WEBVTT - A Good Walk Spoiled

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:20.676
<v Speaker 1>Bushkin. I have a friend who lives in Brentwood, on

0:00:20.716 --> 0:00:23.356
<v Speaker 1>the west side of Los Angeles, between Beverly Hills and

0:00:23.396 --> 0:00:26.276
<v Speaker 1>Santa Monica. He is a little pool house in his

0:00:26.316 --> 0:00:29.236
<v Speaker 1>backyard and I stay there whenever I come to LA,

0:00:29.876 --> 0:00:32.356
<v Speaker 1>kind of like cato'kalon if your memory for O. J.

0:00:32.516 --> 0:00:39.236
<v Speaker 1>Simpson Esoterica goes back that far. Anyway, my friend's street

0:00:39.276 --> 0:00:42.596
<v Speaker 1>dead ends on San Vicente Boulevard, one of the central

0:00:42.676 --> 0:00:46.196
<v Speaker 1>east west corridors in LA. And on the other side

0:00:46.196 --> 0:00:50.156
<v Speaker 1>of San Vicente is this absolutely gorgeous golf course, one

0:00:50.196 --> 0:00:52.716
<v Speaker 1>of the many private country clubs that LA is famous for.

0:00:53.716 --> 0:00:56.916
<v Speaker 1>If you drive down Wilshire Boulevard into Beverly Hills, ten

0:00:56.956 --> 0:01:00.116
<v Speaker 1>minutes east of Brentwood, you go right past Los Angeles

0:01:00.116 --> 0:01:03.156
<v Speaker 1>Country Club, which costs maybe a quarter of a million

0:01:03.196 --> 0:01:06.196
<v Speaker 1>dollars just to join. That is, if they'll even consider

0:01:06.236 --> 0:01:11.876
<v Speaker 1>your application. There's bel Air Country Club just north of Ucla,

0:01:12.396 --> 0:01:14.916
<v Speaker 1>which might be the most beautiful golf course in the country,

0:01:15.596 --> 0:01:19.276
<v Speaker 1>Hillcrest offf Pico, Wilshire country Club in Hancock Park. I

0:01:19.316 --> 0:01:27.156
<v Speaker 1>could go on. They're everywhere, vast, gorgeous and private. The

0:01:27.196 --> 0:01:29.756
<v Speaker 1>one near my friend's house is called Brentwood country Club

0:01:29.996 --> 0:01:32.516
<v Speaker 1>and it has a tall chain link fence around it

0:01:32.796 --> 0:01:35.036
<v Speaker 1>which goes almost all the way out to the street,

0:01:35.276 --> 0:01:39.436
<v Speaker 1>leaving just this narrow, rocky dirt track. There's no sidewalk,

0:01:39.996 --> 0:01:41.796
<v Speaker 1>and since there aren't a lot of places to run

0:01:41.796 --> 0:01:44.836
<v Speaker 1>in Los Angeles, tons of people run around the Brentwood

0:01:44.836 --> 0:01:52.996
<v Speaker 1>Country Club on that narrow dirt track. And there's one

0:01:53.036 --> 0:01:55.436
<v Speaker 1>thing that always bothers me every time I run that route.

0:01:56.316 --> 0:01:58.676
<v Speaker 1>Why do all the runners of West Los Angeles have

0:01:58.756 --> 0:02:02.196
<v Speaker 1>to squeeze into this narrow, rocky little track when there's

0:02:02.236 --> 0:02:05.116
<v Speaker 1>a huge, magnificent park just on the other side of

0:02:05.156 --> 0:02:11.516
<v Speaker 1>the fence. My name is Malcolm Gladwell, and you're listening

0:02:11.596 --> 0:02:16.516
<v Speaker 1>to Revisionist History, my podcast about things overlooked and misunderstood.

0:02:21.436 --> 0:02:25.836
<v Speaker 1>This episode is about the problem with golf. I hate

0:02:25.876 --> 0:02:29.756
<v Speaker 1>golf and hopefully by the end of this you'll hate

0:02:29.796 --> 0:02:39.796
<v Speaker 1>golf too. I'm standing here would Die day Zac, who

0:02:39.916 --> 0:02:44.996
<v Speaker 1>is a very successful landscape architect Santa Monica, and we're

0:02:45.036 --> 0:02:48.796
<v Speaker 1>on the corner of Sanma Sente and Berlin Game and

0:02:48.836 --> 0:02:53.236
<v Speaker 1>we're looking into the Brentwood Country Club and the first

0:02:53.236 --> 0:02:54.516
<v Speaker 1>thing I see is barbed wire.

0:02:55.156 --> 0:02:57.876
<v Speaker 2>Looks like a couple of layers of barbed wire.

0:02:58.276 --> 0:03:00.276
<v Speaker 1>This looks like it looks like the Berlin Wall.

0:03:00.636 --> 0:03:02.996
<v Speaker 2>It like they want us to get in there.

0:03:02.876 --> 0:03:04.476
<v Speaker 1>Are you what are we seeing? We're seeing this. Move

0:03:04.476 --> 0:03:07.476
<v Speaker 1>a little closer here. What's that stand up trees? Do

0:03:07.516 --> 0:03:08.276
<v Speaker 1>you know what those are?

0:03:09.436 --> 0:03:12.956
<v Speaker 2>That looks like silk oaks in the foreground? And then

0:03:13.236 --> 0:03:17.596
<v Speaker 2>I see a Sadris theodora, quite lovely. Lots of larger trees,

0:03:17.636 --> 0:03:20.836
<v Speaker 2>which are unusual in Los Angeles because there's so little

0:03:21.436 --> 0:03:26.556
<v Speaker 2>open space. Yeah, there's some piness. Canariensis looks like a

0:03:26.636 --> 0:03:27.676
<v Speaker 2>redwood in there.

0:03:28.276 --> 0:03:30.196
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Daezak has ever played a round of

0:03:30.196 --> 0:03:33.756
<v Speaker 1>golf in her life. That's exactly why I wanted her opinion.

0:03:34.276 --> 0:03:37.636
<v Speaker 1>I wanted someone objective to tell me what it would

0:03:37.636 --> 0:03:39.436
<v Speaker 1>take to turn this place into a park.

0:03:39.676 --> 0:03:41.876
<v Speaker 2>Well, first of all, I would get rid of the

0:03:41.956 --> 0:03:42.836
<v Speaker 2>two layers.

0:03:42.556 --> 0:03:46.756
<v Speaker 1>Of bark wire. Were the whole Eastern European feel east,

0:03:46.836 --> 0:03:49.276
<v Speaker 1>Your German field would have to be corrected.

0:03:49.876 --> 0:03:53.556
<v Speaker 2>I mean that might be some people's bag, but it's

0:03:53.596 --> 0:03:54.636
<v Speaker 2>not very welcoming.

0:03:55.276 --> 0:03:59.876
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:03:59.996 --> 0:04:03.116
<v Speaker 1>The typical golf course is two hundred acres, give or take.

0:04:03.516 --> 0:04:06.156
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of land. You have to landscape. It,

0:04:06.396 --> 0:04:10.236
<v Speaker 1>mow it, drench it, and pesticides keep this sand traps perfect.

0:04:10.916 --> 0:04:13.316
<v Speaker 1>I read somewhere that when a fancy golf course rebuilds

0:04:13.316 --> 0:04:16.796
<v Speaker 1>its bunkers, it typically takes about three hundred and eighty

0:04:16.876 --> 0:04:21.556
<v Speaker 1>nine truckloads of sand three hundred and eighty nine just

0:04:21.596 --> 0:04:25.116
<v Speaker 1>to keep everything nice and white and fluffy. But at

0:04:25.156 --> 0:04:28.796
<v Speaker 1>the same time, because golf involves launching a potentially lethal

0:04:28.916 --> 0:04:33.356
<v Speaker 1>projectile at great speeds across enormous distances, you have to

0:04:33.396 --> 0:04:35.396
<v Speaker 1>severely limit the number of people on the course at

0:04:35.396 --> 0:04:39.236
<v Speaker 1>any one time. Typically, a good private course can handle

0:04:39.276 --> 0:04:42.236
<v Speaker 1>no more than seventy two golfers at once. So that's

0:04:42.236 --> 0:04:44.796
<v Speaker 1>one golfer per one hundred and twenty thousand, eight hundred

0:04:44.796 --> 0:04:48.236
<v Speaker 1>and thirty three square feet. Can you imagine if basketball

0:04:48.276 --> 0:04:51.436
<v Speaker 1>had the same population density as golf. I did the math.

