WEBVTT - Roe v. Wade and Airbnb Earnings

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power Colli

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Check in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the next hour. Travel

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>is back and will continue to boom. This according to Airbnb,

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>out with an earnings beat that shows despite inflation and

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>global macro economic uncertainty, people are on the move. We

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>will break down their report, plus the leak heard across

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the country, a draft opinion of the Supreme Court reveals

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>plans to overturn row versus Weight, hitting the US like

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a bombshell. Some businesses are taking a stand, and how

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>do you use deep tech to tackle society's biggest problem?

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Plus but can you solve climate change and still make

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a profit? More on that later this hour. All of

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that in a moment, But first we are watching Lift

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>and Airbnb and another volatile day for stocks. Investors waiting

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>for more clues about just what will happen if the

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Fed raises rates later this week as expected. Are at

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Ludlow here to break it all down. And yeah, we

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>swung between gains and losses on the NASDAC one hundred

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>multiple times, very tech heavy index ultimately close up just

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a tenth of one percent. The other way looking at it,

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it was the first back to back or two day

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>gains and then as that one since April nineteen, so

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks. We're expecting a fifty basis point

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 1>hight from the FED on Wednesday, and we care. Why

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>are we talking about the FED and rate heights in

0:01:39.880 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a tech show Because tech stocks that are judged on

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>their future growth future profits are more sensitive to hire

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rates because it discounts that rate of future profits.

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>We're all eyes glued on the FED. It's been one

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of the main pieces of psychological driver for the market,

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>at least around tech stocks. Also interesting see bitcoin drop

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.639
<v Speaker 1>below thirty eight dollars per token on Tuesday. It's lowest

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>level since February and kind of caught up in this

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of treading water moment we're in right now ahead

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of that key FED meeting, but we're in the depths

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of earning season. As you say, two key companies for

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a read on the economy. The first lift down how

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty as well a change quickly two in after hours. Frankly,

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the number of riders that they reported were lower than expected.

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Even if First Corner revenue beat analyst projections, they have

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>seventeen point eight million active riders in the quarter below

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>what the street was looking for. Important to note that

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the CEO saying that they expect demand to pick up

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in the second half of the year. A different story

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>with Airbnb. Airbnb giving a revenue projection for the current

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>quarter of two point zero three to two point one

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars, well above street expectations, but there's fighting

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>talk with the company saying that they're seeing substantial quote

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>demand going into key summer months. And all right, blood Law,

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I want to stick with Airbnb and left

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>now and bring in Brentville of Jeffreys. Brent, great to

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have you back with us. Want to get your headline

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.880
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from Airbnb to start, I mean substantial drought travel

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>demand that Airbnb is seeing despite the fact that we're

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of an ongoing war in Europe, for example,

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>we're facing global macronomics at macroeconomic uncertainty and forty year inflation.

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>What's your takeaway from that? Hey, Emily, We're tired of

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>being inside doing zooms. We all want to get out,

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think the travel pent up demand from what

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>we can see at Jefferies is like no other, which

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is we're shifting from you know, outfitting our home to

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>outfitting our outdoors in our life and the amount of

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>travel cross border, the return to cities, the actual return

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to European travel is all ramping significantly. And if you

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>look at the number of trips that you know, we

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>just survey, uh that that you know, consumers are willing

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or wanting to take the summer, obviously, it's it's incredible.

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the cross borders combined with return

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to cities is the biggest return and help for Airbnb.

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think ultimately we've we've also shifted, you know,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to to quote Brian Chesky, their CEO, I mean, I

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>really do believe this, and we don't like like to

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>pair it with CEO say, but ultimately the world has

0:04:19.680 --> 0:04:22.039
<v Speaker 1>changed in the sense of how we work, where we work,

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and and how productive we can be. And I'm an

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>affirm believer, uh that they're gonna participate uh in that.

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, the big concern is as inflation hits and

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we have less dollars in our pocket, is our mortgage

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>rates are highering our car payments are higher. You know,

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>does this pinch travel? I don't think it will in

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the short term, because there's such pent up demand uh

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to go and be out, be out, and right now,

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>no one wants to sit and have a summer like

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we did last summer or the summer before. And you know,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's only going to help them, uh in the

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>interim and and as business travel comes back to and

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in some sense, you know, that will help the return

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to cities and if you're going to uh, you know,

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>going if I'm going to New York and I'm going

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to spend a week or two weeks with my team,

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to stay in a hotel. So I

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>think that that also is going to help with the

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>return to to the office in some sense that it

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>helps uh, the the enterprise business over time, which is

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously a smaller piece of the overall pie. I think

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting too that travelers are booking further and further out.

