WEBVTT - NFL Championship Round Lines Reactions (Ep. 44)

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everybody. Welcome back to the Betting Pros NFL Podcast,

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.560
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Bett MGM. I'm your host, Dan Harris.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Dan Harris eighty.

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a wild divisional round weekend and we have

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton to talk about. With me to break things

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>down this week is Ian McMillan, a writer over at

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>oddshark dot com. You can find them on Twitter at

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Ian macOS Ian. Thanks for coming back on how you doing.

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing fantastic. It was an absolute whirlwind of a

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 2>weekend of games, some wild games. So yeah, let's get

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 2>into it.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>You knew one of the big favorites was gonna lose, right,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the books aren't going to take a bath

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>on all these moneyline parlays. You knew that somewhere one

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of these teams, either the Chiefs or the Ravens, probably

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>something was gonna go crazy. I mean I didn't expect it,

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>but I mean this is the way it works, right,

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>This is how gambling works. The unexpected happens, and somehow,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure the books made a total killing on that game.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely. And I mean like something I was looking

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 2>at all week was I was tempted. I looked at

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 2>it almost every day. I was tempted just to take

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>a three team money line parlay of the forty nine Ers, Ravens,

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and Chiefs. But something kept telling me, now, one of

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 2>those teams are gonna lose, and sure enough they did.

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:18.720
<v Speaker 2>So I'm glad I held off on that. Now.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>You've been on quite a run actually lately. I mean

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I follow you on Twitter. You've been doing very well

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>with your picks to that hold for the divisional round

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Or did you take a bath like

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of betters.

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, I've Yeah, I've done pretty well this year.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 2>That held in the divisional round. It went three to

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>one and one in the divisional round that I lost

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 2>in the last game the my Packers Seahawks pick so

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 2>six one and one total in the NFL playoffs so far.

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>So I'm doing well.

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's keep it going then into next week.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>So we are doing things a little bit differently this week.

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>We usually record and publish on Monday night, but we

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>figured why wait, football's fresh on everyone's mind, let's just

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>jump into it. So we are recording this on Sunday night,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>like right after the Seahawks Packers game ended. Because there

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>are only two games next week, we're going to change

0:01:58.120 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it up a little bit for this early show. Were

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to break down each of the divisional weekends games first

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>before looking ahead to next week. And if you are

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>at all familiar with my work, you know that this

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is my happy place because I host the Sunday night

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.280
<v Speaker 1>recap show for the Fantasy Pros Football podcast. So I

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>am all about breaking things down with zero time to

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 1>think about them. So let's just jump in right here

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with the forty nine Ers twenty seven Vikings ten. This

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>was a seven point spread and it wasn't something I

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>personally really wanted to get involved with at that number,

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the key number. It honestly felt like a little bit

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of value on the Vikes to me, but nothing I

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to trust. But as I mentioned on Thursday,

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I felt extremely confident that the forty nine Ers were

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:38.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna win this one. I talked about on Thursday show

0:02:38.320 --> 0:02:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Kwan Alexander d Ford coming back with Tart. I mean,

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the key defenders on defense returning. I thought they'd be

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>able to get pressure on Cousins without blitzing, which they

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>did six sacks, the passing offense for the Vikings cannot

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:52.920
<v Speaker 1>get anything going. The defense is completely The defense completely

0:02:52.919 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 1>shuts down Dalvin Cook just nine rushes for eighteen yards.

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 1>The offense. Meanwhile, after the Garoppolo interception, they got conservative

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Garoppolo attempts only nineteen passes there was for

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty one yards and a touchdown with

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the one pick. The running backs tally forty two carries,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty two for Tevin Coleman of course, for one hundred

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and five yards and two scores, where he mostered twelve

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for fifty eight Mattbrita eight for seventeen. He does lose

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a fumble at the end. I believe Mostart hurt his

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>calf at some point in the second half. Doesn't sound

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 1>too severe, and there's rumors that Coleman banged up his elbow,

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't sound like either one's availability for next

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>week's game against the Packers is in doubt. But we'll

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>break down that specific matchup with the Packers in a bit.

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, after seeing this game, you have to

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.839
<v Speaker 1>be pretty impressed with the forty nine ers, right, Oh.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I mean they look like a complete team offense, defense.

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I thought the forty nine Ers in this game.

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was was this was the pick I

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>was the most confident in this weekend. I think there

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of recency bias from the Vikings beating

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the Saints last weekend, but Kirk Cousins on the road

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 2>West Coast. This time. They were playing on a grass field.

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't a dome like they were playing against the Saints,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 2>So I think it was a little bit of recency

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.080
<v Speaker 2>bias went into that line. So I like the forty

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 2>nine Ers. That's why I took them the minus seven.

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't too afraid of that big spread. The big

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 2>thing is the forty nine Ers defense, and in throughout

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 2>the whole season they've been like a top two, top

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>three defensive unit the entire season, and not too many

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>people are talking about that, especially the pass defense as well.

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Outside of that long pass, I believe that was to

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 2>Digs right early in the game to make it seven

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 2>to seven. Other than that long pass, they completely contained

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the passing game with at least one interception. I know

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Richard Sherman got an interception, was one interception or two?

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:39.799
<v Speaker 2>Such a whirlwind the games because that was the first

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 2>one but at least one interception there. I mean that

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 2>forty nine ers pass defenses might be the best pass

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 2>defense in the league right now, definitely the best pass

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 2>defense left over to the teams that are left. So

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 2>forty nine Ers they are looking good. Yeah.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, for me again, part of the reason why

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't feel comfortable at the seven is just, I mean,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>as good as the forty nine ers are, they just

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>they've played a ton of close games, right, I mean

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>basically the last five or six weeks, they're within one

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>score when they were winning. So they just didn't strike

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>me as the type of team that's going to be

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>able to necessarily blow out the Vikings, who I kind

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of feel like we're a little underrated, you know. I

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>get that everybody was jumping on them because of the

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that they went into New Orleans and beat the Saints,

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know, part of the thing with them is

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 1>they were dealing without a healthy Adam Feelin for a

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 1>long time, without a healthy Dalvin Cook. So with both

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of those guys back, and of course you have this

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 1>weird injury where theelan apparently gets spiked, you know, during

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>practice and kind of almost messes up his Achilles or

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>something like that. So there were all these weird things

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that went into it, but you made the key point,

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>which is the defense. It was one interception, by the way,

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I just confirmed that. But it's Kwan Alexander coming back,

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 1>which I did not expect to necessarily see him at

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 1>all for the remainder of the season. D Ford, who

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.799
<v Speaker 1>didn't play a full complement of snaps, but he's able

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to get pressure so easily when you combine him with

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.119
<v Speaker 1>Bosa in particular, you know, in Armstead and then Tart

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>out there just kind of helps the entire defense. And

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>again it's got an elite pass defense coming in, of course,

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but Tart coming back really also kind of made everything

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>just whole. And you see, especially playing at home. We'll

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:16.720
<v Speaker 1>get into that game against the Packers, but it's right now,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>they just look really scary. Does it worry you at all?

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, they had the game. It wasn't though,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>like they were way ahead the entire time. I mean

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>they wound up winning twenty seven to ten. But again

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>after Garoppolo threw that pick, which was you know, not

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a great pick, I mean he just didn't he just

0:06:32.279 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't view the defender coming in they went really really

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 1>conservative on offense, and they just ran the ball. You know,

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 1>they obviously had that driver. They ran it eight times

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>straight to get in. Does it worry you at all

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>coming in as to whether you know Garoppolo is up

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>for the task. You know, he's got at least one

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>more game, possibly too if he makes to the Super Bowl.

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Considering I mean he attempted only nineteen passes one hundred

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and thirty one yards. I don't know if that's necessarily

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:57.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to get it done, or do

0:06:57.720 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>you just think that they said, you know, we've got

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this game where just gonna rely on our run game

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>because we think our defense can hold the four.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.039
<v Speaker 2>I mean, for most cases, if you can just run

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the ball, and if you're as successful out of it

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>as the forty nine ers are, why even why do

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 2>you need to pass the ball? So, I mean, running

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the ball is a little bit less risky Grapplo. I mean,

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 2>I see where you're coming from, because I'm kind of

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>slightly questioned the ball season, but he's played very solid

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 2>throughout the entire season. He didn't he hasn't really had

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 2>any games where like, oh geez, that was a stinker,

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think a huge advantage the forty nine ers

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 2>have and I think this was actually showed pretty clearly

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 2>in this game against the Vikings as the coaching advantage.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I think Kyle Shanahan is a fantastic coach. I love

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 2>how much he uses motion on offense. It's something like

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 2>seventy eight percent of his plays they do a motion

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 2>pre snap, which is really interesting when you watch that.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>And of course, me being a former Falcons fan, I

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>try a little bit every time I see Kyle Shanahan

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 2>having success him in tivin Coleman because of course he

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 2>was the Falcons offensive coordinator when they went to the

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 2>Super Bowl, they let him go. So I'm a big KYLEE.

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Shanahan fan. I think he is one of the best

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 2>coaches in the NFL right now, and I think that

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 2>showed a lot in that Vikings game. And we're gonna

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 2>see I mean, we're gonna talk about the game against

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 2>the Packers here shortly, but I think we're gonna we

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 2>might see that a battle a couple of New Wish

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 2>head coaches there next weekend. And I think Kyle Shanahan's

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna keep shining.

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think he is too. And speaking of winning

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>games when your quarterback doesn't have to do much. Let's

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>move on to the Titans twenty eight Ravens twelve. As

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>we said, you know, this was the one game. I

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>gotta imagine that whatever else happened this weekend for the books,

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this blew up all the money line

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>parlays just completely made their weekend. The Titans, they controlled

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this game pretty much the entire way through. Ryan Tannehill

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>does almost nothing again, seven completions, eighty eight yards. He

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>does throw the two touchdowns, it's all Derreck Henry again

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty carries one hundred and ninety five yards, despite the

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that I mean he was you watch that game.

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>He's facing eight man fronts constantly in that game, and

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:57.599
<v Speaker 1>he's just plowing right through him. He also throws for

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown crying out loud. I mean, I I think

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that really leads just to the one big question that

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>most people have coming out of that game. How much

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 1>would someone have to offer you to attempt to tackle

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Derek Henry coming at you with a bullhead of steam?

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>And what's the number.

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 2>I'd do for free? Just see if I could do it.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 2>I used to play football back in the day. I

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 2>played a little bit of college football up here in

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Canada as well. I was a running back, so I

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 2>was the one getting hit like Derek Henry's. I mean,

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 2>he's a beast, no doubt about it. I'd like to

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 2>see if I could die. I mean, I'm sure I couldn't,

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 2>but it'd be fun. I wouldn't mind being run over.

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 2>I've been run over a couple of times in my career.

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, right, I just want to know that that's

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>a terrible answer. The correct answer is sixteen thousand, four

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty dollars. All right. But meanwhile, the Ravens

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in this game, they're just off. They dropped a ton

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of passes, Lamar Jackson, turned the ball over three times.

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Mark Ing was banged up at first. Let me just ask,

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 1>is this a game you feel like the Titans, you know,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>really won and they took it, or is this a

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>game that the Ravens just kind of gave it to them?

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh? I think the Titans won. I think they took it.

0:09:58.240 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I think I think they they did what they had

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 2>to do. And just to stay on the topic of

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Derrick Henry there and what I find most impressive about

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 2>Derek Henry and it showed quite a bit in this game,

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 2>and I think they briefly mentioned it during the broadcast

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 2>as well. It's not necessarily the big runs that he

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 2>keeps busting off. It's when guys get in the backfield

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 2>and then he still ends up getting like a four

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 2>or five yard game. It's insane. It's like he almost

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 2>doesn't even need an offensive line. He's gonna get four

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 2>yards every single time that he touches the ball. It's

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 2>absolutely insane. Titans did exactly what they had to do

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>with their game plan was fantastic. I was impressed with

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 2>what Mike Frabele brought to the table that game. I

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 2>love how he's doing like workouts with some of the

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 2>other guys on the team right before kickoff. I think

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 2>that's hilarious. He's passionate, and I think the whole team

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 2>after that Patriots whin. They came into this game with

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>a lot of confidence and that's just gonna keep rolling.

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I like the Titans right now. I think they're kind

0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 2>of one of those surprise teams, like we kind of

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 2>saw the Giants there a handful of years ago, like

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 2>a nine and seven team going to the playoffs. They're

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.079
<v Speaker 2>just hitting their stride at the perfect time, and I'm

0:10:58.120 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 2>interested see what they're gonna do next week. But yeah,

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 2>the Titans won that game. The other thing, I'm kind

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 2>of Baltimore they were rusty. I think that was very

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>clear that they're rusty. I don't know if I agree

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:11.839
<v Speaker 2>with their decision of sitting all their important starters in

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 2>week seventeen when they had the bye week the next week.

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's two full weeks they completely took off.

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that kind of showed this weekend.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, although to be fair, again, you know, the Chiefs

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>came out completely flat and they played everybody right in

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Week seventeen, so you never really know what it was.

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And again, you know with the Ravens, the only thing

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll say is, as much as you know the Titans,

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>really they were the better team on that day. In

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, I agree with you there. You know, the

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Ravens never get stopped on fourth down, and you know

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>they went forward a couple of times and they didn't

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>get it. They make it both those times, the game

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>might be completely different, right, I mean, it's those little

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>things that sort of happened in that game. But I

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>agree with you the Titans right now. Look, they're extremely

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>strong defensively. Ryan Tannehill, you know, he's not being asked

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to do all that much, but he's playing smart football,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>right He's you know, you can see him when he

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>knows it's not there. He's not going to take usually

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the killer sack, and he's not going to try to

0:12:06.360 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>force it into coverage. He's going to throw it away.

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>He's going to protect them. And Derek Henry is a

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 1>beast running the ball. I mean you said it. The

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>number of times where he runs into the line and

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like, all right, there is nothing there and he

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just sort of plows forward for five yards. I mean,

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>there is a huge difference when you're looking at second

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and five as opposed to second and eight. As much

0:12:24.800 --> 0:12:27.319
<v Speaker 1>as the NFL has changed, if you play lockdown defense,

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>if you can run the ball, you've got a chance

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to do something in the playoffs, right, So, I mean,

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm in agreement with you. I'm really interested to see

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>where they go forward. Do you think, to be honest,

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that this team has a chance. I mean there's only

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>four teams left, so yeah, they've got a chance, but

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>a realistic chance to win the Super Bowl.

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think they do. And the point that you

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 2>mentioned about Tannahill is dead on. He's been very efficient.

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the word I've been kind of using

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 2>for Ryan Tannehill. He's making the throzy ass to make,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.679
<v Speaker 2>he's not making too many mistakes. He's only had one

0:12:56.720 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>interception the last four games that he started in. He's

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 2>doing exactly what what he needs to do. He's managing

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the game and he's just letting Derek Henry take over.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean, if they can get through the

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Patriots and the Ravens, that they can beat anyone, So

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>why not? Why not Super Bowl?

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 1>And you keep waiting for their efficiency in the red

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>zone to die out, but it's just not. I mean

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:17.839
<v Speaker 1>every time they get in the Renzo, they're basically scoring

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. So yeah, it's going to be interesting. We'll

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:21.959
<v Speaker 1>break down that game against the Chiefs in a minute,

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>but before we move on and talk about today's games,

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I do want to tell everyone about the sponsor of

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the today's show, bet MGM, and specifically the bet MGM

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>Sports app. Like, if you've heard me talk about this

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>app before, just listen closely this time because I've got

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good real life example today of why it

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>pays to sign up with the bet MGM Sports app.

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>You can place a bet right from your phone. Just

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>search for the bet mgm Sports app in your app store,

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>download it and sign up for an account. If you

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>sign up, you're gonna want to use our promo code Harris,

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because when you do, you get a risk free five

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars bet. If you lose your first bet, bet

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>mgm is going to refund it up to five hundred

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>dollars for future wagers. And let me just explain the

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>wonders of the free wager of up to five hundred dollars.

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>If you feel real good about a bet, then great,

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.680
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and use your five hundred dollars wager on that. Alternatively,

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a listener who had just signed up for bet mgm

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and had lost his first bet of four hundred dollars

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>had the free bet now. He took my advice this

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>week and placed a large wager on the two team

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.120
<v Speaker 1>teaser of the forty nine Ers, laying one and teasing

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the total on the Packers and the Seahawks game up

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to fifty three and taking the under. So he reached

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>out to me after the forty nine Ers one and

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>asked if I had any bets I felt great about

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of the divisional round so he could

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>use his free wager. I noticed that the Packers Seahawks

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>total had dropped to forty six at one point, so

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I said, given what he's got riding on the under

0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty three on that game, take his free four hundred

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet. Take the over on the forty six. If

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the game went over forty six, he wins his free bet.

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 1>The game goes under fifty three, he wins his teaser.

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>The game lands between forty six and fifty three, he

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>wins both. And it was dicey for a minute, but

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>he did middle it. He won both bets, and he's

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 1>a happier man for it. Having a free bet is

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>not only like having an extra life, but it's also

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>a great way to try to maximize your winning. So again,

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>download the bet MGM Sports app, sign up for an account,

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 1>use our promo code Harris, and get your risk free

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>five hundred dollars bet. These winnings are paid in free bets.

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>You must be twenty one years or older, and although

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you can sign up an easily deposit money anywhere, you

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>must be in the state of New Jersey to plays

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a sports bet, and certain restrictions apply. Visit BETMGM dot

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>com for the full list of terms and conditions. And

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>if you've got a gambling problem, call one eight hundred gambler.

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Ian, let's get to the real wild one

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that Chiefs fifty one, Texans thirty one. All I can

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>say is thank goodness for in game wagering. Okay, I

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>mean I felt relatively confident even when the Chiefs saw

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>way behind, that they were going to find a way

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to win that game. It's Bill O'Brien to Patrick Mahomes,

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's fourteen nothing. The Textans are about to come

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in for another score, and you know that team from Braveheart,

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the first big battle where the cavalry's charging and Mel

0:15:55.840 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Gibson the screaming hold hold, and of course right then,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>only the cavalry gets just close enough and he screams no,

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and they all pick up the long sticks as a defense.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>That's legit how I felt as I'm watching the in

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>game odds. It's fourteen to nothing. The Chiefs are still

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in game two point favorites. It's twenty one nothing, and

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the money line is still just like plus one point

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty on the Chiefs. I'm like, hold, hold, And finally

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty four to nothing. The in game money line

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Chiefs is like plus two ten and they're

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>getting seven, and I'm like no. And that made up

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long weekend. But that is really one of

0:16:29.120 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why if you are gambling, make sure you're

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to in game wagers, because there's certainly a

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>way to maximize your winning. Anyway, the Chiefs went crazy,

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>fourth biggest comeback and playoff history. Travis Kelcey and Damian

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Williams score three touchdowns each. The homes throws for five touchdowns.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>The offense looks borderline unstoppable. The defense, however, obviously struggled

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for at least the first half. Deshaun Watson threw for

0:16:51.040 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>three hundred eighty eight yards two touchdowns. DeAndre Hopkins, Kenny Stills,

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Wolfeler they each had at least eighty yeards receiving. So

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you've got a game where the Chiefs were down twenty

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>four to nothing at home against a mediocre team, but

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>they ultimately win in a blowout. Do you feel better

0:17:07.280 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>about the Chiefs worse about the Chiefs or the same

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that you felt coming in about the Chiefs.

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I think through all of that, I think I feel

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 2>the same about the Chiefs, to be completely honest. I mean,

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I just have to say that was probably one of

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 2>the most wild football games I've ever watched. I mean,

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I even though last year wasn't a huge comeback, I

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.280
<v Speaker 2>was thinking of last year's Chiefs and Rams Monday night

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 2>game just with how many points were scored. Just an

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 2>insane game to watch. I was just laughing out loud

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 2>watching the game. It was nuts to see that twenty

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 2>four and then they not only did they make the

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.160
<v Speaker 2>comeback from twenty four to nothing, they did it all

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 2>in one quarter. They were winning at halftime. It was insane.

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.120
<v Speaker 2>But that's I mean, that is the Chiefs. They are extreme.

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 2>They have an extremely explosive offense that can do that

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 2>to any team. And don't forget Tech. The Texans were

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 2>one of the worst defenses all year as well, so

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't totally surprising to see an explosive offense like

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 2>that put up one points against that bad of a defense.

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 2>So I mean, it's kind of what I expected. Also,

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Bill O'Brien kind of shot himself in the

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 2>foot there a couple times when they did have the

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 2>lead as well, so it wasn't totally surprising. But man,

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 2>that was a fun game to watch.

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know, man, I feel a little worse

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>about them, And that sounds insane, right, because they just

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 1>had this incredible comeback. They wound up winning by twenty points.

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But you said it that Texans do not have an

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>imposing defense, right, I mean, you should be able to

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>basically do what you want to do. After they're coming

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>off a very hard fought game against the Bills. You've had,

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, a week to rest, and again, you're not

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>supposed to really be rusty. You had the game against

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the Charters in week seventeen where you should be ready

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to go, And the fact that they fall behind like

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that initially is kind of scary, especially because one of

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the reasons I really like the Chiefs is how well

0:18:51.000 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the defense had been playing, right. I mean, realistically, they

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>had just started to put it all together over the

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>last I don't know, five or six weeks. They were

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 1>holding opponents way down. I don't know whether or not

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it was the injury to Thornhill or whatever that kind

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of messed them up a little bit. But it makes

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>me a little worried about them because you know, they're

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>going to go up against the Titans, and again, we'll

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about that game specifically in a minute, but I

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're going to be able to just do

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 1>whatever they want offensively. I mean, the Titans are in

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>a completely different class off defensively than the Texans. And

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I realized that the Texans beat the Titans a couple

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, so you know, but that's just kind

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of what football in right now. You don't really feel

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>confident that, you know, the Texans would be able to

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>hang with the Titans if they played with them. The

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Titans defense is very strong, they're playing well, you know,

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.160
<v Speaker 1>given the struggles of the Chiefs defense. This actually makes

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>me a little more worried about them than I was

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>coming in. Is that crazy?

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 2>No, I mean, no, that's not crazy at all. And

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 2>to be honest, like you said, I mean, we're going

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 2>to talk about with this AFC Championship game here soon,

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 2>but I'm I'm just from a betting percent for a perspective.

0:19:57.000 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of glad that they had that's such a

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 2>huge offensive burst there because the public is. I guarantee

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 2>you the public's gonna love them next week because of

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 2>that recency bias, and I think just because that offensive explained,

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean fifty one points, the public's gonna see that,

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 2>and I think they're gonna they're gonna bet on them.

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, from the eye like that, and we're gonna

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 2>get in that game here soon. But yeah, I mean

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't too sold on the Chiefs going into the

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 2>game to begin with, though, so that's why I kind

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 2>of still feel the same. It's kind of what I expected.

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 2>Their defenses is decent, They're not great, They're not bad.

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Deshaun Watson is a winner, so I think

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 2>you have to kind of put you have to take

0:20:32.240 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 2>that into consideration as well. He was gonna have a

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 2>good game today regardless. I think it's Deshaun Watson. He

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 2>can bring it when the pressure's on. So I think

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 2>part of that was just kind of Deshaun Watson doing

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Deshaun Watson things as well, So I think you have

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 2>to kind of take that in consideration.

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's certainly a fair spin. So we'll talk

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>about that Titans Chiefs game in the second, but first

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the last game of this past weekend

0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Packers twenty eight, Seahawks twenty three. This ended right before

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we started recording, so it's real fresh in our minds.

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's rocket science to say that the

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks should probably just le Russell Wilson do his thing

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>right from the start instead of trying to run the

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.479
<v Speaker 1>ball with you know, old and backup running backs. That's

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>a story for another time, though. I'm interested to hear

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts here because this feels like another game in

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>a long list of games for the Packers where you

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.960
<v Speaker 1>leave and you think they're not that good of a team.

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Aaron Rodgers sixteen to twenty seven for two

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty three yards and two touchdowns, both to

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Devontae Adams, who had a huge game with one hundred

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and six yards. I'll admit that Rogers made a couple

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 1>of incredible throws, especially right at the end there to

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Devontae Adams, where he just dropped it in. Aaron Jones

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>rushes twenty one times only sixty two yards. He does

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.679
<v Speaker 1>score two touchdowns. I mean, the Seahawks are not a

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 1>particularly imposing defense, so they didn't look great offensively. Here

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the defense for the Packers. They do sack Russell Wilson

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 1>five times, but it certainly didn't have this dominant defensive

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>effort feel to the whole thing. So I asked it

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>with the Chiefs. How about the Packers after this game? Better, worse?

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>The same? How are you feeling this idea?

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? The same. I'm not a huge believer in the Packers.

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:02.120
<v Speaker 2>I think, to be completely frank and blunt, I think

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>they're one of the worst thirteen to three teams ever.

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.719
<v Speaker 2>And actually, if you look at the stats, they do

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 2>have the worst point differential, like the plus minus point

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>differential of any thirteen to three team. Ever, they barely

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.160
<v Speaker 2>held on to that against the Seahawks. And I read

0:22:17.200 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 2>something earlier today about the Seahawks. If you took every

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>single score game that was decided by a single score

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL season this year and flipped the result,

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:30.119
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks would have been the worst team in the NFC.

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 2>They would have been three and thirteen if you flipped

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 2>all those singles score games. So the Seahawks really worn't

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 2>that great of a team, and the Packers barely held

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 2>on to that win. I mean a big reason of that,

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 2>but just because, like you said, Russell Wilson can just

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 2>completely take over the game. And that's why the Seahawks

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>got into the playoffs just because of Russell Wilson. So

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 2>but I mean for the Packers to have impressed me,

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 2>they would have had to really have handled the Seahawks,

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:55.239
<v Speaker 2>and they did at the start, but then they let

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 2>them completely climb back in and the Seahawks could have

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 2>won that game. If Russell Wilson didn't take that there

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 2>on third down, the Seahawks could have went down and

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.199
<v Speaker 2>scored a touchdown and won the game. So I'm not

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 2>sold on the Packers whatsoever. And that's that's how I

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 2>felt going into it. I didn't bet on a side

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>in this game. I ended up taking the under, so

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 2>I that was my first loss in the NFL playoffs.

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 2>But I didn't really trust either offense. But that's why

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't bet on the side, because I think both

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks and the Packers aren't as good as the

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 2>records have shown. So I didn't believe in the Packers

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 2>before the game. I don't believe in the Packers moving forward.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I completely agree. And the thing is it's probably

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not going to be an issue next week. But they

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>have to learn how to essentially put their foot on

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the throat of their opponents, right because the second half

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they barely score. They just they just ease up and

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they sort of play keep away. And it really could

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have and probably should have cost them in this game,

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>because you're right, I mean that last drive Wilson got

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball back with you know, four or five minutes left,

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and you thought, okay, you can drive them right down

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 1>and square the touchdown. So yeah, I have a feeling

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Ian that you and I are probably both going to

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be looking at the games next week similarly. But I agree,

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I was not impressed with this performance. And again, the

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Seahawks aren't that good a team. I mean, it's really Wilson.

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>So the fact that the Packers wound up victorious in

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.400
<v Speaker 1>their home field by five points not like a huge

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>sign that, Wow, this team really has what it takes.

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly worried about them going into San Francisco next week,

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about that in a second, but before

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>we do, I want to mind everyone about our giveaway.

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a sign Michael Thomas Saint's helmet running through the

0:24:27.800 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 1>end of January. You can go to betting pros dot

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>com slash contest for more details, but to enter, just

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:34.800
<v Speaker 1>leave a review for the show on Apple Podcasts or Stitcher.

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Send a screenshot of that review to contest at bettingpros

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com. If you have already entered a prior contest,

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 1>you're automatically entered for this one, so you don't have

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to worry about that. That Thomas helmet comes from our

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 1>friends over at Pristine Auction, where they offer a ton

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>of great memorabilia with thousands of auctions every single day.

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Just go to Pristine Auction dot com. That's p r

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I S t i n E Auction dot com. When

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:00.040
<v Speaker 1>you go there, use our promo code betting pro so

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you can win a three five dollars voucher instantly. All right,

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>enough about this past week, and let's move on to

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>next week. The Chiefs are hosting the Titans. So the

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>early consensus lines here, and I want to stress this,

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they're probably all over the point at the place this

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>line in particular, I've seen differences of two points. But

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the consensus line I've got right now is the Chiefs

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>laying seven and a half with the total at fifty

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>one and a half. So again, I've seen this at

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half at some places when they open.

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where their gunment, but it's gonna move around.

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.160
<v Speaker 1>So bear that in mind. But for our purposes, we'll

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>take it at the Chiefs laying seven and a half

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>with the total at fifty one and a half, it's

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a really interesting game to me. I mean, they've obviously

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>they've met before the Titans one thirty five, thirty two,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>although they probably did not deserve to win that game.

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>But forget that for a second. Go back to the

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>middle of the year. There became this formula for trying

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Chiefs and Patrick Mahomes right, run the

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 1>ball a ton, control the clock, keep Mahomes off the field.

0:25:55.160 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>That's how the Colts did it when they won. That's

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>how the Texans did it when they won. And that's

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>really the exact forma that the Titans look to use

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in pretty much every game. And you look at this

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>game with the Chiefs putting up fifty one, and you think,

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>how is any defense supposed to stop Mahomes at this point?

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 1>But the Titans just legitimately shut down what looked to

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:15.600
<v Speaker 1>be the most unstoppable offense in the NFL. So look,

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you've had a couple of minutes to digest this entire weekend.

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel here with the consensus line just

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>over a touchdown and the big total at fifty one

0:26:22.800 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I absolutely love the Titans. I mean I touched on

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 2>this earlier. I think it's the recency bias of seeing

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs put up that many points is why the

0:26:32.040 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 2>line is where it's at right now. The big thing

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at, I mean, we have it. Like you mentioned,

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 2>these two teams played earlier in the season, so we can.

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's gonna be different. They're gonna make coaching

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>changes or strategy changes, i should say, heading into this game.

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.719
<v Speaker 2>But the big thing that I'm looking at when I

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 2>look at the box score of their thirty five thirty

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 2>two win over the Chiefs earlier in the season, Dereck

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Henry in that game twenty three carries one hundred and

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 2>eighty eight yards two touchdowns. That's an average of eight

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 2>point two yards per carrying that game. So you're given

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.199
<v Speaker 2>a team more than a touchdown worth of points in

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a game where they beat them earlier in the year,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 2>and their star player who they're leaning on now in

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs, just absolutely torch them. That doesn't make any

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 2>sense to me, especially with I mean, the Titans have

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 2>to be riding high right now, the amount of confidence

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 2>they have to be feeling going into this game, after

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 2>beating the Patriots, after beating the top team in the league,

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 2>the Ravens. I mean, they are going to be a

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 2>very confident team heading into this year. Now. When they

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 2>did play early in the season, it was in Tennessee,

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 2>so this time it is obviously going to be in

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Kansas City, so that might make a little bit of

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 2>a difference. But I absolutely love the Titans at that number.

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I think I should lock that in soon because I

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 2>think money might start to come in on the Titans

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 2>once people get over the recency bias of seeing the

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs put up fifty one points there today. So I

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:50.679
<v Speaker 2>think it might be good to get in on the

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 2>Titans early. As far as the total, I think I

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 2>would have to lean. I would have to lean the over.

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Patrick mahomes with put up fifty fifty one

0:28:00.520 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 2>points today and then Derek Henry is gonna get them

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:04.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of a lot of yards and points there

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 2>when they play as well, So I'd have to lean

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the over a little bit. It makes me a little

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 2>bit nervous because anytime there's there's a team that runs

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 2>the ball a lot, I think you want to look

0:28:12.480 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 2>more at the under because the more you run the ball, obviously,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 2>the more clock you eat up, which is less time

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:19.960
<v Speaker 2>for points. But at that number where it's at right now,

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I would lean the over in that. So I like

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 2>the Titans in the over.

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I like the Titans too, as long as it's

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>above a touchdown. I do do you have any interest?

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I mean, the Titans are plus two

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty five on the money line. That doesn't really entice

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>me there. I feel like the points, but I'm just

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>wondering about you.

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, I wouldn't. I wouldn't take No. I mean

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 2>I was on Titans plus ten against the Ravens and

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 2>then hindsight, obviously I wish I took that huge is

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 2>like a plus three fifty money line. So maybe I

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 2>should learn from that mistake and sprinkle the money line

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 2>a little bit this weekend. But no, I think I

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 2>think I'll just stick with the with with with the

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 2>points and you and you mentioned that briefly there too,

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 2>as long as it stays at seven or above, that's

0:28:57.160 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 2>where like the Titans. If it dips, blow that magic

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 2>number of seven, and that's where I would be a

0:29:01.720 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 2>little bit more cautious.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I completely agree. I above seven, I like the Titans.

