WEBVTT - Is The GameStop Trade Really A Political Rebellion?

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisn't All, and I'm Tracy Alloway. Tracy, I

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can't tell whether I feel bad for you, uh that

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you're in Hong Kong and missing out on US trading

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>hours these days, or whether I'm really jealous of you

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that you're in Hong Kong and missing out on US

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>trading hours these days. Feel bad for me? I feel

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:37.319
<v Speaker 1>bad for me. I would love to be in New

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 1>York during like the most dramatic moments of some of

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the recent US market action that we've seen. Yeah, no,

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I do feel bad for you. I mean it is

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>really fun, Like I've definitely never before had a whole

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>like Bloomberg monitor just devoted to the real time price

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of game Stop. So that's pretty cool. On the other hand,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you are missing out blessedly just truly awful takes about

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>all this, and every cable news channel and pundit and

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>everything is like pontificating about what all this means. And

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not um, I don't feel bad that you're missing that. Okay,

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's true. I haven't seen a lot of what

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>the US television channels are saying I will I will

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>say though, I'm on Twitter basically at nighttime in the US,

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and so I get a lot of cranks and crazy

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>e's around, you know, the hours of like midnight to

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>four am, So I do see some of the conspiracy

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>theories stuff. I get enough of that, Yeah, exactly, But um,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I get the sense that I'm missing something in the

0:01:42.760 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>whole Game Stop commentary that that has been annoying you. Yes, So,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, I love this story and I don't

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>really want it to end any time soon. Let's get

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that out. And I've learned. I've already like learned a

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 1>bunch just like over the last week about how the

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>markets were, Like it's been very educational. But I do

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>think there is this proclivity of everyone who has an

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>agenda to find a way to like work it in.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And you have like Donald Trump Jr. Talking about it,

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and Ted Cruise and AOC and Dave Portnoy and the

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:21.639
<v Speaker 1>winkle Foss brothers and like Glenn Greenwald and Mad Stoler

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and like literally anyone who has an opinion on anything,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the Game Stop trade bolsters their view. So I totally

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>agree with that agenda point. There's something for everyone in

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the game Stop story, whether it's true or not. But

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>but I do think the fact that it's this sort

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>of raw, sharsh test for a bunch of people talking

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>about it, like, I think that is part of the

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>game Stop phenomenon, and so I think you have to

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about it and you have to recognize its importance. Yeah,

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And a big question too, is like is there some

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>thing like political, like because they're a big class warfare

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>element of this, and like, obviously the enter is kind

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of yes, and people like on the Wall Street bets

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>love the idea that they're like sticking it to the bankers.

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you know, you have these people

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>like this is finally the mission of Occupy Wall Street

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>is now but fulfilled. And like, my eyes just roll

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>out the side of my head when I see stuff

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>like that. So we're gonna try to figure out, like

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what does this mean? Is there a political message? Is

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this Occupy Wall Street two point oh? Or is this

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>just something fun? Is it just a trade? Like what

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>does this all mean? All right, Um, this is gonna

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting episode. Let's let's do it. And we

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.640
<v Speaker 1>should note we have we have not one, but two

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>guests because it's such a such a polarizing topic, I suppose. Yeah,

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have a debate, although I'm worried that our

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>guests are going to be too friendly and then it's

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be me and you fighting against each other.

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>That's okay. But I'm very excited about our two guests today,

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>two of our absolute favorite uh people here to the

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sharpest people who understand markets and market structure and finance

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and even politics. Very excited. Um, We're gonna be speaking

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 1>with George Perks, he is a macro strategist at Bespoke

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Investment Group. And Jill Carlson, she is a partner at

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Slow Ventures and does a lot. We've talked to her

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the past about bitcoin and blockchain stuff and money,

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and they've also they've both written, um, I guess you

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>could say takes for the last week. George has a

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>great piece up on Business Insider that you should check out,

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and Jill has a great piece on Coin Desk that

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you should check out. Um. And so we're gonna we're

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna hopefully get the full range of perspective here. So

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>George and Jill, thank you very much for joining us. Yeah,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you. And and I will know the irony that

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>both George and I have now contributed to the sea

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>of bad takes and are continuing to do so. No,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>both of you are, both of your takes, both you,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>both of your takes are the only good takes. Sometimes

0:04:56.480 --> 0:04:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the best take is that the takes are bad, and

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we can't have when having someone saying that.

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think both joll and I tried to do

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that this past week. The ultimate

0:05:06.839 --> 0:05:09.800
<v Speaker 1>meta take, the Meda take. That's what, that's what. That's

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 1>my role, the Meda take. Okay, um, let's start and

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll get on some opening statements for me west

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Aret with George, George, what you're you're more on the view,

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>it's like this is a trade to an interesting trade.

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>It probably does not fit into anyone's political narrative to well,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>what's your what's your take? So the sort of way

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.239
<v Speaker 1>that this has been described by a lot of people

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is that these are sort of neck beardy editors who

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 1>are all in their basements and spending their stimulus checks

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>their last few dollars on out of the money calls

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh margin bets on Jimmy, and that's you know,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>somehow a revenge against the big bad hedge funds and

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>one percenters and billionaires that have been stepping on the

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>necks of this class of people for a long time.

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's just really hard to take that with a

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>straight face. Um, the single biggest holder of game Stop

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is the guy that pioneered sub prime model finance. He's

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire named Donald Fossive of the company. Um, Like,

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Just that fact alone, forget anything else. Just

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that fact alone suggests that, oh, this is a proletarian

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>revolution of the day traders. Is the wrong take straight up? Um,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:18.839
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the composition of the sort of

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 1>folks that are that are in game Stop, I mean,

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the the guy that has benefited the most in terms

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of um percentage return is this, as far as anyone

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>can tell, as this guy, um who goes by Roaring

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Kitty on Twitter, who's who had a position that was

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>worth upwards a fifty million at various points over the

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>past week. Thanks, you know million by the time people

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>are right, who knows where it's at? But he put

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>up fifty k and it's it's you know, so Um.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>You know this is a guy who's a financial advisor

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 1>for financial advisor for a Massachusetts insurance company. UM. You know,

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not trying to come out and bash this guy,

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>but UM, I'm sorry that that's that's not you know,

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the masses in the United States. Fifty dollars that he

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you'll owd into the stock is half of

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>US media net worth, um, and most of that net

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 1>worth isn't liquid assets. It's tied up in real estate.

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, really, anyone that can come up with

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 1>fift k to put into the stock market on this

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of bet is doing substantially better than the typical person. UM.

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's fair to say, so, you know,

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I just my basic take is just this is not

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>some working class revolution against capital as represented by hedge funds.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>So I I understand the point about deep effing value

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>as he's known around here, and the fact that a

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people on Reddit are quite sophisticated in

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the way they talk about options, and the fact that

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they're targeting Agama squeezes is a very you know, non

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>retail activity. But your point about one of the biggest

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>holders in gm E being the subprime auto finance guy

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like you can have a bad populist movement or a

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>bad coordinated or effective populist movement. I mean, we arguably

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 1>just saw one of those in the US at the

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year with the storming of the capital.

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Could it not just be that these people are trying

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>to make a political statement, but they're just not doing

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a very good job. I mean, I think if you

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>ask the people on Wall Street bets like, why are

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>you in this? I mean, you know, if the tendees

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist, they wouldn't be in it, right, This is

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 1>not a political project as a you know, as a

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>first order um, you know, goal there's definitely some political

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>um spin on it, but that's always true. I Mean.

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite memories from my career in markets

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is watching Bill Ackman and um, uh what's his name? Icon?

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Do get out with Scott Wapner on SNBC. Um, Scott

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Watner moderating on SNBC. And I think it was over

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>herbal Life, which was this similar situation where there was

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a large short interest and Icon was long and um,

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, it turned into a political question, right, like

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>herbal Life is extracting rents from these these poor folks,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's a pyramid scheme and that's evil

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>and we need to stop that. And you know, whereas

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>something oside saying, actually, people get a lot of value

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>out of this, and you know, I don't particularly find

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>a compelling but hey, they like it and it seems

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to work for them. So with the issue here, you know,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>everything gets politicized. Um and um. You know, I think

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>with Game Stop, we've seen that to a degree that's

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>just so over the top. So you know that the

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>takes that have emerged out of it are so beyond

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the pale that you've got avowed communists saying that this

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is like the best thing that's ever happened to workers,

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and you know, at the start of the giant Revolution,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, what are you people talking about? Right? Like, um,

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I just think it's it's hyperbolate. That's the

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to Yeah, I want to hop in there

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>because George, I actually remember watching that acmen Icon debate

0:09:50.960 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>as well, and I'm pretty sure that you and I

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>were probably texting each other at the time or bantering

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>about it, because that was around the time we got

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to know each other. But what I think is so

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>beautif full about the last couple of weeks and about

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what this sort of Reddit revolution has shown is that

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>now anyone can be Akmin or icon, anyone can get

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>up on their soapbox and make a case for how

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the market should be playing out, for what should be

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>happening in a given single name stock. And yes, of

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>course that's going to be politicized, and I think to

0:10:23.840 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>a degree it should be because to your point about

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that some of these redditors are quite sophisticated,

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>that's actually part of the point that just goes to

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>show how high the bar to entry is and how

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>big you can still be in the sense of education

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>or even net worth and still be a little guy

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>compared to one of these big institutions. You know, formerly

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.880
<v Speaker 1>you had to be akmin to be Akman, you had

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to have raised hundreds of millions, if not billions, from LPs,

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>you had to have your own fund, and you had

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to be candidly, probably a white guy in a suit

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>getting on CNBC to have that kind of a soap box.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.719
<v Speaker 1>And that's not the case anymore. And I think that

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a really important part of the paradigm shift here

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that says to me that this is not actually just

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>about the tendees. You know, these are not just purely

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of rational economic actors here, because if you look

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>at the discourse at least around who's taking money off

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the table, who's taking profit on these trades, there are

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people with irrational money still in the

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:33.000
<v Speaker 1>game who are holding the line, as they like to say,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just to stick it to the suits. And that sounds

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty political to me, George, can ever, can anyone be

0:11:41.200 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 1>an acment now? I wasn't around during the Internet stock

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>bubble of the late and early two thousand's. I was

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.319
<v Speaker 1>still in grad school back then. But I know, Joe,

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you've told anecdotes about reading message boards back then, about

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:56.640
<v Speaker 1>people hyping stocks and about stocks doing the kind of

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that stocks you today, and maybe not through a

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>short squeeze in a gamma squeeze, by through you know,

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>mass participation in markets. UM, you know, the democratization as

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it were. I think that's the wrong word for it,

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think what people will identify of of going

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to decimalization of um having expanded access to brokerage accounts

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>that happened in the es like that all happened before,

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>right um people signed up for e trade accounts to

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>ride the Internet stock bubble higher in the late nineteen nineties. Um,

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're able to participate, We're able to

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>coordinate in just the same way that we're seeing now.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you could make the case that the specific

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>strategy is a little bit more complex now. Um. But

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's actually something new. Um. And I

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's actually something that's changed significantly. I will

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>admit that there it's easier to get into the market

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and speculate today with an app like robin Hood than

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it would have been twenty years ago. And it probably

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is a little bit easier to coordinate via some of

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>these large scale network effect online communities like Reddit, Wall

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Street bets or like Twitter or whatever. Um, But I

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's an phenomenon at his core. It's maybe

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a more intense version of something we've seen previously. But um,

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I think there has been ample precedent in relatively recent

0:13:10.480 --> 0:13:13.080
<v Speaker 1>history for this exact same pattern of behavior, and so

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>we're not seeing some new emergent um factor, but just

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>standard rehash of what's happened before. Maybe Joe knows the

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>answer to this, But I wasn't trading in the late

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand's. But I don't remember anyone talking about

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.680
<v Speaker 1>specific options contracts that they could gang up on to

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>create a gamma squeeze. Like that feels relatively new to me. Yeah,

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I just um, you know, my

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty second take is like, yeah, there were message boards. Yeah,

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the message boards moving market there a. I do think

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>George is right, the coordination is sort of more intense

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 1>these days, and I think the sophistication is just um

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>way more intense these days. I mean, the level of

0:13:58.800 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligent at would agree at least on some say like

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street beds posters, is extremely high. They're under some

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>of them at least have very good understanding of how

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the derivatives markets work and where the pressure points are emerging,

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and they know how to communicate as such. And also

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in the case of DFV the Roaring Kitty like also

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very high level understanding of business. I mean, Joel, I

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>guess I would ask you though, like, yes, the markets

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are changing and that is new and anyone can sort

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of like tell a story in a way that maybe

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>previously would be reserved for a hedge fund manager. But

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is that like, is that political or is that just

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>changing market? Well, part of what I love about all

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of the commentary that has occurred around this is that

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>for the first time, people are paying attention to market

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>structure and paying attention to all of the implications that

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>come along with market structure in a way that frankly,

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>even Wall Street didn't um. You know, Church and I

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>will both remember when we're working on banks, right at

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>working at banks, excuse me, right out of college, you know,

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the least loved task was interfacing with middle and back office,

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>was waiting through all of the new regulations that were

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>coming out post two thousand eight. It turns out, you know,

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>now looking back ten years later, for me, that was

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the most important work that I did, because

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>it gave me this understanding of how the market is structured,

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>why it's structured this way, and all of the knock

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>on effects and implications that that has on who can

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>access the market, who can access the market in what ways,

0:15:33.320 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who can access information and data flow, who can access leverage,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>who can access various financial products? And again, I think

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that that should be political. And I think that we've

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>seen over the last year people waking up to the

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>system around them, the fish waking up to the water.

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that this is yet another example of that.

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Whether you know, we look at the storming of the

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Capitol Building or even the election of Donald Rump. You know,

0:16:00.520 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>that was a subset of the American people waking up

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and say, you know what, the current system it's not

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>working for me. It doesn't serve me. Even the BLM

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>protests last spring. Of course, that was a very different

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of belief system and ideology that was driving that,

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>but still it was people waking up and saying this

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>system doesn't serve me. And I think that this fits

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow with all of those other examples of this sort

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of zeitgeist in context of the time that we're in,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of people waking up this time to market structure and

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>saying the market structure is broken. I like that idea

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that market structure market access should be political. I think

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a good way of framing it. Um So I

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>just want to go back to, you know, the notion

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>of what is actually motivating Wall Street bets on aggregate.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So if you spend time on the message board, it's

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty clear to me that there is a wrong sense

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of community. Although I guess you could argue over the

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>past week that might be changing, since they've gone up

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to seven million followers or something crazy like that, and

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>it's starting to change the makeup of the form. But

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if you go back to like a few months, like

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Bets had a very defined identity, It had

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>its own language, its own culture, And it feels to

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>me like when you have that commonality, when you have

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that much in common, you have that unity. And part

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>of that unity is developed by having a common identifiable enemy.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And it feels like Wall Street Bets settled on Wall

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Street or parts of Wall Street and the financial industry

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>as their common enemy. So I don't really get how

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>how we can ignore that side of things. Well, I mean,

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:54.239
<v Speaker 1>if you're someone who is well off, who's done well

0:17:54.280 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in society, who has five figures to risk on relatively high,

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>relatively low expected return trades which is what deep out

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 1>of the money call options and highly concentrated positions and

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>margin all you know imply, Um, if you're if you're

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>resentful towards someone who's you know, got a nice suit on,

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that works at a business that ends in the word capital, Um,

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that that's all well and good. I

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.159
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't deny that there's a certain group of

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>people on you know, the Wall Street bets or however

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you want to frame this community is is resentful of

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the classic hedge fund crowd. But I would also say

0:18:32.960 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>that that's very different from something like the Occupy Wall

0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Street movement in the post crisis period, right where you

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>know that that was not upper middle class people getting

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>super mad about UM. You know, the fact that they

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't get enough respect in markets, or that they you know,

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that that hedge funds got all the attention and their

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.679
<v Speaker 1>ideas were overlooked like that was. That was a rejection

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of the larger distribution of wealth, the distribution of resources

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>this country, so on and so forth. It did end

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>up being, you know, something that UM metastasized into the

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>broader politics of of the United States, but at least

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:10.880
<v Speaker 1>not long term. But I do think you can make

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that that case. Whereas the you know, I'm glad Jill

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>brought up the US capital sacking. I mean that group

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of people was by any measure a diverse group of

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.120
<v Speaker 1>people in terms of the amount of UM social resources

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 1>they controlled, around the types of work they do, around

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, their status as labor capital. Right. You have

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>people flying to that event on private planes, and you

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>also have people who were solid by any definition, working

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>class and not doing as well as other folks in society.

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:42.639
<v Speaker 1>You know. So to me, both the US capital and

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street pets phenomenon and game stop whatever um

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>are really good examples of trying to paint over, you know,

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>a people group of people with diverse and you know,

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>unified interests, but unified interests that don't really break down

0:19:55.960 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>along the lines of UM broader political economy. Right, it's it's,

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it's and and that's really what I object to most

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>about some of the takes is that you're trying to

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>fit um, interesting shaped pegs into holes that are just

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a different shape. And so, yeah, haven't you just painted

0:20:12.040 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>over this group as a bunch of people who have

0:20:15.680 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the five figures to throw away, as a bunch of

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>people who are jealous of the students? Want to absolutely people, Yeah,

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>there are absolutely people in this in this diverse range

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of folks that use walls bats, who are not super

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:31.119
<v Speaker 1>high income, who may be spending their last couple hundred

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars on gm E calls or whatever the trade is, right,

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I totally acknowledge there are people like that in there.

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>My point is, my point is not is that if

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you're just going to ignore those people, you shouldn't ignore

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>those people anymore than you should ignore the people that

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>are also benefiting at benefiting who don't fit into that category. Right.

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't. You can't decide that this, you know, this

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>is not a universal group of little guys. There's certainly

0:20:55.400 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 1>some little guys in there, and there's some big fish

0:20:57.000 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in there too. That's that's my point. I think it's

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's super worth acknowledging that so many

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of the people on the Wall Street Beds forum and

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>participating in discourse and in the ways that they are here,

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>whether that's on the discord or wherever wherever you want

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to point to, they're doing an under anonymous accounts or pseudonyms, right,

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that, to me just drives home

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>this point that in a way, it doesn't matter who

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:29.719
<v Speaker 1>they are, it doesn't matter what their associated economic background is,

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>what their motivations are, but they're all participating in this

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of stick it to the man, stick it to

0:21:36.920 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the suits narrative. And sure, I'm sure that you can

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>break down from each individual the nuanced differences of how

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>they see the world and why they're doing this, you

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>know why they've put money into game Stop. I'm sure

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that there are some who are more rational economic actors

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 1>than others. But at the end of the day, you

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:01.880
<v Speaker 1>have this population of folks who are again populating this

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.000
<v Speaker 1>this message board that is driving home this narrative that

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is fundamentally political, and I think that that's that's a

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>huge paradigm shift from what Wall Street has been to date,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.919
<v Speaker 1>where again you had to be a known name and

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>have a track record in order to have power. Now

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you have people who are you know, going under inappropriate

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>names uh and and going by cat avatars having the

0:22:26.480 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>same level of influence and voice. So, George, I mean,

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you're a finance professional and you've written on Business Insider

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>about game Stop. I'm curious how much vitriol have you

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>encountered on social media, because I'm sure between Joe and

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>myself we've gotten quite a lot of abuse over the

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>past week just by working at Bloomberg and therefore being

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>considered part of the financial establishment. People must be responding

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to you, right, not really, I mean like I anytime

0:22:56.440 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I say something that's like at all just us. Anytime

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I say something that's at all like outside of consensus

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>opinion on Twitter, I'm going to have people in my

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>mentions being annoyed, but like it hasn't been anything unreasonable

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, I haven't had people Maybe I don't know,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe Twitter's quality filter is doing a good job or something.

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>But I haven't been harassed or anything like that. I'm

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>sorry y'all have and um, you know, I don't say

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that to say that you'll have it. You know, it's awful.

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.720
<v Speaker 1>The other night I made a chicken tenders and I

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about it and someone said, I work at Bloomberg,

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>so I could never really appreciate tenders someone uh, they

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>said someone, Yeah, I can't eat tends the way the

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>common men, so that, yeah, I do. It is just

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>so interesting that back to what Jill said, like I

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 1>just should we I mean, maybe we should care if

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the petite bougeois is really mad at you know, capitalists, Um,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but to me, like they're bigger, more pressing political narratives here,

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:57.200
<v Speaker 1>that that ascribing these groups is like they're the underdog,

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>when like socio economically, they're definitely not the clear underdog, right, um,

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>compared to like the worst of people in this country

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or in any other country around the world right now, Like,

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:08.959
<v Speaker 1>is that the people we should be holding up as

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>like the the underdogs who are fighting against injustice and

0:24:12.480 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>being shut out of the system. Like I'm a lot

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>more worried about my friends who you know, have been

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>formally incarcerated and therefore can't rent rent an apartment Like

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that to me is like the people we should be

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>worried about underdogs, not people who are mad that they

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>can't get as many tendees as they want. On robin Hood,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 1>everyone will have their own fight to fight, and I

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't think it's for me to uh to

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:38.720
<v Speaker 1>dismiss this fight over another fight, although even if personally

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I I don't disagree. And again, you know, we covered

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this earlier, but in the macro sense of what defines

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the haves versus the haves have not in the United States,

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely right, Torch, anyone with fifty k to throw

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>into a high risk trade goes into the category of

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the haves. Under that, under that more macro framing, but

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>again it just goes to highlight how unequal access is

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>markets today. Let me ask a question, and I'm I'm

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>glad you ended on that note because there's been part

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.320
<v Speaker 1>of the narrative that's been bugging me a little bit,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>but maybe others have different views. And the story that

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I hear a lot of people saying is why are

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>people um complaining about people on Reddit manipulating the price

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of stocks? The market has been manipulated forever. People on

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street are manipulating the stock market all the time,

0:25:36.560 --> 0:25:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and my I do not I know this is going

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>to be very Actually, the thing that I said that

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>got the most abuse so far in the last week

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>was when I tweeted that prior to this, I do

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>not think that US capital markets are actually particularly manipulated.

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they're pretty transparent by and large. I think

0:25:53.640 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that access has been pretty level for a while thanks

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to Index CTF, people of low cost ways of investing

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that are are probably better than they've ever been, and

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>then the old days it was much worse. But other

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>people think like, oh, it's like Riven with manipulation. I'd

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.919
<v Speaker 1>love to hear both of your takes. Like was prior

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Wall Street bets emerging, were big players on

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street constantly manipulating US capital I'm gonna let the

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 1>former m bond trader go first. I was gonna say, Joe,

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's all relative, right, Certainly US

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>markets relative to some of the emerging markets, uh that

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>I dealt with in my former life once upon a time. Sure,

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>very transparent, very fair and equal market access. Um. But

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that that doesn't mean that it's

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>good enough. And I think that that's the distinction that

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I would draw. But you know it is it is

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>very easy to uh, to make that argument and to

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to have that come back of well, look at how

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>lucky we are here relative to most of the world. Yeah,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. I mean it's so if you

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 1>look at a market like Hong Kong, um, like the

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of capital structure manipulation that goes on with property

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>developers over there. UM. I mean, Tracy, I'm sure you

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.440
<v Speaker 1>can speak to ever Grand and some of these companies, right,

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we would not fly in the US, UM.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, um yeah, just not gonna happen. Um. So

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>comparing a relatively developed emerging market, UM, infrastructure, financial markets,

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure like Hong Kong's UM. And I'm sure you could

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>pick out other examples. Um. You know, look at Japan

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>and how companies over there are able to avoid acting

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and shareholder interests, you know, in favor of UM long

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>term holders or UM even some of the stuff that

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>goes on in Europe sometimes. I mean, the US markets

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are are accessible and you know, cheap and generally fair

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 1>also compared to history of the US markets, UM. Right, Uh,

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we've come a long way, and honestly, a lot of

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the part of the reason for that is this sort

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of market mechanics that drove Robin to stop people from trading. Right.

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>We that ultimately they were following a course prescribed by regulation. Right,

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and that regulation in the long run does a really

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a much better job than it could protecting UM individual

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>investors and making sure things are equitable. UM. But you know,

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean we can't go further. And I definitely

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>agree with the idea that things could be more equitable,

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>things could be more fair, and that there are instances

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of manipulation where um, you know, they need to be enforced.

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>And maybe I'm not a lawyer, but maybe the Wall

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Street bet stuff falls into that category. It's possible we're

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>going to find out that the SEC has evidence that

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 1>people were posting from multiple accounts and people were misleading

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 1>people in a public forum. And you know, YadA YadA, YadA,

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>UM not to say that everything that was going on

0:28:46.320 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>was manipulation or anything like that, UM, but you know,

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I do think we could see a lot more enforcement

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>of um, you know, general anti manipulate of law and

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 1>securities law in this country, and it would only do

0:28:59.840 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>good things for individual investors. I have been down this

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>whole kind of rabbit hole about what market manipulation actually

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>means over the last week, and it's it's actually a

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>very weird kind of question if you remove it from

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously the legal parameters and definitions of just can you

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>be a market participant without in some way manipulating the market,

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>because people now take market manipulation just to mean influence

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>or outside influence on the market. And I think that

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the problem that people are appointing to when they talk

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>about market manipulation in this context is just that a

0:29:34.720 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>few big market players have become or can be in

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the market as it stands, kingmakers or world destroyers. And

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the question is, should a few hedge funds get to

0:29:46.800 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>decide that game Stop is a bad company and should

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>go under? Equally, should retail investors get to decide that

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 1>AMC lives and should get this big cash infusion, and

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't really know what to make of that, but

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is more what we're getting at

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about market manipulation. Now, I definitely agree

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that there's a technical issue where there's what the actual

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>definition is and versus the popular perception are way on

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 1>different planets. Yeah, I think Jill's point about this idea

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that eventually what's going on in markets might have an

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>impact on an actual company. So AMC averted bankruptcy recently

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>because it's stock had been squeezed up so high, and

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we even saw its bond prices start to go up,

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.880
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the influence of Wall Street Bets was

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>really felt across the capital structure of am C. GameStop

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.239
<v Speaker 1>hasn't really done much with its searching stock price, but

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 1>who knows, maybe that will change. I think that idea

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is really really interesting. I also think on the manipulation point,

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be We've seen talk about maybe prosecuting

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Bets people for some sort of coordinated manipulation,

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's going to be really hard to

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>to accuse someone of you know, buying game Stop shares

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>because they like them and then planning to hold them

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for a long time Like that doesn't really seem like

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a coordinated pump and dump effort. But anyway, sorry, I'm

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:17.960
<v Speaker 1>getting slightly off, I respond to the really quick Yeah,

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of course. It just begs the question to me of

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.760
<v Speaker 1>why is it okay when hedge fund managers get together

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>at Lebernadine, you know, the smokey back room of the

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>restaurant in New York, and they share their trade positions

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 1>with each other. Why is it okay that even sell

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>side research is still totally restricted to the clients of

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that of that given firm. You know, why why are

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we okay with these elements of the way that the

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>markets are structured? And we're talking about prosecuting people who

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>are posting openly on a Reddit forum. That to me

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is just a big part of what is so insane

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>here and what the rebellion is against. The last thing,

0:31:55.680 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll say, the one thing you definitely can't fault Street

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Bets for his transparency, right, Like everything is in the open,

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and it is, in one way, like one of the

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 1>most level playing fields out there. Um. I wanted to

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 1>go back to robin Hood though, because when we're talking

0:32:11.840 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>about populist outrage. I feel like a lot of that

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>has been directed at robin Hood in recent days, ever

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>since they decided to shut down availability of trading on

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>game Stop and some other companies. People are really really

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>upset about that decision. And then there are people on

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the other side, uh, maybe like George, who are describing

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>this as a pretty rational stance by robin Hood. It

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to preserve its business. But how should we be

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that? So it's really important to understand why

0:32:43.800 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood restricts of trading. Right. They didn't do it

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>because Ken Griffin called them up and said you're not

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>allowed to trade in these stocks anymore. That's not what happened. Right.

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>They had a mechanical margin call from the Depository Trust

0:32:55.120 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and Clearing Corporation that was due to huge new exposure

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in robin Hood accounts that operate under reg T their

0:33:03.800 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>margin accounts Type two accounts, call them a bunch of

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>different things that created a need for robin Hood to

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 1>post large amounts of cash to ensure that they performed

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 1>on their end of trades during the T plus two

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>settlement cycle UM and the amount of cash they had

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to post went up in part because these stocks are

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so volatile, and in part because they just had so

0:33:23.240 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>many people in their platform opening exposure to them. All

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:30.719
<v Speaker 1>of that, the increase in margin related to volatility, the

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that robin Hood had to come up with the

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>cash itself, all of that is designed to protect the

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>people that own stocks via robin Hood. It's designed to

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure that robin Hood is able to perform on

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>their behalf from a financial perspective, and they did. Robin

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Hood did have to go out and raise cash through

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>bank loans and through credit lines and through a new

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>capital raise. And that is how the system is supposed

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to work. And the reason it's supposed to work that

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>way is so that robin Hood doesn't end up blowing

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>up because they can't perform on their obligations to this

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the clearing house and end up having all of their

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 1>customer accounts liquidated through what amounts to a bankruptcy process.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, Jill and I early in our careers,

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we we hit the street right after something related happened

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:20.000
<v Speaker 1>at MF Global. Right, John Corzine was being too aggressive

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.360
<v Speaker 1>with UM customer collateral and it ended up going the

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:25.760
<v Speaker 1>wrong way on him. His trades actually ended up being correct.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just he got margin squeeze in the in the

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>interim and it it created a big blow up related

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to collateral, and so you know, I just I really

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's really frustrating to see regulation that is definitely in

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>customers interests, that is definitely you know, especially over the

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>long term UM, and that is being rationally managed by

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 1>um the broker Robin Hood um be sort of ascribed

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to some shadowy back room plot involving Citadel and some

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>other people. And I don't really understand, you know, because

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>people just don't understand how the plumbing works. And it's okay,

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>pole don't understand bunny works. But that's another thing that's

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>frustrating about these takes is that they were also unaware

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of the mechanics of the market. UM. So that yeah,

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>this is why I like, so Tracy got mad at

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe this morning over Ivy and she's like, why are

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you anti takes? And it was actually mostly this because

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not that I really, you know, everyone is an

0:35:21.640 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>opinion that's fine. Is that I actually think like some

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of the misunderstandings about this stuff was like worsening the

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 1>public's understanding of this to very negative to a negative degree.

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean some of it. I don't like the whole,

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know, Occupy Wall Street stuff, but also like

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 1>people miss explaining why you know, the margin call aspect

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of everything and plotting what is a sort of system

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 1>rules designed to keep the system from blowing up, as

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>rules designed to punish the little guy or prevent the

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>little guy from doing the same trades as hedge funds do.

0:35:55.960 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>That was like the part where I think, like, Okay,

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>some of these takes are like actually corrosive. Um, so

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that's that's why, Tracy, But Jill, where you gonna I

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:07.880
<v Speaker 1>mean here? So wait I have to respond to that.

0:36:07.960 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Wait wait, wait, wait wait, I think look, I think

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you need to be more specific when you do your

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.760
<v Speaker 1>own takes on how there are too many takes because

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you just go out and say, oh, all these takes suck,

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>But you need to be much much more specific about

0:36:22.920 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>which ones you're talking about, because otherwise it just sounds

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>like you don't want anyone to have an opinion on

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>same goes to you. No, I mean, I think, look,

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>I as someone who has worked for a long time

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>in the cryptocurrency and blockchain space, I can absolutely sympathize

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 1>with the feeling that there are too many takes and

0:36:43.920 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that those takes are actually educating people in the wrong

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>direction um and and leaving them with misconceptions. I think

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no doubt that we're going to come out the

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>other side of this whole game stop thing and the

0:36:56.520 --> 0:37:00.560
<v Speaker 1>whole Robin Hood halting trading fiasco with a whole bunch

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of conspiracy theories, as George points to around Ken Griffin.

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>But my perspective is that if even one percent of

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the people who were affected by this learned something about

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the dt c C and settlement cycles in the United

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.680
<v Speaker 1>States and have an opinion on that, I'll call that

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a win. That's my own hot take there. I agree

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a win, and it's awesome that I mean, first off,

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>it's really harmful that Robin Hood signed up everybody by

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>default for a margin account for a reg TEA marginalis,

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, not something that no one is talking about,

0:37:36.239 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and we should absolutely hold their feet to the fire

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>for that, because I think that's that that harmed a

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:43.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, because, by the way, if they hadn't

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 1>been signed up for margin accounts, if they had been

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.000
<v Speaker 1>signed up in regular cash accounts, the margining works different.

0:37:48.040 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>They wouldn't have had to shut down trading if everyone

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>had been trading in cash accounts as opposed to margin accounts.

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>They did the margin account stuff for other reasons. They

0:37:55.680 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>want to get people trading quickly. They want to get

0:37:57.440 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 1>people doing stuff that's volatile, so you know, you get

0:38:00.760 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 1>the gambling aspect that growth exactly exactly. And so yeah,

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that I'm totally I'm thrilled that

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about collateral settlement and you know how

0:38:12.120 --> 0:38:14.680
<v Speaker 1>T plus two works, and you know how we just

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>went from T plus three a few years ago to

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>T plus two and what the DTCC is. That's great, awesome, Um,

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 1>but you've got people with huge platforms, with millions of

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>people able to see what they're saying, who are trying

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to hold themselves forward as experts, and are saying stuff

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that has nothing to do with all that. And so

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I agree that there's a benefit to this that more

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and market infrastructure for everyone involved is good. We

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>should that's great, we should celebrate that. But if the

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:43.760
<v Speaker 1>cost to that is ten times as many people having

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>the complete opposite level of information, I'm not I don't

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's worth the cost at all. I'm sorry, but

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's really harmful for venture capitalists to go

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:55.520
<v Speaker 1>out and say, well, you know, my company that is

0:38:55.560 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a competitor of robin Hood offer, you know you should

0:38:58.000 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 1>be using them instead because they won't do with these

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:01.640
<v Speaker 1>people Robin Hood guys are doing, which is listening to

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.719
<v Speaker 1>Riffin when their company that they're referring to does the

0:39:05.760 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 1>same did the exact same thing for the exact same reasons.

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.840
<v Speaker 1>That's really harmful, right, and we need to say that. So, um,

0:39:12.880 --> 0:39:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm with you. Joe say his name, George

0:39:15.560 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 1>say his name. I've actually never a massive sub tweet.

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I've never heard Jonath's last name pronounced, so I'm not

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:23.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to pronouce the last time. I'm

0:39:23.719 --> 0:39:27.279
<v Speaker 1>really sorry about that. I don't want to guest. M

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Poliopatia is who you're referring to called out Robin Hood

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and who is as part of a spack taking so

0:39:33.760 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>far public and SOFI is stock trading operations. People come

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:40.480
<v Speaker 1>on the episode again at some point have a similar

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>business model to Robin and did put put restrictions on

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>trading and had the same kind of margin calls at

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the d triple D D t CC Like, I'm sorry,

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:55.840
<v Speaker 1>what what well, Joe, I want to go to you because, um,

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get to the blockchain discussion in a second.

0:39:58.480 --> 0:39:59.839
<v Speaker 1>We're going to leave that to the very end. But

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 1>where we get there was sort of the transition she

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>used to be a trader and now you're on the

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>West Coast. You're surrounded by fintech people, in VC people

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and so like on this whole like growth hack conversation

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and the game of gamification of trading and stuff like that. Like,

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:18.799
<v Speaker 1>is this sort of, in your view, like a sort

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of pivotal moment where perhaps there's like a limit to

0:40:23.640 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which sort of like the West Coast

0:40:27.440 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 1>mindset when brought to bear on something like finance and

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:35.399
<v Speaker 1>trading like kind of reaches its limit. And maybe it's

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a wake up moment for a lot

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>of the people on your half, on your side of

0:40:40.520 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the your side of the country, when you think about

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:44.560
<v Speaker 1>disrupting Wall Street and stuff like that, and the sort

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>of the limits there. Oh, Joe, I wish that I

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 1>could say that that that was at all part of

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the narrative here. I mean, I I have long been

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a proponent of the narrative that you can't move fast

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.239
<v Speaker 1>and break things when you're building something in finance, when

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you're building something that actually touches people money, people's money.

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>But that is not really the narrative that is playing

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:08.799
<v Speaker 1>out on the back of this. If anything, I think

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that the narrative is, how do we speed up the

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>ability of people to get involved and play the markets.

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>How do we build infrastructure, forums, social apps, you name

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.919
<v Speaker 1>it that will continue to reduce the frictions at play

0:41:29.960 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>without any regard really to the fact that those frictions,

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>as George very well pointed out earlier, we're built in

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for the integrity of the system and also to some

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>degree at least to protect the little guy. Um. But no,

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's all been emphasis on apps like common Stock and

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 1>public and Adam, there's a new one that I've heard

0:41:51.520 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of coming out called Tendees Tendees dot af Yes, I

0:41:56.640 --> 0:41:59.840
<v Speaker 1>am serious. Um, that's where all of the hype and

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>it excitement around innovation is. There has not been a

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of self reflection or self awareness. It's too

0:42:05.800 --> 0:42:08.080
<v Speaker 1>bad we're not saving the video for this because we

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're looking at each other on video and

0:42:09.719 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>George's face right now with his hands and his face

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:16.320
<v Speaker 1>is just like capturing at all is ten days that

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just the year is. I think it's awesome.

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I think it's awesome that people are getting exposed to

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, you know, like financial markets are fascinating,

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>fascinating things to you know, be involved with from almost

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>any perspective. You know, I just really hope that this

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:40.799
<v Speaker 1>whether there are people that have come to the stock

0:42:40.800 --> 0:42:42.400
<v Speaker 1>market in the past week because of all the headlines,

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>are come to the past, to the stock market in

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years, because of the advances apps

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>like robin Hood, etcetera. I just really hope that they

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>understand that they're taking big risk by just piling in

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and you know whatever. I had a conversation with someone

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>last night who said, yeah, I own um G m E,

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and I own AMC, and I own a couple other

0:43:01.000 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Nokia and maybe BlackBerry, like all

0:43:03.480 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the meme socks like I put but if they all

0:43:06.719 --> 0:43:11.360
<v Speaker 1>go to zero, it's fine, Like I'm comfortable with that outcome.

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much money that it'll it'll ruin me.

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>And I said, great, that's awesome. Good for you like,

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you're getting involved with the market, but you're doing it

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in a way that isn't betting your entire existence on it.

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:25.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's awesome. And I just really hope

0:43:25.560 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that as these you know, as the successibility, whether it's

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 1>to the stock market, crypto, whatever thing right as it

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>continues to expand, that we also try and do the

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:36.720
<v Speaker 1>best we can educating people around the rest are taking

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that tone does have a lot to do

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with it, George, and I think that the tone in

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:45.919
<v Speaker 1>which the education is happening really matters. And I think that,

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:48.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I look back at sort of the

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:52.919
<v Speaker 1>history of fintech innovation, none of this is really that new.

0:43:53.080 --> 0:43:55.359
<v Speaker 1>I think certainly the degree to which it's taking off

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>right now is that new. But something that a lot

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>of people don't realize about Wealth Front is that it

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:05.000
<v Speaker 1>actually started as basically a social app geared towards getting

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:06.879
<v Speaker 1>people involved in the markets. I think it was called

0:44:06.960 --> 0:44:10.759
<v Speaker 1>catching UM, which you can even take the name of

0:44:10.760 --> 0:44:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the company and ask questions about sort of the motivations,

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>probably that that it was imbuing in its customer base UM.

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think that it's notable that that then ended

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:24.399
<v Speaker 1>up as Wealth Front, which I think arguably has done

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:27.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot to democratize finance in a very responsible way.

0:44:27.560 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>So we'll see where all of the the tech innovation

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:34.719
<v Speaker 1>that's happening around the markets right now ends up this

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>time around. But I do agree George, it's about sort

0:44:37.600 --> 0:44:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of responsibility. Can we go back to the settlement issue,

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because I unfortunately am old enough to remember not just

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>when T plus three changed into T plus two, but

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:53.839
<v Speaker 1>when the dtc C actually started talking about it and

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>looking into this, and that was I think back in

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.839
<v Speaker 1>two thousand twelve, and so it was a multi year

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:03.719
<v Speaker 1>process to get down from T plus three to T

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>plus two. So to eliminate one day in the clearing time,

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:12.680
<v Speaker 1>what are the chances that this actually sparks some sort

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of improvement in the clearing system, because I gotta say,

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 1>like it would be quite unexpected and ironic if you know,

0:45:18.640 --> 0:45:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a sub bredit basically lead to a more efficient US

0:45:23.800 --> 0:45:31.320
<v Speaker 1>back office clearing system. But I'm curious what you think, Well,

0:45:31.360 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everything's going to settle it a a leg no

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 1>matter what. There is no way to um have instant

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, settlement UM in a in an exchange environment,

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not possible. If you look at other markets as

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:50.200
<v Speaker 1>an example, whether it's for an exchange, treasuries, futures, whatever,

0:45:50.239 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 1>there's always a settlement leg and it has to be

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that way. Um, and there are ways to you know,

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 1>shorten it. Um. So I don't know, does T plus

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 1>two versus T plus one actually M mean that this

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:05.719
<v Speaker 1>situation wouldn't have played out the way it does. It's

0:46:05.719 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a technical question that I don't think we can know,

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>um from where we all sit. But um, you know,

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think lower settlement cycles or shorter settlement cycles

0:46:14.800 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>reduced risk, but you're always going to have some kind

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of settlement cycles, so you know, trying to avoid it entirely.

0:46:19.560 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen takes where people are like, we need to

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>have stock settling in microseconds, and it's like, no, that's

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not gonna work. Um, like we're just not going to

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>get there. Um, you know. I I don't think it's realistic.

0:46:31.719 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>If Jill might have a different perspective on that with

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>her rooting and blockchain, but yeah, I mean, if if

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you wade deep enough into the sea of bad takes

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on all of this, many of those takes that have

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.239
<v Speaker 1>been coming out of the corner of the Internet that

0:46:45.280 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I frequent anyway have been around the fact that blockchain

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>would have prevented this, or blockchains would save us from

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 1>let's let's hear it. And look, I I don't want

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to say that that is hard and fast, not true,

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:01.319
<v Speaker 1>but I think at a minute, mom, you don't need

0:47:01.560 --> 0:47:05.879
<v Speaker 1>a blockchain to reduce settlement times right like you can

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>do that with a centralized database. If you look at

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:12.640
<v Speaker 1>certificates of deposits and other short term paper, they already

0:47:12.719 --> 0:47:16.480
<v Speaker 1>settle on a T plus zero basis um. And I

0:47:16.520 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>think that there's this kind of techno utopian angle that

0:47:21.160 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 1>people want to impose upon this situation and say, oh,

0:47:25.800 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can fix this with technology and wave

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this magic wand blockchain is going to be a panacea. No, no, no,

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It is much more about getting alignment within the current

0:47:38.040 --> 0:47:42.720
<v Speaker 1>actors of the financial system to want to change things,

0:47:42.840 --> 0:47:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to want to change processes in particular. And look, do

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that it is insane the amount of power

0:47:50.719 --> 0:47:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that the dt c C wields over market structure. Yes,

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I do think that they are effectively a monopoly and

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:00.880
<v Speaker 1>as long as they don't want something to change, probably won't.

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm hopeful that Joe, to your point this whole

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:08.920
<v Speaker 1>conversation that this this subreddit may in fact start to

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>change the tide of where that power lies. That would

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 1>be great, but it is going to be much more

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>about getting them on board and getting other market participants

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>on board. And I think it will be much easier

0:48:20.680 --> 0:48:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to do that using existing technology than it will be

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to get the whole system to rip and replace and

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:32.040
<v Speaker 1>uh and put in a blockchain. Well, on that note, Um,

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:35.319
<v Speaker 1>that was a fantastic discussion. Love talking to both of you.

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we struck the right tone of politeness without

0:48:38.960 --> 0:48:43.479
<v Speaker 1>being too friendly. So Joe Carlson and George Parks, thanks

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>for coming on, Navot, thanks for having me. Yeah, thanks

0:48:46.840 --> 0:49:12.359
<v Speaker 1>so much. This is fun. Uh, Tragy, George and Jill

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.800
<v Speaker 1>are great to talk to you. I actually I definitely

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.839
<v Speaker 1>have probably moved off. I actually, I mean I haven't

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:22.759
<v Speaker 1>like changing my overall views too much. But I think um,

0:49:22.880 --> 0:49:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Jill's argument, which is that although we have seen versions

0:49:27.560 --> 0:49:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of this kind of class conflict and political conflict in

0:49:30.600 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the past, then it's kind of like a new thing

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:37.239
<v Speaker 1>when applied to the stock market. The idea of like

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:40.920
<v Speaker 1>sticking it to the man, going after the suits but

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:45.960
<v Speaker 1>within the context of trading is kind of new and interesting.

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:48.799
<v Speaker 1>It's like, maybe it's like I give the political story

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more credit than I previously did, Like

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:54.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm like somewhere in the middle. Now, I'm gonna

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:56.880
<v Speaker 1>chalk that up as a win. I will note that

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in an episode in which, uh, you know, two of

0:50:00.000 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the four people on it were complaining about how many

0:50:02.600 --> 0:50:04.759
<v Speaker 1>takes there were, I am the only one who did

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not deliver a take in that, So I'm going to

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>do it right now too. But okay, so to me,

0:50:13.000 --> 0:50:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So to me, my take is that it's impossible to

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:21.240
<v Speaker 1>separate the takes, both good and bad, from the success

0:50:21.280 --> 0:50:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of Game Stop. So the whole thing depends on creating

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a short squeeze or a Gama squeeze, forcing the share

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>price up. And in order to do that, you have

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:33.680
<v Speaker 1>to get as many people as possible actually coming into

0:50:33.680 --> 0:50:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the trade. And in order to get as many people

0:50:35.760 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 1>as possible, you have to serve up these different narratives,

0:50:39.360 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>these different motivations, and you have to have things that

0:50:42.239 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 1>appealed to as wide range of people as possible. And

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's why the takes, even if they're terrible,

0:50:49.480 --> 0:50:51.839
<v Speaker 1>are very, very important because there are things that get

0:50:51.880 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 1>people involved in it, you know that, And you know,

0:50:57.239 --> 0:51:00.319
<v Speaker 1>like I don't think it's occupy Wall Street or like

0:51:00.360 --> 0:51:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the Proletary Revolution or whatever. But I do think that

0:51:05.120 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea that I can download an app and be

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>on the other side of a trade from like Steve

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Cohen or Melvin Capital or whatever is really irresistible. And

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I can see why that narrative is a big part

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of what drove the trade. Now, what I object to

0:51:24.400 --> 0:51:27.120
<v Speaker 1>are the people who are like saying it's too real,

0:51:27.400 --> 0:51:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't really think, Like I guess that's where

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I like like a lot where I sort of like

0:51:32.400 --> 0:51:35.240
<v Speaker 1>draw or like where I start to make the distinction,

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Like that narrative is so good, it's fantastic, it's it's

0:51:39.239 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely irresistible. I can see why people are doing it.

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, sort of like people who know better,

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 1>who are like feeding into this idea that you're like

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:52.520
<v Speaker 1>helping overthrow capitalism or overthrowing the one percent by trading

0:51:52.719 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>on this VC funded app on your iPhone with your

0:51:58.440 --> 0:52:00.799
<v Speaker 1>spare cash, Like I don't buy that, and I think

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that's been way over sold and way over agged. But

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you're a percent right like that, without that, if it's

0:52:06.320 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 1>just a mechanical trade, if it's just a short squeeze,

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:11.200
<v Speaker 1>like if we're like like, people wouldn't have gotten excited

0:52:11.200 --> 0:52:13.400
<v Speaker 1>about this. It was like that, like the Porsche v

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 1>W short squeeze's from a few years ago. Like that

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>class angle is a big part of like what I

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>think made the trade work. So agree with you there, Okay,

0:52:24.080 --> 0:52:26.359
<v Speaker 1>another win. Um, I think that's right. But it also

0:52:26.520 --> 0:52:30.080
<v Speaker 1>begs the question. I mean, the thing that we're getting

0:52:30.080 --> 0:52:32.800
<v Speaker 1>at with the bad takes is that at some point

0:52:32.880 --> 0:52:36.799
<v Speaker 1>it becomes really difficult to counter them because they just

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of get out there and take a life on

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:41.840
<v Speaker 1>their own. So so for instance, if you tweet anything

0:52:41.960 --> 0:52:44.359
<v Speaker 1>in defense of Robin Hood at the moment, you're going

0:52:44.400 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to get a bunch of people um talking about Citadel

0:52:47.360 --> 0:52:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and and all of that, and it just it becomes

0:52:50.320 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>really hard to change the narrative. And I mean, I

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 1>can tell you from personal experience that of course, I've

0:52:55.960 --> 0:52:58.520
<v Speaker 1>spoken to my dad about this, who is a noted

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>conspiracy theorist and fairly right wing, and you know, he

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>thinks it's all market manipulation, it's the hedge funds, getting

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:08.560
<v Speaker 1>up with Robin Hood all of that, and even though

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm a financial journalist, his daughter, who presumably he has

0:53:13.320 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable amount of confidence in, I cannot change his

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:21.000
<v Speaker 1>mind about how all of this is working. It's just impossible. Well,

0:53:21.040 --> 0:53:23.239
<v Speaker 1>this is like the thing which is that there's no

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 1>way to actually like disprove it, and that like if

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you if you try to like say, well, this actually

0:53:29.000 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is not that exciting that you know, this is the DCCC.

0:53:33.000 --> 0:53:36.080
<v Speaker 1>These are capital requirements that actually protect the unbroken and

0:53:36.160 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 1>users of Robin Hood. You're just like a hedge fund shill.

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:42.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you sort of like make up a story

0:53:42.840 --> 0:53:46.080
<v Speaker 1>this is it's it's very difficult. This is I actually

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:47.879
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're coming around to my view a little

0:53:47.880 --> 0:53:50.520
<v Speaker 1>bit that like a lot of these takes need to

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:54.440
<v Speaker 1>be brained in. No, I told I, I agree, there

0:53:54.480 --> 0:53:58.640
<v Speaker 1>are terrible takes, but they're sort of part they're part

0:53:58.640 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of the success because you can have you can have

0:54:01.000 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 1>an alluring yet factually incorrect story around something that brings

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people in and it's probably going to

0:54:08.480 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>be more interesting and probably more simple um than the

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:16.200
<v Speaker 1>explanation of what's actually happening. We talked about this with

0:54:16.239 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and inflation. Remember, like, it's much easier to talk,

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know what. Yeah, we could just go on and

0:54:23.360 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on about this, so I'm gonna say, uh yeah, let's

0:54:26.160 --> 0:54:31.080
<v Speaker 1>um all right, let's leave it there. Let's leave it there. Okay.

0:54:31.400 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 1>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:54:34.160 --> 0:54:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:54:36.840 --> 0:54:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisn't You can follow me

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at the Stalwark. Definitely follow our great guests

0:54:43.560 --> 0:54:48.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. George Parks. His handle is at Parks. Jill Carlson.

0:54:48.320 --> 0:54:53.200
<v Speaker 1>She's at Jill Ruth Carlson. Follow our producers. Thank you

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to our substitute producer Today Till for for his He's

0:54:56.719 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 1>for his tea. Thank you to our follow our producer

0:55:00.040 --> 0:55:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Rack Carlson. She's at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:07.279
<v Speaker 1>head of podcast, Francisco Levi at Francisco Today, and check

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:10.320
<v Speaker 1>out all of our podcasts in Bloomberg onto the handle

0:55:10.640 --> 0:55:12.440
<v Speaker 1>at podcasts. Thanks for listening.