WEBVTT - D.E.I. Ain't It Great?

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe Ketty.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty and no He Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 3>South Korean President Lee J. Meng hosted President Trump Today

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 3>for lunch, which included seafood salad tossed in thousand island dressing,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 3>and long story short. Now there's a four hundred percent

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 3>tariff on Korea?

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Is this?

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Trump met with President she for two hours. How did

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>it go? Here's his assessment. I guess on the scale,

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm from zero to ten, with ten being the best.

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I would say the meeting was in twelve. There you go.

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it was in twelve.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like given a hundred, it's it's it's a fanciful

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>number beyond even what the top limit was for assessment.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It's like turning your ampractical eleven. Yes, right, yeah, on

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a scale of ten, it was a twelve. Well, we

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>will see where the tariffs end up. It's they kind

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of put a pause on the one hundred percent tariffs

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that were supposed to kick in on Saturday, which obviously

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 1>would have royaled the world of economy in a way

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that you can't even imagine, and we're never intended to

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>actually happen, and they're they're gonna work out the details

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 1>later and we'll discuss that whenever it happens. There's so

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>many things going on in the world right now, as

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>you know that, it's just it's mind boggling if whether

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>it's the tariffs, or the rise of China or Russian Ukraine,

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>global economy, AI.

0:01:55.960 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Wow Ei Mundani, socialism, Marxism, Islamism.

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>So Zuckerberg got beat up pretty good the other day

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 1>by stockholders. I guess that we're not seeing the payoff

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>on all this AI investment, and so he gave a

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 1>big speech trying to convince them to calm down and

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it will pay off. Bloomberg the Business website, had an

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>article out today saying AI is all that matters now.

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>For all the headlines today about the FED and interest

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>rates and all that sort of stuff, the only thing

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that really matters is AI. It's either going to pay

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>off the way people think it's going to, or it's not.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And it gets into the details on that. This is

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely amazing, with Nvidia becoming the first five trillion dollar company,

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Tesla getting close to an all time high. So the

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:55.119
<v Speaker 1>Magnificent seven are your seven tech stocks. That's in Nvidia, Tesla, Apple, Microsoft,

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>some Facebook, Google Meta Google. Yeah, that pretty much covers it.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Those seven stocks are the main reason we set records

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>on a near daily basis in the stock market. They're

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>up twenty seven percent this year. That's a good return

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for a year. That's after jumping sixty seven percent last year. Wow,

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>if I or you, if I or you or anybody

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>had taken every cent we had and like taking a

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>taking money out of our house and sold plasma or

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>done whatever we could have done to get more money

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>into those seven stocks. They they went up sixty seven,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty four and twenty seven percent so far this year.

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just unbelievable. And it's either a bubble

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>or it's not. The vast majority of people think it

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is a bubble, according to Bloomberg.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 2>But that's not a reason to get out.

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>As they quote some genius, the best way to make

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>money in Marcus is to spot a bubble early, hop

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>on board as it inflates, and then get out in time. Well,

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of course that's.

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 2>A that's the problem. That last part. Oh oh do

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 2>you hear that?

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, but if you want to be burished,

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and you must have a good reason why the bubble

0:04:15.680 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is about to burst, and I'm not seeing any good

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 1>reason for the bubble to burst yet. Yeah, here's my experience,

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm no expert, but generally you don't see the

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>reason for the bubble to burst ahead of time, and

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>retrospect you think, oh, that's why.

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 4>Should have seen that coman or the explanation that you

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 4>hear in advance is one of seven that are vying

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 4>for acceptance, you know, in society. So yeah, I did

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 4>hear that guy saying that, but there are a bunch

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 4>of other guys saying the opposite.

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Not to mention to further complicate.

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 4>It, it might be a bubble for half of those

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 4>companies and the other companies.

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Bring it home, isn't so blurmberg. It's pretty expensive to

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to it. It's like forty dollars a month to

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>get access to their information, and it's all.

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Written in economic ease.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.800
<v Speaker 1>That makes me think they believe their audience is pretty

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>well educated and pretty serious about this sort of stuff. Okay, then,

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't that a pretty childish explanation of investing the best

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>way to make money? Is to recognize a bubble, get

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in early, and then get out right before it bursts.

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Seems like the sort of thing you say to someone

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>like me, not to someone who's like an expert investor,

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to win at poker, get really really good hands in

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>bed a lot of money.

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I know you're right.

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, if it's up twenty seven percent this

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>year after going up sixty seven percent this year, seems

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of smart people would have thought, well,

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>this is now, it's the time to get up. I mean,

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>we wit a two thirds rise in this stock this year.

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Last year, let's get out now, you know, missed out

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 1>on a twenty seven percentras.

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>Anyway, I know this is this I hate this discussion.

0:05:56.000 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 4>It makes me so uncomfortable because I just I've got

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 4>this bad feeling that I ought to just convert everything

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 4>into gold bury it in the backyard or cash or

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 4>I don't know, something wamp them trade with the Indians side.

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 4>Just it feels so bubbly to me, and I'm gonna

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 4>kick the hell out of myself that i didn't listen

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 4>to my own good judgment.

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, I you know, if we're gonna play the what

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>if I wish I would have diverse, diversify, because that's

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>what all the experts tell me to do for long

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>term brilliance. I wish i'd have taken everything and put

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it into the Big seven two years ago, when it

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>had doubled the year before, right.

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 2>And you know, rode that wave.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd be in a much different position. Oh well, whatever,

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that different. AI story, which I thought

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 1>was interesting, chat GPT is being sued by the parents

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of this kid who killed himself. The sixteen year old

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 1>kid had killed himself, who they say, going back and

0:06:52.760 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at his conversations with the chat GBT bought, the

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>chat GPT bought explained to the kid how to kill himself,

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>why he should kill himself, and how to write the

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>suicide note.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 4>It came around to his way of thinking way too quickly.

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Chat GPT says more than a million people a week

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>show suicidal ideation on their site, ideation being explicit indicators

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of the potential planning or intentive suicide, like you're you're

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>more than just contemplating, which I was told by a

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>college professor is completely normal for all human beings to

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>contemplate it. Occasionally the actually coming up with a plan

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and a timeline is a step further. Chat GPT says

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>a million people a week or indicating they're doing that.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Now that might be part of their trying not to

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be sued to death.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's clearly defense. Yeah, this is a society not

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 4>an US problem. Yeah it might be true.

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Also, Yeah, and then what are these AI companies supposed

0:07:57.480 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with that?

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>If there's just a lots.

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And lots of people are gonna go on GROC or

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Claude or Chat GPT or whatever I'm saying. You know,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>life sucks. I want to kill myself, and Groc is

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, good idea. Here's the Locus local. Uh, it's

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Norm McDonald joke. Here's the rope store. And

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>right next is the Creaky stool store. It's just down

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the street.

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Well right, But you know, if I my buddy comes

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 4>and says I'm thinking and ending and all, and I say,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, I got a good sturdy rope in the

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 4>back of the garage here, let me give me a second,

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 4>I'll find it. I can't as a defense say lots

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:35.439
<v Speaker 4>of people have suicidal ideation. I mean, come on, it's

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Chat GPT do better. I know you're you've designed yourself

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 4>to kiss my ass. Like, great question. Perfect, I'll tell

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 4>you great follow up. Okay, I know that's part of

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 4>your thing you're trying to appeal. But if I say

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm really depressed, I don't have a lot of friends,

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 4>I have no friends, and I think I want to

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 4>kill myself, terrific. Great idea. Here's how to get a rope.

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, No, don't program it to do that. There

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 4>are a few keywords involved, although those can be gotten

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 4>around too, I realized.

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>But it's like when I was asking Groc questions about

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.680
<v Speaker 1>theology and the Bible and God and stuff the other day,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and then I asked Groc, I said, do you believe

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in God? And she said, oh, yeah, there's got to

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>be something more to life than just what we see here.

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And I thought, there's no way you would say that

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 1>if I was asking you questions about Christopher Hitchens and

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Richard Dawkins and atheism.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Right right, Yeah, you don't have any beliefs in anything.

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 4>You're a collection of circuits. Of course, sow's the human brain,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Jack Ba, I'm Joe Getty.

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but we don't we are a collection of circuits

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and all that sort of stuff, and we want friends

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to like us. But if our friend comes to us

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and says I'm thinking to kill myself, we don't say

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I got a gun upstairs.

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 2>Hold on a.

