WEBVTT - Trump’s Threat of ‘Secondary Tariffs’ Invents New Trade Tool

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week Daily reporting from the magazine

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 2>that helps global leaders stay ahead with insight on the people, companies,

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and trends shaping today's complex economy, plus global business finance

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 2>and tech news as it happens. The Bloomberg Business Weekdaily

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Masser and Tim Steneveek on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:33.040 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 3>Let's get to something that we really got into, our

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 3>started to get into yesterday, as President Trump appeared to

0:00:38.320 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>invent a new weapon of economics state craft by threatening

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 3>what he dubbed secondary tariffs on countries that buy oil

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 3>from Venezuela to choke off its oil trade with other

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:52.360
<v Speaker 3>nations with moron the what, where, when and why with

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 3>US as Bloomberg News US Treasury reporter Dan Flatley, he's

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>out there in a Washington, DC beer. All right, Dan,

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 3>what exactly do we know about possible secondary tariffs? And

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 3>why are they kind of secondary tariffs?

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.679
<v Speaker 5>No, it's interesting. So it appears that Trump has sort

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 5>of taken this idea of secondary sanctions. It's been around

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 5>for a while, and his sort of fondness for tariffs

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 5>and kind of combined the two. And it's understandable if

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 5>you look at it from Trump's perspective. He's talked for

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 5>the last several months about how sanctions could hurt the

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 5>US dollar, and you know how he wants to protect

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 5>the US dollar, and he's certainly made no secret about

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 5>his fondness for tariffs, and so what he's kind of

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 5>come up with here, and we're still trying to understand

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 5>some of the details here, is essentially an idea to

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 5>use tariffs as a sanction. And one of the features

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 5>that tariffs as a sanction have or has that sanctions

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 5>don't have is the ability to sort of ramp them

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 5>up and ramp them down depending on how the target

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 5>nation is responding. So if Trump doesn't get what he

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 5>wants out of Venezuela, he could take them up to

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 5>thirty percent or forty percent. If things look like they're

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 5>improving and he's getting what he wants, he could reduce them.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 5>So it's sort of a combination of what he has

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 5>talked about as his favorite word in the dictionary, this

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 5>very powerful tool the tariff uh with with sanctions, and

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 5>more traditional kind of use of sanctions. So you know,

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 5>it's it's it's it's certainly interesting, and I think, just

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:18.720
<v Speaker 5>to you know, kind of bring it all together, that

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 5>a lot of this is aimed at China because China

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 5>is one of the big buyers of Venezuelan oil, so

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 5>you know, it kind of fits into that whole trade discussion.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 6>Well that's that's where I wanted to get because we

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 6>said that it's on countries that buy oil from Venezuela

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 6>to choke off it's oil trade with other nations.

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:37.359
<v Speaker 5>It's really just about China, right, Yeah, I mean I

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 5>think that a lot of you know, folks that have

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 5>reached out to me in the UH, in the you know,

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 5>since the story went out, we're kind of making that

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 5>point that this is really about China and the Chinese UH.

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 5>Some Chinese officials did respond to the story and oppose

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.919
<v Speaker 5>the use of what they call or characterize as extra

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 5>territorial use of US economic statecraft tools like sanctions and

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 5>tariffs and things like that. And so basically what we

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 5>know at this point is Trump has imposed successive rounds

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 5>of ten percent, two successive rounds of excuse me, tariffs

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 5>of ten percent each on China. So we're at twenty

0:03:12.280 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 5>percent right now. And if these tariffs were to go

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 5>into effect, these secondary tariffs, then we'd be looking at

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.799
<v Speaker 5>potentially an additional twenty five percent on top of that,

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 5>So you know, we're talking about forty five percent tariffs

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 5>on Chinese goods and services potentially. But you know, we

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 5>still are kind of sorting through some of those details here,

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 5>and of course, all of this stuff is very much

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 5>subject to change, depending on how the government in Venezuela responds,

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 5>what Trump thinks he's getting out of them, and all

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 5>of that. So you know, it's it's like many of

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 5>the things that have been rolled out in the last

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 5>couple of months, you know, it's all kind of subject

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 5>to change.

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 6>How is this enforceable, Dan, Well, it's a good question.

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 5>You know, sanctions are primarily enforced really by the banks

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 5>and the big financial institutions who safeguard there the channels

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 5>that are used to uh transmit money and other forms

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 5>of transactions under a fear of penalties big finds and

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 5>stuff like that imposed by the US government. Secondary tariffs

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 5>would in theory be potentially imposed or or enforced by

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 5>a similar mechanism, but it would have to be kind

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 5>of set up in a new form because this has

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 5>never really been tried before. So I think that all

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 5>of this, all of these details are sort of things

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 5>that will have to be ironed out. But again, you know,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 5>this is assuming that they ultimately go into effect as

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 5>as announced.

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I think about kind of longer term in terms of

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the implications. Can we expect some kind of retaliation? I'm

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 3>curious how we are kind of gaming out what we

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>might get then from China.

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's interesting. I spoke last night with somebody who

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 5>worked in the first Trump and illustration who raised this point,

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 5>which is, if secondary tariffs are used more frequently, it

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 5>does kind of give other countries the option of using

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 5>tariffs in retaliation for the secondary tariffs, which they don't

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 5>necessarily have in the same way with sanctions. So there's

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:29.159
<v Speaker 5>there's a retaliatory element to this that becomes more operative

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 5>or whatever you want to call it with tariffs than

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 5>might be the case with sanctions. So that is kind

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 5>of an interesting wrinkle in all of this, and so

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 5>we'll have to kind of see how this plays out.

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, dan tariffs makes so much sense for the

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 3>United States, be it President Trump or somebody else, because

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 3>we buy so much. Is that also fair in terms

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>of how we think about this, and this is why

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's making it all so uncomfortable globally, we buy

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 3>so much stuff.

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's a great point. I mean, even myra In,

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 5>the President's chief of the Council of Economic Advisors, made

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 5>this point yesterday when he was here speaking with my

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 5>colleague Salaia Mosen about the fact that the US does

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 5>buy so much from other countries and so we do

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 5>have a point of leverage there. I think what Trump

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 5>has kind of identified as well is that, you know,

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 5>even if these tariffs don't work, if they don't have

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 5>the intended effect like a sanction, might you still get

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 5>some revenue in theory from the tariffs themselves. So it's

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 5>kind of a win win situation in his mind. So

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 5>I definitely think that gives the US some leverage, but

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 5>it does potentially have some unintended consequences, as we were

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 5>talking about with the retaliatory terifts.

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 3>One last question, Dan, so again another reason for us

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 3>all to focus on April second next week?

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 5>Yes, absolutely, I mean April second is, as Trump has

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 5>described it, liberation Day. So we're expecting some more tariffs,

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 5>some reciprocal tariffs on April second. There's been a lot

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 5>of activity behind the scenes, and my colleagues have done

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 5>some great reporting on this about how within the administration

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 5>there's sort of the hawks, the trade hawks, and some

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 5>people who are more of a moderating influence that are

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 5>all kind of trying to make sure that this works

0:07:16.640 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 5>in the way that it's intended. And just by sort

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 5>of doing that and by sort of following the letter

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.119
<v Speaker 5>of the law, by making sure that you're on solid

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 5>legal footing, it does appear to have somewhat of a

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 5>potentially moderating effect on the tariffs themselves, because you want

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.040
<v Speaker 5>to make sure that when you put tariffs in place,

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 5>that they stick, that they work, and that they're not

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 5>subject to legal challenges and other things like that. So

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 5>that does kind of appear to be limiting the scope

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.760
<v Speaker 5>of maybe some of the maximalist tariffs that we were

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 5>expecting a month or two ago. But you know, caveat

0:07:47.960 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 5>empdor Trump could you know, with his the authorities that

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 5>he has impose still very stiff tariffs, you know, basically

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 5>you know, on his own discretion, at his own discretion,

0:07:59.880 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 5>And that is something that I think still has markets

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 5>a little.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Bit nervous, all right, good stuff, and so glad we

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 3>could check in with you. Dan. Thank you so much.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Dan Flatley. He's US Treasury reporter here at Bloomberg News.

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.679
<v Speaker 3>He is joining us from our DC bureau.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:19.239
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 2>on Applecarplay and the Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 2>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 3>For more than two decades, Google Search has definitely ruled

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 3>the web. Search is also Google's beating heart, generating more

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>than one hundred and ninety eight billion dollars in revenue

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty four. Almost sixty percent of Alphabet's annual

0:08:38.080 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>sales tim though enter into the AI race, chatchipt and more,

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 3>and Google is searching for its next game.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 6>It is the cover story of the new upcoming issue

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 6>of Bloomberg Business Week, which you can read now at

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg dot com and on the Bloomberg terminal and soon

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 6>on newstands. To get directly to this story, just go

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 6>to Bloomberg dot com slash BusinessWeek. It's also the Big Take,

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:01.559
<v Speaker 6>which means our editorial team has singled it out as

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 6>a must read for all and I absolutely agree with that.

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 6>The reporters on the story Bloomberg News Technology reporter Julia

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 6>Love and Bloomberg News Big Tech reporter Davey Alba. Julia

0:09:10.800 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 6>is in our San Francisco bureau. Davy here with us

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.719
<v Speaker 6>in our New York studio. Julia, I do want to

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 6>start with you because Google is synonymous with search. We

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 6>google things.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 7>It's a verb.

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 6>Now, it's ubiquitous, It's dominant for what seems like forever.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.559
<v Speaker 6>That was then, But there are some new players in town,

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 6>enter the AI era. What's going on?

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so the search market has really gotten a lot

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 4>more interesting over the past few years. There's been a

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 4>rush of new players. A lot of people use chat,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 4>GPT for search. There are also startups like Perplexity, and

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 4>those new companies have really challenged Google to use generative

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 4>AI to rethink what the core product should look like

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 4>for the first time in many years.

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 3>So what's kind of wild, Julia, is that it sounds

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>like Google and Alphabet had an opportunit unity to maybe

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 3>beat CHATCHYBT at its own game, and yet it kind

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 3>of passed. Take us back there.

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:11.319
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so with this story, we are really shining a

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 4>light on the attempts that Doodle employees made to incorporate

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 4>generative AI in search to have a chatbot that would

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 4>provide answers along side links. They were trying to do

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 4>this well before the launch of chat GPT. Doodle invented

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 4>the AI technology that makes this possible, but the search

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 4>team that proposed this encountered a lot of resistance. Internally,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 4>the company was really loath to reconsider its business model.

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 4>They also had some concerns about the accuracy just because

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Doodle is held to such a high bar. It's a

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 4>critical utility, not just a fun novelty like a startup

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 4>might be, Well Davie.

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 6>The story also explores over the last couple of years,

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 6>the complaints that people have had when it comes to

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 6>Google Search, and the idea that it hasn't become as

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 6>useful for some people because of the way that publishers

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 6>and website developers have really started to game the system.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, yeah, I think that's something that we explored the story.

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:22.520
<v Speaker 7>Even before generative AI sort of exploded onto the scene,

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:27.079
<v Speaker 7>there was already a sense that you could make Google

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 7>more useful than it just on its own by doing

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 7>things like typing your search query and then adding Reddit,

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.200
<v Speaker 7>and then you know, Google was also contending with site

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:44.400
<v Speaker 7>owners and sort of spammers who just knew Google's rules

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 7>and wanted to gain the system to get right up

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 7>top on search results, but those results weren't necessarily the

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 7>best quality results. So that was sort of the scene

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 7>in which you know, chat GPT came on, and then

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 7>Google also had to figure out how does it respond

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 7>to this existential threat and also improve itself so that

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 7>some of these quality issues are addressed. And I think

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 7>it's kind of an open question whether people like what

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 7>they're doing with generative AI, you know, because of market

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 7>pressures they have added on these generative AI features, whether

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 7>or not users have asked for them. And right now,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 7>a lot of the things that would have been you know,

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 7>sort of experimental in the past, or that Google might

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 7>not have launched because it has such a high bar

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 7>and accuracy. Right, that's right in the main product.

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 6>You like it, Carol, what Google? Yeah, the Google AI

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 6>search results?

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Because Tim is like, where did you get this from?

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>Like take us in Like I feel like when we

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.079
<v Speaker 3>do a big techt story and there's like disruption going on,

0:12:57.280 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 3>and you know, execs or pitch something and they kind

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 3>of passed. There's internal discussions about, hey, we kind of

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 3>missed the mark. Take us inside alphabet Google and what's

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 3>going on right now? Are they being like, wait a minute,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 3>the employees, we've got this, we need to move on.

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So Doodle is coming off of a rocky few years.

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 4>Davey and I have heard from our sources that chat

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 4>GPT really sparked a panic inside the company. It was

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 4>very painful for Doodle to see someone else taking its

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 4>invention and finding the product hit. And so they've really

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.200
<v Speaker 4>turned up the heat on their employees to ship products faster.

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 4>And the woman really at the center of it all

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to search is Liz Reid. She's in

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 4>the top search job now. And what's interesting about her

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 4>is she's a long time Doodle executive, but she's spent

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 4>most of her time in Google Maps, and so that

0:13:56.840 --> 0:13:59.559
<v Speaker 4>means that she's a little bit less wedded to some

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 4>of the old ways of doing things in search. She's

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 4>a little more willing to experiment, and I think that

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:09.920
<v Speaker 4>that sensibility has really come in handy as Google kind

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 4>of enters this new era.

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 3>I think what is wild and I think we've seen

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>this was it with either electric cars or something Tim

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 3>will remember better than I will. But you guys writing

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the story. One thing that really stung about chatchpt's rise

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 3>was that it was built on Google's own inventions. Open

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 3>AI's chatbot uses an AI architecture that Google detailed in

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>a now legendary research paper published back in twenty seventeen.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Davy, that's we've seen this before, where all

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 3>of a sudden, like a company had the research and

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>then passed on it. Yeah, that's got to kill absolutely.

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 7>I mean Google runs two of the most advanced AI

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 7>labs in the world, Google deep Mind, which has since

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 7>joined into Google deep Mind, I should say, and a

0:14:56.320 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 7>lot of the AI developments that they have rolled out

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 7>over the years has been really under the hood of

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 7>these consumer facing products. So, you know, AI is something

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 7>that CEO Sundar Pichai has said he wanted to orient

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 7>the company around even by the mid twenty tens. But

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 7>not the kind of generative AI that we see in chat,

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 7>GBT and you know, major products today, but more like

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 7>improvements to search that are under the hood, things like

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 7>making search faster, right, making it more return more relevant results,

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 7>things like that. So yeah, really stung when chat GBT

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 7>came out and became so popular among Well.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 6>You two make the point in the piece that he

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 6>thinks that we're at the really, really early innings when

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 6>it comes to AI's effect, in AI's role not just

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 6>on the company, but also on the world, in the

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 6>way that we interact with the world. Julia, it makes

0:15:56.160 --> 0:16:01.040
<v Speaker 6>sense that Google would be so protective of Google and

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 6>what its search page looks like. After all, it accounts

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 6>for so much of the company's revenue and profit. It's

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 6>really the thing that they need to guard. That said,

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 6>what are they doing moving forward in a few months

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 6>that will potentially upend the way that consumers see search results?

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that we see Goodle testing a few

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 4>different paths right now. It seems to me like they

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.200
<v Speaker 4>aren't entirely certain yet of what the best way is

0:16:29.240 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 4>to incorporate this into Google Search. They've got the AI overviews,

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 4>which Carol is a fan of, where they're often topping

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 4>the search results with an answer that was drafted by

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence. Those are there whether or not you choose them,

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 4>they just appear automatically. But then they've also announced that

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 4>they're experimenting with this new tab called AI mode that

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 4>you'll be able to click to, you know, similar to

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 4>photos and the other you know features in Goodle Search,

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 4>and you'll be able to go there for kind of

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 4>like a chat GPT experience, like when you really want

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 4>to go deep and have a back and forth with

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 4>Doodle's artificial intelligence to explore a particular topic. And so

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.080
<v Speaker 4>I think it's interesting to see them rolling out that

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 4>dedicated mode and we'll see how that goes over. People

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 4>who pay for Doodle's premium AI features are getting an

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 4>early crack at it now.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean we talked some numbers at the introduction to

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 3>you guys, one hundred and ninety eight billion dollars in

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 3>revenue in twenty twenty four search. Whenever they report earnings,

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 3>we go to those search numbers because at the heart

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 3>of their business, that's what it's all about. Julia, I

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 3>want you to first weigh in on this, you know,

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 3>this cover story. How important is it that Google gets

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 3>this right as the world continues to move forward and

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 3>embrace AI.

0:17:57.680 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 4>It's critical. I think that the success of the company

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 4>depends on it. Goodle has made some progress in recent

0:18:06.760 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 4>years in diversifying its revenues. Goodle Cloud is now profitable,

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 4>which was a big win for them. But search is

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 4>still the heart of the company. They need to remain

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 4>relevant to users daily lives. They still want to be

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 4>that thing that you turn to reflectively when you have

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 4>a passing question. And analysts have begun to tell Davy

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:42.280
<v Speaker 4>and me that they are concerned that search growth going

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:44.440
<v Speaker 4>forward may start to level off a bit.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 3>We know things can change, remember AOL, I mean, and

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 3>other things. I'm just gonna say.

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 6>Right, oh, that's what happens.

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 3>Exactly exactly, Davey got about thirty seconds left. Your final

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 3>thoughts on this story and kind of what comes next?

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, I think that this story shows what

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 7>a critical piece of infrastructure in a lot of ways

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 7>Google Search is to the web, and as AI marches forward,

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 7>what is sort of the future?

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:14.679
<v Speaker 3>Google is a reflection of the web.

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 7>Uh, And it's also sort of, you know, a utility

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 7>to explore the web. But if both are degrading, which

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 7>is sort of the sense that we get from from

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:30.359
<v Speaker 7>our sources, then what next.

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a big question. And you know, this is

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 3>why it's such an interesting time period when we look

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 3>at all of these big tech play big tech players.

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 3>Davey thank you so much. Davey Alba, big tech reporter

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg News here in studio, and of course Julia

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 3>Love out there in our San Francisco bureau. She is

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:48.400
<v Speaker 3>our technology reporter here at Bloomberg News.

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 5>You let me drive.

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:55.200
<v Speaker 6>No, no, no no, this is not a toy, honey, please,

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 6>I'll do the gravel.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 3>I want to drive.

0:20:00.840 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 6>It's a good question, good time.

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes.

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 4>Punks and music.

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, Brier runs.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Down on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:14.639
<v Speaker 3>All right, TikTok, everybody. You are up to speed on

0:20:14.680 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 3>the markets thanks to Charlie Pellett and Bill Maloney. And

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 3>we're bouncing around here. A little change though on the

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 3>S and P five hundred, slightly lower in the Dow

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Jones Industrial Average, and just up about four ten percent

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 3>on the Nasdaq one hundred. So yeah, as we kicked

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 3>off a couple of hours ago, or almost two hours ago,

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 3>market's really searching for some direction here, Tim.

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's see what Julie Beale has to say about this.

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 6>She's chief market strategist in portfolio manager at Kane Anderson Rudnick.

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 6>She joins us from Santa Monica. We just heard from

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 6>Barry Redholts about sort of the twists and turns of

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.920
<v Speaker 6>the market since the election was yesterday, in your view,

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.719
<v Speaker 6>a turning point, given the rally that we saw, the

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 6>conviction that we saw based on potentially more targeted US tariffs.

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 8>I think that for sure, there was a lot of

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 8>enthusiasm and excitement that you know, maybe this is really

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 8>the moment where there's going to be more clarity and

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 8>we're going to be moving a little bit less quickly

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 8>and more thoughtfully. I think that still remains to be seen,

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 8>and I think the much bigger issue is less how

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 8>the market reacts and more how companies and consumers react,

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.479
<v Speaker 8>because that's really what's going to be driving the markets

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 8>on the long term horizon. And I think you can

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 8>say to most companies, hey, we're going to add these tariffs.

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 8>Oh just kidding, We're not going to do them. You're

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 8>going to be fine now. I think most capital allocators

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 8>are like, there's still the risk that this will change

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 8>really quickly, and I don't want to be caught sideways

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:43.439
<v Speaker 8>on that. So I think there's a lot of still

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 8>underlying concern that even if you do roll back these

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 8>tariffs and make them less deep or less broad, there's

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 8>still this underlying concern. Hey, I don't really know what's

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 8>going to be coming down. It hasn't necessarily been well communicated,

0:21:57.920 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 8>and I don't want to put myself in a risky

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 8>position and where I'm on the wrong side of that.

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.879
<v Speaker 3>All right, So does that mean, Julie, move into cash?

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Move into cash like investments, don't play the equity side

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 3>of things, Like, what do you do then in this environment?

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.879
<v Speaker 8>I think your previous guests really said. What I truly

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 8>believe is that it's really impossible to try to time

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 8>this kind of a market. It is so much desire

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 8>to kind of create and add value by trading, by moving,

0:22:28.640 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 8>by reacting. This is a really good time to be

0:22:31.400 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 8>sitting on your hands. Frankly, I like the Howard Mark statement,

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:37.040
<v Speaker 8>don't just do something, sit there, And I think this

0:22:37.080 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 8>is a real sit there moment. Where as long as

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 8>you have a portfolio that's put together of good quality

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 8>companies that are they themselves able to respond to changes

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.440
<v Speaker 8>in the market, you should be okay. That is better

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 8>off than trying to position for a very specific outcome.

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 6>Well, let's talk about some of those companies that you

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 6>have your eye on. We always love it when our

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 6>guests send us stock picks, especially stocks that we don't

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 6>talk about all the time.

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 3>I want they're not household names.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 6>These are not well for me, they're not household names

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 6>for you either, Carol Now, Okay, co part CPRT is

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 6>the Tickeer. It's down three point three percent year to date.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 6>They provide insurance companies with services to process and sell

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:22.240
<v Speaker 6>salvage vehicles through auctions. It's about a fifty three billion

0:23:22.280 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 6>dollar company. Yeah, what's your view?

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 8>So you know, I think, look, this is we're looking for,

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 8>are these companies that have really durable earning streams even

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 8>in trickier market conditions, trickier economies, so that we don't

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 8>have to be perfectly correct on the macro. And Copart's

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 8>a great example of that, where if you look at

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:47.199
<v Speaker 8>the consistency of their earnings, it's really a demonstration of

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.680
<v Speaker 8>how competitively protected they are. Right, A lot of these

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 8>salvage yards, these are really not things that you want

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 8>in your backyard. They're really hard to permit, they're really

0:23:56.359 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 8>hard to come by, and so they are a really

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 8>valuable asset or once you have it in place and

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 8>you need to build the scale so that you can

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 8>run these very large auctions, so they have a lot

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 8>of competitive protections around them. They're good stewards of capital

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 8>and that is the kind of not flashy, not sexy

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 8>type of business that I'm really attracted to right now.

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 3>All right. Another one is Varisk Analytics. Hopefully I'm saying

0:24:21.920 --> 0:24:24.479
<v Speaker 3>it correctly. This is about a forty billion dollar more

0:24:24.520 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 3>than forty billion dollar company.

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 6>It's kil they're based in Jersey City. It's in your backyard.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 6>You should know this company literally in your backyard.

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea where they are. I'll have to

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 3>look for their address. Who are they? What are they?

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 3>They're up about four percent here year to date.

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 8>So you can think of Varisk as this intermediary where

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.560
<v Speaker 8>they take a lot of the claims insurance data and

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 8>then sell it back to the insurance company so that

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 8>they can do a better job with their underwriting. And

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 8>that is something that started years ago, I think in

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:56.160
<v Speaker 8>the seventies, where the insurance companies got together and said,

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:58.840
<v Speaker 8>if we pool our data and compare it, it will

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 8>be much easier for us to underwrite accurately. And that's

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.400
<v Speaker 8>where this company kind of came to fruition. So Obviously,

0:25:05.440 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 8>these data assets are extremely valuable, and it's pretty awesome

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 8>when your customer actually provides the thing that you sell

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 8>back to them. That's a pretty unique business model and

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.800
<v Speaker 8>there's a lot of regulatory barriers around that too. So again,

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 8>this is a kind of quiet company that not a

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 8>lot of people have heard about, but I would rate

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.360
<v Speaker 8>it as among the highest quality that we own.

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 6>So that's ticker VRSK up four percent year to date.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 6>A company that's flat year to date, Tyler Technologies. This

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 6>is a company that's based in Roslin Heights, New York.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 6>It's twenty five billion dollar market cap. What's your view?

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 8>So Tyler Technology sells software to municipalities, local governments, and

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:53.959
<v Speaker 8>a lot of these cities have this really big challenge

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 8>right now where they don't they're not really able to

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 8>actually have good IT staff and programmers on site, do

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 8>not pay enough for that to really work for them,

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.479
<v Speaker 8>and many of the solutions that they have kind of

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 8>cobbled together are homegrown solutions or companies that just don't

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 8>even exist anymore. You know, Tyler is unique and that

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 8>they have pretty modern software that they're selling to municipalities,

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 8>but they really know this customer better than an oracle

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 8>can ever speak to them. And so most of these

0:26:23.080 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 8>cities are really being able to outsource a lot of

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.120
<v Speaker 8>their it to a company like Tyler, who can take

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 8>that off their hands and run it, you know, in

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 8>a successful way.

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's funny, there's been so much. In fact,

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 3>there are a couple of columns on the Bloomberg today

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 3>from our opinion team Julie about investing overseas versus continuing

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 3>to invest in the United States. What's a smart thought

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 3>about that? What are you doing for your investors? Are

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 3>you expanding in terms of investments overseas? And just got

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 3>about thirty seconds.

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.439
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely. I think what we are seeing right now is

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 8>just a function of Europe just got way too cheap

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 8>relative to the US. I do think that there's renewed

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 8>excitement and fiscal spending that's going to be happening, and

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 8>so that could drive more economic growth. Right now, growth

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 8>estimates are still better for the US than for Europe.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 8>But I think you should be diversified and have exposure

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 8>to both.

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, which were you maybe saying that six months ago

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:21.159
<v Speaker 3>or no, just quickly.

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.879
<v Speaker 8>I think, broadly speaking, I think you should have but

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 8>you really weren't getting paid for having international exposure for

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 8>the last like five six years, right, But I think

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 8>it really.

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 3>Makes sense now, all right, Really appreciate it. Jillie Beale,

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 3>Chief Market Strategi's portfolio manager at Cain Anderson Rednick, joining

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 3>us from Santa Monica, California.

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:45.719
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week Daily podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live weekday

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live weekday on YouTube and

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:03.520
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal