WEBVTT - US Treasuries Fall on Tariff Signs 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:25.920
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to the broader market here. You're

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 2>taking a look at treasuries, still having all the sell

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>off here, yield's really pushing higher. The question is why

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>is it just purely just a risk on trade and

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>then risk off and treasuries. Let's get more with Ira Jersey,

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Chief US Interest Rate strategistic joining us IRA.

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 2>When you look at a move like this, is this

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 2>a purely Hey, tariffs might not be as bad. We're

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 2>buy inequities, we're selling bonds.

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's as simple as that, Alex. At

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 3>least this morning the headline certainly of the SMP Global

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 3>pmis also didn't hurt any either. You saw a little

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>bit of a move after that with yields moving up

0:00:57.160 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>a basis one or two, But generally it's the risk

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 3>on sentiment right now. And you know, we've been talking

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 3>about the entire year We're going to have this play between, Look,

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:10.319
<v Speaker 3>are we going into a recession anytime soon or is

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 3>the economy going to hang on just enough that the

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Fed Reserve is going to be reluctant to cut interest

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.959
<v Speaker 3>rates because you know, the services sector is doing okay.

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 3>Plus tariffs might increase inflation expectations. So the market just

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 3>hovering around this, you know, low four percent range for

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 3>the tenure yield is probably something that we're going to

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 3>continue to see for quite a long time.

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 4>We're going to get some inflation data at the end

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 4>of this week, Ira, what do you think the how

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 4>do you think the Fed's looking at this core PCEE

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:41.559
<v Speaker 4>data that we'll get on Friday.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, they like the core PC data. But usually and

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 3>in the recent past, the forecast has been done a

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 3>pretty good job in determining where it's going to be,

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 3>at least within a tenth of a percent. So I

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 3>suspect that that the market. Yeah, if there's a big surprise,

0:01:57.480 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 3>obviously the market will move. But I think we'll move

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>on that and think about next week's non form payroll

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 3>report and some of the other PMI reports that we

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 3>get from the US from the Institute of Supply management

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:13.079
<v Speaker 3>next week. Those tend to be the bigger movers, right,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:17.000
<v Speaker 3>and the jobs market still is the key, with certainly

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 3>CPI inflation being number two. Interestingly, when you look at

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>what the ten year yield has been most sensitive to

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 3>in terms of changes when data points miss, it's always

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>payrolls number one. CPI has been number two, but this

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 3>pc inflator is all the way down at number seven

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 3>right now in our list of the top ten, so

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 3>that's fallen off quite a bit. Retail sales, on the

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 3>other hand, that's now number three. That had been number

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 3>two for a long time. But those three are really

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 3>the data points that you want to focus in on.

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>That's certainly when you see any shifts there, that's when

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 3>you're going to see big moves in the treasury market.

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 2>And we get some auctions this week as well, really

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 2>in the belly of the curve. You had mentioned earlier

0:02:58.120 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>last week that the ten year had kind of found

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 2>its high, but we're looking for a bottom. But what

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 2>does that mean then for the belly.

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so we get twos, fives, and seven So those

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 3>fives and sevens is distinctively the belly. I actually think

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 3>tomorrow's two year auction will be maybe the most well

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 3>bid this year of the this week's auctions, in part

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 3>because the break even and the risk factors that you

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 3>can get at a four percent two year yield means

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>that basically yields have to double over the next year

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 3>for people to start losing money. So you're if you're

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 3>an investor, whether you're benchmark to some index or you

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 3>just want to hide somewhere, the two year I think

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 3>will still get pretty good demand, But those fives and

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 3>sevens are the question, Alex, and I think that they'll

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 3>probably do okay. And I'm basing that on the fact

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 3>that last week's twenty year and the twenty year auctions

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>have not gone particularly well in general over the last

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 3>couple of years. But last week it was very strong.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 3>Auction was one of the strongest twenty year auctions that

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 3>we've actually had since that point was reintroduced. And so

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 3>I do think that that fines and sevens this week

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 3>will probably go okay, particularly if they cheapen up a

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 3>little bit here over the next forty eight hours.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 2>As Paul, have you totally tuned out at this moment

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 2>because I was talking about auctions.

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes, sweet, I did, absolutely.

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 5>I feel you, I, but I'm ready to follow up here.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 4>What's the soccer match we got to focus on in

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 4>the next couple of days here? I?

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh, well, I'm still I'm still depressed that the United

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 3>States came in fourth in the Nations League in over

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 3>the weekend, losing to both to both Panama and Canada

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 3>in the consolation game. So you know, ask me later

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 3>this week and I'll let you know.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 4>He got him off his game. All right, Iran, thank

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 4>you so much. We appreciate it. Ivery Jersey Chief, you

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 4>wish interest rate strategist, Chief International soccer strategist for bloomerg Intelligence.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 4>You wears two hats.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 2>There.

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarklay and Android Auto

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.799
<v Speaker 2>Alex Deal, You're alongside paulse We need this at Bloomberg

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Intelligence Radio. Happy rainy Monday in New York. Were broadcasting

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>live from our interactive broken studio right here in Mintown, Manhattan,

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and also check us out on YouTube as well. I's

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 2>got to check in on the markets. We're obviously seeing

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:22.599
<v Speaker 2>a relief rally here. It's definitely a risk on kind

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 2>of day. Does it last? What do you do with it?

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 2>Danian Dioria is co chief investment officer at Investment, joining

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 2>us now from Hartford Data. Is this the kind of

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 2>day that you sell into rallies or do you feel like,

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:33.159
<v Speaker 2>all right, things are going to.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Go well well?

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you know, the obviously the correction that preceded

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 6>all of this was a lot more sentiment driven, I

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 6>think than fundamentals driven. And so you know, if you're

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 6>going to be trading on any of these moves in

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 6>the market, you know, any of the hey, now we're

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 6>going to have a.

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 5>Lot of tear ffs, no apso we're cutting back. It's

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 5>going to be the dirty fifteen. It's not going to

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 5>be everybody, et cetera.

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 6>Then yeah, this is probably a buying moment I think

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 6>for the app person. You know, in the average investor,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 6>it's more about what are the fundamentals here? Do we

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.320
<v Speaker 6>actually think you know, the kind of the tariff tantrum

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 6>that we're going through and have been going through and

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 6>will continue to you know, in spite of a little

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 6>bit of positive news on that front, you know, is

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 6>that is that something that's going to ultimately lead to

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 6>broader concerns in the market. And you know, look, corrections

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 6>three quarters of the time don't lead to recessions. But

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, a lot of it depends on what news

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:31.479
<v Speaker 6>is yet.

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 5>To come.

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 4>For a world where there is some level of uncertainly

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 4>maybe greater than average. Is it a way you construct

0:06:41.920 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>your portfolio, is how you allocate your assets or just

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 4>buy quality and I guess hope for the best.

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 6>So I mean, look, there's a there's a lot of

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 6>different ways you can kind of come at this. Certainly,

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 6>and we sit you know, investments, it's at the junction

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 6>of a lot of manager there's.

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 5>A lot of research services.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 6>I mean, certainly you're hearing a lot more international speak.

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 6>You know, obviously I came into this year, I'll be

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:09.279
<v Speaker 6>honest with you. We do these chief Investment Officer panels everywhere,

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 6>and the idea of US dominance was just you know,

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 6>very much a theme at these panels. And you know, look,

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 6>markets are cyclical, and certainly the US markets had much

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 6>higher valuations than international markets.

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 5>I think you're seeing some repricing of that now.

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 6>But you know, the tone has shifted, right, and you're

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 6>hearing more around well, hey, maybe international diversification is a

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 6>good idea in portfolios. We would say that's a long

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 6>run secular asset allocation need you know, for most people, right,

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 6>unless you're unless you're completely focused on US indexes and

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 6>can't handle the tracking error, we would largely say be

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 6>diverse bied international markets.

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 5>Anyway, we are certainly.

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 6>Hearing more now even from a news and macro perspective,

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 6>that looking at international you know, having diversification away from

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 6>US makes sense.

0:07:57.760 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>And does that do you have to sell something to

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 2>then buy or is this like, hey, I had some cash,

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to deploy.

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, that's a great question because of course.

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 6>We've been living in the last few years with this

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 6>massive amount of money sitting in cash. And while it's great,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 6>you know, we're past these years of financial repression for

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 6>just savers.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 5>We all know that, you know that kind of.

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 6>The traditional wisdom is unless it's money you need in

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 6>the next three years.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 5>It's probably better served than sitting in cash.

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 6>So there are certainly people with money on the sidelines

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 6>who they've missed, you know, whopping twenty plus percent two

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 6>years in a row from the S and P for example,

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 6>And as we all know, you know, it's time in

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 6>the market, right, if you're missing those big months, years,

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 6>et cetera, it's really hard to make that back up

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 6>when you look at the average that.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:44.199
<v Speaker 5>You accumulate over time.

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 6>So look, if you if you have long run money

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 6>sitting in cash, for sure, we would say put that

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 6>into a balanced portfolio. But the other side of the

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 6>coin is you've also got a lot of people who

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 6>leaned into stocks, right, very pro growth optimism that we

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 6>started the year. You know, obviously big run up, especially

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 6>driven by growth, and so you have people who are

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 6>overweight equities. And if your overweight equities relative to your

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 6>risk tolerance and what you can handle, you know, you

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 6>should be thinking about harvesting from the equity position if

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 6>you're doing more equity, and you should also be thinking

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 6>about getting more into fixed income.

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, in your notes, you've got bitcoin is no gold,

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 4>So let me get your thoughts on bitcoin.

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know it's bitcoin is one dred percent from

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 6>my perspective, a risk on speculative asset. I we read

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 6>and you know you're seeing headlines obviously now comparing kind

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 6>of the performance of bitcoin and gold are these places

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 6>to kind of hot out, say again, good, thank you? Yeah,

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 6>so so so look are these places to hide out?

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 6>And we would just very much point out that they

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 6>are massively different. You know, when people think about a

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 6>bitcoin investment, they're not thinking about it a as a

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 6>currency or b as you know, certainly you know, there's

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 6>an argument that this is another form it's digital gold,

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 6>but from the standpoint of the volatility of these assets,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 6>there's no comparison.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 5>And when you're thinking about bitcoin, it's really kind.

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 6>Of more this asymmetric payoff, the potential for sort of

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 6>like a lott of like return.

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 5>If you want.

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 6>That, that's fine, But thinking that it looks like gold

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 6>and is going to be a safe haven asset I

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 6>think doesn't work.

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So that kind of lined me up for the

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 2>safe haven part. So all this taking into effect what's

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 2>like your best safe haven trade right now?

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 6>Certainly fixed income, you know, the standard place to have

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 6>ballast in the portfolio, I think makes a lot.

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 5>Of sense still.

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, but if you're talking about with inequity markets,

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.319
<v Speaker 6>you started off there actually mentioned quality.

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 5>There's a couple of different ways to go after quality.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 6>You can do you know, traditional quality is a fundamental indicator.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 6>You're looking for stocks that or you know, frankly ETFs

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 6>or mutual funds with a bevy of stocks that have

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:54.200
<v Speaker 6>high quality earnings, right, so high profitability, you know, not

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 6>the need to reinvest plow a lot of money back in,

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 6>you know, and also probably you know, cash based earnings

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 6>more than a cruel based earnings. So that's one indicator.

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 6>Another is more technical indicator, of course, which is just

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 6>what is the volatility of that stock? And you've got

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 6>a lot of ways to make that play to the

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 6>traditional defensive sort of you can pick low volatility stocks,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 6>or you can pick kind of minimum variants where you know,

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 6>the stock itself maybe is not the lowest volatility, but

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't correlate well with the rest of the market,

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:25.599
<v Speaker 6>so it adds sort of padding to the rest of

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 6>the portfolio.

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good point, all right, Dana, Thanks Slot.

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 2>We really appreciated Dana Diyoria, a CoA Chief investment officer

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.320
<v Speaker 2>at Investnet joining us on the markets.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:11:38.800 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:11:42.280 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg business app listen on demand wherever you

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch US live on YouTube.

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 2>The other wild carbon than the Trump administration is how

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>the talks unfold when it comes to peace between Russia

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 2>and Ukraine. Apparently US and Russian officials are meeting in

0:11:57.800 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia to discuss a potential CEA spot in the war,

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 2>and this of course follows talks between the American and

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Ukrainian teams joining US now. As Roz mathis and Bloomberg

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>News director for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, Roz,

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>what do you know in terms of where the talks

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 2>are well?