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 4>Second, right, exactly, No, our algorithm says, oh, that's out

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 4>of the effing question. Or if your friend says, hey,

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, I'm really turned on by like young girls,

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like really really young girls, let's talk about that,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 4>you would say, no, you're sick, We're not friends anymore.

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 2>GROC would say, here are the directions to the grade.

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 4>School, yeah, or something similar, or engage in one of

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 4>those quasi erotic chat sessions that are now who.

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Is Elon Musk? Well, that's right.

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 4>There are a couple of different big companies, including chat

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 4>GPT that are or open AI I should say that

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 4>are now like, hey, everybody wants these damn erotic chat

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 4>bot things with you know, semi to full on porn

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 4>pictures generated, So I'm in that business.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Now, Wow, we didn't need more internet pornography for society. No, No,

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 2>you know it's funny. Uh.

0:10:59.280 --> 0:11:02.560
<v Speaker 4>For some reason, I clicked in my head that in

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 4>the early days, especially the very very early days, Christianity

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 4>was a very small sect, and then it grew and

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 4>it grew, and it grew to being an enormously important

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 4>religion around the world. Still is it could go back

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 4>to being something like a fairly you know, a small

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 4>sect of people who reject the sin of the world

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 4>and live a very, very different life than the masses

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 4>of people.

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of that, I've been reading Charles Murray's new book,

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Taking Religion Seriously. It is fantastic if you're the sort

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of person that like, well, this is what he said.

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>He said, it's for the intellectual that feels weird about

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>believing in religion, because he's an intellectual and he went

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>off to Harvard and he said, I was taught very

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>early that smart people don't believe this stuff, and I

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>never really look back. But then he decided in his

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>fifties he wanted to take a closer look at it.

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And the amount of research he's done on a whole

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different topics around God and Christianity it's freaking fascinating.

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And it's a four hour listen. I'm listening to the book,

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's very accessible. It's not fick theology, but if

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you like that sort of thing, it's among the best

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I've ever come across Chryl. Charles Murray's a heck of

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>an interesting dude. Anyway, back to the before we take

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a break. So you got the stocks rising the way

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>they are all around AI. Yet you've got this problem

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of AI encouraging people to kill themselves or whatever.

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Is that a fixable thing? I don't know.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe the bubble bursts around. We can't fix hallucinations,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>we can't fix it giving bad advice. There's just no

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>way around this. Maybe that's where the bubble bursts. I

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know.

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, yeah, I mean it's already a really great

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 4>tool and a profitable one day's pouring money into it

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 4>like it's going to be the world changer of all time,

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 4>way out of proportion to the quality of the product

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.439
<v Speaker 4>at this point or the significance of the product.

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>The Nvidia CEO, where's the cool tom Ford leather jackets

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>all the time? He said the other day, people aren't

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose their jobs to AI. They're gonna lose their

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>jobs to people who don't know how to use AI. Now,

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of course he's got a you know, a real stake

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in the game. But his suggestion was, you know, get involved,

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>start messing with this stuff and learning it and how

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you can apply it in your job. Don't think I'm

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>getting on that train. That's how you end up losing

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:33.479
<v Speaker 1>your job. That's what he says.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 2>We get a lot more on the waystair. We get this.

0:13:40.120 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 5>The woman is suing Sea Worlds for fifteen thousand dollars,

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 5>claiming she was on one of the roller coasters and

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 5>a duck hit her in the face, and for everyone

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 5>else it was the most entertaining thing they saw at SeaWorld.

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Why the shot at Sea World? I don't know.

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So KJP was the White House Press secretary for Joe

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Biden during that weird administration. She's got a book out,

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>she's doing a book tour, and even the New York

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Times says it is an absolute train wreck of a disaster,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and lefty publications are taking it apart. I don't know

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>if that's just mainstream Democrats turning on the whole Biden thing,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>while at the same time, Gavin Newsom comes out yesterday

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 1>and says Joe Biden's the greatest president of law the

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>last century.

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>That's weird, but anyway, more on that later.

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 4>It's ridiculous, is what it is, so I found this

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 4>a really good reasoning by Abigail Anthony. She's writing in

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 4>the National Review about penn America. This is the organization

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.960
<v Speaker 4>that comes out with their report every year about that

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 4>claims that there have been a certain number of banned books.

