WEBVTT - Does Steve Nash's MVPs Help Or Hurt Chris Paul's Chances To Win One?

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Ninety seven.

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Partly cloudy.

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Cumulone members SPF eighty five.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 2>By the way, all previously reported temperatures are in fahrenheit.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>That good mornings swim. Then welcome to the Now Dungs

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>podcast on the Athletic Network. It's Thursday, April twenty ninth.

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 2>J E.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Skeeds along with my top shot hot boy Trey Kirby

0:00:44.360 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>heyl Hey, the international Man of Mystery, taking it to

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the max Leyelism, and last but not least, making the

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>magic happiness JD. Hello Darius here we are shout out

0:00:57.880 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to the stream team for joining us live right now

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. Smash that like button, leave your comments and subscribe,

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 1>cause tonight at nine pm Eastern. Yeah, we already changed

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the start today for this NBA Happy Hour is now

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.319
<v Speaker 1>game night. Yes, come join your boys on the live

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 1>stream here on YouTube as we play a little Geo guesser,

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little Sparkle quiz. Maybe Lee opens up an

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.039
<v Speaker 1>old pack of F one racing cards. You don't know

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen on Game Night tonight, but anyway, we'll

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>hang out for a couple hours, have a blast, of course,

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>answer your questions and comments that you're dropping in the

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 1>stream team there as well, So join us tonight nine

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern. NBA Happy Hour is now game Night. Okay.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Also email us your questions and comments for the next

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>beach step. In podcasts No Dunks at the Athletic dot com,

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we hit the beach yesterday. We talked about new NBA

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>awards we'd like to see added to the mix. We

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>attempted to agree on, like what actually makes up an

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.880
<v Speaker 1>NBA journeyman, like the criteria for that. That was fun,

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>uh task leading that discussion, and then Lee talked a

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>lot about cars and construction. Real manly Man yesterday's Johnson.

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>Rotten Man Man, that's right, yeah, all.

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah, how's your Stanley bru.

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>You gotta be a hippie, you gotta be way more

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:22.920
<v Speaker 3>into it, you know.

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my bad.

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.399
<v Speaker 1>I've got a grunt like Tim the tool Taylor. Yeah.

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>He was talking a lot about uh again, driving over

0:02:32.200 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>screws and then his screw drivers and.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>The left and right.

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah to stuff from a gang. Go check

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 1>out that beach dub podcast that we posted yesterday, and

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I finally grab your suite No dunks merch over at

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>No dunk dot com. Okay, On today's show. We got

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>tweeted the night we got pick the results. Uh, though,

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll just skip that, you know, I think we'll

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>just gloss over that today nothing important happened. Yeah, we're

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna run back some what you got fun. We had

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a blast doing night yesterday. I got some other ones

0:03:04.639 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>for you guys today, and we'll get to the big

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>games and the big news from a very busy Wednesday

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>night in the Association. But first, Weggie number forty four.

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>It was a prime time Weggie Paul George. Hmm, nice

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>nice wedge there underneath sort of the rim lodged in

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>there against the backboard. So beautiful shot there. I love

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that camera work. And here we are go to weggietracker

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Up to forty four wedgies on the season.

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>We're getting closer and closer to that magic number fifty

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna try and set the all time

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>record on pace for fifty five. We're loving it. So

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>great stuff there from a very entertaining game from the

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Clippers and the Suns. And that's the first game we're

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>starting with here Ley the Suns. The headline is the

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Suns clinch of their first postseason birth in eleven years,

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and they did it in style and once again Chris

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Paul taking over late. But what's the big takeaway for

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you in terms of that game and then making the

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>postseason for a first time in a long time.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, repeat Rinson, repeat there with Chris Paul. Get

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 3>the game close, just give the ball to Chris Paul

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 3>and he'll finish it off, which is incredible stuff. Once again.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:14.000
<v Speaker 3>But look, the turnaround in Phoenix I think has gone

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 3>way better than even they could have hoped for. When

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 3>they traded for Chris Paul in the offseason, it was

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>a look, we desperately want to make the playoffs, and

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 3>I think they probably would have settled for somewhere like

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:24.080
<v Speaker 3>fifth or sixth, you know, to be honest, I think.

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 3>But now they're at the point where they potentially have

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 3>home court advantage for as long as they're in the

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>playoffs because they're only a game back of the Utah Jazz.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 3>They play them tonight, but they already hold the tiebreaker

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 3>against the Utah Jazz, having beaten them twice this season. Now,

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 3>who knows exactly what happens, maybe guys rest to night,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure, but Phoenix to be in this position

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>where you know they could have the best record in

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 3>the league is incredible.

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 3>Chris Paul obviously deserves a ton of credit for that.

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 3>And I think when you saw an Okay, see guys

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 3>like Gilges, Alexander Denis Sruder, they elevated their games. And

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 3>you see it as well with outside of the guys

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 3>of the Stars like Devin Booker and and DeAndre and

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Michael Bridges or macale Bridges, Cameron Payne. Those guys are

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 3>sort of elevating their game. That's not all Chris Paul,

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 3>but I certainly think he has influenced those guys by

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>trusting them. He throws in the ball and he needs

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 3>them to knock down shots and they do. And then

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:16.360
<v Speaker 3>cam Raon Payne, you just see him out there. He's

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 3>just feels confident in his game. And I think again

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 3>the way that Chris Paul plays, these guys just see

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 3>how he plays and they try to sort of play

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.679
<v Speaker 3>the best they can. The Suns offensively, they're great, seventh defense,

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 3>their fifth even better. So you know, things have been

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 3>legit with this team. It's not like they're just sort

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 3>of riding one particular wave. You know, they're balanced well

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 3>they're they're well coached, they're deep, and they've got that

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 3>superstar who is really closing out games for them, which

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 3>is great. Now it becomes a tricky part because obviously

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 3>they're going to make the playoffs and skeezee, you know

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 3>better than anybody, after a long playoff drought, the Raptors

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 3>made the playoffs. Remember, for their first two years, home

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 3>court advantage probably went into both series favorite and they

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:58.479
<v Speaker 3>lost in that first round. So that's going to be

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 3>the real big challenge if the Phoenix Suns. I know,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 3>the Suns fans don't want to hear that. They don't

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 3>want to hear that. They're like, hey, stop hating on

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.919
<v Speaker 3>the Suns. The big difference is the Raptors didn't have

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 3>a Chris Paul in that situation.

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 1>Lowry.

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 3>I think Larry hadn't made the playoffs once, but obviously

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 3>he hadn't gone all that far and he wasn't at

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Chris Paul's level. But you know, that's where the Suns

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 3>do have a big advantage. They're going to have a

0:06:18.880 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 3>guy who's going to be thirty six. He's a veteran.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's played over one hundred playoff games and look,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 3>not all of those have been great, let's be fair,

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.680
<v Speaker 3>but it certainly feels like he's the sort of guy

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 3>who is going to be able to at least steer

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 3>them in the right direction. So I think this is great,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 3>and I'm excited for Phoenix. You know, it's been so

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 3>long and they're back, They're in the playoffs, and now

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 3>it's just going to be okay. Can they translate what's

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>happened in the regular season into playoff success and what

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 3>is a successful season?

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 2>You know?

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Do they have to make the conference finals? I don't

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 3>think so, but I certainly think they have to go

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 3>further than the first round at a minimum to really

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 3>make something out of the season. But it's been an

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 3>incredible turnaround, way better than I think any one realistically predicted.

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Sons have not been there since twenty ten. When

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Nash is throwing oops to Amari Stadameyer trade. It's a

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>long time ten season drought there, tied for fist long.

