1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:08,840 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. So Donald Trump has 2 00:00:08,920 --> 00:00:12,600 Speaker 1: ordered his administration to consider imposing reciprocal terror some numerous 3 00:00:12,680 --> 00:00:15,600 Speaker 1: trading partners, including of course the European Union. Val the 4 00:00:15,640 --> 00:00:20,239 Speaker 1: Sanmbrowski's European Commissioner for the Economy and Productivity joins US now. Commissioners, 5 00:00:20,239 --> 00:00:22,279 Speaker 1: thanks so much as always for giving us a little 6 00:00:22,280 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 1: bit of your busy schedule. 7 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:24,320 Speaker 2: When you look. 8 00:00:24,160 --> 00:00:26,800 Speaker 1: At what Donald Trump has announced so far in terms 9 00:00:26,800 --> 00:00:30,720 Speaker 1: of terrorists and steel and aluminium, the European Union always said, look, 10 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:31,720 Speaker 1: we can fight back. 11 00:00:31,840 --> 00:00:32,720 Speaker 2: What would that look like? 12 00:00:34,159 --> 00:00:38,520 Speaker 3: Well, indeed, we are following closely the announcements of Trump 13 00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:44,280 Speaker 3: administration as regards tariffs, and generally speaking, we are obviously disappointed. 14 00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:47,840 Speaker 3: We do not see the basis for those tariffs, neither 15 00:00:47,920 --> 00:00:53,479 Speaker 3: economically nor legally. The EUUs is having the largest trade 16 00:00:53,520 --> 00:00:58,200 Speaker 3: and investment relationship in the world. We have deeply interconnected 17 00:00:58,280 --> 00:01:02,160 Speaker 3: value changed, so all this is going to be quite 18 00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 3: disruptive economically. So we are an engagement is the US 19 00:01:05,440 --> 00:01:11,800 Speaker 3: administration also to find more precisely the plans, to find 20 00:01:11,800 --> 00:01:14,920 Speaker 3: the constructive ways forward. But if necessary, we are ready 21 00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:18,840 Speaker 3: to defend our economic interests and to respond in for 22 00:01:19,120 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 3: firm and proportionate waves. 23 00:01:20,880 --> 00:01:23,000 Speaker 1: So first of all, have you run the numbers of 24 00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:24,840 Speaker 1: what that looks like if there were the first wave 25 00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:28,240 Speaker 1: of tariffs, and if there's some reciprocal and backwards and forwards, 26 00:01:28,240 --> 00:01:30,720 Speaker 1: what that does to GDP or just in terms of 27 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:31,600 Speaker 1: how much that would cost. 28 00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:35,960 Speaker 3: Well, of course it will depends on exact policies which 29 00:01:36,000 --> 00:01:38,120 Speaker 3: are going to be enacted. In a sense, also on 30 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:41,160 Speaker 3: the US sides, there are still some considerations how these 31 00:01:41,240 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 3: reciprocal tariffs are going to be applied. But the EU 32 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:47,880 Speaker 3: is already having actually one of the largest tariffs in 33 00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:50,320 Speaker 3: the world, one of the lowest tariffs in the world, 34 00:01:50,360 --> 00:01:54,240 Speaker 3: sorry for that, So we do not see the economic 35 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:58,360 Speaker 3: reasoning for this as well. But obviously all we are 36 00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:01,040 Speaker 3: looking so what our options are And if you remember 37 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:04,720 Speaker 3: also from the first Trump administration when it imposed the 38 00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:10,680 Speaker 3: tariffs on steel and aluminium, we responded with our tariffs 39 00:02:10,680 --> 00:02:11,639 Speaker 3: in a proportionate way. 40 00:02:12,000 --> 00:02:13,800 Speaker 1: Do you think it would be similar to what happened 41 00:02:13,880 --> 00:02:17,000 Speaker 1: last time or are there new regions of the economy 42 00:02:17,000 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 1: that would be worse affected. 43 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:20,239 Speaker 2: Well, we. 44 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:25,160 Speaker 3: See that there has been already announcement on steel and aluminium, 45 00:02:25,240 --> 00:02:28,760 Speaker 3: and what is being discussed now with so called recipprosal tariffs. 46 00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,280 Speaker 3: It goes beyond it, so it can be broader than 47 00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:31,959 Speaker 3: last time. 48 00:02:32,919 --> 00:02:35,280 Speaker 1: There's also been very little progress on defense spending from 49 00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:37,520 Speaker 1: the EU. What are you expecting jd Events in his 50 00:02:37,600 --> 00:02:41,079 Speaker 1: big speech today to announce and how can Europe step up? 51 00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:46,120 Speaker 3: Well, I think it's very clear also from recent announcements 52 00:02:46,160 --> 00:02:49,160 Speaker 3: from US administrations that EU has to step up its 53 00:02:50,120 --> 00:02:56,040 Speaker 3: defense effort, defense spending, strengthening our own military industry, strengthening 54 00:02:56,040 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 3: support for Ukraine because obviously it's key that we achieve 55 00:03:01,000 --> 00:03:04,080 Speaker 3: a piece in Europe and peace in Ukraine that is 56 00:03:04,320 --> 00:03:08,480 Speaker 3: fair and lasting, and that it's not done behind Ukraine's back, 57 00:03:08,560 --> 00:03:13,760 Speaker 3: but with Ukraine at a table. But it's clear that 58 00:03:15,240 --> 00:03:18,320 Speaker 3: we will have to do more as Europeans, and actually 59 00:03:18,360 --> 00:03:21,760 Speaker 3: European Commission is preparing for the next month as a 60 00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:26,919 Speaker 3: white paper on the future of European Defense, where will 61 00:03:26,960 --> 00:03:29,120 Speaker 3: be elaborating exactly on those issues. 62 00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 2: Joined that is this a possibility? 63 00:03:31,360 --> 00:03:33,720 Speaker 3: Well, I will not go now in detail, but it's 64 00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:37,280 Speaker 3: clear that defense spending will need to increase substantially, both 65 00:03:37,400 --> 00:03:39,520 Speaker 3: at national and at EU level. 66 00:03:40,400 --> 00:03:43,280 Speaker 1: Commissioner. Some have floated the idea that the frozen assets. 67 00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:46,440 Speaker 1: The frozen Russian assets could then be spent by Ukraine 68 00:03:46,440 --> 00:03:47,640 Speaker 1: to buy US weapons. 69 00:03:48,040 --> 00:03:49,160 Speaker 2: Is that a good idea? 70 00:03:50,160 --> 00:03:52,600 Speaker 3: Well, we know that right now as a frozen Russian 71 00:03:52,600 --> 00:03:58,240 Speaker 3: assets or immobilized Russian assets are being used, the proceeds 72 00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:02,280 Speaker 3: from those assets are being used for extraordinary Revenue Acceleration 73 00:04:02,400 --> 00:04:05,240 Speaker 3: loan which is provided by G seven to Ukraine in 74 00:04:05,240 --> 00:04:09,080 Speaker 3: a sense to repay that loan. So if there are 75 00:04:09,080 --> 00:04:12,119 Speaker 3: new initiatives being discussed, and obviously we're looking at all 76 00:04:12,200 --> 00:04:16,359 Speaker 3: the possibilities and all the implications because eventually it is 77 00:04:16,400 --> 00:04:19,000 Speaker 3: important that Russia, as an aggressor is paying for the 78 00:04:19,080 --> 00:04:20,799 Speaker 3: damage which is creating in Ukraine. 79 00:04:20,839 --> 00:04:22,720 Speaker 1: But it would it be possible that one day this 80 00:04:22,760 --> 00:04:24,840 Speaker 1: money would be used to buy US weapons to. 81 00:04:24,760 --> 00:04:26,040 Speaker 2: Get us on side. 82 00:04:26,640 --> 00:04:32,240 Speaker 3: Well, that certainly all will require more discussions and engagements 83 00:04:32,279 --> 00:04:35,040 Speaker 3: also with US administrations. But as I said, we are 84 00:04:35,080 --> 00:04:38,840 Speaker 3: assessing different possible options how to move forward. But it's 85 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:42,240 Speaker 3: worth keeping in mind that right now those assets are 86 00:04:42,320 --> 00:04:44,919 Speaker 3: used as a revenue source for repoyment repayment of this 87 00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:49,359 Speaker 3: external revenues acceleration loan which is being provided for Ukraine. 88 00:04:49,400 --> 00:04:51,760 Speaker 3: So in a sense Russia is already paying in this 89 00:04:51,800 --> 00:04:54,279 Speaker 3: way for a damage it's creating commission. 90 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:56,719 Speaker 1: Just a very quick final question on regulation. Do you 91 00:04:56,760 --> 00:05:00,160 Speaker 1: think the EU will follow the US in deregulating, in 92 00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:02,680 Speaker 1: regulating less but also getting rid of some of what's. 93 00:05:02,440 --> 00:05:03,000 Speaker 2: In place now. 94 00:05:03,120 --> 00:05:05,919 Speaker 3: Well, we have been very clear from our side that 95 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:08,880 Speaker 3: we are not in de regulation, so we will not 96 00:05:09,160 --> 00:05:12,200 Speaker 3: launch some kind of regulation race here. With what we 97 00:05:12,240 --> 00:05:17,000 Speaker 3: are doing. We are doing simplification without abolishing our high 98 00:05:17,240 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 3: social and environmental standards. We set a numerical target for 99 00:05:21,960 --> 00:05:24,760 Speaker 3: how much ADMINSTERI burden we want to reduce by twenty 100 00:05:24,760 --> 00:05:28,960 Speaker 3: five percent in general and by thirty five percent for SEMIS. 101 00:05:29,279 --> 00:05:32,240 Speaker 3: But we are not, for example, abolishing the goals of 102 00:05:32,600 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 3: European Green Deal like carbon neutrality by twenty fifty and 103 00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:39,360 Speaker 3: so on. We're rather looking how we can reach our 104 00:05:39,400 --> 00:05:42,400 Speaker 3: policy goals in a more efficient and less costly manner. 105 00:05:42,800 --> 00:05:44,600 Speaker 2: Thank you so much. Question for joining us as well. 106 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:47,960 Speaker 1: The Sanbraska's European Commisioner for the Economy and Productivity