WEBVTT - TikTok’s Algorithm to Be Secured by Oracle in Trump-Backed Deal 

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's talk tech.

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot going on out there. I want to see.

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm doing this for John Tucker. He's a big TikTok

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 3>per person here, and he's really interested to see what's

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 3>going to be happening at this what's his handle with

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>what you.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:38.800
<v Speaker 4>Love those thirty second videos about really stupid stuff.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 5>Thinks on rumbas, Right, kats.

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Gotta have it.

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 3>That's why when we talk about cats and roomors, we

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 3>talk to our senior technology analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, man

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Deep sing On, Rona Mandeeps here in our studio on

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 3>a Rocks in our Chicago bureau. Let's just talk Mandeep,

0:00:56.240 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 3>just what's the latest on TikTok here? Because I'm seeing

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 3>some big private equity guys might be involved, some big

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 3>tech names may be involved. What's going on here with TikTok?

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I think the White House is definitely keen to

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 6>get a deal done. And as you said, there are

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 6>multiple parties involved. Oracle is the publicly traded entity that's

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 6>front end center in terms of being the lead company

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 6>that will be owning TikTok along with these other private investors.

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 6>And look, at the end of the day, it's clear

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 6>the algorithm would be rewritten or they would be licensing it.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 5>That is, that was a.

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:40.679
<v Speaker 6>Sticking point all along. So Oracle already has the data

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 6>for TikTok in their data centers, so that part is

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 6>already sorted out, and it looks like there will be

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 6>a deal done. I mean, the more private investors are involved,

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 6>it kind of makes it hard who will determine the

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 6>stratity in this age of AI, given all these companies

0:01:58.920 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 6>are focused on and LLLM, so who would call the

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 6>shots in terms of what the future TikTok will look like.

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 6>But at least it will be owned by US entity

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 6>and private investors based in US.

0:02:11.520 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 5>And Oracle is going to play a key role, a

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 5>big role in operating everything, including retraining a copy of

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 5>the algorithm that the US based TikTok would lease from

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 5>Byteedance an rag. I mean, we knew that that was

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 5>kind of in the works from the get go. But

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 5>what's surprising me today is some CEO announcements from Oracle

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 5>Saffracats is being succeeded by two cocos.

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Is this news a surprise.

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's a surprise, yes, But at the same time,

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 7>I think Oracles in a very strong position right now.

0:02:44.120 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 2>You know, I would say, go back several years.

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 7>I think somewhere around twenty fourteen, Larry Ellison had appointed

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 7>Safa and Mark Hurd as the co CEOs, But I

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 7>think Safra has been there for a very long period

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 7>of time. Now they're basically saying they're going to move

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 7>on the leadership to much younger people. And one of

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 7>them actually is the leader who runs OCI or Oracle

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 7>cloud infrastructure, which is behind the TikTok deal, as well

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 7>as all the other AI deals that we're seeing right now.

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 3>Googles and facebooks of the world and the competitors to TikTok.

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is no foregone conclusion that this thing's

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 3>going to work, is it? Because I'm still I'm a

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 3>TikTok user. I still got to, I guess, get a

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 3>new map port all my stuff and do I mean

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 3>we're not sure this scene going to work.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Is it?

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 8>It is?

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 6>And also a lot of the creators have moved to

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 6>these alternative platforms given this unsanatory has been there for

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, almost more than a year now. So who's

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 6>benefiting I mean your YouTube, Instagram to an extend Snapchat.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 6>But to my mind, the whole focus has shifted from

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 6>you know, which who has the best recommendation algorithm to

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 6>who can have the best AI based on the data

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 6>they have? So look at you know. What open ai

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 6>has done is used all the open Internet data. What

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 6>Meta is trying to do with their superintelligence is use

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 6>their social network data to come up with a better

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 6>large anglid model. That's what Gemini is doing, and I

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 6>think that's where the smaller players have a disadvantage. Or Snapchat,

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 6>even though it may gain some engagement, it just doesn't

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 6>have the infrastructure to train their own large anglid model

0:04:27.320 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 6>based on the data they have. That's what you would

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 6>hope to see with a company like TikTok Us that

0:04:33.880 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 6>they focus on training their own large anglid model based

0:04:37.760 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 6>on the video data that they have. But I doubt

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 6>when you have got so many players involved, that's never

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 6>good for you know, a long term strategy where you

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 6>focus on building a product first and then monetizing. It

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 6>would be more about making the company profitable and making

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 6>sure they have a return on investment for what they're doing.