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 7>As you were saying, we had talks initially between the

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.959
<v Speaker 7>US and Ukraine officials in Saudi Arabia. Now we've got

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 7>talks that have been going on today between the US

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 7>and Russia, and they seem to be really granular and

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 7>quite technical in nature, focused on some specifics around perhaps

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 7>getting agreement for ceaespar and maritime traffic in the Black Sea,

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:38.800
<v Speaker 7>for example. We're not getting a lot of redoubts at

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 7>the moment from those conversations, so they seem to have

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 7>gone into a bit of a quiet phase on it,

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.520
<v Speaker 7>at least with each other. But the sense is they're

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 7>going bit by bit and this idea of a ceasefi

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 7>in Ukraine. We had that conversation aitially around in a

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 7>CESFI fit not hitting each other's energy infrastructure even though

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 7>attack seemingly are still going on in the minute. And

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 7>now we've got conversations around how to get you know,

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 7>guarantees around traffic, maritime traffic in the Black Sea. But

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 7>the big one, of course is what to do where

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.240
<v Speaker 7>people are actually fighting along the line of contact, which

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 7>is a very long line on the side of Ukraine,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 7>and what to do there in terms of bringing the

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 7>fighting to a holt. There doesn't seem to be any

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 7>particular developments on that front so far. So the message

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 7>really that we're getting is that even though the US

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 7>President clearly wants a very quick ceasefire here, that there's

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 7>a lot of steps that need to happen, a lot

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 7>of complexity along the way.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.400
<v Speaker 4>And rise as you point out, the US administration certainly

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 4>hopes for a Ukraine piece deal, but it doesn't seem

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 4>like Vladimir Putin is in any hurry here. What do

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 4>we know about his thinking?

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, that's right, I mean, obviously he's willing to have

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 7>conversations and perhaps even a direct meeting with the US

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 7>President with Donald Trump at some point in the near future,

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 7>perhaps in a place like Arabia again. But he's made

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 7>it really clear, and that's by our own reporting and

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 7>our own sourcing as well, is that he's got Maximum's

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 7>demands here and he's not going to shave those down

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 7>in any great hurry. These are things that he says

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 7>that he insists need to happen for there to be

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 7>a cease fire moving towards a more permanent deal, and

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 7>those are essentially red lines that are not that great

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 7>for Ukraine in all of this, in terms of his

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 7>territorial demands to make sure that Ukraine can never join NATO,

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 7>for example, to really know confence Ukraine in and whether

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 7>those are just demands that he gets traction on with

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 7>Donald Trump and the US in the end that are

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 7>detrimental to Ukraine. So he's not in any great hurry

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 7>here to get to a ceaspar final dear, He's obviously

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 7>open to talking, but the position from Russia has been

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 7>very clear. They've got demands and they want them met.

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 2>What about Europe? Where's Europe right now? In during these conversations,

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 2>still trying to get in the door, it seems from

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the conversation in a fulsome way at least.

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 7>I mean, obviously we've had a lot of meetings that

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 7>have gone on just at the EU level lately, including

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 7>last week, and Ealy is having another call this week.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 7>We know that again the US pent the UK Prime

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 7>Minister rather talked with Donald Trump yet again. So a

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 7>lot of conversations going on, and the message from Europe

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 7>is we need to be part of the discussion around

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 7>a CEASPA, and Ukraine's interesting to be represented, but it's

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 7>very clear that they know they're struggling to get a

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 7>seat at the table and that Donald Trump is not

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 7>particularly interested in giving them one at the table, let

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 7>alone giving Ukraine a proper seat at the table. And

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 7>so for Europe the challenge is getting their voice is heard,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 7>or showing that they're there and able to pick up

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 7>some of the slack potentially and supporting Ukraine.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 4>Roz Is there any sense of timing when this could

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 4>come together? Is there any consensus building out there?

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's very hard to say, because again these talks

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 7>that are going on at the moment seemed to have

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 7>been very technical in nature and very specific around detail.

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.479
<v Speaker 7>So are we getting the little pieces of the chessboard

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 7>towards a bigger CEASPA at some point? Imagine? The key

0:16:12.040 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 7>thing is whether there's an agreement to have further rounds

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 7>of talks within a matter of days or at least

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 7>towards the end.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 8>Of this week.

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:21.600
<v Speaker 7>And at what point can that build to a direct

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 7>meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, possibly as soon

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 7>as next month. I mean, obviously Donald Trump keeps saying

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 7>Easter as a timeline. He wants something by Easter. But

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 7>what exactly he would be happy to get by easter?

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 7>Is it a partial ceasepar again around energy, or perhaps

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 7>maritime traffic in the Black Sea as a springboard to

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 7>something else. So we're likely to get a full throat

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 7>at CSPA either way, at least in the next couple

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 7>of weeks.

