Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us.
Speaker 2: Right down our toll free telephone number if you want
Speaker 2: to be a part of the program, it is eight
Speaker 2: hundred and ninety four one Sean if you want to
Speaker 2: join us. You know, pretty amazing here you have President
Speaker 2: Trump and we've gone through the list of areas you know,
Speaker 2: around the world, India, Pakistan, Iran and Israel and Armenian,
Speaker 2: Azerbaijan and Cambodia and Rwanda and you know, the Congo,
Speaker 2: and it goes on and on and on that the
Speaker 2: President has expended political capital in the name of trying
Speaker 2: to negotiate a peace.
Speaker 1: He's used the power of tariffs.
Speaker 2: This is going to be a very very important, critical
Speaker 2: Supreme Court decision, I do believe. While constitutionally, you know,
Speaker 2: you can understand the argument about Congress having issues and
Speaker 2: power over tariffs, but the president also needs it for
Speaker 2: his constitutional authority and role. And this president, more than
Speaker 2: any other, is using it, the tariff issue as a
Speaker 2: leverage point for him to prevent wars.
Speaker 1: And that's a big deal.
Speaker 2: It was not a surprise to me that the President,
Speaker 2: in spite of all these efforts which have been you know,
Speaker 2: it's herculean in many ways to try and bring about
Speaker 2: world peace and has been successful in so many areas.
Speaker 2: With the latest development, I mean, I don't think any
Speaker 2: of us really thought in our lifetime we'd see the
Speaker 2: people of Kaza and the people of Israel both celebrating simultaneously,
Speaker 2: as we played on the program yesterday. And that's all happening,
Speaker 2: and you know, outcomes the Nobel Peace Prize today, and
Speaker 2: of course it didn't go to Donald J.
Speaker 1: Trump.
Speaker 2: You know, some people are defending the Nobel Prize's decision
Speaker 2: not to award the President by pointing out, well, the
Speaker 2: nominations for the twenty twenty five piece prize were closed
Speaker 2: twenty Well, this is really for the year twenty twenty
Speaker 2: four was closed out nine months ago, before this historic
Speaker 2: Mini's peace deal. But it doesn't reflect the magnitude and
Speaker 2: the effort that the president has put into peace around
Speaker 2: the world. And anyway, so the Nobel Committee's deadline nominations
Speaker 2: were January thirty first, the only days into the president's
Speaker 2: second term of office. All right, I guess they can
Speaker 2: use that as an excuse. We checked the record. As
Speaker 2: it turns out, the Nobel Committee had absolutely no problem
Speaker 2: whatsoever nominating Barack Obama for the two thousand and nine
Speaker 2: Nobel Peace Prize, even though the nomination for two thousand
Speaker 2: and nine deadline was the exact same day, which is
Speaker 2: January thirty first, two thousand and nine, and this decision
Speaker 2: so bizarre that even Obama noted that the nomination seemed,
Speaker 2: you know, it seemed hard to justify. In a thirty
Speaker 2: six minute speech accepting the nomination, Obama discussed the tensions
Speaker 2: between war and peace and the idea idea of a
Speaker 2: just war. Perhaps the most profound issue surrounding my receipt
Speaker 2: of this prize is the fact that I am the
Speaker 2: commander in chief of the military of a nation in
Speaker 2: the midst of two wars, and those who were passed
Speaker 2: over so that Obama could be awarded the Peace Prize
Speaker 2: included the Prime Minister of Zimbabwe, who had been considered
Speaker 2: a favor for.
Speaker 1: The award at that time.
Speaker 2: And responding to the controversy over the Obama award, the
Speaker 2: Nobel Committee chair explained, no one could deny the international
Speaker 2: climate had suddenly improved now that mister Obama was and
Speaker 2: he was the main reason.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I could do that.
