WEBVTT - Herm Edwards Fired + The Drive for Six

0:00:02.160 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal Hell.

0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:08.639
<v Speaker 2>That for me. I'm a man, I'm for I've heard

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 2>so many players say, well, I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You want to be happy for a day?

0:00:12.520 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Edith Steak is that woo woom?

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And Dan and Tie, welcome back to the solid Verbo

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>boys and girls. My name is Ty Hildenbrandt. That fine

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>gentleman over there, the one, the only, still, the incomparable

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Dan and the man Rubinstein, Sir, how are you?

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:36.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm good? I'm I say that every show and I'm

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>a happy guy. Ty, I don't know what to tell you,

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 2>and I'm especially happy about this show. I'm especially happy

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 2>about what the day holds. Look. Fall hasn't encroached. It's

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>still summer sort of. It's going to be the eighties today.

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 2>I got outside yesterday. You know what I got yesterday? Ty,

0:00:51.240 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 2>I got a library card. Come on, look at me.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Wow, it's the other time in my life, father time

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:57.560
<v Speaker 1>chasing you down.

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Welcome one, Welcome all.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for tuning back into the solid verbal of

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>this episode, all of our episodes, driven by our good

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>friends over at Geico. We have announced a concept for

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the live show next month. In like two weeks, two

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and a half weeks in New York soliverblelive dot coms

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>where you can buy tickets. If you're in the New

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>York area, please come on out and see us potentially

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>fail spectacularly. No, that's not a way to sell the show.

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Ty okay, Well, then sell me. Sell me on College

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>Football The Game Show.

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 2>College Football the Game Show, the only interactive game show

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that tests our knowledge with an interactive element on all

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 2>things college football, but sort of only what's happened thus

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 2>far in the first five weeks of the season by

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the time we produce and present that show, and so

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.440
<v Speaker 2>it's content that's fresh on everybody's mind. And you get

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>to see Tie in person, you get to politely smell

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>his hair. Smell Tieshair dot com. Yep, and you get

0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to come out in New York, the greatest city in

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 2>the world according to me. So what's not to like?

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 2>I can't wait. It's going to be a really fun time.

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Smell Tizhair dot com, soliverblelive dot com to be in

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>the studio audience for College Football The Game Show, And

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 2>to be clear, can bring three I don't know, whatever

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:16.839
<v Speaker 2>you're into.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, to be clear, you can bring your friends. Uh

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>do we have a splash zone set up for this.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, come on, we always have that splash zone.

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't always work out that people are going to

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>get drenched in the Knight's fluid.

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Da joure right, right, But the potential, the possibility always exists.

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Oh my gosh, the possibility always exists that the people

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 2>need to know if they're sitting close that they're in

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the splash zone. You never know what could happen at

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 2>a Soliverble Live show College Football Colon. The game show Colon,

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>an interactive experience Colon presented by the Solid Verbal Colon

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 2>is still a podcast.

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Not until actual game show, but close enough.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, might be someday, who knows.

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Colon come and see us. Sorry, that's five Collins. Welcome

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.519
<v Speaker 1>to our college football show. I'm ty he's been over

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the next forty five minutes or so, we've got news.

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:12.359
<v Speaker 1>We've got a little game that we are very excited about.

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, I love this game. I don't even recall

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>how long we've been playing this game for. It's a

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a drive for six Spin type of

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>show that you know, we've kind of had percolating for

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.239
<v Speaker 1>a while. And it just so happens that this year

0:03:28.240 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got teams like Duke and Rutgers, Kansas, even Vandy

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that are potentially going down that long wiggled road that

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is a drive for six. So gonna do that here momentarily.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 2>But before we.

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Do, Dan, I can't yell today.

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't got the energy breaking.

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Herb Edwards fired shortly after we hit the stop button,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>as per usual on the Sunday recap episode. Thankfully, we

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>had the foresight to preempt it a little bit at

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the very end of the episode by giving ourselves some

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>contingent season the event that Herm or Brian Harson or

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 1>hel Kirk Farrens got the axe. Indeed, Herm was fired

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>potentially on the field. I don't know if you saw

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>that clip, looks like maybe it happened on the field.

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.839
<v Speaker 1>He took it like a man. But this was pretty

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>much an open secret that it was going to happen.

0:04:27.160 --> 0:04:31.599
<v Speaker 1>We were just waiting for it to occur. This one,

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.799
<v Speaker 1>of course, happens after the loss to Eastern Michigan. Naturally,

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got articles out there. I've got one in front

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>of us from Dennis Dodd, our friend from CBS Sports

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>with eleven potential candidates. Should I read through some of

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>these names for you, that's sure. Absolutely Matt Rule. That

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>rule always would be a win. Always named in conjunction

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>with the college game Byron Leftwich, the current offensive coordinator

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>for the Tampa Bay Bucks, Dan Mullend currently with ESPN.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Also Tom Herman, currently studio analyst. We've got Todd Monkin,

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the offensive coordinator for Georgia, Hugh Freeze, the much maligned

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>head coach at Liberty, Brian Harson, the currently and still

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>much aligned head coach at Auburn, Dion Sanders coach, prime

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:24.679
<v Speaker 1>head coach at Jackson State, Mike Norvell at Florida State,

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Justin Willcox, who just keeps getting on these lists despite

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we've seen the offense the last couple

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>of years, head coach at Cal and Rick Neuheisel, if

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>only because he lives in the area. God, So those

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are eleven names, Dan, of those eleven names outside of

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt Rule, which I think would be a huge win,

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's likely to happen. You know

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>where I stand on Matt Rule. I think he's the

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>next head football coach at Penn State. If and when

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>James Franklin leaves right. But beyond rule, who would clearly

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be a win. Of the other ten names here, who

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is of interest to you? Of them?

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 2>None of them are of interestable. So here's okay. Here

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 2>are the particulars. I do not think Arizona State is

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 2>a bad job. I don't think it's an average job.

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it's an above average job that perhaps when

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>you see job lists or you see the fact that

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>college football media people spend time in Phoenix, and they

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:20.880
<v Speaker 2>wonder to themselves, why doesn't every top kid go to

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 2>Arizona State, And they think Arizona State is a bigger job,

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 2>perhaps or a more attractive job than it actually is.

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a pretty good job. Now, the changing

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 2>landscape of the PAC twelve ten in the future, and

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the changing landscape of whatever happens with the NCAA investigation

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 2>into alleged improprieties on the recruiting trail, it seems like

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 2>you are going to need somebody young, hungry, and can

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:52.719
<v Speaker 2>turn chicken shit into a chicken sandwich because the roster

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.760
<v Speaker 2>is going to be in a place that might not

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 2>be super attractive for a year or two. Now, you

0:06:57.760 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 2>can always upgrade things quickly via the and Arizona state

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 2>is a place where you can attract talent from southern California,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 2>from the West Coast, from other parts of the country

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that aren't necessarily looking like what Arizona looks like later

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 2>on in the season. It's an attractive place geographically. It's

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 2>a big campus. They upgraded facilities relatively recently. There is

0:07:18.360 --> 0:07:24.720
<v Speaker 2>a history of some success, but infrastructure internally wise, right now,

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>who's going to be the ad moving forward? Is it

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 2>a long term Ray Anderson thing? Who brought in his

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 2>close personal friend and former client, Herm Edwards. Is he

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 2>going to be making that decision? I don't know, Maybe,

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 2>maybe not, And so there is there are the number

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 2>of question marks involved in the job make it interesting

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 2>and so generally speaking, with jobs like this, going retread

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work out. You can ask your neighbor to the

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 2>south and Tucson with how it worked out with Kevin Sumlin.

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Now there were highs and lows with rich Rodriguez, for sure,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 2>but I thought he was in a hungrier place than

0:07:56.600 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Kevin Sumlin when he arrived in Tucson. So no, they're

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be a number of names. But like the

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>ones that you mentioned don't do much for me. I'd

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 2>like to see somebody getting that early opportunity, be it

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>a high profile coordinator, be it somebody with a connection

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 2>to the school or at least connection to the West coast,

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 2>so you feel like can hire relatively well, you know,

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>coming up from the Mountain West. Obviously, we saw Brent

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 2>Brennan's name come up for the Arizona job and the

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>success he's had at San Jose State, so that would

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 2>be a come up job for him a San Jose State,

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>a place that traditionally has not had a ton of success.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's a good job. I think you

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.839
<v Speaker 2>can go into California and recruit a bunch of high

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 2>level three star kids and some four star kids that

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the LA schools or Oregon whatever, like, it's

0:08:40.800 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 2>a different experience. You can go away to Arizona if

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>you're from southern California, you're from northern California, whatever. I

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>think there's plenty of talent. The uncertainty around conference, I suppose,

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 2>is a thing more for a school like Arizona State

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>than for Oregon or Washington, because the general sentiment is

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to land somewhere bigger than whatever the

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 2>long term prognosis is for West Coast football. But I

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I think you can win in Tempe. I

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 2>think with the right guy, and that's true of anywhere basically,

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.800
<v Speaker 2>but I think specifically there. As the talent level has

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 2>increased in the state of Arizona, which it has, it

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 2>absolutely has, the Arizona schools have not done a successful

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:20.599
<v Speaker 2>job keeping that talent at home. You look, you know

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>b Jon Robinson and Spencer Rattler. Oregon's done a tremendous

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 2>job recruiting Arizona talent. Obviously, USC has a history of

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 2>doing it as well that geographically, it's in a tough

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 2>place to want or to convince kids to stay home with,

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, Texas not terribly far away. The California schools,

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Oregon whatever, Washington has had success in Arizona. So I

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 2>just think the right smart guy, which is very easy

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 2>to say without naming a specific name, But everybody can

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 2>succeed at somewhere, well, no everybody can succeed at a

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 2>place that's set up in the way that Arizona State

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 2>is set up, with the with the right surrounding investment.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 2>So in terms of Matt rule, could succeed at Nebraska,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 2>could succeed at Arizona State. Sure, but this is not

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the point of his career in which he's coming up

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.959
<v Speaker 2>from Temple right, this is not his like proving ground

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 2>point of his career, which is different. So as I

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 2>look around the West Coast, there's nobody really assistant wise

0:10:18.880 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 2>at USC that jumps out to me or UCLA. Arizona

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>did a good job finding Jedfish with his connection to

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 2>the West Coast and the way he hired aggressively, I

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>think is is pretty great. Kenny Dillingham's name has come up.

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>He's very young, but he has that ASU connection. I

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 2>think he is from Arizona and went to ASU. He's

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 2>thirty two. He's called plays for three weeks. But again,

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 2>thinking like that, yeah, I think is a more successful

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>way about going about your business. Well, so the I

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 2>think it's a solid B plus job.

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the point that keeps coming up, and again,

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a lot to be learned about

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 1>this exact circumstance here, what somebody is walking into. But

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the common threat, if there is one among all the

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>reports that I've seen, is ASU was willing to spend

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever resources to make football more of a priority, to

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>get it out of the proverbial gutter. Everybody says that,

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>literally everybody says that after they fire a coach, So

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't take much from that.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 2>But they spent on those facilities. They did spend in

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the facilities. They raised the money they spent like they're

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:27.239
<v Speaker 2>trying to keep up and be aggressive. That the actions

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 2>are backing up the words. And I think that's my point.

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 2>So regardless of what the circumstance is with the administration,

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>there has been at least a fairly recent track record

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 2>out in Tempe for investing in the football program, and

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 2>so we'll see here. I mean, I'm not enamored with

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 2>any of these names.

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Matt Ruhle will be a huge win, but

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm not convinced he wants to leave the NFL unless

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>they kick him out of the NFL. Byron left which,

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of course is an interesting name. Brian Byron Leftwich should

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>be an NFL head coach now and it's going to

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>happen before long. So I don't think college is in

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the cards for him. I'm interested in Tom Herman. I'm

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>interested in Tom Herman. I know you said about retreads

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to him. I like Jonah Hill, like, I don't know. Yeah,

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I tell you though, I'll give you a second. He's

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>from southern California.

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 2>I understand. Uh has the Texas connections continue?

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>It just feels like his star faded so quickly after

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a meteoric rise, given what he did at Ohio State

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and then got the Texas job and that kind of

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>went poorly, as you would be a much different circumstance

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>than what he had at Texas. But Herban's a guy

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting. Another thing that's interesting to me. And then

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to move on to you know, one or

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>two other mini news tidbits here. If they're going to

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>put Hugh Freeze on the list, given the controversy around

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Hugh Freeze, why not put Urban Meyer on the list too, right,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Like you would think a program that is under investigation

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for whatever would want to steer clear of any other

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>potential controversy by hiring a coach that perhaps has a

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>toxic name. Hugh Freeze is on the list, why not herbs?

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Why not herb just throw them on the list?

0:12:59.400 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:12:59.679 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Why not?

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Right? So, Okay, I'm looking at Bruce Felman's list. Obviously

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 2>this is like his beat the coaching circles and the

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 2>coaching hiring world. Whose list did you go off of?

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I went off with Dennis Dodd. Okay, I'm gonna take

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:17.480
<v Speaker 2>mine over yours. Sorry. He has Jeff Jonathan Smith, who

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 2>is a legacy and a proud Alama Star quarterback from

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State, so you can understand his emotional tized to

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State might be more difficult to pull out an

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 2>existing successful Oregon State coach. Kalani Sataki interesting, but they're

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be a major conference team in short order,

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 2>so Arizona State is a bigger job to me than BYU,

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 2>but still like he has his connection to BYU as well.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Charles Huff is an interesting man so that he just

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 2>became very familiar with as a Notre Dame fan. Now

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 2>thank you, still very early on in his tenure, but

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 2>his ability to recruit the roster in the Sun Belt,

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 2>I would probably say another year too, because he's still

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>relatively young. But I don't think age is as much

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 2>a barrier as it used to be. So Charlestoff is interesting,

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:09.320
<v Speaker 2>though his experience in footprint is not on the West Coast.

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Sean lewis another younger guy who's done good things at

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 2>ken State offensively, especially younger guy. I don't hate the

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 2>Todd Munkin name just because he hasn't had that proved

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 2>experience at a major place. He was at Southern miss

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>and did a good job turning them around. And now

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 2>you can sell people on the like gets In Bennett, Yeah,

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 2>stets In Bennett, and just the tutelage of Kirby Smart

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 2>and the Georgia DNA and the way that like Dan Lanning,

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 2>got himself opportunities and ended up at Oregon in some

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 2>part because of that. Barry otom I'm seeing obviously his

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>head coaching tenure didn't go terrifically well at Miszoo. But

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 2>somebody else who I think has a pretty strong name

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 2>in the industry. I've seen Bill O'Brien, Alex Grinch, Jeff Grimes,

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Casey Dunn all come up. I think when you mentioned

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 2>Tom Herman, I think it's fair to say, and this

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 2>is I don't want to speak out of turn. I

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 2>think it's fair to say that you'd think he'd have

0:15:03.560 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 2>more opportunities that would come out Tom Herman's interviewing for this.

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Tom Herman is the guy that they're honing in on

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 2>for this job. You'd think that there would be more

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.280
<v Speaker 2>interest given the success he had at Texas when he

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 2>did have success, the success obviously he had at Houston,

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and the success as a coordinator Ohio State success on

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 2>the recruiting trail, that there's something behind the curtain. There's

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 2>something behind the curtain. There's always going to be, you

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 2>know the other side of this, the whispers about oh,

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 2>he's this, he's that, and sometimes not specific to Tom Herman.

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 2>That's the reason why an obvious candidate for a lesser

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 2>job than Texas isn't as obvious as it seems, and

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 2>so you're always gonna hear whispers about guys. But I

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 2>think that's something probably with regard to Herman.

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, unfortunately, and double unfortunately is the fact that this

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be the last in season firing.

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there are more on the way. We've heard

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>rumors of Jeff Collins at Georgia Tech, Brian Harrison, you'd

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have to believe is another guy on thin ice. I

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 1>believe that they're going to get this cycle started early.

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Just the way US seeded last season, I could expect

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>there's going.

0:16:16.560 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 2>To be more of this.

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So, yeah, we're going to have to continue taping our

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>contingency plans at the end of our Sunday recap show.

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Depending on what happens. Yeah, I think somebody with especially

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 2>strong connections to California or Texas would be helpful as

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>a starting point for the next Arizona State head coaching job,

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 2>or have the opportunity or have the ability and personality

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 2>to attract guys with that background.

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I have one other bullet point here before we get

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to our game, Djore, this is breaking, quote unquote breaking

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>per Brett McMurphy of Action Network. Yeah, just a little

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>bit before we hit the record button here, the Bedlam

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>series betwe in Oklahoma Oklahoma State officially off starting in

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty five when Oklahoma makes it official and jumps

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>over to the SEC. I don't know if this comes

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>is in great surprise. We've seen this often when teams

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>move conference. The first casualties are generally the rivalries that

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we love among college football. It is one of the

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.879
<v Speaker 1>big bombers, perhaps the biggest bummer when we've got this

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>conference realignment going on. Beside the fact that this is

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>all underpinned by money, and I don't know if any

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>of us college football fans like to think in those terms,

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but losing a rivalry is something that is very tangible,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>and especially a game as great as Bedlam. This fricking sucks.

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>This sucks. I can't even uugh. I love this game

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>every year, and I know they've moved it around a

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and you know, to try and accommodate the

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Big Twelve championship and not have it on back to

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.119
<v Speaker 1>back weeks and what have you. But the fact that

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 1>we're losing games like this, I think is going to

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>be the biggest black guy for any wide scale, mass

0:17:58.960 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>scale conference relign and beyond what we've already seen.

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Agree, and Oklahoma fans would say, look, all we did

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 2>was beat them ninety eight percent of the time. Like,

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 2>what's the novelty in it at this point? Like we

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of know what's going to happen almost all the time.

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Although correct me if I'm wrong with Oklahoma State is

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 2>on a current winning streak in this rivalry game. Actually correct, yes,

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 2>And the Oklahoma coach may have left in the wake

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 2>of it in no small part because of the way

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 2>that they lost that game and the way that the

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 2>disappointing season ended last year of parentheticals, the d parentheticals,

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>who's who's to say, who's to say? Astricies and parentheticals.

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>In Oklahoma state fans, you have the hope every year

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 2>of turning around the trend of losing to Oklahoma all

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the time. And then from a national standpoint, people who

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 2>just enjoy big college football games, we lose one of

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 2>the best and whatever. You wanted to find a rivalry

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 2>as it's a rivalry. Oklahoma fans consider texas their biggest rival,

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 2>and that's fine, but there's a certain amount of energy

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and emotion tied to bedlam that you're just not going

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 2>to get, at least not for a long time, between

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:08.919
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma and Arkansas, Oklahoma and Tennessee, Oklahoma and Auburn, Oklahoma

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:12.479
<v Speaker 2>and Florida. However this works out. I know Oklahoma has

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 2>a history with some of these teams that they're going

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 2>to play in the SEC, but this is in state.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 2>This is a certain amount of energy that like we

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 2>are trying to now compress everything into a pretty good spot.

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Everybody's eight and four and maybe we'll have some new

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 2>bad blood arise. I don't know. I just when you

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 2>start taking these emotional and energetic elements out of the sport.

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 2>It sort of depersonalizes it. Everything is a TV show,

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 2>nothing has history, nothing has specific energy to it, or

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 2>it takes a while, and this is how we let

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 2>it all happen. I mean, when we're questioning in ten, fifteen,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>twenty years, like, huh, sports just kind of seems more

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.080
<v Speaker 2>antiseptic without some of these rivalry games. And look, we

0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 2>get some of them back, right, we have the Backyard

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Brawl back and it's more of a novelty than a

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 2>thing that you can set your calendar to.

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Better than nothing. But I don't know, it's a bummer.

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>It's all sad, still sad. It's a bummer.

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're in a North Korean video to this game,

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 2>which people thought that was real. I know people did

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>think that was great. It's a bummer.

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just a big bummer again. Per the report from

0:20:26.680 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Brett McMurphy, neither athletic Department with any imminent plans to

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>start up the rivalry beyond twenty twenty five. They're not

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>ruling it out at some point in the future. I'm

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sure they will play at some point in the future,

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe a playoff game that'd be wild, but at least

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 1>for the time being. Starting in twenty twenty five, the

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>move over to the SEC claims another rivalry victim.

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess we could always hope in the way that

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>Texas and Texas A and M seem like they're going

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 2>to meet more often than they have lately now that

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be in the same conference. There's always

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 2>hope that when the SEC expands to thirty seven teams,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 2>at one of those expansions will include Oklahoma State and

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 2>they'll be forced to be in the same room together again.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know. This is what has always attracted

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 2>me to always attracted me to the sport is the

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 2>Taylor Swift bad blood of it all. Then you and

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.320
<v Speaker 2>especially like the in state stuff, especially getting Florida Florida State, Clemson,

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.000
<v Speaker 2>South Carolina, even if you know Oregon Oregon State, even

0:21:26.000 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 2>if it's weighted in such a clear direction that you

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 2>get that upset, and that's what actually means more, not

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 2>the SEC. The upset in the rivalry game is what

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 2>means more. And so I don't know, it's just it's

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 2>all deflating. It's not new. This was sort of bound

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 2>to happen. I wish I had do I have my Yeah,

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I still have Bound. It was bound to happen when

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma left the Big twelve. But you know when you

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 2>see stories like this confirming at all and you're like, well,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 2>too bad. All right?

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>That does it for top level news items, stay tuned.

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 1>We of course have our preview episode for week four.

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll go through much more news and specific game previews.

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Then let's talk about the drive for six.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Damn oh, I'm a driver.

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Such a good frickin' movie, baby driver.

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 2>It is very good? Is it as good as Bound?

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 2>We'll find out when you eventually watch Bound for the

0:22:22.920 --> 0:22:26.920
<v Speaker 2>first time. I still have that, and give a very

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 2>detailed and specific review, which you've promised offline.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I have promised off I don't understand what the big

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>deal is. It's just is it a spicier movie than normal?

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:38.679
<v Speaker 2>For me?

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Like? What do people think I am here? I have

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>lived a bit of a sheltered life. I'm not gonna lie,

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not averse to watching movies with a little

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>bit higher spice factor.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Why not? Okay, you're gonna watch Bound, give and report back.

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll rewatch Bound too. We'll dedicate a specific segment to

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 2>the movie Bound. The nineteen ninety six erotic thriller Bound.

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's do it, baby, I'm in. Okay, all right,

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm in. This segment brought to you by our good

0:23:03.080 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>friends over at Verballers dot com.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 2>M that's us, Yeah, that is us.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Forballers dot Com early access to all of our episodes,

0:23:11.560 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>get access to the discord server. Discord server is fricking cool.

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 2>It's great.

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>When we started this thing, we had no concept for

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 1>what discord was. It has quickly become our favorite hang

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>during well throughout the course of the week, but certainly

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>during game days on Saturday. You can just chat with

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.320
<v Speaker 1>other like minded college football fans. It's civil, it's fun.

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>We've got a score bot that keeps you up to

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>date with all the games. Scorebot gets a little bit

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 1>over the top from time to time, but sure. Nonetheless,

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a great place, a true second screen experience. If

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you will, Yeah, going out to you for ballers dot

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>com and sign up. You can also vote in the

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Forballer Top ten poll, which is quickly gaining steam. We've

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 1>got people signing up every week because they want to

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be part of it. You can vote starting at midnight

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>every Saturday night. Slash Sunday morning. We close it up

0:23:58.040 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>bright and early on Sunday morning, on nine am Eastern

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>before we hit record, and then we posted to social media.

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>To my knowledge, it might be the first poll that

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>is out there. It is certainly the most important poll. Yes,

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we'd agree it's the most important top ten

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 1>pole on the interwebs come Sunday morning.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Agree verballers dot com. Okay Forballers dot com get in

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 2>on that early access and that that's sweet, sweet pole action.

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 2>I regret that phrasing.

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>We're popping the hood today on a group of surprise teams.

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Thus far, through three weeks of the college football season,

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>four if you count week zero because some teams in

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>here did play Week zero games. We have made a

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of hay on this show. And I want to

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.880
<v Speaker 1>say this goes back to our conversations with our friend

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Will Leach talking about Illinois a lion I football, how

0:24:49.800 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>every year it's not just a plight to get to.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Be not embarrassing. Yes, is the phrasing hugging with the

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 2>instruction there? Thank you?

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But the drive for six, the drive for Bowl

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>eligibility is something that we have paid I think a

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of attention to over the years, we think

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.280
<v Speaker 1>it's important. Yeah, definitely, we like to train our attention

0:25:13.359 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>on teams that clearly have a drive for six underway,

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and thus far there are a grouping of teams that

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I think are particularly interesting, and we do need to

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>take some time right now and evaluate what their drive

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>for six looks like. It Just pop open the hood,

0:25:29.040 --> 0:25:31.240
<v Speaker 1>just pop it off in that hood and let's talk

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it through, whether they're going to make it to six,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>whether they're going to break down along the way, What

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>does the future have in store for a grouping of

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>teams here.

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's basically our version as college football fans of

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.640
<v Speaker 2>like backdoor relegation, because no other sport has that very

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 2>specific benchmark. Now, you can you're either a playoff team

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 2>or you're not a playoff team, But I feel like

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 2>the weight of being a bowl team carries more gravitas

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 2>in the winning world of college football. That's barely English,

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 2>but yeah, there is something about like a perennial being

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 2>a perennial not bowl team, in the way that you

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 2>can be a perennial not playoff team, lottery team depending

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 2>on the sport, sort of brands you as something and

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 2>so that benchmark is a very successful benchmark, like, Okay,

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 2>we're making progress, Okay, we're competitive, Okay, we missed out,

0:26:17.080 --> 0:26:18.919
<v Speaker 2>but look like how we got to five and seven.

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 2>We had this upset. We put the fear of God

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.920
<v Speaker 2>into these three teams. There is that very specific benchmark,

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and we're going to look at teams who have started

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 2>out now. Granted, quality of competition generally not there, but

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 2>winning games better than losing games, and not all of

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>these teams if I looking at I don't know if

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 2>we want to start with Duke, but lost to Charlotte

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 2>last year. If I if I recall right, correct, that

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 2>is correct insand be Northwestern last year too. I understand that.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 2>But winning, winning, winning, winning, winning. Let's start with due.

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Duke's got a new coach, Mike Elko, formally defensive coordinator

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.120
<v Speaker 1>at Texas A and m formerly defensive coordinator at Notre Dame.

0:26:58.119 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Guy knows how to coach defense. He's done a really

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>good Duke's numbers. I was actually quite surprised going through

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and looking in advance of this week's game how well

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>their defense has played. Granted, the competition's been Temple, Northwestern

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and North Carolina A and T. Not going to pretend

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that that's the stiffest of competition, but they've won all

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>three games, and on a per play opponent adjusted situation

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.119
<v Speaker 1>adjusted basis, Duke's play in pretty solid defense. They're at

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>three to zero with wins again over Temple, Northwestern, North Carolina,

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>A and T. Per our friend Bill Connolly, Duke has

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>a fifty percent chance of winning six or more games,

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.400
<v Speaker 1>which look if you're a Duke football fan, if you're

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>just interested in teams along their drive for six fifty

0:27:46.040 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>percent coin flip. Here's what it looks like the rest

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the way. As I look at Duke. They're on

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the road this week at Kansas. Don't worry, we will

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 1>be covering that game. We have to get a choice game.

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>They should be there. Cowards continue Virginia, Georgia Tech, North Carolina, Miami,

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Boston College, Virginia Tech, Pitt and Wake Forest. There are

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a number of games on here. If I am looking

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>at this objectively through three weeks of the college football season,

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I say they could beat Kansas. I say Virginia could

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>be a hot mess.

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:20.920
<v Speaker 2>They could win that game.

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.320
<v Speaker 1>They could certainly be Georgia Tech. Given the state of

0:28:23.359 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 1>affairs in Atlanta, Virginia Tech, Boston College, even wake Forest,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>who knows what wake Forest. There's definitely potential on the

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>schedule for them to find three wins along the rest

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of the way. How do you feel if you're looking

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>under the hood here with Duke football.

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a lot of smoke and mirrors early

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 2>because the competition. I think Temple might be a disaster.

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 2>It's Temple Northwestern, who also might be kind of a

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 2>disaster after to lose to Southern Illinois yep, and some

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 2>sort of very small north North Carolina A and T

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 2>A and M A and T. I'm impressed by we

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 2>talked about the manor impressed with the manner in which

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 2>they're winning. They're doing a lot of little things correctly.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 2>By the way, it does help to be a former

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 2>Brian Kelly defensive coordinator to get a Power five job, right, So,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Mike Alco I think with his connection to the area,

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he hired well. I think Riley Leonard looks

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 2>to be promising competition. He looks pretty good so far.

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 2>He looks confident, and they're going downfield. It's not a

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of short stuff. The underlying information about Duke football,

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 2>right now, and I watched a good chunk of that

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Northwestern game. Is they're playing with a good amount of effort,

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 2>which goes a long way when the talent level isn't

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 2>there and the roster isn't there. It does seem to

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 2>me that if we're going to use that key term

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 2>of drive, they're driving fast enough to draft off of

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 2>what tie, driving fast enough to draft off of drive

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 2>right behind and be prepared when something falls off of

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 2>the opportunity truck. The opportunity truck.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It took me a while.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 2>It's ex because again you go through their schedule, Virginia

0:30:06.320 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 2>Tech opportunity truck in and of itself, Boston College opportunity

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>truck in and of itself. So the Drive to six

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 2>includes right there two programs that are telling the world,

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 2>hey guys, we beatable, Hey guys, you can have us.

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 2>So whatever you think of Kansas, which I don't think Kansas,

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I think Kansas's opportunity truck is souped up a little

0:30:26.480 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 2>bit more than it's used to in a way that

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>Boston College and Virginia Tech's axels are not necessarily ready

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to roll quickly. So I don't know how axles work.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 2>I am I'm going to say Duke's drive to six

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 2>is looking and I'm inventing this scale on the fly.

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say robust, brisk. I think there. I think

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 2>they have a really good shot of getting to six games.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly enough, again per sp plus, the worst remaining team

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>on this schedule is Georgia Tech.

0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Which doesn't say much for Tech.

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Because we listed some other bad teams, but Tech is

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in a bad place. There's a reason we called that,

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Collins Collins excuse me at the beginning of the show.

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So we will find out a lot more this week,

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not. That Duke Kansas game, the Battle

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Basketball schools, quote unquote, I do believe is

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 1>going to have a fair amount of interest among the

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>weirdos that listen to this show. You and I included, Yeah,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for sure, you and I included. That's why it's part

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of our weekly pick them game. That is part of

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 1>why it is going to be featured. As we go

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>through and talk about all things week four, we will

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>learn a lot more about both of these teams. Are

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about Kansas here shortly as well. I'm

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>not sure if you have a lean in that game

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we can save it for tomorrow. But I have

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:45.480
<v Speaker 1>been impressed by Riley Leonard so far. He's completing about

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy three percent of his passes. He does look confident,

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think above all else it gets down to

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>like the friskiness quotient. It's not a real thing, right,

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>We make up these terms, these scales every week when

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>we do the show. But you do like the teams

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that have a little bit of fight the drive, and

0:32:03.320 --> 0:32:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Duke in the early going has at least

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 1>shown that much to our surprise.

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I just like the general. We were both pretty high

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 2>on the hire of Mike Elcho. When you bring in

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>a coordinator who has been at big places, who has

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 2>built up a resume and a rolladex of assistance, and

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 2>when he gets that opportunity at a place where he is,

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, obviously aware going back to his time in

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.959
<v Speaker 2>the state of North Carolina, that he's going to come

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 2>in with a vision and whatever we think of the

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 2>roster right now, I think it's going to continue to improve.

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's in a good place of the country. And no,

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Duke has the academic thing as well, but it's in

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 2>a good place of the country to restock in a

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 2>better way than where Duke was roster wise the last

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 2>couple of years under God. Now I'm forgetting on. I'm

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 2>seeing his face with his dyed hair Cutcliff coach cut. Yeah, okay,

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 2>so yeah, I say drive to six successful. How about that?

0:32:58.840 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 2>I like it?

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I like it all right. Sorry about Oregon State. We've

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>got Oregon State on this list. Boll team last year,

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>both team last year. And I was going to say,

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>despite the fact that I both, I think we both

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think that Oregon State is pretty good. Yeah, pretty good offense.

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I should qualify that per SP plus ninety seven percent

0:33:19.920 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>chance of winning at least six games, which sounds high,

0:33:23.920 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at the remaining schedule, it computes

0:33:27.440 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>USC Utah back to back weeks tough. That's pretty tough.

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Probably two losses, though they could knock off either one

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of those teams. Who knows what their offense. Then we

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>got games against Stanford Washington State, which you know we'll

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 1>find out more about Wazoo this week as well against

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Oregon Colorado. Colorado's a hot mess, Washington better than expected,

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>cal still knows how to play defense. ASU who knows

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>what state they'll be in by second to last week

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>of the season close out the year Platypus Cup against

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Oregon So despite the fact that the projections seem to

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.920
<v Speaker 1>like Oregon State, there are enough teams on here that

0:34:06.920 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 1>could really cause them some heartache. It does help though

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:12.240
<v Speaker 1>that they've started three to zero thus far. They've beaten

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>Boise They've beaten Fresno, they've beaten Montana State. I think

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>we are both pretty keen on this offense.

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you'll pay good enhanced Boise State, to be clear,

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 2>especially in that first half of the number of turnovers

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that then the havoc that they wreaked on the Broncos.

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we feel pretty good about this offense. It was

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a question of defense going into this thing for Oregon State,

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 1>at least in the early going, for whatever that's worth.

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>The early going, the defense is better. It's better by

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>about thirty spots in the sp plus as compared to

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one.

0:34:51.719 --> 0:34:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Will that continue, I don't know. I have no idea.

0:34:55.320 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 1>They haven't played bad offenses in the form of Boise

0:34:58.280 --> 0:35:01.879
<v Speaker 1>State and Fresno thus far, so I'm curious to see

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as they get into certainly this week against USC certainly

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>next week against Utah, They're gonna have plenty of opportunities

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 1>throughout the courts of the season to showcase what that

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>defense has done in the offseason, how it has improved,

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>if it has improved. Because there's also a game against Washington,

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.480
<v Speaker 1>there's also a game against Oregon Like, there are at

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>least four or five teams on this thing that are

0:35:23.920 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 1>really going to test Oregon State.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 2>Oregon State, for their part, might.

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Be content to get into shootouts, and my hunch is

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that with Jonathan Smith and his gambling tendencies, they'll probably

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 1>win a couple of them. But how good do we

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>think this team is? Is this let me let me

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 1>phrase it two this way?

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:42.399
<v Speaker 2>Maybe is a.

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Tease for our show tomorrow. All Right, I think we

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>both feel pretty confident that Oregon State's getting the six wins. Yes, totally, okay, Yes,

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that being said, level of confidence that Oregon State is

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.240
<v Speaker 1>good enough to catch USC and knock them off games

0:35:58.239 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in corvallis.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're good enough to win that game. You know,

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 2>we're sort of waiting for USC to play a different

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 2>type of game and see how they respond, especially with

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 2>that defense that you know, the forcing of the red

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 2>zone turnovers and you know, Fresno was driving with Jay

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Hayner down I think twenty one to ten when he

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 2>got hurt in the third quarter. Now they comfortably won

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 2>that game. So it's like you're picking knits, You're you're

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 2>looking at very small things in moments, but it's a

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 2>four quarter game. Oregon State's good enough to win that game.

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:34.400
<v Speaker 2>There is something, and this is gonna sound insulting to

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:37.320
<v Speaker 2>both of these entities, there's something about, like the Princeton offense,

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 2>an Oregon States offense, the Princeton basketball offense, who do

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:43.600
<v Speaker 2>they take down like UCLA, like prime nineties UCLA and

0:36:43.640 --> 0:36:47.360
<v Speaker 2>the NCAA tournament that when you watch Oregon States offense

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and you're a team who can't generate open receivers and

0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 2>open plays, you're like, well, the Beams are doing it.

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 2>If Oregon State can do it, why can't we major

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.719
<v Speaker 2>major program to it. Why can't we Texas A and

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:01.200
<v Speaker 2>M do it with five star athletes Oregon State doesn't have.

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 2>And so that's why they'll be in a position to

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:05.840
<v Speaker 2>go to Bowls basically every year for as long as

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Jonathan Smith is there, be it long term, be it short,

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 2>medium term, whatever. The defense is probably again bad this here.

0:37:14.040 --> 0:37:16.240
<v Speaker 2>That's the problem, Like, why wouldn't you just run straight

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 2>at Oregon State. They don't have much of a pass rush.

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:21.320
<v Speaker 2>They're not stopping the run early on against what Fresno

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 2>and Boise and Montana State. I want to say is

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:28.760
<v Speaker 2>who they played in Portland. So until they are able

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 2>to get that to average or slightly below average where

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 2>they're just frisky enough to get off the field at times,

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe confuse a couple quarterbacks who are down, it's hard

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to say that they're taking the next step into that

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 2>the best of what they were under Mike Riley or

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 2>Dennis Ericksson way back when. So yeah, I have them

0:37:46.760 --> 0:37:50.920
<v Speaker 2>squarely in that seven win footprint, which again considering some

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 2>of the lows under both Mike Riley and Gary Anderson,

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:57.400
<v Speaker 2>you'll take because that also means you're probably threatening your

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.840
<v Speaker 2>rivals in Oregon, Washington, in the Northwest.

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm scared to death of Oregon State, especially this

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>week against USC. I'll give it away. I'm taking Oregon State,

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily, not necessarily to win outright. Come when I

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>saw it, when I saw this line early on Sunday,

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 1>when it first dropped, it was seven seven favorite of USC.

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>On the road against Oregon State. I grab seven. It's

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>come down a little bit. I'm not sure what it's

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at now. We'll find out in time for tomorrow. But

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that USC Oregon game I think is going to be fine.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I think potentially a lot of points. I think they

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:37.239
<v Speaker 1>get into trouble when they run up against teams like

0:38:37.320 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Utah because Utah just plays a much different style of offense.

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.400
<v Speaker 2>On a winning streak on a winning streak against Utah

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 2>on winning streak. But we'll see, we'll see.

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we both feel very positively about Oregon State.

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>It is an open question for me of how good

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>do I want to feel about Oregon State. I've got

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>it as like an eight win team, right I think

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>by the time all is said and done, eight with

0:39:01.800 --> 0:39:04.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe a game or two that you could flirt with nine,

0:39:05.120 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't there.

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:09.440
<v Speaker 2>There's also a sense with Jonathan Smith just about program construction,

0:39:09.600 --> 0:39:13.439
<v Speaker 2>roster construction, that he hires West Coast guys that he's

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 2>familiar with, that he's worked with, that are legacies in

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the Northwest. I think his defensive coordinator, let's Trent Bray,

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.360
<v Speaker 2>played at Oregon State, has experienced a bit. You know,

0:39:22.400 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 2>it's good at Nebraska as a linebackers coach, and he

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 2>didn't try to hire young recruiters. Let's just you know,

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 2>he's hitting the portal smartly. Like there's just like he's

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 2>building a house slowly instead of trying to build it

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 2>real quick and flip it right. Well, and then's just

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:38.720
<v Speaker 2>what we talked.

0:39:38.760 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We talked about this when we did the preview. There

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 1>are some coaches and i'd include Mail Tucker, you know,

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:47.400
<v Speaker 1>even Greg Shianna. We'll talk about Rutgers next, but coaches

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that are not on the overthink express. They're doing exactly

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 1>what everyone says they should be doing. And of course

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't always work. But at least in the case

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.359
<v Speaker 1>of Oregon State and frankly some of these other teams.

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Rutgers again next, it does appear to be working. Team

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is better than it was a year ago. So all right,

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>let's move on to Rutgers. Good chow, Let's talk Rutgers football.

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk Rutgers football. Rutgers football is three to zero.

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>They've got wins on the road, a weird win Week

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>one on the road over Boston College twenty two to

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty one. They crushed, absolutely obliterated Wagner for whatever that's worth.

0:40:20.760 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Come on, Tyan, you were Seahawks, Seahawks, Seahawks all week long, continue.

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Long, pause, and then last week on the road at

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Temple a sixteen to fourteen wins. So the wins that

0:40:33.920 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>they've got here against Power five teams have both been

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on the road. Neither has been all that exciting. For

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>what it's worth, They've got Iowa this week. They're about

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a seven and a half point home dog. The over

0:40:44.320 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 1>under for that game is thirty five and a half

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>point thirty five and a half point.

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I realized they were playing this weekend. Yeah,

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 2>which is just unwatchable.

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>That is Vegas telling you don't watch this game, don't

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:02.320
<v Speaker 1>do it, don't put yourself through the Let's talk though,

0:41:02.480 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>about this Rutgers football team. Rutgers has a thirty seven

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>percent chance for the sp plus of winning six or

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 1>more football games. Great their schedule the rest of the

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:18.279
<v Speaker 1>way gets in the way of that. A little bit

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:19.880
<v Speaker 1>gets in the way of that.

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 2>A little bit.

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Iowa and Ohio State back to back weeks. I don't

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>know if we think that highly of Iowa's offense, but

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>i Will still plays defense and that's going to be

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.959
<v Speaker 1>a challenge for this Rutgers offense, which at last check

0:41:31.080 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is one hundred and third in the SP plus.

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 2>Not a good all. By the way, we talk about

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:37.439
<v Speaker 2>the drive to six Rutgers, Iowa's gonna be the drive

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to thirteen.

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:43.719
<v Speaker 1>First one of thirteen. Get that dub continue amazing. We've

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>also got a game against Nebraska. There's an Indiana game here,

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 1>which might be the only winnable of the bunch here

0:41:50.920 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of the remaining lot, Minnesota on the road, Michigan, Michigan State,

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Penn State, back to back to back weeks. They close

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 1>out the year on the road at Maryland. That final

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>stretch of five games is brutal. So they've got two

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>stretches here with Iowa, Ohio State back back weeks. Then

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of a break before they get

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 1>into it Halloween weekend, one more time. Minnesota, Michigan, Michigan State,

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Penn State, Maryland. I do not feel confident that they're

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:22.319
<v Speaker 1>getting the six wins. I have no doubt that they

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 1>will challenge a couple of those teams, like the game

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.799
<v Speaker 1>against Indiana will be interesting. They're at home. The game

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:31.920
<v Speaker 1>against Michigan for some portion of that game I think

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting because home. Yeah, for some portion of

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that game, they'll play super conservatively. They'll try to drain

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the clock to try to keep it out of JJ

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy's hands. They might keep that interesting for a quarter

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>before they get blown out. But otherwise here it's really

0:42:46.719 --> 0:42:48.960
<v Speaker 1>hard for me to see that path they get the

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>six wins.

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:54.319
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, Well, the Nebraska's not something you spend a ton

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.840
<v Speaker 2>of time. They have the Huskers. I think that's the

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Friday night of our live show. Do they play? Is

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 2>that a Friday night game?

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 1>October seventh, Soliverbolive dot com to see our show, not

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this one.

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 2>We won't have the TV. We promise, yeah, now we

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 2>won't subject people to Nebraska. Rutgers football's fine. So we

0:43:12.080 --> 0:43:16.880
<v Speaker 2>talked about Oregon State going about its program building and

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 2>roster construction whatever in a smart way that like there's

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 2>a self awareness there. It seems like there's a self

0:43:21.600 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 2>awareness with Ruckers as well that I agree. We're leaning

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.400
<v Speaker 2>into the Greg Ciano defense thing. We're leaning into transfers,

0:43:28.440 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 2>We're leaning into hiring assistants from the Northeast and have

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.360
<v Speaker 2>the connections in New Jersey as an underrated state in

0:43:33.400 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 2>terms of developing high school talent and so far, again

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 2>it's what Boston College, Wagner and somebody who who did

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.800
<v Speaker 2>they Temple beat Temple? Temple? Everybody gonna Temple this year probably,

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 2>But they get the hell off the field. They're not

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 2>wasting time on defense, aren't they something like fifteenth or

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 2>twentieth or something in terms of three and out percentage nationally?

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 2>So they get off the field against bad teams, which

0:43:57.719 --> 0:43:59.000
<v Speaker 2>makes me think they're going to get off the field.

0:43:59.040 --> 0:44:01.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll be a little bit less against even better teams.

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.960
<v Speaker 2>That there's that confidence, the alignment, the responsibility, the effort

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 2>on defense is there, and they're building depth. I just

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:10.359
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna be pain in the ass. They're

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 2>gonna bring teams down to their level, and they're not

0:44:13.280 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 2>going to be as good as Iowa. But are they

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:20.520
<v Speaker 2>good enough to beat Iowa? And Iowa's especially bad on offense? Perhaps?

0:44:20.960 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Are they good enough to beat a Nebraska team who

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:27.040
<v Speaker 2>is willing to lose to you name it? Perhaps? So

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm kind of if we're talking Indiana, who I'm not

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 2>a big believer, And still I think they're gonna be okay,

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 2>They'll be improved but Indiana. Am I fully sold on Maryland?

0:44:39.080 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Not quite? Yeah, this is kind of a September Terps thing,

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 2>right Indiana, Nebraska, And I'm not sold on Penn State.

0:44:49.160 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it's you're not sold in se No, I'm

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 2>not sold on Penn State being a challenge that Rutgers

0:44:57.680 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 2>will be a challenge for Penn State. I'm not sold

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 2>on that quite yet. But again, these are all a

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of these programs, especially what Michigan be ruckers by

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown last year at home. These are all programs

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:11.959
<v Speaker 2>willing to have extremely off character and down weeks. They're

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:17.279
<v Speaker 2>all willing to maybe without counting Ohio State, but these

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 2>are not bulletproof programs. And so if Rutgers is just

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:24.799
<v Speaker 2>doing it with sloggy defense up front, then they're gonna

0:45:24.840 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 2>catch somebody sixteen thirteen. They just are. And I don't

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 2>know if that's win number five or win number six

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 2>or were number four, but they went to they kind

0:45:32.200 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 2>of went to a fake bowl game last year right

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 2>when they got that last second invite, lost to way

0:45:37.440 --> 0:45:41.200
<v Speaker 2>Wake Forest at five and seven. So yeah, I'm in

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:43.520
<v Speaker 2>for a similar season that the drive is going to

0:45:43.560 --> 0:45:46.640
<v Speaker 2>be that they have enough gas to draft off the

0:45:46.640 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 2>opportunity truck.

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:51.399
<v Speaker 1>You could see them Halloween weekend going to Minnesota and

0:45:52.640 --> 0:45:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we get a Minnesota stinker where they're hyper conservative.

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:57.560
<v Speaker 2>They try to run the ball.

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Rutgers knows it's coming, probably not good enough to fully

0:46:01.200 --> 0:46:05.239
<v Speaker 1>contain Moe Ibrahem, but you know they're not really going

0:46:05.280 --> 0:46:07.080
<v Speaker 1>to air it out. That's just not the style of play.

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.760
<v Speaker 1>See that one being closer than might meet the eye.

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I've got him for five. I think they can get

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to five, but six to me is really pushing.

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 2>It all right. Aaron, by the way, watching along on

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 2>forballers dot Com, says New Jersey is underrated in general.

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:24.359
<v Speaker 2>I agree, okay, I agree there you. I'm a big

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:26.640
<v Speaker 2>fan of the state of New Jersey. My people hail

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:28.960
<v Speaker 2>from the great state of New Jersey, the Garden State.

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:32.560
<v Speaker 1>A couple more teams here, Kansas Okay three and oh

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:35.320
<v Speaker 1>three and oh Kansas thirty five percent chance of going

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:39.800
<v Speaker 1>six or more wins. They've beaten Tennessee Tech, They've beaten

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, They've beaten Houston. The Houston win in particular

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:48.520
<v Speaker 1>was especially impressive. Also impressive here is the fact that

0:46:48.560 --> 0:46:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they scored fifty six fifty five and forty eight points

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:55.960
<v Speaker 1>in their first three games, respectively. This is not an

0:46:56.000 --> 0:46:59.799
<v Speaker 1>offense with Jalen Daniels that has had trouble against the

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>competition through three weeks. When it comes to moving the

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 1>football and putting up points, you can do a hell

0:47:05.480 --> 0:47:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of a lot worse than that. You can more a

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>hell of a lot worse than that. If nothing more,

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Kansas football has ascended to the point where it is

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>now entertaining, and that's an upgrade given where this program's been.

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:20.799
<v Speaker 1>That's a huge freakin upgrade. So I'll due credit to

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.480
<v Speaker 1>not just Jalen Daniels, but Lancel I pulled and what

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:27.640
<v Speaker 1>he's been able to do in very short order at Kansas.

0:47:27.920 --> 0:47:30.319
<v Speaker 1>The game against Duke this week I think is going

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to be particularly interesting. Kansas favored by about nine points

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in that game. We can talk more about that on

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the recap show or the preview show. Excuse me and

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the recap show for what it's worth. The rest of

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the way, here is what Kansas has in front of them.

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Iowa State TCU back to back road games at Oklahoma

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and Baylor before a bye week. Then as they get

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>into the month of November, Oklahoma State at Texas Tech.

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:59.879
<v Speaker 1>Texas closed out the year against Kansas State on the road,

0:48:00.160 --> 0:48:03.120
<v Speaker 1>so they're getting into the thick of their Big Twelve

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>schedule starting up in the month of October. I feel

0:48:09.080 --> 0:48:13.560
<v Speaker 1>like Kandris Kansas excuse me, is particularly dangerous, Okay, per

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the sp plus a thirty five percent chance of winning

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>six or more games. I just feel like, whenever you've

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:22.000
<v Speaker 1>got an offense like this, and granted it may all

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>revolve around one player, but still, you can do a

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:29.480
<v Speaker 1>lot worse than having one really good player. In college football,

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:32.680
<v Speaker 1>We've seen that work for any number of other teams

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in the past. Jalen Daniels right now, completing about a

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:38.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven percent clip of his passes not turning the

0:48:38.880 --> 0:48:42.400
<v Speaker 1>football over through the air seven to one touchdown interception ratio,

0:48:42.960 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>leads the team in rushing yardage, also has three touchdowns

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:48.439
<v Speaker 1>on the ground, so he is clearly the focal point

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of their offense. They will obviously go up against defenses

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.480
<v Speaker 1>that are good enough to contain him, but there are

0:48:54.520 --> 0:48:56.839
<v Speaker 1>plenty of other teams here in the Big Twelve that

0:48:57.080 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where their defense stands, and you could

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:04.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly see a scenario in which Jalen Daniels tortures them

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:07.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. So given the fact that they're already at

0:49:07.560 --> 0:49:11.160
<v Speaker 1>three wins, I feel awesome that Kansas is getting a six.

0:49:11.280 --> 0:49:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel great about this drive for six.

0:49:13.680 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I perhaps don't feel as good as you do,

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 2>judging by your enthusiasm. I feel good about them today. Yeah.

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 2>The problem with Kansas right now to me is the

0:49:24.600 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 2>thinness of this roster and what this defense looks like

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 2>over the course of the year, that even if their

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 2>offense is still humming, scoring fifty ish points against your

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:36.760
<v Speaker 2>West Virginia's and your Houston's, that they're giving up fifty

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.320
<v Speaker 2>eight because two defensive linemen went down in the backups

0:49:39.800 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 2>are just not as good, are just not and the

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:45.040
<v Speaker 2>starters aren't great right now in that front seven. So

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just such a thin line right now that they're

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:52.040
<v Speaker 2>tiptoeing across because of depth, and so I think they're

0:49:52.040 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 2>going to score points against a lot of teams. And like,

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:56.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not super high on the Baylor pickleball offense at

0:49:56.920 --> 0:49:59.520
<v Speaker 2>the moment, I'm not super high on the Kansas State

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 2>offense at the moment. I'm not super high on Texas

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Tech just in general, at the moment. There's a lot

0:50:04.680 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 2>of things to hesitate about regarding a lot of these

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Big twelve schools, but a lot of them have built

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 2>up rosters and have backups that are probably going to

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 2>be closer to their starters.

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Look, there's a lot of changing. The new coach of

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Texas Tech, new coach at TCU, new quarterback at Baylor,

0:50:20.840 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 2>new there's a lot of new at a lot of

0:50:22.400 --> 0:50:25.719
<v Speaker 2>different places. But I just think depth wise and the

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:28.840
<v Speaker 2>toll of the season wise, I think it's going to

0:50:28.880 --> 0:50:31.480
<v Speaker 2>be a lot closer to five than seven to me

0:50:31.640 --> 0:50:34.840
<v Speaker 2>for Kansas football. But in terms of being a hard out,

0:50:34.960 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 2>in terms of in the way that they put the

0:50:36.520 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 2>fear of God into TCU in West Virginia last year,

0:50:39.080 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 2>they're going to be doing that more often this year.

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 2>So I think it's I think it's within the realm

0:50:43.320 --> 0:50:46.359
<v Speaker 2>of possibility. I just think that roster, and even as

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:48.760
<v Speaker 2>impressively as they hit the portal, I think that roster

0:50:48.880 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 2>is just in a more precarious spot to get it

0:50:51.320 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 2>done weekend week out. Yeah, I mean, I'm probably going

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:58.040
<v Speaker 2>to take Duke in this game. Where's the game? It's

0:50:58.040 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 2>a game is in Kansas.

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh, But the point spread's nine, and I feel like

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 1>there is probably a little bit of undue hype for

0:51:05.800 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>both sides of this equation. It's a letdown spot letdown

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>spot for sure, And like I said at the top,

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Duke has been playing really impressive defense so far. Not

0:51:16.880 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the best competition, but still I think their body of

0:51:20.880 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 1>work has been impressive for the teams that they have

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:26.160
<v Speaker 1>played and what that looks like on an adjusted basis.

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I also think it's important that people live in reality totally.

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>It's really important, like a lot of people don't do

0:51:33.360 --> 0:51:35.399
<v Speaker 1>that when it comes to Kansas football or really life

0:51:35.400 --> 0:51:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in general. If broaden this out, but we've had a

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of commentary when we put together over Ball or

0:51:43.600 --> 0:51:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Top ten Paul and I know most people are tongue

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in cheek about it, but we didn't even have Kansas

0:51:48.400 --> 0:51:54.319
<v Speaker 1>on the list of the top thirty teams, and people

0:51:54.400 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are not so much calling for Kansas to be a

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 1>top ten team. I don't think most people outside of

0:52:00.800 --> 0:52:04.360
<v Speaker 1>perhaps Lancelot I Pulled and Jalen Daniels, believe that. But

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the amount of pushback we got to the fact that

0:52:06.160 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they're not even on that list is kind of surprising

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to me. This is not a top thirty team. This

0:52:10.480 --> 0:52:11.320
<v Speaker 1>is a fun team.

0:52:11.560 --> 0:52:12.759
<v Speaker 2>Is it? Is he team the root for.

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:15.399
<v Speaker 1>We're certainly gonna root like hell for Kansas to get

0:52:15.400 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 1>the six to go beyond. It'd be a great story.

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 1>It might be the best story in college football if

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:23.319
<v Speaker 1>they can continue at this clip. But let's pump the

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 1>brakes a little bit here. I like this team to

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>get the six wins, but put them in my top thirty.

0:52:29.040 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't think so. I think you need to ignore

0:52:31.200 --> 0:52:34.640
<v Speaker 2>ironic online college football fans. I'm not talking about ironic

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 2>online college football fans. I'm talking about it for bowlers. No.

0:52:37.320 --> 0:52:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I understand people are like, hey, where's Kansas? Yeah, send

0:52:40.600 --> 0:52:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in private messages, where's Kansas? Why's Kansas not on here?

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? And I asked them, ask them to wager one

0:52:45.440 --> 0:52:48.000
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars on Kansas against the tie rifteen team, and

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:49.560
<v Speaker 2>then they're going to be a little bit less excited

0:52:49.600 --> 0:52:51.360
<v Speaker 2>about having them in the top ten as an option.

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I respect that viewpoint. I respect the enthusiasm for Kansas.

0:52:55.080 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I am right there with you. Yeah, but pump the

0:52:57.560 --> 0:52:58.280
<v Speaker 1>frickin breaks?

0:52:58.920 --> 0:53:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay? Can we pump breaks? Everybody?

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's live in reality here for a second. Six wins,

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 1>count me in, count me in for and entertaining an

0:53:08.120 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>entertaining season ahead, probably an entertaining game this week against

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Duke Like. They are nothing if not plucky and dangerous

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:17.720
<v Speaker 1>given their offense and their coach, who's a good coach.

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:22.120
<v Speaker 2>But Jalen Daniels is randomly excellent. I don't think he

0:53:22.120 --> 0:53:24.480
<v Speaker 2>had any other Power five offers. I just quickly looked

0:53:24.520 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 2>at his twenty four to seven page and it's a

0:53:26.280 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of like New Hampshire Air Force, Bryant, Eastern Washington.

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:33.320
<v Speaker 2>That's that is a wild Then that happens. That happens

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:35.799
<v Speaker 2>with G time guys. We saw with Grayson McCall. We've

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:38.200
<v Speaker 2>seen it all over the place. And now obviously the

0:53:38.239 --> 0:53:42.840
<v Speaker 2>movement between you know, promising backups who were recruited by

0:53:42.880 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 2>a number of schools going to a G five place

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and thriving, that happens much more often. But yeah, Jalen

0:53:47.480 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Daniels randomly being really scary and good for Kansas is

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, awesome falling through the cracks of recruiting. It's

0:53:54.120 --> 0:53:55.040
<v Speaker 2>always a cool story.

0:53:56.120 --> 0:53:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Final talking point here before we let the fine people go. Yes,

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.399
<v Speaker 1>there are two teams on our list that have one

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:07.319
<v Speaker 1>loss and matching six percent probabilities of getting to six

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>wins or more. Okay, those are the Arizona Wildcats two

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and one beat San Diego State, beat North Dakota State,

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>lost in Mississippi State Week two m.

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 2>H and Vandy.

0:54:20.000 --> 0:54:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Vandy's three and one because Vandy played that Hawaii game,

0:54:23.080 --> 0:54:26.239
<v Speaker 1>destroyed Hawaii on the road no less in week zero

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>sixty three to ten. They've also beaten Elin and Northern Illinois.

0:54:31.480 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They lost to Wake for us by twenty Vandy three

0:54:34.560 --> 0:54:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and one, Arizona two and one. As I said, matching

0:54:38.840 --> 0:54:43.200
<v Speaker 1>six percent likelihood per the spplus of getting to six

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>or more wins. Of those two teams, the only answer

0:54:48.560 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 1>for which one is more likely to get the six

0:54:50.719 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 1>wins is Arizona, right.

0:54:52.200 --> 0:54:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Given the schedule? Yeah?

0:54:53.719 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, given the schedule, it is Arizona. So I want

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you to walk down that treacher path of getting Vandy

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to six wins and tell me what that looks like

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:05.360
<v Speaker 1>and how it could possibly occur.

0:55:06.200 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 2>You want me to paint you the universe in which

0:55:09.320 --> 0:55:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Vandy gets to six wins, right now, build me that

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Vandy universe, all right? Miszoo, South Carolina Florida, Tennessee are

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:28.640
<v Speaker 2>all prone to full collapses emotionally, spiritually, physically, football wise, whatever. No,

0:55:28.680 --> 0:55:31.960
<v Speaker 2>they're not going to get there. But could they do

0:55:32.120 --> 0:55:35.960
<v Speaker 2>something weird and beat Miszoo in South Carolina? Sure, that's

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the path to five you asked me to do. Six

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:41.600
<v Speaker 2>is a bridge too far. But the depths of Miszoo,

0:55:42.680 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 2>the woeful play, especially on offense at times, and Lucky.

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:47.680
<v Speaker 2>You can't judge a team against I'm an Oregon fan.

0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:49.800
<v Speaker 2>You can't judge a team against Georgia. You just can't.

0:55:49.840 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 2>Don't do that. Don't do that to yourself. I'm still

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 2>worried about South Carolina. I don't think I'm worried about Florida.

0:55:56.239 --> 0:56:00.600
<v Speaker 2>But the progress of Anthony Richardson the opportunity truck is

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:03.360
<v Speaker 2>going a little bit further farther in the distance.

0:56:03.480 --> 0:56:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Might be rolling down the hill in Neutral.

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's weird to me. They could be sort

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:11.319
<v Speaker 2>of the like Week one. They look like their way

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 2>ahead of things, like the eighteen wheeler truck with tyrons.

0:56:14.520 --> 0:56:16.799
<v Speaker 2>We're like, oh no, that was a Week one thing.

0:56:19.280 --> 0:56:25.320
<v Speaker 2>I am confident in Vanderbilt and their ability to maintain

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:28.920
<v Speaker 2>a healthy distance behind like the Northwestern at its best

0:56:28.920 --> 0:56:32.719
<v Speaker 2>opportunity truck, the Pat Fitzgerald of the South. I think

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 2>they're doing again. It's it's correct construction that they are

0:56:36.520 --> 0:56:39.479
<v Speaker 2>going to be built like a six and six SEC team,

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and when teams completely implode, when programs implode, like I

0:56:44.960 --> 0:56:47.400
<v Speaker 2>don't know, pretty much everybody the SEC East is prone

0:56:47.440 --> 0:56:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to doing outside of Georgia and Kentucky. At the moment,

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 2>I think Vandy might find themselves in an interesting spot.

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 2>So I don't think they're getting to six games this year.

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're probably getting a five games this year. No,

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:01.040
<v Speaker 2>But are they get Are they gonna lose more games

0:57:01.120 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 2>thirty to twenty four instead of thirty to three?

0:57:03.160 --> 0:57:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I say, yes, Yeah, this is a team that Gosh,

0:57:08.000 --> 0:57:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you look at SP numbers from years past, it's

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:14.960
<v Speaker 1>been all deep red, which is not good. That that

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:18.680
<v Speaker 1>signifies bad. And so far in the early going, there

0:57:18.720 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 1>have been market improvements across the board offense, defense, special teams,

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:28.160
<v Speaker 1>just the overall rank. Again, it's early, but this is

0:57:28.200 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 1>all opponent adjusted stuff. We trust our friend Bill pretty

0:57:31.960 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>deeply here with a lot of this stuff, and you

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:36.880
<v Speaker 1>know the proofs in the pudding there three and one.

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:41.840
<v Speaker 2>And yeah, what if aj Swan's really good, Yeah, then

0:57:41.880 --> 0:57:44.600
<v Speaker 2>he's If AJ Swan is really good, then he's one

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:48.480
<v Speaker 2>of the best five quarterbacks in the SEC. Like, it's

0:57:48.520 --> 0:57:53.000
<v Speaker 2>not an incredible SEC quarterback here, so I'd not to

0:57:53.080 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 2>heap that kind of expectation on him, but that takes

0:57:55.400 --> 0:57:56.360
<v Speaker 2>them pretty far.

0:57:57.000 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Six touchdowns, no interceptions, true Ridge average net yards per

0:58:01.520 --> 0:58:03.919
<v Speaker 1>attempt is twelve point zero, which is really damn good.

0:58:04.320 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this year it's price Love, It's Stetson Bennett,

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 2>It's kJ Jefferson, Will Evis, and then Hendon Hooker. So okay,

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:21.720
<v Speaker 2>so there's your obvious A list group. Will Rogers, I

0:58:21.720 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 2>think Will Rodgers is there's a drop off before Will

0:58:23.880 --> 0:58:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Rogers probably. I think there's a drop off before Jackson

0:58:26.520 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 2>Dart definitely drop off between that top group and whatever

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:36.600
<v Speaker 2>A and M is doing at quarterback and Anthony Richardson,

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:38.760
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a drop off before him. Spencer Rattler

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:42.439
<v Speaker 2>has a drop off before him. So I'm just saying,

0:58:42.560 --> 0:58:46.760
<v Speaker 2>especially in the East, there's some opportunity. There's some opportunity

0:58:46.880 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 2>when one of these teams is a mess, which you

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:51.840
<v Speaker 2>can never fully write off. Florida or Tennessee from being

0:58:51.840 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 2>a mess that oh Fandy just beat Tennessee, why not?

0:58:55.680 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 2>And they have So I'm I'm in on an improving Vandy.

0:59:00.000 --> 0:59:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Think it's going to take two more years.

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It was four star aj Swan. Yeah, didn't get a

0:59:05.400 --> 0:59:06.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of big offers.

0:59:06.240 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 2>But you look at what Vandy's done on the trail

0:59:10.120 --> 0:59:11.880
<v Speaker 2>and you know your credit. You know, Barton Simmons is

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 2>the former podcaster, yep U director of player personnel or whatever.

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:19.920
<v Speaker 2>If they're finding those three stars who are like the

0:59:20.000 --> 0:59:23.040
<v Speaker 2>number twenty seven linebacker, the number thirty eight left tackle,

0:59:23.080 --> 0:59:25.919
<v Speaker 2>the number forty, you gonna win games. You're not gonna

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:27.720
<v Speaker 2>win a lot of SEC games. Is not gonna be

0:59:27.720 --> 0:59:30.480
<v Speaker 2>a nine win team, win some games though, I like it.

0:59:31.480 --> 0:59:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's close this out here very quickly.

0:59:33.120 --> 0:59:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's mention Arizona. A lot of good vibes on Arizona

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, A lot of good vibes on Arizona. The

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>schedule does get tougher, it does get tougher. This week

0:59:47.160 --> 0:59:50.400
<v Speaker 1>on the road at Cow almost feels essential if they

0:59:50.440 --> 0:59:53.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get the six wins, as does next week

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at home against Colorado, because the rest of the way,

0:59:57.960 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got Oregon, you've got Washington. You've got USC and Utah,

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:03.919
<v Speaker 1>all four of those teams in a five week span,

1:00:03.960 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>which is just brutal close out the year at UCLA,

1:00:08.240 --> 1:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Washington State, Arizona State. So the thinking would be, you

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>beat cal you beat Colorado. That gets you two four wins,

1:00:18.840 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>because this team is two and one at the moment,

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and then you got to pick off two across the board.

1:00:25.320 --> 1:00:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's UCLA, maybe it's Washington State, maybe it's Arizona State.

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>It's a very narrow path to get the six. I

1:00:32.320 --> 1:00:35.439
<v Speaker 1>think most impressively, we've talked a lot on this show

1:00:35.480 --> 1:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>about coaches that aren't overthinking it. Jedfish is another one

1:00:38.600 --> 1:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that I would throw into that category. He's just building

1:00:41.280 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>things in a way that makes a lot of sense. Yeah,

1:00:43.680 --> 1:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>he needed help at quarterback. You went out and got

1:00:45.600 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Jayden Delara like he's He's recruited skill position guys or

1:00:49.000 --> 1:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>guy Temac coming over from California freshman.

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Why I'm the guy from UTAP Jacob calling.

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Jacob cally also working the portal, bring in support where

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's needed. So this is a team that feels very

1:01:02.680 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>plucky to me in terms of plucky, frisky All Stars

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Arizona is up there, and there are a lot of

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>good vibes, and it can be a weird place to play.

1:01:11.680 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I don't know if you're Oregon going on

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the road, I don't know if you're usc going on

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the road. But I don't think it's too far beyond

1:01:20.920 --> 1:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Arizona to just scare the hell out of someone. I'm

1:01:22.800 --> 1:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>not sure they're winning those games, but I expect Arizona

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to be at least frisky enough to be in this thing.

1:01:29.000 --> 1:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Most of the games on the schedule get to like

1:01:31.240 --> 1:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>five wins. Six feels like a little bit of a

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>stretch to.

1:01:33.320 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Me, though. Yeah, before the season started, I had them

1:01:36.080 --> 1:01:38.360
<v Speaker 2>in my mind as a three ish win program, and I'll

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 2>have them as a five ish when program after all.

1:01:41.240 --> 1:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way, yeah, five and seven, looking right at you,

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I was all in on Arizona being better than expected.

1:01:47.080 --> 1:01:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I uh, with what Colorado and Arizona State look

1:01:50.640 --> 1:01:54.920
<v Speaker 2>like at the moment. That's two. That's two of the

1:01:55.000 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 2>needed three to get to five, right, Yep. So you talk,

1:01:58.480 --> 1:02:01.840
<v Speaker 2>UCLA is currently a Southern Alabama ish program, are they not?

1:02:02.920 --> 1:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That is what we are led to believe after what

1:02:05.120 --> 1:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we saw in week three.

1:02:06.600 --> 1:02:08.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm not fully and we're now just talking about two

1:02:08.560 --> 1:02:11.440
<v Speaker 2>song games. I'm not fully sold on Washington State. On offense, no,

1:02:13.320 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I think Washington and Oregon are pretty good.

1:02:16.560 --> 1:02:21.600
<v Speaker 2>I think USC and Utah are pretty good. But ASU, UCLA,

1:02:22.680 --> 1:02:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Colorado Cal still not figuring out offense. There's a path

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:31.560
<v Speaker 2>if Arizona injury luck and you know, forcing turnovers, getting

1:02:31.560 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>off the field, whatever, because I think the offense will

1:02:33.200 --> 1:02:35.720
<v Speaker 2>be fine, but there's a path to that five ish

1:02:35.720 --> 1:02:36.760
<v Speaker 2>win jump.

1:02:38.160 --> 1:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's send a big shout out to some of our

1:02:40.640 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>premium for ballers who are watching, who are waiting, who

1:02:43.960 --> 1:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>are in joining this live hopefully enjoying the slide branded

1:02:47.600 --> 1:02:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Jason Cale you mentioned Aaron earlier, Andrew. Who else we

1:02:51.840 --> 1:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>got in Sean mister Pizza Cooley always in mainstay mm

1:02:55.280 --> 1:02:58.080
<v Speaker 1>hmm another Shane here. We got all sorts of action,

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Dan different, Dan and Chris, Danny.

1:03:03.720 --> 1:03:06.320
<v Speaker 2>You'll like going through a sixth grade classroom taking role

1:03:06.560 --> 1:03:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Danny Andrew, Aaron by the way, G five wise real quick,

1:03:11.640 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>and then let's just get the heck out of here.

1:03:13.400 --> 1:03:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Youn LV UNLV disastrous these past few years, very absolute disasters.

1:03:20.280 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 2>But here's what we have so far. They're two and one.

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>They beat North Texas comfortably, they beat Idaho State comfortably,

1:03:26.000 --> 1:03:28.480
<v Speaker 2>and they kind of barely lost to Cal. Another incitement

1:03:28.520 --> 1:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>against Cal. But the Mountain West, the bottom of the

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:35.360
<v Speaker 2>Mountain West is pretty bad. So if you and LV

1:03:35.600 --> 1:03:38.520
<v Speaker 2>found a quarterback, Doug Brumfield has done well. Younger QB

1:03:39.120 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>their schedule right now, and what I guess you're looking

1:03:42.040 --> 1:03:45.120
<v Speaker 2>at Bill's thing. Hawaii is a nightmare, Nevada is a nightmare.

1:03:45.160 --> 1:03:49.800
<v Speaker 2>New Mexico's nightmayor Utah State after winning the conference last year,

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>might be a secret nightmare in not a good way.

1:03:54.600 --> 1:03:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they're being the Notre dame, but San

1:03:57.160 --> 1:04:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Diego State's offense might be trash. I'm just saying, UNLV, Yeah,

1:04:02.960 --> 1:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>if the Brumfield bandwagon is taking on new passengers, like

1:04:10.560 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>U and LV could just scoop up, like, oh, we're

1:04:13.240 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>the worst five and seventeen in America, the worst six

1:04:15.360 --> 1:04:17.080
<v Speaker 2>and six team in America. Like, I think the drive

1:04:17.120 --> 1:04:19.400
<v Speaker 2>is actually pretty real for the Rebels right now? How

1:04:19.440 --> 1:04:23.840
<v Speaker 2>about that? The drive is real? Marcus Arroyo, who I

1:04:23.880 --> 1:04:26.800
<v Speaker 2>did not have a terrific relationship with as an Oregon fan,

1:04:27.400 --> 1:04:30.080
<v Speaker 2>but I think he's hired pretty well. I don't know.

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they're hitting the portal pretty hard. And like

1:04:32.960 --> 1:04:36.280
<v Speaker 2>they they went after Harrison Bailey, like the former blue

1:04:36.320 --> 1:04:39.080
<v Speaker 2>chip Harrison Bailey is not being great. He hasn't been great,

1:04:39.120 --> 1:04:42.200
<v Speaker 2>but like he hasn't been loyal to guys because of names.

1:04:42.320 --> 1:04:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Brumfield is the guy entered the portal last year. Convinced

1:04:44.640 --> 1:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>him to come back. Awesome, He's OKOD. So I'm saying

1:04:47.800 --> 1:04:49.480
<v Speaker 2>the bottom Mount West is kind of trash right now,

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>and so it's good to be near the bottom, but

1:04:51.240 --> 1:04:52.160
<v Speaker 2>not the bottom.

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Seventy three percent likelihood of getting the six wins, that's

1:04:55.720 --> 1:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>not bad. Six wins are more unlv not bad.

1:05:00.040 --> 1:05:01.840
<v Speaker 2>They were an over team a couple of years ago.

1:05:02.120 --> 1:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>They were really bad, Yeah, really bad. Two years ago

1:05:04.720 --> 1:05:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they were one hundred and twenty third nationally. Yeah, and

1:05:08.480 --> 1:05:13.000
<v Speaker 1>last year only like ten spots better. So again, slow

1:05:13.000 --> 1:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and steady progress here, mm hmm is definitely.

1:05:15.720 --> 1:05:16.240
<v Speaker 2>The name of the game.

1:05:16.280 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>They've actually been quite good on special teams, which when

1:05:19.440 --> 1:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to like when you're trying to cut corners

1:05:22.520 --> 1:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as best you can, being good on special teams can help.

1:05:26.880 --> 1:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm in all right, don't forget to going out to

1:05:31.600 --> 1:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Solid giveaway dot com. If you've made it this far,

1:05:34.640 --> 1:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>we were giving away a CJ. Stroud signed mini helmet.

1:05:38.080 --> 1:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>We're going to do so in about three weeks. You

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:45.439
<v Speaker 1>can enter to win. You can also enter to win

1:05:46.080 --> 1:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Quasi Daily. Go to Solid Giveaway dot com to find

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>out more about what Quasi Daily looks like. Yeah, in

1:05:53.960 --> 1:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>your neck of the woods, but we're giving away CJ.

1:05:56.640 --> 1:05:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Stroud.

1:05:56.960 --> 1:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got Michael Mayer behind me right now. For those

1:05:58.760 --> 1:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>watching on the video, I'm going to give that out.

1:06:00.880 --> 1:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Send that guy out here in short order. We're giving

1:06:03.760 --> 1:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>away all sorts of cool stuff here as we wind

1:06:07.200 --> 1:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>through this college football season here in twenty twenty two.

1:06:10.480 --> 1:06:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Daniel, I have nothing to add.

1:06:12.600 --> 1:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You nailed it for that guy over there, my good

1:06:14.960 --> 1:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>friend Dan Rubinstein, for all of our most ardent and

1:06:18.680 --> 1:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>passionate for bawlers who are watching live at home via

1:06:22.400 --> 1:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>verbawlers dot com, and for myself, Ty Hildenbrandt, thank you

1:06:26.000 --> 1:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>so much for downloading, for listening, for playing along with

1:06:29.080 --> 1:06:30.920
<v Speaker 1>our badness wherever you may be.

1:06:31.320 --> 1:06:32.440
<v Speaker 2>We will be back tomorrow.

1:06:32.520 --> 1:06:35.920
<v Speaker 1>We're going to preview week four. In the meantime, as always,

1:06:35.960 --> 1:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>stay solid, peace,