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, Ros, thanks a lot, We really appreciate it.

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Ras Mathison joining us on the talks between Russia and

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the US on Ukraine. All right, some breaking news for you,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 2>ASHALLMI is said to raise about five point five billion

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 2>dollars an upsized share placement. They were selling about eight

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred million shares now, Shelmy was kicking off a share

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 2>sale in part to raise funds for its EV business.

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 2>The fundraising expected to be a long term positive for

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.639
<v Speaker 2>the company, but many saying that it may pressure shale

0:17:17.760 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>shares in the short term due to shocker dilution.

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 4>And the stock is up bus sixty five percent year

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:24.959
<v Speaker 4>to date and two hundred and eighty five percent on

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 4>a trilling a twelve month basis. Even I know that's

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 4>a good time to self stock.

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is, and they take your point, all right.

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Coming up R J. Gallows, Senior portfolio manager Fixed and

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.879
<v Speaker 2>come at Federate Hermes will be joining us on the

0:17:35.920 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 2>fixed income space. We get two fives and tens later

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 2>on this week. A lot of supply coming online there.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Switch over to the EV business interest story out there

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 4>that's really been rocking. I think the EV business that's

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 4>byd you know, saying they've gon have a five minute

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 4>charging system that is a game changer if that is

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:11.639
<v Speaker 4>in fact the case. Let's check in with bn EF

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 4>folks here b n EF. They cover all the energy

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 4>industry head to toe. Alex's b but they've got all

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 4>the data, all the analysis. Great stuff. Ryan Fisher joins

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 4>us Bloomberg bn EF EV Charging team leader. So Ryan,

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 4>talk to us about this by d story as relates

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:30.199
<v Speaker 4>to this fast charger.

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean this has just come out of nowhere.

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 9>In some ways, we had the portions of this world

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 9>doing charging three fifty KILLOW. This is a thousand killer

0:18:40.600 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 9>what we were three to four times the kind of

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.960
<v Speaker 9>other best in class that people were expecting when we

0:18:45.960 --> 0:18:49.119
<v Speaker 9>talk about five minutes. Obviously, that's similar to gasoline for

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 9>four hundred kilometers of charge. Some of the others are

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 9>more like the best in class. Lucid obviously is quite famous.

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 9>They're doing it in like one hundred maybe one hundred

0:18:58.119 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 9>and eighty kilometers in that time.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 8>This is a real step change.

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 9>And not only is it that, what you've got is

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:05.959
<v Speaker 9>an announcement and they're going to do it, going to

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 9>make the vehicles available a month later. So typically you

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 9>might hear an announcement from a Western automaker and maybe

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:12.960
<v Speaker 9>a couple of years later that tech you've heard about

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 9>will be there. Whereas they're saying these vehicles in China,

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 9>you'll be able to buy them soon, but yeah, that

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 9>is only in China.

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 2>How how did they get it down to five minutes?

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 9>So it seems like they've improved the fast charging technology

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 9>through both the voltage so you have higher voltage on

0:19:29.240 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 9>the vehicles, you could lower the current or the current

0:19:32.840 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 9>to accept this power, and then changing the battery chemistry

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 9>as well.

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 8>So the interesting thing is.

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 9>That they've added different types of calling because if you

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 9>have really high currents going through the battery, then you

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 9>have a lot of heat.

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 8>Being created, so they've changed their cooling technology.

0:19:47.320 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 9>They've improved some of the other intricacies of the sales

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 9>as well. And on a bigger market point, you've got

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 9>a lot of companies saying we're going to build solid

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 9>state batteries, so like next generation battery technologies for the car, Well,

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 9>is that even needed any more? Or if BYD can

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 9>do this with an evolution of the current tech.

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 4>So what can be what likely will be the competitive

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 4>response from the Western battery infrastructure people. They got to

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 4>up their game, like now don't they.

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's just such a race.

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 9>Like you look at these evs and you think about

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 9>buying one, and there's just something new coming that's more advanced,

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 9>one after the other. So like as a consumer, maybe

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 9>you don't want to buy because you think, well, I'm

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 9>going to buy something that'd be absollete pretty quick. From

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 9>the Western automakers, they're going to find it hard. You

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.680
<v Speaker 9>look at BYD they've just got so many engineers, they're

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 9>vertically integrated. They're doing much of this by themselves, all

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 9>the way down to now buying the ships to distribute

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 9>these cars they've built around the world and getting involved

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 9>in the metals and mining game and things like that.