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>They're not doing this last minute waiting to see what

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>pandemic or COVID restrictions are. We're seeing the same thing

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>potentially with lift also beating estimates. You know, what do

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you think this says about the health of the consumer.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I wonder, you know, is this a

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic pop and what happens later? Yeah, I mean

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone is in more uber and lifts. I've been in

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>more uber and lifts in the last month than I

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>was in the last two years combined. So just look

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at your own consumption personally and from a work perspective.

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the challenge with Lift is their EBIT guide

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for the next quarter is way below the street. You know,

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the street was looking for eighty three million, the guy

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>to tend to twenty way below. So the stocks getting

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>hammered on the increase in investments, and I think this

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>is the challenge that we face in many of these

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.919
<v Speaker 1>reopening trades is how much money is are these companies

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>willing to reinvest back in the business as they see

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>demand come back, to get drivers, to get consumers back

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on the platform, to build the network out and and

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 1>as they said during the pandemic, right they bought it,

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>brought the cust structure to the studs. There was no

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>walls inside this house. It was studs. And they they

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:37.480
<v Speaker 1>had that quote back in the middle of the pandemic.

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, they've no right sized and

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>now they're they're feeling dollars back. The big worry for

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>investors on on Lift is just, you know, candace business

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sustainably make money. And in my opinion, there's way better

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:53.280
<v Speaker 1>opening trades than lift right Google. Uh sorry, yeah, Uber

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.160
<v Speaker 1>is a global platform with with multiple applications that they

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 1>can benefit. It's a platform, not a point solution. Lift

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>is US only right share in the US only, and

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>they're really limited to to the US market. So I

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think ultimately there's just better opening trades. So we at

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Jeffreys like booking Airbnb. Uh, and I think Googer is

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in a better position among some of the other tech

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>stocks to cover lift. Shairs are way down after hours, Brent.

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that is? Well, that's you know,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it goes back to the ebit dot guide. They just

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they're ramping up the expenses and and ultimately to your

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>point on on inflation, look, we're all feeling it. It

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter who you are. Uh, you're gonna feel the

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>pinch of what's happening with the broader economy starting to slow.

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So as that slows, are we going to see the

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>air brakes come on? You know? Consumer spend, and I

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think there's a little bit of concern. I think the

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 1>bearer concern really is around is lift the best way

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to play the opening trade air bbs uplift stocks down.

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's other stories that are better. And then

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the BA dot guide it was it

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>was obviously terrible relative to what the street wanted, and

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it fully they're just being conservative now obviously with the

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>new c th place that left. Alright, Brentville of Jeffrey

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>is always good to have your analysis here. Thank you

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>so much, Brett. This opinion is just off the wall,

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'm really shocked fill Leader would have written it,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>assuming you get this is not some fluke. This is

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the result of a decade long campaign by extremists, extremist

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Republicans to overturn rovers this way. I would be even

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>more shocked if the other justices um in the majority

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>will decide on to this. This is the issue that

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>can can decide elections, at least far as women are concerned.

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>There are people on both sides of this issue, and

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think what we need to do, as

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>being good participants in a democracy is to listen, listen

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to both sides. This will be a galvanizing issue in

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming elections. Reaction there after a leak of unprecedented

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>proportions a draft opinion from the Supreme Court. That draft,

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>written by conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and obtained

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>by political showed the Justice overturning the nineteen seventy three

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>ruling of Row versus Wade. I'm joined now by our

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington correspondent Emory Horden for more on this extraordinary turn

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of events for reaction from the White House, So Emery,

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>first of all, what do we know about this leak

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>so far? So there's really two parts of story, Emily.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>First is the fact that this is an unprecedented leak,

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and you actually have a lot of Republicans all day

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>pointing to the fact that this was a leak, and

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>this is going against really this institution that many believe

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>should be guarded in terms of how they have their

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>normal operating procedure. And then you have the Supreme Court

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>come out and saying they're going to go after the

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>leaker for this egregious act. Then, of course you have

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the leak itself, the contents of that lead, and as

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you outlined there, what this leak does show is that

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court, as of February, this draft opinion would

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 1>be overturning the ninety three Row v. Wade and basically

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that a woman's right to an abortion that constitutional right.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>They would be striking that down and then this would

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>be up to the states to decide. And as you

0:10:20.400 --> 0:10:25.199
<v Speaker 1>can imagine, this has really set off fireworks in Washington,

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 1>d C. Tell us more about what President Biden had

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to say in response to this today. President Biden has

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>made a number of comments today, first a written statement

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and then he also brief reporters on his way to Alabama.

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So he's talking about the fact that this would go

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 1>against basic fairness given the fact that this is about

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a fifty year old law. Take a listen to a

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:46.680
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about what he had to say, calling

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it a rep it goes far beyond if it becomes

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a law and if what is written is what remains

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>beyond the concern whether or not there is like to

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>choose to as Biden also pointed to the fact that

0:11:08.640 --> 0:11:11.080
<v Speaker 1>he did get a phone call saying that this draft

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>document was authentic, and the Supreme Court also said that

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>they said this draft document is real but does not

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 1>mean that that opinion will be upheld. So this is

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>basically how we're going into Potentially we're going to get

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that opinion finalized and the unveiling of that in June.