0:04:52.036 --> 0:04:55.876
<v Speaker 1>If basketball was played according to the geographical requirements of golf,

0:04:56.196 --> 0:05:00.756
<v Speaker 1>a basketball court would be thirty acres. Picture that that

0:05:00.876 --> 0:05:08.996
<v Speaker 1>had to play on motorcycles. Okay, another fact about golf.

0:05:09.596 --> 0:05:13.556
<v Speaker 1>Rich people really really like it. They're obsessed with it

0:05:13.876 --> 0:05:15.876
<v Speaker 1>in a way that there just isn't any parallel for

0:05:15.956 --> 0:05:20.276
<v Speaker 1>ordinary people. Because serious golfers are super anal about their scores.

0:05:20.516 --> 0:05:24.356
<v Speaker 1>We can actually quantify their obsession in order to calculate

0:05:24.396 --> 0:05:27.636
<v Speaker 1>their handicap, basically how well they're playing relative to other

0:05:27.676 --> 0:05:30.236
<v Speaker 1>people at the country club. They all post their results

0:05:30.276 --> 0:05:33.476
<v Speaker 1>on a database maintained by the United States Golf Association.

0:05:34.036 --> 0:05:37.436
<v Speaker 1>So we have a record, and it's a gold mine.

0:05:37.476 --> 0:05:39.716
<v Speaker 4>To be able to calculate your handicap and track it

0:05:39.756 --> 0:05:43.196
<v Speaker 4>through time. You will log into the system either at

0:05:43.316 --> 0:05:45.436
<v Speaker 4>your course or on your home computer.

0:05:45.876 --> 0:05:48.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to an economist at Miami University named Lee

0:05:48.836 --> 0:05:53.396
<v Speaker 1>bigger Staff. He's interested in the habits of top corporate executives.

0:05:53.996 --> 0:05:56.636
<v Speaker 1>If you have the corner office and a multimillion dollar

0:05:56.756 --> 0:05:59.756
<v Speaker 1>stock option and a golf stream five, does that make

0:05:59.796 --> 0:06:01.916
<v Speaker 1>you more or less likely to put in a hard

0:06:01.956 --> 0:06:06.316
<v Speaker 1>day's work. The USGA database is of serious professional interest

0:06:06.396 --> 0:06:07.516
<v Speaker 1>to a guy like bigger Staff.

0:06:07.836 --> 0:06:11.436
<v Speaker 4>And you input you played and what day you played on,

0:06:11.716 --> 0:06:14.716
<v Speaker 4>and what your score was, and you know, after a

0:06:14.716 --> 0:06:18.476
<v Speaker 4>certain number of rounds being played, the USGA will indicate

0:06:18.516 --> 0:06:21.436
<v Speaker 4>what your handicap is, your level of skill, which allows

0:06:21.436 --> 0:06:23.756
<v Speaker 4>you to compete against other golfers of different skill level

0:06:23.796 --> 0:06:25.316
<v Speaker 4>and kind of normalize against that.

0:06:25.716 --> 0:06:27.916
<v Speaker 1>You know, how you always hear that CEOs play a

0:06:27.956 --> 0:06:31.756
<v Speaker 1>lot of golf. Bigger Staff's insight is that the USGA

0:06:31.876 --> 0:06:35.116
<v Speaker 1>database allows us to know exactly how much they play.

0:06:35.756 --> 0:06:37.916
<v Speaker 1>All you need to do is cross reference that list

0:06:37.916 --> 0:06:40.676
<v Speaker 1>of scores with a list of the CEOs of America's

0:06:40.756 --> 0:06:44.276
<v Speaker 1>largest companies. So that's what he does. It takes forever,

0:06:44.356 --> 0:06:44.996
<v Speaker 1>by the way.

0:06:44.876 --> 0:06:47.316
<v Speaker 4>We started while as a PhD student, and so this

0:06:47.396 --> 0:06:49.996
<v Speaker 4>certainly was a multi month process. So it's not something

0:06:49.996 --> 0:06:51.556
<v Speaker 4>that nine issy want to repeat in the near term

0:06:51.556 --> 0:06:53.316
<v Speaker 4>just because it took a lot of collection time.

0:06:53.316 --> 0:06:56.316
<v Speaker 1>There, how can you not love this? Surely this is

0:06:56.316 --> 0:06:59.956
<v Speaker 1>why God invented graduate students. Bigger Staff begins with the

0:07:00.036 --> 0:07:02.996
<v Speaker 1>names of the heads the top fifteen hundred publicly held

0:07:02.996 --> 0:07:06.596
<v Speaker 1>companies in the US. Three hundred and sixty three of

0:07:06.636 --> 0:07:09.836
<v Speaker 1>those fifteen hundred turn out to be I'm so obsessed

0:07:09.876 --> 0:07:13.116
<v Speaker 1>with golf that they enter their scores into the USGA database.

0:07:13.316 --> 0:07:16.836
<v Speaker 4>What you're seeing, on average is, I think fifteen rounds

0:07:16.836 --> 0:07:19.236
<v Speaker 4>a year is kind of the average CEO is playing

0:07:19.276 --> 0:07:22.356
<v Speaker 4>that amount of golf. But it's a heavily skewed distribution, right,

0:07:22.356 --> 0:07:23.356
<v Speaker 4>So we have a lot of people that are playing

0:07:23.436 --> 0:07:27.156
<v Speaker 4>very little golf, and then we have a tail where

0:07:27.236 --> 0:07:29.876
<v Speaker 4>we're picking it up. The top quartile we're looking at,

0:07:29.916 --> 0:07:31.956
<v Speaker 4>which is twenty two or more rounds per year, And.

0:07:31.956 --> 0:07:33.956
<v Speaker 1>If you go to the top ten percent of Bigger

0:07:33.956 --> 0:07:37.876
<v Speaker 1>Staff sample, the CEOs are playing around at least thirty

0:07:37.916 --> 0:07:43.916
<v Speaker 1>seven times a year. A round of golf is a

0:07:43.916 --> 0:07:46.236
<v Speaker 1>good four four and a half hours, So if you

0:07:46.316 --> 0:07:49.076
<v Speaker 1>play thirty seven times a year, that's more than one

0:07:49.156 --> 0:07:52.396
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty hours on the course, the equivalent of

0:07:52.436 --> 0:07:56.036
<v Speaker 1>five and a half weeks of work. By the way,

0:07:56.236 --> 0:07:59.716
<v Speaker 1>these are understatements. They don't include the time spent driving

0:07:59.716 --> 0:08:02.996
<v Speaker 1>to the course, warming up, getting changed, having a drink.