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 9>So it's hard to imagine how everybody is going to compete. Obviously,

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 9>we've got tariffs in different regions to try and block

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 9>the Chinese out, and then when you think about this tech,

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 9>there is an element of do you actually need it?

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 9>So when you look on the Chinese articles, they were

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 9>looking at the JAOMIU Su seven, which is the vehicle

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 9>made by the Jami, which is the smartphone maker. So

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 9>they've entered the market and they're selling electric vehicles and

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 9>the hundreds of thousands of volume. They've outsold loads of cars.

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 9>It's kind of an amazing story, and people comparing saying, well, actually,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 9>this one BYD is talking about is ten thousand dollars

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 9>more expensive. So like the tech is not necessarily everything

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.679
<v Speaker 9>on fast charging when there's people who are doing I

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 9>don't know, fast cars.

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 8>Fancy cars.

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:38.239
<v Speaker 9>They've got a lot of other features as well, like

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.120
<v Speaker 9>whilst this is a step change, do we necessarily need

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 9>five minutes over ten minutes?

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 8>Does everybody care? It's debatable.

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean it depends how long your bathroom break is,

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 2>which you know you got a shot some concessions. Okay.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 2>We also had the headline that BYD is out selling

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Tesla's in China. In particular, you can't get a BYD

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 2>car in the US, I should point that out. And

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 2>the BYD sales for this year about five to six

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 2>million cars. So is this five minute battery like a

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 2>big selling point for this in comparison to say a

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 2>Tesla or no?

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think so.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 9>And then in China what you've got is I think

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 9>last year BID saw something like one point six million

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.880
<v Speaker 9>pure battery election because just the battery powers the car,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 9>and I think Tesla was somewhere around six hundred thousand

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 9>to seven hundred thousand.

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 8>So it gives you, and they were seconds.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 9>It gives you an idea Tesla doing well, but obviously

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 9>just how well BYD are doing one of the things

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 9>BYD had been leaning into previously with these plug.

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 8>In hybrid models. So you have an engine and you

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 8>have a battery.

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 9>The engine might only be small and the car itself

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 9>might be mainly running off the battery. So they've done

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 9>quite well with those, and it might just show a

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:45.439
<v Speaker 9>little bit of a pivot from them to say, actually,

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 9>we can.

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 8>Maybe do without the engine. Now, look we've got this.

0:22:48.160 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 9>Huge range, huge huge, huge range, fast charging power vehicles

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 9>like you don't necessarily need.

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 8>To worry about that.

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 9>Also, it might be a pivot from them in terms

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 9>of Tesla versus BYD when you said that they're not

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 9>available in the US.

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 8>But they are available in other regions.

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 9>So they've done very well in places like Brazil and Thailand.

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 9>There's something like eighty ninety percent share of the EV

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 9>market there, and like eighteen ninety percent share is obviously

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 9>huge for the So that's just that's Chinese manufacturers, with

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 9>which Bwide is pretty major one they've got to plant

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 9>out in Brazil as well, so they're making moves to

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:25.479
<v Speaker 9>kind of dominate those The charging tech could be part

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 9>of that too. So the interesting thing is, like we've

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 9>had these like charging connector wars. Do you have the

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 9>Tesla connector do you have the connector that all the

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 9>other manufacturers are using? And in Europe all the other

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 9>manufacturers won out. In America, Tesla went out well. Arguably

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.479
<v Speaker 9>in some of these kind of smaller merging markets, this

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 9>that you could end up with the Chinese connector becoming

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 9>an interesting proposition and maybe the Chinese automotive industry will

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 9>think about that. And it doesn't mean that they've got

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 9>it so far, but if they're selling the most cars

0:23:53.160 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 9>and they've got the most advanced charging tech, then maybe

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 9>that's the way.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 8>That they can exert more influence over the rest of

0:23:57.920 --> 0:23:58.320
<v Speaker 8>the world.

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Ryan really appreciate it. Ryan Fisher is EV Charging

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:04.359
<v Speaker 2>team leader. That basically means he heads up all the

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 2>coverage when it comes to EV charging at Bloomberg BNF,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 2>and as Paul was saying earlier, Bloomberg EF covers pretty

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 2>much everything commodities, power, transport, industry, buildings and ad sectors,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 2>all to help with the energy transition and some hard

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>data there.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:24.959
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal