WEBVTT - How Zero Population Growth Works

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to you Stuff you Should Know from House Stuff

0:00:04.320 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Josh Clark, and there's Charles Stuff. Chuck Bryant is the

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Stuff you Should Know podcast. Jerry's over there. Uh, it's

0:00:22.280 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the norm. Yep, yep. How you doing man?

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>How you feeling? It is a little rough, sir? Are

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you you'll make it through? What? Yeah? Yesterday we celebrated

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the the the beginnings of Gin and Tonic season. It's

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely that kind of weather for sure. Yeah, it's hard

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>to not sit on the deck and have a citrusy,

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>delightful drink. Nice going. So I'm just a little sleepy,

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>but I'm feeling good. I feel like this topic is

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is all about being sort of down in the dumps

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bill. It depends, it depends on where you land,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and you just place yourself pretty squarely in the gloom

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and doom camp. My friend. No, I'm actually not in

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the doom and gloom camp. I was about to say, which,

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>if I remember correctly, in our episode, was Malthus right

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>about carrying capacity? You overtly said that you are a

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>an optimist. That's right, not Mauthusian uh naysayer. You know, yeah,

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I forgot about that one. We've touched on this a

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>few times. We talked about we did a whole profile

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and Norman Borlog alone on our very short lived and

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>reasonably so UM live webcast. Do you remember we did

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.199
<v Speaker 1>basically a book report on Norman Borlog. Yeah, he was, um, well,

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he's even controversial. He is very much So

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, you win a Nobel Prize but for saving

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a billion lives. Yeah, but still people are gonna put you.

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You get interesting stuff. So um, if you don't know

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about, should probably press pause, go listen

0:01:52.840 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Malthus episode, Go to stuff you should know

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcast, I think it's plural slash archive.

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Make that your homepage and all seven hundred and change

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>episodes are there, and then do control f is everybody

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>doing this so far? And then type of mouths m

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>A L th h U S. It's gonna highlight that link,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>click that and press play and then come back to us.

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we'll wait boom. So so we're back an hour.

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>We we're talking about is carrying capacity in part, but

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>carrying capacity checkers is just kind of a it's a

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:37.239
<v Speaker 1>reflection of a larger issue, and that larger issues population

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>specifically overpopulation, and is that a thing or not is

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a big question, because I mean, at any given point

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>in time, you know, they have, like the the CIA

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>World back book has you know, a pretty good assessment

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>of how many people are alive. It's a total guess.

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a total estimate. We could be at ten billion

0:02:56.280 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, we could be at a hundred million, and

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody just is really terrible accounting. The point is we

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>don't specifically know. It's it's probably pretty accurate, but it's

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>still a guess. The point isn't to shoot holes in

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the estimates of how many people are alive on the planet.

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It's to point out that, like, there's so many people

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't know and we can't possibly know at any

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>given point in time. And that has led a lot

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of people to say, well, wait a minute. There's this

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>thing called carrying capacity, which is the Earth's ability to

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>support and sustain us humans and really any any creatures.

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>But really we're just kind of concerned with us humans

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>at this moment um and right and sustainably those two

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 1>factors have to be met or else you're putting a

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of stress on Earth, and you're eventually bringing

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>about your own demise. So a lot of people are

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>saying like, uh, we're probably past carrying capacity and we

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>just don't know it yet. Or other people are saying,

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>there's really no such thing as carrying capacity city. Thanks

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to human ingenuity, anytime we come up against it, we'll

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way around it. And Norman Borlog was

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>a way to go. But before Borlog really became famous,

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of people who were legitimately concerned

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that we were all going to die. Yeah Borlog, Um,

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't if you haven't listened to that one, if

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you didn't follow Josh's instructions like a good little podcast listener. Uh.

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>He was the um, one of the leaders of the

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Green Revolution in the sixties and seventies, in which we

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 1>made great advances in agricultural Uh than agriculture in yields. Yeah,

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>new new types of wheat in Mexico, new types of

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>rice in India that um yielded much much more than

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they ever had. And and plus they were drought resistant,

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>flood resistant. They could stand up and and hold more grain.

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>They could stand up and say Hello. They basically they

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>could pick the day daily double at high Laia. So, uh,

0:04:57.120 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Borlog was, you know, by all standards, a very smart guy.

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>He cared very much about the people. He wasn't doing

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:07.840
<v Speaker 1>it for fame or riches or anything like that. Like

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>this guy felt like he was working against the clock.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>And if he didn't and he wasn't the only one

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>doing this, yeah he's the most famous. Um, but if

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 1>he didn't do it, then yeah, a lot of people

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>were going to starve. Yeah. And I think, um, I

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>proposed to you before this that we do just one

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Green Revolution. Uh and I think that would

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>be a one to three podcast, sweet one. I love

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. Psychology population That was another one we did too,

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:37.119
<v Speaker 1>was how population works. And it sounds so like eye

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>bleedingly boring, but it turned out to be really interesting stuff.

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 1>So go go read that too. Well we'll wait, go ahead,

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and we're back and it's yeah, and everybody's a little nervous.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 1>Everyone is nervous. And uh Stanford biology professor Paul airlic Um,

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>there's another famous Paul air Like this is Paul are

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>airlic I believe, Oh it's a different one. Well, there's

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>two dudes, I did not realize that. What do you mean,

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm familiar with the other Airic. Then I guess, well,

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 1>who was the other one? Again? He wrote, um, some

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 1>other famous books. He's a biologist. I think it's it's

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not the same guy. Yeah, the other guy was a

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>German physician, uh who worked in chemotherapy immunology. Oh yeah,

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not thinking of different guy. So this guy he

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:29.320
<v Speaker 1>wrote other things besides the Population Bomb. Yeah. So in

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen six eight he writes, the population bomb goes on

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the Tonight Show, it explodes, is huge hit. Apparently he

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.839
<v Speaker 1>was on more than once. Yeah, and everyone got super

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>nervous because his book started with these words. The battle

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that he had all the humanity is over in the

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventies, the world where under will undergo famines. Hundreds

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of millions of people are going to starve to death

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in spite of any crash programs embarked upon. Now that's

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:55.320
<v Speaker 1>not so good. That's how he starts his book. He

0:06:55.400 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>basically says there's gonna be a Malthusian collapse. Um. At

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>one point in the book, he said, if I was

0:07:01.760 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a betting man, I would wager by the year two thousand,

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>England won't be around boom. He drops the mic um

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>and we should probably mention who mouth says Thomas. Malthus

0:07:12.440 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>was a very forward thinking, smart, mathematically inclined minister, I

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>believe in the early nineteenth century, late eighteenth century, an economist,

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and he was the one who said, we have a

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>problem here everyone. I've just done the math. And population

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>grows exponentially, but our food supply grows linearly, and so

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we are destined to outgrow our food supply. And that's

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>where the idea of carrying capacity came from. So Malthis

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and Malthusians um are the people who think like we're

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>going to exceed the food supply eventually and die from famines.

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And Erlic was one of the most vocal and alarmist

0:07:52.480 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>neo Malthusians around. Yes, absolutely, and he scared the pants

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>off of people back then. Uh in night, there were

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>about three and a half billion people. And the birth rate.

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk a lot about birth rates and such,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>has a lot to do with this buckle up. Um.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>The American women had three and a half babies on average,

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and the global birth rate was five babies for a woman.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a lot to me. It was a

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 1>lot kids. Supposedly, in the fifties we were at six

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the global average fertility it was six babies per woman.

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's not just per woman. That's you want to

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about fertility rates. So fertility rate basically is the

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>number of live births that a population has assigned to

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the population of women thought to reasonably be a reproductive age.

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 1>So fifteen to forty four times a thousand, So you

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>take all of those, figure out the the how many

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>women there are, and then you multiply it by a thousand,

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so you have something like, um, fifty births per one

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand women aged fifteen to forty four, and that's your

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>fertility right. Yeah, okay, that's you can figure out how

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>many actual births are taking place. Yeah, with reasonable detail. Um.

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>So like Mauthis Airlic did the math in the sixties

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and said, you know what, our food production isn't keeping up.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Just like Mautha said, we're in big, big trouble, wrote

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the population bomb and co founded Zero Population Growth, which

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is an organization that is now called uh what are

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they called now? Population Connection? Population Connection? A very uh,

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>a little sunnier sounds Electric company. It does, and you

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>should check out their website. It's good. They have a

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of good information on it, just to help you,

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:47.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, figure out what you might want to believe. UM.

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So people are scared the zero population growth group. Their

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>aim is to uh, They're big thing is is contraception

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and giving women um control of their reproduction basically in

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>their fertility right. That's that you decide how many kids

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you want exactly they have that many. They've identified that

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that there's an issue that could easily address overpopulation, and

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that is cutting out unwanted pregnancies or pregnancies or having

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 1>unwanted kids. They've identified that, you know, plenty of people.

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.000
<v Speaker 1>There are two different fertility rates. There's the wanted fertility

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>rate and then there's the unwanted fertility rate, and pretty

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>much across the board in any country in the world,

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the unwanted fertility rate is higher, whether slightly or largely,

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>than the wanted fertility rate. So they're saying, like, if

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the unwanted fertility rates like three point eight babies per

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.079
<v Speaker 1>woman in a given country and the wanted fertility rate

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>is like two point five, well, if we can just

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to only have the wanted pregnancies,

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.679
<v Speaker 1>then you are doing a lot to control of a population.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>And the way that they figured out how to address

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>this is to just basically spread awareness and access to contraception. Right,

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the two pronged approach. UM what their goal is is

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they aren't saying that people should not have babies like

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you said, They're saying people should only have the babies

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that they want to have, and their their ultimate goal

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>is to um to have a sustainable global birth rate

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>below the replacement level, which means there's a lot of

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:33.199
<v Speaker 1>different factors, but it basically means that the world is

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>not growing. When it's like, uh, working a club at

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>at a door, being a doorman, one person goes out,

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>one person comes in. Yeah, you got a little quicker.

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>That's basically what that means is, you know, someone dies,

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.040
<v Speaker 1>someone can be born, and of course it's not that

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>one to one, but you know, well, if you're a

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 1>big picture away, if you're a bouncer and you're tasked

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with keeping it in even ratio, you just have to

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>remember that you can't keep people inside until a new

0:11:56.840 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>person comes along, because that's called kidnapping. You still they

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>still have to leave and you have to deal with

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>an imbalance for a little while. Right now, the replacement

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>level of fertility rate in the US is two point

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>one babies for a woman and three point zero and

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>other developing countries because they have higher death rates and

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>shorter lifespans, which makes sense. So we were onto the

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>replacement rate basically, right. The replacement rate is the number

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of kids a woman of reproductive age would have to

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>have to replace herself. And she's not just replacing herself,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:40.559
<v Speaker 1>she's replacing herself and her male mate who she's reproducing with. Yes,

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of gross to think that a woman

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is giving birth to a boy and a girl who

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>can mate and reproduce her. That's not the point he

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>want them to go mingle with other people's babies. But

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the replacement rate, you would think then is to right

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>for every woman, two point zero kids is what you

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>need to have to have an even replacement rate. That

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>means that people die, new people are born, and the

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>population never grows or declines, it stays the same. The

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>replacement rate is never actually two point oh though most

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>two point one right now, and the reason why is

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>because we humans um tend to have more male offspring

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>than female. Apparently, for every one hundred girls that are born,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and seven boys are born. So the actual

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>replacement rate is two point zero seven and then they

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>round up to two point one plus there's I mean,

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of other factors too, for sure. So

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>those other factors include things like you said, like, um,

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>infomortality rates, lifespan, immigration into a certain area, And the

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>thing is of birth rates or fertility rates and replacement rates.

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 1>The replacement rate tends to be a little more stable. Um.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>The the birth rate. The fertility rate has a lot

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>more to do with social attitudes, access to healthcare, education,

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's a it can change, uh dramatically from place

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to place, whereas say, anywhere in the western world, the

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>developed world, the replacement rates about two point one exactly.

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>That's in the yeah, the three point oh for the

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>developing countries. All the monographers just stood up and we're clapping.

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>So clearly Aerlic was not correct in his dire predictions.

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Here we are in and um, there are problems, but

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>England is still around four billion people haven't starved to death. Um.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 1>But does that mean that he was wrong altogether? Not

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily because right now, uh, and This was a pretty

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.520
<v Speaker 1>startling stat to me. Over the past hundred and ten years,

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>we have grown from one point six billion people to

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>seven point to billion people in a hundred and ten years. Well,

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we're expected to get up to nine point two and

0:14:56.280 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>another uh thirty five years by twenty and so one

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons we have this many people, uh, most

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons are positive because of like advances in healthcare.

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>The lifespan in nineteen hundred was thirty one years old

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and now it's seventy or maybe even little bit higher

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>because that was two thousand, twelve UM, so imagine it's

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher. And the infant mortality rate globally

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen hundred was a hundred and sixty five deaths

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>per one thousand live births was down to thirty four.

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's why there's more people, because we're doing better

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at taking care of ourselves. Yeah, and that those are

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>two huge factors when it comes to um demographics and

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 1>population because though the longer you live, the more old

0:15:41.520 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>people you have, so therefore the less babies you need

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to replace those people, and the fewer babies that die

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>or that survive infancy UM will be adults one day exactly.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But these are the really if you're a demographer, the

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot is that working age. So when you're a demographer,

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>especially one that's um economics minded, chuck that sweet spot

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the reproductive working age people. That's a good sizeable population

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you want to have. If you have a lot of babies,

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>well then you have a lot of people who are

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>raising those babies, so those babies are dependent on So

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>say you have a lot fewer women in the workforce,

0:16:21.560 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>so your workforce is depleted. If you have a lot

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of like an aging population, you have a lot of

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>older people who have already aged out of the workforce

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and are now dependent on the taxes paid by that workforce.

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>So a large population of either babies or old people,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and god forbid both at the same time. It puts

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of strain on the middle you know what

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. Sure, So when you have a longer life

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>expectancy and a lower infant mortality rate like we have

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 1>now in the developed world, you want to have something

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>closer to the replacement rate, you know, which makes sense. Um,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I got some more stats that would uh seem to

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>back up air likes. Predictions are not predictions. But at

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>least his gloomy outlook currently. You know, I couldn't find

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 1>much on what he felt today. Yeah, I'm curious that

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>he's still around. I'm curious about there's some good interviews.

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna check that out. You know what, We'll post

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it on uh the website because now we're posting links, yeah,

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.119
<v Speaker 1>to like the research that we do stuff. You should know,

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 1>great links on that on the podcast page for this episode. Guys.

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So currently, as of last year and estimated eight hundred

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and five million people go to bed Hungary every night,

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>more than half of which are in Asia. One in

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>four people in Sub Saharan Africa was chronically malnourished UM

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred fifty million people worldwide like access to clean

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.920
<v Speaker 1>water UM, contributing to about eight hundred and fifty thousand

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>deaths per year. And UM, here's the thing, though, is

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>we're living in cities out more than ever. UM. People

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are moving into cities, which is a good thing and

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>one way because it provides a lot of opportunity, economic

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>economic opportunity for people, especially in developing countries. But when

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at these cities, a lot of them are

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>full of slums and sweatshops. In these developing nations, something

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>like um half of the population and a lot of

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:27.959
<v Speaker 1>cities live in slum conditions in Africa, that's right. So

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 1>you think sub Saharan Africa, I think rural in a

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways. So yes, I'm aware that they they

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>lack access to clean drinking water, and that's an issue

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that Sub Saharan Africa faces. You don't think about that

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>being an issue in a city. But the problem with

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>slums is they very rarely have access to clean drinking

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.439
<v Speaker 1>water in the exact same way that places like rural

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Africa have the same problem. Yeah, and and we're not

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>even I mean that's that's clean drinking water and like

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 1>sanitation and shelter. We're not even talking about education and

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 1>healthcare and like all the things that people need to

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>live a fruitful life. You know. So cities are a problem.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Even if air look was wrong, there are clearly issues. Um.

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Some people will argue and we'll get to the critics

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 1>and stuff later, but a lot of people argued that

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's distribution of food and stuff like that, Like we

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>have the resources, we're just not dividing it out properly. Right,

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And apparently if I read that if everyone lived like

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>an American and consumed like an American does, the caring

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.480
<v Speaker 1>capacity would be something like two billion, So we would

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>have already far exceeded it. But if everybody lived with

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>just the minimal amount that they need to live, the

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>caring capacity would be something like forty billion. We've been

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>able to sustain the caring capacity as it is right

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>now because not everybody lives like an American. But if

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>you're an American, that means that a lot of the

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>other world, especially developing world, thinks that you are over

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>consuming by a lot. And that's really evident. And um

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a graph that went around recently that shows water

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>use in agriculture by type of product, so everything from

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>like soy to beef. It showed how much water? Did

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you see that? I didn't see that, but I've seen

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Beef is like a huge consumer water, right,

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and six point to eight gallons of water

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>used to produce one ounce of beef. That's a lot.

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of water. And so that's that's part

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of the point. Whereas if everybody's and apparently in China

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and India and these ascending countries with ascending economies. Um.

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the one of the great benefits of being

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.720
<v Speaker 1>part of the developed worlds. You can get steak anytime

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you want, baby, and uh, I want a big one

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, put it in front of me. I'll give

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you some money here. Here, just take this and and

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>put in your pocket. There's some money for you. Give

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>me my steak, and you don't care how much water

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it took. And they're these people who are saying they

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily agree with their like, but they're saying, he

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>was totally off here, he was alarmed. They're saying, this

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is one of the problems. You know, this is one

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.239
<v Speaker 1>of the problems with too many people. Yeah, and so

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>getting back to to uh, contraception and zero population growth

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or now the population connection they're big goal. They say

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>there are two two million women in the developing world

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>who have an unmet need for family planning. So they're

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not saying, you know, we want to put our ideals

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>on you and you shouldn't be having kids. They're saying

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>they're that many women that are like, I don't want

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>these five kids. I would have wanted to and I

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.199
<v Speaker 1>either don't know about contraception, don't have contraception or I

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>have literally no idea how conception works for a lot

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>of them. Well, I shouldn't say a lot. The first

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>idea that women just need access to contraception and they

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>will use it. Yeah, and they're they're they're working on that, right,

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>But they found in studies it's something like ten percent

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>or less of the women who are defined as having

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 1>unmet contraceptive needs. Um site a lack of access as

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to why they're having unwanted kids. Instead, they're saying it's

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>things like family pressure or societal pressure to have a

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 1>bunch of kids. Um Like you're saying, like not understanding

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>contraception or how conception works. Yeah, they say they don't

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 1>believe that they need contraception. If you have sex infrequently

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>or after birth, after I've had one kid, we don't

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>need to use contraception anymore. Like literally not knowing how

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>conception works. So that's a big educational hurdle that Population

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Connection is trying to overcome. Right, So they're saying it's

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>not just getting contraception to women, is educating them on

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>how to use it and changing their social outlook. Yeah,

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>changing the culture. Yeah, largely men, you know, saying you know,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>like revolutionary road or something. You know. Alright, So, uh,

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk a little bit after the break about

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 1>what the critics of zero population growth have to say.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're back. We're talking about solutions to overpopulation. But

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>not everybody thinks it's a problem. Some people say over

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:40.320
<v Speaker 1>population is a myth. They say that are like in

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and of it himself damaged his own argument. Yeah, he

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of personal heat. Yeah, still does because

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of the language he used. It was so alarmed as

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:52.959
<v Speaker 1>starting his book off with, you know that we've already

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>lost and no matter what we do, billions of people

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to die. Um and then it not panning

0:23:58.240 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>out saying that England is going to be around in

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. I mean that was putting a lot on

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>the line. And so a lot of people said, you're

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>your specific landmarks or um or milestones were unmet. Therefore

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>your heart whole arguments out the window. And some people

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 1>believe that other people are like, that's not necessarily true.

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.160
<v Speaker 1>That is alarmist as well, possibly your reactionary at least.

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>But some people say, I still don't agree with Earli

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>because humans are smart. We can figure our way out

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of any problem. That's right. Critics will say that humans

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>UM are not parasites to the earth. We are the

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>saviors of Earth, and we are the ones that are

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 1>coming up with these solutions like the Green Revolution and uh,

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>longer lifespans and progressing medically to help people live longer.

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about saviors of Earth, you know, Like

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's stretching it a little bit. I think

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>we um extract a little too much to be called

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>saviors of Earth. Well, I've guarantee you there's a lot

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>of people that think humans are saying years of birth.

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>You know. I would see us more as like Homer

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>with Pincy the lobster again and the salt water and

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>fresh water, trying to strike the balance. I wouldn't call

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.640
<v Speaker 1>him a savior of either the goldfish or Pinchy at

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that moment. He's just keeping them both in stasis. How

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>many times have you referenced pinch there's probably seven seven

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not bad. It's one for every one shows roughly. UM.

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Other critics will say that low birth rates are no

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.120
<v Speaker 1>good for the economy, UM, like you were talking about

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>earlier UM, older people and babies. Uh. Well, I guess

0:25:33.240 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>low birth rates wouldn't affect that. But older people are

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:39.480
<v Speaker 1>more of a tax on society than they are spenders

0:25:39.880 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and investors, right, But in the same in the same way,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>if you have too many babies, that's a big text

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>eventually that those babies will be a workforce like spend

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 1>money exactly. So the baby boom and the post war

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:58.680
<v Speaker 1>boom economic boom in the United States, it's not coincidental

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that they went hand in hand. There are a bunch

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of people having babies and eventually they grew into the

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>workforce and they made a bunch of money in the

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 1>eighties for the United States. Yeah, and there's it's also

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.479
<v Speaker 1>supported in developing countries. Uh. More than seventy countries are

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 1>categorized now as low fertility with two babies or less

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>per woman, And those areas are expected to make a

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>big economic gains in the coming decades because they're going

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>to be people to spend money, right and be in

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the workforce. And there's kind of a few ways that

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the workforce and wealth in the economy and birthrates are

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>all kind of tied together too. It turns out that

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:47.400
<v Speaker 1>if you give a woman rights to her own contraceptive decisions,

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:52.800
<v Speaker 1>um the birth rate tends to inevitably fall as a result. Uh.

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And then when that happens, it happens because some women

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:58.480
<v Speaker 1>have more babies than they want to when they don't

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>have right to their own count receptive decisions. UM. Another

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>reason is when they have those kind of rights, they

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>usually also have the right to an education. When they

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>enter um school, they will tend to put off having

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>kids because once they graduate from school, they'll usually enter

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the workforce, and so just by nature of getting to

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing later on in life, they're having fewer

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>kids as well. Uh. And when you have more educated

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>women in the workforce, your economy is stronger too. So

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>directly and by proxy, um, lower birth rates are associated

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 1>with the stronger economy. But again, you don't want to

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 1>get too low, because if you get too low, then

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, the generation before it started to

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>taper off is going to be bigger than the generation

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that's working. And if it costs fifty dollars in tax

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>money to keep the average retiree afloat, say in the

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>United States, well that divided by a thousand people is

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot easier to bear than divided by a hundred people.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>A hundred working people, you know what I mean. Yeah,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:02.960
<v Speaker 1>we gotta keep up the old folks and uh keep

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>them in stake and ovaltine right. You know. So if

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're an economist, demographer, whatever, everybody's kind of

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>saying like, you want to get a country developed, and

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to get them at the two point one

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.120
<v Speaker 1>replacement rate and everything will be hunky dory from there. Yeah.

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing a critic might say too is um,

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and this is what we were talking about earlier about

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the environment, Uh, the impact on the environment, Like we're

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>just going to destroy our world with so many people. Um.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that impact carbon emissions aren't really tied

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to population growth rates. It's tied to per capita income levels.

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 1>By evidence that China in the US have some of

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the lowest UH fertility rates right now, and we are

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the worst polluters. So it's not because we have all

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>these people. It's because we're consuming too much as Americans exactly,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>and I guess in China as well, which actually makes

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it seem kind of nerve racking that India and China

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>with these enormous populations, are starting to become wealthier and wealthier,

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>because that's just going to make it even worse as

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>far as the environment goes. Did you check out the

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Population Connection site? No? I didn't. They have a pretty

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting f a q um that if you don't know

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>where you stand. I mean, it's helpful to read uh

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>like they say things like, instead of we want to

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>focus on quality of life, not quantity, and instead of

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>saying how many people can the earth support, maybe how

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>many people can't be or support because right now all

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>these people are dying from lack of you know, clean

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 1>water and sanitation and food. Um. And there's the counter

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>argument that you hear from critics a lot. I've seen

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this stat thrown around that the entire world's population could

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>live in Texas. It's still mind boggling. I have trouble

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>like believing it. Well, I think somebody forget to carry

0:29:55.400 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a one or something. No, it's true. Population Connection says,

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sure they can. Uh, you could fit everyone in Texas.

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>You could also fit forty people in a phone booth.

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 1>But um, Texas, they said, in no way has the

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>carrying capacity to take care of those people. So it's

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.280
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a hollow. You know the fact

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that you throw out when you say that, right, like,

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>sure you can jam everyone in there. Um. Texas would

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>be like what do you guys doing here? Everyone? Um?

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's pretty interesting stuff. I recommend people read their

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>f a Q U. It seems like they definitely have

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the right um mindset because that what they want to

0:30:35.920 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>do is, you know, make sure people have a good

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>quality of life all over the world. Well, I will

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>go read the f a Q because I suddenly feel underprepared.

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But I will tell you that the impression that I

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>have from researching them without going on their website was, um,

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't find anything like where population connection or the

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>population connection myth or anything like that. There's definitely debate

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>on the other side saying overpopulation is a myth, but

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>no one seems to be attacking population connection is like

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>a nefarious organization because they're not saying don't have babies, right,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's a really sticky situation to be in because

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are like, well, God wants us

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to have as many babies as we possibly can. Who

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>are you to be meddling in that kind of thing.

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a fine line that a group like

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that has to walk, and they seem to be walking

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>at fine, there's just saying like, here's some contraception. Maybe

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 1>let's not have unwanted babies. Let this little angels stay

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in heaven, and uh, we'll just go from there. I

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>think that's their on their homepage, all right, the Behavioral Sink.

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>What um, where did you find this? I don't remember

0:31:46.480 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>where I ran across it, but um, I'd read it

0:31:49.000 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a while back. But I have to give a shout

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>out to Josh from Jersey, the original Jersey, not New Jersey,

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>who recently wrote in to suggest we we do an

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>episode on that and a perfect timing, because he wrote

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.959
<v Speaker 1>in after you'd selected this one, and I was like,

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>these two would go great together, hand in hand. Yeah,

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So thanks Josh for reminding us. Well, thank you Josh

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>for thanking Josh, which Josh, I'm thinking all the Josh

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is so. In nineteen seventy two, this dude named John B. Calhoun. Um,

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this is one of his experiments. This guy, what he

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>liked to do was build um rat and mouse utopias.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>He've been doing it since the forties and basically with

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the aim to see what would happen to a population,

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>in this case mice or rats if you gave them

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a perfect mouse world. And he called these world Universes.

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And the one in nineteen seventy two, the one that

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>really like made all the headlines I guess, was called Universe,

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and it was pretty good size. It was a hundred

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 1>over a hundred inches square. Um. The walls were fifty

0:32:56.160 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>four inches high. It had space for um, let's see,

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>what's two hundred fifty six times fifteen chuck. Um, I'm

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with about in my head. I'm gonna say

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like close to thirty. It is exactly hundred. Yeah, that's

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>what I meant. I meant three thousand, hundred forty okay

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>okay um. So there was enough room comfortably for thirty

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred and forty mice, yes, um. And long before

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that he introduced four breeding pairs, so eight mice he

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>first introduced to Universe, and it was well stocked by

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the way. They had everything. They wood, water that was

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>cleaned out. They were all disease free. No predators, yeah,

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>no yah. He threw a cat in there one right,

0:33:43.440 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>just to keep him on their toes or something. Yeah,

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was. It was mouse Heaven is what

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.120
<v Speaker 1>they called it. Yes, And he actually did in papers

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>about these universes. He would refer to them as heaven

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:55.840
<v Speaker 1>or utopia, and he would use words like that. Um.

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So he introduces these for breeding pairs of mice to

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>UM to verse twenty five and um. After a hundred

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>and four days, it took them to finally settle down

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and be like, Okay, this place is actually pretty great.

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not too good to be true, um, despite the

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>fact that it seems to be built by human hand,

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.359
<v Speaker 1>which is weird, and the temperature never changes. But we're

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.719
<v Speaker 1>just gonna say it's probably fine and start breeding. And

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>they started breeding pretty quickly. Yes, they started doubling in

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>population every fifty five days after that, right, Yeah, like

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>you said, because it was so great there, they were

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>just like, hey, let's eat and uh do it and

0:34:35.320 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>make a little baby mice. Like you know, there is

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>no end in sight, so you're doubling every fifty five days. Uh.

0:34:42.239 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>This is all a big study to study what overpopulation,

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what would happen. And what he found time after time

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:53.720
<v Speaker 1>was that things went bad. Yeah, which is really something

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>because remember Paul Airic released the population bomb in but

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:05.319
<v Speaker 1>for decades before that, John Calhoun saw firsthand what the

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>real problem was. The real problem wasn't over population leading

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>to scarcity of food and conflicts, conflict and resource wars

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and famine and starvation. What he found was that the

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>real problem was over population itself, but just too many,

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>too many mice, and not enough valuable roles for mice

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to play exactly, so there comes to be a point

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>in any mouse population. As far as Calhoun was concerned.

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And again, this is the universe twenty five and he

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:38.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't making like one a week or something. These were

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.280
<v Speaker 1>detailed or smart studies. He was hired by the National

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Institutes of Health. He spent like twenty or thirty years

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>working there. He was like a bona fide legitimate researcher um,

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and he would find that at some point the abundance

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.719
<v Speaker 1>would lead to overpopulation rather than scarcely. Like he he

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>never ran out of food. They always had enough food

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>and water and everything. What came to be an issue

0:36:01.719 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>with space and social interactions. There were just too many people.

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:08.439
<v Speaker 1>There are too many mice, I should say to the mice.

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>There people, sure, um, And they're rubbing shoulders up against

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 1>one another, constantly moving past one another. There's not enough room.

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, there wasn't enough. Um, there were

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>too many mice to fulfill the number of social roles needed. Right. Yeah,

0:36:28.400 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>it says by day three fifteen, so this is close

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to a year. Um. A lot of mice are living

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in there. And they said there were more peers to

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>defend against. So males were stressed out and stopped defending

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>their territory. They abandoned it. Uh said normal social discourse,

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:51.399
<v Speaker 1>UM broke down completely. Social bonds broke down. UM. There

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>was like randomized violence for no reason. It seemed like. Um.

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.840
<v Speaker 1>The female mice, the mothers saw this and would attack

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>our own babies. And it was procreation slumped, infant abandonment,

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:09.439
<v Speaker 1>increase mortality sword um. Then he talked about the beautiful ones,

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.239
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was hysterical. There were these male mice

0:37:12.320 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that just they never fought, They never sought to reproduce

0:37:15.680 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>or have sex. All they did was eat, sleep and

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>groom and just sort of loaf around. So all these

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 1>social barriers are completely being destroyed, these social norms, I

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>should say. Yeah, and these the the females that could

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:32.320
<v Speaker 1>reproduce one off by themselves to quester themselves away from society.

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.920
<v Speaker 1>And the males that were capable of reproducing became those

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>beautiful ones and didn't seek sex either. So over time

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they lost their ability to carry out these complex social

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>interactions that lead to reproduction, and they just stopped reproducing

0:37:46.440 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it in general. Yeah, by day five sixty and this

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>is um, I guess that's the close to two year mark. Um, well,

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:59.959
<v Speaker 1>I guess eighteen months they had mice and then growth ceased. Yeah,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>which is even close to the thirty that this place

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>could could conceivably hang on to. Yeah, So it was

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>how many was they stopped reproducing? Um? Very few My

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>survive pass weaning at that point. The beautiful ones were

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>still secluded, the females that they basically called this the

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:25.479
<v Speaker 1>first death of two deaths. He did specifically social death

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>essentially exactly like the death of the spirit, the death

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of the society, and then eventually the physical death the

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:35.879
<v Speaker 1>second death. Yeah, the one leads to the second, like

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a point that you pass, and he came

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>up with a great name for it, called the behavioral

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:45.359
<v Speaker 1>sink um where they think they refer to it as

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the event horizon. Once you pass that, it's all over, right,

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no coming back from that, and once there's no

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>coming back from that, not only has your society collapsed,

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>or does your society collapse? Um, you your population becomes

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 1>extinct because reproduction becomes impossible even he found, which is

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty startling. He found that even after enough of the

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>population dies off that it returns to those potable, ideal

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers of the early days in Universe twenty five or

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:18.080
<v Speaker 1>any of the universes, they still don't reproduction doesn't start

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.919
<v Speaker 1>up again because remember, social norms and bonds have broken down,

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 1>so they can't even figure out how to reproduce once

0:39:26.600 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>there's room for people enough again. It's it is so interesting,

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:32.839
<v Speaker 1>he said that. Um. He wrote he wrote this really

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of blockbuster paper called Population Density and Social Pathology,

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.799
<v Speaker 1>and it was published in Scientific American in nineteen sixty two,

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and he said that the individuals that are born under

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>these circumstances will be so out of touch with reality

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 1>as to be incapable even of alienation, so like they

0:39:51.320 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>can't even feel like they're not connected as society anymore,

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>because there's no society for them to ever connect or

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 1>disconnect from. It's right, it really is. And a lot

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of people jumped on this and said, whoa, what's going

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on here, because if you look at his data, every

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:11.879
<v Speaker 1>time he ran this experiment, the results became the same.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.040
<v Speaker 1>There was an abundance of resources, there was never scarcity.

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Population became overpopulation. Once they reached the point of the

0:40:20.120 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>behavioral sink, the population slid into extinction. And on the

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:30.399
<v Speaker 1>way there was violence, cannibalism um like uh and sexualism

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in fanticide um just like all the horrible things you

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 1>can possibly think of, um, right, you know, on the

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:41.839
<v Speaker 1>way towards extinction. And so a lot of people said,

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, these mice kind of a reflective of our

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>own society, don't you think and um, Calhoun was kind

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of like, yeah, I would say that's probably correct. Yeah.

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And there was a big boom at the time because

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>of this experiment in literature and movies with a lot

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of doomsday uh areas uh. Tom Wolf, the Great writer

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>wrote in The Pump House Gang in nine UH he

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>actually referenced the behavioral sink um and uh in reference

0:41:11.239 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to New York City, and he said, I got to uh,

0:41:14.239 --> 0:41:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it was easy to look at New Yorkers as animals,

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:18.919
<v Speaker 1>especially looking down from someplace like a balcony at Grand

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Central at the rush hour Friday afternoon and the floor

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 1>was filled with poor white humans running around, dodging, blinking

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>their eyes, making a sound like a pinfull of starlings

0:41:27.200 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>or rats or something. And there are all these movies

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that came out. There was one called ZPG with Oliver

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Reed and Geraldine Chapman Chaplain that was called Zero Population Growth. Yeah,

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:42.839
<v Speaker 1>like for a generation the government said no, one's allowed

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to have babies. Here's your robot baby, right, and they're like, no,

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a real baby. And they're like, no,

0:41:46.960 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not. Um, I think it. I didn't see, but

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure it ended very portly. I didn't see it either. Yeah.

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I saw it on IMDb though. And of course, of

0:41:56.360 --> 0:42:01.280
<v Speaker 1>course Soilent Green. Yeah, great, great movie from the novel

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Make Room, Make Room. And there's there's another novel called

0:42:07.560 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>stand On Zanzibar, and um, there were people called muckers

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.799
<v Speaker 1>who ran them up and just suddenly went crazy and

0:42:15.840 --> 0:42:18.760
<v Speaker 1>started killing a bunch of people. Oh no, what happens.

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>From time to time in the news, a lot of

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:25.280
<v Speaker 1>people would were saying, Yeah, the stuff that Calhoun's finding

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is clearly extrapolateable onto human society, and at the time

0:42:32.640 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>too there was a lot of discussion about what to

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:40.960
<v Speaker 1>do about um, inner city over population, crime, housing projects. UM.

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>There's this really great documentary called The pruitt I go

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Myth and it's about there was this the pruitt I

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>Go UM project in St. Louis became I think we've

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about it before, but it became like the the

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the poster child for how no matter what you do

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for poor inner city people, they're gonna screw it up

0:43:04.120 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's gonna become crime ridden. And it's them. It's

0:43:06.640 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not it's not the their their quality of life or

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>education or anything like that. It's them. And this this

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:17.399
<v Speaker 1>this documentary just totally demolishes that idea, but it's still

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a longstanding idea. And there were a group of policy

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:24.680
<v Speaker 1>policymakers who looked at Calhoun's research and said, clearly, we

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.040
<v Speaker 1>need to we need to do something. There's there's too

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>many people, and there's a lot of people who don't

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>have um valuable social roles and they're turning a crime

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and everything. UM. It was very much open to interpretation

0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:40.680
<v Speaker 1>because Calhoun, even though he was putting these things in

0:43:40.800 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>terms like heaven and utopia and hell and behavioral sink

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of stuff. He was still just kind

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of putting data out there and it was up to

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>society at large or interpreted, and it really said a

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>lot about your attitudes towards your fellow human how you

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>interpreted it. But Calhoun himself actually took something of an

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.799
<v Speaker 1>optimistic view of all of this data, which is kind

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of mind boggling. Yeah, I was surprised to read this actually,

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:06.919
<v Speaker 1>he Um, it makes sense that if you think about it. Yeah.

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:09.959
<v Speaker 1>He found that there were outliers and that not all

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the mice descended into a hellish violence and looting and

0:44:16.320 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 1>mouse looting. He found that some could actually handle this

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and what he called the ones that could had a

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 1>high social velocity, UM, mice that fared well with a

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of high number of social interactions. And that is

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>not me. And he said, I'm a type, A blood type,

0:44:32.360 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 1>blood personality type. Uh. He said that basically, these mice

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 1>will thrive. Um. And he said, and even the ones

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>who don't, what he termed the losers, um, found ways

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to be more creative. And he sufficient, Yeah, he had

0:44:46.520 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a sunny your outlook, basically saying that man is essentially

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a positive animal and we will create and design our

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>own solutions, right, and his solution was since and it

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:02.080
<v Speaker 1>makes sense because he own that it's not scarcity or

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:07.240
<v Speaker 1>famines or anything that leads to trouble, it's overpopulation itself.

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>His idea was, well, let's go find more space. And

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 1>so he was a member of this group called the

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Space Cadets, which was a group of thinkers that we're

0:45:14.400 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out how to establish colonies on like

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Mars or the Moon or wherever, which is exactly what

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Calhoun's point was, is that we just need more space.

0:45:24.880 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 1>As long as we can sustain ourselves, that's fine. But

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:32.280
<v Speaker 1>even if we don't stress agriculture, the planet or whatever,

0:45:32.480 --> 0:45:34.680
<v Speaker 1>we're still going to run into problems. So let's go

0:45:35.239 --> 0:45:39.399
<v Speaker 1>off to other worlds and terror form. Oh and did

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you see the thing about the rats of nim Oh?

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Was that taken it? It was based directly on his research,

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Brisbee and the Rats of nim Nice. Yes, So

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>go see that again and also go read the Behavioral Sink,

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Super interesting, an article on Cabinet by Will Wiles that

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:02.359
<v Speaker 1>informed a lot of episode. Yeah, this stuff is fascinating

0:46:02.400 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to me because I see kind of both sides. Um

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:09.399
<v Speaker 1>clearly there are some issues going right now, and uh,

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>but I also think that there are solutions around the corner. Yeah.

0:46:13.239 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I ultimately don't have a strong opinion either way, and

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think if I think about it, it's because I

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 1>think humans will, yeah, become an ingenuitouve. You can have

0:46:24.520 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>steak tonight, me too, grass fed only you know, it

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make it any better. I mean that's why beef

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 1>is so it uses so much because it eats so

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.799
<v Speaker 1>much food that also requires water. Right, it requires water

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like two times over at least the dumb cows. Yeah,

0:46:43.800 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 1>does you feel bad about our steak consumption? Chuck, I

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:48.839
<v Speaker 1>don't need much steak. Good for you, buddy, It's because

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Emily doesn't eat beef. So oh yeah, you know, usually

0:46:51.880 --> 0:46:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I just will cook chicken because it's not like I'll

0:46:54.040 --> 0:46:55.840
<v Speaker 1>have a steak and I'll cook work chicken every now

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and then. But usually it's just easier because chicken comes

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in like a two or three pack, right, you know. Yah,

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Plus you cook it until it's dry as a bone,

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so you can feel better about the water consumption, that's right. Uh.

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:09.920
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know more about population growth and

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>specifically zero population growth type, those words into the search

0:47:13.480 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>bar house to works dot com and don't forget to

0:47:15.719 --> 0:47:17.719
<v Speaker 1>go to stuff you shaulow dot com and listen to

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.920
<v Speaker 1>this episode and check out the extra great links on

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:23.360
<v Speaker 1>there too. Uh. And since I said search bar in

0:47:23.400 --> 0:47:27.719
<v Speaker 1>there somewhere, it's time for listener mail. I'm gonna call

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 1>this linguists sticks up for us, all right? Right? Hey,

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>guys studied linguistics in college, so it always pickles me

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 1>when you guys go on tangents about words and language.

0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:39.560
<v Speaker 1>The main reason I'm writing is because I want to

0:47:39.560 --> 0:47:42.160
<v Speaker 1>offer you a counterpoint to the language police that have

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:46.480
<v Speaker 1>been harshing your vibe. Grammar nuts are what we call

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:50.840
<v Speaker 1>in the biz. Uh, prescriptivists, um, who like to dictate

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>how people should speak. Linguists, on the other hand, are

0:47:54.560 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>descriptivists who make their careers out of how people actually

0:47:59.120 --> 0:48:02.280
<v Speaker 1>speak in real war old situations. Oh, I didn't realize.

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought linguists could be one or the other. I

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:08.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that like linguists tend to be descriptive ists.

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>That's what she says. What is um who wrote Infinite

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Jess David Foster Wallace. He was a big time prescriptivists,

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 1>really he used to drive him crazy, like how people

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>should speak? Yeah, like that, there is a a specific

0:48:22.760 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>way that humans are supposed to speak and right, right

0:48:25.680 --> 0:48:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and communicate, and if you dedate from that, you're about

0:48:29.080 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>as bad as human being and that would be like

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the downfall of society or pretty much on um. We

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>don't use the terms good or bad grammar. Instead, we

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>prefer standard and non standard Linguists recognize the social functions

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of non standard grammars and observe their uses and functions

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.800
<v Speaker 1>rather than to try and micromanage them. A final point,

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm certain your listeners still know what you mean when

0:48:52.480 --> 0:48:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you say things like there's a lot of something, even

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>if it isn't standard grammar and the laws of linguistics,

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>as long as you're interlocuature, which is a listener interlocutor interlocutor. Yeah,

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>as long as they accurately understand what you mean, you

0:49:11.120 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 1>have successfully communicated. And that's why humans had been in language,

0:49:14.840 --> 0:49:17.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. So go be free and know that I

0:49:17.600 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>will always love your show no matter how you speak.

0:49:19.600 --> 0:49:22.720
<v Speaker 1>And that is from Kristen. Thanks Kristen. The supportive linguists

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:26.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that that's funny that Kristen mentioned that as long

0:49:26.280 --> 0:49:31.920
<v Speaker 1>as your interlocutor understands what you're saying, you're communicating correctly. Um,

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:33.919
<v Speaker 1>someone else, I don't remember who it was, they wrote

0:49:33.920 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 1>in and suggested we do an episode on shorthand. Oh interested.

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I was just talking about that with Emily last night. Bam,

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 1>it's all over the place. I took speed writing in

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>high school and she was, did you very surprised at that?

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So like speedwriting with hands? Speedwriting is like like stenography, No,

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:53.480
<v Speaker 1>right with your hand. Um, it's basically a version of shorthand,

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 1>but not exact shorthand. Got you. It's a kind of shorthand.

0:49:58.440 --> 0:50:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like shorthand, but like more aggressive. Yeah, like

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>max power or something. The joke was my friend Shannon,

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I won't see her last name, but she would cheat

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 1>and class because she didn't learn the shorthand. So the

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>test where they would just read a long passage quickly

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:18.359
<v Speaker 1>and you would have to do it and then transcribe

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:22.279
<v Speaker 1>that into longhand. She was just super good at writing

0:50:22.280 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 1>really fast, so she would just write down everything in

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>longhand super fast and then figure out how to transcribe

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 1>it back to shorthand and then back to Longhand and

0:50:30.800 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 1>she she got caught doing that. Yeah, and the teachers

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:35.719
<v Speaker 1>like that's cheating. Yeah. It sounds like she was like,

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 1>well name with fast. Nope, that's not speedwriting, that's just

0:50:41.160 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 1>writing fast. Uh. If you want to get in touch

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>with us, either to show us support, criticize us, and

0:50:47.680 --> 0:50:50.239
<v Speaker 1>even something neutral is fine, you can tweet to us

0:50:50.239 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 1>at s y s K podcast. You can join us

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:54.799
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook dot com, slash stuff you Should Know. You

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 1>can send us an email to Stuff Podcast at how

0:50:57.320 --> 0:50:59.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff Works dot com and has always joined us at

0:50:59.680 --> 0:51:02.040
<v Speaker 1>our look Curious home on the web, Stuff you Should

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Know dot com. For more on this and thousands of

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>other topics, is it how stuff Works dot com