0:08:03.436 --> 0:08:06.476
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't include the hours spent practicing shots on the putting

0:08:06.516 --> 0:08:08.836
<v Speaker 1>green or the driving range, or all the rounds you

0:08:08.916 --> 0:08:11.396
<v Speaker 1>play that you don't enter into the database, like if

0:08:11.396 --> 0:08:13.756
<v Speaker 1>you're only playing nine holes or playing a fun round,

0:08:14.156 --> 0:08:18.356
<v Speaker 1>so the real time is probably way higher. Bigger Staff

0:08:18.396 --> 0:08:20.476
<v Speaker 1>then goes on to show that the more golf of

0:08:20.596 --> 0:08:24.316
<v Speaker 1>CEO plays, the worse his firm does, and also that

0:08:24.356 --> 0:08:26.996
<v Speaker 1>the more golf of CEO plays, the more likely he

0:08:27.076 --> 0:08:30.196
<v Speaker 1>is to be fired. In other words, this isn't a

0:08:30.236 --> 0:08:34.796
<v Speaker 1>harmless habit, it's a dangerous habit. Remember the Wall Street

0:08:34.876 --> 0:08:38.556
<v Speaker 1>investment bank bear Stearns. They went bankrupt during the mortgage

0:08:38.596 --> 0:08:42.516
<v Speaker 1>crisis in July of two thousand and seven, Right when

0:08:42.556 --> 0:08:46.196
<v Speaker 1>the crisis was beginning. The CEO of bear Stearns would

0:08:46.236 --> 0:08:49.316
<v Speaker 1>often helicopter out from Wall Street on Friday afternoons to

0:08:49.356 --> 0:08:51.996
<v Speaker 1>his exclusive course in New Jersey to get a round

0:08:51.996 --> 0:08:55.916
<v Speaker 1>in before sunset. Even when his company was collapsing, he

0:08:55.956 --> 0:09:00.836
<v Speaker 1>couldn't stop playing golf. Out of President Donald Trump's first

0:09:00.876 --> 0:09:03.996
<v Speaker 1>four months in office, he visited his own golf courses

0:09:04.396 --> 0:09:08.076
<v Speaker 1>twenty five times. One week he played three times. You

0:09:08.116 --> 0:09:10.236
<v Speaker 1>would think he would be at the office learning how

0:09:10.236 --> 0:09:13.476
<v Speaker 1>to be president, reading intelligence briefings, drading the swamp. No,

0:09:13.636 --> 0:09:17.596
<v Speaker 1>he's golfing. It's an addiction, right, because the definition of

0:09:17.636 --> 0:09:21.116
<v Speaker 1>an addiction is a self destructive habit. Just think if

0:09:21.116 --> 0:09:23.876
<v Speaker 1>I said to you that an important employee of a

0:09:23.916 --> 0:09:27.556
<v Speaker 1>major organization made lifestyle choices that caused him to miss

0:09:27.676 --> 0:09:30.836
<v Speaker 1>enormous amounts of work, harm his performance, and put his

0:09:30.876 --> 0:09:34.276
<v Speaker 1>own career in jeopardy, you would say, WHOA, check that

0:09:34.316 --> 0:09:39.716
<v Speaker 1>guy into rehab. That's golf crack cocaine for rich white guys.

0:09:41.116 --> 0:09:44.276
<v Speaker 4>The highest in the sample one hundred and forty six

0:09:44.356 --> 0:09:47.156
<v Speaker 4>or one hundred and forty eight rounds recorded in a

0:09:47.196 --> 0:09:48.716
<v Speaker 4>single year, which I mean that at that point, that's

0:09:48.716 --> 0:09:51.076
<v Speaker 4>a tremendous amount of time spent on the golf course.

0:09:51.436 --> 0:09:53.996
<v Speaker 1>You thought I was engaging in hyperbole, didn't you that

0:09:54.036 --> 0:09:57.316
<v Speaker 1>I was using the word addiction metaphorically? One hundred and

0:09:57.316 --> 0:09:59.436
<v Speaker 1>forty eight rounds a year is a round of golf

0:09:59.556 --> 0:10:01.716
<v Speaker 1>every three days.

0:10:01.876 --> 0:10:03.516
<v Speaker 4>And that would be if it was kind of uniformly

0:10:03.516 --> 0:10:07.516
<v Speaker 4>distributed across the year. It's you know, GoF certainly has

0:10:07.556 --> 0:10:09.956
<v Speaker 4>a season where it's a little bit more dents in

0:10:10.036 --> 0:10:12.036
<v Speaker 4>terms of the summer versus the winner.

0:10:12.876 --> 0:10:16.596
<v Speaker 1>And you can't tell me what company it is. I

0:10:16.636 --> 0:10:17.996
<v Speaker 1>want to know what company it is.

0:10:18.676 --> 0:10:21.636
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we're just with this data, given it somewhat sensitive,

0:10:23.236 --> 0:10:25.436
<v Speaker 4>we're unwilling to name out CEOs.

0:10:25.996 --> 0:10:28.276
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe you won't tell me. I mean, here,

0:10:28.316 --> 0:10:31.596
<v Speaker 1>we have an activity that is incredibly expensive, that is

0:10:31.756 --> 0:10:35.236
<v Speaker 1>organized in just about the most extravagant manner possible, and

0:10:35.316 --> 0:10:38.876
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, this expensive habit is incredibly addictive,

0:10:39.036 --> 0:10:41.236
<v Speaker 1>to the point that there's a chief executive out there

0:10:41.396 --> 0:10:45.196
<v Speaker 1>of a major American corporation who plays an average of

0:10:45.236 --> 0:10:47.756
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and forty eight rounds of golf a year

0:10:48.236 --> 0:10:51.556
<v Speaker 1>and is so completely unself conscious about that fact that

0:10:51.636 --> 0:10:54.476
<v Speaker 1>he posts all one hundred and forty eight rounds on

0:10:54.516 --> 0:10:58.276
<v Speaker 1>a public database where it can be analyzed by graduate students.

0:10:59.196 --> 0:11:01.556
<v Speaker 1>So what happens to rich white guys with a dangerous,

0:11:01.596 --> 0:11:05.236
<v Speaker 1>costly obsession. Do they burn through their life savings paying

0:11:05.276 --> 0:11:08.956
<v Speaker 1>for their addiction like ordinary addicts do? Please give them

0:11:08.956 --> 0:11:09.916
<v Speaker 1>a little more respect.

0:11:12.476 --> 0:11:14.836
<v Speaker 3>By the way, this is my fifteenth year in television.

0:11:14.876 --> 0:11:16.556
<v Speaker 5>Imagine that fifteen years of me.

0:11:18.676 --> 0:11:20.756
<v Speaker 1>The longest stomach test in the history of show.

0:11:20.756 --> 0:11:24.436
<v Speaker 3>Of everyone, you could argue, I would say in the

0:11:24.476 --> 0:11:26.916
<v Speaker 3>forties and fifties there was no one who was more

0:11:26.956 --> 0:11:29.196
<v Speaker 3>widely popular in America than Bob Hope.

0:11:29.316 --> 0:11:33.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking to Richard Saglan, Bob Hope's biographer. I think

0:11:33.436 --> 0:11:35.916
<v Speaker 1>Bob Hope has been a little forgotten in recent years,

0:11:36.196 --> 0:11:38.236
<v Speaker 1>but in his day he was huge.

0:11:38.756 --> 0:11:41.996
<v Speaker 3>Every late night comedian who does a stand up monologue

0:11:41.996 --> 0:11:44.356
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of the show owes a debt to

0:11:44.396 --> 0:11:46.676
<v Speaker 3>Bob Hope because he kind of invented that thing, a

0:11:46.756 --> 0:11:49.596
<v Speaker 3>stand up comedy monologue that sort of took note of

0:11:49.596 --> 0:11:51.556
<v Speaker 3>what was going on in the world, what was going

0:11:51.596 --> 0:11:54.596
<v Speaker 3>on in Hollywood, what was going on everywhere, and he

0:11:54.716 --> 0:11:57.956
<v Speaker 3>was just the voice of America. I think for a

0:11:57.956 --> 0:11:58.516
<v Speaker 3>long time.

0:11:59.516 --> 0:12:01.636
<v Speaker 1>Bob Hope is a crucial part of the story of

0:12:01.636 --> 0:12:05.356
<v Speaker 1>golf in America, although I'm warning you things are going

0:12:05.396 --> 0:12:08.236
<v Speaker 1>to get a little complicated, which is sort of the point,

0:12:08.316 --> 0:12:10.156
<v Speaker 1>because you don't get to run the world for as

0:12:10.196 --> 0:12:13.196
<v Speaker 1>long as rich white guys have without being pretty wily,

0:12:13.916 --> 0:12:16.876
<v Speaker 1>and some of their best and wiliest work has been

0:12:16.916 --> 0:12:22.076
<v Speaker 1>on the golf course. So there's a principal and property

0:12:22.116 --> 0:12:25.156
<v Speaker 1>tax law called highest and best use, which is that

0:12:25.196 --> 0:12:27.316
<v Speaker 1>one of the ways you figure out how much to

0:12:27.436 --> 0:12:30.276
<v Speaker 1>tax a piece of property is to estimate what its

0:12:30.316 --> 0:12:33.476
<v Speaker 1>best use might be. For example, if I have a

0:12:33.476 --> 0:12:36.196
<v Speaker 1>one acre plot and the fanciest part of Manhattan that

0:12:36.276 --> 0:12:38.596
<v Speaker 1>I used to grow vegetables, I can't say to the

0:12:38.636 --> 0:12:42.156
<v Speaker 1>city that land is worthless, it's just a vegetable garden. No,

0:12:42.716 --> 0:12:44.996
<v Speaker 1>the city's going to say we're going to value that

0:12:45.036 --> 0:12:47.276
<v Speaker 1>one acre and tax it as if it had an

0:12:47.276 --> 0:12:50.356
<v Speaker 1>apartment block on it, because that's the best use of

0:12:50.436 --> 0:12:53.596
<v Speaker 1>land in the fancy parts of Manhattan. Now, if you've

0:12:53.596 --> 0:12:55.636
<v Speaker 1>got a vast golf course in the middle of Beverly

0:12:55.716 --> 0:12:59.036
<v Speaker 1>Hills or Brentwood. Highest and best use makes you really

0:12:59.156 --> 0:13:02.916
<v Speaker 1>nervous because plainly, the highest and best use of land

0:13:02.956 --> 0:13:04.636
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of one of the most expensive and

0:13:04.676 --> 0:13:07.316
<v Speaker 1>densely populated cities in the world is not a private

0:13:07.356 --> 0:13:12.356
<v Speaker 1>golf course. So years ago, in nineteen sixty, California's country

0:13:12.356 --> 0:13:15.236
<v Speaker 1>clubs realize they have to act or they're going to

0:13:15.236 --> 0:13:19.076
<v Speaker 1>get taxed into oblivion. They get together and they propose

0:13:19.196 --> 0:13:23.196
<v Speaker 1>an amendment to the state constitution that permanently exempts them

0:13:23.396 --> 0:13:26.436
<v Speaker 1>from the highest and best use standard. They want their

0:13:26.516 --> 0:13:31.516
<v Speaker 1>vegetable garden to be taxed as a vegetable garden. If

0:13:31.556 --> 0:13:36.196
<v Speaker 1>you think about it, this is seriously audacious. Private golf

0:13:36.196 --> 0:13:40.716
<v Speaker 1>courses are these massive, opulent, gated playgrounds, and membership is

0:13:40.756 --> 0:13:44.076
<v Speaker 1>often restricted. In Los Angeles in nineteen sixty, a lot

0:13:44.076 --> 0:13:46.876
<v Speaker 1>of these clubs didn't let in Jews. They certainly didn't

0:13:46.916 --> 0:13:49.036
<v Speaker 1>let in black people except to work in the kitchen.

0:13:49.556 --> 0:13:54.356
<v Speaker 1>Yet they wanted a constitutional exemption to ordinary property taxes

0:13:54.556 --> 0:13:57.356
<v Speaker 1>like they were some kind of public amenity. How can

0:13:57.396 --> 0:14:01.356
<v Speaker 1>they argue this, They don't, not really. They just bring

0:14:01.396 --> 0:14:04.036
<v Speaker 1>in Bob Hope, who in addition to being the most

0:14:04.076 --> 0:14:08.956
<v Speaker 1>popular entertainer in America, is also an obsessive golfer. Obsessive

0:14:09.676 --> 0:14:10.156
<v Speaker 1>I might.

0:14:10.036 --> 0:14:10.876
<v Speaker 5>As well level with you.

0:14:10.916 --> 0:14:13.316
<v Speaker 6>I spent so much time in Sandtrap they sent me

0:14:13.356 --> 0:14:16.996
<v Speaker 6>citizenship papers from Saudi Arabia. Oh yeah, I love to

0:14:17.036 --> 0:14:17.676
<v Speaker 6>hear the whole.

0:14:17.836 --> 0:14:21.356
<v Speaker 1>Bob Hope once wrote an entire book just devoted to

0:14:21.436 --> 0:14:24.636
<v Speaker 1>his golf game, called Confessions of a Hooker, in which

0:14:24.676 --> 0:14:28.156
<v Speaker 1>he estimates that he had played on two thousand different

0:14:28.196 --> 0:14:30.276
<v Speaker 1>golf courses over the course of his life.

0:14:30.396 --> 0:14:34.076
<v Speaker 3>He belonged to the Lakeside Country Club in La near

0:14:34.156 --> 0:14:40.076
<v Speaker 3>where he lived a life of the prestigiousstigious. I think so. Yeah.

0:14:40.196 --> 0:14:42.436
<v Speaker 1>The genius at picking Bob Hope is the face of

0:14:42.436 --> 0:14:46.996
<v Speaker 1>California's country clubs is that his whole persona, his whole act,

0:14:47.276 --> 0:14:50.596
<v Speaker 1>was about being every man. He's self deprecating. Half his

0:14:50.716 --> 0:14:53.076
<v Speaker 1>jokes are about how he's not part of the inn group,

0:14:53.236 --> 0:14:55.396
<v Speaker 1>even though, of course there's no one more in than

0:14:55.436 --> 0:14:55.996
<v Speaker 1>Bob Hope.

0:14:56.116 --> 0:14:58.196
<v Speaker 6>Isn't this wonderful love being here in California?

0:14:58.236 --> 0:14:59.436
<v Speaker 2>I just love it. Look at that guy.

0:15:00.596 --> 0:15:02.036
<v Speaker 1>That's the only place in the world where you can

0:15:02.076 --> 0:15:03.356
<v Speaker 1>get four seasons in one day.

0:15:03.396 --> 0:15:05.716
<v Speaker 4>I want to tell you that this is.

0:15:05.996 --> 0:15:07.876
<v Speaker 6>We better hurry. We'll be able to be snowing before

0:15:07.916 --> 0:15:08.396
<v Speaker 6>the third hole.

0:15:09.476 --> 0:15:10.036
<v Speaker 2>Let's move on.

0:15:10.156 --> 0:15:13.236
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, So how did the Bob Hope for Golf

0:15:13.276 --> 0:15:17.956
<v Speaker 1>campaign do in nineteen sixty It wins. The proposition passes

0:15:18.196 --> 0:15:21.116
<v Speaker 1>and is added to Article thirteen of the California Constitution,

0:15:21.516 --> 0:15:25.516
<v Speaker 1>where it remains to this day. In order to win

0:15:25.716 --> 0:15:28.276
<v Speaker 1>a set of privileges for the very wealthy, in other words,

0:15:28.636 --> 0:15:32.236
<v Speaker 1>California's country clubs turn to a man who symbolizes the

0:15:32.236 --> 0:15:35.756
<v Speaker 1>common man. I mean, when does it ever happen that

0:15:35.796 --> 0:15:38.676
<v Speaker 1>a TV celebrity wins a sweetheart deal for his rich

0:15:38.716 --> 0:15:41.516
<v Speaker 1>golf buddies by posing as a friend of the common man.

0:15:42.476 --> 0:15:50.476
<v Speaker 1>If you get my drift to give me back, just like,

0:15:50.796 --> 0:15:54.596
<v Speaker 1>totally understand Prop thirteen property has passed in nineteen seventy eight,

0:15:55.396 --> 0:16:01.476
<v Speaker 1>and what are the principal stipulations of the proposition. I'm

0:16:01.476 --> 0:16:03.756
<v Speaker 1>in a big conference room in the Los Angeles County

0:16:03.836 --> 0:16:07.756
<v Speaker 1>Municipal building, one of those beautiful nineteen thirties office buildings

0:16:07.756 --> 0:16:10.396
<v Speaker 1>that are all over downtown Las Ane Angels. There are

0:16:10.476 --> 0:16:12.676
<v Speaker 1>four people on the other side of the table. They're

0:16:12.716 --> 0:16:15.916
<v Speaker 1>from the La County tax Assessor's office. I'm on my

0:16:16.036 --> 0:16:18.996
<v Speaker 1>quest to figure out why Brentwood Country Club isn't just

0:16:19.036 --> 0:16:21.476
<v Speaker 1>a big park that I can go running through, and

0:16:21.516 --> 0:16:24.836
<v Speaker 1>I've decided to start the people who run the tax system.

0:16:25.116 --> 0:16:29.356
<v Speaker 1>These are serious folks, deliberate, thoughtful. They have promised to

0:16:29.396 --> 0:16:32.436
<v Speaker 1>help me. You'll have to guess what they really think.

0:16:34.116 --> 0:16:37.636
<v Speaker 5>The tax rate is set is one percent of the value,

0:16:37.876 --> 0:16:39.996
<v Speaker 5>as opposed to a variable rate, which it was before.

0:16:40.316 --> 0:16:43.556
<v Speaker 1>The man speaking is Brian Donnelly. He's talking about the

0:16:43.556 --> 0:16:47.916
<v Speaker 1>most famous amendment to the California Constitution, Proposition thirteen.

0:16:48.396 --> 0:16:52.236
<v Speaker 5>The properties only get reassessed with when there's a transfer

0:16:52.356 --> 0:16:56.156
<v Speaker 5>or a change of ownership, or there's new construction. Those

0:16:56.196 --> 0:16:57.796
<v Speaker 5>are the primary parts of it.

0:16:58.076 --> 0:17:00.836
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he's saying. If you own a house, every

0:17:00.836 --> 0:17:03.516
<v Speaker 1>one or two years, typically the value of your property

0:17:03.556 --> 0:17:05.836
<v Speaker 1>is reassessed by the city or county where you live.

0:17:06.556 --> 0:17:09.076
<v Speaker 1>So if your house doubles in value, the local government

0:17:09.196 --> 0:17:13.036
<v Speaker 1>will raise your taxes accordingly. That's the way property taxes work,

0:17:13.716 --> 0:17:18.276
<v Speaker 1>except in California. Proposition thirteen said that for tax purposes,

0:17:18.556 --> 0:17:21.476
<v Speaker 1>the value of any piece of property in California is

0:17:21.636 --> 0:17:25.476
<v Speaker 1>frozen at pre nineteen seventy eight levels, and the only

0:17:25.556 --> 0:17:28.756
<v Speaker 1>way that property can be reassessed at its real current

0:17:28.876 --> 0:17:32.116
<v Speaker 1>value is if the property is sold, or, to be

0:17:32.156 --> 0:17:35.796
<v Speaker 1>more specific, if ownership of more than fifty percent of

0:17:35.836 --> 0:17:40.196
<v Speaker 1>the property changes hands. In other words, California has two

0:17:40.276 --> 0:17:43.956
<v Speaker 1>kinds of taxpayers, the post nineteen seventy eight people who

0:17:43.996 --> 0:17:47.716
<v Speaker 1>pay normal property taxes, and the people lucky and old

0:17:47.836 --> 0:17:50.036
<v Speaker 1>enough to be living in the same house they owned

0:17:50.076 --> 0:17:53.276
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy eight, who pay a tiny fraction of

0:17:53.316 --> 0:17:54.036
<v Speaker 1>their fair share.

0:17:54.316 --> 0:17:56.876
<v Speaker 5>You know, I've got family members who've owned their house

0:17:56.916 --> 0:18:01.156
<v Speaker 5>in nineteen sixty nine and they're paying I think their

0:18:01.196 --> 0:18:04.356
<v Speaker 5>tax will value is about ninety thousand dollars or something

0:18:04.356 --> 0:18:06.516
<v Speaker 5>like that. The houses in that neighborhood sell for six hundred,

0:18:07.076 --> 0:18:11.396
<v Speaker 5>so they're paying a lot less than It's the properteen conundrum,

0:18:11.396 --> 0:18:12.836
<v Speaker 5>which I'm sure you've read about.

0:18:16.116 --> 0:18:20.796
<v Speaker 1>Please understand, this system is insane, totally crazy. I mean,

0:18:20.876 --> 0:18:23.076
<v Speaker 1>just think of all the reasons why someone might deserve

0:18:23.116 --> 0:18:26.156
<v Speaker 1>a big tax break. I mean, they're sick, they're poor,

0:18:26.756 --> 0:18:29.116
<v Speaker 1>they have tons of young kids, they've made a big

0:18:29.156 --> 0:18:32.236
<v Speaker 1>investment in their business. The state of California says, no,

0:18:33.076 --> 0:18:36.156
<v Speaker 1>we think the most deserving group are people whose property

0:18:36.156 --> 0:18:40.956
<v Speaker 1>hasn't changed hands in forty years. Okay, now imagine that

0:18:41.036 --> 0:18:44.636
<v Speaker 1>you're a private golf club. You did that spectacular bit

0:18:44.676 --> 0:18:47.436
<v Speaker 1>of jiu jitsu with Bob Hope in nineteen sixty, which

0:18:47.476 --> 0:18:50.676
<v Speaker 1>means that you don't pay real property taxes. Gift from

0:18:50.716 --> 0:18:55.636
<v Speaker 1>God number one. Then comes proposition thirteen, and you get

0:18:55.636 --> 0:19:00.116
<v Speaker 1>a second gift from God because proposition thirteen says that

0:19:00.156 --> 0:19:05.116
<v Speaker 1>those already artificially low property taxes are now frozen forever

0:19:05.276 --> 0:19:08.996
<v Speaker 1>at nineteen seventy eight levels, so long as your country

0:19:09.196 --> 0:19:12.756
<v Speaker 1>club does not change hands. And that last part is

0:19:12.836 --> 0:19:16.796
<v Speaker 1>crucial because if you have a change in ownership, then

0:19:16.876 --> 0:19:20.396
<v Speaker 1>you have to pay real property tax like every other

0:19:20.596 --> 0:19:24.156
<v Speaker 1>long suffering California taxpayer who hasn't been in one place

0:19:24.156 --> 0:19:28.716
<v Speaker 1>since nineteen seventy eight. So the country clubs of Los

0:19:28.756 --> 0:19:33.716
<v Speaker 1>Angeles all hang by a thread. They continue to exist

0:19:34.476 --> 0:19:37.916
<v Speaker 1>only so long as the tax system perceives that they

0:19:37.956 --> 0:19:42.756
<v Speaker 1>have not changed hands. And for years everyone assumes they

0:19:42.756 --> 0:19:47.276
<v Speaker 1>haven't changed hands. I mean Brentwood, LA country Club, Wiltshire.

0:19:47.596 --> 0:19:50.356
<v Speaker 1>All the major golf clubs were all founded before nineteen

0:19:50.396 --> 0:19:54.796
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight, but then a neighborhood newspaper called the Los

0:19:54.796 --> 0:20:00.396
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Garment and Citizen runs an article January sixteenth, twenty ten,

0:20:00.756 --> 0:20:05.076
<v Speaker 1>in which they say, wait a minute, most private country

0:20:05.076 --> 0:20:09.356
<v Speaker 1>clubs in Los Angeles have what's called equity ownership. They're

0:20:09.436 --> 0:20:12.436
<v Speaker 1>owned by their members. When you admit it, you get

0:20:12.436 --> 0:20:15.316
<v Speaker 1>a share. When you die or quit, someone else takes

0:20:15.316 --> 0:20:19.196
<v Speaker 1>your share. So over time, if enough members die or quit,

0:20:19.556 --> 0:20:23.276
<v Speaker 1>isn't that a change in ownership. That question was put

0:20:23.316 --> 0:20:25.796
<v Speaker 1>to Rick Auerbach, who was then the head of tax

0:20:25.796 --> 0:20:27.196
<v Speaker 1>assessment for La County.

0:20:27.476 --> 0:20:28.876
<v Speaker 5>I think the quote was kind of funny for me.

0:20:28.876 --> 0:20:31.916
<v Speaker 5>You said something about, let's see, on most issues we

0:20:31.916 --> 0:20:34.076
<v Speaker 5>haven't heard at least the question asked before. He said

0:20:34.116 --> 0:20:35.556
<v Speaker 5>he'd worked in the office thirty nine years, but this

0:20:35.636 --> 0:20:36.156
<v Speaker 5>was a new one.

0:20:36.356 --> 0:20:39.916
<v Speaker 1>So hour Back refers the question to the city's lawyers.

0:20:40.356 --> 0:20:42.636
<v Speaker 1>They put their best and brightest legal minds on it

0:20:42.916 --> 0:20:46.956
<v Speaker 1>for six months, and on June second, twenty ten, the

0:20:46.996 --> 0:20:51.476
<v Speaker 1>County's tax court issues a solemn, four page ruling. They conclude,

0:20:51.756 --> 0:20:56.636
<v Speaker 1>no country clubs haven't changed hands. If you're keeping track,

0:20:56.876 --> 0:20:59.596
<v Speaker 1>that's the third straight up gift from God that LA's

0:20:59.596 --> 0:21:01.996
<v Speaker 1>private country clubs have gotten in the last fifty years.

0:21:02.516 --> 0:21:05.236
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to someone who's a member of Bella

0:21:05.436 --> 0:21:08.916
<v Speaker 1>Country Clubs and I said, what percentage of the members

0:21:08.916 --> 0:21:12.396
<v Speaker 1>of bel Air today? We're members in seventy eight and

0:21:12.436 --> 0:21:16.156
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know, ten percent? So why isn't that

0:21:16.196 --> 0:21:17.156
<v Speaker 1>a change of ownership?

0:21:17.476 --> 0:21:19.476
<v Speaker 5>Right? If I haven't had a chance to dig through

0:21:19.516 --> 0:21:22.276
<v Speaker 5>this a whole lot since I got it out of

0:21:22.276 --> 0:21:24.436
<v Speaker 5>the file the other day. But they kind of get

0:21:24.436 --> 0:21:27.676
<v Speaker 5>into it. It's they're saying, if there's no one event

0:21:27.876 --> 0:21:31.156
<v Speaker 5>that is that is more than fifty percent of a transfer,

0:21:31.596 --> 0:21:34.396
<v Speaker 5>then it's not. Each of those little individual slices are

0:21:34.436 --> 0:21:36.076
<v Speaker 5>not a change of ownership on their own.

0:21:37.116 --> 0:21:44.596
<v Speaker 1>Did you find that argument plausible? Well, yeah, that's that's.

0:21:44.596 --> 0:21:46.036
<v Speaker 5>We were implementers of the law.

0:21:46.276 --> 0:21:46.396
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:21:46.516 --> 0:21:50.796
<v Speaker 1>You don't have opinions? No, Well no, I could swear

0:21:50.956 --> 0:21:52.956
<v Speaker 1>as I looked across the table at Donnelly and his

0:21:53.036 --> 0:21:56.556
<v Speaker 1>cohorts that they were twitching like they desperately wanted to

0:21:56.556 --> 0:21:59.356
<v Speaker 1>say something but had to bite their tongue. You know

0:21:59.396 --> 0:22:03.836
<v Speaker 1>what it's like. You know that famous paradox I forgot

0:22:03.836 --> 0:22:06.716
<v Speaker 1>with the ship. Well, you the question is if you

0:22:06.836 --> 0:22:08.596
<v Speaker 1>change if you have a ship and you change a sex.

0:22:08.676 --> 0:22:11.636
<v Speaker 1>Some ancient think and you change one board at a time.

0:22:12.716 --> 0:22:14.516
<v Speaker 1>Is at the end of the day, is a ship different?

0:22:15.196 --> 0:22:18.516
<v Speaker 1>That's what this is. The thing I can't remember is

0:22:18.556 --> 0:22:22.076
<v Speaker 1>a ship of theseus? The famous thought experiment described by

0:22:22.076 --> 0:22:27.916
<v Speaker 1>the Greek philosopher Plutarch roughly two thousand years ago. Plutarch says,

0:22:28.356 --> 0:22:31.476
<v Speaker 1>imagine theseus is sailing on a ship, and one by

0:22:31.516 --> 0:22:34.196
<v Speaker 1>one he replaces every one of the original planks that

0:22:34.236 --> 0:22:37.156
<v Speaker 1>make up that ship with a new plank, until every

0:22:37.196 --> 0:22:40.516
<v Speaker 1>single piece of the ship is new. The question is,

0:22:40.716 --> 0:22:43.636
<v Speaker 1>when theseus reaches shore, is he sailing on the same

0:22:43.636 --> 0:22:46.196
<v Speaker 1>ship as he was when he left or a new ship.

0:22:47.076 --> 0:22:50.156
<v Speaker 1>One view says it's a new ship. This is called

0:22:50.156 --> 0:22:53.796
<v Speaker 1>the myriological theory of identity. The identity of something is

0:22:53.796 --> 0:22:57.236
<v Speaker 1>the sum of its component parts. Change the parts, you

0:22:57.356 --> 0:23:00.756
<v Speaker 1>change the thing. On the other side of the argument

0:23:00.916 --> 0:23:04.996
<v Speaker 1>is something called spatio temporal continuity theory, which says that

0:23:05.076 --> 0:23:08.796
<v Speaker 1>an object can maintain its identity so long as the

0:23:08.916 --> 0:23:12.156
<v Speaker 1>chain is gradual and the form or shape of the

0:23:12.196 --> 0:23:16.436
<v Speaker 1>object is preserved to the changes of its component materials.

0:23:17.396 --> 0:23:18.996
<v Speaker 1>I think you can see where I'm going with this.

0:23:20.076 --> 0:23:23.756
<v Speaker 1>The city's lawyers take a second view. So long as

0:23:23.756 --> 0:23:27.436
<v Speaker 1>a country club replaces its rich white guys gradually, and

0:23:27.516 --> 0:23:30.316
<v Speaker 1>so long as each new rich white guy preserves the

0:23:30.356 --> 0:23:33.196
<v Speaker 1>form and shape of the rich white guy he is replacing,

0:23:33.476 --> 0:23:36.156
<v Speaker 1>then the private golf clubs of today must have the

0:23:36.156 --> 0:23:39.996
<v Speaker 1>same existential status as the private golf courses of nineteen

0:23:40.036 --> 0:23:43.956
<v Speaker 1>seventy eight. Collections of rich white guys, from the standpoint

0:23:43.996 --> 0:23:48.836
<v Speaker 1>of the La County property tax system, possess spatio temporal continuity.

0:23:51.596 --> 0:23:54.116
<v Speaker 1>At this point I realized I was in way over

0:23:54.196 --> 0:23:57.156
<v Speaker 1>my head. Tax assessors were not going to be enough.

0:23:57.636 --> 0:24:01.636
<v Speaker 1>I needed an actual philosopher, so I called Mark Cohen

0:24:02.196 --> 0:24:05.156
<v Speaker 1>of the University of Washington to get to the bottom

0:24:05.156 --> 0:24:07.916
<v Speaker 1>of the question of whether large groups of rich white

0:24:07.916 --> 0:24:09.996
<v Speaker 1>people possess onto life logical permanence.

0:24:11.076 --> 0:24:16.636
<v Speaker 6>Here's an argument that favors the spaciotemporal continuity theory. The

0:24:16.716 --> 0:24:21.556
<v Speaker 6>idea that what makes the ship persist through time as

0:24:21.596 --> 0:24:25.396
<v Speaker 6>one and the same is that it moves smoothly through

0:24:25.436 --> 0:24:29.996
<v Speaker 6>space time. One plank is removed and thrown overboard, and

0:24:30.196 --> 0:24:33.196
<v Speaker 6>a replacement plank is installed taken from the cargo the

0:24:33.236 --> 0:24:36.516
<v Speaker 6>ship has on board, so when it arrives it doesn't

0:24:36.516 --> 0:24:39.636
<v Speaker 6>have a single part that is identical to any of

0:24:39.636 --> 0:24:42.276
<v Speaker 6>the parts that started out with, and so there's no

0:24:42.356 --> 0:24:44.636
<v Speaker 6>point at which you can say, aha, now we have

0:24:44.716 --> 0:24:48.876
<v Speaker 6>a new ship, a different a numerically different ship. So

0:24:48.996 --> 0:24:51.476
<v Speaker 6>that if you have that sort of argument in mind,

0:24:51.476 --> 0:24:55.076
<v Speaker 6>you think, okay, the Space Show temporal continuity criterion is

0:24:55.076 --> 0:24:57.916
<v Speaker 6>the correct one. Forget about requiring that all the parts

0:24:57.916 --> 0:24:58.476
<v Speaker 6>are the same.

