WEBVTT - Thanks for the Memories

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says someone mutters

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and the street lamp gutters. Soon it will be morning.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland and I'm Joe McCormick. Hey, we're all

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>back together again. Yeah. Oh it's been a little while. Yeah,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been quite a bit. Yeah. Yeah, I forgot how

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>small this table is when there are three people around it. Well,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that we had three one time while you were gone,

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>we had Holly was on. She was great. Oh I'm glad, Yes, Holly.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Holly is always wonderful. So it's it's a great memory

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of mine to think back on Holly in that episode.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>You know now that you say the word memory, Yeah,

0:00:51.080 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>almost as if it were a segue. I recall something.

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a memory I have about a thought I had

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>about memories. I remember that. So let me take y'all

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>back to a couple of months ago, I please do,

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Or it might have been a couple of years ago.

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. My memory is not very good. When

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I was researching the brain to brain communication video that

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I wrote, there was a video episode we did a

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>while back, and it was about the idea of people

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>communicating without words from brain to brain. So in one

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of the experiments described in the video, they had two

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>people sitting in rooms in different buildings, and they were

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>using a combination of an e G cap on one

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>end and then a transcranial magnetic stimulation device on the

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>other end to have one person caused the other person's

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 1>brain to press a button. Right, So that's kind of cool.

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>The brain actually caused the person's finger to push the button.

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Well, the brain caused the other person's brain

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to cause the person's finger to press them exactly as

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the brain itself pushing the button. Just want

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>to be like leaping out through the ear and going

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to deep right, which would have been brang prang ish.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>The yeah, the the the idea of being in that

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>video you you were. We were taking that concept of

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>a direct brain to brain communication and saying, what if

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>this could be extended to the point where someone could

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.840
<v Speaker 1>transfer an entire brain state to someone else? Right, Sure,

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't know the ultimate end of what can be

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>shared from brain to brain, because this example in this

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>video that we talked about. It was very basic. It

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially just a one bit impulse. It's saying press now,

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like action, do something. But what the most

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>optimistic advocates of brain to brain communication we're saying is

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that one day, based on these same technologies, just taken

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>to a much more complex level, you might actually be

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>able to share really complex contents of the brain, such

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 1>as skills like you could train somebody on a skill

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 1>like I know kung fu, right, just with a brain transfer,

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you can put that knowledge brain state into their brain.

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Or you could share a memory of yours directly into

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's brain without words, going like oh I I

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>had I saw this beautiful sunset once here you go, right,

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 1>including the emotions I experienced when I saw this thing. Sure,

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And to be honest, we don't know if something like

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>that is possible or not. It might be, it might

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not be. But I actually thought about this problem a lot,

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>and while I certainly wouldn't say it's impossible to have

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody else's memories beamed into your brain, I do kind

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of wonder because let's imagine how this would work. Uh,

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you're trying to transfer a memory of when

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you were at a birthday party when you were seven

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>years old, and you were handed a little paper plate

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>with a piece of birthday cake on it, and there

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was a big scorpion sitting on that piece of birthday cake.

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>This is where we learned how terrible Joe's childhood was.

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It rained every time there was a pool party. Now,

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have a videotape of this event, it would

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>be easy to transfer a video file from one computer

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to another, right, assuming it's a common, easily read file

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>type and you have the right libraries, codex whatever to

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>translate the file. But the reason you need something like

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a codec is that there are potentially infinite number of

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>ways visual information like video could be encoded as information

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>for storage and transfer. Right, So, if you had a

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>video of this event on your hard drive, there wouldn't

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>be a little picture of a piece of birthday cake

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>with sprinkles and big happy scorpions sitting on it somewhere

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:38.039
<v Speaker 1>inside your computer. It would just be a file like

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 1>any other file, long string of data bits, ones and zeros.

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>We know how that goes. That's some kind of program

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>then compiles or or kind of filters down into a

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>single image or a series of images rather exactly. So

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason we have common file types and codex and

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff is so all of our computers can agree on

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>how to translate these bits of data into lard pixels

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>on the screen or vice versa from recording them from

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a lens. But our brains don't have common file types yet,

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>do they know? They don't? Well, you know, we can't

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>even we can't even describe the file types that are there, right,

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't even fully understand how episodic memories are encoded

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>in the brain. And by episodic memories, I mean something

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like that, like we're calling a particular event and what

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 1>happened and how it made you feel. Yeah, yeah, all

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>things like that, as opposed to what we might call

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>semantic memories, which are more like remembering how to do something,

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>or remembering what a fork is for, or or what

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a scorpion can do to you, or something your birthday

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 1>party with your seven. So, when you think about it,

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>describing your memory and words to another person is sort

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of one crude way of translating or converting a memory

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>file type across possibly incompatible file types. Right, It's like

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a converter program in a way. But of course, some

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>aspects of the experience can always be lost when you're

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>transferring a memory this way. That's why we find ourselves

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>saying things like, well, I guess you really had to

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be there, so something gets lost in this translation. So

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's even, it goes beyond even the The analogy

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that we could draw is imagine that we're in the

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>early days of computers, where every computer is its own

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>individual type of thing, and the type of computer I

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.159
<v Speaker 1>own and the type of computer Laura owns, the type

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of computer Joe owns are all different types. We don't

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>all have mac os or Windows. There's not intercompatible. There's

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>no way for me to send the work that I

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>do on mine onto yours and haven't mean anything. They're

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>all based on different operating systems, and so I have

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I might have something on my machine and I want

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to share it with YouTube, but I'm kind of stuck

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.799
<v Speaker 1>because I don't have a way of doing that unless

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, come over and look directly at my screen,

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>which there's no analog for in human brain memory stuff. Yeah,

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and oh wait, no, hold on, there's that consciousness binding

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 1>machine we talked about. Well weight, I dreamed that I

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>was about to say, like, I'd love to the other

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>episode recording will I was a vacation. Uh No. I

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was going to also say, though, that even even this

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>example with the analogy, it's it's not um, it's not

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>completely accurate. Because with a computer we could actually point

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>to the the the file name and say this represents

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that memory. We can't do that in the brain to

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the extent where we can identify a specific series of

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 1>neurons and say this represents that memory. Yeah, that's totally true.

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't know if in theory we could one day

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.240
<v Speaker 1>do that. We certainly can't do that now, and we

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we could do it, if that would

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>be at any way transferable. Very good point. Now, on

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, in favor of the idea of sort

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of technological compatibility for organic memories when we record, store,

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and recall memories, I think we all agree that something

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>physical is happening in the brain. Like even if you're

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a duellist and you believe you know that there's something

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of like supernatural, a soul or something going beyond

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the brain, I think even most people who think this

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think that memory encoding and recall is a supernatural process. Yeah.

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone agrees that it's a more than the

0:08:21.080 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>sum of its parts kind of situation, but something that

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we hypothetically eventually will be able to suss out. Yeah,

0:08:28.160 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is a physical thing that happens in

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 1>the brain. If it's a physical thing that happens in

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the brain, then it can, in theory at least be

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>measured and recorded by scientific instruments. I'm not sure if

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it can be without killing the brain, but at least

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>it is in theory possible to see, Okay, here the

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>physical states of every single cell in the brain and

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>what they're doing in relationship to each other. So you

0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 1>should be able to record with the physical reality of

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a certain memory being recalled, is Yeah, once we get

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to the point where we have the data capacity, just

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the thorough put really to to watch all of those

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>things carefully enough to designate them. Yeah. Sure. And so

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>if we accept that the basis of all our memories

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is some kind of physical fact about the brain, and

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>those physical facts can be measured, then shouldn't all of

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>our memories be somehow recordable from the outside. Well maybe

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not. So I thought we should look at

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this question today and sort of examine the field of

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:33.720
<v Speaker 1>memory and technology and see what we can reasonably say

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>about where technology and memory meet. Will we one day

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to record our memories onto computers, will we

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to share them between brains without words? And

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>what the future of memory and technology is and these

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>are all, you know, really cool questions to ask, and

0:09:53.120 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we've already mentioned it before in the episode, but there's

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so much that we don't know about the brain and

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 1>how memory works that this is going to be largely speculative.

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going to try and lay the foundation of what

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>we understand about memory, but honestly, we are on the

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>very first steps of a very what could be a

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>very long journey. We don't even know how long the

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>journey will be, right, We we have no idea, right. Uh.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of researchers are working on this kind of stuff,

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about a few of them later on

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in the podcast. But first, first, let's talk about what

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>we solidly do know about how memory is encoded in

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the brain. Okay, Well it's going to be short, alright,

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that word solidly solidly. Uh. You you can

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you encounter things and you process them and later you

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>can recall a simulation of the thing that happened. Oh,

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>we we're pretty sure that we know a little bit

0:10:47.320 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>more than that, a little bit more. There actually has

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 1>been some very recent uh information coming out from a

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>study that I think, Joe you you came across a

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.360
<v Speaker 1>blog on on the the idea about something that could

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.679
<v Speaker 1>really shake up the the idea of how memories are

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>stored in the brain. But we'll get to that in

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>a second. So, first of all, we generally talk about

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>three uh phases of memory. We talked about the encoding

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of memory, the storage of memory, and the retrieval of memory. UH.

0:11:17.320 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's really a complex construction of the results from

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>multiple regions of the brain all working together to encode

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a memory and store it. So memory remembering things and

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and forming new memories is very similar to thinking in general.

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:39.599
<v Speaker 1>It involves multiple regions of the brain working in concerts.

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like there's one part of your brain

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's the memory factory and that's all it does.

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of stuff that works together to do this. Now,

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>there are some facilitators that are really important in the

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 1>encoding of memory. So first we have to perceive something

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to form a memory of some sort. See

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the scorpion, yes, yeah, not just the scorpion. You also

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.719
<v Speaker 1>see the cake, You feel the plate, you hear the

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 1>children screaming you, the smell of cake, and scorpion enters

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>your nostrils. All these things are collectively part of that experience,

0:12:12.880 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and you have an emotion of I wanted that cake,

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>or maybe I wonder if scorpions are edible. I mean,

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>who knows what's going through your mind. So those perceptions

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are integrated into a single experience, and the Hippo campus

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>plays a big part in this. The Hippo campus is

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of working as a manager, pulling all this this

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the separate lines of data and integrating them into what

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>will eventually be turned into the memory um. And that

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>pretty much is the collection of all the perceptions that

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>define that experience. Right now, here's where we start getting

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>into things that we believe are going on, but we

0:12:56.320 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know for sure because we don't fully understand the

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 1>workings of the brain. So xts think that the hippocampus

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 1>and the frontal cortex tag team together to sort through

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>these integrated experiences that the hippocampus has pulled together and

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>determine which ones are keepers and which ones you can

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>toss away. So, in other words, we've got stuff happening

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>around us all the time, much of it we are

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not consciously aware of because we're not focusing on that

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, or if we are consciously aware of it,

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to remember it later. Yeah, we're not.

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>There was nothing going on up in that corner of

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the room, so we can just blot it right out. Yeah,

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>that that's just a great spot in the memory. There's

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing like you know, it may turn out that, uh,

0:13:36.640 --> 0:13:39.079
<v Speaker 1>there was actually something going on over there, there was

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a pinana on fire, but that was not important to

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the moment where the scorpion was sitting there on your cake,

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't factor into your memory. It wasn't encoded, um,

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so if it's not encoded, it just kind of fades away,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it. Just so, the frontal cortex and the

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 1>hippocampus together are saying, all right, this is what's important

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for this memory. This is what we're going to store

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for later. All this other stuff we're gonna leave behind.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>It's important. So you don't get overloaded with all the

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.199
<v Speaker 1>data around you all the time. But then, of course,

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>from our experience, you can think about how even that

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>is not necessarily a totally clear distinction. I mean, think

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>about all of the things you experience that you probably

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>yourself wouldn't be able to recall clearly just out of

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>the blue. But if somebody sort of like repeated it

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to you, you know, said like, hey, remember when Jonathan

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>said X, Y and Z, you might be like, oh, yeah,

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he did say that. Yeah. The same sort

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of thing that when you encounter a smell that's similar

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to one that that played a really important part in

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a memory that of yours, it brings that back. So

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>for me, for example, the one that I will always

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>associate with a particular part of my life is the

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>smell uh that you get when you go to like

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a giant indoor pool. The chemicals like that immediately takes

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>me back to swim lessons when I was a little kid.

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter how old I get, as so as I

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>smell it, boom, I'm back there summer break. It smells

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like the Gainsville College pool uh and uh and and

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the terror that I experienced on a weekly basis going

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to swimming lessons. Uh. So you know, that's the sort

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that that like. It just it keys into

0:15:21.480 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>those those little memories. We'll talk a little bit more

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 1>about what we think is happening when that goes on. Well, sure,

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.080
<v Speaker 1>because the memory doesn't exist, I mean the same way

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>that a video file isn't a series of physical images

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>inside your computer somewhere. That's not how it does, and

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not how the brain does either. It's it's a

0:15:42.000 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>series of electrical impulses or electrochemical impulses. Rather. Yeah, it's

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's these electrochemical reactions in the brain. I mean, we're

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about neurons that are communicating with these various hormones

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and electrical chemical reactions. It's really complicated. We don't have

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a full understanding of it. But our brains are really plastic, right,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so when we encounter new material, it starts shuffling stuff

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.800
<v Speaker 1>around to incorporate it. Sometimes it's a means of comparing

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a new experience to one that you have already had.

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>This is important for memory. It's an important thing about

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>our survival, right because let's say you've encountered something that

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>nearly killed you and then later on in life you

0:16:23.880 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 1>encounter it again. It's important that you remember that it

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>nearly killed you the last time. Absolutely, yeah, yeah, And

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the way that a particular smell can,

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>like the smell of a food that you got really

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>sick off of, or tequilo or etcetera. Whatever it happens

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>to me that it was um will will turn you

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>off later in the future. Right, So, repeating as supposed

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 1>to later in the past. Sorry, repeating an experience multiple

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>times reinforces these electrochemical reactions in the order that they

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>happen and in the patterns that they form. So there's

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>one kind of a prevailing theory, at least for a

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>very long time anyway, that memories are essentially these these

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>um networks of neurons that represent the collective perceptions integrated

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>into that experience. Or it's a it's a pathway of

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>electrochemical signals across a series of those neurons, right right,

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a synaptic thing, right, You're looking at the

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:33.680
<v Speaker 1>actual electrochemical reactions across series of synapses. Uh. So that

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>was like the that's like the large theory about the

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>idea of you form a memory. You have this experience,

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a your brain encodes it and it is translated across

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the series of neurons through the synaptic communications, and that

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>represents the memory. And every time you remember, you are

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially constructing that same pathway, that same series of of

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>communications all over the little the little thought cards kind

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>of dashes straight across that that same pathway. Right, it's

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the it's not the destination, it's the journey theory of right. Sure, sure,

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>but there is a recent study that's kind of challenged that. Right. Yeah,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this was the one that I was talking about that

0:18:13.359 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe had shared with us before the podcast, where the

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>story is that it might not just be the synapses

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>that are important, and maybe the neurons themselves have undergone

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:29.679
<v Speaker 1>some kind of change that mean that the neurons have

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>something of the memory in them. And the reason why

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm being so vague with the language is because we

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>don't have the full understanding of it. We merely have

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:41.159
<v Speaker 1>seen an experiment that tests this hypothesis with slug with

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>slugs yea C slugs, because C slug brains and human

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>brains are so similar. Depends on the humans. The experiment

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>was that they did conditioning with C slugs with mild

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 1>electric shocks. There's gonna be a lot of mode electric

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>shocks in this episode, for better or worse, but at

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>any rate, the sea slugs, yeah, well they were, they were.

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>They learned to withdraw from the shocks. What other flavor

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of electrical shocks are are there, spicy, there's nuclear three

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 1>mile island shocks. Um, So the slugs, the slugs learned

0:19:21.280 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to withdraw from these electric shocks. And then the researchers, uh,

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they they inhibited the synaptic connections. They disrupted the synaptic

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>connections that were associated. They thought, with the formation of

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>the memory, hey, this thing will hurt you, go away

0:19:38.920 --> 0:19:42.680
<v Speaker 1>from it. But they they observed the slugs were still

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>withdrawing even though the synaptic pathways had been disrupted. So

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that led them to the conclusion that perhaps the neurons

0:19:50.960 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>themselves must have something to do with memory formation, and

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the synaptic passageways, and possibly we would

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>might be able to use that information in the future

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to treat people who have certain types of memory problems

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.719
<v Speaker 1>where the neurons are healthy but the synapses are no

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>longer communicating. They the thought is perhaps the memories are

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not lost, they just can't be accident. So that's kind

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. But again, this is early days, right, that's

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.639
<v Speaker 1>so crazy, the idea that you could have potential memories

0:20:24.680 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>in your brain. Yeah, that just you just can't you

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can't recall them, but they're there. That's a possibility. Now,

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>whether or not that's actually true, it's still too early

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to say, but it is an interesting hypothesis, and it

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>may very well be that the actual reality is some

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>combination of the things we already thought we knew and

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>this new emerging information. It's probably a combination of the two.

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And because you know it's it can be pretty complex stuff.

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The idea being here that that it's it's very difficult,

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>very challenging to talk about how technology is going to

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>interact with our memory when we don't fully understand the

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>actual process of creating those memories in the first place.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.679
<v Speaker 1>What we do know is that memory memory is malleable,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>right Oh yeah, yeah, Well, the that that pathway that

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a memory sort of exists on changes every time, changes

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>very slightly. Every time you call up that memory. It

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>can potentially change a great deal, But most of the

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>time it's little details, things that either get embellished, like

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>when when you are remembering, you are reconstructing, You're not really. Uh,

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not the same as going into a filing cabinet

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>and pulling out the file marked whatever your memory is

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>seven seven year seventh birthday. Yeah, yeah, it's it's not like.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not like playing a tape. It's like a reconstructing

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>frame by frame. Yeah. I I likened it to imagine

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that you are putting on a play, and the script

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it represents the original event, the play is the the

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you you recalling the event every time you see a play.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 1>If you go see a play more than once, you

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>will notice that there are little differences in each performance,

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just because there are a lot of different parts that

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>come along with any play. Uh, and because humans are

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>bad at repeating precise actions precisely. Yeah. Yeah, you can't

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>do it exactly every single time, right, Yeah. And then

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>some people's brains are like going to see a play

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>where you've got those actors who work by beats instead

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of you know, they're like the script and important but more.

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>But but either way, you know you're you're going to

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>see have a different experience each time. It might not

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.719
<v Speaker 1>be significantly different, you might say. You might say when

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>you walk out, like, you know, I liked it better

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the second time than the first time, and I can't

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>really you know, there were little changes that were different.

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>The same sort of thing when you're remembering, and your

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.959
<v Speaker 1>brain tends to fill in gaps too, So when you

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>are remembering something and perhaps the connections aren't going straight

0:22:52.680 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>through the way they did when you first formed this memory,

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>your brain's like, well, let's just what'll work. Let's just

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Fred Fred was there, putting Fred into this memory now

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and then suddenly friends at your seventh seventh birthday party

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>even though you didn't meet Fred till you were nine.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.520
<v Speaker 1>That might happen, um, and you might talk to Fred

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.359
<v Speaker 1>later and say, you remember when you're you're at my

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>seventh birthday party? Is like, dude, I didn't didn't know

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you when you were seven, and they will You're like, oh,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I could have sworn you were there. Yeah, So memory

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 1>is not is not this permanent type of thing. It

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.719
<v Speaker 1>changes every single time where you remember, and knowing that

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it changes doesn't affect that that fact, right, Yeah, you can't.

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:36.680
<v Speaker 1>You can't concentrate into you can't remember really hard and

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>get the truth of it. That doesn't work that way,

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>which is both amazing and terrifying to me. Probably the

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>stress of trying to force yourself to remember correctly would

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 1>make you forget more. Yeah, add in more superfluous details

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that didn't actually happen. So good luck with that, guys. Yeah. So,

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I thought was interesting about all

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>this when I was looking into the encoding and the

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>storage and the t evil bit, is that it really

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>made me think that Sherlock Holmes, at least the the

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Benedict Cumberbatch version of Sherlock Holmes is pretty much

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>a uh, you know, as fictional as you can get,

0:24:11.880 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that here's a here's a character who

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>can walk into a situation and apparently instantaneously perceive everything

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that's going on. Everything appears to have equal importance in

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that perception, and uh, and also he has incredible retention. Now,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about story memories, there are three different

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>storage phases, right. There's the sensory stage, which only lasts

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.679
<v Speaker 1>a fraction of a second. That's the thing that allows

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>an experience to linger after the experience itself has ended.

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So if there's a flash of light, that's what allows

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that flash of light to remain in your memory long

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>enough for it to go to short term memory. Short

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>term memory is something that lasts about thirty seconds. You

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>can usually hold about seven things in your short term

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>memory for about thirty seconds, and then it's about the

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.160
<v Speaker 1>max of it. Charlotte Holmes apparently can hold an infinite

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of information and retrieve it within those three seconds.

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>No problem. Well, I mean his forehead is very tall,

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that is true. I was thinking he might be using

0:25:12.119 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>one of those memory palace things, right, like the mamonic

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>devices to have you constructed. Well, never mind, I don't

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:22.040
<v Speaker 1>want to get a sidetrack anyway. So the long term

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 1>memory is as far as you can we know, it's

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it's limitless. You can store an infinite number of memories

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and long term memory at least, there's no way there's

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we've never been able to define a limit to it.

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you were able to, you know, see something

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and then remember a long term memory associated with that thing,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that's different. That's why Charlotte Holmes can come in see

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a color of dust on a person's shoe and say, oh,

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that person was in such and such, because that's something

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that's in my long term memory, not my short term.

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>But just being able to perceive everything at once and

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>have it have meaning that I would question at any rate. Uh.

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 1>That is the storage part retrieval, as we talked about already.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>That's where you're constructing the memory. Each time you remember,

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>you're not you're not going to pull a file. You

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>are building that file all over again. So if we

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>go with that file example, instead of you pulling the

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>file and reading a report, you sit down with a

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>blank sheet of paper and you write the report out

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>again from memory. That's essentially what whatever, what is happening

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in your brain. Yeah, so let's talk about how technology

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>can interface with memories already, or or interfere with memories,

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>as the case may be. So again, very much kind

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>of cutting edge technology and science on this stuff. Uh.

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>And and even when we don't fully understand the mechanics

0:26:47.960 --> 0:26:51.399
<v Speaker 1>of memory, we can still do stuff to mess with it,

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of again awesome and terrifying at the

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>first step of figuring out how something where, because it's

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>going like, let's see what happens if we oh, oh, nope,

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that was bad. Oh yeah, I mean that seems much easier.

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Like for a while people couldn't figure out how the

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>ancients built the pyramids, But it wouldn't be that hard

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>to knock them over. I just think of uh, I

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>just think of the buckerup bonds. I know, No, don't

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>touch that. You don't know what that's connected to during neurosurgery,

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 1>connected to that scorpion birthday party. Yeah, well yeah. One

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>of the things I was looking into was really an

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting project. DARPA funds that. Uh that's a study that's

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>done by the University of Pennsylvania that's looking into the

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:38.200
<v Speaker 1>possibility of using deep brain electrical stimulation to help encourage

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>memory formation. So this would be for people who suffered

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>traumatic brain injuries or TV eyes as they are referred to. Sometimes,

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're talking about stuff that's happening in the brain.

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes when you suffer brain damage, part of the damage

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is the inability to form memories. Something can happen to

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>some people. So the there's the study of the University

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of Pennsylvania looking into using tiny electrical shocks in the

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>brain towards the area of the hippocampus in order to

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>help facilitate the formation of memories, so that people who

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>have suffered these kinds of injuries will be able to

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>continue having, uh, you know, a more independent life and

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>be able to form memories. The way they would before

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the injury had happened. So that's pretty interesting. And again

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things where because we know a

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:32.199
<v Speaker 1>little bit about how memories are formed, we're able to

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>take these these kind of fairly primitive steps in the

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>grand scheme of things. Um we've also talked about inhibiting

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the formation of memories on forward thinking, specifically in the

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>video series in two thousand fourteen June of two thousand fourteen,

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so as we record this, it's almost a year since

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 1>that video went live. Um I talked about some scientists

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>who were looking into uh inhibiting or in uh doing

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 1>what they would call an inception memory, installing a memory

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>into mice. And now we come back to the mild shocks.

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Tell us all about it. Okay, So, yes, they took

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the mice, they put them into a container that had

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a floor that could give a mild electric shock, not

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the very day kind um to the little mice feet,

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.760
<v Speaker 1>which the mice did not like. The mice associated that

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>particular box with being shocked. And so if you ever

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:36.600
<v Speaker 1>took the mouse out of its happy little safe container

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and put it into the shock o matic container, the

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 1>mouse would get distressed, would hide in the corner and

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 1>freeze and shiver. It was pathetic then, because scientists are

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>supervillains in the James Bond style. Let's see what happens

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:59.959
<v Speaker 1>when we take away the puppy exactly. Yeah, good old

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>egon getting into it. So what they did was they

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 1>they used optogenetics. They actually altered the mice brains so

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>that they could put fiber optic lines into them and

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>shine light on specific neurons that they had implanted that

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>had this sort of photoreceptive uh reaction, so that when

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>light was shined on them, they would uh they would

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>essentially spark the same pathway that the mice had formed

0:30:28.760 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>when they were in the chockomatic box. Then they put

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the mice into a new environment that was not the

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>chacomatic box, so the mice had no reason to associate

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it with being hurt. They shine the light on that

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>particular region of the brain so that the mice were

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:47.239
<v Speaker 1>remembering getting shocked even though they hadn't been shocked in

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that room, and they behaved as if the room was

0:30:51.400 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be the chockomatic box again. So they were

0:30:55.320 --> 0:31:01.200
<v Speaker 1>having this kind of um this this new environment, they're

0:31:01.280 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they're remembering something that happened, hadn't happened to this new environment.

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>They associate with the new environment and behave the same way. Um,

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting and terrifying. Again, Like whenever we get in

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the memory, this is where I start thinking because there's

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>so much of ourselves that's wrapped up in memory, and

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the thought of changing or inhibiting that is uh, kind

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of brings a lot of questions about how permanent is

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the self as well? Right well, I mean all of

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the movies and stuff that deal with this all have

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of dystopian plots. So we just imagined this would

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>be used to implant false memories and and make us

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>pawns of an evil scheming corporation for bad memories on

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>other people all strange days for you still haven't seen that,

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>have you know? Okay, there's also I mean they also

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 1>looked into suppressing memories as well, to try and to

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 1>remove the association of pain with the shock box. That's

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>also part of the study. I like to think that

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>they did that so that the mice could finally go

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>back to two normal, stress free lives, but that probably

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the actual purpose. Probably not. Now, I wanted to

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>mention this isn't entirely on topic, but it is related

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to technology and memory. There have also been a lot

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of people writing about the possibility that, uh, technology is

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 1>taking the the need for us to remember away from

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of in a lot of cases, because we've

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>got a place where we can store the information that's

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not in our heads, so we can offload memory. Yeah. Yeah,

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that we've basically uploaded our processing systems to whatever device

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 1>we're using at the time, and therefore we don't need

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to remember phone numbers or our division tables or yeah,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 1>or or specific events people who are just looking at

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>an event through their camera and taking photos. There's an

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>argument to be made that uh. In fact, there have

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>been these that have have shown this that people who

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>are taking the photos have a harder time remembering details

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about the stuff they took the photos of because their

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>brain said, oh, I don't need to remember that, we

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have a record of it. So these things that you're

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not taking pictures of, I'm totally going to concentrate and

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>remember details. But this other thing that you took picture of, don't.

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>We've got the picture, why do I need the remember?

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, I know it sounds weird that I'm

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>putting it that way, but that's really what the studies found.

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>So it was kind of interesting. They did this by

0:33:29.160 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 1>taking people through a museum and they had them look

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 1>at all these different exhibits, and at some exhibits they

0:33:34.320 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>weren't told which ones ahead of time. They were told, oh,

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>take a picture of this one, and then at the

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>end of it they said, all right, we want you

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to describe each of these exhibits that you saw, and

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the ones that people took pictures of had the least

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of detail out of all the ones. That that's

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in fascinating psychology, especially since uh, in general, I think

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>researchers have kind of pooh pooed the idea that that

0:33:57.440 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>developing technologies are removing our capacity to to think. Yeah,

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean because people have been arguing since

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>like Aristotle, right, is Google making a stupid Yeah? Yeah?

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh if you teach people to read, how will they

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>ever remember anything? You know? Right? Well, yeah, I mean,

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we've we've been using offloading memory technology from even before reading.

0:34:17.719 --> 0:34:20.320
<v Speaker 1>You you had, like, you know, the one smart person

0:34:20.480 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>probably in your in your local group who could remember everything.

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>You remind me if this Sparry is poisonous or not. Hill.

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>If you didn't have that one smart person, you didn't

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>have a group for very long, right, well, or the

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>other way of putting it is like I offload a

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of memories onto Rachel, and she, I'm sure, offloads

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.359
<v Speaker 1>some memories onto me, like we remember things for each other.

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>This is the problem, is that I offload my memories

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to Tibolt, and he, being a puppy, is incapable of

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>giving me any meaningful backup whatsoever. He's adorable. All right,

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about f m R eyes. You know, you

0:34:57.280 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>can't have a good discussion about the brain without talking

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>about f m R I or fumri as I like

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to call it. So please tell us all about fumri. Well.

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>For some number of years, the Stanford neuroscience and psychology

0:35:12.600 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>professor Anthony Wagner has been developing techniques that use brain

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>scans to detect, wait for it, not the objectively defined

0:35:23.120 --> 0:35:27.560
<v Speaker 1>contents of a person's memory, but whether someone is currently

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>experiencing a memory. And that might sound kind of unimportant,

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually not. It might be more interesting than

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it sounds. And here's why. So imagine this. You put

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 1>me in an fm R I scanner and that yeah, well,

0:35:43.080 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I know you always want to cram me into metal boxes.

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>But uh, f m R I of course stands for

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>functional magnetic resonance imaging, and that's uh. That's a device

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that measures brain activity in real time by detecting like

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>increases or decreases of blood flow in regions of the brain.

0:36:00.080 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>And so it can be useful for showing what parts

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of the brain people are using when they're given a

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>certain stimulus or engaging in a certain activity or having

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a reaction. And so you put me in the f

0:36:11.760 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>m R I. I am sure you're very pleased with this,

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 1>But then you've got more in store for me. You

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.839
<v Speaker 1>show me pictures of faces of people who will be

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>attending a party with me later this evening. Uh it

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>might be a scorpion cake party or some other kind

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>of party. That part doesn't really matter. What matters is

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the pictures. Some of the pictures are of strangers, and

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the pictures are of people that I have

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>seen or met before. Now, although lots of complex things

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 1>are going on in my brain at any given time,

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and even in the process of memory recall, Wagner's method

0:36:48.560 --> 0:36:52.440
<v Speaker 1>could potentially analyze my f m R I scans and

0:36:52.520 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>determine when I was looking at someone I had previously

0:36:56.239 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>made memories of, thus as seeing in my brain memory

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>or REvil activity, or someone I had never seen before.

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Un Thus it saw the brain activity associated with perceiving

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>novel information. In the system they came up with for

0:37:12.480 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>doing this actually got pretty darn good. Yeah, well, in

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>cooperative subjects, right, and we'll get back to that, right.

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But but so by by gathering data on what it

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>looks like when a whole lot of different subjects have

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:32.760
<v Speaker 1>experienced a memory versus learned new information, Wagner's team built

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm that can identify when a new subject is

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>retrieving a memory with like accuracy. That's that's pretty good, yes,

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:47.920
<v Speaker 1>But why would it be interesting or useful to know

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if somebody was retrieving a memory at any given time. Well,

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the potential applications is in the use of

0:37:55.960 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 1>lie detector screenings. So imagine a criminal a proceeding. You

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>could have the old polygraph test for lie detection. But

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>these days we all know that that is highly unreliable.

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:12.240
<v Speaker 1>A lot of experts refer to it pretty explicitly as pseudoscience.

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>It is not generally accepted these days. Well, I think

0:38:16.280 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>actually some jurisdictions still use them for some purposes, but

0:38:20.200 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>among the experts they tend to say, like, no, you

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>can't really rely on lie detector tests. And Jonathan, I

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:27.560
<v Speaker 1>think you did a video on that for brain stuff, right,

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:30.399
<v Speaker 1>And I've done a I did a podcast, a tech

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:34.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast a long time ago about polygraphs and how

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you know their study there there they're keyed in too,

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:42.320
<v Speaker 1>look for changes in physiological response. But so like skin

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>conductance or heart rate. Yeah, it's it's like Matt Murdoch basically, Yeah,

0:38:47.520 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's daredevil, but in electronic format. And uh, and

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you can uh, there's some people who just naturally don't

0:38:56.480 --> 0:39:00.239
<v Speaker 1>care if they're lying, so there's no real physiology will

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>change in their responses. There's some people who are uh

0:39:04.160 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>so keyed up about being questioned that they're going to

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>be giving off, you know, pitives, they're nervous or something. Yeah,

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:15.800
<v Speaker 1>And and they're just a lot of different ways that

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a polygraph machine can come but really it's not even

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the machine that the person interpreting the results from the

0:39:21.520 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>polygraph machine can come to a mistake and conclusion. So

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>they are not as you say, they are not reliable. Yeah,

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:31.919
<v Speaker 1>far from scientifically sound. So since then, since we learned that,

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people in law enforcement, in

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:37.799
<v Speaker 1>in the justice system have been yearning for a more

0:39:37.880 --> 0:39:43.279
<v Speaker 1>scientifically sound way of evaluating the truth of somebody's testimony.

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>So if a system like this fm R I scan

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.359
<v Speaker 1>or fool proof, it could actually make a great new

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>type of lie detector test. For instance, the suspect accused

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>of a crime claims never to have been present at

0:39:56.760 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the crime scene at all, never been there. Yet you

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>hook him or her up to an fMRI machine and

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:06.880
<v Speaker 1>display a picture of the crime scene. Now, is that

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:11.719
<v Speaker 1>suspect showing internal brain scan signs of retrieving memories or

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of cataloging novel information? Sounds amazing, right, Yeah, yeah, that

0:40:16.440 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>would be great. And hey, we were just talking about

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a system that does that, right, except apparently it's not foolproof.

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And props to professor Wagner for pointing this out himself. Yeah.

0:40:27.880 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>He and his team published in June of a study

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about how to beat their own system right. It was

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>called goal directed Modulation of Neural Memory Patterns Implications for

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.879
<v Speaker 1>fMRI based Memory Detection in the Journal of neuroscience right,

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:48.839
<v Speaker 1>because they wanted to test their method in non cooperative subjects.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Deceptive subjects you know, like people taking lie detector tests

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:56.560
<v Speaker 1>may sometimes be so. Wagner and his team set up

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a trial in which twenty four subjects devoted two days

0:40:59.280 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to looking at paces while hanging out in an fMRI

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>I sounds like parties super Party. On the first day,

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>they were shown two hundred paces two hundred hypothetically novel

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 1>faces for two seconds each, then given eight seconds to

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>invent a story to go along with the face. The

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 1>researchers instructed them to do this with the idea that

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it would help the subjects form a memory about the face,

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:24.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, like kind of tricked their brain into thinking

0:41:24.200 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 1>it was something worth saving. The researchers then shuffled the

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 1>photos around and these subjects repeated the exercise, and during

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:34.279
<v Speaker 1>the second past, their algorithm was able to detect whether

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the subjects were experiencing memories about six of the time.

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good base, Yeah, yeah, wait way above sure. Uh.

0:41:43.239 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Day two, the researchers added two hundred new faces to

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>the original batch and then shuffled the photos into two

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 1>separate sets. During the first set, the subjects were supposed

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to react to each face as usual, you know, honestly

0:41:57.239 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 1>either recognized the face or exp orians it for the

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 1>first time. Then during the second set, the researchers asked

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:07.799
<v Speaker 1>them to try to fool the machine, meaning that for

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.960
<v Speaker 1>faces they remembered, the subjects were asked to focus on

0:42:11.000 --> 0:42:13.439
<v Speaker 1>things about the photo that they hadn't noticed the first

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>time around, kind of distract themselves from calling up their

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:19.919
<v Speaker 1>memory of it. That buttons are on their shirt or something, sure,

0:42:20.000 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>the lighting, some something weird about I don't know, the

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:26.600
<v Speaker 1>background whatever. Uh. And for new faces, they were asked

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to recall something or someone that the photo reminded them

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of in as much detail as possible. It might be like,

0:42:33.560 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>all right, this picture of a stranger looks an awful

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:38.560
<v Speaker 1>lot like an uncle I have. So I'm going to

0:42:38.640 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>think about my uncle while I'm looking at this picture

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of a stranger, and that's going to be as if

0:42:43.080 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I were actually remembering this person and why my uncle

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 1>suspiciously owns a scorpion farm. Uh. You know, there are

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of repressed memories you guys have been prying

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 1>back for the so so during during this uh, the

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>second trial, the algorithms proficiency dropped to only with the

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:08.839
<v Speaker 1>deceptive subjects, so that that is no better than a

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>coin flip um. It was, I should say, easier for

0:43:12.480 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>them to fake memories than it was for them to

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:19.360
<v Speaker 1>conceal memories. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense to me,

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:20.839
<v Speaker 1>in the same way that it seems like it would

0:43:20.880 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be easier to make up lies and pretend you knew

0:43:24.120 --> 0:43:26.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody with words than it would be to like hide

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:30.239
<v Speaker 1>the recognition in your face when you see somebody you

0:43:30.280 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 1>know absolutely you know. Uh. This is why I'm a

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>really bad actor, because when people say things to me,

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't be surprised if if I've heard it times

0:43:41.040 --> 0:43:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in rehearsal, I'm just like, yeah, no, that's just yeah, yeah,

0:43:46.000 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. I'm a bad actor too. I only know

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.919
<v Speaker 1>my que lines and my lines the rest of the show.

0:43:51.960 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 1>It's not important. I'm not in it. I don't care.

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea what it's even about. Hamlet's about

0:43:56.600 --> 0:44:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this guy who comes into the Danish uh royal court

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and sees that everybody's dead, and then he has to

0:44:04.680 --> 0:44:06.399
<v Speaker 1>go back and report to the King of England. That's

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.960
<v Speaker 1>what Hamlets. That's a short story, but it sounds kind

0:44:08.960 --> 0:44:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of interesting. There's a lot of preamble. Okay, I thought

0:44:12.160 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 1>you were going to say, hamlets about a guy who

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:16.959
<v Speaker 1>meets a grave digger once. Actually it will be about

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a grave digger who meets this totally not so dat

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>so So, based on all of these results, Wagner and

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 1>his team are recommending and and themselves constructing more research

0:44:31.640 --> 0:44:36.439
<v Speaker 1>into into deception and stress and and how memories are

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are made and recalled under those kind of circumstances, because

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they suspect that a suspect trying too hard to be

0:44:43.080 --> 0:44:48.839
<v Speaker 1>honest might also throw the results. Yeah, yeah, that makes sense. Though,

0:44:48.880 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I would say the interesting thing to me about this

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is that we're not at I would say we're probably

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:58.959
<v Speaker 1>not at the peak of interpreting these results yet either.

0:44:59.080 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So I I would say that f m R I

0:45:01.680 --> 0:45:07.040
<v Speaker 1>scanning for LIE detection probably can get better than it is,

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:09.440
<v Speaker 1>and who knows, we may end up with the system

0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:12.239
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty hard to beat. At least we could end

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 1>up with a system that could lead us to possible

0:45:17.440 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>further investigation. Yeah yeah, Now, I hope nobody's ever just

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.360
<v Speaker 1>convicted on the basis of a test lay. Yeah, I

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.399
<v Speaker 1>would imagine it would be more at least I think

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:29.239
<v Speaker 1>the ideal implementation of this would be you are in

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an investigation phase, and this is a means of finding

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:35.920
<v Speaker 1>out if the lead you're on, if you're on the

0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>right track, or if you need to switch gears very quickly.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>As opposed to this is the piece of evidence that

0:45:42.920 --> 0:45:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the whole case hinges upon that I would definitely be

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot more concerned about. Um, So let's talk about

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.879
<v Speaker 1>let's go let's say that we've figured out the basics here.

0:45:54.200 --> 0:45:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, let's go ahead, what I don't know, twenty

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to forty years now, we've now we figured it out. Uh,

0:46:09.560 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's say, do you think by that time we'll get

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>to this point where we can share memories directly in

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 1>some meat manner, whether it's brain to brain communication or

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>brain to computer, or you know, some other variation that

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>we haven't even thought of yet. I feel like it's

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:28.080
<v Speaker 1>really hard to say, because we haven't really seen anything

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.840
<v Speaker 1>like that yet. And to be honest, I've from what

0:46:30.960 --> 0:46:34.360
<v Speaker 1>I've read a lot of the people who predict that

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll be able to download our memories into a computer,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.840
<v Speaker 1>or more precisely, maybe it should be upload our memories

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 1>to a computer. The basis they often seem to have

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:47.680
<v Speaker 1>for saying this is just sort of general stuff about

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:51.080
<v Speaker 1>how great technology is. You know, I've read several like

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:54.319
<v Speaker 1>opinion pieces saying, oh, by we'll be able to put

0:46:54.320 --> 0:46:58.160
<v Speaker 1>our brains in computers because look at how amazing our

0:46:58.239 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>gaming consoles are today. They're so much more powerful than

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the computers of the nineteen eighties. And that just seems

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to me to say, well, like, well, I understand our

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:09.839
<v Speaker 1>computers are much more powerful, but I'm not sure if

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>this is dealing with the specifics of the problem. They're

0:47:12.800 --> 0:47:17.680
<v Speaker 1>applying the concept of Moore's law universally across all disciplines,

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and that is not the way Moore's law works or

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the way the other disciplines work. Yeah, well, More's law

0:47:23.200 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>might not even work that way. For yeah, yeah, you

0:47:28.760 --> 0:47:32.360
<v Speaker 1>might end up with a computer that, by volume, is

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>much much more powerful than a human brain. But so

0:47:36.760 --> 0:47:39.759
<v Speaker 1>what I mean that doesn't necessarily mean you've conquered this

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>translating problem, like where can you actually extract the semantic

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:48.560
<v Speaker 1>value of these structures in your brain and say, here's

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.120
<v Speaker 1>what this memory is about in a way that would

0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>make sense to a machine or to another person, And

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 1>we even got to a point Joe and I were

0:47:55.280 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>talking before the podcast started about how, uh, in this world,

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:03.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say that we have inner the world where we

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>are able to share a memory directly to another person,

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>in this brain to brain communication, we can't even be

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:13.719
<v Speaker 1>sure that the memory the other person receives is going

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:16.799
<v Speaker 1>to be similar to the memory we have. For In

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>other words, Lauren, you have a concept in your head

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>about what the color red is, and you have a

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:28.200
<v Speaker 1>concept in your head about what a bicycle looks like,

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and your version may be similar but different to the

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:33.680
<v Speaker 1>one that I have in my head. And I'm telling

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm sharing a memory with you about a red bicycle

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I saw now in that technology, would you be experiencing

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:44.800
<v Speaker 1>my memory kind of the way you would if you

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:46.759
<v Speaker 1>went to see a movie where the two of us

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:52.359
<v Speaker 1>philosophical subtleties aside are are witnessing the same thing. It's

0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a visual field of information. Or would you in fact

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:59.880
<v Speaker 1>be experiencing my memory but based upon your concepts of

0:49:00.160 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>red and bicycle? Are sure? So with with my picture

0:49:04.040 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of a red bicycle and my picture of my aunt?

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Who is writing it? Not your aunt? Right? So we

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 1>we can't be sure if we get to a point

0:49:12.440 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 1>where we can do this sort of memory sharing thing,

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that the individual elements of the memory will be true

0:49:19.400 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to the person who actually experienced it, or if it

0:49:22.440 --> 0:49:25.719
<v Speaker 1>will be like like you know, I I tell you

0:49:25.760 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>how to make something, so you end up using the

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff you have around you to make the same thing. Okay, Well,

0:49:32.760 --> 0:49:34.719
<v Speaker 1>let's say that we never do figure out a way

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to decode like the semantic contents of your memory. You

0:49:39.280 --> 0:49:41.600
<v Speaker 1>know that we can look at your brain, we can

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:44.799
<v Speaker 1>analyze what's going on, and we just have no way

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 1>to connect to that to actual information. We just see

0:49:47.840 --> 0:49:51.680
<v Speaker 1>stuffs lighten up. We never find the codec to decode

0:49:51.680 --> 0:49:54.120
<v Speaker 1>and red like like you're literally looking at a giant

0:49:54.160 --> 0:49:56.560
<v Speaker 1>panel of light bulbs and you see that certain light

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:58.520
<v Speaker 1>bulbs are flashing on and off, but you have no

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 1>context for what that. There's no red bicycle memory center

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of the brain that's universal across humanity, which seems pretty

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:09.880
<v Speaker 1>likely to me that that is not a effect a

0:50:09.960 --> 0:50:13.959
<v Speaker 1>thing that can be discovered, but who knows. There's still

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>one obvious way that we would be able to outsource

0:50:16.800 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>memory recall, which is that we could outsource memory recording

0:50:21.880 --> 0:50:25.760
<v Speaker 1>so in other words, we have some means of recording

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what's going on around us at any time when we

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>would be focusing on it anyway, So we have an

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 1>actual record of what's happening, not just a reconstruction of

0:50:36.160 --> 0:50:40.319
<v Speaker 1>what is actual ones and zeros kind of record. Yeah. Yeah,

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here is again to bring up the

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:48.960
<v Speaker 1>horrific British sci fi series Black Mirror. There is one

0:50:49.000 --> 0:50:53.720
<v Speaker 1>episode where characters have a technology that allows them to

0:50:53.800 --> 0:50:57.920
<v Speaker 1>recall basically everything they've ever seen. They have an implant

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that just records it all. And now I don't think

0:51:00.440 --> 0:51:03.840
<v Speaker 1>it's explicit in the episode exactly how that works, Like,

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is it trying to recall things from their brain, from

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>their memories? I don't think so. I think it's actually

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a third party storage system. Yea that yeah, I think

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 1>so that it's essentially it's it's using your sensory organs

0:51:19.360 --> 0:51:23.600
<v Speaker 1>as the camera, camera and microphone, and as the screen

0:51:23.640 --> 0:51:26.799
<v Speaker 1>to play back on. It's both. Yeah, So if you

0:51:26.840 --> 0:51:30.280
<v Speaker 1>were to have some kind of third party technology camera

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>implanted in your head, whether it's actually using your eyes

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:35.239
<v Speaker 1>as a lens or it's just a little camera on

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>your head somewhere, and then it's attached to a solid

0:51:37.840 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 1>state drive in your skull, and it's just keeping it

0:51:40.640 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 1>as some you know whatever kind of arbitrary media format

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that can be interpreted later. This would ensure that encoding

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and decoding could be compatible, and you could have recording

0:51:51.560 --> 0:51:54.319
<v Speaker 1>of everything you see. Yes, it's just not memory, it's

0:51:54.360 --> 0:51:57.279
<v Speaker 1>not your memory. It would be third party from front

0:51:57.320 --> 0:51:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to back. It would be essentially the same thing as

0:51:59.520 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if you had a cell phone with a with a

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:07.640
<v Speaker 1>camera on it, recording everything you know, facing out from you.

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And again you would you wouldn't say these are my memories.

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:13.799
<v Speaker 1>You would just say, here some video of stuff that

0:52:13.920 --> 0:52:18.440
<v Speaker 1>happened where I was right right. And as you know,

0:52:18.480 --> 0:52:20.959
<v Speaker 1>those of us who have watched Black Mirror saw that

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:25.400
<v Speaker 1>might not go very well socially speaking. Yeah, yeah, I

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:28.520
<v Speaker 1>think it pretty convincingly made the case that this is

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 1>not really something you want in your life. Yeah, nobody

0:52:32.440 --> 0:52:37.440
<v Speaker 1>really wants total recall of of everything that happened around them.

0:52:37.440 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I kind of am comfortable in in

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this cloudy mist of possibility that is my past. My

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:46.600
<v Speaker 1>past is getting cloudy here by the minute, So let's

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.239
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and wrap this up. Only thing I want

0:52:49.280 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>total recall of is the Paul Verhoeven movie Total Recall.

0:52:53.440 --> 0:52:57.279
<v Speaker 1>That's fair. Well, while I cannot guarantee that you will

0:52:57.320 --> 0:52:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have that, I can at least get you a coup.

0:52:59.000 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Come on, John, than open your mam. Alright, So anyway,

0:53:02.560 --> 0:53:05.319
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna wrap this up for real these now. This

0:53:05.360 --> 0:53:08.160
<v Speaker 1>has been a really interesting topic to look into, and

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I am curious to see where this technology and our

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the brain goes and maybe maybe what we're

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about here right now it seems like it's really improbable,

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:24.319
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe impossible to do, but who knows, Perhaps in

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>forty years we'll find out that it's a commonplace and

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that the things we're thinking about our small potatoes compared

0:53:36.800 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 1>to what's actually achievable. Yeah, I think it's a really

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>interesting topic. I'm kind of disappointed that we couldn't say

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:45.279
<v Speaker 1>something more definite, but I think are we just don't

0:53:45.320 --> 0:53:49.200
<v Speaker 1>have very much knowledge about what's possible in this realm today. Yeah,

0:53:49.200 --> 0:53:52.279
<v Speaker 1>it comes back to that that problem of us not

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:55.839
<v Speaker 1>having that much information about our own bodies. Despite all

0:53:55.880 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of the amazing science and technology that we have, we

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>are ourselves is still kind of mysterious to me. That

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:04.520
<v Speaker 1>is the most exciting thing though, because it means there's

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:08.120
<v Speaker 1>so much more to learn, and uh, I can't wait

0:54:08.160 --> 0:54:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to to read up on this stuff because it's really

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:15.239
<v Speaker 1>really cool. Now, I have a question for all of

0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:19.360
<v Speaker 1>our listeners out there. If there is a subject about

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.000
<v Speaker 1>which you want to know more, whether it's something that

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>we've covered in this episode, maybe a past episode, or

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:26.560
<v Speaker 1>something you just would like us to cover in the future,

0:54:27.400 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I would like you to let us know about it.

0:54:29.440 --> 0:54:33.359
<v Speaker 1>We love getting your feedback. You guys are awesome. Keep

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:37.279
<v Speaker 1>it coming. The email addresses FW thinking at how Stuffworks

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or you can always drop us a line

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:43.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, Google Plus or Facebook. At Twitter and Google Plus,

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 1>we are FW thinking. You can search fw thinking and

0:54:45.400 --> 0:54:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and a little search bar will pop up. Leave

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 1>us a message and tell us what you think. We

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>love hearing from you, and you'll hear from us again

0:54:52.960 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 1>really soon. This topic in the future technology, I'll visit

0:55:01.160 --> 0:55:14.360
<v Speaker 1>forward thinking dot com. Brought to you by Toyota. Let's

0:55:14.360 --> 0:55:15.080
<v Speaker 1>go places,