Speaker 2: Here's an interesting side note to this, so the winner
Speaker 2: of the Nobel Peace Prize is a woman that is
Speaker 2: actually very courageous, and she is the Venezuelan opposition. Maria
Speaker 2: Carino Machado is her name. And what was fascinating is
Speaker 2: she received the award and she posted on x he
Speaker 2: dedicated her Nobel Peace Prize to President Donald J. Trump
Speaker 2: and his support for her cause, after the Nobel Committee
Speaker 2: again declined to bestow Trump himself with the award. Quote,
Speaker 2: this recognition of the struggle of all Venezuelans is a
Speaker 2: boost to conclude our task, which to conquer, you know,
Speaker 2: for freedom. And she went on and she said, we
Speaker 2: are on the threshold of victory. And today, more than ever,
Speaker 2: we count on President Trump, the people of the United States,
Speaker 2: the people the peoples of Latin America, and the democratic
Speaker 2: nations of our world as our principled allies to achieve
Speaker 2: freedom and democracy. I dedicate this prize to the suffering
Speaker 2: people of Venezuela and to President Trump for his decisive
Speaker 2: support of our cause. His dedication did not come out
Speaker 2: of the blue. The Trump administration has been working to
Speaker 2: pressure them or government in Venezuela at the crackdown on
Speaker 2: their drug trafficking efforts, and considering they've not been too
Speaker 2: particularly cooperative. We've been watching what's been happening with these
Speaker 2: narco terrorist boats that are being shot out of the sea.
Speaker 2: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Thatt and Yahoo knocked the Nobel
Speaker 2: Committee after President Trump failed to win the group's coveted
Speaker 2: Peace Prize. Quote the Nobel Committee talks about peace. President
Speaker 2: at reel, Donald Trump makes it happen. The Israeli Prime
Speaker 2: Minister's office posted on x the facts speak for themselves.
Speaker 2: President Trump deserves it. The post in response to the
Speaker 2: White House spokesman Stephen Chung, who suggested the committee be
Speaker 2: played that the committee plays politics over peace. In a
Speaker 2: side note to this, the President is going now on
Speaker 2: Sunday to visit Israel. On Monday, he will speak before
Speaker 2: the Kanessid and visit Israel ahead of the release of
Speaker 2: these remaining hostages in Gaza, speak before the Kanesse, meet
Speaker 2: with Prime Minister Netanyahu, and reportedly land a Bengorian airport,
Speaker 2: and speak alongside not only the Prime Minister but President
Speaker 2: Isaac Herzog. According to reports, following these speeches, he may
Speaker 2: go meet with the hostage families. The President also promised
Speaker 2: pitar and Egyptian mediators he's going to meet, and Turkey
Speaker 2: leaders that he would meet as well, that Israel Israel
Speaker 2: won't return to fighting. Well, they're not going to return
Speaker 2: to fighting. But really that decision is going to be
Speaker 2: in the hands of Hamas. If Amas starts firing rockets,
Speaker 2: you know, it's it's it is beyond disconcerting. There was
Speaker 2: a poll that came out of a new Quinnipiac survey
Speaker 2: that came out forty three percent of New Yorkers favored
Speaker 2: the Palestinians versus twenty two percent of the side with Israel.
Speaker 2: And according to the Quinnipiac Pole, you know, the Republicans
Speaker 2: favor Israel over the Palstinians fifty three to eleven. So
Speaker 2: this is a red blue issue in many, many ways.
Speaker 2: And you have the anti Semitic, you know, members of
Speaker 2: Congress and the the virulent you know, rhetoric that we've
Speaker 2: heard out of the squad members, et cetera, et cetera.
Speaker 2: It is very, very frustrating. And this is why I
Speaker 2: try to I try to cloak this argument in terms
Speaker 2: that we can understand, because what happened on October seventh
Speaker 2: is there is a little over nine million. A population
Speaker 2: of nine million in Israel. It is not a big country.
Speaker 2: It is about the size of New Jersey. And I
Speaker 2: keep pointing out, and have pointed out from day one,
Speaker 2: since October seventh, what two years, four days ago, that
Speaker 2: if you look at the fifteen hundred Israelis that were
Speaker 2: slaughtered that day, and I've looked at the videos the
Speaker 2: IDF showed me in private, you know, the actual videos
Speaker 2: taken by these murdering, you know, kidnapping, raping thugs of
Speaker 2: Hamas because they were proud of what it was that
Speaker 2: they were doing. But the level of ignorance to me
Speaker 2: is breathtaking among some. And this is part of the problem.
Speaker 2: I think people were sympathetic in the beginning, but they
Speaker 2: don't really understand the magnitude of it. Because when you
Speaker 2: compare such a small population, just compare it to America's population.
Speaker 2: What's our population now lived at three hundred and sixty
Speaker 2: million Americans, whatever the number is, compared to nine million,
Speaker 2: that would be the equivalent of forty thousand dead Americans
Speaker 2: in a single day. And if you ask yourself, what
Speaker 2: would you expect your country to do if you knew
Speaker 2: that forty thousand Americans were killed in one day, and
Speaker 2: that others were taken hostage, and that others were raped,
Speaker 2: and that others were beheaded, kiddennapped. All of these things happen,
Speaker 2: and I have a hard time understanding, you know how
Speaker 2: in two years time it evolved into an issue of well,
Speaker 2: how is Israel responding? And then there's a level of
Speaker 2: ignorance as to the events leading up to this. And
Speaker 2: having been to Israel numerous times and reported from Israel
Speaker 2: numerous times, it is frustrating that so many people they've
Speaker 2: never been in the terror tunnel networks that I have
Speaker 2: been in and reported from. They've never been to those
Speaker 2: border towns that I have been to. One town in particular,
Speaker 2: over ten thousand rockets fired into their one little border
Speaker 2: town with Gaza in ten years. They've never seen the devastation.
Speaker 2: They don't know what it's like to live life under
Speaker 2: those conditions. And I just say, if it was ever
Speaker 2: happening in America, I promise you would have a very
Speaker 2: different perspective and a very different desire of what the
Speaker 2: conclusion and outcome should be. And it's not like Israel
Speaker 2: is asking as much as some people would argue, as
Speaker 2: much from the United States as you think, yes, we
Speaker 2: do support them, Yes they are allied. They're the only
Speaker 2: democracy in the region. And you know, can you blame them,
Speaker 2: but when their very survival is literally in jeopardy and
Speaker 2: hanging in the balance, as they've been surrounded by enemies.
Speaker 2: And this is what makes what President Trump pulled off
Speaker 2: here so difficult. He had to thread one needle after another.
Speaker 2: You know, Arab nations that have wanted no part of
Speaker 2: being involved in a solution for the region. You know,
Speaker 2: he was able to get them on board and committed
Speaker 2: to that process. The President was able to persuade the
Speaker 2: Israelis were perfectly positioned to go in and knock out
Speaker 2: Hamas once and for all and finish the job and
Speaker 2: decimate the place, and the President, because of the great
Speaker 2: relationship that he's built up with Israel, was able to
Speaker 2: convince the Prime Minister not to do that. The presidents similarly,
Speaker 2: you know, spoke very loudly, and he is respected in
Speaker 2: that part of the world. I know because I was
Speaker 2: with him on the trip to the Gulf States. I
Speaker 2: sought firsthand the level of respect that they have for
Speaker 2: this president, a respect for his strength, the fact that
Speaker 2: he wants a peaceful coexistence and to have trade deals
Speaker 2: and business deals. And you know, I mean there is
Speaker 2: I probably do beyond the Israelis. I'll tell you the
Speaker 2: next happiest people that are that exist in the world
Speaker 2: that are that Donald Trump took out Iranian nuclear sites,
Speaker 2: it would be the Arab world. And I just said
Speaker 2: this yesterday. You know that he never got credit in
Speaker 2: his first term that he created a coalition that I
Speaker 2: never thought I'd see in my lifetime, and that was
Speaker 2: you had intelligence sharing, cooperation.
Speaker 1: At a level nobody knew about.
Speaker 2: I knew about it because of different sources that I
Speaker 2: have and they were informing me about it. But trust me,
Speaker 2: there's no love loss between Saudi Arabia and Iran, and
Speaker 2: the UAE and the Kataris and the Egyptians and Jordanians,
Speaker 2: and they all feared Iranian hegemony and a nuclear armed Iran,
Speaker 2: and they partnered with the US and with israel An
Speaker 2: intelligence sharing and there was probably you know, I think
Speaker 2: without taking out those Iranian nuclear sides, I don't think
Speaker 2: what happened this week would have actually happened. Now we
Speaker 2: got to get to the phase two of this aspect,
Speaker 2: and I think we will. By the way, you got
Speaker 2: to tip your hat to the First Lady, Milania Trump
Speaker 2: studying journalists Friday, announcing that she had an open channel
Speaker 2: with the Russian President Vladimir Putin to secure the reunification
Speaker 2: of kidnapped Ukrainian children with their families. Is that eight
Speaker 2: kids have been returned to families over the past twenty
Speaker 2: four hours, including one who was brought from Ukraine to
Speaker 2: her family in Russia, and plans are already underway for
Speaker 2: further reunifications. The First Lady wrote a letter to Putin
Speaker 2: that was delivered at President Trump's August fifteenth, Alaska summit
Speaker 2: with his Russian counterport counterpart. And much has unfolded since
Speaker 2: President Putin received my letter, she said. Putin replied to
Speaker 2: her letter and quote since the President, since President Putin
Speaker 2: and I have an open channel of communication, you know,
Speaker 2: she described several back channel meetings and calls that have
Speaker 2: taken place. My representative has been working directly with President
Speaker 2: Putin's team to connect children with their families. And she
Speaker 2: accomplished that maybe she should get a peace prize too,
Speaker 2: But you know, don't expect you know, goodness, by the way,
Speaker 2: we have insane debate audio. What's going on in New
Speaker 2: Jersey and in Virginia. Wow, these races are heating up.
Speaker 2: I think maybe with some of the most embarrassing moments
Speaker 2: in gubernatorial debate history, especially in the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that. We have a lot to get
Speaker 1: to today.
Speaker 2: We'll get legal analysis on the indictment of Letitia James.
Speaker 2: Jack Chidarelli deglubinatorial candidate from New Jersey will join us.
Speaker 2: He's really in this race. And I believe that wins
Speaker 2: Sears is making a massive comeback as well. It's one
Speaker 2: last thing on what's happened this week in the history
Speaker 2: of this week, all these lawmakers demanding that have been
Speaker 2: demanding a ceasefire in Gaza over the past two years,
Speaker 2: eerily silent now since Donald Trump actually secured one with
Speaker 2: Israel and Hamas on Wednesday. You know, well, where are
Speaker 2: the squad members? Where's Congresswoman to leave that said, you know,
Speaker 2: this is what happens when you refuse to facilitate a
Speaker 2: ceasefire and help the escalate. Where's she? You know, she
Speaker 2: had nothing to say about our sitting president. Leader of
Speaker 2: the squad. Another frequent voice calling for a ceasefire? Why
Speaker 2: is she so quiet?
Speaker 1: Quiet?
Speaker 2: You know, why are Democrats in general so quiet as
Speaker 2: Congresswoman Jayapaul, you know, call for an immediate and permanent
Speaker 2: ceasefire on the two year anniversary of October seventh. Oopsie, Daisy,
Speaker 2: you know she's not commented since Trump announced the deal?
Speaker 1: Why is that?
Speaker 2: Where's Congressman Omar, you know, one of the most outspoken
Speaker 2: supporters of the Palestinian causing in Congress, issuing a lukewarm
Speaker 2: response to the good news, saying, well, but the sake
Speaker 2: of humanity, let's hope this will be a lasting, im
Speaker 2: permanent ceasefire, and then demanded that Israel be punished. Unbelievable.
Speaker 2: What part of forty the equivalent of forty thousand dead Americans?
Speaker 2: Doesn't she get those sick of ignorant people. Schumer's out there?
Speaker 2: How came Jeffries out there praising the Mid East peace deal?
Speaker 2: But no mention of Donald Trump? I mean, this is
Speaker 2: how petty the Democratic Party has become. And you know
Speaker 2: how lacking encouraged Schumer is. He doesn't want to alienate
Speaker 2: his radical base anymore. Anyway, The so called leader of
Speaker 2: the Senate, he's really leader in name only issued this
Speaker 2: statement on the amazingly good news that President Trump has
Speaker 2: engineered this peace deal, but he didn't mention Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: I mean, nowhere in Schumer's statement on this miraculous piece
Speaker 2: deal of the words Donald Trump ever appeared, not once.
Speaker 2: Nowhere doesn't happen. Does any of this surprise you? It shouldn't,
Speaker 2: because this represents the radicalization of the Democratic Party today.
Speaker 1: And it's so far worse than we ever thought, you know.
Speaker 2: And now Trump is embarking on this trip to the
Speaker 2: Middle East, and you're getting worldwide praise. You are getting
Speaker 2: some Democratic praise as well, to be fair, But he's
Speaker 2: gonna embark on this trip, He's going to speak before
Speaker 2: the Kanesset, and you know, you have to hope let's
Speaker 2: see these hostages get released, Let's see phase two. I
Speaker 2: think one thing you've got to understand in factor in
Speaker 2: here is if there was any leverage that Hamas might
Speaker 2: have had, you know, by agreeing to phase one of
Speaker 2: this deal, that leverage will be gone. And I think
Speaker 2: President Trump's you know, give he gave them a plain choice,
Speaker 2: take the deal or get obliterated. Doesn't get any more
Speaker 2: clear than that, not unlike what he did with Iran,
Speaker 2: not unlike by the way what he's doing and what
Speaker 2: he promised Vladimir putin different circumstances, different country. You know,
Speaker 2: we're dealing with nuclear weapons as something you have to
Speaker 2: factor in. He's taken the handcuffs off the Ukrainians. They're
Speaker 2: now pounding Russian refine in a massive way. Reuters reporting
Speaker 2: that the Russians now have have long lines and people
Speaker 2: waiting to buy and purchase gasoline as a result of this.
Speaker 2: The lifeblood of Russia's economy is is gas period, it's
Speaker 2: oil period. And then the president putting tariffs on countries
Speaker 2: that do business with Russia.
Speaker 1: It's having a massive effort.
Speaker 2: Speaker Gingrich pointed out that when the House passed the
Speaker 2: budget that would have kept the government open without increasing spending,
Speaker 2: and it was blocked by the Democrats, the clean cr
Speaker 2: what is a clean r continuing resolution that means that
Speaker 2: you keep the government open, funding at current levels.
Speaker 1: And once the.
Speaker 2: Public found out about that, all of a sudden, well,
Speaker 2: you know, nearly forty percent of Americans they blame the Democrats.
Speaker 2: You're always going to have, you know, thirty percent of
Speaker 2: the radical left that will blame Republicans for nothing. What
Speaker 2: the Democrats are saying the opposite of what they have
Speaker 2: said their entire careers, like Chucky Schumer, Oh, you can't
Speaker 2: shut down the government. Now we're feeling the impact of
Speaker 2: it as of really right now, I mean this is now,
Speaker 2: as of next week, the paychecks stopped going out ap reporting.
Speaker 2: The White House Budget Office said today that mass firings
Speaker 2: of federal workers have now started in an attempt to
Speaker 2: let people that as a result of the Schumer shutdown,
Speaker 2: now and these these firings, according to President Trump, may
Speaker 2: end up being permanent. Russ Voight, director of OMB, said
Speaker 2: on x that RIfS have begun that means reduction enforced
Speaker 2: plans aimed at reducing the size of the federal government.
Speaker 2: A spokesperson for the Budget Office said the reductions are substantial,
Speaker 2: but did not offer any more immediate details. The Education
Speaker 2: Department among the agencies hit by new layoffs. A department
Speaker 2: spokesperson said earlier today about providing more details. The Department
Speaker 2: of laid off forty one hundred employees when Trump took
Speaker 2: office in January. Its workforce was nearly had amid mass
Speaker 2: layoffs in the Republican administration's first months. At the start
Speaker 2: of the shutdown, it had twenty five hundred employees, and
Speaker 2: now many of them are going.
Speaker 1: To be furloughed. So how long will Chuck keep going? Now?
Speaker 2: I guess the quote of the week is, you know,
Speaker 2: Chucky Schumer just two days ago, every day gets better
Speaker 2: for us, you know, crowing about extending the shutdown. Now,
Speaker 2: let me play a montage with Schumer over the years
Speaker 2: talking about the dangers of the shutdowns, and then ask
Speaker 2: yourself what has changed in Chucky Schumer. I can tell
Speaker 2: you what it is before you hear it. It is
Speaker 2: his desire to cling on to power, which, by the way,
Speaker 2: he will not be successful at He's he's right now
Speaker 2: leader in name only to begin with. But if he's
Speaker 2: challenged by AOC, his political career is over.
Speaker 1: It's done.
Speaker 2: I'll mention a name to Chuck Schumer, one that he
Speaker 2: will readily remember, Alfonse de Motto. That's what we beat
Speaker 2: to become the senator in New York. He will be
Speaker 2: Alfonse de Motto, and he will retire from the US Senate. Anyway,
Speaker 2: here's Chucky in years gone by.
Speaker 3: What if I persuaded my cause to say I'm going
Speaker 3: to shut the government down? I am going to not
Speaker 3: pay our bills unless I get my way. It's a
Speaker 3: politics of idiocy, of confrontation, of paralysis.
Speaker 1: It's sort of like this.
Speaker 3: Someone goes into your house, takes your wife and children hostage,
Speaker 3: and then says, let's negotiate over the price of your house.
Speaker 3: You know, we could do the same thing on immigration,
Speaker 3: because we believe strongly in immigration reform. We could say
Speaker 3: we're shutting down the government. We're not going to raise
Speaker 3: the debt ceiling until you pass immigration reform. It would
Speaker 3: be governmental chaos. Speaker McCarthy needs to stop letting the
Speaker 3: MAGA radicals drive his decisions and do the obvious and
Speaker 3: sensible thing, follow the Senate's lead and pass a bipartisan
Speaker 3: cr to prevent this reckless shutdown. We do not want
Speaker 3: to let a Trump temper tantrum governor policies will caused
Speaker 3: the shutdown of a government which everyone on both sides
Speaker 3: of the isles knows is the wrong idea.
Speaker 2: No, that was then, this is now and Chuck Schumer again,
Speaker 2: leader in name only, is scared to death of the
Speaker 2: radicals that run his party. What a change, Pretty dramatic.
Speaker 2: I want to go to the Senate debate. I'm sorry
Speaker 2: the gubernatorial debate. Sorry about that because we have Jack
Speaker 2: Chidarelli at the top, and then later we'll talk more
Speaker 2: about this. There were two remarkable exchanges in this debate
Speaker 2: that took place in Virginia between Abigail Spanberger and Lieutenant
Speaker 2: Governor Wins some merl sears, and I'm beginning to think
Speaker 2: that the house of cards for Abigail Spamberger is now
Speaker 2: collapsing in the in the Commonwealth of Virginia. One exchange,
Speaker 2: they had to ask her four times about the issue of,
Speaker 2: you know, allowing biological boys in girls' locker rooms. To
Speaker 2: listen to how she won't answer the question.
Speaker 4: Focusing on a K through twelve school system, should transgender
Speaker 4: girls who are biological males be allowed to use girls'
Speaker 4: bathrooms and play on girls sports teams? You have sixty seconds.
Speaker 5: I'm a mother of three daughters in Virginia public schools,
Speaker 5: and nothing is more important to me than their safety
Speaker 5: and their experience in schools. I'm also a former federal agent,
Speaker 5: and I work to investigate crimes against children, and so
Speaker 5: nothing is more important to me than the safety of
Speaker 5: all of our children. And that work, in part has
Speaker 5: earned me the endorsement of Virginia's police benevolent.
Speaker 3: Associations talking find.
Speaker 5: Issues related to what's happening in our schools in each
Speaker 5: individual community. I think it's important that we have parents
Speaker 5: and teachers and administrators making decisions about their individual schools,
Speaker 5: not politicians. And if we are talking about the safety
Speaker 5: of our children, I would ask why my opponent continues
Speaker 5: to support efforts to defund public safety, an effort carried
Speaker 5: on continually by this expoundation.
Speaker 4: Once again, the question was should transgender girls who are
Speaker 4: biological males be allowed to use girls' bathrooms and play
Speaker 4: on girls sports teams? In K through twelve? You have
Speaker 4: fifteen seconds to clarify.
Speaker 5: In cases across Virginia. I think it's incumbent upon parents
Speaker 5: and educators and administrators in each local community to make
Speaker 5: decisions locally.
Speaker 1: That's what this is about.
Speaker 5: There should never be really in lockness.
Speaker 1: We finally have her saying that, but you voted for that.
Speaker 2: Up now you won't answer the question now, Jay Jones,
Speaker 2: the guy that's running for AG is a Democrat exposed,
Speaker 2: including messages wishing the death upon the former of Virginia
Speaker 2: House Speaker Todd Gilbert and his family, and then span
Speaker 2: Berger is asked for four separate times to clarify if
Speaker 2: she still endorses the guy.
Speaker 1: Again, she won't answer.
Speaker 6: Will you continue to endorse Jay Jones to be the
Speaker 6: next Attorney General of Virginia? And were you aware of
Speaker 6: these text messages before they released? You have thirty seconds.
Speaker 5: In fact, it appears that it was those who released
Speaker 5: the text messages and held them for years, so the
Speaker 5: public was unaware who had knowledge of these text messages
Speaker 5: for many of us. You do these text messages the
Speaker 5: day that they came out, and I denounced them as
Speaker 5: soon as I learned of an importantly at this point,
Speaker 5: as we move forward, the voters now have this information,
Speaker 5: information that was withheld for them. You're running, presumably for
Speaker 5: polit affairs reasons, but the voters now have the information
Speaker 5: and it is up to voters to make an individual
Speaker 5: choice based on this information.
Speaker 6: Miss Memory, I understand what you're saying about the voters,
Speaker 6: But for you yourself, do you still continue to endorse
Speaker 6: Jay Jones? Fifteen seconds? Yes or no?
Speaker 5: We are all running our individual races.
Speaker 7: I believe my opponent has said that about her Lieutenant
Speaker 7: governor nominee. Affairs and up their every person to make
Speaker 7: their own decision. I am running my race to serve
Speaker 7: Virginia and that is what I intend to do.
Speaker 6: Thank you, missus vam Berger. We just want to clarify
Speaker 6: you know what you're saying is that as of now,
Speaker 6: you still endorse Jay Jones as attorney General.
Speaker 5: I'm saying, as of now, it's up to every voter
Speaker 5: to make their own individual decision. I am running for governor.
Speaker 5: I am accountable for the words that I say, for
Speaker 5: the acts that I take, for the policies that I
Speaker 5: have put out.
Speaker 2: I can't take it. It's so frustrating. We'll get back
Speaker 2: to that later. Now these races seem to be in play.
Speaker 2: Virginia get voting, New Joysey get voting. We have Jack Chidarelli,
Speaker 2: the gubernatorio candidate, coming up,