

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>call in sports, which doesn't matter who the announcer is.

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Brent Musburger was really famous for doing it, but the

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>announcer is always like that is not insignificant to a

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people watching that, you know, right, just a

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>little not to those out there. But I uh, I

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 1>went and I went and looked at this after the

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>game last night. So yeah, I mean Green Bay, San Francisco,

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington can't say tough. Honestly, Philly, who's leading division right now,

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 1>seems like they have the easiest of all the next quarter,

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which is home against Arizona at Carolina, home against Washington,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>home against San Francisco. I mean not nothing's easy in

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, but that's pretty manageable. Redskins are dealing with

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>home against San Francisco, at Philly, Dallas and at Seattle. Well,

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>they've got two division games, so that that does crank

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>it up a little bit for them. Here if there's

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a silver lining and I know what, like three teams

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in the modern history of the NFL have made the

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 1>playoffs after an owen four start. But if you're still

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:37.120
<v Speaker 1>worried about the Giants for whatever reason, they're going Chargers

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>at Broncos, Seahawks Rams. Yeah, they'll put them to bid.

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just sitting here thinking, by the time Halloween rolls around,

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless something crazy happens, I feel like the

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Giants are going to be out of this conversation. Yeah,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And to be honestly, I'm not as worried about them

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 1>anymore from standpoint of fighting for playoff spots, but they

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>still are a team that they're like a it's like

0:26:57.440 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>a zombie. Like you gotta finish them off. Yeah, you

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>don't want them. You want them demoralized and out of

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the conversation to where they're not even where, like Nick

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>always says, you want them to the point where they

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:11.040
<v Speaker 1>may show up on Sundays, but whatever they're doing on Wednesday, Thursday, Friday,

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.479
<v Speaker 1>it's not enough to beat you, right, and that's how

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 1>you got to get him really demoralized at that point. Right.

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know though, because like you've already beaten them

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at home, so you still have to go face them

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 1>on the road. And you want them to be for

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the team, be competitive when the Redskins come to town

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>or so, you know, I don't want them to be

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>finished off completely. I mean until the Cowboys play him

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in December. Yeah, yeah, they want them to kind of

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>be ready to trail off. Dallas is gonna play two

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>teams that I think are almost guaranteed to host a

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>playoff game this year make Kansas City yep. And at home? Yeah,

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>at home sure? And I mean I think this this

0:27:53.040 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>Washington team is sneaky good. I feel like, are people

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>write them off because you know, Cousins has that kind

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of he puts up stats but never delivers, like that's

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of his reputation. But he looked he has looked

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>really good for most of this season. Their offensive line

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is solid. The defense I think is a story for

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that team, the one I will I want to check

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in on them because Josh Norman is now out for

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks and a couple of their injury. Yeah,

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a couple of their other defensive backs got hurt like

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.239
<v Speaker 1>they were I mean they were throwing whoever they had

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>left out there, like everybody. It wasn't just defensive backs.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like every play it seemed like a defensive

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>guy was going down. So, but their pass rush I

0:28:30.680 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>think is improved this year over what it was last year.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>They say, sorry, they have drafted incredibly well over the

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>last two or three years. They say Norman could miss

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks. Cowboys don't face them for what

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>three or I mean weeks two weeks from now, well, no,

0:28:45.760 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>three weeks now from now because of the bye. Yeah,

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:50.280
<v Speaker 1>so it'll be back. He'll be back. They have been

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>fortunate they've played without They played the Giants without Beckham,

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>they played the Cardinals without David Johnson. I saw Time

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery with broken ribs, but they're thinking he might play

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>this game against with broken ribs at the running back position.

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>They might fluck with that. But and then their backup

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>running back got hurt too, and they Yeah, they had

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>that rookie, that sixth round pick I think is the

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>guy that I don't know who the Aaron Aaron Jones

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is the guy. Jamal Williams is another one to watch.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Um got hurt. I don't think Dorsey's coming back. I

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>think he's done. I think he's done. All right, let's

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>go on to the next question. Um, Running Game will

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hit it's stride and return to what we saw in

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen. True or false? True? Like I said, for

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>all the doom and gloom, the Running Game has not

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>been bad. It was atrocious one weekend in Denver. I'm

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 1>willing to chalk that up because they've been good in

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>every other game they eat. Like I said, even if

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to play that stupid game and take the

0:29:47.680 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Morris run out of the equation, they still ran for

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty yards, which is very good. Um,

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's going and uh, it sounds like Chaz

0:29:56.200 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Green's injury isn't long term for the time being. What ever,

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>roll your eyes if you want to. I didn't roll you.

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Rolled your eyes. I expect him. I feel confident that

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 1>he should be in there for green Bay. I guess

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how the things develop as the week goes along.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, and then you know, I don't think every

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 1>team on the schedule is going to have a defense

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like these first four either, I mean that's really four

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in a row where they're you're talking about a lot

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>of talent on your defense. I mean you remember, I know,

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know from year to year it changes, but this

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay team couldn't stop them from doing anything on

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the ground last year and really either of those playoff games,

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and so we'll see. I feel good that they'll get

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>it on track. Yeah, I think they'll get it on track.

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>But you said, like like last seen, no, because they're

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not gonna lead the league and he's not gonna lead

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the league in rushing. Zeke isn't. I mean, I don't

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>know what he ranks right now, but it's not down there.

0:30:51.040 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>It's Yeah, that one game killed him. I mean that

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:56.600
<v Speaker 1>one game. Yeah, nine yards, that's a killer right there.

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he ain't. Kareem Hunt. Kareem Hunt's doing the Zeke

0:30:59.520 --> 0:31:02.280
<v Speaker 1>thing this year. Yeah, we'll see if that continues all season.

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he's definitely off to a great start. He

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:06.479
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred and one yards last night, rookie, right,

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and he had an off night kind of you know,

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it was it wasn't There were tough yards he got

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>last night. Yeah. I respected the way he played last night.

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>He was the leading rusher going into the game. Yeah.

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's saying something right there that after three

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>games he's already the leading rusher and everyone else has

0:31:21.160 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>played four. All right, next question, DeMarcus Lawrence. Lee's the

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL with seven and a half sacks. He will end

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>with fifteen sacks? Over or under? I like over over fifteen? Yeah,

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>because I still think he's got another blow up game

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in him. I mean, just the way he plays, the

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>way he rushes. Now that they got some help coming, um,

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got another game of of you know,

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 1>three or so. Mister Dallas Cowboys Encyclopedia, when's the last

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>time a gay went over fifteen? Where? Huh? Where? Where? What?

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Where's he? Now? I don't know, DeMarcus where? Oh? Wh what?

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>What year? What year was it? Do you remember what

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>year the last time the Cowboys had a pass rusher

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that got over fifteen sacks? And in two thousand and

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>eight I believe he had That was the year he

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>had twenty. So I think we're talking about oh nine.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he came back after that with fifteen. I don't

0:32:19.960 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really have this. I don't have them media gat in

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>front of me. I mean he was around that time.

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say anywhere from like two thousand and seven

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and eleven he was in that boat

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of like ten, you know, anywhere from fit fourteen fifteen

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>he got a couple where he was over twenty, yeah, nineteen,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eleven, nineteen point five, that was the last time. Yes,

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>when did you have twenty? Was it? It was two

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight? Yep. Okay, so two thousand and eleven,

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>so the last time, ken, are you looking at the

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys year by year or just looking career? Okay? Well,

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't nobody else had I mean, I can't

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>think of another pass rusher that would have gotten that

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>high Hatcher even at Yeah, no, they have not had

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:06.479
<v Speaker 1>anybody come like. Hatcher's the closest since I've been here.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>The double digits. Yeah, Um, I'm gonna say he hits

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>it because at this point he's halfway there after a course,

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>he hits fifteen or he's over fifteen. I think he

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>hits it. I don't know by how much, but I

0:33:18.400 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be tough for him because he's gonna

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>start to be a point of emphasis for these teams,

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think his supporting cast is good enough

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to take that pressure off of him. I think he's

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be good. He's gonna maybe he opens the door

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 1>for other people to get sacks um, but I think

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's it's gonna get tough for him with the way

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>he started. But I think twelve games, I mean, what

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>he he only has to he he doesn't even have

0:33:44.000 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to average a sack a game the rest of the

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>way to get there. So I think he'll get there,

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's gonna get a lot tougher. I

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>think the reason why that I think he is going

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to get there is because he even if though teams

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have great left tackles, he doesn't face them. He doesn't

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>really he can go up on both sides of the line,

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part he's rushing from the left end.

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>But they're gonna they're gonna start giving more attension. That's fine.

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't help, that's fine. Odd Gurley was knocking the

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>crap out of him. No, but that but that's okay

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>because that that's that's to be expected. A lot of

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>teams are gonna play on the right side. They're gonna

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>play that tight end or running back whatever. It's not like, though,

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna go up against this awesome Pro Bowl left

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>tackle that can shut him down. I mean, he's not

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:30.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna face that unless they want to switch their whole

0:34:30.400 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>offense around, which I doubt that they will. So what

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is is that he's either gonna face a

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>matchup that he should be able to win, or he's

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna force teams to do things like that. And that's

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>when you hope that Malik. And by the way, did

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>he play the other day, Malik, he did for him

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>other than kicking the ball at the end of the

0:34:49.520 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>game at the end of the half, you know, to

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of people on Twitter asking me why

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't one of the five players to remember, I

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>still thought the Rams were gonna get the ball and

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>spike it. I didn't think they were running out of time,

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 1>did you know. I thought they were going to spike

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball and that that kid would have made a

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>field goal from sixty five yards, so what's five morning yards? Yeah? Anyways,

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think he will get it. I

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>think he'll get up there because I think he's really

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>really rushing the well well right now, all right, let's

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>take our final break. When we come back, I have

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>two more questions for you guys. The question that we'll

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:24.640
<v Speaker 1>hit when we come back is is this defense better,

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 1>worse or the same as last year. We'll do that

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>when we come right back. This is Dallas Cowboys dot

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. To work this big land, you need equipment

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.879
<v Speaker 1>with values rooted as deep in Texas soil as you are,

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>like John Deer compact tractors with a six year power

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>training warrant to hit big features that help you work

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>less so you have more time to do what you love.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>John Deer was first in the Texas fields, and we're

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:49.399
<v Speaker 1>proud to be on the field as the official agg

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and turf equipment of the Dallas Cowboys. Find Texas sized

0:35:52.719 --> 0:35:56.800
<v Speaker 1>deals and my John Deer Dealer dot com Slash Football Terms, Conditions,

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>exclusions and warranty limitations applies. He can be love for details.

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>We entertainment loving people demand the best unlimited wireless plan

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.080
<v Speaker 1>ever from ATNT. What else do you want? Are you unicorn?

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe only at and T offers you unlimited data with

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>HBO included and never payoverages. Get ATNT Unlimited plus our

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>best wireless deal and unlimited Data plus save twenty five

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>dollars per month on Direct TV It's entertainment. You're way

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:18.239
<v Speaker 1>after twenty two kidlets of data use and TAM Slow

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 1>Speeds plan includes stream saving videos, will stream and standard

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>definition unless you're turn it off twenty five dollars Direct

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>D savings acrise at and t unlimited plus credits starting

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>three bills. Service prices subject to change, other usage speed fees,

0:36:26.719 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>charges and restrictions. Supplies a ATD dotcom slash unlimited for details.

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Star Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>with sideline access and photo ops with current players, alumni

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>and cheerleaders. That's not all, though, You'll get to talk

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>x's and those with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>McClay and of course with yours truly me, Brian Broadest.

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 1>You can trust the official fan travel partner of the

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys, and with us you'll travel like a pro.

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Visit Cowboys Travel dot com to book your travel package today.

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Back to the break final segment of the break Life

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in the s WBC Borget Studios, Nick take it Away

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, let's let's find a good one here. Let's

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>pick out a good one. Just kind of like when

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 1>you're going in and you're trying to figure out what

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>underwear you want to pick out a good one? Why

0:37:13.400 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I pick one out here? A true cowboy loves his freedom.

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John gives you that feeling of freedom where it

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>counts the contour pats that nestles you in fabrics you

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>can barely feel, kind of like commando shop Exclusive Cowboys

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Underwear Tommy John dot com Forward Slash Cowboys for twenty

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:31.400
<v Speaker 1>percent off first order Tommy John dot com Forward Slash

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>cow Voice. I don't know what. I don't know what

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you do when you run, but I gotta I gotta pair.

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I got a pair of Tommy John underwear for running

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that it comes with a little pouch that is that

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the ones to run anywhere I don't know, or go anywhere.

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they're called. But it has a

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 1>little pouch that I can put my keys in or

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:51.759
<v Speaker 1>like if we're on the road. It's perfect for like

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a hotel room key or whatever. It's great. Yeah, awesome,

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.399
<v Speaker 1>So like it's your keys in your underwear. Yeah, it's

0:37:57.440 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 1>like there's a little pocket and you just put it

0:37:59.360 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>in there and there's they're safe. And I used to

0:38:01.840 --> 0:38:03.959
<v Speaker 1>have to tie my keys or in on my shoe

0:38:04.040 --> 0:38:08.400
<v Speaker 1>when I went for a run, hotel key or or

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>back in the day before I had this underwear. If

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I was running at home, I would tie my house

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>key to my shoe, or if I was in a hotel,

0:38:15.960 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I would put my hotel key in my um inside

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>my shoe. We gotta talk after this. What else are

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:23.399
<v Speaker 1>you supposed to do? Thank, we're talking now, I mean, well,

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:25.359
<v Speaker 1>what else are you We're gonna have a running talking

0:38:25.480 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>what else? What else are you supposed to do with

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you after Yeah, I'll tell you if this

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter now because I have a pouch on

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:33.759
<v Speaker 1>my underwear that holds it. So don't wait to go.

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John, Tommy John's awesome. Send me more stuff, please

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>please anyway, please, please please. It's getting to the point

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:43.360
<v Speaker 1>where I don't have to choose anymore. I can just

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 1>every day it's a Tommy John day. You know it's

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>getting close, you know, Yeah, all right, let's let's get

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:49.239
<v Speaker 1>back in. We got a couple more questions here. We

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 1>want to hit and we also will take questions from

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you guys. You guys call us two one four eighty

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>seven to twenty one h two and we'll take your questions.

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, during this segment, Tommy John though de

0:38:58.239 --> 0:39:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Lawrence did continue his sack streak. Awesome. I'm sure

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Amber will be very happy to just pointed out last week.

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Very very good. All right, next question, the defense has

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:13.800
<v Speaker 1>been better, worse or the same as last year? Nick? Mmm?

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the defense has been worse because they've lost.

0:39:20.400 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean they've lost two games and through the first

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.520
<v Speaker 1>four they only lost two games last year, like through

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole season up until the very very end. And

0:39:29.640 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 1>you put that on the defense. I put some of

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>it on the defense. I also will say this, you

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>face Eli Manning, Carson Palmer, Trevor Simeon, and Jared Goff.

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.359
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna get worse than that. It's gonna get worse

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>than that, starting starting Sunday. It gets worse than that.

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>And so you're to go too and two and to

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 1>lose games against Trevor Simeon and Jared Goff. I know

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that that they are better than most people expected, but

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and Goff is up there when it comes

0:39:58.080 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to the yards and points, their offense is up. They're

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the league. Yeah, they're not. Again,

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that by the end of the season,

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.120
<v Speaker 1>he's got a game like the Falcons for two years ago.

0:40:08.239 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>To me, where you've dominated the first half, you're running

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. What a great It's true, you're right,

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and the next thing you know, you're like he lost

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Falcons and then they're than the NFC Championship game.

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.399
<v Speaker 1>They're not bad. I'm not saying the Rams were ready

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>to take that step right now, but you know that

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>that game was very similar to that one. First time

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>since Week three twenty fifteen against Atlanta that the Cowboys

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 1>have held a double digit lead and not won the game. Really, yep, um,

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 1>how how can you argue that it's not worse. It's

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think they've been terrible, but it's worse.

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean week last year, for through the first four weeks,

0:40:43.800 --> 0:40:46.280
<v Speaker 1>they gave up twenty to New York, twenty three to Washington,

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen to Chicago. And what was Week four was that

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco so fourteen points? What was the score of

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that game? Twenty eight to fourteen. I think something like that. Yeah,

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>so you've given up the forty nine ers. Yeah, I

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>don't remember, but before seventeen, maybe they didn't give up

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>more than and then they gave up sixteen to Green Bay.

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 1>They didn't give up more than twenty three points. Through

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the first like two months of last season, they've given

0:41:11.440 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>up thirty five to the Rams. And I mean, even

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>if you don't count the pick six, they gave up

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty five to Denver. So yeah, I mean they've been worse.

0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They've given up more big plays. They've had problems stopping

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the run two of the four weeks. And like we

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>said in the previous segment, they've caught some breaks too.

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they gave up three points to the Giants.

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But we know that Odell Beckham changes what they do.

0:41:35.080 --> 0:41:37.839
<v Speaker 1>We know David Johnson changes what Arizona does. So they've

0:41:37.840 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>caught a couple of breaks there, and those are the

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:43.279
<v Speaker 1>two games that they've won. So they need catch some

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>more breaks. I guess I will say this. Through the

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:49.240
<v Speaker 1>first month of last season, I would guess they were healthier.

0:41:50.719 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 1>You'll have Sean Lee back soon. You'll have Anthony Hitchins

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:57.320
<v Speaker 1>back soon. Cheeto can hopefully at some points start contributing

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:01.839
<v Speaker 1>to this defense soon, so there's reason to opt for there.

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And David irvings back now, so you've got all of

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>your suspended players back in the fold, Um, there's reason

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to feel optimistic that they can improve. I love it

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 1>when you talk optimism, being optimistic in the Cowboys this week. No,

0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:20.960
<v Speaker 1>being optimistic is being optimistic is fine as long as

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:24.919
<v Speaker 1>it's based on something more than that's just a gut field,

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 1>just what you want. Yeah, I guess all right. This

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>final question, actually you led into it pretty well. Which

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.400
<v Speaker 1>returning player will have the biggest impact, Anthony Hitchins or

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 1>David Irving. Man, it's good. I'm gonna say David Irving.

0:42:39.120 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And I really like Hitchens, and I think Hitchens. You're

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:45.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk yourself out. I am gonna talking myself out

0:42:45.640 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>of it, you know why, Because I'm gonna talk myself

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:49.399
<v Speaker 1>out of them. I think Irving will would be good,

0:42:49.600 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but I think Hitchens gives you two better players. Irving

0:42:52.480 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>gives you a better player. Hitchens gives you two better players.

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 1>You got Hitchens and you got a better Jalen Smith.

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Because I think less will be more for Jay Smith.

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Not to have to play all the time. So really good.

0:43:03.040 --> 0:43:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say that, But I like what Irving does.

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a big upgrade. But I think Hitchens

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:09.800
<v Speaker 1>can give you a better linebacker, Corp. You know, I

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>thought you were gonna say when you say he gives

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>you two better plays. I thought you were going to

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>say he's been better. He'll be better as a run defender.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>He'll also be better as a nickel guy. Because that

0:43:16.760 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>game that you just played with that running back was

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of running all around the field. I think Hitchens

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>would have done a better job against him than what

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:25.759
<v Speaker 1>you saw did his answer. Then I got another point here.

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 1>But I've been driving the Anthony Hitchins bandwagon since probably May,

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 1>so I mean, I'm not gonna jump off now that

0:43:32.360 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>he's actually getting ready to play. I think. I mean,

0:43:35.320 --> 0:43:39.800
<v Speaker 1>he's He's not Bobby Wagner. I'm you know so. But

0:43:40.560 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>he is a solid all around linebacker. He tackles well.

0:43:44.160 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>He is better in coverage than Jalen Smith has been

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>through the first month of the season. And not only

0:43:50.160 --> 0:43:52.399
<v Speaker 1>what you said about giving Jalen a lighter workload, which

0:43:52.400 --> 0:43:54.839
<v Speaker 1>should be good for him. He partners well with Shaun Lee.

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that'll be good. I like David Irving. I

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:00.759
<v Speaker 1>said this yesterday and actually ironically he had like the

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>best game of his career against the Packers, So maybe

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he does it again. But I gotta see more consistency

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>from him than just you know, basically two amazing performances

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and then a bunch of kind of stop and start,

0:44:15.280 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>good bad, mixed bag. So the hope is that you

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>put in with DeMarcus Lawrence and now, you know, think

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:24.480
<v Speaker 1>about the if you got those four in there with

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>him and with Malie Collins and you have him at tackle,

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.160
<v Speaker 1>can you with Crawford at in? I think that's a

0:44:30.280 --> 0:44:34.960
<v Speaker 1>really good front four in a Nickel situation. You guarantee me, like,

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>can you accurately predict where Irving is going to get

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:40.800
<v Speaker 1>most of his snaps? Because I can't. I can't. I

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 1>have no idea I can tell you where I prefer it.

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I like him better as a defensive tackle me too, Yeah,

0:44:46.120 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I think I would prefer And that's

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>not so much that I think he's better at defensive tackle.

0:44:51.160 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's more from the standpoint personally for me

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that if I'm looking at how this defensive line is

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>made up, and I'm trying to get my best guys

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on the field and pass rush to situations, I think

0:45:01.160 --> 0:45:03.919
<v Speaker 1>he's best at defensive tackle. With those other three guys

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I just mentioned, I think you have your best four

0:45:06.239 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>pass rushers. Maybe you could sub about Mayoa for Crawford

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:12.200
<v Speaker 1>if you feel a little better about that in certain situations,

0:45:12.239 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but I think you got your best four on the

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>field at that point. I think you need to figure

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 1>out where Crawford's going to play, too, Like, where do

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you want him to play the most? They need more

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>out of him. There's just no doubt about it that

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:26.320
<v Speaker 1>they've needed more out of him before. And you know,

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you getting to a point where, well, yeah, he's got

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a bad contracting to live up to that. Okay, forget

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:32.479
<v Speaker 1>that you need to play he needs to just play

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.239
<v Speaker 1>better as a captain, as a guy that they need

0:45:35.440 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>more from. He needs to do some some things and

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if his better spot is an end

0:45:40.360 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>or tackle and they need him to do something. He's

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>not helping much and they're relying on him. So wherever

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna play Crawford to to, you know, utilize him

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the best, then I would kind of say you put

0:45:54.640 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Irving in at that other spot. Um, I was gonna

0:45:57.600 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 1>say this about Jalen Smith, bless you, Jalen Smith and Hitchens,

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, you see, it would seem like Jalen Smith

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 1>needs to play less plays, and the smart thing to

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>do would just say put him on nickel, because you

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Hitchens go first and second down and then you put

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:17.720
<v Speaker 1>him on nickel. But Nicholas where receivers come flying across

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the field where he might have to carry them. So

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you actually need to start Jalen Smith with

0:46:22.920 --> 0:46:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Sean Lee and Hitchens is your nickel guy. Yeah, probably

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to ease him in. Ease him in

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and let him play, you know. And I like the

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.080
<v Speaker 1>thought of Jayalen beyond the field on rundowns far more

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.439
<v Speaker 1>than passing down. I agree with that too, So that's

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>probably what they you know. So Hitchens, I would think,

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 1>would come in and help you on the on the nickel,

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and they'll have different packages that they both of them

0:46:44.160 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>can play and maybe rotate Shaun Lee sum as well.

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:48.680
<v Speaker 1>He's coming off a hamstring injury. If he's ready to

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 1>play this week. Let's get to some calls that you

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 1>can call us at two one four eighty seven two

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty one O two. Again it's two one four eight

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.239
<v Speaker 1>seven two twenty one O two, or you can hit

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.279
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter at Cowboys Break will start with a

0:46:59.320 --> 0:47:04.239
<v Speaker 1>call from Rob in Las Vegas. Rob, What up? Hey? Everybody? Hey,

0:47:04.840 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you know we talk about the defense. Which one's better

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:10.839
<v Speaker 1>this year last year? I think I think they're about

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:12.839
<v Speaker 1>the same. I just think at the end of the day,

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>it's the running game that drives this team. Right now,

0:47:16.880 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>they're losing the time of possession by over three minutes.

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 1>For this year, they're averaging about twenty eight and the

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>other teams are urging thirty one and a half. Last year,

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 1>they almost every single game they own time of possession.

0:47:35.640 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Kept the defense off the field, and let's face it,

0:47:40.280 --> 0:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a good thing because we saw when that

0:47:42.040 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 1>defense has to be on the field a lot. We're

0:47:44.320 --> 0:47:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in trouble the team at Jason Whitman and Cole Beasley,

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they're built to get first downs five yards, six yards,

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and like Nick was saying, third and eight thirty nine,

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:59.080
<v Speaker 1>they're they're out of the play. So I think we

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 1>could talk about safeties, and we could talk about the

0:48:01.640 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>pass rush, but If this running game does not start

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>producing on first down four or five six yards like

0:48:10.000 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 1>they delet, this team's gonna struggle all year because we

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>knew going in this defense can't put up. And I

0:48:21.400 --> 0:48:24.160
<v Speaker 1>noticed that if there's a big time running team coming in.

0:48:24.440 --> 0:48:27.160
<v Speaker 1>If you notice the teams we beat, the Giants no

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>running game at all, Arizona, no running game at all.

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 1>Denver pounded us, and the Rams pounded us this week.

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if if Green Bay doesn't have

0:48:39.160 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a running game, I like our chances. But this offense

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and this running game is what drives this team and

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what's going to make this team successful. All right,

0:48:50.640 --> 0:48:53.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the call. I think it's pretty astute point.

0:48:53.040 --> 0:48:54.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it all starts there. And he

0:48:54.800 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>was talking about time of possession. Last year, the Cowboys

0:48:57.480 --> 0:49:01.720
<v Speaker 1>their average possession, their average drive two minutes and fifty

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>seven seconds. This year two minutes and thirty five seconds, again,

0:49:04.719 --> 0:49:07.839
<v Speaker 1>almost thirty seconds less per drive that they have the ball.

0:49:08.239 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>This team is just not and I think it goes

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>back to him not being able to run and specifically

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>not running well on first downs. They're not sustaining drives

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>like they once did, and that helps you keep that

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:19.799
<v Speaker 1>defense off feel a little bit more. I think that's

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the difference, way more than there are a difference really

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.439
<v Speaker 1>in the way they're playing on defense, that number would

0:49:24.440 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>be a lot different than thirty seconds. Yeah, but you

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta think about you gotta think about like when you

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>look across the league, the difference between the top team

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 1>and the bottom team is very very small. When you're

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:36.239
<v Speaker 1>talking about average time of possession. If you think there's

0:49:36.239 --> 0:49:38.320
<v Speaker 1>some drives that are forty seconds because you get a

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:40.880
<v Speaker 1>deep pass or something like that, so go ahead. I'm sorry, No,

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:42.919
<v Speaker 1>it's just I mean it's funny because like I said

0:49:42.960 --> 0:49:45.560
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the show, I mean, statistically, they're running the

0:49:45.600 --> 0:49:49.399
<v Speaker 1>ball pretty well. But I think the element that you're

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 1>missing is and you know, people, and rightly so, people

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:56.799
<v Speaker 1>I think have been criticizing the offense for being predictable.

0:49:56.920 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 1>And I think last year they just they could run

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 1>at will and if and we're gonna do it and

0:50:04.000 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>we know, you know that it's coming and it doesn't matter,

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't. I don't think they can do that

0:50:08.680 --> 0:50:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this year. And whether you want to blame, whether you

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 1>want to blame, like I said, whether it's the left guard,

0:50:13.200 --> 0:50:15.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the right tackle, whether the all pros aren't

0:50:15.440 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>playing up to their snuff, whether Ezekiel Elliott's missing his reads,

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:23.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to blame it on, it is not dominant.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 1>And therefore it used to not matter that you were predictable,

0:50:26.680 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and it does right now. But you know something, and

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll let you get to that real quick. But I

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:32.080
<v Speaker 1>want to make this point. I don't have the numbers

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:34.279
<v Speaker 1>right in front of me, but I think there is

0:50:34.320 --> 0:50:37.240
<v Speaker 1>a perception and you watch the games and you almost

0:50:37.440 --> 0:50:39.960
<v Speaker 1>think that they're running the ball on first downs more

0:50:40.040 --> 0:50:42.400
<v Speaker 1>than they're passing. They're really not. I mean, they're passing

0:50:42.440 --> 0:50:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball on first down quite a bit. So it's

0:50:44.200 --> 0:50:46.440
<v Speaker 1>not that they're just so predictable where every down, every

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>time on first down, here we go to run and

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 1>they can't get anything. They're mixing it up. They're probably

0:50:50.760 --> 0:50:53.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent, but it's just when they run it on

0:50:54.000 --> 0:50:55.879
<v Speaker 1>first down. And this goes back to what defenses are

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:58.319
<v Speaker 1>saying is basically, we're not going to let you run

0:50:58.360 --> 0:51:00.239
<v Speaker 1>on first down. Yeah, you might throw it on us,

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to let you run on first downs.

0:51:02.200 --> 0:51:04.320
<v Speaker 1>And so far they have not been able to impose

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it will even when defenses last year, right, That's my

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:10.360
<v Speaker 1>point is that defenses did that all last year and

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they were just like, Okay, we're going we're gonna do

0:51:12.680 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it anyway, we're gonna get four yards. Sorry. And I

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:17.239
<v Speaker 1>think where you're seeing is, you know, look at look

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 1>at two years ago when this team was four and twelve,

0:51:20.200 --> 0:51:24.600
<v Speaker 1>they still had like the fourth leading rusher in the NFL, right, McFadden.

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they were running the ball pretty well, even

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>though they were down in some games. They weren't winning,

0:51:29.160 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>they weren't very good, but they were one of the

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 1>worst teams, if not the worst team, in short yardage situations.

0:51:34.960 --> 0:51:36.880
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't run on third and one. They had trouble

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone and around the goal line. And

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what you're seeing a little bit with

0:51:41.680 --> 0:51:43.759
<v Speaker 1>this team is that they've had some issues in the

0:51:43.840 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>red zone when it gets down close. They're having a

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:49.600
<v Speaker 1>hard time moving people off the ball when they really

0:51:49.680 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>need to. So, yeah, as Dave your point, the stats

0:51:52.640 --> 0:51:55.359
<v Speaker 1>look pretty good. They are running the ball fairly well.

0:51:55.680 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>But we even saw after that run by Morris, I

0:51:57.960 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>mean he got down there, it was kind of hard.

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 1>You had to throw row the ball to try to

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:03.799
<v Speaker 1>get it get it in. So that's where I think

0:52:03.840 --> 0:52:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the issue is still is it's short yardage downward gets

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>tight in the red zone, being able to just say

0:52:09.600 --> 0:52:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we are knocking you back off the ball, and we

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:14.960
<v Speaker 1>haven't really seen that yet, So I think that's kind

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of where the issue is. You think that also we

0:52:17.719 --> 0:52:19.239
<v Speaker 1>were just kind of seeing a little bit of what

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year. It just happens that this was compacted.

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.080
<v Speaker 1>It's the first four games because last year when they

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 1>faced good defenses, they struggled the Giants, the Vikings. There

0:52:28.200 --> 0:52:30.560
<v Speaker 1>were some games that they played really good defenses and

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they just they couldn't get anything going. Maybe it just

0:52:33.560 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 1>so happens that this year you played the Rams, who

0:52:36.480 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>their front is as good as any defense they played

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:41.280
<v Speaker 1>last year, and they played the Denver Broncos, who obviously

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 1>their defense is right up there, and you had those

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in the first four games. Versus being spaced out through

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the season. It's entirely possible. And these next two games.

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is gonna be a tall task with

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the Packers just because of Aaron Rodgers, but you should

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>be able to run on this team. I'd like to

0:52:57.360 --> 0:52:59.640
<v Speaker 1>think you can run on San Francisco, which I know

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that they've got a lot of draft picks in their

0:53:02.480 --> 0:53:05.799
<v Speaker 1>front seven, but that is still a talent depleted team.

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see, We'll see what this looks like. Because

0:53:09.880 --> 0:53:13.600
<v Speaker 1>if if the struggles continue against these next two defenses,

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:16.359
<v Speaker 1>then I don't think that excuse holds as much water

0:53:16.480 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>as it does. Right now, You're saying, who has a

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of draft picks at Francis Scan Francisco Orrus Buckner,

0:53:22.000 --> 0:53:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Solomon Thomas, Ruben Foster's in there. Now, you know at

0:53:25.600 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>some point that I think that that needs to be

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 1>addressed as well for the Cowboys. Um, you're seeing these teams,

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:38.160
<v Speaker 1>especially last week with the Rams. Rod Marinelli as good

0:53:38.200 --> 0:53:40.719
<v Speaker 1>as he is and coaches up these guys, and he

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 1>coaches up a lot of no names. They need some names,

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:47.880
<v Speaker 1>like they need some players to they need to start drafting,

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, try to get some guys that are

0:53:51.480 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in the elite pass freshers or elite defensive tackles. You know,

0:53:56.280 --> 0:53:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, go ahead, Yeah, I'm just saying

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that it's catching up to them of you for you

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>can just keep trying to find diamonds in the rough.

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:08.279
<v Speaker 1>Over and over, but at some point you do need

0:54:08.360 --> 0:54:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to surround them with some really awesome, great players. And

0:54:12.239 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the defensive line has been now at

0:54:16.280 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 1>end they've tried it end a little bit more with

0:54:18.719 --> 0:54:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the Marcus Lawrence a Taco. That's the question is when

0:54:21.600 --> 0:54:23.919
<v Speaker 1>could they do that? I mean they they've had They've

0:54:24.000 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>had two first round picks on this defense. They were later,

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:30.479
<v Speaker 1>but that's that's just the factor of where you draft,

0:54:30.520 --> 0:54:32.719
<v Speaker 1>based upon where you finish, Like when were they really

0:54:32.760 --> 0:54:36.399
<v Speaker 1>supposed to get these really much higher level players well

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in the draft? You know, it's a mindset from Marinelli.

0:54:40.200 --> 0:54:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't sit there and say it. He

0:54:41.760 --> 0:54:44.799
<v Speaker 1>likes to get these guys because it makes him look

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:46.959
<v Speaker 1>like a better coach. If you can get Nick Hayden

0:54:47.000 --> 0:54:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to play well when nobody wants Nick Hayden, and you

0:54:49.120 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 1>can get David Irving and all these guys and Tyrone

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Crawford and make them you know, now, he was a

0:54:54.000 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 1>third round pick and so was Malite Collins and all that.

0:54:56.200 --> 0:55:00.239
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying it worked out. But you he

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:03.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't want Shary Floyd and he could. You know, most

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 1>guys at defensive line are gonna want a first round pick,

0:55:06.600 --> 0:55:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't really want them. He doesn't want those

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:11.800
<v Speaker 1>type of players as much. So I don't buy that

0:55:12.000 --> 0:55:13.919
<v Speaker 1>narrative as much as I used to. And I've talked

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:17.720
<v Speaker 1>about that before that. Okay, let's go through it. Taco

0:55:17.880 --> 0:55:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was pick twenty eight, DeMarcus was pick thirty four, Tyrone

0:55:20.840 --> 0:55:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Crawford was pick eighty one, Malie Collins was pick sixty seven.

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Mife Jones, Well, I'm thinking purely on the defense. Okay,

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that's bait. Oh and Randy Gregory was pick sixty. I mean,

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:36.799
<v Speaker 1>clearly did not work out. But you tried. The resources

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:39.239
<v Speaker 1>have been spent, and for whatever reason, it has not

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:41.640
<v Speaker 1>worked out. I'll do it better, though. What I'm saying

0:55:41.760 --> 0:55:43.880
<v Speaker 1>is is that's fine, do it better, like do offensively,

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, take the offensive line approach. You know that

0:55:47.160 --> 0:55:49.239
<v Speaker 1>they were doing the same thing, was second and third

0:55:49.360 --> 0:55:52.040
<v Speaker 1>round picks for years, and then they finally said, you

0:55:52.080 --> 0:55:53.399
<v Speaker 1>know what, we need to do a little bit better.

0:55:53.520 --> 0:55:55.239
<v Speaker 1>That's the question, Like you can only do one of them,

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Like you only got that one first round pick. So

0:55:57.239 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>are you saying that you would have preferred instead of

0:55:59.320 --> 0:56:01.239
<v Speaker 1>going as heavy as they do with the offensive line,

0:56:01.239 --> 0:56:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they should have done on defensive line. Here's

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:05.840
<v Speaker 1>another thing that maybe I'm maybe I'm changing the argument

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to this, Get me some bigger guys up front, Get

0:56:09.400 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 1>me more size upfront, guys that can play like this undersize.

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:18.080
<v Speaker 1>How many guys do you need that are undersized? I

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mean the guys that are that are quick and off

0:56:20.719 --> 0:56:22.799
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I mean, at some point you can't get

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>moved off the ball. And Tyrone Crawford's playing in sometimes,

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 1>so that means he's not the biggest tackle. Stephen Pie

0:56:29.440 --> 0:56:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is not a huge tackle at all. He's undersized. Malie

0:56:33.000 --> 0:56:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Collins is a is pretty good, but he's a little

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>bit quicker than he is big. They need some big

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:42.480
<v Speaker 1>guys up front, and preferably big talented guys. So I

0:56:42.760 --> 0:56:45.239
<v Speaker 1>think that that's kind of the issue for me, is

0:56:45.239 --> 0:56:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're getting moved off the ball because they don't

0:56:47.719 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 1>really have that size. When everybody's undersized, I don't know,

0:56:52.719 --> 0:56:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just don't. I don't think that it

0:56:54.800 --> 0:56:58.560
<v Speaker 1>works all the time. Not everybody's Jay Rayliffe that can

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:01.000
<v Speaker 1>play undersize. Yeah, they can do that and play for

0:57:01.200 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 1>four years like that. I don't And I mean I

0:57:04.120 --> 0:57:06.759
<v Speaker 1>hear what you're saying, and sure, they've been picking at

0:57:06.800 --> 0:57:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the back end of the drafts, they've been finding guys

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in the middle rounds. But I don't think you can

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the resources they've spent on the defensive line

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:18.200
<v Speaker 1>since about twenty fourteen when they trade it up for

0:57:18.280 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence and say we don't have we don't have the talent.

0:57:21.200 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've spent a lot of resources to put

0:57:23.720 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 1>these guys in place. I'm talking about tackles, and I

0:57:26.320 --> 0:57:28.280
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the line anymore. I'm talking about tackles.

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think upfront, they need bigger guys up front, and

0:57:32.000 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>even if it's not a first round pick, but I

0:57:34.440 --> 0:57:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think that they need more size up there. I think

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that they're too small, too undersized. All Right, we appreciate

0:57:41.120 --> 0:57:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys. Join us. We'll be back tomorrow. We'll start

0:57:42.960 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 1>talking a little bit more about Cowboys versus Packers, which

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 1>be coming up this Sunday three thirty at at and

0:57:48.040 --> 0:57:50.480
<v Speaker 1>T Stadium, Tilted for Nick Even and David Hellman. I'm

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Derek Eatleton. This has been The Break live on Dallas

0:57:52.640 --> 0:57:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. This has been a production of

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com and Dallas Cowboys Football club