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 4>They're big against banned books, and she describes their methodology

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 4>and why it so scures the results. It's just an

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 4>excuse for the left to have ammunition against Republican legislatures.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 4>For instance, America's new report for the twenty twenty four

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 4>to twenty twenty five school year, titled the Normalization of

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Book Banning, records thousands of instances of book bans affecting

0:15:09.920 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 4>nearly four thousand unique titles across the country. But again

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 4>the numbers are wildly inflated. The main issue, she writes,

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.960
<v Speaker 4>is that the following definitions are employed. Pet America defines

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 4>a school book ban is any tation and I'm sorry,

0:15:24.920 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 4>any action taken against a book based on its content

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 4>and as a result of parent or community challenges, administrative decisions,

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 4>or in response to director threatened action by government officials

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 4>that leads to a book being either completely removed from

0:15:37.720 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 4>availability students, or where access to a book is restricted.

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Or diminished, diminished, right, right?

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:50.080
<v Speaker 4>And then the school book bans take varied forms, including prohibitions,

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 4>as well as a range of other restrictions, which may

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:53.119
<v Speaker 4>be temporary.

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>So, because that number is really large, four thousand, there's

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>no way that it's that big.

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 4>It's actually it's some closer to oh, seven thousand instances,

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 4>four thousand unique titles, one more sentence, real quick. For example,

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 4>if a book that was previously available to all now

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 4>requires parental permission or is restricted to a higher grade

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 4>level than the educators initially determined, that is a ban.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, Okay, So there are four thousand books that have

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>been banned or diminished. Okay, well, how many of them

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>were diminished? And what the hell do you mean by diminished?

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>You went from saying fifth graders in below could read

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>this to saying seventh graders in below.

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Big freaking deal.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, right, and Abigail points out age appropriateness.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Is not a ban of a book.

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Third graders shouldn't be reading this. Let's put it in

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 4>the middle school library. That's a book ban. Not to mention,

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 4>she points out, you can get all of these books

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 4>in less than twenty four hours on Amazon, so it's

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 4>banned in what sense free to children in school libraries

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 4>when it's inappropriate. Yeah, this is not exactly Nazi book

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 4>burning here, folks.

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Phony if you're a Democrat in the New York Times

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 1>thinks your book tour sucks, you are not doing well.

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:12.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to that a little bit, among other things.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 2>Stay here, armstrong and getdy.

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 6>The three one swing in a line drive and that's

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 6>a base hit in the right field. There comes a

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:26.120
<v Speaker 6>menues around thirty's coming into score, Guerrero to third. It's

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 6>an RBI single for Bobasht and it's five one Blue

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 6>Jays here in Game.

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Five, quieting the Dodgers crowd. Uh, this is a story. Sorry,

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 2>Star Wars geeks.

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Every time I hear Boba Shet, I think Boba Fett a.

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Wacky minor character. Anyway, back to you, I'm really digging

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 2>the World Series.

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I've watched pretty much every pitch, and it turns out

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot more people are than having quite a while

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, because it's a Dodgers and show aotani

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what are people are, so it

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 1>could be a little people are so sick of everything else.

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I mentioned, the other day, I was wearing a

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers hat and the number of people that came up

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to me say, oh, you see that game last night.

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 1>The first shared experience I've had with random people, and

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how long.

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 4>And a shared I was gonna say, non adversarial experience.

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Even though sports is adversarial, the enjoyment of it isn't. Yeah,

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 4>you know, if I got some friends who were big

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 4>Eagles fans, we can talk about football and kid each

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 4>other about our rivalries, but we have that shared enjoyment

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 4>of it.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:31.679
<v Speaker 2>And man, we don't have enough of that in this

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 2>country anymore.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Up in Toronto, a full third of the humans that

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>live in Canada had watched the two home games.

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.440
<v Speaker 2>I'll bet those number. Half of the Moses, Well, I'll bet.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Those numbers are gonna go up. They'll have half the

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>country watching when they have a chance to win a

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>World series.

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Tomorrow night, I guess.

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe's gonna tell us a story about their pitcher, which

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is something coming up.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:59.440
<v Speaker 4>But oh, he's a unique bird man, unbelievable. He's set

0:18:59.480 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 4>records that go back to Fort Host McGillicuddy back.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 2>In the nineteen aughts. It's unbelievable.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>So we got another stupid political book out. I don't

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>know who buys these things. I think you buy him

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to set them on your coffee table. I don't believe

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>anybody ever reads them, or they only get printed to

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>be put in the front of the news stand at

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the airport to get you to come in and buy

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>some gum.

0:19:23.000 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 2>I've never understood these political books. I think a lot of.

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 4>The purchases are bulk purchases by various packs could be

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 4>and political supporters.

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:34.400
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of end around bribes.

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:39.639
<v Speaker 1>The White House press spokeswoman for Joe Biden, Kreem Jean Pierre,

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>known as KJP, has got a book out and it's

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 1>been a mess, according to the New York Times.

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 2>And this is a.

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Unless the title of the book was I was Awful

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 4>at my job.

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 2>It's misleading.

0:19:51.480 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 1>This is from a New York Times news story. This

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't an opinion piece. This is the politics reporter just

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>commenting on how the book tour is going for k

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.600
<v Speaker 1>The name of the book is Independent because she switched

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>her affiliation from Democrat to Independent.

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 2>After she left office.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh bold, But the subtitle is A Look Inside a

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Broken White House, which I find interesting because apparently toward

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the end of one of her interviews recently, they because

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>they ask her about Joe Biden and all these different things,

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and she didn't see any signs of him faltering in

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>any way whatsoever, And she didn't see any signs of

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this or that, or she wasn't around for this or that.

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And then the interviewer asked.

0:20:34.400 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Her at some point, so, in what way was it

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 2>a broken white House?

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the subtitle, but you've not given any

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>indication of And she said, well, I'm referring to the

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump White House.

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>I live in the present. What wait? What you were

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the press secretary for a foreign administration.

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>You write a book that says a look inside a

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Broken White House. You don't have anything to say about

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a broken white House? And then when you're ask about it,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you claim, oh, I'm talking about the Trump White House.

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 2>What but you're not in that white house?

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Heah, you don't have any You don't have any insight

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>more than I do watching television about That's why childlike claim,

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Well, that's what's That's why they're calling it

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>a train wreck. They go through a whole bunch of

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>different examples. So far, Miss Jean Pierre has come across

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.239
<v Speaker 1>in interviews as erratic and defensive rather than as a

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>forceful champion for her old boss, for attempts to defend

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>him have come at a different difficult time. Her message

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>has not been well received. Along the way, she has

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>struggled to answer questions. Exhibit A was an interview published

0:21:40.440 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>on Monday with The New Yorker I haven't read this,

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:48.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to now, which has been described by many

0:21:48.440 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>as an absolute train wreck.

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>According to New York Magazine.

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>New York Magazine called the interview a train wreck, yikes,

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>an excruciating case study in said one other you know,

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>mainstream thus left leaning publication asked why she thought the

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>party had given mister Biden the boot. Jean Pierre said,

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>there's more to this than just that.

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Period of time.

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>This is very layered, right, There's a period of time

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that I questioned what was happening now? And she goes

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>on and on and on and has described here in

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:30.399
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times a word salad that left the

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>interviewer and many readers perplexed. So again, this is a

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>New York Times news story saying she's putting out word

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.679
<v Speaker 1>salads that leave everyone perplexed as to what the hell

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>she's talking about. The interviewer from The New Yorker, this

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>guy named Choltner, Mister Choutner, said to her, Sorry, I'm

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>not trying to be dense, but I'm a little unclear

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>what this has to do with democratic leaders and Democrats

0:22:54.880 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in the country thinking Joe Biden was going to lose

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump.

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>In other words, I don't understand what you just said. Right.

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 4>You haven't even come close to answering my question. You

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 4>just talked at me.

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 1>In another point in the interview, Chotener asked Jean Pierre

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>why she had written in the book that it was

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>an insult to Kamala Harris that people didn't want her

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:19.199
<v Speaker 1>to be the nominee, while she also wrote that the

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>truth was I never really believed Harris could win. How

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>did you write both of those things at the same

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>time in the same book, the interviewer wrote. Jean Pierre responded, well,

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>two things can be true, right, The thing I say

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.159
<v Speaker 1>the second time actually proves the thing I said the

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:32.640
<v Speaker 1>first time.

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 2>Right, No, no, not remotely.

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 4>Maybe she should have flipped frantically through her giant binder

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 4>to find the answer to that question.

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they mentioned that at some point in this long

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>article that she that's the way she handled it, and

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:49.720
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't really have that for this circumstances. She goes around, well,

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't need it. You and Theory wrote the book,

0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>so you shouldn't need a binder to answer questions about

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>your own book. The New York Times the author of

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>this article referencing the the train wreck that was the

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker article that came out Monday. They tried to

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>get a hold of her on Wednesday, but she was

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 1>not available for an interview.

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 2>You're on a book tour and the New.

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>York Times to calls to ask you questions about your book,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and you say, I'm not available, Wow, because they're asking

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.760
<v Speaker 1>you about your disastrous New Yorker article that came out

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the day before. I mean, you're really in the bunker

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>when your whole thing now is to try to sell

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:28.959
<v Speaker 1>books to make yourself some money, at your last gasp

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>of having any relevance whatsoever.

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.880
<v Speaker 2>And the New York freaking Times calls.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 4>To ask you some questions. Uh, wants to give you

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 4>some more ink scheduling problem? Yeah, no time, I'm very busy. Hey,

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 4>you know this is funny. Tell me if I'm wrong, friends,

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:49.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm both inside and outside of these studios. If somebody

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 4>had told you a year ago KJP is going to

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 4>write a book and then do interviews, isn't this exactly

0:24:57.720 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 4>what you would have pictured? I mean, how could it

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 4>be anything else? She is just she's performing precisely as

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 4>an author at as she did as the press secretary,

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 4>floundering words, salady nonsense, full of self contradiction, and frequent

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 4>identity politics too.

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to get to that at some point

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 2>or no? She complains in there.

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.359
<v Speaker 1>So after October seventh, if you all remember, they brought

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in what's his name, the spokesman from the Pentagon was

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 1>answering all the questions.

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, I can picture him. But Kirby.

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>When they brought Kirby in to handle everything there for

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.639
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks, she really thought that was awful,

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, pushing aside the first openly gay black woman

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>who was the.

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 2>Official White House press secretary.

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>To have this white male come up and mansplain things, well,

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>is obvious what was going on there.

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 2>They realized she was over her head.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>At a time when people were really paying attention and

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>really needing answers to questions, and they brought in somebody

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>who knew what the hell they were talking about.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm going to say this slowly, sweetie pie, so

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 4>you can see you follow it. James, Admiral Kirby's really

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 4>capable at his job.

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 2>You are not at all capable of you at your job.

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 2>So they had him come in.

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 4>And identity politics is at the center of every breath

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 4>you take, but not the rest of the world. He

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 4>was really good at the job. You were really bad

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 4>at the job. That's where the analysis begins and ends.

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry to have been so blunt.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>The New York Times goes on to Pylon. In another

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>interview last week, Gail King of CBS Mornings was openly

0:26:33.920 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of Miss Jean Pierre for writing that she had

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>never seen signs of mister Biden's decline. You even write

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Kreein that you were on the plane with him going

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to to the debate and you didn't see anything, ms

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:49.880
<v Speaker 1>King said, referring to mister Biden's halting, fumbling debate performance

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>with Donald Trump that caused him to have to drop

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the race. So you were on the plane

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with them the day that he had the complete meltdown,

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and you never saw any indication of this. She responded

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:04.119
<v Speaker 1>that she had not happened to see mister Biden on

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the flight, but with age comes what happens when you

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>get older.

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 2>I never saw anyone who wasn't there.

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Wait a minute, well, let me jop that down. Let

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 4>me jot that one down. This is an alleged professional

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 4>word smith of such skill that she is appointed to

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 4>be the spokesperson for the botus say that sentence again,

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 4>with age.

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Comes what happens when you get older. Wow, that's good stuff.

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>How about the fact that she says she didn't see

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the president on the flight? The plane ate that big

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and you're the White House press spokes person, I have

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 1>feeling you have you you have access to the president,

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>so that I mean, come on, But this is the

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:43.719
<v Speaker 1>part I already said this, But this is how they

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>ended in the New York Times because it's so good.

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.600
<v Speaker 1>In another curious moment, in missus Jean Pierre's interview with

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>mister Schoutner of The New Yorker, she said that her

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>subtitle A Broken White House referred to the Trump White House,

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 1>not the one she had worked in the book for

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>me is really about the moment we're in, she said.

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.399
<v Speaker 2>But she wrote it last year, earlier this year. That

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.439
<v Speaker 2>is the most hilarious thing ever.

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad I read this article just to be aware

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>of that. So her subtitle is you know, living in

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a broke my experience.

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 2>No, it doesn't even say that.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It just says independence stories of a broken white House.

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 2>That's what it is. Yeah, stories of a broken Hine House.

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, tell us some stories, because so far you've got

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>no stories about a broken white house. You say you

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>saw no decline, you saw no backbiting. Where's the broken whites? Well,

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm referring to the Trump White House.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 4>That is unbelievable, bizarre that it was even published and

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>she's getting interviewed and everything.

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this is childlike.

0:28:45.200 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>That is the most embarrassing thing I've ever heard. She

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>should have to give her money back. If I'm the

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>book company, I'm saying, this is some sort of false

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you claimed your There's got to be something you contractually broke.

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Tales a broken white House? No, I mean this white

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>House in which I'm not involved, that I wrote before

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the White House started.

0:29:07.280 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Right, maybe there's a non compass mentis clause in the

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 4>contractor that is the sanity clause, as.

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 2>The Marx Brothers would remind us.

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.200
<v Speaker 1>And then, of course the icing on the cake is

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>after that disastrous interview the New York Times cultrummings, she says,

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>not available. You're on a book tour and you're not

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>talking the press. Oh that's great, okay, DEI isn't it grand?

0:29:31.280 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 1>It's one no kidding, that's the headline. DEI, ain't it grand?

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll finish strong?

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Next strong?

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 5>Yet?

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Chop a, come on to stuck pay held series masterpiece, come.

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Twenty tell you all try Yes, Savage twenty two.

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's amazing, And I don't think you need to

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 4>be a baseball fan to really enjoy a story of

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 4>somebody who comes from a very very low level and

0:30:06.360 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 4>enjoys success. But there's there's a great piece. Jared Diamond,

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 4>The appropriately Jared Diamond wrote about Trey Savage the first

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 4>two batters he ever faced in professional baseball in single

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 4>A ball, which is I'm telling you, folks, your cashier

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 4>at Target makes more money and has a much more

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.680
<v Speaker 4>luxurious lifestyle than a single a ballplayer.

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So you know, only a slightly worse shot of becoming

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>a major league baseball player.

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 2>It's really neck and neck.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 4>So he walks the first two batters he ever faced

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 4>in professional baseball. His pitching coach immediately comes out to

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 4>the mount, jogs out to the mount, and and he

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 4>before he could utter a word to what he feared

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 4>would be a flustered twenty one year old, you, Savage

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 4>spoke up first. I know, I know, I'm good, having

0:30:53.560 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 4>already diagnosed the problem on his own, And the coach said, okay,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 4>we're all good, and he went to the back to

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 4>the dugout, and the Savage didn't allow an earned run

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 4>that day, shut him out. Less than seven months have

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 4>passed since that inauspicious debut, and he wasn't in dunnedn what.

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Is that Oklahoma? I don't even know where that is?

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 4>For a single A, He's pitching in the World Series

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 4>and dominating the Los Angeles Dodgers with one of the

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 4>most fearsome lineups that has ever been assembled at the

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 4>cost of hundreds of millions of dollars. It's just an

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 4>awe inspiring, jaw dropping ascension and go ahead.

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I loved the way he handled that home run he

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>gave up in the third inning. I mean he yeah,

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>he pitched an amazing he only gave up one run.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But that home run that he gave up, he didn't flinch,

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>he didn't look. It was such a monster home run.

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I love the way that they replayed it several times.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>He throws a pitch, Dude, hits it so hard.

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Pitcher just like, okay, give me another ball. I mean,

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 2>he was like ready to pitching it. He knew it

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 2>was out. I know what happened. Yep, let's go. And

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 2>that's so in.

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 4>His character, which we'll get to, but it's worth mentioning

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 4>he Let's see, he.

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Introded.

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 4>He induced the most swings and misses since the system

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 4>was created to count that sort of thing. He became

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 4>the youngest pitcher to rack up double digit strikeouts in

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 4>a World Series game since somebody named Smokey Joe Wood

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 4>did it. In nineteen twelve, he struck out twelve batters,

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 4>surpassing the World Series record set by Don Newcomb in

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 4>nineteen forty nine with the Brooklyn Dodgers. I mean, to

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 4>break a record that's endured that long in baseball is

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 4>just it's crazy. And some of these stories I love

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 4>so much, and partly because as a youth and a

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 4>young man, I was a pitcher and I love baseball

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 4>and competed like a fiend. But after let's see, so

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 4>he got promoted to high A, which is different than

0:32:55.920 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 4>a ball. In Vancouver, first inning, familiar leader off walking

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 4>a home run, pitching coach Eric Yardley went out for

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:05.120
<v Speaker 4>a chat. He told you Savage that he wanted to

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 4>give him a little break to collect his wits. Your

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 4>Savage looked at him and simply said thank you, and Yardly,

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 4>the coach wasn't sure how to respond. Nobody had ever

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 4>reacted that way to a mountain visit. So instead of saying,

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm all right, I can't get these guys. I don't

0:33:19.840 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 4>know what happened. I missed with my curb blah blahlahlah, No,

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 4>he said thank you.

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 2>That was it.

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 4>He was ready to go. It caught me off guard,

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 4>says the coach. It's just like, yeah, perfect, sounds good.

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 4>He didn't give up another run. He did, however, finish

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 4>with ten strikeouts in four innings.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's just like the game last night. He gives

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:40.280
<v Speaker 2>up that home run. He didn't. It seemed to phase

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 2>him not at all.

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.880
<v Speaker 4>It reminds me of the legendary story about Joe Montana

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 4>and the Super Bowl, in which they were into crunch

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 4>time and everybody.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Was puking up their guts and he looked.

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Into the stands and said, hey, look John Candy and

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 4>his teammates laughed, and then they went on to win

0:33:54.920 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 4>the game. You chat, Cormstrong and j Getti.

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Final here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew.

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 4>It's a team game around here too, folks. Let's begin

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 4>with Michaelangelo, our technical director.

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Michael.

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm just looking here on Amazon for the KJP

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 4>book because I have a table that when the logs

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 4>when the legs is wobbly, and I think it will fit.

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Under it perfectly. Yeah, yeah, good plan.

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.879
<v Speaker 4>Katie Greener esteemed Newswoman as a final thought, Katie, ah

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 4>that book.

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 6>We do a good job at a better job at

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 6>holding up your table than she did at her job

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 6>in the White House.

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Hey there you go, Jack. Final thought for us.

0:34:44.000 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>So far, my giant inflatable pumpkin has not blown loose

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and gone down the street like it has in previous

0:34:49.719 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>years because it hasn't been windy, so I'm hoping I

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 1>can pull that off. It's always embarrassing to get a

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>knock on the bar from a neighbor. Hey, you're twenty

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>foot pumpkins down the street.

0:34:57.960 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 2>You might want to go get that all right.

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna see My final thought to the great Matt Tayebi,

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 4>who wrote a piece that we cited heavily in hour

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 4>three of the show, I think.

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 2>Kicked off our three with it.

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.439
<v Speaker 4>If he's talking about all the rich, over educated kids

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:16.319
<v Speaker 4>who are talking like Marxists now, and he says we're

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 4>in the upper class twits promoting revolution space, a script

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 4>with which most of the rest of the world is

0:35:22.800 --> 0:35:23.840
<v Speaker 4>sadly familiar.

0:35:24.280 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no kidding.

0:35:26.080 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty wrapping up another grueling four hour.

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Work to upper class twits.

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 4>Indeed, so many people who thanks so with a little time,

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 4>go to Armstrong geddy dot com. You've got some great

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 4>new T shirts and swag for you for your favorite

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.399
<v Speaker 4>Ay and g fan. Maybe give it a day till

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 4>our starve. The lazy shirts are ready to go.

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:45.800
<v Speaker 2>We will see you tomorrow with all the news.

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Then God bless America.

0:35:49.840 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Armstrong and Getty. You gotta put some fans on. Pants,

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:10.760
<v Speaker 2>you gotta put some mans on if you get pulled

0:36:10.840 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 2>over by the Holloway But strong, Armstrong, and Getty