WEBVTT - Peter Kenny: Could See A 5% Correction Before Election (Audio)

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Global business news twenty four hours a day. If Bloomberg

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com, the radio plus mobile act and on your radio.

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>This is a Bloomberg Business Flash from Bloomberg World Headquarters.

0:00:14.360 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Charlie Pallat of the DAL. The SMP nastac all

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>trading higher right now. That are reserve meeting minutes, quelling

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>speculation that borrowing costs could rise as soon as next month.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got the SMP five hundred index higher by four

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>points right now eighty two, a gain of two tenths

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of one percent. Those minutes, by the way, showed officials

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>were divided in July over the urgency to raise interest

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>rates again. The Dow up twenty six points, up one

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.480
<v Speaker 1>tenth of one percent, NASTACK up a point a little

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 1>change there, up by less than point one percent. The

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Tenure up five thirty seconds, had yield one point five

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>five percent. Gold down four ninety the ounce the thirteen

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>forty seven, a drop there of four tenths of one percent.

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Crude Oil West Texas Intermediate up thirty one cents forty

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>six eighty nine of barrel. Again they are of seventh

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>cents of one percent. I'm Charlie Pellet and dance a

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business flash. Thank you Charlie Pellett. It's time now

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>for the E t F Report. It is brought to

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>you by E t F Exchange sixteen b n Y

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Melon's Annual E t F Symposium September twenty one in

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Dana Point, California. This essential conference is complementary for I

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>R R I A S, but space is limited. Register

0:01:25.319 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>now at b n y melon dot com slash e

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>t F. Let's go to Katherine Cowdery for the Exchange

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Traded Fund Report. Money is pouring into e t s

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>this month billion dollars in the US in the first

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>half of August. Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Eric Baltuna says it

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 1>continues a breakneck call of sixty eight billion dollars since

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the end of June. Is this goldilocks environment, right, You've

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>got breaksit behind you, and you've got decent economic news

0:01:52.400 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>but not too good and so there's really just no

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>fear of the Fed. And plus I don't think there's

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>anybody thinking they're going to raise before the election. Bell

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Junas as a flows are showing that investors are indulging

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>their risk on appetite as more than ten different small

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>cap e t f s have taken in money. In August,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going all the way. Small cap ets took in

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 1>two point five billion, and about a dozen of them

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>saw flows. So this tells me they're really all in

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. E t s that focus on industrial companies

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>are leading all sectors and flows. So far this month,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.359
<v Speaker 1>they've taken in eight one million dollars. One of the reasons,

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Beltuna says performance the industrial select sector Spidery t F

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is up five percent since July. That's your Bloomberg ETF report.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Katherine Cowdery. This is taking Stock with Kathleen Hayes

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and Grim Fox on Bloomberg Radio. Well, stocks are fluctuating,

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.119
<v Speaker 1>still trying to figure out what to watch. The FED

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.320
<v Speaker 1>minutes did show a FED somewhat divided. As I've been

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>talking to people on the show today along with my

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>co host Pim Fox and looking at research notes, I'm

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>seeing that some people are saying they appear slightly more hawkish.

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.639
<v Speaker 1>Some people are saying they're more held back by inflation.

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Question is, though, what does this mean for the stock market?

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>And as we watched so many of the retailers following

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>short are we seeing signs that some weakness in the

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:15.359
<v Speaker 1>macro economy is spilling over into the business economy. We're

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>very happy to be joined now by Peter Kenny, senior

0:03:17.560 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>market strategist at Global Markets Advisory Group. Uh, Peter, welcome,

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Kathleen. So uh just here quickly. From the

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>stock market view, from the investing view, we got these

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>f onm C minutes. They didn't know how weak the

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>GDP was with the second jobs report. Do you just

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>put them on the back burner and say next or

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>does this? Is there something you take away for the

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>stock market well? As far as the markets concerned, what

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing from the Fed and from the interest rate

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>conversation or landscape is that we're likely to see much

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of the same unchanged outlook. In other words, we're seeing

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>very mixed economic performance and a very divided f o

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>MC that provides for an unchanged view moving forward, and

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that has provided for some significant risk on allocation of

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>resources into equities. And that's a concern because we're seeing

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 1>pe ratios well above historical averages. The Dow Industrials, transports,

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and utilities have all seen a meaningful uptick in the

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>in the price ratings ratio over the last twelve months

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>and are are well into an area where we have

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>historically seen a pullback. We're also seeing the same sort

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>of themes in the Russell two thousand, nastac one s

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred. So as far as I'm concerned,

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>this risk on appetite, which has driven valuations higher than

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>they've historically been, is some cause for concern, But we're

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>not seeing anything on the part of the FED which

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.919
<v Speaker 1>is indicating that we should expect an economic slowdown. The

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>issue for the FED is interest rates, and interest rates

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>is not something that they can really engage in in

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>September in terms of a race, it's not going to happen,

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>And if it's not in September, it's not going to

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>be before the elections, which means does it happen in December.

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>That's far enough off in terms of the calendar for

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>investors to not really have to focus on it. Peter,

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>where's the money coming from that pushes stocks hire? Is

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that the retail investor? Or? Is it institutions? I think

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:24.479
<v Speaker 1>it's institution and PIM I think it's institutional institutions. Globally,

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the US equity market is seeing a really significant influx

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>of capital from around the world for very very clear reasons,

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>whether it is the dividend field on US corporate issues,

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's the likelihood or the perspective prospects of

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 1>an increase in prices of equities. This is the most

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>relatively attractive place to be putting your money to work,

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>globally speaking. And you know, just look at negative rates

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, in EU are largely in some pockets of

0:05:58.080 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the EU, and you're seeing that this the U S

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>equity market is the is the landscape that global investors

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 1>are more than willing to put their money to work

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>at because of the relative attractiveness and ren yields. So

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>if that's the case, then we are Do you say,

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>which of these three? Do you say stocks continue to rise,

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>UM as A B spasses it? Do you say, oh, well,

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, back and forth. You know, global investors

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>want invest here. On the other hand, you know the

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>earnings have been that great or is there a third

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>possibility that stocks drive down? I mean, is the is

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>this global demand for anything that looks better than anything

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.400
<v Speaker 1>else going to be a much of a driver for

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 1>this a year? Yeah, certainly, in the last of those

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>three options, I think is the most likely, and this

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is why UM equity markets have historically not been able

0:06:55.640 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 1>to whole evaluations UH as measured by P north of

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty for extended periods of time. And I think that

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we've seen over the last two weeks a real slowdown

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in activity in terms of volume and turnover, and we've

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 1>seen a real moderation in terms of price gains. The

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>post Brexit rally has run its run its course. We're

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>now in a post Brexit rally mentality in terms of

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the broader street, and we're seeing that there's no compelling

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>reason at these valuations to put much capital at risk,

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in spite of the fact that the global environment does

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>continue to sort of fuel the allocation events of cash

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>into US equities and US corporate debt UM. I do

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>think that we've kind of reached an equilibrium. The goldilocks

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>scenario that many have spoken about is going to add

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>best provide for very modest, very incremental returns from here

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>until we we hit some to sort of a real

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>pivot point in terms of volatility, which will of course

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>drive prices two more historically based valuations. Peter, You've got

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.559
<v Speaker 1>to simplify it for me because I just keep thinking

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that one of the reasons that stocks go up is

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that somebody buys them. And I was looking at US companies.

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>They've reduced their stock buy backs to the lowest level

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>in four years. This is a report from the stock

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>research firm trim Tabs. If you have US companies not

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>buying back their stock, combine that with what you've just

0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>described as this perhaps overvalued stock market because of the

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>pe levels. What happens when we get maybe a five

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>to correction. Let's assume that that takes place, how many

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>people go under and what happens next. I do think

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>that that takes place. I would not at all be

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>surprised to see a five percent pull back between now

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and the elections, possibly more. And I do think it's

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be predicated upon a lack of corporate by backs,

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>which has been a huge driver of price appreciation and

0:09:03.600 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>equity markets, and coupled with extended evaluations. In that case,

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to wait to see that. Where

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the dust clear is because a lot of this volatility

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that we have coming up on us, certainly before the election,

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to be as a result of the elections,

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and based on the outcome of those elections, we're gonna

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a much more clarity as to what

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate scenario looks like going forward and what

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the corporate guidance looked looks like going forward. My sense

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is that we do get that bull back. My senses

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that it represents an opportunity because I think over the

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>next twelve months, the S and P five is likely

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to gain somewhere between six and a half and seven percent.

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>That's so that would take us up to gosh, how

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>far do the math quickly for me, Peter, the math

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>would get us to uh twenty, that's not bad today. Yeah,

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean you certainly beat the return you'd get holding

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different kinds of bonds, that's for certain.

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>And so in the longer term twelve months, I'm I'm

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>actually quite confident, okay, okay, So give me a longer

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.480
<v Speaker 1>term play. What are some names or that you would

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that you would buy now or hold onto now because

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>look out over the election divide and you can you

0:10:21.200 --> 0:10:23.679
<v Speaker 1>know you'll hold onto it make some money. Okay, So

0:10:24.480 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I would when you starting to reverse mining's miners, uh,

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>they've had a huge run. I look for them to moderate,

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>truckers and parts, huge run moderate, food meets and products

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>huge run moderate. So the stocks that I think will

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 1>likely outperform in the next twelve months are at the industrials,

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>medical stocks, pharma, and housing. UM. I think that you're

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to see all rotation into those names,

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that they will lead the market higher.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much, Peter Kenny. He is a senior market

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>strategists Global Marks Advisory Group. Is also an independent market

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>strategist at Kenny and Co. We're gonna take you through

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to the clothes on Wall Street. This is taking Stock.

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Pim Fox my coast. Kathleen Hayes, this is Bloomberg.