WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - March 14th, 2025

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Business Week Insight from the reporters and

0:00:12.960 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 2>editors that bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Stenovek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, Welcome to the Bloomberg Business Wee Weekend Podcast.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Tim is on assignment this weekend. Well, this past week

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a global selloff and overall volatility in stocks thanks to

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>tariffs and trade wars, fedchair J Powell saying the US

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>economy is fine, favorable US inflation prints. We also got

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>US airlines warning about weakening demand, and many many headlines

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>out of Washington, and that included continuing efforts by DOGE,

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Government Efficiency run by Elon Musk, in

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>what may be a remaking of the US federal government.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And so we're going to kick off this hour with

0:01:02.200 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive into the changes President Trump is making

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and policies he's pursuing, and ask what is his possible

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>endgame domestically and globally. One view in just a moment,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and got to say it kind of went a little viral.

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Also this hour, the chief financial officer of on Semiconductor,

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.440
<v Speaker 1>on Tariff's the macro and going public on a big deal,

0:01:22.920 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>plus the rise in power demands and possible wider use

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of nuclear power, and Zach Dell, co founder of base Power,

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and yes, the son of Michael Dell, on backup power

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>for stressed out grids. All of that to come first up, though,

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>with a steady stream of headlines out of the White

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>House regarding Tariff's, geopolitics and more, we've got a deep

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>dive into how the United States relationship with the world

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>may be changing short term and even possibly longer term.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We wanted to try and suss out what President Trump's

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 1>endgame may be when it comes to the United States

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and democracy. And to that end we turn to Ed Price,

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a former British trade official Non Residents senior fellow at

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and Why You. Ed has advised members of the European

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and British parliaments and writes often about politics, economic policy,

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and more.

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>In my view, he is a good thing for America,

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 3>the nation and America the democracy, because everybody's talking about

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 3>America and the democracy and we're sitting here doing this again,

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 3>and he is potentially a very bad thing for the

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Republic and the Union and the United States. And it

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>might seem strange to make that distinction, because as things stand,

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>we very often think of those things as the same. Right,

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 3>we will say USA and we'll say America interchangeably. And

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 3>as I try to argue in this column, I may

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 3>be wrong. I think that Trump's absolute structural purpose, is

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 3>foundational purpose, is to split those two things in half,

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 3>to get them away from one from the other.

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 4>Explain how he does that and what that means. People

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 4>might hear you and say, wait a second, these things

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 4>sound like something that are inextricably bound.

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 3>So they're not, in my opinion, right, Seventeen seventy six

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 3>is the moment that the American nation was born, and

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 3>it was born of breaking the law and defying a king.

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.679
<v Speaker 3>So that's the rebelliousness, right, That's the flags on the

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:10.519
<v Speaker 3>back of pickups. It's great, It's all American. Seventeen eighty nine,

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 3>when the Constitution is ratified, is the moment that we

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 3>chose to be legalists and chose to be a republic.

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.960
<v Speaker 3>Alexander Hamilton in that intermigrament was saying, look, should we

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 3>have a king right, and they were arguments about how

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 3>powerful the president should be. These arguments have never been resolved.

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:29.720
<v Speaker 3>And we saw with Nixon, we saw with Kennedy the

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 3>imperial presidency. Because again, we haven't decided as a nation

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 3>what exactly our republic is fought. So if President Trump

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>truly wanted to create a presidency with unlimited powers, he

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't be able to do it within the existing seventeen

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 3>eighty nine United States framework. He would have to somehow

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 3>appeal to the seventeen seventy six animal spirits to misuse

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the term of the nation.

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So is that where Doge comes in?

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Doge goitness me? So Elon Musk is supposed to be

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 3>a genius. He doesn't realize he's the full guy, right,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>He's the four guy. He's going to be ousted at

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 3>some point when Doge goes too far, which it will

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 3>probably into entitlements, Trump will need.

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Which is what they are dealing with, which is what they.

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Want to do as we speak. Trump is going to

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 3>need someone that wasn't affirmed by the confirmed by the

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Senate to get rid of quickly, and that's Musk. And

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 3>I think we saw Musk on Fox the other day

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 3>sweating it a little bit with Kudlog because it looked

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 3>like he's starting to realize that maybe he's in trouble.

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 3>His businesses aren't doing very well and so on. So

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Doze is the kind of battering ram. It's like the

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 3>vanguard that's seeing how far, like a test balloon, how

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 3>far this stuff can go. And when challenged, Musk will

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 3>be quite easy to peel off.

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Well when is I just you know, because I think

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's safe to say that some have thought government has

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>gotten really big, and there's some security in that in

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that you don't move fast and break things that maybe

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be broken. But at the same time, it's very

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.719
<v Speaker 1>easy to get lazy over existing structure, and waste does

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>get created, and you know whether it's you know, So,

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the balance between good efficiency and disruption, especially in

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a government like the United States.

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess there's two points.

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 3>One is that whether or not the American people want

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>a big government is debatable. That's why we have elections.

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 3>Whether or not the Americans want an all powerful government

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 3>was already decided at the aforementioned Constitutional Congress, Right, So

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>I'm very careful to try and prize away an efficient

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 3>government from the size of the government. Donald Trump wants

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 3>a smaller government, which he then says is more efficient.

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:40.840
<v Speaker 3>So those of us who are worried, and this is

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 3>the second point, those of us who are worried about

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 3>fiscal and debt, will go, Okay, that makes sense, But

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 3>that's disingenuous because what he actually wants is a more

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 3>powerful government.

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:50.039
<v Speaker 1>He wants a concentration of power.

0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Scentration of power. So Lord Acton famously says that power corrupts,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 3>and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I think power accumulates as well,

0:05:57.839 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 3>and this is what we should be watching for.

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 4>I want to go back to what you said about

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 4>Elon and Doge, because I think a lot of people

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 4>have been proven wrong over the past few months when

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 4>they said this is a honeymoon that is going to

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 4>end badly. These two look pretty close at this point.

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 4>And given Elon's status as the wealthiest person in the world,

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 4>he proved in this election cycle that he's incredibly powerful

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 4>with helping to elect people.

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 3>And you're saying he might be there longer than I think.

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 4>I think I am, yeah, just because he has the resources,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 4>and you know, he has said he wants to use

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 4>these in other parts of the ballot.

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 3>So the president with respect has a long and storied

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 3>history of using and discarding people. And I don't think

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 3>that Elon Musk rule of his wealth is I.

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 4>Mean, there are many books written by those people who

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 4>want there's described.

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 3>There is a library of people that have been have

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 3>been let down by the president. Should we say, I

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.560
<v Speaker 3>guess I'm contending. I mean, I can see too that

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 3>maybe the time is something I couldn't possibly forecast. But

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I think the function of putting Musk into this thing

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 3>called doge is that he's easy to get rid of.

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 3>He's easy to point out later and say, this guy

0:07:11.280 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 3>made these mistakes, not me right, and at that point

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:15.320
<v Speaker 3>he's gone.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So when you hear things like Canada and this is

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>something I think we all too are asking ourselves. You

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>know again, what is the endgame here? Do you think

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of President Trump?

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Honestly, I mean I might regret saying this. Okay, maybe

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 3>this is my last appearance on your show. I don't know.

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 3>I think he's serious. I think he's serious.

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Canadians are if we if it ever comes off kind

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of jokey on air, I'll be honest with you We've

0:07:42.000 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>had people reach out and say, hey, this is serious.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>We don't think this is a I think.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 3>It's dead serious. I think Donald Trump's vision is a

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 3>big sharpie around the entire of North America, including Greenland,

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 3>with Trump Land written on it. And I think that

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 3>there's some strategic sense to this, right because of the

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 3>world of you know, you look at the Second World War,

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 3>it was just who can get the biggest load of

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 3>resources in one place. And if you look at Russia

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 3>and China, they kind of have Eurasia on lock. So

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 3>it would strategically make sense for the America, the North

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Americans to converge together, if not for the fact that

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 3>we don't behave like that. And the very reason for

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 3>this country is law, as I said seventeen eighty nine.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 3>So the seventeen eighty nine edition of the United States

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 3>cannot annex Canada. It tried, it failed, It just it

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>didn't work. But the sort of pre seventeen seventy six

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 3>bubbling rebelliousness of the nation might And I feel that he's,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 3>as I say, dead serious.

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:40.800
<v Speaker 4>If he's dead serious, are you saying or predicting that

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 4>he might in fact try to make Canada the fifty

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 4>first state.

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:47.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that he would make it the fifty

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 3>first state. I feel like that's a meme, but I

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 3>think he would try to.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Bring He talks about it.

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 3>He talks about it all the time in Hue. Might

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 3>or be it. I imagine that the Republicans would never

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 3>be elected again because all of my Canadian friends are

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty liberal. I don't know how that works, right, but

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 3>I think that what he wants is some control over

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 3>the North American hemisphere. It's almost like the Monroe Doctrine

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 3>is being extended north and being extended north at the

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 3>expense of these polities that already exist, in particular Denmark

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 3>and Canada.

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>If we go along with your thinking, and some others

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>think that he too is not kidding. Is it something

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that could happen without US military action?

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean at some point the Canadians would not

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 3>be happy about this, right, I mean, you can't tell

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 3>a sovereign state you now belong to us. Others have

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 3>tried that in history, Napoleon Stalin Hitler, and it never

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 3>ends well. So I think that the US military would

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 3>have to at some point invade. I mean this again,

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 3>it's like amazing to hear yourself say this on a livestream,

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 3>So I don't think Canada.

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But to be fair, the president has talked about it.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So we start kind of carrying it out, like how

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this might happen.

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 3>Sure, sure, I think it's not impossible. I mean, you

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 3>could come in from green We have bases.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 4>There, we're Bloomberg. We got to talk markets, big picture

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 4>and the way that they have responded to big picture

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 4>President Trump's policies over the last few weeks, or what

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 4>they view as his policies. Uh, do you think it's

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 4>fair to say that the equity and bond markets have

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.960
<v Speaker 4>not necessarily been a check on the president?

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 3>He said to himself, to him, right, you don't look

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:22.680
<v Speaker 3>at the stop market anymore.

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but I mean he's said a lot of things.

0:10:24.600 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 4>He said, you take that to heart.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.599
<v Speaker 3>I think he's unrestrained. I think at this point he's

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 3>he's not thinking about popularity in the way that he

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 3>has previously. Something has changed in his demeanor.

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 4>He's not running for reelection, so.

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Or well, I mean, you respect.

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 4>That he's not supposed to.

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 3>He's not supposed to run for reelection. Again, there's his

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 3>whole thing, whole thing.

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 6>This is this whole thing.

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 3>I think he's fundamentally trying to reshape North America. I

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 3>think Russia is a distraction. Of course, we have to

0:10:57.080 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 3>talk about markets, right, so I don't want to pivot

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 3>away from that. Yeah, but the question for me is China.

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Is he getting ready to hand Taiwan over py Ukraine?

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And full credit to our producer Ceci because she said,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, as we were planning for this about how

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump and his cabinet have signaled that their content to

0:11:15.600 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 1>sit back on Taiwan and China. You have Treasury Secretary

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Pssent even said he doesn't see China taking action against

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Taiwan in this term. So what does this messaging tell

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you is the seating ground on global democracy? Should we

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.560
<v Speaker 1>feel confident that Trump's presence is enough of a deterrent

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:32.559
<v Speaker 1>only got about forty five to fifty seconds.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 3>Democracy is okay because we voted for him. The Republic

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 3>might not be. And this is what I mean. It

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>might be that there's a period of massive populism in

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 3>this country, including the seating of Taiwan, and democracy in

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan is in trouble. But in this country it's doing

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 3>pretty well. And that's a real head scratcher right, because

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 3>we may choose to abandon democratic allies.

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>But democracy would continue here.

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Democracy here, I think for a while. Yep, I'm going to.

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Squeeze in one more question because your column ends with

0:12:02.720 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>all of this political disruption doesn't necessarily mean the end

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of an era, but rather the beginning of one. Twenty

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>five seconds said it before.

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Trump wants some sort of empire, some sort of imperium.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you would brand it like that.

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you would be honest like that.

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 3>But at core, he wants to solidify power, move himself

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 3>to center stage, and create some kind of Autakia in

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 3>North America.

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>That was Ed Price, a former British trade official now

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>non resident senior fellow at NYU. Coming up on Bloomberg

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, A sector that always bears close watching semiconductors.

0:12:36.160 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>The CFO of on Semi is next. This is Bloomberg.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 2>on Apple CarPlay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Intel got a new CEO this past week. TSMC sales

0:12:58.080 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 1>quickened in the first two months of the year, driven

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>by resilient demand for AI chips. Just a few of

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the headlines out of the semi world this past week

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and earlier this month, the chip company on Semiconductor made

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>its pursuit of a Legro Microsystems public, disclosing an unsolicited

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>bid valuing the company at six point nine billion dollars

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>including debt. Now. That followed news last month that the

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.679
<v Speaker 1>company plans to cut about twenty four hundred jobs this

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>year as part of a restructuring plan, and take related

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:29.320
<v Speaker 1>charges of fifty to sixty million dollars mostly this year.

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 4>Here to talk about all of this, tariffs and the

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 4>macro environment is the chief financial officer of on Semiiconductor,

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Thad trent along with Bloomberg News Senior editor Nina Trentman

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 4>that is featured in the recent Bloomberg CFO Briefing newsletter

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 4>can be found online at Bloomberg dot com slash CFO Briefing.

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Also sign up to get it there. Nina joins us

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 4>here in the studio. Fad joins us from Phoenix.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 5>Fad.

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 4>We want to start with you top of mind. I

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 4>think for everybody is the macro, the jobs market, tariffs.

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 4>How would you describe the US economy, the global economy,

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 4>and the macro and vironment right now.

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so, first of all, thanks for having me on look.

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 7>In terms of the terraffs, there's definitely an impact that's

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 7>happening out there right now. I would say what we're

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 7>seeing from our perspective, and it's really been happening for

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 7>the last three or four months, is a pause. Customers

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 7>are really slowing down, trying to figure out what to do,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 7>what's the impact on the terraffs, and how they're going

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 7>to adjust their supply chain to adjust to these terrorfs.

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 7>Right now, what's happening with the uncertainty is that pause

0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 7>and customers just saying we're going to run kind of

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 7>hand the mouth. We're going to be very very cautious

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 7>in the short term until we get clarity. So I

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 7>think clarity is really what we need for this to

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 7>get kind of back to a growth environment again, given that,

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 7>given that just the uncertainty around the globe. But what

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 7>we're hearing from our customers is they're looking for alternatives,

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 7>and we're in a spotted on SIDI where we can

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 7>offer alternatives to our customers. We have a very large

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 7>manufacturing footprint, a large manufacturing footprint in the United States,

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 7>and we can offer our custom from res alternatives based

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 7>on where they're located, where they're manufacturing is and hopefully

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.400
<v Speaker 7>help them navigate through the tariffs. But to answer your question,

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 7>it's mostly a pause right now.

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a pause. Love that word to describe it. You said,

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>tariff's definitely having an impact. This pause. Customers really slowing down.

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at some of your biggest customers, the supply

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>chain function on the Bloomberg WT Microelectronics, Arrow Electronics, Abnet,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Hyundai Motor Tesla BYD you play a lot, Volkswagen, you

0:15:28.080 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>play a lot into the automotive sector, but also the

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>industrial space. All of them pausing, all of them slowing

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>down or is it largely the automotive sector.

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.400
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so you know, eighty over eighty percent of our

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 7>business is automotive industrial, so that's where we focus. What

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing on both sides is a slowing in auto

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 7>and industrial. If you think about those customer bases have

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 7>really complex manufacturing and complex supply chains, and the pause

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 7>is happening across the board and across all gields right now,

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing pockets of shoots of kind of green shoots

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 7>that are looking good. But general I would say people

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 7>are looking for certainty right now in terms of the

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 7>geopolitical situation and where the dust is going to land

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 7>on the tariffs and.

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 5>That How does this impact your current situation at the company,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Carol mentioned, you're restructuring, you're making job cuts, you're making

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 5>changes sort of. How does this affect you?

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So look for us directly, we don't think there's

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 7>a huge impact or a material impact from the tariffs

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 7>directly in terms of our business, but our in customers

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 7>are being impacted by the tariffs right so the big

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:32.880
<v Speaker 7>concern is what does in demand do and what does

0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 7>the macro do as a result of these terraffs in

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 7>the geopolitical situation. For us, there is a slowdown in

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 7>the industry. Autos are soft right now. So you know,

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 7>as you mentioned, we announced restructuring. We're looking at this

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 7>is not just a cost reduction, but are restructuring. How

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 7>do we take cost out of the company that's permanent.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 7>So we've been going through a transformation here at a

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 7>semi for a number of years here and a lot

0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 7>of this is structural nature, where when we think about

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 7>the market recovering, these are cost savings that are with

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 7>us forever.

0:17:03.560 --> 0:17:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Dad, you said autos are slowing down. Is that because

0:17:06.920 --> 0:17:10.919
<v Speaker 1>of tariff concerns and automaker problems and issues or is

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it because of the consumer?

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 2>Are both?

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 7>Oh, it's a consumer, It's more consumer now Now, I

0:17:16.440 --> 0:17:19.400
<v Speaker 7>would say what's been happening over time is consumer based, right,

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 7>I think the demand for autos has been coming down

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.320
<v Speaker 7>for a period of time now. The short term, what

0:17:24.359 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 7>I've been talking about over the last couple of months

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 7>has definitely been tariff based, where if you're an automaker

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 7>and you're importing from Mexico or Canada, you're seriously considering

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 7>what that supply chain looks like, what that manufacturing footprint

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 7>looks like, and that is causing a pause right now

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 7>with those customers.

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 4>You've got manufacturing sites around the globe. You mentioned what

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 4>you do here in the US. The investments that are

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 4>being announced in this semi area. TSMC to spend an

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 4>additional one hundred billion dollars in US plants to boost

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 4>semiconductor manufacturing in the US. How is that going.

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 3>To impact you?

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 4>Will it impact you? Directly? Will it impact you in directly?

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 7>Look, it's not going to have a direct impact for

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 7>US because we manufacture about sixty five percent of our

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:09.880
<v Speaker 7>products in house, so we have a large manufacturing footfront ourselves.

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 7>So a TSMC coming into the United States isn't going

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.880
<v Speaker 7>to impact us directly. But it's really good for the industry.

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 7>The more manufacturing we can get into the United States

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 7>is going to be great for obvious reasons national security.

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 7>So I think for the industry, the supply chain, given

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 7>what's going on for our customers, I think it's all good.

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:30.160
<v Speaker 7>Even though it may not impact us directly. Our customers

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 7>buy other products from our peers that have manufacturing and TSMC,

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 7>so the more that we can have a diverse supply

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 7>chain is going to be great for the industry. So

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 7>I think these investments are great overall for our customers

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 7>and for the semiconductor industry.

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Should we expect more investments from you in the US?

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 5>I know that you're investing more in the Czech Republic

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 5>where you already have a site and you're building that out,

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 5>But what is your CAPEC strategy entail with regards to

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 5>US investments.

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we've been making big investments over the last three years,

0:19:00.600 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 7>I would say, and that's in manufacturing capacity. A lot

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 7>of that investment phases behind us at this point. We've

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 7>made big investments in the United States. We acquired a

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 7>fab in East Fishfield, New York. We have a large

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 7>manufacturing site in New Hampshire. So we've been making big

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 7>investments over the last several years. You brought up the

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 7>Czech Republic. When we think about investments in our footprint,

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.680
<v Speaker 7>it's what we call brownfield investments. It's not a greenfield

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 7>investment that becomes a capital light investment for us, so

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 7>it saves about forty percent capital When we think about

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 7>a brownfield investment investing in a site where we already

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 7>have a location, already have the infrastructure. So in the

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 7>Czech Republic, we have a large site there that we

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 7>are expanding. We are going to continue to invest in

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 7>that site over time, but that investment is a lower

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 7>capital and it's also faster time to market, so we

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 7>can get to market two years faster with a brownfield

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 7>investment than a greenfield investment.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, So you've done a lot of investments around

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the world, and in terms of your manufacturing sites, you

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>also spend money sometimes when it comes to a deal.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I know you might be limited in what you can

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about, but that takeover offer for a Legro microsystem

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>unsolicited bid values the company about six point nine billion

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 1>dollars that includes debt. Offers are not often made public

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>sometimes though done to kind of put some pressure on

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>shareholders on the target. What can you tell us about

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>this deal moving any closer to being a done deal?

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, Look, we put out a press release that I

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 7>think details really are sequence of events that have gotten

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 7>us to this point. Let me start with the strategic

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.719
<v Speaker 7>rationale of why this is compelling for on Semi. So

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 7>in on Semi we focus on intelligent power intelligence sensing

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 7>as we talked about for auto industrial and the AI

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 7>data center. Allegro Microsystems has got a great portfolio of

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 7>sensing products that sell into automotive industrial, very very consistent market,

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 7>and we believe with our scale and our go we

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 7>can take that product broader and create innovative products for

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 7>our customers. Both companies have a culture of innovation, so

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 7>I think we're going to be combining companies that have

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 7>common themes of innovation and it allows us to bring

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 7>more value to our customers. That's really the strategic value

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 7>of this in terms of what we're wanting to happen

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 7>here is we're wanting to get some meaningful engagement with

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 7>their board, hoping to get some dialogue. At this point,

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 7>we haven't gotten that. Thus we went public with our

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 7>offer to say we're here and we're hoping that we

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 7>get some engagement from this point forward.

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's interesting that you're pursuing this deal at a

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 5>time when dealmaking was supposed to pick up, but we

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 5>haven't really seen it, and many companies are saying, well,

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 5>the current environment is just so uncertain.

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 8>So talk to us.

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.360
<v Speaker 5>About how the company came to this conclusion that now

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 5>is actually a good time.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah. You know, when you think about a strategic deal

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 7>for us, it's got to click a few boxes, right.

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you've got to have the strategic nature, the

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 7>rationale in terms of what we can bring to our customers,

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 7>and then you have to have the financial side of

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 7>the things. So you know, we think about the creative deals,

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 7>how quickly we can get to accretion and the shareholder

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 7>value that we can create over time. The element that

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.440
<v Speaker 7>you have to take into consideration is the regulatory environment

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 7>and that is the unknown right now. I don't think

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 7>the regulatory environment has really changed much, you know, from

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:21.199
<v Speaker 7>administration to administration. So when you think about this, the

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.920
<v Speaker 7>hurdle is higher when you think about you're going to

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 7>go to bat for something like this, but you have

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 7>to have conviction that it's going to make sense and

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 7>that you can get through that regulatory environment. When we

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 7>look at it, we don't compete head to head on

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 7>any of those products, and we've analyzed everything that we

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 7>can see publicly, and we don't believe there's going to

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 7>be a barrier. It may take some time, but we

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 7>believe we can get this one across the line.

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 4>That if you cannot get this one across the line,

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 4>if you have to walk away, or if the deal

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 4>falls through, if it doesn't work out for some reason,

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 4>who do you pursue next?

0:22:53.160 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 7>Well, look, that's hard to say. Right this one has

0:22:56.520 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 7>a lot of strategic value to us. We're committed to

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 7>the proposal that we have on the table. We're hoping

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 7>to get that board and management team engaged and get

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 7>in a room and talk about how we can get

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 7>a combination together.

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Could the price go up and are you willing to

0:23:09.240 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>raise the price if necessary to get the deal across

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>the finish line.

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 7>Look, that's to be determined. At this point. Everything that

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 7>we've been able to look at is based on publicly

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 7>available information. We want to get together with that management team,

0:23:22.080 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 7>understand the true value, and then we'll make determinations. At

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 7>that point. We have a very compelling offer. There's it's

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.240
<v Speaker 7>a fifty seven percent premium to the unaffected price.

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 1>That was on Semiconductor CFO Thad trent along with Bloomberg

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>News Senior editor Nina Trettman. That was featured in a

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>recent Bloomberg CFO Briefing newsletter, which can be found at

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com slash CFO Briefing. A new one comes

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>out on Sunday. Still ahead on Bloomberg BusinessWeek, two views

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>on the energy space, one on the surge and interest

0:23:50.400 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in nuclear the other a startup providing backup power. That's next.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg.

0:24:01.520 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live each

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting a two pm Eastern on Applecarplay and the

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 2>listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Just say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Shares in nuclear power stocks rose this past week after

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.399
<v Speaker 1>technology and energy companies pledged to support wider use of

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power to cater to surging demand from data centers

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and factories. Amazon Meta Platforms, Occidental Petroleum and Now are

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>among the initial members of the Large Energy Users Group,

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>which is backing a global effort announced in twenty twenty

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>three to triple the world's nuclear capacity by twenty fifty.

0:24:44.560 --> 0:24:47.760
<v Speaker 1>It's all about meetings surging US demand for electricity, which

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 1>will surge almost sixteen percent over the next five years,

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.679
<v Speaker 1>more than triple the estimate from a year ago, driven

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>by new data centers and factories that are going to

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>suck up power. That's according to the energy consulting group

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Grid Strategies. To hear more about the role nuclear power

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>will play in meeting that demand, Tim and I spoke

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:08.439
<v Speaker 1>with the president and CEO of ANI. The Nuclear Energy Institute,

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Maria korsnik Anyi, is the lobbying arm of the nuclear

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>power industry. She began with a near term forecast for

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the industry.

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 9>In the next two years, we're expecting at least four

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 9>grid scale applications for four different sites, a handful of

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 9>microreactor applications, five sites with construction activities in flight, and

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 9>two microreactor startups. So when I say that nuclear is moving,

0:25:37.920 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 9>I just want you to feel that not only is

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 9>the R and D, which we're going to be very

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 9>thankful to, our national labs have brought a lot of

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 9>different ideas to the marketplace, but you're actually now seeing

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 9>it go into site applications and construction applications to get

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 9>things moving.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 4>What would you say is the difference between the Biden

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 4>administration's approach to nuclear energy versus the Trump administration's approach

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 4>to nuclear energy? How did things change in January?

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 9>So that's interesting. You know, this is maybe one of

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 9>the only things, but one of the very few things

0:26:10.280 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 9>that gets bipartisan support. And interesting if you think about

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 9>nuclear right and you say, hey, well, it's very reliable.

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 9>You know, it's clean, it's carbon free, it has jobs.

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.439
<v Speaker 9>You know, like, there's enough in there to love. On

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 9>both sides of the aisle. On the Democrat side, you're

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.440
<v Speaker 9>going to get it more for the carbon free aspect

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 9>of it. On the Republican side, you're going to get

0:26:33.840 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 9>it more for the energy security, national security, high reliability

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.640
<v Speaker 9>of the energy source, and both sides love the jobs.

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.200
<v Speaker 1>So talk a little bit more about the build out.

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you kick things off with, you know, things

0:26:46.160 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that are happening now. Realistically, a lot of folks said,

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>when we really think about nuclear energy while the US

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 1>is active, that it's still a very small portion of

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>our electricity generation right in terms of a power provider,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that that build out might be eight to ten years away.

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>You're in it, you're talking to the players that are

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in it. What is the realistic timeframe that it is

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a substantial or more substantial part of a generation of

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>power here in the United States.

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 9>So today nuclear is about twenty percent, just under twenty

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 9>percent of the generation. But to your point, let's talk

0:27:23.359 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 9>about all of that demand. And you mentioned earlier the

0:27:26.640 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 9>AI demand that's really getting into the marketplace.

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 10>But you know, it's not just AI, it's.

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.920
<v Speaker 9>Also ensuring, manufacturing. It's also the fact that you want

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 9>to build out the clean energy supply that we have today,

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 9>and so all of that together is really driving this

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 9>demand much higher than what we had imagined even just

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 9>a few years ago. The next few years, you're going

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 9>to see ones and twos of things built. Think pilot

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 9>projects over the next few years, and I think in

0:27:57.040 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 9>the twenty thirties and the twenty forties of very significant buildout.

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 9>And I want to add, it's not just a build

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 9>out in the United States. The conversation we're having about

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 9>nuclear it's happening around the globe.

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:11.240
<v Speaker 10>Well, and why is it so important?

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Look at Europe, look at France, look at China, look

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at various nations in terms of their percentage of power

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>generation being larger than what it is in the United States.

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 11>If the US.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't have a role in this area, what does that mean?

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so let's just try that on for size.

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 9>Who is interested in building a lot of commercial nuclear

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 9>Russia and China, And they're not only interested in building

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 9>it in their own country. Today, right now Russia is

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 9>building nuclear plants in ten other countries.

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 10>And why is that?

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 9>Well, it wasn't too long ago where we saw Russia

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 9>turn off the gas supply to Europe. So I would

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 9>tell you there's a geopolitical strategy on some countries that

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 9>would like to control other countries energy supply, and why

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 9>should we fall for that. So we have fantastic technology,

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 9>we have the ability to really help our allies and

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:10.719
<v Speaker 9>in that way we protect them from this kind of behavior.

0:29:11.120 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 9>And it would be sad to see this replicated in

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 9>ten to twenty years we look back and say, oh,

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 9>why do they have the power over commercial nuclear industry?

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 9>Why do they have the power over all of these

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 9>different countries. We shouldn't let ourselves get there. So from

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 9>a national security perspective, from an energy security perspective, the

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 9>United States needs to lead in commercial nuclear power.

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the president and CEO of ANYI, the Nuclear Energy Institute,

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Maria Korsnik. While on the subject of power, you might

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 1>recall back in February, more than one hundred million people

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 1>faced frigid conditions across the eastern and central US, including

0:29:47.520 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the entire state of Texas, as an arctic blast threatened

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to break low temperature records. Someone who knows a bit

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 1>about Texas and the Texas State grid is Zach Dell,

0:29:57.160 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>who is co founder and CEO of Based Power Company.

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>You joined Tim and me from Houston, kicking off our

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.719
<v Speaker 1>chat with a reminder of Texas's place in the US

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 1>energy space.

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 8>Texas is the energy capital of the country. It leads

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 8>to the country in renewable generation. We have more wind

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 8>and more solar than almost anywhere in the country, and

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 8>that's because Texas is the middle of the wind corridor,

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 8>it's in the middle of the sun Belt, and it's

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 8>a great place to develop energy infrastructure. It's a free market,

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.440
<v Speaker 8>it's a deregulated energy market for the most part. Or

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 8>Coat is one of the largest electricity markets in the country,

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 8>and so it's a great place to build energy technology.

0:30:34.240 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 8>That's why we've decided to start the company here in Texas.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 8>But it's also a part of the country that's seen

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 8>incredible population growth, it's seen incredible growth in heavy industry,

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 8>and that's put a lot of stress on the grid.

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:49.720
<v Speaker 8>And so we started the company to increase our capacity

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 8>for energy consumption and add resources to the power grid

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 8>in the form of distributed battery storage to help absorb

0:30:55.840 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 8>some of that growth, absorb from that demand, and set

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 8>us up for a future of energy abundance and human

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 8>prosperity here in the state.

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 4>Zach explain where exactly the company lives on the grid

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 4>in the sense of Okay, it's not necessarily a utility,

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 4>it's not necessarily an energy provider.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 8>How do you define it exactly, So we are a

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 8>distributed energy technology company. So we deploy our storage assets

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 8>on the grid edge on site with our customers. So

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 8>we install batteries on homes today. Customers sign up for

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 8>base Power, we go install our battery on their home.

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 8>When the grid is up and running. We use that

0:31:31.760 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 8>battery to support the power grid in times of high demand.

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.440
<v Speaker 8>When the grid goes down. The customer gets that battery

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 8>to protect their home from power averages.

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Well and tell us about it. Like a customer that

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>signs up, Zach, exactly what are they getting. They're getting

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>batteries right, and there's installation that's involved. I'm curious about

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 1>how it works. What they get. My understanding is the

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>batteries are big. What it costs? Give me give us

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>an idea.

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 8>Yes, So customers sign up and pay four ninety five

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 8>upfront and sixteen dollars a month and get all the

0:31:57.600 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 8>benefits of home backup protection without the high up cost

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 8>of buying a large generator or buying a traditional home battery.

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 8>So we install a battery that's twenty five kill a

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 8>wide hours for one system, and you can get two

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 8>systems installed, which gets you to fifty kill a lot hours,

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 8>which will protect your home for up to one to

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 8>two days, depending on the size of the home and

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 8>the event of a power out. So you get a

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 8>really large battery for really low upfront cost and a

0:32:20.920 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 8>low monthly fee, cheaper than a gym membership, cheaper than

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 8>a Netflix subscription, cheaper than Amazon Prime. And when the

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.880
<v Speaker 8>grid's up and running, you're buying your electricity from us.

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 8>We're able to save you ten to twenty percent a

0:32:32.680 --> 0:32:34.640
<v Speaker 8>month on power. And when the grid goes down, you

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 8>get to protect your home, keep that fridge going, keep

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 8>your ac running, keep your lights on, and keep your

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 8>family safe.

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Zach.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 4>We're talking about this in the context of Texas, of course,

0:32:43.040 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of focus has been on Texas's grid. Also,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 4>California is grid another state that comes into focus. Any

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 4>plans to expand to California.

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, I mean, we hope to be in all fifty

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 8>states over the next couple of years, and we're working

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 8>to partner with some of the regulated utilities in states

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 8>like California that don't have a regulated energy market. Texas

0:33:01.720 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 8>is an amazing place to start the business because the

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 8>vast majority of the state, about eighty percent, is deregulated,

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 8>So we are actually a retail actor provider and a

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 8>battery developer, So we sell power directly to the homeowner

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 8>and then we own and operate the batteries on site.

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 8>In a state like California, you have regulator utilities like

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 8>LEDWP and PGNE that have kind of geographic monopolies over

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 8>certain areas, and so we'll partner directly with those regulated

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.120
<v Speaker 8>utilities provide our hardware and software to them to enter

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 8>those markets.

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.040
<v Speaker 1>And from what I understand too, Zach, that the success

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of the company's contingent on more and more people right

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>signing up, right, you need to kind of have a network.

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:42.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, not necessarily. We're able to operate our batteries at

0:33:42.600 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 8>the individual level, so we don't necessarily there's not like

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 8>traditional network effect benefits to more people signing up. But

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 8>obviously businesses benefit from scale and we benefit from scale

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 8>in the same ways. But it's not like the system

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 8>doesn't work well if a couple of people in the

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 8>neighborhood have it. There's really no meaningful difference if you're

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 8>the only one in your neighborhood or everyone in your

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 8>neighborhood has base power, all right.

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you're as an individual, there's no difference. But

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you get out of building that scale.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 8>Well, we benefit from scale, just like most businesses benefit

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:15.360
<v Speaker 8>from scale. So we have economies of scale on the

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 8>supply chain side, on the engineering side, building out our team,

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.640
<v Speaker 8>our resources. The larger we get, the lower the cost

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:24.920
<v Speaker 8>that we can provide to the customer. So our goals

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 8>of business is to develop a compounding cost advantage to

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 8>vertical integration. So we develop our own batteries, we develop

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 8>our own software, we manage the insolution, we sell power

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 8>directly with the homeowner, and by doing all those things,

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 8>we can drive the cost down for the customer and

0:34:37.080 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 8>deliver the most affordable and most reliable power.

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Right because from what I understand too, you're monitoring what

0:34:41.800 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the prices of energy and so when it goes down,

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>you guys are filling up the batteries. Correct, that's right.

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 4>If a power company sees what you're doing right now

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.479
<v Speaker 4>and says, wait a second, that's a really good idea.

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:54.879
<v Speaker 4>What's to stop con ED or PGNE on California from

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 4>basically replicating what you're doing, but they already have the

0:34:57.120 --> 0:34:58.240
<v Speaker 4>relationship with the customer.

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:00.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, it's very hard. You have to become an expert

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 8>in battery hardware engineering, power electronics, supply chain operations. You

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 8>have to deploy these batteries on site, you have to

0:35:07.080 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 8>interface directly with the customers, you have to build a

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 8>consumer brand. There's a lot of interesting and challenging distributed

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 8>system software problems that you have to solve to deploy

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 8>this technology. So we're really excited to partner with those

0:35:17.160 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 8>utilities and help them deploy battery technology in their service territories.

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 8>As you guys know, these investor own utilities are not

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 8>incentivized to invest money in op X in R and

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 8>D their cap X driven businesses. They earn a regulated

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 8>way of return on their CAPEX, and so their incentive

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 8>is really to deploy CAPEX and their service territory and

0:35:34.800 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 8>they add that into their rate base and that kind

0:35:37.239 --> 0:35:39.680
<v Speaker 8>of influences what they end up charging the end consumer.

0:35:39.960 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 8>Our business is a little bit different.

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:42.280
<v Speaker 10>We're an R and D driven business.

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 8>We develop technology and we bet that that technology is

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 8>going to benefit the customer and we benefit downstream of that,

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 8>and so we think that we're an obvious partner or

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:51.960
<v Speaker 8>some of these regulated utilities as kind of an R

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 8>and D partner where we can develop technology and then

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 8>we can go deploy that technology in their service territory.

0:35:57.200 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 8>They benefit, we benefit, and the homeowner benefits as well.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>So curious, are you profitable or how many states do

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you think you have to reach out to or expand

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to before you are profitable.

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 8>I don't think about it as a number of states number.

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 8>It's really about building the fleet and getting to scale.

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 8>And so we started the company a little under two

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 8>years ago. We launched a product in May. We've been

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.720
<v Speaker 8>scaling rapidly. We're doing on the order of twenty battery

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 8>installation of the day. We'll continue to scale up at

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 8>a faster and faster rate and move outside of Texas

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.160
<v Speaker 8>and states like California. And you know, we think there's

0:36:26.160 --> 0:36:28.680
<v Speaker 8>a really attractive kind of economic proposition for the business

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 8>going forward.

0:36:30.080 --> 0:36:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Zachdale, co founder and CEO based Power Company. And that

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>wraps up our first hour of the weekend edition of

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Ahead in our next hour,

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 1>Melinda Gates Venture arm NBA, Students Lord Overseas and how

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to challenge segregation enacted under the color of law. We

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the state of fair housing. This is Bloomberg

0:36:49.239 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. I'm Carol Master along with Tim Stenoveek.

0:36:52.200 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 2>You are listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 2>us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Listen on Apple cart Play and Android Auto with the

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business app, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:37:05.920 --> 0:37:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Plenty Ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week, Tim just a reminder is on

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.879
<v Speaker 1>assignment this weekend. Now for the next sixty minutes, we

0:37:13.920 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>will touch upon the world of MBAs, including studying overseas

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and this year's NBA job market, Plus where the VC

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>firm founded by Melinda French Gates is finding opportunities, and

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the state affair housing in the United States with the

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>author of How to Challenge Segregation Enacted under the Color

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>of Law. First up this hour and update from the

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>world of venture capital.

0:37:35.120 --> 0:37:35.239
<v Speaker 10>Well.

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 4>Quite a few of the companies that Pivotal Ventures has

0:37:37.320 --> 0:37:40.480
<v Speaker 4>invested in are familiar to our viewers and listeners. Elvest

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 4>and Little Otter, to name just a couple. Those founders

0:37:43.520 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 4>and CEOs have been on our air. Other investments include

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Hugh Founder's First Capital Partners, Millie Monamie, Summer Health, and more.

0:37:50.640 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 4>Pivot Ventures was found in nearly a decade ago by

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 4>Melinda French Gates, and it seeks to, in its own words, quote,

0:37:56.320 --> 0:38:01.919
<v Speaker 4>accelerate social progress through high impact investments, bilanthrope partnerships, and advocacy.

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 4>The companies also invested in nearly two dozen funds. We've

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 4>got with us. Aaron Harkless Moore, Senior director of Investments

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 4>at Pivotal Ventures. She joins us from Washington, DC, erin,

0:38:13.200 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 4>when you're looking out over the investment landscape, what are

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:19.839
<v Speaker 4>the boxes that the companies or the funds you want

0:38:19.840 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 4>to invest in, or you are looking to invest in,

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:24.759
<v Speaker 4>what are the boxes they have to check?

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:28.839
<v Speaker 10>Tim, Carol, thanks for having me on today. It's great

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:33.440
<v Speaker 10>to be with you. We're excited about this market opportunity

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 10>that we see in investing in innovators that are building

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 10>the next generation of companies that are tackling some of

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 10>the biggest challenges facing our society in caregiving and women's

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:50.200
<v Speaker 10>health and mental health. So we want to see founders

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 10>that have lived experience in building in the areas that

0:38:53.600 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 10>they're targeting, and that are taking advantage of huge market opportunities.

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:00.920
<v Speaker 10>Our strategy at Pivotal is to invest in both funds

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 10>and directly into startups that are again innovating in what

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 10>they're doing, and so we're looking for founders that are

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 10>going to bring game changing technologies to the table and

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 10>also backing the investors that are going to capitalize them

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 10>as well.

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Aaron, we love size and scope here at Bloomberg. Give

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.719
<v Speaker 1>me an idea of how much stuff gets pitched to you,

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 1>how much comes across your desk, whether it's a startup

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>or a fund that says, help, we're doing something good,

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:31.719
<v Speaker 1>but we need either some funding or some assistance to

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 1>even you know, increase our impact.

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 10>Sure, our pipeline is very robust, and I think it's

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 10>a it's a hallmark of our strategy that we try

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 10>to do a couple of things differently. You know, when

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 10>we're accessible, we don't need a warm intro. So if

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 10>founders can find us, you know, on LinkedIn, at conferences,

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.600
<v Speaker 10>at events, we're happy to take those meetings and get

0:39:53.640 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 10>to know get to know them and what they're trying

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 10>to build. We also want to invest early when we can.

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 10>You know, typically for fund managers on that side of

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 10>the table, you will focus a lot on emerging managers,

0:40:07.320 --> 0:40:10.000
<v Speaker 10>those that are often first time funds. And I actually

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 10>like to think of them in a different frame, is

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 10>its next generation managers that are finding new patterns and

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 10>new types of founders and innovations that they can back.

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 10>So our pipeline is robust and we're excited to be

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.720
<v Speaker 10>deploying capital in this market environment.

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.239
<v Speaker 4>Well, how would you describe the market environment right now?

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.560
<v Speaker 4>Because so much of what we talk about is about

0:40:29.560 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 4>investment in AI. I mean, there's even a headline from

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 4>our Bloomberg News team Anthropic finalizes three point five billion

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 4>dollar funding around at a sixty one point five billion

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.719
<v Speaker 4>dollar valuation. Do you feel like you're you're missing out

0:40:42.719 --> 0:40:45.479
<v Speaker 4>at all because of a lack of AI investments right now?

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:47.399
<v Speaker 2>Not at all.

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 10>We are investing in AI. Our fund managers are you

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.440
<v Speaker 10>mentioned Little Otter as well at the top of the

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:57.240
<v Speaker 10>introduction one of our newer investments. You know, they raised

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.560
<v Speaker 10>a little over nine million dollars to continue to bring

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 10>AI into their behavioral health and mental health platform to

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 10>support children and families and caregivers. And so you know,

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 10>AI is present in our strategy and the funds and

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 10>the companies that we're investing in, and we think AI

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:19.720
<v Speaker 10>is essential to modernize our healthcare system, our caregiving and infrastructure,

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:24.239
<v Speaker 10>foundational industries like manufacturing and supply change, wealth tech. It's

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 10>showing up across our fun portfolio, in our and directly

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.560
<v Speaker 10>in some of the companies we're backing. So it's important

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 10>in something that we're spending a lot of time in

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:32.880
<v Speaker 10>at Pivotal Ventures.

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I should note Rebecca Edgar, the co founder and

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:37.080
<v Speaker 4>CEO of Little Otter, was on our program that was

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:39.960
<v Speaker 4>back on Valentine's Day Carols just a little over a

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:40.439
<v Speaker 4>week ago.

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>It was a great conversation. Yeah, it was a really

0:41:44.480 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 1>rewarding conversation. I feel like eye opening for all of us.

0:41:48.560 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I am curious too about the caregiving component that you

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:54.279
<v Speaker 1>guys are investing in. I feel like that comes up

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 1>more and more in terms of, you know, if it's

0:41:57.680 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a book on like how to lead, how to manage,

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>how to move ahead, you got to think about the

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 1>caregiving component in your personal life, but also have society

0:42:04.840 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 1>at large talk to us about how you approach caregiving

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and what you see as the biggest kind of struggles

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 1>that we need to really invest in and overcome.

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 10>Sure, just to give a shout out to all the caregivers.

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 10>We're all caregivers at some point in our lives, you know,

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.960
<v Speaker 10>whether you're caring for young people, the aging, your own

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 10>family members, your spouse, a friend, a neighbor. We've supported

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 10>some research at Pivotal Ventures that size the care economy

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 10>is a six hundred and forty eight billion dollar market.

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 10>That's huge. It's actually bigger than the pharmaceutical industry. And

0:42:38.560 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 10>we need that modern caregiving system to support women and

0:42:41.960 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 10>families in all of us to be able to, you know,

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 10>do our work and be productive and active contributors to society. So,

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.080
<v Speaker 10>you know, we think that those investments in those systems,

0:42:53.080 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 10>whether it be from childcare all the way through to

0:42:57.840 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 10>tools to optimize the home and caregiving in the home,

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 10>to the eldercare space and in the aging side of

0:43:05.160 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 10>the spectrum, all are huge opportunities. We have funds and

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:11.840
<v Speaker 10>companies in our portfolio that we're tracking that are innovating

0:43:11.880 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 10>in those spaces, and we think it's a big market

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 10>and others should be paying attention and deploying capital there

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:17.759
<v Speaker 10>as well.

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Where do the funds of funds come in here versus

0:43:20.920 --> 0:43:22.960
<v Speaker 4>the direct investments? Like how do you think of when

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 4>to make an investment in a company versus when to

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 4>deploy capital to a fund of funds.

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:31.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, both are pillars of our strategy. Our portfolio of

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:35.799
<v Speaker 10>fund investments is essential to changing the face of our

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 10>investment ecosystem and the venture capital sector in particular. There's

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:43.799
<v Speaker 10>been some data, you know, pitch Book is put out

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 10>and others. You know, about seventeen percent of decision makers

0:43:47.600 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 10>at US venture capital firms right now are women. That

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 10>number is almost doubled in the last decade, but we

0:43:53.760 --> 0:43:56.080
<v Speaker 10>still have a long way to go, and so as

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 10>part of our strategy, we think it's incredibly important to

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:03.480
<v Speaker 10>back these women investors who are deploying capital and finding

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:08.080
<v Speaker 10>great founders in every sector, whether that be supply chain

0:44:08.080 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 10>and manufacturing as I mentioned, and the tech that's innovating there,

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 10>to digital health, to the consumer space. You know, we

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 10>want to find women leaders and investors of all stripes

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 10>that are that are deploying capital across those sectors. And

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:24.439
<v Speaker 10>our direct investing strategy is complements that. It's not really

0:44:24.520 --> 0:44:26.839
<v Speaker 10>an either or. I think it's a both and and

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 10>we see opportunities again in this care economy thesis. Women's

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:34.879
<v Speaker 10>health as well maternal health, menopause, and care around those

0:44:34.920 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 10>themes is a huge opportunity. So you know, with our

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:40.880
<v Speaker 10>direct investing, we try to flex and focus on areas

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 10>that are aligned back to our broader mission at Pivotal

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:47.320
<v Speaker 10>to get more power to more people, especially women.

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.640
<v Speaker 4>I did mention the Pivotal Ventures was founded close to

0:44:50.680 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 4>a decade ago by Melinda French Gates. Just clear clear

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:55.359
<v Speaker 4>something up for us. Is there other money in there

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 4>right now or is this all money from Melinda French Gates?

0:44:57.719 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Do you have other.

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:05.160
<v Speaker 10>LPs capital solely from Melinda? Again, she started Pivotal about

0:45:05.160 --> 0:45:08.720
<v Speaker 10>a decade ago in twenty fifteen, really with a mission

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:14.080
<v Speaker 10>to advance social progress and advance women's power and influence,

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 10>get more power. As I said before, two more people.

0:45:17.600 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 10>And one thing that was innovative when Melinda set this

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 10>up was this idea that you need multiple tools to

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 10>advance this objective and to see our mission, and that

0:45:27.160 --> 0:45:30.920
<v Speaker 10>includes philanthropy, that also includes the investing and the investment

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 10>capital that we're deploying.

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that gives you more leeway in terms

0:45:36.120 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 4>of timing there's not as much pressure for returns over

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 4>a certain period of time. Do you think it changes

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.360
<v Speaker 4>your investment strategy because there is this patient capital.

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:49.839
<v Speaker 10>Our strategy is long term, as you noted, and I

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:54.719
<v Speaker 10>do agree that having that ability to see the full

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:57.960
<v Speaker 10>picture and deploy multiple tools in our tool get as

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.759
<v Speaker 10>a platform is huge to drive our mission and the

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:03.479
<v Speaker 10>type of change that we want to see in the world.

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:05.680
<v Speaker 10>But let me be clear, this is a strategy that

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 10>is centered on achieving best in class financial return by

0:46:10.200 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 10>investing in these funds and some of the themes that

0:46:12.719 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 10>we've discussed like care economy and women's health and AI,

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:19.000
<v Speaker 10>we think there's a great potential to deliver you know,

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 10>best in class market rate returns again over the long term.

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 10>But we do have that patience in our in our

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 10>with our founder alongside us to do just that.

0:46:27.880 --> 0:46:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Aaron, do you feel like that the establishment, the financial establishment,

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:35.000
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to women founders and funders, are

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>still kind of forgotten and overlooked.

0:46:39.840 --> 0:46:43.400
<v Speaker 10>It's easy to stick with the patterns that that one notes.

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 10>I've been investing in funds and for close to two

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:50.000
<v Speaker 10>decades now, and you know, I think that it's it's

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:53.640
<v Speaker 10>no one gets fired for sort of following the same playbook.

0:46:54.000 --> 0:46:57.000
<v Speaker 10>What excites me about what we're doing at Pivotal Ventures

0:46:57.120 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 10>is we're recasting a different playbook that that I think

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:05.520
<v Speaker 10>will show other investors and other stakeholders and the financial

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 10>ecosystem and the investment industry that there is real value

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:11.320
<v Speaker 10>to be had by bringing different perspectives to the table,

0:47:11.760 --> 0:47:14.800
<v Speaker 10>looking at opportunities like this care economy that are huge

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.960
<v Speaker 10>against six hundred and forty eight billion dollar market. That's

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:20.080
<v Speaker 10>the type of paradigm shifting we want to see. And

0:47:20.120 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 10>it's really it comes back to, you know, having that

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 10>patience and time horizon to play it out and being

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 10>long term focused.

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 4>What is your time horizon for an investment.

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.960
<v Speaker 10>It's a typical it's an early stage and investor timeline.

0:47:36.000 --> 0:47:39.719
<v Speaker 10>You know, we're deploying capital year over year, and you know,

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 10>on our funds their typical venture early stage fund that

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 10>will be investing over a three to four year time

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 10>period and then harvesting the gains beyond that. So you know,

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:53.480
<v Speaker 10>it's it's a long time horizon. I'd say, you know,

0:47:53.560 --> 0:47:57.280
<v Speaker 10>decade plus that we're really looking to drive the results

0:47:57.280 --> 0:47:59.320
<v Speaker 10>that we want to see both in our funds and

0:47:59.719 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 10>with our companies. If they return capital sooner, that's great,

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 10>but you know, not at the sacrifice for your building.

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 10>I think an enduring platform as a fund manager or

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:10.240
<v Speaker 10>a business as a founder.

0:48:10.440 --> 0:48:13.400
<v Speaker 1>That was Aaron Harkless Moore, Senior director of Investments at

0:48:13.440 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Pivotal Ventures. Coming up on Bloomberg Business Week, the NBA

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>jobs market, and more. That's coming up next. This is Bloomberg.

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:30.319
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live each

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:33.319
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting at two pm Eastern on Apple car Play

0:48:33.440 --> 0:48:36.080
<v Speaker 2>and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.320
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just Say Alexa played Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 4>The story from our Bloomberg News team getting our attention.

0:48:46.960 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 4>At business schools across the US, graduation fast approaching the mood.

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 4>Though subdued NBA programs that once offered a glide path

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 4>to lucrative jobs are finding fewer and fewer seats on

0:48:57.360 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 4>Wall Street and in corporate America for their graduates. At

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.200
<v Speaker 4>every one of the nation's top schools known as the

0:49:02.719 --> 0:49:04.360
<v Speaker 4>mag seven. I didn't know this, they were known as

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:04.840
<v Speaker 4>the Maxie.

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:05.359
<v Speaker 8>I didn't either.

0:49:05.680 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 4>Job blason and outcomes have declined since twenty twenty one,

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 4>and this year is looking no better. No joke, Carol.

0:49:10.640 --> 0:49:12.800
<v Speaker 4>You can attest to this. As I was writing this intro,

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 4>I got an email from Dean mclaris at Columbia.

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Business School, right grad grad.

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:23.240
<v Speaker 4>The subject says hire CBS and it's like an email

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:24.240
<v Speaker 4>talking about recruiting.

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, So that is the view from schools inside

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Let's go outside the US to France.

0:49:29.520 --> 0:49:32.720
<v Speaker 1>We've got Emmanuel mctay, dean of the French Business School

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Etic Business School with us, as well as Dimitri Cassanides,

0:49:36.320 --> 0:49:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg New Senior editor. She spearheads our global business coverage

0:49:40.280 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>business school coverage, I should say for Bloomberg Business WEEKND.

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:47.200
<v Speaker 1>They're both here in our Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio. Welcome, Welcome,

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you here. Hello, Dean Mattay. Before we

0:49:51.520 --> 0:49:53.799
<v Speaker 1>get going, we want to ask you about what you

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:57.719
<v Speaker 1>are hearing and seeing from other business school deans during

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>your visit here to the United States and other as

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the schools. How much is the job market a topic

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 1>right now?

0:50:04.520 --> 0:50:09.080
<v Speaker 6>What is striking here is, as always, I mean, the

0:50:09.120 --> 0:50:15.640
<v Speaker 6>power of the higher education institutions, their entrepreneurial spirit, the

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:19.200
<v Speaker 6>amount of resources that they have to reach their ambitions.

0:50:19.840 --> 0:50:24.440
<v Speaker 6>But also I could feel some kind of anxiety about

0:50:24.520 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 6>you know, research funding, about the capacity of welcoming foreign students,

0:50:31.920 --> 0:50:36.960
<v Speaker 6>foreign researchers, foreign professors. So I could feel that it

0:50:37.040 --> 0:50:40.480
<v Speaker 6>was kind of mixed feelings as always, and I mean,

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:43.720
<v Speaker 6>the best educational system in the world, especially for business,

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 6>but at the same time, some question about tomorrow, uncertainty

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 6>about tomorrow.

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:52.880
<v Speaker 4>I know, you know, I don't want to use the

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 4>term frenemies, but you are also competitive with these schools.

0:50:56.480 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 4>Is this only good news for you if there's an

0:50:59.719 --> 0:51:03.120
<v Speaker 4>in the United States that's not as conducive to attracting

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 4>foreign students foreign professors, Is it just great news for UNFL.

0:51:06.680 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 6>But I mean bad news for the US is bad

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:13.160
<v Speaker 6>news for US. And of course, if I was really egoistic,

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 6>I would say, yes, it's good news for US. We

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 6>will have more foreign students coming to US and probably

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 6>will have opportunity to recruit talented professors and researchers from

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 6>the US market. But no, I think it's not good

0:51:27.760 --> 0:51:30.440
<v Speaker 6>news because we tend to see US in a very

0:51:30.600 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 6>global market, in a very global higher education system, and

0:51:34.440 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 6>we see more and more countries I mean turning in

0:51:39.800 --> 0:51:43.760
<v Speaker 6>onto themselves, not only the US, I mean the UK, Canada,

0:51:43.760 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you name them Scandinavian countries and they want

0:51:47.520 --> 0:51:52.120
<v Speaker 6>less and less immigration and including foreign students, and it's

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:54.920
<v Speaker 6>not good news at all. I mean, I visited a

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:57.080
<v Speaker 6>lot of countries all around the world, and what we

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:59.479
<v Speaker 6>can see is that when there is a country which

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 6>you know, try to decrease immigration, and especially a students immigration,

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:07.359
<v Speaker 6>it's a disaster for the country and for the schools.

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:11.160
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, that's not surprising. And I think I'm hearing very

0:52:11.239 --> 0:52:13.200
<v Speaker 11>much the same from other people that we're talking to.

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.200
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I think it's of great concern because of

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 11>just the points that Dematase is making, and I think

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.480
<v Speaker 11>there is a big concern. Sometimes we think, oh, it's

0:52:22.520 --> 0:52:26.000
<v Speaker 11>a problem for students in terms of the immigration challenges

0:52:26.040 --> 0:52:28.280
<v Speaker 11>that we're confronting, but I think it is a huge

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:31.279
<v Speaker 11>concern on the research and faculty front. When we've seen

0:52:31.320 --> 0:52:34.759
<v Speaker 11>the shifts in education on global business schools over the

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 11>last decade or two decades, one big thing we've noticed

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:40.640
<v Speaker 11>is a lot of talent coming to this country to

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:42.920
<v Speaker 11>our business schools. Look at the deans of a lot

0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 11>of our business schools and where they've come from. So

0:52:46.120 --> 0:52:48.440
<v Speaker 11>it's a challenge on many fronts. And I think that

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 11>there is definitely. You know, however openly they're sort of

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:54.960
<v Speaker 11>airing this anxiety. There is a great deal of anxiety

0:52:55.040 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 11>right now and really just kind of wait and see

0:52:57.600 --> 0:52:58.800
<v Speaker 11>and where is this all going.

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to say one of the things, my daughter

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is just finishing up an undergraduate degree, but spent a

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:05.880
<v Speaker 1>year over in London at the Lendon School of Economics,

0:53:06.160 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and it was such a great combination of US versus

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:14.400
<v Speaker 1>being overseas for a full year. The importance of partnerships

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for you in linking up with US business school. Talk

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about that.

0:53:18.560 --> 0:53:19.400
<v Speaker 7>How important that is?

0:53:19.400 --> 0:53:23.560
<v Speaker 6>Definitely. I mean, we want our students, wherever they are from,

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 6>we want them to go to the best schools all

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 6>around the world. So we have here in the US.

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:32.960
<v Speaker 6>Basically we have three hundred partners academic partners all around

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:37.200
<v Speaker 6>the world, mostly for exchanges double degrees. But we have

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:41.920
<v Speaker 6>among these three hundred ten, let's say, strategic partners, including

0:53:41.960 --> 0:53:44.799
<v Speaker 6>one here in the US. So Berkeley has Business School

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 6>in California with whom we have launched a joint degree

0:53:49.560 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 6>for quite a large cohort of students or a Master

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 6>in Management, and students spend time in Paris, first on

0:53:56.800 --> 0:53:59.919
<v Speaker 6>at a campus and then they go to Seoul core

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:03.120
<v Speaker 6>are So at a SKK business school, and then they

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:08.160
<v Speaker 6>spent one year at Berkeley Hearts. And yes, the graduates

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:11.960
<v Speaker 6>from this programmer I mean great people and fine easily

0:54:12.000 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 6>good positions on the job market. So this is why

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 6>we are here today on the Eastern Court Coase to

0:54:18.760 --> 0:54:20.360
<v Speaker 6>find another strategy partner.

0:54:21.080 --> 0:54:23.319
<v Speaker 4>And who's that strategic partner going to day? I mean,

0:54:23.320 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 4>who do you want that to be?

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:31.400
<v Speaker 6>So we have already partners here of course, as you

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:33.200
<v Speaker 6>can guess in New York, in Boston we have a

0:54:33.200 --> 0:54:36.480
<v Speaker 6>double degree agreement with the MI T, we have Pittsburgh.

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 6>So we are talking to all of them and will

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:43.880
<v Speaker 6>I mean find the best partner here just to I

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:49.600
<v Speaker 6>mean join lounge joint program to probably lounge initiatives in

0:54:49.680 --> 0:54:52.799
<v Speaker 6>terms of entrepreneurship artificial intelligence. So we want to do

0:54:52.840 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 6>more than just exchange and.

0:54:54.880 --> 0:54:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, meter to do more students, more NBA students in

0:54:59.280 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>the United seeing that they want a program that is

0:55:02.280 --> 0:55:04.239
<v Speaker 1>not just US based. Do they want to have some

0:55:04.320 --> 0:55:05.320
<v Speaker 1>exposure overseas?

0:55:05.400 --> 0:55:07.799
<v Speaker 11>I mean, anecdotally, we are hearing that I don't have

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:09.839
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the data on that, But in interviewing

0:55:10.080 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 11>a lot of the students in the last few months

0:55:11.719 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 11>about any number of issues that we've been reaching out on,

0:55:14.760 --> 0:55:17.279
<v Speaker 11>that is definitely something that they're seeing. And I think

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:20.360
<v Speaker 11>that there's probably something about what's going on in the

0:55:20.360 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 11>world right now and in our country with the government

0:55:22.560 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 11>and the new administration that's making students and prospective students consider,

0:55:26.480 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 11>you know, it might be that I'm not going to

0:55:27.960 --> 0:55:29.840
<v Speaker 11>be working in the US, maybe I will want to

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:32.600
<v Speaker 11>go work abroad. What you know, where are the kinds

0:55:32.600 --> 0:55:34.880
<v Speaker 11>of programs that are going to really position me the best?

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:38.160
<v Speaker 11>And I think that some of what Dean Matase is

0:55:38.160 --> 0:55:41.040
<v Speaker 11>describing with their partnerships also is something that's seen as

0:55:41.040 --> 0:55:43.439
<v Speaker 11>an if you're a student that's coming out having done

0:55:43.440 --> 0:55:46.279
<v Speaker 11>one of those programs, there is a competitive advantage to that.

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I also think about oh, please jump in.

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:52.239
<v Speaker 6>Oh, I mean we now welcome every year something like

0:55:52.280 --> 0:55:54.600
<v Speaker 6>one hundred American students at EDEK.

0:55:55.480 --> 0:55:57.719
<v Speaker 1>This is how big is your student base?

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:02.120
<v Speaker 6>All ten thousands, okay, from all over the world, so

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:05.359
<v Speaker 6>one hundred and twenty countries. What they are looking for

0:56:05.480 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 6>is probably a good retail on investment because of course

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:10.439
<v Speaker 6>suits and fees in France are not the same as

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:14.400
<v Speaker 6>the one in the US. Also probably lifestyle. And also

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 6>something which is very important these days is that, I

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:20.160
<v Speaker 6>mean the purpose of the school is to put business

0:56:20.239 --> 0:56:23.080
<v Speaker 6>at the service of common good and this is something

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 6>maybe that these days in the US is going to

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:28.640
<v Speaker 6>be i mean put into questions. So we have a

0:56:28.640 --> 0:56:32.360
<v Speaker 6>lot of research on climate finance, on ESG, on sustainability,

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:35.400
<v Speaker 6>and this is something that they're going to learn still

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:39.040
<v Speaker 6>learn in Europe and in France especially, which I suspect

0:56:39.080 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 6>will be less a bit less the case in the

0:56:41.160 --> 0:56:41.759
<v Speaker 6>US this day.

0:56:41.840 --> 0:56:43.759
<v Speaker 11>Right That is definitely one piece of it. Is there

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 11>some pulling away from some commitments that we see with

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:49.440
<v Speaker 11>our government right now, and that throwing into question where

0:56:49.440 --> 0:56:51.840
<v Speaker 11>we saw business school students wanting to go over the

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 11>last decade, wanting to do more good with what they're doing,

0:56:54.600 --> 0:56:56.879
<v Speaker 11>and now suddenly you find yourself in an environment where

0:56:56.920 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 11>it's like is that going to be prioritized? Are the

0:56:59.600 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 11>companies going to be prioritizing that? Like what are the

0:57:01.760 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 11>opportunities for that? So I think that the other thing

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:08.120
<v Speaker 11>I wanted to quickly touch on, Dematist was you had

0:57:08.360 --> 0:57:10.719
<v Speaker 11>mentioned a number of the rise and the number of

0:57:10.760 --> 0:57:14.080
<v Speaker 11>American students studying now leaving the US to study business.

0:57:14.120 --> 0:57:16.720
<v Speaker 11>Is there a number you can attach to that. I mean,

0:57:16.760 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 11>what have you seen over the last couple of years

0:57:19.400 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 11>in terms of not just specific to a deck, but

0:57:22.200 --> 0:57:23.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, broadly speaking, you.

0:57:23.880 --> 0:57:27.040
<v Speaker 6>Mean in terms of American students moving to Europe. Yeah, yeah,

0:57:27.080 --> 0:57:30.280
<v Speaker 6>so's it's been increasing in France. I mean we are

0:57:30.320 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 6>now welcoming I think four thousand and five hundred American students,

0:57:35.120 --> 0:57:39.320
<v Speaker 6>I mean amongst four hundred and fifty thousand students. So

0:57:39.360 --> 0:57:43.000
<v Speaker 6>it's not so many of them. I remember that twenty

0:57:43.040 --> 0:57:46.440
<v Speaker 6>to thirty years ago we barely could see American students

0:57:46.680 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 6>in our schools. I mean it's the American students wanted

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:52.320
<v Speaker 6>to stay here. And year after year we can see

0:57:52.320 --> 0:57:56.120
<v Speaker 6>that the number are increasing, and in all of the programs,

0:57:56.200 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 6>so including in the bachelor program. So we have a

0:57:59.400 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 6>young student moving from the US to Europe and to

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:06.200
<v Speaker 6>France to study I mean business. It's the case for

0:58:06.280 --> 0:58:10.560
<v Speaker 6>the masterin Management and also at the NBA level. So yeah,

0:58:10.640 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 6>I think over the past two years we have increased

0:58:12.520 --> 0:58:15.160
<v Speaker 6>the number of American students by twenty five persons.

0:58:15.160 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 12>Wow.

0:58:16.120 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 4>The inserted regions of the US. Different business schools are

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:21.560
<v Speaker 4>known for different specialties. If we go to Silicon Valley,

0:58:21.560 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 4>we'll talk to a lot of Stanford graduates. For example,

0:58:24.360 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 4>here in New York, you know, the Wall Street sort

0:58:26.400 --> 0:58:30.400
<v Speaker 4>of feeds from NYU and from Colombia. Is there an

0:58:30.400 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 4>industry that your business school feeds into?

0:58:32.960 --> 0:58:36.200
<v Speaker 6>Finance and asset management? I mean, this is we were

0:58:36.240 --> 0:58:40.160
<v Speaker 6>talking about that just before. I mean and in a

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:42.440
<v Speaker 6>very special way. Because we have a kind of recipe,

0:58:42.480 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 6>good recipe to monetize the results of our research. So

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:50.000
<v Speaker 6>we launch a research center in asset management twenty years ago,

0:58:50.360 --> 0:58:53.960
<v Speaker 6>and the story ended up with EDEK selling a spin

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:57.680
<v Speaker 6>off in finance for two hundred million euros at the

0:58:57.720 --> 0:59:00.400
<v Speaker 6>stock Extende of Singapore. So we have to compete with

0:59:00.520 --> 0:59:03.840
<v Speaker 6>American business just what you teach, Yeah exactly, Yeah, we

0:59:04.120 --> 0:59:06.360
<v Speaker 6>have to compete with you guys and you I mean,

0:59:06.360 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 6>schools here are a lot of resources, huge endowments. We

0:59:09.560 --> 0:59:12.440
<v Speaker 6>don't reach the same amount, So we have to find

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:14.600
<v Speaker 6>other ways to find resources.

0:59:14.760 --> 0:59:19.760
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating, and so that helped to finance the school education.

0:59:20.040 --> 0:59:23.560
<v Speaker 6>It goes to the foundation, to the ed Foundation, and

0:59:23.680 --> 0:59:27.200
<v Speaker 6>thanks to this money, we we launch Aventure fund for

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:31.800
<v Speaker 6>impact startups. We are financed a research center on climate finance.

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:35.040
<v Speaker 1>That was Emmanuel Mattey, dean of the French business school

0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Edek Business School, along with Dimitri Cassanin's Bloomberg News senior editor,

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Still Ahead on Bloomberg Business Week a blueprint for undoing

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:45.000
<v Speaker 1>segregated housing in the US.

0:59:45.320 --> 0:59:49.000
<v Speaker 12>It debunked this myth of de facto segregation and showed

0:59:49.320 --> 0:59:52.120
<v Speaker 12>that the segregation of our communities which still persists today,

0:59:52.720 --> 0:59:56.640
<v Speaker 12>was created by intentional government policy, and those policies were

0:59:56.640 --> 0:59:58.960
<v Speaker 12>in violation of the Constitution, and so we have an

0:59:58.960 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 12>obligation to remedy the ongoing impacts of those policies.

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg.

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:09.439
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live each

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:12.480
<v Speaker 2>weekday starting a two pm Eastern up on Apple CarPlay

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:18.440
<v Speaker 2>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

1:00:18.480 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>New York station, Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

1:00:23.360 --> 1:00:26.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, we got some news in the world of real

1:00:26.160 --> 1:00:29.440
<v Speaker 4>estate affordable housing. To be specific, millions of dollars in

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 4>federal contracts for affordable housing were canceled after a Department

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 4>of Government Efficiency Review of Nonprofits website and LinkedIn profiles

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:40.080
<v Speaker 4>for terms associated with DEI. That's according to current and

1:00:40.080 --> 1:00:43.160
<v Speaker 4>former staff at the US Department of Housing and Urban Development.

1:00:43.560 --> 1:00:46.560
<v Speaker 4>That canceled awards Carroll include ongoing projects in more than

1:00:46.600 --> 1:00:51.520
<v Speaker 4>one thousand communities to address homelessness, disaster recovery, persistent poverty,

1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 4>and other housing issues. This according to a list seen

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 4>by Bloomberg City Lab.

1:00:54.800 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And this came from our own reporter Kristen Camps, who

1:00:56.960 --> 1:01:00.960
<v Speaker 1>covers housing and design housing policies, something that Leah Rothstein

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>knows very well. She's a housing expert and author author

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>of Just Action, How to Challenge Segregation Enacted under the

1:01:08.040 --> 1:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Color of Law, which she co wrote with her father, Richard.

1:01:11.720 --> 1:01:15.400
<v Speaker 1>She joins us now from Oakland, California. So great to

1:01:15.440 --> 1:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>have you here with us, and really timely topical, Leah.

1:01:20.000 --> 1:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>This book is a fall up to your dad's book,

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>The Color of Law, which explored how housing became so segregated.

1:01:25.840 --> 1:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>For those who maybe don't really understand kind of some

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of the history here or have forgotten, perhaps remind us

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:35.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of how housing became so segregated.

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:38.280
<v Speaker 12>Sure, well, you know the subtitle of the Color of

1:01:38.360 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 12>Law is a forgotten history of how government segregated America.

1:01:41.760 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 12>So it's not uncommon to have forgotten this particular fact

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:47.840
<v Speaker 12>of our history. You know, we have an idea in

1:01:47.880 --> 1:01:51.280
<v Speaker 12>this country that we've adopted that the racial segregation of

1:01:51.280 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 12>our communities is a form of de facto segregation, a

1:01:54.200 --> 1:01:58.280
<v Speaker 12>kind of segregation that was created by private actors or

1:01:58.280 --> 1:02:03.320
<v Speaker 12>personal preferences, or economic conditions, or by accident. And what

1:02:03.400 --> 1:02:06.520
<v Speaker 12>the Color of Law shows, with detail after detail of

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:11.480
<v Speaker 12>government policy from decades of this country's history, government policy

1:02:11.520 --> 1:02:16.240
<v Speaker 12>from local, state, and federal levels that intentionally, explicitly and

1:02:16.320 --> 1:02:22.080
<v Speaker 12>purposely created racially segregated communities. So it debunked this myth

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 12>of de facto segregation and showed that the segregation of

1:02:25.640 --> 1:02:29.560
<v Speaker 12>our communities, which still persists today, was created by intentional

1:02:29.560 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 12>government policy, and those policies were in violation of the Constitution.

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:36.680
<v Speaker 12>And so we have an obligation to remedy the ongoing

1:02:36.720 --> 1:02:38.120
<v Speaker 12>impacts of those policies.

1:02:38.240 --> 1:02:41.400
<v Speaker 4>And that's exactly where your book picks up just action

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:44.960
<v Speaker 4>how to challenge segregation and acted under the color of Law.

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:48.520
<v Speaker 4>So what is the solution here, Well.

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:51.280
<v Speaker 12>There's no one solution, just like there wasn't one policy

1:02:51.320 --> 1:02:55.320
<v Speaker 12>that created segregation. It was many, many actions and policies

1:02:55.360 --> 1:02:56.080
<v Speaker 12>of governments.

1:02:56.240 --> 1:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, can we go there, just remind us of the policies,

1:03:00.120 --> 1:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>As you said, it wasn't just one policy, Like what

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:03.920
<v Speaker 1>were some of those specific policies.

1:03:04.720 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 12>Sure, there was redlining policies which determined where banks could

1:03:09.480 --> 1:03:12.880
<v Speaker 12>or would give loans for mortgages and small business lending,

1:03:12.920 --> 1:03:16.280
<v Speaker 12>and it determined that neighborhoods where African Americans lived were

1:03:16.320 --> 1:03:21.320
<v Speaker 12>not good places to provide loans to homeowners or business owners,

1:03:21.720 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 12>and so African Americans in those neighborhoods had no access

1:03:25.040 --> 1:03:28.280
<v Speaker 12>to mortgages and couldn't buy homes and build wealth. That's

1:03:28.320 --> 1:03:31.720
<v Speaker 12>one example. Another, the most powerful example is how the government,

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:35.600
<v Speaker 12>the federal government subsidized the suburbanization of our country in

1:03:35.640 --> 1:03:38.400
<v Speaker 12>the mid twentieth century after World War II, when we

1:03:38.440 --> 1:03:40.439
<v Speaker 12>didn't have a lot of suburbs in this country. Most

1:03:40.440 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 12>people lived in urban centers, and the federal government, through

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:47.480
<v Speaker 12>the Federal Housing Administration, helped to subsidize developers to build

1:03:47.640 --> 1:03:50.880
<v Speaker 12>the suburbs that we are used to today, and did so

1:03:51.080 --> 1:03:53.800
<v Speaker 12>on the condition that those developers only sell their homes

1:03:53.840 --> 1:03:57.560
<v Speaker 12>to whites and This was explicit government policy written into

1:03:57.640 --> 1:04:00.720
<v Speaker 12>the FHA manual, written into the d of the homes

1:04:00.720 --> 1:04:03.560
<v Speaker 12>that these developers built, saying that the home could only

1:04:03.560 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 12>ever be owned or occupied by whites. Now, those homes,

1:04:06.720 --> 1:04:09.160
<v Speaker 12>when they were first built and sold, they were affordable

1:04:09.240 --> 1:04:12.480
<v Speaker 12>for working families of any race. The white families that

1:04:12.520 --> 1:04:14.600
<v Speaker 12>got into those homes got into home ownership when it

1:04:14.600 --> 1:04:18.320
<v Speaker 12>was affordable. And those homes and suburban areas around the

1:04:18.360 --> 1:04:21.560
<v Speaker 12>country are no longer affordable to working families. So the

1:04:21.600 --> 1:04:24.160
<v Speaker 12>white families that got into them when they cost one

1:04:24.240 --> 1:04:27.480
<v Speaker 12>hundred thousand dollars in today is money built up wealth

1:04:27.520 --> 1:04:30.280
<v Speaker 12>as those homes accumulated in value. Now there were several

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:33.600
<v Speaker 12>hundred thousand dollars, in some places over a million dollars,

1:04:34.240 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 12>and so those white families accumulated wealth through the increased

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:40.440
<v Speaker 12>value of their homes, while African American families, who were

1:04:40.440 --> 1:04:44.320
<v Speaker 12>explicitly prohibited from getting into home ownership when it was affordable,

1:04:45.040 --> 1:04:47.080
<v Speaker 12>weren't allowed to build wealth in the same way. So

1:04:47.120 --> 1:04:49.640
<v Speaker 12>we have a wealth gap today that exists because of

1:04:49.640 --> 1:04:51.200
<v Speaker 12>those past government policies.

1:04:51.320 --> 1:04:53.960
<v Speaker 4>Is it fair to say that the explicit things that

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:57.120
<v Speaker 4>you and that your dad talked about in his first book,

1:04:57.640 --> 1:05:00.200
<v Speaker 4>those are no longer enacted current.

1:05:01.480 --> 1:05:04.680
<v Speaker 12>Many of them are no longer enacted as explicitly as

1:05:04.720 --> 1:05:08.040
<v Speaker 12>they were. There's many policies and programs that have a

1:05:08.160 --> 1:05:12.800
<v Speaker 12>racially discriminatory impact, if not an explicit intent, that are

1:05:12.880 --> 1:05:16.600
<v Speaker 12>still you know, in place today. But you know the

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:20.600
<v Speaker 12>example I gave about the subsidized suburban homes. So you know,

1:05:20.680 --> 1:05:23.560
<v Speaker 12>since then we've passed the Fair Housing Act, which says

1:05:23.600 --> 1:05:26.240
<v Speaker 12>we can no longer discriminate in the sale and rental

1:05:26.280 --> 1:05:28.800
<v Speaker 12>of housing. Those restrictive covenants on the deeds of the

1:05:28.880 --> 1:05:33.040
<v Speaker 12>homes are no longer legally enforceable. But even those though

1:05:33.080 --> 1:05:38.240
<v Speaker 12>those laws have changed, the situation doesn't just resolve itself.

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:43.080
<v Speaker 12>When the homes and suburbs that were created through government subsidies,

1:05:43.600 --> 1:05:46.400
<v Speaker 12>you know, are no longer affordable to families who don't

1:05:46.440 --> 1:05:49.920
<v Speaker 12>have intergenerational wealth. So they're not affordable to African American

1:05:49.920 --> 1:05:52.919
<v Speaker 12>families who were denied the opportunity to build the same

1:05:52.960 --> 1:05:56.000
<v Speaker 12>wealth that whites could. So this is how, even when

1:05:56.000 --> 1:06:02.320
<v Speaker 12>those racially explicit policies get changed or revoked, the consequences

1:06:02.440 --> 1:06:06.160
<v Speaker 12>are ongoing unless we take intentional action to change them.

1:06:06.280 --> 1:06:09.200
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So that brings us up to speed to essentially today.

1:06:09.240 --> 1:06:12.720
<v Speaker 4>And you know you said mainly the explicit policies are

1:06:12.760 --> 1:06:16.720
<v Speaker 4>no longer there, But there are these implicit policies I

1:06:16.800 --> 1:06:21.960
<v Speaker 4>think that many would argue still do prevent homes from

1:06:22.000 --> 1:06:26.840
<v Speaker 4>being built in certain areas and do perhaps prevent more

1:06:26.840 --> 1:06:29.320
<v Speaker 4>people from living in certain areas. And a lot of

1:06:29.320 --> 1:06:31.520
<v Speaker 4>those happen on the local levels, such as zoning. How

1:06:31.520 --> 1:06:32.120
<v Speaker 4>do you look at that?

1:06:32.360 --> 1:06:36.600
<v Speaker 12>Yep, yeah, Well, in just Action, we focus explicitly on

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:39.800
<v Speaker 12>local policies and programs because that's where we can have

1:06:39.880 --> 1:06:45.520
<v Speaker 12>an impact as residents, as organized activists, as voters. And

1:06:45.640 --> 1:06:48.680
<v Speaker 12>that's also what can have the biggest impact on challenging segregation.

1:06:48.760 --> 1:06:50.920
<v Speaker 12>Even though the federal government had a large role to

1:06:50.920 --> 1:06:54.920
<v Speaker 12>play in creating segregation, once it's established, laws like zoning,

1:06:55.640 --> 1:07:02.400
<v Speaker 12>like you know, housing development subsidies, Section eight, program administration,

1:07:02.480 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 12>all of these happen on the local level. So there's

1:07:04.320 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 12>a lot that can be done locally to challenge the

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:09.160
<v Speaker 12>segregation that was set up by the federal government. So

1:07:09.240 --> 1:07:12.920
<v Speaker 12>zoning is a perfect example. Passed by local city councils,

1:07:13.000 --> 1:07:18.480
<v Speaker 12>planning commissions, and zoning has enforced segregation by ensuring that

1:07:18.640 --> 1:07:22.560
<v Speaker 12>in more affluent, whier areas. Those areas tend to be

1:07:22.680 --> 1:07:25.840
<v Speaker 12>zoned only to allow single family homes, so that ensures

1:07:26.160 --> 1:07:29.960
<v Speaker 12>that homes in those areas remain unaffordable to only the

1:07:30.000 --> 1:07:33.560
<v Speaker 12>most affluent people because as demand increases, you can't build

1:07:33.560 --> 1:07:36.360
<v Speaker 12>more homes to meet that demand. You're limited by how

1:07:36.360 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 12>many lots there are in that community because you can

1:07:38.320 --> 1:07:41.600
<v Speaker 12>only build one home per lot. So some communities are

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:44.959
<v Speaker 12>challenging single family only zoning to allow more than one

1:07:45.000 --> 1:07:47.880
<v Speaker 12>home per lot, which can open up access to that

1:07:47.920 --> 1:07:51.080
<v Speaker 12>community to a broader range of households because there's a

1:07:51.080 --> 1:07:54.520
<v Speaker 12>broader range of housing sizes and affordability options created.

1:07:54.920 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>How does the division politically within this nation, you know,

1:07:58.520 --> 1:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>either to prevent seeing more equality when it comes to

1:08:05.720 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>housing and more diversity when it comes to housing.

1:08:10.480 --> 1:08:14.280
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, great question. It's cyclical, right. So when we live

1:08:14.320 --> 1:08:17.479
<v Speaker 12>around people who only look like us and have similar

1:08:17.479 --> 1:08:21.600
<v Speaker 12>life experiences than us, we tend to not support policies

1:08:21.600 --> 1:08:24.720
<v Speaker 12>that we see as helping other people. And when we

1:08:24.760 --> 1:08:27.360
<v Speaker 12>live in neighborhoods that are more integrated and we have

1:08:27.520 --> 1:08:31.519
<v Speaker 12>more access and more exposure to people who are different

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:35.439
<v Speaker 12>from us, there's less polarization. We understand each other's life

1:08:35.520 --> 1:08:39.320
<v Speaker 12>experiences and hopes and dreams. We understand we're not that different,

1:08:39.760 --> 1:08:43.080
<v Speaker 12>and people tend to support policies that help a broader

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:46.240
<v Speaker 12>range of people when they have personal relationships with people

1:08:46.240 --> 1:08:50.360
<v Speaker 12>who they think of as other. So the segregation of

1:08:50.360 --> 1:08:53.439
<v Speaker 12>our communities keeps us polarized because we don't have we

1:08:53.479 --> 1:08:56.599
<v Speaker 12>don't have natural social contact with people who are different

1:08:56.600 --> 1:08:59.759
<v Speaker 12>from us, and then we tend to continue to support

1:09:00.360 --> 1:09:01.480
<v Speaker 12>that maintain that segregation.

1:09:03.360 --> 1:09:06.639
<v Speaker 4>You mentioned that you focus on the local level because

1:09:06.640 --> 1:09:09.000
<v Speaker 4>that's where people can have an impact, from voting to

1:09:09.120 --> 1:09:12.600
<v Speaker 4>zoning and more. Can you share with us some examples

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:15.960
<v Speaker 4>of communities in certain areas of the country that you

1:09:16.040 --> 1:09:18.320
<v Speaker 4>think are doing this well and why they're doing it well,

1:09:18.320 --> 1:09:19.280
<v Speaker 4>how they're doing it well.

1:09:21.360 --> 1:09:23.920
<v Speaker 12>Sure, so, you know, in our book we give dozens

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:27.599
<v Speaker 12>of examples of strategies and programs that local communities can adopt,

1:09:27.640 --> 1:09:29.320
<v Speaker 12>and for each one we give an example of a

1:09:29.360 --> 1:09:32.240
<v Speaker 12>community somewhere in the country that successfully adopted that. So

1:09:32.280 --> 1:09:34.960
<v Speaker 12>there isn't I would say, one that's doing everything, because

1:09:35.000 --> 1:09:37.759
<v Speaker 12>there's so many pieces to this puzzle, but there's many

1:09:37.800 --> 1:09:42.320
<v Speaker 12>communities that are doing something. Zoning changes have been you know,

1:09:42.880 --> 1:09:45.679
<v Speaker 12>catching on around the country to meet the affordable housing

1:09:45.720 --> 1:09:48.360
<v Speaker 12>crisis that the whole country is now feeling. And there's

1:09:48.400 --> 1:09:52.240
<v Speaker 12>some success stories around the organizing for zoning changes. There's

1:09:53.600 --> 1:09:57.160
<v Speaker 12>an example I love is a community land trust model,

1:09:57.200 --> 1:10:01.839
<v Speaker 12>which is a locally formed nonprofit organization that creates permanently

1:10:01.880 --> 1:10:07.000
<v Speaker 12>affordable home ownership opportunities in areas with housing costs that

1:10:07.040 --> 1:10:10.280
<v Speaker 12>are rapidly rising. So we wrote about a group in Durham,

1:10:10.320 --> 1:10:14.200
<v Speaker 12>North Carolina that was a predominantly African American community that

1:10:14.320 --> 1:10:18.320
<v Speaker 12>was gentrifying and you know, it was near Durham, Sorry,

1:10:18.320 --> 1:10:20.960
<v Speaker 12>it was near Duke University, which was increasing enrollment and

1:10:21.040 --> 1:10:23.880
<v Speaker 12>investors were buying at properties and the longtime residents were

1:10:23.880 --> 1:10:27.280
<v Speaker 12>being displaced. And in that time, the residents there started

1:10:27.280 --> 1:10:29.360
<v Speaker 12>going door to door talking to each other about what

1:10:29.400 --> 1:10:32.400
<v Speaker 12>they wanted to do to improve conditions in their neighborhood.

1:10:32.920 --> 1:10:36.719
<v Speaker 12>You know, simple beginning community organizing, right. They were talking

1:10:36.720 --> 1:10:38.800
<v Speaker 12>to their neighbors. They decided they wanted a park in

1:10:38.840 --> 1:10:41.559
<v Speaker 12>their neighborhood because they didn't have a park. Kids were

1:10:41.560 --> 1:10:44.280
<v Speaker 12>playing in the street, and so they advocated that the

1:10:44.320 --> 1:10:46.679
<v Speaker 12>city turn a vacant lot into a park, and they won.

1:10:47.080 --> 1:10:49.439
<v Speaker 12>They started to see, oh, we can really make change here.

1:10:49.760 --> 1:10:52.400
<v Speaker 12>They learned about the community land trust model and started.

1:10:52.439 --> 1:10:56.200
<v Speaker 12>They crowdfunded to buy two vacant lots and built homes

1:10:56.200 --> 1:11:00.240
<v Speaker 12>on them and sold them at affordable prices to and

1:11:00.240 --> 1:11:04.000
<v Speaker 12>moderate income families. In the land trust model, in the

1:11:04.000 --> 1:11:06.719
<v Speaker 12>home sale, the land trust retains ownership of the land

1:11:06.840 --> 1:11:10.040
<v Speaker 12>underneath the home, so only the home is sold, so

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:12.040
<v Speaker 12>it's more affordable than if you were buying the home

1:11:12.080 --> 1:11:16.560
<v Speaker 12>and the land. And when the homeowner wants to resale

1:11:16.920 --> 1:11:19.479
<v Speaker 12>resell the home, they have to adhere to a maximum

1:11:19.560 --> 1:11:22.800
<v Speaker 12>resale price, and that ensures that the home is affordable

1:11:22.800 --> 1:11:25.640
<v Speaker 12>every time it's resold. So this group that started by

1:11:25.640 --> 1:11:27.519
<v Speaker 12>going door to door to get a park in their

1:11:27.560 --> 1:11:30.960
<v Speaker 12>neighborhood now has a land trust with over three hundred

1:11:30.960 --> 1:11:34.760
<v Speaker 12>properties all around the city. They've prevented a lot of

1:11:34.760 --> 1:11:38.800
<v Speaker 12>displacement in this neighborhood by creating affordable homes in an

1:11:38.840 --> 1:11:41.840
<v Speaker 12>area that home prices were increasing really fast that people

1:11:41.840 --> 1:11:45.080
<v Speaker 12>couldn't keep up with one great example, but there's over

1:11:45.120 --> 1:11:47.400
<v Speaker 12>three hundred communities around the country with a land trust

1:11:47.439 --> 1:11:50.280
<v Speaker 12>and they're growing rapidly. It's a great model, a great

1:11:51.080 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 12>tool in the toolbox for addressing these issues.

1:11:53.479 --> 1:11:56.919
<v Speaker 1>That's Leah Rothstein, author of Just Action, How to Challenge

1:11:56.960 --> 1:12:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Segregation Enacted under the Color of Law, wraps up the

1:12:00.479 --> 1:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition of Bloomberg BusinessWeek from Bloomberg Radio. Thank you

1:12:03.320 --> 1:12:05.559
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. Be sure to tune into

1:12:05.560 --> 1:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week Monday through Friday starting at two pm

1:12:08.360 --> 1:12:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Time on Bloomberg TV, Bloomberg Radio, and on

1:12:11.560 --> 1:12:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Series XM Channel one twenty one. You can also listen

1:12:14.720 --> 1:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to us on Applecarplay and Android Auto. It's free in

1:12:18.040 --> 1:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Apple App Store or on Google Play. You can

1:12:21.040 --> 1:12:23.879
<v Speaker 1>also watch our daily broadcast on YouTube. Just search Bloomberg

1:12:23.920 --> 1:12:27.519
<v Speaker 1>Global News, where simulcast on Bloomberg Originals available at Bloomberg

1:12:27.560 --> 1:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com, Slash Originals, and streaming platforms including Roku, Amazon, fireTV,

1:12:32.280 --> 1:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>SEMSI TV Plus and more. Find our Bloomberg BusinessWeek podcast

1:12:35.920 --> 1:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.

1:12:39.240 --> 1:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And the latest edition of the Bloomberg BusinessWeek magazine is

1:12:41.920 --> 1:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>available on newsstands now, at Bloomberg dot com and always

1:12:45.200 --> 1:12:48.439
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal. For Tim Stanebek, I'm Carol Masser.

1:12:48.720 --> 1:12:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Have a good and safe weekend.

1:12:49.840 --> 1:12:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Everyone, This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

1:12:55.600 --> 1:12:59.320
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

1:12:59.320 --> 1:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

1:13:03.400 --> 1:13:07.280
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

1:13:07.520 --> 1:13:10.360
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

1:13:10.520 --> 1:13:12.679
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg Terminal