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>These guys are literally coaching together. Yeah at this point, Yeah,

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 2>wild stuff.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And so here they are. But Chris Paul twenty eight

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and ten last night, Clippers, they didn't know what to

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>do with them again in the fourth quarter, he hit

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>five of his eight shots, scored fifteen. You know, when

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it got tight, when the Clippers pulled within one, it

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>was Chris Paul once again like making consecutive tough baskets

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>there to close it out. He is the closer here.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And you said it, Lee, I mean they're one game

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>back of the Utah Jazz. Let's say the Suns get

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the number one seed, the best record in the NBA. Huh,

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Chris Paul comes there in the first season, gets the

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>best record. Well, we'll get a few former MVPs for

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Phoenix Suns that have done that before. Barkley and his

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>first year with the Suns, right one MVP leading the

0:07:54.280 --> 0:07:56.560
<v Speaker 1>league's the best record there in Phoenix. Same with Steve

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Nash his first one, you know, returning to the Suns

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>in his case, winning MVP and leading them to the

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>best record. A lot of us think Yoki is gonna

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>win MVP and he We're gonna get to him and

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what he did last night. But trait, if the Suns

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>do have the number one record, does Chris Paul have

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>any chance over the final ten or even I guess

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the question, does he have any chance to get like

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>top three top two with what he's doing here recently

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and again the caveat the Phoenix Sun's having the number

0:08:22.640 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>one record in the liague.

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 2>Well Skeets, Now that you mentioned the historical MVPs that

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 2>the Suns have, I think that Chris Paul's gonna win

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 2>it because Charles Barkley shouldn't have won the MVP in

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 2>nineteen ninety three and Steve Nash shouldn't have won it

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 2>in two thousand and five. So maybe they'll give it

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>to Chris Paul because this belongs to Nicoley Jokinz. But

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 2>this guy's gonna get some votes, no doubt about it.

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 2>And I think you're right that top three is certainly

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 2>in the mix at this point. As you know, Chris

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Paul has certainly put the team on his back for

0:08:51.320 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 2>the fourth quarters and the way he is, he's showing

0:08:54.559 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 2>out and doing it every single night, and if they

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>get the number one seed, those are some good arguments,

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 2>especially considering when you're looking at who's gonna come in

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 2>third right now anyways, you're probably saying Jokic, then Embiid

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 2>and then third is maybe a toss up. Steph Curry,

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I would think, was kind of leading that for a while.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.959
<v Speaker 2>But the Warriors obviously are scrapping to stay in the

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 2>play in tournament. Jannis obviously has a case for number

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 2>three as well, but it feels like we're just going

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to kind of ignore that right now. Meanwhile, the Bucks

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 2>are kind of, you know, playing five hundred basketball, just

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.839
<v Speaker 2>waiting for the playoffs, which is really where Yiannis needs

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 2>to show up. So yeah, I can certainly see people

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.680
<v Speaker 2>talking themselves into Chris Paul at least being a top

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 2>three MVP candidate, because it's impossible to deny the impact

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 2>he has. Just look at like Frank Kaminski. He has

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 2>played like thirty five minutes in the past month, score

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 2>thirteen points in thirteen minutes in the first half last night.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.440
<v Speaker 2>They're just like, hey, we need you to shoot your

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.120
<v Speaker 2>threes and do your Frank Kominski stuff. He's like, all right,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I got you. Chris Paul getting the MVP chance, no surprise,

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 2>he should be there, But I don't know. Less and

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>less I'm thinking it's a crazy idea to give Chris

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 2>Paul some MVP votes.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, what you're saying there, Trey is a I saw

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Kazim had a tweet last night that said Chris Paul

0:10:03.200 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>got to blame Steve Nash for not getting real MVP

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 1>consideration because folks are hell bent on never letting that

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>happen again. And there it is any truth to that.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Lee Like does Nash winning you know his MVPs? Like

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>does it help or hurt a guy's chances? Like Chris

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Paul where where the stats are not blowing you away?

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>But of course it's like what he's done, the impact

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 1>on that winning culture, the intangibles, whatever you want to

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:29.160
<v Speaker 1>call it. You know, it is similar to Steve Nash

0:10:29.160 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>in that sense. What do you think about like that

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>tweeting that idea?

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I think Steve Nash went back to

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 3>Phoenix because largely because Mark Cuban didn't think his back

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 3>was going to hold up, and so he didn't want

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 3>to re sign him, and so the Sun said we'll

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 3>take him. And then he rejuvenated that Sun's team, and

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't remember if they finished with the best record

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 3>or not in the in the Western Conference. I was

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 3>certainly up there, but they seem to when he came

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 3>back all of a sudden, you know, he was exactly

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 3>what they would needed for a Mari stardomeron for and

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 3>Sean Marrion and Raja Bell. You know, Raja Bell was

0:10:58.360 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 3>that sort of guy who was like, all of a sudden,

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 3>he's just shooting threes and it's like, this guy's great

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 3>playing alongside Steve Natch. So, but I think with Chris Paul,

0:11:05.559 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 3>it's more the fact that the Sons were like, you know,

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 3>they had a good bubble of course, and I was like, okay,

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 3>he's there and he improved the thunder. What's he going

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 3>to do with the Suns? Are they going to be

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 3>about somewhere in the middle.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>But instead he's.

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Got them, you know, to a point where it's like, wow,

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.680
<v Speaker 3>this is this is so much better than what anyone

0:11:21.760 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 3>was really predicting with them. So the numbers, yeah, they

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 3>sixteen and eight. I think he's only putting up on

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 3>the season. But he's having a much greater significant impact

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 3>on that team and their record than those numbers show,

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.079
<v Speaker 3>because he's doing it late. I don't have the clutch

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 3>stats here. I meant to check those this morning.

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I forgot to. But Phoenix's money in the clyps there's

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>something like twenty and eleven last year.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, see were as well, you know, so it's no

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 3>coincidence that where he goes his team improves.

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's timing as well, isn't it.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, because he's playing so well right now that

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>that is, you know, the freshest recency buyers certainly plays

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 3>a factor. You know, Jokic and the the Nuggets are

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 3>doing well certainly since Jamal Murray went down. But it's

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.200
<v Speaker 3>almost like we've been talking about him so much that

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 3>that maybe he has dropped a little bit in the.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we've been talking about him in the MVP conversation

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 2>for so long that we need to get him out

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.560
<v Speaker 2>of the MVP. Come. Guy made a huge clutch play

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:16.640
<v Speaker 2>last night, I know.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>But if he had faltered here when Jamal Murray went

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>out and the Nuggets last a bunch of games, then

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>this gets really interesting. But that didn't happen. So yeah,

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>that's why, you know what, We're going to make our

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>award picks on tomorrow's Drop podcast. By the way, we're

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>doing that tomorrow. We'll do our top five ballot all

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of that. But he did it like he didn't fall

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>off at all, is the problem. But I'm saying I

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>think that Chris paul Is is definitely, of course at

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the MVP table at this point. I'm with you on that.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And that's what I'm saying. In the more recent

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 3>games and in the recent history, we've seen him step

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 3>up and hit those shots late, win those games for

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 3>his teams, and that just elevates him in the conversation.

