1 00:00:09,840 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jai Ley. 2 00:00:13,960 --> 00:00:17,560 Speaker 1: We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 3 00:00:18,000 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, 4 00:00:23,600 --> 00:00:33,720 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on the Bloomberg. Joining 5 00:00:33,800 --> 00:00:36,200 Speaker 1: us now is Michael Purvis Whiting and co chief global 6 00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:39,760 Speaker 1: strategist and head of equity Derivatives, Michael GOODMANNY. She said, 7 00:00:39,800 --> 00:00:42,559 Speaker 1: it doesn't sound like two countries gunning for a trade war, 8 00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:45,199 Speaker 1: does it not at all? I mean, it is a 9 00:00:45,479 --> 00:00:48,920 Speaker 1: it's a curious uh think of for for Trump to 10 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:51,640 Speaker 1: be offering up if he wants to, you know, reduce 11 00:00:51,680 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 1: the trade war uh clouds and have them paid from 12 00:00:55,720 --> 00:00:58,880 Speaker 1: the horizon. Uh. I think just you know, given how 13 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:02,080 Speaker 1: sensitive that that company has been from a national security 14 00:01:02,120 --> 00:01:04,200 Speaker 1: point of view. UM. But certainly you know, when you 15 00:01:04,200 --> 00:01:06,280 Speaker 1: when when you see you know, manum is going to 16 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:09,800 Speaker 1: be uh uh you know, hanging out with the Vice 17 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:12,240 Speaker 1: Premier of China and all that, it does look like, 18 00:01:12,680 --> 00:01:14,760 Speaker 1: you know, sort of a budding romance, if you will, 19 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:20,440 Speaker 1: UM between these two countries. And that's obviously very you 20 00:01:20,480 --> 00:01:22,679 Speaker 1: know that that's one less worry factor for the markets. 21 00:01:22,840 --> 00:01:24,120 Speaker 1: We all saw the tweet from the President of the 22 00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:26,760 Speaker 1: United States, Presidency of China and I are working together 23 00:01:26,800 --> 00:01:30,720 Speaker 1: to give massive Chinese phone company ZTE away to get 24 00:01:30,760 --> 00:01:33,880 Speaker 1: back into business fast. Too many jobs in China lost. 25 00:01:34,240 --> 00:01:38,000 Speaker 1: Commerce Department has been instructed to get it done. Still 26 00:01:38,040 --> 00:01:40,679 Speaker 1: trying to work out what gets it done means. As 27 00:01:40,720 --> 00:01:43,480 Speaker 1: you say, Michael, this is a company that has been 28 00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:47,200 Speaker 1: a national security issue that the Republicans themselves were quite 29 00:01:47,240 --> 00:01:50,200 Speaker 1: firm with President Obama and his administration for not doing 30 00:01:50,320 --> 00:01:53,280 Speaker 1: enough around this company, and now it seems like it's 31 00:01:53,320 --> 00:01:57,320 Speaker 1: a a bargaining chip at a broader issue, right. Uh, 32 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,360 Speaker 1: you know, it's it's uh, you know, weaving its specific 33 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:04,240 Speaker 1: corporate situations into foreign policies always is always a tricky 34 00:02:04,320 --> 00:02:07,600 Speaker 1: path there, but but this one especially so given you know, 35 00:02:07,720 --> 00:02:10,160 Speaker 1: it will be interesting to see how how the more 36 00:02:10,200 --> 00:02:12,840 Speaker 1: mainstream Republicans you know, react to that, let alone the 37 00:02:12,880 --> 00:02:15,360 Speaker 1: Democrats waking up this morning to kind of strip out 38 00:02:15,400 --> 00:02:18,400 Speaker 1: the nuances of z T and what's happening with various 39 00:02:18,480 --> 00:02:21,200 Speaker 1: companies and how transactional this seems to be. You'd have 40 00:02:21,240 --> 00:02:22,880 Speaker 1: to say, Michael, if this was your key risk for 41 00:02:22,919 --> 00:02:25,040 Speaker 1: twent and the idea that a trade war was going 42 00:02:25,080 --> 00:02:27,880 Speaker 1: to one fall between China and the United States. These 43 00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:30,760 Speaker 1: headlines are somewhat bullish, on't they. Yeah, yeah, yeah, as 44 00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:33,359 Speaker 1: as we're talking about it's it's it's one less sort 45 00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:36,640 Speaker 1: of risk to U to worry about. I I personally 46 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:40,079 Speaker 1: was never looked at the trade wars as being um 47 00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:43,799 Speaker 1: and I'm not sure anyone really did as being you know, um, 48 00:02:43,919 --> 00:02:47,160 Speaker 1: the the most dominant or or most palpable risk for 49 00:02:47,240 --> 00:02:50,839 Speaker 1: the markets this year. Certainly obviously something to be monitoring there. 50 00:02:50,880 --> 00:02:52,799 Speaker 1: But you know, I think in the back of a 51 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:55,000 Speaker 1: lot of people's minds, people thought it would be a 52 00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:57,440 Speaker 1: lot of a lot of bark and probably a lot 53 00:02:57,520 --> 00:02:59,600 Speaker 1: less bite as you got in down into the granular 54 00:02:59,639 --> 00:03:02,200 Speaker 1: details and and but you know, with this news breaking 55 00:03:02,240 --> 00:03:06,480 Speaker 1: up with the weekend, it certainly seems um, perhaps even 56 00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:09,040 Speaker 1: a less so. Yes, Michael Purvis with us with Weeden 57 00:03:09,280 --> 00:03:13,600 Speaker 1: is well, Michael, I literally named vix charts Purvous charts. 58 00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:17,240 Speaker 1: You are a great student of the vix. What is 59 00:03:17,280 --> 00:03:21,760 Speaker 1: the distinctive feature of a VIX twenty two to thirteen 60 00:03:21,919 --> 00:03:25,680 Speaker 1: this time around? Is it correlated to equities? That's the 61 00:03:25,760 --> 00:03:30,000 Speaker 1: spot The present vix versus future vixes. What's the pro 62 00:03:30,160 --> 00:03:33,880 Speaker 1: nuance in this move? I think what's really defined the 63 00:03:34,000 --> 00:03:37,880 Speaker 1: vix UH over the last several weeks um is how 64 00:03:37,920 --> 00:03:40,839 Speaker 1: it has been behaving relative to the other vixes TOM. 65 00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:43,360 Speaker 1: In other words, there's a VIX for the Russell two thousand, 66 00:03:43,440 --> 00:03:46,560 Speaker 1: the small caps, there's a VIX for eurostocks. There's the 67 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:51,600 Speaker 1: VIX right, there's always the Pharaoh vix UH. There there's 68 00:03:51,640 --> 00:03:54,800 Speaker 1: also you know a bunch of alatility metrics across assets. 69 00:03:54,800 --> 00:03:56,760 Speaker 1: There's a VIX for the nd X, which is really 70 00:03:56,840 --> 00:03:59,560 Speaker 1: kind of tracks the UH, much more sensitive to the 71 00:03:59,720 --> 00:04:03,320 Speaker 1: the big tech companies. And what I find fascinating right 72 00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:05,880 Speaker 1: now is that if you look at typically the VIX 73 00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:08,600 Speaker 1: trades at a discount to most of these other vixes, 74 00:04:08,680 --> 00:04:11,080 Speaker 1: But if you look at it recently, it's actually trading. 75 00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 1: It's been trading at a pretty consistent premium, or at 76 00:04:14,280 --> 00:04:17,320 Speaker 1: least at very historical levels relatively the other ones. The one, 77 00:04:17,640 --> 00:04:20,640 Speaker 1: the one other VIX that it's not trading at a 78 00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:23,520 Speaker 1: premium two is the what's called the v X and 79 00:04:23,600 --> 00:04:26,080 Speaker 1: or the VIX for the nd X. And what that 80 00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:29,960 Speaker 1: is telling me is that this you know, higher NIX 81 00:04:30,080 --> 00:04:33,240 Speaker 1: range is really not about It's really not about you know, 82 00:04:33,400 --> 00:04:37,839 Speaker 1: um interest rates, uh, you know, spiraling ever higher. Um. 83 00:04:37,880 --> 00:04:40,840 Speaker 1: It's really about what happened, um, you know back with 84 00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:46,960 Speaker 1: this this Facebook uh Cambridge analytical scandal several weeks back, 85 00:04:47,400 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 1: and whether the markets were going to re rate Facebook 86 00:04:50,040 --> 00:04:52,320 Speaker 1: and its peers and Fang and for the matter in 87 00:04:52,400 --> 00:04:55,560 Speaker 1: tech lower there. And that's why, you know, the two 88 00:04:55,680 --> 00:04:57,960 Speaker 1: big outperformers from the ballside have been the VIX and 89 00:04:57,960 --> 00:05:01,000 Speaker 1: this and this and this VIX for the NDA. I 90 00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:04,000 Speaker 1: think that's what you're seeing is is that those clouds 91 00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:06,440 Speaker 1: are fading and that's allowing the VIX to you know. 92 00:05:06,600 --> 00:05:09,880 Speaker 1: So this is a really interesting point. So we had 93 00:05:09,920 --> 00:05:13,080 Speaker 1: the VOLE blow up of February where these short volatility 94 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:16,920 Speaker 1: products completely failed and a lot of people said, we're 95 00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 1: moving into a regime of higher volatility. We couldn't possibly 96 00:05:20,160 --> 00:05:23,720 Speaker 1: go back to because what was going to happen to 97 00:05:23,880 --> 00:05:26,559 Speaker 1: the world was gonna end. We couldn't possibly go back 98 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:30,800 Speaker 1: to the VOLE levels of seventeen. But if the question is, 99 00:05:31,120 --> 00:05:33,120 Speaker 1: and the premise, your premise right now is that this 100 00:05:33,200 --> 00:05:36,080 Speaker 1: was a text story, then I'll ask the question again, 101 00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:40,320 Speaker 1: can we go back to the lower volatility range. I 102 00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:45,760 Speaker 1: think I think it is a look, two thousand seventeen 103 00:05:45,839 --> 00:05:49,440 Speaker 1: was distinguished by having the lowest realized volatility on in 104 00:05:49,560 --> 00:05:53,520 Speaker 1: decades um uh and and and and more vixed nine 105 00:05:53,560 --> 00:05:56,200 Speaker 1: prints than any other year in the in the in 106 00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:59,280 Speaker 1: the vix's history, we even had a few ticks below 107 00:05:59,360 --> 00:06:02,360 Speaker 1: nine and le January getting back to those levels I 108 00:06:02,440 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 1: think is a real push if for nowhere the reason 109 00:06:04,920 --> 00:06:07,680 Speaker 1: that we do have higher interest rates, and you can't 110 00:06:07,680 --> 00:06:10,040 Speaker 1: be dismissed of higher interest rates in the volatility story. 111 00:06:10,080 --> 00:06:11,960 Speaker 1: I just think that what's dominant right now is the 112 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 1: tech the tech situation there. But um uh, you know, 113 00:06:16,920 --> 00:06:21,359 Speaker 1: if we could we see twelves and thirteens, absolutely, and 114 00:06:21,400 --> 00:06:24,880 Speaker 1: I mean we we are the christ on Friday and 115 00:06:24,880 --> 00:06:26,800 Speaker 1: and and so, could we see a lot more of 116 00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:29,360 Speaker 1: this sort of let's call it, you know, eleven twelve 117 00:06:29,400 --> 00:06:32,839 Speaker 1: to fifteen rather than sort of fifteen to twenty going forward? Yeah, 118 00:06:32,839 --> 00:06:34,760 Speaker 1: I mean I think that's really a function of whether 119 00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:38,680 Speaker 1: that ultimately, whether that tech dip gets bought that the 120 00:06:38,680 --> 00:06:42,560 Speaker 1: the you know, if if I've been arguing time that 121 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:48,279 Speaker 1: that so goes tech uh particularly fang so goes the 122 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:51,600 Speaker 1: the SPX and so goes the vix. It's incredibly it's 123 00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:55,920 Speaker 1: it's become absolutely integrated into overall US equity story. As 124 00:06:55,960 --> 00:06:58,520 Speaker 1: a strategy standpoint, where do you make up oil seventies 125 00:06:58,560 --> 00:07:02,560 Speaker 1: six sixty brand up to seventy thirty nine in two 126 00:07:02,640 --> 00:07:06,320 Speaker 1: cups of coffee this morning? Obviously, the backdrop here out 127 00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:08,880 Speaker 1: on the social feed, in the various news agencies is 128 00:07:08,920 --> 00:07:12,480 Speaker 1: what's going on in Gaza. I've got seven Palestinians killed, 129 00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:17,120 Speaker 1: Nine Palestinians killed according to CNN International, Reuters has ten. 130 00:07:17,760 --> 00:07:20,280 Speaker 1: Even in folks, I'm very unsure what that number is. 131 00:07:20,320 --> 00:07:23,360 Speaker 1: That's just what we're seeing within the feed right now. 132 00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:26,200 Speaker 1: There's geo political risk out there. Do you have a 133 00:07:26,240 --> 00:07:29,040 Speaker 1: point in your head where a certain Brent price or 134 00:07:29,080 --> 00:07:33,240 Speaker 1: West Texas Intermediate price gets Michael Purvis's attention. Well, I 135 00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:35,680 Speaker 1: think the move that we're we've all been looking for, 136 00:07:35,800 --> 00:07:38,520 Speaker 1: and even if some of this Middle East headlines were 137 00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:43,000 Speaker 1: not there, uh, particularly you know, the Gaza headlines, I 138 00:07:43,000 --> 00:07:47,040 Speaker 1: think people sort of feel that there's enough momentum right now. 139 00:07:48,440 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 1: Take out seventy that paint that paints a path towards 140 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:53,600 Speaker 1: eighty pretty well. I know there's a lot of calls 141 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:55,440 Speaker 1: out there for a hundred And I'm not an oil 142 00:07:55,480 --> 00:07:58,600 Speaker 1: expert by any stretch, but I would say that that, um, 143 00:07:58,640 --> 00:08:01,720 Speaker 1: I think, you know, getting above eight on w T 144 00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:04,440 Speaker 1: I does seem like that's a lot of work to do. 145 00:08:04,520 --> 00:08:07,800 Speaker 1: You're gonna need something more than just some Gaza headlines 146 00:08:08,480 --> 00:08:11,040 Speaker 1: and iron um to get there. There's a lot of 147 00:08:11,280 --> 00:08:14,600 Speaker 1: technical resistance at the eighty dollar level there. But but look, 148 00:08:14,720 --> 00:08:16,640 Speaker 1: you know, I mean it's still striking. Is that we're 149 00:08:16,640 --> 00:08:19,160 Speaker 1: talking about, you know, seventy crude? Right? I mean he 150 00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:21,360 Speaker 1: would have guessed, you know, six months ago, nine months ago, 151 00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:23,560 Speaker 1: very few people are out there on that. You know, 152 00:08:23,680 --> 00:08:26,640 Speaker 1: twenty six dollars was not that long ago. This is great. 153 00:08:26,720 --> 00:08:30,880 Speaker 1: Courier dude showed up today. Michael Purvis showed up. Did 154 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:33,959 Speaker 1: you ride a bicycle and in the ring? I did? 155 00:08:34,000 --> 00:08:35,640 Speaker 1: I bike as much as I can. You like, live 156 00:08:35,679 --> 00:08:40,880 Speaker 1: two blocks away, so it's it's the fastest way to 157 00:08:40,920 --> 00:08:47,280 Speaker 1: get around. Thank you, Michael, Chief global strategist and head 158 00:08:47,280 --> 00:08:49,760 Speaker 1: of Equity Derivatives to Package and I got to get 159 00:08:49,760 --> 00:09:05,160 Speaker 1: over near the Hilt Motel. We're gonna do a couple 160 00:09:05,200 --> 00:09:08,439 Speaker 1: of themes here. Isaac Wiltanski with us with a compass 161 00:09:08,480 --> 00:09:11,240 Speaker 1: point really did dive into just sort of the news 162 00:09:11,280 --> 00:09:15,160 Speaker 1: flow of the week. Isaac um. A really really strong 163 00:09:15,240 --> 00:09:18,200 Speaker 1: supporter of my work well over a decade has been 164 00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:21,640 Speaker 1: Richard Clarada, who is going to be upfront and the 165 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:25,720 Speaker 1: beauty contest tomorrow morning for the Senate Banking Committee to 166 00:09:25,840 --> 00:09:29,920 Speaker 1: replace Stanley Fisher as the PhD type is Vice Chairman 167 00:09:29,920 --> 00:09:33,400 Speaker 1: of the Fed. Dr Clarata, folks I've always associated with 168 00:09:33,440 --> 00:09:38,959 Speaker 1: Columbia University, has written definitive work on dynamics stochastic general 169 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:41,520 Speaker 1: equilibrium theory. There'll be a quiz at the end of 170 00:09:41,520 --> 00:09:47,560 Speaker 1: this UH section as well, Isaac, Isaac, so we don't 171 00:09:47,600 --> 00:09:50,920 Speaker 1: do DSGE theory on a Monday morning. Who is Richard 172 00:09:50,960 --> 00:09:55,080 Speaker 1: Clarida and why will you lean forward during his testimony tomorrow? 173 00:09:57,040 --> 00:10:00,600 Speaker 1: I think Richard Clarida is going to be c as 174 00:10:01,120 --> 00:10:07,000 Speaker 1: UH the center of economic hat on the Federal Reserve 175 00:10:07,080 --> 00:10:12,080 Speaker 1: Board under President Donald Trump, and one of the viewpoints 176 00:10:12,120 --> 00:10:15,520 Speaker 1: here in d C has been that Chairman Powell is 177 00:10:15,679 --> 00:10:19,640 Speaker 1: more of a has more markets experience and not as 178 00:10:19,800 --> 00:10:23,840 Speaker 1: much economic background, and so the Trump white House was 179 00:10:23,960 --> 00:10:28,400 Speaker 1: clearly and I think undeniably looking for someone to sit 180 00:10:28,440 --> 00:10:31,600 Speaker 1: in that vice chairman's role that number two spots, who 181 00:10:31,640 --> 00:10:34,600 Speaker 1: has written papers like the one that you just discussed, 182 00:10:34,920 --> 00:10:38,679 Speaker 1: and who can delve deeply with the staff there on 183 00:10:38,760 --> 00:10:42,240 Speaker 1: economic theory. And so I think the hearing tomorrow, which 184 00:10:42,240 --> 00:10:46,920 Speaker 1: will actually include um both Richard Clarada and Michelle Bowman, 185 00:10:47,120 --> 00:10:50,200 Speaker 1: who is also nominated to the board. She's nominated for 186 00:10:50,240 --> 00:10:54,679 Speaker 1: a spot that's reserved for someone with community banking expertise. 187 00:10:55,200 --> 00:10:57,320 Speaker 1: I think that the focus is going to be on 188 00:10:58,080 --> 00:11:01,120 Speaker 1: Mr Clarada because he is seen as one of these 189 00:11:01,160 --> 00:11:05,720 Speaker 1: pillars of economic thought for the for the Powell Federal Reserve, Isaaca, 190 00:11:05,720 --> 00:11:06,959 Speaker 1: I have to say, out of all the things that 191 00:11:07,000 --> 00:11:10,080 Speaker 1: we've wasted our time talking about since November twenty sixteen, 192 00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:13,280 Speaker 1: the Federal Reserve under this administration is one of them. 193 00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:17,920 Speaker 1: I lost count of how many economists were worried about 194 00:11:17,960 --> 00:11:21,199 Speaker 1: the replacements filling the seats on the Federal Reserve that 195 00:11:21,240 --> 00:11:24,400 Speaker 1: would be nominated by this administration when actually looking back 196 00:11:24,480 --> 00:11:29,200 Speaker 1: on it, they've been really mainstream candidates. This administrations has 197 00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:32,360 Speaker 1: filled the empty seats at the Federal Reserve with some 198 00:11:32,559 --> 00:11:37,600 Speaker 1: with some fantastic names, nothing controversial about it. I think 199 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:39,559 Speaker 1: you hit the nail on the head there. Look this 200 00:11:39,559 --> 00:11:41,920 Speaker 1: this Federal Reserve Board, at least the members that we 201 00:11:42,000 --> 00:11:46,720 Speaker 1: have so far are centrists and pragmatists. Now, part of 202 00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:49,200 Speaker 1: that is the realization that it is hard to get 203 00:11:49,280 --> 00:11:53,200 Speaker 1: someone through the Senate. Still, the average length of confirming 204 00:11:53,240 --> 00:11:57,599 Speaker 1: someone for those individuals who are lucky enough to be confirmed, 205 00:11:58,080 --> 00:12:01,280 Speaker 1: is about eighty or so days right now in the U. S. Senate. 206 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:03,720 Speaker 1: And that's the longest at least out of that I've 207 00:12:03,720 --> 00:12:07,400 Speaker 1: counted out of the past five administrations. So it takes 208 00:12:07,440 --> 00:12:10,640 Speaker 1: a considerable amount time. And so part of that is 209 00:12:10,640 --> 00:12:12,800 Speaker 1: is the realities of the Senate. But I think part 210 00:12:12,840 --> 00:12:17,920 Speaker 1: of it is the Trump administration's acceptance of the importance 211 00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:21,600 Speaker 1: of the economy within their broader storyline. And you can't 212 00:12:21,640 --> 00:12:24,319 Speaker 1: mess around with the frind if the economy is going 213 00:12:24,360 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 1: to be part of your your political storyline, if you're 214 00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:30,160 Speaker 1: just joining us. I Boltansky with his compass point out 215 00:12:30,160 --> 00:12:32,720 Speaker 1: of Ohio, Wesley and a really good feeling for the 216 00:12:32,800 --> 00:12:37,600 Speaker 1: nitte gritte of Washington, d C Isaac, John Swann, er uh, 217 00:12:37,640 --> 00:12:39,720 Speaker 1: Mike Allen, I can't remember who wrote it, talked about 218 00:12:39,720 --> 00:12:43,600 Speaker 1: the exhaustion and the few members of the Trump team 219 00:12:43,679 --> 00:12:46,800 Speaker 1: on trade that's not only China, China, China, like we 220 00:12:46,840 --> 00:12:50,040 Speaker 1: haven't the headlines this morning, but also NAFTA as well. 221 00:12:50,400 --> 00:12:56,680 Speaker 1: How thinly staffed is the Trump trade team. I think 222 00:12:57,040 --> 00:12:59,120 Speaker 1: it's something that I've noticed over the past few months. 223 00:12:59,120 --> 00:13:02,319 Speaker 1: When you walk around own some of these buildings, whether 224 00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:05,240 Speaker 1: it's a Commerce department or the Treasury or any of 225 00:13:05,280 --> 00:13:08,120 Speaker 1: the other major agency, you see that there are a 226 00:13:08,160 --> 00:13:12,400 Speaker 1: lot of empty offices, and that has a toll. And 227 00:13:12,480 --> 00:13:16,400 Speaker 1: the US, especially on trade, is facing battles on a 228 00:13:16,480 --> 00:13:20,200 Speaker 1: number of fronts, and these battles take up hundreds and 229 00:13:20,280 --> 00:13:24,559 Speaker 1: thousands of pages of paper. Yeah, I mean you did interrupt, 230 00:13:24,559 --> 00:13:27,559 Speaker 1: but just because of time. How does Canada in Mexico 231 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:32,800 Speaker 1: adapt to the facts we have an exhausted NAFTA team. Well, 232 00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:37,800 Speaker 1: I think the positive here is the deadline, albeit a 233 00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:42,600 Speaker 1: somewhat squishy deadline on May seventeenth to get a NAPTA 234 00:13:42,640 --> 00:13:47,600 Speaker 1: deal announcement. Look, deadlines are are able to catalyze action 235 00:13:47,640 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 1: in DC more so than anything else. So yes, the 236 00:13:50,360 --> 00:13:53,199 Speaker 1: NAFTA team is tired, but I think speaker Ryan say, 237 00:13:53,240 --> 00:13:56,680 Speaker 1: it's setting a quasi deadline of May seventeenth for a 238 00:13:56,679 --> 00:14:00,360 Speaker 1: deal announcement. NAFTA it's going to catalyze movement here decay, 239 00:14:00,520 --> 00:14:03,160 Speaker 1: and this of course needs to happen. The deadlines need 240 00:14:03,240 --> 00:14:07,120 Speaker 1: to be hit in and thereabouts because the midterms are 241 00:14:07,120 --> 00:14:09,280 Speaker 1: coming up, Isaac, so they need to deal before that. 242 00:14:09,280 --> 00:14:12,000 Speaker 1: I want you to help sort of translate something for me. 243 00:14:12,040 --> 00:14:14,960 Speaker 1: The president's waiting. The following presidency of China and I 244 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:17,559 Speaker 1: are working together to give massive Chinese phone company z 245 00:14:17,720 --> 00:14:20,160 Speaker 1: t E a way to get back into business fast. 246 00:14:20,160 --> 00:14:22,520 Speaker 1: Too many jobs in China lost. Commerce Department has been 247 00:14:22,520 --> 00:14:26,240 Speaker 1: instructed to get it done. Z t E. ISAAC was 248 00:14:26,280 --> 00:14:30,400 Speaker 1: a national security issue for good reasons. A blockade was 249 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:32,920 Speaker 1: put on it. What does it mean when the President 250 00:14:32,960 --> 00:14:36,440 Speaker 1: turns around and says, I've instructed the Commerce Department to 251 00:14:36,600 --> 00:14:41,240 Speaker 1: get it done? What happens next? I think? I think 252 00:14:41,240 --> 00:14:43,280 Speaker 1: there's only one takeaway that you can have from the 253 00:14:43,360 --> 00:14:46,720 Speaker 1: President's tweeting that and that policy reversal. It's at the 254 00:14:46,800 --> 00:14:50,440 Speaker 1: president c z T is a bargaining chip in the 255 00:14:50,600 --> 00:14:54,560 Speaker 1: broader negotiation between China and the EU. Okay, Isaac, you're 256 00:14:54,600 --> 00:14:57,040 Speaker 1: expert on this. Can that happen? I don't have any 257 00:14:57,040 --> 00:14:59,880 Speaker 1: answer on this Monday morning. Granted, its news overnight is 258 00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:04,120 Speaker 1: essentially and over the weekend, can you use a sanctioned 259 00:15:04,240 --> 00:15:10,480 Speaker 1: international offender as a quote bargaining chip unquote. You know, 260 00:15:10,520 --> 00:15:12,800 Speaker 1: there's a saying that a law is only as strong 261 00:15:12,880 --> 00:15:15,800 Speaker 1: as the most recent congress, meaning that Congress can change 262 00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:19,800 Speaker 1: anything that a previous congress is done. A administrative action 263 00:15:19,960 --> 00:15:23,480 Speaker 1: is largely as strong as the most recent administration. And 264 00:15:23,520 --> 00:15:26,360 Speaker 1: so yes, I think that the President as of last night, 265 00:15:26,400 --> 00:15:29,320 Speaker 1: with that tweet, made it clear that ZTE is on 266 00:15:29,440 --> 00:15:31,400 Speaker 1: the table and it's going to be part of a 267 00:15:31,440 --> 00:15:34,880 Speaker 1: negotiation between China and US as as trade talks continue. 268 00:15:35,040 --> 00:15:38,440 Speaker 1: So trade sulks resumed this week. The top Chinese economic 269 00:15:38,480 --> 00:15:41,320 Speaker 1: advisor to president she coming over to Washington, d c. 270 00:15:41,880 --> 00:15:45,160 Speaker 1: Isaac's attentions actually easing. Is that's what you're seeing and 271 00:15:45,760 --> 00:15:47,480 Speaker 1: what to what extent can we get a deal? And 272 00:15:47,560 --> 00:15:51,440 Speaker 1: what does that deal look like. I think that both 273 00:15:51,480 --> 00:15:54,720 Speaker 1: sides realize that it is in their own best interest 274 00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:56,760 Speaker 1: to step back from the cliff, which is part of 275 00:15:56,800 --> 00:15:58,680 Speaker 1: the reason that I think they will step back from 276 00:15:58,680 --> 00:16:02,240 Speaker 1: the cliff. The more bargaining ships that we put on 277 00:16:02,280 --> 00:16:04,280 Speaker 1: the table, and it's clear that the President view z 278 00:16:04,440 --> 00:16:07,160 Speaker 1: t E as a bargaining ship, the more of those 279 00:16:07,200 --> 00:16:09,760 Speaker 1: that we have on the table, the easier it is 280 00:16:09,840 --> 00:16:13,960 Speaker 1: to craft a space saving deal that will at least 281 00:16:14,000 --> 00:16:16,400 Speaker 1: get us back to the trade the tont that we 282 00:16:16,880 --> 00:16:20,680 Speaker 1: had only a few months ago. Isaac wouldn't find a 283 00:16:20,840 --> 00:16:23,920 Speaker 1: question if we could. We're following Gaza, the news out 284 00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:26,320 Speaker 1: of Gaza, folks, I want to be very careful about 285 00:16:26,320 --> 00:16:28,480 Speaker 1: the news flow there. Michael Barr in New York and 286 00:16:28,520 --> 00:16:32,040 Speaker 1: our other team across the nation will have updates on 287 00:16:32,120 --> 00:16:36,840 Speaker 1: that within minutes. But Isaac, the movement of the embassy 288 00:16:36,880 --> 00:16:40,840 Speaker 1: to Jerusalem, we had Michael Arnod of Israel on our 289 00:16:40,920 --> 00:16:43,480 Speaker 1: our head of all of our Israel and Palestinian coverage. 290 00:16:43,720 --> 00:16:46,520 Speaker 1: He was great. How does this play in the Beltway? 291 00:16:47,040 --> 00:16:50,560 Speaker 1: How does the move of this embassy play in your 292 00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:56,200 Speaker 1: Washington Beltway? You know, it's difficult to tell at the moment, 293 00:16:56,640 --> 00:16:59,720 Speaker 1: especially given the headlines that we're seeing cross and and 294 00:16:59,760 --> 00:17:01,720 Speaker 1: I want to be careful as well, but I can 295 00:17:01,760 --> 00:17:05,400 Speaker 1: tell you those policy experts that that I follow generally 296 00:17:05,520 --> 00:17:08,560 Speaker 1: view this is more of a symbolic move than a 297 00:17:08,680 --> 00:17:13,040 Speaker 1: substantive move. But as we know, in foreign affairs, symbolism matters, 298 00:17:13,320 --> 00:17:16,240 Speaker 1: and so um I think at the moment, everyone is 299 00:17:16,320 --> 00:17:19,400 Speaker 1: just watching to see what happens more so than anything else. 300 00:17:19,520 --> 00:17:22,640 Speaker 1: Isaac Boltansky thinking so much, great update? Why why Range? 301 00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:25,720 Speaker 1: Why did I'll get it out? John three to one? 302 00:17:26,280 --> 00:17:31,960 Speaker 1: Why did Ranging update? Very much? With compass point as well, 303 00:17:44,680 --> 00:17:47,720 Speaker 1: Stephen Roschuto with us, it was wonderful to have on. 304 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:52,480 Speaker 1: We're trying to slice in dice well the American consumer, 305 00:17:52,920 --> 00:17:58,160 Speaker 1: he is with miserable UH securities. UH. Their chief US 306 00:17:58,240 --> 00:18:01,520 Speaker 1: economists as well, like US, will start with inflation because 307 00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:05,359 Speaker 1: that's where President mr was as well. It's certainly not 308 00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:09,720 Speaker 1: runaway inflation. Is it really higher inflation? Well, I think 309 00:18:09,760 --> 00:18:13,040 Speaker 1: you've seen general upward drift and inflation. The question is 310 00:18:13,040 --> 00:18:16,120 Speaker 1: what's been the driving factor. I think the driving factor 311 00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:19,840 Speaker 1: was a sixteen month slide in the dollar that eliminated 312 00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:25,040 Speaker 1: some of the global deflationary pressures from dampening domestic price pressures. 313 00:18:25,040 --> 00:18:27,399 Speaker 1: And now I think the dollars turn corner and I 314 00:18:27,440 --> 00:18:30,439 Speaker 1: think the upward movement and the dollar will tend to 315 00:18:30,480 --> 00:18:33,400 Speaker 1: moderate the inflation environment again, and I think that's gonna 316 00:18:33,400 --> 00:18:35,359 Speaker 1: be the big surprise for people. My question, Steve on 317 00:18:35,359 --> 00:18:39,640 Speaker 1: a Monday, is there's a certitude about three or four 318 00:18:39,760 --> 00:18:43,159 Speaker 1: rate increases and all my radar go up. When I 319 00:18:43,240 --> 00:18:45,920 Speaker 1: use the word, everybody's just certain they've got this all 320 00:18:46,000 --> 00:18:49,879 Speaker 1: figured out. We know it is a real risk factor. 321 00:18:50,080 --> 00:18:51,920 Speaker 1: I mean I was one of the first ones who 322 00:18:51,960 --> 00:18:54,119 Speaker 1: moved from two to four rate hikes, and to be 323 00:18:54,160 --> 00:18:55,600 Speaker 1: honest with you, I did it with the hope that 324 00:18:55,600 --> 00:18:58,919 Speaker 1: would eventually be the first one to move back from four. Uh. 325 00:18:59,000 --> 00:19:00,719 Speaker 1: And I continue to look for the data. And that's 326 00:19:00,720 --> 00:19:02,560 Speaker 1: why I think the retail sales numbers and the housing 327 00:19:02,640 --> 00:19:04,760 Speaker 1: numbers that we're gonna have out this week are very, 328 00:19:04,840 --> 00:19:07,560 Speaker 1: very critical in that environment. And I think dovetailing on 329 00:19:07,600 --> 00:19:10,200 Speaker 1: the backdrop of what we saw from benond inflation readings 330 00:19:10,600 --> 00:19:13,280 Speaker 1: last week, I think those factors could come in to 331 00:19:13,400 --> 00:19:16,600 Speaker 1: suggest that four may not be necessary. But for right now, 332 00:19:16,840 --> 00:19:19,760 Speaker 1: it's still our forecast. But we're looking for evidence that 333 00:19:19,800 --> 00:19:22,119 Speaker 1: we think will come through allows us to move it 334 00:19:22,160 --> 00:19:24,440 Speaker 1: back and step back from a four. Right hya that's 335 00:19:24,440 --> 00:19:26,479 Speaker 1: back on targets. Steve On They why do they need 336 00:19:26,520 --> 00:19:29,359 Speaker 1: to back off? Well, the question is how far do 337 00:19:29,400 --> 00:19:32,320 Speaker 1: you need to go before you cause something to go wrong? Um, 338 00:19:32,359 --> 00:19:34,800 Speaker 1: the curve is flattening rather dramatically, and if you go 339 00:19:34,840 --> 00:19:37,280 Speaker 1: back and look at the last three long business cycles 340 00:19:37,640 --> 00:19:40,240 Speaker 1: the FED, and they've been long business cycles because inflation 341 00:19:40,280 --> 00:19:43,440 Speaker 1: didn't manifest themselves, manifests itself. And this time through it's 342 00:19:43,480 --> 00:19:46,680 Speaker 1: exactly the same environment. And each time that they continued 343 00:19:46,760 --> 00:19:48,679 Speaker 1: to push the front end of the curve up, they 344 00:19:48,720 --> 00:19:50,320 Speaker 1: got into an environment where there was some kind of 345 00:19:50,320 --> 00:19:53,439 Speaker 1: financial hiccup which was unnecessary. And I think this is 346 00:19:53,440 --> 00:19:55,119 Speaker 1: one of the reasons why they should learn from the 347 00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:57,320 Speaker 1: lessons of three out of three, which is a very 348 00:19:57,400 --> 00:20:01,240 Speaker 1: very abnormal process in an economy to have three times 349 00:20:01,240 --> 00:20:03,919 Speaker 1: in a row the same thing developed. And I'm afraid 350 00:20:03,960 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 1: that if they continue to push for the four over time, 351 00:20:07,600 --> 00:20:09,239 Speaker 1: that we'll get to a curve that will be so 352 00:20:09,320 --> 00:20:11,359 Speaker 1: flat that it will cause a financial hiccup to a car. 353 00:20:11,520 --> 00:20:13,720 Speaker 1: Do you think in the curve is artificial or it's 354 00:20:13,760 --> 00:20:16,320 Speaker 1: something to actually pay attention to? And from what I've heard, 355 00:20:16,359 --> 00:20:18,720 Speaker 1: so fine, you don't think it's official so artificial, So 356 00:20:18,760 --> 00:20:21,800 Speaker 1: why isn't it? I don't think it's artificial because the 357 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:24,320 Speaker 1: ft is unwinding, there's been a big uptick in supply. 358 00:20:24,720 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 1: A number of things that should have pushed the long 359 00:20:26,680 --> 00:20:29,560 Speaker 1: end of the curve up haven't. There's a global grab 360 00:20:29,680 --> 00:20:32,159 Speaker 1: for yield. There's a global glab grab for duration. We 361 00:20:32,160 --> 00:20:34,840 Speaker 1: saw the announcement over the weekend of the large UK 362 00:20:34,960 --> 00:20:38,639 Speaker 1: pension fund that's opted to move out into US treasuries 363 00:20:38,680 --> 00:20:41,520 Speaker 1: to grab the yield. Environment. On one of your own stories, 364 00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:44,080 Speaker 1: I saw recently that you had a one ninety yield 365 00:20:44,119 --> 00:20:47,200 Speaker 1: on Australian bonds zero precent real yields. I think that's 366 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:50,760 Speaker 1: the environment that's grabbing it. Step Shot so with us 367 00:20:50,760 --> 00:20:54,200 Speaker 1: this warning, Mr shootos with a missoo where he is 368 00:20:54,240 --> 00:21:11,840 Speaker 1: their chief US economist of of all things UH. Here 369 00:21:11,880 --> 00:21:14,239 Speaker 1: to help us learn more about what is going on 370 00:21:14,440 --> 00:21:17,880 Speaker 1: in the Middle East currently is Jonathan ferzigera Bloomberg Middle 371 00:21:17,920 --> 00:21:21,720 Speaker 1: East politics reporter. And Jonathan, I wonder if you could 372 00:21:21,760 --> 00:21:24,040 Speaker 1: just give us a little bit of a history lesson 373 00:21:24,080 --> 00:21:27,440 Speaker 1: to understand how we got to this situation and why 374 00:21:27,680 --> 00:21:31,560 Speaker 1: the location of the US embassy in Jerusalem is such 375 00:21:31,600 --> 00:21:39,679 Speaker 1: a contentious issue. Sure, Jerusalem has resonances for billions of 376 00:21:39,680 --> 00:21:43,720 Speaker 1: people around the world. Is a Jewish, Christian, Muslim, It 377 00:21:44,840 --> 00:21:47,960 Speaker 1: is the site of some of the holiest places for 378 00:21:48,040 --> 00:21:52,159 Speaker 1: all the fates um in. Now we're going back around 379 00:21:52,400 --> 00:21:58,159 Speaker 1: seventy years and the Israel has established the idea was 380 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:00,560 Speaker 1: that Jerusalem was going to be a capital for both 381 00:22:01,520 --> 00:22:05,280 Speaker 1: Israel Jewish state and the Palestinian state. That didn't happen. 382 00:22:05,720 --> 00:22:11,800 Speaker 1: UH Israel UM and the Arab nations around it went 383 00:22:11,840 --> 00:22:17,399 Speaker 1: into a war Israel one, it established the capital, and 384 00:22:17,480 --> 00:22:21,760 Speaker 1: virtually nobody, no other state in the world, very few 385 00:22:22,200 --> 00:22:25,680 Speaker 1: UH recognized it as a capital. So now seven years 386 00:22:25,800 --> 00:22:28,239 Speaker 1: later Trump has done that. Okay, But but Jonnath, let 387 00:22:28,240 --> 00:22:30,960 Speaker 1: me just break in and understand, because there there was 388 00:22:31,560 --> 00:22:37,640 Speaker 1: obviously many combatants in that war of n and Jordan's 389 00:22:38,680 --> 00:22:43,480 Speaker 1: was involved in a way that shaped the future of Jerusalem, 390 00:22:43,560 --> 00:22:48,400 Speaker 1: did it not? Okay? So Jordan's int eight wound up 391 00:22:48,960 --> 00:22:55,400 Speaker 1: as the occupying power U over Jerusalem and the West 392 00:22:55,400 --> 00:22:59,119 Speaker 1: Bank that's half of Jerusalem, East Jerusalem, so the city 393 00:22:59,200 --> 00:23:03,919 Speaker 1: was split. It was split until nineteen sixty seven Jordan's 394 00:23:04,280 --> 00:23:07,600 Speaker 1: had control of it, and then in the nineteen sixty 395 00:23:07,600 --> 00:23:12,159 Speaker 1: seven more the sixty war, UH Israel captured East Jerusalem 396 00:23:12,240 --> 00:23:15,520 Speaker 1: and the West Bank and they've been in charge since 397 00:23:15,560 --> 00:23:18,400 Speaker 1: they've been next the city. And again that hasn't been 398 00:23:18,400 --> 00:23:22,360 Speaker 1: recognized by most countries. And at that time, just to 399 00:23:22,400 --> 00:23:25,320 Speaker 1: be clear, at that time, in the Old City, because 400 00:23:25,320 --> 00:23:27,760 Speaker 1: there's the new City. In the Old City of Jerusalem. 401 00:23:27,800 --> 00:23:30,320 Speaker 1: There was a Jewish quarter in the Old City and 402 00:23:30,680 --> 00:23:36,119 Speaker 1: there were expulsions there as well. Yeah, the old city 403 00:23:36,200 --> 00:23:41,560 Speaker 1: was plundered. Uh. The old city is walled. It has 404 00:23:42,000 --> 00:23:45,600 Speaker 1: uh three of the Holy of Sites in Islam and 405 00:23:45,680 --> 00:23:49,040 Speaker 1: Judaism and Christianity. Um. And so there was a Jewish 406 00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:54,120 Speaker 1: section and those Jews were expelled in night. They came 407 00:23:54,160 --> 00:23:58,320 Speaker 1: back in sixty seven. Justin how unified is Israel behind 408 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:02,840 Speaker 1: Mr net Yahoo and behind these moments this morning, I 409 00:24:02,840 --> 00:24:08,880 Speaker 1: think Israel is very deeply split. Um. It tilts towards 410 00:24:09,359 --> 00:24:13,800 Speaker 1: Ntan Yahoo. Uh. He uh gives his really a sense 411 00:24:13,880 --> 00:24:19,240 Speaker 1: that he's fighting, that he's standing up. But especially now 412 00:24:19,480 --> 00:24:22,840 Speaker 1: with the violence in in Gaza. Um, it's not going 413 00:24:22,880 --> 00:24:28,040 Speaker 1: down really well. And Israelis are worried to that point. 414 00:24:28,080 --> 00:24:32,040 Speaker 1: And I mean it's with great respect for all in 415 00:24:32,080 --> 00:24:35,080 Speaker 1: the midst and I mean folks, the real time midst 416 00:24:35,160 --> 00:24:39,240 Speaker 1: of these protests. Is there a limit? Is there a 417 00:24:39,400 --> 00:24:43,639 Speaker 1: hurdle where this protest begins to have residence with the 418 00:24:43,680 --> 00:24:46,320 Speaker 1: people of Israel or is it is We've had in 419 00:24:46,320 --> 00:24:50,040 Speaker 1: this three or four reports this morning. A distraction fifty 420 00:24:50,080 --> 00:24:53,760 Speaker 1: miles away which sounds almost cruel. Well, I don't think 421 00:24:53,760 --> 00:24:58,399 Speaker 1: it's a distraction. I think that as the deaths all 422 00:24:58,400 --> 00:25:03,240 Speaker 1: amounts and it is very quick today, UM, people are 423 00:25:04,320 --> 00:25:08,560 Speaker 1: digesting this and it will I mean your tomorrow's front 424 00:25:08,560 --> 00:25:11,320 Speaker 1: pages or the internet. Right now is a mix between 425 00:25:12,040 --> 00:25:15,359 Speaker 1: the glory of the the U. S. Embassy and the 426 00:25:15,640 --> 00:25:21,280 Speaker 1: bloodshed in in Gaza. So it's it's a pretty cloudy picture, Jonathan. 427 00:25:21,280 --> 00:25:25,080 Speaker 1: What has been the reaction of the Palestinian Authority based 428 00:25:25,200 --> 00:25:30,440 Speaker 1: in the West Bank in Ramala. So as soon as 429 00:25:30,760 --> 00:25:35,080 Speaker 1: UH President Trump announced the move and the recognition of 430 00:25:35,600 --> 00:25:39,480 Speaker 1: Jerusalem and Israel's capital, This was in December, the Palestinian 431 00:25:39,560 --> 00:25:43,120 Speaker 1: said that they were pulling out of the peace process 432 00:25:43,280 --> 00:25:49,440 Speaker 1: or whatever peace process were started to form under under Trump. UM. 433 00:25:49,600 --> 00:25:55,640 Speaker 1: Since then, they've been somewhat removed from the confrontations in Gaza. 434 00:25:56,080 --> 00:26:02,080 Speaker 1: UM and the West Bank has been, you know, comparatively tranquil. 435 00:26:02,600 --> 00:26:05,760 Speaker 1: And this would because of Palestinian politics and the split 436 00:26:06,200 --> 00:26:09,719 Speaker 1: between the Palestina Authority and the West Bank and Gaza 437 00:26:09,760 --> 00:26:13,760 Speaker 1: Strip which is controlled by Hamas. What's the economic situation 438 00:26:13,840 --> 00:26:20,679 Speaker 1: in Gaza, It's desperate, Uh, it is been awful for 439 00:26:20,760 --> 00:26:25,480 Speaker 1: the last ten years of the highest unemployment UM and 440 00:26:26,160 --> 00:26:31,040 Speaker 1: food poverty and uh, it's just it's it's bleak um 441 00:26:31,080 --> 00:26:35,080 Speaker 1: and it's gotten worse UM. Partly, I mean a lot 442 00:26:35,080 --> 00:26:39,800 Speaker 1: of this derived from the fact that Gaza is surrounded 443 00:26:39,840 --> 00:26:43,320 Speaker 1: by by fences, is locked in by Israel and Egypt 444 00:26:43,440 --> 00:26:50,000 Speaker 1: in the south. UM, so the question of trade UM 445 00:26:50,240 --> 00:26:54,360 Speaker 1: is almost off the often map. I want to thank 446 00:26:54,359 --> 00:26:58,680 Speaker 1: you very much for joining us Jonathan Bloomberg Middle East 447 00:26:58,680 --> 00:27:02,959 Speaker 1: politics reporter, giving us details about the United States opening 448 00:27:02,960 --> 00:27:08,200 Speaker 1: it's a Jerusalem embassy and also dozens killed, a dozen 449 00:27:08,280 --> 00:27:14,640 Speaker 1: stead in as Gaza as confrontations over this US embassy 450 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:18,679 Speaker 1: move on the border between Gaza and you know, and Israel. 451 00:27:25,200 --> 00:27:29,400 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and 452 00:27:29,480 --> 00:27:34,800 Speaker 1: listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast 453 00:27:34,840 --> 00:27:39,080 Speaker 1: platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before 454 00:27:39,119 --> 00:27:43,320 Speaker 1: the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.