0:24:59.116 --> 0:25:03.396
<v Speaker 1>But Con is not finished as a philosopher. His job

0:25:03.436 --> 0:25:06.116
<v Speaker 1>is to consider all the scenarios raised by the ship

0:25:06.116 --> 0:25:09.636
<v Speaker 1>of THESEUS conundrum, like the museum counter example.

0:25:09.876 --> 0:25:13.756
<v Speaker 6>The museum example goes like this. Suppose the ship is

0:25:14.676 --> 0:25:18.316
<v Speaker 6>in a museum of ancient ships and a gang of

0:25:18.356 --> 0:25:21.676
<v Speaker 6>crooks is trying to steal this ancient ship, and it

0:25:21.796 --> 0:25:24.836
<v Speaker 6>realizes it can't just haul it out in one piece.

0:25:24.916 --> 0:25:27.476
<v Speaker 6>They would easily be spotted. So they come up with

0:25:27.516 --> 0:25:28.396
<v Speaker 6>a clever scheme.

0:25:28.756 --> 0:25:31.716
<v Speaker 1>They sneak in every night and steal the ship, one

0:25:31.796 --> 0:25:34.396
<v Speaker 1>board at a time, one plank a day, so the

0:25:34.516 --> 0:25:36.316
<v Speaker 1>museum doesn't realize what's going on.

0:25:36.636 --> 0:25:40.116
<v Speaker 6>By the time they're finished on day number an, they

0:25:40.156 --> 0:25:43.996
<v Speaker 6>have all end parts of the ship removed. Now they

0:25:44.036 --> 0:25:47.156
<v Speaker 6>reassemble them and put it on the black market. They're

0:25:47.316 --> 0:25:51.756
<v Speaker 6>selling theseus's ancient ship for a pretty price, and they've

0:25:51.876 --> 0:25:56.116
<v Speaker 6>left a replica behind in the museum. I contend that

0:25:56.196 --> 0:25:59.436
<v Speaker 6>in this case, when you describe it in this way,

0:25:59.556 --> 0:26:04.356
<v Speaker 6>it seems as if Theseus's ship has been stolen piecemeal

0:26:04.556 --> 0:26:06.956
<v Speaker 6>from the museum.

0:26:07.316 --> 0:26:09.796
<v Speaker 1>Cohen's point is that there's no simple answer to the

0:26:09.796 --> 0:26:13.316
<v Speaker 1>ship of Theseus problem. You can go around and around

0:26:13.356 --> 0:26:16.476
<v Speaker 1>and around. That's why it's a puzzle. But do you

0:26:16.556 --> 0:26:19.596
<v Speaker 1>see what the lawyers at the LA Board of Equalization did.

0:26:20.316 --> 0:26:23.836
<v Speaker 1>They just waltz into a philosophical conundrum that has bedeviled

0:26:23.836 --> 0:26:26.036
<v Speaker 1>some of the best minds in the world for two

0:26:26.276 --> 0:26:29.996
<v Speaker 1>thousand years and declare victory and say, oh, it's definitely

0:26:30.076 --> 0:26:35.076
<v Speaker 1>option one spatio temporal continuity.

0:26:36.516 --> 0:26:41.796
<v Speaker 6>The problem as it stands is irresolvable, and you only

0:26:41.876 --> 0:26:44.516
<v Speaker 6>come to a conclusion that makes any sense to you

0:26:45.356 --> 0:26:50.436
<v Speaker 6>if you place it in a context in which there

0:26:50.476 --> 0:26:56.236
<v Speaker 6>is something sort of extra metaphysical, something pragmatic, that helps

0:26:56.316 --> 0:26:58.276
<v Speaker 6>that tilts you in one direction or the other.

0:26:58.796 --> 0:27:03.116
<v Speaker 1>So what's the pragmatic, extra metaphysical consideration here? It's at

0:27:03.196 --> 0:27:06.796
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles ranks near the bottom of all major metropolitan

0:27:06.876 --> 0:27:10.036
<v Speaker 1>areas in the United States in terms of public parks.

0:27:10.716 --> 0:27:13.676
<v Speaker 1>There's Griffith Park off in the northeastern corner of the city,

0:27:13.836 --> 0:27:16.076
<v Speaker 1>which only a fraction of the city can even get to.

0:27:16.796 --> 0:27:20.396
<v Speaker 1>And then there's basically nothing except these massive golf courses

0:27:20.956 --> 0:27:24.356
<v Speaker 1>which are both closed to the general public and subsidized

0:27:24.356 --> 0:27:26.556
<v Speaker 1>by the general public. Do you want to know the

0:27:26.556 --> 0:27:30.116
<v Speaker 1>size of that subsidy? I asked around a guy I

0:27:30.196 --> 0:27:31.996
<v Speaker 1>know knows a guy who's a member of the La

0:27:32.076 --> 0:27:35.676
<v Speaker 1>Country Club. That guy's back of the envelope calculation was

0:27:35.716 --> 0:27:38.316
<v Speaker 1>that the club's land was worth about six billion dollars.

0:27:38.876 --> 0:27:41.196
<v Speaker 1>But that was a couple years ago. Then I heard

0:27:41.196 --> 0:27:43.116
<v Speaker 1>from another guy who said that they now think it's

0:27:43.156 --> 0:27:48.836
<v Speaker 1>worth nine billion, nine billion. Under normal circumstances, the property

0:27:48.876 --> 0:27:51.596
<v Speaker 1>taxes on that much land would come to about ninety

0:27:51.796 --> 0:27:55.036
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year. Do you know what LA Country

0:27:55.036 --> 0:27:57.916
<v Speaker 1>Club actually paid after you add up the Bob Hope

0:27:57.916 --> 0:28:02.716
<v Speaker 1>exemption and the Spatio temporal continuity ruling two hundred thousand

0:28:02.756 --> 0:28:07.076
<v Speaker 1>dollars give or take all. Right, let's do the math together.

0:28:07.916 --> 0:28:11.356
<v Speaker 1>They should be paying ninety million. In fact, they're only

0:28:11.396 --> 0:28:15.876
<v Speaker 1>paying two hundred thousand dollars in property taxes ninety million

0:28:15.916 --> 0:28:18.996
<v Speaker 1>minus two hundred thousand dollars is eighty nine million, eight

0:28:19.116 --> 0:28:22.676
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars. That's how much the tax bearers of

0:28:22.756 --> 0:28:26.916
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles subsidize one of the swankiest country clubs in

0:28:26.956 --> 0:28:30.116
<v Speaker 1>the world every year. Well, now I wander to bring

0:28:30.196 --> 0:28:33.316
<v Speaker 1>up something else that comes to mind here, which is

0:28:33.356 --> 0:28:39.156
<v Speaker 1>that the spatial temporal argument, taken out of philosophical context,

0:28:39.796 --> 0:28:45.596
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as being can sometimes be really troubling. For example,

0:28:45.636 --> 0:28:49.236
<v Speaker 1>it's a very I mean, I think there's something fundamentally

0:28:49.316 --> 0:28:52.276
<v Speaker 1>intuitive about it. And I don't mean that necessarily in

0:28:52.316 --> 0:28:55.556
<v Speaker 1>a good way. That it you know, that we get

0:28:55.596 --> 0:28:59.956
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we call the Hudson River the Hudson River,

0:29:00.116 --> 0:29:05.476
<v Speaker 1>even though the Hudson River is at every second changing.

0:29:05.916 --> 0:29:08.676
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, the water's up, the same boats

0:29:08.756 --> 0:29:10.476
<v Speaker 1>go down on it. You know, it's never that he

0:29:10.556 --> 0:29:13.076
<v Speaker 1>never looks the same way twice ever. But we continue

0:29:13.116 --> 0:29:15.796
<v Speaker 1>to call it the Hudson River. But it strikes me

0:29:15.836 --> 0:29:19.436
<v Speaker 1>that in a political context, as kind of thinking can

0:29:19.476 --> 0:29:23.836
<v Speaker 1>be used to perpetuate inequality and injustice.

0:29:24.596 --> 0:29:25.116
<v Speaker 6>Interesting.

0:29:26.116 --> 0:29:28.996
<v Speaker 1>For example, what is the what is an aristocracy but

0:29:29.116 --> 0:29:35.956
<v Speaker 1>a political formulation of the spatial temporal continuity principle? Right?

0:29:36.116 --> 0:29:38.316
<v Speaker 6>It is something like that, and it's.

0:29:38.076 --> 0:29:41.996
<v Speaker 1>It's troubling it precisely that way, because they're saying circumstances

0:29:42.036 --> 0:29:44.956
<v Speaker 1>can change, and the holders of the privilege can change.

0:29:44.996 --> 0:29:48.956
<v Speaker 1>The father can die and the son can inherit the peerage,

0:29:49.316 --> 0:29:53.276
<v Speaker 1>but the peerage remains intact. It has this quality that's

0:29:53.316 --> 0:29:56.236
<v Speaker 1>independent of all that's going around it.

0:29:56.276 --> 0:30:00.756
<v Speaker 6>And that's yes, where there where the identity of the

0:30:00.796 --> 0:30:05.596
<v Speaker 6>object confers, for example, a right or a title, and

0:30:05.676 --> 0:30:10.076
<v Speaker 6>if it's considered to be held intact and in by

0:30:10.156 --> 0:30:14.636
<v Speaker 6>whoever holds it at any one time, then basically that

0:30:14.836 --> 0:30:19.356
<v Speaker 6>removes change altogether from the realm of what matters as

0:30:19.356 --> 0:30:25.236
<v Speaker 6>far as as ownership is concerned. Yes, so the seventeenth

0:30:25.396 --> 0:30:28.276
<v Speaker 6>great grandson of the peer still has all of the

0:30:28.356 --> 0:30:32.876
<v Speaker 6>rights and privileges, even though so far removed from the

0:30:32.956 --> 0:30:36.996
<v Speaker 6>rights and privileges as they attached to the original holder

0:30:37.036 --> 0:30:41.676
<v Speaker 6>of them. So there is something that is unfair and

0:30:41.756 --> 0:30:46.516
<v Speaker 6>anti egalitarian about the way this principle can get applied.

0:30:50.476 --> 0:30:55.716
<v Speaker 1>So the golf clubs of Los Angeles are essentially aristocratic

0:30:55.756 --> 0:31:05.156
<v Speaker 1>institutions exactly. I think someone needs to tell Brimwood and

0:31:05.276 --> 0:31:08.036
<v Speaker 1>La Country Club and all the others that if they

0:31:08.076 --> 0:31:12.076
<v Speaker 1>want to hold space, temporal continuity privileges, they have to

0:31:12.076 --> 0:31:16.596
<v Speaker 1>give something back. Take down your barbed wire. Your members

0:31:16.596 --> 0:31:20.116
<v Speaker 1>can play golf on weekdays, but evenings and weekends belong

0:31:20.196 --> 0:31:24.396
<v Speaker 1>to the ordinary taxpayers of Los Angeles. Let them come

0:31:24.476 --> 0:31:27.356
<v Speaker 1>and enjoy the greens and fairways that they've been subsidizing

0:31:27.476 --> 0:31:31.236
<v Speaker 1>for generations. It's worth remembering, by the way, that the

0:31:31.236 --> 0:31:34.036
<v Speaker 1>most famous golf course in the world, the home of golf,

0:31:34.116 --> 0:31:37.076
<v Speaker 1>Saint Andrews in Scotland, is open to the general public

0:31:37.116 --> 0:31:41.716
<v Speaker 1>on Sundays. In Toronto, the fanciest golf club is Rosedale

0:31:41.756 --> 0:31:44.556
<v Speaker 1>Country Club, right in the middle of the city, but

0:31:44.596 --> 0:31:47.916
<v Speaker 1>the golf course is only private in summer. The rest

0:31:47.916 --> 0:31:50.156
<v Speaker 1>of the time it's open to anyone who wants to

0:31:50.236 --> 0:31:52.676
<v Speaker 1>go for a walk, or play frisbee, or go cross

0:31:52.676 --> 0:31:56.916
<v Speaker 1>country skiing. Canada and the United Kingdom, i would point out,

0:31:57.196 --> 0:32:00.956
<v Speaker 1>are governed by a queen. They have an actual aristocracy,

0:32:01.636 --> 0:32:04.076
<v Speaker 1>but somehow they've figured out a way to have their

0:32:04.156 --> 0:32:08.316
<v Speaker 1>fancy golf courses be democratic. It's only on the corner

0:32:08.316 --> 0:32:11.356
<v Speaker 1>of the sena day in Berlin game that golf remains

0:32:11.396 --> 0:32:13.716
<v Speaker 1>an instrument of medieval privilege.

0:32:14.436 --> 0:32:18.676
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when you fly over LA. The green space

0:32:18.716 --> 0:32:21.636
<v Speaker 2>that you see is cemeteries and golf courses.

0:32:21.356 --> 0:32:22.116
<v Speaker 1>And golf courses.

0:32:22.156 --> 0:32:24.756
<v Speaker 2>You don't see parks. We don't have a park like

0:32:24.916 --> 0:32:28.876
<v Speaker 2>say San Francisco's Golden Gate Park or New York's Central Park,

0:32:28.956 --> 0:32:29.596
<v Speaker 2>Central Park.

0:32:30.236 --> 0:32:30.356
<v Speaker 6>Day.

0:32:30.476 --> 0:32:32.596
<v Speaker 1>Doc and I are standing outside the barbed wire or

0:32:32.596 --> 0:32:36.436
<v Speaker 1>Brentwood Country Club, peering through a fence. We're trying to

0:32:36.476 --> 0:32:39.116
<v Speaker 1>spot one of the privileged few permitted a walk in

0:32:39.116 --> 0:32:40.756
<v Speaker 1>the park on the west side of LA.

0:32:40.836 --> 0:32:44.476
<v Speaker 2>I see one, guy, I see one.

0:32:46.196 --> 0:32:48.996
<v Speaker 1>That's unbelievable. It's a Saturday afternoon. Sun is now coming

0:32:48.996 --> 0:32:53.476
<v Speaker 1>out yep. Like right now, we're standing on the running

0:32:53.556 --> 0:32:57.236
<v Speaker 1>track and there's someone running up there. Now, there are

0:32:57.236 --> 0:33:00.996
<v Speaker 1>more people on this narrow dirt track than there are

0:33:01.636 --> 0:33:04.316
<v Speaker 1>typically on the golf course. You see if you can

0:33:04.356 --> 0:33:08.916
<v Speaker 1>still see any kind of I'm still looking for a

0:33:08.916 --> 0:33:10.636
<v Speaker 1>golf I'm not.

0:33:11.076 --> 0:33:12.076
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I see one.

0:33:12.396 --> 0:33:13.076
<v Speaker 1>You see one?

0:33:12.956 --> 0:33:14.956
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's very exciting.

0:33:15.196 --> 0:33:23.276
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, next time I'm climbing the fence. Maybe we all should.

0:33:38.916 --> 0:33:41.636
<v Speaker 1>Original's History is produced by me LaBelle and Jacob Smith,

0:33:41.676 --> 0:33:46.356
<v Speaker 1>with Camille Baptista, Stephanie Daniel, and Ciamara Martinez wife. Our

0:33:46.476 --> 0:33:50.756
<v Speaker 1>editor is Julia Barton. Flond Williams is our engineer. Original

0:33:50.836 --> 0:33:54.356
<v Speaker 1>music by Luis Guerra. A special thanks to Andy Bauers

0:33:54.476 --> 0:33:57.476
<v Speaker 1>and my old pal Jacob Weisberg at Panathley.

0:33:58.316 --> 0:33:59.156
<v Speaker 6>I'm out in Battlo