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>The President also, emiline is written statement clearly pointed to

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that if this was to be overruled that

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>now it is up to elected officials and also voters

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.319
<v Speaker 1>in America in November to go to the polls. So

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>now this has become a hot button election issue. Hot

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>button indeed Bloomberg's Emory Harder and thank you. I want

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>to continue this conversation and talk about how companies are

0:11:54.440 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>reacting to this news. I'm joined now by Laura Speakerman.

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>She is the co founder and chief revenue officer of Alloy,

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>which has been rather proactive and offering reprojective benefits to employees. So, Laura,

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>you made the decision back in January to cover legal

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>fees up to five thousand dollars if an employee or

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a partner faces legal issues due to anti abortion laws.

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>You're also giving them a travel stipend medical cost stipend.

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Why did you decide to do this? Yeah, that's right, only, Uh,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>this was important to us for a lot of reasons,

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think the two that will highlight today is

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that Alloys Mission were a fintech company. Um, we we

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>really want to see equitable outcomes. Financial services industry plays

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a big role in that for people, particularly people of color,

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly women, and so this supporting this really aligned very

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>well with our values as a company and our mission

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and vision as a company. The second reason, potentially more tangible,

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is it supports our hiring and retention. We already have

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>tons of policies and benefits in place, as do many

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>companies that help us attract and retain the best talent possible,

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and so this was an easy way to sort of say, look,

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>this just adds on to our medical benefits, are PTO policies,

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of stuff, and so it was it was

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to us a necessary thing we had to do to

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>remain competitive. Now, you told Blueberg News that reimbursing workers

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>for abortion related travel is the low bar of what

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>they can do. What more should companies be doing? Well, Look,

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this is one piece of of how to

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>make life a little bit better for the poor, you know,

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the people who have to go through this in their lives.

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>It's not something anyone wants to have to deal with.

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:40.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just one piece of it. And so I think

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>our policy will evolve as we decide how how other

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, other potential benefits we could offer, or sort

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of evolving um what reproductive rights means even for for

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>our population at alloy and I hope other companies would

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>do the same. I think we're seeing that we it's

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a really competitive talent industry, this is probably a low

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>ish bar, and that it's a relatively inexpensive set of

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>benefits related to you know, if you looked at what

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:07.959
<v Speaker 1>we spent on healthcare, for example, all sorts of stuff

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>incredibly expensive. And so I think there's a lot more

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>there that we and other companies can do and probably

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 1>have to do, to fill in the gaps that the

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>government has left us with. Cheryl Samberg of Meta posted

0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>today saying, this is a scary day for women across

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>our country. Every woman, no matter where she lives, must

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>be free to choose weather and when she becomes a mother.

0:14:29.360 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>A few things are more important to women's health and equality.

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>And I just want to underscore that this is a

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>draft opinion. It doesn't necessarily signal where the Supreme court

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>stands at this very moment. But we're seeing, you know,

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of criticism about how, you know, other companies

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>are handling reproductive benefits. For example, Amazon came out um

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>with their package earlier this week. There's some criticism there

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't cover contract workers, who are kind of

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the lifeblood of keeping the trains running on time at Amazon.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think their policy is lacking. I haven't looked

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>at that policy in detail. I would assume if it

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>does not cover contract workers, that does seem like a

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>big gap, considering that's a big part of their workforce. UM.

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true of a lot of companies who

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>are probably contemplating this. That being said, we haven't seen

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that many companies do this. I was really happy to

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.240
<v Speaker 1>see yelp Uh, City Bank, Amazon do this all in

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the last few days. Really, I think, um, I would

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>encourage Facebook Meta. If that's how they feel about women,

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they should probably put something in place off for really

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>good benefits. We know they have a ton of money, uh,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>sitting around ton of cash. This is a pretty easy

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>thing for them to implement. I would encourage any company

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that has the luxury of doing that to do it now.

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Alloy has a history of taking a public stance on

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>political issues. For example, Uh, you prohibit companies from using

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Alloys products if they would deny customers access based on

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>their immigration or citizenship status. Have you found taking these

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>public political stands has hurt business at all? No, we haven't. UM,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I can't promise you it never will, and we'll have

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to cross that bridge when we get there. We haven't.

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, Uh, the benefits of what it has given,

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of the the alignment between us, our values and

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>our team again and kind of keeping folks engage, getting

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>them on board, getting them excited about us in our mission,

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 1>has outweighed any potential negative impacts we've seen so far.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that there will be zero negative impacts.

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>We work with a bunch of banks which are historically

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>much more conservative, as you can imagine, so I would

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 1>anticipate some fallow at some point for us. There's been

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>basically no negative impacts thus far, and the moral imperative

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as the business case I can make for

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>this really outweigh to me the risk that we're or

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>make the word risk very much worth it. I'm curious

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>what the internal reaction has been. You know often companies

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want to take political stance because you know it,

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know it might impact their retention and recruiting efforts. Certainly,

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily everyone agrees with your policies, even people who

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>work at your own company. What's been the reaction internally

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so far? Really positive? UM. Again, there may be people,

0:17:10.320 --> 0:17:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there are people who disagree with this who

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>work at alloy UM, and we are open to the

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>idea that you don't have to agree with every single

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 1>thing we do or everything I agree with their my

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>cobounders agree with to be at alloy UM. However, the

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>response I've seen has been unilaterally positive. I've gotten a

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>ton of messages and d m s from people both

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>when we announced the policy in January UM and today

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>when we put out a statement given the leak that

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>happened last night. UM. Just really positive feedback that this

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 1>is something that aligns with their values and that they're

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:42.400
<v Speaker 1>proud to work here. UM. I got a message today

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>from someone in one of the states that I think

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>is the you know, going to be the most impacted.

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>UM who who just said, you know, they really appreciate

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it and it means a lot to them. So that

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>was especially sort of haartning to hear all right, Laura Speakerman,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Ali, thanks for joining us to thank you.

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Ammution coming up between supply constraints and COVID lockdowns, why

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple's third quarter forecast has analysts worry at is next?

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. Apple investors and Wall Street analysts were

0:18:23.840 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>initially excited when Apple reported its second quarter earnings. The

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>company said it generated nine billion dollars in revenue, with

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion of that coming from the iPhone and another

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty billion coming from a very strong services quarter, but

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the jubilation was short lived. After announcing the results for

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Q two, Apple said that Q three would be a challenge.

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple said it's expecting a four billion dollar to eight

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar negative hit to revenue due to COVID related lockdowns,

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing chip shortage, and global issues like the war

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine. That means with Apple reports Q three results

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>in ju Law, the overall remedy number will be up

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to eight billion dollars less than it could have been.

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>This led to questions from analysts to CEO Tim Cook,

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>such as should the Apple supply chain be shifted to

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>avoid these ongoing issues? In China and the chip problems.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Cook of course defended his infrastructure, but said that Apple

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is always looking at making tweaks. Analysts are still pegging

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a year or a year revenue increase for the current quarter,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a number around eighty four billion dollars that of course

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>remains fluid. Several Apple suppliers and assembly partners were temporarily

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:36.560
<v Speaker 1>closed in April amid China's ongoing crackdown on COVID cases.

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 1>So far, that's led this some delays the high end

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>versions of the Maple pro and supply problems for the iPad.

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple's intense warning, however, indicates that consumers may just have

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>a hard time finding other Apple products in the coming

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>weeks and months, including the iPhone and Apple Watch. I'm

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:59.199
<v Speaker 1>Mark Erman. This is power On. Don't forget. You can

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to marks weekly power On newsletter at Bloomberg dot

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>com and seeking with Apple. Bloomberg has learned the tech

0:20:05.960 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>giant has hired someone who helped lead safety efforts and

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>vehicle engineering at for This assigned that the iphonemaker is

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 1>once again ramping up development of an electric car. Desi

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Wakashchevitch worked it forward since, most recently serving as its

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>global director of Automotive Safety Engineering. A bipartisan group of

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>US senators wants to loosen Google's grip on the digital

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>ad market. Bloomberg has learned they planned to introduce legislation

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that would force Google to sell off parts of its

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lucrative ad tech business. The measure could also have implications

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>for Amazon and Facebook parent Meta and the SEC is

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>beefing up its crypto enforcement team. The Wall Street Regulator

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>adding twenty staffers to its unit focused on policing crypto

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>market abuses from new coin offerings and crypto exchanges to

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>defy platforms and n f t s. The office has

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:03.120
<v Speaker 1>brought more than eight enforcement actions since launching in love.

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>More on that in our crypto report later this hour.

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to bloomber Technology. I'm emily checking San Francisco.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to Elon Musk's evolving a vision for Twitter,

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 1>taking the company private but not blocking out the possibility

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 1>of becoming public again in the future. Are Ed Ludlow

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>here to discuss. We're getting some new information in a

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 1>report from dal Jones. What now So? Dal Jones is reporting,

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>according to their sources, that Elon Musk is telling potential

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>co investors, because remember he's still trying to line up

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the equity portion of this deal that he could eventually

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>take Twitter public again, and he could, according to dal

0:21:47.400 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Jones sources, do that within a three year time frame,

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting because he's trying to take Twitter private. So,

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, talk to us more about what he has said,

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>what clues we have about you know, his you know,

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>how he plans to evolve Twitter and how it would

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>then ultimately make four for stands for it to be

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a public company again. Eventually. I mean, in the letter