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, this is going to be a complicated transaction

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 5>because the law mandates this stick to sale to US owners,

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.279
<v Speaker 5>but it forbids byttance from any operational role, including with software. Meantime,

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 5>China's law X bars the export of sensitive technology like

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 5>the algorithms. So I guess, anach My question to you

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 5>is is it not only technically feasible to fully disentangle

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:21.280
<v Speaker 5>TikTok from bytans, but will US lawmakers accept whatever convoluted

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 5>plan has come up here?

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think that has been very clear.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I imagine if you go back, you know,

0:05:26.960 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 7>back in January, we're supposed to be shut down, but

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 7>people have been operating it.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Oracle has been hosting it.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 7>So I think Oracle is going to go out and

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 7>say we have control over the data, we have control

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 7>over the algorithm.

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think that may let's let's hope that.

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 7>Will pacify all the regulators and the uh, you know,

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:46.119
<v Speaker 7>the Congress out there.

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.480
<v Speaker 3>So many. Do we know who the CEO USA is

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 3>going to be, who the CFO is going to be,

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 3>what the board?

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 5>Oh good question.

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean we don't know any of that.

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 6>No, no, I mean the transaction isn't even finalized. We're

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.599
<v Speaker 6>still hearing rumors about who the private investors are going

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 6>to be, and that list seems to be growing, you know,

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 6>beyond the private equity guys. Now it's a Rupert Murdoch.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 6>And you know, it was interesting to hear their names. Okay,

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 6>but look, I mean it will be somebody seasoned. My

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 6>only hunt here is they may be too focused on

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 6>you know, the algorithm where the bigger opportunity lies in

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 6>the LM. And you know how a video LLLM could

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 6>be gamescha AI everything.

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know we always have to bring everything back

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 5>to AI.

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he knows what get they clicks, he knows what's

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 3>going on. We trained them. Well, all right, just on

0:06:36.000 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 3>what's the thirty second stuff. What's the big thing you're

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 3>looking at this week?

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 7>This week it's going to be Apple and how the

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 7>pro is going to be doing in the market.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us.

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming.

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 4>Up after this.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarplay and Android

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I swear this whole healthcare discussion used to be more

0:07:09.279 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 3>than just obesity drugs.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 5>I know, but it feels like that's the most exciting

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 5>part of the healthcare world, the pharmer world.

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I don't know. I mean Sampa's Ellie Joints is here.

0:07:17.880 --> 0:07:20.240
<v Speaker 3>He's a director of research for Global Industries. He's also

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 3>like the best healthcare guy over there in Europe, is

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 3>based in London, one of the leaders there, and we

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 3>talked to him all the time.

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Sam.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 3>It looks like again Pfizer here spending four point nine

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars for this obesity startups. Met Sarah, what can

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 3>you tell us about? Met Sarah?

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, well how are you doing so?

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 2>And Scarlett?

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 8>Nice to have you both again taking about this topic.

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:48.679
<v Speaker 8>Thank you, topic of obesity. So look, just to answer

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 8>your your opening point, obesity is one of the key

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:59.239
<v Speaker 8>causes of a whole variety of diseases cardiovascular, cancer, mental health.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 8>So we can treat it if we can prevent it,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 8>if we can reduce it, it's brilliant for the entirety of society.

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 8>Here there is a deal where I thinks they've got

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 8>something that's going to be able to give them a

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 8>chance at playing in this very important area and very

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 8>massive market. Right. So the drugs are interesting, they're relatively

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:23.119
<v Speaker 8>early stage. We're looking to see with some new data

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 8>coming up, whether some of the promise that we've seen

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 8>earlier for these drugs that the company has, which the

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 8>latest stage one is still in phase two. They need

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.319
<v Speaker 8>to start the phase three in twenty twenty six, whether

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 8>they are as competitive as they looked in the earlier trials.

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.200
<v Speaker 8>There were some questions on efficacy less so than side

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 8>effect profile, So we'll have to wait and see how

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 8>that pans out.

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Sam, can you get into the science a little bit

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 5>and maybe you know, keep it basic for folks like

0:08:49.000 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Paul and me, Because Metzara is described as the next

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.600
<v Speaker 5>generation hopeful in obesities. They use these long acting amlin

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 5>analogs versus GLP one, and I'm wondering for people who

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 5>might behold out for matsera's treatment what that means versus

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 5>the currently available zep bound or we goo v.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So the latest stage drug is very similar to

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 8>we go vy and similar to zepetite or zip bound,

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 8>and the anlin drug is a little bit early stage.

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 8>Earlier stage, there are companies were more advanced drugs in

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 8>that world, but they all kind of feed into the

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 8>same pathway, which is the pathway that talks between your

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.719
<v Speaker 8>food intake and your satiety centers in your brain and

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 8>your insulin centers in your pancreas it tries to balance

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 8>of eaten enough, let's stop eating now, and let's release

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 8>some insulin make it more sensitive so that we can

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 8>deal with the onslaughter sugar that comes into our blood.

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 8>That's where they are is that's central to that space.

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 8>There's cells in the gut that release look on like

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 8>GLP ones, gk on like peptize the cells in other

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 8>parts of the body who are responding to it. So

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 8>that's where these things sit, and amulin is just one

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 8>of those agents in the middle of it.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 3>SA I'm just kind of stepping back on his GLP

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 3>one drugs in general, there's a certain level of efficacy today,

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 3>there's a certain level of say, side effect, whether it's

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 3>a large or something else today. Is there a room

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 3>for improvement on both efficacy and side effects going forward

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 3>with these drugs?

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean with it's the balance that's the most importantacy.

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 8>I think we're pretty much there. I mean, you know,

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 8>there are folks that we know that go on a

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 8>drug for a week or two and they lose four

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 8>or five kilograms. That's fine. You don't want to lose

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.719
<v Speaker 8>much faster than that, because I don't think it's particularly

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 8>healthy if you lose weight at a much higher speed.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 8>And also you don't want to get much lighter than

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 8>a aty kilo or ninety kilo or seventy five kilograms,

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 8>depending on your size. So the key is how do

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 8>you get there? If you get there by having lots

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 8>of side effects in your probability of staying on the

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 8>drug is lower, but we want you to stay on

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 8>the drug. So it's a very very tight balance. And

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 8>then of course you have to figure out what am

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 8>I happy taking a weekly injection, which I think a

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 8>lot of people are not. Don't have a problem with it,

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 8>But what if Mitzra's writing can push it to once monthly.

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 8>What if some of the other competitors coming along with

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.319
<v Speaker 8>once every three months now. Those are things that we

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.240
<v Speaker 8>have to wait and see how the data shows in

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:23.080
<v Speaker 8>terms of that balance. Have just referred to Sam.

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 5>We mentioned earlier the headline that the White House now

0:11:25.400 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 5>says doctors may be exempt from H one B visa

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 5>fees that were just an ounce of one hundred thousand dollars.

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 5>Obviously that has huge ramifications for the medical industry. What

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 5>does it mean potentially the one hundred thousand dollars fee

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 5>for H one B visas for the pharma and the

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 5>biotech industry in the US.

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think any industry that requires skilled workers. I

0:11:48.720 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 8>think the sector, the sector that's most exposed is one

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 8>that you guys probably have already talked about, is the

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 8>tech industry. Right in terms of pharma biotech. I think

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 8>the US has really good existing talent. The point is, though,

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 8>that sometimes a particular talent is based somewhere else. You

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 8>just want that particular person. So why do you have

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 8>to go through this process if they really are the

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 8>one person who knows this particular disease area so well,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 8>and does really one or two people at that level

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:23.599
<v Speaker 8>make a difference, Especially in a sector where US is

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 8>already a leader, You're not really bringing in people to

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.839
<v Speaker 8>compete with the US talent. So that's something that I

0:12:28.880 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 8>think is important to remember. Doctors, of course, you know

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 8>the country that doesn't like Europe, many countries in Europe

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 8>on producing enough doctors. UK especially, you need to allow.

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 4>That stay with us.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Coarclay, and Android

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:12:56.559 --> 0:13:00.160
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 5>Let's go down to Mark German. He's our go to

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 5>tech gadget guy for more on Aura because we're just

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 5>talking about how Aura's the company that owns Aura that

0:13:10.000 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 5>how Wellness Ring is now an eleven billion dollar company

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 5>with its latest capital raise. Mark, this is a finish

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 5>company and it needed to raise more money, didn't it.

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 9>Definitely they want to scale production, they want to scale

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 9>r Indeed, they want to move into new regions, they

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 9>want to get into new retail stores, they want to

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 9>add new software features. So they're looking to grow quickly.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 9>This nearly eleven billion dollar valuation. This is a you know,

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 9>a pretty specific hardware company. They really make one thing,

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 9>and if you look at their market cap now after

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 9>that raise, you compare it to other companies that are

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 9>known for really one type of hardware product Peloton, Eye, Robot,

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 9>Sonos bos Aura is now worth more than all of

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 9>them combined, which is pretty crazy to think about. So

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 9>so far, this looks to be a success story. It's

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 9>not a very old company, but it's a company doing

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 9>effective things and they're clearly building a product that people like.

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 9>They've sold three million units in the last fourteen fifteen

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 9>months or so. They've sold five and a half million

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 9>rings to date. They're due to cross one billion in

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 9>revenue in twenty five, a billion and a half in

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 9>twenty six. They did five hundred million in twenty four

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 9>so they seem to be growing quite nicely.

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, not being into the ring fit ring

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 3>business myself.

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 5>Fitring, I like that fit ring.

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 8>I mean, this.

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Seems like something that your friends in Cooper Tina could

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 3>come out with tomorrow and copycat. How do you think

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 3>about the competitive landscape.

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the competitive landscape is interesting. There's a few smaller

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 9>players that are also doing smart rings. Samsung rolled out

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 9>what they call the Galaxy Ring last year, and for Samsung,

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 9>who's actually been a dud, the functionality is just not

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 9>on par with Aura. What Aura as is a very

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 9>strong brand, They have very strong functionality, and they have

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 9>that big first mover advantage. But you're right, if Apple

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 9>comes out with the ring, They're gonna eat Aura's lunch.

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 9>You know. Aura's perspective is that they have this gigantic

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 9>and tried and true in legal proceedings patent portfolio, and

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 9>so they feel that if Apple were to come out

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 9>with a ring, or another company were to really hit

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 9>the nail on the head with a ring, that they

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 9>would be able to defend their patents. And they've shown

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 9>to be able to do that. They have some cases

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:41.359
<v Speaker 9>in front of the International Trade Commission and other organizations

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 9>right now for some of the other competitors. So we'll

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 9>see what happens. I don't anticipate Apple coming out with

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.120
<v Speaker 9>a ring anytime soon. I will say that this ten

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 9>billion dollar valuation is a little bit of a double

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 9>edged sword. On one hand, that's amazing for the company.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 9>On the other hand, it puts them in territory where

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 9>they're probably not going to be acquired or bought in,

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 9>which would spur another company like Apple if they wanted

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 9>to ring develop one versus by them. And definitely they're

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 9>going to have to make a decision in the next

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 9>couple of years whether they're going to go public via

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 9>an IPO spat or if they're going to stay private.

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us.

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 3>More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am easterne on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 5>Let's go back to a story that we were talking

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 5>about earlier, which is the CEO change over at T Mobile.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 5>We just spoke earlier with the outgoing CEO and the

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 5>incoming CEO with our Bloomberg Television colleagues Caroline Hyde and

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 5>Ed Ludlow, and so now we want to bring in

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 5>our Bloomberg Intelligence expert, John Butler, the senior telecom analyst

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 5>for more on this side. John, was this a surprise?

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 4>This changeover all? This was incredibly well broadcast. Shriney has

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 4>been hitting the conference circuit, so at this time of year,

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 4>all the major investment banks hold these conferences, and he's

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 4>been in almost everyone sort of out there telling the

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 4>T Mobiles story. And in my mind it answers one

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 4>of two questions. Right with any incoming CEO, You're like,

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 4>can they manage the company effectively? And can they manage

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 4>the stock effectively? Can they get that narrative out? It's

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 4>been a good story and he is really good at that.

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 4>So he's answered the second question and I think in

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 4>some ways he's answered the first as well.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about the wireless business these days. It's

0:17:44.280 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 3>just a brutally competitive business. Just give us the lay

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 3>of the land there between AT and T, Verizon, T Mobile,

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and anybody else who might be out there.

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the big three are still dominant. Paul and

0:17:54.359 --> 0:17:58.439
<v Speaker 4>T Mobile has executed beautifully over the past few years.

0:17:58.560 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 4>You know, they've done a very good of sort of

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 4>securing the lead in terms of subscriber growth by you know,

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 4>marketing on this hip counterculture brand image. They continue to be,

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 4>I think, having an outsized impact on consumers. When you

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 4>think a wireless it really is a consumer retail business.

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 4>They all have thousands of stores, they advertise on the

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:28.479
<v Speaker 4>Super Bowl, they have giveaways, and I think T Mobile

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 4>more than most really does that well. And I think

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 4>the Big three, because of their scale set, it sort

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 4>of sets this sort of wide mode for any newcomers

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 4>that want to come in. So Mobile as number two

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 4>in the industry, I think is going to remain firmly

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 4>in that place, if not move into the number one

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 4>position over the next several years. Number one Zon Number

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 4>one is Verizon still, so I'm a Verizon person.

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 5>I am too, But I just went to Italy and

0:18:58.160 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 5>how did what did you do for your phone needs?

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Fine, it's just I have a plan that just ports

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 3>over to an international.

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 5>Okay, because as do uh huh.

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:07.439
<v Speaker 3>All of my offspring that's the only thing that I

0:19:07.480 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 3>still pay for.

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 5>Yes, no one, no one wants to give that up.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 5>Why pay for your own clone service when dad will

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 5>pay for it. I switched over to T Mobile because

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 5>of the giveaways, yes, because of the free iPhone last cycle,

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 5>and also because you get free data and free international

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 5>texting when you're overseas up to five gigabytes, so that

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 5>means I never have to buy an international data pison shopping.

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.320
<v Speaker 4>That is the single biggest hook I hear. So when

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 4>people come to me and they're like, I'm a T

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 4>mobile subscriber. They have all these giveaways and they have

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 4>international call.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 5>That makes a big difference because when I was on

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 5>AT and T, I was paying ten dollars a day

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 5>and that adds.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 4>Up really quickly, does it really?

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 8>You know?

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.199
<v Speaker 5>And then only one person in the family can get

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 5>it because you know, not everyone's going to.

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 3>Get it right, and they have four offspring plus an

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 3>next wife, you're still paying for it.

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, there you go.

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Charlie Pellett is on the t MO, but he he

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 3>always tries to sell me.

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 5>To Charlie also knows the great deal. Well that's the

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 5>secret here at Bloomberg.

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Charlie's traveling the strange parts of the world where he

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 3>probably needs that kind of stuff. So what's the future

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 3>of wireless in this country? Is it just our poop

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 3>growth average revenue per user? And is that kind of

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 3>the story for that is So.

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 4>That is a great question, that is what's driving growth

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 4>now for a telco you's sort of run out of

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 4>room for adding new subs and so you need to

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 4>drive that up, that average revenue per user, and they're

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 4>doing it with the giveaways. We were just talking about

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:34.640
<v Speaker 4>They actually charge modestly for those. In some cases they're

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 4>selling you phone insurance. T Mobile is now pushing into

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 4>the advertising business, but the real avenue of growth to

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 4>watch for them going forward is broadband. They are making

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 4>more and more inroads into that market and T Mobile

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 4>It's what I'm watching with the new CEO here to

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 4>see what he does in fiber broadband, because if T

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 4>Mobile has had any sort of a misfire over the

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 4>past decade, it's not going into fiber broadband in a

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.480
<v Speaker 4>bigger way in the way that AT and TM Verizon

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 4>both have through sizeable and aggressive acquisitions. So it'll be

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 4>interesting to see what he does there. My call is

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 4>he's going to start building quickly and aggressively, would be

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 4>my guess.

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 5>Another thing I just thought of that sold me on

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 5>TIM Mobile was they have a really simple bill, right,

0:21:22.560 --> 0:21:25.399
<v Speaker 5>they don't have the quoted amount and then tax on

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.919
<v Speaker 5>top of that, everything's included, which makes any different.

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 4>It's user friendly, it's very They're very good at consumer branding.

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 4>They really understand the consumer and what they want and

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 4>wireless and from their carrier so and Snoop Dogg and

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 4>Snoopy spokesperson.

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I know, so when it comes to fierroptic, how

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 5>much more of that rollout is left? I mean, where

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 5>are they in that in that not transition, but in

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 5>that buildout. Is it like second inning or is it

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 5>eighth ining?

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 4>So I'm going to call second inning. Here's the really

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 4>interesting fact I picked up recently. If you look at

0:21:57.240 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 4>Canada or even Europe parts of Europe, fiber broadband is

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 4>seventy percent of the total installed base of broadband subscribers.

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 4>And keep in mind, fiber is far and away the

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 4>best medium for broadband. It has truly symmetrical speed, so

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 4>upload and download great for zoom calls, and it's extremely

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 4>high capacity, so it's sort of future proof in that sense.

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 4>The US is only thirty percent penetrated with fibers, so

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 4>I think there's lots of room to run there. And

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 4>that's what AT and T has done so well. They

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 4>have really leaned hard into a fiber broadband strategy. Verizon

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 4>has and is continuing to lean in there, and T

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 4>Mobile is the laggard. So again, with the new CEO

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 4>coming in here, I'm looking to see if we'll see

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 4>any change in that strategy of theirs.

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal