WEBVTT - Global Bond Turmoil Amid German Spending and Uncertain US Policy

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Steve chivone with us with federated Aaron as thrilled he

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 2>could be with this. You were just down in San Diego, Steve,

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>talking to people trying to make decisions on asset alloccasion.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 3>How miserable are people.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 4>Worried? You know, I think you've got and Frank, I

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 4>don't mean to be callous about it, but it makes

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 4>me like the market set up better today, ironic, given

0:00:52.080 --> 0:00:54.959
<v Speaker 4>the newsflow we just heard that than where we were

0:00:55.040 --> 0:01:00.639
<v Speaker 4>last November. The expectations set last November was unfulfillable. Where today,

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 4>you know, we've got a healthy wall of worry around

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 4>resurgent inflation, hawkish fed tariffs policy, and I think that

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 4>that wall of worry is going to get knocked down

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 4>or taken down brick by brick as we get in

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 4>the second half of the year. So more pain to come,

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 4>but we see a much much better second.

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Half Tursan Slack moments ago with Apollo just put out

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the states affected by terrorists. It's the usual victims of Michigan, Texas.

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I feature Nebraska is today, Indiana, Kentucky is MAG seven,

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Steve chiveron as the technology excellence of growthy federated or

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>MEZ is it affected by tariffs.

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 4>It's not necessarily affected by tariffs in an extraordinary way.

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there is certainly some effects that relates to

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 4>chips and things of that nature. But if you think

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.240
<v Speaker 4>about it, if you were going to retaliate against the

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 4>United States, you really can't do it in a general

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 4>economic sense. Right if you're Canada or Mexico, where exports

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>represent twenty five or a third of your GDP and

0:01:59.880 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 4>the US those imports maybe three or four percent, you're

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 4>not winning that battle. Your only leverage if you are

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 4>a foreign country trying to retaliate against the United States

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:12.600
<v Speaker 4>is to try to go after the MAG seven where

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 4>fifty percent of the revenue for some of those names

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 4>are overseas, and so I think they are the obvious

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 4>retaliation target if we're going to go down that route.

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 5>Steve, what are we doing with asset allocation these days?

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 5>That we sit back and we had such outperformance by

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 5>the equity markets in twenty three and twenty four. What

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 5>are we doing with asset allocation these days?

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Look, I think what we're in is a fog

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 4>of uncertainty, which is what we're calling it, and it's

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 4>an economic slowdown in this first part of the year. However,

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 4>I think inflation concerns are overblown, particularly because the risks

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 4>to growth I think are greater than the risks to inflation.

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 4>I really don't care what Chairman Powell has to say.

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 4>This FED is cutting and I think they may be

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 4>cutting by the middle of the year. I think tariffs,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 4>for all of the concern Paul, we are going to

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 4>end up essentially with the United States instituting a tariff

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 4>level equal to the world's vats. I think trade barriers

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 4>are going to come down with resident from the tariffs,

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.640
<v Speaker 4>and you're going to see US barriers get up to

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 4>about the level of a VAT. That's not the end

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 4>of the world. You're going to get to a tax

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 4>top package somewhere between Memorial Day and the fourth of July.

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 4>And I think in the back half of the year

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>you're going to see cyclicals small caps and the short

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 4>end of the curb rally. I'm not smart enough, clever enough,

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 4>or quick enough to try to get defensive today and

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 4>get bullish tomorrow. We're going to invest for that better

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 4>second half.

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Stay Chiver on one final questionnaire. I think it's really

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 2>really important. The conservative client, they got a retirement plan,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 2>They're like swingey, it's a five oh one. K the

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>things on steroids?

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 3>Do they do something?

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Here?

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 3>I got to do something. I just the newsflow. I

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 3>can't take it. Lisa Matale gave me my first gray hair.

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 3>What do I do? I mean, what's the to do

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>list for you? Infederated here?

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 4>I think for a conservative client, one of the best

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 4>things you can do is put together a portfolio that

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 4>generates income. You know, in my household, once a quarter,

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, we get our dividend payment on stock that

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 4>we have, and we call it dividend Day. It's one

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 4>of the happiest days of the year for my wife

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 4>four times a year because that money comes in and

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 4>we're not worried about a share price, right, We're not

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 4>worried about a stock being up or down. We know

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 4>that the investments that we hold generate an income, and

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 4>I think for clients that are conservative or tending to

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 4>get skittish, having a portfolio that produces an income that

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 4>helps you to stay calm because you know that check

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 4>is coming in and not overreact to share price movements,

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 4>helps you stay invested, helps you stay long, and helps

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 4>you not overreact to some of the noise that you're

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 4>seeing in the political news flow right now. And I

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 4>think that's the best thing you can do. You don't

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 4>want to overreact.

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Steve Schiveron, thank you so much for the guidance.

0:04:56.560 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 2>Cerre and folks, this is a huge issue. Will be

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 2>covering us of course, and really into March. You know,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 2>get the jobs report coming up, Paul, But I'm sorry.

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 3>S a location. What do we do? Some people say,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>do nothing. You know, we'll have to see.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>watch US live on YouTube.

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 3>This is joy. I had absolutely nothing to do with this.

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Eric and the interns figured this out and

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I just want to take a moment here. People on

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 2>the East coast have absolutely no clue the academic heritage

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 2>of far western Canada, including the University of British Columbia.

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>It is I learned this years ago. It is just wacko.

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>How good the economics is. She's out of that combine, Catherine.

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 2>These joins US now with pigium as well, like econometrics

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>in aid economics. It was like absolutely definitive in my ute.

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>Continent of Europe is what you focus on?

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Is it blowing up?

0:06:09.040 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>This morning I saw Italian German spreads really didn't move.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 2>It's a one off lift.

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:15.720
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it.

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 6>Yes.

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 7>I think what we're seeing is in some ways a

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 7>quote unquote you know, good move in an orderly move

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 7>asset prices. I think markets are taking this very positively.

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 7>It is you know, I see it as a third

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 7>in a row of droggies, whatever it takes of the

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 7>next generation.

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 6>EU announcement in July twenty twenty, this is big. This

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 6>is huge.

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 8>This.

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 7>When I first heard these numbers, I was like, this

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 7>is a go big or go home number.

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 3>This is a huge deal.

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Like you and I studied Duley Garber Folkards Lando, David

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 2>Fokertslando at jointsche Bank years ago, like the deve Putin invaded.

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 2>Paul Focarts Lando told me the fiscal sphere, the space

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 2>in Europe will never be the same culturally. Are the

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 2>institutions there, BMP, PERRYBA, this the entire structure of Europe.

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 3>Are they ready for this non austerity?

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 6>This is a great question. I mean, it is a

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 6>big move.

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 7>But one argument that I've made a long time in Europe,

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 7>We're so used to having this narrative following the sovereign

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 7>debt crisis, that debt is a problem in Europe. We

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 7>think about Italy more recently, we think about France. But

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 7>if we look at the EU as a whole, or

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 7>even just the euro Area as a whole, debt to

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 7>GDP is very, very low. It's much much lower than

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 7>any other comparable economic region, either in size or level

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 7>of development. It's at the EU level. It's eighty percent

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 7>relative to GDP, so it's.

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 6>Way way lower.

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.920
<v Speaker 7>They have loads of fiscal space. The issue for Europe

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 7>is not the lack of money. The issue in Europe

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:57.239
<v Speaker 7>is not the lack of general consensus about how these

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 7>funds should be spent. The problem in Europe is there

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 7>is no fiscal mechanism in place to allow this spending

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.239
<v Speaker 7>to happen. So what is so important about this signal

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 7>that we're seeing from Germany is not just the size,

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:17.240
<v Speaker 7>but what it means for Europe working together, having leadership

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 7>in its largest, most economically important economy.

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 6>In terms of going forward.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 7>And I think everything else, you know, provided this is

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 7>planned and executed, you know properly, there are there are

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 7>risks clearly around doing big stuff. I think everything else

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 7>is going to fall into line.

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 5>That answer just doubled my knowledge of what's going on.

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh this is much.

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I want you to jump in here, but I said

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 2>it with leguard at Jackson Hall. Sure, people called me

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 2>up and said this is a huge speech.

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 3>What Catherine is that Your phone is my fault? Now

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 3>hold on, let me see. Oh it's it's Air France.

0:08:57.640 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 8>Available.

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I never this is the first time that's happened. It's

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 3>your fault. What card is fired up? Oh that's we're doing.

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 3>Paul saved me. But the guards fired up about that's amazing.

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 5>And Catherine in your notes here, I love this. The

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.679
<v Speaker 5>German spending plan is a game changer, a fiscal bazooko.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 5>Earlier expectations of a two hundred million dollar defense bill

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 5>were completely surpassed. So just putting in the context a

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 5>huge announcement by Germany as it relates to spending, will

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 5>the rest of Europe?

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 9>Will they follow? And they follow?

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 7>I think they're going to have to follow. I think

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 7>it's going to be a multi pronged approach. We're going to,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 7>you know, get some announcements today. What I would say

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 7>is a lot of these announcements coming today are.

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 6>You know, these are quote unquote easy.

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 7>They are politically easy, they are financially easy for them

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 7>to agree. It doesn't require, for example, unanimity at the

0:09:58.679 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 7>EU level.

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 6>These there are.

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 7>Announcements that I'm expecting today that are more in the

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 7>incrementalism bucket. So if we want to see another big

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 7>substantive move from here, I think what I would be

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 7>looking at is one we need a signal that the EU,

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 7>not Europe, but the EU is actually politically aligned and

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 7>moving forward. That doesn't necessarily mean they've got to agree eurobonds,

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 7>but I want to see them smash some old chestnuts

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.959
<v Speaker 7>here along the lines of banking union, along the lines

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.400
<v Speaker 7>of capital markets union, because no matter how much public

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 7>money they throw at this is never going to be enough.

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 7>You need private money and you need the signal the

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 7>politically they're working together.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 2>I got eight questions, including how she fixes the Toronto

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 2>maple leafs.

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 3>Cather Nize. This is brilliant, and what I think.

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>We need to focus on in the time we've got

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>left is what's it mean for Americans? Because the risk

0:10:57.520 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 2>here is they're eighty percent GDP? Are they going to

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>become like us with the out of control debt and deficit?

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is that the fear, the pushback that Europe's

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 2>going to see?

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 7>That risk is always there, but there are mechanisms in place.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 7>We have these new fiscal rules at the EU level.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 7>Some people say, you know, they're not really very very stringent,

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 7>but I mean think the proof is in the pudding.

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 7>I mean they have been pretty effective if absolute debt

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 7>to GDP is only eighty percent, So you know, my

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 7>guess is they are going to handle this in a

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 7>way that is constrained.

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 2>Here's the guard when I was with her in Jackson Hall,

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 2>this is Maynard Keynes quote. The difficulty lies not in

0:11:43.160 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 2>the new ideas but escaping from the old ones. Brilliant

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 2>to Paul's good question is Finland ready to escape the

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>old ideas and become like America with a pop phenomenal

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 2>GDP and all the other things.

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 6>I think Europe is ready to move forward.

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 7>I saw, you know, excerbs from the Munich Security conference.

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 7>You know, we saw White House press conferences. I think

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 7>from the perspective of Europe, this was a game changer

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:15.320
<v Speaker 7>for them.

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:16.760
<v Speaker 6>This really shifted.

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 7>Going back to these German numbers. Going into the weekend,

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 7>the numbers were two hundred billion for a defense fund.

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.320
<v Speaker 7>Only then on Monday we heard four hundred billion for

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 7>a defense fund and four hundred billion for infrastructure.

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 6>Then we heard five hundred million for each of those.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 6>So we grew literally in a matter of.

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Days, across the nation, around the world, and particularly to

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 2>those of you in the continent of Europe. Katheransu us

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>with PGM. Here a brilliant conversation. This is what surveillance

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 2>is about. We welcome you on your commute across America,

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 2>and of course we say good morning on YouTube. Subscribe

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg Podcast. Growing each and every day, Paul, this

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>is I mean, this is thirty years Paul. This is

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.680
<v Speaker 2>a new con with doctor Nase.

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 5>And Catherine talk to us about just the political support,

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 5>the popular support. Isn'tre that support out there across Europe

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 5>for this new way of thinking about spending and maybe

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 5>having to take a bigger role in defending themselves and

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 5>what that costs.

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it tells you a lot, you know,

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 7>about where we find ourselves.

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 6>If you said we need.

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 7>To increase this defense spending with one for one cuts

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 7>in the social safety network, I think you're going to

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 7>come up against a lot of resistance, which is why

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 7>we've ended up where we are, where the easiest flex

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 7>point has been increasing debt and doing this through debt financing,

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 7>because there is that resistance. But I think the reality

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:54.080
<v Speaker 7>is is that over the course of time, slowly some

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 7>of this social welfare network is going to need to

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 7>be rained in. And it comes by to your point

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 7>about debt sustainability. So you know, for now this is

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 7>this extra you know, slodge of money over and above,

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.719
<v Speaker 7>but ultimately is going to have to come at the

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 7>offset of something.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 2>The ambiguity here and this goes back to Stigler's posts,

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 2>not as Nobel Prize, but Stigler's looking at the little

0:14:16.400 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 2>g the growth rate here, the American bargain has always

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 2>been we will grow our way out of our debt.

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you see a new nominal GDP, whatever the mix

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>of it is in Europe where they become more like

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>America and they get the little g to cover for

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 2>the debt expansion.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 7>I absolutely think that this is possible. And why do

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 7>I think that? Firstly, you know, demographics is not destiny.

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 7>If I look at what's going on in Japan. I mean,

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 7>it's remarkable Japan grew faster in the fourth quarter of

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 7>last year than the United States. This is a country

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 7>that's facing a significantly, you know, dramatic and dramatically different

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 7>demographic headwin than the United States. And it's because they

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 7>took a very long term strategic view.

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.239
<v Speaker 6>And they have invested.

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 7>They've increased labor market participation, they've improved productivity, and so

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.600
<v Speaker 7>you can get growth. We're also seeing early signs in

0:15:14.640 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 7>that the European periphery, on the back of these next

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 7>generation EU investments, that potential growth is starting to pick up.

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 7>You know, we're not talking anything huge, but you know,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 7>a tenth a couple tenths is actually nothing to sneeze

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 7>at if you accumulate that over many, many years. So

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 7>I don't see any reason why Europe cannot grow. Germany

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 7>did actually grow on average by two percent GDP real

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 7>on average every year in the decade before the financial crisis.

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 7>Now they haven't grown it all since twenty nineteen. That's

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 7>not normal. That's not normal. So I think there is

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 7>absolutely scope for them to do.

0:15:52.560 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 3>We'll get a few more in here.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 2>We've got someone who's slummed in from Germany we've got

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>to talk to exactly.

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 5>So in terms of Germany, a market viewing Germany and

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 5>broader Europe now, is this increased acceptance of higher spending.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:11.200
<v Speaker 5>Is it seen as pro growth? Does it raise inflation concerns?

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 5>What are the markets telling us here?

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 7>I think the market for now is working on the

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 7>assumption that this is a positive for growth.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 3>I looked at a lot of.

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Charts today and the yield move is contained. Yes, cultural

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 2>this is critical for PJUM. If if Greg Peters was here,

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 2>this is the question you'd ask you the is the

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 2>institutional integrity there to sustain European business so they don't

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 2>disinvest or halt investment.

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 7>Well, this is why I think. In addition to this,

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 7>you know, big fiscal Bazooka. I want to see a

0:16:47.240 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 7>strong signal from the EU level that leaders there are

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.520
<v Speaker 7>working in unison, that they're willing to take hard political

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 7>decisions that you know, are going to go against some

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 7>vested interest to move forward. I want to see that signal.

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.880
<v Speaker 7>We haven't seen it yet. What we're going to hear

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 7>today is not that signal.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 6>It needs to be more.

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>ECB just out of the headlines, the European Central Bank

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 2>says rates are becoming meaningfully less restrictive. Is that a

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 2>societal less restrictive or is that a growthiness imploding?

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 7>So uh, you know you asked the great question before,

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 7>what is it?

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 6>What does it mean for the ECB? This is a

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 6>complete flip.

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:35.480
<v Speaker 7>For so long in Europe it was really monetary policy

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.680
<v Speaker 7>that was leading and fiscal was lagging. And now fiscal

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 7>is firmly in the driving seat, and the ECB is

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 7>going to have to adjust to that.

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 6>I think at the margin.

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 7>Here it's going to raise there or at least put

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 7>them at the top end of neutral. So yes, I

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 7>was expecting this cut today. I think they probably will

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 7>cut one more time, maybe later this year, but that

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 7>they sit at that top end of neutral of two

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 7>point two five percent by the end of this year,

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 7>so they are going to be more cautious, and of

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 7>course they need to see what this all means for

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 7>the real economy, and it will take time. Right, this

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 7>stuff's not shovel ready. It's not going to impact on

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 7>GDP on day one.

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.199
<v Speaker 2>This is one of Alketzani's from London, visiting today with

0:18:18.320 --> 0:18:19.479
<v Speaker 2>Pgium Fixed Income.

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm cut to the chase at Latour de Jent this

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.840
<v Speaker 2>afternoon at lunch in Paris, overlooking the brand spankin New

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame. You're going to have a fancy lunch with

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 2>seasonal duckling on we go to the Crape Mademoiselle. What

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 2>are the fancy people of Europe think of this world

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>turned upside down?

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 10>How well had differently? There is a lot on the plate,

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 10>and what we see is on one side, some countries

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 10>that have the FISCUS place to googleld notably polland Germany.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 10>Some other said that not so. Macron probably now is

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 10>taking the lead. And this is something that honestly it

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 10>was back at twenty seventeen when it said we really

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 10>need in Europe to speed up and get some defense spending.

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 10>So probably it's going to lead the queue and we

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.919
<v Speaker 10>will get there. I don't know how much and how fast,

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 10>but this is the final destination.

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this is a c change for yes, both

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 5>the US and Europe broader to find if there's going

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 5>to be a lesser role in the US across Europe,

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 5>that means obviously the European countries need to step up more.

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 5>Seen at the EU today, What does that mean for

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.160
<v Speaker 5>investing house That impact your investment outlook as you think

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 5>about allocating capital across the globe.

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 10>Well, the big question is how this is going to

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 10>be financed and how this well have an impact on

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 10>growth because it is a structural it is a permanent

0:20:09.040 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 10>increase in expenses. And this is why I believe we

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 10>are seeing the bound going to the GUIs this is

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 10>what worries us at the moment. So I would say

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 10>that for the time being, nothing has been approved from

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 10>the Parliament in Germany. So the situation still remains quite

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 10>quite fluid. So we take called staying cautious on the

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 10>risks set.

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 2>If you were at the guard press conference, one question

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 2>would you ask the.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 10>ECB quantitative titaning? What are you going to do on that?

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 10>Because on cutting rates this is something that was a

0:20:47.520 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 10>consensus view.

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:51.720
<v Speaker 3>But news I.

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Find this absolutely extraordinary. How should the United States respond?

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 2>This is all of a sudden, Europe are destiny nation

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>for marginal investment? I mean a Monday, What do you

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 2>tell American clients today of the action of the White

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 2>House has changed this whole dialogue.

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, to us, it really goes back to the consequence

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 10>on the other classes, so on rates, on the currency,

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.720
<v Speaker 10>so on the US dollar. Honestly, we are shorter the

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 10>US dollar longer Europe because we do expect the US

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 10>dollar to progressively depreciate. In the past, it was because

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 10>of the FED. We thought that the FED action and

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 10>the asynchrony between FED and the ECB would have led

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 10>to depreciating currency. But this is what I think the

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 10>US administration wants. They want a weaker a US dollar.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, just looking at the German ten year boomed. Just

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:55.959
<v Speaker 5>you know since February twenty eighth, when was it two

0:21:56.000 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 5>point four percent. We're now our two point eighty six percent,

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 5>So big, big move up in German yields. Is the

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 5>expectation within with you and your clients, UH and investors

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.399
<v Speaker 5>in Europe that this backing away from monsterity is a

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 5>good thing for the European economy.

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.640
<v Speaker 10>It is as long as the increase in the death

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 10>spending goes into improving growth. So we are talking about

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 10>a country that has a sixty percent that to GDP ratio,

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 10>which is honestly, it's not issues Germany. This is Germany.

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 3>You are well over one hundred.

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 10>I'm talking about Germany. So if spending on infrastructure this

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 10>is going to be growth constructive. On military expenses, that

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 10>multiplier might be a little bit low lower.

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 2>So I got to get to say, we're going to

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 2>go to the news here in the United States Monica.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 2>But I think this is just so question is so important.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 2>So Spain expands their debt, Germany expands their dead, which

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 2>is like Mississippi expanding its dead in Michigan. To the

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 2>Guard's point, where is the fiscal union they will affect

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 2>this efficiently.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't see it. Well.

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 10>What we need to understand is how the framework will

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 10>be fully deployed, because if it goes down to the nations,

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 10>so this is where the issue will be. And not

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:28.359
<v Speaker 10>all the countries will spend at the same size at

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 10>the same time, just because they have different needs. So

0:23:31.160 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 10>the issue might be eventually to have an umbalanced Europe

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 10>with some countries that have been spending more Poland, Germany

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 10>and some that have less room.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 6>Let's see what the commissioners.

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:48.719
<v Speaker 10>Today will vote on the escape rule, just to allow

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 10>some more spaces to the countries, to the state members.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 2>So if we ever do a remote tour Dejan right

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 2>there on the front and overlooking the river, can you.

0:23:58.720 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Join us there?

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Sure there are It would be like lunchtime.

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Yanks, Harris. We could do lunch, you.

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Know, we'll do the deck of the Hausler and then

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll do.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 3>Lisa. It's perfect mound of defect travel guide for Europe.

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Head of a Monday investment at Racist.

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Listen live each weekday

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>starting at seven am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android Auto.

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 4>With the Bloomberg Business.

0:24:34.880 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>App, you can also watch us live every weekday on

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 3>Now a four hour conversation with Henrietta Trey.

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 2>She's been so kind to be with us on like

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:49.239
<v Speaker 2>a three day basis here with BEDA partners. Henriette, I

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 2>actually do have a countdown clock going for the first time.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 3>We're eight days away from March fourteenth. Within the halls.

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Of Congress, Democrats and Republicans buffeted by the company of News.

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 2>What's the path you see to I believe it's March

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 2>fourteenth at midnight.

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.960
<v Speaker 11>It is March fourteenth at midnight, but on the House

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 11>side it's really March twelfth, because they are going on

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 11>recess on that day.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:19.680
<v Speaker 8>So what it looks to me like is.

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 11>The House Republican Conference and the Senate Republicans are really

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 11>trying to jam Democrats here by putting a bill out

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 11>at the last minute that they will not support on

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 11>the House side, but then Senate Democrats will be forced

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 11>to support and vote for sometime midweek next week, around

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 11>the eleventh or twelfth, So they're really cutting it down

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 11>to the wire. And we've increased our odds from twenty

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 11>percent to twenty five percent that we might see a

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 11>shut down next week as a result.

0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so they shut down, and let's say since sir

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 2>on recess, they shut down for Friday, Saturday, Sunday, OMG,

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Monday morning they reopen.

0:25:57.320 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Is that the scenario here, Innrietta?

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 11>Nope, They're also on re us the next week, so

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 11>it would be a shutdown of you know, at a minimum.

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Does an adult in the room say hey, everybody on

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 2>recess and get back to work?

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Does that? Has that ever happened?

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 11>I'm sure it has happened in history, but it's not

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 11>something that usually does occur. That's sort of why my

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 11>odds are relatively low that we see a shutdown is

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 11>because they usually develop a last minute solution. But as

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 11>for strategy, right now, Republicans are not in the room

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 11>with Democrats. They're in the room with themselves trying to

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 11>jam Democrats. And that's going to come into a math

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 11>problem when we get over the Senate and they need

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.160
<v Speaker 11>seven Democratic votes to keep the government open.

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 8>So it's sort of the run up to the eleventh hour.

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.760
<v Speaker 5>Right now, what have we heard from the White House

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 5>in this whole process?

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Here?

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 11>The White House, and by that I mean Elon Musk,

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 11>who was with House Republicans yesterday and really trying to

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 11>figure out how to get the DOGE cuts implemented into

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 11>any kind of a permanency. You know, we're seeing cuts

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 11>across all kinds of agencies. Trump is planning to announce

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 11>who's shuttering the Department of Education later on today, as

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 11>I think y'all reported, you know, they're they're working just

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 11>with Republicans and really enjoying this situation where Democrats are

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 11>just being whipsawed back and forth with no clear direction

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:19.400
<v Speaker 11>on how to combat them.

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:22.880
<v Speaker 5>So talk to us about you've mentioned in the past, Henrietta,

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 5>about the Democrats in this budget process may be the

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 5>time when they can actually step up and be heard

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 5>here because it seems like President Trump and to a

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 5>lesser extent, Elon must take all the oxygen out of

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 5>the room. Is this an opportunity for the Democrats to

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 5>step up and assert some leadership or at least their position.

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 11>It's definitely an opportunity, but as yet they do not

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 11>have a clear and unified path forward. So right now

0:27:49.720 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 11>their ire is all focused on DOGE, and it seems

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.679
<v Speaker 11>like the main concessions they're asking for is cuts to Doge.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 11>But as we saw in the week of the State

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 11>of the Union address earlier this week, the Republican voter

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:02.919
<v Speaker 11>base really supports the idea of dog even if they

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 11>don't support the actual cuts that are coming. So Democrats

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 11>are having a hard time coalescing around how exactly to

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 11>ran doje in and get the voters behind it. They

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.479
<v Speaker 11>don't like the cuts, but they haven't identified, you know,

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:20.120
<v Speaker 11>a clear flag that they can weave that can get

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 11>Trump to move off in this position.

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 2>And all you're Henrietta Tray's brilliance. I mean, you said,

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 2>I believe the Senate seven Democrats have to vote with

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 2>the Republicans.

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Is that what you said?

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Yep?

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 8>But this has to get sixty votes in the Senate side.

0:28:35.200 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, why would any Democrat now vote with the Republicans?

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 8>I completely agree with that assessment.

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 11>The question is whether they can stomach shutting the government

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 11>down and the way that Trump is going into this.

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 2>But to be cynical about it, isn't that what sixteen

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 2>hundred Pennsylvania Avenue ultimately.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 8>Would like exactly?

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 11>And so this is sort of plying right into Trump's hand,

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 11>and Democrats threat is to say, if you don't negotiate

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 11>with us, we will shut it down.

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 8>And Trump's effectively saying and so I don't care.

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Jeez, that's how that's where we are.

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 5>Hey, let's just switch gears a little bit, Henrietta Beda Partners.

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 5>You guys have any tariff odds tractor A?

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:19.600
<v Speaker 9>What is it?

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 3>And B?

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 5>What's it telling me of these days?

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 8>Oh? Sure?

0:29:22.640 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 11>You know, our clients are all hedge funds and they

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 11>want the you know, quick and dirty of how things

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 11>are working and what we're expecting. Everybody's just trying to

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 11>wrap their arms around the realm of the possible. And

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 11>so when we put our odds tracker out, we cover

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 11>a whole host of different components. Odds of tariffs on China,

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 11>you know, virtually one hundred percent. Obviously those are going

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 11>into effect. We're at twenty percent now. Odds on Canada

0:29:45.600 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 11>VERSUS Mexico are slightly lower. I think the odds of

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 11>EU auto tariffs have been and continue to be very high,

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:54.800
<v Speaker 11>and I want that to be really clear cut every

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 11>time we talk to clients. You know, EU auto tariffs

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 11>I think are coming. There's a per catalyst for that.

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 11>On April first, the March thirty first deal that Ambassador

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 11>Tie negotiated with the EU, and the under the Biden

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 11>administration expires on March thirty first, So April first is

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 11>the date that Trump used in his America First trade agenda,

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 11>and it's not coincidental, it's exactly in line with the

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 11>expiration there. So our hotstracker really just tries to get

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 11>to the heart of the matter. Tariffs are coming. They

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 11>are in place. There might be some staggered effects, but

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 11>they are coming.

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Henrietta, thank you so much.

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Just Treasure the frequent visit tendri outa Trey's expert on

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 2>all this with ATA partners.

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:44.280
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>watch us live on YouTube.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 2>The newspapers, the headlines, she reads twenty of them. To

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 2>get ready for this, Lisa Mintaio joins us.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 3>What do you have this one?

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 11>All right?

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 9>We'll starting with the Wall Street Journal because it has

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 9>a look into how more Americans are relying on their

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 9>four to one k as like this Rainy Day fund,

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 9>and they're using it to avoid things like big things foreclosure,

0:31:07.560 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 9>to pay medical bills. This was according to Vanguard. So

0:31:10.560 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 9>the number is four point eight percent of account holders

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 9>took early withdrawals last year just for those reasons. So

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 9>it was a record high. But they say why it's

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 9>happening more is because more employers are automatically enrolling their workers,

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 9>and some of them, I mean have little savings to

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 9>begin with. So now part of their paycheck is going

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 9>into this other savings and now they need to use

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 9>that to help pay for these like other things.

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 2>A high ground on this. He and I have argued

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 2>about it. I'm pretty firm here and there should be

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 2>no withdrawals. It's it's a sireene call. Everybody does it

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and it makes no sense in terms of the actual

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>assumption and the failure of our retirement SYS.

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 3>What do you think?

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 9>But then where do you go?

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean I don't know. I mean it's it's

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 5>it's you have to do for one K because there's

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.000
<v Speaker 5>no such intension anymore. So all the swinging offspring works,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 5>they're putting their max into four and just having to

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 5>deal with it.

0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 3>In the mat. At least folks get the map.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 2>But Lisa it's a huge deal for the contribution.

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 9>It is because people are a strapped for cash and

0:32:10.000 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 9>if you want to do something buy a home, you

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 9>need something, like you really want to do it, you

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 9>don't have the money. So where are you going to go?

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:17.840
<v Speaker 9>You go where you actually do have it, and you

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 9>were tired.

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:19.240
<v Speaker 3>People are living longer.

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Boston College has great work on this. There's a

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 2>tip point forty two years old. Yeah, after forty two

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 2>years old, people are like, oh, I'm getting older, Lisa,

0:32:27.520 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't understand this. But those under forty two like

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.360
<v Speaker 2>you are just like, I don't care. I'll take a

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>loan out. Nobody cares.

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 9>Next, Okay, this one, okay, I'm fine.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I go before I get a gluten free coffee. Don't

0:32:41.440 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 3>it thrown at me?

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 9>Yes, thank you. I'm a little biased on this next one.

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 9>So Duayne the Rock Johnson is back on top as

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 9>Hollywood's highest paid actor. Okay, get this twenty twenty four

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.400
<v Speaker 9>eighty eight million dollars. This was in boardroom. If you

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 9>go on their Instagram page, it's all rotten down. So

0:32:59.440 --> 0:33:02.880
<v Speaker 9>why Okay, he pulled in fifty million from Red One.

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 9>Red One.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.760
<v Speaker 3>Watched the Mississippi.

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 5>He's a voice actor.

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 3>It's a voice thing.

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 9>No, that was a lot like he was actually an

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 9>actor for that. That was for the Red One. So

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 9>it was like the biggest fee plus by ideal streaming history. Okay,

0:33:17.760 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 9>so put it there. Then we get to Mwana I.

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 9>I mean that's where the big money was too. It

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 9>switched from the TV series theatrical. He got a big

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 9>cut of the box office as an executive producer and

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 9>that doesn't really happen. So that's how it came down

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 9>to a two money.

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 5>He past one billion dollars. Oh yeah, you saw that coming.

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 9>Most definitely he can buy me like fifty. And finally,

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:46.840
<v Speaker 9>this one, I'm pulling an audible audible, I'm moving this

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 9>one up for you. Tom the CEO of Air France.

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.160
<v Speaker 9>He sat down with the Financial Times right and he

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 9>said that they are banking on wealthy American tourists who

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 9>spend on fashion brands hotels in Paris to help them

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 9>recover from this tough year. Okay. He said they're shifting

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 9>their business model to focus on this premium and market.

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 9>So he gave an example. He said some Americans are

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 9>paying as much as fifty thousand dollars a night for

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 9>the biggest suite of the Bristol Hotel. Yeah, right there

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 9>you get the If you want the cheaper option, it's

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 9>two thousand a night, Tom, So that's a bargain.

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 2>I just booked the last week of the year two

0:34:24.320 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago, and I was lucky.

0:34:26.160 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 3>I got a run.

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 2>That's how bad it is. Of course, Paul is is

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:38.280
<v Speaker 2>is this about the European planes, not just near France,

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.879
<v Speaker 2>or is it about how uneven the services on the

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 2>American place?

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Which is I don't have an opinion.

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 9>I don't know, but interesting I think.

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.279
<v Speaker 5>That, you know, the business class over Europe is from

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 5>the American airlines is good. They got the life flat beds.

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 5>Have to get that, a boy, they charged for that.

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, and what about the airline tickets, because Tom, do

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 9>you know Air Francis they're charging twenty four thousand dollars

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 9>for a return first class ticket between New York and Paris.

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:07.520
<v Speaker 9>That's in April. Can you believe that?

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Lisa Matteo, I hate you, missus the rock

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean eighty eight million.

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.280
<v Speaker 5>Sure he can afford it. He's not flying commercial.

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.479
<v Speaker 3>Lisa Matteo, thank you so much.

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>On the newspapers, this is the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast, available

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday, seven to ten am Eastern on

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal