WEBVTT - TechList: The History of Podcasting

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, it's Jonathan Strickland, and I'm here to introduce

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>a playlist of ten episodes of my podcast tech Stuff

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that are all about entertainment and entertainment related fields, from

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>video games to television series, two films to internet videos

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>from yesteryear. So I hope you guys enjoy these episodes.

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>You can go to the tech Stuff podcast page and

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to listen to all sorts of episodes about tech

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:42.240
<v Speaker 1>from all realms, and hopefully this will provide a little

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of entertainment, a little bit of education, and probably

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>more than a few puns, because that's kind of how

0:00:49.080 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>I roll. Enjoy this playlist. Welcome to text Stuff, a

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>production from my Heart Radio. Hey there, and welcome to

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:16.600
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>producer with I Heart Radio, and I love all things tech.

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna listen to another classic episode in our

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>entertainment playlist. This one's on the history of podcasting, a

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>very interesting topic, a topic in which I play a

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>very very small part. Although honestly, by the time Tech

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Stuff came around, podcasting was already established, it just wasn't mainstream.

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I was a listener of podcasts even into

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.759
<v Speaker 1>the early days. Not quite as early as the earliest days.

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I came around, probably in the second wave, but um,

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>it was interesting to go back and look into how

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>they all got started. So enjoy. I realized that while

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about podcasting in an episode or two, I've

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>never done a full episode about the history of podcasting itself.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what we're going to talk about today.

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to look at the history of podcasting, how

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 1>it evolved, how it got its name, the earliest examples

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of podcasts, and then we're gonna talk a little bit

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.640
<v Speaker 1>about the how stuff works history with podcasts, at least

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>based upon what information I could glean from my Taciturn coworkers.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 1>So sit back, relax, and let's learn about some history, y'all.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the stuff you missed in history of podcasting. I'm

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. So this particular story is a complicated one.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>It's filled with a lot of different people, a lot

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 1>of different things have happened over the course of the

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 1>evolution of podcasting. There are incidents and accidents, their hints

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.519
<v Speaker 1>and allegations. As Paul Simon would say, so let's dive

0:02:55.560 --> 0:02:59.520
<v Speaker 1>in now. If you look at the story for like

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Go Anywhere and you look for the history of podcasting,

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you just type that into Google and you pull up

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>some stuff you including an article that we have on

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>house top works dot com. You will frequently see that

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasting dates back to two thousand four with Adam Curry,

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>who I remember from my childhood. He was a VJ

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 1>on MTV, which used to show music videos, and that's

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>where a lot of the histories start. They say two

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, Adam Curry made the first podcast, but uh,

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not entirely accurate. Actually, the story dates back before

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>two thousand four, and it's the first podcast was not

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>from Adam Curry, not really. So I thought we could

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>probably dispel some myths and learn about the truth here. Uh.

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And there are also a few different threads to this story,

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>as it turns out, and one of those threads I've

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>already covered in an episode of tech Stuff from about

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a year ago. I thought it was more recent than that,

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>but as I was looking through the archives to pull

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>up my notes, I realized that I my notes dated

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>from two thousand and sixteen about the history of the

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>MP three standard and This just shows how bad I

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>am at being able to keep track of time. I

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>was convinced that I had done the MP three episode

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe a month or two ago, and it is August

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 1>as I record this now. I'm not gonna go over

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>all of the history of the MP three standard again,

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's all there in that episode. But I'm going

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to give you the cliffs Notes version. Our cliffs Notes

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>still thing. Someone tell me if cliffs notes still exist.

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure I've asked that in a previous episode,

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>but i've I've clearly forgotten again. Anyway, I'm gonna give

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you a summary of what I talked about that previous episode.

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.680
<v Speaker 1>A research institution in Germany formed a group that dedicated

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 1>itself to developing compressions strategies for digital audio files. So

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>a raw audio file, if you didn't compress it at all,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>it represents a pretty decent amount of digital information. It

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>obviously depends upon how long the audio track is. Right,

0:05:04.440 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>the more the more information is there, the longer the file,

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the larger the file size will be. So a three

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:16.200
<v Speaker 1>minute song is going to have more information packed into

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it than say a minute of quiet room tone. So

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got this fairly large amount of data, especially for

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the time that we're talking about, which was late nineteen

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>seventies early nineties, there was a need to find a

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>way to compress that data down so it didn't take

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>up as much space, and that then you could transmit

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it over various media like telephone lines. And that's what

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>this group in Germany was trying to do. They wanted

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to be able to transmit digital audio over telephone lines,

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>but in order to make it efficient, they needed to

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>find a compression strategy or else the files were just

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna be too large. Now these days, while the file

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>side haven't really changed, I mean, the raw audio is

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>still what it is, we definitely have much faster throughput,

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Like we're able to send a lot more information in

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>a shorter amount of time than what we used to

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to do. So it's not as big a

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>deal today unless you're talking about just trying to store

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>a ton of audio on a relatively small storage device.

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>But back in the nineteen seventies and eighties, this was

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty tough challenge. Now, whether they were successful or

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>not in creating a compression strategy that makes the file

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:40.159
<v Speaker 1>sizes smaller without affecting the audio quality depends upon a

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. For one, it depends upon your sense

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 1>of hearing, because some people are more sensitive to it

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 1>than others, and for one person it may sound perfectly fine,

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and another person may say, no, I can hear all

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 1>sorts of problems from the compression in that audio. For another,

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the settings of the compression itself. You

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>can compress it at different rate, and that will determine

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>how how much it affects the audio file itself. Broadly speaking,

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>their compression strategy was to create what was essentially a

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 1>virtual ear approach, in which a computer program would analyze

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>audio an attempt to remove extraneous data. In other words,

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it was looking for any sounds that would lay outside

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the typical range of human hearing and then chuck those

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds out because people wouldn't be able to hear them anyway.

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So any sound that was at a frequency above or

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>below what your typical human can hear, that would be

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>removed because you wouldn't be able to hear it anyway.

0:07:40.960 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it would be sounds that might be a soft

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sound that follows a very loud sound, because that loud

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:51.160
<v Speaker 1>sound would mask the softer sound, and if we can't

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>hear the softer sound, then there's no reason to include it,

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>at least according to this compression strategy. And that was

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a way of getting rid of information in so that

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you could compress everything together and make smaller file sizes.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So really the goal was just to keep only the

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>data that humans would really be able to perceive. And

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it took some time for them to tweak this and

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they could come up with an algorithm

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that worked and didn't result in a really choppy, unpleasant

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>audio experience. So, depending upon how you set your compression rates,

0:08:24.520 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you might manage to reduce a file size and not

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>notice a huge difference in quality, or you might end

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>up with something that is truly unlistenable. If you remember,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the people working on the MP three standard back in

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the day would use Tom's Diner as a way of

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>measuring their success, and they said that the first few

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 1>times they tried to make a compression formula, it turned

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Tom's Diner into an unlistenable mess. Some of the uncharitable

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 1>among us might claim that the completely uncomp rest version

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of Tom's Diner is an unlistenable mess, but that's that's

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>just being mean. Spirited. I would say the MP three

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>would later make podcasting practical, but it was not a

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 1>quick leap from m P three's too podcasts. There was

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>a good amount of time between the development of the

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>MP three and the rise of the podcast But the

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>MP three development sort of leads us into other things

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that will eventually allow podcast to become a reality. Now

0:09:28.520 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 1>let's skip ahead to the early nineties. The development of

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the MP three largely happened in the eighties, but didn't

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>really start making a debut until the nineties. Anyway, the

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>mainstream world was scratching its head over something called the

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet in those early nineties. Before then, the only people

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>who really had access to the Internet were academics, government officials,

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 1>and scientists who had been using it for quite some time.

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>But the rest of us really didn't have any exposure

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to it. It was not something thing that your average

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>person had any access to. Your average Joe hadn't really

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>had any contact with it at all. Computer hobbyists had

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>been cutting their teeth on bulletin board systems or bbs is.

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Now these were message boards and file repositories that typically

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>sat on someone's spare computer. So with your very basic

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>bulletin board system. The way it would work is you

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>would have a phone number and that phone number would

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>go to the modem connected to this other computer, the

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>computer that houses the BBS. You would use your computer

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to dial into that number that would connect you to

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.600
<v Speaker 1>this other BBS, and you would then be able to

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>browse the files that have been uploaded to that particular

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>directory for the BBS, play games, leave messages, that kind

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of thing because you're dialing in. Typically a lot of

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>those smaller BBS has had maybe one phone line, sometimes

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>up to three, where that's how many people could connect

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:03.439
<v Speaker 1>to anyone time. So there were various ways to discourage

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:07.200
<v Speaker 1>people from spending too much time on the BBS and

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>thus keeping it busy for everybody else. For example, UH,

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>some of them would charge for a certain amount of time,

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>like after a certain number of minutes had passed, you

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>would have to pay to keep access to the BBS. UH.

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Some would just have a time limit and after that

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the when you hit your time limit, it would just

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>kick you off and you would have to wait another

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>day to be able to log back into your BBS. Eventually,

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>you had some BBS is on what was called Fido Net.

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>This was a network that allowed bbs is to exchange

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>information with each other. So it's almost like post offices.

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Think about going to a post office and you would

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>drop a letter off, and that letter would then be

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>sent to another post office, someone else's BBS and they

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>can receive it. That was kind of the world before

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Internet had really taken off, and the Internet really

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is a different beast altogether. Instead of dialing into a

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>single machine and browsing what was on that machine, you

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>could suddenly connect to a network of networked machines. In

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>something very important happened in the United States, the Federal

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Communications Commission the f c C made an important decision

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that encouraged explosive growth on the Internet. That that decision was,

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>they're going to lift some restrictions. Up until there was

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a restriction on commercial uses for the Internet. You you

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>weren't allowed to use it for commercial purposes. It was

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>meant for research, it was meant for government use, and

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that was it. But in ninety one, the f c

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 1>C said we're lifting those restrictions, and it became the

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Wild West for a while where lots of companies said,

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure how we can use this to our advantage,

0:12:52.120 --> 0:12:54.559
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure it's huge and we have to use

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it to our advantage. So there were a lot of

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>different parties rushing into the space because now it was

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>possible to make a commercial use of it, but no

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>one had really figured out how to actually do that yet.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of competition to try and figure

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 1>out how can we dominate this space, and no one

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>really had the answer yet. So how did this affect

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Internet use? Well, before the FCC lifted restrictions, there were

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>around one thousand Internet hosts connected to this network of networks.

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>There were more than a million Internet hosts. But for

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>our story, the important bit is that people and companies

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>could launch commercial interests in the Internet, including radio stations. Now,

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Carl Malamud gets the credit for being the first person

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to launch an Internet radio site, and this was called

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet Talk Radio. Malamud launched this show in and he

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 1>launched it with a program called Geek of the Week.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You can actually find recordings of some of those old

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>episodes online and they tiply feature various important people in

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the computer and text spheres, and Malamouda would just interview

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>them about whatever subject they wanted to talk about, and

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>those were the programs that went out live on the Internet.

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>On June, the band Severe Tire Damage became the first

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>musical act to perform a concert on Internet radio. Their

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>show went out over mbone. It's the letter M as

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in merry and bone, B, O and E. That stands

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.360
<v Speaker 1>for multicast backbone, or it's actually a protocol that sat

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>on top of the multicast backbone, which made it feasible

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to send data to multiple viewers around the world simultaneously.

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So I thought it would be helpful to understand how

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this works. Generally speaking, I p multicasting involves setting up

0:14:51.080 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a great big convoy, and more specifically, it has to

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>do with packets. So the Internet sends information in packets.

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Anytime there's data passing between computers on the Internet, you're

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>generally talking about packets that are going back and forth.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And a packet is a unit of data and it

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>includes a few types of information within that packet. So

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the first type of that information is the data that's

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>necessary to deliver it to the right destination. So you've

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 1>got these sort of headers and footers inside of a packet,

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, at the very top and the very bottom

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of the packet, that helps tell the Internet system at

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>large where that packet needs to go. It's essentially like

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the address you would find on an envelope in the

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 1>post office. So the packets have that part of the information.

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 1>They also have the payload, the actual data that they're

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>carrying to the destination. Let's say it's a web page.

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 1>It would be a little part of that web page,

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>would be a small portion of the web page. And

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>then you have a third part, which is uh the

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:01.160
<v Speaker 1>way that that packet fits in with other packets to

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>complete whatever that payload is. So again, in the case

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of a web page, let's say you're going to how

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com, and just for the sake of

0:16:09.520 --> 0:16:14.240
<v Speaker 1>this example, we're just gonna use a nice round, simple

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>number of one hundred packets. It takes one packets to

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>load up the home page of how stuff works dot com.

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Those headers and footers will tell the packets where they

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>need to go, which would be your browser because you're

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the one who typed in www dot how stuff works

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>dot com. And they also tell your browser how they

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>all fit together so that it can construct the website

0:16:39.080 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can see it on your side. On the

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>client side of this exchange, Uh, packets tend to be

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 1>relatively small, so you typically need a lot of them

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>to deliver any information of significant size. This brings us

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to that third type, that that bit of information that says, hey,

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm the puzzle piece that goes in the top right corner.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not exactly how it works, but it's a decent

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>enough analogy to kind of understand what's going on. Now,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>why would you send data and packets. Why wouldn't you

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>just send the entire piece all at once. It's meant

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a way to ensure the delivery of information,

0:17:16.920 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and by dividing it up into packets, you can actually

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>make a better case for that information, making it to

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>where you wanted to go. If you're sending it all

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>out as one big file, one thing that can happen

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>is it can slow everything down because depending on the

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>size of the file, it might start to tax certain

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 1>parts of the system, and if it fails, you're you've

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>got to send it all over again. It just becomes

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a big nightmare. So the founders of the Internet, who

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>as we all know, put the Internet on top of

0:17:45.119 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Big ben because that's where it gets the best reception,

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>figured that by breaking information up into packets and sending

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>them along the network, you had a better chance of

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>actually receiving the information you wanted. And the reason for

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that is twofold. It's redundancy, and packet switching. Redundancy means

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that a server is sending out multiple copies of the

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>same packet to make sure that one of them gets

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to their destination. So this is kind of like if

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>you had critical message and you've got you make three

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>copies of it and you send a copy each with

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a different messenger and they all rush out. Well, that

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>means that you're more likely to get your message to

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>where it needs to go, because even if one of

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>them fails along the way, you have three others going.

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember us at three copies, so you have one original,

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>that's four total, so one of them is likely to

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>get there. So that way you can send those writers

0:18:38.640 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>off to gone door to let them know the row

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>end is coming out to help them or something. Packet

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>switching is the method of sending the packets themselves, and

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>this involves each packet taking its own path. Typically it's

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>whichever path is the most efficient for that packet at

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>that time for it to get to its destination and

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>packets that all belong to the same document or file

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>can travel very different pathways. So if you go and

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to pull up how supports dot com, the

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>packets that represent that web page could be taking very

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 1>different paths in order to get to your computer. Remember,

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.479
<v Speaker 1>the network is this network of networks. It can be

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bouncing from all sorts of different machines before it finally

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.640
<v Speaker 1>gets to you. The destination computer then assembles all those

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>packets back into the document or file or whatever it

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>may be. And this is really cool because it means

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>that the Internet is really robust. If nodes on the

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Internet go offline for whatever reason, if if certain computers

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 1>between you and the computer you're trying to get information

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>from go down, well the packets can route around that.

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 1>They don't come up to like a sinkhole in the

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:44.600
<v Speaker 1>middle of the road and say well, we wanted to

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>get there, but we can't. No, they can take a

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>different pathway, and you just have to make sure that

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you are, you know, having that redundancy there, which, by

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.239
<v Speaker 1>the way, you don't have to do t C P

0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I P does it for you. But as long as

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>that's in place with the redundancy, you don't even have

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to worry if some of those packets somehow lose their

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>way for whatever reason, whatever it may be, you'll likely

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>end up getting the information you asked for, may not

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>be as fast as you wanted, depending upon the problems,

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but you'll get it. So back to Inbone, it's a

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>little different from the approach I just mentioned. The basic

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>packet switching strategy works great for static files and pages.

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>So if I have a photograph and I want to

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>send that information across to some other computer, it works

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.879
<v Speaker 1>great for that. Photographs don't change. It's gonna be the

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>same photograph no matter what, so it's very easy to

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>send that. And now I'm not talking about photo editing

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>software here, obviously, I'm just talking about sending an image.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to send something like a video

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:54.280
<v Speaker 1>where you have stuff constantly changing both the image and

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the audio, or even more so live video which is

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>persistently changing and you're not sure when it's going to end,

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:07.400
<v Speaker 1>another approach was pretty important. So broadcast represents this ongoing

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>creation of information, and how do you disseminate that across

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:15.919
<v Speaker 1>the network? Inbone would keep all the packets together, like

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 1>packed together like a like a convoy, as I said earlier,

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>until the last possible moment before they would split up

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>and move through different routers and go through the rest

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of its journey. So it's more like a fire hose

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>approach in the first half until you get to a

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>point where you absolutely have to split things up because

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they will not get to their destination otherwise. This allows

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>for a more efficient transmission of live content, and it

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:42.479
<v Speaker 1>helped make sure that those packets would arrive at their

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>destinations at more or less the same time, because you

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>want it to be like a broadcast. You want the

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>people who are watching it to all have the same

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>experience that around the same time. Otherwise you could end

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>up in a situation where one person is watching the

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>concert on a slight delay and someone else might be

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>more than a minute or two behind. And this does

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>still happen, by the way, I can't tell you how

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>many times I've watched the w w E network and

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 1>have been in a Facebook chat about what was going

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on with a pay per view, only to have someone's

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>boil something for me because I was lagging a bit

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.399
<v Speaker 1>behind the rest of the live feed for everybody else.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>But that's the price we pay for this amazing technology.

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Xerox Park was the group that created the inbone extension

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Internet Engineering Task Force adopted it in nineteen two,

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>so it was all well in place for the Internet

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Radio Days of nine and Severe Tire Damage performed at

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Xerox Park. You remember, Xerox Park is also the research

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and development area where we got things like the graphic

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 1>user interface and the computer mouse, as well as a

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>ton of other stuff. A lot of interesting research and

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>development came out of Xerox. So their audience Severe Tire

0:22:56.280 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>Damage for this initial concert pretty much consisted of a

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>dude in Australia, which is really true. There was a

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>researcher in Australia who was helping along with this project

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and he was the intended audience for the Severe Tire

0:23:10.240 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Damage concert of In slightly more famous band called the

0:23:17.320 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Rolling Stones performed their first live concert on the Internet,

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and cheekily, Severe tire Damage performed a set just before

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>The Rolling Stones were scheduled to go on and then

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 1>they put their set out over the Internet, this time

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>broadcast to the Internet at large. So Severe Tire Damage said,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we were happy to open for the Rolling Stones, even

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>though we're not in the same city as the Rolling Stones,

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and that was kind of making a point saying you

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>could now have this sort of experience where people from

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the world could address an audience in

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a sequence and they didn't have to be in the

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>same place at the same time. The Rolling Stones, for

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>their part, were pretty good natured about it. I think

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at first they called him weird furry guys from from

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>uh Palo Alto, California. But they also said to The

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>New York Times that it was a good reminder of

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the democratic nature of the Internet. There was a college

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>radio station called w x y C still Is that

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.719
<v Speaker 1>became the first terrestrial radio station to start broadcasting on

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. They began their simulcast in the fall of

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>n now They first started off with their off air

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 1>signals using a Cornell University utility called see You See Me.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>On November seven, the radio station became the first to

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>simulcast it's broadcast live over the air and on the Internet.

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>A few months later, w R. E. K reck Over

0:24:43.320 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>at Georgia Tech went live with its simulcast technology. And

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of interesting because they had actually hooked up

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 1>their Internet client on November seven, which was the same

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>day w x y C went live, but it would

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>take a few more months before Georgia Tech Broadcast hit

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, and since then tons of different university and

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.399
<v Speaker 1>then commercial radio stations as well as public radio have

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>joined on and used the Internet for broadcast. Now we're

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:10.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a quick break, but when we come back,

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about how this technology of streaming

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 1>radio gradually gave people the idea of creating sort of

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:24.240
<v Speaker 1>an episodic content that would be digestible in a downloadable

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>format and thus eventually evolve into podcast But first, let's

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break to thank our sponsor. Okay, So

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 1>streaming radio was now available online, and to listen to

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>any streaming radio station you needed to use an audio player,

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Real Audio and other companies were making software that would

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>allow you to listen to audio over the Internet. But

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>what about podcasts? Well, jumping back to that's when a

0:25:56.720 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Canadian science news program called Quirks and Works hit the Internet.

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>The radio show had been airing on terrestrial radio since

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 1>nineteen Each show lasts about an hour and consists of

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:14.199
<v Speaker 1>segments about science, news and interesting facts. The Internet versions

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:19.159
<v Speaker 1>were recorded episodes stored in MP three format available for download,

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and this would become really important later on. Similarly, in

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 1>CNN launched its Internet newsroom, and the company began to

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>make shows available for download and included an updated compilation file.

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>This too would become really important later on. Meanwhile, a

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>guy named Jim Logan had founded a company called Personal Audio.

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>According to Alan Martin of a l phr dot com,

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so we're gonna call it Alpha. Personal Audio's original goal

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was to create a digital audio playing device, but that

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't work out. However, in the process of trying to

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:58.360
<v Speaker 1>make this happen, the company had filed four and been

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>awarded several pat dealing with digital audio distribution on the Internet.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And this would be around the mid nineties, nine six

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and later, and this also becomes incredibly important. That's a

0:27:11.560 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of foreshadowing right there. Some of you are way

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>ahead of me on this, I'm sure of it, but

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the nineties. Over the next few years,

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>the MP three file format began to gain popularity, and

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen nine, Napster became perhaps the best known of

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the peer to peer networks that made sharing MP three's

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:34.200
<v Speaker 1>across computers incredibly easy. And while I would never say

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that Napster caused piracy. It definitely made it a lot

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>easier to do. You could rip tracks off of a

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>disk with one of a dozen different programs. So you

0:27:44.920 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>buy a CD or you get a CD, you put

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>it in your computer, you pull the music off of it,

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.439
<v Speaker 1>convert those files into MP three format, store them on

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a drive on your computer, download the Napster interface, and

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>then you could authorize Napster to use that particular draw

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I've to share all those files, and the music industry

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>got really scared. So in short, the way peer to

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>peer works is that you have some software that allows

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>your computer to direct directly connect in to a network

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of other computers running that same software. And this network

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is constantly changing, with some computers being connected and some

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>computers going offline. It all depends on who's using their

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>computer for what. And you can search that network to

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>see if there are any copies of a particular type

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>of file you want, and when you download, you can

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>actually download from multiple sources at the same time. So

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>if there's one source that is particularly slow because of

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, maybe there's some problems like there's congestion and

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the internet between you and that particular server, then you

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>can start getting packets from other servers that also have

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that same file, and it's all decentralized, and it was

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a very quick way to spread files across and there's

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing illegal about that, right You can you can spread

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>any sort of file you like, and if you have

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the legal authorization to distribute that file, then peer to

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>peer networks are completely valid. The problem was a lot

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of people were using them to spread m P three's

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that did not technically belong to them. Maybe they had

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>bought an album and then they uploaded or they rather

0:29:27.640 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>made available all of the tracks off that album and

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so people could get it for free. Well that's not great.

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of violating copyright law, and it it helped

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>precipitate an era in which we saw crazy amounts of

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>work in digital rights management, and it was not a

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>bright and shining moment in Internet history. That being said,

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there are so many valid reasons to use peer to peer.

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a real shame that Napster and other peer to

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>peer platforms are forever associate ned with this concept of piracy,

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>just because that was a pretty big use for a

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of these networks, and it got a lot of

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:13.600
<v Speaker 1>press around this same time, we also started seeing MP

0:30:13.720 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>three players popping up. Now, the earliest players were pieces

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of software running on your computer, not exactly convenient for

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on the go listening. I did a couple of episodes

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>about the history of MP three players, including the rise

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 1>of the iPod. So again I'm not going to go

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>into it too much, but Apple's iPod really helped push

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>MP three's even further into the mainstream, and the iPod

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>became the device most associated with this relatively new form

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of consuming audio simultaneously. So much is happening that's important

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to podcasting. We got the birth of the RSS feed.

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Now RSS stands for well, it depends upon whom you ask.

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>It could stand for rich site summary, or maybe it

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>stands for really simple syndicate sation. It just depends upon

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the authority you're asking at the time. But whatever it

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>stands for, what it does is pretty cool. It is

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>a format for delivering updated content to people. So in

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the old days, you go on the web, and web

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 1>pages were pretty darn static. If you went to a

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>web page one day and you looked at it, chances

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>are the next day it was going to look exactly

0:31:21.680 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the same way. There were not that many dynamically changing

0:31:25.280 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>web pages. It just wasn't very easy to do and

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:30.719
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't much call for it. But over time we

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>started building in more functionality on the web. We started

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>creating more dynamic elements, and that created a new problem.

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 1>How could you, as a user know if your favorite

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>websites have been updated. You could go and check them

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>every single day and look for differences, or you could

0:31:49.360 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 1>use rs S and RSS was this set of rules

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that people running these websites could use. They could incorporate

0:31:55.760 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it into their website. You could then subscribe to that

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:02.120
<v Speaker 1>website and anytime there was a change, that change would

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>get reflected in your RSS aggregator. You would open up

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>your aggregator and it would give you kind of like

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>headlines of the latest changes that had happened in the

0:32:12.200 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>pages that you are subscribed to. So once you were

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>able to do that, it really transformed the browsing experience.

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You no longer had to do all this legwork yourself

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and just have your laundry list of websites that you

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:30.760
<v Speaker 1>visit every single day. You could actually take a quick

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>look at your RSS aggregator and see if there's any

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>reason to go to that website well. That RSS model

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>would later become helpful to podcasts. It could alert podcatching

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>services and users to new episodes as they joined the list,

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>removing the need to visit the home page of the program.

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And there was a way of enclosing audio files that

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 1>would be developed a little bit later, and that really

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>sealed the deal. All of this was happening around to

0:32:56.280 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousand's. In December two thousands, a software

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>develop br named Dave Winer found himself in an unlikely

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>partnership with Adam Curry that former MTV v j I

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, and they were trying to adapt the RSS

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>feed so that it could include audio. So Weiner was

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy who created that modification for RSS, and he

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>demonstrated it in early by using it to enclose a

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 1>song by The Grateful Dead, and he put it in

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a blog he was writing, so people who were following

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>his blog were subscribed to it could immediately get access

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to that song. And while this provided the skeletal structure

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>upon which podcasts would be built, very few people were

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>actually using it back then. In September two thousand three,

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Winer adapted his approach on behalf of a colleague named

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Christopher Leiden over at the Harvard Brookman Center, and Lydon

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to create an interview show with audio tracks

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 1>saved in the MP three format. He was thinking of

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it as like an audio blog, so he's regularly interviewing

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>people and uploading those files, and he wanted there to

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>be a way for people to subscribe to it. He

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 1>was interviewing bloggers, futurists, and political figures, and this would

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 1>eventually become a show called Radio Open Source and is,

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 1>by most accounts, the first actual podcast, though at the

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 1>time it wasn't called a podcast. So if you hear

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:19.319
<v Speaker 1>the Adam Curry had the very first podcast and it

0:34:19.440 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>launched in two thousand four. Just know that two thousand

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 1>three saw Christopher Leiden's show Radio Open Source, and by

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.719
<v Speaker 1>all measures, that really was a podcast, It just didn't

0:34:32.760 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 1>have the name yet. Later in two thousand three, and

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.879
<v Speaker 1>influential jet named Kevin Marks whipped up some interesting technological

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>wizardry in connection with the two thousand three Blogger Cohn event.

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>He showed off a program that could take the audio

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 1>files housed in an RSS enclosure and transfer them automatically

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>over to Apple's iTunes and then you can use the

0:34:55.840 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>iTunes management software to synchronize to an i hot Now, remember,

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in these days, you had to physically connect an iPod

0:35:05.600 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to a computer and use iTunes to transfer music across

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 1>the cable to your iPod. There's no wireless way of

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 1>doing this yet. The iPod had no access to the

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>iTunes store directly. You had to download things or rip

0:35:20.840 --> 0:35:24.200
<v Speaker 1>things from your music collection directly to iTunes and the

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>import those things from iTunes over to your iPod or

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:31.919
<v Speaker 1>other m P three player. I had a creative zen

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 1>back then and I used it with iTunes and it

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>was a headache, but it would kind of work. But

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>this was huge, this approach to having this automatic conversion

0:35:44.760 --> 0:35:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and something that I don't think Apple necessarily anticipated when

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it built in the synchronization capability and iTunes. The purpose

0:35:51.360 --> 0:35:54.400
<v Speaker 1>for the feature was convenience. So let's say you've got

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a decent music collection and you put all your songs

0:35:57.600 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 1>over on iTunes and you want them to transfer those

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>songs to your brand spanking new iPod. That's not so

0:36:05.640 --> 0:36:07.520
<v Speaker 1>difficult to do the first time, though it can take

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a while. You just connect your iPod to iTunes and say,

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 1>all right, I want all these files to be moved over.

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 1>But then later on, let's say you add more music

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to your library. So how do you add that to

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>your iPod. You've already got a music library on your iPod,

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You've got new songs in your iTunes library on your computer.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you get those two to match up again? Well,

0:36:32.640 --> 0:36:36.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing you could do is individually move those files over,

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's gonna take a while. You could try and

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:40.840
<v Speaker 1>highlight them in a batch, but that's kind of irritating.

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>So Apple built in this function where you could have

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>synchronization turned on and if you plugged your iPod into

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 1>your computer with your iTunes library, it would automatically pull

0:36:52.840 --> 0:36:57.319
<v Speaker 1>any new tracks, anything that had been added after the

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:01.359
<v Speaker 1>last time your iPod had been synchronized and add them

0:37:01.360 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to your iPods library, so you didn't have to wait

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.919
<v Speaker 1>and do it all manually. That was the secret that

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was able to you know, they were able to use

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to make this automatic updating for podcasts or what would

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>become podcasts. But again, I don't think Apple was necessarily

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:23.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking that when they included that feature. Kevin Marks was

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>able to take it and turn into something really useful

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for people who wanted to create this episodic audio content. Now,

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Adam Curry would make a piece of code available that

0:37:31.840 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>would automate this RSS and closed audio to iTunes process

0:37:35.840 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to his blog visitors, and it's called I Potter, I believe,

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>is what the script was named. And he also began

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>to contact other bloggers who are interested in using audio

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to reach an audience in this same sort of way.

0:37:47.280 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>On February eleven, two thousand four, The Guardian published an

0:37:50.160 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>article titled Audible Revolution. It was written by Ben Hammersley,

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and he was writing about the use of the Internet

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>as a means to distribute audio content. And in that

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>piece Hammersley asks, quote, but what to call it? Audio blogging, podcasting,

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:10.040
<v Speaker 1>guerrilla media end quote? And so this may very well

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 1>be the origin of the term podcasting. Now it's possible

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that the word podcasting had been mentioned by someone before,

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>but this is the earliest piece in writing that I

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>can find that mentions that term, and it happened at

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that point entered into the general conversation about audio distribution

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:33.400
<v Speaker 1>through the Internet. On September two thousand four, Danny J.

0:38:33.560 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Gregoire used the term podcaster in a discussion about the

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:43.560
<v Speaker 1>technical issues surrounding publishing and distributing podcasts, and this section

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in which he said this would go like this. Here's

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a quote. I can see there being the desire of

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>users in some instances to be able to easily subscribe

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>and get older posts slash episode slash shows. What are

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we calling these things? Any way? How about pode or

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 1>sewed for short that no longer appear on the RSS

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>feed right now? If, for example, someone wanted to listen

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:12.359
<v Speaker 1>to all the daily source codes back to sewed number one,

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>they would have to manually go through the archives and

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:20.600
<v Speaker 1>download any seds not automagically received, somewhat defeating the purpose

0:39:20.680 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>of an I potter. Not too much of a problem now,

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But I guess one could argue that this is simply

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:31.399
<v Speaker 1>an RSS slash server side issue, and that the podcaster, yes,

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I like making up new words, should be responsible enough

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to offer a page of separate feeds of old sods

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 1>by month slash year, slash, season, slash etcetera. End quote.

0:39:43.160 --> 0:39:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So he also used the word podcaster. Two days later,

0:39:47.280 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Evil Genius Chronicles podcast, Dave Slusher had this

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to say, somebody has registered podcasting dot net and I

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.759
<v Speaker 1>saw a podcaster or podcaster dot net, and I saw

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a podcaster hitting as a user against hitting my RSS

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>feed and I went and looked at it. And right

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 1>now it's just a coming soon page, but I'm going

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to that. I want to see who's

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.279
<v Speaker 1>got that and what they're going, what they're doing with

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that term. I think they've coined the term, so iPod

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>platform just doesn't spring from the tongue. But what I'm

0:40:20.200 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>doing right here, and what Adams doing meaning Adam Curry,

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:25.800
<v Speaker 1>and what Dave Winer is doing, and what I T

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Conversations are doing, that's podcasting. I think that is the term.

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm using that from here on out. You know, so

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I am a podcaster and they are podcasters, and I

0:40:36.320 --> 0:40:40.520
<v Speaker 1>am podcasting right now, and you listen to my podcast.

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 1>The name stuck. That's an understatement and it's something that

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we all know because you wouldn't be listening to this

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:53.480
<v Speaker 1>if it didn't. In November two thousand four, Libson launched

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>l I B S. White End. This was the first

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.799
<v Speaker 1>podcast service provider and it still exists to this day.

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I've actually used it. It's pretty pretty useful, pretty easy

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>to use, not totally intuitive, but not difficult and these

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>services make it easier for podcasters to get their content

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.480
<v Speaker 1>up online. They handle all the RSS feeds and all

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the technical side of things. All you have to do

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>is fill out a few fields and then you can

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 1>start uploading your content to the service, where we'll host

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>your files and make them available for various podcatching services.

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Later on, in February two thive, Public Radio International launched

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>The World, which was the first daily public radio news podcast.

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The next month, March two thousand five, the Public radio

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>show on the Media would become the first to also

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:44.719
<v Speaker 1>be distributed as a podcast in full. In April two

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:48.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand five, Leo Laporte, who had worked in traditional media

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 1>for years as a technology news communicator, a reviewer, and

0:41:51.880 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>an educator, formed This Week in Tech, a network also

0:41:56.600 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>known as twit. This would become one of the first

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.840
<v Speaker 1>podcast networks in the world. In other words, it became

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>the umbrella to multiple shows in podcast format. On June six,

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand five, iTunes four point nine launched with a

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast directory added to the iTunes Music store, and this

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>made it much easier for iTunes users to find and

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>download episodes, and it became really important to podcasters that

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:24.279
<v Speaker 1>they get their shows onto Apples directory because that was

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the place to be. That's where most people were getting

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.479
<v Speaker 1>their podcasts from in those days, so if you weren't

0:42:29.480 --> 0:42:32.319
<v Speaker 1>showing up an Apple's directory, it felt like you were

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 1>missing out on the people who would otherwise be able

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to your show. This move also forced a

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>different company to change its course, and that company was

0:42:44.000 --> 0:42:48.680
<v Speaker 1>called Odeo o d e O. Odio's purpose originally was

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to create a podcasting directory as well as a suite

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of tools for creating podcasts. It was poised to launch

0:42:55.440 --> 0:42:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in the summer of two thousand five, but then Apple

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>got into the game with podcasting, and the people at

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Odeo saw the writing on the wall. There just was

0:43:03.000 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 1>no way they were going to compete against Apple in

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that space, So rather than abandoned ship entirely, they decided

0:43:09.080 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>to change what their company was going to do, and

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>they also ditched the name. Instead, Odeo would become a

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:18.800
<v Speaker 1>company that would allow people to send out little messages

0:43:18.880 --> 0:43:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to their friends using SMS messaging or a web client,

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's how Twitter was born. Yep, Twitter exists because

0:43:26.960 --> 0:43:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of iTunes sort of. In August two five, NPR officially

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 1>got into the podcast game. Making show segments available as

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast downloads. So while their rise in popularity a few

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>years later makes it seem like they were latecomers to podcasting,

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact is they were around in some of those

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:49.120
<v Speaker 1>earliest days. The New Oxford American Dictionary would name podcast

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as their word of the year on December third, two

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand five, and the following year podcast would become a

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:59.080
<v Speaker 1>new word in the dictionary. We've got a lot more

0:43:59.120 --> 0:44:01.879
<v Speaker 1>to talk about to wrap up, and actually to talk

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>about some of the other influential podcasts that came out

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:07.439
<v Speaker 1>in those early years. But before we do that, let's

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:17.080
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break to thank our sponsor. So in

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.799
<v Speaker 1>two thousand six, Edison Research held a survey to find

0:44:20.800 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>out how many people were aware of podcasting in general.

0:44:25.560 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 1>So two thousand six is still early days for podcasting,

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and the survey bears it out. According to their report,

0:44:32.280 --> 0:44:37.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty two of Americans who responded to this survey said

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:40.959
<v Speaker 1>they had heard about podcasting, but only half as many

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>only eleven percent, had ever actually listened to a podcast.

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:47.879
<v Speaker 1>And this is why, in those early days of doing

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:50.560
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff, just a couple of years later, I found

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 1>it really challenging to explain to people what it was

0:44:53.400 --> 0:44:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I was doing. I'd say things like, yeah, it's an

0:44:56.560 --> 0:45:00.319
<v Speaker 1>audio show, kind of like a radio show. No, no,

0:45:00.400 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's not on the radio. It's it's on

0:45:03.880 --> 0:45:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the internet. No no, no, you you don't. You don't

0:45:07.480 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>stream it, you download it and then you then you

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to it on an iPod or like an NP

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:17.400
<v Speaker 1>three player. I've had that kind of conversation so many times. Well,

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in February two thousand six, Wait Wait Don't Tell Me

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>becomes nbr's first full program podcast, which means I've been

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a subscriber for more than a decade. Wow. Before that,

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:35.799
<v Speaker 1>NBR had been uploading segments of shows, but not entire episodes.

0:45:36.000 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 1>So wait, Wait Don't tell Me. It was kind of

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:41.840
<v Speaker 1>their experiment what would happen if they allowed an entire

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:45.160
<v Speaker 1>show that would go out on NPR to also be

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:48.360
<v Speaker 1>downloaded as a podcast. As it turns out, people would

0:45:48.360 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>go bunkers for it. That really showed up when they

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:57.360
<v Speaker 1>started doing this American Life. Also that month, in February

0:45:57.360 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six, the Ricky Gervais Show entered the

0:45:59.719 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>gain US Book of World Records as the most downloaded

0:46:02.320 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast in history. Though, come on, be fair. Two thousand

0:46:06.280 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>six is pretty early in the podcast game. I mean,

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't even started tech Stuff yet, and it could

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have waited a bit, to be honest. That record would

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 1>be broken later on, in the spring of two thousand seven,

0:46:19.640 --> 0:46:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Jack and Stench start a subscription based podcast at five

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 1>dollars per month per subscription. The Jack and Stinch Show

0:46:28.320 --> 0:46:32.240
<v Speaker 1>grew out of a radio program called Jamie Jack and Stinch.

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Their radio company had canceled their show, so they were

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.360
<v Speaker 1>out of a job, and that's when the creators decided

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that they were gonna they were gonna try and make

0:46:40.880 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a listener supported series and see if they can make

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:46.359
<v Speaker 1>it work. And it turns out it did work. They're

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>still podcasting today and it's still five dollars per month

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>or cents per show, as they say on their website.

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Other subscription based shows would soon follow, and so you

0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:59.280
<v Speaker 1>began to see a few different ways to monetize podcasts.

0:46:59.640 --> 0:47:03.399
<v Speaker 1>There were these listeners supported shows through subscriptions or later

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on through platforms like Patreon. Then there are sponsors supported

0:47:08.000 --> 0:47:11.360
<v Speaker 1>shows such as tech Stuff, where we monetized by having

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 1>ads in our shows. There's also fully sponsored content in

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 1>which a company will pay for a full episode of

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a program, so there are a few different ways to

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>make money from podcasting, though I'd say the vast majority

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of podcasters out there aren't really making a big profit

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:31.560
<v Speaker 1>from it. On April two thousand eight, Josh Clark and

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:35.839
<v Speaker 1>Chris Palette became Internet superstars forever and ever when the

0:47:35.960 --> 0:47:40.000
<v Speaker 1>very first episode of Stuff You Should Know published. That

0:47:40.160 --> 0:47:43.080
<v Speaker 1>is our most popular podcast here at how Stuff Works

0:47:43.120 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com and Stuff you Should Know the very first

0:47:45.680 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>episode April two thousand eight, Chuck was not a co

0:47:49.760 --> 0:47:53.400
<v Speaker 1>host yet, it was my former editor Chris Polette. The

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:56.840
<v Speaker 1>topic they covered was how grass aline works and the

0:47:56.880 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>show was just nine minutes long. Those are the episodes

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 1>saw Josh work with a couple of different potential co hosts.

0:48:03.680 --> 0:48:06.719
<v Speaker 1>So there was Chris Palette and there was also Candice,

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:08.400
<v Speaker 1>who would later go on to be one of the

0:48:08.400 --> 0:48:12.240
<v Speaker 1>original hosts of Stuff You Missed in History Class, which,

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, it was originally called Factor Fiction. Chuck

0:48:15.680 --> 0:48:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Bryant would join Josh for the episode why does Toothpaste

0:48:19.680 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 1>make orange Juice Taste Bad? Which published on May two

0:48:24.160 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, and the charisma between the two hosts was undeniable.

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Josh and Chuck would become the definitive voices of stuff

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:35.359
<v Speaker 1>you should know, and they still are today, and they

0:48:35.400 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 1>sit on either side of me. Chuck's on my right,

0:48:39.600 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Josh is on my left. Other house stuff works shows

0:48:43.440 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>that launched around that same time, where Brain Stuff, which

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:50.160
<v Speaker 1>originally featured our founder Marshall Brain giving short explanations of

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting stuff, and then stuff you Missed in History Class, which,

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:57.799
<v Speaker 1>as I said before, started life as Factor fiction. And

0:48:57.840 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 1>there there was a little show called tech Stuff, tiny

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>little show that you're listening to right now. The first

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:07.440
<v Speaker 1>official episode of tech Stuff because we recorded a few

0:49:07.600 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that never published, a bunch of test episodes so that

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:14.240
<v Speaker 1>we can get used to being on the microphone, and

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:18.439
<v Speaker 1>they were bad and we should feel bad. I don't

0:49:18.480 --> 0:49:21.799
<v Speaker 1>think they exist anymore. I'm pretty sure there's no existing

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.959
<v Speaker 1>recording of those early episodes, or I would release them.

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Why not, I would be I would group them together

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and say, you want to listen to what the show

0:49:29.160 --> 0:49:32.160
<v Speaker 1>sounded like back in two thousand and eight, because this

0:49:32.239 --> 0:49:36.319
<v Speaker 1>is it. So the first official episode went live on

0:49:36.440 --> 0:49:39.720
<v Speaker 1>June tenth, two thousand eight, and that episode was called

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:45.640
<v Speaker 1>how the Google Apple Cloud Computer Will Work. The less

0:49:45.640 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>said about that, the better podcasts continued to grow in popularity,

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 1>and podcast networks also began to grow. And then we

0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>flashed back to that story I mentioned about Personal Audio.

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Back in the ninety nineties, a company, Personal Audio LLC.

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Was what some people called a patent holding company. Me

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the company was in the business of making money from

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the patents it held. It didn't make anything else. It

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:14.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't offer any services, it didn't offer any products. It

0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:16.880
<v Speaker 1>had these patents. Now, there are a couple of different

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 1>ways you can make money with patents, and they are

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>completely viable. One of this is to license your patent

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and designed two interested parties, And again there's nothing wrong

0:50:27.760 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 1>with that. So let's say I come up with a

0:50:30.000 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 1>really cool idea on how to do something, and I

0:50:33.560 --> 0:50:37.080
<v Speaker 1>patent that idea and then let companies know, Hey, if

0:50:37.120 --> 0:50:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you want to do this thing in this cool way

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that I thought of, just come on over to me

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and we'll make a deal. Will you'll pay a licensing fee,

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I allow you to use my method. Everything will be

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:49.720
<v Speaker 1>cool until the patent expires, in which case it becomes

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:54.800
<v Speaker 1>public property. Or you could go another route, which involves

0:50:55.080 --> 0:50:57.399
<v Speaker 1>just sitting on your patents and looking around and then

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:00.719
<v Speaker 1>suing people who appeared to be using your patent did ideas,

0:51:01.239 --> 0:51:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Then you can either win money through a lawsuit or,

0:51:03.880 --> 0:51:07.480
<v Speaker 1>as is more common, reach a settlement agreement where a

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:12.440
<v Speaker 1>company will pay you for using that patented idea. Lawsuits

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:14.520
<v Speaker 1>are really expensive, and often you'll find parties willing to

0:51:14.520 --> 0:51:17.759
<v Speaker 1>settle out of court just to avoid risking a full,

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:21.560
<v Speaker 1>full blown court battle where even if you win, it's expensive,

0:51:21.719 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 1>but if you don't win, it's even more expensive. Well,

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio had sued Apple a couple of times in

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>an East Texas court over patents involving playlists Why East Texas.

0:51:32.680 --> 0:51:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio claimed it had an office nast Texas, but

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different technology journalists said that that office

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>was essentially empty and really was just connected to their

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:46.400
<v Speaker 1>patent lawyer's office. I don't know if that's true or not,

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:50.160
<v Speaker 1>but that's how it was reported, and that to East

0:51:50.160 --> 0:51:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Texas was known as being a very favorable court when

0:51:53.239 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 1>it came to patent litigation. It was very favorable towards

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:04.480
<v Speaker 1>patent holders. So in Personal Audio sued several parties, including

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Adam Carolla and how Stuff Works, among others. Although technically

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they were going after Discovery because How Stuff Works was

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:14.239
<v Speaker 1>owned by Discovery at that time. The claim was that

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio held the patented approach that these other podcasts

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.200
<v Speaker 1>were using to distribute audio over the web, and then

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a long legal battle followed. Now I was in the

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:26.880
<v Speaker 1>dark throughout the entire process, for which I am thankful.

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I only learned about developments after they had hit the

0:52:29.719 --> 0:52:33.880
<v Speaker 1>news cycle. The Electronic Frontier Foundation got involved. The e

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>f F and they're very much a a consumer based

0:52:38.200 --> 0:52:43.440
<v Speaker 1>organization that tries to look out for protections against corporations

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:49.400
<v Speaker 1>encroaching upon the Internet. They view the Internet as a

0:52:49.440 --> 0:52:54.799
<v Speaker 1>public utility that should be UH, should be accessible by all,

0:52:55.360 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and that no company should have this kind of of

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:02.960
<v Speaker 1>leverage over it. So the tech news sites did some

0:53:03.040 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 1>digging and made some allegations about Personal Audio about UH,

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the company had not ever produced a podcast,

0:53:10.560 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 1>nor ever planned to do so, and so a lot

0:53:13.360 --> 0:53:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of people were throwing around the words patent troll about

0:53:16.320 --> 0:53:19.839
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio. That's not my place to say, but the

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:23.960
<v Speaker 1>courts did ultimately find in favor of the podcasters. This

0:53:24.040 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was after Personal Audio had already started to back off

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:30.279
<v Speaker 1>from the lawsuits, not because the company was saying they

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a case. They said, no, we've got a case.

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:36.040
<v Speaker 1>There's just no money in podcasting, so no one could

0:53:36.040 --> 0:53:39.440
<v Speaker 1>pay us, which was kind of like a back end

0:53:39.520 --> 0:53:42.960
<v Speaker 1>its slap against podcasters. I mean, I can't necessarily disagree

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 1>with him. There's not a whole lot of money in

0:53:44.920 --> 0:53:48.200
<v Speaker 1>podcasting for for the vast majority of podcasters out there.

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You gotta do it because you love it, and maybe

0:53:50.600 --> 0:53:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you wind up finding a profitable approach to it. It

0:53:53.400 --> 0:53:58.760
<v Speaker 1>does happen, but it's hard to do. Now, it turns

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:02.200
<v Speaker 1>out that all of that was moot because there have

0:54:02.320 --> 0:54:06.440
<v Speaker 1>been further UH lawsuits. The e f F pursued a

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 1>claim that the patents that Personal Audio was depending upon

0:54:10.560 --> 0:54:15.200
<v Speaker 1>are invalid, and that has gone to court, and that

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 1>ended up being decided in the favor of e f

0:54:19.160 --> 0:54:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and against Personal Audio. So there's you know, some of

0:54:24.640 --> 0:54:27.400
<v Speaker 1>those examples I was talking about earlier, like Quirks and

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Quirks and Malamud's Internet talk radio platform, we're exhibiting features

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:35.719
<v Speaker 1>that were described in the Personal Audio patent. Now, that

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 1>patent that they were really relying upon in this particular

0:54:38.400 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>case was filed in two thousand nine, but it was

0:54:41.520 --> 0:54:45.400
<v Speaker 1>given a priority date of N and this does happen

0:54:45.440 --> 0:54:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in patent law. If you have filed for certain patents

0:54:49.080 --> 0:54:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and you have a later patent that you feel is

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:57.920
<v Speaker 1>derivative of a previous one, and you want that effective

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:02.759
<v Speaker 1>date to be early earlier than what you're filing it for,

0:55:02.920 --> 0:55:05.319
<v Speaker 1>you can appeal for a priority date, and they did

0:55:05.360 --> 0:55:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and they got it. It was in but the examples

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of Quirks and Quirks and internet talk radio predated N

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and that led the court to rule that the patent

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>was invalid as it was describing something that had already existed.

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:23.640
<v Speaker 1>So the case went to the Court of Appeals and

0:55:23.680 --> 0:55:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the Court of Appeals upheld that ruling. So as of

0:55:26.520 --> 0:55:28.759
<v Speaker 1>the recording of this podcast, there's been no word if

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Personal Audio will pursue this to the Supreme Court, because

0:55:31.800 --> 0:55:35.319
<v Speaker 1>they could it could go that next step, but two

0:55:35.400 --> 0:55:40.400
<v Speaker 1>courts so far have said, you know, there's evidence here

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that this stuff existed before you described it in your patent,

0:55:44.480 --> 0:55:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and you can't patent an idea that already exists. I

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 1>hope you guys enjoyed this episode of the history of podcasting.

0:55:51.640 --> 0:55:53.840
<v Speaker 1>If you have any suggestions for future episodes, send me

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:56.480
<v Speaker 1>a message You can send it to me via Twitter

0:55:56.640 --> 0:55:59.520
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook. The handle for both is tech stuff hs

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 1>W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Text

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:56:10.680 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 1>from I Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:56:13.560 --> 0:56:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.