Speaker 1: Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of
Speaker 1: My Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind.
Speaker 1: Listener mail. This is Robert Lam and this is Joe McCormick.
Speaker 1: And it's Monday, so it's time for us to read
Speaker 1: back a few with the messages that you have sent
Speaker 1: in over the past week or so, rob do you
Speaker 1: mind if I jump right in with this message in
Speaker 1: response to our episodes on the invention of the chainsaw?
Speaker 1: Go for it all right? This comes from Chris. Chris says, Hi,
Speaker 1: Joe and Robert. Longtime listener, first time emailer. I'm currently
Speaker 1: listening to your podcast on the chainsaw and just thought
Speaker 1: i'd let you know a place where these appear unchained
Speaker 1: or with the bar removed completely. In sporting culture, if
Speaker 1: you watch pretty much any downhill mountain bike race, there
Speaker 1: will be numerous crowd members wielding chainsaws as a way
Speaker 1: to cheer on the riders. I believe are a couple
Speaker 1: of different reasons behind this. The first and most obvious
Speaker 1: is that a lot of mountain biking facilities are built
Speaker 1: in forest plantations that are periodically harvested, so it's quite
Speaker 1: common to hear chainsaws in the background. To riding. The
Speaker 1: second is perhaps a slight stretch. A traditional way to
Speaker 1: cheer on a road cyclist is to ring a cow bell.
Speaker 1: Similar reasoning, bicycle races take place on rural roads where
Speaker 1: the only unnatural sound maybe that of cattle as they
Speaker 1: go about the business of being cattle. I believe the
Speaker 1: chainsaw represents the newer, more extreme sport of downhill racing.
Speaker 1: I thought this was an interesting little side note to
Speaker 1: the use of chainsaws. Thanks for the quirky and interesting
Speaker 1: topics that you cover. Regards Chris Well, then sounds completely
Speaker 1: made up. I don't know I believe any of that that,
Speaker 1: but it's so weird. I guess it has to be true. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I wonder Well, now I'm wondering if I should have
Speaker 1: checked this beforehand. You know what, Chris, if you were
Speaker 1: lying to us, and I determined afterwards, I'm gonna cut
Speaker 1: this whole message out of the episode. But I was
Speaker 1: wondering if, okay, could chainsaws be so that the the
Speaker 1: downhill mountain biking person can hear you through a through
Speaker 1: a helmet they've got on that would like cover up
Speaker 1: their ears and muffle normal applause and cheers. I guess
Speaker 1: so I could see that being the case. You know,
Speaker 1: they're muffled, they're going fast. Uh, you can't just yell hey,
Speaker 1: way to go race that downhill? You know, you need
Speaker 1: to maybe something louder. And it's either this or air horns.
Speaker 1: And I guess the air horn could be more startling,
Speaker 1: whereas the chainsaw could be startling too. I guess if
Speaker 1: you're just suddenly wrapping it up, but more of it,
Speaker 1: I guess it is just constantly going. Then maybe it's
Speaker 1: like a nice ambient roar when they rush by. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I guess so, I mean something about it seems vaguely threatening. Yeah. Well, anyway, Chris,
Speaker 1: thanks for getting in touch. All right, so that was
Speaker 1: a bit of a Halloween listener mail, and it's okay
Speaker 1: if those continue to roll, Lynn will continue to read him.
Speaker 1: But we also begin to hear from folks in regard
Speaker 1: to our Doune episodes. Uh so basically we put out,
Speaker 1: you know, two new Science of Dune episodes, and this
Speaker 1: was this bit of listener mail comes to us from see, hey, guys,
Speaker 1: not normally one to write into podcasts first time, actually,
Speaker 1: but I just finished your new episode on the BENI
Speaker 1: Jesra like yourselves. I'm a pretty big fan of Doone.
Speaker 1: It is my default favorite book in any sort of
Speaker 1: favorite book discussions, I give both Done and Done Messiah
Speaker 1: a read through every couple of years. Anyway, to the point,
Speaker 1: I was really thinking deeply about the box while watching
Speaker 1: some late night peanut butter brownies finished baking in the oven,
Speaker 1: and a curious thing struck me. I am one that
Speaker 1: leans towards the box not being a secret technology but
Speaker 1: some parlor trick of the Reverend Mother. As I was
Speaker 1: listening to you guys discussed the box and Paul's later
Speaker 1: anecdote about not falling for tricks again, it made me
Speaker 1: wonder if he would have felt anything at all if
Speaker 1: he hadn't asked what was in the box. After all,
Speaker 1: the benegestor to have command of the voice, and so
Speaker 1: I wonder if the Reverend Mother telling Paul what to
Speaker 1: expect in the box, maybe that was enough. I think
Speaker 1: maybe the Reverend Mother planted that in his mind, maybe
Speaker 1: with the voice, and then Paul's mind created that very
Speaker 1: pain that tortured him. So maybe the box is just
Speaker 1: simply that a box. Anyway, Thank you guys for the
Speaker 1: years of podcasting excellence. And I look forward to any
Speaker 1: more cheers. See. Yeah, you know, I pretty much suspect
Speaker 1: this is what Herbert had in mind, that actually the
Speaker 1: box itself doesn't do anything, and it is the Reverend
Speaker 1: mother who is the who is the active principle, who
Speaker 1: is causing the the sensations of pain that Paul is feeling. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I too think that's probably more in line with with
Speaker 1: the way he seems to operate. And it's certainly the
Speaker 1: way that the Reverend Mothers seemed to operate. It's a
Speaker 1: it's kind of it's like a distraction to a certain extent,
Speaker 1: and it's a method of of of tweaking our perception
Speaker 1: of things. Um, but I wonder what would happen if
Speaker 1: she had said something other than pain, Like what if
Speaker 1: she had said, it's filled with like what's in the paint?
Speaker 1: What's in the box? And and she says, well, it's eyeballs,
Speaker 1: it's a witch's hair from a witch who once lived
Speaker 1: in this house. Now it's the intestines of a murderer. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it would have that. It would have been interesting. Have
Speaker 1: you ever done one of those Halloween parties the field,
Speaker 1: the Field, the Ikey's I remember it is a child.
Speaker 1: I remember going to some sort of uh, you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know, it's like an Elks Club Halloween or something,
Speaker 1: I don't know, and uh, and somebody had that set
Speaker 1: up and I remember thinking it was pretty neat because
Speaker 1: you had the other spaghetti for guts I think, and
Speaker 1: then skinned grapes, particularly skinned grapes for for eyeballs. And yeah,
Speaker 1: I can't remember what those are, the two big ones.
Speaker 1: I was like, Yeah, these aggress I guess another way
Speaker 1: of framing it is you could say that if if
Speaker 1: the Reverend Mother is just doing something, you know, psychologically
Speaker 1: manipulated of de Paul with her own voice and stuff,
Speaker 1: that the box could be considered misdirection. You know, the
Speaker 1: classic uh, one of the most common tricks used by
Speaker 1: stage magicians is misdirection. And that like they will draw
Speaker 1: your attention to an object or to what they're doing
Speaker 1: with one of their hands or something. You know, the
Speaker 1: whole point is to get you to look at this
Speaker 1: thing while the real trick is happening somewhere else in
Speaker 1: their other hand or something. Now, there's nothing really presented
Speaker 1: as far as I know, to doubt the the the
Speaker 1: idea that the needle that the gone jibar itself has
Speaker 1: has poisoned at the tip of it. But I mean,
Speaker 1: if if the box doesn't really have pain in it,
Speaker 1: if the box is just a box, is it possible
Speaker 1: if the gonjibar is just a needle and that if
Speaker 1: she has to poke you with it, you're just gonna
Speaker 1: get poked with the needle. You're not actually gonna die.
Speaker 1: Or is it a similar situation where if you draw
Speaker 1: your hand out, you're gonna believe you're gonna die when
Speaker 1: you're when you're spiked with that gone jibar needle poison
Speaker 1: or no poison, Like, you don't need the meticyanide. It's
Speaker 1: like the matrix your mind makes it real. Yeah, whoa dude, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that that's Dune. That's how the Dune works on you.
Speaker 1: All right? What else we have? Joe? Alright? This next
Speaker 1: message is also in response to the Dune episodes. This
Speaker 1: comes from e k ek Ses, Robert, and Joe. I've
Speaker 1: enjoyed your podcast for quite a while. As a psychiatrist, artist,
Speaker 1: and D and D enthusiasts. There are a number of
Speaker 1: topics you cover that cross over with my professional and
Speaker 1: personal interests. Your latest episode and the discussion on pain
Speaker 1: and the psychological inputs certainly touched on a topic that
Speaker 1: I frequently discussed with my patients. You mentioned hypnosis briefly,
Speaker 1: and although I do not practice it myself, during my training,
Speaker 1: I've seen video documentation of patients undergoing surgery under hypnosis
Speaker 1: instead of anesthetics, including a Sissyrian section. This is a
Speaker 1: profound reduction in pain rather than a moderate effect size,
Speaker 1: although of course hypnosis this is really only an option
Speaker 1: for a select population. This is what we're talking about
Speaker 1: in the episode that while it does seem like hypnosis
Speaker 1: is pretty efficacious for people who are susceptible to it,
Speaker 1: not everybody is susceptible to it. But e K goes
Speaker 1: on that said, I think we all have experience of
Speaker 1: not noticing an injury and feeling pain only when we
Speaker 1: notice the scrape or blister later. In my work with
Speaker 1: individuals with anxiety and depression, I've found that people in
Speaker 1: a negative state of mind often experience worse pain. In
Speaker 1: the same way, the brain gives more value to negative
Speaker 1: thoughts and words of discouragement when depressed, the brain also
Speaker 1: pays more attention to negative physical inputs like pain. Thus,
Speaker 1: I find that treating depression and anxiety often improves physical
Speaker 1: pain as well, even if it does not take away
Speaker 1: the physical ailment that causes it. I believe there was
Speaker 1: also a World War two physician who found that service
Speaker 1: members wounded in the battlefield often needed less morphine than
Speaker 1: civilian who had similar gunshot wounds. The theory is that
Speaker 1: the soldier's injury meant going home and returning as a hero,
Speaker 1: and thus had a different meaning than, for example, a
Speaker 1: shopkeeper who was wounded in a robbery and had only
Speaker 1: lost as a result. In psychiatry, of course, we deal
Speaker 1: with how the meaning of things affects perceptions and experiences,
Speaker 1: and this is definitely true when it comes to pain.
Speaker 1: Keep up the good work. Enjoy the podcast. E K Yeah,
Speaker 1: I feel like we've discussed the the scenario with the
Speaker 1: World War two physician. UM believe this is coming. I
Speaker 1: think so, either in some of our past episodes on
Speaker 1: perceptions of pain or perhaps placebo. Okay, I guess that
Speaker 1: didn't stick in my brain for some reason. Maybe I'll
Speaker 1: mean or it could be possible that I assembled it
Speaker 1: wholesale in my own brain. I could be misremembering, but
Speaker 1: it rings a bell or chainsaw well, e K. Thank
Speaker 1: you very much for sharing your insight from clinical experience.
Speaker 1: Always great to hear from from people working in a
Speaker 1: professional capacity in the subjects we cover all right, Here
Speaker 1: is one from zach Uh. This is in response to
Speaker 1: our episode on the leshy Uh. This was put out
Speaker 1: as a vault episode, but it was one of our
Speaker 1: favorite Halloween episodes from the previous year. Zach rides high.
Speaker 1: In the recent fault episode, Joe was listing the subtle
Speaker 1: ways in which a lesh she might have a subtle
Speaker 1: detail wrong with it, enabling the hero of the folk
Speaker 1: tale to realize that they're encountering Aleshi. I think this
Speaker 1: has come up before in your episodes about Incubi and succuby.
Speaker 1: I think you guys mentioned how Christian authors interpreted this
Speaker 1: feature of monsters as being imposed by God to provide
Speaker 1: righteous Christians with the opportunity to realize they were being
Speaker 1: tempted by an evil monster. This reminds me of how
Speaker 1: scam emails or texts will always have crazy misspellings or
Speaker 1: bad grammar. If you're a scammer sending issuing emails to people,
Speaker 1: it's as if no matter how well written the email is,
Speaker 1: God will alter the text of the email in transit
Speaker 1: to insertain misspellings and give the recipients an opportunity to
Speaker 1: realize they are being scammed. Thank you God for protecting
Speaker 1: me from modern day lescies, Zach. It's it's strange how often,
Speaker 1: uh this is true. Yeah, yeah, So you know the
Speaker 1: thing that we've discussed in that I think it's come
Speaker 1: up a few times before, is yeah, this this medieval um,
Speaker 1: I don't know, it's late medieval and kind of post
Speaker 1: medieval concept as well, that these demons could take human
Speaker 1: form um in order to deceive people and uh and
Speaker 1: make them give into their sins. But God being just
Speaker 1: would not allow the devil and his minions uh to
Speaker 1: have a complete advantage over the righteous, and so there
Speaker 1: would always be that telltale sign such as uh, duck
Speaker 1: feet on an otherwise, you know, attractive female form, that
Speaker 1: sort of thing. And so as long as you looked
Speaker 1: for the duck feet, acknowledge the duck feet, and then
Speaker 1: corrected your course, you know appropriately, you'd be all right. Uh.
Speaker 1: So I do like this comparison. I mean, it's certainly
Speaker 1: you can't rely on this absolutely, but it's one of
Speaker 1: those things they frequently teach you. I know, we're always
Speaker 1: getting warnings at work about how to look out for
Speaker 1: phishing emails, and that's one of the things. They're like,
Speaker 1: look for the airs, look for the duck feet. But
Speaker 1: I do want to reemphasize what you said, Rob. You know,
Speaker 1: it shouldn't be your only fail safe, because hey, some
Speaker 1: scammers must have really good grammar. It's just the law
Speaker 1: of large numbers. All right. Maybe we should finish up
Speaker 1: with uh with the message or too About Weird how Cinema.
Speaker 1: This one comes from Greg Gregg, says, Hi, gentlemen, you
Speaker 1: mentioned during this week's Weird howse Cinema episode, which was
Speaker 1: Highway to Hell, that you couldn't recall a sofa slash
Speaker 1: easy chair horror film. I think the context was I
Speaker 1: was saying, you know, there's like, there's a horror movie
Speaker 1: for every type of media technology. Uh. There's like The
Speaker 1: Ring where you watch a videotape and then it kills you.
Speaker 1: There's h there's fear dot com where you go to
Speaker 1: a website and it kills you. There is Uh. Those
Speaker 1: came out I think right around the same time, and
Speaker 1: we're extremely similar movies. By the way, there was another
Speaker 1: one called nine seven six Evil we were talking about,
Speaker 1: which I've never seen, but it allegedly is about a
Speaker 1: phone number you call and it kills you. But I
Speaker 1: was like, well, surely nobody ever made a movie where
Speaker 1: there's a reclining chair and you sit in it and
Speaker 1: it kills you. But apparently I was wrong. Greg says,
Speaker 1: look no further than Killer Sofa nineteen from the Fine
Speaker 1: Folks at High Octane Pictures. This New Zealand horror comedy
Speaker 1: was most recently available on Amazon Prime, alongside sure to
Speaker 1: be classics like Veloci Pastor, in which a priest transforms
Speaker 1: into a velociraptor. At least, give the Killer Sofa trailer
Speaker 1: a look. The image of a recliner evil e peering
Speaker 1: out of a second floor window says it all. Thanks Greg.
Speaker 1: You know, Greg, I gotta be honest. I did not
Speaker 1: have high hopes for this, and I went and looked
Speaker 1: at because I mean, movies like this A lot of
Speaker 1: times they when you're trying this hard to make a
Speaker 1: silly or bad movie on purpose. You know this level
Speaker 1: of irony from the conceptual origins. It just doesn't usually
Speaker 1: work in its final form. I don't know why, but
Speaker 1: most of the time, it's it's not as fun as
Speaker 1: the concept would seem. But I gotta say, I watched
Speaker 1: the trailer for this and it it looks dope. I'm sold. Uh.
Speaker 1: It's got these great shots of like menacing springs poking
Speaker 1: out into the into the frame, and there's something quite
Speaker 1: infectious about the way the characters in the trailer just
Speaker 1: keeps saying the word recliner over and over and not
Speaker 1: switching out for synonyms like chair. Yeah, this is I
Speaker 1: think in that episode, Um, I said that I thought
Speaker 1: that I had seen some sort of a killer or
Speaker 1: couch or or whatever movie not seen. That's the poster
Speaker 1: for it, and I believe this is the one. This
Speaker 1: must have come up for me in Amazon or something. Um.
Speaker 1: You have my sincere apology for for not heeding you. Um. Now,
Speaker 1: as as far as I understand, this is not a
Speaker 1: part of like the full Moon universe, so I don't
Speaker 1: think we can currently have killer Sofa Battle um, like
Speaker 1: Killer Ball or anything like that, which is which is
Speaker 1: a shame. It seems like this creation would fit well
Speaker 1: in that universe. Oh within band camp. Yeah, I'm not
Speaker 1: seeing Killer Ball either, but that to me, Again, I
Speaker 1: don't want to pre judge. I haven't seen it, but
Speaker 1: that sounds like the kind of movie I was talking
Speaker 1: about that usually doesn't doesn't really do it for me. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, and here's one more. This one comes to
Speaker 1: us from Mike. Mike says, Hey, Joe, he's got beef
Speaker 1: with me, apparently to start, I've been enjoying this podcast
Speaker 1: for the last five years and playing older episodes in
Speaker 1: between your new ones, catching up constantly. I'm a fan
Speaker 1: of horror slasher films of the seventies and eighties. On
Speaker 1: multiple occasions, I've heard you state that Jason Vorhees essentially
Speaker 1: becomes a revenant after the seventh God Awful film. Here's
Speaker 1: my gripe, though, isn't Jason a behemoth revenant from the
Speaker 1: beginning first film? He drowned at Crystal Lake and died.
Speaker 1: He is the uncaring, unfeeling, unstoppable, monolithic beast from the start.
Speaker 1: Any thoughts, Mike, Well, Mike, I I appreciate all the aggression.
Speaker 1: Uh uh No, I think you're wrong. Uh So. I
Speaker 1: will admit that the early films are not quite consistent
Speaker 1: on this point. Uh so. Yeah. In the first Friday
Speaker 1: Thirteenth movie, the premise is that Jason died and uh,
Speaker 1: and of course it is revealed that it's his mother
Speaker 1: who is doing the killings that are that are being
Speaker 1: blamed on him. But uh my, my basic understanding was
Speaker 1: that this is just sort of ignored in rhet cond
Speaker 1: in the second film where Jason does show up. I
Speaker 1: think just because the first one was successful, they wanted
Speaker 1: to make another one. They thought it would make money.
Speaker 1: They're like, okay, well, Mrs Voor, he's got her head
Speaker 1: cut off at the end of the first film, so
Speaker 1: we can't really use her again. Well what if we
Speaker 1: just say that, like, Jason wasn't actually dead, he was alive.
Speaker 1: Uh So that's what we got Jason, and it turns
Speaker 1: out is alive. He is a psychotic killer adult man
Speaker 1: in the second movie, and uh, then again in the
Speaker 1: third movie, then again in the fourth movie. In the
Speaker 1: fourth movie, Corey Feldman waxed him in the head with
Speaker 1: the machette and he is no more. The fifth movie
Speaker 1: features a copycat. And yes, it is the sixth film.
Speaker 1: I think you got the order a little off because
Speaker 1: you were saying the seventh it's the sixth film. Where
Speaker 1: finally they're just like, ahh to hell with it. Okay,
Speaker 1: he's he's undead. It's magic now, I you know what,
Speaker 1: I think it's it was a smart move on their part,
Speaker 1: good choice. Yeah, like I said, there's a progression there.
Speaker 1: I haven't. Like I said, for me, most of them
Speaker 1: are kind of a blur, and they kind of blur
Speaker 1: together because I was probably watching them on you know,
Speaker 1: USA or TNT back in back in the day, and
Speaker 1: I would catch like parts of one late at night,
Speaker 1: and Uh, in isolation like that, they can seem much
Speaker 1: the same. Um, So I trust your your judgment on this.
Speaker 1: They are much the same. Uh. They have extremely similar
Speaker 1: structures across most of them. Now here's the question. Has
Speaker 1: he remained a revenant since then or have the newer
Speaker 1: films kind of gone back and made him human again. Uh?
Speaker 1: There was a remake film in about two thousand nine
Speaker 1: or so, which I have not seen since I saw
Speaker 1: it in the theater then. But my my memory is
Speaker 1: that he is a regular human in that one. I
Speaker 1: guess we could alway, if there's any there any films
Speaker 1: that come out subsequently, uh that we're not fond of,
Speaker 1: we can always say that they were just a holidack
Speaker 1: simulation aboard the Starship Grendel from Jason Jason X. Yes,
Speaker 1: I gotta say that, actually, Jason X is. It has
Speaker 1: one of the most inspired moments of the entire series,
Speaker 1: which is which is when the characters distract Jason by
Speaker 1: putting him in the hollow deck and supplying him with
Speaker 1: fake holographic victims. It's kind of a perfect solution, right
Speaker 1: because then like he's not actually hurting anybody, and of
Speaker 1: course you know you can't stop him because he's unkillable,
Speaker 1: but you just like let him busy himself playing video
Speaker 1: games for the rest of eternity. I should I need
Speaker 1: to go back and watch it at some point, because
Speaker 1: there's raises the question like how they get him? How
Speaker 1: did he ever escape from the Holio deck. Couldn't they
Speaker 1: have just programmed in infinite victims and then he'd be
Speaker 1: happy in this simulated world. I think the problem was
Speaker 1: that the Holidack broke or ran out of power or something, okay,
Speaker 1: because because otherwise it seems like it could be a
Speaker 1: good fit. Though on the other hand, the other side
Speaker 1: of looking at it is or don't ethical concerns arise
Speaker 1: if we are creating this endless simulation where their endless
Speaker 1: victims for Jason to dispatch. Um, I think we get
Speaker 1: into murky territory pretty quickly with that. What, like your word,
Speaker 1: is it not fair to do this to Jason? Well,
Speaker 1: I'm not not really concerned about Jason. I'm thinking about
Speaker 1: the simulation, like what are they? What are these simulars
Speaker 1: or these conscious holographic victims? Yeah, um, I'm gonna yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm not sure how I feel about that. Would he
Speaker 1: eventually get it out of his system? Maybe he reached
Speaker 1: the point where he's like, killing brings me no jewel anymore.
Speaker 1: Now Jason becomes a creator, Yeah, he becomes yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: now he's a peaceful artist because he saw the error
Speaker 1: of his ways. Oh man, that that would actually, I
Speaker 1: think that would work as a sequel. Would be kind
Speaker 1: of like the Creature Walks among Us, where Jason has changed.
Speaker 1: He goes out into the world and he's this artist
Speaker 1: or something, but of course he makes pottery. But eventually
Speaker 1: he's going to backslide, and there's your movie. He backslides
Speaker 1: because of rude gawkers at the craft's fair who come
Speaker 1: by the tent but never buy anything. Well, you should
Speaker 1: have had some postcards everything most people will buy a postcard.
Speaker 1: All right, now that we have that settled, let's I
Speaker 1: guess we'll go ahead and close it out for today.
Speaker 1: But we appreciate everyone who wrote in UM. As we
Speaker 1: we often stressed we don't we don't have time to
Speaker 1: respond to everybody via email. We we do try and
Speaker 1: read everything that comes in and and we do get
Speaker 1: to feature a lot of listener mail UM on the
Speaker 1: listener mail segments. But yeah, keep it coming. If you
Speaker 1: have response to past episodes, UM, hopes and desires for
Speaker 1: future episodes, let us know we would love to hear
Speaker 1: from you. In the meantime, If you would like to
Speaker 1: check out other episodes of Stuff to Blow Your Mind,
Speaker 1: you'll find them in the Stuff to Blow Your Mind
Speaker 1: podcast feed Core episodes on Tuesday and Thursdays, more listener
Speaker 1: mails every Monday, Artifact episodes on Wednesday, and on Friday's
Speaker 1: we do a little Weird how Cinema. That's our time
Speaker 1: to set aside most serious concerns and just talk about
Speaker 1: a strange film. Huge thanks as always to our wonderful
Speaker 1: audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to
Speaker 1: get in touch with us with feedback on this episode
Speaker 1: or any other to suggest a topic for the future,
Speaker 1: just to say hello. You can email us at contact
Speaker 1: at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com. Stuff to
Speaker 1: Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio. For
Speaker 1: more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the i heart
Speaker 1: Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your
Speaker 1: favorite shows.