WEBVTT - Surveillance: Subway Shooting with Mayor Adams

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene, along

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>with Jonathan Ferrell and Lisa Brownwitz Jay Lee. We bring

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>you insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and of course, on the Bloomberg Terminal. A

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>conversation this morning with the Mayor of New York. Based

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on the briefing I'm from my law enforcement officials and

0:00:38.159 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 1>based on the evidence that we were able to accumulate,

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he has now been upgraded to a suspect and we're

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>asking all New york Is to assist us in his apprehension.

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>H please do not approach him. If you see him,

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or if you know about his you know his whereabouts,

0:00:55.600 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>please notify law enforcement. Can you tell us what you

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and all of your staff have learned about Mr James

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>in the last six or seven hours. Well, you know

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>this is moving and is extremely fluid of There is

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a host of evidence that we have been recovering of

0:01:13.680 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the NYPD, the FBI, as well as our state law

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>enforcement entities have all collaborated together. I cannot say enough

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>about the fast of growth that you have you are

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>witnessing of. They had to piece together this case, from

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the band arrival here to the city, to the devices,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>things that we collected. They're doing a great job in

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>bringing this person to justice. Mayor, I want to talk

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>here about what we're gonna do. As Governor Hoco said

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 1>about crime, you know the numbers in Chicago, you don't

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>know the numbers here. I would say that you are

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>arguably the most qualified politician in the nation with your

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>experience from Bushwick years ago, after where you are now

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this First, I'm cameras in amendments and

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>civil liberties and all that London is covered with cameras

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>after terror events. Is this the tipping point where New

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>York City one fifth of the cameras of London, begins

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to monitor the public like London. Well, I think that

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I've been talking about this since the time I took office.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>In January. I sent to my deputy mayor public safety

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>across the globe to find out, how are we protecting

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>human beings throughout the entire globe. And we are not

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>going to sit back and allow this technology to exist

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and not protect the people of the city. And we're

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to explore it. Mayor Adams, you also

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>had put more police forces into subway stations to protect

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the people of the city, given that this is just

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one in a series of events that have unfolded over

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the last year during the pandemic, even in subway stations,

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>acts of violence. Clearly that failed yesterday. I know you've

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>said you given yourself an incomplete on crime in the

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>first one hundred days of your campaign. Is that incomplete

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>looking more like a failure, less like anything of semblance

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of a passing grade. Well, we should be clear. We've

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 1>been here before, as New York is. You know, I

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>often talk about my mid eighties when I started into

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>transit police ironically, and I'm aware of what it takes

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>to turn around generational poverty, generational crisis, that violence in

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>our cities. And then we cannot ignore the over proliferation

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:37.560
<v Speaker 1>of guns. Uh No, NYPD. My administration has not failed.

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>We have removed eighteen hundred guns up the streets of

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>our cities since being elected. Think about that. You are

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>experts at the study of games. On January four, you

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>stated you showed up at a press conference and said,

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we gotta do something about gangs. These kids three dead

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last twenty four hours, not the headlines like Brooklyn,

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>but three days on Gates Avenue, on the Avenue, on

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Laconia Avenue. What are we gonna do about the gangs

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that pull these kids into crime and violence at a

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>zero And it's called precision policing, not just throwing out

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a wide net. Having a precision approach to those who

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>are trigger police and violent gangs. That is at the

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>heart of our crisis. Uh, they're the mayor of New

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>York City and an important conversation and we really need

0:04:28.880 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 1>to be abundantly clear that we had a headline at

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that moment of the apprehension of the suspect, and that

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>was corrected by ABC or sorry for that. That happens

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>within the news flow that we have, as you know

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg surveillance. We've done everything we can to speak

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>to experts into people who have lived so much of

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>continental Europe and this new war. It is our honor

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:57.720
<v Speaker 1>now to speak to Nina Krascheva, professor of International Affairs

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at the New School, with the hair didge of her

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>family far and back to World War Two. And you know,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't have time to go into the story of

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.559
<v Speaker 1>your family coming out of the death of I believe

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>your grandfather in World War Two. But we can speak

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>to you with your academics at New School, your work

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>at Princeton, of the mind of Vladimir Putin. As we've

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>talked to Angela Stent, you have studied Putin and his

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>affair with not the Russia the Soviet Union of Christeff

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but the Russia and Soviet Union of Stalin. What is

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the distinction of how Vladimir Putin looks at the early

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union. Well, we thank you very much. We know

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.479
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't like the early Soviet Union because he

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thinks it was an interruption of great imperial history when

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union was trying to become part of its

0:05:55.640 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>own self, sort of as Stallion put it, um country

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>within its own nation. So socialism or communism with um

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>within one taken country Putin wants to be. And I

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>disagree with a lot of experts who say he wants

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to recreate the Soviet Union. He actually wants to go

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>back into history thousand years and the only reason he's

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>interested in study, well, one of the reasons he's interested

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 1>in studed because Studin was a gather of lands such

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as Catherine the Great, right such just Peter the Great.

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>So he was a gather of lands, and he sees

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>cruse Chef as somebody who gave away those lands. And

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>if you need to be very brutal and very firm

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and very angry at the world together lands, Putin is

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be that. Mr Kristcheff was very much affiliated

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 1>with Poland in the news this morning, Professor Kristcheva is Finland.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I refuse to believe that Vladim and Putin will not

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>focus on Finland, given this heritage of Leningrad and St. Petersburg.

0:06:59.279 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>What is the embolism to Mr Putin of this new

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>independence of Sweden and the eight under mild border of Finland. Well,

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>it is you know, originally the Russians were saying, well,

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not afraid of Finland and Sweden becoming part of

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>NATO because we have good relationship with them. I think

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the tone may be changing, but I think what's important

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>here is that Putin trying to prevent NATO from expanding east,

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in fact made NATO even more expensional in in the

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>East and that in the East, and that's that's what

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>should really give them pause on the other hand, what

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I also know about Puttin is that once you challenge him,

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>he's going to challenge back. So I think that it's

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about time for Sweden and Finland to think about NATO,

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>because if Putin gets angry, he does get angry, and

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we did. We do see it. We we've seen it

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and we do see it in Ukraine. Now, Nina, does

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>this end with regime change in Russia? Well, this is

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a very terrifying words to say, because we go to

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>prison for this for even utter those words. Um No,

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it does. Uh, it may get less toxic,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>because Puttin is toxic. But I do think that. I mean,

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>what happened now, and we've never seen it before, even

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>under Stallion, because now the KGB over that security Forces,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the FSB and Putting they are one and the same.

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Even on the Stallion they were sort of on parallel tracks.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>But starting with the brutal Dictator and f F KGB

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh it was a different name then, but security forces

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>worked for him. Now Putting works with He is the

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>security force. And so in this sense, even if the

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>main hydroid at the top of it is the main dragon,

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is gone, the system will remain the system is not

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>going to give itself up, so maybe they would be

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>slightly better relationship with outside world. But for the Russians,

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it really doesn't look good inside. Well, let's talk about

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>inside Russia, professor. Does domestic feeling within Russia a have

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a bearing on the Kremlin or on Vladimir Putin's decision

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>making whatsoever? And be what is that feeling at this moment? Well,

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it was. It's really very interesting what happened because at

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the beginning was such a shock on February twenty and

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about fifty one of the country was just terrified, horrified,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people went, as you remember, went

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>to protest, and then the state completely regrouped and basically

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>any word of opposition now became a crime. Everything is

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>a crime. People just stopped in the streets. My niece

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>was arrested three times. Uh stopped and asked why are

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>you here when you're um when your passport shows that

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you live in an entirely different part of part of Moscow.

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>So it is like that, I mean, it's very stealininless

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, and so slowly but surely, with also great

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>propaganda on TV that we are liberating with the Russian

0:09:56.760 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>liberate our Ukrainian brothers from Nazi regime installed by the

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>United States and NATO. Then now about support they as

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they call it special Operation. I mean, the numbers are fudge,

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but there is a lot of patriotism. And one of

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the patriotism part is because the sanctions now and not

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just financial and economic, they are cultural, they are society,

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>they're humanitarian and everything, and so Russians have no other

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>choice but to rally around the flat. Professor, I've got

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds. We saw Vladimir Putin yesterday at the Cosmo

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Drome in the far east of Russia. Is he healthy?

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of rumors once again, a lot of rumors.

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.199
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't look sick to me, but the people do,

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.559
<v Speaker 1>saying that the reason he went into Ukraine sort of

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>follow up the cliff so quickly and on Februar, because

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>he's rushing for something. I don't know that, but they're rumors.

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>For Nina Kristcheffer, thank you so much for joining Bloomberg

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>this morning, Professor kristef at the New School UH here

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in New York City, and of course, with their heritage

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>age across so many decades of the Soviet Union in

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the Russian Federation. We're now gonna do what we do

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>best at Bloomberg Surveillance, and that is speak to someone

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>truly expert. Stephen Englanders, Global head of G ten FX

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Research at Standard Charter. They have a fantastic Bill Winter's

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>remit to look at emerging markets and particularly the Pacific

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>rim up to Japan. Stephen Englander, thank you so much

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>for joining us this morning. The ramifications of a weaker

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Japanese yen now at one out to one thirty. What

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>does that do to the degrees of freedom that Powell

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and Laguard have? How does weak yen redound back to

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>and unraveling of the yen red down back to America?

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 1>In Europe, well, I'd say that the yend is the

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>very optional along with the euro where the central banks

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>have some ambiguity with respect to how hockey is they

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be. In fact, the the b o J's

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>downright dubbish ecbats kind of on offense. UM. I don't

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to change very much what the Fed does. UM.

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the impact on US inflation or global

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:27.720
<v Speaker 1>growth is that strong. Um And the end is weakness

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is probably partly reflecting Chinese economic growth weakness, and the

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Governor Coroda's adamant insistence that they can

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>continue the same kind of policy with Japanese rates drifting

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>further and further away from everyone else's. It is such

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>an artificiality, particularly with this phrase of buying their own

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>paper on board at the Bank of Japan. The standard

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 1>charter view on this is Japan something that will amend

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in a melleable way to the shocks of weekend and

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.199
<v Speaker 1>all around it. In this experiment of y s C

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>or do you worry that something could snap, Well, I'd

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>say we're not very exciting about the continuation of y

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 1>c C under current circumstances. Um. We we don't see

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a huge benefit to Japan from a weaker yen at

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>this point in a world where um growth is is

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of limited by supply, having a weaker currency doesn't

0:13:31.400 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>really increase your ability to supply more um. You just

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>pay more for imports. Now, in the case of Japan,

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the they've wanted to get their inflation up um, you know,

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>for many years, almost a decade or more. But the

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>problem is that they want to get domestic inflation up,

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not kind of make the population poorer because the port

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>costs are higher. So, you know, so we don't see

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of where this has ended. And I'm looking right

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>now at a very confusing picture when you take a

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:04.080
<v Speaker 1>look at the at the words from the Bank of Japan,

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Governor Quarta versus other authorities that are concerned about what

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you said, which is rising costs. Quota meanwhile is the

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>one who's doubling down uneasing policies and the sort of

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>yield curve control. At what point will there be a

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>break and will be he'd be forced to back away

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>from the purchases that Tom was talking about and really

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>pay more attention to the end. It may not be immediate. Um.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, in a number of places, the you know,

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the limit to how weak the currency can be in

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>g ten countries and sometimes how expensive it is to

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>travel abroad. But there's not that much of it now. Um.

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Quite possibly the erosion of real wages to Japan is

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>going to become a political issue down down the road,

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So that might end up being the limiting factor. And

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I think as um, you know, many have discussed. I mean,

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>y CC is great if it's kind of demand shocks

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that you're kind of trying to control and if your

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>forecast of developments are are good and it provides guidance

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>when circumstances have changed as much as they have. UM,

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not clear that y CC is the tool that

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that really gives you the flexibility that you need. Steve,

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned that part of the end weakness may have

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with the growth story in China, and it

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>strikes me that the b o J isn't the only

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>central bank we're talking about keeping policy easy while everyone

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 1>else is out there hawking. China is as well. We

0:15:30.880 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about China, uh, talking about further triple

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>our cuts if needed. Why aren't we seeing more weakness

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for unman B that we're seeing for the Japanese end. Well,

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's lots of moving parts for China. I

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>think that the entry of China into the global um,

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, financial system, the the opening up of China markets,

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>so there is capital inflow into China and the it's

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>very music. But you know the fact that they have

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>such a large trade surplus on an ongoing basis, UM,

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>they're just not spending much abroad. They usually travel a

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>lot or not and UM, you know, their current account

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>is strong and they have capital influence that usually you know,

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a good sign for the currency. Obviously. I

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>think that there's some concerns about the impact of the

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>latest COVID wave and their ability to UM grow and

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 1>how aggressive the policy easing is going to be, but

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>there's some tail winds to c n Y that you

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you can't ignore. Steve Angelders, thank you so much. Greatly appreciated.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>With Standard Charter Bank, we get a perspective, a change

0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>perspective on the American economy. Kathleen bus Johnstick joins us

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>right now. We are thrilled for that here with mixed

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>moments in the market. Kathy, thank you so much for

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us from Oxford Economics. Kathy, what has changed for

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you on the duration of high inflation in the last

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours. Thanks Tom, happy to be with you. Um.

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, the numbers really just confirm our view that

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we've had for a while now that inflation is untolerably high,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're hearing that from Fed officials. That's why they're

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>saying we need to get to neutral quickly and then

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>actually moved to restrictive. Now we're going to debate whether

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the peak and inflation for consumer prices that is is

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>in whether it was March or April May, and we

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's probably April. But nevertheless, the real issue is

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>how quickly does it decelerate um and and there I

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think most believe it's going to be much more gradually

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>than previously thought. And we still see headline inflation still

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 1>above five percent by the end of the year. So yes,

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit of a reprieve, but still really high

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and uncomfortably high for the Fed reserve. Kathleen, can you

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 1>make that help us understand that can action between pp

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I and cp I Basically the prices that consumers pay

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in stores when they go out to eat versus the

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>prices that producers have to pay and how much that

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>directly gets passed through to future inflation that people feel

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in the grocery store or when they go on a vacation.

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:21.239
<v Speaker 1>What do we have a sense of how direct and

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:25.880
<v Speaker 1>what the time is for that transmission. Yeah, so it's

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>a great question. And you know what we have seen

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 1>in this business, Suguli, So that's really different than the

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>prior decade is that Corporate America has really strong pricing power.

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's say if we went back five six years ago,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have hopefel prices would have won up, but

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>corporations would have had a hard time pass laying it

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>on to consumers and it would have erode it profit margins.

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>Now we're not really seeing that right Earnings. I know

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you've been speaking a lot about earnings for the last

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>few days. We're going to get the um the next

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 1>quarterly earnings data rolling out, But up until this point,

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 1>everything have actually been quite good and that's helped fuel

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the equity market. That's because Corporate America has pricing power

0:19:06.200 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and we see that many surveys. But Kathy, are we

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>starting to reach the limits of that? Lisa has brought

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it up a few times during the show bed Bath

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and beyond disappointing facing inflationary pressure, supply chain headwinds, and

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a headline just coming out from the company, they see

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a slowdown in consumer demand. If demand starts to deteriorate,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>consumers start to push back against higher prices, are less

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>tolerant of it. Is that the point we're at now,

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>we may be and that is the critical point of

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the cycle. Right we all know we're late cycle. How

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>late are we in the cycle and how much pressure

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on corporate profits. Right, So if you see input costs

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 1>still rising as a PPI data suggest unit labor costs,

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we know wage games are still high. If companies are

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>no longer able to pass it on as easily to consumers,

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>then it is gonna start to bite into corporate profit margins.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>There's no way around that, and we may be reaching

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>that point now. The consumers to us still look like

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 1>they're in really good shape, but remember they don't have

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>that fiscal stimulus, right, the checks that we're given out

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:11.439
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, that's gone, and now you really have

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:14.479
<v Speaker 1>to rely on private wage gains to really carry you

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>through and the expect savings. The real question really for

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>all of us when we fork I asked and look

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:20.880
<v Speaker 1>at this, is how much of that you know, two

0:20:20.920 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>point seven trillion worth of accumulated savings does the consumer

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>rely on? Kathy, We're also talking about an inflation surge

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>stemming from commodities, and this often has been thought of

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>as something that's temporary, transient, pick your poisonous word. How

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>much is that changing in an era where it does

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>seem like we are deglobalizing and it seems like these

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>shocks are all having the same impact even though they

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are very different in nature. Yeah, that is something that

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>could play out, you know, over the medium to long

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>term and it and it is a real potential game

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>changer to the backdrop um that globalization really brought in

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>disinflationary forces where it kind of capped overall price games.

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>If that's changing and praying on the ends, which it

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like it may be, that is very different. You know,

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>scenario doesn't necessarily it's hard to say, you know, we're

0:21:12.480 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly oil prices or or copper or where that will

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>play out. But what we can say is that you

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>know that disinflationary impulse could be behind us or economics.

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 1>This is a very confusing moment. I am here with

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Tom Keane, with Kaylee Lines. We are broadcasting both on

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>radio as well as on television at a delicate moment

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>where we're looking at earnings reflecting both strength when you

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>take a look at delta and the incredible demand, and

0:21:46.359 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>then you look at JP Morgan talking about increased credit

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>loss provisions as a result of some of this uncertainty.

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Peter Sheer has been passing through all of this and

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>has a fantastic view uh joining us right now, Peter

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sheer a orse I have with back economics with the

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>full view. What's your view on how we should read

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this moment. So I'm starting with equities. I think equities

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.640
<v Speaker 1>right now are to me an easier read. I expect

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>equity indust needs to go back to the pre March

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>fed lows. So I think we get back and retest that.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're gonna see ongoing pressure in the

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>equity markets. To me, that translates to pressure on credit spreads.

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think we see credit spreads wide in particularly

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the I G spector, which is held in pretty well

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>in the last month or so. And then finally on

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>treasury yields, it's a little bit more up in the air.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I really actually think the two year, three or four

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 1>year stage I want to be buying those. I think

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>those yields can head lower. I'm a little bit more

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.239
<v Speaker 1>confused in the tense to thirties. Peter, You're great at

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>looking across equities, bonds, currencies, commodities. I'm seeing tangible currency

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>signals of an unraveling with your almost hitting a one

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>oh seven. It's almost like a David focus landal moaning

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 1>from Deutsche Bank. With the depreciation we're seeing against the dollar.

0:22:57.000 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>From where you sit at the academy, is the system

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:05.239
<v Speaker 1>malieable now and functionable or do you look at it

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>with kinks or with breakpoints? So I think we're at

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.480
<v Speaker 1>this early stages of a real shift and how we

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have to think about Europe, how we have to think

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.320
<v Speaker 1>about dealing with autocratic nations, not just Russia, but also

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>China the Middle East. And I think that's creating this

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>new shift where you're getting the commodity nations and the

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>autocrats aligning with China because China is a massive consumer

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>of what they're selling, they need it. I think Europe

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>is going to struggle. I think you're gonna start seeing

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>all these second order effects and you don't know what

0:23:32.440 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be, whether it's gonna be car harnesses or

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>neon production. Europe is gonna have a lot of trouble,

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and food is going to be a problem over the

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>summer as well. So I think it makes sense to,

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, avoid European assets right now. Well, and when

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about food, that leads me to the idea

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of just higher prices across the board, higher input costs

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that companies are facing. You're starting to see that showing

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 1>up in earnings Bed Bath and Beyond. One example, it's

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>down about twelve at the opening bell after posting a

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>surprise lost warning of supply chain issues. And the interesting

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>line out of the company is they're starting to see

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>consumer demand taking a hit. Peter, are we reaching or

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>at the limit of the ability of these companies to

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>exercise pricing power and to pass costs on? Yeah, I

0:24:11.720 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's very exact here right now. People are just

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of getting hit left, right, and center right, whether

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it's gas, whether it's food, whether it's all the goods

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:19.879
<v Speaker 1>and services they're buying. So we're seeing that at the

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>same time, you're seeing mortgage rates go spike higher. So

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I think you could get this double whammy where consumers

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit spent out, they're tapped out, it's

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>getting too expensive for them to buy, and the housing

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>market could start turning very quickly. So that's why I

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 1>do think that the FAT is gonna be able to

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>maintain QUT, which is dangerous for stocks. I think they're

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>going to have to back pedal on all the rate

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.919
<v Speaker 1>hike talk though, because I think that economy is more

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>precarious than people are talking about and Peter, this is

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>perhaps reflected in the banking sector as well. As we

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.360
<v Speaker 1>passed through some of the earnings and take a look

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>at some of the opening bell moves. JP Morgan now

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>down uh substantially at one point down more than four percent.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Now down about three percent. But I was just looking,

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that is the lowest since January five, two twenty one.

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 1>For sspective, JP Morgan gained twenty five percent last year.

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>We have almost erased those gains. Peter, what is this

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>saying at a point when we are seeing a resteepening

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>in the yield curve and you're actually getting some income

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>for overnight rates. Well, what I think is people overestimate

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>what two s tends means for banks. Most banks are

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>fairly well hedged and that affects their income. But that's

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.199
<v Speaker 1>really slow and over time, where banks make a lot

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of their money is on transactions. And if you see

0:25:25.400 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that housing market slow, the number of re fives goes down,

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the number of you mortgages go down. I think that's

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.159
<v Speaker 1>a bigger hit if people start tapping out of their

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>credit cards and saying, hey, I better start paying this

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>off now because yields are getting too high. So I

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>think you could see a bit of a consumer lead

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>slow down, a housing led slowdown, and that to me

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>is much worse for bank earnings than anything to do

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 1>with two sends yield curve peter. A lot of people

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>will say this is an overbeared market. People have gotten

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so bearish and so down in the dump set of time,

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>when companies are still doing pretty well. How do you

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of pass through that noise which is real and

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>come up with some sort of conviction about the direction

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of travel. You know, I think it's very tricky. You

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>try and sit here and read the signs in the

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>page and get lucky, like yesterday morning, where we're telling people, okay,

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we're barish, but it felt like you really want to

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>pop after cp I, we got that that guy to

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a chance to reload. So you're managing that, and it

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:17.120
<v Speaker 1>does seem though it swings accessively to extremebarishnist to extreme bullishists.

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>One thing we spend a lot of time thinking about

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>is that there is very little liquidity either direction, right.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>We always think about no liquidity on the way down.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>There's no liquidity on the way up or down, which

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>means any signal you get is lost. So I think

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:29.639
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta be a little bit in nimbo. You're running

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:31.679
<v Speaker 1>smaller position size, and so I'm trading this from the

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Berry side, and again at the back of that you

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 1>look for long ideas. I want to be lawns some

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.120
<v Speaker 1>emerging markets, especially how it in South America. I love

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the oil and energy space. I think we are going

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 1>to spend so much money not only building out sustainable energy,

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but reinvesting and refocusing on traditional energy sources, the oil services,

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>those companies like that are going to do very, very well.

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>So there's opportunities within this whole kind of mess to

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>try and trade around. Peter. You know the Lehman Index,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg aggregate indexes, the credit index I believe is

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>down pretty much the largest draw down in history. That's

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>French Peter tiered academy for a bond bear market. I'm

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by the equity language. Do you buy the bond dip?

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 1>So I want to start shifting into some bombs. I

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>think you are going to see people looking at this

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and saying, Okay, this a little bit more permanent, and

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, when we had quantitative easy, what that does

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>is at every part of the point on the yield

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>curve and risker, someone gets pushed out, and I think

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>the reverse is gonna happen on the way back end. Peter.

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Come on, we're friends. We've been doing this a while. Peter.

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>You're an academy of securities. Your monthly statement is delivered

0:27:38.000 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>by carrier pigeon or whatever they do. You know, you're

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of davy guys. Great, I'm looking at my

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>monthly statement and I'm self three years yield or four

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>years yield. You're telling me to buy the dip. First off,

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:55.639
<v Speaker 1>I think on the retail side, everyone just keeps contributing

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to a G G and B n D monthly. It's

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in there for one case, I think already seen a

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of selling pressures. When you look at the e

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:03.639
<v Speaker 1>p s, there's a lot of men already a lot

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:05.479
<v Speaker 1>of outflows. So I think people are able to reload

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's the institutional investors that are driving. I

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>think people are starting to take a little bit of

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a niblett yields here. What does that mean for the

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 1>equity market, Peter? When it didn't seem to blink at

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>yield at two and three quarters of a percent, are

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.440
<v Speaker 1>we going to reach the point where it does indeed

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.120
<v Speaker 1>blink and the Tina thesis is called into question. Yeah,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we're at that stage right now. I think

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we're already seeing that where if you tackle a bitcoin right,

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>it keeps struggling, and as yields go higher risk assets.

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the the higher risk text stocks right,

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>they've done worse. So I think you're seeing people repriced

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>risk and they're focused on steady growth, they're focused on dividends,

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>they're looking for opportunity, they're looking for energy. So I

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna again, I'm not comfortable with equities until

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>they get back to both the March levels of this year,

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>which for most coincides with one level. So I think

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that's where we get back. It's another you know something

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>on the SMP maybe a bit lower. That's where I

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>can get constructive again. What's going to be the leadership

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to the downside if that makes sense, Peter? What what

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 1>creates the drag? What area of the equity market in particular?

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's still gonna be this, you know,

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the big high tax stocks where people question the valuations,

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>where people say, well, you know what, we've got a

0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>good run. We can take some gains and look for

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>something else, and maybe we just want to be a

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit conservative with so much going on right now.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Peter Sheer, thank you so much for being with us

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of Academy Security as head of macro strategy, some really

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>insightful moments. This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening.

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Join us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>six to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance podcast on

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course on

0:29:53.520 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the terminal. I'm Tom Keene, and this is Bloomberg