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because you mentioned it, so you think that this,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>as the week goes on, is probably going to come

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>down then, right?

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I mean maybe because I just think

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>it opened up such a big line because of the

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 2>game today. We saw the Chiefs put up fifty one

0:29:18.640 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 2>points in three quarters, So I would think maybe people

0:29:21.960 --> 0:29:23.480
<v Speaker 2>are going to start thinking about a little bit more too.

0:29:23.520 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Logically as the week goes on, and sharp money was

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 2>probably going to come in on the Titans, I would think, so, yes, yes, yeah,

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:32.239
<v Speaker 2>I would think it's going to get closer closer, it's

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:34.239
<v Speaker 2>going to go lower as the week goes on.

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. I guess I feel that this

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is the way it's going to go because you've got

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the Titans who have just knocked off the Patriots and

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens, so you feel like that the public would

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>be on them. But I feel like the public is

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the Titan. You know, the public's going to just be

0:29:48.240 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>enamored of the fifty one points right and Patrick Mahomes

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and just going to want to go all over the Chiefs.

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And I agree that the Sharps are probably going to

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>be hitting the Titans and that's going to at least

0:29:57.600 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>keep it in check. But yeah, I don't have a

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>good feeling for but I agree with you that I'm

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:03.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a planet now while it's seven and a

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>half because I do like that number, and it could

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not gonna rise anywhere crazy. It's not

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna go up to like ten or anything like that.

0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, as long as you're above seven, you know,

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the difference between seven and a half eight eight and

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a half, it's not that big a deal. So I

0:30:16.480 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>feel like locking in it now. And with the total

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>look I to say it. I mean I went with

0:30:21.400 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the under this week, which was over by halftime, so

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly not something that I feel great about. I

0:30:27.240 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>would still lean the under here, man, I mean I

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>get it. I just I see this as more of

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Titans putting up a pretty big defensive

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>effort going into this game, and you know, I could

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 1>see it being close. It's probably not one the I'm

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>going to pull the trigger on but at the opening number,

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>despite what you know, the fact that the Chiefs basically

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just went over this number by themselves, I think I

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.840
<v Speaker 1>would still probably lean towards the under, but not enough

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to make a play on it. Forty nine Ers hosting

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, so their early consensus lines again the forty

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>nine Ers laying seven with the total at forty five.

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Another rematch here. The previous game in Week twelve was

0:31:03.760 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 1>a dominant performance by the Niners thirty seven to eight.

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers was sacked five times. George Kittle had one

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty nine yards. Look, it's a significant spread.

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Both these spreads are pretty significant for a conference. You know,

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>seven points in a playoff game, it's no joke. I

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:19.920
<v Speaker 1>think I know how you feel here. I think I

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>probably feel the same. But what are your thoughts here

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>on the spread of seven with the total at forty five.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just just quickly mentioned two pretty big spreads for

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 2>championship games. I'm gonna look into it tomorrow, but I

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>wonder if this is the first time that both championship

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 2>games have been lines of a touchdown or more. That's

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of interesting. But yes, I am definitely going with

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 2>the forty nine Ers here. I just think they're underrated

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>and the Packers are overrated. I mean, I've said my

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>piece about the Packers. I think they're the worst thirteen

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 2>to three team ever. And now they're going on the road.

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 2>They've got to go to San Francisco, where where they

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>just they got walloped in San Francisco earlier in the season.

0:31:57.840 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 2>I love the forty nine Ers. I love their coaching.

0:31:59.760 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 2>I think this is another game where there's gonna be

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>coaching advantage. I'm not a huge fan of Matt Lafleur,

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 2>and I think that was part of the reason why

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 2>they barely squeaked by the Seahawks today. I didn't love

0:32:09.480 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 2>the game plan by Matt Lafleur, so in a coaching

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 2>matchup between him and Kyle Shanahan as well. I love

0:32:15.560 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Shanahan and that coaching matchup. I just I don't

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 2>see how the Packers are gonna be able to slow

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 2>down the forty nine Ers, and then I don't see

0:32:23.080 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 2>how the Packers are gonna score points either. So I

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 2>mean the spreads at seven, I would even take the

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 2>forty nine Ers close to at like nine, and a half.

0:32:31.200 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 2>I would probably still take the forty nine ers. I

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.080
<v Speaker 2>might even take the forty nine ers if it was ten.

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 2>So at seven, yes, give me that all day.

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm gonna I don't see this dropping under a touchdown.

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>If it does, I'm pushing all my chips into the

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:46.760
<v Speaker 1>middle on the forty nine ers for sure, if you

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>get at six and a half or something like that.

0:32:48.600 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with you, I like it at seven.

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is finally gonna be the game. I mean,

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>we look, I mean you go back to the game

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>they played against the nine Ers earlier and you were like,

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>oh boy, this is not These two teams are not

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>in the same class. Nothing has changed at all. And

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know with the forty nine ers just being healthy.

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean the one thing people forget. They hadn't had

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a buy since week four. I mean, they were exhausted,

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>they were banged up, they had that buy. They got healthy.

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Bosa is a maniac, and he's just you know, they

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have a second receiver the Packers. It's really really

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>difficult to see the Packers winning this game, certainly, but

0:33:25.640 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping this game close. Man. So I agree with you

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>at this point. I don't have a real good feel

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>for the total. By the way, at forty five. I mean,

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the first game was exactly forty five thirty

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>seven eight, So I don't personally have any play on that.

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>But in terms of the spread, yeah, I mean, and

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not too worried by the way about where this

0:33:43.680 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is going. Like you said, it's not going to go

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to ten or anything like that, so I don't feel

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the big rush to get in if the public somehow

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 1>becomes you know, Packers are a very public team. If

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the public somehow pushes this to six and a half,

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>then I'd be all over it. So for me, I

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 1>don't feel all that crazy about going after it. I'll

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>probably put some on it at seven for now, but

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel crazy about going that because if it

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>goes to seven and a half, it goes to eight whatever,

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>not the big deal for me. But do you have

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>any feeling on the total whatsoever?

0:34:10.480 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm with you. I won't be betting on the

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>total at that number because I think, I honestly think,

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it sounds like an easy answer, but I

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 2>honestly think it's gonna be a very similar score to

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 2>what the regular season game was just because I think

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 2>there are forty nine Ers offense is just a lot

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 2>better than the Packers defense and their defense forty nine

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Ers defense a lot better than the Packers' offense thirty

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:32.399
<v Speaker 2>seven to eight in the regular season. I think it's

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.800
<v Speaker 2>gonna be similar. I just don't see the Packers. I

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 2>mean the Packers. I think what they'll have to do

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 2>on offense is they need to get Aaron Jones going,

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and they need to get him going early, and they

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 2>need to get him going in more than just the

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 2>running game as well. If they can get him in

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the past involved in the passing game a little bit,

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 2>then that will take a little bit of the pressure

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 2>off Davante Adams and not in them not having a

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 2>second receiver that they can go too. So I mean,

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 2>and it's always hard to discount Aaron Rodgers, one of

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 2>the greatest quarterbacks of all time, obviously, but no, I

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 2>would stay away from the total just because I think

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be I think it's gonna be a similar

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 2>to what it was last last game. So I think

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:10.399
<v Speaker 2>the forty nine Ers are gonna win by I don't

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 2>think I think forty nine is gonna win by a lot.

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 2>And I don't think the Packers are gonna score a

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of points, so yeah, I'll stay away from the total.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we we view this game very similarly. And again,

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I really think that if the Saints had managed to

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>beat the Vikings, that the Saints would have come into

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Lambo and beat them, and you know, pretty you know,

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>I think this was really the best that you know, God,

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to say it like this, but it

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.399
<v Speaker 1>just feels like a like a fraudulent season a little

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bit for the Packers.

0:35:36.200 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Again, they're not a thirteen to three team. They wind

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 1>up drawing another team that's not all that good, you know,

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, as well as Russell Wilson gets them to play,

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they wind up getting a very favorable draw there. You know,

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they're a decent team, they're a solid team. They're a

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>playoff team, but they're not a team that deserved really

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a BIGE, you know, obviously for the reasons that we discussed.

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>And they're not a team that I feel like is

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:00.919
<v Speaker 1>a super Bowl caliber team. So I grew you go ahead.

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, sorry, Well I was just gonna say I will

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:06.200
<v Speaker 2>say something about about the Packers positive. There is something

0:36:06.239 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 2>to say about just being able to squeak out these

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 2>just dirty, grimy close games. I mean, they do have

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>a thirteen and three record. There is something you have

0:36:13.680 --> 0:36:15.720
<v Speaker 2>to say for that. They didn't lose the close games.

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:19.160
<v Speaker 2>They they managed to win these dirty, grimy close games.

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 2>So there is something to say for that. So if

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 2>they can turn this into a slugfest with the forty

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:25.960
<v Speaker 2>nine ers, maybe Aaron Rodgers can pull it out. Yeah,

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, there's something to say for that.

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't want I don't want to hate mail from

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Packers that I picked them early on in our preseason

0:36:33.920 --> 0:36:36.359
<v Speaker 1>episodes to win the division and everything like that. I

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>love Aaron Rodgers. He's one of my favorite players of

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all time. They're a very very solid team. But I

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:45.439
<v Speaker 1>really do think that there's a class difference right now

0:36:45.480 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 1>with the forty nine Ers and the Packers. So I

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>do see this line creeping up sort of sounds like

0:36:50.200 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>you do, and I'm not afraid to go after it

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:54.239
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think if they beat the forty nine ers,

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>kudos to them, and I you know, I'll eat crow

0:36:56.880 --> 0:37:00.000
<v Speaker 1>because you know, I really really it's it's very difficul

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>well to see it happening. I could much to me

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:05.759
<v Speaker 1>I could so much easier to see the Titans beating

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs than I could the Packers beating the forty

0:37:08.120 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>nine ers A a way. I see right. Yeah, so

0:37:10.440 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>that's how I say, Well, it should be fun. But

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that is it for today's show. Thanks a lot for

0:37:14.280 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>joining me, Ian, especially on a Sunday night with very

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>little time to think about the games. Did a great job.

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Remind everybody where they can find more of you in

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 1>your work.

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely. The main area where you can find me

0:37:25.040 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 2>is on Twitter at Ian mac Os, I A I

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 2>N m ac Os. Also, obviously I worked for odd Shark.

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 2>We also have a Monday to Friday live stream on YouTube,

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 2>so just search odd Shark on YouTube. It's called Guys

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 2>and Bets. I'm on that from Monday to Thursday as well,

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:43.880
<v Speaker 2>so check that out.

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Awesome, thanks again for coming on. I want to remind

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone about bet MGM, where you can get a risk

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:51.279
<v Speaker 1>free five hundred dollars bet if you sign up for

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the bet MGM Sports app using our promo code Harris,

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and don't forget to leave this review on Apple Podcasts

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>or Stitcher. Send a screenshot of that review to contest

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 1>at Betting Pros doc to be entered into our Michael

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Thomas signed helmet giveaway. We'll be back on Thursday getting

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>into some of our best bets for the Championship round.

0:38:07.920 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you that