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter's board when he first made the offer for

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:12.679
<v Speaker 1>the company, said these changes which I want to enact

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>can only be done if Twitter is private, and those

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.480
<v Speaker 1>changes range from removing bots, open source and the algorithm

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 1>having a time limited edit button. He's talked about, you know,

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>he's talked in tweets, who was at the met gala

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>last night, saying Twitter can be the most inclusive, best

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>platform out there. It just needs to stick to the

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>principle of free speech. But he's also trying to line

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>up co financing, right, and a big question for investors

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to get involved is how do we make money on

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this in the long run? What's the timeline for him

0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to line up that final batch of equity. Well, so

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>remember the deal hasn't actually closed. Soft twenty cents a

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>share for each shareholder that has a share, and as

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>many shares as they have by year end, and the

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>expectation is that existing Twitter shore holders will vote for this,

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>They'll go for it, but who knows. Well, I'm sure

0:22:56.960 --> 0:22:59.639
<v Speaker 1>there'll be more dribbles of news all the way to

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:04.479
<v Speaker 1>the bid. A bitter end, Ludlow, thank you. Meantime, the

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>world of one click checkout startups has been a race

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to number one, but recently there have been a lot

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of questions about viability. Most recently, Bolt Financial was sued

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>by its most prominent customer, which includes the parent company

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of Forever twenty one, alleging that bull overstated his customers

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and failed to deliver on promise technology leaned to a

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:28.119
<v Speaker 1>one fifty million dollar loss in online sales. I want

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this all with Albert Saneger. He is

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the founder and CEO of Nate, a universal shopping app

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:36.679
<v Speaker 1>with a one click checkout function. Albert, thank you for

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>joining us. So first I want to clarify you are

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 1>in the same sort of general business, but do something

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>different to what Bolt promises to do. Can can you

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>explain your one click checkout technology? Yes? Thank you, Emily,

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to be here. UM. So yes, need is

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>uh the world's first universal shopping up. You can downloading

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and or your shipping and payment information once, and you

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>can skip the check out anywhere, pay now or pay later,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and share shopping lists with your friends. So Nate is

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>a consumer business. We don't sell software to retailers. So

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on the controversy surrounding Bolt, which in

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 1>turn has trying to spotlight on the space. I mean,

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>there are some people who think that Bolt is hiding

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>shoddy business fundamentals um, and that maybe is you know,

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>grossly overvalued. Well look, UM, I can't speak about the

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>specifics of of Bolt. I know that every company is

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.880
<v Speaker 1>different and every management team is different. UM I'll tell

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you that. UM. Broadly speaking, when you're building a payments business,

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a choice to make, and the choice is

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>who is your customer? Is your customer the retailer? Where

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>is your customer the consumer? Much like in real estate?

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Right do you represent the seller or do you represent

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the buyer? And there are lots of really interesting software

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:12.679
<v Speaker 1>companies that are selling software to retailers, and sometimes they

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>sell them. They sell them solve for for conversion upside

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 1>in the form of one click chuckot, or in the

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>form of point of sale financing, or in the form

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of shipping in trance and those are great businesses, but

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that is not what made us made. That is a

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>consumer business. I want to talk to you a little

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 1>bit more about Ryan Breslow, the founder of Bolts specifically though,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 1>because he has been incredibly vocal and opinionated, for better

0:25:38.440 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>or for worse. He it seems like he was ousted

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>from the CEO spot. He's he's staying on as chair.

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that the founders should be that outspoken? Uh?

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I know. I know how hard it is to build

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a business from scratch. I can tell you that firsthand.

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, different founders have different approaches to product development,

0:26:04.400 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 1>go to market, and team building. UM and I have

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the autmost respect for those who are, you know, more

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:15.639
<v Speaker 1>or less vocal about how they're building those things. UM

0:26:15.640 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 1>My style is more focused on um observing this new

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>generation of shoppers and building four consumers and letting the

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>rest of the other pieces fall into place. Then You

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>have another company in this space called Fast, which recently

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>shut its doors. So you know, there's this question about

0:26:35.280 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, is this kind of technology really possible? Is

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it overhyped? Um? I actually argue that one click check

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>out is a is a great feature, but it is

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a feature nonetheless. And the question is if your customers

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>are retailers, then what are the other services that they

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>need in order to sort of build a compelling product.

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>In the case of our customers are consumers. And I

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>can tell you for sure without a doubt that consumers

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 1>want one click checkout, There's no doubt about that, UM.

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.959
<v Speaker 1>But they want a few more things than one click checkout.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>They want aggregation, the sort of aggregation that happened in

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>music with Spotify, it happened in food the door Dash,

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>it happened in transportation with Uber, and it's happening now

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in e commerce with me. Consumers demand aggregation. Of these

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>two million retailers in the non names on economy, you've

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.639
<v Speaker 1>got Bolt and Fast. Why is your company called Nate?

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, Nate is um in a way, and assistant

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that lives in the cloud, that does things on your behalf.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So we knew that we wanted to personify, and I

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>also wanted to make sure that UM, we didn't use

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>um a woman's name, because there are lots of assistance

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>out there to have associations with the word woman and

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the warmth competence trap is real. So if we are

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>going to objectify a machine that does the heaven lifting

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.679
<v Speaker 1>for us, might as well have a man's name. Although

0:28:12.720 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 1>we use it pronounced uh, Nates has no gender UM

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and it was actually a play on the words native

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>commerce commerce that is naeded. All right, well, it sounds

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like a very interesting play. We will continue to follow.

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Albert Sandager, founder and CEO of Nate Thank You, Come

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Up Coin by c O'Brien Armstrong, spoke at the Milk

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>and Global Conference about everything from crypto adoption to a

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>decentralized Twitter. We'll talk about all this and more with

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>the Web three company the graph up next to the schoolwork.

0:28:47.120 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I think freedom in all forms is worth defending, and

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, crypto is a lot of it is about

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>economic freedom, so freedom of speech is another version. I

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>do think there's an opportunity for Twitter to essentially embrace

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 1>UM using a decentralized protocol and UM just in the

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>way that you've probably heard of DEFY, which is decentralized finance.

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>There's another one UM called do so decentralized social media,

0:29:08.600 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>which is another emerging area coming up. If you look

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>at how crypto has grown over the last year or two,

0:29:30.040 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it's growing faster than the Internet did in the early days.

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's now about two million people in the world

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>who have crypto or have tried it, and so if

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you just plot that curve out, it means that in

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>within this decade, we're going to have over a billion

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>people in the world using crypto, and to me, that's

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>just incredibly exciting. Going by CEO Brian Armstrong there at

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the Milk and Global Conference, I want to dive into

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>all of this and more in our Crypto Report with

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Ava Bylin, director of the Graph Foundation, which has a

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 1>miss in to allow for full stack decentralized applications or

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>depths with an indexing protocol for corying blockchains. Even thank

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. So what do you

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>think billion people using crypto in a decade will happen.

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it will totally happen. And you know, really

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the question is where these individuals coming from and what

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>are they going to do and I think we we

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>often think about crypto in this speculative nature, you know,

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>defies the center of attention. But really what crypto and

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Web three enables is access, access to banking, access to content.

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, even echoing Brian Armstrong, things liked so

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>or decentralized Twitter are definitely in the works. Um. But

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, even at the graph, you like to think

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>about this as the next step in iterating the gig economy.

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, people like to stake their tokens um,

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, on Web three, and it's very similar to

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>holding an asset and expecting it to be useful, um,

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know in FIAT or Web two world. Um, but

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>here you actually get to work for a protocol. So

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we're really excited to see what this looks like where

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.479
<v Speaker 1>people actually start working for the technologies, putting the capital

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to work and actually getting to earn a portion of

0:31:02.320 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that revenue. Meantime, there's still a sort of wild West

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>feel about the crypto landscape. Coin bases also now cracking

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>down on the issue of people front running tokens based

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 1>on whether coin base might be about to list them.

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on that. I think just like in

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>typical startup world, you're going to have nine out of

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>ten startups that don't succeed. And similarly, in crypto, you know,

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the value of the token or the productivity of the

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>token and a protocol um you know, or the success

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of a community is still going to be reflective of

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>its quality. So I think that we need to start

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 1>focusing a little bit more on which tokens and which

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:41.160
<v Speaker 1>protocols are sustainable, which are going to actually provide real

0:31:41.280 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>value in the next decade or you know, two decades,

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.200
<v Speaker 1>three decades, and which are the communities that are going

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to sustain themselves. You know, one major difference between Web

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>three and Web two is the switching costs are much lower.

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 1>It's really really inexpensive for a user to start using

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a different DAP or different protocol, whether it's just transferring

0:31:58.640 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>tokens to another wallet um or really just completely up

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>and moving. And so I think these product teams, these

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>communities have a lot more pressure to deliver high quality experiences. Meantime,

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the SEC is adding twenty more people to its team

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:17.560
<v Speaker 1>policing crypto markets. I'm curious does that signal more regulation,

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>more enforcement coming. You know, we've always been fairly open

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that regulation is welcome. You know, it's not that the

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 1>crypto industry wants to be unregulated. We just want more clarity.

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, in general, this bodes well for having

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>more resources focused on our industry. And you know, our

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>our goal really is to have more folks that are

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, applying the law and applying their policies in

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a way that's conducive with innovation and not stifling growth. Um.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, as as is possible in this new wild

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 1>west of development. The industry is still scaling, still working

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>on interoperability, and there's a lot of work to do.

0:32:52.120 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>What's your role in that at the graph? Yeah, so

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>we as the graph. As you mentioned, we're an indexing protocol,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and really all that means is we're trying to make

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it easy to organize data, making it easier for developers

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>to access that data. Um. You know, people will often

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>call us the Google of block chains, and so we're

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>really here to unite all developers, full stack back end

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and make it easier for anyone to build across applications,

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 1>across chains and acting as a uniting layer where you know,

0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>any a p I, any way that you can access

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 1>data should be open source, and anyone should be able

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to do that and build on top of any protocol.

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious about your thoughts on open source and

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 1>how far that goes. What do you think about open

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>sourcing Twitter's algorithm. I think that's a great idea, you know,

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for the decentralized movement, especially with something as

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>as useful as Twitter. My general stance with open source,

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, versus closed sources, I think there's a lot

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of fund around open source ruining business models. You know,

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, sustainability is really what

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>matters when it comes to a good business or a product,

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and if you can continue building, you know, to actually

0:33:56.360 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>continue building on a protocol, whether it's open source or

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>close source, is a chal lenge. And so the protocols

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and depths that are more likely to succeed are the

0:34:03.400 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>ones that actually innovate on top of existing models rather

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 1>than just replicating and copying them and moving on. And

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>how do you see the ethereum merge impacting the broader landscape?

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Just how sort of tectonic do you think that will be?

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a few narratives here, So, you know,

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:23.279
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, this is the first major blockchain that's

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>moving to proof of stake. You know, I think there

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>will be ripple effects and how does this impact other chains?

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But more broadly, I think it's the first step for

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, non technical people, non developers, to see what

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it really means to have your assets put to work,

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to have a utility token like ethere um ether and

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 1>being able to actually earn revenue and generate income as

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 1>an individual from participating in that blockchain. It's a completely

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 1>novel concept. You know, even the gig economy is fairly new,

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:53.480
<v Speaker 1>but Web three enables this possibility that individuals can have

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>full sovereignty over their assets and the way they contribute

0:34:56.120 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to technology. All right, dav Balan, director of the Graph,

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us to share your view of the crypto.

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 1>D five future time for this week's Teconomics segment, and

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:18.240
<v Speaker 1>we're speaking with Zach Vogue, co founder and managing partner

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of d c v C, which has a mission to

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 1>back entrepreneurs solving trillion dollar problems to multiply the benefits

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism for everyone, but all the while reduce costs

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 1>problems like climate change ZAC But what exactly does that mean?

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about your mission. Sure, So we you know,

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to pointed more concisely, we like to back entrepreneurs solving

0:35:39.520 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar problems computationally. These are hard problems in the climate,

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>these are hard problems in life sciences, hard problems in

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>transforming industry. Now, historically we've seen big venture capital fronts

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>like Climber Perkins for example, you know, dive into clean

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>tech investing and then pulled back because the returns just

0:35:56.880 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>weren't there, at least not in a you know, reasonable

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 1>time horizon. So why do you think you can make

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.040
<v Speaker 1>it work? Now? Over the past handful of years, there's

0:36:07.080 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>been massive advances in computational approaches AI, machine learning, machine

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>vision that have massively, massively reduced the capital required to

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>solve some of these problems. Not all. Some of these

0:36:17.000 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>problems are still great for government. But there's companies like

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>my company, Pivot Bio that is replacing synthetic fertilizer nine

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, replacing that with microbes.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's real, real possibility to make big changes in

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>this sector. So let's talk about some of the contributions

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in this sector. We've seen alphabet just in

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the last month. Alphabet Elon Musk and many more commit

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 1>more than two billions dollars to startups tackling climate change.

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Talked to us about where you see the capital flowing

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>and what's most significant about it. So, yeah, those declarations

0:36:51.800 --> 0:36:53.879
<v Speaker 1>are great and we need much more of those. Those

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>type of things. We see money flowing into. Areas like

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>methane remediation, which is one of the lowest hanging fruit, UM,

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>industrial transformation, electrifying the grid, electrifying everything. Uh, just you know,

0:37:05.120 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>basic deep tech areas the lowest hanging fruit. Why do

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you think that is? So? Methane is a relatively ephemeral gas,

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions for

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the planet, and it's only is short lived in the

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in the atmosphere. And our company in Kiros Aerospace helps

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>detect methane leaks and they've already had a bigger impact

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>than Tesla. Many people are surprised to hear that. But Tesla,

0:37:30.239 --> 0:37:32.840
<v Speaker 1>let's say that again. Which company has a bigger impact

0:37:32.840 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>than Tesla, Cairos Aerospace. Uh Tesla impact report five million

0:37:38.400 --> 0:37:43.680
<v Speaker 1>tons of CO two E prevented. UH Cairos was seven million.

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 1>It's only increased there for for Cairos, how did they

0:37:45.880 --> 0:37:48.879
<v Speaker 1>do that. They have sensors and they do basin wide

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>surveys of installed oil and gas infrastructure which is very leaky,

0:37:52.440 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 1>leaks methane, and they help pinpoint the leaks and help

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the companies rapidly fix them. So the challenges ahead are

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>of course tremendous, but there's also a lot of macroeconomic uncertainty, inflation,

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:06.920
<v Speaker 1>consumers under pressure, businesses under pressure. I mean, look what's

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>happening in the public markets. Does that concern you in

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:13.719
<v Speaker 1>terms of you know, some you know funds that have

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>been pouring money into these spaces potentially pulling back. Absolutely,

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So the public markets are in a risk off scenario

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. We all know that. And obviously there's a

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of bad stuff going on out there. Things have

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>slowed down. We've seen deals repricing for following deals of

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>our existing deals. We've also seen a lot more structure

0:38:31.520 --> 0:38:34.880
<v Speaker 1>coming into deals. So this has affected the whole market

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're sort of taking a weight and see approach.

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>We're still doing good deals. Good deals are still getting done,

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>but I think everyone is taking a little bit of

0:38:42.239 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>a breather, and the pace of capital employment is slowing down.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Now you invest in deep tech, which takes time to

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:53.720
<v Speaker 1>scale and to deliver these computational approaches. As you're talking about,

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 1>how do you ensure that companies hit their milestones and

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:01.359
<v Speaker 1>still make a profit. Absolutely, these are problems that are

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>capital intensive a bit more. We've just heard that the

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>capital requirements are less if you can rely on computation.

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>Obviously you need great execution from the team to hit

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>their milestones. But they are solving trillion dollar problems. So

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>once they do solve them, they create giant, durable, capitalist,

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>successful companies that produce huge returns for investors. What kind

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of how big are the returns? Let's talk about that,

0:39:22.760 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>um what what? What's a huge return? In your view?

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Huge return is you know, creating the next trillion dollar company? Right?

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>And these you know the types of companies that you

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>can create with deep tech? Are you know fixing you

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 1>know the fertilizer industry. We heard pivot bio. That's a

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>two billion dollar industry acres of corn in the US

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>that can be transformed to this much less polluting industry. Um. So,

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.800
<v Speaker 1>if you can solve that, you can create enormous durable businesses.

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>So are you saying the next let's say in a decade,

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 1>could the trillion dollar companies in a decade be the

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:03.560
<v Speaker 1>next Apple and Google and Amazon and Facebook? Could they

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>be companies focused on tackling climate change? They will be

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in Larry Fink of Black Rock obviously said that the

0:40:09.239 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>next fifty trillion dollars of fifty unicorns will be will

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>be these these companies. So, uh, what's gonna What's going

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.240
<v Speaker 1>to make our break? Whether or not that happens, obviously,

0:40:20.280 --> 0:40:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem is real. But investors want returns, and the

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.960
<v Speaker 1>question is will those returns happen fast enough. These companies

0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.800
<v Speaker 1>are more capital intensive, but there's going to be insatiable

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 1>demand for public, high quality public equities that are addressing

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the climate. So our pathways, we're going to back these

0:40:38.680 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 1>companies at the early stages and ultimately get them public

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and there will be huge demand for these stocks. Not

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to mention, they will be profitable because they're solving these

0:40:46.640 --> 0:40:50.520
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar problems. If the government giving these companies, this industry,

0:40:50.560 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>these industries enough support, the government can always be doing

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot more. We don't back regulatory change or prospective

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>regulatory change. That's great. I want to be regulatory change,

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but that's not something that we view as ventured backable.

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.720
<v Speaker 1>We need back companies that have a working business model

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>with a real product that customers are willing to pay

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 1>money for. So this is very much a capitalistic endeavorent

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>that we are not a double bottom line fund. What

0:41:12.880 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>more could the government do? The government could put in

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a carbon tax, for instance, which has been very pernicious.

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>They could also, um encourage uh, you know, more investment.

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Right Obviously, some of the best technological breakthroughs have underpinnings

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of government research. So those are two huge areas of

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the government could have a big impact. Locally, the government

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in California could keep Diable Canyon, are last functioning nuclear

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>power plant open, which would have a huge impact for

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the climate. Interesting. All right, well we'll be washing to

0:41:44.680 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>see which is which is the first of those you

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:51.399
<v Speaker 1>know companies to become the next trillion dollar company. UM.

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Zack Bogue, co founder and managing partner of dc DC,

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us. Good to have you back

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:58.240
<v Speaker 1>on the show. And that does it. For the sedition

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology to or Ow, Airbnb c O Brien

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Cheske will be here to talk about the company's earnings

0:42:04.800 --> 0:42:07.720
<v Speaker 1>results and the biggest change to AIRPNB, he says coming

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>in a decade. And also, don't forget to check out

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>our podcast. You can find it anywhere you get your podcasts.

0:42:14.320 --> 0:42:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily checking in San Francisco. This is Bluebird