0:12:51.640 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>That's all I'm saying. Yeah, yeah, No, he's looked. Chris Paul,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not, has finished top seven in MVP

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 1>bloats like eight times, like a lot, you know, which

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>surprised me a little bit and looking into that, but

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>he'll do that again. I would imagine at least top

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>seven and like we're saying, maybe top five, maybe top three,

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>who knows where he falls. He just like when you

0:13:12.400 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>had Chris Paul to your team at this point, you

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>know what's gonna happen. You're gonna be pretty damn good

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in the clutch, like you said, Lee, because he's got

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good track history of that. He's gonna steady

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the pace, which is where the Suns are, you know,

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like they're they play somewhat slowly. They rank in the

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>bottom third. Because that's again Chris Paul just has his

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>fingers over everything, over everything that you're running out there

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and then you're gonna protect the ball because he's incredible

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at that. So they're a really good team passing the

0:13:36.600 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>ball fourth and assists. They don't turn it over a ton,

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, awesome, you know, sort of assist to turnover

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>ratio there with them, and again that clutch factor. That's

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting from a Chris Paul led team right

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>now at the point guard. And this is wild that

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:50.959
<v Speaker 1>they might have the best record in the league or

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>at least chasing the Jets. So fun stuff. They're really

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>fun game now, Clippers, I like, I hope these teams

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.320
<v Speaker 1>meet somehow in the playoffs because they don't like each other, yeah,

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>which is great. You know, there's some animosity there between,

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>especially like Booker CP three and then sort of Paul

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>George and there's no Kauai for the Clippers. So I

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think everybody's freaking out over that last, though. I

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>will say I don't like the Clippers' chances maybe now

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of going up in the standings anymore. Like that was

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>a big win for Phoenix in that sensely where they

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>might be holding on to it the very least the

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>second seed, like we said, maybe get to first but

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're nice little buffer there a little bit.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Now, yeah, two games, two games and what about eight

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 3>to ten to go? I think sort of depending on

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 3>exactly what their schedules are, but yeah, that would have

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 3>been one of those ones that they would have moved

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 3>to what forty four? Yeah, it would have been still

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 3>one or two losses behind the Suns, but ahead of

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 3>them on victory. So yeah, it's pretty important there for

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 3>the Phoenix Suns to hang on at home against the

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>team they could likely face. But there's enough time, I

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.600
<v Speaker 3>think for the Clippers here just to still over the

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 3>haul and if they if they really get on a

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 3>bit of a hot streak and the Sons do drop

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 3>a game or two, but very very close.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to yell Kitsch, the lead MVP

0:15:01.800 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>front runner. At least he blocks, did he? Zion's lap

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>shot now gets hold off the Pelicans one fourteen, one twelve.

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Zion asked about it after the game, like that critical,

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 1>like nine call there got to earn my respect, he said, So,

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he took it on the chin, But what

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>did you think of that? No call there? Leaves thought

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it was a foul or no that you'll could take

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>something swipe at Zion there as about two seconds left,

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>ingram nice little shovel pass to him. I thought it

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>was really nice. But what'd you think about that play?

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 3>This was as bang bang a players I think you

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 3>can possibly get because he does sort of swipe at him,

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 3>which I think that gives the referees a chance to

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of say, you know what, like that that's a

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 3>foul just because you sort of he sort of winds

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 3>up and hits him there. I went back frame by

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 3>frame over both replaces to see him baby, just to

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 3>see exactly like what happened first, And I think he

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:54.480
<v Speaker 3>gets enough ball first and as way as far as

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I understand the rule, the hand is part of the ball.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 3>If your hand is covering that part of the ball,

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 3>then it's not a fair and I think he gets

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.960
<v Speaker 3>enough of that. There's a little bit of collateral afterwards

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 3>with the with the sort of hand coming down and.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Their head a little bit.

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 3>But overall I'm kind of like, I think that's actually fine.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 3>I think it is it's fine that call he gets.

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 3>He gets enough of it there for me to be like,

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the refs made the right call on that play. So

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 3>you know, the Pelicans obviously upset, not not happy. I

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 3>was hoping Zilla would have a little ride up on

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 3>it this morning, because he's usually pretty accurate.

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't really say anything. He just said it was

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like one line. I was like, come on, they'll give

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>me some more of that.

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 3>But overall, I think it's yeah, you could, you could

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 3>make the case there's a foul, but I think it's

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 3>about a fifty two percent non foul forty eight percent.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 3>I lean a yo kitchen in the nugget's favorite and

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 3>for the ref to not, you know, they decided they

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:45.080
<v Speaker 3>weren't gonna well, he still have had to make free throws,

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 3>of course, but well.

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what's funny about it. I feel like Yo kich

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>was almost trying to foul them in a weird way

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 1>put the line like, at least like we're not giving

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>up the dunker lay up here. I think he even

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>said that after the game. Well, I'm just going to like,

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>at least foul you know, sorry, at least take a

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>hard swipe at yes, and yeah, maybe I hit ball

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>which definitely does make contact, and at the very least

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I prevent him from tying the game up and make

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>him earning at the line. So it's it's it's a

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a close one there. But what would you think.

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Trey clean, super clean, to be complete completely honest. Yeah,

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean Zion maybe in five seasons he gets that call,

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I would say, you know, when he's one of the

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 2>faces of the league, even more so. But Nikola Jokich

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 2>is your MVP right now, so he's getting the calls.

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 2>And I thought maybe maybe he touches Zion's hair a

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.920
<v Speaker 2>little bit at the top, but he doesn't even get

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of hand I don't really think on this block.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 2>He gets the ball pretty cleanly. When you see it

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 2>from behind, it just looks like a massive swipe because

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.960
<v Speaker 2>it is a massive swipe. But I did love Jokic's

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 2>reaction afterwards, just walking back to the bench like no

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 2>big deal, just like he had a game winner, all right,

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 2>game winning blocks. Bought some great quotes from this afterwards.

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:55.639
<v Speaker 2>Stan Van Gundy said, I do think that strength gets

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 2>punished in this league a lot more than quickness. If

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 2>you're able to go through contact a little bit called differently.

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 2>If you fall down every time your hit or you flop,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 2>you get calls. That's just the way it is. It's

0:18:05.119 --> 0:18:07.200
<v Speaker 2>not just just Zion, That's just.

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>The way it is.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 2>Things will never be the same now. Obviously, stan Van

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Gundhy was a Dwight Howard's coach. Dwight Howard went to

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 2>the line a whole bunch of times. He got fouled

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot. But big guys do get refereed differently, I

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.439
<v Speaker 2>do think, And to be quite honest, Zion did go

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 2>down to the ground on that foul call right or

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 2>on that shot attempt right there. But do you guys

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>agree that a strong guy gets officiated differently?

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? I dred percent think so. But also, Zion, isn't

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>he like uh? Is he like second in the league

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>in free through attempts? For somebody's very exactly right exactly

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a second year player, which is damn impressive and deservedly so.

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's at the rim all the time. There's

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a lot of contact. Yeah, I think I

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>think stan Van's got a point. I think it's just

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>much more difficult if you're an official to call that

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the big guys down there. Lely you agree like shot, Yeah,

0:18:57.400 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>it was for sure.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean you could just see Shack he would go there,

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.679
<v Speaker 3>and because he was so big and strong, players were

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 3>able to do things that they weren't allowed to do

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 3>against other guys, and so that was a sort of

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 3>a punishment against I think you see it with Lebron

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 3>too at times. You know, it's like just because he's

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 3>so tough, it's like, well he can take more body

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:16.239
<v Speaker 3>contact than other guys. But that's just again, how you

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 3>interpret the rule, and a refereeing is so very difficult

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 3>because let's say, for example, last night, they called that

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 3>foul and then they defend it after the game, which

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 3>they could have done.

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>The refs.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 3>It's like, sure if they call that, sometimes you know

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:29.199
<v Speaker 3>they didn't. And it's funny because I thought, you know,

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 3>Zion saying as well, he's got to earn his respect,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>which is pretty mature thing of him to say and

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 3>to realize that that's how it goes in the league,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 3>and I thought maybe he could have tried to sell

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 3>it a little bit more, but he sort of did.

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:40.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he goes down, he hits the ground, so

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, there's some physicality on the play, but yeah,

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 3>it's overall, I think it's just it was the right call.

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 3>But you know, you can see why Pelicans see, well,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.320
<v Speaker 3>that's automatically a foul because you know there was the

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of the connection there, but he gets it clean

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 3>enough at the start, and great defensive played from Nikola jokicch.

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know it's almost blue this game, right,

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>They were up nine with like forty five seconds to go. Yeah,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and it was nearly a tie game. You know, if

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Yokich doesn't recover there in time and take a swipe

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>out it.

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, even on that last play, right, that's the only

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 2>reason that Pelicans have it, because Jokich with like an

0:20:14.600 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 2>uncharacteristic turnover in the last ten seconds of the game.

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But great Cowley, I kin I actually forgot that. Stan

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Band Gundhy coached Shaquille O'Neil as well at one point.

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 2>This guy's coached a lot of some solid bigs. The

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.080
<v Speaker 2>other thing I love from stan Ban Gundhy somebody asked

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 2>him if he was gonna teach Zion how to flop.

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 2>He says, I cannot imagine going to a player and

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 2>telling him to start flopping. I can't imagine that's what

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 2>you have to do. I could never bring myself to

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>do that with the player. But what are you gonna do?

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 2>Can you learn how to flop? Well?

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean a guy like Zion. I don't know if

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that's possible, but yeah, other guys, I think Ken, especially

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the smaller you are, I think the easier it is

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to sell that contact, like get out of here too, JG.

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to put this up here. Ingram should have

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>taken that up, maybe get a foul call. He didn't

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 1>want that moment. What the fuck are you talking about?

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Like he just gave it to a guy who's shooting

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 1>like what seventy percent from the floor this year, like

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in a beautiful past. The defense collapsed a little bit.

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a nice play a boy yolkic to again take

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a swipe at it. I think he was like, well,

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 1>screw this if I found my foul and at least

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not a layup. That's a nice play there from Ingram.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Come on, you had me maybe up until that he

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't want that moment. Should have could have what Okay,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't think from the moment there were you talking about?

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah I mean that, but that that is I think

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 3>that is actually the right play from Ingram, because you

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 3>can see he might have been like, maybe I want

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 3>this moment, but instead he found his teammate who was

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.480
<v Speaker 3>rising up and it nearly paid off.

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>Look again, like you know he could have taken a floater, Yeah, absolutely,

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe would have hit it, sure, but he was

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>shoveling it to a teammate who shoots like goddamn, like

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the highest percentage we've ever seen play a bad play,

0:21:57.280 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a great play.

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I would have liked to see Denzel

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Valentine from Brandon right there, just pull up from thirty

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:05.440
<v Speaker 2>five feet. Why not let a rip.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Our final sort of like games here, I'll lumpum together

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's the it's the hottest thing in sports right now.

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>It's the race for the tenth seed. You know, nobody's

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about it and covering it like we are at

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>no dunks. So last night, a few games and a

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>few teams in the mix, of course, Julius Randall and

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks beat your Bulls tray one thirteen ninety four

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 1>for their tenths, winning eleven games. Bulls are trying to

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>get into the playing tournament, and meanwhile the Wizard's trying

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to hold onto that ten seed. While Beale and Westbrook

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>bawling out again, they led their team, the Wizards pass

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the lebron less Lakers one sixteen one O seven TK.

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>How you feeling about your Bulls chances here? With the

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Wizards winning, Bulls lost their what do you think?

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say it. The Knicks are more back

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 2>than the Bulls. Yeah, and the race is over?

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Wow calling it?

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, yeah, I don't know. The Wizards are playing

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.080
<v Speaker 2>too well right now. I can't believe I'm saying that

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the Wizards are playing too well right now. They've got

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 2>the leading scorer in the NBA and the leading assist

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 2>man in the NBA. This is ridiculous stuff. I did

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:13.679
<v Speaker 2>think it was interesting though, that ESPN flexed this Bulls

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Knicks game for Lakers Wizards, and then the NBA called

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 2>in some refs to fix the game for the Knicks,

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 2>thinking that nobody would see it. But I was watching,

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 2>and I saw those dastardly Knicks hitting Daniel Tyson the

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 2>face time and time again, something that Celtics fans literally

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 2>warned me about. They're saying, daniel Tye is gonna get

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>hit in the face all the time and he will

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 2>never get foul calls. That's exactly what happened. I'm kidding.

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 2>The Knicks bullied the Bulls completely in the fourth quarter.

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 2>They really went to another gear defensively. The Bulls couldn't

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.479
<v Speaker 2>get it done with no Zach Lavine. Randall had eight

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 2>in the fourth, quickly had eleven in the fourth. They

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.920
<v Speaker 2>were incredible. And guess what, I'm legitimately happy for all

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 2>my Knicks fans friends, Jason Concepcion, Seth Rosenthal, Jack Settlement,

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:01.800
<v Speaker 2>and of course Lee Ellis watching that game last night, ma'am.

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>It felt good in my heart. I can't deny it

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 2>to you guys, seeing the Knicks have a starter out

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 2>there that nobody wants starting. I loved it. Elfred Payton,

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>You're the new Keith Bogans. Why are you starting all

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 2>these games because Tom Thibodeau's there. I love that part too.

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Three huge parts of the twenty eleven Bulls in Thibbs

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Rose and obviously TODJ. Gibson, And of course I love

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 2>seeing Julius Randall in the game taking threes with the

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Knicks up twenty and a minute and a half left.

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I was like the rudy guy, slow clap. I remember this,

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.560
<v Speaker 2>this is my kind of shit right here. I'm gonna

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 2>have to take some lessons in how to become a

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Knicks fan because that was nice last night. I can't

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.479
<v Speaker 2>deny it. The Knicks are back and the Bulls are

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 2>blowing it. I saw a stat they haven't been over

0:24:48.320 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 2>five hundred in the past four seasons.

0:24:50.200 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Whoa, yeah, wow, yeah, so they've never actually been back

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:55.880
<v Speaker 1>at all.

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 2>All time? When do you put it that way? Sense

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 2>their back ski its I don't make pro sense. Still

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 2>not bad.

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was very similar actually that Balls lost to

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the Next oddly to the Raptors losing to the Nets

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the night before there where it was like a coose

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>game for three quarters they're in it and then like

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like the Next did to the Balls, the Nets did

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Raptors, put the clamps on them and just

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>ran away in the fourth quarter. And it was like

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a dominant win there, and those two

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>teams not looking good. Lely, your Bradley Beal is going

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>to be on the playing tournament for you man. You

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>must be happy. Yeah, I am.

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 3>It is amazing watching the Wizards right now because they

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 3>are kind of fun to watch, you know.

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>They just get out and run.

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 3>And that was going up against the Lakers team obviously

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 3>no Lebron, but Davis played a heavy minutes and this

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 3>was an important game.

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>For them, and they stood up to the challenge.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:51.640
<v Speaker 3>And last night was one of those nights where there's

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 3>so many games on you just don't even know what

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 3>sort of game to tune into because the Knicks Bulls

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 3>was legitimately like, I want to watch this. I think

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 3>this one, this one's going to be fun and and manual. Quickly,

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:04.880
<v Speaker 3>he's quickly becoming well, no pun intended there, but one

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 3>of my fun favorite guys to watch it because he

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 3>just gets.

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Out there and flings it. He doesn't care where.

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 3>He is on the court, and he's got the you know,

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 3>he's got the hype going as well, so I think

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 3>he's going to quick again quickly become a fan favorite

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 3>there of the Knicks because he just goes out there

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 3>and believes in himself. You know, for a rookie, he's

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.160
<v Speaker 3>not afraid of the moment. He's not afraid of where

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 3>he is on the court. If he's open, he's shooting

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 3>it and it's going in. So that was great. But yeah,

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 3>the Wizards, this is this is a big turnaround as well,

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 3>because they were just so gross to watch earlier this

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:37.679
<v Speaker 3>season and it was like, be you're putting up just

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 3>those Remember he went on that run where he's just

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 3>putting up forty every night and they were losing it. It

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 3>was like, what's the point? And now they're you know,

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 3>playing at the right time, and they're going to be

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 3>tough in that first playing round. You know, whoever they play,

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:53.120
<v Speaker 3>they're going to feel pretty confident again against because you know,

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.239
<v Speaker 3>you just have to play hard, and they do that

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 3>right now, and they've got the two stars that are

0:26:58.920 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 3>tough to defend.

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 2>So this is this.

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know where it's gonna go for the Wizards,

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 3>how this season's gonna win, but certainly Westbrook again another

0:27:06.560 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 3>triple double being in that sort of like everyone's written

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.919
<v Speaker 3>us off, no one believes in us. Westbrook kind of

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 3>loves that situation.

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So true.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't know who they will face. I mean,

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 3>it does change the take off.

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:19.959
<v Speaker 1>They'll they're likely going to play the Pacers if that

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>stays a nine to ten games, So I think most

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>people would take Washington the way they're playing right now,

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they're struggling, Yeah, exactly. So then the Wizards move on

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to then likely play the loser of like a Heat

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Hornets game. It could be still the Celtics in that game.

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's call it Heat Hornets. You know, let's say the

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Hornets lose that game. So yeah, Wizards Hornets to see

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>who gets the eighth seeds. Again, I think most people

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>would probably be backing Washington right now. You're right, Lee,

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>like they might be one of the favorite teams to

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>get from the play and turn it actually into the playoffs. Yeah,

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair soough for sure.

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 3>And then if we got Westbrook versus Hottening Durant in

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 3>that first round, I mean.

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>Right, I said that a couple of weeks ago. I

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, sign me up for that. I mean, it'd

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:00.719
<v Speaker 1>be at least a juicy storey lying to a one

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 1>eight matchup. Yeah, yeah, at the very least. So all right,

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>not looking good for the Bulls. Not looking good for

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>my zombie Raps as they continue to sort of lose

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ground here on the Wizards. Well, I gotta hope at

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>this point, Tray, that the Pacers just like keep losing

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:14.400
<v Speaker 1>from here on out.

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe that's more likely, that's the most likely scenario at

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 2>this point, But we might be seeing some crazy lineups

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 2>on that May thirteenth game between the Raptors and Bulls.

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 2>If both of them are locked in out of the

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.439
<v Speaker 2>play in tournament, Like, what are we going to be

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 2>watching here? So literally it's going to be Ryan Archie

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Diakano versus Malachi Flynn. Just the one on one game.

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I love my stuff.

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all right, let's get to a little what you

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 1>got brought to you by the Zebra.

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 2>What's it?

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Good?

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? A little what you got again here brought to

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>you by the Zebra. Sticking with like some of the

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 1>games and storylines from last night. First one, guys, the

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Utah Jazz made twenty four to threes, bounced back from

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 1>consecutive losses, set a franchise scoring record one fifty four

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>to one oh five over the Kings, my goodness. And

0:29:09.560 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>then we had Jaalen Brown scoring thirty eight, Tatum outing

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thirty five. Celtics rebounded from an embarrassing loss a night

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>earlier with the one twenty one to eleven victory over

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the Hornet. So, Lee, what you got question is you

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>know what was the better bounce back? When was it

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Jazz or the Celtics.

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 3>It's the Celtics for me, because they had a real

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.960
<v Speaker 3>embarrassing loss at home the night before against the thunder

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 3>the team that just couldn't hasn't been able to beat

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 3>anybody for months, it seems, so the Celtics had to

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 3>sort of go out there last night.

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Against a good opponent.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure the Hornets are shorthand at the moment though,

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Heyward know la mellow ball, but they got beaten by

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 3>the Hornets just last week by twenty points, so this

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 3>was kind of like a all right, we're got to

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 3>go out there and show this team's better. Tatum came back,

0:29:49.440 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 3>but then the Celtics actually lost Marcus Smart just before

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 3>the game. He got suspended for apparently threatening a referee

0:29:56.200 --> 0:29:58.560
<v Speaker 3>or abusing a referee, so they sort of were short

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 3>hand a little bit there, but they came out in

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 3>that first quarter build a big lead, a.

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Twenty point lead. Hornets made it a game, though.

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 3>The Hornets got back into this one late in the fourth,

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.239
<v Speaker 3>but the Celtics closed it out, and yeah, you want

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 3>you want to see your two all stars basically just

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 3>say we're not losing this game, and that's what they did.

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 3>Brown and Tatum were fantastic, and then the role players

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>chipped in. So I think it's that one. I mean,

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 3>the Jazz you know you can I don't think you

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 3>can get to take a revenge game against the Kings,

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Especially when they're short headed. Uh.

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, the Jazz I thought like their losses to

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 3>the Wolves were actually like, you know, the Wolves.

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Played hard and played played well.

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 3>So you know, putting up one hundred and fifty on

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>the Kings is like, that's not fair. You've got to

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.440
<v Speaker 3>You've got to beat at least a reasonable opponent. So okay, yeah,

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Celtics for me.

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so the being town boys the better bounce back

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>when Trey you agree.

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow, yeah, But I mean it honestly just comes down

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to the Kings having really bad timing with the Jazz

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 2>having lost those two games against the timber Wolves and

0:30:55.480 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 2>still having something to play for trying to keep that

0:30:58.280 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 2>number one seed. So yeah, I mean shooting sixty four

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty four points in regulation, Like, I

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 2>don't know, the Kings scored a lot of points. I mean,

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, in today's game, one hundred and five isn't

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 2>a ton, but you're still over one hundred and he's

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 2>still almost lost by fifty. That's quite the bounce back.

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.160
<v Speaker 2>That's a big bounce back right there. So yeah, I mean,

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 2>the Celtics obviously had a better win. They're obviously playing

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:24.840
<v Speaker 2>for something as well. But man, one hundred and fifty

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 2>four points, that's.

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>A lot of points. Yeah, it is a ton Matt Thomas,

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.240
<v Speaker 1>former Rappet players seven ver seven in that game, seventeen

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>points in nine minutes. He got it up. He hit

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>three threes, but everybody was scoring for Utah. But I'm

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>with you, I think, you know, especially like Jayalen Brown

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>had sort of like called out his team after that

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing loss to the Thunder and my godly he backed

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that up. Yeah, Like he came out and he out

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>scored the Hornets in the first quarter. Didn't he have

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>like twenty or twenty one points after the first twelve

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 1>minutes and they had He single handedly had a lead

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>over Charlotte, So that that was a good win. And

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you're right with with that late sort of Marcus smart

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>scratch there for what he did. Good goodwin, good bounce

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>back win. All right, our next one, I'm gonna show

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you a little footage here on the old stream team

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Bam getting the best of teenage mutant Ninja Purtle last night,

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>dunking all over his head. And then we had really

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Hatchamura dunking on Anthony Davis on the fast break, popping

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>them there in the face. So both big big dunks.

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Question is which one was the bigger dunk, Bam or

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Ruey Trey what you got?

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 2>A lot of things the factor into this, Skeets, including

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 2>the titles on the highlights. These come to you from

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:44.960
<v Speaker 2>MLG Highlights, a solid highlights channel. Bam detonated on Yakam

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Purdle like dynamite dunk versus Rui. Hachimura murders Anthony Davis

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 2>with monster duck.

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a tough call right there.

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 2>You're going with the dynamite dunk detonation or the monster

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>dunk murder. You mentioned it there, Skeets, Ruey gets some

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 2>points because he dunked on Anthony Davis. Pearl's no slouch

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 2>at the rim, but Ad at all time great caliber

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 2>of defender, still returning from injury, so maybe not at

0:33:13.280 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 2>his key prowess, but nonetheless you're taking Ad as a

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 2>defender over Peardle. I do think there's a little more

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 2>ferocity for ruly Hatchamura, but I'm ultimately gonna go with

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Bam here because, as you said, Skeets, Ruey basically punches

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 2>a d in the face as he's going up for

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 2>this dunk, which makes it look awesome, especially the pictures

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 2>of it, like Anthony Davis just flailing back, he's grabbing

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 2>his nose afterwards, but not quite as clean of a

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.720
<v Speaker 2>dunk for Ruy. Bam is just straight up body to

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 2>body with pearl up at the top, and then of

0:33:44.680 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>course he simply detonates him with a dynamite dunk. So

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:51.240
<v Speaker 2>give me Bam a dynamite dunk from a guy named Bam.

0:33:51.280 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 2>It's perfect.

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Lee, what you got Bama? RUI?

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think BAM's was probably a big a dunk.

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.840
<v Speaker 3>But Ruy gets Anthony Davis. I think that's one you

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 3>want for the Harlot real spish because Davis is kind of,

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, hurt after the play. He's like that, it's

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 3>it's like you got him and there was no fount.

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's like the fast Break variety posts. But you

0:34:08.640 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>know it's not as it's not as crazy to me,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I think Bam runs away with this.

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:14.600
<v Speaker 4>Nah.

0:34:14.880 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 3>I think I think you've got to You've got to

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 3>discount just the fact like Purdole isn't it isn't a

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.040
<v Speaker 3>bad defender. But it's just like who would rather have

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 3>on your on your you know, on your on your list.

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 3>You'd say, man, I smashed one over Anthony Davis. People,

0:34:26.600 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh wow, Anthony Davis.

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 1>It's big, huge, it's big.

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 3>But I would just rather have Anthony Davis on my

0:34:35.400 --> 0:34:36.719
<v Speaker 3>You know, if you're like a hunter and you've got

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 3>the heads up on the wall, you know, as a dunker,

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.879
<v Speaker 3>you've got the you've got the Anthony Davis trophy up there.

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So which which teenager and ninja turtle would you most

0:34:47.040 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like to dunk? Only if you had it's like to

0:34:49.000 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>dunk on and they get their weapon.

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Wow, Raphael had those one of those. Yeah, Michelangelo had

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 3>the nun chucks. Yeah, Leonardo the big sword, didn't he?

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>And then Donna tell yeah the staff.

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 3>I would say probably Leonardo because you know, I mean

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that's a that's a that's a blade that he's got there.

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's true, you know, I mean, because I think

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Donna Tella could just like sort of body you off

0:35:18.120 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 3>with that.

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But cross check.

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, in hockey, that's right.

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 3>So if a guy's got an actual kind of machete

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 3>and you're dunking over him, I think that that it

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 3>takes some balls.

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, same question, though you can also include Bebop,

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>rock Steady and Krang Casey's.

0:35:40.160 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 2>Casey Jones might be the hardest to dunk on since

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 2>he is wearing football pads and carrying a hockey stick

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 2>at all times. That's gonna be tough. He's got a

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of reach and a lot of strength. I think

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 2>it would be most fun to dunk on Raphael because

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 2>he would be so pissed. Yeah, if you dunked on him,

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 2>he would get up, probably stab you with a with

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 2>a sigh, and then he's ejected and you got a

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:02.240
<v Speaker 2>ball against April O'Neil.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Anthony Davis could have used the Casey Jones mask.

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah too.

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Ed he wasn't rocking that all right. That's a fun

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>question for everybody in the stream team which teenage ninaternal

0:36:14.280 --> 0:36:16.720
<v Speaker 1>character would most like the dunk on? You're only getting

0:36:16.719 --> 0:36:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that stuff here from no dunk I'm telling you you're

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>not seeing that anywhere else today.

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I love it. It's a perfect poll too, four options.

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, our final one here. CJ. McCollum had

0:36:27.520 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty six points. Norman Powell out of twenty four helped

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the Blazers solidify their hold on the seventh place in

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the West one thirty one oh nine victory over the

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Grizzlies there last night. The win moves Portland two games

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.200
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Memphis, so they're still matched up in the

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>playing tournament seven eight. But Portland's two games up on

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Memphis and San Antonio there and now just a half

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:50.600
<v Speaker 1>game back from the Dallas Mavericks, who are still in

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the sixth seeds. So I guess the question is here,

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.440
<v Speaker 1>who's going to avoid that play? Interny, who would you

0:36:55.480 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>be putting money on to stay out of that seventh

0:36:58.520 --> 0:37:01.320
<v Speaker 1>seed and keep the sixth seed is but the Mavericks

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>or the Blazers trade what you got.

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm being a big time floppity flipper on this one

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 2>because I was going Dallas as of last Thursday and

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Thursday nights, Porzingis rolls his ankle, so on Friday I

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 2>went with Portland. But now the MAVs have gone two

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 2>and one without Kristaps Porzingis. He's questionable for tonight's game.

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 2>We'll see if he plays, but either way, it's not

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 2>going to be long. So now I'm back on the MAVs.

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 2>But it really comes back to the MVP ballot talk

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 2>that we had yesterday on the whole of the season.

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Dame and Luca, I think, are having very similar years,

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 2>similar stats, their team's records are the same, both teams

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.760
<v Speaker 2>have had a lot of players miss a lot of games.

0:37:37.800 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Their initials are even opposites LD and DL crazy stuffs.

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 2>But it feels like Luca is peaking right now, whereas

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 2>Dame looks like he's been carrying the Blazers for the

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.320
<v Speaker 2>entire season and he's just came back from a hamstring injury.

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Just looks like he's still rounding into form. Whereas Luca

0:37:57.760 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 2>it feels like he's going to hit a game winner

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 2>every single night, even though that's clearly not the case

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 2>with what's happening. But it feels like the MAVs did

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 2>a good job to survive with poor Zingis out for

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:09.840
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of time. Here, got a couple of wins.

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 2>He's going to be coming back soon, which bodes well

0:38:12.200 --> 0:38:15.120
<v Speaker 2>for the Mavericks as well. So I think it's Dallas,

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 2>but you know, I reserve the rights to change my mind,

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 2>new information, new decisions.

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's close right now. I believe they

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.760
<v Speaker 1>have the same amount of wins Ley and the MAVs

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>are maybe just a game short right now, you know,

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like they have one less loss. Yes, so who you

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.839
<v Speaker 1>going This is a tough question, But who's more likely

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to avoid it? And just say in the six seat Dallas,

0:38:37.800 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Sir Portland.

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:41.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well the Blazes have the tie breakout, which could

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 3>be key in that in that matchup.

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 1>But looking look safe in a hotel room.

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Looking at the schedule though, it clearly favors the Mavericks

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 3>for me because they have a much easier schedule to

0:38:53.440 --> 0:38:56.560
<v Speaker 3>got the Pistons, the Kings, the Cavs twice, they got

0:38:56.560 --> 0:39:00.200
<v Speaker 3>the Raptors, and then they finish with the they finish

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.240
<v Speaker 3>with the Minnesota Timberwolves, whereas the Blazers have still got

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:08.880
<v Speaker 3>like Brooklyn, Boston, the Lakers, the Spurs, the Jazz, the Suns,

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.520
<v Speaker 3>and the Nuggets to close out. So now we know

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 3>as well, like sometimes those last two or three games

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 3>there's literally no one playing for teams. It just sort

0:39:16.200 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 3>of depends on where they are in the standings and

0:39:18.520 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 3>if they just want to get their guys a little

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.279
<v Speaker 3>bit a bit extra rest. But just looking at that,

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:24.759
<v Speaker 3>I would say that the MAVs have a more winning

0:39:24.840 --> 0:39:26.840
<v Speaker 3>ball schedule, so I think they get in and I

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 3>think that they avoid the play in which I believe

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:31.399
<v Speaker 3>was the question. Yes, I think the MAVs of all.

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Okay, okay, look, I'm already getting like sort of like

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>chills in trying to figure out who I'm going to

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 1>be taking in like playoff matchups and like because we like,

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of course, like everybody, we're going to do like playoff

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>previews and ultimately predictions and like, oh, team X and

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in four games, TEAMX in five games. Yes, it's like,

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. You start looking at some of these

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:55.200
<v Speaker 1>matchups already, and a big part of it, like let's

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>be honest, is because the Lakers are so far down

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and then they're going to be adding Lebron and you're

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like you almost feel bad for the Nuggets. It's like

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:05.640
<v Speaker 1>so many of these matchups currently as is, and this

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>is without even knowing some of the play in tournament

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.439
<v Speaker 1>winners getting in there for as the seventh and eight seat.

0:40:10.440 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I don't know, I think there's gonna be

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.480
<v Speaker 1>so many where you're like, I guess that'll probably go seven,

0:40:16.520 --> 0:40:18.279
<v Speaker 1>and I have no clue I'll flip a coin on

0:40:18.320 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>whether you know, just for example, like a Sun's Mavericks

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>matchup or a Suns Blazer's matchup. For crying out loud,

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is very still tight, so I can't wait

0:40:27.120 --> 0:40:28.879
<v Speaker 1>for it getting awful close. What are we two weeks

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>away from? Basically not long the play in tournament and

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 1>then and then the playoffs starting soon after that. Oh,

0:40:34.960 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>very exciting stuff. Well what is that sound and we

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:39.920
<v Speaker 1>hear that one?

0:40:40.239 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, something crazy by?

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 3>Well there's a truck that drove by, But it wasn't

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it didn't seem super weird.

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:50.799
<v Speaker 2>Old noticed in there.

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it was. Let's hear from all

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of you guys out there, all your answers to those

0:40:55.600 --> 0:40:57.200
<v Speaker 1>what you got questions? Leave them in the stream team

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>we've been in the YouTube comments, or tweet them in

0:40:59.600 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>at no dunks in Okay.

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Time for tweet to the night, Tweet out the night. Wow.

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Pretty simple tweet of the night for today. It comes

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:21.320
<v Speaker 2>to us from Tim Reynolds of the AP down in Miami.

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.280
<v Speaker 2>It's simply a picture of what may be the greatest

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 2>misspelled jersey in NBA history, the Dwayne Deadman wearing the

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:35.920
<v Speaker 2>Miami Vice two tone jersey and it's spelled d ed

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 2>m A and straight up dead Man this is awesome.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Usually a misspelled jersey is just something that looks hilarious

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:50.319
<v Speaker 2>when you see it, like Andre Drummond with three m's

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 2>or Eric beldsoe, yes, this is dead Man. This is awesome,

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 2>like you're saying, skeets, this is straight up the Undertaker.

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 2>These jerseys didn't get great reviews compared to the Miami

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Vice jerseys of the past couple of seasons, but this

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 2>is a must have one. If you can actually get

0:42:07.480 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 2>the Dwayne Deadman dead Man jersey, that would be major

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 2>stuff because eventually he switched into a standard d ed

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 2>m O N. I think for the second half, a

0:42:17.280 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 2>straight up Dwayne Deadman jersey, but a dead Man jersey fire.

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Lee, what do you think of that? You like

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 1>that better than the actual spelling is?

0:42:25.400 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:25.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 3>Why wouldn't you just say just keep it like that

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 3>from now on?

0:42:28.960 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why not?

0:42:30.040 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 3>It suits those jerseys, and you know he's a sort

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 3>of big intimidating guy as well, so you know, I

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:37.279
<v Speaker 3>think it fits his persona as well.

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, does he have any sort of WrestleMania streak going

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that we need to know about. I guess that one's

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.400
<v Speaker 1>done right for the actual Undertaker, I guess brock defeated

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that or snapped that right.

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think I think he was twenty one in

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.879
<v Speaker 2>zho at the time that brock Lesnar beat him, right,

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 2>Which is pretty crazy because Dwayne Deadman wears number twenty

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.960
<v Speaker 2>one skits whoa the Undertaker. He literally needs to get

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 2>his hands on this jersey, I think, because, like you're saying, League,

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Dwayne Deadman is big. He's seven feet two forty five

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 2>is what he's listed at. The Undertaker is huge as well.

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.719
<v Speaker 2>He could wear this jersey. Yeah, Dwayne Deadman had to

0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:14.239
<v Speaker 2>hook up the Undertaker's what I'm saying.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the Undertaker played hoops too, didn't he, like back

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in probably his high school days because he was a

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>big dude.

0:43:20.280 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think so, And I think you're exactly right.

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Him and Kevin Nash. Kevin Nash was like recruited in

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.279
<v Speaker 2>the same class as Magic Johnson or something like that,

0:43:28.360 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 2>like Magic Johnson was the number one recruit in the

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:33.600
<v Speaker 2>nation and Kevin Nash was number two. Seriously, something crazy

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:35.839
<v Speaker 2>like that. Hey, in the seventies, if you were over

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:39.000
<v Speaker 2>seven feet tall. Yeah, you're gonna be getting basketball. Yeah,

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 2>that's exactly right.

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's see if we can get that jersey, that

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.239
<v Speaker 1>error jersey, into the hands of the actual Undertaker. Yeah,

0:43:45.280 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 1>why not, that'd be that'd be a cool ass jersey

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>for him to rock. Actually, totally, he could pull it off.

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Get back on his chopper, turn back into the American badass.

0:43:52.880 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh I love it. Okay, good tweet of the night.

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:57.880
<v Speaker 1>There a great catchup. You know it could have been

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in the running for Worst of the Week. Actually sometimes

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we do that. But tomorrow on the Drop podcast, we're

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.200
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of us a week because we're going long

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.479
<v Speaker 1>on the awards. I already teased this a couple of times.

0:44:08.520 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>We're making all of our picks for the six major awards, MVP,

0:44:13.880 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Most Improved sixth Man, Rookie, Defensive Player of the Year,

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:21.719
<v Speaker 1>and everybody's favorite award, the Coach of the Year. That's right.

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So we'll make our picks for all those. Like I said,

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:26.959
<v Speaker 1>we'll even flush out the MVP pick. You know who

0:44:27.080 --> 0:44:29.279
<v Speaker 1>is at the table, who's.

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 3>In the final call for the table tomorrow.

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right, this be it. So we'll start doing that.

0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But that stuff usually takes a while, so you know,

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna like get rid of a couple of

0:44:40.640 --> 0:44:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the other things that we sometimes have in the Drop podcast. Also,

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>JD is like still trying to like basically flip a

0:44:46.040 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 1>house over there. We're gonna start a little earlier tomorrow too,

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to join us live at nine am

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on YouTube for the Drop Podcast. So yeah, NBA

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 1>Award talk heavy stuff there tomorrow next week. By the way,

0:44:57.760 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we got a couple of guests lined up to join

0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 1>us here on the show. That'll be fun, all right.

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Pick them results brought to you by Bett MGM. You know,

0:45:05.080 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I swerved. I took the Hornets. I had to. Everybody

0:45:07.600 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>else had Boston to win by eight or more. The

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 1>line was seven and a half Celtic's favor and man,

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was just gonna maybe maybe maybe pull

0:45:17.080 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>it out because there was a couple plays at the end.

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>There was a dumb foul on Tata like they tried

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to trap and they did the whole thing anyway, Celtics

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.520
<v Speaker 1>just covered and I'm done. I have now lost two

0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:32.759
<v Speaker 1>consecutive months. I'm eight and twelve Task finishes twelve and eight,

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Train and leate eleven and nine, So good on you, guys.

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I got too far behind. You just can't get behind

0:45:38.360 --> 0:45:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in the pickup because then you start panicking and you

0:45:40.600 --> 0:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>do start swerving when you probably shouldn't. But that's what

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.759
<v Speaker 1>happened with me. And yeah, I've been garbage the last

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 1>two months, so I owed two payoffs. There's some talk

0:45:49.120 --> 0:45:52.800
<v Speaker 1>going around of just saving it till the postseason to

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:56.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, help us with content in the summer and

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:58.359
<v Speaker 1>really do something worthwhile. You know, I'm not gonna sit

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>here and eat an Herby sandwich. Okay, I'm not doing that,

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh though I already did just chug a beer once

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 1>as a pickup payoff. Also lame, also lame. We can

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 1>do better, so we will. Uh, don't you worry? Won't

0:46:11.160 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>be forgetting about these uh these losses and me having

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to pay it off. But if you have suggestions, let

0:46:15.760 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>us know, write us in, email him, email him in,

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:22.239
<v Speaker 1>No dunkink athletic dot com, tweetm in and no dunk sinc.

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>What I should do for any of these payoffs or

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:26.399
<v Speaker 1>do I just at this point guys would just take

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>two sort of small payoffs and merge them into one

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>like Mega payoff one giant. I mean that's a possibility

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 1>to if we come up with something brutal. I think

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.719
<v Speaker 1>that might be fair. But again, a serious suggestions we

0:46:38.760 --> 0:46:41.280
<v Speaker 1>won't make. We won't make any picks for tonight months

0:46:41.280 --> 0:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>basically over. We will do a short month for me. Well,

0:46:45.040 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll have like two weeks of action. I guess we

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 1>don't do this in the playoffs in terms of the

0:46:49.800 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>pick them, but we'll do it for the rest of

0:46:51.560 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the regular seasons. And maybe we'll just make that one

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's so short, like I don't know, some donation

0:46:56.320 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. We just got to pony up

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:00.719
<v Speaker 1>some dough to a good cause. So we'll come up

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:02.359
<v Speaker 1>with something like that. So don't you worry. We'll start

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>it back up. He started me there, all right, sort

0:47:05.120 --> 0:47:06.960
<v Speaker 1>of a quicker show. It's all good, everybody all right

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:09.080
<v Speaker 1>with that? Guys, goold, want to get out of here.

0:47:09.160 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, you want to just tap dance for

0:47:10.719 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 2>thirteen minutes? Now, get it to an hour?

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Not really, We're gonna have a bit of a shorter

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>one here. Again. Jad's very very busy.

0:47:16.200 --> 0:47:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Hey, well, well we've got a little bit of talking

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 3>about I saw interaction with Chris Hayes there too yesterday

0:47:22.600 --> 0:47:25.160
<v Speaker 3>because after the tweet that I had saying about him

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:27.239
<v Speaker 3>and doctor Fauci talking to the trash to each other.

0:47:27.320 --> 0:47:29.800
<v Speaker 3>So if anyone's got a contact for Chris Hayes and

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 3>he wants to come on the show and talk his

0:47:31.560 --> 0:47:34.040
<v Speaker 3>basketball talk, let him know, let.

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Him know, let us know it. Basically went back on

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Twitter saying like he's got you know, do you know

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.120
<v Speaker 1>how small thing he is? And he's got like sixty

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:43.640
<v Speaker 1>pounds on him, Like he's like too small, He's got.

0:47:43.440 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 2>To kick the takes Fauji into the post banks in

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:50.120
<v Speaker 2>a banker runs back down doing the little stand thing.

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Too small, Fauji, too small.

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, I actually have a rapid fire question off

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of that tomorrow, Lely, So don't you worry. Okay, I

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 1>think it'd be fun that if we can make that

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:02.399
<v Speaker 1>game actually happen. I'll tease it right now for you guys.

0:48:02.400 --> 0:48:04.719
<v Speaker 1>You're hearing this question for the first time right here,

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:08.439
<v Speaker 1>this second. If they could play a game for charity, right,

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Hayes versus Fauci. Okay, that's the that's the main event.

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But let's say you guys were the undercard, which random celebrity,

0:48:16.840 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 1>would you like to challenge to a game of one

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:20.959
<v Speaker 1>on one to sort of get us in the mood

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:23.839
<v Speaker 1>for that for that heavyweight one on one battle between

0:48:23.880 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Hayes and Fauti. So start thinking it over, everybody, start

0:48:26.160 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 1>dropping your suggestions for these guys. I'll be asking Ley

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Trey and Task that on tomorrow's Drop podcast again nine

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>am Eastern starts, so it'll get up in your podcast

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.359
<v Speaker 1>feed a little bit earlier than normal, as well as

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we do our NBA award picks and some rapid fire

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:43.800
<v Speaker 1>fun and all that. Please like comments, subscribe to No

0:48:43.880 --> 0:48:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Dunks on YouTube. Email us your questions and comments for

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:47.400
<v Speaker 1>the next beat step in podcast No Dunks at the

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Athletic dot com, Tweet them in at No dung Sinc.

0:48:49.760 --> 0:48:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I NC. Grab your No Dunks merchover at No dunks

0:48:52.280 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com and join us Tonight, yes, Thursday, April twenty ninth,

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for those keeping track for our first ever really NBA

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Happy Our Game night. There's no games on TNT tonight

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>because there's some weird thing called the NFL Draft, So

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we're gonna try something new here, maybe a

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:13.880
<v Speaker 1>little geo guesser, some sporkle quizzes, uh, some some pop

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:15.319
<v Speaker 1>and some packs. Who knows what else.

0:49:16.480 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 2>It's funny you mentioned popping packs. I just came up

0:49:18.400 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 2>with a new name for this that we could call

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 2>what we're doing tonight game night. Everybody does it? What

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:24.839
<v Speaker 2>about game time?

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:27.960
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind that at all. Yeah, And when things

0:49:32.560 --> 0:49:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get tight, it's crunched time at the end of the sport.

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>This time is running out, all right, So join us tonight.

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:43.840
<v Speaker 1>That's nine pm Eastern live on YouTube. Guys, just subscribe

0:49:43.880 --> 0:49:45.879
<v Speaker 1>to us on new YouTube so you know when we're

0:49:45.880 --> 0:49:48.879
<v Speaker 1>going live. You get that little notification button. You're told

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:51.040
<v Speaker 1>when we're going live. That'll be fun. We'll see it then.

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh clipper bros. You heard it here first.

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 2>Have a great time, turn up. Love you guys, awesome,

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for joining us. Sam. Remember Willie Nelson once smoked

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 2>weed on the roof of the White House with the

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 2>President's son. That's a true story. Happy birthday, Willie Nelson.

0:50:09.080 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Happy birthday to my father in law higas well. Brace

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the day people. You could stay ooo every day.

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 4>And Daggy happy every minute.

0:50:23.440 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It's been so long that your dolna waiting for.

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:31.919
<v Speaker 4>Its happened already it's

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Gonna be Grevy.