WEBVTT - Apple AI Plan Hinges on Robots, Cisco CEO Talks Tariffs

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is a

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>live from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>York and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Can Apple be the

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 2>AI comeback kid? Details on the company's push into robots

0:00:29.320 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 2>and a lifelike Siri.

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.840
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we talked to the Cisco CEO, Chuck Robins, fresh

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 3>off earnings, the company seeing AI sales pick up but

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 3>remains cautious on its outlook.

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps and Bitcoin retreats from record highs are reminder to

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.599
<v Speaker 2>investors that the ditital asset remains a volatile.

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 3>One and it's AI that that is story for Apple

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 3>because as tech giants are really trying to plot their

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 3>AI focus, it's plotting it's comeback. The efforts centers on robotics,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 3>on lifelike syriad as you said, and home security. Yesterday,

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 3>some two percent as investors bet this move could really

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 3>help Apple and get its mojo back. Let's go to

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Mark German, who breaks the story yesterday on the future

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 3>of AI. Today, we're going into blood Oxygen readings as well,

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 3>but start with the AI focus.

0:01:14.800 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 4>What can we expect?

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, Apple is a hardware company, right, all these

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 5>companies Chat, GPT, Google, Gemini, Microsoft, they have all these

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:27.639
<v Speaker 5>AI features, but from a consumer standpoint, it really hasn't

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 5>been monetized. How does Apple monetize its products well by

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 5>selling hardware, getting people to go to Apple stores and

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 5>buy new stuff every year or two. And so they're

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 5>going to replay that strategy when it comes to artificial intelligence,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 5>and the way they see AI is by integrating it

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 5>and creating devices around the smart home, home cameras and robotics.

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 5>So the company is working on several items that are

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.120
<v Speaker 5>reported yesterday. The centerpiece of the strategy is a tabletop robot.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 5>This is essentially a virtual companion that you would have

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 5>in your bedroom on your nightstand, you could have in

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 5>your office on your desk, can have on a kitchen counter.

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 5>It uses a robotic arm to move around in space.

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 6>It's like an.

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 5>iPad that can move through thin air on that robotic limb.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 5>He could help you get things done through your day.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 5>You can hold conversations with it. If you're having a

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 5>conversation with another human being, it can even interject and

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 5>jump in as if it's a third person in the room.

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 6>You can consume video on it.

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 7>It has FaceTime.

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 5>There's also a smart home POB basically a home pod

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 5>with a screen coming out next spring. This is going

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 5>to have similar functionality to that device, without the conversational

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 5>abilities and without the robotic arm. And they're developing a

0:02:39.200 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 5>suite of home security in home automation products designed to

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 5>rival what Amazon has been doing with a ring and

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 5>Blink and what Google has been doing with Nest and

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 5>other companies of course in the space include ADT and Roku.

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 7>There is a software component, and that is Siri.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:01.239
<v Speaker 2>You write about a lifelike Siri, sources describe it to

0:03:01.320 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 2>you park.

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, the lifelike Siri is the ability to hold conversations,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 5>help you get things done, interject into conversations with other

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 5>human beings as if it's another person in the room,

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 5>very similar to what you're seeing on voice mode from Chat,

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 5>GPT and from Gemini and some of these other LM

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 5>based assistants. There's also a revamp next year to Siri

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 5>on the iPhone, the iPad and the Mac that's coming.

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 5>It's an underlying infrastructural change, but there's also a redesign,

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 5>like a visual redesign to Siri coming as well to

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 5>the iPhone and iPad on the home devices. Specifically, they're

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 5>going to be creating a visual personality for Siri. Obviously Siri,

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 5>obviously you heard it and you spoke to it. Now

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 5>you're going to be able to see it too. If

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 5>you remember Microsoft Clippy's Clippy from the nineties and the

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 5>early two thousands in Microsoft Suite of Office apps, including Word,

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 5>something similar to that. It floats around your display. You

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 5>can interact with it at any time. They're actually trying

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 5>to create a virtual character, either based on a memoji

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 5>or the finder icon that's the filesystem logo that Apple's

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 5>used for years on the Mac.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Very briefly mark the Blood Oxygen the workaround versus Messimo's

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 3>fight on Apple.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Is it going to make much of an effect in

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 4>the long term?

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's interesting because this workaround is, like you said,

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 5>a real workaround. You're not going to have the blood

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 5>Oxygen app like you had before on the Apple Watch. Instead,

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 5>the sensors will be used and that will allow you

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 5>to read that data on the phone itself through the

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 5>health app.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 6>So it took them two years.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 5>The US Customs Agency finally allowed them to do this

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 5>workaround and it comes at a pretty opportune time. In

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 5>a few weeks they'll be announcing the next Apple watches,

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:47.080
<v Speaker 5>and now they'll be able.

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 6>To market in the US. Blood oxygen saturation tracking is

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 6>part of that.

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Mark Guerman, who leads our coverage of consumer electrolics

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 2>and broke detail on what happens next on Apple for

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 2>more and what Apple's doing than I's web Bush joins us.

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 6>Look.

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 2>Mark's reporting moves the needle right. We know that this

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 2>tabletop robot will be the centerpiece on the hardware side.

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 2>We know that Siri will be made more lifelike. Has

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 2>this changed things for you, Dan in what you're modeling

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>for Apple? And to kind of comeback that many think

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>that Apple needs to have in the AI domain, Look.

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.919
<v Speaker 8>In their AI strategy has been a disaster, and you

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 8>know it's if you look at every other big tech company,

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 8>you know Apple is massively behind. And I think when

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 8>you look at this as a potential opportunity, I think

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 8>Street is basically shrugged the shoulders. I mean robotics, Apple's

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 8>going to come out in another device. Look look it

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:46.359
<v Speaker 8>up in AI Bok, a Microsoft book and meta. I

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 8>mean it speaks to our view right now, it's an

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:54.280
<v Speaker 8>F one race and Manza. It's all passing thereby an

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 8>Apple and cooker watch from a park bench drinking a cappuccino.

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 2>That's actually a really interesting I think maybe veiled dan

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:08.480
<v Speaker 2>reference to WWDC, which opened up with the F one sequence.

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 2>If you remember, then that puts the emphasis back on Siri.

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:14.599
<v Speaker 2>What how much better does Siri need to be then?

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 2>If it is to be a tool use daily by

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 2>technology users around the world in the same way that

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 2>chat GPT is an Apple on my iPhone?

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 6>Look, what's just call it? It is like Siri.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 8>Nothing's going to happen internally, I mean internally, this has

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 8>been a disaster. Right If you go back to WWDC,

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 8>it felt like Michael J. Fox back to the future

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.280
<v Speaker 8>moment in twenty sixteen. They continue to promise what's on

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 8>the come, what's next? They're going to have to do

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 8>an acquisition. I mean, look, it's just it's the reality

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 8>of the situation. It's not happening internally, and there's no

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 8>one on the street that believes any innovation is coming

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 8>out of Apple when it comes to AI organically.

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 3>Dan, you still got an outperform and a two and

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:01.920
<v Speaker 3>seventy dollars price target on Apple.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:03.520
<v Speaker 4>You're sounding way more.

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Cautious than your money perspective is leading us.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, look to get to two seventies. No, AI, this

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 8>is a stock that's going to move higher. And even

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 8>saw what happened last week with the tariffs, Cook obviously

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 8>playing nice in the sandbox with Trump, that was a

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.160
<v Speaker 8>huge relief and the stocks had to move. And I

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:23.160
<v Speaker 8>think there's a stock that could go to two seventy

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 8>or potentially two eighty without AI. But for this to

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 8>be a three point fifty four hundred, four hundred and

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 8>fifty dollars stock, it's AI and it's not happening internally.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's the problem that the street has

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 8>is that things like robotics next Gen or three thousand

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 8>dollars buys to four thousand dollars. It's all about software

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 8>and it comes down to like they need two essentially,

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:53.560
<v Speaker 8>and we've talked about perplexity. Other acquisitions are going to

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 8>have to do. It's not happening internally. That's just the reality.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting, Dan is the notes you have been putting out,

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:05.239
<v Speaker 3>for example today, have been more around. As you just said,

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>there was a relief when Tim Cook was alongside President

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 3>Trump last week. Well, this week it's all been about

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 3>what President Trump has meant for in video of AMD

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 3>and for paying to play. What do you make of

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the moves that we've seen and to gain access in China.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 8>Look, it speaks to I mean, you know a godfather quote, right,

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean it's a deal you can't refuse. And I

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 8>think the reality is is that big tech CEOs are

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 8>learning the new rules.

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 6>Of the game.

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 8>Now, of course it's wed godfather of AI, Jensen and video.

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 8>They need to do with fifteen percent, it's breadcrumbs relative

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 8>to getting into a China market. They can't give this

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 8>the fall in a silver platter, and I viewed as

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 8>bullish and it's going to put more fuel in the

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 8>engine of this AI round.

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 7>Dan super quickly.

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 2>We broke the story last week that Dojo is no

0:08:54.480 --> 0:08:56.959
<v Speaker 2>more at Tesla, and Musk has come out on x

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 2>ray and kind of explained it the focus on AI

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 2>five and a six.

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:02.719
<v Speaker 7>But how did you react to that. I don't think

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 7>I saw a note.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 2>And what do you think about the stop gap between

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 2>those generations of customs silicon?

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, that that's a great story that you guys, Broke,

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.440
<v Speaker 8>I mean I view it as this is to me,

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 8>it's more certainty that Xai. They're going to have a

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 8>massive investment XAI. That'll come at the shareholder meeting, but

0:09:20.040 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 8>it speaks to our view. It's why Tesla stocklifting. I

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 8>think more and more recognizing this is going to be

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 8>a holistic strategy Tesla Xai.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:30.040
<v Speaker 6>It's all about autonomous and robotics.

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 8>And I think that was a view you kind of

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 8>read through the tea leaves that that was my view.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.440
<v Speaker 4>That nice web Bush. Great to catch up with you.

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:38.960
<v Speaker 4>Thank you.

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:42.960
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, coming up, ciscosio Chuck Robbins joining us to discuss

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 3>the company's earnings, the state of AI infrastructure demand.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>So Cisco shares it down about one point two one

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.079
<v Speaker 2>point three percent. They've made an effort earlier in the

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 2>session to kind of bounce back. We got this full

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 2>year revenue outlook for fiscal twenty six. Some analysts felt

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 2>it was a little cautious, but we're seeing AI infrastructure

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 2>orders pick up. Delighted to say that we're joined now

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 2>by Cisco CEO Chuck Robins, and actually, Chuck, I'm going

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 2>to ask you something that I felt like the analyst

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 2>community didn't really get to, and that is that there

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 2>is this big products refresh happening mere term overcoming years.

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>And I feel like you've been trying to talk about

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.839
<v Speaker 2>Cisco as a platform offering for a while and if

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 2>we look at that fiscal twenty six outlook is that

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 2>baked into that where Cisco is a platform offering and

0:10:41.720 --> 0:10:44.079
<v Speaker 2>you folded security into it. That's kind of what I

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>think people want to know.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 9>Yes, well, first of all, thanks for having me, and

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 9>I do I want to thank the team and all

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 9>of the Cisco folks for just a great year. We

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 9>obviously had good order growth in Q four we had

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 9>the great performance in the AI infrastructure order. We actually

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.439
<v Speaker 9>reported that we had taken down a approximately a billion

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 9>dollars of revenue from those orders, which was something that

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 9>everybody wanted to talk about. We talked through how we

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 9>filled the progress kicking in on security, and then to

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 9>your point, this product refresh cycle that we are beginning

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 9>will happen over years, and honestly, we just turned on orderability.

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 9>Large customers take a lot of time to evaluate put

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 9>these things in labs before they.

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 6>Put it in their critical infrastructure.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 9>But the points you make about the platform is really

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 9>important because as we get into agentic AI, with the

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.559
<v Speaker 9>low latency constant communication that's going to occur, we're going

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 9>to have to do security in the network.

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 6>There is no other alternative.

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 9>You cannot introduce latency by sending it to a security appliance,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 9>and we are the only company that has both networking

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 9>and security technology to fuse it together to create that

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 9>platform effect that you're describing.

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 2>AI is a double edged sword, Chuck, It's margin dilutive.

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about that?

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think we have always had a portfolio of

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 9>products that had various margin profiles. I mean, we had

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 9>a point in our history where the Tolco and the

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 9>service provider world was as much as thirty five thirty

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 9>six percent of our business, and that was a different

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 9>margin profile than the enterprise and so we just manage

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 9>it the same way we have all along.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 6>So I'm not too worried about that.

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, Chuck, that massive opportunity ahead that you articulate with

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 3>AI infrastructure, that bringing in of two billion of orders,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 3>the billion dollars of revenue already. Is it the platform

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 3>offering that helps you push out and fend against some

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 3>of the other competitors that want in on that.

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 4>Of course HPE is trying to get in. You've got

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 4>broad Com. Is that how you set yourself apart?

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think the key to remember with this is

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 9>that it's networking systems and it's optics. That's primarily what

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 9>we're selling for AI infrastructure, and there's really only three

0:12:56.600 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 9>companies on the planet that can deliver the networking silicon

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 9>that these customers require, and we're one of them. And so,

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 9>you know, they're looking for low power requirements, they're looking

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 9>for meeting their dates, they're looking for speed, bandwidth deployment,

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 9>you know, and we're hitting that right now with them.

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 9>And we've really built great relationships. If you if you

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 9>go back five or six years ago, I had to

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 9>try to convince people that we were rebuilding relationships here.

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 9>And even if you go back fifty twelve fourteen months

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 9>ago when we gave them the target of one billion

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 9>dollars in orders, I think there were a lot of

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 9>skeptics and the team actually delivered really well and we

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 9>have great relationships with these customers.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Now we are joined by Chuck Robins, Cisco CEO, and

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, you beat your things that previously others were

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 3>cynical of, but the market moves with you. Many wanted

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 3>even more in terms of your full year revenue guidance.

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Some are even going as far as to say that

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>maybe you're suggesting a little bit of a cautious it

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 3>spend for the next fiscal year.

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.559
<v Speaker 7>Do you abide by that, Chuck, No, we don't see that.

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 9>We see we haven't seen any sort of slowdown at all.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 9>The only place we've seen that challenge, as has been reported,

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.920
<v Speaker 9>in US Federal our product order growth was seven percent.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 9>If you take out US Federal, we grew ten percent.

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 9>And if you think about security, same thing. If we

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 9>take out a US federal we grew double digits and

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 9>security on orders. And I also talked about the fact

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 9>that if we look at the fiscal year that we

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 9>just entered, our US Federal team is actually forecasting a

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 9>return to growth, so hopefully that won't be a head

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 9>win in the next year. So we haven't seen anything meaningful,

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 9>but we're also cognizant that we were operating in a

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 9>pretty complex and dynamic environment.

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 7>Chuck.

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 2>We love to talk about the big projects on Bloomberg Tech,

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the big data center projects. Are there any specific examples

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 2>of projects you're involved in that do you think are

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 2>really needle moving for Cisco?

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 9>Well, all the cloud providers are needle moving, and over

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 9>time the neo cloud segment as well as the sovereign

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 9>clouds we think are going to will be a big

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 9>part of our business. Also we're just getting started in those.

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 9>If I hit on a few of those. The sovereign

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 9>AI data centers that we talked about in UAE as

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 9>well as in Saudi are the early ones. We're having

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 9>discussions in other Asian countries, in Africa, in Europe, you

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 9>have this push for on prem sovereign applications, So from

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 9>geopolitical perspective and a risk perspective, they want more control

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 9>over the tech stack that they have in their countries.

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 9>So that's more of a sovereign play, and we're one

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 9>of the unique companies who can actually deliver say Splunk

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 9>on prem or they're asking for WebEx on prem, which

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.320
<v Speaker 9>we can do so. And then the neo clouds we

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 9>could talk about as well, but that's another emerging opportunity

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 9>for US.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I don't think many appreciate the scale of Cisco. Sometimes

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 2>you've got a lot of credit by the way, on

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 2>this program at least about how you've communicated tariff's impact.

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 2>But you're basically one of the biggest and leading network

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 2>chip producers globally, and this is an administration that wants

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 2>more US manufacturing. So you have the volume of gear,

0:15:57.960 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 2>you design your own chips, TSMC makes them for you.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 2>The economics kind of works in your favor. Have you

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 2>made some commitment to do what this administration is trying

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>to do, which is take that process that you've mastered,

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 2>but just bring it to the States in some form.

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that much like you know, Nvidia, AMDUS others,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 9>there are a lot of companies that actually rely on

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:25.960
<v Speaker 9>TSMC the for the fabrication of the silicon, and they've

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 9>obviously made commitments on their side to actually build out

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 9>capacity in the United States, and so we're happy to

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.920
<v Speaker 9>see that happening. The thing that people don't really realize

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 9>is that we've maintained a US manufacturing footprint all along,

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 9>and so we have a footprint in the US today

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 9>that we can look at expanding. But I think it's

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 9>just important for us right now to wait and see

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 9>exactly where all this stuff lands. If you go back

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 9>to twenty eighteen when the China tariffs hit. Our teams

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 9>have made moves and mitigated roughly eighty percent or so

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:02.760
<v Speaker 9>of those, and so we just continue to look at

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 9>these things as they come out, figure out what the

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 9>best plan of action is, and then we act.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 3>When you think about planning ahead a business continuity, Chuck,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 3>when you see what's happened with MD and Video and

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 3>the deal they've cut to access China, when you think

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 3>about exporting more broadly, you're thinking that might come your

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 3>way of pay to play in the future.

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 6>I have no idea.

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 9>We wake up every day and we try to figure

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 9>out what's transpired and what's happening in the world, and

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 9>how do we react to it. I've talked about over

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 9>time that the current crop of CEOs in the United

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 9>States have basically been operating in times of uncertainty or

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 9>crisis or certainly very dynamic environments, and so we're all

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 9>used to just dealing with whatever changes are coming our way.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 9>You know, there's the old saying that you can deal

0:17:52.200 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 9>with the world as it is or how you'd like

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 9>it to be, and just we just wake up and

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 9>we deal with what comes at us and try to

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 9>plan a accordingly, try to do scenario planning, but then

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 9>deal with.

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 6>It as it is.

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 3>And when you're controlling your own destiny. You've been doing

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 3>a bit of M and A and you mentioned the

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 3>Sprung coffering and how that helps you access the likes

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 3>of view Up for example. Anymore M and A on

0:18:13.160 --> 0:18:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the rise in particularly when it comes to AI.

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 9>We're always looking Our strategy hasn't changed. Obviously, valuations are

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 9>quite frothy in that space. But if there's something that

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 9>helps us advance our strategy more effectively, then we're always

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 9>willing to take a look at it. I would say

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 9>that M and A is not the strategy. We have

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 9>our product strategy and our solution strategy for our customers,

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 9>and if there's an acquisition that helps us accelerate that,

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 9>then that's what we're really interested in. And you think

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 9>about places like AI, infrastructure or security or observability.

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 6>In those kind of areas, they're always interesting to us.

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 2>Chuck, how's the relationship with Nvidia evolving since it was

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 2>all announced?

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 6>It's great.

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 9>Our team and their team's execs had dinner last night

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 9>and we're working on architectures for Neocloud architectures for the enterprise.

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 9>We're working on go to market, joint go to market together.

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 9>So I'd say it just continues to get stronger. And

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.399
<v Speaker 9>we're really on the front end now of a lot

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 9>of the technology integrations that we've been working on, and

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 9>we're on the front end of the real enterprise wave

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 9>of this AI. If you think about it, it started

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 9>in the back end networks of the cloud providers.

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 6>It's moving.

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 9>It's obviously going to have an impact on the front

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 9>end networks, it's going to have an impact on the

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 9>enterprise and even the telco business that we saw this quarter.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 9>We had telco and cable. Our orders were up greater

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 9>than twenty percent, and a lot of that was attributed

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 9>to their preparation for AI.

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Chuck Robins, Cisco CEO and Fantastic speak with you today,

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 3>Time Now for Talking Tech and First Up and Video

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 3>partner on HI. But it's expecting sales of its servers

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 3>to more than double this quarter. The company sees one

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 3>hundred seventy percent rise in revenue just from its AI service,

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 3>but executives are warning look that consumer electronics business could

0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:09.480
<v Speaker 3>shrink this year as it faces potential US tariffs plus

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Oracle is coming back. Jobs in its cloud unit are

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:14.680
<v Speaker 3>coming in the latest company to take steps to control

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:18.159
<v Speaker 3>costs amid heavy spending on AI infrastructure. Now, according to sources,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 3>more than one hundred and fifty jobs work cut in

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 3>the Seattle area, which traditionally the unit's hub. Oracle said

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 3>last year it was moving its headquarters to Nashville, and

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 3>the company currently has more jobs listed in Tennessee and

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.160
<v Speaker 3>any other stake And Airbnb will.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 4>Now allow guests to.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Reserve some US trips without paying up front, and a

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 3>feature is.

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 4>Called reserve now, Pay later.

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 3>It lets use this book in advance without the need

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.359
<v Speaker 3>to pay the full amount till eight days before the

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:45.960
<v Speaker 3>end of the listening's cancelation period. Now, the move comes

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 3>after the company of horse worn last week of moderate

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:50.680
<v Speaker 3>gains through the remainder of the year.

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 2>And if we got okay coming up prices a Bitcoin

0:20:54.720 --> 0:20:58.159
<v Speaker 2>and ether down following stronger than anticipated inflation. But crypto

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 2>and crypto related companies, it's been on a bit of

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.919
<v Speaker 2>a tear recently to talk about what is going on

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 2>in the crypto market. Next, let's think about some of

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the names you've been looking at. Apple had a really

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 2>strong day yesterday, a little softer today, nine percent.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 7>Cisco.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 2>We've just had that conversation with Chuck Robbins and the

0:21:14.200 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 2>market will digest his outlook. Core weaves down eleven percent.

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 2>It fell twenty one percent yesterday. Is basically the cost

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 2>of its build out in its scaling is spooking investors.

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Check out our interview from yesterday. It was a big one.

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. I'm

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 2>looking at the crypto frankly and also sort of the

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 2>industry at large. It's been like a very heavy news

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>flow twenty four hours. If you take about bitcoin and

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 2>ether in particular, we were pushing fresh record highs. Largely

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 2>is like this appetite for risk assets. But then we

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 2>got this PPI print or wholesale inflation print that that

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 2>was high and there was a little jitter. And it's

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 2>not just stocks. You see that in the specific digital

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 2>currencies as well. Bullish in its second day of trading

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 2>up another nine percent after an astonishing day yesterday. We

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 2>just throw that in there, given you know, it's sort

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of an adjacent crypto platform, but that would indicate that

0:22:16.640 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 2>in that single name, at least Caroline there's still a

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of bullish sentiment out there. I can't believe I

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 2>did that gross.

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 3>Let's move on, will excuse you and pardon you the pun.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Let's stick with a crypto market and bullish sentiment across

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:31.200
<v Speaker 3>the world. Cavitagupta is with us, founder and general partner

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 3>of Delta Blockchain Fund. It's a venture firm focusing on

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 3>early stage blockchain innovation and computer to that end, is

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 3>it helpful or not that there is a lot of

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 3>risk on attitude in the market that is pushing us

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 3>into new IPOs, into the cryptosphere when also it is

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 3>dictated by macro perspective and where interest rates are going.

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Is it helpful for the formation of new businesses right

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 4>now or one hundred percent?

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.760
<v Speaker 10>But what's happening with digital asset treasures in the market

0:22:55.880 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 10>like five hundred million dollar new digital asset TRUSS three,

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 10>five hundred million dollar for hyper liquids for also assets

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 10>which are not luted coming into the market directly at

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 10>NASDAK now listed having access is creating a very interesting

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 10>by pressure for the first time in.

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 4>The history EAT.

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 10>Actually we have a shortage of EAT available in the

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 10>market to buy because we have over four billion dollar

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 10>treasuries coming into the market to buy eat. That's it,

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 10>and so we are seeing a lot of changes.

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's move into that because this is the micro strategy

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 3>or now strategy strategy of basically being able to hold

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>bitcoin initially, now moving to eat Salana other assets on

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 3>basically your balance sheet using it as a treasury. It's

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.200
<v Speaker 3>starting to trickle down into slightly more riskier asset paths.

0:23:43.400 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just look at what listed yesterday or five

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 3>on the NASTAC. They've done a spac where we're seeing

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 3>now they're going to be buying up World's Liberty coin,

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:56.920
<v Speaker 3>yes one that you can't trade freely anyway as a crypto,

0:23:57.520 --> 0:24:00.880
<v Speaker 3>and now they're having a publicly traded entity that's going

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>to be there eventually to buy up a.

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:03.959
<v Speaker 4>Load of that asset.

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 3>It's got, you know, the Trump's involved, the wickoffs involved.

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 4>Is it good to see that happen in your ecosystem?

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 10>I think it's good and bad at the same time.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 10>The good is that there is an appetite. There are

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 10>people who are pumping in a billion dollars into entities

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 10>like this, right, so there is definitely a demand for it,

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.160
<v Speaker 10>which is really good for the crypto market. The downside

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 10>is where does the buck stop?

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 10>And so we are now seeing assets which don't even

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 10>have a billion dollar FTV in the market coming in

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.040
<v Speaker 10>and raising three hundred million, four hundred millions and completely

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 10>going crazy, and not only.

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 4>In US and reads how investory they're raising.

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 10>A bunch of them are crypto investors, like most of

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 10>the crypto funds, including ours, are now doing a lot

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 10>of digital asset tressrees. But apart from that also a

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 10>lot of retail investors and institution investors who do not

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 10>have access still because there is no ATF of Salana,

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 10>there is no ETF of Souis, so where do they

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:03.160
<v Speaker 10>get access to these? And that does raise a question, Hey,

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.639
<v Speaker 10>is it another pump and dump on the Wall Street

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 10>from crypto market to now Wall Street? And who is

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 10>really going to have a real exit liquidity here? It's

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 10>still going to be the insider circle or outsider or

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 10>is it the new landscape for it at least for

0:25:17.320 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 10>next two and a half three years till we have

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 10>the Trump government.

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.719
<v Speaker 2>KIVIDA, you invest at the earliest stage, at the bottom

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 2>of the curve, those founded on the technological underpinning of everything.

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 7>We're talking about.

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 2>But I see robin Hood and Stripe and the bigger

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 2>FinTechs and the banks looking at stable coin in particular

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.399
<v Speaker 2>wanting to do their own thing. How disrupted is that

0:25:39.440 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 2>to you? You know, if you at that scale that

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 2>activity is happening and you have all of your portfolio

0:25:44.000 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 2>companies doing something at a different scale.

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's very fascinating. Thanks it for that question, because

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 10>now we are completely as an early stage investment fund.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 10>We are going into a space where we have demand

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 10>for so many acquisitions of our companies and so many

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 10>brain powermand Like some of the top banking CEOs, which

0:26:02.560 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 10>four years back would not even give me a day,

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 10>give me a second in their schedule, are now hosting

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 10>us for dinners trying to understand how are these cross

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 10>chain stable coins gonna settle, How are the money markets

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 10>and reposts and all these eels are gonna happen, And

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.600
<v Speaker 10>everybody wants to do their own stable coin settlement platform

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:22.919
<v Speaker 10>and want to issue.

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 4>Their own stable coin. I have a feeling in next.

0:26:25.000 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 10>Year and a half, not only Circle, We're gonna have

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 10>like twenty IPOs of some of the top companies, try Probinhood.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 10>I'm pretty sure Square is gonna come on the block

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 10>for that Facebook and Instagram will have their own stable coin.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 10>It's only going to be about who's going to have

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 10>a distribution and everybody's gonna have their stable cooin blockchain platform.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Now, okay, more Proaly, if everyone's getting into the spaces

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 3>stable coins, if we're seeing companies being developed more and

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 3>more activity in the space, how do you protect any

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 3>downside here? Or is it just doing your due diliges

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 3>and showing that you understand how tradable the asset is

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 3>that you're getting into. And indeed the future of actually

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the digital asset is. From a project perspective, I.

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 10>Think the fundamental of investing in digital assets will always

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:08.560
<v Speaker 10>remain the same technology.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 4>Is it scalable?

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 10>Of course, now we have a new Now we have

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.320
<v Speaker 10>a new exit place acquisitions by some of the top companies.

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 10>So is it an institutional adoption product? Can the founders

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 10>take it to let's say a top bank and say, hey,

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.199
<v Speaker 10>we can settle all your repos on this. But the

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 10>other part of this is if I just look at

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 10>the liquid fund, which is doing way better than a

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 10>lot of early stage investment in the technology platform just

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 10>because where the market is today, I'm realizing that digital

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 10>assets restrend is not done yet. It's going to go,

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 10>and it's still not there at the peak because more

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 10>and more people in Hong Kong market, UK market, a

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 10>lot of smaller European and Asian markets are now suddenly

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 10>waking up to it, and that's the demand we are getting.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 10>Anything under billion dollar FTV is now going into those

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 10>Asian markets and completely raising another layer of investments, and

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 10>that excites me, bothers me and makes me very curious.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.320
<v Speaker 7>At the same time, tov to go to.

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 2>A general partner at Delta Blockchain Fund. It's great to

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 2>have you back on the show. Thank you very much.

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, parag Agrowole, the former CEO of Twitter

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 2>who's squared off against Elon Musk.

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 7>Well he's back.

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 2>He's got a new AI startup and he's going to

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 2>join us to talk about that experience and what he's

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 2>doing now. This is Bloomberg Tech, the former CEO of

0:28:37.280 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 2>what was then known as Twitter. Parag Agrowole has moved

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 2>on from his days sparring with Elon Musk and he

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 2>stepped into the world of AI startups. Agrowyle's new company,

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Parallel Web Systems is building a tool to help AI

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 2>agents navigate the web.

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 7>Parag Agroyle joins us.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Now, it's good to see you back in the world

0:28:56.240 --> 0:28:58.959
<v Speaker 2>of technology, at least publicly, back in the world of technology.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, I was reading about parallel web systems, the

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>idea that the customer is the AI agent, and it's

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 2>just a place to start. Tell us about this startup,

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 2>what you're doing, why you're doing it.

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 11>Hey, Ed, First of all, thank you so much for

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.840
<v Speaker 11>having me after leaving Twitter. One of the things I

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 11>was doing was this writing a bunch of code, tinkering around.

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 11>I was actually building AI agents a couple of years

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 11>ago that were mostly collecting information from the web, bringing

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 11>it back to me so that I could create it.

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 11>And I had a couple of realizations doing so. One

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 11>that the AI agents are going to be the primary

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 11>customer of the web going forward. They will use the

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 11>web a lot more than humans ever have. And two,

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.600
<v Speaker 11>the web that exists isn't built for them. It's not

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 11>ready for them. Everything I and so many people have

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 11>built over the last thirty years has been built for

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 11>humans and for eis. Their needs are different, and that's

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 11>the problem that we're starting at Parallel, and.

0:30:03.320 --> 0:30:05.360
<v Speaker 6>That's why we describe EI.

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 11>Agents as a primary customer for all the technology that

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 11>we're building.

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 2>There is actually some news that we're breaking here right

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 2>which is that you've raised around thirty million dollars for Parallel.

0:30:16.640 --> 0:30:18.280
<v Speaker 2>You know, that's a lot out the gate. Just tell

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 2>us about about how that went, that came about and

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 2>the team that you've built.

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 11>We when we've started with this vision or visions like

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 11>a big vision in order to really transform what the open.

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Web looks like.

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:41.040
<v Speaker 11>Doing so requires reimagining from the ground up every part

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 11>of the infrastructure that spans the crawl, the index ranking systems,

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 11>reasoning systems, completely new interfaces built for a systems. And

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 11>as we sort of thought about what it would take

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 11>to build all of this, I think that was the

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 11>appropriate amount of money to raise. The team we have

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 11>is also the one needed to take on this problem.

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 11>The team around me is the team that built a

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 11>lot of the key primitives of the current human web,

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 11>whether it be at social networks like Twitter and Snap,

0:31:15.320 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 11>or at scripe and even marketplaces at Airbnb and so

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 11>the best people who've sort of built the previous version

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 11>of the web, recognizing ways in which it does not

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 11>serve the needs of what's coming. Yes, have now come

0:31:29.000 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 11>together to build this future web aar We too.

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 3>Had started off by saying the customer is the agent here,

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 3>but who actually is the customer?

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 4>And seeing the integration with.

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Lindy for example, with AI agents, but more broadly, who

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 3>buys you? Whose problems you solving? Is it those of

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 3>open AI and perplexity you are busy building the agentic platforms.

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 11>I think one way to think about our customer set

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 11>right if you think of any piece of software or

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 11>any workflow, both of those are changing. They're changing by

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 11>incoorporating models like lllms into them that give them intelligence. Now,

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 11>once you have those, it almost feel silly to not

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 11>have access to the open Web in order to serve

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:13.959
<v Speaker 11>your customers or do your Workflorce.

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 6>Let me give you an example.

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 11>We work with an insurance a large insurance company. One

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 11>of the things they do is underwriting, wherein there's a

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 11>bunch of people that spend thirty minutes, perhaps even two hours,

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 11>understanding a business they're about to underwrite, to understand everything

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 11>about it and discover all long tail risk signals anywhere

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 11>on the web. Now they've been doing that with human

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 11>operations forever. As we started working with them and they

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 11>incorporated our APIs into how they do things, combining all

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 11>of the data from the web with all of the

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 11>internal proprietary information that they have collected, they're actually able

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 11>to outperform humans meaningfully, not just in terms of cost

0:32:59.560 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 11>and how you can do things, but in terms of quality,

0:33:03.000 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 11>because it turns out humans cellucinate it too.

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 3>Briefly, Parak, you built parallel web systems hot on the

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 3>heels of a very combative few years having led Twitter,

0:33:13.720 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 3>but you were known as building the machine learning systems

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 3>over Twitter and now X.

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 4>What lessons have you learned to bring to this new company.

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 11>One, A lot of the lessons from the past no

0:33:27.600 --> 0:33:32.160
<v Speaker 11>longer apply when you're thinking of building machine learning systems.

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 11>When we're building those at Twitter at twenty fourteen, they

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 11>look very very different from the systems we are now

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 11>able to build, velocity at which we were able to move,

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 11>and the kinds of problems we are able to take on.

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.480
<v Speaker 11>What remains similar, though, for people who've been doing machine

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:51.520
<v Speaker 11>learning for a while, is the mindset of solving problems

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 11>end to end, understanding evils, dealing with stochastics, systems, and

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 11>I think those are the lessons that truly inform us.

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:06.719
<v Speaker 2>Parrague, Sun Valley twenty twenty two. I was there, I

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 2>remember seeing you there, and then everything that followed, just

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 2>for the first time, reflects a little bit on what happened.

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 7>In Yeah please.

0:34:20.120 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 11>What happened was we built over eleven years that I

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 11>was at Twitter, one of the most consequential platforms to exist.

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:37.160
<v Speaker 11>It allowed everyone to speak and hear directly from others,

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 11>and there is nothing like it, and I'm very proud

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 11>of what I was able to achieve there with my years. Now,

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 11>of course there was a lot more to be done.

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 11>It remains a platform that matters in the world.

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 6>But my new mission pulls.

0:34:55.880 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 11>A thread from that, which is how do you keep

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 11>the web open. It's the same mission around allowing everyone

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:10.279
<v Speaker 11>to publish openly on the web, around every AI being

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:15.880
<v Speaker 11>able to access what everyone is publishing freely. There is

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 11>a risk on the open web, wherein we might have

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 11>a bunch of payballs and silos, and an AI model

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 11>from one vendor is able to access certain parts of

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 11>the web, while the agent you might run on your

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 11>computer using open source software cannot And that's not the

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:36.839
<v Speaker 11>future I want and that's why we're building Parallel all.

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Raight Agrowell, thanks for joining us, found our CEO Parallel

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Web Systems and of course pre you to see the

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:51.319
<v Speaker 3>CEO of Twitter. Fitness ban maker Woop is refusing to

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 3>disable it's blood pressure tracking tool following warnings from the

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 3>FDA saying that the company is operating as a medical device.

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now to discuss CEO Will almed Will, what's

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 3>your view that the FDA does not have authority in

0:36:05.760 --> 0:36:08.640
<v Speaker 3>this moment. Your wellness not medical device.

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 12>Well, thanks for having me on you know Whoop spent

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 12>the last three years developing a very innovative feature called

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 12>blood Pressure Insights, and this takes our wrist worn wearable

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 12>alongside a calibration with a cuff and is allowed to

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 12>provide you with a daily estimate of your blood pressure

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 12>and in turn it also then gives you insights how

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 12>your blood pressure may be affecting other things in your wellness.

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 12>This could be sleep, stress, nutrition, a variety of different

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 12>wellness factors, and the FDA has come forward saying that

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 12>they believe that this should be regulated now. The twenty

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 12>first Century Cures Act makes it very clear that wellness

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.400
<v Speaker 12>intended features are not supposed to be regulated by the FDA,

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 12>and the FDA is intended to actually just regulate medical

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 12>devices that are diagnosing something. So there's this key question

0:37:03.120 --> 0:37:06.279
<v Speaker 12>of intended use. And you can see this with other

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 12>physiological metrics like r A monitoring for example, where HORRY

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:13.600
<v Speaker 12>monitoring has wellness applications and medical applications.

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 6>The wellness applications.

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:19.440
<v Speaker 12>Might be things like exercise or stress monitoring or sleep monitoring,

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.879
<v Speaker 12>and we do all that and then alternatively, there could be,

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 12>you know, a diagnosis for a fib and that would

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:28.120
<v Speaker 12>be an example where.

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 2>The fall will That's what the FDA is interpreted, right,

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 2>But you're a smart guy and you employ lots of

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.280
<v Speaker 2>smart people, why not just go through the FDA process

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:40.359
<v Speaker 2>in the first place, kind of foreseeing that this might

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:40.759
<v Speaker 2>come up.

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 12>Well, you have to understand there's different use cases, right.

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 12>One use case for blood pressure is around wellness, and

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 12>there's other use cases that might be a medical diagnosis.

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 12>And we're certainly looking at you know, cleared products as

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 12>well on a longer term horizon. But we're providing a

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 12>lot of value today and following the law again the

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 12>twenty first century Cures Act makes it very clear if

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 12>a product is intended for a wellness use case, it's

0:38:07.800 --> 0:38:10.160
<v Speaker 12>not supposed to be regulated by the FDA. So then

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 12>the fundamental question becomes, does blood pressure have wellness intended

0:38:15.160 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 12>use cases? We believe it does, right, There's an avalanche

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:22.239
<v Speaker 12>of pure reviewed research that shows that blood pressure, not

0:38:22.360 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 12>surprisingly is influenced and influences other aspects of your wealth.

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Will why call it medical grade? Why market it that way?

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 12>Well, we recently came out with the Whoop five DOTZHO

0:38:35.560 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 12>and the Whoop MG, and a key distinguishing factor between

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 12>the WOOP five dot OHO and the MG is that

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 12>the MG has a medically cleared feature on it. Now,

0:38:44.640 --> 0:38:47.800
<v Speaker 12>both of those products have a number of wellness features

0:38:47.840 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 12>associated with it. The WOOP MG happens to have an

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 12>ECG monitor as part of that that can detect aphib

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 12>and by the way, we spent two and a half

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 12>years working with the FDA to have that cleared feature.

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 12>So that is the distinguishing factor between those two hardwares.

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 12>And I want to be very clear in the app

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:12.120
<v Speaker 12>there's an enormous number of medical disclaimers explaining what is

0:39:12.239 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 12>for wellness and what is for medical capabilities.

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you've said this is a misunderstanding. What happens next?

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Will you continue to fight the FDA on it or

0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 2>in the background are you trying to reach some solution.

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 6>We have a lot of respect for the FDA.

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.239
<v Speaker 12>I mean, we've engaged with them on a number of

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 12>different features over the years. We think in this specific

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:36.560
<v Speaker 12>case they have it wrong, and so we're going to

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 12>continue engaging.

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 6>With them on it.

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:42.760
<v Speaker 12>We've responded to their warning letter outlining how we feel

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 12>about this and why we think we're following the law,

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 12>and we look forward to continuing to engage with them

0:39:48.840 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 12>on it.

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:52.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, that must take up headspace and ultimately your time.

0:39:52.840 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 3>How does that impact your future product roadmap? How does

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 3>more broadly, the FDA acting this way affect innovation more broadly?

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Do you think ultimately?

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 12>I think that you know, innovation needs to be able

0:40:04.760 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 12>to thrive in the United States. Whoop is one of

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 12>the first wearables in the world that can measure blood

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 12>pressure accurately from the risk that's a really big deal,

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.840
<v Speaker 12>and it's also being accepted in fifty other markets around

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 12>the world.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 6>So, you know, we want.

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:23.000
<v Speaker 12>To make sure that there's policies that are consistent here

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 12>in the US that really allow companies to innovate and

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 12>to operate. It's also worth noting, you know, we have

0:40:30.120 --> 0:40:32.560
<v Speaker 12>a lot of people using this every single day, and

0:40:32.680 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 12>overwhelmingly if you look at the feedback from our members,

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 12>they absolutely love this feature and they talk about how

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 12>accurate it is and how it's helping them understand their wellness.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 12>So we feel like we're on the right side of history,

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.239
<v Speaker 12>and we're going to continue educating the FDA on what

0:40:47.280 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 12>we're doing.

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 6>Well.

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:51.960
<v Speaker 2>I'm very quickly I'm not a Whoop user, but I'm

0:40:52.040 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 2>very conscious that in the Premier League and other international

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 2>football players, it's very in the public conscience. I just wonder, like,

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 2>is this a good pr moment for you to fight

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 2>America's regulator.

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 6>I think in the long.

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 12>Run we'll be on the right side of history, and

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:10.399
<v Speaker 12>that maybe in a very short period of time too.

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 12>I think that fighting for innovation, fighting for Americans access

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:17.399
<v Speaker 12>to health data is the right thing to do. And

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 12>I've spent thirteen years building this company. When I first started,

0:41:21.280 --> 0:41:24.160
<v Speaker 12>the idea that you could measure sleep or heart rate

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 12>accurately from the wrist seemed impossible, and now we're able

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 12>to do blood pressure accurately from the risk. That's a

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 12>really big deal and I think it should be celebrated

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 12>as long as there's the right guidelines in place and

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.279
<v Speaker 12>the right education in place for members to understand how

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 12>to use it. And that's what we've done with this feature,

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 12>and that's why we're proud of it.

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:47.600
<v Speaker 7>Whip CEO Will Almed, Thank you very much, Caro.

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Ah great conversation to round out. What is the end

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:54.520
<v Speaker 3>of this edition of Bloomberg Tech Ed programming note, make

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 3>sure to check out the next edition of Bloomberg Tech Europe.

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Tom McKenzie can be exploring how AI is changing the wing.

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 3>We work six thirty am London time on Friday.

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 2>And give and I have twenty seconds. I didn't expect.

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 2>We have a podcast and you know where to find it.

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.840
<v Speaker 2>It's on the Internet and it's also on the Bloomberg

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 2>platforms and you should listen to it and to recap

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the show from New York City and London.

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 7>This is Bloomberg Tech